Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1

Le 3 sept. 2016 20:30, "Reinhard Sandtner"  a
écrit :

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> app works fine
> signature ok
> building from src successful
>
> lg
> reini
>
>
>
> > Am 31.08.2016 um 22:50 schrieb Mark Struberg  >:
> >
> > New take for OWB-1.7.0
> >
> > Repo is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> >
> > Source release is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >
> > You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >>
> >>> No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
> >>> shouldn't.
> >>>
> >>> TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
> >> said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>  On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
> 
>  @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it
> >>> is a
>  bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
>  deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
> >>> respect
>  the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both
> >> statements
>  are very compatible).
> 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>  @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>   | Old Wordpress Blog
>   | Github
>   |
>  LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>   | JavaEE Factory
>  
> 
> 
>  2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> >> :
> 
> > -1, because it still breaks
> > org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as
> >> owb
> >>> is
> > used with openejb).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> >> :
> >
> >> Good morning!
> >>
> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> >> OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> The staging repo is:
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>
> >>
> >> The source release can be found at
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>> openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>
> >>
> >> My Key can be found in
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>
> >> The tag in SVN is
> >>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>> openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >> Revision r1758342
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [+1] let's ship it!
> >>
> >> [+0] meh, don't care
> >>
> >> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>
> >>
> >> The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Reinhard Sandtner]

+1 (non-binding)

app works fine
signature ok
building from src successful

lg
reini



> Am 31.08.2016 um 22:50 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> New take for OWB-1.7.0
> 
> Repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> 
> Source release is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> 
> You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> 
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> 
> 
> Here is my +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>>  wrote:
>>> 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>> 
>>> No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
>>> shouldn't.
>>> 
>>> TCK passes even after my fix.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
>> said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
 
 @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it
>>> is a
 bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
 deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
>>> respect
 the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both 
>> statements
 are very compatible).
 
 
 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau  |  Blog
  | Old Wordpress Blog
  | Github
  |
 LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
  | JavaEE Factory
 
 
 
 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek 
>> :
 
> -1, because it still breaks
> org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as 
>> owb
>>> is
> used with openejb).
> 
> regards,
> gerhard
> 
> 
> 
> 2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg 
>> :
> 
>> Good morning!
>> 
>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache 
>> OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>> 
>> 
>> The staging repo is:
>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>> 
>> 
>> The source release can be found at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
>>> openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>> 
>> 
>> My Key can be found in
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>> 
>> The tag in SVN is
>> 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
>>> openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>> Revision r1758342
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [+1] let's ship it!
>> 
>> [+0] meh, don't care
>> 
>> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>> 
>> 
>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>> 
>> 
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
> 
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Joseph Bergmark]

+1

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Mark Struberg 
wrote:

> New take for OWB-1.7.0
>
> Repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
>
> Source release is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>
> You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
>
>
>
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >
> >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
> >>  shouldn't.
> >>
> >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>
> >>
> > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
> > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>  LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
> >>  >
> >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes
> it
> >>  is a
> >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
> >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
> >>  respect
> >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both
> > statements
> >>  > are very compatible).
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  >  | Old Wordpress Blog
> >>  >  | Github
> >>  >  |
> >>  > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
> >>  > 
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> > :
> >>  >
> >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as
> > owb
> >>  is
> >>  >>  used with openejb).
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  regards,
> >>  >>  gerhard
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > :
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > Good morning!
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> >>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> >>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
> >>  >>  > strub
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Thomas Andraschko]

+1 - my applications are working fine

2016-09-01 10:50 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> dont care much of digits but +1 to just move forward and not reuse failed
> release numbers
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Wordpress Blog
>  | Github  rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2016-09-01 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>
> > 1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> > > validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> > >
> > > Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg"
> > >  a écrit :
> > >
> > >>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
> > >>
> > >>  Repo is
> > >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> > >>
> > >>  Source release is
> > >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> > >>
> > >>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  [+1] let's ship it!
> > >>  [+0] meh, don't care
> > >>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  The VOTE is open for 72h
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  Here is my +1
> > >>
> > >>  txs and LieGrue,
> > >>  strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > > :
> > >>  >
> > >>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place
> > > where we
> > >>  >>  shouldn't.
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control
> > > - that
> > >>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> > >>  >
> > >>  >
> > >>  >
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  LieGrue,
> > >>  >>  strub
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and
> > > standalone)
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request
> > > scopes
> > >>  it
> > >>  >>  is a
> > >>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be
> > > fixed in
> > >>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl
> > > doesn't
> > >>  >>  respect
> > >>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and
> > > both
> > >>  > statements
> > >>  >>  > are very compatible).
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>  >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >>  >>  >  | Old Wordpress
> > > Blog
> > >>  >>  >  | Github
> > >>  >>  >  |
> > >>  >>  > LinkedIn  |
> > > Tomitriber
> > >>  >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
> > >>  >>  > 
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> > >>  > :
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> > >>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest
> > > (as soon as
> > >>  > owb
> > >>  >>  is
> > >>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>  regards,
> > >>  >>  >>  gerhard
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > >>  > :
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> > >>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> > >>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

dont care much of digits but +1 to just move forward and not reuse failed
release numbers


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Wordpress Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-09-01 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :

> 1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> > validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> >
> > Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> >
> >
> > Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg"
> >  a écrit :
> >
> >>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
> >>
> >>  Repo is
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> >>
> >>  Source release is
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>
> >>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>
> >>
> >>  The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  Here is my +1
> >>
> >>  txs and LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > :
> >>  >
> >>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place
> > where we
> >>  >>  shouldn't.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control
> > - that
> >>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  LieGrue,
> >>  >>  strub
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and
> > standalone)
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request
> > scopes
> >>  it
> >>  >>  is a
> >>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be
> > fixed in
> >>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl
> > doesn't
> >>  >>  respect
> >>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and
> > both
> >>  > statements
> >>  >>  > are very compatible).
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  >>  >  | Old Wordpress
> > Blog
> >>  >>  >  | Github
> >>  >>  >  |
> >>  >>  > LinkedIn  |
> > Tomitriber
> >>  >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
> >>  >>  > 
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> >>  > :
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> >>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest
> > (as soon as
> >>  > owb
> >>  >>  is
> >>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  regards,
> >>  >>  >>  gerhard
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> >>  > :
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> >>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>  >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
> >>  >>  >>  > strub
> >> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Mark Struberg]

1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.






> On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>  wrote:
> > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> 
> Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> 
> 
> Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg" 
>  a écrit :
> 
>>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
>> 
>>  Repo is
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
>> 
>>  Source release is
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>> 
>>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  [+1] let's ship it!
>>  [+0] meh, don't care
>>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>> 
>> 
>>  The VOTE is open for 72h
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  Here is my +1
>> 
>>  txs and LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg 
> :
>>  >
>>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place 
> where we
>>  >>  shouldn't.
>>  >>
>>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control 
> - that
>>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >>
>>  >>  LieGrue,
>>  >>  strub
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and 
> standalone)
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request 
> scopes
>>  it
>>  >>  is a
>>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be 
> fixed in
>>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl 
> doesn't
>>  >>  respect
>>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and 
> both
>>  > statements
>>  >>  > are very compatible).
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>  >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  >>  >  | Old Wordpress 
> Blog
>>  >>  >  | Github
>>  >>  >  |
>>  >>  > LinkedIn  | 
> Tomitriber
>>  >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
>>  >>  > 
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
>>  > :
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
>>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest 
> (as soon as
>>  > owb
>>  >>  is
>>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  regards,
>>  >>  >>  gerhard
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
>>  > :
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
>>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  >>  > 
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
>>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
>>  >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>>  >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
>>  >>  >>  > strub
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >
>>  >>
>>  >
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.

Would 1.7.0.1 ok?

Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg"  a écrit :

> New take for OWB-1.7.0
>
> Repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
>
> Source release is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>
> You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
>
>
>
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >
> >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
> >>  shouldn't.
> >>
> >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>
> >>
> > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
> > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>  LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
> >>  >
> >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes
> it
> >>  is a
> >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
> >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
> >>  respect
> >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both
> > statements
> >>  > are very compatible).
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  >  | Old Wordpress Blog
> >>  >  | Github
> >>  >  |
> >>  > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
> >>  > 
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> > :
> >>  >
> >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as
> > owb
> >>  is
> >>  >>  used with openejb).
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  regards,
> >>  >>  gerhard
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > :
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > Good morning!
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> >>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> >>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
> >>  >>  > strub
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

[Mark Struberg]

New take for OWB-1.7.0

Repo is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/

Source release is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/

You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)




[+1] let's ship it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] nope, because ${blocker}


The VOTE is open for 72h



Here is my +1

txs and LieGrue,
strub



> On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>  wrote:
> > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> 
>>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
>>  shouldn't.
>> 
>>  TCK passes even after my fix.
>> 
>> 
> Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
> said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
>>  >
>>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it
>>  is a
>>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
>>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
>>  respect
>>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both 
> statements
>>  > are very compatible).
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  >  | Old Wordpress Blog
>>  >  | Github
>>  >  |
>>  > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>>  >  | JavaEE Factory
>>  > 
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek 
> :
>>  >
>>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
>>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as 
> owb
>>  is
>>  >>  used with openejb).
>>  >>
>>  >>  regards,
>>  >>  gerhard
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg 
> :
>>  >>
>>  >>  > Good morning!
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache 
> OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > The staging repo is:
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > The source release can be found at
>>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
>>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > My Key can be found in
>>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
>>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>>  >>  > Revision r1758342
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
>>  >>  > strub
>>  >>  >
>>  >>
>>  >
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :

> No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
> shouldn't.
>
> TCK passes even after my fix.
>
>
Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all


>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
> >
> > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it
> is a
> > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
> > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
> respect
> > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both statements
> > are very compatible).
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Wordpress Blog
> >  | Github
> >  |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek :
> >
> >>  -1, because it still breaks
> >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as owb
> is
> >>  used with openejb).
> >>
> >>  regards,
> >>  gerhard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >>
> >>  > Good morning!
> >>  >
> >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > The staging repo is:
> >>  >
> >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > The source release can be found at
> >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > My Key can be found in
> >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>  >
> >>  > The tag in SVN is
> >>  >
> >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >>  > Revision r1758342
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  >
> >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  >
> >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > txs and LieGrue,
> >>  > strub
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Mark Struberg]

No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we shouldn't.

TCK passes even after my fix.


LieGrue,
strub





> On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>  wrote:
> > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
> 
> @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it is a
> bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
> deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't respect
> the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both statements
> are very compatible).
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Wordpress Blog
>  | Github 
>  |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
> 
> 
> 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek :
> 
>>  -1, because it still breaks
>>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as owb is
>>  used with openejb).
>> 
>>  regards,
>>  gerhard
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>> 
>>  > Good morning!
>>  >
>>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > The staging repo is:
>>  >
>>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > The source release can be found at
>>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > My Key can be found in
>>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>  >
>>  > The tag in SVN is
>>  >
>>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>>  > Revision r1758342
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > [+1] let's ship it!
>>  >
>>  > [+0] meh, don't care
>>  >
>>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > txs and LieGrue,
>>  > strub
>>  >
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)

@Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it is a
bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't respect
the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both statements
are very compatible).


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Wordpress Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek :

> -1, because it still breaks
> org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as owb is
> used with openejb).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>
> > Good morning!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >
> >
> > The source release can be found at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >
> >
> > My Key can be found in
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >
> > The tag in SVN is
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> > Revision r1758342
> >
> >
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> >
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> >
> > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Gerhard Petracek]

-1, because it still breaks
org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as owb is
used with openejb).

regards,
gerhard



2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :

> Good morning!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>
>
> The staging repo is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>
>
> The source release can be found at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>
>
> My Key can be found in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>
> The tag in SVN is
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> Revision r1758342
>
>
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
>
> [+0] meh, don't care
>
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Reinhard Sandtner]

hey folks,

+1 (non-binding) tested with my app

checked
* building src zip
* LICENSE
* NOTICE 
* md5, sha1
* signature
also -> all fine

lg
reini

> Am 30.08.2016 um 10:40 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>  
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Mark Struberg]

And here is my own

+1

LieGrue,
strub





> On Tuesday, 30 August 2016, 17:53, Mark Struberg  
> wrote:
> > Txs, Adam!
> 
> Every review and vote is welcome :D
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>  On Tuesday, 30 August 2016, 17:21, Adam Cornett 
>  wrote:
>>  > Working well in our test environments, here is my (non-binding) +1.
>> 
>> 
>>  On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>>  
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>>   +1
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>   @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>>    | Old Wordpress Blog
>>>    | Github 
>>  >>   u> |
>>>   LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>>>    | JavaEE Factory
>>>   
>>> 
>>>   2016-08-30 14:55 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark 
> :
>>> 
>>>   > +1
>>>   >
>>>   > built, mvn apache-rat:check, and ran a couple of the sample 
>>  applications.
>>>   > Looked good to me
>>>   >
>>>   > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Struberg 
>>  >>   >
>>>   > wrote:
>>>   >
>>>   > > Good morning!
>>>   > >
>>>   > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache 
>>  OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>>>   > >
>>>   > >
>>>   > > The staging repo is:
>>>   > >
>>>   > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>   > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>>>   > >
>>>   > >
>>>   > > The source release can be found at
>>>   > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>   > > 
>>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>>>   > >
>>>   > >
>>>   > > My Key can be found in
>>>   > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>>   > >
>>>   > > The tag in SVN is
>>>   > >
>>>   > > 
>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>>>   > > Revision r1758342
>>>   > >
>>>   > >
>>>   > >
>>>   > > [+1] let's ship it!
>>>   > >
>>>   > > [+0] meh, don't care
>>>   > >
>>>   > > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>>>   > >
>>>   > >
>>>   > > The VOTE is open for 72h
>>>   > >
>>>   > >
>>>   > > txs and LieGrue,
>>>   > > strub
>>>   > >
>>>   >
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  -- 
>>  Adam Cornett
>>  adam.corn...@gmail.com
>>  (678) 296-1150
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Mark Struberg]

Txs, Adam!

Every review and vote is welcome :D

LieGrue,
strub






> On Tuesday, 30 August 2016, 17:21, Adam Cornett  
> wrote:
> > Working well in our test environments, here is my (non-binding) +1.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
> wrote:
> 
>>  +1
>> 
>> 
>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>>  @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>   | Old Wordpress Blog
>>   | Github 
> >  u> |
>>  LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>>   | JavaEE Factory
>>  
>> 
>>  2016-08-30 14:55 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark :
>> 
>>  > +1
>>  >
>>  > built, mvn apache-rat:check, and ran a couple of the sample 
> applications.
>>  > Looked good to me
>>  >
>>  > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Struberg 
> >  >
>>  > wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > Good morning!
>>  > >
>>  > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache 
> OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > The staging repo is:
>>  > >
>>  > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > The source release can be found at
>>  > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  > > 
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > My Key can be found in
>>  > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>  > >
>>  > > The tag in SVN is
>>  > >
>>  > > 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>>  > > Revision r1758342
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > [+1] let's ship it!
>>  > >
>>  > > [+0] meh, don't care
>>  > >
>>  > > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > The VOTE is open for 72h
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > txs and LieGrue,
>>  > > strub
>>  > >
>>  >
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adam Cornett
> adam.corn...@gmail.com
> (678) 296-1150
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Adam Cornett]

Working well in our test environments, here is my (non-binding) +1.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Wordpress Blog
>  | Github  u> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2016-08-30 14:55 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark :
>
> > +1
> >
> > built, mvn apache-rat:check, and ran a couple of the sample applications.
> > Looked good to me
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Struberg  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Good morning!
> > >
> > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> > >
> > >
> > > The staging repo is:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> > >
> > >
> > > The source release can be found at
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> > >
> > >
> > > My Key can be found in
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> > >
> > > The tag in SVN is
> > >
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> > > Revision r1758342
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [+1] let's ship it!
> > >
> > > [+0] meh, don't care
> > >
> > > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> > >
> > >
> > > The VOTE is open for 72h
> > >
> > >
> > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Adam Cornett
adam.corn...@gmail.com
(678) 296-1150

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+1


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Wordpress Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-08-30 14:55 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark :

> +1
>
> built, mvn apache-rat:check, and ran a couple of the sample applications.
> Looked good to me
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
>
> > Good morning!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >
> >
> > The source release can be found at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >
> >
> > My Key can be found in
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >
> > The tag in SVN is
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> > Revision r1758342
> >
> >
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> >
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> >
> > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Joseph Bergmark]

+1

built, mvn apache-rat:check, and ran a couple of the sample applications.
Looked good to me

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Struberg 
wrote:

> Good morning!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>
>
> The staging repo is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>
>
> The source release can be found at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>
>
> My Key can be found in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>
> The tag in SVN is
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> Revision r1758342
>
>
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
>
> [+0] meh, don't care
>
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Mark Struberg]

Btw, the Release Notes as committed to the readme/README.txt:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12334329

Bug

[OWB-1115] - Wrong version listed on download page
[OWB-1121] - IllegalStateException in case of duplicated classes
[OWB-1122] - InjectionPoint.getQualifiers does not return the list of selected 
qualifiers with programmatic lookup
[OWB-1123] - NPE at NormalScopeProxyFactory.createNormalScopeProxy during 
deserialization
[OWB-1124] - Lazy start on SessionContext NPE on no active RequestContext
[OWB-1125] - Please delete old releases from mirroring system
[OWB-1129] - isAfterBeanDiscoveryFired() doesn't handle before/during/after 
event states as required
[OWB-1130] - ContainerCtrlTckTest fails
[OWB-1131] - Typo in exception message
[OWB-1136] - Can't access SessionScoped beans inside @Observers 
@Initialized(SessionScoped)
[OWB-1138] - PassivationCapable bean id is not unique: PRODUCERMETHOD#class
[OWB-1139] - JSP misses CDI ELResolver
[OWB-1140] - Caused by: javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException: 
Api type [xxx] is not found with the qualifiers

Dependency upgrade

[OWB-1134] - Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and 
maven-checkstyle-plugin

New Feature

[OWB-1141] - Maven Shade transformer for openwebbeans.properties
[OWB-1142] - Gradle ShadowJar Transformer for openwebbeans.properties

Task

[OWB-1089] - OpenWebBeansJsfPlugin is pretty much empty
[OWB-1127] - Upgrade to XBean 4.4
[OWB-1143] - upgrade to apache-parent-18, plugins and dependencies
[OWB-1144] - Drop JSF-1.2 module for OWB-1.7.x
[OWB-1145] - Drop EL-1.0 module for OWB-1.7
[OWB-1146] - Remove tomcat6 module for OWB-1.7
[OWB-1147] - Remove webbeans-jee5-ejb-resource module for OWB-1.7
[OWB-1148] - remove the webbeans-doc module



LieGrue,
strub




> On Tuesday, 30 August 2016, 10:40, Mark Struberg  
> wrote:
> > Good morning!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> 
> 
> The staging repo is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> 
> 
> The source release can be found at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> 
> 
> My Key can be found in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> 
> The tag in SVN is 
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> Revision r1758342
> 
> 
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> 
> [+0] meh, don't care
> 
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> 
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

[Mark Struberg]

Good morning!

I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.


The staging repo is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/


The source release can be found at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/


My Key can be found in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS

The tag in SVN is 

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.0/
Revision r1758342



[+1] let's ship it!

[+0] meh, don't care

[-1] nope, because ${blocker}


The VOTE is open for 72h


txs and LieGrue,
strub