[drakelist] FS-4 Repair

2006-06-20 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Good afternoon my fellow Drake Denizens;

Just when I thought it was save to go back into the water, my FS-4 developed
intermittent problems. I did all the usual things like cleaning switches and
checking the circuit board for solder problems and grounds, but I am afraid
that one or more of the now obsolete ICs may be the culprit. I don't get a
lot of bench time these days and I am interested in finding someone with
more brains, experience and patience than me, to help with its repair. I
would appreciate some suggestions of where I can send this thang. It's just
too valuable to let it sit on the shelf as a paperweight.

My best regards to all;
Gene

Gene McCalmont
W5DDW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Argyle Texas

--
Submissions:drakelist@www.zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


RE: [drakelist] L4B help

2005-11-08 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Hello Joe;
As you know, the L4B is a fairly straight forward grounded grid linear
amplifier design. I've used several of these amps, including an L4 with
3-400 tubes, for many reliable years. As you suspected, the excessive grid
drive is indicative of other problems and I would suspect from your
description that the root cause is the lack of HV applied to the tubes,
rather than the RF deck itself. The lack of HV applied to the tube plates
will cause the grid to conduct excessive current. Although there are other
failure modes that can present the same result, lack of HV is the most
common. Please be very careful testing your amp as excessive grid will ruin
your 3-500Zs. Of course, I'm sure you already know most of this.

I would suggest that you check these things in order of the most simple
first:
1. Do you have the HV connection to the back of the RF deck firmly fixed in
place. Is this cable and connector in good shape? These components will age
and although they may look good from the outside, there may be hidden
problems. If all looks good, proceed to the next step.

2. Remove the top cage of the L4-PS (check your user manual for proper
instructions) and inspect the fuse resistor (a small .82 ohm component) on
the deck's top side, to determine if the resistor is OK. This resistor is
mounted to an insulated post on the top of the PS and is not easily confused
with the big power dropping resistors mounted directly to the PS
transformer. Also check to confirm that the HV cable to the RF deck is
properly soldered. The resistor is a common source of problems for the L4-PS
and will deteriorate with age. It is designed to self sacrifice should the
HV short in the cable or at the RF deck. If it is cracked, burnt, blistered
or slightly swollen, replace it. Replacement resistors are readily available
and this is an easy job. The HV cable is generally very stiff and the wire
within does not take solder readily. If the PS has been worked on, it is
possible that the cable has become separated from the HV supply. If
everything looks good, proceed to the next step.

3. Visually inspect the diode daughter boards to determine if the diode
stack was properly replaced and installed. It is very easy to mount these
daughter boards backwards such that the PS HV is actually cut off on one
or each cycle rather than conducting. Check the circuit diagram for your PS
to determine how the cathode should be connected on each bank. It is a
common failure mode to connect these daughter boards with opposite polarity.
You may have to remove the two capacitor boards to adequately inspect the
diode boards. If everything looks correct, proceed to the next step.

4. Visually inspect the two banks of HV capacitors for problems such as
electrolyte leaks, swelling, any unusual discoloration, burn marks from
excessive heat or other signs of deterioration and open leads or cold solder
joints. Problems with the HV caps is the most common failure mode for the HV
power supply and they are difficult to replace because axel lead HV caps of
the proper size and rating are not usually available. Any observed problem
means that all HV capacitors must be replaced. There is a thread on this
list that addresses a new HV capacitor replacement board that would be worth
looking into, however, the replacement job is not complicated and there are
many threads in the list archives that explain how to do this job. If
everything looks correct, proceed to the next step.

5. Walk to the fridge and open the door by grasping the handle usually
located on one side of the door opposite the hinges. Pull firmly and swing
the door out of the way. Inspect the contents of the fridge and find a small
container, usually brown glass, narrow at the top and with a bright label
affixed to the side. Remove the container from the fridge and secure the
fridge door by pushing it shut. Locate an appropriate opener for the
container and pry the top closure loose from the container to expose the
contents within. Note: your container may be different and require a
different opening procedure. Please consult the instructions specifically
written for your type of container for proper procedures. Find a comfortable
place to sit and enjoy the contents of the container with perhaps a nice
cigar. Just maybe you will think of something that will solve your problem.

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oak Ridge Ln.
Argyle Texas 76226



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Roth
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:01 PM
To: drakelist@www.zerobeat.net
Subject: [drakelist] L4B help


Joe Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
I was fortunate to find an L4B to complete my Drake C-line station

RE: [drakelist] L4-PS R12 burned - .825 ohm 2W resistor on pin 6 of cable harness

2004-12-06 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hello Jason;
From your email, it appears that one of your 3-500z tubes has bit the
dust. It would be difficult to say what caused the problem, but these
tubes, while robust to a fault, are not indestructible and do have a
definable life cycle. It is entirely normal for the tube plates to have a
dull reddish glow while the amp is keyed, however, from your description, I
would say you are correct that one tube was under full load while the other
was not. While color descriptions are mostly subjective, an orangey glow
means the remaining tube was pulling a lot of current when observed.
Depending on how long this condition existed, it too is probably exhausted.

There is practically no way an average amateur can check a 3-500z unless the
tube is put into service and observed. Fortunately, you had enough presence
of mind to observe the tubes while switching off the power. Bravo! This is
the way I would proceed:

1. You will, of course, have to open the PS to replace R12. If at all
possible, replace R12 with an exact value 2w carbon resistor. If
unavailable, get as close as you can using only what is available in a 2
watt configuration metal oxide composition resistor. Remember, R12 is kind
of like a thermal fuse so any condition that causes excessive current draw
exceeding its 2w dissipation rating, will blow the fuse. Metal oxide
resistors will be slower to give it up than carbon, so carbon is the
choice. The value of R12 is important and fortunately, it is a commonly
manufactured part.
2. Observe the other PS components paying close attention to the filter
capacitors, bleeder resistors and all three dropping resistors. These
components may need attention as well. 
3. Go to the bottom of the RF deck and observe the components and socket
around the tube that was not conducting. Look for obvious problems such as
swollen/cracked capacitors and resistors, burnt wire etc. At this point, I
would not start wholesale replacing components. It is likely that any
component failure at this point was catastrophic and should be easily
discovered.
4. It is most likely that the one tube you observed had reached its end of
life and will need to be replaced. When you remove the tube, mark it with a
felt tip marker. What caused it to fail, having not discovered any obvious
failed components on the chassis underside, will be difficult to determine.
At this point, you have several options. Replace that one tube with another
USED tube and get on with life, or replace BOTH 3-500z tubes with fresh
examples.

Although this would be a lot of work, the most optimal approach, since the
amp is already down for the count, would be to freshen the PS with new
capacitors and diodes, and a few other components, do a really good cleaning
of the amp, service the fan motor, replace any obviously defective under
chassis components at the RF deck, plunk in some new Taylor 3-500z tubes
from RF Supply and Rock and Roll. You will have an awesome amp, capable of
1,500watts out, that will last you another 20+ years.

Good luck and please keep me informed.
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oak Ridge Ln.
Argyle Texas 76226

-Original Message-
From: Jason Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 6:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [drakelist] L4-PS R12 burned - .825 ohm 2W resistor on pin 6 of
cable harness


Thank you VERY much for your EXCELLENT advice - I will do some checking
inside the PS today.  I did notice that one tube was dark while the other
was red, almost orange, when this happened.  I noticed a small pop sound
coming from the power supply and when I turned my head to look at the supply
and start reaching for the power switch I saw that one tube appeared to be
handling the entire load while the other was not doing anything.  Filaments
were lit on both tubes. 


I will take a drive by the parts store today and dig up some of those
resistors.  And will take OUT that tube that went dark.  No idea why it
would go dark and the other pick up the load - would a grid-to-filament
short cause this?


Thanks,
Jason

--
On Behalf of Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] L4-PS R12 burned - .825 ohm 2W resistor on pin 6 of cable harness

2004-12-06 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Good evening Garey and Jason;
Jason, I believe Garey to be correct in this and it's something I had not
noticed in the past. I have another L-4B, left at my door in a wicker basket
with a note from its previous owner, which is suffering from a blown R12. I
had not been into this PS as yet, but opened it up just a few moments ago.
Yup... Thar she blows (no pun intended)... A wirewound flameproof just as
Garey had said and with the same markings (best I can tell), so I believe it
was original. Interesting. However, I fear that this owner was not so lucky
and it looks like one or more of the carbon bleeder resistors have cooked. I
am somewhat reluctant to look further into this... before Christmas!

Gary, I'm still working on my 30S-1 resolving some issues with unstable bias
voltages on a 4CX1500B. I believe the fuse you referred to is almost
unobtanium. Fortunately, I haven't had need of this beast!

Good luck guys and keep those tubes glowing.
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oak Ridge Ln.
Argyle Texas 76226

Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Gene  Jason -

One critique of your otherwise excellent advice.  snip


--
On Behalf of Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


[drakelist] Joke

2004-10-23 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
My fellow Hams and Drake Fans;
From the moment I turn on some form of popular media in the morning, to the
point I retire for the evening, I am bombarded with politically motivated
sound bites extolling the virtues of one or the other of our political
candidates or pointing out some trivial aspect of the other's personality. I
subscribe to the Drake List, among others, as an escape from the noise of
society and the opportunity to share with and learn from others who
appreciate the old classic tube rigs. I do not feel that this forum is an
appropriate outlet for politically motivated off topic post and I'm
surprised that Thom, who normally runs a very tight ship, would allow this
to happen, let alone continue.

While I would not propose to limit your ability to speak your political
mind, surely there are other forums where this would be welcomed and
appreciated. I, for one, am encouraged by our lively and often contentious
political climate and have a deep respect for all those candidates who ply
the course toward political service. It takes a rare person to do this,
wither an incumbent or a pretender.

I would encourage each and every one of you to get off your duffs, support
your candidate of choice and get out and vote this November. But please,
respect the rest of us who may not share your political views, and use our
Drake forum as it was intended.

With respect;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oak Ridge Ln.
Argyle Texas 76226

--
On Behalf of Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] Inquiry on R4C es Sherwood filters

2004-09-19 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hello John;
Your post caught my eye this afternoon, so I thought I'd share my experience
with you while the Redskins get trounced by the Giants in the background.

The first question you should ask yourself is What do I intend to do with
this once I'm finished?

Not all of the modifications from Sherwood are needed if you intend to
operate only CW or only SSB or listen only to AM. Also, I'd ask What is
reasonable for me to spend? A full boat R-4C can be an expensive
proposition. I know, I've built 6 of these machines for myself and for
others. They are remarkable receivers and perform very well when compared
with more modern rigs.

I'd also ask myself what level of performance do I expect? That is to say,
a R-4C with the appropriate 2nd IF filters and the installation of the
GUF-1 upgrade 1st IF filter from INRAD, produces an excellent receiver
with not a lot of investment. I'd suggest the 6Khz crystal filter if your
operation is mostly CW/SSB. If you use your radio to listen to SW broadcast,
then the 8Khz filter would be a better choice. If you have installed the
4NB, then the 8Khz filter is again your best choice. It allows the noise
blanker to perform it's job better, with less pumping of the AGC.

One of the most popular and biggest bang for the buck mods from Sherwood is
the upgrade power supply board and the R-4C audio amplifier, AMP-4. These
modifications solve two of the most annoying problems of the rig. The
Sherwood web site explains the upgrades in good detail. These mods are
relatively easy to perform and your cash outlay is less than $100.
Everything gets progressively more complex and expensive from this point
onward.

I almost always replace the diode product detector in an upgraded RC-4 with
the Sherwood PD-4. It gives the receiver improved headroom in the presence
of strong signals. It's more difficult to install, in my opinion, but still
well within the capability of most Hams. You must pay close attention to the
instructions and be able to identify various components on the Drake factory
circuit boards.

The MIX-4 is the last upgrade I do, but only when the particular R-4C I'm
working on is having problems in this area. A problematic 3rd mixer presents
a noticeable hum in the audio and the typical snap crackle pop of a noisy
6EJ7. It is one of the more difficult mods to install. Since 6EJ7s are cheap
and plentiful, I first try to find a tube that will solve the problem before
resorting to the MIX-4 upgrade.

Last but certainly not least are the first IF crystal filter upgrades. This
is where you are going to spend a lot of money but the results are very
dramatic. If operating CW exclusively, or just a lot, the 600hz crystal
filter will DRAMATICALLY improve the receiver's ability to isolate
individual signals and gives the CW operator a truly superior machine. It is
difficult to describe how unwanted signals just disappear when the 600Hz is
switched into the IF chain. 

The upper and lower SSB filters dramatically improve the receivers 3rd order
intercept performance with a resultant improvement in MDS in crowded band
conditions. There are few receivers that offer the kind of performance these
filters bring to the R-4C. The roofing filter approach is one of the
reasons the TenTec Orion has won such acclaim for it's performance. However,
installation of the filters and attendant switching circuits is not for the
faint of heart. 

