[Dorset] Google Wave

2009-05-29 Thread Terry Coles
For those who haven't spotted this yet, and if you have the time, (1 hr 20 
mins actually), get over to http://wave.google.com/ and have a look at 
Google's latest product, due for launch later this year.  The video is in high 
definition and is well worth watching all the way through, otherwise you'll 
miss one of the many innovations.  The team is headed up by the two brothers 
who developed Google Maps.

As a taster, Google's aspiration for this is to replace or enhance all current 
forms of communication, including email, instant messaging (including twitter 
etc), blogging, collaborative editing, bug tracking and just about anything 
else you can think of.  I just watched the whole thing and probably averaged a 
wow every 10 minutes or so.

The good news is that most of the code is going to be Open Sourced and the 
protocols are open too.  Google have already been collaborating with two other 
organisations who have produced their own clients for this.  They say that 
they gained so much when people innovated on top of Google Maps (which they 
hadn't intended originally), that they've set out to promote that from the 
start with Wave.

So have a look and let us know what you think of it.

-- 
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux



-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-05-29 Thread Sean Gibbins
Terry Coles wrote:
> So have a look and let us know what you think of it.
>
>   

Stunning - I watched it earlier - they've put a massive amount of work
and thought into it and I reckon it'll be massive once folk get their
collective, collaborative heads around it.

Sean

-- 
www.funkygibbins.me.uk


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-05-30 Thread Terry Coles
On Friday 29 May 2009, Terry Coles wrote:
> The good news is that most of the code is going to be Open Sourced and the
> protocols are open too.  Google have already been collaborating with two
> other organisations who have produced their own clients for this.  They say
> that they gained so much when people innovated on top of Google Maps (which
> they hadn't intended originally), that they've set out to promote that from
> the start with Wave.

And just to make sure:

'Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Google and its 
affiliates hereby grant to you a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-
charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this License) patent 
license for patents necessarily infringed by implementation of this 
specification.'  See http://www.waveprotocol.org/patent-license.

-- 
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux



-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-02 Thread Victor Churchill
Slightly surprised there hasn't been more noise about this. Maybe they
should have made a quicker 'highlights' video since possibly the
length might put a lot of potential viewers off.

I went from 'Wow' to 'OK, and..' to 'hmm... dunno' during the course
of the talk & demo. Yes there is some very nice technology there, and
yes they have put a lot of work in. And once you get the idea of the
API (which they did explain in principle quite clearly) then the demos
started to become 'more of the same'. (Although some of the
server-side robots were impressive!)

I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
problem.

And finally, although there still is a wow-factor there, I find myself
wondering just how I would actually see it being used. I don't really
think there is that much call for picture sharing and real time
collaborative editing, and it seemed like it was addressing
requirements I don't have. I'd quite like to be persuaded otherwise...

Maybe something to discuss over a beer tomorrow.

-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-02 Thread Simon P Smith

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:47:22 +0100, Victor Churchill
 wrote:
> 
> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
> problem.
> 

This is something that concerned me.  There is more and more reliance
on the network being always on and reliable.  Added to the confidentiality 
of storing all your conversations on a server outside your control.

I lost it (attention) after about 20 minutes so echo the requirement for a 
shorted punchy video about its features.  All of it made sense although it
would be nice to see some sort of identification and integrity measures (me
being paranoid and all that).

Si

-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-02 Thread Chris Dennis
Simon P Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:47:22 +0100, Victor Churchill
>  wrote:
>> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
>> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
>> problem.
>>
> 
> This is something that concerned me.  There is more and more reliance
> on the network being always on and reliable.  Added to the confidentiality 
> of storing all your conversations on a server outside your control.
> 
> I lost it (attention) after about 20 minutes so echo the requirement for a 
> shorted punchy video about its features.  All of it made sense although it
> would be nice to see some sort of identification and integrity measures (me
> being paranoid and all that).

I don't think you're being paranoid.  I noticed that the presentation 
didn't mention security, or wave-spam, or anything bad at all.  There is 
some discussion of such things on the wave forum though -- the Google 
people claim to be aware of and planning for such problems.

It all looked very clever, but does, as Si says, require a fast and 
reliable network: maybe we'll have one of those one day.

cheers

Chris
-- 
Chris Dennis  cgden...@btinternet.com
Fordingbridge, Hampshire, UK

-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-02 Thread Matt Pardoe
I can see it being used on company intranets where security and network
spped won't be an issue and features such as colaborative editing etc
will be more useful. I had some concerns about everything being sored on
another server if using it over the internet and what the security would
be like, on that front I thought the part of the demo where they showed
differnet servers talking to each other, so maybe you could set it up
with a client and server on each PC making into a peer to peer system
with nothing stored on an external server

-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-04 Thread Terry Coles
On Tuesday 02 Jun 2009, Victor Churchill wrote:
> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
> problem.

Two things here.  First of all, networks are beginning to get faster and more 
reliable, so in time I believe the performance will be there.  The second 
point is that as someone else said, companies will be able to run this over 
their intranet and even with offsite nodes, the performance should be pretty 
good if they have fast inter-site connections.

> And finally, although there still is a wow-factor there, I find myself
> wondering just how I would actually see it being used. I don't really
> think there is that much call for picture sharing and real time
> collaborative editing, and it seemed like it was addressing
> requirements I don't have. I'd quite like to be persuaded otherwise...

We use Groove at work for collaborative development with IEEE Standards and 
it's pretty good, even though the product was bought by Microsoft and you can 
no longer buy it without buying Office 2007, (no surprises there then).

I say that it's pretty good, but it's not a patch on Google Wave.  We could do 
some really powerful stuff if we went over to Wave and save money too.

> Maybe something to discuss over a beer tomorrow.

;-(  I just got back from Chester.

-- 
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux



-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-04 Thread Andrew Morgan
Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Jun 2009, Victor Churchill wrote:
>   
>> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
>> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
>> problem.
>> 
>
> Two things here.  First of all, networks are beginning to get faster and more 
> reliable, so in time I believe the performance will be there.  The second 
> point is that as someone else said, companies will be able to run this over 
> their intranet and even with offsite nodes, the performance should be pretty 
> good if they have fast inter-site connections.
>   
Latency doesn't seem to be a problem for e-mails or existing instant 
messaging.
They did say that it doesn't have to do updates per-key-press, you can 
send a message as a whole. (Well, will be able to when they implement 
that bit!)

I thought it all looked quite good.

-- 

Andrew.


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-07 Thread Peter Merchant
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 22:24 +0100, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Terry Coles wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 Jun 2009, Victor Churchill wrote:
> >   
> >> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
> >> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
> >> problem.
> >> 
> >
> > Two things here.  First of all, networks are beginning to get faster and 
> > more 
> > reliable, so in time I believe the performance will be there.  The second 
> > point is that as someone else said, companies will be able to run this over 
> > their intranet and even with offsite nodes, the performance should be 
> > pretty 
> > good if they have fast inter-site connections.
> >   
> Latency doesn't seem to be a problem for e-mails or existing instant 
> messaging.
> They did say that it doesn't have to do updates per-key-press, you can 
> send a message as a whole. (Well, will be able to when they implement 
> that bit!)
> 
> I thought it all looked quite good.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Andrew.
> 
> 
from today's observer. I think I like this guys writing. 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jun/07/media-business-google-wave

But he doesn't answer the question about who is going to pay to store
all this stuff that we do with Wave, who owns it, and how long it has to
be kept for legal reasons. 

He keeps his other stuff here. Note the 'living without Microsoft' link
http://www.briefhistory.com/footnotes/



Peter M.


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-07 Thread Nathan Baum
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 17:29 +0100, Peter Merchant wrote:

> But he doesn't answer the question about who is going to pay to store
> all this stuff that we do with Wave, who owns it, and how long it has to
> be kept for legal reasons. 

That depends where it's stored. Wave is a distributed system, like
conventional email, IRC, or Jabber, the instant messaging service it is
built upon. Different Wave service providers will have different answers
to those questions.


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-10 Thread Ralph Corderoy

Hi Terry,

> For those who haven't spotted this yet, and if you have the time, (1
> hr 20 mins actually), get over to http://wave.google.com/ and have a
> look at Google's latest product, due for launch later this year.

I've not managed to do that, even now.  Partly it's the amount of time
required, and partly that I tend to find videos provide a low signal to
noise and I'm stuck at their speed.  The written word can be more useful
and I've just read http://mashable.com/2009/05/28/google-wave-guide/
which seems to explain some of it quite well.  How much it's missed out,
I obviously don't know.  :-)

So if there's others like me who'd like to know what it's all about, and
whether to invest 100 minutes of your time in the video, that may be
worth a read first.

Cheers,


Ralph.


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-11 Thread Victor Churchill
2009/6/10 Ralph Corderoy :
>
> I've not managed to do that, even now.  Partly it's the amount of time
> required, and partly that I tend to find videos provide a low signal to
> noise and I'm stuck at their speed.  The written word can be more useful
> and I've just read http://mashable.com/2009/05/28/google-wave-guide/
> which seems to explain some of it quite well.  How much it's missed out,
> I obviously don't know.  :-)
>
> So if there's others like me who'd like to know what it's all about, and
> whether to invest 100 minutes of your time in the video, that may be
> worth a read first.

Hi Ralph,

Seems like others have had the same issue ("80 minutes!?") as there is
a "Readers' Digest Condensed" version (more just someone's selected
highlights, actually) at [1]. Although TBH I don't know how useful the
video snippets would be on their own if you hadn't already seen the
full length version.

OT, I think I do tend to agree with you about the effectiveness of the
medium - you can't easily 'skim' a video ;-)

But OTOH [2] I've just downloaded an open source software package
(Kompozer) and found myself  looking for a nice entry level 'howto'
video on the web rather than a user guide doc... hey well, nobody's
consistent *all* the time!

[1] 
http://lifehacker.com/5285944/the-google-wave-highlight-reel?skyline=true&s=x
[2] wow. what an acronym-fest. Three in one message.

-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] Google Wave

2009-06-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy

Hi Victor,

> Seems like others have had the same issue ("80 minutes!?") as there is
> a "Readers' Digest Condensed" version (more just someone's selected
> highlights, actually) at [1]. Although TBH I don't know how useful the
> video snippets would be on their own if you hadn't already seen the
> full length version.
>
> [1] 
> http://lifehacker.com/5285944/the-google-wave-highlight-reel?skyline=true&s=x

Thanks, very useful.  I'll make the time to watch the whole shebang
having seen those.

Cheers,


Ralph.


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset