Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-24 Thread Vikas Mayur
+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Why do you think about updating all our templates following
> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
> At least the second and the third could be done automatically.
>
> Jacques


Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and 
?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it 
now, maybe in a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...


I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a big 
deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi All,

Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques






Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available 
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably use 
this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the 
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)


Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and 
?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do 
it now, maybe in a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...


I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a big 
deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi All,

Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques








Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-26 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.

--
Ashish

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably
> use this version as explained in the link below.
> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...
>
> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>  I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and
>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more
>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in
>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...
>>
>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a
>> big deal, but  please express yourself
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Vikas
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi All,

 Why do you think about updating all our templates following
 http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
 At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

 Jacques

>>>
>>>
>>
>


Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available 
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably use 
this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...


Ooops, this remark makes no sense forget it. I understood Freemarker explanation the wrong side. Actually the deprecated ?default 
builtin will behave better in future. Those guys are serious : they enhance deprecated builtins ;o)


Jacques


BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : 
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and 
?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more features 
(mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do
it now, maybe in a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a big 
deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi All,

Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques










Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions before. 
Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux before).


Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.

--
Ashish

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably
use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and

?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, maybe in
a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not a
big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Hi All,


Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques












Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-27 Thread Jacopo Cappellato

Jacques,

are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the  
"subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did  
something wrong).


Jacopo

On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August  
2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions before.  
Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on  
Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux before).


Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should  
preferably

use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? 
exists and

?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some  
more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it  
now, maybe in

a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !)  
it's not a

big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All,


Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques














Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-27 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
Jacopo ,

Why don't you use Subclipse ?
Do you think Subversive is good ?

I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th June and
using Subclipse for SVN thing.
Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box.

--
Ashish


On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jacques,
>
> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the
> "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did
> something wrong).
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>  BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In
>> my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not only in term of
>> features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many
>> issues - if any - on Linux before).
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
>>> Its working fine for me.
>>> --
>>> Ashish
>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
 I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
 http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
 It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should preferably
 use this version as explained in the link below.
 We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

 BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
 http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
 http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

 Jacques

 From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists and

> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some more
> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now,
> maybe in
> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...
>
> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's not
> a
> big deal, but  please express yourself
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>  +1
>>
>> Vikas
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>>
>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following
>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically.
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

>>>
>


Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-27 Thread Jacopo Cappellato

Ashish,

the main reason is that I couldn't find the Subclipse plugin for  
Ganymede... but maybe I've just missed it. Do you have a link to  
download it?


Thanks,

Jacopo

On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:


Jacopo ,

Why don't you use Subclipse ?
Do you think Subversive is good ?

I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th  
June and

using Subclipse for SVN thing.
Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box.

--
Ashish


On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Jacques,

are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the
"subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did
something wrong).

Jacopo


On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August  
2007). In
my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not only  
in term of
features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have  
many

issues - if any - on Linux before).

Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should  
preferably

use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss  
IDE :

http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? 
exists and



?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing  
some more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it  
now,

maybe in
a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !)  
it's not

a
big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

+1


Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All,



Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques

















Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-27 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
Jacopo,

Here is the link for the Subclipse installation.
http://subclipse.tigris.org/install.html

You should select first option from step 4.

Name: Subclipse 1.2.x (Eclipse 3.2+)
URL:  http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.2.x


If I am right you are using Mac Notebook.
Right ?
If Yes , Jacopo please let me know your thoughts on Eclipse Ganymede on Mac
Notebook.

--
Ashish


On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ashish,
>
> the main reason is that I couldn't find the Subclipse plugin for
> Ganymede... but maybe I've just missed it. Do you have a link to download
> it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>
>  Jacopo ,
>>
>> Why don't you use Subclipse ?
>> Do you think Subversive is good ?
>>
>> I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th June
>> and
>> using Subclipse for SVN thing.
>> Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box.
>>
>> --
>> Ashish
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>  Jacques,
>>>
>>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the
>>> "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I did
>>> something wrong).
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August 2007). In
>>>
 my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not only in
 term of
 features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not have many
 issues - if any - on Linux before).

 Jacques

 From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
> Its working fine for me.
> --
> Ashish
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should
>> preferably
>> use this version as explained in the link below.
>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...
>>
>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ?exists
>> and
>>
>>  ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some
>>> more
>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now,
>>> maybe in
>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...
>>>
>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) it's
>>> not
>>> a
>>> big deal, but  please express yourself
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>

 Vikas

 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Hi All,


> Why do you think about updating all our templates following
> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
> At least the second and the third could be done automatically.
>
> Jacques
>
>
>


>>>
>>
>
>>>
>


Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-27 Thread Jacopo Cappellato

Thanks Ashish,

it worked like a charm... and yes, I am using a Mac and now I will  
switch to Ganymede and I will let you know how it works (it seems  
really good for now).


Sorry for the off topic for the dev list.

Jacopo


On Jun 27, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:


Jacopo,

Here is the link for the Subclipse installation.
http://subclipse.tigris.org/install.html

You should select first option from step 4.

   Name: Subclipse 1.2.x (Eclipse 3.2+)
   URL:  http://subclipse.tigris.org/update_1.2.x


If I am right you are using Mac Notebook.
Right ?
If Yes , Jacopo please let me know your thoughts on Eclipse Ganymede  
on Mac

Notebook.

--
Ashish


On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Ashish,

the main reason is that I couldn't find the Subclipse plugin for
Ganymede... but maybe I've just missed it. Do you have a link to  
download

it?

Thanks,

Jacopo


On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:

Jacopo ,


Why don't you use Subclipse ?
Do you think Subversive is good ?

I downloaded the Eclipse Ganymede(www.eclipse.org) launced on 25th  
June

and
using Subclipse for SVN thing.
Ganymede is perfect and working fine on my Linux box.

--
Ashish


On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jacques,


are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the
"subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I  
did

something wrong).

Jacopo


On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August  
2007). In


my opininon it's really better than any versions before. Not  
only in

term of
features but also *stability* (at least on Windows, I did not  
have many

issues - if any - on Linux before).

Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.

Its working fine for me.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available

http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should
preferably
use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss  
IDE :

http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? 
exists

and

?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing  
some

more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it  
now,

maybe in
a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ??  
and !) it's

not
a
big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

+1



Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All,



Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ 
ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done  
automatically.


Jacques




















Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-27 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Jacopo,

I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one but 
not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7).
I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some 
indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry later by 
importing projects one by one...


On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I used 
the J2EE distro.

I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm 
still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine)

I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to M3 
then M4 and finally M7...


Jacqiues

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jacques,

are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the  "subversive" 
plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I
did  something wrong).

Jacopo

On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:


BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August  2007). In my 
opininon it's really better than any versions
before.  Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on  
Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux
before).

Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should  preferably
use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and

?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some  more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it  now, maybe in
a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !)  it's not a
big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All,


Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques
















Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-27 Thread Jacques Le Roux

The current builtins work well and are easy to read. I finally decided to do 
nothing. We will see if ever it's needed.

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi All,

Why do you think about updating all our templates following  
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques


Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-28 Thread Jacques Le Roux

This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all worked 
without any issues

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jacopo,

I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one but 
not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7).
I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some 
indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry later 
by importing projects one by one...


On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I used 
the J2EE distro.

I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm 
still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine)

I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to 
M3 then M4 and finally M7...


Jacqiues

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jacques,

are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the  "subversive" 
plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are I
did  something wrong).

Jacopo

On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:


BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August  2007). In my 
opininon it's really better than any versions
before.  Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on  
Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on Linux
before).

Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should  preferably
use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and

?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some  more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it  now, maybe in
a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !)  it's not a
big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All,


Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques


















Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-28 Thread Jacques Le Roux

For those who have pretty big workspaces (many projects) with some plugins 
(moreover in my case, I was using 3.4 milestones from
months, maybe straight from 3.3 it's ok)
Actually it was not Classic that I used but the pure 3.4 SDK (ie without any 
plugins). I had problems with all other brands. You may
find it from the Download Classic line, look for " Eclipse Project download 
page."
Then I used the new P2 Update Manager, very nice.

HTH

Jacques

- Original Message - 
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins



This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all worked 
without any issues

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jacopo,

I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the 
J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one but
not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm 
but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7).
I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large 
(I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some
indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on 
Windows about subversion issue. I will retry later
by importing projects one by one...

On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I 
was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I
used the J2EE distro.
I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm 
still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine)

I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in 
this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to
M3 then M4 and finally M7...

Jacqiues

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jacques,

are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the  "subversive" 
plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are
I
did  something wrong).

Jacopo

On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:


BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August  2007). In my 
opininon it's really better than any versions
before.  Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on  
Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on
Linux
before).

Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should  preferably
use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and

?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some  more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it  now, maybe in
a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !)  it's not a
big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All,


Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques




















Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-28 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Last but not least : I have just discovered by chance the Eclipse Save Actions 
preference. I put a tip there :
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Eclipse+Tips#EclipseTips-Setting%22SaveActions%22Preference.
 I think it's worth it !

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For those who have pretty big workspaces (many projects) with some plugins 
(moreover in my case, I was using 3.4 milestones from
months, maybe straight from 3.3 it's ok)
Actually it was not Classic that I used but the pure 3.4 SDK (ie without any 
plugins). I had problems with all other brands. You
may
find it from the Download Classic line, look for " Eclipse Project download 
page."
Then I used the new P2 Update Manager, very nice.

HTH

Jacques

- Original Message - 
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins



This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all worked 
without any issues

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jacopo,

I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used the 
J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one
but
not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a charm 
but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7).
I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at large 
(I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some
indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to load on 
Windows about subversion issue. I will retry
later
by importing projects one by one...

On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so far) I 
was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I
used the J2EE distro.
I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I think I'm 
still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine)

I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something wrong in 
this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to
M3 then M4 and finally M7...

Jacqiues

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jacques,

are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the  "subversive" 
plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are
I
did  something wrong).

Jacopo

On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:


BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August  2007). In my 
opininon it's really better than any versions
before.  Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least on  
Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on
Linux
before).

Jacques

From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
Its working fine for me.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html
It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should  preferably
use this version as explained in the link below.
We may wait for 2.4 to do this one...

BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE :
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link)

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? exists and

?if_exists are more readable than ?? and !
?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some  more
features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it  now, maybe in
a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway...

I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !)  it's not a
big deal, but  please express yourself

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


+1

Vikas

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All,


Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.

Jacques






















Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins

2008-06-29 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
Jacques,

I also noticed this while I was reading the new feature in the Eclipse
Ganymede.
But its only for Java code :-).

The important feature on the image you attached is that "Now eclipse format
only the edited lines instead of formating the whole java files".
Anyway thanks for sharing it.

--
Ashish



On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Last but not least : I have just discovered by chance the Eclipse Save
> Actions preference. I put a tip there :
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Eclipse+Tips#EclipseTips-Setting%22SaveActions%22Preference.
> I think it's worth it !
>
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> For those who have pretty big workspaces (many projects) with some plugins
>> (moreover in my case, I was using 3.4 milestones from
>> months, maybe straight from 3.3 it's ok)
>> Actually it was not Classic that I used but the pure 3.4 SDK (ie without
>> any plugins). I had problems with all other brands. You
>> may
>> find it from the Download Classic line, look for " Eclipse Project
>> download page."
>> Then I used the new P2 Update Manager, very nice.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Jacques Le Roux" <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:57 AM
>> Subject: Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins
>>
>>
>>  This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all
>>> worked without any issues
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>> Jacopo,
>>>>
>>>> I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used
>>>> the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one
>>>> but
>>>> not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a
>>>> charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7).
>>>> I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at
>>>> large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some
>>>> indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to
>>>> load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry
>>>> later
>>>> by importing projects one by one...
>>>>
>>>> On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so
>>>> far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I
>>>> used the J2EE distro.
>>>> I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I
>>>> think I'm still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine)
>>>>
>>>> I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something
>>>> wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to
>>>> M3 then M4 and finally M7...
>>>>
>>>> Jacqiues
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>> Jacques,
>>>>>
>>>>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the
>>>>>  "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are
>>>>> I
>>>>> did  something wrong).
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August
>>>>>>  2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions
>>>>>> before.  Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least
>>>>>> on  Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on
>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>> before).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss.
>>>>>>> Its working fine for me.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ashish
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available
>>>>>>>> http://f