[digitalradio] New Version of Mixw released

2010-09-05 Thread obrienaj
A new version of Mixw has been released , find it at 
http://mysite.verizon.net/jaffejim/index.htm
Andy K3UK




Re: [digitalradio] New Version of Mixw released

2010-09-05 Thread Tony

 On 9/5/2010 9:29 AM, obrienaj wrote:


A new version of Mixw has been released , find it at 
http://mysite.verizon.net/jaffejim/index.htm

Andy K3UK


Andy,

I was hoping to see RSID : (

Tony -K2MO









Re[4]: [digitalradio] New

2010-09-01 Thread Vlad_UA6JD
Hello, Dan.
 Done - please check http://www.qrz.com/db/WD5CND

 We add APRS logo when you will use it

You wrote :
 Never had a page, how does it work and how will I get there? Like to try.
 Dan

 --- On Sat, 8/28/10, Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us wrote:


 From: Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us
 Subject: Re[2]: [digitalradio] New
 To: Dan Walker digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 10:57 PM


   



 Hello, Dan.

 If you like samples - let me know and I will design qrzcom page for
 you with APRS clickable logo in.

 You wrote :
 Thank You,
 Dan

 --- On Sat, 8/28/10, Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us wrote:

 From: Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us
 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New
 To: Dan digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 10:01 PM

   

 Just my two cents worth..

 About QRV APRS .
 I think nobody use it now.
 It possible to add APRS logo to your qrzcom page and when you click
 on it show your position
 You can see sample of use it in the few pages now, for example click
 to:

 http://www.qrz.com/db/k8waw or

 http://www.qrz.com/db/do3nn

 You wrote :
 I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now
 have a GPS unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
 Thank you,
 Dan Walker WD5CND

 Best regards
 73 Vlad UA6JD 
 web design in www.qrz.com
 Sample and download books
 on http://www.qrz.com/db/Ua6jd

 

 Best regards
 73 Vlad UA6JD 
 web design in www.qrz.com
 Sample and download books
 on http://www.qrz.com/db/Ua6jd









   



Best regards
73 Vlad UA6JD 
web design in www.qrz.com
Sample and download books
on http://www.qrz.com/db/Ua6jd



Re: [digitalradio] New

2010-08-29 Thread J. Moen
There's a good introduction to APRS at http://www.wa8lmf.net/bruninga/aprs.html

At the bottom of that page is a link to join the TAPR APRSSIG email list.  It 
is very active and I'd recommend you join.

My other suggestion applies if you would like to have some fun at home right 
off the bat.  Download a copy of UI-View32 from http://www.ui-view.org/

You can start out running this program to watch other position beacons as they 
are reported through RF digipeaters with IGate capability.  That is, you can 
play with APRS reporting from data on the internet even before you hook up your 
PC to your radio.  You can focus on any location you want, world-wide.  My 
first introduction to APRS, years ago, was when a friend took a vacation and 
beaconed the whole trip.  I could watch in near real time as he navigated 
across the US.  

In addition to UI-View32, you can use the findu.com site to lookup APRS info 
directly on the internet.  To focus on your home town of Joplin, MO, using 
findu.com, I looked for APRS activity near your lat/long as reported on qrz.com 
for your callsign:

http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/near.cgi?lat=37.034415lon=-94.509317last=240distance=200n=100rate=1

It shows the activity in your area, and the fact that there's an IGate in 
Joplin.

Next you can connect to your radio and begin to have UI-View32 issue position 
reports from your home QTH.  You can configure UI-View32 with your fixed 
lat/long info and don't need a GPS for that.  Some people who have a home 
weather station that can connect to their PC will use that to have their home 
QTH APRS beacons contain the latest temp, wind, etc.

If it's still fun, I'd consider the other recommendations you've gotten.  As 
Jeff KE7ACY pointed out If you want to send out APRS packets so that others 
can track your movements - all you need is a TinyTrak type device and an HT.  
That can be fun.  One time I was at Dayton for the Hamvention.  I typically 
bring along my HT and a mag mount for the rental car.  Hooked up the gps to the 
HT as I drove around the area.  I'd given my wife the findu.com link to track 
me, and she called me on the cell from back in California and asked why I was 
on the freeway going 8 miles per hour.  I thought that was pretty funny, while 
I sat there in the traffic jam.

As suggested by others, you can go whole hog while mobile and bring along a lap 
or netbook and hook your gps to that, and to the radio.  People do that, but I 
would first try some of the simpler ideas listed above to get started.  Good 
luck.

   Jim - K6JM

  - Original Message - 
  From: Dan 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 5:18 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] New 
  I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now have a GPS 
unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
  Thank you,
  Dan Walker WD5CND



[digitalradio] New

2010-08-28 Thread Dan
I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now have a GPS 
unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
Thank you,
 Dan Walker WD5CND




Re: [digitalradio] New

2010-08-28 Thread Andy obrien
You don't specifically NEED a GPS unit for APRS unless you plan on operating
mobile.

APRS uses VHF, HF, or both.  Which do you plan?  If mobile, most use VHF.. 2
meters.  On HF is is mainly 30M but there is some HF APRS on  20M too.

Most common APRS methods use packet radio.  300 baud packet on HF and 1200
baud packet on 30M  .  There is some APRS using PSK but that is not as
common.

So, to start,  we need to figure out how you intend to generate the packet
tones and decode the received signals .  If mobile , we need to figure out
if you have one of the special radios that has a TNC built in. or are you
going to need one like the small TNC-X (designed by my neighbour a few
blocks away).  Not mobile, you can use a soundcard based application  , like
Multpsk,  to generate the Packet tones in APRS mode.

Many GPS units do not work with ham radio and APRS.  Only the higher-end GPS
units tend to come with data output presented in a manner than can be linked
to a radio.  So don't assume your Tom Tom will do what u want unless it
outputs data via NMEA

So, tell me more about what you have in mind ?

Andy K3UK

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Dan wd5...@yahoo.com wrote:



 I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now have a GPS
 unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
 Thank you,
 Dan Walker WD5CND

  



Re: [digitalradio] New

2010-08-28 Thread Vlad_UA6JD
Just my two cents worth..

About QRV APRS  .
I think nobody use it now.
It possible to add APRS logo to your qrzcom page  and when you click
on it show your position
You can see sample of use it in the few pages now, for example click
to:

http://www.qrz.com/db/k8waw or

http://www.qrz.com/db/do3nn

You wrote :
 I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now
 have a GPS unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
 Thank you,
  Dan Walker WD5CND





Best regards
73 Vlad UA6JD 
web design in www.qrz.com
Sample and download books
on http://www.qrz.com/db/Ua6jd



Re: [digitalradio] New

2010-08-28 Thread Dan Walker
Plan on orerating mobile have Kenwood TH-F6A and my Tom Tom is not the highend 
unit I thought it was. TH-F6A says it has 1200bps modem for VHF. How do I put 
it all togather? Not even sure what I can do with APRS. Been off the air for a 
while.
Dan

--- On Sat, 8/28/10, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:

 
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 7:45 PM


  



You don't specifically NEED a GPS unit for APRS unless you plan on operating 
mobile.  

APRS uses VHF, HF, or both.  Which do you plan?  If mobile, most use VHF.. 2 
meters.  On HF is is mainly 30M but there is some HF APRS on  20M too.  

Most common APRS methods use packet radio.  300 baud packet on HF and 1200 baud 
packet on 30M  .  There is some APRS using PSK but that is not as common.  

So, to start,  we need to figure out how you intend to generate the packet 
tones and decode the received signals .  If mobile , we need to figure out if 
you have one of the special radios that has a TNC built in. or are you going to 
need one like the small TNC-X (designed by my neighbour a few blocks away).  
Not mobile, you can use a soundcard based application  , like Multpsk,  to 
generate the Packet tones in APRS mode. 

Many GPS units do not work with ham radio and APRS.  Only the higher-end GPS 
units tend to come with data output presented in a manner than can be linked to 
a radio.  So don't assume your Tom Tom will do what u want unless it outputs 
data via NMEA

So, tell me more about what you have in mind ?

Andy K3UK


On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Dan wd5...@yahoo.com wrote:


  



I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now have a GPS 
unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
Thank you,
Dan Walker WD5CND











  

Re: [digitalradio] New

2010-08-28 Thread Dan Walker
Thank You,
Dan

--- On Sat, 8/28/10, Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us wrote:


From: Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New
To: Dan digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 10:01 PM


  



Just my two cents worth..

About QRV APRS .
I think nobody use it now.
It possible to add APRS logo to your qrzcom page and when you click
on it show your position
You can see sample of use it in the few pages now, for example click
to:

http://www.qrz.com/db/k8waw or

http://www.qrz.com/db/do3nn

You wrote :
 I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now
 have a GPS unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
 Thank you,
 Dan Walker WD5CND

Best regards
73 Vlad UA6JD 
web design in www.qrz.com
Sample and download books
on http://www.qrz.com/db/Ua6jd









  

Re[2]: [digitalradio] New

2010-08-28 Thread Vlad_UA6JD
Hello, Dan.

 If you like samples - let me know and I will design qrzcom page for
you with APRS clickable logo in.

You wrote :
 Thank You,
 Dan

 --- On Sat, 8/28/10, Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us wrote:


 From: Vlad_UA6JD jt...@mail-on.us
 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New
 To: Dan digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 10:01 PM


   



 Just my two cents worth..

 About QRV APRS .
 I think nobody use it now.
 It possible to add APRS logo to your qrzcom page and when you click
 on it show your position
 You can see sample of use it in the few pages now, for example click
 to:

 http://www.qrz.com/db/k8waw or

 http://www.qrz.com/db/do3nn

 You wrote :
 I would like to try APRS, but have no idea where to start. I now
 have a GPS unit from TomTom. What else do I need and where do I start?
 Thank you,
 Dan Walker WD5CND

 Best regards
 73 Vlad UA6JD 
 web design in www.qrz.com
 Sample and download books
 on http://www.qrz.com/db/Ua6jd









   



Best regards
73 Vlad UA6JD 
web design in www.qrz.com
Sample and download books
on http://www.qrz.com/db/Ua6jd



[digitalradio] New CMSK released

2010-08-22 Thread n0hnj
CMSK version 21.08.10 has been released 
(http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/CMSK/cmsk.htm)

Sound cards separate from Windows default can now be selected.

Anyone wanting to try this mode out please drop me an email. I'll be checking 
periodically today.

73
Dave
KB3MOW




Re: [digitalradio] New CMSK released

2010-08-22 Thread Andy obrien
What are the main frequencies ?

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:35 AM, n0hnj dco...@zitomedia.net wrote:



 CMSK version 21.08.10 has been released (
 http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/CMSK/cmsk.htm)

 Sound cards separate from Windows default can now be selected.

 Anyone wanting to try this mode out please drop me an email. I'll be
 checking periodically today.

 73
 Dave
 KB3MOW

  



RE: [digitalradio] New CMSK released

2010-08-22 Thread Dave 'Doc' Corio
Darned if I know of a set frequency for it, Andy, but given its'
bandwidth, I'd guess we'd be safe just about anywhere in the digital
bandplan as long as we don't park on top of another QSO!

How about 7.078?

73
Dave
KB3MOW

  -Original Message-
  From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Andy obrien
  Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 8:37 AM
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New CMSK released



  What are the main frequencies ?



  On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:35 AM, n0hnj dco...@zitomedia.net wrote:


CMSK version 21.08.10 has been released
(http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/CMSK/cmsk.htm)

Sound cards separate from Windows default can now be selected.

Anyone wanting to try this mode out please drop me an email. I'll be
checking periodically today.

73
Dave
KB3MOW






  


[digitalradio] New guy

2010-08-20 Thread Stephen
Hello all. After being a SWL for several years, a friend willed (he is an SK 
now) to me his Icom 765. I am intrested in getting into the digital modes. 
Being new, I don't even know enough to ask the right questions.

My wife is in the US Navy and we will retire to the country of Panama. I got my 
ticket last Feb. but we moved to Baton Rouge and I have nothing set up (except 
a long wire in the attic). I have had all the gear (IC-765, IC-AT500, IC-2kl 
and its powersupply) back to a guy who rebuilt and referbished to factory 
spect. I have found that if you have a ticket, in Panama, they will give you 
one (of equal rating) so you can operate in their country. 

Is HRD the program to use, or should I start out with somethig that is more 
simple? Do I get an outboard sound card? What cables do I need? Any advice 
will be appreciated.

Steve
KJ4SLK



Re: [digitalradio] New guy

2010-08-20 Thread Andy obrien
Welcome Steve.  Getting started is not too complicated.  HRD is a good
choice.  Your others would be Multipsk,  FLdigi, Digipan or Winwarbler .
All fairly easy to set up.  If you PC has an internal sound card, that is
all you would need.  You can add a second sound card later if you wanted to
do digital modes and listen to other sounds at the same time.  In general
you need a cable that will take the audio received from you radio to the
line-in of your computer soundcard.  Also a cable that takes generated tones
from your PC to the input of you radio.  Most people also like to have the
ability to control the radio via the software, so there is also usually a
connection via a serial or USB port that controls the radio and switches
between transmit and receive.  Many  hams built all this themselves but many
others buy commercial  interfaces.  These interfaces range from very basic
(but effective) interfaces like the Donner cable  that sells for around
$40.00, the Signallink interfaces that is around $120, to the higher end
interfaces with bells and whistles like the Microham or Rigblaster products
that exceed $250.00.  If you want to build your own, Skip Teller's interface
recently outlined in QST magazine can be built easily and inexpensively.


For software, I find the easiest are the products that get you very quick
responses when stuck, and the ones that don't scold you when you don't read
the manual (or have an Einstein brain) .  Winwarbler, Digipan, HRD-DM780,
Multipsk  and FLdigi will all get you quick, patient, responses if you need
help.  Authors of each of these applications are active here

Andy K3UK

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Stephen smyer...@yahoo.com wrote:



 Hello all. After being a SWL for several years, a friend willed (he is an
 SK now) to me his Icom 765. I am intrested in getting into the digital
 modes. Being new, I don't even know enough to ask the right questions.

 My wife is in the US Navy and we will retire to the country of Panama. I
 got my ticket last Feb. but we moved to Baton Rouge and I have nothing set
 up (except a long wire in the attic). I have had all the gear (IC-765,
 IC-AT500, IC-2kl and its powersupply) back to a guy who rebuilt and
 referbished to factory spect. I have found that if you have a ticket, in
 Panama, they will give you one (of equal rating) so you can operate in their
 country.

 Is HRD the program to use, or should I start out with somethig that is more
 simple? Do I get an outboard sound card? What cables do I need? Any advice
 will be appreciated.

 Steve
 KJ4SLK

  



Re: [digitalradio] New guy

2010-08-20 Thread charles standlee
Steve,

Welcome to digital communications... Since you live in Louisiana here are a 
couple of sites that you may want to look at, first the Louisiana section 
website at www.laarrl.org on the right side of the page is a link for digital 
communications and has a 6 or 7 part tutorial on digital communications and 
other technical stuff written in laymens terms, the other is the website for 
the 
Baton Rouge area Ham club www.lsu.edu/brarc. There are a lot of folks in the 
state who can help you out with answers and quite a few in Baton Rouge.

I will help you more off line, I live in the Alexandria area so it may be tough 
for a face to face, unless you come to our Hamfest in October.
 73, Chuck AC5PW 





From: Stephen smyer...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, August 20, 2010 4:13:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] New guy

  
Hello all. After being a SWL for several years, a friend willed (he is an SK 
now) to me his Icom 765. I am intrested in getting into the digital modes. 
Being 
new, I don't even know enough to ask the right questions.

My wife is in the US Navy and we will retire to the country of Panama. I got my 
ticket last Feb. but we moved to Baton Rouge and I have nothing set up (except 
a 
long wire in the attic). I have had all the gear (IC-765, IC-AT500, IC-2kl and 
its powersupply) back to a guy who rebuilt and referbished to factory spect. I 
have found that if you have a ticket, in Panama, they will give you one (of 
equal rating) so you can operate in their country. 


Is HRD the program to use, or should I start out with somethig that is more 
simple? Do I get an outboard sound card? What cables do I need? Any advice 
will be appreciated.

Steve
KJ4SLK





  

RE: [digitalradio] New guy

2010-08-20 Thread Rick Westerfield
Hello Stephen,

 

   There are a few of us into digital modes here in Louisiana. Just hit us up 
for a sked here on this reflector if you want to try something new.  We are 
here to help.

 

Rick

Bossier City, LA

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of charles standlee
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 5:28 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New guy

 

  

Steve,

 

Welcome to digital communications... Since you live in Louisiana here are a 
couple of sites that you may want to look at, first the Louisiana section 
website at www.laarrl.org on the right side of the page is a link for digital 
communications and has a 6 or 7 part tutorial on digital communications and 
other technical stuff written in laymens terms, the other is the website for 
the Baton Rouge area Ham club www.lsu.edu/brarc. There are a lot of folks in 
the state who can help you out with answers and quite a few in Baton Rouge.

 

I will help you more off line, I live in the Alexandria area so it may be tough 
for a face to face, unless you come to our Hamfest in October.
 

73, Chuck AC5PW 

 

 

  _  

From: Stephen smyer...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, August 20, 2010 4:13:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] New guy

  

Hello all. After being a SWL for several years, a friend willed (he is an SK 
now) to me his Icom 765. I am intrested in getting into the digital modes. 
Being new, I don't even know enough to ask the right questions.

My wife is in the US Navy and we will retire to the country of Panama. I got my 
ticket last Feb. but we moved to Baton Rouge and I have nothing set up (except 
a long wire in the attic). I have had all the gear (IC-765, IC-AT500, IC-2kl 
and its powersupply) back to a guy who rebuilt and referbished to factory 
spect. I have found that if you have a ticket, in Panama, they will give you 
one (of equal rating) so you can operate in their country. 

Is HRD the program to use, or should I start out with somethig that is more 
simple? Do I get an outboard sound card? What cables do I need? Any advice 
will be appreciated.

Steve
KJ4SLK

 





RE: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-16 Thread Greg DeChant
Just picked this up from HamSpots:

 

Due to increased abuse of the Cluster Network by spam auto-spots generated
by the ROS software. 
HamSpots will no longer provide a Local Spot  Chat facility for the
promotion of the ROS mode. 
HamSpots will no longer report a consolidated view of ROS Cluster spots. 
All ROS Cluster spots have been removed from other HamSpots pages. 

Effective: 16-July-2010, 2100utc

 

Wonder what this software is really up to?

 

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of W2XJ
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:36 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question

 

  

Andy

You make a lot more sense than some of the children in this group who want
to just whine to the FCC and ARRL.


On 7/15/10 6:15 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:


 
 
   

The comment in parenthesis in number 8 are the comments that reflect my view
of why this fine software and mode are not worth the hassle.

Andy K3UK



On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jim, N1SZ n...@japierson.com wrote:

  
 
 
   

Dave  All,
 
No, I was thinking the same thing.  Let's take a look at some significant
red flags with the ROS software:
 
1.)Special code added in apparent anger to keep critics from using the
software (although reportedly removed in recent versions)

2.)Won't make the source code open for public inspection (not that it is
100% required, but it would allay a lot of concerns about the software)

3.)Requires Gmail e-mail account and password - (giving such things away
would make any IT security professional lose their mind). is this still the
case?

4.)PDF literature provided by Jose had PDF file signatures and Authored
by signature of another well know digital mode author in Jose's  own
work... I wonder how that happened?

5.)Automatically sends messages to a hard coded list of servers. and
possibly other places?

6.)Apparently sends bogus callsigns and spots to various reflectors

7.)Gives users little if any control over the software's spotting to the
internet

8.)Now, after going away for a short time, has a new version that if
you try and defeat the automatic spotting with a firewall, it automatically
shuts down. (Sounds like a child's temper tantrum to me.)

 
Well, I've make it known that I've been suspicious of Jose's intentions all
along, but if this all seems Normal to you and doesn't bother you.. I say
good luck and press on with your use of ROS.  But from my limited
interactions in the world of IT security, it sure sets off a lot of alarms
and warning signs to me.
 
Jim
N1SZ
 


 
   







AW: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-16 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Okay now for all users to read and notice

First of all @jose : no I am not crazy, but all users should know what your
soft does EXACTLY

 

For the rest of the world:

There are 2 exe in the ros folder

Ros(versxyz).exe is doing the on air things and the emailreport

Adifdata.exe is connecting to different clusters and sends the (wrong) spots

 

Jose decided to spread the users over the qrgs as he is doing it with his
tones in the channel

 If the spots were correct there would be a pileup every day and no user
could do a qso he thinks

 

So what he did is

Ros sends the data to adifdata via ros ini

So far so good

But the qrg is randomly calculated . so almost never correct . in the
autogenerated spots you only see who is working but not where (qrg)

The only way to get rid of the wrong spots is to denie the adifdata to
connect to the cluster

As vk3ama has closed the spotpage there is no need to send those false spots
anymore

So we users (I am a fan of that mode) can only get jose to change if we do
not sent those false spots

Many syops around the world put ROS on the bad word list cause of the
massive spotflooding and that the spots are false

Only Solution is:

Take a firewall and block the adifdata

Spot only real qso by hand typing (avoid the bad word to get a better chance
of forwarding)

Emailfunction can be used or not . has been safe so far . but who knows what
comes next

If jose change the randomizing of qrg and let the user decide whether to
send a spot or not I will use the spotfunction again

Then after change you know who is on air and where to find (that is all
needed info)

Till he changed his mind we ALL should block the autospotfunction cause it
is making more trouble as it helps

 

So please give that info to all other ros user

 

Maybe we can get rid of that bad behaviour (of the soft and his builder)

 

JOSE IT IS TIME TO CHANGE ! !

 

Best would be no autospotting at all

 

I decide to use ros without it and hope all others do the same

 

If no spots get in the cluster the function is useless

 

Greetings to all

Sigi

Delta golf nine beat frequency counter

 

 



AW: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-15 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
All ros spots are bogus . or almost all ... most of them wrong

Sad as I know jose could make it better

 

@rein you should keep the old 1.0 cause that is the last one with a
blockable adifdata exe

All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close
after a while if adifdata can get no inet

So if you wanna use that soft WITHOUT sending spots you should keep the old
1.0



Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-15 Thread Robert Bennett
Everyone better use V1.0 then, or we shall end up using different versions that 
don't talk to each other!


  - Original Message - 
  From: Siegfried Jackstien 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM
  Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question


  All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close 
after a while if adifdata can get no inet

  So if you wanna use that soft WITHOUT sending spots you should keep the old 
1.0




  




Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-15 Thread Dave Wright
Why would anyone want to use any version of this software?  

Which is better; the software that sends out false reports that you can block, 
or the software that sends out false reports that you can't?  In any case, it 
is doing who knows what in the background.

The fact that Jose has now coded a new version that you can't block simply 
indicates that there is more to this than just the spots to the cluster.  Why 
must it have access to the internet to work?  What else does it send out that 
is so important that the software MUST have access to the internet??  Such 
activity would be considered a major threat to computer security in most 
circles.  

Am I the only one that wonders this?

Wow!

Dave
K3DCW


On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Robert Bennett wrote:

 
 Everyone better use V1.0 then, or we shall end up using different versions 
 that don't talk to each other!
  
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Siegfried Jackstien
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM
 Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question
 
 All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close 
 after a while if adifdata can get no inet
 
 So if you wanna use that soft WITHOUT sending spots you should keep the old 
 1.0
 
 
 
 
 

Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net



RE: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-15 Thread Jim, N1SZ
Dave  All,

 

No, I was thinking the same thing.  Let's take a look at some significant
red flags with the ROS software:

 

1.)Special code added in apparent anger to keep critics from using the
software (although reportedly removed in recent versions)

2.)Won't make the source code open for public inspection (not that it is
100% required, but it would allay a lot of concerns about the software)

3.)Requires Gmail e-mail account and password - (giving such things away
would make any IT security professional lose their mind). is this still the
case?

4.)PDF literature provided by Jose had PDF file signatures and Authored
by signature of another well know digital mode author in Jose's  own
work... I wonder how that happened?

5.)Automatically sends messages to a hard coded list of servers. and
possibly other places?

6.)Apparently sends bogus callsigns and spots to various reflectors

7.)Gives users little if any control over the software's spotting to the
internet

8.)Now, after going away for a short time, has a new version that if
you try and defeat the automatic spotting with a firewall, it automatically
shuts down. (Sounds like a child's temper tantrum to me.)

 

Well, I've make it known that I've been suspicious of Jose's intentions all
along, but if this all seems Normal to you and doesn't bother you.. I say
good luck and press on with your use of ROS.  But from my limited
interactions in the world of IT security, it sure sets off a lot of alarms
and warning signs to me.

 

Jim

N1SZ

 

PS - I know. I'm feeding Jose's need for attention

 

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Wright
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 4:45 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question

 

  

Why would anyone want to use any version of this software?  

 

Which is better; the software that sends out false reports that you can
block, or the software that sends out false reports that you can't?  In any
case, it is doing who knows what in the background.

 

The fact that Jose has now coded a new version that you can't block simply
indicates that there is more to this than just the spots to the cluster.
Why must it have access to the internet to work?  What else does it send out
that is so important that the software MUST have access to the internet??
Such activity would be considered a major threat to computer security in
most circles.  

 

Am I the only one that wonders this?

 

Wow!

 

Dave

K3DCW

 

 

On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Robert Bennett wrote:





  

 

Everyone better use V1.0 then, or we shall end up using different versions
that don't talk to each other!

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Siegfried Jackstien mailto:siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de  

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM

Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question

 

All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close
after a while if adifdata can get no inet

So if you wanna use that soft WITHOUT sending spots you should keep the old
1.0

 

 

 

Dave

K3DCW

www.k3dcw.net

 



image001.jpgimage002.jpg

Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-15 Thread Andy obrien
The comment in parenthesis in number 8 are the comments that reflect my view
of why this fine software and mode are not worth the hassle.

Andy K3UK



On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jim, N1SZ n...@japierson.com wrote:



  Dave  All,



 No, I was thinking the same thing.  Let’s take a look at some significant
 “red flags” with the ROS software:



 1.)Special code added in apparent anger to keep critics from using the
 software (although reportedly removed in recent versions)

 2.)Won’t make the source code open for public inspection (not that it
 is 100% required, but it would allay a lot of concerns about the software)

 3.)Requires Gmail e-mail account and password – (giving such things
 away would make any IT security professional lose their mind)… is this still
 the case?

 4.)PDF literature provided by Jose had PDF file signatures and
 “Authored by” signature of another well know digital mode author in Jose’s
 own work….. I wonder how that happened?

 5.)Automatically sends messages to a hard coded list of servers… and
 possibly other places?

 6.)Apparently sends bogus callsigns and spots to various reflectors

 7.)Gives users little if any control over the software’s spotting to
 the internet

 8.)Now, after “going away” for a short time, has a new version that if
 you try and defeat the automatic spotting with a firewall, it automatically
 shuts down. (Sounds like a child’s temper tantrum to me…)



 Well, I’ve make it known that I’ve been suspicious of Jose’s intentions all
 along, but if this all seems “Normal” to you and doesn’t bother you…. I say
 good luck and press on with your use of ROS.  But from my limited
 interactions in the world of IT security, it sure sets off a lot of alarms
 and warning signs to me.



 Jim

 N1SZ





Re: AW: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-15 Thread rein0zn

OK Sigi.

I am not going to repeat my suggestion how to get Jose Ros to fix it.
Was told I became globally hated for doing so.

73 Rein W6SZ

-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Sent: Jul 15, 2010 2:34 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question

All ros spots are bogus . or almost all ... most of them wrong

Sad as I know jose could make it better

 

@rein you should keep the old 1.0 cause that is the last one with a
blockable adifdata exe

All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close
after a while if adifdata can get no inet

So if you wanna use that soft WITHOUT sending spots you should keep the old
1.0




Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-15 Thread W2XJ
Andy

You make a lot more sense than some of the children in this group who want
to just whine to the FCC and ARRL.


On 7/15/10 6:15 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:

  
  
  

 
 The comment in parenthesis in number 8 are the comments that reflect my view
 of why this fine software and mode are not worth the hassle.
 
 Andy K3UK
 
 
 
 On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jim, N1SZ n...@japierson.com wrote:
   
  
  

 
 Dave  All,
  
 No, I was thinking the same thing.  Let¹s take a look at some significant
 ³red flags² with the ROS software:
  
 1.)    Special code added in apparent anger to keep critics from using the
 software (although reportedly removed in recent versions)
 
 2.)    Won¹t make the source code open for public inspection (not that it is
 100% required, but it would allay a lot of concerns about the software)
 
 3.)    Requires Gmail e-mail account and password ­ (giving such things away
 would make any IT security professional lose their mind)Š is this still the
 case?
 
 4.)    PDF literature provided by Jose had PDF file signatures and ³Authored
 by² signature of another well know digital mode author in Jose¹s  own workŠ..
 I wonder how that happened?
 
 5.)    Automatically sends messages to a hard coded list of serversŠ and
 possibly other places?
 
 6.)    Apparently sends bogus callsigns and spots to various reflectors
 
 7.)    Gives users little if any control over the software¹s spotting to the
 internet
 
 8.)    Now, after ³going away² for a short time, has a new version that if
 you try and defeat the automatic spotting with a firewall, it automatically
 shuts down. (Sounds like a child¹s temper tantrum to meŠ)
 
  
 Well, I¹ve make it known that I¹ve been suspicious of Jose¹s intentions all
 along, but if this all seems ³Normal² to you and doesn¹t bother youŠ. I say
 good luck and press on with your use of ROS.  But from my limited
 interactions in the world of IT security, it sure sets off a lot of alarms
 and warning signs to me.
  
 Jim
 N1SZ
  
 
  

 
 



Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-14 Thread Dave Wright
Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his 
website?


On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:

 Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
 agent at FCC:
 
 ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
 maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
 techniques.
 
 I do not know who wrote it.
 
 What is the problem with it?
 
 73 Rein W6SZ
 
 
 

Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net



Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-14 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hello friends,

I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He doesn't deserve that much attention.

la5vna Steinar







On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
 Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his 
 website?


 On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:

   
 Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
 agent at FCC:

 ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
 maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
 techniques.

 I do not know who wrote it.

 What is the problem with it?

 73 Rein W6SZ



 
 Dave
 K3DCW
 www.k3dcw.net


   



[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-07-14 Thread digitalradio

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
group.

  File: /ROS v1.0.zip 
  Uploaded by : dg9bfc siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de 
  Description : OLD ROS 1.0  

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/ROS%20v1.0.zip 

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

dg9bfc siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
 





Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-14 Thread rein0zn
Hello Steinar,

It is gaining in usage and popularity. 
Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference.
I for one, thought it would, wrong again!

Amateur Radio a la 2010

73 Rein W6SZ




-Original Message-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question

Hello friends,

I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He doesn't deserve that much attention.

la5vna Steinar







On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
 Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his 
 website?


 On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:

   
 Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
 agent at FCC:

 ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
 maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
 techniques.

 I do not know who wrote it.

 What is the problem with it?

 73 Rein W6SZ



 
 Dave
 K3DCW
 www.k3dcw.net


   





http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit)

Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522

Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-14 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Rain

I meant on this forum ;)

la5vna Steinar

 


On 14.07.2010 18:20, rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
 Hello Steinar,

 It is gaining in usage and popularity. 
 Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference.
 I for one, thought it would, wrong again!

 Amateur Radio a la 2010

 73 Rein W6SZ




 -Original Message-
   
 From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
 Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question

 Hello friends,

 I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
 mode now.
 He doesn't deserve that much attention.

 la5vna Steinar







 On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
 
 Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his 
 website?


 On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:

   
   
 Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
 agent at FCC:

 ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
 maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
 techniques.

 I do not know who wrote it.

 What is the problem with it?

 73 Rein W6SZ



 
 
 Dave
 K3DCW
 www.k3dcw.net


   
   


 

 http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
 Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit)

 Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522

 Yahoo! Groups Links



 

   



Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-14 Thread Jeff Moore
What are you basing that statement on??The Hamspots page?  You need to take 
a look at the left column - see the red squares?  That indicates that the spot 
was auto-generated by the ROS software  --  BOGUS spots!  The real spots are 
the ones w/o the red square - I didn't see more than a dozen of those when I 
looked yesterday compared to 50 or 60 bogus spots.

ROS is dead!  The author is killing it!  Quit poking it with a stick and let it 
go away!

Jeff  --  KE7ACY

- Original Message - From: rein...@ix.netcom.com 
Hello Steinar,

It is gaining in usage and popularity. 
Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference.
I for one, thought it would, wrong again!

Amateur Radio a la 2010

73 Rein W6SZ

-Original Message-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question

Hello friends,

I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He doesn't deserve that much attention.

la5vna Steinar







On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
 Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his 
 website?


 On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:

 
 Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
 agent at FCC:

 ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
 maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
 techniques.

 I do not know who wrote it.

 What is the problem with it?

 73 Rein W6SZ



 
 Dave
 K3DCW
 www.k3dcw.net




Re: [digitalradio] New question

2010-07-14 Thread rein0zn

Jeff, I am monitoring it Few amateurs are, I believe.
Few amateurs ever tried it. I used it before the illegal
ruling came.

( My opinion )

You have to listen abroad to hear/see the activity.

I would say in spite of the actions by rhe author. 

Users seem to like it.
I like it. 
Nobody else here needs to like it though.
And then how can I like something that I can't use?

73 Rein  W6SZ 

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 1:09 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question

What are you basing that statement on??The Hamspots page?  You need to 
take a look at the left column - see the red squares?  That indicates that the 
spot was auto-generated by the ROS software  --  BOGUS spots!  The real spots 
are the ones w/o the red square - I didn't see more than a dozen of those when 
I looked yesterday compared to 50 or 60 bogus spots.

ROS is dead!  The author is killing it!  Quit poking it with a stick and let 
it go away!

Jeff  --  KE7ACY

- Original Message - From: rein...@ix.netcom.com 
Hello Steinar,

It is gaining in usage and popularity. 
Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference.
I for one, thought it would, wrong again!

Amateur Radio a la 2010

73 Rein W6SZ

-Original Message-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question

Hello friends,

I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He doesn't deserve that much attention.

la5vna Steinar







On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
 Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his 
 website?


 On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:

 
 Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
 agent at FCC:

 ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
 maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
 techniques.

 I do not know who wrote it.

 What is the problem with it?

 73 Rein W6SZ



 
 Dave
 K3DCW
 www.k3dcw.net





[digitalradio] New question

2010-07-13 Thread Rein A
Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
agent at FCC:

ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
techniques.

I do not know who wrote it.

What is the problem with it?

73 Rein W6SZ




[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-07-12 Thread digitalradio

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
group.

  File: /JT65A/JT65-HF.pdf 
  Uploaded by : iz4czl iz4...@yahoo.com 
  Description : JT65-HF download mirror 

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/JT65A/JT65-HF.pdf 

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

iz4czl iz4...@yahoo.com
 





[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-07-12 Thread digitalradio

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
group.

  File: /JT65A/jt65-hf-setup.pdf 
  Uploaded by : iz4czl iz4...@yahoo.com 
  Description : JT65-HF setup and use guide.pdf (manual) 

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/JT65A/jt65-hf-setup.pdf 

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

iz4czl iz4...@yahoo.com
 





[digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

2010-06-19 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Pour les francophones: la version française de ce message se trouve sur mon 
site (http://f6cte.free.fr). Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien Principales 
modifications (courriel avertissant de la sortie de la nouvelle version).


Hello to all Ham and SWL,

The new release of MultiPSK (4.18) is on my Web site (http://f6cte.free.fr). It 
is not yet on Earl's and Terry's WEB sites.

The main modifications of MULTIPSK 4.18 are the following:

1) Decoding of the NWR SAME mode

NWR (National Weather Radio) SAME (Specific Area Message Encoding) is simply a 
method of identifying the local area to which an alert message applies. It 
utilizes a digital data stream that contains the alert message with information 
about the type of event expected, its timing, duration, and location. The NWR 
SAME system is used in USA and Canada, in VHF (162.400, 162.425, 162.450, 
162.475, 162.500, 162.525, 162.550 MHz).

To listen NWR SAME messages: the NWS tests the NWR and SAME alerting technology 
weekly. These tests normally occur on Wednesday between 10 AM and Noon with 
some variations to accomodate local requirements.


This mode is available for licencied copies, only (otherwise, the decoding is 
stopped after 5 minutes). 

See specifications further on.

2) Transmission/reception of ARQ FAE QSP (indirect) mails through a mails 
Server

Differences between a direct mail and a QSP mail (indirect)

A mail is direct if you can transmit it directly to the final addressee: A --B.

If you can't transmit the mail directly because the final addressee can't be 
directly reached due to the link conditions, the mail can be forwarded by the 
connected station, which acts as a mails Server: A--C (mails Server)--B. 

For this, you must use a QSP mail.

A paper based on snapshots presents this new system:

http://f6cte.free.fr/QSP_mails_forwarding_easy_with_Multipsk_in_ALE_and_ALE400.doc

3) New macros:

- RPRT@ permits to ask to the other Ham or to the SWL monitoring your QSO to 
send you a reception report by e-mail. Your address must be specified in the 
WEB ADDRESS of your personal data (Personal button). It will be transmitted 
the following command r...@lenemail addressCRC which is the report demand. If 
correctly decoded, a reception report will be transmitted to the e-mail address 
that you specified, through Internet.

Examples of use of this macro

1) The main objective is to ask the other Ham with whom you are in QSO to send 
you a reception report by e-mail.

2) But it can be also done by a SWL monitoring your QSO.

3) This macro can be used in conjuction with a Multipsk beacon which mode can 
be controlled by a RS ID. For example, you can switch the beacon in BPSK31 and 
asks the beacon for a reception report. Afterwards, the beacon can be switched 
in Olivia by a new RS ID and a new reception report can be asked...

Note: this macro can be used for all digital modes (except JT65), CW included.

A paper based on snapshots presents this new system:

http://f6cte.free.fr/How_to_use_the_« RPRT@ 
»_email_reception_report_with_Multipsk.doc

The source code (in Pascal/Delphi and in English) to code/decode this command 
is available for the coding/decoding software developpers, by making the demand 
to F6CTE by e-mail.

- TUNE:command permits to send a Tune (non modulated carrier) with the 
command: TUNE: Power (in % from 0 to 100) Frequency (in Hz from 0 to 5000) 
Duration (in 1/10 sec from 1 to 999). For example: TUNE: 5 4000 10 (5% of 
power at 4000 Hz for 1 sec)

This function can be used for transmission tests or, perhaps, to create his/her 
personal jingle (short musical sequence).

- S/N gives the Signal to Noise ratio (in dB) obtained about 4 seconds before 
the switching to transmission.

- Quality for PSK modes only, gives the signal quality from 1/5 to 5/5 
obtained about 4 seconds before the switching to transmission.



4) Improvements

Addition of a filter possibility in the SELCAL mode.


Addition of 6 new memories of frequency and mode in the Transceiver window, for 
a total of 10 memories.


Some improvements for contesters: addition of a manual control of the QSO 
number, proposition of standard HF QRGs for the Freq MHz field, possibility 
to double the size of the QSO-log or DXKeeper buttons (in the Logbook 
window). 



Note about translation of Multipsk.exe and Clock .exe: the 4.17 version of 
Multipsk/Clock has been completly translated to Spanish by Joachin (EA4ZB), 
from French. The translation file is on my Web site 
(http://f6cte.free.fr/Translation_files.htm). 



NWR SAME (VHF)

The NWR (National Weather Radio) SAME (Specific Area Message Encoding) is a 
digital system for transmission in USA and Canada, in VHF, of warning messages. 
There are, in fact, other agencies that NWS (National Weather Service) which 
use the SAME system. There are also many other messages that warning or watch 
messages.

Description :

Baud rate: 580.83.

Modulation : Logic 0 at 1562.5 Hz and logic 1 at 2083.3 Hz

Reception 

Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

2010-06-19 Thread KH6TY

Hi Patrick,

Wonder if you happen to know that I created the original (very first) 
Weather Radio Alert in 1974, which then created the entire weather alert 
radio industry! At that time, there was no SAME feature, so the alarm 
went off too often when no bad weather was close by. SAME came along 
after I retired.


The key to making the alert reliable was this patented circuit:

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.htmlr=8f=Gl=50co1=ANDd=PTXTs1=4,158,148OS=4,158,148RS=4,158,148 
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.htmlr=8f=Gl=50co1=ANDd=PTXTs1=4,158,148OS=4,158,148RS=4,158,148


After manufacturing and selling over 3,000,000 radios in 10 years, I 
retired and had time for ham radio. DigiPan was the first thing I did 
after I retired.


Your support of the weather alert feature means a lot to me! Thanks!

73, Skip KH6TY

On 6/19/2010 4:37 AM, Patrick Lindecker wrote:


/Pour les francophones: la version française de ce message se trouve 
sur mon site (http://f6cte.free.fr). Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien 
_Principales modifications (courriel avertissant de la sortie de la 
nouvelle version)_./



Hello to all Ham and SWL,

The new release of *MultiPSK (4.18)* is on my Web site 
(http://f6cte.free.fr http://f6cte.free.fr). It is not yet on Earl's 
and Terry's WEB sites.


**

*The main modifications of MULTIPSK 4.18* are the following:

*

1) Decoding of the NWR SAME mode

*

NWR (National Weather Radio) SAME (Specific Area Message Encoding) is 
simply a method of identifying the local area to which an alert 
message applies. It utilizes a digital data stream that contains the 
alert message with information about the type of event expected, its 
timing, duration, and location. The NWR SAME system is used in USA and 
Canada, in VHF (162.400, 162.425, 162.450, 162.475, 162.500, 162.525, 
162.550 MHz).


_

To listen NWR SAME messages: the NWS tests the NWR and SAME alerting 
technology weekly. These tests normally occur on Wednesday between 10 
AM and Noon with some variations to accomodate local requirements.



This mode is available for licencied copies, only (otherwise, the 
decoding is stopped after 5 minutes).


See specifications further on.

*

2) Transmission/reception of ARQ FAE QSP (indirect) mails through a 
mails Server


*_

Differences between a direct mail and a QSP mail (indirect)

_

A mail is direct if you can transmit it directly to the final 
addressee: A --B.


If you can't transmit the mail directly because the final addressee 
can't be directly reached due to the link conditions, the mail can be 
forwarded by the connected station, which acts as a mails Server: 
A--C (mails Server)--B.


For this, you must use a QSP mail.

A paper based on snapshots presents this new system:

*

http://f6cte.free.fr/QSP_mails_forwarding_easy_with_Multipsk_in_ALE_and_ALE400.doc

**

3) New macros:

*

- *RPRT@* permits to ask to the other Ham or to the SWL monitoring 
your QSO to send you a reception report by e-mail. Your address must 
be specified in the WEB ADDRESS of your personal data (Personal 
button). It will be transmitted the following command r...@lenemail 
addressCRC which is the report demand. If correctly decoded, a 
reception report will be transmitted to the e-mail address that you 
specified, through Internet.


_

Examples of use of this macro

_

1) The main objective is to ask the other Ham with whom you are in QSO 
to send you a reception report by e-mail.


2) But it can be also done by a SWL monitoring your QSO.

3) This macro can be used in conjuction with a Multipsk beacon which 
mode can be controlled by a RS ID. For example, you can switch the 
beacon in BPSK31 and asks the beacon for a reception report. 
Afterwards, the beacon can be switched in Olivia by a new RS ID and a 
new reception report can be asked...


__

_Note:_ this macro can be used for all digital modes (except JT65), CW 
included.


A paper based on snapshots presents this new system:

*

http://f6cte.free.fr/How_to_use_the_« RPRT@ 
»_email_reception_report_with_Multipsk.doc


*__

_The source code_ (in Pascal/Delphi and in English) to code/decode 
this command is available for the coding/decoding software 
developpers, by making the demand to F6CTE by e-mail.


- *TUNE:command* permits to send a Tune (non modulated carrier) with 
the command: TUNE: Power (in % from 0 to 100) Frequency (in Hz from 0 
to 5000) Duration (in 1/10 sec from 1 to 999). For example: TUNE: 5 
4000 10 (5% of power at 4000 Hz for 1 sec)


This function can be used for transmission tests or, perhaps, to 
create his/her personal jingle (short musical sequence).


- *S/N* gives the Signal to Noise ratio (in dB) obtained about 4 
seconds before the switching to transmission.


- *Quality* for PSK modes only, gives the signal quality from 1/5 to 
5/5 obtained about 4 seconds before the switching to transmission.


**_


Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

2010-06-19 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 04:36 AM 6/19/2010, you wrote:


Hi Patrick,

Wonder if you happen to know that I created the original (very first) Weather 
Radio Alert in 1974, 


I did and I do thank you for your afford.
Here in the center of Tornado Alley there is one on
every headboard (or should be) .

Sometime I would like to hear how it all started.
Bet you could write a book on that.

John, W0JAB 



Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

2010-06-19 Thread KH6TY

John,

I have written up a short story of how the weather alert radio industry 
began. You can read it at this link: 
http://home.comcast.net/~hteller/WeatherAlertStory.htm 
http://home.comcast.net/%7Ehteller/WeatherAlertStory.htm


73, Skip KH6TY



Sometime I would like to hear how it all started.
Bet you could write a book on that.

John, W0JAB





Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

2010-06-19 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Over the course of my work as a 2way radio tech I have looked
at a lot of circuits for one project or another your's being one of them
Very interesting how you made that puppy. Also just about an hour
ago my radio went off. 

John, W0JAB

At 10:13 AM 6/19/2010, you wrote:


John,

I have written up a short story of how the weather alert radio industry began. 
You can read it at this link: 
http://home.comcast.net/%7Ehteller/WeatherAlertStory.htmhttp://home.comcast.net/~hteller/WeatherAlertStory.htm

73, Skip KH6TY




[digitalradio] New 30-40M SDR receiver

2010-05-20 Thread Andy obrien
FYI, see below.  Thanks to Simon Brown at sdr-radio-com for the info.



We've now completed and tested the first batch of SDR Receivers and
they are now
released as ready to sell.

The new web page for the SDR Receiver is:

http://www.crosscountrywireless.net/sdr_receiver.htm

73, 

Chris, G4HYG


[digitalradio] New SCS Email Program For Pactor

2010-05-16 Thread Andy obrien
FYI,
Andy K3UK

-- Forwarded message --
From: vk4jrc


Hi Everyone,

Not sure IF anyone in the group has seen this, could be interesting!

http://www.scs-ptc.com/downloads/scsmail

Can be run in Client or Server mode, and gives a chance for people to run a
private Email network, outside WinLink, Winmor or SailMail.

73,

Jack VK4JRC


RE: [digitalradio] New SCS Email Program For Pactor

2010-05-16 Thread Ed G
 

  Oh great!   Those who have complained about the WinLink system Pactor
interference haven't seen anything yet!Once this new product gets into
the hands of every ham who wants to operate his own private email server we
could see a huge increase in Pactor messaging stations all over the place!

 

   At least that's my initial take on the situation. I'm an EmComm WL2K
user and have no personal problem with this but I'm sure others will.

 

   Ed  K7AAT

 

 

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Andy obrien
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 12:54 AM
To: digitalradio
Subject: [digitalradio] New SCS Email Program For Pactor

 

  

FYI,

Andy K3UK

-- Forwarded message --
From: vk4jrc 

  

Hi Everyone,

Not sure IF anyone in the group has seen this, could be interesting!

http://www.scs-ptc.com/downloads/scsmail

Can be run in Client or Server mode, and gives a chance for people to run a
private Email network, outside WinLink, Winmor or SailMail.

73,

Jack VK4JRC



image001.jpgimage002.jpg

[digitalradio] New SDR related Yahoo gtroup

2010-04-15 Thread Andy obrien
I started the digitalradio Yahoo group ten years ago (next month)
because ,at that time , there were many groups dedicated to particular
modes of applications but no generic groups where anything related to
digit modes was ok to discuss.  For the same reason, I have started
SDRlist.  A Yahoo group for discussion of any software defined radio.
Currently there are lists for Flex radios, SDR-IQ, SDR-14, Sofrock,
Winrad, CW skimmer, and many more.  There is also a forum for
SDR-Radio.  These lists can be quite good, but it can be a a little
awkward if you want to poast a question about a  rival product or
application.  So, if you have any interest in software defined radios
for amateur radio or SWLing, please consider joining via
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SDRlist/  .  Please help build this new
group in to a thriving on-line community where useful exchanges of
information and opinion will make the group a leader in SDR.

Andy K3UK


Re: [digitalradio] New SDR related Yahoo gtroup

2010-04-15 Thread Tony

Andy,

Congratulations on the upcoming 10th anniversary of digital radio!

Tony -K2MO


On 4/15/2010 8:51 AM, Andy obrien wrote:


I started the digitalradio Yahoo group ten years ago (next month)
because ,at that time , there were many groups dedicated to particular
modes of applications but no generic groups where anything related to
digit modes was ok to discuss. For the same reason, I have started
SDRlist. A Yahoo group for discussion of any software defined radio.
Currently there are lists for Flex radios, SDR-IQ, SDR-14, Sofrock,
Winrad, CW skimmer, and many more. There is also a forum for
SDR-Radio. These lists can be quite good, but it can be a a little
awkward if you want to poast a question about a rival product or
application. So, if you have any interest in software defined radios
for amateur radio or SWLing, please consider joining via
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SDRlist/ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SDRlist/ . Please help build this new

group in to a thriving on-line community where useful exchanges of
information and opinion will make the group a leader in SDR.

Andy K3UK




__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 5029 (20100414) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




Re: [digitalradio] New SDR related Yahoo gtroup

2010-04-15 Thread WD8ARZ
Congratulations Andy, and have to say how much it was appreciated for all the 
help Bonnie gave ya getting it up and going too.

73 from Bill - WD8ARZ
  - Original Message - 
  From: Andy obrien 
  To: digitalradio ; multi...@yahoogroups.com ; sdr...@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:51 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] New SDR related Yahoo gtroup


  I started the digitalradio Yahoo group ten years ago (next month)
  because ,at that time , there were many groups dedicated to particular
  modes of applications but no generic groups where anything related to
  digit modes was ok to discuss.  For the same reason, I have started
  SDRlist.  A Yahoo group for discussion of any software defined radio.
  Currently there are lists for Flex radios, SDR-IQ, SDR-14, Sofrock,
  Winrad, CW skimmer, and many more.  There is also a forum for
  SDR-Radio.  These lists can be quite good, but it can be a a little
  awkward if you want to poast a question about a  rival product or
  application.  So, if you have any interest in software defined radios
  for amateur radio or SWLing, please consider joining via
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SDRlist/  .  Please help build this new
  group in to a thriving on-line community where useful exchanges of
  information and opinion will make the group a leader in SDR.

  Andy K3UK


  

  http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
  Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: [digitalradio] New SDR related Yahoo gtroup

2010-04-15 Thread Andy obrien
I think you are confused Bill.  Bonnie was not involved in getting it
going.  She did contribute two graphics 4-5 years after we got going.

Actually, it was Andrew Nicholson who gave the initial help since he merged
his rival group with mine after a few months.

Andy K3UK

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM, WD8ARZ wd8...@comcast.net wrote:



 Congratulations Andy, and have to say how much it was appreciated for all
 the help Bonnie gave ya getting it up and going too.

 73 from Bill - WD8ARZ

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
 *To:* digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ;
 multi...@yahoogroups.com ; sdr...@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:51 AM
 *Subject:* [digitalradio] New SDR related Yahoo gtroup

 I started the digitalradio Yahoo group ten years ago (next month)
 because ,at that time , there were many groups dedicated to particular
 modes of applications but no generic groups where anything related to
 digit modes was ok to discuss.  For the same reason, I have started
 SDRlist.  A Yahoo group for discussion of any software defined radio.
 Currently there are lists for Flex radios, SDR-IQ, SDR-14, Sofrock,
 Winrad, CW skimmer, and many more.  There is also a forum for
 SDR-Radio.  These lists can be quite good, but it can be a a little
 awkward if you want to poast a question about a  rival product or
 application.  So, if you have any interest in software defined radios
 for amateur radio or SWLing, please consider joining via
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SDRlist/  .  Please help build this new
 group in to a thriving on-line community where useful exchanges of
 information and opinion will make the group a leader in SDR.

 Andy K3UK


 


 http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
 Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links



  



[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-04-10 Thread digitalradio

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
group.

  File: /RSIDqstNOV09.doc 
  Uploaded by : obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com 
  Description : Nov'09 QST article on RS-ID  

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/RSIDqstNOV09.doc 

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com
 





Re: [digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-04-10 Thread Patrick Lindecker
 Hello Andy,

You wrote a nice article. Congratulations!

Just a remark, the RS ID does not carry the parameters of the mode but just 
contain a number which corresponds to a mode or a sub-mode with its own 
parameters.

73
Patrick

- Original Message - 
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio



 Hello,

 This email message is a notification to let you know that
 a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio
 group.

  File: /RSIDqstNOV09.doc
  Uploaded by : obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com
  Description : Nov'09 QST article on RS-ID

 You can access this file at the URL:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/RSIDqstNOV09.doc

 To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
 http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

 Regards,

 obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com






 

 http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
 Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links




 




[digitalradio] New release (4.17) of MULTIPSK

2010-03-14 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Pour les francophones: la version française de ce message se trouve sur mon 
site (http://f6cte.free.fr). Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien Principales 
modifications (courriel avertissant de la sortie de la nouvelle version).


Hello to all Ham and SWL,

The new release of MultiPSK (4.17) is on my Web site (http://f6cte.free.fr). 
The main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR: http://www.eqth.info/multipsk/index.html 
(click on United States Download Site).
Another mirror site isTerry's: http://g90swl.co.uk/multipsk/

Multipsk associated to Clock are freeware programs but with functions submitted 
to a licence (by user key).

The main modifications of MULTIPSK 4.17 are the following:

1) Decoding of the COQUELET modes (8 and 13)

These modes are used in HF for professional transmissions. 2 sorts of Coquelet 
exist: the 8 tones (still used) and the 13 tones (perhaps still used).


This mode is available for licencied copies, only (otherwise, the decoding is 
stopped after 5 minutes). 

See specifications further on.

2) Interface with PSKReporter

Principle: the SWL or Ham monitoring transmits received data to a PSKreporter 
WEB server, either manually or automatically (by Multipsk in direct or 
panoramic reception). This server gathers reception records of any digital mode 
activity and then make those records available, in near realtime, to interested 
parties (typically the amateur who initiates the communication). Stations are 
located on a world map.

All text modes can be reported (included JT65, ALE and ALE400 soundings and ARQ 
FAE calls). However in PACKET/PAX/PAX2, the option (available clicking on the 
Options button) Only the information on RX and TX frames must be unchecked 
to be able to report to PSKReporter. The Call ID can also be reported.

For configuration and help about PSKReporter, click on PSKReporter located on 
the menu top bar. 

3) New macros:

- COM:command permits to send a serial command through the selected main COM 
port (Serial port menu).

Through this command, it is possible to control such equipment as TNC or DSP. 
Attention: Multipsk gives the possibility

to send a command through the serial port but this one must be determined by 
the user. See help for details.

4) Improvements

Possibility to do a callsign look-up in DXKeeper,


Slight improvement of the 4285 and 110A decoding and SELCAL display,


Partial decoding of the CCIR 493-4 Selcall (Australian Selcall) mode. It is an 
option of the GMDSS DSC mode,


Timestamp on each line (for versions under licence): a timestamp (12:03:51 
for example), will be added at the beginning of each new line for all text 
modes (configuration in the Options menu of the RX/TX screen),


Possibility to control a TNC (or another exterior equipement) with COM and EXEC 
macros in 4 phases: TNC initialization, at RX to TX switchover, at TX to RX 
switchover, at the TNC end of service (configuration in the Options menu of 
the RX/TX screen),


Possibility of QSO recording in a TCP/IP client logbook (configuration in Your 
logbook of the Configuration screen and with the TCP/IP button of the 
RX/TX screen),


Digitalk (thanks to Skip KH6TY), through a TCP/IP link with Multipsk, permits 
to pronounce (in an English way) all the decoded text. It is aimed to blind 
Hams and SWL (configuration in the Options menu of the RX/TX screen). The 
PC must be a XP.


For blind Hams and SWL, possibility to search transmissions (PSK31, RTTY...) on 
the waterfall with the -- and -- keys (configuration in the Options 
menu of the RX/TX screen),


Possibility of pause of the text transmission, by double-clicking on the 
transmission window (second one), then resumption with a simple-clicking,


New function Auto RX to switch automatically in reception as soon as the 
transmission buffer is empty (for Hellschreiber mainly, but also for PSK31...),


Colors for the panoramic (characters and background) can be freely chosen 
(Fonts button),


Improvement of the selection of the modes detected by RS ID, 


SdR: possibility to transmit in base band and to select one among 12 HF 
frequencies.

Note about translation of Multipsk.exe and Clock .exe: the 4.16 version of 
Multipsk/Clock has been completly translated to Spanish by Joachin (EA4ZB), 
from French. The translation file is on my Web site 
(http://f6cte.free.fr/Translation_files.htm). 

Coquelet specifications:

Created by : ACEC in the 1950s years. 

These modes are used in HF for professional transmissions.

2 sorts of Coquelet exist: the 8 tones (still used) and the 13 tones 
(perhaps still used).

Baud rate : 13.33 and 26.67 for Coquelet 8, 13.33 and 20 for Coquelet13

Speed : 66 or 133 wpm for the Coquelet 8, 66 or 100 mpm for the Coquelet13

Modulation for Coquelet8: MFSK 8 tones. The first tone (one among the 8 tones) 
defines the bits 3,4 and 5. The second tone (one among the tones 5, 6, 7, 8) 
defines the bits 1 and 2.

The idle sequence switches from tone 8 to 1, then from tone 1 to tone 8, etc...


Re: [digitalradio] NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE

2010-03-05 Thread KH6TY

Andy,

I now cannot see the previously seen randomness in the new 500 Hz-wide 
mode of ROS, so it does not appear to be spread spectrum. In addition, 
the addition of data now alters the idling carrier frequencies according 
to the data, because if it did not, it would still fit one of the 
requirements for spread spectrum.


The randomness does still appear in the 2250 Hz-wide mode, either in HF 
or EME mode, and is not influenced by the sending of data, however, 
suggesting that mode has not been changed.


I would say that the 500 Hz-wide ROS mode is probably legal for US 
amateurs to use, but the 2250 Hz-wide mode would still only be legal to 
use over 222 Mhz.


Perhaps Steinar can use his superior spectrum analysis software to 
confirm this.



73 - Skip KH6TY




Andy obrien wrote:
 




-- Forwarded message --
From: *ROS v2.5.0 Beta* no-re...@wordpress.com 
mailto:no-re...@wordpress.com

Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:42 PM
Subject: [New post] NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE
To: k3uka...@gmail.com mailto:k3uka...@gmail.com


http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/author/rosmodem/  


NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/new-narrowband-digital-mode/


*José Alberto Nieto Ros 
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/author/rosmodem/* | 5 March, 2010 at 
03:42 | Categories: Uncategorized 
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/ | URL: 
http://wp.me/pNifC-5R http://wp.me/pNifC-5R


I have created a new narrowband digital mode for Ham Radio operators

Technical description will be sent to FCC with the aim that they give 
their approval for this new mode.


Add a comment to this post 
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/new-narrowband-digital-mode/#respond 








[digitalradio] New Improved Active LoTW Search by US State page on Hamspots.net

2010-03-04 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA
The Search by US State of Active Callsigns using LoTW page on 
Hamspots.net has had some major updates.

The search results now show the last known year of upload to LoTW of 
callsigns (great for avoiding those who haven't uploaded in many years).

The Spot count is broken down by mode making it much easier to identify 
the callsigns that may help towards CW,PHONE or RTTY WAS  Triple Play.

The Other mode is for the less popular modes that aren't 
CW,SSB,RTTY,PSK or WSJT (JT65), like Throb, ROS, SSTV, etc.

The Unknown mode is for those spots where the mode could not be 
determined from the Cluster spot comments.

Enjoy.

de Laurie, VK3AMA




[digitalradio] NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE

2010-03-04 Thread Andy obrien
-- Forwarded message --
From: ROS v2.5.0 Beta no-re...@wordpress.com
Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:42 PM
Subject: [New post] NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE
To: k3uka...@gmail.com


 http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/author/rosmodem/  NEW NARROWBAND
DIGITAL MODE
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/new-narrowband-digital-mode/
*José Alberto Nieto Ros http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/author/rosmodem/* |
5 March, 2010 at 03:42 | Categories:
Uncategorizedhttp://rosmodem.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/|
URL:
http://wp.me/pNifC-5R

I have created a new narrowband digital mode for Ham Radio operators

Technical description will be sent to FCC with the aim that they give their
approval for this new mode.

Add a comment to this
posthttp://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/new-narrowband-digital-mode/#respond


Re: [digitalradio] New subject: FSK clicks

2010-02-28 Thread Wes Linscott
The EPC PSK125 contest was in operation.  Is that possibly what you were 
seeing/hearing?

Wes W1LIC




From: jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, February 27, 2010 8:05:55 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] New subject: FSK clicks

  
I was just listening on 80M - some kind of RTTY contest is on - and
I hear a bunch of normal-sounding FSK RTTY signals, and some that
are awfully clicky, like key clicks except it's FSK.  I wonder what
those guys are doing wrong.  Having the speech processor turned on,
perhaps?  Or too-rapid switching between mark and space?  Please
listen when you get a chance and see if you hear what I'm hearing
and if you can guess what is causing it.  On the waterfall it shows
up kinda like an overdriven PSK signal, but that shouldn't matter
so much for FSK.

Jim W6JVE


 

[digitalradio] New subject: FSK clicks

2010-02-27 Thread jhaynesatalumni
I was just listening on 80M - some kind of RTTY contest is on - and
I hear a bunch of normal-sounding FSK RTTY signals, and some that
are awfully clicky, like key clicks except it's FSK.  I wonder what
those guys are doing wrong.  Having the speech processor turned on,
perhaps?  Or too-rapid switching between mark and space?  Please
listen when you get a chance and see if you hear what I'm hearing
and if you can guess what is causing it.  On the waterfall it shows
up kinda like an overdriven PSK signal, but that shouldn't matter
so much for FSK.

Jim W6JVE



Re: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

2010-02-25 Thread jose alberto nieto ros
Hi, Sieg,

This mode dont need a tone for the synchronization. Is auto :-)





De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 18:36
Asunto: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

  
Hello Jose
 
1. Downloaded the 202 but soft says it is 201 … in the info and on the upper 
gui-line
 
2. Had my first qso last night ….. yippie yeah :-D
 
3. the macrobuttons should be settable by the user (klick on them with right 
mouse … a macroeditor starts …. 
 
4. the macobuttons should have selectable if you wanna send a new pilot or 
not….like in the soft mftty (see here:http://www.polar- electric. com/MFTT/ 
index.html )
 
5. associate the macrobuttons to the f-keys
 
Maybe you can grab some ideas from the other soft hi hi
Greetz
Dg9bfc
Sigi
 
 



Von:digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com ] Im 
Auftrag von nietorosdj
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 03:46
An: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
 
  
Please download the latest version.



  

AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

2010-02-25 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Tone not for sync of the soft but maybe for others to tune in if you are not
using channels like 3.600, 3.603, ..

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von jose alberto nieto ros
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 18:49
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Hi, Sieg,

 

This mode dont need a tone for the synchronization. Is auto :-)

 

  _  

De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 18:36
Asunto: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

  

Hello Jose

 

1. Downloaded the 202 but soft says it is 201 . in the info and on the upper
gui-line

 

2. Had my first qso last night ... yippie yeah :-D

 

3. the macrobuttons should be settable by the user (klick on them with right
mouse . a macroeditor starts .. 

 

4. the macobuttons should have selectable if you wanna send a new pilot or
not..like in the soft mftty (see here: http://www.polar-
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html  electric. com/MFTT/
index.html )

 

5. associate the macrobuttons to the f-keys

 

Maybe you can grab some ideas from the other soft hi hi

Greetz

Dg9bfc

Sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
] Im Auftrag von nietorosdj
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 03:46
An: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Please download the latest version.

 





AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

2010-02-25 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Hello Jose

 

1. Downloaded the 202 but soft says it is 201 . in the info and on the upper
gui-line

 

2. Had my first qso last night ... yippie yeah :-D

 

3. the macrobuttons should be settable by the user (klick on them with right
mouse . a macroeditor starts .. 

 

4. the macobuttons should have selectable if you wanna send a new pilot or
not..like in the soft mftty (see here:
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html )

 

5. associate the macrobuttons to the f-keys

 

Maybe you can grab some ideas from the other soft hi hi

Greetz

Dg9bfc

Sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von nietorosdj
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 03:46
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Please download the latest version.





[digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.1.0 More Powerfull

2010-02-25 Thread nietorosdj
Download here: http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/

And configure the Email menu



AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

2010-02-25 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Ok for the pilot tone ... what about the rest userselectable macros , f-keys
??

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von jose alberto nieto ros
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 18:49
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Hi, Sieg,

 

This mode dont need a tone for the synchronization. Is auto :-)

 

  _  

De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 18:36
Asunto: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

  

Hello Jose

 

1. Downloaded the 202 but soft says it is 201 . in the info and on the upper
gui-line

 

2. Had my first qso last night ... yippie yeah :-D

 

3. the macrobuttons should be settable by the user (klick on them with right
mouse . a macroeditor starts .. 

 

4. the macobuttons should have selectable if you wanna send a new pilot or
not..like in the soft mftty (see here: http://www.polar-
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html  electric. com/MFTT/
index.html )

 

5. associate the macrobuttons to the f-keys

 

Maybe you can grab some ideas from the other soft hi hi

Greetz

Dg9bfc

Sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
] Im Auftrag von nietorosdj
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 03:46
An: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Please download the latest version.

 





Re: AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

2010-02-25 Thread jose alberto nieto ros
Patient please. I am working in details more important, please believe in me.





De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 20:46
Asunto: AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

  
Ok for the pilot tone ….. what about the rest userselectable macros , f-keys ??
 



Von:digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com ] Im 
Auftrag von jose alberto nieto ros
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 18:49
An: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Betreff: Re: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
 
  
Hi, Sieg,
 
This mode dont need a tone for the synchronization. Is auto :-)
 



De:Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackstien @freenet. de
Para: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 18:36
Asunto: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

  
Hello Jose
 
1. Downloaded the 202 but soft says it is 201 … in the info and on the upper 
gui-line
 
2. Had my first qso last night ….. yippie yeah :-D
 
3. the macrobuttons should be settable by the user (klick on them with right 
mouse … a macroeditor starts …. 
 
4. the macobuttons should have selectable if you wanna send a new pilot or 
not….like in the soft mftty (see here:http://www.polar- electric. com/MFTT/ 
index.html )
 
5. associate the macrobuttons to the f-keys
 
Maybe you can grab some ideas from the other soft hi hi
Greetz
Dg9bfc
Sigi
 
 



Von:digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com ] Im 
Auftrag von nietorosdj
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 03:46
An: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
 
  
Please download the latest version.
 



  

Re: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.1.0 More Powerfull

2010-02-25 Thread Andy obrien
Nice email feature.  By the way, the version info says v2.1.1 but the exe
file says 1.3.1 ?

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM, nietorosdj nietoro...@yahoo.es wrote:



 Download here: http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/

 And configure the Email menu

  



Re: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.1.0 More Powerfull

2010-02-25 Thread jose alberto nieto ros
Bo problem, It is the number by defect. After always i have to rename, but this 
time i forgot it :-)

Donwload new version





De: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 22:37
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.1.0 More Powerfull

  
Nice email feature.  By the way, the version info says v2.1.1 but the exe file 
says 1.3.1 ?


On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM, nietorosdj nietoro...@yahoo. es wrote:

  
Download here: http://rosmodem. wordpress. com/

And configure the Email menu






  

AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

2010-02-25 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Surely the decoding and other things are more important

I see that sometimes you have 2 or more versions uploaded so I see you ARE
working hard on the soft … I didn´t wanna hurry you up .. it is a hobby
always so excuse me PLEASE!!

Dg9bfc

Sigi

By the way jose … did you think about a different qrg list … a bit easier
please …. Last digits zeroes 3600 3603 3606 etc….update your hp if you have
the time

Why exclusice 1 baud here 16 baud there if you have an auto mode???

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von jose alberto nieto ros
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 22:10
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Patient please. I am working in details more important, please believe in
me.

 

  _  

De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 20:46
Asunto: AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

  

Ok for the pilot tone ….. what about the rest userselectable macros , f-keys
??

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
] Im Auftrag von jose alberto nieto ros
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 18:49
An: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Betreff: Re: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Hi, Sieg,

 

This mode dont need a tone for the synchronization. Is auto :-)

 

  _  

De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackstien @freenet. de
Para: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 18:36
Asunto: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

  

Hello Jose

 

1. Downloaded the 202 but soft says it is 201 … in the info and on the upper
gui-line

 

2. Had my first qso last night ….. yippie yeah :-D

 

3. the macrobuttons should be settable by the user (klick on them with right
mouse … a macroeditor starts …. 

 

4. the macobuttons should have selectable if you wanna send a new pilot or
not….like in the soft mftty (see here: http://www.polar-
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html  electric. com/MFTT/
index.html )

 

5. associate the macrobuttons to the f-keys

 

Maybe you can grab some ideas from the other soft hi hi

Greetz

Dg9bfc

Sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
] Im Auftrag von nietorosdj
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 03:46
An: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

 

  

Please download the latest version.

 

 





[digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta

2010-02-24 Thread nietorosdj
Please download the latest version.



[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-02-21 Thread digitalradio

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
group.

  File: /ROS error pictures/Run-time error.jpg 
  Uploaded by : g0dja dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk 
  Description : Picture of Run-time error at G0DJA 

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/ROS%20error%20pictures/Run-time%20error.jpg
 

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

g0dja dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
 





[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-02-20 Thread digitalradio

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
group.

  File: /ROS Audio/ROS 1baud.WAV 
  Uploaded by : g0dja dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk 
  Description : ROS 1 Baud 

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/files/ROS%20Audio/ROS%201baud.WAV 

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

g0dja dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
 





Re: [digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-02-20 Thread Dave Ackrill
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 Hello,
 
 This email message is a notification to let you know that
 a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio 
 group.
 
   File: /ROS Audio/ROS 1baud.WAV 
   Uploaded by : g0dja dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk 
   Description : ROS 1 Baud 
 

Beware!  These is was recorded straight from ROS to Spectrum Labs using 
VAC, so they are very loud.

Dave (G0DJA)


Re: [digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2010-02-20 Thread Dave Ackrill
Dave Ackrill wrote:

 Beware!  These is was recorded straight from ROS to Spectrum Labs using 
 VAC, so they are very loud.

Sorry, I changed what I was going to write as I realised I had not 
ticked the 'notify people' button for the 16 bit file.

What that should say is Beware! These were recorded straight from ROS...

I should read things back before I hit send!

Dave (G0DJA)


[digitalradio] New software and demo files for LD-1 SDR

2010-02-14 Thread Peter
A new release of the LD-1 software with improved functionality and a streamlined
installation procedure is now available. Also, I've recorded some new demo
files which can be played back using Winrad or Rocky. It seems I'd been running
my sound card's Line-In gain way too high, saturating the input. The new
software and demos are all available at
www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1Downloads.htm. Details at www.garage-shoppe.com.

73,
Pete, NI9N
www.lazydogengineering.com
www.garage-shoppe.com






AW: [digitalradio] New SDR available

2010-02-10 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Another one out in the market . nice and cheap .. Performance tests??

Dg9bfc

Sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von Peter
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 19:46
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New SDR available

 

  

Hi, all. I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some
significant improvements. Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog
Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters. It also feature
USB control. Anyone who's interested can find the details at
http://www.lazydoge http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm
ngineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, www.garage-shoppe.com.

73,

Pete, NI9N 





[digitalradio] New SDR available

2010-02-09 Thread Peter
Hi, all.  I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some 
significant improvements.  Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog Devices 
DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters.  It also feature USB 
control.  Anyone who's interested can find the details at 
http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, 
www.garage-shoppe.com.

73,

Pete, NI9N  






Re: [digitalradio] New SDR available

2010-02-09 Thread Andy obrien
This seems like an astonishingly low price. What are the bandwidth
capabilities of this device? Can you do 100 Khz, 200 , more ?  Does it
require a high end soundcard ?

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Peter p...@lazydogengineering.com wrote:



 Hi, all. I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some
 significant improvements. Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog
 Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters. It also feature
 USB control. Anyone who's interested can find the details at
 http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog,
 www.garage-shoppe.com.

 73,

 Pete, NI9N

  



Re: [digitalradio] New SDR available

2010-02-09 Thread Brian Denley
Very impressive!  I will strongly consider buying one.  Anyone own the LD1?
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html
- Original Message - 
From: Peter p...@lazydogengineering.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 1:46 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] New SDR available


Hi, all.  I'm offering a new SDR, inspired by the Softrock-40 but with some 
significant improvements.  Instead of a crystal LO, it uses two Analog 
Devices DDS chips, and has 5 selectable preselector filters.  It also 
feature USB control.  Anyone who's interested can find the details at 
http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD1home.htm and at my blog, 
www.garage-shoppe.com.

73,

Pete, NI9N







[digitalradio] New SDR from Flex Radio

2010-02-09 Thread Bob McGwier
The Flex 1500 will soon be available. The first one has rolled off 
prototype line and you can see it (in operation) at the Orlando 
Hamcation if you are going (this weekend).

If is a BCB through 54 MHz 5 watt TRANSCEIVER with control, etc. run via 
the USB 2.0 connection.  If it were not for the 5 watt amplifier, it 
would power itself completely from the USB 2.0 cable.

It will be run by PowerSDR 2.0 (soon to be released).  It comes with 
full support for CAT and 3rd party digital programs without the use of 
cables (both supported virtually).

http://www.flex-radio.com/Products.aspx?topic=F1.5k_features

The cost is $580 for the time being.


Bob
N4HY

-- 
(Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
“All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for
  people of good conscience to remain silent
-Thomas Jefferson
Active: Facebook,Twitter,LinkedIn





Try Hamspots, PSKreporter, and K3UK Sked Page 
http://www.obriensweb.com/skedpskr4.html
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [digitalradio] New kenwood radio (video clip)

2010-02-08 Thread J. Moen
From Kenwood's booth at the 2009 Tokyo Ham Fair, posted on YouTube in August, 
2009.  It shows a mock-up of Kenwood's next mid-range (US $2,000) 160-6 meter 
HF radio that targets most of the Elecraft K3's specs.  A real one should be 
at Dayton 2010.  One assumes it will be as easy at digital modes as Kenwood's 
TS-2000 is.

  Jim - K6JM

- Original Message - 
  From: Andy obrien 
  To: digitalradio 
  Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 9:42 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] New kenwood radio (video clip)


  -- Forwarded message --
  From: Jason kf6q...@yahoo.com
  Date: Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:32 PM
  Subject: [KenwoodTS-2000] New kenwood radio enjoy
  To: kenwoodts-2...@yahoogroups.com kenwoodts-2...@yahoogroups.com




  
http://dx-hamspirit.com/2009/09/new-kenwood-hf-transceiver-short-clip-from-tokyo-ham-fair-2009/

  Copy and paste link into address bar if you can't click on it



[digitalradio] New kenwood radio (video clip)

2010-02-07 Thread Andy obrien
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason kf6q...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:32 PM
Subject: [KenwoodTS-2000] New kenwood radio enjoy
To: kenwoodts-2...@yahoogroups.com kenwoodts-2...@yahoogroups.com




http://dx-hamspirit.com/2009/09/new-kenwood-hf-transceiver-short-clip-from-tokyo-ham-fair-2009/

Copy and paste link into address bar if you can't click on it

 


[digitalradio] New Sunspot Group #11043

2010-01-31 Thread Thomas F. Giella NZ4O
Posted Sunday January 31, 2010 at 1500 UTC at 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm

On Saturday the 30th a new solar cycle 24 sunspot group emerged in NE 
quadrant of the Sun near N27E35 and was numbered 11043 by NOAA/SWPC. It 
contains a beta magnetic signature capable of producing B class and isolated 
C class solar flares.

On Saturday the 30th the solar flux index values were 77.0 75.0 74.2 and the 
sunspot number 25. We have had visible sunspots for 10 days in a row, 23 of 
the last 24 days and 34 of the last 36 days. I think that we can safely say 
that solar cycle 24 is well underway and steadily picking up it's pace.

Sunspot group #11041 is now a spotless plage near S27W58 and will soon cross 
the SW limb of the Sun.

73  GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
n...@arrl.net

LF/MF/HF/VHF/UHF Frequency Radiowave Propagation Email Reflector: 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/spaceweather
NZ4O Daily Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data Archive: 
http://www.solarcycle24.org
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data In Graphic  Image Format: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o2.htm
NZ4O Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation Forecast  Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o3.htm
NZ4O Solar Cycle 24 Forecast Discussion  Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm
NZ4O 160 Meter Radio Propagation Theory Notes: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o5.htm
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Raw Forecast Data Links: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o6.htm







Suggested frequencies for calling CQ with experimental digital modes =
3584,10147, 14074 USB on your dial plus 1000Hz on waterfall.

Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[digitalradio] NEW : Digitalradio 2010 Challenge via Clublogs

2010-01-11 Thread Andy obrien
I have arranged for clublogs.org  (http://www.clublogs.org) to add
Digitalradio as a club .  This means you can connect  to their web
site, registered, and then upload your log .  The upload will be an
ADIF upload.  If you need help with that part, just let me know, it is
quite easy.  You also need to add digitalradio as a club you belong
to.  To do that click on CLUBS and pick digitalradio from the list.
You can add other clubs that you belong to, also.Once you have
done that you will be able to participate in a variety of challenges.
One will be between members of digitalradio, and an other can be
digitalradio versus others groups/clubs.  I am particularly interested
in a 2010 challenge for data QSOs.  Clublogs.org will allow you to
filter your log and see QSOs and  DXCC entities worked by mode (CW,
SSB , or DATA) .  So upload your log periodically and see where you
stand versus other people and how we stand versus other clubs.  After
you upload your log and join a club, it can take some time before your
data starts to show.

Andy K3UK


About Club Log
Introduction by Michael G7VJR

Club Log is a web-based application that uses a large database to
analyse amateur radio log files, which are uploaded by users all over
the world. Using the logs, it is possible to offer band-mode league
tables, efficient log search tools, analysis for DXpedition planning
purposes and most wanted lists for DXCC entities (including by date,
band or mode for example).

There is a great deal of information that can be mined and analysed in
a standard ADIF file. Club Log can provide empirical propagation
charts, and give back to its users the ability to find wanted DX
spots, identify QSLing gaps and perform other analysis of their logs
which might be hard to do with normal logging software. Through Club
Log, I also host online log search systems for significant
DXpeditions.

One of the driving principles of Club Log is to store as many QSOs as
possible, as this makes the reports and statistics more meaningful and
representative. Everything in Club Log depends upon analysing real
QSOs, and or this reason I am very grateful to everyone who
participates. If you have not joined yet, I warmly invite you to sign
up and join the action! It is completely free.




[digitalradio] New to the group

2010-01-11 Thread clive_2e0bsl
Thought id say hi to the group. Wonder if anyone knows what the signals are 
round 1.877 - 2k wide is it Olivia or some other MSK?



AW: [digitalradio] New to the group

2010-01-11 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Maybe stanag 4285 …. Used by military …. Tune to 1875 usb don´t know the
submode or i fit is really stanag4285 and i fit is coded or not …..

What soft have you for digital??

Dg9bfc

Sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von clive_2e0bsl
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Januar 2010 21:09
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [digitalradio] New to the group

 

  

Thought id say hi to the group. Wonder if anyone knows what the signals are
round 1.877 - 2k wide is it Olivia or some other MSK?





[digitalradio] New Digital Mode Web Site by WZ7I

2010-01-01 Thread Tony
All, 

Wes, WZ7I has a new digital mode website entitled Which digital mode should I 
be using for keyboard to keyboard. I'm sure he'd like to hear comments / 
suggestions from the group. 

See http://mysite.verizon.net/wz7i/digitalmodes.html

Tony -K2MO


AW: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

2009-12-31 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
If the signalink is a new one maybe the changes are already made . see at
the bottom of the page .

But maybe somebody got a used one that he found on e-buy ..

So just a quick check with spectran or any other spectral software and you
will see if you have to change the transformers and the caps ..

Have a nice happy new year

Greetz

Dg9bfc

Sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von Rick Westerfield
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 23:50
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: RE: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

 

  

It is working pretty good already and all of those surface mount components
scare me a little.  I would need an electron microscope to make some of the
changes he suggests in the link.

 

Rick - KH2DF

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Siegfried Jackstien
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:27 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

 

  

Hi rick and andy

Maybe this is of interrest for you

http://www.frenning
http://www.frenning.dk/OZ1PIF_HOMEPAGE/SignaLinkUSB-mods.html
.dk/OZ1PIF_HOMEPAGE/SignaLinkUSB-mods.html

that guy made some mods to the signalink to improve linearity and other
things

maybe it helps to further improve winmor (or any other digital-mode)

dg9bfc

sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von Andy obrien
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 22:14
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

 

  

Congratulations Rick, interesting to see the WINMOR improvments.  Is it
better than your Rigblaster ?

Andy









[digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

2009-12-30 Thread obrienaj
I see a few new people have joined in the past few days, and they mentioned 
they received new digital mode interfaces as gifts for Christmas.  Welcome.  
How about telling us what you received ?  Anything we can help you with on this 
maillist ?

Andy K3UK




RE: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

2009-12-30 Thread Rick Westerfield
Hello Andy,

 

   Although I might not be considered a new member, I did receive a
Tigertronics Signalink USB under the tree last week.  Quite a nice little
gift from Santa Claus, I tell you.  My WINMOR scores and speeds have gone up
considerably and my retries have gone down - not much more to ask for,
really.  It is quite an improvement over my Dell motherboard computer
soundcard.

 

   And the Signalink came with good instructions and was very easy to
install. The price at a hundred dollars was very reasonable for what you get
- free shipping.  It replaced a Rig Blaster (to be kept for Field Day) and I
am still using a Rig Talk for rig control.  So yea, I'm pretty happy.

 

Rick - KH2DF

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of obrienaj
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:52 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

 

  

I see a few new people have joined in the past few days, and they mentioned
they received new digital mode interfaces as gifts for Christmas. Welcome.
How about telling us what you received ? Anything we can help you with on
this maillist ?

Andy K3UK





Re: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

2009-12-30 Thread Andy obrien
Congratulations Rick, interesting to see the WINMOR improvments.  Is it
better than your Rigblaster ?

Andy


AW: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

2009-12-30 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
Hi rick and andy

Maybe this is of interrest for you

http://www.frenning.dk/OZ1PIF_HOMEPAGE/SignaLinkUSB-mods.html

that guy made some mods to the signalink to improve linearity and other
things

maybe it helps to further improve winmor (or any other digital-mode)

dg9bfc

sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von Andy obrien
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 22:14
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

 

  

Congratulations Rick, interesting to see the WINMOR improvments.  Is it
better than your Rigblaster ?

Andy







RE: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

2009-12-30 Thread Rick Westerfield
It is working pretty good already and all of those surface mount components
scare me a little.  I would need an electron microscope to make some of the
changes he suggests in the link.

 

Rick - KH2DF

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Siegfried Jackstien
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:27 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

 

  

Hi rick and andy

Maybe this is of interrest for you

http://www.frenning.dk/OZ1PIF_HOMEPAGE/SignaLinkUSB-mods.html

that guy made some mods to the signalink to improve linearity and other
things

maybe it helps to further improve winmor (or any other digital-mode)

dg9bfc

sigi

 

 

  _  

Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von Andy obrien
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 22:14
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re: [digitalradio] New digital interfaces for Christmas

 

  

Congratulations Rick, interesting to see the WINMOR improvments.  Is it
better than your Rigblaster ?

Andy








[digitalradio] New Solar Cycle 24 Sunspot Group

2009-12-24 Thread Thomas F. Giella NZ4O
Posted Thursday December 24, 2009 at 1300 UTC at
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm

A new solar cycle 24 sunspot group emerged early this morning. It is located
near S27E26 and appears to have a simple beta magnetic signature. If and
when it's numbered by NOAA/SWPC it will be #11040.

If numbered then the month of December has seen seven solar cycle 24 sunspot
groups emerge. And of course that is a new record for solar cycle 24.

The solar flux index values for December 23rd were 80.7 78.4 76.8 and the
sunspot number 23.

73, GUD DX, Merry X-mas  Happy New Year,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
n...@arrl.net

COL LF/MF/HF/VHF/UHF Frequency Radiowave Propagation Email Reflector:
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/spaceweather
NZ4O Daily Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data Archive:
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o1.htm
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data In Graphic  Image Format:
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o2.htm
NZ4O Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation Forecast  Archive:
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o3.htm
NZ4O Solar Cycle 24 Forecast Discussion  Archive:
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm
NZ4O 160 Meter Radio Propagation Theory Notes:
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o5.htm
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Raw Forecast Data Links:
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o6.htm
Harmful Man Induced Climate Change (Global Warming) Refuted:
http://www.wcflunatall.com/globalwarminglie.htm






Suggested frequencies for calling CQ with experimental digital modes =
3584,10147, 14074 USB on your dial plus 1000Hz on waterfall.

Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




[digitalradio] New ARRL Course on Digital Technology for EmComms

2009-12-15 Thread Mark Thompson


New ARRL Course on Digital Technology for
EmComms

With digital technology becoming an
integral part of Amateur Radio, hams interested in emergency communications now
have a new tool to help them take advantage of emerging modes such as Packet
Radio APRS, Winlink 2000, IRLP, EchoLink and WIRES-II, D-STAR, APCO25, HF
sound card modes and Automatic Link Establishment (ALE). The ARRL Digital
Technology for Emergency Communications 
Coursehttp://www.arrl.org/catalog/?item=1247 will introduce hams to all of
the ways Amateur Radio operators are using digital technology as a valuable
emergency communications tool.


Written by ARRL
Publications Manager and QST Editor Steve Ford, WB8IMY, this self-study
CD-ROM will answer such questions as: Can you transfer supply lists or
personnel assignments between emergency operations sites? Can you get critical
e-mails to the Internet if a connection goes down? Can you relay digital
images of damage at specific locations? Can you track the locations of emergency
personnel and display them on computer maps?


Illustrations, screenshots, Internet links and audio files are used to 
demonstrate
transmission modes and equipment configurations. Bite-sized learning units
and interactive knowledge checks make learning interesting and fun.

This course is a great starting point for anyone interested
in the public service applications of digital communications technology,
said Ford.


  

[digitalradio] New release (4.16) of MULTIPSK

2009-12-03 Thread Patrick Lindecker
New release (4.16) of MULTIPSK

Pour les francophones: la version française de ce message se trouve sur mon 
site (http://f6cte.free.fr). Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien Principales 
modifications (courriel avertissant de la sortie de la nouvelle version).


Hello to all Ham and SWL,

The new release of MultiPSK (4.16) is on my Web site (http://f6cte.free.fr).
The main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR: 
http://www.eqth.info/multipsk/index.html (click on United States Download 
Site).
Another mirror site isTerry's: http://g90swl.co.uk/multipsk/

Multipsk associated to Clock are freeware programs but with functions 
submitted to a licence (by user key).

Multidem 2.2.4 and Clock 1.8.5 have been slightly modified (improvement of 
the sound card and mixer management).

The main modifications of MULTIPSK 4.16 are the following:

1) Decoding of the STANAG 4285 mode

This mode is used in HF for professional transmissions. Unfortunatly, almost 
all transmissions are encrypted, which limits the interest of this mode


Several sub modes (75 to 2400 bps) and two different interleaving (short and 
long) are proposed. All modes are fixed frequency.


The receiver should be in USB mode. The bandwidth must extend from 300 to 
3300 Hz (at -30 dB) with a relatively flat frequency response between 600 
and 3000 Hz. The central frequency is, in this case, equal to 1800Hz. It can 
be selected a 1500 Hz central frequency for Ham receivers.

It is a first decoding version which is far away to be perfect (the signal 
must be very good to be decoded).

See specifications further on.

2) RS ID, Call ID (Message ID)
RS ID

Due to the extension of the RS ID use, it is proposed a function which 
allows to select a group of modes for which the user wants a RS ID detection 
(function available by clicking on  ID ).

Message ID

Creation of a Message ID which permits to send small messages of 9 
characters maximum which will appear in the waterfall of the other Hams. As 
it works in background and as it is not related to any specific digital 
mode, it can be useful, for example, in case of difficulty of doing a QSO. 
Message IDs are not considered as true Call IDs and are not stored (they are 
only displayed).

For more information, download:

http://f6cte.free.fr/The_RS_ID_easy_with_Multipsk.doc

http://f6cte.free.fr/The_Call_ID_and_Prop_ID_easy_with_Multipsk.doc

3) New macros:

- LAST QSO transmits all the data about the last QSO done with the Ham 
which call sign is in the Call field. By clicking on Number? in the QSO 
panel, these data also appears,

- SELF REPEATING permits to automatically repeat the same sequence until 
the user decides to switch on reception. It is a useful function for tests. 
This macro must be located at the end of the sequence.


-EXEC:command permits to execute a Windows command. For example, it 
provides an easy way to look up call on qrz.com:

EXEC:rundll32.exe url.dll,FileProtocolHandler 
http://www.qrz.com/db/CALL. Macros which can be directly replaced by a 
text can be integered to the EXEC macro. This macro is reserved for Hams 
with experience in computers. See help for details.

4) Improvements of

the ARQ FAE mode (in ALE or ALE400) with, mainly, an automatic 
re-synchronization using the RS ID,

the Packet 1200 bauds decoding,

the sound card management,

the 110A decoding,

APRS (Packet, 141A and ALE400). It can be sent a specific icon, for example 
Emergency (in the APRS Transmission panel),

JT65: JT65 beacon transmitting at each minute.

Note about translation of Multipsk.exe and Clock .exe: the 4.15 version of 
Multipsk/Clock has been completly translated to Spanish by Joachin (EA4ZB), 
from French. The translation file is on my Web site 
(http://f6cte.free.fr/Translation_files.htm).

4285 specifications:

Baud rate: 2400.

Modulation : 8PSK (not differential, the exact phase being determined 
through known data) with a central frequency of 1800 Hz

Reception mode: USB

Character set : different synchronous or asynchronous formats are proposed 
(5 ITA2, 7 bits ASCII or 8 bits (ASCII+ANSI))

Shape of pulse : raised cosine

Bandwidth : about 3 KHz (300 to 3300 Hz)

Demodulation : coherent

Synchronization : automatic using the known data

Convolution code: yes. The constraint lenght is equal to 7 bits,

Interleaving : yes. Two interleavings are proposed: short or long.

