Re: [BUG] AT2 eating my cpu
> >EVERYTHING is working correctly but AT2 thread is eating 99% of my cpu. Currenttly on WinNT4.0 it does not. By the way I suspect it could do it on w2000, I put it yesterday. I'll have feedback in few days, and let you know. Andrea
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Hi. This actually works, thank you ! (The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of 'problem with receiving device' message). They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though. But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed because of a problem with falcom, or is it temporary because something else needs to be fixed ? I don't see a performance problem in polling a gsm_modem (it doesn't get messages that quick anyway), but I wish the kannel.log didn't grow when there is no traffic... Also, I'm still curious about the return codes...
RE: kannel to kannel connection
Hi all I've seen that it is possible to have the following configuration: app ---> kannel > SMSC: HTTP (type-Kannel) ---> kannel ---> SMSC: EMI2 ^client^server Is it possible to achieve this conf ? app ---> kannel ---> kannel (or other WapGW) connectionless or connection oriented ---> WAPSite My will is to achieve a WSP proxy like configuration with the kannel wap gw. I currently doing this with a big hack in 1.0.1 code but iwould like to know if it is doable only with configuration, or if someone else has tryed to achieve this kind of config. Thanks to all answers LOESCH Jean-Jacques Platform Architect VOLUBILL Tel: +33 4 76 04 37 11 Mob: +33 6 18 41 03 80 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:LOESCH;;Jean-Jacques FN:Jean-Jacques LOESCH ORG:VOLUBILL TITLE:Platform Architect TEL;WORK;VOICE:+33 4 76 04 37 11 TEL;CELL;VOICE:+33 (6) 18 41 03 80 TEL;WORK;FAX:+33 4 76 04 26 99 ADR;WORK:;;80 Alée Saint Exupéry;MONTBONNOT SAINT-MARTIN;Isere;38330;FRANCE LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:80 Al=E9e Saint Exup=E9ry=0D=0AMONTBONNOT SAINT-MARTIN, Isere 38330=0D=0AFRA= NCE EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMAIL;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMAIL;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20010430T112542Z END:VCARD
RE: kannel to kannel connection
>Hi all >I've seen that it is possible to have the following configuration: > > app ---> kannel > SMSC: HTTP (type-Kannel) ---> kannel ---> SMSC: >EMI2 > ^client^server > >Is it possible to achieve this conf ? > > app ---> kannel ---> kannel (or other WapGW) connectionless or >connection oriented ---> WAPSite > >My will is to achieve a WSP proxy like configuration with the kannel wap gw. >I currently doing this with a big hack in 1.0.1 code but iwould like to know >if it is doable only with configuration, or if someone else has tryed to >achieve this kind of config. WSP is WAP, the above message was talking about SMS not wap. I dont see why you want to do a proxy on a WSP level. Bearerbox does that for you when being remote to Wapbox. Furthermore Wapbox supports HTTP proxies since a long while. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting -- Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com -- Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
RE: kannel to kannel connection
>>Is it possible to achieve this conf ? >> >> app ---> kannel ---> kannel (or other WapGW) connectionless or >>connection oriented ---> WAPSite >> >>My will is to achieve a WSP proxy like configuration with the kannel wap gw. >>I currently doing this with a big hack in 1.0.1 code but iwould like to know >>if it is doable only with configuration, or if someone else has tryed to >>achieve this kind of config. >WSP is WAP, the above message was talking about SMS not wap. I dont >see why you want to do a proxy on a WSP level. Bearerbox does that >for you when being remote to Wapbox. Furthermore Wapbox supports >HTTP proxies since a long while. "WSP is WAP" Thanks for that information :) but i think all the people here in this list already know that. Here is my pb app ---> kannel ---> Openwave wap GW i got to keep my openwave in place, and the only place i can put some boxes are between the cell phone and the openwave, but i would like to install some kannel boxes between because it offer me some control and features openwave does not offer. Thanks for any help. LOESCH Jean-Jacques Platform Architect VOLUBILL Tel: +33 4 76 04 37 11 Mob: +33 6 18 41 03 80 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:LOESCH;;Jean-Jacques FN:Jean-Jacques LOESCH ORG:VOLUBILL TITLE:Platform Architect TEL;WORK;VOICE:+33 4 76 04 37 11 TEL;CELL;VOICE:+33 (6) 18 41 03 80 TEL;WORK;FAX:+33 4 76 04 26 99 ADR;WORK:;;80 Alée Saint Exupéry;MONTBONNOT SAINT-MARTIN;Isere;38330;FRANCE LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:80 Al=E9e Saint Exup=E9ry=0D=0AMONTBONNOT SAINT-MARTIN, Isere 38330=0D=0AFRA= NCE EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMAIL;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMAIL;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20010430T112542Z END:VCARD
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
On 3 October 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi. This actually works, thank you ! If you are talking about my patches I sent the list, then a] This work around is for all modems. It uses modem memory for reception of SMSs and uses direct SMS sending to send SMSs. It tends to be more reliable. b] Andreas Fink has written the AT2 driver which uses SMS version two and has a few advantages because of that. I suggest he re-writes the list on how to set up that driver so we can all help debug it with him. c] I will have new patches as of tomorrow which fix a few more bugs and yeild the original AT driver even better then my last patches. The only way to loose SMSs is by sending and failing to send 4 times, as per the RETRIES variable, set in the smsc_at.c file. d] I require a nominee before I can patch the CVS tree ... would you / someone mind nominating me ? e] The new patches will stop the kannel log from growing when there are no incvoming / outgoing SMSs ... this was originally for debugging. > (The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of > 'problem with receiving device' message). > > They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though. > > But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed > because of a problem with falcom, or is it temporary because > something else needs to be fixed ? >I don't see a performance problem in polling a gsm_modem > (it doesn't get messages that quick anyway), but > I wish the kannel.log didn't grow when there is no traffic... > > Also, I'm still curious about the return codes... > -- Matt Common computer data descriptions bitlicknibble byte
Re: HTTP SMSC
Hi List, it seems that my push setup does not fit in the userguide - it is about more genaral things. It has following components: PI ---> PPG ---> SENDSMS --->SPOOLER--->CONTENT GATEWAY So PPG does not speak even with a content gateway. This is because it was decided that push messages must go through the spooler. To make this work, I only needed to configure a http smsc with send-url=sendsms-url. This sendsms script is the same I used for testing the phones. (I send a manually written tokenized SI document as data message using this service.) So the jump to a full push is really small. Another thing: When I said that PPG works only with HTTP SMSC, I meant that I have tested only HTPP SMSC. There is no reason why other SMSCs should not work, though it is probably better to start testing with a SMSC simulation. Aarno - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:10 PM Subject: Re: HTTP SMSC > > > When I call > > > > > > $ ./text_ppg -H http://localhost:8080/cgi-bin/wap-push.cgi > > > > > > I get push failed. > > > > You missed password and username > > ??? > > > I will commit one today (it is part of the userguide). > > great! I realy need something to cut-and-paste for this :)) -- sorry. > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > Wapme Systems AG > > Münsterstr. 248 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > --- > wapme.net - wherever you are >
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Matt, I would like you to patch the at code and let at2 code from Andreas Fink. By the way maybe someone won't agree with this, but having an at3 is not so good. Anybody using at currently has any comments? Andrea
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Why is it that bad to have at3 ? Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. Thanks.
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Ok then Matt, at3 seems the best solution. Andrea - Original Message - From: "Alexei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:40 AM Subject: Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC? > Why is it that bad to have at3 ? > Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my > Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. > I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. > I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. > Thanks. > > >
Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?
> Ok, if you got this problem then you most probably dont connect to a > CMG SMSC but something emulating it or a CMG with an old release. > > The thing it does in this line is reading the timestamp information > out which the SMSC gives back on a request. Apparently yours is empty > or such. In my case this is something like > timestampinformation:phonenumber and the code separates it to keep > track of it. Of course if you get nothing back, its clear that > delivery reports cant work for you. and what about the failed assertions that crash smsbox and then bearerbox after one SMS has been processed over emi2? This is definitly some kind of buggy. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?
> > Ok, if you got this problem then you most probably dont connect to a >> CMG SMSC but something emulating it or a CMG with an old release. >> >> The thing it does in this line is reading the timestamp information >> out which the SMSC gives back on a request. Apparently yours is empty >> or such. In my case this is something like >> timestampinformation:phonenumber and the code separates it to keep >> track of it. Of course if you get nothing back, its clear that >> delivery reports cant work for you. > >and what about the failed assertions that crash smsbox and then >bearerbox after >one SMS has been processed over emi2? > >This is definitly some kind of buggy. > >Stipe I've never seen a crash in smsbox because of this. SMSbox is unchanged as far as DLR's are concerned. If you got an assert, in your case, thats normal because your EMI reply is not what bearerbox would expect. Of course this should be fixed and is relatively easy to fix. But it also means that in your case DLR's will not work because no timestamp imformation is given back from the SMSC. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting -- Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com -- Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
On 3 October 2001, Alexei wrote: > Why is it that bad to have at3 ? > Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my > Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. > I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. > I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. > Thanks. Quite frankly, the current AT module is so buggy it is not even worth thinking about using. I believe that if people want an AT module which works in a similar way to the original but works, then they should switch to the AT2 module it was alot more reliable then the original AT module and that was weeks ago - by now it must be even better ! Tomorrow I am going to send out my latest patches which will alter the smsc_at.c and smsc_p.h files. -- Matt Common computer data descriptions bitlicknibble byte
OT-ringtone title
I found an applet which does some conversion between rttl and hex dump. Here is an example: Barbie girl:d=4,o=5,b=125:8g#,8e,8g#,8c#6,a,p,8f#,8d#,8f#,8b,g#,8f#,8e,p,8e,8c#,f#, c#,p,8f#,8e,g#,f# becomes 024A3A615185AD953DB9359404008A9902EC2EC2EC26C41061C610624AB0 830AB0830AB0CB0CB0D30E30D30D30D30AB08309B0830BB0830BB0830BB0 AB0AB0BB0AB0BB0BB0BB09B1041871841892AC20C2AC20C2AC32C32C34C3 8C34C34C34C2AC20C26C20C2EC20C2EC20C2EC2AC2AC4000 By the way there isn't the song title in this hex dump. So, anyone knows hot to convert from rttl to hex with title included? Thanks Andrea Viscovich
moving from 1.0.3 -> 1.1.5
Have anyone upgraded from 1.0.3 to 1.1.5? Interesting parts are CIMD2, EMI-IP (EMI2) and SMPP, changes, and stuff that can ruin the daily work for me :) -- Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NoName4Us AB "While money can't buy happiness, it certainly lets you choose your own form of misery."
RE: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
I'm still using the AT module (with a nokiaphone) because I have the following problem when I want to send an operator logo with the AT2 module : My logo is divided into 2 sms. The first one is sent correctly but the second always fails (status FAILED in the logs). With the AT module, it's working fine... I have no idea where it could come fom. Eric Guivarch -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Matt Flax Envoye : mercredi 3 octobre 2001 14:47 A : Alexei Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC? On 3 October 2001, Alexei wrote: > Why is it that bad to have at3 ? > Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my > Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. > I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. > I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. > Thanks. Quite frankly, the current AT module is so buggy it is not even worth thinking about using. I believe that if people want an AT module which works in a similar way to the original but works, then they should switch to the AT2 module it was alot more reliable then the original AT module and that was weeks ago - by now it must be even better ! Tomorrow I am going to send out my latest patches which will alter the smsc_at.c and smsc_p.h files. -- Matt Common computer data descriptions bitlicknibble byte
AT module patches
I have some patches here for the latest CVS release. Use them like so : a] Download and unzip the latest CVS release. b] Patch from the 'gateway' directory c] Compile d] Execute AT module with the same configuration Stress testers - feedback please -- Matt Common computer data descriptions bitlicknibble byte patch.smsc_at.bz2 patch.smsc_p.bz2
