Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-11 Thread k . igor


I use CM500 for few months now. I don't hear difference between Heil proset and 
CM500. Microphone is a bit different and TX EQ needed to be adjusted and mic 
gain reduced significantly. But the main CM500 advantage, aside from being 3 
times cheaper than the Heil, they are much more comfortable, I can wear them 
for more than 10 hours straight during contest, while Heil would kill my ears 
after 3-4 hours. 

73, 

Igor, N1YX 
- Original Message - 
From: Robert Harmon k...@pacbell.net 
To: Gary Gregory garyvk...@gmail.com 
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 2:28:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500 

O.K. you guys, now you've done it.  I have to try the C-500 phones too.  :) 

Bob 
K6UJ 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-11 Thread Jim Brown
On 1/10/2011 5:42 AM, py5eg wrote:
 Has someone tested for yaesu rigs? What are the results?

Yes. A few months ago, I made a simple adapter to connect a CM500 to an 
FT1000MP for use at PJ4A. I checked it out with the MP that's still on 
my shelf (and for sale), and got critical on the air reports from a 
nearby super contester.

The CM500 works just fine with the Yaesu, and sounds great.  No 
adjustments needed for headphones. For the mic, you will need to set the 
mic gain VERY LOW to avoid overdriving the Yaesu's mic input. This does 
NOT imply anything bad about either the mic or the rig -- it's just that 
the mic is hot and the MP has plenty of available gain to accommodate 
mics that have very low output.  And, as with any mic and the MP (or 
it's descendents), you need to carefully select the TX DSP that does the 
least damage to the audio. But if you DON'T turn the mic gain way down, 
or if you don't select the right DSP, the audio will sound just awful 
(like far too many SSB contesters). :)

73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-10 Thread py5eg
Hi Folks

I just got a pair of CM500 which came without any catalog and I would
kindly ask the following questions:

1) I tested on my K3 and the boom set is working fine
2) I noticed that the CM500 has more base and less high frequency
respond comparing with the heil.
3) Has someone tested for yaesu rigs? What are the results?

Thanks in advance

ATILANO DE OMS
PP5EG - PY5EG
ZW5B, PS2T, PT5T
ARAUCARIA DX GROUP
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-10 Thread ab2tc

Hi,

I also bought a pair of these based on the recommendations on the reflector
and also on the Yahoo group. I have not put it on the air yet as I was
thoroughly disappointed with the headphones on receive. There seems to be a
profound lack of highs compared to any other headphones I own including a
pair of Heil and a pair of Koss. I also strongly dislike the fact that each
earpiece has a wire coming out of it. I'll keep using my Heil proset until
they break.

AB2TC - Knut



py5eg wrote:
 
 Hi Folks
 
 I just got a pair of CM500 which came without any catalog and I would
 kindly ask the following questions:
 
 1) I tested on my K3 and the boom set is working fine
 2) I noticed that the CM500 has more base and less high frequency
 respond comparing with the heil.
 3) Has someone tested for yaesu rigs? What are the results?
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 ATILANO DE OMS
 PP5EG - PY5EG
 ZW5B, PS2T, PT5T
 ARAUCARIA DX GROUP
 snip
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Yamaha-CM500-tp5750572p5907129.html
Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-10 Thread Hector Padron
Lack of highs? Not mine,besides,does any ham transmit today with more than 
4000Hz at the high end? answer is NO,most of them are below 3000Hz,at that freq 
ANY headset will response well.Also I injected an audio generator to my CM-500 
from 20 to 5000Hz and I heard the tone from 60(my ears) all the way up to 
5000Hz with same level,I don't see why they has lack of highs.Besides the K3 
has an excellent RX EQ and you can tailor the received audio to your personal 
taste so If you think it has too much lows,then cut them up with it.
I have been using those Yamaha for more than a year and for me they sound as 
well as ANY other headset. Maybe some users feel bad because they are cheap 
compared with Heil, Senhisser,and others.
 
AD4C

If freedom means something,it is the right to tell others what they don't want 
to hear –George Orwell

--- On Mon, 1/10/11, ab2tc ab...@arrl.net wrote:


From: ab2tc ab...@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 2:42 PM



Hi,

I also bought a pair of these based on the recommendations on the reflector
and also on the Yahoo group. I have not put it on the air yet as I was
thoroughly disappointed with the headphones on receive. There seems to be a
profound lack of highs compared to any other headphones I own including a
pair of Heil and a pair of Koss. I also strongly dislike the fact that each
earpiece has a wire coming out of it. I'll keep using my Heil proset until
they break.

AB2TC - Knut



py5eg wrote:
 
 Hi Folks
 
 I just got a pair of CM500 which came without any catalog and I would
 kindly ask the following questions:
 
 1) I tested on my K3 and the boom set is working fine
 2) I noticed that the CM500 has more base and less high frequency
 respond comparing with the heil.
 3) Has someone tested for yaesu rigs? What are the results?
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 ATILANO DE OMS
 PP5EG - PY5EG
 ZW5B, PS2T, PT5T
 ARAUCARIA DX GROUP
 snip
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Yamaha-CM500-tp5750572p5907129.html
Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-10 Thread ab2tc

Hello again,

I am not talking about anything above 2700Hz at all. With my receive
bandpass set to 300-2700Hz the CM-500 sound definitely muffled compared to
any other headphones I have. Yes, I could compensate with the EQ, but then
it would be unuseable with any other headphones I have since there is no
macro support to quickly change the RX EQ settings quickly. Until that
happens the CM-500 stays shelved in my shack.

AB2TC - Knut


AD4C2009 wrote:
 
 Lack of highs? Not mine,besides,does any ham transmit today with more than
 4000Hz at the high end? answer is NO,most of them are below 3000Hz,at that
 freq ANY headset will response well.Also I injected an audio generator to
 my CM-500 from 20 to 5000Hz and I heard the tone from 60(my ears) all the
 way up to 5000Hz with same level,I don't see why they has lack of
 highs.Besides the K3 has an excellent RX EQ and you can tailor the
 received audio to your personal taste so If you think it has too much
 lows,then cut them up with it.
 I have been using those Yamaha for more than a year and for me they sound
 as well as ANY other headset. Maybe some users feel bad because they are
 cheap compared with Heil, Senhisser,and others.
  
 AD4C
 snip
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Yamaha-CM500-tp5750572p5908494.html
Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-10 Thread Hector Padron
Ok,then because you don't like and I love it,do you want to sell it to me ?
 
AD4C
 


If freedom means something,it is the right to tell others what they don't want 
to hear –George Orwell

--- On Mon, 1/10/11, ab2tc ab...@arrl.net wrote:


From: ab2tc ab...@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 8:38 PM



Hello again,

I am not talking about anything above 2700Hz at all. With my receive
bandpass set to 300-2700Hz the CM-500 sound definitely muffled compared to
any other headphones I have. Yes, I could compensate with the EQ, but then
it would be unuseable with any other headphones I have since there is no
macro support to quickly change the RX EQ settings quickly. Until that
happens the CM-500 stays shelved in my shack.

AB2TC - Knut


AD4C2009 wrote:
 
 Lack of highs? Not mine,besides,does any ham transmit today with more than
 4000Hz at the high end? answer is NO,most of them are below 3000Hz,at that
 freq ANY headset will response well.Also I injected an audio generator to
 my CM-500 from 20 to 5000Hz and I heard the tone from 60(my ears) all the
 way up to 5000Hz with same level,I don't see why they has lack of
 highs.Besides the K3 has an excellent RX EQ and you can tailor the
 received audio to your personal taste so If you think it has too much
 lows,then cut them up with it.
 I have been using those Yamaha for more than a year and for me they sound
 as well as ANY other headset. Maybe some users feel bad because they are
 cheap compared with Heil, Senhisser,and others.
  
 AD4C
 snip
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Yamaha-CM500-tp5750572p5908494.html
Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Hector,

I too love my CM-500 but then I set the RX EQ to suit and I don't have
a 'collection' of headsets...certainly would not waste money on Heil
gear...too rich for my blood and they are not real robust.

Also found with the Heil stuff you have to do some serious adjustment
on the TX EQ which would make microphone changes cumbersome.

I have settings now that enable me to use an old Turner +3 on the
front panel and CM-500 on the rear. I am told there is little to no
difference in audio from those who know my rather terrible voice. I
was not blessed with broadcast quality vocal chords...:-)

Now my XYL (this is strange) has a great voice for HF and everyone who
chats with her comments on the audio and tell her she sounds better
than the OM...:-(...now that does suck!!!

The settings you sent me way back when Hector work great for me, well
done with your testing back in the early days..My CM-500 is a definite
keeper.

Thanks again Hector for your posts on the reflector, always fun to
read and I often learn just a little bit more.

73's

Gary  Jennie (VK4JLG)

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Hector Padron ad4c2...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Ok,then because you don't like and I love it,do you want to sell it to me ?

 AD4C



 If freedom means something,it is the right to tell others what they don't 
 want to hear –George Orwell

 --- On Mon, 1/10/11, ab2tc ab...@arrl.net wrote:


 From: ab2tc ab...@arrl.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 8:38 PM



 Hello again,

 I am not talking about anything above 2700Hz at all. With my receive
 bandpass set to 300-2700Hz the CM-500 sound definitely muffled compared to
 any other headphones I have. Yes, I could compensate with the EQ, but then
 it would be unuseable with any other headphones I have since there is no
 macro support to quickly change the RX EQ settings quickly. Until that
 happens the CM-500 stays shelved in my shack.

 AB2TC - Knut


 AD4C2009 wrote:

 Lack of highs? Not mine,besides,does any ham transmit today with more than
 4000Hz at the high end? answer is NO,most of them are below 3000Hz,at that
 freq ANY headset will response well.Also I injected an audio generator to
 my CM-500 from 20 to 5000Hz and I heard the tone from 60(my ears) all the
 way up to 5000Hz with same level,I don't see why they has lack of
 highs.Besides the K3 has an excellent RX EQ and you can tailor the
 received audio to your personal taste so If you think it has too much
 lows,then cut them up with it.
 I have been using those Yamaha for more than a year and for me they sound
 as well as ANY other headset. Maybe some users feel bad because they are
 cheap compared with Heil, Senhisser,and others.

 AD4C
 snip


 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Yamaha-CM500-tp5750572p5908494.html
 Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



-- 
Gary
VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
http://www.qsl.net/vk4fd/
K3 #679, P3 #546
For everything else there's Mastercard!!!
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500

2011-01-10 Thread Robert Harmon
O.K. you guys, now you've done it.  I have to try the C-500 phones too.  :)

Bob
K6UJ


On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:

 Hector,
 
 I too love my CM-500 but then I set the RX EQ to suit and I don't have
 a 'collection' of headsets...certainly would not waste money on Heil
 gear...too rich for my blood and they are not real robust.
 
 Also found with the Heil stuff you have to do some serious adjustment
 on the TX EQ which would make microphone changes cumbersome.
 
 I have settings now that enable me to use an old Turner +3 on the
 front panel and CM-500 on the rear. I am told there is little to no
 difference in audio from those who know my rather terrible voice. I
 was not blessed with broadcast quality vocal chords...:-)
 
 Now my XYL (this is strange) has a great voice for HF and everyone who
 chats with her comments on the audio and tell her she sounds better
 than the OM...:-(...now that does suck!!!
 
 The settings you sent me way back when Hector work great for me, well
 done with your testing back in the early days..My CM-500 is a definite
 keeper.
 
 Thanks again Hector for your posts on the reflector, always fun to
 read and I often learn just a little bit more.
 
 73's
 
 Gary  Jennie (VK4JLG)
 
 On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Hector Padron ad4c2...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Ok,then because you don't like and I love it,do you want to sell it to me ?
 
 AD4C
 
 
 
 If freedom means something,it is the right to tell others what they don't 
 want to hear –George Orwell
 
 --- On Mon, 1/10/11, ab2tc ab...@arrl.net wrote:
 
 
 From: ab2tc ab...@arrl.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 8:38 PM
 
 
 
 Hello again,
 
 I am not talking about anything above 2700Hz at all. With my receive
 bandpass set to 300-2700Hz the CM-500 sound definitely muffled compared to
 any other headphones I have. Yes, I could compensate with the EQ, but then
 it would be unuseable with any other headphones I have since there is no
 macro support to quickly change the RX EQ settings quickly. Until that
 happens the CM-500 stays shelved in my shack.
 
 AB2TC - Knut
 
 
 AD4C2009 wrote:
 
 Lack of highs? Not mine,besides,does any ham transmit today with more than
 4000Hz at the high end? answer is NO,most of them are below 3000Hz,at that
 freq ANY headset will response well.Also I injected an audio generator to
 my CM-500 from 20 to 5000Hz and I heard the tone from 60(my ears) all the
 way up to 5000Hz with same level,I don't see why they has lack of
 highs.Besides the K3 has an excellent RX EQ and you can tailor the
 received audio to your personal taste so If you think it has too much
 lows,then cut them up with it.
 I have been using those Yamaha for more than a year and for me they sound
 as well as ANY other headset. Maybe some users feel bad because they are
 cheap compared with Heil, Senhisser,and others.
 
 AD4C
 snip
 
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Yamaha-CM500-tp5750572p5908494.html
 Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 
 
 -- 
 Gary
 VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
 http://www.qsl.net/vk4fd/
 K3 #679, P3 #546
 For everything else there's Mastercard!!!
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html