Lowest S/N (on Multipsk): + 5 dB in 75 bps and + 12 dB in 2400 bps (the 
signal to noise ratio must be, in general, very good, to be able to decode 
this mode, i.e excellent at 2400 bps and good at 75 bps).

Each frame contains a synchronization preamble phase (80 symbols), 4 data 
phases of 32 symbols where the unknown data is transmitted (mixed with 3 
known data phases of 16 symbols to follow the transmission characteristics).

An adaptative equalization is required at this speed (2400 bauds).

73

Patrick




Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.16) of MULTIPSK

2009-12-03 Thread Phil Williams
Just installed and out on the road for a test drive...philw de ka1gmn

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr wrote:



 New release (4.16) of MULTIPSK

 Pour les francophones: la version française de ce message se trouve sur mon

 site (http://f6cte.free.fr). Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien Principales

 modifications (courriel avertissant de la sortie de la nouvelle version).

 Hello to all Ham and SWL,

 The new release of MultiPSK (4.16) is on my Web site (http://f6cte.free.fr
 ).
 The main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR:
 http://www.eqth.info/multipsk/index.html (click on United States Download

 Site).
 Another mirror site isTerry's: http://g90swl.co.uk/multipsk/

 Multipsk associated to Clock are freeware programs but with functions
 submitted to a licence (by user key).

 Multidem 2.2.4 and Clock 1.8.5 have been slightly modified (improvement of
 the sound card and mixer management).

 The main modifications of MULTIPSK 4.16 are the following:

 1) Decoding of the STANAG 4285 mode

 This mode is used in HF for professional transmissions. Unfortunatly,
 almost
 all transmissions are encrypted, which limits the interest of this mode

 Several sub modes (75 to 2400 bps) and two different interleaving (short
 and
 long) are proposed. All modes are fixed frequency.

 The receiver should be in USB mode. The bandwidth must extend from 300 to
 3300 Hz (at -30 dB) with a relatively flat frequency response between 600
 and 3000 Hz. The central frequency is, in this case, equal to 1800Hz. It
 can
 be selected a 1500 Hz central frequency for Ham receivers.

 It is a first decoding version which is far away to be perfect (the signal
 must be very good to be decoded).

 See specifications further on.

 2) RS ID, Call ID (Message ID)
 RS ID

 Due to the extension of the RS ID use, it is proposed a function which
 allows to select a group of modes for which the user wants a RS ID
 detection
 (function available by clicking on  ID ).

 Message ID

 Creation of a Message ID which permits to send small messages of 9
 characters maximum which will appear in the waterfall of the other Hams. As

 it works in background and as it is not related to any specific digital
 mode, it can be useful, for example, in case of difficulty of doing a QSO.
 Message IDs are not considered as true Call IDs and are not stored (they
 are
 only displayed).

 For more information, download:

 http://f6cte.free.fr/The_RS_ID_easy_with_Multipsk.doc

 http://f6cte.free.fr/The_Call_ID_and_Prop_ID_easy_with_Multipsk.doc

 3) New macros:

 - LAST QSO transmits all the data about the last QSO done with the Ham
 which call sign is in the Call field. By clicking on Number? in the QSO

 panel, these data also appears,

 - SELF REPEATING permits to automatically repeat the same sequence until
 the user decides to switch on reception. It is a useful function for tests.

 This macro must be located at the end of the sequence.

 -EXEC:command permits to execute a Windows command. For example, it
 provides an easy way to look up call on qrz.com:

 EXEC:rundll32.exe url.dll,FileProtocolHandler
 http://www.qrz.com/db/CALL. Macros which can be directly replaced by a
 text can be integered to the EXEC macro. This macro is reserved for Hams
 with experience in computers. See help for details.

 4) Improvements of

 the ARQ FAE mode (in ALE or ALE400) with, mainly, an automatic
 re-synchronization using the RS ID,

 the Packet 1200 bauds decoding,

 the sound card management,

 the 110A decoding,

 APRS (Packet, 141A and ALE400). It can be sent a specific icon, for example

 Emergency (in the APRS Transmission panel),

 JT65: JT65 beacon transmitting at each minute.

 Note about translation of Multipsk.exe and Clock .exe: the 4.15 version of
 Multipsk/Clock has been completly translated to Spanish by Joachin (EA4ZB),

 from French. The translation file is on my Web site
 (http://f6cte.free.fr/Translation_files.htm).

 4285 specifications:

 Baud rate: 2400.

 Modulation : 8PSK (not differential, the exact phase being determined
 through known data) with a central frequency of 1800 Hz

 Reception mode: USB

 Character set : different synchronous or asynchronous formats are proposed
 (5 ITA2, 7 bits ASCII or 8 bits (ASCII+ANSI))

 Shape of pulse : raised cosine

 Bandwidth : about 3 KHz (300 to 3300 Hz)

 Demodulation : coherent

 Synchronization : automatic using the known data

 Convolution code: yes. The constraint lenght is equal to 7 bits,

 Interleaving : yes. Two interleavings are proposed: short or long.

 Lowest S/N (on Multipsk): + 5 dB in 75 bps and + 12 dB in 2400 bps (the
 signal to noise ratio must be, in general, very good, to be able to decode
 this mode, i.e excellent at 2400 bps and good at 75 bps).

 Each frame contains a synchronization preamble phase (80 symbols), 4 data
 phases of 32 symbols where the unknown data is transmitted (mixed with 3
 known data phases of 16 symbols to follow the transmission
 

[digitalradio] New Solar Cycle 24 Sunspot Group

2009-11-21 Thread Thomas F. Giella NZ4O
Posted Friday November 20, 2009 at http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm

Yesterday evening another new solar cycle 24 sunspot group emerged in the NE 
quadrant of the Sun in between sunspot group #11032 and #11033. If numbered 
by NOAA/SWPC it will be #11034 and SIDC Belgium Catania #32.

The NOAA/SWPC sunspot number is 30 (tied for the highest so far for solar 
cycle 24) and the SIDC Belgium sunspot number is 26. The solar flux index 
(SFI) is 78.0.

The new sunspot groups could push the SFI above 80 in coming days. This 
would raise the maximum usable frequency (MUF) of the F layer high enough to 
improve propagation conditions on 20, 17 and 15 meters.

Solar cycle 24 continues to ramp up this month. As Paul McCartney once sang, 
Coming up.

73  GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
n...@arrl.net
eList Owner/Moderator
John 3:16 

COL LF/MF/HF/VHF/UHF Frequency Radiowave Propagation Email Reflector: 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/spaceweather
NZ4O Daily Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o1.htm
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data In Graphic  Image Format: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o2.htm
NZ4O Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation Forecast  Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o3.htm
NZ4O Solar Cycle 24 Forecast Discussion  Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm
NZ4O 160 Meter Radio Propagation Theory Notes: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o5.htm
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Raw Forecast Data Links: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o6.htm
Florida  U.S. Raw Weather Forecasting Resource Links: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/kn4lf13.htm






Suggested frequencies for calling CQ with experimental digital modes =
3584,10147, 14074 USB on your dial plus 1000Hz on waterfall.

Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [digitalradio] New Version of WSPR Available

2009-11-21 Thread Andy obrien
Am I missing something else ?  I have WSPR 2.0 working for transmit and
receive but if I choose the CAT option in the setup, nothing appears to
happen.  It doe not appear to read my frequency despite setting it up the
normal way one sets up for a TS2000.  Is it supposed to read the frequency?
When I update the radio my PC internal speaker squawks at ,me.

Andy K3UK


On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:



 Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:

  Andy did figure it out eventually, at least he's reporting spots:
  2009-11-20 08:32 N4ABN 10.140166 +9 0 DM59pd 1 K3UK
  FN02hk 2484 72




Re: [digitalradio] New Version of WSPR Available

2009-11-21 Thread Andy obrien
OK, it works with a TS570 setting but not with a TS2000 setting for
some reason.  I see if does not read the frequency but updates the
frequency back to the originally setting.  What are the advantages of
this ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
 Am I missing something else ?  I have WSPR 2.0 working for transmit and
 receive but if I choose the CAT option in the setup, nothing appears to
 happen.  It doe not appear to read my frequency despite setting it up the
 normal way one sets up for a TS2000.  Is it supposed to read the frequency?
 When I update the radio my PC internal speaker squawks at ,me.

 Andy K3UK


 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
 wrote:



 Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:

  Andy did figure it out eventually, at least he's reporting spots:
  2009-11-20 08:32 N4ABN 10.140166 +9 0 DM59pd 1 K3UK
  FN02hk 2484 72





Re: [digitalradio] New Version of WSPR Available

2009-11-21 Thread Dave Ackrill
Andy obrien wrote:
 OK, it works with a TS570 setting but not with a TS2000 setting for
 some reason.  I see if does not read the frequency but updates the
 frequency back to the originally setting.  What are the advantages of
 this ?

Mine works fine with my TS2000X Andy,

You may have a setting problem somewhere, maybe?

Dave (G0DJA)


Re: [digitalradio] New Version of WSPR Available

2009-11-20 Thread Dave Ackrill
Andy obrien wrote:
 I think I figured the fancy-dancy slider out.

Don't forget to un-tick the 'idle' box as well Andy.

Dave (G0DJA)


[digitalradio] New Version of WSPR Available

2009-11-19 Thread Dave Ackrill
Joe (K1JT) has just announced the release of a new version of WSPR as 
follows.

WSPR 2.0 is now available for download from the WSJT Home
Page, http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/ .  Click on
WSPR in the left margin, then on the appropriate WSPR 2.0
link for your operating system.  Installable binary packages
are provided for Windows and for recent Debian-based 32-bit
Linux systems.  A recommended Linux distribution is Ubuntu 9.04.

Version 2.0 of WSPR introduces a number of new program
features, including the following:

   - User-friendly setup screen with drop-down selection
of audio devices and CAT parameters
   - Support for compound callsigns
   - Fine adjustment of fractional time for transmitting
   - Optional CW identification
   - Tools for frequency calibration and automated
frequency corrections for your radio
   - A Tune button
   - Direct on-line access to the WSPR 2.0 User's guide,
WSPRnet, and the WSJT Home Page

Full details are presented in the all-new User's Guide,
which is a must read if you want to use the new features.
The manual includes a Troubleshooting guide.  Click
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSPR_2.0_User.pdf
to read the manual.

WSPR also runs on most other Linux distributions, on
FreeBSD, and on Mac OS X -- but at present, on these
platforms you must compile it from source code.  Some basic
instructions are included on the WSJT Program Development
web page, http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/devel.html .


Many people have contributed to the success and popularity
of WSPR, and to WSPR 2.0 in particular. Members of the WSJT
Development Group, especially G4KLA, OH2GQC, VA3DB, W1BW,
W6CQZ, and JCDutton have written code, particularly code
addressing platform portability issues.  G3ZOD, LZ1BB,
OZ1PIF, and VK3SB have spend many hours helping to debug
beta releases and prepare distribution packages. G3ZOD
drafted most of Appendix D of the new User's Guide. Many
thanks to all!

-- 73, Joe, K1JT

Dave (G0DJA)



[digitalradio] New Solar Cycle 24 Sunspot Group

2009-11-19 Thread Thomas F. Giella NZ4O
Posted Thursday November 19, 2009 at http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm

The cycle 24 sunspot group that I mentioned on November 18, 2009  has been 
numbered 11033 by the NOAA/SWPC. It is located near N17E20 and contains a 
beta magnetic signature capable of producing very small B class solar 
flares. As mentioned yesterday SIDC Belgium assigned it Catania #28.

The old solar cycle 24 sunspot group #11029 has produced new sunspots and 
has been re-numbered 11033 by NOAA/SWPC. SIDC Belgium has given the sunspot 
group Catania 30. It is located near N21E47 and contains a beta magnetic 
signature capable of producing very small B class solar flares.

The NOAA/SWPC sunspot number is 29 (the second highest so far for solar 
cycle 24) and the SIDC Belgium sunspot number is 30. The solar flux index 
(SFI) is 77.4.

The new sunspot groups could push the SFI above 80 in coming days. This 
would raise the maximum usable frequency (MUF) of the F layer high enough to 
improve propagation conditions on 20, 17 and 15 meters.

Solar cycle 24 continues to ramp up this month!

73  GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
n...@arrl.net


COL LF/MF/HF/VHF/UHF Frequency Radiowave Propagation Email Reflector: 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/spaceweather
NZ4O Daily Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o1.htm
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Data In Graphic  Image Format: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o2.htm
NZ4O Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation Forecast  Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o3.htm
NZ4O Solar Cycle 24 Forecast Discussion  Archive: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o4.htm
NZ4O 160 Meter Radio Propagation Theory Notes: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o5.htm
NZ4O Solar Space Weather  Geomagnetic Raw Forecast Data Links: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o6.htm
Florida  U.S. Raw Weather Forecasting Resource Links: 
http://www.wcflunatall.com/kn4lf13.htm





Suggested frequencies for calling CQ with experimental digital modes =
3584,10147, 14074 USB on your dial plus 1000Hz on waterfall.

Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



  1   2   3   4   5   >