I hope this information helps out some, John. Perhaps others have differing
opinions worth considering.

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oak Ridge Ln.
Argyle Texas 76226

--
On Behalf of Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] Inquiry on R4C es Sherwood filters

2004-09-19 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hello John;
Your post caught my eye this afternoon, so I thought I'd share my experience
with you while the Redskins get trounced by the Giants in the background.

The first question you should ask yourself is What do I intend to do with
this once I'm finished?

Not all of the modifications from Sherwood are needed if you intend to
operate only CW or only SSB or listen only to AM. Also, I'd ask What is
reasonable for me to spend? A full boat R-4C can be an expensive
proposition. I know, I've built 6 of these machines for myself and for
others. They are remarkable receivers and perform very well when compared
with more modern rigs.

I'd also ask myself what level of performance do I expect? That is to say,
a R-4C with the appropriate 2nd IF filters and the installation of the
GUF-1 upgrade 1st IF filter from INRAD, produces an excellent receiver
with not a lot of investment. I'd suggest the 6Khz crystal filter if your
operation is mostly CW/SSB. If you use your radio to listen to SW broadcast,
then the 8Khz filter would be a better choice. If you have installed the
4NB, then the 8Khz filter is again your best choice. It allows the noise
blanker to perform it's job better, with less pumping of the AGC.

One of the most popular and biggest bang for the buck mods from Sherwood is
the upgrade power supply board and the R-4C audio amplifier, AMP-4. These
modifications solve two of the most annoying problems of the rig. The
Sherwood web site explains the upgrades in good detail. These mods are
relatively easy to perform and your cash outlay is less than $100.
Everything gets progressively more complex and expensive from this point
onward.

I almost always replace the diode product detector in an upgraded RC-4 with
the Sherwood PD-4. It gives the receiver improved headroom in the presence
of strong signals. It's more difficult to install, in my opinion, but still
well within the capability of most Hams. You must pay close attention to the
instructions and be able to identify various components on the Drake factory
circuit boards.

The MIX-4 is the last upgrade I do, but only when the particular R-4C I'm
working on is having problems in this area. A problematic 3rd mixer presents
a noticeable hum in the audio and the typical snap crackle pop of a noisy
6EJ7. It is one of the more difficult mods to install. Since 6EJ7s are cheap
and plentiful, I first try to find a tube that will solve the problem before
resorting to the MIX-4 upgrade.

Last but certainly not least are the first IF crystal filter upgrades. This
is where you are going to spend a lot of money but the results are very
dramatic. If operating CW exclusively, or just a lot, the 600hz crystal
filter will DRAMATICALLY improve the receiver's ability to isolate
individual signals and gives the CW operator a truly superior machine. It is
difficult to describe how unwanted signals just disappear when the 600Hz is
switched into the IF chain. 

The upper and lower SSB filters dramatically improve the receivers 3rd order
intercept performance with a resultant improvement in MDS in crowded band
conditions. There are few receivers that offer the kind of performance these
filters bring to the R-4C. The roofing filter approach is one of the
reasons the TenTec Orion has won such acclaim for it's performance. However,
installation of the filters and attendant switching circuits is not for the
faint of heart. 

I hope this information helps out some, John. Perhaps others have differing
opinions worth considering.

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oak Ridge Ln.
Argyle Texas 76226

--
On Behalf of Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] Drake synthesizer update.

2004-06-06 Thread Gene McCalmont

Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hello Gerry;
Thanks for the update on the Far Circuits kit. I must say that I am a bit
discouraged by your report. I assume that there is always some deviation
in magazine construction projects, but as you say, had you not been in the
business, you'd be dead in the water. The poor quality control on the
circuit board is enough to deal with without having to interpret what parts
were substituted. How does an average Ham work through this without some
documentation?

Thanks again for your update and please keep us informed on your progress...
I for one was/am looking forward to taking up the project.

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerry
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [drakelist] Drake synthesizer update.



Gerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
I ordered two kits from Far Circuits which arrived this week. snip

--
On Behalf of Gene McCalmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


[drakelist] Crystal Eliminator Update?

2004-05-26 Thread Gene McCalmont

Some weeks back, there was a very brief discussion about the Drake Crystal
Eliminator article featured in the latest issue of QST. I seem to remember
that several critical components were no longer available, such as the
fluorescent display module and possibly the VCO.

Questions:
1. Has anyone been successful in getting the parts together for this
project?
2. Has anyone actually built the project?
3. Is anyone planning on building the project?

If you have any experience with the Crystal Eliminator, I would appreciate
hearing about your experiences.

Best Regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] R-$C

2004-05-20 Thread Gene McCalmont

Good Morning from Texas;
There are a number of reasons a R-4C could cost $800, and more, and they are
all based on condition, options (accessories) and availability. Prices are
generally set by what a willing buyer will pay and a what willing seller
will accept. Although there is much teeth gnashing and angst voiced on
this reflector, and others, about prices on eBay, it is a great forum for
establishing market prices for used equipment of any type, vintage rigs
included. So, consider:

1. Let's start with an Excellent to Very Good late serial R-4C, with no
accessories, in good cosmetic condition, with the original manual, requiring
nothing, and operating well on all bands... $325
2. Add a model appropriate and working 4NB noise blanker... $156
3. Add the AM, and three additional original crystal filters... $225 (adding
new crystal filters from INRAD or Sherwood would increase the price
considerably although they would perform better, IMHO)
4. Let's drop in, say, 10 band crystals at a conservative $10 each (again
more if purchasing new from Sherwood or International Crystal). $100

OK, so now we have a moderately well equipped R-4C, purchased a bit at a
time, that tips the scales at $806. It is a good performer and worthy of
your attention.

Now, lets have some fun. Let's add some stuff to update some of the marginal
sections of the receiver:

1. How about a 6Khz First IF crystal filter from INRAD. $110
2. Let's upgrade the marginal power supply board and audio section with mods
from Sherwood. $100
3. How about fixing than dang product detector while we're at it. $35
4. You know, the 3rd Mixer is a pain in the buttinsky, so in goes a solid
state 3rd mixer stage. $59

Now, we're up to $1,110 and we have a receiver that is performing very well
but still has room for improvement.

How about adding additional Sherwood First IF crystal filters and a
switching kit? So, in goes a 600hz CW first filter ($135), a couple of SSB
filters ($199/pair) and a four filter switching including the PC boards and
TO-5 relays and a custom front panel wafer switch assembly ($325)

Now, we're up to $1,769 and we have, what can arguably be defended, one of
the best performing receivers available... and we haven't even thought about
a new DSP kit from SGC, shipping charges, bench time, interconnecting
cables, starlet in Malibu (she can help install the rig), etc. If you've
never heard a fully equipped R-4C on a crowded contest weekend, you owe it
to yourself to find out what the fuss is all about.

So, an R-4C can cost much more than $325, or $800 or... One rule of thumb
worth considering: Buy the best and most well equipped radio you can
afford, that will fit your operating style/requirements, first. You will be
dollars and sense (pun intended) ahead in the long run. There is nothing
worse than having your classic station constantly on the bench awaiting
repairs. Frankly, I'd much prefer cruising the airwaves. Now, what did I do
with that dang soldering iron?

Best regards;
Gene

P.S. These are only my opinions, for what they are worth. Others will have
different and valid opinions worth consideration.

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rocco Lardiere
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drake List
Subject: Re: [drakelist] R-$C



I saw a decent R4-C at the TRW swap meet a month ago for $325.  I passed - I
have two already.  There were no other takers when I left.  $800 is nuts,
unless possibly it is new, sealed in the original box, has a crate full of
extra filters, and was previously owned by some famous starlet from whom you
get to pick it up at her house in Malibu.

But there are always dealers out there trying to bid things up.

73,

Rocco N6KN

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] R-$C

2004-05-20 Thread Gene McCalmont

Hello Evan;
You bring up several, what I feel to be, very important points, but first an
observation: eBay is capitalism in action, with all its good and bad
ramifications for both buyers and sellers. Most of us have our war stories
about eBay and I would not exclude our local Ham fests in that.

Point one:
The buyer must do his homework before placing a bid. Your references are
worthy examples. Rule of thumb an uninformed buyer will usually pay too
much for an auction item. Of course, you could apply this rule to just
about any selling situation where the seller and buyer are trying to reach a
negotiated price.

Point two:
It is well known to savvy sellers that auction fervor will drive up
prices. Actually, your point two is closely tied to point one. It is very
easy to get tied up in a last nanosecond bidding war.

Point three:
Bidding on eBay is fun. In fact, it's competition that's fun... and if you
win, you get a prize. It's kinda like trying to break through a pileup.
Everyone wants to win.

The result: someone will occasionally pay too much for an item, be it new or
a vintage piece of Ham gear, and that's a shame, but it is also an excellent
example of market forces at work. Now the real trick is to make sure you are
not the one overpaying! Therefore, your implied conclusions are (i) be
informed and know what an item is worth, (ii) set a maximum price you are
willing to pay and stick with it.

Before eBay, prices for and availability of vintage Ham gear was stagnant.
More often than not, perfectly good vintage gear went into the Dumpster at
estate sales and the tired old pieces making the Ham fest rounds were worn
out. Vintage gear is more readily available today than at any time I can
remember and the variety of it all is amazing. I also have a much more
realistic idea of what my stuff is worth should the unspeakable happen, and
my eBay savvy son has to liquidate some of the gear.

Thanks for your excellent comments. Is that plastic I smell burning? I may
have just found the soldering iron.

73 QRT SK;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [drakelist] R-$C


Gene,

I understand your reasoning.  But how about the people that pay more for a
used rig than what it is currently selling new for with warranty?  e.g.
Yaesu FT-1500M was selling used on Upay, I mean Ebay, for upwards of $175
while it was on closeout at the dealers for $119 (I got one for $99 at
Hamvention).  The new Kenwood TM-271A has been selling for $185-200 on Upay,
I mean Ebay, when you can get it at the dealers for $169, I got mine at
Hamvention for $144.  I mean, people are obviously online to do the Ebay
bidding.  Just typing in the model number into your search engine gives the
dealer pricing and location within seconds.  Yet they insist on paying more
for a used rig without warranty.

I was planning on buying 10-12 TM-271As and then selling them on Upay, I
mean Ebay, but I just don't have the time right now.  Nobody ever accused
Ebay bidders as having more brains than money.  Strange.

73s,

Evan

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] Removing the RF Gain Lever R-4C

2004-05-15 Thread Gene McCalmont

Well, it's going to take me awhile to live this one down. |:)

Obviously, the solution was rather simple, as was the brain of the guy
originally asking the question. My sincerest thanks to all those who went
out of their way, on a Saturday afternoon, to answer my question in a manner
that preserved my sense of self-worth (LOL). It appears that, once again, it
was the simplest of task that did me in.

Now... where did I leave that hot soldering iron?

My best regards to all;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


[drakelist] Sherwood SSB filter board wiring question

2004-05-14 Thread Gene McCalmont

No one said that the installation instructions from Sherwood Engineering
would be easy to follow but I've run into a problem for which I can find no
answer. Of course, everyone is at Dayton (but me), so I thought I'd ask the
group for some help.

Installing a Sherwood four filter switch kit in an R-4C
---
Wiring the SSB board: (Page 3, latest version, DC Connections)
#1. The instructions say to attach a 2 foot wire to the SSB filter board pad
labeled BLUE and run it through the center cable-harness cutout, for a later
attachment. There is no pad labeled BLUE, although I was able to figure this
one out by following the schematic of the board for which there was a Blue
connection, supplying power to the two filter-switching relays.

#2. The instructions say to attach a 2 foot wire to the SSB board pad
labeled +12V. There is no pad labeled +12V. The schematic diagram of the SSB
filter board shows no such +12V connection and indeed shows only the
connection indicated in step #1 which appears to be the same as in step #2.

#3. Wire the board to a +12V source near the R-4C accessory plug. No mention
of the blue wire or which wire to connect to the +12V source... although
+12V would seem logical, if there were such a wire. Of course, attaching the
BLUE wire to the +12V source would activate the relays locking them
permanently in the closed position.

No doubt, when installing the filter-switch assembly, all this will be
explained, (one should hope). I'll continue to read on, but if there is
someone who has some experience with this and might be able to shed some
light on the installation, I would appreciate hearing from them.

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


[drakelist] S meter calibration

2004-03-23 Thread Gene McCalmont

FYI regarding S meter calibration:
Elecraft (www.elecraft.com) has produced one of the best tools I've found
for measuring receiver performance and calibrating S meter readings to the
50 microvolt standard. It is the XG1 Receiver Test Oscillator and it can
be found at http://www.elecraft.com/mini_module_kits/mini_modules.htm.

It's inexpensive (compared to other test equipment) and is an easy to build
kit, which yields repeatable and accurate test results. You might want to
check this out.

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


[drakelist] WTB: T-4XC plate tune variable capacitor

2004-02-28 Thread Gene McCalmont

Good afternoon to the list:
I discovered this afternoon, after digging into my pristine T-4XC to find
out why it wouldn't tune on 75 meters, that someone in this transmitter's
history had removed a plate from the rotating portion of the plate tune
air-variable capacitor. Upon close inspection, I noticed what appeared to be
some minor arching that had occurred in the past. Rather than fix the
problem, apparently the previous user chose instead to remove the offending
plate. Actually, if one chooses to work only 40 meters and above, this was
not a particularly offensive repair, as the air-variable capacitor has
sufficient range to tune 40 through 10 with one less plate. However, on
anything below 40 meters, there is not enough capacitance to tune the plate
output circuit.

So, if you have an air-variable plate tune capacitor, perhaps in a parts
transmitter, and would like to sell it, I would appreciate hearing from you.

My best regards to the list;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226
(940) 464-4474 Office
(214)-502-0322 Cell

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] R4B or R4C+mods?

2004-02-11 Thread Gene McCalmont

Good afternoon Andy;
I just received your message and had a little time on my hands so I thought
I'd send some observations from my side. Of course with anything posted here
or elsewhere, your mileage may vary and there are always genuinely important
and differing opinions.

I have and still use both an R4B and a R4C/Sherwood receiver on CW and they
are both very good rigs for that purpose. IMHO, a well tuned R4C with
Sherwood CW filter modifications is an outstanding performer, but it is also
much more expensive than a good working R4B, which does not require further
modifications to be a capable performer. If ultimate CW performance in an
older style radio is your goal, and cost is no consideration, then a
Sherwoodized late model R4C, well aligned and in proper working condition,
is going to be hard to beat. However, we are talking about a substantial
investment in time and money to reach this level of performance.

Any well aligned R4C with it's optional CW filters can also be an excellent
CW performer, without the optional Sherwood filters. A well accepted
modification that really nets good results is replacing the first IF crystal
filter with a 6khz 8 pole INRAD (a $125 upgrade). This greatly improves
selectivity of the receiver in both SSB and CW with only a slight sacrifice
in AM performance. INRAD also provides optional second IF crystal filters
that are IMHO better than the original Drake units... but only slightly.

Frankly, I've found that the R4B is also an excellent CW receiver and I
enjoy working CW with this rig because of it's overall audio quality and
it's selectable bandwidth filters. No modifications are required, save the
usual alignment and general servicing of the radio. My only negative comment
on the R4B is that the two 6HS6 tubes are getting very difficult to find at
any reasonable price... but they don't fail all that often and can be had on
the tube aftermarket.

So;
Ultimate Performance, price no object = a late model R4C with lots of
Sherwood goodies
Very good Performance, price is important = a well tuned R4C with 6Khz
option and Drake filters
Price an object = a really well serviced and operating R4B
Of course, there are lots of other options.

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


RE: [drakelist] R4 and T4X injection issue, transceiving

2003-10-18 Thread Gene McCalmont

Good Morning Ken
Garey Barrell's suggestions (K4OAH) are right on target. I too have
experienced the same problem as have most of us on the list. Another option
you may try is to substitute your current injection cables with RG-58.
Mouser sells these cables with molded RCA plugs already attached. Although
the capacitance is not quite on design target, it's close. Switching to
RG-58 and repeaking the set cured my problem nicely. I also use this cable
combination on all of my Collins equipment with equally good results.

Good luck and 73 de
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226
(940) 464-4474 Office
(214)-502-0322 Cell


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


[drakelist] KM7N Request for R4C

2003-10-13 Thread Gene McCalmont

Apologies to the group as this is a reply to Mark's posting.

Mark, I tried unsuccessfully to send you an email at your ATT.NET address
only to discover that ATT WorldNet has blacklisted the out going email
server at Direcway.com! If you would please respond directly to me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I have a R4C receiver that you may be interested in.
If you do not get a reply from me, you might want to call the number below.

Again, my apologies to the group and thanks to the list operator for
sponsoring this invaluable resource!

Best regards;
Gene

W5DDW
Gene McCalmont
270 Oakridge Road
Argyle Texas 76226
(214)-502-0322 Cell


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--