Re: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-26 Thread kim . boll . jensen

Dear Mohajer and all

If you are using type K thermocouplers you will have to turn off power to the
component before measuring the temp. Since they are sensitive to magnetic
fields.

Best regards,

Mr. Kim Boll Jensen
i-data, Denmark





Kamran Mohajer kmoha...@cisco.com on 99-08-24 23:50:26

Please respond to Kamran Mohajer kmoha...@cisco.com

To:   emc-p...@ieee.org
cc:(bcc: Kim Boll Jensen/INT)

Subject:  Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components





Hello EMC-PSTCers,

I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature limits on
magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found that my results
are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15 degrees on measuring
on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the thermocouple to different
location on a coil seems to give you different results.  Is there a method that
I should be following to measure temperature with thermocouples methods, not
change of resistance, on magnetic parts such as transformers, coils, etc.?

Thanks,


***

Kamran Mohajer
DSL Compliance Lead
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Phone(408)-525-6121
Fax(408)527-0495
kmoha...@cisco.com
***


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).









-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-26 Thread Gene Haymes


I too, have noticed a variation in temperature, especially when measuring a 
very hot component with forced air cooling. I usually try to get the highest 
possible temperature reading by :
1. Use very small thermocouple wire, such as AWG 30. Larger wire sizes can 
conduct heat away from the tip.
2. Bury the tip of the thermocouple as deep into the winding as possible. If 
the component comes from a vendor, already varnished, use a tool to try to 
separate a gap in the center of the winding layers. Then, push the tip of the 
thermocouple into the gap as far as you can. use epoxy to hold it in and to 
help couple it thermally to the winding. Use a thermocouple bridge that is 
isolated from everything else and be aware that the thermocouple wires might be 
hot.
I have seen a switching power supply transformer thermocouple be so noisy that 
it would not work with an electronic thermocouple bridge without running the 
wires through ferrite beads.
3. I usually also measure and record the core temperature. The core temp and 
winding temp do not have to be the same. To measure core temp, again seek the 
hottest spot which would be deep, away from air and connected with epoxy.
4. If the component is large and has a few ohms of resistance, you can allow 
the temp to stabilize, quickly make several resistance measurements of the 
winding and then extrapolate back to the maximum resistance and use the copper 
law to determine temperature.
5. If you do all this and worry that the readings are inconsistant, only 
measure it one time! (Joking)
Kamran Mohajer wrote:

 Hello EMC-PSTCers,

 I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature limits on 
 magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found that my 
 results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15 degrees on 
 measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the thermocouple to 
 different location on a coil seems to give you different results.  Is there a 
 method that I should be following to measure temperature with thermocouples 
 methods, not change of resistance, on magnetic parts such as transformers, 
 coils, etc.?

 Thanks,


 ***
 Kamran Mohajer
 DSL Compliance Lead
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 Phone(408)-525-6121
 Fax(408)527-0495
 kmoha...@cisco.com
 ***

 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-26 Thread Barry Esmore

Hi Kamran,

I use both change of resistance and a thermocouple as a check. I would
expect the thermocouple to read a little below the resistance method. Some
standards require the change of resistance method (not the thermocouple
method) to be used for compliance assessment of winding temps.

Regards

Barry Esmore
AUS-TICK

Phone: + 61 3 9886 1345
Fax: + 61 3 9884 7272
Email: bar...@melbpc.org.au

- Original Message -
From: Kamran Mohajer kmoha...@cisco.com
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 7:50 AM
Subject: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components



 Hello EMC-PSTCers,

 I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature limits on
magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found that my
results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15 degrees on
measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the thermocouple to
different location on a coil seems to give you different results.  Is there
a method that I should be following to measure temperature with
thermocouples methods, not change of resistance, on magnetic parts such as
transformers, coils, etc.?

 Thanks,




***
 Kamran Mohajer
 DSL Compliance Lead
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 Phone(408)-525-6121
 Fax(408)527-0495
 kmoha...@cisco.com


***

 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).





-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



RE: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-25 Thread Ehler, Kyle

Hi Kamran,

I've run into this problem myself.  Usually, it is because the test
conditions you use are different from what the vendor is using.  They may be
loading the EUT to full capacity and/or using a thermocouple attachment
method different from yours.  In the case where your product's configuration
is not identical to the vendor, you can expect some discrepancy.  Compliance
agencies such as UL understand that your conditions of applicability are
different from the vendor's and thus your data will be unique.

If you wish to minimize the discrepancy, load the EUT to maximum rating and
use a similar probing scheme as the vendor.  
In some cases,  magnetic flux can be so great that it induces an undesirable
EMF and reading error in which case you might have to run the EUT until
thermal equilibrium occurs then, cut power and take a measurement sweep
immediately afterward.

UL for example, demands that the thermocouple probe be attached to the
windings of the coil -with the thermocouple junction in direct contact with
the wiring and NOT through core, ferrite or tape insulation (if the
conductors are coated there is no need to remove the coating).  I was just
audited a couple weeks ago for COMPASS FUS and was reminded that the use of
cyanoacrylate glue or thermal conductive epoxy to attach a thermocouple to a
coil was entirely acceptable.

Here's a  tip in using thermocouples:  It is best to force the junction
wires of the thermocouple to fuse into a single point and to avoid using a
junction made of twisted bare wires (which forms several thermocouple
contact junctions and can cause errors).  In the fabrication of the
junction, I use a microtorch to fuse type 'J' thermocouples.  Twist the
wires together, but clip the excess off and leave enough that when you hit
it with the torch a 'ball' fuses from the wires and consumes all the twists.

This takes a little practice but works much better than using a zapper to
'arc' weld thin 30 to 36ga. wires (IMHO).  I then check each channel for
accuracy before attachment and test.  On most thermocouple types the red
wires are negative polarity, white is positive.  The thinner the wires, the
better ease in accessing tight spots and getting a good contact.


Kyle Ehler  kyle.eh...@lsil.com mailto:kyle.eh...@lsil.com  
Assistant Design Engineer
LSI Logic Corporation
3718 N. Rock Road
U.S.A.  Wichita, Kansas  67226
Ph. 316 636 8657
Fax 316 636 8889
Fax 316 636 8315

-Original Message-
From:   Kamran Mohajer [SMTP:kmoha...@cisco.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, August 24, 1999 4:50 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components


Hello EMC-PSTCers,

I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature
limits on magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found
that my results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15
degrees on measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the
thermocouple to different location on a coil seems to give you different
results.  Is there a method that I should be following to measure
temperature with thermocouples methods, not change of resistance, on
magnetic parts such as transformers, coils, etc.? 

Thanks,

 


***
Kamran Mohajer
DSL Compliance Lead
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Phone(408)-525-6121
Fax(408)527-0495
kmoha...@cisco.com


***

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-25 Thread HAhmadi

Dear Kamran,

Obtaining a temperature test results that is 10-15 degrees higher or lower
than your vendor is not unusual at all. We experience this all the time
with major test houses. I have had many cases where an experience test
engineer in a test house measures as much as 20 degrees lower or higher
than our in-house measurements. This is because there are many
variable/uncontrolable factors involved when measuring thermals.

Thanks
H.Ahmadi



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-25 Thread Fred Waechter

Kamran,

As John Crabb pointed out, making measurements at different points will give 
you some variation due to hot spots etc. What most people miss is that 
thermocouple readings are affected by magnetic fields. To get a correct 
reading, turn power off and take a reading immidiately after the reading 
stabilizes. I have seen the reading change as much as 10-15 degrees when the 
power is turned off. Usually the reading jumps higher. I also noticed that how 
much the reading changes depends on where I placed the thermocouple. Usually 
the biggest change
is when the thermocouple is placed between the core and the coil.

When trying to correlate your readings with your vendor's make sure you're 
using the same type of thermocouple and measure at the same point. Find out if 
they made the measurement with power on or off.

Several years ago I had the same problem. I called the manufacturer of the 
thermocouple I was using. They could not tell me how much my reading would 
change but recommended taking the reading with power off.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Fred Waechter



Kamran Mohajer wrote:

 Hello EMC-PSTCers,

 I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature limits on 
 magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found that my 
 results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15 degrees on 
 measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the thermocouple to 
 different location on a coil seems to give you different results.  Is there a 
 method that I should be following to measure temperature with thermocouples 
 methods, not change of resistance, on magnetic parts such as transformers, 
 coils, etc.?

 Thanks,


 ***
 Kamran Mohajer
 DSL Compliance Lead
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 Phone(408)-525-6121
 Fax(408)527-0495
 kmoha...@cisco.com
 ***

 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

--
Fred Waechter
Sr. Applications Engr.
SMPS Consulting
w...@skybest.com
Phone/FAX: 336-246-5236



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-25 Thread Art Michael

Hello Kamran,

I have been faced with this problem many times in the (nearly 35) years
that I have been involved with such measurements. In my experience, this
is the major and problematic correlation factor (in the product safety
domain). It is the one that stands out above all others, when faced with
correlation difficulties (especially when the tests are conducted on
different continents as they were in my situation :-)

Very slight changes in the immediate-area ambient temperatures and the
electrical service where you are making the measurements can drastically
affect the temperature readings as can the location of the thermocouples
on the transformer under test (as you already noted). 

Consider the following possiblilites (not in any particular order) ; 

A) Be certain that there is no extraneous air-flow over the trafo (from a
room-fan, people constantly walking by in the adjacent aisles, or room
air-conditioning drafts. ( I believe ambient air-flow to be a major
factor when you are faced with correlation difficulties)

B) Be certain your input voltage is a clean sine-wave. Distortions in the
input voltage waveshape will affect your data. (At one time we tried to
use a low-distortion/low harmonics constant-voltage transformer to keep
the line voltage constant during temperature tests - even that small
amount of input distortion was sufficient to affect our results).

C) If the trafo is in a switching-mode power supply, the currents 
being switched will likely be affecting the indicated temperatures. 

