Re: [Elecraft] FS W2 Wattmeter HF + VHF/UHF couplers [updated]
The DCV/U-200 has been sold. W2 with HF coupler still available. Thanks, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Cliff Frescura Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 8:47 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] FS W2 Wattmeter HF + VHF/UHF couplers I have for sale: 1. W2 wattmeter with DCHF-2000 1.8 - 54 MHz 2KW coupler, coupler cable, and power cable (power pole end). Modified to turn on when power is applied: $285 2. DCV/U-200 144 MHz - 450 MHz 200W coupler with coupler cable (coupler only): $90 W2 with both couplers : $350 Pictures available upon request. ConUS shipping included via USPS Priority mail. Payment via PayPal or Zelle. No returns. Please reply off list. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] FS W2 Wattmeter HF + VHF/UHF couplers
I have for sale: 1. W2 wattmeter with DCHF-2000 1.8 - 54 MHz 2KW coupler, coupler cable, and power cable (power pole end). Modified to turn on when power is applied: $285 2. DCV/U-200 144 MHz - 450 MHz 200W coupler with coupler cable (coupler only): $90 W2 with both couplers : $350 Pictures available upon request. ConUS shipping included via USPS Priority mail. Payment via PayPal or Zelle. No returns. Please reply off list. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft business practices - more info
Being in the payments industry, I can tell you that most of these policies are driven by the card brands (Visa, MasterCard, etc.), certifying bodies (PCI, EMVCo) as well as the payment gateways. It is a very complicated chain with many rules. The shopping cart either does an immediate charge or what is called a "pre-auth" where it holds the funds but does not transfer them yet. If and when they decide to actually charge the card, then a complete/post-auth is issued. The catch is that if a pre-auth is issued it will reverse automatically if no complete/post-auth is issued, usually within 24 hours. So the only practical choice is to charge the card. The alternative is for the shopping cart to get a card token from the gateway that it can store and retrieve for later payment. It is verboten to store clear text card numbers, in any media: computer, post it note, etc. When the order is shipped, operations tells the shopping cart software to go ahead and charge against the card token. In this scenario it would be best practice to the shopping cart software to also delete the token and associated card data from the payment gateway, unless the cardholder explicitly opted in to save card info. This is not an Elecraft only issue. Payments are very complicated and challenging for many merchants. Fundamental reasons are for risk reduction (for all stakeholders) and security. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Lou Voerman W2ROW Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 1:27 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft business practices - more info I heard from Elecraft Sales and will attempt to communicate what I was told. Sales is using a new shopping cart platform which allows them limited time to capture payment information. As a result, it seems that they are unable to defer payment in the case of a backorder, so orders are charged immediately (as was the case for the two orders I placed recently). They said that they are testing a new application which will allow deferring payment until actual ship time. The target for this application to be implemented is next month. In the mean time they said they will add a refund offer to the notifications they send to customers when a backorder occurs. I am generally satisfied with this explanation but would have liked to have told in advance. Again, I have been a loyal and satisfied Elecraft customer for many years and am not attempting to in any way talk anyone out of doing business with them. I was surprised when my credit card was charged twice before shipment was projected to occur and now I have more knowledge. Thanks, Lou -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Franklin antennas
A bit of trivia... When the antenna/tower at KDKA was replaced in 1994, the legs of the old antenna were cut into thin cross sections, encased in clear plastic with a station medallion and sold for charity to Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh during their annual Christmas Fundraiser. It's a nice conversation piece. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gmail Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:24 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Franklin antennas KDKA, Pittsburgh, still has a Franklin, they are not a center fed vertical. both the bottom and top sections are end fed. The purpose is to lower angle of radiation and reduce skywave and selective fading. KDKA has a motorized capacitor on the top section. Both stations have extensive ground systems that would not be needed if they were dipoles. KDs antenna was replaced in 1994. Still a Franklin as changing the antenna would have required a power reduction with the “ratchet rule”. Ray W8LYJ Formerly with Group W Engineering, owner of both stations until recently. http://www.durenberger.com/documents/KDKANEWTOWER.pdf Sent from my iPad > > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 15:48:48 -0700 > From: Fred Jensen > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] ARRL book on receiving antennas > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Yes, very straightforward theory.? Just gather all the watts actually > radiated by the antenna and divide it by the watts you put into Rr.? > Unfortunately, I did not really address Bob's question ... "How do you > sweep up all those watts?" :-)? That is a nearly intractable problem at > HF unless you'll tolerate significant inaccuracies and assumptions.? > It's much easier at UHF and uWaves. > > An alternative is to measure/compute the losses.? Did something similar > on a 10 KW FM broadcast TX, calculating the power it took to heat the > exhaust air on the premise that the rest went up the coax to the antenna > and I knew what the PA input power was. > > KFBK in Sacramento CA [1530 KHz] eliminated a lot of the unmeasurable > variables by employing a Franklin antenna [center-fed half-wave > vertical] over the rice fields of the southern Sacramento Valley [nearly > always standing water, and always wet]. The center-fed vertical exhibits > far less ground losses than bottom-fed monopoles ... at 50 KW, it's > colloquially known as the "Flame Thrower of Sacramento."? It may be the > only Franklin left in NA.? KFBK is also famous as the birthplace of the > RCA Ampliphase transmitters and the radio birthplace of Rush Limbaugh. > > NEC models coupled with terrain models can be used to establish upper > and lower bounds on antenna efficiency with pretty good fidelity to > reality.? But Bob still posed a good question. > > 73, > > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > >> On 9/9/2018 2:01 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> Skip, >> >> That is a great formula for theory - I vaguely remember it from my >> electromagnetic fields course. >> But how you measure it? >> With practical measurement equipment, it is difficult to isolate to a >> single plane. >> >> That may be do-able with fully characterized equipment in a controlled >> antenna field space or in an EMC lab, but it certainly is not >> practical in a typical ham antenna installation - and even the >> radiation resistance is not easily measured. >> >> Antenna modeling done properly will provide a much more easily >> produced result.? Comparative results between different antennas can >> be obtained from a reference pickup antenna, but that can only show >> the relative performance, > > > > -- > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 17:20:17 -0700 > From: Alan > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] ARRL book on receiving antennas > Message-ID: <96b660d3-5a7d-cb60-8d1d-827aaa6d7...@sonic.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > >> On 09/09/2018 01:01 PM, Jim Brown wrote: >>> On 9/9/2018 12:39 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >>> How does one measure transmit antenna efficiency? >> >> Not easily. :)? B... > >> AND -- propagation reporting systems like WSPR and the Reverse Beacon >> Network (RBN) can provide very good comparisons between antennas IF a >> LOT of reports from? a LOT of stations is averaged over a LOT of time. > > Back in the late 1970s, when I worked at W1AW, a new 90-foot tower with > stacked monobanders for 20 meters was installed. We wanted to compare > the new antenna against the big rhombic that had been used for many > years for the 20 meter bulletin and code practice transmissions. > > So, for a week or two, we did test transmissions after each scheduled > transmitting session. We would switch between antenna "A" and antenna > "B", send long dashes, and ask listeners
Re: [Elecraft] Connecting RS232 to TS-2000 and a PC and a KPA500
Yes, you can make a "sniffer" that sends data to the KPA500 from the radio. This is exactly how I used my KPA500 with my TS-940. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Paul Baldock Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 6:23 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Connecting RS232 to TS-2000 and a PC and a KPA500 Is it possible to connect a PC to the RS232 of the Kenwood TS-2000 and then T of the same cable to send just the data (and gnd) from the TS-2000 to the KPA-500. The logging program on the PC would do the polling of the TS-2000. Thanks - Paul KW7Y __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] FS KPA500 and KAT500
The KPA500 has been sold. The KAT500 is still available. From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:c...@cfcorp.com] Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 5:59 PM To: 'elecraft@mailman.qth.net' Subject: FS KPA500 and KAT500 For sale: KPA500 $1500 KAT500 $500 Factory built, original owner. Plus shipping and insurance. I am located in Los Angeles and can meet nearby. Please reply off list c...@cfcorp.com 73, Cliff K3LL/6 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] FS KPA500 and KAT500
For sale: KPA500 $1500 KAT500 $500 Factory built, original owner. Plus shipping and insurance. I am located in Los Angeles and can meet nearby. Please reply off list c...@cfcorp.com 73, Cliff K3LL/6 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] FS: E850463 KAT500 to KPA500 Cable
Cable has sold. -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Cliff Frescura Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:00 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] FS: E850463 KAT500 to KPA500 Cable Hi, I have a KAT500 to KPA500 15 Pin cable that is excess to my needs. Complete info here: http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_prod_list.htm#kat500 $20 via PayPal and shipped USPS Priority mail. Thanks and 73, Cliff K3LL/6 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] FS: E850463 KAT500 to KPA500 Cable
Hi, I have a KAT500 to KPA500 15 Pin cable that is excess to my needs. Complete info here: http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_prod_list.htm#kat500 $20 via PayPal and shipped USPS Priority mail. Thanks and 73, Cliff K3LL/6 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Chinese Filters on eBay
"Elecraft Inside!", to borrow Intel's old line. But seriously, people just spent circa $3K-$4K USD (new) on a high performance radio and then go this route on a fairly critical component? On one hand, it's a tribute to Elecraft's success and popularity, on the other it can be a support nightmare. Can counterfeit versions be that far off? 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Nr4c Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 8:36 PM To: Al Lorona Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Chinese Filters on eBay "Pop the top"! Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Nov 2, 2016, at 5:39 PM, Al Lorona wrote: > > When purchasing a used K3, remember to ask, "Are the filters genuine Elecraft?" > > Al W6LX > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > n...@widomaker.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
I think I jumped the gun and was wrong. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Dauer, Edward [mailto:eda...@law.du.edu] Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 3:42 PM To: Cliff Frescura; elecraft@mailman.qth.net; brian Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking Thanks, Cliff. I am aware of the 30M 200W power limitation, but I don’t see why adding 30M to the K3’s Band Map would cause 40 meters and 10 meters to be in error. When the K3 is at 7.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 3.5. When the K3 is at 28.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 24.9. That never happened before today. Moreover the amp correctly senses 30M on the first dit and switches correctly, and seems very happy producing 200W or more on 30M. Brian, K3KO, suggested disconnecting the cable from the amp to see what the band buttons on the amp do. They work correctly with the cable disconnected, and they work correctly with the cable connected and the K3’s power off. 7.0 switches to 7.0, 28 switches to 28, and so forth. So what does that mean – that the fault lies in the K3? But before adding 30M to the Band map in the K3 changing bands worked for all of 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 – that is, changing the K3 band changed the KPA500 band correctly. Now it doesn’t work for 40 and 10, and 30; but it does for 80, 20 and 15. Since the only change that occurred was adding 30M to the band map, does that mean something is fouled up in the configuration? I did recycle the power to both the K3 and the KPA500 after making the configuration change. One other fact – pressing the 10MHz band button on the KPA500 correctly switches the K3 to 10MHz – but places the amp on 5.3 MHz. The amp then switches to 10 MHz with the first transmitted dit. But pressing the 10MHz band button on the amp when the K3 power is off changes the amp to 10 MHz. Appreciative and still perplexed, Ted, KN1CBR Edward A. Dauer, LL.B. M.P.H. Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus of Law University of Denver On 8/7/16, 4:19 PM, "Cliff Frescura" wrote: "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
"But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Test serial-to-USB converter
Another test you can try is to short pins 2 and 3 on the RS-232 side of the converter (loop back) and then use a terminal program to see if characters that you type are echoed back. Some notes: 1. make sure handshaking is off/none 2. make sure local echo is off 3. data rate does not matter 4. there are several (free) terminal emulation programs out there. HyperTerminal used to be bundled with XP but is no longer free. However you can download a trial version here http://www.hilgraeve.com/hyperterminal-trial/ 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:05 PM To: Jan Ditzian; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Test serial-to-USB converter Jan, The best way to test a USB to serial converter is by substitution with a known good one, or by substitution of a known good working serial device connected to the questionable converter cable. Yes, a power surge or a lightning event can damage serial interfaces as well as USB interfaces. Since your USB ports on the computer seem to work, borrow a known good USB to serial converter and try it out - preferably one with an FTDI chipset. If you have any other devices that use a serial COM port interface, see if they work with your USB to serial adapter - if so, the adapter is probably OK, but remember that in the event of a power surge, multiple failures are possible even though in normal troubleshooting we assume only a single failure. You can test the USB to serial converter with a 'scope and an RS-232 breakout box, but you have to know the proper RS-232 levels to understand what is happening. A null modem loopback cable can be helpful if you have to proper driving software application for that testing. I did that during my years of PC modem testing, but that was more than 30 years ago and the software ran under DOS - not helpful now. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/18/2016 6:36 PM, Jan Ditzian wrote: > I have a K3 that lost communication with my computer. It uses an > Elecraft serial-to-USB converter and cable. This probably happened > during a known power surge. I also lost communication to my MDS > rotor, which uses a built-in USB cable, which I believe may also be a > serial-to-USB arrangement. I checked things out a bit, and I can tell > that my USB ports all seem to work. I also tried the K3 with another > computer and was unable to communicate with it. However, I also tried > a direct serial-to-serial cable from the K3 to the first computer, > which has a serial port, and was also unable to communicate. I am now > unsure of the location of the problem. I am willing to go with > whatever works. > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Shipping fully assembled KPA-500
My factory assembled KPA-500 was shipped in one carton, all parts installed. Set the line voltage and install the fuses, and you're off to the races! 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Ralph McClintock Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 5:02 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Shipping fully assembled KPA-500 What does Elecraft recommend for shipping a built KPA-500? Do KPA-500F amps ship with the xformer installed? Not selling mine, just wondering about buying a used one!! W1ZK -- Secretary USS PUEBLO Veterans Association Life Member American Ex-Prisoners of War Life Member Disabled American Veterans __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 beta firmware revision 1.75 available
Thanks, I'm assuming there is a small copy/paste artifact on the page since it shows the date of the earlier software version, 1.67. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dick Dievendorff Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 5:43 PM To: 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 beta firmware revision 1.75 available A new KAT500 firmware revision 1.75 is now available for download, see http://www.elecraft.com/KAT500/kat500_software.htm Beta firmware arrives in a ZIP archive file; download and extract the firmware and release notes files into a folder on your PC, and then use the KAT500 Utility Firmware tab and "browse" to that folder. This version should appeal to users of the KAT500's serial command capability in conjunction with control programs like Win4KSuite and others that send frequency set commands to the KAT500. 73 de Dick, K6KR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] logging/k3s control program
Yes, check out: http://www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/Help/CommandSequences.htm Also, the DXLab reflector at dx...@yahoogroups.com is very active, much like this one. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim - N4ST Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 3:55 PM To: 'Walter Underwood'; 'Elecraft List' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] logging/k3s control program Haven't used DXLabs for several years. Does it have the ability to create buttons that can be programmed to run K3S macro language? __ 73, Jim - N4ST __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] logging/k3s control program
Hi Jerry, In regard to: "4) It should have support for contest operating." Most general purpose logging programs have some contesting capabilities, but there are many aspects of contesting that really necessitate the use of a dedicated contest logging program. I would suggest you start with a dedicated general purpose logging program (my preference is DXLab - http://dxlabsuite.com/ ) and then add a dedicated contest logging program (my preference is N1MM - http://n1mm.hamdocs.com/tiki-index.php ). 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 12:39 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] logging/k3s control program Now that I have been operating my K3S for several months 'barefoot' (no computer) I realize I need a logging/control program. In searching the interwebby one can be overwhelmed with the myriad of software available. I would appreciate any input for my needs. I apologize if the following are pretty much standard in all programs. 1) I am primarily a dx chaser so a comprehensive log program should include auto matching to notify me if I have already worked a station and keep track of dxcc by band. 2) It should have a field for entering notes (perhaps user defined fields?) 3) It should support cw, rtty & some digital modes - which ones? I haven't a clue as I have never used a digital mode but intend to. 4) It should have support for contest operating. 5) It should be able to auto dump to LOTW. 6) I should be able to export the entire database in some readable form (suitable for Excel, etc) 7) It should be able to fully control the k3s/p3 (or is this something I should have a separate program for?) To me it seems this is the list I need but the problem is I'm not confident that I even know all the right questions to ask :( Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks Jerry, k1tgx __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Operating remotely via Direct TV satellite provider
Yes, the signal has to travel ~22,300 miles x 2 (up and down). 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Gilbert Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 8:53 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Operating remotely via Direct TV satellite provider Not sure about the audio, but I think latency would be the bigger issue. I had satellite internet (essentially Hughes. net) for about three years before a wireless ISP opened shop in our area. My typical pings were on the order of 1300-1500 msec. I don't think you'd want to live with that for anything other than casual ragchewing. Dave AB7E On 4/9/2016 8:23 PM, Don Strom wrote: > Is anyone operating their K3 remotely using a satellite provider. > > I believe I heard that is not possible with satellite internet at the remote site? > > Something to do with the way the audio is passed via the internet connection. > > Don W0EAR > > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 problem
Can you measure the 110V line voltage on key down? Is it stiff enough? 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Crownover Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:22 AM To: 'Nr4c' Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 problem Bill, Did that, it's set for 110v. I used the yellow tap, which gives me 75 v, right in the middle of the spec. I did try the other two, but same behavior. Thnaks, Mike AD5A -Original Message- From: Nr4c [mailto:n...@widomaker.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 10:19 AM To: Mike Crownover Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 problem What input voltage is it configured for? Check manual for voltage tap info. Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Feb 15, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Mike Crownover wrote: > > I just bought a lightly used KPA500. It arrived from the seller, well > packed and complete with cables, manuals, etc. I turned the amp on, > interfaced it with my K3, keyed the radio and the KPA500 immediately > shut-off. No fault light or error code, nothing. It shuts down just as > if I had pressed the power button, the fan runs, etc... The antenna is > resonant 1:1, I've lowered input power to 10 watts, swapped coax, > hooked it up to another K3, used RCA to RCA cable, the Elecraft cable, > etc.. When down to 10 watts input, I can tap the paddle like a > straight key lightly and the amp works, but put two dits together and > it shuts down. > > > > Has anyone had an experienced anything like this. I keep thinking this > has to be something simple. > > > > Mike AD5A > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > n...@widomaker.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Love me K3 line
Antennas? -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Paul VanOveren Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 5:10 PM To: elecraft reflector Subject: [Elecraft] Love me K3 line I have worked both S Sandwich and S. Georgia Islands on 4 bands and CW and SSB for ATNOs, # 343 and 344 for my DXCC credits. When I sold my Alpha 374 3 holer amp and purchased the KPA 500 I was somewhat concerned about the pwr output difference. However I have worked probably 15 ATNOs since the switch and have NOT missed working any station that I have wanted to work. The P3 w/SVGA added is a great tool, particulary on CW, looking for a hole to call in when the DX is listening 5 to 20 Kcs up... NF8J Paul __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Kenwood TS-590SG with KPA500 amp?
I have an old TS-940 working with the KPA500. I used the ACC amp connections on the back on the Kenwood for PTT, which I believe is a DIP mechanical relay - not loud at all. In addition, the KPA500 sniffs the RS-232 line between the Kenwood and my logging PC running DXLabs to automatically switch bands on the KPA when the frequency changes via the computer or via the radio. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Steven C Veal Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 4:55 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Kenwood TS-590SG with KPA500 amp? Hello all: I have a KPA500 on order to use with my Kenwood TS-590SG (and with my Elecraft KX3). I would appreciate any suggestions on the best way to interface the TS-590SG and the amp. In reviewing the Kenwood manual and some of the Yahoo groups, it appears that there are at least two ways to interface to the amp. The 590SG offers a mechanical relay as well as a solid state relay for amplifier switching. The mechanical relay is apparently fairly foolproof but is noisy. The solid state relay is quieter or near silent but apparently has some issues in keying the KPA500. I don't do CW, so rapid keying is not really an issue with me. I would appreciate any advice on the best way to interface these two. I attempted a cursory scan of previous mail list posts but the number of postings is voluminous. IS THERE A QUICK WAY TO SEARCH PREVIOUS POSTS? Thanks all in advance for your responses!Steve, N5SKHWeatherford, TX __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Long RS232 Runs - RS422
"Consequently levels of +5 and 0 volts will, in most normal cases, work, although they are out of specification" Yes, they work by accident. Until they don't. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Woolley Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 6:45 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Long RS232 Runs - RS422 The +/- 3 volts levels are requirements on the driver, not the receiver. In practice, receivers have quite a small hysteresis, and the threshold points are set to meet the requirements of a type 1 interface as defined in section 7 of ITU-T V.28. Whilst the specified purpose of this is that a powered down or open circuit condition should result in defined states for, particularly control signals (off), in practice it means that real world receivers will also handle high speed signals which are strictly positive. Consequently levels of +5 and 0 volts will, in most normal cases, work, although they are out of specification. ITU-T V.28 is generally aligned with the electrical characteristics of EIA232, but has the advantage that the document is available for free download. -- David Woolley Owner K2 06123 On 21/01/16 20:03, Cliff Frescura wrote: > RS-232 use +3 to +15VDC and -3 to -15VDC for signaling levels, thus -5 > and +5 will work too, but *not* 0VDC and +5VDC > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Long RS232 Runs - RS422
RS-232 use +3 to +15VDC and -3 to -15VDC for signaling levels, thus -5 and +5 will work too, but *not* 0VDC and +5VDC Like others, I've run RS-232 over 100's of feet. RS-422 will go much further and has the advantages of multi-drop and noise immunity due to its differential nature. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of WILLIS COOKE via Elecraft Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:53 AM To: j...@audiosystemsgroup.com; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Long RS232 Runs - RS422 The old criteria was 50 feet, but that was set before the specification for any twisted pair for digital, let alone Cat 5. In short, it it works well, it is OK but 200 feet sounds reasonable. RS-232 uses a 5 volt signal level. RS-422 uses a higher signal level, I believe 12 volts, but that is from memory. Watch out for the serial dongles that plug into USB ports. Some are not full RS232 and do not work except with certain connections, ham radio applications not included. Be careful and if it does not work, keep trying different dongles or get on the internet and find the brand and source for one that will work. If all else fails or if you want to be sure, buy a card based RS-232 or 488 interface that uses all DB-9 or DB-25 connectors. Willis 'Cookie' Cooke,VP of Tidelands ARS and TXPE K5EWJ & Trustee N5BPS From: Jim Brown To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:44 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Long RS232 Runs - RS422 On Thu,1/21/2016 10:32 AM, Michael Walker wrote: > I wanted to mention that for those that want long RS232 runs for > devices (Steppir, Rotator, Elecraft Amp), It helps to define "long." Distance for RS232 was originally defined in feet. Many years ago, it was redefined in terms of capacitance between conductors. Using cables as common as CAT5, lengths of 200 ft or more are no problem. Simply use one pair per signalling circuit. 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to wrco...@yahoo.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] suggested PC??? Real RS-232 ports
I agree with N1MGO, I've come full circle on this one and am in the process of removing all of the USB/RS-232 converters in my setup and reinstalling a 4 port card that I had in an old XP system (drivers work fine). Determining what is a quality USB/RS-232 serial adapter is not always clear. There are potential driver issues as well as suspect RF shielding. Some of these devices don't enable you to securely connect to both ends (no screw connections, so the connector is not securely seated). They are just another (additional) point of failure. Plus you are also now dealing with limitations of USB (re: polling). The FTDI chipset and drivers seem the most reliable and if you want to take apart your newly purchased converter, you can determine if the chipset is counterfeit. http://hackaday.com/2014/02/19/ft232rl-real-or-fake/ If you need only 1 RS-232 port I would go with a converter, but once you get above 2, then I think it is a good choice. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tim Tucker Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 10:44 AM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] suggested PC??? I haven't had used a "real" (old fashioned) serial port on any PC that controls radio equipment in probably 10 years. It's really not necessary if you purchase quality USB/Serial adapters (no fake chipsets) where needed. The only PC I have with a old-fashioned serial port is an ancient Toshiba laptop I keep around that runs DOS so I can program old Motorola radios. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Gordon LaPoint wrote: > You should consider adding real RS232 ports, at least 2 or 4 if you > will ever run two radios, and even more if you want to control rotors, > amps > (KPA-500) or other accessories. > >> >> > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Remote KAT500
8 ft is not true for rs-232. Depends on type of cable and baud rate. 50ft is generally fine and can go up to hundreds of feet. Maybe you are thinking about usb. 73, Cliff K3LL Original message From: Mike va3mw Date:12/30/2015 11:32 AM (GMT-08:00) To: Va3ied Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Remote KAT500 While the spec for serial is about 8ft, I run it much further in professional sports timing. Give it a try and see if it works. If you can keep the baud rate down, that will help. To really do it correctly, you will want to run rs232 to rs485 converters and that will certainly solve your problem. Www.rs485.com has the bits you need. You can send serial like this thousands of meters. We do this all the time. It isn't as complicated as it sounds. Mike va3mw > On Dec 30, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Va3ied wrote: > > My tower and garden shed are about 150 feet away. I have LMR400 buried inside > some PEX pipe. Would like to use the KAT500 inside the shed...not sure how > well a serial connection that distance would work! > scott va3ied > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Remote-KAT500-tp7604849p7612014.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to va...@portcredit.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 RESET??
I find it hard to believe that the processor in the KPA is locked up. I've done quite a bit of experimentation with the RS-232 port on it and have never locked mine up and never had the need to attempt a reset? Can you get to the menu of the KPA? If so, it is not locked up. However if you unplug power from the amp and wait a minute to two it may have the same effect. How is the Flex connected to the amp? Are the communication parameters the same if you are using RS-232? When you do attempt to key the amp, is there an asterisk (*) shown on the KPA display? When you changed bands on the Flex does the amp follow? 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of joeduerbusch Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2015 8:34 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 RESET?? I got a new KPA500 for Christmas. It worked fine. But I tried to interface it with my FLEX-6300 using a program Called DDUTIL. DDUTIL connected to both the Flex and KPA500 but now I have NO KPA500 keying. Yes I have the PA Key hooked up. Without the DDUTIL the KPA500 worked and changed bands by RF. That doesn't work either. Is there a HARD RESET for the KPA500 as I think its computer is locked up Joe K0BX #1 Honor Roll Mixed Honor Roll RTTY 5BDXCC Plus 30,17,12 5BWAS Stop the insanity! Please do not add me to any distribution lists (Joke, Stories or Junk) without my permission. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Rescaling the W2?
Very cool Alan! Did you verify the power with another reference meter? ...wondering if the scale adjustment is linear over the calibration setting range. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Alan Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 9:07 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Rescaling the W2? I just tested it. The maximum you can set the W2 calibration value to is 650. (Using the ">" and "+" RS-232 commands) That causes the wattmeter to read about 60% high on my W2. So with the W2 set to read 2000W full scale, the actual full scale would be about 1250W. Or you could go in the other direction. The minimum calibration value is 350, which causes the power to read about 47% (on my unit). With the W2 set to read 200W full scale it would actually be about 425W full scale. Alan N1AL On 11/20/2015 07:15 AM, Cliff Frescura wrote: > I find the scaling awkward as well. My W2 is placed on the input side > of my > KPA500 and it seems that dividing the scale by two might do the trick. > I've not looked at the schematic, but wonder if it could be tricked by > a resistor divider in the sensor line. > > 73, > > Cliff K3LL > > -Original Message- > From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of > Don Wilhelm > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:55 AM > To: Scott Townley; elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Rescaling the W2? > > Scott, > > I believe that would require a new sensor and firmware to support it. > Popular scales on wattmeters are 200 watts and 2000 watts full scale, > so you are not going to get much better with another brand product. > The W2 used with its utility program can give you more resolution, but > then using the Utility when mobile would not be advisable. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 11/20/2015 8:32 AM, Scott Townley wrote: >> I know the W2 can be "dialed in" to match one's personal standard, >> but...can it be completely rescaled? >> I use the K3/KPA500/W2 mobile, and the KPA500 is mounted in my pickup >> bed so the W2 is the only system meter available at the operating >> position. However, the 2's scaling doesn't give me much display >> dynamic range...the KPA500 will only light 5 of the 17 LEDs at full >> power. >> It would be far more useful for me to have the meter scaled to 600W >> say...then the 15th LED would be 450W. Even scaling it to 1000W >> would give me more than half the display range. >> >> > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > c...@cfcorp.com > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > n...@sonic.net > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA 500 voltage drop on key down
Sounds like the amp is plugged into an outlet that is potentially overloaded or underrated. Changing the tap won't solve the problem and may damage the amp. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Matt Murphy Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 7:46 AM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: [Elecraft] KPA 500 voltage drop on key down I just set up my KPA 500 and the HV on standby is 72.5 volts. On key down, however, it drops to 48 volts and the lights in the shack noticeably flicker a bit. Would changing a the tap on the transformer potentially help things? Or is the real issue the voltage drop between the pole and the wall socket? Suggestions/ideas would be much appreciated, as well as tips for debugging any issues with the household wiring. Per the KPA 500 manual, the amp may fault if the voltage under load gets below 60VDC, so running in it with reduced drive may be necessary. While doing that wouldn't be the end of the world, I'd like to address the root cause if possible. 73, Matt NQ6N __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Rescaling the W2?
I find the scaling awkward as well. My W2 is placed on the input side of my KPA500 and it seems that dividing the scale by two might do the trick. I've not looked at the schematic, but wonder if it could be tricked by a resistor divider in the sensor line. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:55 AM To: Scott Townley; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Rescaling the W2? Scott, I believe that would require a new sensor and firmware to support it. Popular scales on wattmeters are 200 watts and 2000 watts full scale, so you are not going to get much better with another brand product. The W2 used with its utility program can give you more resolution, but then using the Utility when mobile would not be advisable. 73, Don W3FPR On 11/20/2015 8:32 AM, Scott Townley wrote: > I know the W2 can be "dialed in" to match one's personal standard, > but...can it be completely rescaled? > I use the K3/KPA500/W2 mobile, and the KPA500 is mounted in my pickup > bed so the W2 is the only system meter available at the operating > position. However, the 2's scaling doesn't give me much display > dynamic range...the KPA500 will only light 5 of the 17 LEDs at full > power. > It would be far more useful for me to have the meter scaled to 600W > say...then the 15th LED would be 450W. Even scaling it to 1000W would > give me more than half the display range. > > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
Thanks -this is helpful information. If going the hardware route, I am inclined to implement the logic via an RS-232 wedge device vs implementing a BAND0-3 device (basically an antenna switch). 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Dick Dievendorff [mailto:d...@elecraft.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:36 PM To: Cliff Frescura Cc: Cady, Fred; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning If the band lines are used only, the ATU picks a mid band freq if there is no history since last ATU power up. On first tx after that, it performs a memory recall tune using the counted freq. Power up means DC power applied. A k3 can provide approx freq on RX thru the ACC cable, depending on a menu setting Dick, K6KR > On Nov 15, 2015, at 16:20, Cliff Frescura wrote: > > I went back and reviewed the KAT500 command set and it doesn't look > like this is possible because the serial protocol does not have a way > to communicate split status. I've been knee deep in the KPA500 serial > protocol (with great results thanks to Jack W6FB) and thought they may > have some high level similarities, but not really. > > Do you know how the KAT500 interprets frequency, if driving only the > band data lines (BAND0-3) via an external TTL device? Does it pick > middle of the band if there is no last used frequency? > > 73, > > Cliff K3LL > > -Original Message- > From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:c...@cfcorp.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:58 PM > To: 'Cady, Fred'; 'Elecraft@mailman.qth.net' > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning > > Apparently yes. However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to > communicate frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not > auxBus, since the radio is not a K3/S. > > 73, > > Cliff K3LL > > -Original Message- > From: Cady, Fred [mailto:fc...@montana.edu] > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:28 PM > To: Cliff Frescura; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning > > Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions > when operating split? At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for > its solution according to: > > MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014 > > * FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be > increased while in transmit mode when using FSK-D. > > * KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3 > VFO is moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends > VFO A frequency except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent. > > Cheers, > Fred KE7X > www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books. > > From: Elecraft on behalf of Cliff > Frescura > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning > > Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to > have the > KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall. > > The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on > 40m SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than > 5KHz for anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna. Consider that > the KAT500 already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution" > doesn't apply. Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning > since the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX. > > Here is how it would work: > > 1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on... >a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune > (under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time > after this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode) >b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of > frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings. >c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in > order to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel. > 3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then > go into "normal" (non Split) mode. > > The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise > antenna. If the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't > even engage it. In my specific situation there is also at KPA500 > connected, so the way that the > KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it > retunes/recalls. Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged > initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile. On very rare > occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault. Wh
Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
I went back and reviewed the KAT500 command set and it doesn't look like this is possible because the serial protocol does not have a way to communicate split status. I've been knee deep in the KPA500 serial protocol (with great results thanks to Jack W6FB) and thought they may have some high level similarities, but not really. Do you know how the KAT500 interprets frequency, if driving only the band data lines (BAND0-3) via an external TTL device? Does it pick middle of the band if there is no last used frequency? 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message----- From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:c...@cfcorp.com] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:58 PM To: 'Cady, Fred'; 'Elecraft@mailman.qth.net' Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning Apparently yes. However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to communicate frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not auxBus, since the radio is not a K3/S. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Cady, Fred [mailto:fc...@montana.edu] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:28 PM To: Cliff Frescura; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions when operating split? At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for its solution according to: MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014 * FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be increased while in transmit mode when using FSK-D. * KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3 VFO is moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends VFO A frequency except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent. Cheers, Fred KE7X www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books. ____ From: Elecraft on behalf of Cliff Frescura Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall. The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna. Consider that the KAT500 already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution" doesn't apply. Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX. Here is how it would work: 1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on... a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune (under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode) b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings. c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel. 3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into "normal" (non Split) mode. The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna. If the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it. In my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it retunes/recalls. Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile. On very rare occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault. While probably not an issue, the amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX transitions is a bit unsettling. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote: > I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's > still solid after all this wind. Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune. Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers. Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a tissue or paper towel as a probe. If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities. You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the antenna and your test point. Most vector an
Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
Apparently yes. However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to communicate frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not auxBus, since the radio is not a K3/S. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Cady, Fred [mailto:fc...@montana.edu] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:28 PM To: Cliff Frescura; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions when operating split? At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for its solution according to: MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014 * FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be increased while in transmit mode when using FSK-D. * KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3 VFO is moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends VFO A frequency except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent. Cheers, Fred KE7X www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books. From: Elecraft on behalf of Cliff Frescura Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall. The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna. Consider that the KAT500 already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution" doesn't apply. Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX. Here is how it would work: 1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on... a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune (under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode) b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings. c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel. 3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into "normal" (non Split) mode. The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna. If the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it. In my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it retunes/recalls. Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile. On very rare occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault. While probably not an issue, the amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX transitions is a bit unsettling. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote: > I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's > still solid after all this wind. Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune. Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers. Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a tissue or paper towel as a probe. If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities. You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you don't have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one (and ask them to help you do the measurement). 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by:
Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall. The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna. Consider that the KAT500 already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution" doesn't apply. Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX. Here is how it would work: 1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on... a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune (under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode) b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings. c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel. 3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into "normal" (non Split) mode. The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna. If the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it. In my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it retunes/recalls. Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile. On very rare occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault. While probably not an issue, the amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX transitions is a bit unsettling. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote: > I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's > still solid after all this wind. Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune. Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers. Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a tissue or paper towel as a probe. If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities. You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you don't have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one (and ask them to help you do the measurement). 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speaker SP3 Video
Sounds fine here. Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chester Alderman Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 1:43 PM To: 'Steve Ellington'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Speaker SP3 Video No audio on your video? Tom - W4BQF -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Steve Ellington Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:26 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Speaker SP3 Video I just did a little video on the SP3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2EmW46zgDw Steve N4LQ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to alderm...@windstream.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S Radio check?
I would start with your local AM Broadcast stations like WBT on 1100 KHz. I would then check out WWV on 5.0MHz, 10MHz, 15MHz, 20MHz as well as CHU in Canada on 3.33MHz, 7.850MHz and 14.67MHz. You might want to add these into memory for easy recall. Be mindful that time of day/current propagation/solar conditions will be in play as well. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of ae...@carolinaheli.com Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 12:20 PM To: 'ELECRAFT' Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Radio check? I'm not sure if my antenna/coax/radio is deaf because I can hear some signals. Is there a way to quantify and verify that at least the radio is receiving as designed ? The K3S, antenna, and coax are all new. Without a signal generator or such I'm not sure how this can be accomplished. I was only able to barely hear one or two people on the SSB net and was not able to check in. I'm in the Charlotte NC area for reference. My dipole is at 35' broadside to 45 degrees. Due to the height I'd expect high angle radiation which should help/work for NVIS and longer type contacts. Thanks in advance. Jerry Moore CDXA, INDEXA, SKCC, Fists AE4PB, K3S - S.N. 010324 http://www.qrz.com/db/AE4PB An Amateur is - Considerate, Loyal, Progressive, Friendly, Balanced, and Patriotic. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control?
Update: Bottom line is that the sniffer approach works. Details: 1. Ideally, the sniffer should *not* be attached to the radio (Kenwood) RS-232 line, but to the secondary RS-232 line (Configured by DXLabs software). It appears that KPA500 only responds to commands from DXLabs and not the radio (I suspect this is because polling is being used by DXLabs and not the Kenwood Auto Info command) - yes, I did try a pin 2/3 swap on the sniffer tap point. This also has implications when the KPA500 is turned on after frequency changes because it will know the current frequency (not fatal since it can RF Sense switch anyway). 2. The KPA500 seems to "look for" radio RS-232 data about every 5 seconds because that is the lag from the Kenwood changing frequency to the KPA changing bands. A bit too long for me but tolerable. Next Steps: 1. Move the sniffer to the KAT500 RS-232 line where DXLabs will send data via the Secondary COM Port (K3 native format) to the KAT500 when clicking on a spot or moving the Kenwood VFO. Alas, I have the USB cable for the KAT500, so I need to get the RS-232 cable. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message----- From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:c...@cfcorp.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 2:10 PM To: 'Jack Brindle' Cc: 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: RE: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control? Thanks Jack and others that replied off list. I'm going to go with the y cable sniffer approach. Since I don't use the amp all the time, I'd rather not have to power it up just so the KAT500 can receive commands from the Kenwood. 73, Cliff K3ll -Original Message- From: Jack Brindle [mailto:jackbrin...@me.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:55 PM To: Cliff Frescura Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control? Or connect the Kenwood’s serial port to the KPA500’s Radio port, then set the RADIO = SERIAL in the KPA. Follow the directions in the KPA manual. This is exactly what that serial port is designed to do. Make sure you use the RADIO port, not the PC port for this. If you connect the serial port from the TS-940 to a computer, just make a Y cable to allow the KPA to see the data going from the Radio to the computer. And make sure the TX line is not connected to the KPA. Also note that the KPA will not interpret the data destined for the KAT500. It is specifically look for transceiver data on the Radio port, or KPA-specific commands on the PC port. - Jack, W6FB > On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Cliff Frescura wrote: > > Thanks Dick, > > Looks like I could either have the KPA500 sniff the RS-232 line into > the > KAT500 (use RXD pin only at the KPA500), or implement BAND0-3 and make > it minimally emulate a K3S into the KPA500. > > 73, > > Cliff K3LL > > -Original Message- > From: Dick Dievendorff [mailto:d...@elecraft.com] > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 10:55 AM > To: Cliff Frescura > Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control? > > The KAT500 can read, but not pull down the 4 band change lines. > > Dick, K6KR > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 8, 2015, at 21:07, Cliff Frescura wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> If I change bands on the KAT500 via the PC Data port, it appears that >> the new band data is not sent to the Amp Control connector. Is this >> expected behavior? (hoping no). >> >> >> >> For reference, my setup is: >> >> >> >> Kenwood TS-940 >> >> DXLabs Logging program >> >> KAT500 >> >> KPA500 >> >> >> >> The 940 is connected to the computer and controlled by DXLabs. >> DXLabs is configured to send commands to the KAT500 (follow the 940). >> This all works fine. I'm now trying to have the KPA500 follow the >> KAT500 via the Amp Control connector on the KAT500 (with E850463 cable). >> >> >> >> 73, >> >> >> >> Cliff K3LL >> >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this >> email >> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to >> d...@elecraft.com > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted
Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control?
Thanks Jack and others that replied off list. I'm going to go with the y cable sniffer approach. Since I don't use the amp all the time, I'd rather not have to power it up just so the KAT500 can receive commands from the Kenwood. 73, Cliff K3ll -Original Message- From: Jack Brindle [mailto:jackbrin...@me.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:55 PM To: Cliff Frescura Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control? Or connect the Kenwood’s serial port to the KPA500’s Radio port, then set the RADIO = SERIAL in the KPA. Follow the directions in the KPA manual. This is exactly what that serial port is designed to do. Make sure you use the RADIO port, not the PC port for this. If you connect the serial port from the TS-940 to a computer, just make a Y cable to allow the KPA to see the data going from the Radio to the computer. And make sure the TX line is not connected to the KPA. Also note that the KPA will not interpret the data destined for the KAT500. It is specifically look for transceiver data on the Radio port, or KPA-specific commands on the PC port. - Jack, W6FB > On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Cliff Frescura wrote: > > Thanks Dick, > > Looks like I could either have the KPA500 sniff the RS-232 line into > the > KAT500 (use RXD pin only at the KPA500), or implement BAND0-3 and make > it minimally emulate a K3S into the KPA500. > > 73, > > Cliff K3LL > > -Original Message- > From: Dick Dievendorff [mailto:d...@elecraft.com] > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 10:55 AM > To: Cliff Frescura > Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control? > > The KAT500 can read, but not pull down the 4 band change lines. > > Dick, K6KR > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 8, 2015, at 21:07, Cliff Frescura wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> If I change bands on the KAT500 via the PC Data port, it appears that >> the new band data is not sent to the Amp Control connector. Is this >> expected behavior? (hoping no). >> >> >> >> For reference, my setup is: >> >> >> >> Kenwood TS-940 >> >> DXLabs Logging program >> >> KAT500 >> >> KPA500 >> >> >> >> The 940 is connected to the computer and controlled by DXLabs. >> DXLabs is configured to send commands to the KAT500 (follow the 940). >> This all works fine. I'm now trying to have the KPA500 follow the >> KAT500 via the Amp Control connector on the KAT500 (with E850463 cable). >> >> >> >> 73, >> >> >> >> Cliff K3LL >> >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this >> email >> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to >> d...@elecraft.com > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > jackbrin...@me.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control?
Thanks Dick, Looks like I could either have the KPA500 sniff the RS-232 line into the KAT500 (use RXD pin only at the KPA500), or implement BAND0-3 and make it minimally emulate a K3S into the KPA500. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Dick Dievendorff [mailto:d...@elecraft.com] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 10:55 AM To: Cliff Frescura Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control? The KAT500 can read, but not pull down the 4 band change lines. Dick, K6KR Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 8, 2015, at 21:07, Cliff Frescura wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If I change bands on the KAT500 via the PC Data port, it appears that > the new band data is not sent to the Amp Control connector. Is this > expected behavior? (hoping no). > > > > For reference, my setup is: > > > > Kenwood TS-940 > > DXLabs Logging program > > KAT500 > > KPA500 > > > > The 940 is connected to the computer and controlled by DXLabs. DXLabs > is configured to send commands to the KAT500 (follow the 940). This > all works fine. I'm now trying to have the KPA500 follow the KAT500 > via the Amp Control connector on the KAT500 (with E850463 cable). > > > > 73, > > > > Cliff K3LL > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > d...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control?
