Hector,

I too love my CM-500 but then I set the RX EQ to suit and I don't have
a 'collection' of headsets...certainly would not waste money on Heil
gear...too rich for my blood and they are not real robust.

Also found with the Heil stuff you have to do some serious adjustment
on the TX EQ which would make microphone changes cumbersome.

I have settings now that enable me to use an old Turner +3 on the
front panel and CM-500 on the rear. I am told there is little to no
difference in audio from those who know my rather terrible voice. I
was not blessed with broadcast quality vocal chords...:-)

Now my XYL (this is strange) has a great voice for HF and everyone who
chats with her comments on the audio and tell her she sounds better
than the OM...:-(...now that does suck!!!

The settings you sent me way back when Hector work great for me, well
done with your testing back in the early days..My CM-500 is a definite
keeper.

Thanks again Hector for your posts on the reflector, always fun to
read and I often learn just a little bit more.

73's

Gary & Jennie (VK4JLG)

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Hector Padron <ad4c2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ok,then because you don't like and I love it,do you want to sell it to me ?
>
> AD4C
>
>
>
> "If freedom means something,it is the right to tell others what they don't 
> want to hear" –George Orwell
>
> --- On Mon, 1/10/11, ab2tc <ab...@arrl.net> wrote:
>
>
> From: ab2tc <ab...@arrl.net>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RES: Yamaha CM500
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 8:38 PM
>
>
>
> Hello again,
>
> I am not talking about anything above 2700Hz at all. With my receive
> bandpass set to 300-2700Hz the CM-500 sound definitely muffled compared to
> any other headphones I have. Yes, I could compensate with the EQ, but then
> it would be unuseable with any other headphones I have since there is no
> macro support to quickly change the RX EQ settings quickly. Until that
> happens the CM-500 stays shelved in my shack.
>
> AB2TC - Knut
>
>
> AD4C2009 wrote:
>>
>> Lack of highs? Not mine,besides,does any ham transmit today with more than
>> 4000Hz at the high end? answer is NO,most of them are below 3000Hz,at that
>> freq ANY headset will response well.Also I injected an audio generator to
>> my CM-500 from 20 to 5000Hz and I heard the tone from 60(my ears) all the
>> way up to 5000Hz with same level,I don't see why they has "lack of
>> highs".Besides the K3 has an excellent RX EQ and you can tailor the
>> received audio to your personal taste so If you think it has too much
>> lows,then cut them up with it.
>> I have been using those Yamaha for more than a year and for me they sound
>> as well as ANY other headset. Maybe some users feel bad because they are
>> "cheap" compared with Heil, Senhisser,and others.
>>
>> AD4C
>> <snip>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Yamaha-CM500-tp5750572p5908494.html
> Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



-- 
Gary
VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
http://www.qsl.net/vk4fd/
K3 #679, P3 #546
For everything else there's Mastercard!!!
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to