[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4059) Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971570#action_12971570 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-4059: -- They are working for me. Can you please double check and paste here one of the links that is broken? Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken Key: OFBIZ-4059 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: site Reporter: Paul Foxworthy Priority: Minor The links from https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/mailing-lists.html to the Nabble mailing list archives are broken. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4059) Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971576#action_12971576 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4059: Hi Jacopo, Yes it's because I just update them. I 'm still struggling with the Firefox search plugins though... Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken Key: OFBIZ-4059 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: site Reporter: Paul Foxworthy Priority: Minor The links from https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/mailing-lists.html to the Nabble mailing list archives are broken. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-4059) Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4059. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Thanks Paul, It's fixed. I finally gave up with the home grown search plugins and suggested rather to rely on the [Add to Search Bar Firefox addon|https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/3682] see [Plugin search tools for Firefox using Nabble or Mark Mail|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Plugin+search+tools+for+Firefox+using+Nabble+or+Mark+Mail] Links to Nabble mailing list archives broken Key: OFBIZ-4059 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4059 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: site Reporter: Paul Foxworthy Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Minor The links from https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/mailing-lists.html to the Nabble mailing list archives are broken. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r1049451 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
Why is this needed for this particular form?
Isn't this automatically managed by the from widget?
-Bruno
2010/12/15 hans...@apache.org
Author: hansbak
Date: Wed Dec 15 08:15:49 2010
New Revision: 1049451
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1049451view=rev
Log:
preserve viewindex and size in multipage lists
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml?rev=1049451r1=1049450r2=1049451view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml Wed Dec 15
08:15:49 2010
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ under the License.
if(quantity == null || quantity.compareTo(BigDecimal.ZERO)
== 0) quantity = BigDecimal.ONE;
return(quantity.multiply(amount));}/
/row-actions
+ field name=viewSizehidden value=${viewSize}//field
+ field name=viewIndexhidden value=${viewIndex}//field
field name=invoiceIdhidden//field
field name=invoiceItemSeqId widget-style=buttontext
hyperlink target=listInvoiceItems
description=${invoiceItemSeqId}
@@ -384,6 +386,8 @@ under the License.
hyperlink description=${uiLabelMap.CommonRemove}
target=removeInvoiceItem
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
parameter param-name=invoiceItemSeqId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
@@ -467,6 +471,8 @@ under the License.
hyperlink description=${uiLabelMap.CommonRemove}
target=removeInvoiceApplication
parameter param-name=paymentApplicationId/
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
@@ -523,6 +529,8 @@ under the License.
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
parameter param-name=partyId/
parameter param-name=roleTypeId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4043: --- Attachment: screenshot-2 (Timer thread).jpg Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo -- Key: OFBIZ-4043 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04 Environment: On OFBiz demo stable Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: Leaks Suspect .jpg, screenshot-2 (Timer thread).jpg Using [Mat|http://www.eclipse.org/mat/] I generated these report 110 542 instances of org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40, loaded by java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 occupy 415 680 440 (79,89%) bytes. These instances are referenced from one instance of java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[], loaded by system class loader Keywords java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40 java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[] It's not quite clear to me how this happends, but I'm quite sure it happens in stable demo and maybe also in trunk. I have also attached a screen-copy with more information -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r1049451 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
As far as i can see it is currently not
if you are on page 2 and press a update/delete button, the system will
show page one again
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:51 +0100, Bruno Busco wrote:
Why is this needed for this particular form?
Isn't this automatically managed by the from widget?
-Bruno
2010/12/15 hans...@apache.org
Author: hansbak
Date: Wed Dec 15 08:15:49 2010
New Revision: 1049451
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1049451view=rev
Log:
preserve viewindex and size in multipage lists
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml?rev=1049451r1=1049450r2=1049451view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml Wed Dec 15
08:15:49 2010
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ under the License.
if(quantity == null || quantity.compareTo(BigDecimal.ZERO)
== 0) quantity = BigDecimal.ONE;
return(quantity.multiply(amount));}/
/row-actions
+ field name=viewSizehidden value=${viewSize}//field
+ field name=viewIndexhidden value=${viewIndex}//field
field name=invoiceIdhidden//field
field name=invoiceItemSeqId widget-style=buttontext
hyperlink target=listInvoiceItems
description=${invoiceItemSeqId}
@@ -384,6 +386,8 @@ under the License.
hyperlink description=${uiLabelMap.CommonRemove}
target=removeInvoiceItem
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
parameter param-name=invoiceItemSeqId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
@@ -467,6 +471,8 @@ under the License.
hyperlink description=${uiLabelMap.CommonRemove}
target=removeInvoiceApplication
parameter param-name=paymentApplicationId/
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
@@ -523,6 +529,8 @@ under the License.
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
parameter param-name=partyId/
parameter param-name=roleTypeId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
Re: svn commit: r1049451 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
OK, now I better see what you mean.
Thank you,
Bruno
2010/12/15 Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
As far as i can see it is currently not
if you are on page 2 and press a update/delete button, the system will
show page one again
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:51 +0100, Bruno Busco wrote:
Why is this needed for this particular form?
Isn't this automatically managed by the from widget?
-Bruno
2010/12/15 hans...@apache.org
Author: hansbak
Date: Wed Dec 15 08:15:49 2010
New Revision: 1049451
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1049451view=rev
Log:
preserve viewindex and size in multipage lists
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml?rev=1049451r1=1049450r2=1049451view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml
(original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceForms.xml Wed Dec
15
08:15:49 2010
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ under the License.
if(quantity == null ||
quantity.compareTo(BigDecimal.ZERO)
== 0) quantity = BigDecimal.ONE;
return(quantity.multiply(amount));}/
/row-actions
+ field name=viewSizehidden value=${viewSize}//field
+ field name=viewIndexhidden value=${viewIndex}//field
field name=invoiceIdhidden//field
field name=invoiceItemSeqId widget-style=buttontext
hyperlink target=listInvoiceItems
description=${invoiceItemSeqId}
@@ -384,6 +386,8 @@ under the License.
hyperlink description=${uiLabelMap.CommonRemove}
target=removeInvoiceItem
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
parameter param-name=invoiceItemSeqId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
@@ -467,6 +471,8 @@ under the License.
hyperlink description=${uiLabelMap.CommonRemove}
target=removeInvoiceApplication
parameter param-name=paymentApplicationId/
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
@@ -523,6 +529,8 @@ under the License.
parameter param-name=invoiceId/
parameter param-name=partyId/
parameter param-name=roleTypeId/
+parameter param-name=viewIndex/
+parameter param-name=viewSize/
/hyperlink
/field
/form
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com http://twitter.com/hansbak%0AAntwebsystems.com:
Quality services for competitive rates.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-4057) Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with current BIrt integration
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-4057: -- Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with current BIrt integration -- Key: OFBIZ-4057 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Chirag Manocha Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES Priority: Blocker Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-4057_BirtJarUpdate.patch, OFBIZ-4057_jars1.zip, OFBIZ-4057_jars2.zip I designed the birt report with Birt Report Designer 2.6 The .rptdesign file is created with the version 3.2.22. When running it with current jars it is giving following error :- Exception: org.eclipse.birt.report.model.util.XMLParserException Message: Line Number:0 Error Code:Error.XMLParserException.EXCEPTION Exception:org.eclipse.birt.report.model.parser.DesignParserException: The report file of version 3.2.22 is invalid for it is greater than the latest supported one. Message:A generic exception occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
admin User Login and Framework Only Demo Installation
I noticed that the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/commonext. That prevents an admin from logging into a framework-only demo installation. Is that intentional? If yes, how does one log into a framework-only demo installation? -Adrian
Re: admin User Login and Framework Only Demo Installation
Oops, I meant the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/securityext. On 12/15/2010 8:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: I noticed that the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/commonext. That prevents an admin from logging into a framework-only demo installation. Is that intentional? If yes, how does one log into a framework-only demo installation? -Adrian
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4057) Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with current BIrt integration
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971725#action_12971725 ] Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4057: --- Hi Chirag, could you include your report example ? Moreover, some of the libs you added in your archives are already present in OFBiz, would it be possible to make it more accurate? Cheers, Birt Reports of latest version is not compatible with current BIrt integration -- Key: OFBIZ-4057 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4057 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Chirag Manocha Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES Priority: Blocker Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-4057_BirtJarUpdate.patch, OFBIZ-4057_jars1.zip, OFBIZ-4057_jars2.zip I designed the birt report with Birt Report Designer 2.6 The .rptdesign file is created with the version 3.2.22. When running it with current jars it is giving following error :- Exception: org.eclipse.birt.report.model.util.XMLParserException Message: Line Number:0 Error Code:Error.XMLParserException.EXCEPTION Exception:org.eclipse.birt.report.model.parser.DesignParserException: The report file of version 3.2.22 is invalid for it is greater than the latest supported one. Message:A generic exception occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Framework Independence
I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: admin User Login and Framework Only Demo Installation
I agree that if you successfully load demo data (ant run-install) in a framework only setup, the demo admin user should be there as well. Jacopo On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: Oops, I meant the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/securityext. On 12/15/2010 8:32 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: I noticed that the admin user login demo data is loaded in applications/commonext. That prevents an admin from logging into a framework-only demo installation. Is that intentional? If yes, how does one log into a framework-only demo installation? -Adrian
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-4060) Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found
Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found - Key: OFBIZ-4060 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Adrian Crum Priority: Minor I'm getting this error in the log: 2010-12-15 09:58:38,203 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) [ComponentLocationResolver.java:43 :WARN ] Unable to get file URL for component location; expanded location was [C:/ofbiz/framework/images/webapp/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-en-US.js], original location was [component://images/webapp/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-en-US.js] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Framework Independence
first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
On Dec 15, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? IMO a part of the content component could live in the framework. Jacopo -Adrian
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-4060) Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4060: --- Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) Parent: OFBIZ-3814 Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found - Key: OFBIZ-4060 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Adrian Crum Priority: Minor I'm getting this error in the log: 2010-12-15 09:58:38,203 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) [ComponentLocationResolver.java:43 :WARN ] Unable to get file URL for component location; expanded location was [C:/ofbiz/framework/images/webapp/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-en-US.js], original location was [component://images/webapp/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-en-US.js] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4060) Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971770#action_12971770
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4060:
It should be normally handled by this snippet in
framework/common/widget/CommonScreens.xml, maybe there is a flaw, though I
seriously tested it. Have you a specific URL?
{code}
set field=initialLocaleComplete type=String
value=${groovy:parameters?.userLogin?.lastLocale}
default-value=${groovy:locale.toString()}/
set field=initialLocale type=String
value=${groovy:parameters?.userLogin?.lastLocale?.substring(0,2)}
default-value=${groovy:locale.toString()?.substring(0,2)?:'en'}/
set field=localeFileNameComplete type=String
value=/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-${initialLocaleComplete}.js/
set field=localeFileNameComplete type=String value=${groovy:
localeFileNameComplete.replace('_', '-')}/ !-- those files are build this
way OOTB (ie a - not a _ between language and country --
set field=fileNameComplete type=String value=${groovy:
org.ofbiz.base.location.FlexibleLocation.resolveLocation('component://images/webapp'
+ localeFileNameComplete)}/
set field=localeFileName type=String
value=/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-${initialLocale}.js/
set field=localeJsFile type=String value=${groovy: fileNameComplete ?
localeFileNameComplete : localeFileName}/
set field=layoutSettings.javaScripts[+0] value=${localeJsFile}
global=true/
{code}
Bug In Jquery Integration - js File Not Found
-
Key: OFBIZ-4060
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4060
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Adrian Crum
Priority: Minor
I'm getting this error in the log:
2010-12-15 09:58:38,203 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2)
[ComponentLocationResolver.java:43 :WARN ] Unable to get file URL for
component location; expanded location was
[C:/ofbiz/framework/images/webapp/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-en-US.js],
original location was
[component://images/webapp/images/jquery/ui/development-bundle/ui/i18n/jquery.ui.datepicker-en-US.js]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Framework Independence
To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own frame work as I did. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 10:40 AM: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Framework Independence
At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework are the content entities and their CRUD services. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote: I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
I'm guessing you'd also need ContentWorker and DataResourceWorker. Regards Scott On 16/12/2010, at 8:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework are the content entities and their CRUD services. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote: I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Framework Independence
I agree. It possible to split content to framework component and keep functionnal on application but I think this operation It's not easy and I haven't suggest how do this. Nicolas Le 15/12/2010 20:15, Adrian Crum a écrit : At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework are the content entities and their CRUD services. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote: I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian -- Nicolas MALIN Consultant Tél : 06.17.66.40.06 Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/ --- Société LibrenBerry Tél : 02.48.02.56.12 Site : http://www.librenberry.net/
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971842#action_12971842 ] Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4043: --- Jacques, I just upgraded the Derby driver. Maybe this could help ? Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo -- Key: OFBIZ-4043 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04 Environment: On OFBiz demo stable Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: Leaks Suspect .jpg, screenshot-2 (Timer thread).jpg Using [Mat|http://www.eclipse.org/mat/] I generated these report 110 542 instances of org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40, loaded by java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 occupy 415 680 440 (79,89%) bytes. These instances are referenced from one instance of java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[], loaded by system class loader Keywords java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40 java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[] It's not quite clear to me how this happends, but I'm quite sure it happens in stable demo and maybe also in trunk. I have also attached a screen-copy with more information -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Framework Independence
the pattern of having the entities and services specific to a component will be broken. so a test file in each folder about were the entities and services are should be included. you can take the webapp/content/docbooks and put in common since it is standalone engine for created docbooks output. suggest put in webapps or common. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 11:15 AM: At first glance it looks that way. All we really need in the framework are the content entities and their CRUD services. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 11:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote: I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971849#action_12971849 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4043: --- since the local host work on my machine and the trunk has run for a month without failing on my server, we need to think of the OS or activity as the triggers for this. Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo -- Key: OFBIZ-4043 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04 Environment: On OFBiz demo stable Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: Leaks Suspect .jpg, screenshot-2 (Timer thread).jpg Using [Mat|http://www.eclipse.org/mat/] I generated these report 110 542 instances of org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40, loaded by java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 occupy 415 680 440 (79,89%) bytes. These instances are referenced from one instance of java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[], loaded by system class loader Keywords java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40 java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[] It's not quite clear to me how this happends, but I'm quite sure it happens in stable demo and maybe also in trunk. I have also attached a screen-copy with more information -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Framework Independence
I agree this is the way to go. Certain parts of certain application components should have been in the framework from the beginning, but certainly not all of them. Splitting out those specific parts and putting them in framework components as needed is the way to go. -David On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote: I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: Framework Independence
Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the framework more (or totally) independent from the applications and specialpurpose components. The only question is the best way to do that, and it looks like as far as a general approach goes (moving minimal needed parts from application components to framework components) a fair consensus is being reached quickly. Of course, this is helped by lots of previous discussion on this topic. -David On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: I don't think you will find a consensus so just need to branch your own frame work as I did. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 10:40 AM: To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some of the framework components have UIs. I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. -Adrian On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm trying to get a framework-only installation to run. There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. Should we move the content component to the framework? -Adrian
Re: svn commit: r1042542 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications: accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/ order/data/ order/entitydef/ order/src/org/ofbiz/order/order/ product/entitydef/ product/script/org/of
Hi, Can I check I understand what's going on in lines 394 and onward in the getTaxAdjustments method in TaxAuthorityServices.java? You can choose a price based on any criteria, and that price is passed in the itemPrice parameter to the getTaxAdjustments method. This method looks at the default price for the product to determine if the itemPrice is tax-inclusive or not. If the default price is tax-inclusive, the actual price being charged for the product is assumed to be tax-inclusive as well. An adjustment is calculated so that the tax rate being charged for the actual price is the same as the tax rate on the default price. Have I got that right? If so, should it be possible for a given product to have some prices that do include tax and some that don't? Thanks Paul Foxworthy -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1042542-in-ofbiz-trunk-applications-accounting-src-org-ofbiz-accounting-tax-order-dat-tp3074820p3090321.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: svn commit: r1042542 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications: accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/tax/ order/data/ order/entitydef/ order/src/org/ofbiz/order/order/ product/entitydef/ product/script/org/of
That's pretty much correct. A product can certainly have some prices with tax included and some without. Keep in mind though that there are possible configurations that will result in invalid (or undesired) numbers coming out the other end, such as a price in a certain currency without tax included that has a from date later than another price with the same currency and also a valid from/thru date range that has tax included. That could be eliminated by passing down the ProductPrice record that the calculated price was based on (probably the List price), but doing so would require a lot of code changes. -David On Dec 15, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Paul Foxworthy wrote: Hi, Can I check I understand what's going on in lines 394 and onward in the getTaxAdjustments method in TaxAuthorityServices.java? You can choose a price based on any criteria, and that price is passed in the itemPrice parameter to the getTaxAdjustments method. This method looks at the default price for the product to determine if the itemPrice is tax-inclusive or not. If the default price is tax-inclusive, the actual price being charged for the product is assumed to be tax-inclusive as well. An adjustment is calculated so that the tax rate being charged for the actual price is the same as the tax rate on the default price. Have I got that right? If so, should it be possible for a given product to have some prices that do include tax and some that don't? Thanks Paul Foxworthy -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1042542-in-ofbiz-trunk-applications-accounting-src-org-ofbiz-accounting-tax-order-dat-tp3074820p3090321.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-4043) Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971990#action_12971990 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4043: Thanks Erwan, You upgraded only the trunk and the Derby issue appeared only in the stable branch9 so far. Anyway, though we see org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40 is implied I'm not sure that Derby is the reason. Actually I'm even inclined to think that Derby it's not the culprit, but calls to it. Memory leaks in (at least) stable demo -- Key: OFBIZ-4043 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4043 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04 Environment: On OFBiz demo stable Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: Leaks Suspect .jpg, screenshot-2 (Timer thread).jpg Using [Mat|http://www.eclipse.org/mat/] I generated these report 110 542 instances of org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40, loaded by java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 occupy 415 680 440 (79,89%) bytes. These instances are referenced from one instance of java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[], loaded by system class loader Keywords java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0x7f3681c111f0 org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection40 java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[] It's not quite clear to me how this happends, but I'm quite sure it happens in stable demo and maybe also in trunk. I have also attached a screen-copy with more information -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