D) Why do you discount rise-of resistance ?  I believe this technique 
integrates the temperature differences across a transformer and yields a
more repeatable result (in my humble experience).  

E) One problem I've found in transformer construction is that air can
become entrapped, by the impregnating materia, between the outer-wrap
layers. This effects the temperatures measured on the outer surfaces
(again, a thermocouple location problem).

F) Another problem is the heating effect on the trafo of adjacent hot
components (cold ones or sinks too, I suppose) when transformers are
evaluated in an end-product. Be certain that you and your vendors (and
your test agency) apply thermocouples in the same location/s.  Consider
submitting a transformer, with thermocouples attached by you, to your
vendor/s and test agency/ies.  This will, at the least, rule out
thermocouple location (and its attachment) as a variable. 

G) Be certain that you are using high-grade (low error) thermocouples and
calibrated equipment.

Good Luck!

Regards, Art Michael

Int'l Product Safety News
A.E. Michael, Editor
P.O. Box 1561 
Middletown CT 06457-8061 U.S.A.

Phone  :  (860) 344-1651
Fax:  (860) 346-9066
Email  :  i...@connix.com
Website:  http://www.safetylink.com
ISSN   :  1040-7529
-
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Kamran
Mohajer wrote:

 
 Hello EMC-PSTCers,
 
 I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature limits
 on magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found that
 my results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15
 degrees on measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the
 thermocouple to different location on a coil seems to give you different
 results.  Is there a method that I should be following to measure
 temperature with thermocouples methods, not change of resistance, on
 magnetic parts such as transformers, coils, etc.?
 
 Thanks,
 
  
 ***
 Kamran Mohajer
 DSL Compliance Lead
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 Phone(408)-525-6121
 Fax(408)527-0495
 kmoha...@cisco.com
 ***
 
 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
 
 
 


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



RE: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-25 Thread Lacey,Scott

Kamran,

The method used by most of the better magnetics houses is to embed
thermocouples into the transformer during construction of a sample. The
resulting temperatures will be higher than external measurements.

Scott Lacey

-Original Message-
From:   Kamran Mohajer [SMTP:kmoha...@cisco.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, August 24, 1999 5:50 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components


Hello EMC-PSTCers,

I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature
limits on magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found
that my results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15
degrees on measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the
thermocouple to different location on a coil seems to give you different
results.  Is there a method that I should be following to measure
temperature with thermocouples methods, not change of resistance, on
magnetic parts such as transformers, coils, etc.? 

Thanks,

 


***
Kamran Mohajer
DSL Compliance Lead
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Phone(408)-525-6121
Fax(408)527-0495
kmoha...@cisco.com


***

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



RE: Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-25 Thread Andrews, Kurt

Kamran,

When UL or Intertek does safety testing (UL 1950, IEC 60950) on one of our
units that has coils or transformers in it they apply the thermocouples to
the top (highest) horizontal surface of the coil or transformer for their
temperature rise (heating) tests. I can usually find the remnants of the
glue they use to attach the thermocouples on the top of the parts. On a
recent unit from UL with a transformer comprised of two coils standing on
end side by side, they placed thermocouples on the top horizontal surface of
both coils. The magnetic parts in our equipment are rather small, less than
two inches on a side. I would imagine larger magnetic components may require
more thermocouples. I figure they use the top surface since heat rises it is
likely to be the hottest spot. In my opinion it would make sense to use
whatever method the NRTLs use and not worry too much about how the vendors
do it.

Although not definitive I hope this offers some insight.

Kurt Andrews
Compliance Engineer
Tracewell Systems, Inc.
567 Enterprise Dr.
Westerville, OH 43081
Ph. 614-846-6175
Fax 614-846-7791
Email: kandr...@tracewell.com 


-Original Message-
From:   Kamran Mohajer [SMTP:kmoha...@cisco.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, August 24, 1999 5:50 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components


Hello EMC-PSTCers,

I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature
limits on magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found
that my results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15
degrees on measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the
thermocouple to different location on a coil seems to give you different
results.  Is there a method that I should be following to measure
temperature with thermocouples methods, not change of resistance, on
magnetic parts such as transformers, coils, etc.? 

Thanks,

 


***
Kamran Mohajer
DSL Compliance Lead
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Phone(408)-525-6121
Fax(408)527-0495
kmoha...@cisco.com


***

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Temperature Measuring of Magnetic Components

1999-08-24 Thread Kamran Mohajer

Hello EMC-PSTCers,

I wonder if anyone knows of the method of measuring temperature limits on 
magnetic components.  I happen to get involved in this and found that my 
results are different than the vendors result by as much as 10-15 degrees on 
measuring on a same magnetic component.  Even applying the thermocouple to 
different location on a coil seems to give you different results.  Is there a 
method that I should be following to measure temperature with thermocouples 
methods, not change of resistance, on magnetic parts such as transformers, 
coils, etc.? 

Thanks,

 
***
Kamran Mohajer
DSL Compliance Lead
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Phone(408)-525-6121
Fax(408)527-0495
kmoha...@cisco.com
***

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).