Hi, If I change bands on the KAT500 via the PC Data port, it appears that the new band data is not sent to the Amp Control connector. Is this expected behavior? (hoping no). For reference, my setup is: Kenwood TS-940 DXLabs Logging program KAT500 KPA500 The 940 is connected to the computer and controlled by DXLabs. DXLabs is configured to send commands to the KAT500 (follow the 940). This all works fine. I'm now trying to have the KPA500 follow the KAT500 via the Amp Control connector on the KAT500 (with E850463 cable). 73, Cliff K3LL __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] What out for VE7FYC
Don't discount the possibility that someone hijacked his call sign - especially if funds were not mailed to his physical address. Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:20 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] What out for VE7FYC Not so. That callsign shows up several places on Google... was even a past officer of the Pacific Northwest VHF Society. I'm not saying that he's a crook or anything, and I wouldn't be surprised to find that this complaint was the result of bad communication between the parties, but the callsign seems legit. Personally, I find these gripe posts with unproven accusations to be totally annoying and out of place here. Dave AB7E On 9/22/2015 1:04 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: > Bill, To all appearances that call sign is bogus. The QRZ.com name of > record is unusual and and address composed only of BC, Canada is a bit > on the suspicious side. QRZ.com reports the call sign record as > unmanaged. That would be a "no sale" for me. I hope you did not > suffer a loss. > > Jim, W4ATK > > On 9/22/2015 11:28 AM, W0WFH Bill via Elecraft wrote: >> He will tell you he sending money via Paypal an nothing. So don't >> ship himanything till you have funds in hand.He has been turned into >> Paypal Securitydepartment too. >> Bill Hudson, W0WFH >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this >> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to >> jim.w4...@gmail.com > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > xda...@cis-broadband.com > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Product Suggestion - 500W Dummy Load
Maybe the dummy load could be an option for the speaker /s 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred Jensen Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 7:36 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Product Suggestion - 500W Dummy Load Strangely, these non-inductive resistors do not last forever. When I came home from SE Asia to Houston in 67, I filled my Heath with mineral oil [interesting story on a Sunday], and it measured 51 ohms DC. Today, it measures 74 ohms DC. 73, Fred K6DGW - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015 - www.cqp.org On 9/17/2015 7:12 PM, GRANT YOUNGMAN wrote: > >> On 9/17/2015 8:19 PM, Byron Peebles wrote: >>> I'd love to find Elecraft offering a 500W dummy load to match the K-Line. >>> No one even makes a sturdy paint can anymore. >>> > > Actually, Ameritron still makes a “Cantenna" style dummy load. I’ve had the > same one sitting under my desk for 20+ years. > > Grant NQ5T __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details
Didn't ask. But the web site lists the SP3 at $179 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brian & Cyndi Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:06 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details Did the boys at HamCon quote a price for the speaker? 73, Brian, W6FVI On 9/14/2015 11:51 AM, Cliff Frescura wrote: > I don't know where it is made, but I was able to see one in the flesh > at HamCon this past weekend and it has a solid feel and weight to it > (in addition to sounding great too). Seems like a no brainer addition to me. > > One wish would be to have the headphone jack on the speaker and use > the input switch (as an output switch) to switch between headphone and > speaker, so that the headphones can stay plugged in (I modified my > SP-940 to work this way) > > 73, > > Cliff K3LL/6 > > -Original Message- > From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of > ae...@carolinaheli.com > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:39 AM > To: a...@sbcglobal.net; ae...@carolinaheli.com; 'Bob McGraw - K4TAX'; > 'Wayne Burdick'; 'Elecraft Reflector' > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details > > I guess I shouldn't have assumed anything but I did.. > > > -Original Message- > From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of > a...@sbcglobal.net > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:03 PM > To: ae...@carolinaheli.com; 'Bob McGraw - K4TAX'; 'Wayne Burdick'; > 'Elecraft Reflector' > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details > > Jerry's (AE4PB) post and others suggest new speaker is actually made > in the USA. Is that true?? > Mike AC5P > > > On Monday, September 14, 2015 10:34 AM, "ae...@carolinaheli.com" > wrote: > > > I believe when you consider the engineering reputation of Elecraft > and economies of scale for the manufacture of the SP3 several > expectations > arise: > 1. This is likely a very well-engineered component that's not easily > replaced by a similar sized speaker. > 2. Performance of the speaker exceeds similarly priced speakers (and > definitely less expensive ones to a degree). > 3. There is NOT likely a premium baked in to the price for the > Elecraft name due to the economies of scale (low quantity manufacture > generally means higher costs, thus higher price). Translation - the > price isn't just for the name. > > At the end of the day consider the labor costs plus parts are likely > fairly high if they are US manufactured. > > The US consumer is the sole reason most US manufacturing has gone > overseas (especially China). Buy cheap, get cheap. > > So it comes down to a question of quality vs "good enough" vs "price" > > I can only speak for myself in saying that it means something to have > a matching set rather than a hodgepodge. > I do compromise and use what I have to be able to get the job done > UNTIL I've saved enough for the next piece. > > Personally the SP3 is last on my list because most if not all of my > operating will be with headphones. > The point here is that it's on my list :) > > > > Jerry Moore > AE4PB, K3S SN# Arrives Wed. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of > Bob McGraw - K4TAX > Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 3:28 PM > To: Wayne Burdick; Elecraft Reflector > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details > > New products are always welcome. I look forward to "hearing them" at > maybe one of the next ham fests. I like the fact the SP3 uses an oval speaker. > I've never figured out exactly why, but I find ovals typically do > sound better than rounds, but maybe it seems to be only in my findings. > > As a comment, I prefer non-amplified speakers as this avoids the > potential RFI issues when used with the radio. The model that I > mentioned and use has a slight tilt to the bottom which aligns the > front with the K3S with its front elevated by the stand. > > I also find the audio system in the K3S to be really nice, specially > the > 2 channel effect using the AFX feature along with a stereo speaker > configuration. This give a nice wide spatial effect to which I find > very pleasing. Thanks Wayne and company for doing a fine job with the > K3S and its new features. > > 73 > Bob, K4TAX > K3S s/n 10,163 > > On 9/13/2015 2:09 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote: >> Hi al
Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details
I don't know where it is made, but I was able to see one in the flesh at HamCon this past weekend and it has a solid feel and weight to it (in addition to sounding great too). Seems like a no brainer addition to me. One wish would be to have the headphone jack on the speaker and use the input switch (as an output switch) to switch between headphone and speaker, so that the headphones can stay plugged in (I modified my SP-940 to work this way) 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of ae...@carolinaheli.com Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:39 AM To: a...@sbcglobal.net; ae...@carolinaheli.com; 'Bob McGraw - K4TAX'; 'Wayne Burdick'; 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details I guess I shouldn't have assumed anything but I did.. -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of a...@sbcglobal.net Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:03 PM To: ae...@carolinaheli.com; 'Bob McGraw - K4TAX'; 'Wayne Burdick'; 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details Jerry's (AE4PB) post and others suggest new speaker is actually made in the USA. Is that true?? Mike AC5P On Monday, September 14, 2015 10:34 AM, "ae...@carolinaheli.com" wrote: I believe when you consider the engineering reputation of Elecraft and economies of scale for the manufacture of the SP3 several expectations arise: 1. This is likely a very well-engineered component that's not easily replaced by a similar sized speaker. 2. Performance of the speaker exceeds similarly priced speakers (and definitely less expensive ones to a degree). 3. There is NOT likely a premium baked in to the price for the Elecraft name due to the economies of scale (low quantity manufacture generally means higher costs, thus higher price). Translation - the price isn't just for the name. At the end of the day consider the labor costs plus parts are likely fairly high if they are US manufactured. The US consumer is the sole reason most US manufacturing has gone overseas (especially China). Buy cheap, get cheap. So it comes down to a question of quality vs "good enough" vs "price" I can only speak for myself in saying that it means something to have a matching set rather than a hodgepodge. I do compromise and use what I have to be able to get the job done UNTIL I've saved enough for the next piece. Personally the SP3 is last on my list because most if not all of my operating will be with headphones. The point here is that it's on my list :) Jerry Moore AE4PB, K3S SN# Arrives Wed. -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bob McGraw - K4TAX Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 3:28 PM To: Wayne Burdick; Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SP3 External Speaker details New products are always welcome. I look forward to "hearing them" at maybe one of the next ham fests. I like the fact the SP3 uses an oval speaker. I've never figured out exactly why, but I find ovals typically do sound better than rounds, but maybe it seems to be only in my findings. As a comment, I prefer non-amplified speakers as this avoids the potential RFI issues when used with the radio. The model that I mentioned and use has a slight tilt to the bottom which aligns the front with the K3S with its front elevated by the stand. I also find the audio system in the K3S to be really nice, specially the 2 channel effect using the AFX feature along with a stereo speaker configuration. This give a nice wide spatial effect to which I find very pleasing. Thanks Wayne and company for doing a fine job with the K3S and its new features. 73 Bob, K4TAX K3S s/n 10,163 On 9/13/2015 2:09 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > Hi all, > > The K3 or K3S will work with a wide range of speakers, including the > ones Bob (K4TAX) mentioned. > > Here are some possible reasons for using an SP3: > > - matches the K-Line perfectly, including a rugged fold-up tilt stand > - full stereo A/B source selection, supporting dual-rig and > dual-speaker configurations (or both) > - plenty of room inside the cabinet for built-ins that might improve > station integration > > Of course these factors don't apply to everyone. But the good news is > that we will no longer have to say "maybe next year" every time > someone asks us to add a matching speaker to the product line :) > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote: > >> I use a pair of "off the shelf" brand speakers which have 2" x 4" >> ovals in a nice efficient solid enclosure that is 5" deep > > > > > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help sup
Re: [Elecraft] Icom IC-7300
+1000 And does this rig have the CAT fix for split? Original message From: Tony Estep Date:09/02/2015 5:48 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Icom IC-7300 I note that it has only one tuning knob, which in turn probably means you can't do the standard dx-split operating technique. If that's the case, then no matter what fancy gizmos it may boast, it would be of no interest to me, and some others might feel the same. Tony KT0NY __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] KPA500 Temperature Display
Hi, Would it be possible to allow the ability to show temperature in degrees F or C in the next firmware update? Thanks, Cliff K3LL __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Fw: Don't have a 50W dummy load
" Using a 100W light bulb will not provide the required impedance, and will produce inaccurate results and possible damage the transceiver." True, also - In the "old days" there was no need to specify *incandescent* light bulb. Wonder what would happen with a CFL or LED lamp (do not try this)? The key word is Resistive. 73, Cliff K3LL -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Matt VK2RQ Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:52 AM To: Bob Gibson Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Fw: Don't have a 50W dummy load For the calibration procedure, you need the load to be a known 50 ohm resistive impedance. Using a 100W light bulb will not provide the required impedance, and will produce inaccurate results and possible damage the transceiver. 73, Matt VK2RQ > On 26 Mar 2015, at 5:25 am, Bob Gibson via Elecraft wrote: > > HOW ABOUT A LAMP WITH 100 WATT BLUB, THATS ALL US OLD GUYS HAD! 73s Bob W5RG > >- Forwarded Message - > From: Warren Merkel > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 1:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Don't have a 50W dummy load > > That kit from OHR looks nicely done. I wonder if the pcb was immersed in a gallon can of mineral oil instead of the included case, how much more power could it withstand then? 5x-10x maybe? I could use the enclosure for something else. Otherwise I'd get a full paint can kit off ebay for about the same $. > > Warren KD4Z > >> On March 24, 2015 5:39:04 PM EDT, Brian wrote: >> Excellent advice Don. I bought a 100w dummy load kit from OHR. It's >> called the RFL-100 and it's about $40, comes in a very nice cabinet, >> and takes less than an hour to build. It has come in handy more >> times than >> >> I can count. >> >> http://www.ohr.com/rfl100.htm >> >> Oak Hills has some good goods. >> >> 73 de KB9BVN >> Brian Murrey > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > w...@yahoo.com > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to > matt.vk...@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [Bulk] OT: Verizon's response to Net Neutrality: in Morse code!!
In my younger years I thought of the FCC of a regulatory and technology body. My thinking changed when UPS successfully lobbied the FCC in 1989 to reallocate part of 220MHz from Amateur to Commercial service. UPS argued that the reallocation was in the "public interest" and they would put the spectrum to good use. After a ruling in their favor, UPS never commercially deployed and the spectrum was unused for quite some time. Be sure to read the fine print and understand the players. One person's regulation is another person's corporatism. 73, K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:28 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [Bulk] OT: Verizon's response to Net Neutrality: in Morse code!! I'm with you, Phil. As I recall, you're retired FCC staff. If anyone understands FCC Rules, you do. I WANT (caps added for emphasis) FCC regulation of our airwaves, and of our internet. I'm old enough to remember when the FCC had staff to enforce their Rules, and things were much better then. We lived in fear of the FCC, and kept our noses clean. Anyone who subscribes to cable has experienced bills that increase for no reason, and when it's the only game in town, as it is for my internet, all we can do is pay it. So YES, YES, YES, I want someone sitting in Comcast's shoulder. These assholes are billing me monthly rent for a cable modem that I BOUGHT from a local store in 2006, and there isn't a damned thing I can do about it. YES, I want regulation! Now, those who demand "small government" have made the FCC toothless, without the budget to enforce their own Rules. THAT'S why we have RF noise from all those consumer devices that make it difficult to use our ham stations, and even to tune in AM radio. 73, Jim K9YC On Thu,2/26/2015 8:09 PM, Phil Kane wrote: > That's what all the Title II fracas is about. Those of us in the > professional (regulatory) field fault the FCC of 20 years ago for not > insisting on that but creating this "information service" category > rather than putting them in the "telecommunications service" category > from the beginning. > > As hams we are used to having the FCC look over our shoulders to make > sure that we play by the rules. It's time that the "broadband" > infrastructure providers get a taste of that. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [Bulk] OT: Verizon's response to Net Neutrality: in Morse code!!
*Netflix* got what they wanted. They had better lobbyists and took a dispute between them and Comcast, expanded the scope to include the entire internet, and then got the .gov on their side. 73, K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 8:30 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [Bulk] OT: Verizon's response to Net Neutrality: in Morse code!! On 2015-02-26 11:08 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: > Has anyone read the regulations that they kept hidden? Do we really > know what is in them? Look at the last set of "Net Neutrality" regulations from the FCC - the ones that the industry had over turned on the grounds that the Commission did not have the authority to adopt them because "Broadband was not a utility". Seems to me the industry got what they wanted forced the Commission to reclassify "Information Service" as "Communications Utility." Voice and cable have been regulated as utilities for a very long time - who in their right mind would consider broadband data delivered on the very same networks to be anything other than a utility for the very reasons that voice and cable are utilities? 73, ... Joe, W4TV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com