Re: Patch for CPA functionality
Hi, first of all: what in hell is CPA??? after short review, I would say, this stuff should go into smsc_http.c. In addition some parts are not done (e.g. smsc_shutdown , this function is responsible for freeing all used memory by the smsc module , that means here is the memory leak!)... Have you tried to implement this stuff within smsc_http? If yes, please explain why this stuff doesn't fit into smsc_http? Thanks in advance! On Wednesday 14 January 2004 05:11, Phuah Yee Keat wrote: Hi, The patch is based on snapshot version 20031105. So tell me what do I need to do in order to get the patch committed? Updated User manual? Sample configuration files? Cheers, Phuah Yee Keat -- Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.centrium.de msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 98063111 ___ Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Re: Patch for CPA functionality
Hi, first of all: what in hell is CPA??? I think if you guys have heard of CPA, I wouldn't need to write one! :-) CPA is another protocol that is used by one of the local telcos over here, the reference website is at http://cpa.digi.com.my/ http://cpa.digi.com.my/Forum.jsp (this have some pdfs on where this is used) But seemed that the specs is proprietary, I wonder if there will be any problems if I release the specs out over here. after short review, I would say, this stuff should go into smsc_http.c. In addition some parts are not done (e.g. smsc_shutdown , this function is responsible for freeing all used memory by the smsc module , that means here is the memory leak!)... The codes are a quick hack because I need it here. Sad to say I don't quite understand a lot of internal stuffs of kannel myself. And I send the patch to the mailing list hoping that someone might clean it up for me (which I think might not happen!). I will certainly look into the smsc_shutdown function! Have you tried to implement this stuff within smsc_http? If yes, please explain why this stuff doesn't fit into smsc_http? Ok, I started off hacking smsc_http.c actually, hoping just to extend it and do not touch its core functions, so I tried to just code the 3 functions: 1. cpa_send_sms 2. cpa_receive_sms 3. cpa_parse_reply But it have not been long before I realized that CPA need something extra, login and session. Well, basically, for CPA, a session needs to be established, the session goes a bit like this 1. kannel send login request 2. telco replies login request, if successful, reply a session_timeout, and session_id 3. kannel need to relogin again after session_timeout 4. kannel need to use the session_id to send any MT messages to the telco. Found myself hacking the core functionalities in http_smsc so much that it might just break kannel_http, brunet_http and xidirs_http functions. So I just whacked up my own smsc_cpa.c and pray that it is going to be integrated coz I am lazy to manage the patches and kannel's daily snapshot. Cheers, Phuah Yee Keat
Re: How to reply just to the List?
Not for me! :( I always receive duplicates when you guys reply all. Alexander Malysh wrote: On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:48, Phuah Yee Keat wrote: Hi, This is non kannel related. How do I just reply to the list? Coz when I click on the Reply buttton, I will just reply to the sender of the post. If I click on Reply all, I will need to delete the sender's name from the To: list, is there a easy way to just reply to the list? just click on Reply all and Mailman will handle this gracefully ;) (means, sender will receive email only once) I am using ThunderBird on Windows FYI. Cheers, Phuah Yee Keat
[OT] RE: How to reply just to the List?
if kannel list moderator can set ReplyTo: tag to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then good to know that many people have started using Thunderbird. is it still that heavy? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Phuah Yee Keat Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to reply just to the List? Hi, This is non kannel related. How do I just reply to the list? Coz when I click on the Reply buttton, I will just reply to the sender of the post. If I click on Reply all, I will need to delete the sender's name from the To: list, is there a easy way to just reply to the list? I am using ThunderBird on Windows FYI. Cheers, Phuah Yee Keat
Re: [OT] RE: How to reply just to the List?
Yeah, the best is for the ReplyTo: tab to be set to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I know one reason against that is that some posters might not be subscribed to the list. Not sure about what's the case here though. Thunderbird is very light. Started using it, coz nobody starts to write worms that target thunderbird yet! :-) Cheers. Navjot Singh wrote: if kannel list moderator can set ReplyTo: tag to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then good to know that many people have started using Thunderbird. is it still that heavy?
Re: How to reply just to the List?
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 11:48, skrev Phuah Yee Keat: Hi, This is non kannel related. How do I just reply to the list? Coz when I click on the Reply buttton, I will just reply to the sender of the post. If I click on Reply all, I will need to delete the sender's name from the To: list, is there a easy way to just reply to the list? I am using ThunderBird on Windows FYI. Cheers, Phuah Yee Keat Perhaps you can configure Thunderbirds toolbar to add a button for 'Reply to list'? I have such a button in my Kmail (KDE beta 2) that I use for lists. -- Med vennlig hilsen, Eurobate ASA Arne K. Haaje Senior Network Engineer Eurobate ASA - Postboks 4589 Nydalen - 0404 Oslo - Norway Phone: +47 23 22 73 73 - Fax: +47 23 22 73 74 - Mob: +47 92 88 44 66 http://www.eurobate.com/
UCP 50
Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol? -- Med vennlig hilsen, Eurobate ASA Arne K. Haaje Senior Network Engineer Eurobate ASA - Postboks 4589 Nydalen - 0404 Oslo - Norway Phone: +47 23 22 73 73 - Fax: +47 23 22 73 74 - Mob: +47 92 88 44 66 http://www.eurobate.com/
Re: UCP 50
Arne K. Haaje schrieb: Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol? yes, this is one operation mode of EMI/UCP. Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wapme-systems.de/ --- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2 nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H g2HyLAEKQIp30Q== =aYCI -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Re: [PATCH] merging of smsc_at
as no objections were there, commited to cvs. On Monday 12 January 2004 15:08, Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi all, attached you can find patch that adds 2 new options for smsc_at: max-error-count and reset-string. For description of those see userguide changes inside of the patch. This patch adds also properly device reconnections and some fixes here and there. P.S. This patch was generated based on smsc_at from centrium tree and is used since at least 3 months w/o any problems. Comments and votes please! doc/userguide/userguide.xml | 16 16 +0 - 0 ! gw/smsc/smsc_at.c | 105 79 +26 -0 ! gw/smsc/smsc_at.h |4 3 + 1 - 0 ! gwlib/cfg.def |2 2 + 0 - 0 ! 4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) -- Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.centrium.de msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 98063111 ___ Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Re: UCP 50
Arne K. Haaje wrote: Yes, I know - but that is what they are using.. To send an SMS you craft a packet then send it over HTTPS. I am okay with the encryption for the transport, but why use HTTP (S). Why not just connect to a SMSC that speak the protocol natively? There is also the issue of 1 SMS/sec they have. Wonder what they do with votes etc. from a TV program... Telia has always been a bit strange.. which means you have to pass the UCP string via HTTP GET/POST over HTTPS to them? ... what kind of perversion is this?! I guess they use HTTPS for getting the security purpose done?! Seems they never heard of stunnel (for SSL-enabling TCP server-client applications) or of VPNs. I wouldn't call this strange, but perverted. So if it is that way, then: no, Kannel does not support this. ;) You'll be on your own to get either: a) implement the UCP string encapsulation into gw/smsc/smsc_http.c for a special 'telia' type. b) tell them to give you a native UCP account and use SSL tunnel or VPN for security. Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wapme-systems.de/ --- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2 nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H g2HyLAEKQIp30Q== =aYCI -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Re: UCP 50
onsdag 14. januar 2004, 22:02, skrev Stipe Tolj: Arne K. Haaje wrote: Yes, I know - but that is what they are using.. To send an SMS you craft a packet then send it over HTTPS. I am okay with the encryption for the transport, but why use HTTP (S). Why not just connect to a SMSC that speak the protocol natively? There is also the issue of 1 SMS/sec they have. Wonder what they do with votes etc. from a TV program... Telia has always been a bit strange.. which means you have to pass the UCP string via HTTP GET/POST over HTTPS to them? ... what kind of perversion is this?! I guess they use HTTPS for getting the security purpose done?! Seems they never heard of stunnel (for SSL-enabling TCP server-client applications) or of VPNs. I wouldn't call this strange, but perverted. So if it is that way, then: no, Kannel does not support this. ;) You'll be on your own to get either: a) implement the UCP string encapsulation into gw/smsc/smsc_http.c for a special 'telia' type. I might look at this when I have the time, but riht now I need this yesterday ;-). I think I have (avery proprietary) fallback.. :-( b) tell them to give you a native UCP account and use SSL tunnel or VPN for security. I will do that, but I wont hold my breath.. BTW. If I get such an account, can I then use Kannel with the emi module if I compile it with OpenSSL? -- Med vennlig hilsen, Eurobate ASA Arne K. Haaje Senior Network Engineer Eurobate ASA - Postboks 4589 Nydalen - 0404 Oslo - Norway Phone: +47 23 22 73 73 - Fax: +47 23 22 73 74 - Mob: +47 92 88 44 66 http://www.eurobate.com/
Re: UCP 50
Paul Keogh wrote: which means you have to pass the UCP string via HTTP GET/POST over HTTPS to them? ... what kind of perversion is this?! I guess they use HTTPS for getting the security purpose done?! Seems they never heard of stunnel (for SSL-enabling TCP server-client applications) or of VPNs. I wouldn't call this strange, but perverted. rant I am getting really tired of all these operator interfaces !!! Its only the middle of January and already I've implemented yet another NDA'd, XML/HTTP proprietary transaction model for yet another operator, designed by yet another consultant which is just yet another variant on all the other XML/HTTP interfaces out there. Sure, you can share functions etc. but it still needs to documented, tested, maintained, regressed etc. And guess what - it sits in front of a stable, tried and tested SMPP SMSC !. Its so stupid. I hope the Microsoft/Vodafone mobile web services thing stomps all over these guys. /rant welcome to the club ;) I might look at this when I have the time, but riht now I need this yesterday ;-). I think I have (avery proprietary) fallback.. :-( b) tell them to give you a native UCP account and use SSL tunnel or VPN for security. IPSEC VPNs make the most sense IMHO... +1 I will do that, but I wont hold my breath.. BTW. If I get such an account, can I then use Kannel with the emi module if I compile it with OpenSSL? You'll need to modify the EMI code to use the SSL I/O functions I'd guess. But the mechanisms that Stipe is suggesting in b) don't need any code changes, just configuration on your box. You could also use ssh/ssh2 to do encrypted tunnelling (at least I can do this with VNC, so it should work for other TCP applications). yep, Paul is right. Forgot to mention this. Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wapme-systems.de/ --- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2 nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H g2HyLAEKQIp30Q== =aYCI -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
add new protocol for china unicom SGIP
I want to add to kannel new protocol about china unicom SGIP. I learn SMPP protocol code. I want to get some help,How to add new protocol surportted for kannel. where do I get document from? == [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.126.com25M;! 2,000,00050M!
Kannel WAP
Hi Stipe and all Is upgrading Kannel WAP from WAP 1.2 to 2.0 in progress? Or any plan of when it can be released? If the plan has not started, when is it going to start? Please let me know the status coz I wish to take part if I could. James
