Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
On Oct 5, 2006, at 7:14 PM, John Resig wrote: > On 10/5/06, Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John Resig himself: http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/010451/ >>> >>> Ah, yes. Don't know how I missed that. >> >> I guess almost everyone is overwhelmed by this mailing-list :( >> >>> Would be great to see that added to core. John, is that still in the >>> works? Any ETA? >> >> I can't answer this, however I think that using the bug/feature >> tracking >> system will be more productive. >> >> First check existing tickets >> http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/ >> >> Then create a new ticket >> http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/new/ > > That's still the best way to make sure that bugs and/or features get > noticed. I'm still inundated, trying to keep up with everything - but > I still try. > > --John Thanks for the gentle reminder. I see the ticket now: http:// jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/249/ . Looks like Jörn created it about 6 hours ago. Thanks, Jörn! Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
On 10/5/06, Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > John Resig himself: > > > http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/010451/ > > > > Ah, yes. Don't know how I missed that. > > I guess almost everyone is overwhelmed by this mailing-list :( > > > Would be great to see that added to core. John, is that still in the > > works? Any ETA? > > I can't answer this, however I think that using the bug/feature tracking > system will be more productive. > > First check existing tickets > http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/ > > Then create a new ticket > http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/new/ That's still the best way to make sure that bugs and/or features get noticed. I'm still inundated, trying to keep up with everything - but I still try. --John ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
> > John Resig himself: > > http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/010451/ > > Ah, yes. Don't know how I missed that. I guess almost everyone is overwhelmed by this mailing-list :( > Would be great to see that added to core. John, is that still in the > works? Any ETA? I can't answer this, however I think that using the bug/feature tracking system will be more productive. First check existing tickets http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/ Then create a new ticket http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/new/ -- Fil ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Fil wrote: >> I know this was brought up before in another thread, but I don't >> think anyone satisfactorily answered it. Is there a way to find >> multiple tags for a given to slideUp/slideDown? >> .../... >> Anyone else have any ideas on this? > > John Resig himself: > http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/010451/ > (then he got sick) > > -- Fil Ah, yes. Don't know how I missed that. Would be great to see that added to core. John, is that still in the works? Any ETA? Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
Looks pretty good, Jörn. One thing I'd add somewhere in there is, after expanding a section, set it's height to "". This was discussed on the list a while back, and is necessary so the section will expand to contain any dynamically added content. --Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] | irc: monkinetic|redmonk > Original Message ---- > Subject: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion > From: "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, October 05, 2006 1:14 am > To: "jQuery Discussion." > > Hi folks, > > instead of pointing Frank what he could change on his code, I gave it a try > for myself. You can see the result, yet badly documented, here: > http://www.joern.jquery.com/accordion/accordion.html > > The behaviour should be exactly the same as the original. Is this worthy to > put it in the jQuery plugin repository? > > -- Jörn > -- > GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist! > NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
> I know this was brought up before in another thread, but I don't > think anyone satisfactorily answered it. Is there a way to find > multiple tags for a given to slideUp/slideDown? > .../... > Anyone else have any ideas on this? John Resig himself: http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/010451/ (then he got sick) -- Fil ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Klaus Hartl wrote: > Interesting! Did you know I wrote an accordion plugin as well, > together > with Gilles, a while ago? > > It's based on a definition list, so it's a little more semantic: > > http://stilbuero.de/jquery/accordion/ Hi Klaus, I like the semantic aspect of your accordion plugin. Still, it looks like it requires a one-to-one relationship between each and . I know this was brought up before in another thread, but I don't think anyone satisfactorily answered it. Is there a way to find multiple tags for a given to slideUp/slideDown? I poked around the w3c site a bit and found something that would be very helpful in this regard: > The term and its definition can be grouped within a di element to > help clarify the relationship between a term and its definition(s). http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-list.html#edef_list_di Alas, it's xhtml 2.0 working draft. :( Anyone else have any ideas on this? Cheers, Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > Hi folks, > > instead of pointing Frank what he could change on his code, I gave it > a try for myself. You can see the result, yet badly documented, here: > http://www.joern.jquery.com/accordion/accordion.html > > The behaviour should be exactly the same as the original. Is this > worthy to put it in the jQuery plugin repository? Hi Jörn, with Firefox 1.5.0.7 on Windows I see some display bugs concerning the height of the sub elements. In the 1st example the height of the third element and in the 2nd example the second and third element grows out of its box at the bottom. No problems seem to appear on Firefox (DeerPark) 1.5.0.6 on my Mac. Alex ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb: > Hi folks, > > instead of pointing Frank what he could change on his code, I gave it a try > for myself. You can see the result, yet badly documented, here: > http://www.joern.jquery.com/accordion/accordion.html > > The behaviour should be exactly the same as the original. Is this worthy to > put it in the jQuery plugin repository? > > -- Jörn Interesting! Did you know I wrote an accordion plugin as well, together with Gilles, a while ago? It's based on a definition list, so it's a little more semantic: http://stilbuero.de/jquery/accordion/ :-) -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
> The behaviour should be exactly the same as the original. It sure works fine in Safari > Is this worthy to put it in the jQuery plugin repository? I have a question about this: is there (any plans to) an open SVN repository for jQuery plugins? I'd hate to pollute the main development repo with my buggy plugin projects :D -- but something's clearly missing here, as we're unable to really cooperate on the same files and instead must each have a set of scripts on one's servers. If this is any indication, we have opened such a project for SPIP, called "the SPIP Zone", and now have around 100 commiters, with no conflict as code is always progressing (or forked when "visions" differ). The only base for participation is accepting a "Charter" that basically says that everything we do there is free software around SPIP, for the common good, with no advertising/self-promotion. -- Fil ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Plugin Rewrite: Accordion
Hi folks, instead of pointing Frank what he could change on his code, I gave it a try for myself. You can see the result, yet badly documented, here: http://www.joern.jquery.com/accordion/accordion.html The behaviour should be exactly the same as the original. Is this worthy to put it in the jQuery plugin repository? -- Jörn -- GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist! NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
