Re: [Report] Please Review
Trevor, It's on the Wiki now, feel free to sign off on it. - Frank On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:50 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > Nope, it's not on the Wiki yet. Lewis being on there may be a hold over > from past reports, I don't think he's an official mentor. > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 6:32 AM Trevor Grant > wrote: > >> Looks good. I'd like to help working on 1st release. I know there have >> been >> issues with it- but I've released python software in the past- and I know >> that's one of if not _the_ major hurdle. >> >> Also- congrats (I'm sorry? lol) to Lewis on becoming a Mentor. (I've been >> traveling a lot the last two months and must have missed the email.) >> >> I just logged in to the wiki and didn't see this, so guessing not posted >> yet? >> >> Let me know when it is and I'll sign. >> >> tg >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:38 AM Frank Greguska wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > Please review the report below. In particular please provide details for >> > any presentations you've given on SDAP (@Joe Jacob? do you have >> anything to >> > add there?) >> > >> > SDAP >> > >> > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. >> > >> > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. >> > >> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >> > >> > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release >> > 2. Improve committer participation >> > 3. Improve/create user guide documentation >> > >> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >> > aware of? >> > >> > No. >> > >> > How has the community developed since the last report? >> > >> > We are continuing to attract new committers. >> > *Presentations?* >> > >> > How has the project developed since the last report? >> > >> > Development of a helm chart for use when deploying to kubernetes has >> been >> > opened as a PR. >> > Further development work has continued and existing installations are >> being >> > maintained. >> > >> > How would you assess the podling's maturity? >> > >> > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest >> is >> > high. However, active participation from project members is low. First >> > source release should be coming soon. >> > >> > Please feel free to add your own commentary. >> > >> > [X] Initial setup >> > [X] Working towards first release >> > [X] Community building >> > [ ] Nearing graduation >> > >> > Date of last release: >> > >> > -XX-XX >> > >> > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? >> > >> > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 >> > >> > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling >> > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues >> > that need to be addressed. >> > >> > Mentors are helpful and responsive. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: >> > >> > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann >> > Comments: >> > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant >> > Comments: >> > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney >> > Comments: >> > >> >
Re: [Report] Please Review
Nope, it's not on the Wiki yet. Lewis being on there may be a hold over from past reports, I don't think he's an official mentor. On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 6:32 AM Trevor Grant wrote: > Looks good. I'd like to help working on 1st release. I know there have been > issues with it- but I've released python software in the past- and I know > that's one of if not _the_ major hurdle. > > Also- congrats (I'm sorry? lol) to Lewis on becoming a Mentor. (I've been > traveling a lot the last two months and must have missed the email.) > > I just logged in to the wiki and didn't see this, so guessing not posted > yet? > > Let me know when it is and I'll sign. > > tg > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:38 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Please review the report below. In particular please provide details for > > any presentations you've given on SDAP (@Joe Jacob? do you have anything > to > > add there?) > > > > SDAP > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > 2. Improve committer participation > > 3. Improve/create user guide documentation > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > aware of? > > > > No. > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > > *Presentations?* > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > Development of a helm chart for use when deploying to kubernetes has been > > opened as a PR. > > Further development work has continued and existing installations are > being > > maintained. > > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest is > > high. However, active participation from project members is low. First > > source release should be coming soon. > > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > > > [X] Initial setup > > [X] Working towards first release > > [X] Community building > > [ ] Nearing graduation > > > > Date of last release: > > > > -XX-XX > > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues > > that need to be addressed. > > > > Mentors are helpful and responsive. > > > > Signed-off-by: > > > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > > Comments: > > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > > Comments: > > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > > Comments: > > >
Re: [Report] Please Review
Looks good. I'd like to help working on 1st release. I know there have been issues with it- but I've released python software in the past- and I know that's one of if not _the_ major hurdle. Also- congrats (I'm sorry? lol) to Lewis on becoming a Mentor. (I've been traveling a lot the last two months and must have missed the email.) I just logged in to the wiki and didn't see this, so guessing not posted yet? Let me know when it is and I'll sign. tg On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:38 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > Hello, > > Please review the report below. In particular please provide details for > any presentations you've given on SDAP (@Joe Jacob? do you have anything to > add there?) > > SDAP > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > 2. Improve committer participation > 3. Improve/create user guide documentation > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > aware of? > > No. > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > *Presentations?* > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > Development of a helm chart for use when deploying to kubernetes has been > opened as a PR. > Further development work has continued and existing installations are being > maintained. > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest is > high. However, active participation from project members is low. First > source release should be coming soon. > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > [X] Initial setup > [X] Working towards first release > [X] Community building > [ ] Nearing graduation > > Date of last release: > > -XX-XX > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues > that need to be addressed. > > Mentors are helpful and responsive. > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > Comments: > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > Comments: > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > Comments: >
Re: [REPORT] Please Review -- Due Today
Ok, I didn't realize I had to do that, thought I could just reply to email. Suffice to say, I'm here and mentoring, but also learning how to mentor at the same time. Tg On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 1:36 AM Justin Mclean Hi, > > > Umm, I thought I signed off on it? > > There was no signoff on the incubator wiki or in the report in Whimsy: > https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2019-10-16/Incubator > > Thanks, > Justin >
Re: [REPORT] Please Review -- Due Today
Hi, > Umm, I thought I signed off on it? There was no signoff on the incubator wiki or in the report in Whimsy: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2019-10-16/Incubator Thanks, Justin
Re: [REPORT] Please Review -- Due Today
Umm, I thought I signed off on it? On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 7:49 AM Justin Mclean HI, > > While the report was submitted last month it did not get any mentor > signoffs and you'll need to report agin this month. Are your mentors active > or do you need some more mentors? > > Thanks, > Justin >
Re: [REPORT] Please Review -- Due Today
HI, While the report was submitted last month it did not get any mentor signoffs and you'll need to report agin this month. Are your mentors active or do you need some more mentors? Thanks, Justin
Re: [REPORT] Please Review -- Due Today
Report has been submitted. Thanks, -Frank On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:10 PM Trevor Grant wrote: > Looks good to me, thanks for putting it together! > No comments. > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:12 PM Frank Greguska wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > SDAP > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > > 3. Improve committer participation > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > aware of? > > > > No. > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > Interest in the project has increased after presentation at ApacheCon > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > Frank Greguska attended ApacheCon NA and presented an overview of SDAP. > > > > Discussion about what is necessary to produce a release were beneficial > and > > the path forward is clear. Goal is to get a source release before the end > > of the year. > > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest is > > high. However, active participation from project members is low. First > > source release should be coming soon. > > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > > > [X] Initial setup > > [X] Working towards first release > > [X] Community building > > [ ] Nearing graduation > > > > Date of last release: > > > > -XX-XX > > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues > > that need to be addressed. > > > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive. > > > > Signed-off-by: > > > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > > Comments: > > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > > Comments: > > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > > Comments: > > >
Re: [REPORT] Please Review -- Due Today
Looks good to me, thanks for putting it together! No comments. On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:12 PM Frank Greguska wrote: > Hello, > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > SDAP > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > 3. Improve committer participation > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > aware of? > > No. > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > Interest in the project has increased after presentation at ApacheCon > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > Frank Greguska attended ApacheCon NA and presented an overview of SDAP. > > Discussion about what is necessary to produce a release were beneficial and > the path forward is clear. Goal is to get a source release before the end > of the year. > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest is > high. However, active participation from project members is low. First > source release should be coming soon. > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > [X] Initial setup > [X] Working towards first release > [X] Community building > [ ] Nearing graduation > > Date of last release: > > -XX-XX > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues > that need to be addressed. > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive. > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > Comments: > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > Comments: > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > Comments: >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Damn... I'm unsure if I can attend.. try my best. See you! Julian Am 08.09.19, 22:47 schrieb "Frank Greguska" : Last minute change of plans, I'll be giving the talk on SDAP tomorrow. Looking forward to meeting you all. - Frank On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:25 AM Trevor Grant wrote: > Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting > there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite. > > tg > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer < > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and > > help for the initial release. > > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in > > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. > > > > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there! > > > > Julian > > > > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" : > > > > Cool. > > > > Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating > > the IoT > > room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. > > > > Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up > > with > > him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other > > non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator > > projects > > are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can > > sometimes be different. > > > > Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack > > channel, but > > haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear > > something on there I'll respond. > > > > tg > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Trevor. > > > > > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is > > today, I > > > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit > > the wiki > > > directly? > > > > > > wrt your questions: > > > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and > > talking about > > > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > > > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the > code > > is > > > running in a few different places. The main problem with the > release > > at > > > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal > > requirements > > > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not > > releasing all > > > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > > > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation > > challenging. > > > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we > were > > told > > > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's > still > > > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are > > not JAR > > > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that > issue: > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it > > seems > > > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're > > actually > > > supposed to do. > > > > > > - Frank > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant < > > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to > > find > > > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm > > seeing > > > one > > > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep > > growing > > > the > > > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which > > will > > > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw > > from. Sort > > > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any > > talks > > > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a > > > lightning > > > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously > > mentioned > > > > feedback loop. > > > > > >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Last minute change of plans, I'll be giving the talk on SDAP tomorrow. Looking forward to meeting you all. - Frank On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:25 AM Trevor Grant wrote: > Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting > there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite. > > tg > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer < > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and > > help for the initial release. > > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in > > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. > > > > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there! > > > > Julian > > > > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" : > > > > Cool. > > > > Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating > > the IoT > > room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. > > > > Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up > > with > > him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other > > non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator > > projects > > are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can > > sometimes be different. > > > > Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack > > channel, but > > haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear > > something on there I'll respond. > > > > tg > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Trevor. > > > > > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is > > today, I > > > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit > > the wiki > > > directly? > > > > > > wrt your questions: > > > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and > > talking about > > > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > > > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the > code > > is > > > running in a few different places. The main problem with the > release > > at > > > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal > > requirements > > > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not > > releasing all > > > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > > > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation > > challenging. > > > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we > were > > told > > > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's > still > > > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are > > not JAR > > > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that > issue: > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it > > seems > > > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're > > actually > > > supposed to do. > > > > > > - Frank > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant < > > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to > > find > > > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm > > seeing > > > one > > > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep > > growing > > > the > > > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which > > will > > > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw > > from. Sort > > > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any > > talks > > > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a > > > lightning > > > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously > > mentioned > > > > feedback loop. > > > > > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is > > the > > > thing > > > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x > > release > > > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a > > 0.x > > > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two > > cents). > > > > > > > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Sorry- Justin got back to me last night, I saw this morning- he said yes that's the right thing to do and that he saw the entry. On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:48 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > FYI - I've edited the Wiki directly to add our report to it. > > - Frank > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:25 AM Trevor Grant > wrote: > > > Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting > > there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite. > > > > tg > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer < > > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors > and > > > help for the initial release. > > > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in > > > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. > > > > > > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat > there! > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" : > > > > > > Cool. > > > > > > Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating > > > the IoT > > > room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. > > > > > > Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch > up > > > with > > > him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other > > > non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator > > > projects > > > are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can > > > sometimes be different. > > > > > > Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack > > > channel, but > > > haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear > > > something on there I'll respond. > > > > > > tg > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Trevor. > > > > > > > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission > is > > > today, I > > > > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit > > > the wiki > > > > directly? > > > > > > > > wrt your questions: > > > > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and > > > talking about > > > > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > > > > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the > > code > > > is > > > > running in a few different places. The main problem with the > > release > > > at > > > > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal > > > requirements > > > > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not > > > releasing all > > > > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > > > > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation > > > challenging. > > > > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we > > were > > > told > > > > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's > > still > > > > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are > > > not JAR > > > > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that > > issue: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now > it > > > seems > > > > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're > > > actually > > > > supposed to do. > > > > > > > > - Frank > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant < > > > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > > > > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable > to > > > find > > > > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights > (I'm > > > seeing > > > > one > > > > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep > > > growing > > > > the > > > > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, > which > > > will > > > > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw > > > from. Sort > > > > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > > > > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there > any > > > talks > > > > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe > a > > > > lightning > > > > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously > > > mentioned > > > > > feedback loop. > > > > > > > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that > is > > > the > > > > thing > > > > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x > > > release > > > > > first just to get
Re: [REPORT] Please review
FYI - I've edited the Wiki directly to add our report to it. - Frank On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:25 AM Trevor Grant wrote: > Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting > there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite. > > tg > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer < > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and > > help for the initial release. > > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in > > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. > > > > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there! > > > > Julian > > > > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" : > > > > Cool. > > > > Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating > > the IoT > > room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. > > > > Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up > > with > > him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other > > non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator > > projects > > are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can > > sometimes be different. > > > > Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack > > channel, but > > haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear > > something on there I'll respond. > > > > tg > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Trevor. > > > > > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is > > today, I > > > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit > > the wiki > > > directly? > > > > > > wrt your questions: > > > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and > > talking about > > > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > > > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the > code > > is > > > running in a few different places. The main problem with the > release > > at > > > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal > > requirements > > > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not > > releasing all > > > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > > > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation > > challenging. > > > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we > were > > told > > > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's > still > > > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are > > not JAR > > > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that > issue: > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it > > seems > > > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're > > actually > > > supposed to do. > > > > > > - Frank > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant < > > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to > > find > > > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm > > seeing > > > one > > > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep > > growing > > > the > > > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which > > will > > > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw > > from. Sort > > > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any > > talks > > > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a > > > lightning > > > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously > > mentioned > > > > feedback loop. > > > > > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is > > the > > > thing > > > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x > > release > > > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a > > 0.x > > > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two > > cents). > > > > > > > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite. tg On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer wrote: > Hi all, > > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and > help for the initial release. > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. > > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there! > > Julian > > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" : > > Cool. > > Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating > the IoT > room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. > > Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up > with > him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other > non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator > projects > are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can > sometimes be different. > > Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack > channel, but > haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear > something on there I'll respond. > > tg > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska > wrote: > > > Thanks Trevor. > > > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is > today, I > > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit > the wiki > > directly? > > > > wrt your questions: > > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and > talking about > > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the code > is > > running in a few different places. The main problem with the release > at > > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal > requirements > > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not > releasing all > > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation > challenging. > > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we were > told > > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's still > > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are > not JAR > > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that issue: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it > seems > > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're > actually > > supposed to do. > > > > - Frank > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant < > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to > find > > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm > seeing > > one > > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep > growing > > the > > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which > will > > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw > from. Sort > > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any > talks > > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a > > lightning > > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously > mentioned > > > feedback loop. > > > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is > the > > thing > > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x > release > > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a > 0.x > > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two > cents). > > > > > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > > > > > > > > > SDAP > > > > > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science > problems. > > > > > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards > graduation: > > > > > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > > > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > > > > 3. Improve committer participation >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Hi all, I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and help for the initial release. Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there! Julian Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" : Cool. Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating the IoT room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up with him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator projects are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can sometimes be different. Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack channel, but haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear something on there I'll respond. tg On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska wrote: > Thanks Trevor. > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is today, I > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit the wiki > directly? > > wrt your questions: > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and talking about > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the code is > running in a few different places. The main problem with the release at > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal requirements > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not releasing all > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation challenging. > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we were told > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's still > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are not JAR > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that issue: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it seems > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're actually > supposed to do. > > - Frank > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant > wrote: > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to find > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm seeing > one > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep growing > the > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which will > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw from. Sort > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any talks > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a > lightning > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously mentioned > > feedback loop. > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is the > thing > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x release > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a 0.x > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two cents). > > > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > > > > > > SDAP > > > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > > > 3. Improve committer participation > > > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > > aware of? > > > > > > No. > > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards a > >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Cool. Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating the IoT room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up with him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator projects are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can sometimes be different. Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack channel, but haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear something on there I'll respond. tg On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska wrote: > Thanks Trevor. > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is today, I > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit the wiki > directly? > > wrt your questions: > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and talking about > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the code is > running in a few different places. The main problem with the release at > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal requirements > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not releasing all > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation challenging. > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we were told > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's still > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are not JAR > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that issue: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it seems > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're actually > supposed to do. > > - Frank > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant > wrote: > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to find > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm seeing > one > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep growing > the > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which will > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw from. Sort > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any talks > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a > lightning > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously mentioned > > feedback loop. > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is the > thing > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x release > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a 0.x > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two cents). > > > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > > > > > > SDAP > > > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > > > 3. Improve committer participation > > > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > > aware of? > > > > > > No. > > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards a > > repeatable > > > build pipeline has been started. > > > > > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed Oceanographic > Matchup > > > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE) > components > > > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a standardized quality > > > flag. > > > > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > > > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest > is > > > high. However, active participation from project members is low. A push > > is > > > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting the > > > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can claim a > 1.0 > > > version of SDAP. > > > > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > > > > > [X] Initial setup > > >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Thanks Trevor. Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is today, I am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit the wiki directly? wrt your questions: I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and talking about SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the code is running in a few different places. The main problem with the release at this point is understanding and complying with all the legal requirements Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not releasing all components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes understanding the Apache release requirements documentation challenging. Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we were told we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's still unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are not JAR files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that issue: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it seems that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're actually supposed to do. - Frank On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant wrote: > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to find > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm seeing one > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep growing the > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which will > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw from. Sort > of a chicken and egg problem. > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any talks > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a lightning > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously mentioned > feedback loop. > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is the thing > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x release > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a 0.x > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two cents). > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > > > SDAP > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > > 3. Improve committer participation > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > aware of? > > > > No. > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards a > repeatable > > build pipeline has been started. > > > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed Oceanographic Matchup > > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE) components > > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a standardized quality > > flag. > > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest is > > high. However, active participation from project members is low. A push > is > > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting the > > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can claim a 1.0 > > version of SDAP. > > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > > > [X] Initial setup > > [X] Working towards first release > > [X] Community building > > [ ] Nearing graduation > > > > Date of last release: > > > > -XX-XX > > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues > > that need to be addressed. > > > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive. > > > > Signed-off-by: > > > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > > Comments: > > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > > Comments: > > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > > Comments: > > >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
This looks good- thanks Frank. Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to find someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm seeing one hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep growing the community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which will create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw from. Sort of a chicken and egg problem. Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any talks coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a lightning talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously mentioned feedback loop. I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is the thing everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x release first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a 0.x release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two cents). This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska wrote: > Hello, > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > SDAP > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems. > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > 3. Improve committer participation > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > aware of? > > No. > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards a repeatable > build pipeline has been started. > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed Oceanographic Matchup > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE) components > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a standardized quality > flag. > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest is > high. However, active participation from project members is low. A push is > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting the > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can claim a 1.0 > version of SDAP. > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > [X] Initial setup > [X] Working towards first release > [X] Community building > [ ] Nearing graduation > > Date of last release: > > -XX-XX > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues > that need to be addressed. > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive. > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > Comments: > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > Comments: > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > Comments: >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Hi, Yes as Julian explains (thanks!) it's moved to confluence as the wiki is being shut down. As your report didn't get posted in time, and there was a little confusion were to put it, I submitted the report for you in confluence and to the ASF board. Thanks, Justin
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Got it. Thanks for clarifying. - Frank On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 3:18 AM Julian Feinauer wrote: > Hi Frank, > > I can jump in here a bit. > This time, the wiki was moved to confluence, so the new place is > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2019. > As it did not work that flawless with some permissions on the confluence > site Justin posted our Report for the Edgent project there, and I saw he > did the same with your version from the List. > > So I think he meant that no one "answered" to your Review request, and > thus took that as "final" version. > > Julian > > Am 06.05.19, 18:18 schrieb "Frank Greguska" : > > Justin - > > Can you explain how this is supposed to work? The "Podling Report > Reminder" > email indicates we are supposed to submit the report by adding it to > the > wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/INCUBATOR/May2019 but > that > page did not and still does not exist so I just sent it to the mailing > list. The email also indicates that mentors are supposed to sign off > on the > report on the wiki page. So I assume as long as the report is on the > wiki > page 2 weeks prior to the meeting it gives everyone enough time to > review. > Is that correct? Who do we contact if the wiki page is not available 2 > weeks prior to the board meeting? > > Thanks, > > Frank > > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 7:44 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is now several days passed it due date so I've added it the teh > > incubator report. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Hi Frank, I can jump in here a bit. This time, the wiki was moved to confluence, so the new place is https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2019. As it did not work that flawless with some permissions on the confluence site Justin posted our Report for the Edgent project there, and I saw he did the same with your version from the List. So I think he meant that no one "answered" to your Review request, and thus took that as "final" version. Julian Am 06.05.19, 18:18 schrieb "Frank Greguska" : Justin - Can you explain how this is supposed to work? The "Podling Report Reminder" email indicates we are supposed to submit the report by adding it to the wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/INCUBATOR/May2019 but that page did not and still does not exist so I just sent it to the mailing list. The email also indicates that mentors are supposed to sign off on the report on the wiki page. So I assume as long as the report is on the wiki page 2 weeks prior to the meeting it gives everyone enough time to review. Is that correct? Who do we contact if the wiki page is not available 2 weeks prior to the board meeting? Thanks, Frank On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 7:44 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is now several days passed it due date so I've added it the teh > incubator report. > > Thanks, > Justin >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Justin - Can you explain how this is supposed to work? The "Podling Report Reminder" email indicates we are supposed to submit the report by adding it to the wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/INCUBATOR/May2019 but that page did not and still does not exist so I just sent it to the mailing list. The email also indicates that mentors are supposed to sign off on the report on the wiki page. So I assume as long as the report is on the wiki page 2 weeks prior to the meeting it gives everyone enough time to review. Is that correct? Who do we contact if the wiki page is not available 2 weeks prior to the board meeting? Thanks, Frank On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 7:44 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is now several days passed it due date so I've added it the teh > incubator report. > > Thanks, > Justin >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Hi, This is now several days passed it due date so I've added it the teh incubator report. Thanks, Justin
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Signed off On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:19 PM Frank Greguska wrote: > Thanks Lewis. > > Our mentors have answered any questions that have been asked. > > - Frank > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:51 PM lewis john mcgibbney > wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> I provided a report from us to the IPMC - >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2019 >> >> @mentors please review and approve >> >> @dev, can someone please answer the question "...Have your mentors been >> helpful and responsive or are things falling through the cracks? In the >> latter case, please list any open issues that need to be addressed." >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> SDAP >> >> SDAP is an integrated data analytic center for Big Science problems. >> >> SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. >> >> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >> >> 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release >> 2. Improve/create user guide documentation >> 3. Grow Community >> >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >> aware of? >> >> A member of the SDAP podling stepped up to the release manager role which >> is great. It shows the the podling is maturing. >> Unfortunately, the release candidate which was produced was not in >> compliance with the ASF release policy, thankfully Justin highlighted >> this and we are in the process of rolling the RC back. Lewis (SDAP >> champion) >> and the release manager are working to resolve this and get the first >> incubating release candidate finished. >> >> How has the community developed since the last report? >> >> Two VOTE's have been made over on private@sdap regarding extending >> PPMC and Committership to two community contributors. This is very >> positive. >> >> How has the project developed since the last report? >> >> SDAP is on the verge of it's first release. With some persistence >> the podling will have a release candidate for community VOTE soon. >> >> How would you assess the podling's maturity? >> Please feel free to add your own commentary. >> >> [X] Initial setup >> [X] Working towards first release >> [X] Community building >> [ ] Nearing graduation >> [X] Other: One the release management process is documented we will be >>pushing for graduation. >> >> Date of last release: >> >> -XX-XX >> >> When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? >> >> Kevin M Gill was elected on 2018-03-05 >> >> Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling >> through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues >> that need to be addressed. >> >> Signed-off-by: >> >> [ ](sdap) Jörn Rottmann >> Comments: >> [ ](sdap) Suneel Marthi >> Comments: >> [X](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney >> Comments: >> >> IPMC/Shepherd notes: >> >> -- >> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ >> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc >> >
Re: [REPORT] Please review
Thanks Lewis. Our mentors have answered any questions that have been asked. - Frank On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:51 PM lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > Hi Folks, > I provided a report from us to the IPMC - > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2019 > > @mentors please review and approve > > @dev, can someone please answer the question "...Have your mentors been > helpful and responsive or are things falling through the cracks? In the > latter case, please list any open issues that need to be addressed." > > Thanks > > > > SDAP > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic center for Big Science problems. > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > 3. Grow Community > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > aware of? > > A member of the SDAP podling stepped up to the release manager role which > is great. It shows the the podling is maturing. > Unfortunately, the release candidate which was produced was not in > compliance with the ASF release policy, thankfully Justin highlighted > this and we are in the process of rolling the RC back. Lewis (SDAP > champion) > and the release manager are working to resolve this and get the first > incubating release candidate finished. > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > Two VOTE's have been made over on private@sdap regarding extending > PPMC and Committership to two community contributors. This is very > positive. > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > SDAP is on the verge of it's first release. With some persistence > the podling will have a release candidate for community VOTE soon. > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > [X] Initial setup > [X] Working towards first release > [X] Community building > [ ] Nearing graduation > [X] Other: One the release management process is documented we will be >pushing for graduation. > > Date of last release: > > -XX-XX > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > Kevin M Gill was elected on 2018-03-05 > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues > that need to be addressed. > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Rottmann > Comments: > [ ](sdap) Suneel Marthi > Comments: > [X](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > Comments: > > IPMC/Shepherd notes: > > -- > http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc >
