[digitalradio] testers needed

2007-09-02 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I have run a few local tests of an software application, now I am
looking for a couple of HF contacts.  It involves PSK (63, 125, 250)
with ARQ.  It will require using a Linux boot CD, simply put the CD in
a windows CD-rom , boot it.

If interested, email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The software is not
for general release yet.

Andy K3UK


[digitalradio] Re: PC Monitors for ham use?

2007-09-02 Thread Brian A
Rick,

I am really bothered by loosing still more lines of text with these
wide screen beasties.   The present OS's are like Stephen Kings
Langoliers.   They eat away at available screen real estate.

Any way to turn them 90 degrees and also rotate the windows display
screen so that a full page can be displayed?   

Brian/K3KO

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have seen some multi screen shacks. In fact, I think one ham has 5 
 screens for various functions, some of which are dual screens with one 
 computer. My idea was to keep things a bit simpler so I wanted only one 
 screen that was at the right distance for my limited eyesight 
 accommodation. In fact, I have some computer glasses which have a 
 large upper area set to the screen distance and the lower for reading 
 distance. It makes a huge difference for me compared to trying to see 
 the screen with the center of my trifocals. Progressive lenses have a 
 very small sweet spot for a given distance so I have not gone that
route 
 either.
 
 My 22 Samsung 225BW works well with either Windows XP or Vista as long 
 as you insure that the screen is connected to and turned on when you 
 boot up the computer as it has to detect and set the screen parameters. 
 Otherwise, it can look as bad as it does with Linux OS and that is 
 completely unacceptable to me.
 
 Other advantages of a large widescreen is the ability to play
widescreen 
 movies to match the screen size (larger) and it makes it easier to
bring 


 up two documents you are working between and drag and drop as needed. 
 The one downside is that you don't necessarily have more real estate to 
 work with, it is just wider and because of that, you make not see as 
 many lines of text in a document as you would with a 4:3 monitor. As
you 
 probably have noticed, almost all the monitors sold now are widescreen. 
 Same trend with notebook computers.
 
 73,
 
 Rick, KV9U
 
 
 Andrew O'Brien wrote:
  Any thoughts on a wide screen PC monitor versus a standard screen? 
  I'm thinking of adding a 21 inch wide screen.
 
  Andy K3UK
 





Re: [digitalradio] PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Robert Thompson
One reason there isn't a windows version is that PSKMail is leveraging a lot
of already available bits of Linux infrastructure. To port it to windows
would require either porting most of those pieces to windows yourself (time
consuming), using pre-ported bits where possible (flaky, as they were only
ported well enough to fulfill someone else's specific needs), or writing
bridge code to adapt to similar windows services where possible and writing
the missing pieces from scratch.


Re: [digitalradio] Re: PC Monitors for ham use?

2007-09-02 Thread Rick
Hi Brian,

If you are using a large size monitor, you won't really lose a lot of 
text since the monitor screen real estate is physically larger than many 
of the smaller 4:3 monitors. Compare a 19 4:3 running at 1280x1024, to 
a 22 wide screen 16:9 which typically runs 1680x1050. Your vertical is 
still larger than the previous monitor although I think there could be a 
smaller size pixel. Of course, one thing you can not do with LCD 
monitors is make the fonts larger by using a smaller resolution like we 
did with CRT monitors. And the operating system drivers must be able to 
handle the widescreen monitor. This should be no problem with MS 
products but my experience with Linux has been very disappointing.

[As I side note, the latest 7.10 Kubuntu, Tribe 4 (or 5?) that I 
downloaded today still does not support the Samsung 205/225 SyncMasters.]

I am thankful that we can use the control - plus and minus keys to 
temporarily adjust font size in many documents as I have difficulty with 
some smaller fonts.

Some monitors are intended to rotate sideways and you could use them to 
view a full document, however, I wonder if the 22 size monitors would 
be excessively large unless you wanted to see the entire page larger 
than lifesize?  The real estate on my 22 monitor is 11 3/4 high and 18 
1/2 inches wide. This enables me to place two pages side by side at 
almost full size and view most of both pages. I wish this had been 
available in the past when I used to be a consultant who did a fair 
amount of document development and needed to compare docs and cut and 
paste, etc.

73,

Rick, KV9U



Brian A wrote:
 Rick,

 I am really bothered by loosing still more lines of text with these
 wide screen beasties.   The present OS's are like Stephen Kings
 Langoliers.   They eat away at available screen real estate.

 Any way to turn them 90 degrees and also rotate the windows display
 screen so that a full page can be displayed?   

 Brian/K3KO

   


Re: [digitalradio] PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
1. Stick CD into computer
2. Reboot

How much simpler can it get?
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 4:19 pm, Rick wrote:
 I try to keep in mind that when I am looking at new technology 
 solutions
 that can be used for emergency communications, it has to be as simple 
 as
 possible and is used by many others so that we can interoperate.



[digitalradio] Re: PC Monitors for ham use?

2007-09-02 Thread Brian A
Rick,

Tnx info.

Large than life size is good.  Bifocals are bad.  Computer glasses
are always lost.  Given the demographics of our society, such a
larger than life full page display would be welcome by many.

73 de Brian/K3KO

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Brian,
 
 If you are using a large size monitor, you won't really lose a lot of 
 text since the monitor screen real estate is physically larger than
many 
 of the smaller 4:3 monitors. Compare a 19 4:3 running at 1280x1024, to 
 a 22 wide screen 16:9 which typically runs 1680x1050. Your vertical is 
 still larger than the previous monitor although I think there could
be a 
 smaller size pixel. Of course, one thing you can not do with LCD 
 monitors is make the fonts larger by using a smaller resolution like we 
 did with CRT monitors. And the operating system drivers must be able to 
 handle the widescreen monitor. This should be no problem with MS 
 products but my experience with Linux has been very disappointing.
 
 [As I side note, the latest 7.10 Kubuntu, Tribe 4 (or 5?) that I 
 downloaded today still does not support the Samsung 205/225
SyncMasters.]
 
 I am thankful that we can use the control - plus and minus keys to 
 temporarily adjust font size in many documents as I have difficulty
with 
 some smaller fonts.
 
 Some monitors are intended to rotate sideways and you could use them to 
 view a full document, however, I wonder if the 22 size monitors would 
 be excessively large unless you wanted to see the entire page larger 
 than lifesize?  The real estate on my 22 monitor is 11 3/4 high
and 18 
 1/2 inches wide. This enables me to place two pages side by side at 
 almost full size and view most of both pages. I wish this had been 
 available in the past when I used to be a consultant who did a fair 
 amount of document development and needed to compare docs and cut and 
 paste, etc.
 
 73,
 
 Rick, KV9U
 
 
 
 Brian A wrote:
  Rick,
 
  I am really bothered by loosing still more lines of text with these
  wide screen beasties.   The present OS's are like Stephen Kings
  Langoliers.   They eat away at available screen real estate.
 
  Any way to turn them 90 degrees and also rotate the windows display
  screen so that a full page can be displayed?   
 
  Brian/K3KO
 
 





[digitalradio] Linux amd PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Andrew O'Brien
On 9/2/07, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 1. Stick CD into computer
  2. Reboot

  How much simpler can it get?


I have found it  to be that simple with FL-DIGI but Rick and others
have run in to conflicts with video cards or soundcards.  It is not
always as simple as I have found.

Andy K3UK


[digitalradio] Re: Linux amd PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Additionally, some digital mode intefaces that use virtual serial
ports require drivers that do not support Linux, thus rig control is
not always possible.

Andy K3UK


On 9/3/07, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 9/2/07, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

 
  1. Stick CD into computer
   2. Reboot
 
   How much simpler can it get?
 

 I have found it  to be that simple with FL-DIGI but Rick and others
 have run in to conflicts with video cards or soundcards.  It is not
 always as simple as I have found.

 Andy K3UK



Re: [digitalradio] PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Jose A. Amador

Leigh,

It seems to me that there is still a catch, and is the need, specially 
for lazy people (read it both as lazy and easy to annoy) to store 
permanent parameters somewhere, so between reboots (easy to happen in 
emergency environments at the worst moments) the station does not lose 
its identity and configuration to match its hardware confifguration.

It would be convenient to be able to save paramneters on a floppy, flash 
drive or a folder on a hard drive.

I have not been persistent enough to get on the air with PSKmail myself 
yet, even when gmfsk and fldigi work well here with the PSKmail + 
Mandriva Live CD.

73,

Jose, CO2JA

---

Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:

 1. Stick CD into computer
 2. Reboot
 
 How much simpler can it get?

 On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 4:19 pm, Rick wrote:
 I try to keep in mind that when I am looking at new technology 
 solutions
 that can be used for emergency communications, it has to be as simple 
 as
 possible and is used by many others so that we can interoperate.



__

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


Re: [digitalradio] PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Jose, the latest Puppy ISO with PSKMAIL does that, gives an option to save
to flashdrive , CD, or a partition on the HD.

Andy K3UK


On 9/2/07, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Leigh,

 It seems to me that there is still a catch, and is the need, specially
 for lazy people (read it both as lazy and easy to annoy) to store
 permanent parameters somewhere, so between reboots (easy to happen in
 emergency environments at the worst moments) the station does not lose
 its identity and configuration to match its hardware confifguration.

 It would be convenient to be able to save paramneters on a floppy, flash
 drive or a folder on a hard drive.

 I have not been persistent enough to get on the air with PSKmail myself
 yet, even when gmfsk and fldigi work well here with the PSKmail +
 Mandriva Live CD.

 73,

 Jose, CO2JA

 ---

 Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:

  1. Stick CD into computer
  2. Reboot
 
  How much simpler can it get?

  On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 4:19 pm, Rick wrote:
  I try to keep in mind that when I am looking at new technology
  solutions
  that can be used for emergency communications, it has to be as simple
  as
  possible and is used by many others so that we can interoperate.

 __

 Participe en Universidad 2008.
 11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
 Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
 http://www.universidad2008.cu
  



Re: [digitalradio] PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Rick
I don't plan on tying up one computer for one mode during an emergency 
event. We just went through a pretty major disaster situation here in SW 
Wisconsin in the past week, with the 1000 year rain event. (Back in 1965 
we had the 100 year event and we thought that was bad).

With the hardened communications infrastructure, for the most part it 
was not a communications emergency, so there would have been no need for 
emergency e-mail, but they did call out ARES/RACES for non 
communications support.

There is a LOT more to operating a communications mode than just turning 
on the computer. And digital communications typically add a great deal 
more complexity to the equation. Consider that we have had two attempts 
to demonstrate Winlink2000 during exercises, but each time something 
went wrong and we could not get it to work via a VHF telpac.

Our local needs are primarily tactical and text digital modes are 
limited in supporting that need. DV might be OK, but that would be 
something to consider maybe a decade or two from now. Maybe much longer.

73,

Rick, KV9U



Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
 1. Stick CD into computer
 2. Reboot

 How much simpler can it get?
 On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 4:19 pm, Rick wrote:
   
 I try to keep in mind that when I am looking at new technology 
 solutions
 that can be used for emergency communications, it has to be as simple 
 as
 possible and is used by many others so that we can interoperate.

 


Re: [digitalradio] PSKMAIL ?

2007-09-02 Thread Jose A. Amador

I don't have it yet, just the Mandriva based one...and it worked so well 
with my PC hardware that I already installed it in one partition. That 
is the way I solved the vanishing configuration problem.

Seems that my LiveCD wish list has been already fulfilled on the Puppy 
version.

73,

Jose, CO2JA

---

Andrew O'Brien wrote:

 Jose, the latest Puppy ISO with PSKMAIL does that, gives an option to 
 save to flashdrive , CD, or a partition on the HD.
 
 Andy K3UK
 


__

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


[digitalradio] Re: A Beginner's Look at Ham Radio's Digital Future with Jeff Reinhart, AA6JR

2007-09-02 Thread expeditionradio
What's the problem, Bruce? 
Under current FCC rules, we can run 100kHz bandwidth data on most HF
bands if we want to.

Bonnie KQ6XA

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If the ARRL wants to start another fire storm push
 that 100 khz wide on 6 and 2 meters stuff again