RE: Measurement below 30MHz

2002-06-10 Thread djumbdenstock

KC,

Allow me to make one additional comment regarding your final statement.  You
asked ". . . which one should I use?"

The FCC will never have a problem with you using linear (20 dB/decade)
roll-off.  This is more restrictive than is sometimes called for.  They
allow the use of 40 dB/decade below 30 MHz.  You will not have a rejection
of an application for using a provision that is allowed.  Similarly, if you
choose, the FCC allows you to use other roll-off factors as long as you use
at least 2 points to establish the roll-off and provide the calculation that
showed how you arrived at your results.  So which to use?  That is up to
you.  Personally, I generally use 2 points and provide the roll-off
calculated.

Good luck,

Don Umbdenstock

> --
> From: djumbdenst...@tycoint.com[SMTP:djumbdenst...@tycoint.com]
> Reply To: djumbdenst...@tycoint.com
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:34 PM
> To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; kcc...@hkpc.org
> Subject:  RE: Measurement below 30MHz
> 
> 
> Hello KC,
> 
> I cannot comment on the Japanese standard; I can comment on the FCC
> regulations.  The FCC does allow 40 dB/decade below 30 MHz; they also
> allow
> a different roll-off established by measuring at 2 points along a radial.
> The resultant may be different than 40 dB/decade, depending on the
> frequency
> and the antenna.  A basic loop antenna at 13 MHz will likely produce less
> than 40 dB/decade.  If the antenna is wound in a field canceling manor,
> you
> might measure something greater than 40/dB per decade.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Don Umbdenstock
> Tyco Safety Products
> Sensormatic
> 
> > --
> > From:   KC CHAN [PDD][SMTP:kcc...@hkpc.org]
> > Reply To:   KC CHAN [PDD]
> > Sent:   Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:36 PM
> > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> > Subject:Measurement below 30MHz
> > 
> > 
> > To all
> > 
> > I just came across a Japanese standard about a RFID product at 13.5 MHZ,
> > it says that measurement of FCC from 30m to 3m will need to take the
> 20dB
> > conversion(ie 20dB/decade) into account.
> > 
> > But I found a statement from FCC part 15.31(f)(2) that at frequency
> below
> > 30 MHZ, 40/decade extrapolation factor shall be used.
> > 
> > I just want to clarify which we should use for measurement below 30MHz,
> > 20dB/decade or 40/decade?
> > 
> > Thank you
> > KC Chan
> > 
> > 
> > ---
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> > 
> > Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> > 
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> >  majord...@ieee.org
> > with the single line:
> >  unsubscribe emc-pstc
> > 
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> >  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
> >  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com
> > 
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> >  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
> >  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
> > 
> > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> > http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> > Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
> > 
> 
> ---
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>  majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>  unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
>  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
>  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
> 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"


RE: Measurement below 30MHz

2002-06-07 Thread djumbdenstock

Hello KC,

I cannot comment on the Japanese standard; I can comment on the FCC
regulations.  The FCC does allow 40 dB/decade below 30 MHz; they also allow
a different roll-off established by measuring at 2 points along a radial.
The resultant may be different than 40 dB/decade, depending on the frequency
and the antenna.  A basic loop antenna at 13 MHz will likely produce less
than 40 dB/decade.  If the antenna is wound in a field canceling manor, you
might measure something greater than 40/dB per decade.

Best regards,

Don Umbdenstock
Tyco Safety Products
Sensormatic

> --
> From: KC CHAN [PDD][SMTP:kcc...@hkpc.org]
> Reply To: KC CHAN [PDD]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:36 PM
> To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject:  Measurement below 30MHz
> 
> 
> To all
> 
> I just came across a Japanese standard about a RFID product at 13.5 MHZ,
> it says that measurement of FCC from 30m to 3m will need to take the 20dB
> conversion(ie 20dB/decade) into account.
> 
> But I found a statement from FCC part 15.31(f)(2) that at frequency below
> 30 MHZ, 40/decade extrapolation factor shall be used.
> 
> I just want to clarify which we should use for measurement below 30MHz,
> 20dB/decade or 40/decade?
> 
> Thank you
> KC Chan
> 
> 
> ---
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>  majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>  unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
>  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
>  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
> 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"


RE: Measurement below 30MHz

2002-06-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello KC,

The attached message leads you a web site that discusses the 20 versus 40
dB/decade problem. ANSI/NIST may/should be doing a study.

Regards,

Ken Hall

-Original Message-
From: KC CHAN [PDD] [mailto:kcc...@hkpc.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:36 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Measurement below 30MHz



To all

I just came across a Japanese standard about a RFID product at 13.5 MHZ, it
says that measurement of FCC from 30m to 3m will need to take the 20dB
conversion(ie 20dB/decade) into account.

But I found a statement from FCC part 15.31(f)(2) that at frequency below 30
MHZ, 40/decade extrapolation factor shall be used.

I just want to clarify which we should use for measurement below 30MHz,
20dB/decade or 40/decade?

Thank you
KC Chan


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

--- Begin Message ---

Ken Hall asked me to make these files available on my personal area on the
ARRL Web site.  He considers these to be public documents, so they can be
shared as needed.

The following summary document also contains hyperlinks to the various files
Ken shared with us earlier.

http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/c63/plc/C63_Summary_11_May.pdf 
http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/c63/plc/C63_Summary_11_May.doc

http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/c63/plc/C63_Summary_11_May.htm - Not real pretty,
but good for those that cannot read .doc or .pdf files.

Let me also thank Ken for the significant amount of work he put into this
project. This really makes a big difference to the work of C63!

73, 
Ed Hare, W1RFI
ARRL Lab
225 Main St
Newington, CT 06111
Tel: 860-594-0318
Internet: w1...@arrl.org
Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis

ARRL is the National Association for Amateur Radio.  It is supported by
membership dues, individual contributions and the sale of  publications and
advertising. For more information about ARRL, go to
http://www.arrl.org/news/features/inside-your-league.html. For more
information about membership, go to http://www.arrl.org/join.html.  Your
contribution can also help support ARRL's ongoing efforts to protect Amateur
spectrum. Go to https://www.arrl.org/forms/development/donations/basic/ to
learn more about the ways you can support the ARRL programs and activities
of most importance to you. You can help ARRL protect Amateur Radio for you
and future generations to enjoy.
--- End Message ---


Re: Measurement below 30MHz

2002-06-07 Thread Ken Javor

No one seems to be answering this, so I will take a stab at it.  But this is
only technical aspects, not a policy response.  At 13 MHz (11.5 m tuned
dipole) a real measurement antenna (one which draws power from the Poynting
vector impinging upon it) will not be measuring in the far field.  Further,
since a 13 MHz tuned dipole would be a special build, you likely will be
using either an electrically short whip or loop.  Since the VDE used to
require the loop below 30 MHz, it is most likely a commercial EMI test
facility would have the loop.  The question of scaling depends on the
electrical size of the emitter and your distance from the emitter.  The
easiest case is if you are in the far field of the emitter, which is almost
certainly the case for an RFID operating at 13 MHz.  Then the field will
scale linearly with distance (20 dB per decade).  If you are somehow in the
near field of a small loop, the magnetic field (what you measure with the
loop) decreases with the cube of the distance as long as your separation
from the loop is large relative to the loop dimensions which is certainly
the case for an RFID at 3 meters.

--
>From: "KC CHAN [PDD]" 
>To: 
>Subject: Measurement below 30MHz
>Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2002, 9:36 PM
>

>
> To all
>
> I just came across a Japanese standard about a RFID product at 13.5 MHZ, it
> says that measurement of FCC from 30m to 3m will need to take the 20dB
> conversion(ie 20dB/decade) into account.
>
> But I found a statement from FCC part 15.31(f)(2) that at frequency below
> 30 MHZ, 40/decade extrapolation factor shall be used.
>
> I just want to clarify which we should use for measurement below 30MHz,
> 20dB/decade or 40/decade?
>
> Thank you
> KC Chan
>
>
> ---
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>  majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>  unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
>  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
>  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
> 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"