Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi Maruan, [1] everything works. Thanks! Looks like we are done here and I'm going to cut the release on Monday or Tuesday evening (UTC+2) BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/PDFBox%201.8.x/122/ Am 26.04.2014 00:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi Andreas, I’ve committed the changes. Fingers crossed that I did that correctly this time. BR Maruan Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi, I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week. Any objections? @Maruan What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for another week or two. BR Andreas Lehmkühler Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36 geschrieben: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-) WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Yes, already monitored it :-) thanks for the patience. BR Maruan Am 26.04.2014 um 10:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi Maruan, [1] everything works. Thanks! Looks like we are done here and I'm going to cut the release on Monday or Tuesday evening (UTC+2) BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/PDFBox%201.8.x/122/ Am 26.04.2014 00:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi Andreas, I’ve committed the changes. Fingers crossed that I did that correctly this time. BR Maruan Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi, I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week. Any objections? @Maruan What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for another week or two. BR Andreas Lehmkühler Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36 geschrieben: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-) WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi Andreas, will commit them later today. BR Maruan Sahyoun Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi, I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week. Any objections? @Maruan What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for another week or two. BR Andreas Lehmkühler Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36 geschrieben: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-) WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi Andreas, I’ve committed the changes. Fingers crossed that I did that correctly this time. BR Maruan Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi, I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week. Any objections? @Maruan What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for another week or two. BR Andreas Lehmkühler Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36 geschrieben: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-) WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi there, there is an issue with my local copy of pdfbox atm - need a little more time to resolve the issue. BR Maruan Sahyoun Am 18.04.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Hi, I'm currently on a trip so won't be able to fix it today. BR Maruan Am 18.04.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de: Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min. After that, two possibilities IMO: - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue. Tilman Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes Yes! WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? PDFBOX-1946 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946: person didn't answer = set to resolve +1 PDFBOX-1977 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a perfect test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? Sounds reasonable. Will you do that? PDFBOX-2026: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. +1 PDFBOX-1897 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897: I'll let Maruan resolve that one Tilman BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ Thanks for the fast reply BR Andreas Lehmkühler
New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-) WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes Yes! WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? PDFBOX-1946 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946: person didn't answer = set to resolve PDFBOX-1977 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a perfect test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? PDFBOX-2026: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. PDFBOX-1897 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897: I'll let Maruan resolve that one Tilman BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi, Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes Yes! WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? PDFBOX-1946 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946: person didn't answer = set to resolve +1 PDFBOX-1977 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a perfect test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? Sounds reasonable. Will you do that? PDFBOX-2026: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. +1 PDFBOX-1897 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897: I'll let Maruan resolve that one Tilman BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ Thanks for the fast reply BR Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Sounds reasonable. Will you do that? Yes will do. Tilman
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min. After that, two possibilities IMO: - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue. Tilman Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes Yes! WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? PDFBOX-1946 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946: person didn't answer = set to resolve +1 PDFBOX-1977 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a perfect test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? Sounds reasonable. Will you do that? PDFBOX-2026: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. +1 PDFBOX-1897 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897: I'll let Maruan resolve that one Tilman BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ Thanks for the fast reply BR Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi, I'm currently on a trip so won't be able to fix it today. BR Maruan Am 18.04.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de: Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min. After that, two possibilities IMO: - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue. Tilman Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes Yes! WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? PDFBOX-1946 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946: person didn't answer = set to resolve +1 PDFBOX-1977 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a perfect test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? Sounds reasonable. Will you do that? PDFBOX-2026: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. +1 PDFBOX-1897 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897: I'll let Maruan resolve that one Tilman BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ Thanks for the fast reply BR Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi, Am 18.04.2014 16:58, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min. After that, two possibilities IMO: - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue. IMHO we are not in a hurry here, so let's wait a couple of days to give the other committers a chance to provide their opinion about the new release. Tilman Thanks so far for handling those open issues. BR Andreas Lehmkühler Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes Yes! WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? PDFBOX-1946 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946: person didn't answer = set to resolve +1 PDFBOX-1977 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a perfect test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? Sounds reasonable. Will you do that? PDFBOX-2026: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. +1 PDFBOX-1897 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897: I'll let Maruan resolve that one Tilman BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ Thanks for the fast reply BR Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
I submitted a patch in January to PDFBOX-399https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-399 for ignoring badly-formatted CMap ToUnicode instructions. Can this be considered for inclusion in 1.8 series? Apologies if I put the patch in the wrong issue. Cheng On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:40 AM, John Hewson j...@jahewson.com wrote: Looks good to me! -- John On 18 Apr 2014, at 14:52, Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de wrote: Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes Yes! WDYT? Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? PDFBOX-1946 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946: person didn't answer = set to resolve PDFBOX-1977 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a perfect test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? PDFBOX-2026: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. PDFBOX-1897 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897: I'll let Maruan resolve that one Tilman BR Andreas Lehmkühler [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
