Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)
On 6/30/07, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 14:25 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : > On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -1. (sorry!) > > > > There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have > > size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad > > docs. > > Claude, this seems to be some issue with DVSL. It looks like the 2.x > branch is still on 0.43 while the trunk is using 1.0-dev. Which i > don't appear to have in my filesystem currently, so the 1.x trunk > isn't building for me either. What's the status of DVSL right now? > Any chance you could give me a hand getting docs building again? :) DVSL 1.0 is ready for an RC, I lacked some time to push it out (yet one week of hard work and I'm on vacation). Here's the situation: For Tools 1.x: The DVSL ant task has changed from o.a.tools.dvsl.DVSLTask package to o.a.dvsl.DVSLTask package. To make Gump happy, I made the build.xml in tools 1.x trunk now use the new package to declare the DVSL ant task, but it wasn't a really good solution since Gump is the only one happy. So I'm gonna roll this back and put a deprecated class in the old DVSL package. It's better for BC and even if the next 1.x tools release is made before DVSL there won't be any problem. that sounds like a good plan But for Tools 2.x, which is still using dvsl-0.43, it's a totally different problem: it's simply that the published dvsl-0.43 binary (as long as the 0.44 and 0.45 ones) doesn't work with velocity-1.5 (it just needed to be recompiled). So to build the docs there is no other real solution today than building dvsl-1.0-dev manually, copy it to the lib, and edit build.xml to use o.a.dvsl.DVSLTask. hmm. or hack the docs build to use velocity 1.4, right? probably not worth it, since 2.0 final probably won't come before DVSL 1.0 It'd be cool to release DVSL 1.0 quite soon, wouldn't it? I'll try to initiate it and start the vote on sunday evening - I'll be offline during the w-e. that would be great. i see no reason to wait. once the deprecated DVSLTask subclass discussed above is added. Claude > > Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. > > > > On the positive side, "ant test" worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6 > > > > I'll note some trivial nits, probably want to fix before final 2.0 release > > -- notice file has 2006 copyright, not 2007 > > -- ant clean doesn't remove empty target directory > > -- the VLS_readme file is written in the first person tense, but who is that > > person? (no one signed the message) > > -- the STATUS file appears to be out of date. (not sure-- worth a check). > > > > best, > > WILL > > > > On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed > > > and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that we > > > have to do this again, but here goes: > > > > > > The new test build for this release is once again available at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, but i won't wrap it up until > > > the morning of Monday, July 2 at the earliest. If there aren't enough +1s > > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > > > > > My vote is +1 > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Forio Business Simulations > > > > Will Glass-Husain > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.forio.com > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)
Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 14:25 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : > On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -1. (sorry!) > > > > There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have > > size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad > > docs. > > Claude, this seems to be some issue with DVSL. It looks like the 2.x > branch is still on 0.43 while the trunk is using 1.0-dev. Which i > don't appear to have in my filesystem currently, so the 1.x trunk > isn't building for me either. What's the status of DVSL right now? > Any chance you could give me a hand getting docs building again? :) DVSL 1.0 is ready for an RC, I lacked some time to push it out (yet one week of hard work and I'm on vacation). Here's the situation: For Tools 1.x: The DVSL ant task has changed from o.a.tools.dvsl.DVSLTask package to o.a.dvsl.DVSLTask package. To make Gump happy, I made the build.xml in tools 1.x trunk now use the new package to declare the DVSL ant task, but it wasn't a really good solution since Gump is the only one happy. So I'm gonna roll this back and put a deprecated class in the old DVSL package. It's better for BC and even if the next 1.x tools release is made before DVSL there won't be any problem. But for Tools 2.x, which is still using dvsl-0.43, it's a totally different problem: it's simply that the published dvsl-0.43 binary (as long as the 0.44 and 0.45 ones) doesn't work with velocity-1.5 (it just needed to be recompiled). So to build the docs there is no other real solution today than building dvsl-1.0-dev manually, copy it to the lib, and edit build.xml to use o.a.dvsl.DVSLTask. It'd be cool to release DVSL 1.0 quite soon, wouldn't it? I'll try to initiate it and start the vote on sunday evening - I'll be offline during the w-e. Claude > > Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. > > > > On the positive side, "ant test" worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6 > > > > I'll note some trivial nits, probably want to fix before final 2.0 release > > -- notice file has 2006 copyright, not 2007 > > -- ant clean doesn't remove empty target directory > > -- the VLS_readme file is written in the first person tense, but who is that > > person? (no one signed the message) > > -- the STATUS file appears to be out of date. (not sure-- worth a check). > > > > best, > > WILL > > > > On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed > > > and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that we > > > have to do this again, but here goes: > > > > > > The new test build for this release is once again available at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, but i won't wrap it up until > > > the morning of Monday, July 2 at the earliest. If there aren't enough +1s > > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > > > > > My vote is +1 > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Forio Business Simulations > > > > Will Glass-Husain > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.forio.com > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -1. (sorry!) There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad docs. Claude, this seems to be some issue with DVSL. It looks like the 2.x branch is still on 0.43 while the trunk is using 1.0-dev. Which i don't appear to have in my filesystem currently, so the 1.x trunk isn't building for me either. What's the status of DVSL right now? Any chance you could give me a hand getting docs building again? :) Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. On the positive side, "ant test" worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6 I'll note some trivial nits, probably want to fix before final 2.0 release -- notice file has 2006 copyright, not 2007 -- ant clean doesn't remove empty target directory -- the VLS_readme file is written in the first person tense, but who is that person? (no one signed the message) -- the STATUS file appears to be out of date. (not sure-- worth a check). best, WILL On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed > and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that we > have to do this again, but here goes: > > The new test build for this release is once again available at: > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, but i won't wrap it up until > the morning of Monday, July 2 at the earliest. If there aren't enough +1s > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > My vote is +1 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)
On 6/29/07, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok... The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to use it! good to hear! There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not ready and will wait for the 2.1 release. we're only in alpha stage right now. unless they're really drastic, i think they should go in now. To me, "alpha" means "the big refactorings and core infrastructure is done; here's something to *start* working with. expect some changes." I'm likely to make more than a few small developments too. so, +1 One remark: when fully rebuilding I saw that there remains some internal references to deprecated classes, like to the old ToolInfo class in o.a.v.tools.view package, that could easily be changed. it's something we need to consider. at this point, i've decided to leave the old core infrastructure in place and deprecated. i know there's not likely to be many people who directly interacted with it (and thus we probably can yank it), but it's not really hurting anything and might still be useful in some way i haven't foreseen. also, i have occasionally thought that it might be nice to break the many deprecated class out into a separate "backwards compatible" build, but then we're basically talking about doubling the number of jars we distribute. since we already put out three, that seemed like overkill. anyway, all that is to say, we should have a discussion at some point about whether and/or how long we want to leave the various deprecated pieces (support for old toolbox format, support for Tools with init() methods, and the old tool management infrastructure) in place. Claude Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 09:36 -0700, Will Glass-Husain a écrit : > Ok, I change my vote to a +1. Don't want to hold up progress here. After > all, it's an alpha. Anyone who uses this and complains about missing docs > will get support on the list. > > > does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the > > docs have been updated and so many of them are wrong, and the tools > > are mostly documented via javascript? > > Best, WILL > > > On 6/29/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -1. (sorry!) > > > > > > There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro > > have > > > size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad > > > docs. > > > > does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the > > docs have been updated and so many of them are wrong, and the tools > > are mostly documented via javascript? > > > > > Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. > > > > > > On the positive side, "ant test" worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK > > 1.6 > > > > > > I'll note some trivial nits, probably want to fix before final 2.0release > > > -- notice file has 2006 copyright, not 2007 > > > > will fix. > > > > > -- ant clean doesn't remove empty target directory > > > > that's mvn/ant crossover. will fix, but doesn't matter. > > > > > -- the VLS_readme file is written in the first person tense, but who is > > that > > > person? (no one signed the message) > > > > been that way for all final releases. i wrote it before i was even a > > committer, i believe. > > > > > -- the STATUS file appears to be out of date. (not sure-- worth a > > check). > > > > it's an alpha. all the docs are out of date. :) > > > > > best, > > > WILL > > > > > > On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed > > > > and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that we > > > > have to do this again, but here goes: > > > > > > > > The new test build for this release is once again available at: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, but i won't wrap it up until > > > > the morning of Monday, July 2 at the earliest. If there aren't enough > > +1s > > > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > > > > > > > My vote is +1 > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Forio Business Simulations > > > > > > Will Glass-Husain > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > www.forio.com > > > > > > > - > > To
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)
I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok... The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to use it! There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not ready and will wait for the 2.1 release. so, +1 One remark: when fully rebuilding I saw that there remains some internal references to deprecated classes, like to the old ToolInfo class in o.a.v.tools.view package, that could easily be changed. Claude Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 09:36 -0700, Will Glass-Husain a écrit : > Ok, I change my vote to a +1. Don't want to hold up progress here. After > all, it's an alpha. Anyone who uses this and complains about missing docs > will get support on the list. > > > does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the > > docs have been updated and so many of them are wrong, and the tools > > are mostly documented via javascript? > > Best, WILL > > > On 6/29/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -1. (sorry!) > > > > > > There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro > > have > > > size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad > > > docs. > > > > does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the > > docs have been updated and so many of them are wrong, and the tools > > are mostly documented via javascript? > > > > > Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. > > > > > > On the positive side, "ant test" worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK > > 1.6 > > > > > > I'll note some trivial nits, probably want to fix before final 2.0release > > > -- notice file has 2006 copyright, not 2007 > > > > will fix. > > > > > -- ant clean doesn't remove empty target directory > > > > that's mvn/ant crossover. will fix, but doesn't matter. > > > > > -- the VLS_readme file is written in the first person tense, but who is > > that > > > person? (no one signed the message) > > > > been that way for all final releases. i wrote it before i was even a > > committer, i believe. > > > > > -- the STATUS file appears to be out of date. (not sure-- worth a > > check). > > > > it's an alpha. all the docs are out of date. :) > > > > > best, > > > WILL > > > > > > On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed > > > > and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that we > > > > have to do this again, but here goes: > > > > > > > > The new test build for this release is once again available at: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, but i won't wrap it up until > > > > the morning of Monday, July 2 at the earliest. If there aren't enough > > +1s > > > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > > > > > > > My vote is +1 > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Forio Business Simulations > > > > > > Will Glass-Husain > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > www.forio.com > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)
Ok, I change my vote to a +1. Don't want to hold up progress here. After all, it's an alpha. Anyone who uses this and complains about missing docs will get support on the list. does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the docs have been updated and so many of them are wrong, and the tools are mostly documented via javascript? Best, WILL On 6/29/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1. (sorry!) > > There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have > size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad > docs. does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the docs have been updated and so many of them are wrong, and the tools are mostly documented via javascript? > Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. > > On the positive side, "ant test" worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6 > > I'll note some trivial nits, probably want to fix before final 2.0release > -- notice file has 2006 copyright, not 2007 will fix. > -- ant clean doesn't remove empty target directory that's mvn/ant crossover. will fix, but doesn't matter. > -- the VLS_readme file is written in the first person tense, but who is that > person? (no one signed the message) been that way for all final releases. i wrote it before i was even a committer, i believe. > -- the STATUS file appears to be out of date. (not sure-- worth a check). it's an alpha. all the docs are out of date. :) > best, > WILL > > On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed > > and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that we > > have to do this again, but here goes: > > > > The new test build for this release is once again available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, but i won't wrap it up until > > the morning of Monday, July 2 at the earliest. If there aren't enough +1s > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > > > My vote is +1 > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Forio Business Simulations > > Will Glass-Husain > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.forio.com > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
On 6/29/07, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nathan Bubna-3 wrote: > > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I > Why not user the same version number like Velocity? never done it before. all Tools 1.x releases are (i believe compatible with all 1.3+ Engine releases). This way it would be much simpler for the users to match versions. E.g. they would intuitively use Velcity 1.6 with VelocityTools 1.6. it would be cool if that just happened. for Tools 1.1, 1.2, & 1.3, we were relatively lucky to have the Tools version numbers line up to the Struts 1.x version numbers, but that was 90% coincidence. i don't, however, think it is worth it to alter development pace (rushing or holding back on release cycles) just to keep numbers in sync. better to just document what version(s) of Velocity are required for each version of VelocityTools. Tools 2.0, while it is highly compatible with 1.x versions, is largely a rewrite of the internal infrastructure and involves a lot of package shuffling and refactoring. what compatibility there is comes through a huge number of deprecated classes and methods put/left in place just for that purpose. Those will start disappearing in subsequent version minor version releases. Calling this a 1.x release would be quite a stretch. Ahmed. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-VelocityTools-2.0-alpha1-tf3991455.html#a11361412 Sent from the Velocity - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Nathan Bubna-3 wrote: > > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I > Why not user the same version number like Velocity? This way it would be much simpler for the users to match versions. E.g. they would intuitively use Velcity 1.6 with VelocityTools 1.6. Ahmed. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-VelocityTools-2.0-alpha1-tf3991455.html#a11361412 Sent from the Velocity - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)
-1. (sorry!) There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad docs. Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. On the positive side, "ant test" worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6 I'll note some trivial nits, probably want to fix before final 2.0 release -- notice file has 2006 copyright, not 2007 -- ant clean doesn't remove empty target directory -- the VLS_readme file is written in the first person tense, but who is that person? (no one signed the message) -- the STATUS file appears to be out of date. (not sure-- worth a check). best, WILL On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that we have to do this again, but here goes: The new test build for this release is once again available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, but i won't wrap it up until the morning of Monday, July 2 at the earliest. If there aren't enough +1s and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Turns out the "test" directory was being left out of the source zips, both in 2.x and 1.x. I'll re-post the vote for 2.0-alpha1 promptly... On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with "ant env" and "ant -version"). * downloaded "velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src.zip" * unzip and cd to main directory * ant clean * ant test test.generic: prepare.test: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\rst [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\classes [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\log [copy] Copying 7 files to C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-sr c\build\test\src BUILD FAILED C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\build.xml:599: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test.xml:75: Warning: Could n ot find file C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test\etc\jetty.x ml.tmpl to copy. WILL On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I > > would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated > > documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. > > > > The test build for this release is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as > > roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm > PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) > > > My vote is +1 > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Hi Marino, Just to clarify... when you tested the build, did you actually download the binary release candidate and do 'ant test' from there? Or did you just work from svn head. Looking at Nathan's recent commit, I think the actual release binary was missing the test files. WILL On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe it's a Windows issue? On 6/28/07, Marinó A. Jónsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm using the current HEAD and it works fine for me :) > > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf > Of Will Glass-Husain > Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44 > To: Velocity Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 > > Hi > > -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm > running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with "ant env" and "ant > -version"). > > * downloaded "velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src.zip" > * unzip and cd to main directory > * ant clean > * ant test > > test.generic: > > prepare.test: > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My > Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil > d\test\rst > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My > Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil > d\test\classes > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My > Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil > d\test\log > [copy] Copying 7 files to C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My > Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-sr > c\build\test\src > > BUILD FAILED > C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- > tools-2.0-alpha1-src\build.xml:599: The following error occurred while > executing this line: > C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- > tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test.xml:75: Warning: Could n ot find file > C:\Documents > and Settings\wglass\My > Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test\etc\jetty.x > ml.tmpl to copy. > > WILL > > > > > On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. > > > I would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated > > > documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. > > > > > > The test build for this release is available at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/> > > > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as > > > roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s > > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > > > By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm > > PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) > > > > > My vote is +1 > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Forio Business Simulations > > Will Glass-Husain > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.forio.com > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Maybe it's a Windows issue? On 6/28/07, Marinó A. Jónsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm using the current HEAD and it works fine for me :) +1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Glass-Husain Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44 To: Velocity Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 Hi -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with "ant env" and "ant -version"). * downloaded "velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src.zip" * unzip and cd to main directory * ant clean * ant test test.generic: prepare.test: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\rst [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\classes [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\log [copy] Copying 7 files to C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-sr c\build\test\src BUILD FAILED C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\build.xml:599: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test.xml:75: Warning: Could n ot find file C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test\etc\jetty.x ml.tmpl to copy. WILL On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. > > I would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated > > documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. > > > > The test build for this release is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as > > roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm > PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) > > > My vote is +1 > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
RE: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
I'm using the current HEAD and it works fine for me :) +1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Glass-Husain Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44 To: Velocity Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 Hi -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with "ant env" and "ant -version"). * downloaded "velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src.zip" * unzip and cd to main directory * ant clean * ant test test.generic: prepare.test: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\rst [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\classes [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\log [copy] Copying 7 files to C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-sr c\build\test\src BUILD FAILED C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\build.xml:599: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test.xml:75: Warning: Could n ot find file C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test\etc\jetty.x ml.tmpl to copy. WILL On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. > > I would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated > > documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. > > > > The test build for this release is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as > > roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm > PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) > > > My vote is +1 > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Hi -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with "ant env" and "ant -version"). * downloaded "velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src.zip" * unzip and cd to main directory * ant clean * ant test test.generic: prepare.test: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\rst [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\classes [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\buil d\test\log [copy] Copying 7 files to C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-sr c\build\test\src BUILD FAILED C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\build.xml:599: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity- tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test.xml:75: Warning: Could n ot find file C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test\etc\jetty.x ml.tmpl to copy. WILL On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I > would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated > documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. > > The test build for this release is available at: > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as > roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) > My vote is +1 > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
If you need the extra hour, then you are welcome to it. :) On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-) :-) On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I > > would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated > > documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. > > > > The test build for this release is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as > > roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s > > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) > > By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm > PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) > > > My vote is +1 > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-) :-) On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I > would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated > documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. > > The test build for this release is available at: > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ > > Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > [ ] -1 No, because __ > > The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as > roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s > and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of > waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) > My vote is +1 > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-alpha1/ Check out the release artifacts, play with an example, and vote! :) [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 10am PST on Saturday, Feb 24th. If there aren't enough +1s and no -1s, then the vote will stay open until either i'm tired of waiting or all PMC members have voted. :) By the way, that close date should have been updated to "roughly 4pm PST on Saturday, June 30th". Oops. :) My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
