Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Dave Airlie wrote: r200 render path looks really A LOT better, unfortunately the open-source driver doesn't implement the required extensions (some bits of documentation are missing afaik, and even if not (I have no idea what's in the documentation or not) it would probably quite a bit of work as core mesa doesn't support them neither (mostly ATI_(text_)fragment_shader). Well I've started it, but it'll take me a while to finish off the software implementation, Eric thinks he can do the hardware side (I think I can probably do it as well.. but I'll try and get the software side working first hopefully...) Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. -- // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., RD dept. \X/ http://www.develer.com/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: SW fallback: clipping bug [patch]
Am Freitag, 22. Oktober 2004 13:28 schrieb Keith Whitwell: Ian Romanick wrote: Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2004 22:51 schrieb Nicolai Haehnle: There is disagreement about the meaning of the CLIPSPAN _n parameter in CVS. The drivers I have looked at and drivers/dri/common/spantmp.h treat _n as the number of pixels in the span after clipping. depthtmp.h and stenciltmp.h treat _n as the end+1 x coordinate of the span. This inconsistency leads to artifacts when software fallbacks are hit while clipping is used, especially with partially obscured clients. The attached patch should fix these artifacts by changing depthtmp.h and stenciltmp.h appropriately. What about this? Needed? I could have sworn this patch already got committed. In any case, it looks good to me. I didn't realize the the templates in depthtmp.h treated the _n parameter differently than the ones in spantmp.h. The fix, as in this patch, of making depthtmp.h work like spantmp.h seem to be the right one. The other option would be to fix each driver that uses depthtmp.h. Yes, I'm happy to see it go in also. So, who will commit it then? ;-) Maybe this little cosmetic, to: --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_texstate.c 2004-10-15 23:40:19.626568574 +0200 +++ src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_texstate.c.Dieter2004-10-15 23:24:27.345155774 +0200 @@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ * specific cases necessary, they were insufficient. See bugzilla #1519, * #729, #814. Tests with quake3 showed no impact on performance. */ - dbg = 0x6; + dbg = 0x06; /* if (((rmesa-hw.ctx.cmd[CTX_PP_CNTL] (R200_TEX_0_ENABLE )) -Dieter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Am Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2004 19:38 schrieb Bernardo Innocenti: Dave Airlie wrote: r200 render path looks really A LOT better, unfortunately the open-source driver doesn't implement the required extensions (some bits of documentation are missing afaik, and even if not (I have no idea what's in the documentation or not) it would probably quite a bit of work as core mesa doesn't support them neither (mostly ATI_(text_)fragment_shader). Well I've started it, but it'll take me a while to finish off the software implementation, Eric thinks he can do the hardware side (I think I can probably do it as well.. but I'll try and get the software side working first hopefully...) Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. Above applies here, too. - Sorry. The situation seems to be much worse in the future. Bad IP (TRIPS, etc.) madness due to USA-law. -Dieter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
On Sunday 24 October 2004 19:38, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. If that with above is a wish like I think it probably is, you might want to have a look at Utah-GLX which has rudimentary hw accel support. Also, somebody, somewhere (possibly in the nv driver in X, but I'm not sure) figured out how to do DMA. Of course, what's really needed is the equivalent of glxtest for NVidia and somebody with NVidia hardware who has a few weeks to spare for long nights of puzzling over register dumps :) cu, Nicolai pgppeOhHYFYMY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. Above applies here, too. - Sorry. The situation seems to be much worse in the future. Bad IP (TRIPS, etc.) madness due to USA-law. True. ATI no longer releases docs. 3dlabs no longer does. Nvidia never did. Intel requires an NDA now. If there weren't all those patents out there we might just try to develop a free graphics chip. Philipp --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Am Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2004 20:20 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. Are you sure. I thought Xig had it all before. Do you have actual numbers? Haven't looked at them for very long time, but I bought the first version of there X server 1994 (?) for mga. Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. Above applies here, too. - Sorry. The situation seems to be much worse in the future. Bad IP (TRIPS, etc.) madness due to USA-law. True. ATI no longer releases docs. 3dlabs no longer does. Nvidia never did. Intel requires an NDA now. If there weren't all those patents out there we might just try to develop a free graphics chip. ;-) Greetings, Dieter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. Above applies here, too. - Sorry. The situation seems to be much worse in the future. Bad IP (TRIPS, etc.) madness due to USA-law. True. ATI no longer releases docs Not true. They have released r300 documents to XiG under an NDA recently. Adam --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Am Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2004 20:10 schrieb Bernardo Innocenti: CC trimmed. Dieter Nützel wrote: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever Do you really need the datasheet to get these to work? Some time ago I disassembled ATI's fglrx kernel module and their DRI module. The asm output looks quite readable: you can see symbol names and accesses to PCI registers (base ptr + offset). A bad original for DRI;-) I'm not familiar with 3D hardware, but my rough guess is that you could easily guess what the registers if you know what the GL extensions are supposed to do and see what values are written in registers. Some are on it for ages, but. IANAL, but reverse engineering is perfectly legal here in Europe and probably even in the USA if your goal is achieving compatibility. If we didn't get another IP right (software patents, which we didn't have today, even if the EPÜ/EPC did it falsely the US-way) in Europe. BTW Which is the official Italian standpoint. European Commision Draft or Parliament (later is against)? Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. Above applies here, too. - Sorry. The situation seems to be much worse in the future. Bad IP (TRIPS, etc.) madness due to USA-law. This is certaily bad, but not as bad as being unable to develop the driver at all. You may implement patented algorithms and restrict its use in some countries. I can freely use the S3TC extension here because it's not (yet) patentable. Yes, but IS falsely by the EPÜ/EPC... ...and solved with Roland's work;-) Any US developer could write it and even compile it, as long as he doesn't sell it in his country. Somewhat to simple I think. Greetings, Dieter PS Fight for the European Parliament's draft! PPS We had Thursday some very good results in our parlament. http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/52417 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Dieter Nützel schrieb: The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. Are you sure. I thought Xig had it all before. Do you have actual numbers? Haven't looked at them for very long time, but I bought the first version of there X server 1994 (?) for mga. Roland made a comparison a year ago: http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03.html Xig even outperforms the ATI windows drivers. Philipp --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Am Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2004 20:45 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: Dieter Nützel schrieb: The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. Are you sure. I thought Xig had it all before. Do you have actual numbers? Haven't looked at them for very long time, but I bought the first version of there X server 1994 (?) for mga. Roland made a comparison a year ago: http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03 .html Xig even outperforms the ATI windows drivers. Ah, OK I know that ones, but know the side effects, too. No standard xv, etc. -Dieter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Dieter Nützel wrote: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever Do you really need the datasheet to get these to work? Some time ago I disassembled ATI's fglrx kernel module and their DRI module. The asm output looks quite readable: you can see symbol names and accesses to PCI registers (base ptr + offset). I'm not familiar with 3D hardware, but my rough guess is that you could easily guess what the registers if you know what the GL extensions are supposed to do and see what values are written in registers. IANAL, but reverse engineering is perfectly legal here in Europe and probably even in the USA if your goal is achieving compatibility. Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. Above applies here, too. - Sorry. The situation seems to be much worse in the future. Bad IP (TRIPS, etc.) madness due to USA-law. This is certaily bad, but not as bad as being unable to develop the driver at all. You may implement patented algorithms and restrict its use in some countries. I can freely use the S3TC extension here because it's not (yet) patentable. Any US developer could write it and even compile it, as long as he doesn't sell it in his country. -- // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., RD dept. \X/ http://www.develer.com/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Dieter Nützel wrote: The asm output looks quite readable: you can see symbol names and accesses to PCI registers (base ptr + offset). A bad original for DRI;-) This information should only be used to write a header file describing the registers. Of course I'm not talking about cutting pasting asm code into the open-source DRI module ;-) I'm not familiar with 3D hardware, but my rough guess is that you could easily guess what the registers if you know what the GL extensions are supposed to do and see what values are written in registers. Some are on it for ages, but. Perhaps I'm underestimating the complexity behind that code... I seemed to me that there was not too much glue code between the module API and the hardware registers. IANAL, but reverse engineering is perfectly legal here in Europe and probably even in the USA if your goal is achieving compatibility. If we didn't get another IP right (software patents, which we didn't have today, even if the EPÜ/EPC did it falsely the US-way) in Europe. The new patent law is still being discussed. The current convention explicitly disallows patenting computer programs, mathematical methods and the like: http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/epc/e/ar52.html BTW Which is the official Italian standpoint. European Commision Draft or Parliament (later is against)? Italy has always been vaguely against the new software patent law. AFAIK, the strongest supporter of this regulation is Irland (where Microsoft's European HQ is, along with many other big corporations). The law will be discussed again in the Parliament... let's hope not too many politicians will already have been bought by that time. I can freely use the S3TC extension here because it's not (yet) patentable. Yes, but IS falsely by the EPÜ/EPC... ...and solved with Roland's work;-) Who I'm very grateful to for his clever hack. Let's hope the distributors can license that code from VIA. Microsoft did so for DX9. Any US developer could write it and even compile it, as long as he doesn't sell it in his country. Somewhat to simple I think. Well, WANL (We Are Not Lawyers)... -- // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., RD dept. \X/ http://www.develer.com/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
--- Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. It's my opinion that xig uses trickery to get there FPS higher then it should be posible to under OpenGL compliant rendering. It's also true in the font and 2d(like lack of xv support) accelerations as well. Do you mean fglrx or opengl.dll - radeon.drv? Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. Above applies here, too. - Sorry. The situation seems to be much worse in the future. Bad IP (TRIPS, etc.) madness due to USA-law. True. ATI no longer releases docs. 3dlabs no longer does. Nvidia never did. Intel requires an NDA now. If there weren't all those patents out there we might just try to develop a free graphics chip. Philipp --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
--- Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dieter Nützel schrieb: The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. Are you sure. I thought Xig had it all before. Do you have actual numbers? Haven't looked at them for very long time, but I bought the first version of there X server 1994 (?) for mga. Roland made a comparison a year ago: http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03.html Xig even outperforms the ATI windows drivers. This has allot more todo with OSs then video drivers. Take the original doom and quake for example. Both had software rendering directly to the HW, via DOS. It's also true that on a 386(33mhz) doom was playable on linux(about 23 FPS) and unplayable in DOS(about 18 FPS) about just by changing OSs. For quake the numbers where less devistating on a 486(32 FPS) but in windows emulated dos(with IP/UDP support) got only 27 with quake. Philipp --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Mike Mestnik wrote: --- Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. It's my opinion that xig uses trickery to get there FPS higher then it should be posible to under OpenGL compliant rendering. It's also true in the font and 2d(like lack of xv support) accelerations as well. What do you mean by the lack of xv support? I often use the XiG driver and have never encountered this limitation. Adam --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2004 19:38, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. If that with above is a wish like I think it probably is, you might want to have a look at Utah-GLX which has rudimentary hw accel support. Also, somebody, somewhere (possibly in the nv driver in X, but I'm not sure) figured out how to do DMA. Of course, what's really needed is the equivalent of glxtest for NVidia and somebody with NVidia hardware who has a few weeks to spare for long nights of puzzling over register dumps :) I just want to point out that glxtest is not that hardware specific. Only the register pretty-printer is. So, for starters, it would be curious to look at the output of glxtest with NVidia driver - what kind of maps it uses, how they change during drawing, etc. So volunteers with hardware and spare time are needed :) best Vladimir Dergachev cu, Nicolai --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
--- Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Mestnik wrote: --- Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. It's my opinion that xig uses trickery to get there FPS higher then it should be posible to under OpenGL compliant rendering. It's also true in the font and 2d(like lack of xv support) accelerations as well. What do you mean by the lack of xv support? I often use the XiG driver and have never encountered this limitation. This is when you run (mplayer, xine, ext) and you go full screen. With xv ONE of the things you will see is the video gets streached to fill the whole screen. Withought xv the video stayes the same size and the extra screen is filled with black. Adam ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
If there weren't all those patents out there we might just try to develop a free graphics chip. I have thought about this (repeatedly - the idea gets very tempting after asking for the docs for the Nth time) and I don't think it is feasible to make an actual chip. By the time we are finished the world will move on. What could work, however, is to make a *board* that is capable of decent 3d. Put lots of memory, lots of bandwidth and several DSP to approximate the same level of raw floating-point power as 3d GPUs. Leave everything else to the software. The problem is getting such a beast under $1000 range. Last time I looked TI DSPs that were up to the task were rather expensive. best Vladimir Dergachev Philipp --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
Mike Mestnik wrote: --- Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Mestnik wrote: --- Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for doing this work. We really need to get the open-source ATI driver on par with the propretary driver (both feature-wise and performance-wise). But sadly we will NEVER match it. NO SmoothVision, HyperZ docu ever The nonfree xig driver has been developed without HyperZ docs and outperforms fglrx. It's my opinion that xig uses trickery to get there FPS higher then it should be posible to under OpenGL compliant rendering. It's also true in the font and 2d(like lack of xv support) accelerations as well. What do you mean by the lack of xv support? I often use the XiG driver and have never encountered this limitation. This is when you run (mplayer, xine, ext) and you go full screen. With xv ONE of the things you will see is the video gets streached to fill the whole screen. Withought xv the video stayes the same size and the extra screen is filled with black. Right... And how is this missing with Accelerated-X? xv has worked fine for me with XiG for a very long time. Adam --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
On Sunday 24 October 2004 14:16, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2004 19:38, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: Even though I just have a Radeon 9200, I'm very excited about the ongoning R300 effort and with there was a similar project for NVidia cards too. If that with above is a wish like I think it probably is, you might want to have a look at Utah-GLX which has rudimentary hw accel support. Also, somebody, somewhere (possibly in the nv driver in X, but I'm not sure) figured out how to do DMA. You're probably thinking of the rivatv project, also on sourceforge. I'd be surprised if the open nv driver did DMA. Of course, what's really needed is the equivalent of glxtest for NVidia and somebody with NVidia hardware who has a few weeks to spare for long nights of puzzling over register dumps :) The utah driver isn't totally impenetrable. While the register values are all given as magic numbers, the function names are readable at least. Also, as the closed nvidia driver does not use the DRM, glxtest would be of no use. - ajax cu, Nicolai pgpWF7ldQOOtc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ATI 9600 / RV350 test platform
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Loic Dachary wrote: Hi, I spent most of the week end installing a test platform for the r300.sf.net code base (most of the time spent because there is no clear HOWTO for installing the CVS various trees from dri.sf.net). At this point I'm in the following situation: kernel-2.6.8 with drm module from r300.sf.net Xorg CVS tree of 2004/10/23 with ati.patch from r300.sf.net Mesa CVS tree of 2004/10/23 with mesa.patch from r300.sf.net + r300 driver module from r300.sf.net (when I say r300.sf.net I mean the CVS tree, not the files displayed on the web page). A short summary of the situation: When I load the drm/radeon modules I get: [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.0 20040925 [drm] Initialized radeon 1.12.0 20041023 on minor 0: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AP [Radeon 9600] When I run /spare/xorg/Xorg I don't see the expected message dri enabled. Now, I run /spare/xorg/Xorg without any configuration file. Does someone have a template configuration file I could use ? I've tried Xorg -configure but it fails because two drivers define the same symbol and I'm not too eager to solve this problem just for the sake of getting my hands on a template configuration file. Which drivers define the same symbol ? This should not normally happen. To fix this simply delete one of the offending drivers. X -configure should work - if it does not something is broken. Also you can specify X -verbose to have the log message printed on stdout. Lastly if you are looking in /var/log do not forget to examine /var/log/Xorg.0.log, not the XFree86 log file. best Vladimir Dergachev --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
ATI 9600 / RV350 test platform
Hi, I spent most of the week end installing a test platform for the r300.sf.net code base (most of the time spent because there is no clear HOWTO for installing the CVS various trees from dri.sf.net). At this point I'm in the following situation: kernel-2.6.8 with drm module from r300.sf.net Xorg CVS tree of 2004/10/23 with ati.patch from r300.sf.net Mesa CVS tree of 2004/10/23 with mesa.patch from r300.sf.net + r300 driver module from r300.sf.net (when I say r300.sf.net I mean the CVS tree, not the files displayed on the web page). A short summary of the situation: When I load the drm/radeon modules I get: [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.0 20040925 [drm] Initialized radeon 1.12.0 20041023 on minor 0: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AP [Radeon 9600] When I run /spare/xorg/Xorg I don't see the expected message dri enabled. Now, I run /spare/xorg/Xorg without any configuration file. Does someone have a template configuration file I could use ? I've tried Xorg -configure but it fails because two drivers define the same symbol and I'm not too eager to solve this problem just for the sake of getting my hands on a template configuration file. I compiled r300_demo and it says (r300_demo --diag): CHECKPOINT main 488 driver radeon version 1.12.0 driver description ATI Radeon AGPVendorID: AGPDeviceId: BusID: pci::01:00.0 Context 1 AGP base: 0x Map Offset SizeType Handle Mtrr 0 0xd000 262144 KB FB 0x1 1 0xf500 64 KB REG 0xf8ad none and blocks forever (does not exit). I'm unsure if any of what I've done is useful to anyone. I would like to get to the point where I'm reasonably sure that I did not do any mistake. Debugging r300 is currently out of the question because of the deadlines I must meet in my day job. However, updating from CVS, recompiling, running a few tests and sending the output is something I can do on a regular basis. Cheers, -- Donate to FSF France online : http://rate.affero.net/fsffrance/ Loic Dachary, 12 bd Magenta, 75010 Paris. Tel: 33 1 42 45 07 97 http://www.fsffrance.org/ http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 08:10:14PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: IANAL, but reverse engineering is perfectly legal here in Europe and probably even in the USA if your goal is achieving compatibility. Have to be careful - most folks doing reversing do a clean-room implementation (1 person reverses and creates a spec, another person develops based on the spec) to avoid creating some software that might be called a derivative work of the original. I can freely use the S3TC extension here because it's not (yet) patentable. Any US developer could write it and even compile it, as long as he doesn't sell it in his country. Use of a patented algorithm without paying the license fee is a patent infringement. Even if it's your own code on your own machines. Selling or distributing it doesn't even enter into the picture as far as the US legality goes; it only affects the damages which would be awarded in a patent suit. It's also better in general for you not to check whether what you're doing would infringe any patents or not, because damages for willful infringement are usually significantly higher. I think the general rule of thumb regarding patents is to play dumb until you haven't any choice (receive a CD, or patent is somehow brought to your attention otherwise). -- Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
On 2004-10-25 04:10:30 +0800 Vladimir Dergachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there weren't all those patents out there we might just try to develop a free graphics chip. I have thought about this (repeatedly - the idea gets very tempting after asking for the docs for the Nth time) and I don't think it is feasible to make an actual chip. By the time we are finished the world will move on. What could work, however, is to make a *board* that is capable of decent 3d. Put lots of memory, lots of bandwidth and several DSP to approximate the same level of raw floating-point power as 3d GPUs. Leave everything else to the software. The problem is getting such a beast under $1000 range. Last time I looked TI DSPs that were up to the task were rather expensive. best Vladimir Dergachev [snipped...] This was discussed in lkml a few days ago. A hardware company is considering building an open fpga based video card. Although the target is mainly 2d accel its a good start. There was a lot of discussion about off screen rendering and support for the new compositing model in xorg. You can see that thread posted on kerneltrap. -- Blood is thicker then water... And much tastier John Davidorff Pell --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Rogelio Serrano wrote: On 2004-10-25 04:10:30 +0800 Vladimir Dergachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there weren't all those patents out there we might just try to develop a free graphics chip. I have thought about this (repeatedly - the idea gets very tempting after asking for the docs for the Nth time) and I don't think it is feasible to make an actual chip. By the time we are finished the world will move on. What could work, however, is to make a *board* that is capable of decent 3d. Put lots of memory, lots of bandwidth and several DSP to approximate the same level of raw floating-point power as 3d GPUs. Leave everything else to the software. The problem is getting such a beast under $1000 range. Last time I looked TI DSPs that were up to the task were rather expensive. best Vladimir Dergachev [snipped...] This was discussed in lkml a few days ago. A hardware company is considering building an open fpga based video card. Although the target is mainly 2d accel its a good start. There was a lot of discussion about off screen rendering and support for the new compositing model in xorg. You can see that thread posted on kerneltrap. I was aware of that. However, the proposition was by a company that is known for its 2d video cards (used for air control for example), so I was talking something a bit different - just have a DSP add-on board powerful enough to do decent 3d. Programming DSP is a lot easier than FPGA, the code is more portable, and, besides, there are no FPGAs at the moment that can possibly compete with ASICs that are produced by ATI or NVidia. On the other hand with the movement to programmable everything conventional GPUs are slowly turning into DSPs. It may very well be that a conventional DSP will provide similar perfomance as long as we are using all the whiz-bang features. (as opposed to using as few features as possible - which regular ASICs should still do much better than anything else). best Vladimir Dergachev -- Blood is thicker then water... And much tastier John Davidorff Pell --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Doom3 works on R200!
On 2004-10-25 11:11:56 +0800 Vladimir Dergachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Rogelio Serrano wrote: On 2004-10-25 04:10:30 +0800 Vladimir Dergachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there weren't all those patents out there we might just try to develop a free graphics chip. I have thought about this (repeatedly - the idea gets very tempting after asking for the docs for the Nth time) and I don't think it is feasible to make an actual chip. By the time we are finished the world will move on. What could work, however, is to make a *board* that is capable of decent 3d. Put lots of memory, lots of bandwidth and several DSP to approximate the same level of raw floating-point power as 3d GPUs. Leave everything else to the software. The problem is getting such a beast under $1000 range. Last time I looked TI DSPs that were up to the task were rather expensive. best Vladimir Dergachev [snipped...] This was discussed in lkml a few days ago. A hardware company is considering building an open fpga based video card. Although the target is mainly 2d accel its a good start. There was a lot of discussion about off screen rendering and support for the new compositing model in xorg. You can see that thread posted on kerneltrap. I was aware of that. However, the proposition was by a company that is known for its 2d video cards (used for air control for example), so I was talking something a bit different - just have a DSP add-on board powerful enough to do decent 3d. Programming DSP is a lot easier than FPGA, the code is more portable, and, besides, there are no FPGAs at the moment that can possibly compete with ASICs that are produced by ATI or NVidia. On the other hand with the movement to programmable everything conventional GPUs are slowly turning into DSPs. It may very well be that a conventional DSP will provide similar perfomance as long as we are using all the whiz-bang features. (as opposed to using as few features as possible - which regular ASICs should still do much better than anything else). best Vladimir Dergachev I see. Thats a good idea too. We just have to look for a company willing to do that. I have long been convinced that designing the hardware like this is the only way to go. -- Blood is thicker then water... And much tastier John Davidorff Pell --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
