Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2003-11-10 Thread Felix Kühling
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:05:07 +0100
Mark Baas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey,
 
 When running Scorched3d I get this error:
 drmCommandWrite: -22
 drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -22 (exiting)
 
 I also got this error with a GameSkel of Soya3d
 http://oomadness.tuxfamily.org/en/soya/game_skel.html

I just committed a fix for this (or a similar) problem. If you compile
DRI from source please try a cvs update. Otherwise wait for the next
snapshot.

 
 --
 Mark Baas [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 - Penguin Liberation Front -

Best regards,
  Felix

__\|/_____ ___   -
 Felix   ___\_e -_/___/ __\___/ __\_   You can do anything,
   Kühling  (_\Ä// /_/ /)  just not everything
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   \___/   \___/   Uat the same time.


---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød

Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I spoke too soon, it would seem.  22 March 2001 also dies, it just managed
 to remain functional overnight.  It crashed, hard, as did later.  It took
 the whole box down in the process.
 
 Thankfully this box uses reiserfs.  It was converted immedately after I
 ended up with a corrupt filesystem one of the last times X did this to
 me..  

ReiserFS is more prone to fs corruption than ext2. OTOH, you don't
have to wait for a looong time to fsck big partitions. 2.4 itself has
a few problems... just read the changelog for the latest ac kernels.

 Radeon support is not even pre-alpha quality right now IMO.  =(

It (well, yesterdays) works fine on Red Hat Linux Wolverine + rawhide updates, except 
for
Descent 3. This has been a problem with all Radeon drivers I've tried, though.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrd
Red Hat, Inc.

___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Gareth Hughes

Joseph Carter wrote:
 
 Radeon support is not even pre-alpha quality right now IMO.  =(

Mate, that's a pretty strong statement to be making.  Yes, you are
having problems.  Lots of other people aren't (myself included).  Let me
guess -- you have an AMD chipset?  An AMD 750 perhaps?

-- Gareth

___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Joseph Carter

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:20:53PM -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote:
  Thankfully this box uses reiserfs.  It was converted immedately after I
  ended up with a corrupt filesystem one of the last times X did this to
  me..  
 
 ReiserFS is more prone to fs corruption than ext2. OTOH, you don't
 have to wait for a looong time to fsck big partitions. 2.4 itself has
 a few problems... just read the changelog for the latest ac kernels.

Reiser is more prone to corruption in operation..  It seems to survive a
crash better though.  The last of the problems that kept me from running
it have been fixed thankfully.


  Radeon support is not even pre-alpha quality right now IMO.  =(
 
 It (well, yesterdays) works fine on Red Hat Linux Wolverine + rawhide
 updates, except for Descent 3. This has been a problem with all Radeon
 drivers I've tried, though.

Current speculation is that it might be some issue with agpgart and my
Abit KT-7A..  Of course, since it's crashing in 2D, I don't see how that
can be the source of the problem.

I'm going to see if there are BIOS updates for it and I may also try the
Mesa 3.5 branch.  I'm seriously regretting my choice of the Radeon at the
moment, that's for sure.

-- 
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]Free software developer

== Signoff: Beregond (Klingon function calls do not have 'parameters' --
   they have 'arguments' -- and they ALWAYS WIN THEM.) at 02:00PM


 PGP signature


Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Gareth Hughes

Joseph Carter wrote:
 
 Current speculation is that it might be some issue with agpgart and my
 Abit KT-7A..  Of course, since it's crashing in 2D, I don't see how that
 can be the source of the problem.

If the DRI is enabled (and I'm guessing that's the whole point, or you
wouldn't be posting in this forum), 2D acceleration is done with bus
mastering DMA via AGP.  Hence, problems with your AGP support will be
fatal.  Have you tried running with the DRI disabled?

-- Gareth

___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Jeff Hartmann

Joseph Carter wrote:

 
 Current speculation is that it might be some issue with agpgart and my
 Abit KT-7A..  Of course, since it's crashing in 2D, I don't see how that
 can be the source of the problem.

It actually VERY unlikely that agpgart is your problem.  VIA support has 
been pretty solid in agpgart since I originally wrote agpgart.  In fact 
the first chipset that worked under agpgart was a VIA MVP3.

If your enabling the DRI, its actually going to use the same DMA 
mechanism that 3D uses to get 2D commands to the card.  Have you tried 
the driver without the dri enabled?  (i.e., Have you tried 8bpp or not 
loading the dri/drm modules?)

