[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 28 April 2008 19:39, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps 
upstream? 
> > Anyone got one?
> 
> I assume I'm not the only Freenet user who shares a 256kbps link with 
> several flatmates...

In which case you can set it to 128k (12K/sec limit), or "lower bandwidth" 
(8K/sec limit). Or reconfigure it post install.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Michael Rogers 
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? 
> Anyone got one?

I assume I'm not the only Freenet user who shares a 256kbps link with 
several flatmates...

Cheers,
Michael

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Florent Daignière 
* Matthew Toseland  [2008-04-28 17:08:15]:

> On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * toad at freenetproject.org  [2008-04-28 
> > 14:28:50]:
> > 
> > > Author: toad
> > > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
> > > New Revision: 19582
> > > 
> > > Modified:
> > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java
> > > Log:
> > > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps.
> > > 
> > 
> > Huh ?
> > 
> > What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ?
> > 
> > That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing
> > experience of users using a slower link!
> 
> And significantly increase performance for users using at least a 256kbps 
> link. Optimise the common case! However, we should probably reduce the actual 
> limits to half the specified upload speed, i.e. from 24 to 16 for 256kbps.
> 

How so? Last time I checked my node didn't use even a quarter of the
alloted bandwidth

> Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? 
> Anyone got one?

I had one for years; my parents still have one iirc
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Florent Daignière 
* toad at freenetproject.org  [2008-04-28 14:28:50]:

> Author: toad
> Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
> New Revision: 19582
> 
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java
> Log:
> Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps.
> 

Huh ?

What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ?

That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing
experience of users using a slower link!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * toad at freenetproject.org  [2008-04-28 
> 14:28:50]:
> 
> > Author: toad
> > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
> > New Revision: 19582
> > 
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java
> > Log:
> > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps.
> > 
> 
> Huh ?
> 
> What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ?
> 
> That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing
> experience of users using a slower link!

And significantly increase performance for users using at least a 256kbps 
link. Optimise the common case! However, we should probably reduce the actual 
limits to half the specified upload speed, i.e. from 24 to 16 for 256kbps.

Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? 
Anyone got one?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 28 April 2008 19:39, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps 
upstream? 
> > Anyone got one?
> 
> I assume I'm not the only Freenet user who shares a 256kbps link with 
> several flatmates...

In which case you can set it to 128k (12K/sec limit), or "lower bandwidth" 
(8K/sec limit). Or reconfigure it post install.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael


pgpJhWZPjOS9b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Michael Rogers 
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? 
> Anyone got one?

I assume I'm not the only Freenet user who shares a 256kbps link with 
several flatmates...

Cheers,
Michael
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Florent Daignière 
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-28 17:08:15]:

> On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-28 14:28:50]:
> > 
> > > Author: toad
> > > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
> > > New Revision: 19582
> > > 
> > > Modified:
> > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java
> > > Log:
> > > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps.
> > > 
> > 
> > Huh ?
> > 
> > What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ?
> > 
> > That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing
> > experience of users using a slower link!
> 
> And significantly increase performance for users using at least a 256kbps 
> link. Optimise the common case! However, we should probably reduce the actual 
> limits to half the specified upload speed, i.e. from 24 to 16 for 256kbps.
> 

How so? Last time I checked my node didn't use even a quarter of the
alloted bandwidth

> Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? 
> Anyone got one?

I had one for years; my parents still have one iirc


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daignière wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-28 14:28:50]:
> 
> > Author: toad
> > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
> > New Revision: 19582
> > 
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java
> > Log:
> > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps.
> > 
> 
> Huh ?
> 
> What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ?
> 
> That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing
> experience of users using a slower link!

And significantly increase performance for users using at least a 256kbps 
link. Optimise the common case! However, we should probably reduce the actual 
limits to half the specified upload speed, i.e. from 24 to 16 for 256kbps.

Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? 
Anyone got one?


pgp1hd4DE6Ftq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

2008-04-28 Thread Florent Daignière 
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-28 14:28:50]:

> Author: toad
> Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
> New Revision: 19582
> 
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java
> Log:
> Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps.
> 

Huh ?

What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ?

That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing
experience of users using a slower link!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl