Re: [digitalradio]my last word(To the Moderators)
To the Moderators, This is my opinion and mine alone. I think that this thread has outlived it usefulness. You have one saying put your money where your mouth is and contester need to have busy dect. Then what is good winlids or packeters. I myself have heard it all before and it hasn't changed. My opinion on certain modes and operations will be noted to the FCC when and if they decide to get involved. I feel that those that want to continue this take it off the group. Again just my opinion as things are starting to get personnel. Kurt --- On Wed, 11/25/09, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote: From: "John Becker, WØJAB" Subject: Re: [digitalradio]my last word To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:50 PM Makes a lot of sense Let me try it this way - if I'm operating with my mark tone on a freq between your mark and space you never bother my QSO. Why is that the every time you hear a tone close to your operating freq it's QRM. It seems to a lot that you just like to complain. At 11:23 AM 11/25/2009, you wrote: >Not making a lot of sense there, John. > > >73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Re: [digitalradio] Disinformation about ALE by N5PVL Re: Getting serious about ALE / LID factor
Wow another rant. I don't care for contesting, but they are not the only QRM on the band. ALE can be, Winlids for sure but wait lets bring up cw and ssb, and of course AM, this is even during a contest. QRM is a way of life, get over it. KT --- On Mon, 11/23/09, expeditionradio wrote: From: expeditionradio Subject: [digitalradio] Disinformation about ALE by N5PVL Re: Getting serious about ALE / LID factor To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 10:23 AM Charles, Your constant efforts to spread disinformation about ALE use in ham radio shows how little you know about how hams are using ALE. If you are really concerned about lids on HF, start with the #1 primary source of QRM: contesters. Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, "Charles Brabham" wrote: > The system was not designed for use on amateur > radio's shared spectrum, and that is why it's use > is not appropriate there.
Re: [digitalradio] Linux Here I come!
I have to agree with using Ubuntu, and 9.10 is out. I upgraded from 9.04 and had no problem. You can also copy it to a disk and run it off that to make sure you like it before you do a hard install. I do wish HRD was available for Linux and I would dump windoze completely. 73 Kurt --- On Sat, 10/31/09, Per wrote: From: Per Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Linux Here I come! To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, October 31, 2009, 2:59 PM I'm using ubuntu 9.10 here now and its great. You can install fldigi through synaptic, fldigi 3.11.4 is on the mirrors. I recommend that you learn about mirrors and synaptic, on ubuntu. The ham radio section is packed. 73 de Per, sm0rwo From: Tim N9PUZ To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com Sent: Sat, October 31, 2009 7:50:44 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Linux Here I come! James French wrote: > I would recommend Ubuntu 9.04 to start with. I have not downloaded it yet but I believe Ubuntu 9.10 was released this past week. Tim, N9PUZ
Re: [digitalradio] New to digital modes? Try this weekend's challenge
I would recommend FeldHell also. KT K8YZK --- On Thu, 10/29/09, Phil Williams wrote: From: Phil Williams Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New to digital modes? Try this weekend's challenge To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 29, 2009, 7:13 PM What? No THOR?! ;-) philw de ka1gmn On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:31 AM, obrienaj wrote: We have had few new people join this group after the QST article on RS ID. Since many of them are NEW to digital modes other than RTTY or PSK31... I thought I would challenge the people who have not ventured away from PSK31 or RTTY to try a task this weekend. Three QSOs in three different modes. To keep is focused, I suggest you choose from these 5 modes Olivia Feld Hell Domninoex MFSK16 MT63 If you have NO clue about these modes, great... just ask and we will get you started. Choose Multipsk, Fldigi, or DM780 as your software and we can help set up.
Re: [digitalradio] Inexpensive digital mode interfaces with LINUX ?
Hi Andy, I have the donner rig and digital interface for my IC-738 but I use XP because my main program is HRD (This is my 6th one). Send Whitey or Carol a message and ask them, I am sure they give you a quick answer. They have great service after the sale, and they are true plug-n-play. 73 Kurt K8YZK --- On Thu, 10/15/09, Andrew O'Brien wrote: From: Andrew O'Brien Subject: [digitalradio] Inexpensive digital mode interfaces with LINUX ? To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 7:51 PM Does anyone know if there are inexpensive digital mdoe interfaces that work under Linux, have a usb conenctor, and provide CAT rig control ? I have a good inertface but it supports Windows only. For some upcoming projects I would like to have one that works under Linux. I was looking at the Donner digital interfaces but it is not clear if they require software that works with Windows or they are multi-platform Andy K3UK
[digitalradio] Re: Computer OS
Hi Simon and thanks to all for the replys from everyone else. Simon I already have 3 other computers running XP(and my main ham computer is using HRD a Great Program), and hear all the good things about Linux/Ubuntu, so I thought I would try a different one on my laptop. As far as XP license key, I still have the recovery disk for the laptop. Now as anyone installed Ubuntu or Linux on a flash drive, and used it that way on another system. I have a 1gig flash drive and thought if I could install it there, I could pop it in/out when I wanted to and still leave XP on the machine. Is it possible? 73 Kurt --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why change? Myself I would add some more RAM if possible and just use it > as-is. The only other OS I would use is Windows 2000. Linux is another > option, you may not find all the software you need though. For Linux I find > Ubuntu very idiot-proof. > > Before you install something make a note of the XP licence key, there are > free utilities for this. > > Simon Brown, HB9DRV > > -- > From: "Kurt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I am looking for another OS to used on a older laptop. > > Laptop is 1ghz,256mgs ram, and a 40gig hd,dvd/cd reader. Right now it > > has XP(came with it)on, and thought I would try something else. >
[digitalradio] Computer OS
I am looking for another OS to used on a older laptop. Laptop is 1ghz,256mgs ram, and a 40gig hd,dvd/cd reader. Right now it has XP(came with it)on, and thought I would try something else. The OS must have the ability to surf the net,email and have some softwareavailable for psk31,rtty,logbook. But the most important is easy to use. Any suggestions? 73 Kurt
[digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Don't know about anyone else, but I am tired of reading the messages between some here, and the bs that is passing back and forth. If you guys want to have a pissing contest, then why not do it with emails to each other, or take it to another forum. Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] JT65A
I finally got the receive part working like it is suppose to, or at least it looks like it. Now it looks like a good mode for quick contest qso's, but other then that can it be used for keyboard-to- keyboard? I myself am looking for something other then hello/goodbye contacts except maybe on 6/2 meters for meteor work. 73 Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Bozo on JT65A
Ok I am one of those bozo's that can't seem to get anything going. I followed the guide and all the settings look right. I see where it is receiving or looks like it is receiving. Question is the receive screen is split into 2 parts. I show the time, etc on the receive part but does not decode, but on the lower part I see the callsign of the transmitting station. Is this right or am I out in left field? 73 Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Re: FCC Announcement
It's done and over with, damn cry babies
Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)
> > > > Unfortunatelly all this name calling and mode bashing (you know, > > > the mode I support is better than yours etc) does not promote > > > digital radio at all. > > > > > > 73 de Demetre SV1UY > > > Ok I hope I have not done any name calling and if so I apologize, it was not done on purpose. I hope I have not said to QRM any station on purpose either, or bashed any mode. I my opinion (and this will be my last entry on this subject), winlink is being shoved as the all to end all for emergency communication, and for those at sea etc. I see it as a QRM generator with no control operator. I believe that the saying if you hear them you can work them, means a winlink station can hear a qso in progress before it transmit if one can hear it. I will work within the reg's to have the FCC at least here in the states curb in the abuse that is going on with winlink/pactor2or3. 73 Kurt K8YZK
Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info)