 
 
 I'm going to see if there are BIOS updates for it and I may also try the
 Mesa 3.5 branch.  I'm seriously regretting my choice of the Radeon at the
 moment, that's for sure.
 
I personally would suggest narrowing the problem down first before you 
get experimental code.  I also wouldn't suggest flashing the BIOS on a 
video card unless you know exactly what your doing.  Its possible that 
you could render the card useless if you do it incorrectly.

-Jeff


___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker



On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:


 On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:

  I'm going to see if there are BIOS updates for it and I may also try the
  Mesa 3.5 branch.  I'm seriously regretting my choice of the Radeon at the
  moment, that's for sure.
 

 With all the negativity floating around, I'd like to say that I think the
 DRI developers have done an *awesome* job on all the drivers I've used
 (Voodoo3/4/5, Rage 128, G400, i810, and Radeon).  Aside from a handful of
 problems (most due to configuration errors on my end) these drivers have
 worked nearly flawlessly for me.  These driver have *never* caused me to
 regret buying the cards I did, and have, on more than one occaision, made
 me proud of the choices I made.

 Anytime the dri developers are in the Philadelphia area, dinner is on me
 :-)

Same here.  It seems like DRI rolls along swiftly and surely to greater,
faster, and more stable code, despite what seems like a serious lack of
bandwidth/hardware/docs/appreciation supplied to the developers.

At some stages in time, some things are going to be broken, but nobody is
forcing the user to run the latest and greatest.  CVS has the ability to
checkout arbitrary dates and revisions.  Take advantage of that.

-jwb


___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød

Jeff Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Joseph Carter wrote:
 
  On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:36:40PM -0700, Jeff Hartmann wrote:
 
  I haven't, I'll comment the drm/dri modules out and see how that works.
  Just to be on the safe side, I will also make sure radeon/agpgart are not
  loaded in the kernel.  It'll probably take a day or so to know if that
  works, but I suspect I'll know in a couple hours if it doesn't.
 
  Are you using the radeon module from the kernel?  If you are this
  could possibly be a source of the problems.  If you are using DRI
  CVS use the kernel modules from the CVS tree.  The kernel modules
  that come with the kernel will only work properly with a release
  version of XFree86.  Its very likely that we have changed things in
  the DRI CVS tree that require kernel module changes.
  I had the radeon module from the kernel, but was told that should not
  affect 2D.  (Also was told agpgart wouldn't affect it, but seems that's
  not quite true..)
  CVS drm has its up()'s and down()'s (pun intended) still and that
  needs to
  change with more recent kernels.  I just haven't had much time to do
  anything with it yet.
 
 Here is my recommendation:
 use 2.4.2 (don't use a pre patch unless you want to take all
 respondsibility for breakage.)

2.4.2 has known corruption issues.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrd
Red Hat, Inc.

___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread AMD-760MP

  Our policy is the following:
  We only submit kernel changes which will be compatible with the latest
  XFree86 release to the kernel.  When there is a new XFree86 release,
  there will be updates.  This does not include bugfixes which are
  backwards compatible, which we tend to send more frequently.

 But there has never been an official release for Radeon - hence, no
 such problems. 4.0.3 doesn't support Radeon, AFAIR.

From XFree86.org's driver status page:

4.0.3: Accelerated support is provided for Mach64, Rage, Rage 128 and Radeon
chips.

AFAIK, Radeon 3D is at least marginally functional in 4.0.3 as well.

I believe you said you were on a Via Apollo chipset? Could you narrow that
down a bit? My advice/bugfixes vary wildly based on the chipset in question.

For instance: The Apollo Pro 133A (6934) has severe AGP4X issues in some
implementations, but the 6934X and 6934DP/6934XDP haven't shown evidence of
the same issues.


___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød

"AMD-760MP" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   Our policy is the following:
   We only submit kernel changes which will be compatible with the latest
   XFree86 release to the kernel.  When there is a new XFree86 release,
   there will be updates.  This does not include bugfixes which are
   backwards compatible, which we tend to send more frequently.
 
  But there has never been an official release for Radeon - hence, no
  such problems. 4.0.3 doesn't support Radeon, AFAIR.
 
 From XFree86.org's driver status page:
 
 4.0.3: Accelerated support is provided for Mach64, Rage, Rage 128 and Radeon
 chips.

That's 2D - no 3D support.

 I believe you said you were on a Via Apollo chipset?

Wrong person - I'm running it successfully on an ASUS A7V133 - this
would be a VIA KT133A.
 

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrd
Red Hat, Inc.

___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel