Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions
Hi, On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:57:26PM +0200, rony wrote: [...] > Uninstalling the Ubuntu OOo and instead installing the genuine OOo, > downloaed from http://OpenOffice.org/download, installing it and running > the very same program works without an error! We (at least Debian, can't speak of Ubuntu) don't patch anything in that area, and we use OpenJDK (which should be sufficiently compatible and doesn't "cripple" stuff for building). Using Sun JDK is no option, no. So sorry, no idea. What I *can* say, though is that not veretyhing exposed on distros is a bug *caused* by those distros. We had many bugs in the last years where it just occurred with some circumstances, other compilers, ... > In the case it matters, here is the CLASSPATH setting for the Ubuntu OOo: > > > /opt/BSF4ooRexx/bsf-v400-20090910.jar:/opt/BSF4ooRexx/bsf-rexx-engine.jar:.::/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/ridl.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/jurt.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/juh.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/progra Looks OK. Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] unopkg - question about "shared-extension-desc.xml"
Thank you, Joachim On 22.08.10 19:49, Oliver Brinzing wrote: Hi Joachim, Registration of shared and bundled extensions occurrs now at startup and must be done for every user individually. See http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/The_Active_Extension ok, i added issue http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113899, cause i don't think a user should be able to uninstall a shared extension via unopkg regards Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions
On 21/08/2010 23:57, rony wrote: > Hi René, > > sorry that it took a while to get back, but I got totally carried away > changing/enhancing the installation scripts and had to get everything > into sync again, before coming back to check out and analyze the problem > with the Ubuntu distribution. > > Here's to what boils it down: > > * Using latest 64-bit Ubuntu, having everything updated to today, > * Running an ooRexx script which uses the OOo/UNO Java bridge to > interact with OOo, yielding the following error: > > 40 *-* xContext = UNO.connect() -- connect to server and > retrieve the XContext object > REX0040E: Error 40 running /usr/bin/UNO.CLS line 1804: Incorrect > call to routine > REX0634E: Error 40.900: BSF4ooRexx/routine/BSF(), error 3: Java > exception occurred: [org.apache.bsf.BSFException: /// Java-exception > (RexxAndJava) occurred: > [java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException], g*etCause(): > [java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > > com.sun.star.lib.connections.pipe.PipeConnection.createJNI(Ljava/lang/String;)I*] i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. > \\\?BSF4ooRexx subfunction "invoke": object > 'java.lang.cl...@593d93f4' - method [FINDINTERFACEWITHMEMBER], > method not found or error (exception) executing method!] > > Uninstalling the Ubuntu OOo and instead installing the genuine OOo, > downloaed from http://OpenOffice.org/download, installing it and running > the very same program works without an error! > > In the case it matters, here is the CLASSPATH setting for the Ubuntu OOo: > > > /opt/BSF4ooRexx/bsf-v400-20090910.jar:/opt/BSF4ooRexx/bsf-rexx-engine.jar:.::/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/ridl.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/jurt.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/juh.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/progra on a Ubuntu box here the libraries seems to be in /usr/lib/ure/lib/libjpipe.so so try adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH, see if that helps. > The genuine OOo will have practically the same setting, except that its > directory would be pointed to: > "/opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/*". > > HTH, > > ---rony -- "I wish you success, and may your lambdas always beta reduce." -- dons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] I have a blank Calc document that shows red text in 3.3
Hi James, On Sunday, 2010-08-22 16:00:11 -0400, James wrote: > It is a blank file the shows vertical red text (that used to be there as > horizontal text in a cell). The document has no cell content at all, the only thing that could be displayed is an image (actually twice) if one refreshes the links, which I didn't. Eike -- OOo Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. Signature key 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS -- Please don't send mail to the old e...@sun.com account that I used for mailing lists, it phased out. Use eike.rat...@oracle.com instead. Thanks. pgpmOxGpLOyiW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE > dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. > the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. Then that is a bug in the bridge or the extension itself IMHO ... > on a Ubuntu box here the libraries seems to be in /usr/lib/ure/lib/libjpipe.so > > so try adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH, see if that helps. ... because ure-link is exactly what points to that /usr/lib/ure thing. Anything which assumes that the ure is inside the OOo dir is wrong; the only valid assumption is that *ure-link* is. That's how the three-layewr OOo interface was defined. Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] XInitialization
Hello Jan,
On Monday 23 August 2010, 02:12, Jan private wrote:
> Hello Ariel,
>
> > > I have written a C++ component, which works fine. But just recently I
> > > noticed that
> > >
> > > void SAL_CALL myComponent::initialize( const Sequence< Any >&
> > > aArguments ) throw ( Exception, RuntimeException)
> > >
> > > is called four times after running openoffice.org -writer before the
> > > empty writer document opens.
> >
> > what kind of component have you written?
>
> I am not sure what information you need.
there are different kinds of UNO components you can implement. Each component
can have a different behavior.
> Here is the class definition (C
> ++, Linux x86) and the relevant method:
>
> class iMath : public cppu::WeakImplHelper6
> <
> XDispatchProvider,
> XDispatch,
> XInitialization,
> XServiceInfo,
> XDialogEventHandler,
> XContainerWindowEventHandler
I guess you are implementing a css.frame.ProtocolHandler. aren't you?
> {
> public:
> // XInitialization
> virtual void SAL_CALL initialize
> (const ::com::sun::star::uno::Sequence< ::com::sun::star::uno::Any >&
> aArguments) throw (Exception, RuntimeException);
> }
how, when, why, ..., your components gets initialized depends on the component
type.
For your purpose you may need to implement a css.task.Job, to be instantiated
every time a document is loaded from its location or a new one is created.
It all depends on what you're trying to achieve.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions
Michael Stahl wrote. > so try adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH, see if that helps. Or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (no idea whether that helps for JNI "Linkage" but it can be tried, too) Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi there, for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. When starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would be running, and if one would like to proceed. Is this an expected behaviour? Is there a command-line utility which one could use to make sure that after unopkg OOo gets reliably shutdown? Or with other words: how could one make sure in an un/installation script, that OOo has completely shut down after unopkg, before proceeding ? ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi, On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an > installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. When > starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would > be running, and if one would like to proceed. > > Is this an expected behaviour? Nope. I don't see that in all the packages here which use unopkg in their preinst/postinst/prerm. Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] XDesktop.terminate() Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi there, ... cut ... > Just a quick question (which would save me a little bit of research. > which currently would be quite helpful): how can I make sure, having a > xContext (from com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap.bootstrap()) to > shutdown OOo gracefully at the end? (Presumably not closing OOo > explicitly leavees an instance open.) > > sorry for the noise, just found what I need: XDesktop.terminate(). ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi René, On 23.08.2010 16:05, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > >> for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an >> installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. When >> starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would >> be running, and if one would like to proceed. >> >> Is this an expected behaviour? >> > Nope. > > I don't see that in all the packages here which use unopkg > in their preinst/postinst/prerm. > Thank you very much for this hint! Going back because of it, I just noticed that unopkg is not the culprit, but a script that runs afterwards, so it is my own fault probably. Sorry for the wrong alarm. Just a quick question (which would save me a little bit of research which currently would be quite helpful): how can I make sure, having a xContext (from com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap.bootstrap()) to shutdown OOo gracefully at the end? (Presumably not closing OOo explicitly leavees an instance open.) ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions
On 23.08.2010 14:09, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > >> i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE >> dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. >> the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. >> > Then that is a bug in the bridge or the extension itself IMHO ... > The extension just employs the Bootstrap class if invoked outside of OOo. >> n a Ubuntu box here the libraries seems to be in /usr/lib/ure/lib/libjpipe.so >> >> so try adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH, see if that helps. >> > ... because ure-link is exactly what points to that /usr/lib/ure thing. > Anything which assumes that the ure is inside the OOo dir is wrong; > the only valid assumption is that *ure-link* is. That's how the three-layewr > OOo interface was defined. > What would be the easiest way to re-install the Ubuntu-OOo after deinstalling the genuine OOo? (Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of modules (with the risk that I am overlooking an important one, given that the OOo related modules seem to be quite dispersed.) ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:29:47PM +0200, rony wrote: > (Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of Eww, synaptic. > modules (with the risk that I am overlooking an important one, given > that the OOo related modules seem to be quite dispersed.) apt-get install openoffice.org. Which is a dummy package which is supposed (unless Ubuntu patched somthing) there install all modules + Java suppoer (including officebean), but of course without SDK) (or select openoffice.org in synaptic). Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] I have a blank Calc document that shows red text in 3.3
On 08/23/10 07:16, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi James, > > On Sunday, 2010-08-22 16:00:11 -0400, James wrote: > >> It is a blank file the shows vertical red text (that used to be there as >> horizontal text in a cell). > The document has no cell content at all, the only thing that could be > displayed is an image > > xlink:href='http://e-academy.com/images/insidepage/spacer.gif' > xlink:actuate='onLoad' xlink:show='embed' xlink:type='simple'> > > (actually twice) if one refreshes the links, which I didn't. > > Eike > I deleted the text. The question is how did the image get there? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem
Hello, I'm building OpenOffice 3.2.1.4. I wonder there is a way to install some modules. Actually I deleted some modules I don't need to install in the middle of building. After building packimages module, I got some error message including some lists I deleted and it indicates that there is dependency problems. So I cannot install OpenOffce. I wonder how I can ignore some modules I don't want. Please let me know Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] XInitialization
Hello Ariel, > I guess you are implementing a css.frame.ProtocolHandler. aren't you? I suppose you are right. I started out by copying from some SDK example. Now I looked and found in iMath.cxx: #define SERVICE_NAME "de.gmx.rheinlaender.jan.imath.ProtocolHandler" > how, when, why, ..., your components gets initialized depends on the > component > type. > For your purpose you may need to implement a css.task.Job, to be instantiated > every time a document is loaded from its location or a new one is created. > It all depends on what you're trying to achieve. Yes, that is what I want: A component of which an instance is attached to every document and lives as long as the document is opened. But it also needs to provide and handle menus, dialogs and other user interaction. So do I need both Job and ProtocolHandler? I found sdk/examples/DevelopersGuide/Components/Addons/JobsAddon and will try to adapt it to my purposes. Thank you! Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:59:09PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: > Hello, > > I'm building OpenOffice 3.2.1.4. I wonder there is a way to install > some modules. > Actually I deleted some modules I don't need to install in the middle > of building. > After building packimages module, I got some error message including > some lists I deleted and it indicates that there is dependency > problems. > So I cannot install OpenOffce. > I wonder how I can ignore some modules I don't want. > Please let me know > You can't. If you want to create an install set, you have to build everything. Later, if you want to work on a specific module, you can actually remove others. But it will work only as far as you do only compatible changes and I strongly discourage you to do it. Out of curiosity: is there really an SW project that is able to handle removal of part of it's source tree during build? And build (and install) just that which remains? D. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