, > > Unfortunatelly all this name calling and mode bashing (you know, the > mode I support is better than yours etc) does not promote digital > radio at all. > > 73 de Demetre SV1UY I am not bashing any mode, as I use most of them at one time or another, and trying my hand at ALE right now. But I do not go and use a freq without listening and asking if the freq is being used before I start transmitting. This is not so much as a mode bashing as it is to try to get it even across the board. I know here if you purposely start transmitting over a on going QSO, and keep on doing it, you will get a letter from the FCC stating that, it is a no-no, and they will take your license and some money also. Seems though Winlink is exempt from the law let alone common courtesy and practice. Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think that sending messages and relaying messages by amateur radio was ever ment to restrict the content to amateur radio only subject matter. In fact, if you look at the ARL numbers, you will find that most of them are NOT related to amateur radio subject matter. > > 73, > > Walt/K5YFW > Walt I have to agree. While stationed in the military, I did a lot of phone patches/radiograms thru hams while in the states and had nothing to due with ham radio, and of course used mars when overseas. If I remember right you can even order pizza thru your local 2 meter repeater phone patch, but you can not due business over the radio. My main problem with WinLink is that it comes on without knowing if a QSO is in progress on the freq and as others have stated, I have heard them from 14.110 down to 14.070. How much room do they need? Now days with sat's internet and cellphone, if you have enough money to buy a ship to go out into the ocean, how much more to setup a sat cellphone/internet account for surfing the net? Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info
- > I'm afraid that there is no simple solution to the problem of who is working what mode where. But each operator must be diligent to try as best possoble not to QRM another signal on the portion of the band that they are "working." Walt and others this is the problem. We are required to check to make sure the freq is not busy and to not interfer with other communications, if we hear them. Yet WinLink is automatic and never checks before it starts transmitting. So who is at fault the operator in qso on a certain freq, or the automatic station that comes on over the qso in progress. Simple logic would say that the automatic station is wrong, but it seems that FCC/ARRL/IARU if not others, do not care if the automatic station comes on over the stations already in qso. Being this is the digital radio, maybe somewhere down the road a programmer will get a program going that will listen before it transmits, but I guess I will continue to use the computer between my ears to make sure the freq is not busy. Hey it's an old computer but still works great. 73 Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info
> > 3580-3600kHz N.America Freq Coordination Info > > CENTERCHANNEL===COORDINATED ENTITY > FREQ=MODEBANDWIDTH===LOCATION=NOTES > > 3581.5 CW (3581.4-3581.6kHz) ARRL MORSE USA (CT) > 3583.5 P2 (3582.7-3584.3kHz) WLINK2000 NEDERLAND > 3587.0 RY (3586.8-3587.2kHz) ARRL NTS USA > 3587.5 RY (3587.3-3587.7kHz) ARRL NTS USA > 3589.0 P3 (3588.0-3590.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (VA) > 3589.0 P3 (3588.0-3590.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (TX) > 3590.0 P2 (3589.2-3590.8kHz) WLINK2000 USA (WA) > 3590.0 P3 (3589.0-3591.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (WA) > 3590.0 P3 (3589.0-3591.0kHz) WLINK2000 S.AFRICA > 3590.0 P3 (3589.0-3591.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (TN) > 3590.0 P3 (3589.0-3591.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (FL) > 3591.0 P3 (3590.0-3592.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (TN) > 3591.0 P3 (3590.0-3592.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (HI) > 3591.0 P3 (3590.0-3592.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (WA) > 3591.9 P3 (3590.9-3592.9kHz) WLINK2000 GERMANY > 3592.0 P2 (3591.2-3592.8kHz) WLINK2000 USA (WA) > 3593.0 P3 (3592.0-3594.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (MA) > 3593.0 P3 (3592.0-3594.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (FL) > 3593.0 P3 (3592.0-3594.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (MT) > 3593.5 P3 (3592.5-3594.5kHz) WLINK2000 NEDERLAND > 3595.0 P3 (3594.0-3596.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (AK) > 3595.0 P3 (3594.0-3596.0kHz) WLINK2000 USA (LA) > 3595.0 P3 (3594.0-3596.0kHz) WLINK2000 USVI > 3596.0 P3 (3595.0-3597.0kHz) WLINK2000 BELGIUM > 3597.5 RY (3597.2-3597.7kHz) ARRL USA(CT)6pm9pmET > 3597.6 AL (3596.5-3599.0kHz) ALE IARU R2 (24/7) > = > NOTES: > DATE: FEB-2007 > MODE ABBREVIATIONS: > P2=PACTOR2 > P3=PACTOR3 > AL=AUTOMATIC LINK ESTABLISHMENT > RY=RTTY OR OTHER FSK MODES > CW=MORSE PRACTICE QST > Having WLINK2000 shoved down our throats is enough, but to even work it the equipment is expensive. I don't mind that the freq's listed above are the main ones used or even that the ARRL uses theirs for code pratice, but and this is a BIG BUT, they should not be automatic stations, that someone, somewhere should listen before they transmit to see if there are other stations using the freq. There will be someone who says that they might not hear the stations in QSO's and, that is possible, then again they might, and from what I have seen/heard from being in QSO's when these stations come on, they have interfered with my contacts. Remember if you can hear them, you can work them saying. Well if I can hear the wlink, they can hear me. Seem now that everybody is trying to stake out their special freq's. NTS system think they own their special freq's, work all whatever nets have their, and the frequency police will let you know if you get on their's even if they are not being used. A lot of egos involved in this. Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Prop Beacons
Well I have been paying attention to the messages about ALE and the IARU beacons. Well now that there is a RTTY contest going on and I copy signals from 14.073 up to 14.108, but copied one US Ham at 14.09995. So how close is to close and how much protection if any is afforded to the beacons? 73 Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Re: Te-Tec Jupiter
Hi Walt, I use a Jupiter on the digital modes and have had no problem at all other then make sure you change to line in, instead of mic input. I use HRD,MMTTY/SSTV,IZ9BLY Hell/Stream,Multipsk software. I have a Donner interface and connect to accessory jack on the rear of the radio. If you have any specific questions, email me direct and I will see if I can answer them for you. 73 and Gud Luck Kurt K8YZK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is anyone on the list using a Ten-Tec Juliter? > > If so, I would be interested in its performance on sound card digital modes. > > Tnx & 73, > > Walt/K5YFW >
[digitalradio] Linux software
I have a older computer that I am thinking about setting up and using Linux(want to try it). Is there a lot of software for digital modes for linux, I mainly do PSK31,Hell and RTTY. Any help/suggestions would be welcomed. 73 Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Re: US Hams Codeless Feb 23
Unlike any of the other modes, it is a SKILL SET, and not just > something from memory, or which can be picked up in a few minutes of > operatin,such as PSK. > the CW rule (way back in the mid 60s) it was ILLEGAL for any government to > allow any ham who had not demonstrated their SKILL in CW (It did not mention > a code speed)was not to be allowed operations on the HF bands. That was an > international law and no government had the right to go against it in their > own country whether they wanted to or not. CW is like learning a foreign language and not everyone can learn a different language, and if you can some are better then others at it. I memorized the different dots and dashes for the different letters when I learned CW and I know it was not the correct way to do it. As far as using CW to show a skill I disagree, because in the 60's in the old Novice days of 1yr or upgrade, I had hard enough time listening for my call let alone call it a skill, even though I passed the test. I am tired of hearing all the crying and gashing of teeth about the downfall of Amateur Radio because of no more code. The same thing was said in the 50's about bringing in the Novice license, or the advent of Voice. I think that the requirement should have stayed for Extra Class, but the FCC decided that it isn't necessary anymore. Now it is time to get over it, and move on. CW hasn't gone away, it is just not a requirement for HF. There are a lot of great CW group FIST/SKCC/NVARC that still promote CW. Show the no-codes that CW can be fun, just like the other modes. As far as other countries and CW the international law stated CW was required for operation on 30mhz or below, anything about was left up to the country itself. The last WARC they decided that CW was no longer need as a requirement and left it up to the individual country to decide. Kurt K8YZK 20wpm Extra.
[digitalradio] Re: GRUMBLE
Well lets see with me, bad eye sight makes it easier to read. I am a old RTTY operator when there was no such thing as lower case letters on a keyboard (love the smell of oiled paper). Sometimes it is just easier then looking for the shift key. Kurt K8YZK
[digitalradio] Digital Freq's
I have been looking at the different digital modes and then at the different freq's they are on and wondering who decides what digital modes gets to use what freq? I.E. Olivia 500/8 is on 14.076 yet Olivia 1000/16 is on 14.110 or so. Then there is,automatic stations use freq's that are different then keyboard to keyboard for the same mode, or do the originator of the mode and those that use it just jump in and say this looks good lets use it. Just wondering. Kurt Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[digitalradio] Wow
Wow so many Pactor freq's. Maybe I should run out and by a Pactor Controller and WinLink..NOT Seems like the automatic modes are taking over, Pactor, Olivia,ALE, it makes one wonder if there is a agenda going on, and who is getting the cash. Just my views. 73 Kurt WA8VBX Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[digitalradio] Digital Freq's
Ok so this has probably been asked before, but with all the different modes out now, along with the different programs to use them, where can a newbie get a list of freq's that are used. I know about PSK,RTTY,SlowScan, etc but where do the others hangout like MT63,Oliva,Throb,Chip? The list in the files here is from 2002, so it is a little outdated. 73 Kurt WA8VBX Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Re: QOTD
I have been reading the messages, and just have a couple of comments. One is I would like to see a sub-band for the automatic stations, even if it is just a gentleman agreement like the current agreements. Second is if you operate in the subband you have to take the QRM that comes with it, and if it means that a automatic station comes on without checking to see if the freq is busy so be it, you know that in the subband it might happen. Also just because you can hear the automatic station does not mean that it can hear you, so even if does check, doesn't mean it won't start transmitting because it might not have heard you anyway. Just my opinion Kurt WA8VBX Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Veterans Day
To all the veterans in the group THANK YOU, and for all to remember those that gave their lives tomorrow at 11am. Kurt WA8VBX Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Police & fire monitoring
Homeland security says we have to use plain language?, now that is a first to me, as a dispatcher for the last 10yrs for police/fire/rescue, I try to use plain language but still use some of the 10 codes, and yes they might be different in one place then another. 73 Kurt WA8VBX - Original Message - From: "John Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 7:39 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Police & fire monitoring > Homeland security says that all department must be able > to talk to each other in *plain* words. Case in point. > a 10-51 from an officer here means a tow truck is needed > in the next town it means out of service for a meal. > > The in car systems are using UHF and 900M in most cases. > > > > At 06:08 PM 11/9/05, you wrote: > >Seems that more and more police and fire agencies are using computers > >to aid in calls. The urgent calls are sent over the radio by voice > >dispatch and backed up by sending the complaint call via radio to the > >computer in police and fire vehicles. Does any one know what > >frequency band the computer information is sent and software used? I > >suppose one has to log on to the computer server some way, that would > >not allow monitoring of calls of a more mundane nature. Also seems > >that police and fire agencies are using "plain speak" instead of 10 > >codes and other code shortcuts. For instance now instead of "10-4" > >(Acknowledge) they are using "copy". > > > >Jerry - K0HZI > > > > > > > > The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ > More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Re: Digital Net ?
Sounds good to me, I would suggest a band that has nice coverage in the evening/night hours and what I am thinking is 30 meters would probably work. 73 Kurt WA8VBX --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "obrienaj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would be a stupid idea to suggest a digital net? Perhaps now that > the winter months are approaching in the northern hemisphere, we > may have time for such a thing. > > I was thinking about perhaps 3 times per week, a brief 15-30 minute > net. Anyone suggest a band ? Anyone suggest a time > > I was thinking that we could try an Olivia net one night, maybe Chip > on another night, PSK31 the third night. Or maybe a call-up in all > three modes each night? > > I ran a PSK31 net a few years ago, when it was new, and mostly had > just myself as a check-in, so maybe it's still a bad idea. > > Thoughts? > > Andy K3UK > > P.S., of course. I'd love it if we all used ALE and then linked in a > digital mode, but I'm not sure if everyone is ready for that. > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Chip64 and chip128
I see there are some qso's going on 7090, what other freq's are being used for now? 73 Kurt Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Ten Tec Argonauts
Anyone using any of the older Argonauts(505,509 515) on digital modes? Kurt WA8VBX The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Winlink
I might be the bad apple in the group, but I have read enough about winlink. Good Bad or Ugly it is here and will probably be here for a long time. Does it cause QRM YES, does it have it's place in ham radio YES, is it the means to meet all the demands for ARES, Red Cross etc, probably not and as technology changes so will it, and in my opinion only, most likely the same way packet has. So since this is about digital modes other then just winlink, can we just agree to disagree and move on to some other mode, or new mode coming out. 73 Kurt WA8VBX The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Advice to the Winlink team
Howard, I have been paying attention to the different messages on Winlink, some I agree with some I don't, but I did see you mention SCAMP, is this downloadable software? 73 Kurt WA8VBX The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] Careful what you type on PSK31
Now I blame the keyboard, I know what I want to type, but it types what ever it wants.. Kurt - Original Message - From: "Harv Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 7:37 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Careful what you type on PSK31 > > I always blame the birds that roost on my G5RV. > > Harv, AI9NL > > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:30:04 -0500, Paul L Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> S! Don't tell anyone! >> >> Danny Douglas wrote: >> > Forward error correction cannot correct spelling, or mistyping. >> > >> >> >> The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ >> >> http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>> src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" >> width="200" >> style="border:0" alt="Digital Spotter"/> >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor >> >> ADVERTISEMENT >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> To visit your group on the web, go to: >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";> src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" > width="200" style="border:0" alt="Digital Spotter"/> > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" width="200" style="border:0" alt="Digital Spotter"/> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] ARRL website down ?
I haven't been able to get into either. 73 Kurt - Original Message - From: "obrienaj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 12:27 PM Subject: [digitalradio] ARRL website down ? > > > Anyone able to access the ARRL web site today? I've been trying all > morning but never make a connection, I do not receive any error > messages either. > > > > > > > > > The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Discussion Forums at http://www.obriensweb.com > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Discussion Forums at http://www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
