Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-23 Thread adamslim

I've mentioned it several times before: Slim are great at the slim
client, but they need to sell the server option too.

How about a fully-configured NAS machine with a CD-ROM drive and a
Mac/Windows installer that sorts everything out for you (anyone with
Linux would probably be happy to do it themselves!) - detects the NAS,
configures its SlimServer for your network etc.

Also, some way to configure the SB3 for your wireless network (once you
have got the above installation sorted) by plugging it in wired and
sending the info would be nice - rather than having to enter a
megadigit key!  (Not sure if this is possible though)

I think the form factor/quality/price balance of the SB3 is great, but
it does need a geek.  Not a problem for me, but it does limit SD's
ability to take over the world.  They don't need to create an SB4 yet,
or even a hybrid TP/SB - they need to make their current devices able
to work for networking and computing novices.

Oh and a nice two-way communicating remote (or several options,
including knobby ones) would be the order of the day.  Could just
package up a Nokia 800 with a nice skin.

Adam


-- 
adamslim

SB3 into Derek Shek d2, Shanling CDT-100, Rotel RT-990BX, Esoteric Audio
Research 859, Living Voice Auditorium IIs, Nordost and Anti-cables
http://www.last.fm/user/AdamSlim/

adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-23 Thread bhaagensen

adamslim;196991 Wrote: 
 
 (anyone with Linux would probably be happy to do it themselves!) 
 

nah, don't be too sure 'bout that, I would be happy not to :) Otherwise
I agree with your points: I would call it something like streamlining
the product. Take for instance one common use case related to artwork.
Currently basically all methods for adding a new album w. artwork
relies on some user interaction. This makes it difficult to always get
the artwork in place before rescanning. Things are certainly not helped
by the fact that in order to do this in retrospect one must to do a
complete clear/rescan...aarghh. (There are a number of forum threads on
this issue)

It's certainly not a showstopper for me, rather a minor annoyance.
However when adding up small quirks like this, it all of a sudden
becomes interesting to check out other products. Moreover I do not feel
that I can recommend the SB to people without mentioning theses things
(In general I find the server side handling of the music library a bit
cumbersome compared to itunes/rhythmbox/banshee).


-- 
bhaagensen

bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-23 Thread Peter
adamslim wrote:
 I've mentioned it several times before: Slim are great at the slim
 client, but they need to sell the server option too.

 How about a fully-configured NAS machine with a CD-ROM drive and a
 Mac/Windows installer that sorts everything out for you (anyone with
 Linux would probably be happy to do it themselves!) - detects the NAS,
 configures its SlimServer for your network etc.

 Also, some way to configure the SB3 for your wireless network (once you
 have got the above installation sorted) by plugging it in wired and
 sending the info would be nice - rather than having to enter a
 megadigit key!  (Not sure if this is possible though)

 I think the form factor/quality/price balance of the SB3 is great, but
 it does need a geek.  Not a problem for me, but it does limit SD's
 ability to take over the world.  They don't need to create an SB4 yet,
 or even a hybrid TP/SB - they need to make their current devices able
 to work for networking and computing novices.

 Oh and a nice two-way communicating remote (or several options,
 including knobby ones) would be the order of the day.  Could just
 package up a Nokia 800 with a nice skin.
   

I'm counting on either a self-contained server or a smart remote as the 
next new SD product.

I wouldn't buy the server myself, but I probably would buy a smart 
SONOS-like remote especially if it would be hackable enough to make it 
control other things. Counting on that, too!

Regards,
Peter

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-23 Thread davidcotton

I nearly went the olive (over here in europe its marketed as hermstedt
hifidelio)but the cost put me off.  That and the fact that at the time
you had to use a proprietry usb harddrive which was more expensive than
the usual off the shelf ones.  Instead went for sb3 and been very happy.


-- 
davidcotton

davidcotton's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4588
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-23 Thread bolfings

A refurb Mac mini with an external 500gb drive, a SB3, and I have a
music and video server, as well as a CD and DVD player, virtually no
configuration/installation issues, and comes in under $1,000 - 

I know that many of you could build something a little cheaper and a
bit more capable, but I'm very happy, and would highly recommend this
set-up to anyone -


-- 
bolfings

bolfings's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4440
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-23 Thread Pale Blue Ego

There are plenty of HTPCs out there.  Many are quite affordable -
cheaper than the latest TIVO and no subscription fee:

http://tinyurl.com/2s7nuz


-- 
Pale Blue Ego

Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread kbelinski

I consider the Squeezebox to be immensely successful product. It brings
network-based music server concept into the mass consumer market. Its
adoption of FLAC lossless compression gains acceptance by the
audiophile market. The competition is not sitting idle. Olive
(http://www.olive.us) has come up with similar product plus additional
useful features at very competitive price. The built-in hard disk even
though small in storage capacity is no doubt useful.  I find having a
small collection of favorite music in local hard disk useful because I
do not have to keep my SlimServer running all the time. Some other
features are quite neat too.

I hope Slim Devices are keeping tab of the competition and respond with
better products. Not that the Squeezebox is bad. But there are
competitions out there constantly trying to out do the Squeezebox.
Keeping up is the only way to survive.


-- 
kbelinski

kbelinski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1039
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread mortslim

I like that the squeezebox does not have a harddrive.  I mainly use it
for the squeezenetwork, thus a harddrive is not required.

It thus uses less electricity and makes less (none) noise.


-- 
mortslim

mortslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11039
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread slimkid

kbelinski;196788 Wrote: 
 ... Olive has come up with similar product plus additional useful
 features at very competitive price.

Without getting into all the features, just checking on thier price
list:

Olive MUSICA 160 GB - $1099
Olive MUSICA 250 GB - $1499

The most expensice 90 GB I have ever seen (in the last 5 years).


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Mark Lanctot

slimkid;196805 Wrote: 
 Without getting into all the features, just checking on thier price
 list:
 
 Olive MUSICA 160 GB - $1099
 Olive MUSICA 250 GB - $1499
 
 The most expensice 90 GB I have ever seen (in the last 5 years).

Geez, for those prices you can make a wicked fast server with 500 GB of
storage.  It will be able to do other tasks as well, plus it's far more
flexible.

There are lots of people running down the Slim architecture lately, but
IMHO it's their greatest strength.  Take advantage of relatively cheap
mass-market computer hardware!  Computer hardware will always be
cheaper than specialized audiophile hardware, and with
SlimServer/Squeezebox the audio playback hardware is in the player
where it belongs.

The Olive Musica is apparently a low-power, inflexible PC running Linux
with local storage.  I guess a lot of people like this?  That's not a
more advanced product, just a less flexible and substantially more
expensive one.

Also the Olive Musica is nothing new - it's been out for ~3 years.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Peter
Mark Lanctot wrote:
 slimkid;196805 Wrote: 
   
 Without getting into all the features, just checking on thier price
 list:

 Olive MUSICA 160 GB - $1099
 Olive MUSICA 250 GB - $1499

 The most expensice 90 GB I have ever seen (in the last 5 years).
 

 Geez, for those prices you can make a wicked fast server with 500 GB of
 storage.  It will be able to do other tasks as well, plus it's far more
 flexible.

 There are lots of people running down the Slim architecture lately, but
 IMHO it's their greatest strength.  Take advantage of relatively cheap
 mass-market computer hardware!  Computer hardware will always be
 cheaper than specialized audiophile hardware, and with
 SlimServer/Squeezebox the audio playback hardware is in the player
 where it belongs.

 The Olive Musica is apparently a low-power, inflexible PC running Linux
 with local storage.  I guess a lot of people like this?  That's not a
 more advanced product, just a less flexible and substantially more
 expensive one.
   
It's not that bad though. You have a place to put your CD's in... (I 
miss that - very rarely).

I think I dislike the tiny display most of all.

Regards,
Peter

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Michaelwagner

But the biggest impediment to mass acceptance is the fact that a
squeezebox needs a geek. Judging by the olive prices, lack of a geek
costs about $700. :-)


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread amcluesent

These one-box systems are all very well as 'lifestyle' accessories,
loaded up with a few 100 tracks. 

The real asset is your library of ripped  tagged music; no way would I
allow the lock-in from a vendor with my 1,500 albums on their closed
system.


-- 
amcluesent

amcluesent's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10286
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Michaelwagner

That's all well and good, but no one is really in any serious way
packaging a one-stop-shopping squeezebox box. The ones I've seen so
far are as expensive as the olive.

Is the Olive proprietary? I've never really looked at it.


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Mark Lanctot

You know, that pico-ITX board (even a nano-ITX board) as well as a 3.5
HDD would fit very easily into a Transporter chassis.

If the second screen were eliminated you could probably also fit a
CD-ROM drive, possibly even full-size.

If the internal electronics were downgraded to Squeezebox specs and the
knob and maybe the buttons were dropped, it could compete price-wise
with the Olive units.  It'd be far more powerful because it could serve
as a SlimServer for other players.  It'd also be much more open.  Run it
on DSL much like SlimCD - all you need apart from SS is samba and a
method to upgrade SS.

I probably wouldn't be interested in it, but based on the interest in
this thread and in the forum in general there does seem to be a demand
for it.  In the past I've downplayed this idea but the Transporter
chassis looks like it was made for this purpose...


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Michaelwagner

Oh, no, don't drop the knob!


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Mark Lanctot

Michaelwagner;196916 Wrote: 
 Oh, no, don't drop the knob!

:-)  I agree that the knob is cool, but I don't use it all that often. 
I have read comments from others wondering about a Squeezebox-class
device in a Transporter chassis, minus the second screen and the knob.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Michaelwagner

Really? I don't have a transporter (too poor), but on my Audiotron and
on a VCR I had once that had a knob on the remote, they were the most
often used controls on the whole setup.


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Mark Lanctot

Michaelwagner;196920 Wrote: 
 Really? I don't have a transporter (too poor), but on my Audiotron and
 on a VCR I had once that had a knob on the remote, they were the most
 often used controls on the whole setup.

I use the remote almost exclusively.  Some have suggested a knob in the
remote.  I would use that for sure, but then again I'm using a universal
remote so...?


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Squeezbox and other new breed of music server solutions

2007-04-22 Thread Michaelwagner

The knob is a great feature. If you doubt that, look at last years april
fools announcement.
http://www.slimdevices.com/au_press_kronos.html


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34696

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss