Re: [slim] Lossless Downloads

2009-06-22 Thread JSonnabend

Thanks, everyone.


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64725

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Lossless Downloads

2009-06-20 Thread JSonnabend

Does anyone know if any of the big music services are offering DRM-free
lossless downloads yet?  

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64725

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Storing CDs after Ripping

2008-12-04 Thread JSonnabend

I use 'these'
(http://www.uline.com/Product/ProductDetail.aspx?model=S-4640ref=403)
from Uline.  They hold about 106 CD's each and are easily stackable.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=50527

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Search Kills Slimserver

2007-12-17 Thread JSonnabend

Mike -

Thanks for the reply.  I had no idea I was running a beta version. (or
had forgotten -- I'm sure I knew when I downloaded it).  I installed it
a while back and it's run fine ever since.  

I rebooted the server after upgrading my NIC and now search works fine
again.  I'll get around to upgrading to the latest stable 6.x when I
get a chance.

What's the status with version 7?

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41090

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Search Kills Slimserver

2007-12-15 Thread JSonnabend

This is a weird one.  Lately, when I search using either basic or
advanced search on the web interface, SlimServer stops running.  I have
to restart the server, which runs fine until the next search.

Anyone else see this?

I'm using SlimServer 6.5b2.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41090

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Transporter - Native support for WMA Lossless?

2007-01-12 Thread JSonnabend

Peter;169570 Wrote: 
 Cool, do they run on Linux or OS/X as well?
 
 Regards,
 Peter

Are you being facetious?

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28267

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Transporter - Native support for WMA Lossless?

2007-01-12 Thread JSonnabend

MP3 is actually not open in the sense of free.  The MP3 format is
patented and subject to license restrictions.

When I decided to rip my collection, I debated between FLAC and WMAL. 
I settled on the latter because I was using Sonic Foundry Vegas to make
mixes at the time, and it read WMAL files directly.  Now that reason
isn't so important, but I see no need to transcode.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28267

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Transporter - Native support for WMA Lossless?

2007-01-11 Thread JSonnabend

Peter;169197 Wrote: 
 slimditty wrote:Anybody with any sense should choose open protocols.
 Luckily, any 
 lossless protocol can be converted losslesly to any other, so as long
 as 
 you can find the proper tools (I'm sure Microsoft won't have provided 
 you with any) you can convert to FLAC. This should do it: 
 http://www.litexmedia.com/wma_workshop/ (for a price).
 
 MS  Apple are trying very hard to pull you into their corner and not 
 let go. Just say no ;)
 
 Regards,
 Peter

Huh?  Microsoft provides free tools for WMAL-PCM (WAV) conversion. 
'Windows Media Audio 9 Lossless to PCM Converter'
(http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/forpros/encoder/utilities.aspx)

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28267

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Open Source Dream Falls Apart?

2006-10-24 Thread JSonnabend

 even linking to GPL libraries has a viral quality to it (e.g. you can't
 just make it a kernel module)
To my knowledge, this has never been tested in court.  In my
understanding, the whole you link to it you're infected position is
based on a twisted definition of derivative work under copyright law.


I'd gladly take a case from an accused linker pro bono on this
point.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28873

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Open Source Dream Falls Apart?

2006-10-20 Thread JSonnabend

 Open Source/GPL may be a good idea, but not when some people profiteer
 on the back of other people's efforts.
I think the biggest point has yet to be made.  

What's to stop -you- from doing the same?  It's open source.  Someone
wants to buy it off you, then sell it to them.  They could just as
easily get it for free themselves, so if they're willing to pay you,
they're either stupid or perceive some added value you provide.

Oh, and you could design your own hardware that uses SlimServer and
sell that, too.

Who'd be riding whose back then?

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28873

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Rescan Music Library . . . Isn't

2006-07-16 Thread JSonnabend

Ok, I posted this in the third party plugin forum with no luck. Maybe
it's not a third party plugin.  I'll post it here, hopefully wihout
incurring any anti-cross posting wrath.

The Rescan Music Library plugin isn't rescanning. It's turned on
and set to rescan at midnight. I have the d_scan debug turned on, but
the log isn't showing any activity since my last manual rescan.

I'm running:

SlimServer Version: 6.2.2 - 7135 - Windows XP - EN - cp1252

Anyone else seeing this?

TIA

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25560

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: server database is case sensitive and that's bad. read why.

2006-05-24 Thread JSonnabend

Perhaps a better solution would be to stop SlimServer from messing with
DB entries once they've been populated.  That way, anyone could write
an external app to populate the db without worrying about tags, sorting
algorithms, etc.  

As it stands now, SlimServer updates DB entries whenever it plays a
track.  There was a thread on this earlier.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24093

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: server database is case sensitive and that's bad. read why.

2006-05-24 Thread JSonnabend

@geoffb:

I disagree that the tags are the actual data.  I keep my actual
data in an Access DB (I use CATraxx).  A real DB is more efficient
than file-to-file tags, whose real purpose is to allow players to
extract data about tracks they're playing.

@JJZolx:

How does one set the relevant date field in the DB?  I'd like to go
back to populating my DB programmatically, rather than scanning.  As it
stands now, every time I play a track (many of which are untagged),
SlimServer alters the DB record as it sees fit.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24093

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: server database is case sensitive and that's bad. read why.

2006-05-24 Thread JSonnabend

Pale Blue Ego Wrote: 
 Garbage in, garbage out.  
 
 If you don't like the garbage, clean it up.
Wow, that clears things right up.  Thanks for the insight.

The point, which you've apparently missed, is I -have- cleaned
everything up.  My Access database is pristine.  I should be able to
simply port the Access database to MySQL and be done with it, no?  No. 
I need to tag my files and have SlimServer read the tags.  That's an
extra step and provides a lot less control (e.g., I can't customize the
sort field).

I haven't dealt with tags to date because my main audio system doesn't
use SlimServer (it relies on the Access database and provides much more
sophisticated functionality) and I don't have a portable player.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24093

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: server database is case sensitive and that's bad. read why.

2006-05-24 Thread JSonnabend

 I agree. I, too keep my music info in a database. That database is
 conveniently and automatically built and maintained for me by
 Slimserver based on my tags.
That characterization is as self-serving as it is inaccurate.  Slim
collects limited information from file tags and allows -zero- central
management of your data.  And it allows for a bare minimum of
information at that (quick, tell me how many tracks you have released
between 1984 and 1986 on Grammy Award winning albums?  How many covers
of Bob Dylan songs do you have? Live tracks from 1972? Jazz Christmas
albums?).  It's not much of a -database-, it's really just a data store
for an audio streaming program.

 Seriously, though, if you absolutely must have your access DB how about
 trying to go the other direction--grab the data from the SQLite (or
 MySQL) db that slimserver builds and build an access db from it.
Because my Access DB is built and maintained by CD/music cataloging
software that's light years ahead of Slim's db in terms of real data
management.  That's not a knock on Slim, it's simply a statement of
fact -- SlimServer is not a music database program, it's an audio
streaming program.

Seriously, though, instead of telling me why I'm wrong to not want to
use Slim as my data management program, why not admit that users should
be allowed to populate the Slim DB without fear of SlimServer mucking
with the data?

Didn't see your edit

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24093

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: server database is case sensitive and that's bad. read why.

2006-05-24 Thread JSonnabend

Ben, azinck3 -

Maybe I just don't understand.  Could you explain to me -why-
SlimServer needs to alter database records?  In particular, why when a
db record has an artist name, album name and track name does SlimServer
need to alter that based on it's understanding of what those fields
should be (paricularly for tracks that have no tags)?

On a related note, why is it acceptable to have a don't rescan my
tracks option but not a don't update the db on play option?

Maybe you could shed some light on this other than by saying,
SlimServer should be able to muck with data as it sees fit

TIA for your insights.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24093

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: server database is case sensitive and that's bad. read why.

2006-05-24 Thread JSonnabend

 It isn't meant to be a replacement for a music database, and it
 shouldn't be misconstrued as such.
Great, you've finally made a valid point.  Now go back and re-read the
thread and see if you're arguing with me or against me.  I think you'll
see that you've simply restated my original position.

What we don't seem to agree on is: (a) whether tags or a real db is the
best place to store metadata and (b) whether users should be able to
populate Slim's DB directly.

As for others' arguments that storing metadata in tags leads to greater
portability, that's simply a restatement of the argument the others are
broken too, and so we have to do it this way.  If all player software
allowed import/export of db's, then all this would be irrelevant, and
tags could go back to their original purpose -- to support portable
players.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24093

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: server database is case sensitive and that's bad. read why.

2006-05-24 Thread JSonnabend

Michaelwagner Wrote: 
 For squeezeboxes to be a complete solution, something, other than
 slimserver, should be maintaining the information you want, in the way
 you want it, and stuffing them into the tags.
I agree for the most part, except that it's necessary to stuff[] them
into tags

 whereas I think it's more robust if that information is carried in the
 file tags and thence into Slimserver. . . . My reason is that, when
 information about a single item is stored in multiple files, utilities
 like copy or backup can copy one without the other, yielding data which
 is out of sync.
Well, if you boil it down, all you're saying is you'd rather synch
the two via tags.  That doesn't solve the problem of data races or
other failures -- it simply adds another layer.

 You think tags are only for portable players. I disagree. I think
 they're for O/S=application independence.
Well, you and Snarlydwarf make a good point about -portable- players. 
So strike portable and you're left with the proper statement, namely,
that tags were created so that -players-, portable or otherwise, could
display information about the file.  Obviously, that approach is
lacking for standard database type stuff, such as searching, sorting,
etc., and so SlimServer, iTunes and others maintain real db's for the
info (as do, btw, image cataloging apps like Adobe's Photoshop
Organizer).  Presently, tags are only a real necessity for portables,
hence my earlier, slightly erroneous statement.

The OS/App independence argument is a total red herring.  Slim stores
its info in MySQL and/or SQLite.  Those are real db's, and they're
cross platform.  As for tags being cross platform, that's true only so
long as there are apps on your target platform that can read the tags. 
Your argument is more akin to a closed format vs. open format argument,
and that's not the issue here.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24093

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Use Slimserver Browser vs IE?

2006-04-24 Thread JSonnabend

)p( Wrote: 
 I just embed the ie active-x control in my custom app I use as a htpc
 frontend and point it to the server url. This way if have full control
 over its appearence.
 
 peter

Care to share it?


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=22609

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: The Worst DB Implementation?

2006-04-18 Thread JSonnabend

I reached the same conclusion as Malor and Brownie after thinking about
my alternatives.  I don't have Access, so I'll have to write a routine
in Delphi or C# using DAO/ADO/OLEDB/ABCDE (or whatever MS is calling
the COM interface these days).  

We can tell SlimServer not to scan, it's too bad we can't tell it not
to update the DB other times.  Oh well.  Thanks to everyone for the
input.  Sorry about the thread title, I was feeling a bit frustrated
when I posted, I guess.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23061

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] The Worst DB Implementation?

2006-04-17 Thread JSonnabend

Ok, this is weird, and I can't think of a single reasonable explanation
for this.

I populate my slimdb database (SQLite) from an external Access DB. 
Everything works great, until I start browsing my db through the
SlimServer web interface.

I browse by artist (or search, for that matter) for the artist Clap
Your Hands Say Yeah.  I find one album with 12 tracks.  Everything is
fine.  The next time I browse (or search) over to that album, -there
are only 11 tracks-.  The first track no longer appears with the album.
Surf over again, -now there are only 10 tracks-.  Tracks 1 and 2 have
disappeared.

What's up with this?  Anyone else see this?

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23061

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: The Worst DB Implementation?

2006-04-17 Thread JSonnabend

I'm copying over rather than letting it scan my tracks because my tracks
aren't tagged, but I do have a complete, centrally managed, clean db
with all my track information.  

As for the notion that it's somehow difficult to populate a
relational database, that's just not true. This isn't a particularly
complicated schema, and there's should be no reason why one can't
manually build the db.

In any event, it seems that the tracks are disappearing, SlimServer is
renaming the tracks.  So track 1, which was some song title From
Clap Your Hands Say Yeah by Clap Your Hands Say Yeah becomes Clap
Your Hands Say Yeah - some song title on Clap Your Hands Say Yeah. 
Why is SlimServer renaming the tracks in the db?

[image: http://sonnabendlaw.com/cap1.jpg]

[image: http://sonnabendlaw.com/cap2.jpg]

[image: http://sonnabendlaw.com/cap3.jpg]


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23061

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: The Worst DB Implementation?

2006-04-17 Thread JSonnabend

azinck3 Wrote: 
 I believe that when you play the track slimserver attempts to actually
 read the tags at that point to try to maintain accurate DB info.  Your
 tags don't exist so it uses it's guess tags feature to attempt to
 discern the appropriate tag info from your directory structure and
 filenames.  It then updates its database to reflect the results of its
 guess, thus resulting in the info you're seeing.
Thanks for the info.  I was starting to think this might be the case. 

How do I turn off the guess the tags feature (or, for that matter,
the update the DB with the best info feature)?  I'll twiddle with the
Perl code, if need be.

TIA

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23061

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: The Worst DB Implementation?

2006-04-17 Thread JSonnabend

Thanks for the idea.  I've done that already, but to no avail (the first
guess tags entry reads 0 after I delete all the entries and hit
Change).

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23061

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Best software for organising your music?

2006-04-10 Thread JSonnabend

Hands down its CATraxx.  http://www.fnprg.com/catraxx/

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=22887

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Remove Silence at Beginning/End of Track

2006-04-06 Thread JSonnabend

Currently I'm using Winamp in my home media system, but I'm thinking
about switching over to a Slim setup.  Winamp, when using the
DirectSound output, will remove silence at the beginning/end of tracks.
A user can select the db cutoff point for this to kick-in.  Is there
any way to do this in Slimserver/SoftSqueeze/SB?

If it matters, my collection is ripped to WMAL.

TIA.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=22786

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Password protecting the server ...

2006-03-26 Thread JSonnabend

Well, at least we can turn on password protection (and change the
default port).


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=22424

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Password protecting the server ...

2006-03-25 Thread JSonnabend

mherger Wrote: 
 You can't. Only the http stream and CLI interface can be protected.
 Don't  have those players on _your_ network :-)
Does that mean that once I've opened my server to the outside world,
anyone with a Squeeze Box can connect to my server?  If so, that's
pretty sad.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=22424

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Can't Open File For...

2006-03-02 Thread JSonnabend

Well, I found the problem.  I should have mentioned that I populate the
SQLite DB myself from an Access DB.  I had filled in all the fields I
thought were important.

Two fields in the Tracks table I had not included were FS and Sec
(or is it Secs?).  Apparently, these fields need to be non-zero to
get Slim to fire the tracks.  I now use 1000 as a value for these
fields, and all seems to work.

I'm not sure why Slim crapped out on me after working as it was, but I
did do a lot of futzing in recent days, and so that may have killed
something.

Thanks for the reply.

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21603

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Can't Open File For...

2006-02-28 Thread JSonnabend

I've suddenly run into problems, and I'm not sure what's brought them
on.

Using SlimServer 6.2.1 or 6.2.2 with SoftSqueeze 2.0 or later, I
suddenly can't listen to any music.  I get a Can't Open File For
[songname] error.  After turning on the debug source in SlimServer, I
see a message saying something to the effect of not bothering to open
a file of zero length.

The source files are WMA Lossless.

Any ideas?

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend

JSonnabend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=760
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21603

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] 0 Songs

2005-08-12 Thread JSonnabend

I've written some code to populate slimserversql.db from an external
Access database.  Everything works fine -- I'm able to browse artists,
albums, etc. and play music without problems.  The only small hitch is
that Slimserver indicates:

Your music library contains 1238 albums with 0 songs by 1966
artists.

I can't browse or search for songs, but the songs are all there when I
browse, etc., by album or artist.  Any thoughts?  What field might I
not be populating that I need to populate?

TIA 

- Jeff


-- 
JSonnabend
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: 0 Songs

2005-08-12 Thread JSonnabend

Yes, with 'wma'.  Is that right (they are WMA lossless files)?


-- 
JSonnabend
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss