Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi, :-) Small idea: have you considered using Google Apps for the project's mail needs? *So* easy to set-up, *so* easy to maintain, feature-packed, and I'm sure they will give TDF a free upgrade to an enterprise account. Lots of other benefits, too. David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Decisions about libreoffice.org English main site management
Hi, sorry for stepping in so late -- was on vacation until January 10th and then instantly went ill, finally back to reading through e-mail backlog. IMHO, the raised questions in this thread have been answered during yesterday's SC call (minutes and recording will be online soon). If there are open questions to me directly, just ping me, then I have missed them. :-) Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi, Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-01-14 09.50: In general, IMHO etc. I believe a forwarding setup, as well as being easier fits into most people's existing mail flows rather better. Also using a proprietary software hosted service for our project would not be an ideal choice IMHO;-) I agree. :-) IMHO, Google Apps also doesn't allow easy creation via API/scripts/command line, which is what we need. I envision an interface where all eligible people can maintain their forwarding themselves, and Alex already agreed to hack something in Python for that. I even have a spare server that could take of the forwarding. Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[steering-discuss] Minutes of SC call 2011-01-13 for review
Dear SC members, please read, review and correct the minutes at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2011-01-13 regards, André -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Minutes of SC call 2011-01-13 for review
Le Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:20:04 +0100, Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net a écrit : Dear SC members, please read, review and correct the minutes at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2011-01-13 regards, André Done, fixed typos and one specific phrasing. -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Minutes of SC call 2011-01-13 for review
Hi André, On 14/01/2011 18:56, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Le Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:20:04 +0100, Andre Schnabelandre.schna...@gmx.net a écrit : Dear SC members, please read, review and correct the minutes at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2011-01-13 regards, André Done, fixed typos and one specific phrasing. Fixed typos. Thanks André for the minutes. Kind regards Sophie -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi *, I'll only give short feedback on the suggested names On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote: My plan is actually to have something like volunteer.nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org +1 (long, but fits) or volunteer.nickn...@libreofficemail.org -1 (sounds like it would be a webmail service like gmail, gmx, web.de, ) or volunteer.nickn...@libreofficevolunteers.org -1 (I just prefer the community one - with volunteer there is a (slight) distinction between community members that are paid by someone, and those who only spend their spare time - at lest in my brain :-))) ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi, :-) If it's not a real libreoffice.org or documentfoundation.org account, I don't think anyone will be interested. I know I wouldn't bother using one of these libreofficecommunity.org, etc., accounts myself i'd just use my own mail account in that case 0.2 cents. ;-) David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi, Am 14.01.2011 17:34, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: volunteer.nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org volunteer.nickn...@libreofficemail.org volunteer.nickn...@libreofficevolunteers.org -1 (I just prefer the community one - with volunteer there is a (slight) distinction between community members that are paid by someone, and those who only spend their spare time - at lest in my brain :-))) But anyway, there will be the word volunteer. at the beginning of the mail-address in any case. Wouldn´t that disturb your brain as well? ;-) Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi, On 14/01/2011 20:33, Volker Merschmann wrote: [...] For the rest: I do not like any of the offered domain names, they all are too long. I would like to see nickn...@libreoffice.org for the members. Agreed with Volker here, wouldn't be possible to have it as simple as nickn...@libreoffice.org? Other wise, my preferred choice would go to volunteer.nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org for the same concern as Christian's brain ones ;) Kind regards -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:53 +0300, sophie wrote: Hi, On 14/01/2011 20:33, Volker Merschmann wrote: [...] For the rest: I do not like any of the offered domain names, they all are too long. I would like to see nickn...@libreoffice.org for the members. Agreed with Volker here, wouldn't be possible to have it as simple as nickn...@libreoffice.org? Other wise, my preferred choice would go to volunteer.nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org for the same concern as Christian's brain ones ;) Howdy, If you are going to issue email addresses just use the real name, if the risk is perceived as large then just say no. If you decide to issue these vanity email addresses I can see for leading word volunteer: nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org is a better choice IMO. Adios, Drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[steering-discuss] Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi Florian, all Florian Effenberger wrote: Hello, as discussed yesterday in the confcall, we're planning to give out official LibreOffice e-mail accounts to people who are community members per the membership committee's decision. [...] My plan is to hand out only e-mail forwarders, not real mailboxes with POP and IMAP, as the latter one requires lots of maintenance. +1 [...] For LibreOffice, I'm a bit hesitant to hand out @libreoffice.org, as this may seem like people are acting on behalf of TDF, causing liability issues. Maybe I'm too touchy, so I'm happy for comments, which is why I am writing this mail. :-) As membership has to be requested and approved in a formal way, I could imagine to include a passus in the formalism where community members declare not to act as representatives or spokespeople for the LibreOffice community or TDF unless they have been approved to do so. Perhaps a mandatory signature like the following would be sufficient: (First Name) Name - LibreOffice community member - In this case a mail address like nickn...@libreoffice.org might be sufficient IMHO. And in case of possible abuse (or deliberate misinterpretation) the community membership can be revoked... If usage of the @libreoffice.org mail address still looks too risky, I'd vote for My plan is actually to have something like volunteer.nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org (or nickn...@libreoffice-community.org) Best regards Bernhard -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Brilliant! I definitely like the sound of that as it solves all the issues there. Good thinking :) Can we do this? Regards from Tom :) From: Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org Sent: Fri, 14 January, 2011 19:21:10 Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu: OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org then it gets the name OpenOffice out there and being seen by a lot of people. Free advertising! +1 For some people this is even a matter of pride, like wearing a t-shirt with a well known brand or message. So, nickn...@libreoffice.org Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org Regards -- Olivier Hallot Comitê Executivo The Document Foundation Voicing the enterprise needs -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
On 1/14/11 8:21 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote: So, nickn...@libreoffice.org Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org I totally agree with Olivier. Just to make the concept stronger, and to protect us from possible email trolls, we can add a specific paragraph in the bylaws. -- Italo Vignoli tel: +39.348.5653829 VoIP: +39.02.320621813 it...@libreoffice.it skype italovignoli -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Minutes of SC call 2011-01-13 for review
Hi SC, Am 14.01.2011 16:20, schrieb Andre Schnabel: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2011-01-13 quote # decision: SC appoints a team of 4 people that will be responsible for managing the website for a trial period of two months this team consists of: * David Nelson (for textual content) * Christoph Noack (for user experience) * Ivan Miskovic (for design) * Christian Lohmaier (for infrastructure) /qoute Is this for the international (main) site only? Are we still allowed to use our roles as authors and publishers in Silverstripe, as we have done the past weeks? Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi all! Am Freitag, den 14.01.2011, 23:47 +0100 schrieb Christoph Noack: And if there are still some concerns, my proposal would be: forename.lastn...@community.libreoffice.org Sorry for this proposal, I totally missed Florian's earlier mail containing a statement concerning sub-domains. Bad if one starts reading from the most recent mails ;-) Cheers, Christoph -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 23:47 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: Hi all! Am Freitag, den 14.01.2011, 20:45 +0100 schrieb Italo Vignoli: On 1/14/11 8:21 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote: So, nickn...@libreoffice.org Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org I totally agree with Olivier. Just to make the concept stronger, and to protect us from possible email trolls, we can add a specific paragraph in the bylaws. Yep, agree as well. (Especially since we'll never get rid of less informed people who spread strange information ... independent of any email address.) And if there are still some concerns, my proposal would be: forename.lastn...@community.libreoffice.org Howdy, I like that construct. You could also flip the problem or solution on it's head. Instead of an adornment such to remove authority use it to state it. forename.lastn...@bod.documentfounation.org forename.lastn...@esc.documentfounation.org Part of taking responsibility for the role is receiving such an address, when or if your roll reverts to community member only. nickn...@libreoffice.org Perhaps a special case of: forename.lastn...@documentfounation.org for paid staff. Just a thought - but again Christoph's change is pretty good IMO if that is the way you choose to go IMO. //drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Minutes of SC call 2011-01-13 for review
Hi Sophie, hi André, ... Am Freitag, den 14.01.2011, 18:59 +0300 schrieb sophie: Hi André, On 14/01/2011 18:56, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Le Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:20:04 +0100, Andre Schnabelandre.schna...@gmx.net a écrit : Dear SC members, please read, review and correct the minutes at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2011-01-13 Thanks for the minutes! As far as I remember, my proposal to draft a wiki page for the website team had been discussed as well. I hope this is correct (and helps to understand the SC decision), otherwise please remove the statement I've added recently ... During the trail period, the team is asked to draft a (e.g.) wiki page how the community can contribute. Cheers, Christoph -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Minutes of SC call 2011-01-13 for review
Hi Stefan, :-) On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 04:34, Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org wrote: # decision: SC appoints a team of 4 people that will be responsible for managing the website for a trial period of two months this team consists of: Is this for the international (main) site only? Are we still allowed to use our roles as authors and publishers in Silverstripe, as we have done the past weeks? My interpretation is that the decision concerns the English main site (it does not cover the NL sites). During this trial period, you should not use your SilverStripe author/publisher permissions to do any stuff on the English main site without the prior agreement of the person in charge of content (me). But people can do what they like on the NL sites - it's not our/my business. However, the SC specifically asked me to seek to build a contributor team, as regards content, and I will be doing that (started already - see [1]). So if you're interested in working on the English NL site, there will definitely be the opportunity (although I will be preferring English NL contributors for drafting content). However, you do need to get a remit from me first. No just jumping in. ;-) And, of course, we will be paying attention to feedback from the community. SC, is the above a reasonable interpretation of your intentions? [1] http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Call-for-volunteers-to-work-on-the-libreoffice-org-website-content-tp2258026p2258026.html David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Help , if it is or not
Do we or don't we? This project DOES NOT incorporate, access, call upon, or otherwise use encryption of any kind, including, but not limited to, open source algorithms and/or calls to encryption in the operating system or underlying platform. This project DOES incorporate, access, call upon or otherwise use encryption. Posting of open source encryption is controlled under U.S. Export Control Classification Number ECCN 5D002 and must be simultaneously reported by email to the U.S. government. You are responsible for submitting this email report to the U.S. government in accordance with procedures described in: http://www.bis.doc.gov/encryption/PubAvailEncSourceCodeNotify.html http://www.bis.doc.gov/encryption/PubAvailEncSourceCodeNotify.html and Section 740.13(e) of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) 15 C.F.R. Parts 730-772. Thanks for your help! Florian Reisinger -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Mac App Store - or else ?
I know an iphone dev, and he has told me the review process does take time, but i think in time this app store will be just as good as the app store found on the iphone. I am more then willing to head up a team to get this ball moving in regards to getting permission from oracle to relicense their code as well as getting it into the app store itself. i think though for that someone will need a developers license, which i am more then willing to get. On 01/14/2011 08:34 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 13/01/11 23:44, Larry Gusaas a écrit : Hi Larry, Make it available in the App Store. OOo was always listed in the Open Source software download page at Apple support. That service has now been replaced by the App Store. I checked out the App Store the day before yesterday and was rather disappointed by the paucity of freeware actually available. I had rather hoped that I would indeed find a similar array of content to that which used to be (still is ?) available under the Freeware / Open Source filter of the Apple Software Download page. Perhaps I missed something, or perhaps the store is just too recent (despite it being announced for a while already) for that software to have been included, or then again, perhaps it is the necessity of Apple's Review process that is putting people off. I assume that Apple reviews all of the software that an author might want to put on the store and has the final say in whether the app actually appears there or not ? Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [tdf-discuss] Using free, open microblogging
Hi Christoph, On 13/01/2011 00:04, Christoph Noack wrote: [...] Italo, sorry for being misleading here - it is not about limiting the impact of any marketing activity. The twitter messages will be available in their network, so outside the LibreOffice website there won't be any changes. If I understand Sophie's message correctly, it will even get better :-) yes, more impacts :-) What this discussions might kick of is, to decide whether we (being an open-source project) want to present commercial services on the LibO frontpage - especially since there is an open alternative. I think, this would also be a good sign for developers interested in FLOSS - to present a deep relationship with other open projects. Yes, I agree with you here. Being an open source project, we also need to support the open source alternatives/world in my opinion (but it's mine :-) However, since I'm not the one who likes to use Twitter or identi.ca, this is a decision for the Marketing. +1 Kind regards Sophie -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Help , if it is or not
Hi Florian, Given the ability to save documents with password protection, I'd say yes. Best regards Simon Brouwer Florian Reisinger schreef: Do we or don't we? This project DOES NOT incorporate, access, call upon, or otherwise use encryption of any kind, including, but not limited to, open source algorithms and/or calls to encryption in the operating system or underlying platform. This project DOES incorporate, access, call upon or otherwise use encryption. Posting of open source encryption is controlled under U.S. Export Control Classification Number ECCN 5D002 and must be simultaneously reported by email to the U.S. government. You are responsible for submitting this email report to the U.S. government in accordance with procedures described in: http://www.bis.doc.gov/encryption/PubAvailEncSourceCodeNotify.html http://www.bis.doc.gov/encryption/PubAvailEncSourceCodeNotify.html and Section 740.13(e) of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) 15 C.F.R. Parts 730-772. Thanks for your help! Florian Reisinger -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Vriendelijke groet, Simon Brouwer -*- nl.openoffice.org -*- http://www.opentaal.org -*- -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice version for Android platform
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Tom Tasche tomtas...@gmail.com wrote:
@Jaime: Can't wait to hear from you!
Please contact me directly via mail when you're ready.
As you can see, I don't feel very comfortable with this
mailing list... ;)
I hope you are kidding :)
FYI, ODFDOM ( http://odftoolkit.org/ ) is a framework that allows
reading and writtig
odt, odp, ods.
But I think we need time to port and making a frontend for Android.
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vuhung16plus{remove}@gmail.dot.com , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16plus
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Fuzzy (OpenSuSE build) LibreOffice 3.3rc2 and rc3 writer table formula (works fine in OOo 3.3rc9!!!)
Il 13/01/2011 21:51, Petr Mladek ha scritto: Carlo Strata píše v Čt 13. 01. 2011 v 21:11 +0100: Hi Everyone, I have just updated my LibreOffice 3.3rc2 to rc3 (linux, x86-64, OpenSuSE Build Service/OBS build, kernel 2.6.36.3, java 1.6.0 update 23 x86-64). LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:5) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.3 Since yesterday, and surely since LO 3.3rc2, I fall with this trouble. - Download the following document (created with OOo 3.3rc9, linux, x86-64, vanilla) http://digilander.libero.it/carlo.strata/carlo/Writer%20table%20troubles,%20created%20by%20OOo%203.3rc9.odt - putting the mouse over the Total labeled cell, you'll see a tooltip like adapt/resize the row (this is correct, I suppose) - click now on the lowest right cell (the sum cell), select its content and delete it (e.g. press the CANC/DEL key) - in the automatic appeared table toolbar click on the SUM icon (an uppercase sigma letter) and then press enter to accept the sum proposed/suggested parameter (e.g.C2|C3|C4) - save and close the document - reopen the just saved document - putting again the mouse over the Total labeled cell, you'll now see a different tooltip that is the same as you were over the sum cell (this is not correct of course) - if you now also click over the Total label, you will see a formula error explosion on many table cells (this is not correct at all). Hmm, it does not look good. On OOo 3.3rc9, linux, x86-64, vanilla, all works fine. Is this an OpenSuSE LibreOffice only bug? Is this an all LibreOffices only bug? I have reproduced the bug with the LO-3.3-rc3 build for SLED11-SP1. I do not see it with the plain LO-3.3-rc3 build = it is SUSE-specific. Carlo, could you please report it into the Novell bugzilla at https://bugzilla.novell.com ? Done: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664516 A writer table formula (may be a calc trouble) replicate itself on many table cells Cedric, Kohei, I am not sure if it is a bug in Writer or Calc. I guess that it is caused by the an extra patch from the build/patches directory. Does it trigger any bell? I think it may be a + or - 1 outrange table cell addressing... or something like that. I see it also on SLED10, so it should not be caused by the split build. Carlo, thanks a lot for reporting the problem. I want we build a better community and a better Office application: we must pursue Quality at all. With this purpose I suggest to us evaluating to solve this Impress issue in Libò 3.3 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116339 Impress freeze opening the issue file. OOo has just assigned it to DEV branch outside OOo 3.3, we have an occasion to improve them: it's now time to change in people minds what they thought about go-oo and derived quality. Isn't it? Best Regards, Petr Best Libò 2011! Ciao, Carlo -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Fuzzy (OpenSuSE build) LibreOffice 3.3rc2 and rc3 writer table formula (works fine in OOo 3.3rc9!!!)
Hello Petr, On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 21:51 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: I have reproduced the bug with the LO-3.3-rc3 build for SLED11-SP1. I do not see it with the plain LO-3.3-rc3 build = it is SUSE-specific. Yup, I did reproduce the problem in the build from SUSE's repository. Indeed this looks bad. Cedric, Kohei, I am not sure if it is a bug in Writer or Calc. This is a Writer table, so it has no relation to Calc's code. I guess that it is caused by the an extra patch from the build/patches directory. Does it trigger any bell? First thing that comes to mind is the extra formula support in Writer table which was still a patch in the build repo not integrated into LibreOffice proper. That's probably the only thing that I can think of. But I think Cedric would be the better person to figure this out. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc kyosh...@novell.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Fuzzy (OpenSuSE build) LibreOffice 3.3rc2 and rc3 writer table formula (works fine in OOo 3.3rc9!!!)
Il 14/01/2011 14:30, Kohei Yoshida ha scritto: Hello Petr, On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 21:51 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: I have reproduced the bug with the LO-3.3-rc3 build for SLED11-SP1. I do not see it with the plain LO-3.3-rc3 build = it is SUSE-specific. Yup, I did reproduce the problem in the build from SUSE's repository. Indeed this looks bad. Cedric, Kohei, I am not sure if it is a bug in Writer or Calc. This is a Writer table, so it has no relation to Calc's code. If it could help, I discover this bug reopening a file of mine that I saved on November 2010 the 10th with this OpenSuSE build: meta:generatorLibreOffice/3.3$Unix OpenOffice.org_project/330m9$Build-1/meta:generator I take this tag from meta.xml obtained unzipping my the odt file, suggested in this by Renzo Bianchi of the Italian OOo Language Group (Plio) to whom I also belong as well as Italo Vignoli that you already know, I suppose. ;-) Fortunately I succeed in reading the modified cells with AbiWord 2.8.6 (OpenSuSE build too); so may point out some useful information like the bug may be a rendering trouble or something like that. I guess that it is caused by the an extra patch from the build/patches directory. Does it trigger any bell? First thing that comes to mind is the extra formula support in Writer table which was still a patch in the build repo not integrated into LibreOffice proper. That's probably the only thing that I can think of. But I think Cedric would be the better person to figure this out. Kohei Carlo -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice version for Android platform
Hi Tom! Am Mittwoch, den 12.01.2011, 22:00 + schrieb Tom Tasche: [... OpenOffice Document Reader for Android ...] As you can see, I don't feel very comfortable with this mailing list... ;) Well, maybe you feel more comfortable when I say downloaded your app and looking forward to do some real use :-) Thanks for making something like that available! [...] Glad you like the idea behind my app! I hope we can build a lot more stable, robust and functional app in the future (hopefully together). Sounds great! [...] Cheers, Christoph -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi all! Am Freitag, den 14.01.2011, 20:45 +0100 schrieb Italo Vignoli: On 1/14/11 8:21 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote: So, nickn...@libreoffice.org Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org I totally agree with Olivier. Just to make the concept stronger, and to protect us from possible email trolls, we can add a specific paragraph in the bylaws. Yep, agree as well. (Especially since we'll never get rid of less informed people who spread strange information ... independent of any email address.) And if there are still some concerns, my proposal would be: forename.lastn...@community.libreoffice.org Cheers, Christoph -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Professional Printing from LiO
Can LibreOffice writer use for professional offset printing? -- Prabath Galagamage http://textlk.blogspot.com/ http://agniezine.wordpress.com/ http://www.ejsa.info -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
