Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
Yes the existence of sonos tells that there is a market this kind of thing and there are a bunch more in this productniche aimed at music enthusiasts . So even if we are a minority we are big enough to drive sonos and bunch more companies . That's something is it not ? Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
There is a difference between raspi solutions and buy of the shelf :) I have seen attempt at something like a reciever 2 off the shelf it lacked analog out thou ( sonic orbiter or some such ) Actually a major benefit with Touch is that the setup is so much better when the device has its own UI . The Bisare two tier setup of reciever doesn't very good . It should had a rudimentary web UI for setup. Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
Mnyb wrote: > There is a difference between raspi solutions and buy of the shelf :) True - a Pi based player isn't for everyone. I guess an off-the-shelf easily configurable device would have a place. I completely agree with the OP - I still feel bitter at Logitech's mishandling of the product line. SONOS have proven that the market was there for the taking, and with Slim Devices' head start and Logitech's reach it should have been a doddle. I have a vague recollection of someone from Logitech taking over the reigns and canvassing for opinions on the product line. I doubt anyone suggested starving it of investment and advertising. I too would like to see the concept/name/product rights sold to an enthusiastic development company, but it feels like Logitech will never allow that. The really great thing now though is that the concept has survived despite the product line being strangled. Thanks to continued LMS and player software development from a dedicated few, we can now build our own players and servers for pocket money. Long may it continue. chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
Squeezebox is more of a hifi enthusiast thing. Sonos is like for people who like music but buy Bose radios. Both for me are aimed at people late 30 and older. At this point both are going to have their lunch eaten by Spotify, Tidal, Apple etc. Not to mention Google Music + Chromecast audio. I wouldnt see much of a future in it. Squeezebox had a brief window of opportunity under Logitech but that's gone now. 3x Squeezebox Touch 2x Squeezebox Radios 1x Squeezebox Classic Server: Logitech Media Server Version: 7.9. Mobile: 3x Ipeng on Iphone / 2x Ipeng on Ipad / Orange Squeeze+Squeeze Player Laptops: 2x Squeezeplay 7.8.0-r328 Osamede's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11753 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
@Dasmueller, I agree with owning and controlling my own music. When I'm on Lake Powell up in the Escalante river arm on the houseboat the closest thing to selecting a stream is satellite radio which you may not get because of the multi hundred foot sandstone walls... Cell service, yea right, spotty at best. This is typical in the American West, lots of wilderness as large as whole countries in Europe. When the gang wants to rock to "Talkin' Care of Business", they want it now and they will probably want it one more time! With a laptop loaded with LMS, Squeezeplay, music, a cheap USB DAC to the stereo we have that capability. We could use WMP, but why switch when we all know and use the LMS WebUI at home. 2 Duets - 1 for upstairs and 1 for downstairs Rock Solid with LMS 7.8.0 and WHS 2011 w3wilkes's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22973 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
Osamede wrote: > Logitech didnt as much miss the boat as they got on it early, bought the > boat, took over it... but didnt understand where to steer it. > > The original gang were music enthusiasts first and foremost, which > ultimately is not so relevant today - music enthusiasts are almost > extinct in the mass music consumer landscape. It's all decline from > here, as music has gone the way of "fast food" - people are happy with > renting 128kbps streams direct to their phone as loudspeaker. > > And the people selling music dont really want you to own or control your > own music - they want you as one big always-online wallet and data > stream. Squeezebox was the opposite of that. Of course I may be wrong, but I think this is a pretty accurate assessment of what has transpired. That being said I applaud those who continue to maintain the LMS system. Not being the fan of the numerous subscription music "systems", they hold no interest for me. Call me a dinosaur but I choose to have the music I want to listen to, be it vinyl, Cd's or computer files all of which I can play when I choose. There are myriad music providers, television providers, cellphone providers etc. For me the older way just works better. Oh, and I do save a few $ in the process. dasmueller's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
cliston wrote: > Who created the original Slim Devices? Who sold to Logitech? Slim > Devices was way ahead of its time IMO. Streaming music is now the > preferred way to listen to music, but at the time of Slim Devices is was > not the way most people listened to music. And Logitechtotally > missed the boat. They had a wonderful product that they have abandoned. > > I would guess that the original owner or Slim Devices signed some sort > of non-compete clause when they sold to Logitech. But how many years > would that last? Can this group of loyal Squeezebox owners track down > the originators of Slim Devices and gain any knowledge from them, or > persuade them to try again, with new and improved Squeezeboxes? Is this > a ridiculous idea? Logitech didnt as much miss the boat as they got on it early, bought the boat, took over it... but didnt understand where to steer it. The original gang were music enthusiasts first and foremost, which ultimately is not so relevant today - music enthusiasts are almost extinct in the mass music consumer landscape. It's all decline from here, as music has gone the way of "fast food" - people are happy with renting 128kbps streams direct to their phone as loudspeaker. And the people selling music dont really want you to own or control your own music - they want you as one big always-online wallet and data stream. Squeezebox was the opposite of that. 3x Squeezebox Touch (7.7.3-r16676) 4x Squeezebox Radios (7.7.3-r16676) 1x Squeezebox Classic Server: Logitech Media Server Version: 7.7.3 1375965195 Mobile: 3x Ipeng on Iphone / 2x Ipeng on Ipad / Orange Squeeze+Squeeze Player Laptops: 2x Squeezeplay 7.8.0-r328 Osamede's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11753 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
Mnyb wrote: > An updated Touch 2 and a new reciever 2 and boom 2 A Boom 2 definitely - not so sure about the others as there are easy ways to make your own Receiver-equivalent these days, and with the various phone-based controllers I think the touchscreen in the Touch is becoming a little redundant. Don't get me wrong, I love my Touch, and I have a BNIB replacement in the loft for when it fails, but I'm not as pleased with that purchase as I am with my BNIB Boom (bought the other day!) that's going to join it in the loft. I rarely get up from my seat to operate, or even look at, the Touch now that I have iPeng. The sound quality and overall package of the Boom are things that aren't as easy to achieve independently and cheaply (unlike an RPi 'Receiver'). It's a true hifi enthusiasts 'kitchen radio' in the way that the Radio never was. A new Boom, with Bluetooth, Airplay etc etc (and a built-in battery pack), and the same attention to sound quality, would be a killer I reckon. And it would be more in line with Logitech's market segment (apart from the bit about sound quality :), and provided they could get some kind of vacuous celebrity endorsement.). chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
I have 2 Squeezebox Touch units. I bought them to be able to more easily manage the music that I already had. Sifting through physical media was and continues to be a pain when one chooses to do so. Certainly there is a large maintenance component to a digital music library. Luckily, I have the time and inclination to do so. Streaming music services have never had any appeal to me, so that is not an important facet of LMS/Squeezeboxes for my purposes. From my other recent post one could also see that I am adverse to paying for something I feel I do not need. It seems that many/most these days think that such a method of obtaining what they want to hear is the way to go. That's fine with me, just not my style. dasmueller's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
I wish they would. I'd like to see an updated Transporter that plays DSD files. cliston's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11571 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
cliston wrote: > I wish they would. I'd like to see an updated Transporter that plays > DSD files. Isn't it easier to add a DSD-capable DAC to a touch (or raspberry pi)? That way you only need to change the DAC when the Next Great Format comes along (OK, DSD wasn't even the Next Great Format back in the 90's, but...) "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
cliston wrote: > I wish they would. I'd like to see an updated Transporter that plays > DSD files. That is very very niche . An updated Touch 2 and a new reciever 2 and boom 2 , there are tons of stuff new hardware could do and new software . More massmarket more in line what Logitech can do ? A high end hifi product is not very Logitech . It would for example be no problem designing a player that supported several protocols and servers . Like LMS dlna roon AirPlay and Bluetooth in one box . For the niche DSD need a 24/192 or USB output to a DSD capable DAC ? But heck it's software so decoding it a Touch 2 would also work . Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
Its seems that streaming hardware is all the rage these days, while Logitech decided to get out of the business! Will Logitech ever stage a streaming hardware come back @Michael? local.bin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22053 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
Who created the original Slim Devices? Who sold to Logitech? Slim Here's the press release: http://www.logitech.com/de-ch/press/press-releases/2763 Sean as well as Dean have moved on and are no longer in the industry. From what I've heard Dean is still busy cleaning up his basement. -- Michael ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices?
cliston wrote: > Who created the original Slim Devices? Who sold to Logitech? Slim > Devices was way ahead of its time IMO. Streaming music is now the > preferred way to listen to music, but at the time of Slim Devices is was > not the way most people listened to music. And Logitechtotally > missed the boat. They had a wonderful product that they have abandoned. > You are of course right. Logitech bought something they did not really understand and with software that errr surprised them. I believe Sean can sometimes be seen riding a bicycle, having given up attempting to park his car elegantly. Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known Last.fm/user/ModelCitizen ModelCitizen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=446 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[slim] Original Slim Devices?
Who created the original Slim Devices? Who sold to Logitech? Slim Devices was way ahead of its time IMO. Streaming music is now the preferred way to listen to music, but at the time of Slim Devices is was not the way most people listened to music. And Logitechtotally missed the boat. They had a wonderful product that they have abandoned. I would guess that the original owner or Slim Devices signed some sort of non-compete clause when they sold to Logitech. But how many years would that last? Can this group of loyal Squeezebox owners track down the originators of Slim Devices and gain any knowledge from them, or persuade them to try again, with new and improved Squeezeboxes? Is this a ridiculous idea? cliston's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11571 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104968 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Owners
erland wrote: I would say that the chance of Logitech selling to anyone would also be pretty close to zero, so I think people should stop dreaming about a revival, it's not going to happen. What's more likely going to happen is that someone realize that there is a need, a market and thus a potential to earn some money and based on this decide to fill the hole Logitech have left with some new more exciting products. However, we got to give it some time, updating hardware/software to match the needs and sign necessary agreements with content providers aren't going to happen over a night. Fortunately we can keep enjoying music from our current Squeezebox devices while we wait, so it's not a major problem, I'll start to worry if we haven't seen any indication that someone is about to try to fulfill the needs within the Squeezebox market segment within a year or two. Erland Email the Woz You know why this should be expanded. Your music anywhere (without cost or interference.) BFL banned for life's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56269 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96784 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[slim] Original Slim Devices Owners
now that logitech is not going to make the squeezebox products any longer, i hope that the original owners of the squeezebox would buy back the rights to continue to develop the product. i've been an owner of a squeezebox classic for about eight years now. for the price, i think that the squeezebox is the greatest thing since sliced bread. i have seen the squeezebox touch in operation in a very high end stereo equipment shop. if anyone knows of or has heard of any chances that this product could be developed further by another party please respond. thanks, steve babin babi8987's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4439 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96784 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Owners
babi8987 wrote: now that logitech is not going to make the squeezebox products any longer, i hope that the original owners of the squeezebox would buy back the rights to continue to develop the product. i've been an owner of a squeezebox classic for about eight years now. for the price, i think that the squeezebox is the greatest thing since sliced bread. i have seen the squeezebox touch in operation in a very high end stereo equipment shop. if anyone knows of or has heard of any chances that this product could be developed further by another party please respond. thanks, steve babin The poster that started this thread indicated he was interested in making an offer. The odds of original owners buying it back are said to be zero by people that know more about their situation. http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?96660-The-Future-of-Squeezebox-Product-Line-Uphighlight=make+offer garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96784 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Owners
garym wrote: The poster that started this thread indicated he was interested in making an offer. The odds of original owners buying it back are said to be zero by people that know more about their situation. I would say that the chance of Logitech selling to anyone would also be pretty close to zero, so I think people should stop dreaming about a revival, it's not going to happen. What's more likely going to happen is that someone realize that there is a need, a market and thus a potential to earn some money and based on this decide to fill the hole Logitech have left with some new more exciting products. However, we got to give it some time, updating hardware/software to match the needs and sign necessary agreements with content providers aren't going to happen over a night. Fortunately we can keep enjoying music from our current Squeezebox devices while we wait, so it's not a major problem, I'll start to worry if we haven't seen any indication that someone is about to try to fulfill the needs within the Squeezebox market segment within a year or two. erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96784 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[slim] Original Slim Devices SB3 - up to date with recent firmware or old tech?
Might be picking up one of these, original Slim Devices SB3's. If I upgrade the firmware to the latest release, will it be the equivalent of the last of the Logitech branded SB3's or are there internal hardware differences? Also, can I upgrade the PSU for it by using a SB Touch psu which is better. Thanks! -- Gazjam Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=90523 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices SB3 - up to date with recent firmware or old tech?
maybe an obvious question, but just wanting to know that Slim Devices branded SB3 can run latest firmware etc. Thanks. -- Gazjam Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=90523 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices SB3 - up to date with recent firmware or old tech?
There is absolutely no hardware difference. Even the older Squeezebox 2, which is internally nearly identical to the SB3, can run the latest SB2/3 firmware. -- JJZolx JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=90523 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices SB3 - up to date with recent firmware or old tech?
Thanks very much. :) Is it right the SB3 and Touch voltage and input plug are identical too? In other words can I use a Touch PSU with the SB3? thanks. -- Gazjam Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=90523 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices SB3 - up to date with recent firmware or old tech?
Gazjam;659113 Wrote: Thanks very much. :) Is it right the SB3 and Touch voltage and input plug are identical too? In other words can I use a Touch PSU with the SB3? thanks. Yup. I've done that myself. -- vrette (3) SB Touch, (3) SB Radio, Cambridge Audio 840AV2, 340T, DacMagic, BW 683, HSU VFT2-MK3, Logitech Harmony 880, 7.6.1 on Asus E35M1-M PRO Win7 64 bit , and a bunch of other stuff... vrette's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15256 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=90523 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices SB3 - up to date with recent firmware or old tech?
sweet. thanks. :) -- Gazjam Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=90523 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Squeezebox: wireless-g?
aubuti;456172 Wrote: Yes, they are the same except for the logo on the faceplate. However, the Slim Devices branded SB3s were produced in both wifi and wired-only versions (the wifi model also does wired ethernet). So if you need to have wifi you should verify that the one you are looking at is a wifi model. Offhand I am not sure how you would verify it's wifi-capable without trying to set it up, because the antennas are internal and the label on the bottom doesn't say anything about wireless. Wasn't it the SB2 that had wired and wireless options? I thought the SB3 was wireless (also with wired ethernet) only. The option was black or white plastic case. -- funkstar my collection: *1*x squeezebox radio *1*x squeezebox touch *1*x squeezebox boom *2*x controller, *1*x receiver *2*x sb3 (sliver/black), *1*x sb2 wired (silver) *1*x sb (black), *1*x slimp3 (with rear shield) interested in any others if you have them! funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67630 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Squeezebox: wireless-g?
killie99;456332 Wrote: definately SB3 which was wired or wired/wireless. I have a wired only one Funfstar, whereabouts in our fair land are you from and how did you get a Touch? Oh well I was mistaken then. I'm in the UK and I am part of the Beta test team. That's why I have a Touch and a Radio -- funkstar my collection: *1*x squeezebox radio *1*x squeezebox touch *1*x squeezebox boom *2*x controller, *1*x receiver *2*x sb3 (sliver/black), *1*x sb2 wired (silver) *1*x sb (black), *1*x slimp3 (with rear shield) interested in any others if you have them! funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67630 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Squeezebox: wireless-g?
definately SB3 which was wired or wired/wireless. I have a wired only one -- killie99 Musical Fidelity KW250S, Impulse H2 speakers, SB3, Duet a Boom killie99's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8337 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67630 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[slim] Original Slim Devices Squeezebox: wireless-g?
Found an original Slim Devices Squeezebox V3 for sale, but was wondering if it worked the same as the Logitech's? Same wireless-g capabilities, etc? Thanks in advance for your input! -- calipoop calipoop's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32676 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67630 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Squeezebox: wireless-g?
Yes, they are the same except for the logo on the faceplate. However, the Slim Devices branded SB3s were produced in both wifi and wired-only versions (the wifi model also does wired ethernet). So if you need to have wifi you should verify that the one you are looking at is a wifi model. Offhand I am not sure how you would verify it's wifi-capable without trying to set it up, because the antennas are internal and the label on the bottom doesn't say anything about wireless. -- aubuti aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67630 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Original Slim Devices Squeezebox: wireless-g?
Cool, thanks for the quick history lesson. I'll keep an eye out for the wired/wireless claim. -- calipoop calipoop's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32676 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67630 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
