Re: [Evolution] A few notes about the user interface

[Michael Leone]

> forwarding inline is much more efficient.  In many cases I think
> that forwarding as an attachment is completely stupid.

Change "many cases" to "all text-email-based cases".
Only if you are forwarding a binary, should the default fowarding behavior
be an attachment.

But that's just real-world sanity talking.






___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] 2 bugs in the lates snapshot

[Michael Leone]

> 2. When I click in the "To:" button in the composer winodow the list of
> avalaible contacts is empty. However the completation works

Invisible, not blank. Click somewhere in the left column, where the name
would be. Then click TO:. You'll see the name from the list appear on the
right. Unfortunately, it also seems to not be in alphabetical order, as well
as non-visible.

Happened a few snapshots ago, too. Then it went back to normal (visible and
in order). Now it's back to invisible and out of order.

Pesky, that bug. :-)




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] 2 bugs in the lates snapshot

[Michael Leone]

On 06 Apr 2001 09:02:02 +0930, Not Zed wrote:
> On 05 Apr 2001 16:25:52 -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> > > 2. When I click in the "To:" button in the composer winodow the list of
> > > avalaible contacts is empty. However the completation works
> > 
> > Invisible, not blank. Click somewhere in the left column, where the name
> > would be. Then click TO:. You'll see the name from the list appear on the
> > right. Unfortunately, it also seems to not be in alphabetical order, as well
> > as non-visible.
> > 
> > Happened a few snapshots ago, too. Then it went back to normal (visible and
> > in order). Now it's back to invisible and out of order.
> > 
> > Pesky, that bug. :-)
> 
> 
> Is that like theme related or something?  Works totally fine here.

Not sure how it could be, since I haven't changed my theme in a few
weeks, and I know the pick list used to work with my current theme, as
of a couple days ago.



-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

And if it's too much fun, that oughta clue you, son
You're probably doing something that's wrong ...
  "Don't Do It"
  Little Charlie and the Nightcats 
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] RH 7.0 Composer Problem

[Michael Leone]

> On 6 Apr 2001, TonyK Lindstrom wrote:
>
> I have a different problem:
>
> if I reciev an email, and right click on an email in the address headder
> and add to contacts, then at a latter date compose a mail, select this
> contact from th to button and press send evo tells me i need to select a
> recipiant before sending a mail

I'm seeing this "Need to select a recipient" problem, too. Also see it
sometimes when just choosing from the contacts pick list.
(BTW ... that's what we always used to call it, way back when. If there's a
new term for that, somebody let me know).

Of course, since the list is still invisible and unusable, I  haven't gotten
this message lately. It doesn't show up if you type the address in (or let
auto-complete ... complete it :-)




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Contacts pick list back to invisible

[Michael Leone]

Hello.

Using latest snapshot - 2001.04.04.08.00, RH6.2 RPMs, the Contacts pick
list in the Composer window is back to showing invisible contacts again.

All the contacts are there, altho not in alphabetical order. If I click
on the spot where a contact should be, on the left window, and then
click TO:, or CC:, I see that contact come over to the right.


-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

And if it's too much fun, that oughta clue you, son
You're probably doing something that's wrong ...
  "Don't Do It"
  Little Charlie and the Nightcats 
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] LDAP support

[Michael Leone]

On 12 Apr 2001 10:48:33 +0930, Not Zed wrote:
> i'm cc'ing this to rms too, just for background.
> 
> You must be a laywer to have such strong and obviously correct views on
> the matter.

Perhaps it would be better to send this to some official or accredited
lawyers for all organizations involved, who might be better qualified
and trained in the points of the relevant laws, to comment on. It is a
discussion of what is legally permissable under the terms of 2 different
licenses, and how they interact, after all.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] LDAP support - legal issues

[Michael Leone]

> Can we please just stop this thread? Like it or not it is *not*
> compatable with the GPL so give it a rest. If you don't believe it then
> ask Richard Stallman at the FSF. Since he says it's incompatable, we are
> not going to link with it.
>
> I really don't want to be discussing legal dribble anymore.

Heh. I think you mean "drivel".

I would suggest that Matthew forward a request to ... whoever accepts
legal-oriented email for Ximain, asking that person (who is surely a lawyer,
or can contact Ximian's laywers) to verify wether or not it's legal. That is
more their job than the folks on this list. We might raise legal questions;
the legal staff shuld be the definite source of legal and licensing matters.

Anybody know if there's such an email as [EMAIL PROTECTED] that Matthew can
post his questions to? Or a specific individual at Ximian who should be
contacted, as to licensing issues with Ximian products?



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] mail crashes everytime i close evolution

[Michael Leone]

> Passwords get written out to disk on exit, so if it doesn't exit
> cleanly, you lose.

Would it be better to write it out after the first successful retrieval
(presuming that a retrieval is done before a (graceful) exit of the session
when you changed your password)? That way, you know you've entered the
correct password, and even if Evo crashes, it should remember it next time.
For instance, I only close my Evolution to update from the nightly
snapshots, otherwise it could be (and has been) days before I exit Evo.






___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Updating snapshots via Red Carpet

[Michael Leone]

I've been following this procedure, before using RC 
to download and install the nightly snapshots:
 
Close Evo
run "killev" from a shell
run "oaf-slay" from a shell
 
Is this necessary? I've noticed that the current RC 
doesn't seem to check if there's enough available disk space for all the options 
selected (at least, I've had my /var partition run out of room in the middle of 
a RC update). But I don't know if RC is intelligent to issue these 2 commands 
before updating Evo, if it is truly necessary, or if I'm just being paranoid 
before updating.
 
 

[Evolution] Contacts pick list visible, but broken

[Michael Leone]

On 11 Apr 2001 05:17:32 -0400, Christopher James Lahey wrote:
> This should work fine now.  Sorry about that.

Well, now it's visible; thanks. However, when I compose a new message,
and use the TO: button to pick a recipient, it properly fills in the TO:
line. But hitting SEND gives me a "Warning: You must specify recipients
in order to send this message". Yet it has the name of the contact
(which has a valid email address), and is underlined (which means that
the contact email address has been looked up, right?)

So the pick list is still broken, at last for me. Snapshot
2001.04.11.08.00, RH6.2.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

[Michael Leone]

> On 04 Apr 2001 22:46:41 +0930, Not Zed wrote:
> > Also just try setting CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 in your environment from the
> > shell you execute evolution-mail in (or rather, do it this way, before
> > running evolution)
>
> There's a new-and-improved easy way to do this, which is to just start
> evolution with "evolution --debug /tmp/evolution.out" (or whatever for
> the filename).
>
> (I guess this answers the question of whether or not anyone reads anyone
> else's weekly status reports on the hackers list :-)

Is that available in the nightly snapshots, or only in the CVS code?



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] no new snapshots in RC?

[Michael Leone]

> I've been hoping for a new snapshot to be available which will address
> some of the IMAP issues I've been facing, but haven't seen any snapshots
> through RC for several days.

Right; the snapshots have been failing, for one reason or another, until
last night. (bug in gal; bug in gtkhtml, etc).
Always check http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot for the status of a
snapshot build (or reason for build failure). For instance, Debian and
Redhat 6.2 builds worked last night, but RH 7 did not.

> Should I expect to update my evolution through RC, or do I need to
> figure out how to update it without RC?

Since last night's snapshot has a bug (something about incorrect version of
gal), I'd wait and update tomorrow.

You can always update by hand, by FTPing the binaries from ftp.ximian.com,
and doing an rpm -Uvh *.rpm.





___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] new redcarpet ?

[Michael Leone]

> Now that RedCarpet is dead, when will its next snapshot appear ? I miss it
> ...

You let RC remove itself when installing today's snapshot?

You might be able to re-install it, by downloading RC again from
ftp.ximian.com.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] (no subject)

[Michael Leone]

On 18 Apr 2001 22:27:12 -0500, Weiqi Gao wrote:
> Having been downloading and using Evolution using Red Carpet for the
> last three three months, I'm surprised today when updating to today's
> Evolution update necessitates the removal of "red-carpet" itself.

Red Carpet requires libgtkhtml.so.7, but the latest gtkhtml provides
libgtkhtml.so.9 - not 7, so Red Carpet wants to remove Red Carpet, since
you would get failed dependencies in Red Carpet, after installing the
latest Evo snapshot.

Same problem exists for Pan, the newsreader, and for the same file.

Conflicting dependencies.

-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] howto run Evolution from other programs

[Michael Leone]

> Hi there!!
>
> I was thinking of configuring Opera so that I could send email with
> evolution when clicking on an email link on a webpage, I tried with
> evolution (started a new evolution session) and evolution-mail (nothing
> happened). Anyone know how to start evolution to get only a compose
> window?

Yes.

Can't be done.  :-(

Not yet, anyway. That's supposed to be a post-1.0 feature, according to the
other requests.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] new redcarpet ?

[Michael Leone]

> Le 2001.04.17 19:05:20 +0200, Michael Leone a écrit :
> > > Now that RedCarpet is dead, when will its next snapshot appear ? I
miss
> > it
> > > ...
> >
> > You let RC remove itself when installing today's snapshot?
> >
> > You might be able to re-install it, by downloading RC again from
> > ftp.ximian.com.
>
> It won't install (mismatch on gtkhtml ...)

Ouch!

I suppose you could try a rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm.

Or try uninstalling today's evolution snapshot, and re-installing the last
snapshot (which should be in your /var/cache/red-carpet/packages). That can
be tricky, tho - many dependcy problems.

Personally, I'd wait until tomorrow, when (hopefully) there will be a new
gtkhtml build (which you'll probably have to get yourself), and then maybe
RC will re-install again.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] red carpet?

[Michael Leone]

> On 18 Apr 2001 23:26:51 -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> > On 18 Apr 2001 19:17:32 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any sensible explanation for the fact that the latest
Evolution
> > > build doesn't like Red Carpet? :-/
> >
> > And Pan, the newsreader, as well. Both are listed as being necessarily
> > removed, in order for Evolution to work.
>
> So, you can do with Pan exactly what someone else suggested on the list
> for redcarpet: download the src.rpm and --rebuild it on your system. It
> will be linked to the appropriate libraries and hopefully it will work.
> I did that with redcarpet, and it's ok now.

Yep; did it last night, and both work. Hopefully, tho, soon all packages
will get in sync with regards to the gtkhtml versions, and we won't have to
go thru this again.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] red carpet?

[Michael Leone]

On 18 Apr 2001 19:17:32 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> 
> Is there any sensible explanation for the fact that the latest Evolution
> build doesn't like Red Carpet? :-/

And Pan, the newsreader, as well. Both are listed as being necessarily
removed, in order for Evolution to work.



-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] rebuild RC faild

[Michael Leone]

> Hi !
>
> As I miss redcarpet, I tried to rebuild it from the SRPM from
> ftp.ximian.com.
> However it didn't work:

Mine did work this way. HOWEVER, the difference is that I manually
uninstalled Red Carpet (rpm -e red-carpet), installed the latest Evo
snapshot, THEN rebuilt Red Carpet from the SRPM. Worked like a charm.

I didn't let Red Carpet uninstall itself.

> ... I have a Gnome1.4 installed from redcarpet, on a RH6.2 system.
> in particular:
> [xav@nomade:~]$ rpm -q gtkhtml
> gtkhtml-0.9.3-100_helix_200104182202
> [xav@nomade:~]$ rpm -q gnet-devel
> gnet-devel-1.0.4-0_helix_1

Do you have gnet-1.0.4-0_helix_1, as well, or only the -devel?



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Exchange Support?

[Michael Leone]

Evolutionsupports POP3and IMAP now. And POP (and, I 
believe, IMAP) support is on,by default, in a standard Exchange installation. 
So, assuming that they haven't turned off all POP3 and IMAP,or haven't turned it 
off on a user-by-user basis, you could probably use Evolution to connect to 
Exchange that way.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Chris Ford 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:22 
AM
  Subject: [Evolution] Exchange 
  Support?
  
  Did I read somewhere that Evolution is going to 
  be able to connect to MS Exchange servers to handle LAN email?  The 
  company I work for uses Exchange for all email, and they _WILL_NOT_ turn on 
  POP support.  So we (Linux and UNIX users) are stuck running Outlook in a 
  terminal server window.  If I could use Evolution to connect to the 
  Exchange servers it would make many people's lives much 
easier
   
  Chris Ford

Re: [Evolution] 4.17 snapshot, can't compose

[Michael Leone]

On 18 Apr 2001 22:38:53 -0400, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> 
>   JP has been working on fixing the snapshot builds...  The current
> snapshots *should* be working.  (I have no way of testing this myself,
> but the issues with the GtkHTML and GAL versions should be solved and
> consequently the composer should be working again.)

They might be working; however, you can't seem to install the snapshots
via Red Carpet, because Red Carpet says that it must remove itself
before you can install the latest snapshot.

I'm downloading the RPMs manually now, and will try installing that way.

> 

-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Snapshot Status

[Michael Leone]

> On 19 Apr 2001 14:19:19 -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
> > Will snapshots be made available for Mandrake-7?
> 
> Not in the very short term.

However, the RedHat 6.2 snapshots work and install fine on Mandrake 7.2.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Exchange Support?

[Michael Leone]

> They have turned it off, and say that they will not turn it on.  They
> tell me that running POP3 and IMAP makes Exchange unstable...
> I told them that installing Exchange makes it unstable  they weren't
> amused.  So, back to my original question.

Heh. Actually, I run both POP3 and IMAP on my Exchange server, altho no one
accesses it that way - only thru MAPI and OWA.
My Exchange server is quite stable, altho I only have 50 users defined, and
only less than half who actually make any kind of SERIOUS use out of it
(serious is defined as emails, many folders, calendar entries, tasks, etc -
the whole nine yards) . It never crashes. Of course, I pre-emptively reboot
it once 1 month or 2 months, just in case.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Snapshot question

[Michael Leone]

I was looking at the Snapshot status page
(http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot/) and it seems very different - much
fewer dependencies and builds (i.e., no bonobo, etc). Why is that?

Also, does this mean that from now on, the snapshots will only work with
Ximian Gnome 1.4, or will they continue to work with 1.2? I expect the
Ximian servers to be overloaded for the next couple (days/weeks), so I was
going to hold off on installing 1.4.

Well, I'm also going to hold out because the installer gave me unresolvable
dependency errors about Nautilus, when I looked at a "Normal" install (on
Mandrake 7.2). Altho it didn't seem to mind a "Productivity Only" install -
no unreolvable dependencies there.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Dep Error during install

[Michael Leone]

Me not. :-)

My Nautilus wouldn't install, because of the ORBit problem - I had 0.5.6,
and RC didn't want to force an update to 0.5.7 (said my 0.5.6 was newer than
the 0.5.7; goodness knows why, unless there was a bug in building one of
those 2 packages).

Anyway, I manually downloaded the new ORBit; forced the install; and then RC
was able to install Nautilus.

So far, don't see what all the fuss is about; Nautilus seems really slow to
me. But maybe I'll just have to give it time.

- Original Message -
From: "Michael Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Evolution List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Dep Error during install


Me three.

Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
> Le 2001.04.27 10:12:20 +0200, Florin Andrei a écrit :
> > On 26 Apr 2001 13:46:52 -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> > > When I run the go-gnome script, I get freetype2 dep error.
> > >
> > > Package nautilis-...has a conflict (freetype2 cannot be installed)
> > > Package freetype2-...has a conflict (freetype2 cannot be installed)
> >
> > I have exactly the same problem.
>
> "me too" (c)
>
> Xav
>
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

--
Michael Barker
Preside Consulting Services
Nortel Networks

ESN:730 3363
Phone:  +44 (0)20 8945 3363
Fax:+44 (0)20 8945 2509
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Getting Evolution via RedCarpet - Mandrake 7.2?

[Michael Leone]

On 27 Apr 2001 05:09:42 -0500, Aaron Zuercher wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> I just joined the Evo list, and caught the tail of this thread about 
> tricking Red-carpet to allow Mandrake to download Evo.   I am running 
> Mandrake and would like more information on how to do this.  Could you 
> please send me the release file also?  Thanks!
Make a backup copy your original /etc/mandrake-release file.
Then replace the contents of /etc/mandrake-release with

RedHat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot) for i686

Reboot.

Your RC now thinks it's running RH 6.2, so you get an Evolution Snapshot channel.

(The snapshots are only made for RH 6.2, RH 7.0, and Debian, so you have to fool RC into thinking you're running one of these distributions. Of course, you also don't get to see the Mandrake-specific update/fix files this way - for those, you'll still need to use Mandrake-update.)

If you don't want to change this file, you could also download the snapshots by hand, and install that way. Just be sure to get the RH 6.2 snaps.

-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 

Re: [Evolution] Pilot Conduits in Evolution 0.10

[Michael Leone]

This won't activate the pilot coinduits, will it? I 
was under the impression thatthere's some command line parameter that must be 
passed to the compiler. This simply rebuilds the normal (i.e., 
non-conduit-enabled) version of Evolution, doesn't it?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  mark 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:40 
PM
  Subject: Re: [Evolution] Pilot Conduits 
  in Evolution 0.10
  Download the src.rpm :-)then install (as root)using rpm 
  -Uvh .src.rpmthis next step will depend on your distro, 
  but if your using redhat it will install into:/usr/src/redhat/SPECScd 
  into theirand then enter:rpm -ba .specif u 
  want to build for a diffent architecture than i386 just add --target=i686 or 
  --target=i586 after it,so say i want to rebuild evolution from a src.rpm 
  for i686 arch heres the steps i would use:rpm -Uvh 
  evolution.src.rpmcd /usr/src/redhat/SPECSrpm -ba evolution.spec 
  --target=i686this will then put the finished rpm into 
  /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686then install as normal: rpm -Uvh 
  evolution.i686.rpmHope that helps
  

  Mark On 30 Apr 2001 13:43:24 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm of the understanding that to get the Evolution conduits to work one must
> recompile the source.  If this is the case, how would one compile an src.rpm to
> get the necessary changes and still be able to install via RPM?
> 
> Chris Tooley
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 

Re: [Evolution] Nightly snapshots for .10

[Michael Leone]

Well, there hasn't been a new snapshot in 4 or 5 days - see
http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot/ - so even if you had the channel, you
wouldn't have gotten a snapshot.

You don't say what OS you're using; the nightly snapshots only show up for
RH 6.2, RH 7.0 and debian. For me, since I run Mandrake, I have to either
fool RC into thinking I'm running RH 6.2, or else download manually.

BTW .. the snapshots keep failing with the same error - "Can't find " a
couple of ical header files.

- Original Message -
From: "Paul R. Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:02 PM
Subject: [Evolution] Nightly snapshots for .10


> I'm not seeing any nightly snapshots for evo .10 in RedCarpet 1.0.
> Is that because something is not correctly set up on my end or are these
> not being made available through Red Carpet?
>
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
>
>


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Can't send mail: "could not parse URL 'druidwindow'"

[Michael Leone]

On 02 May 2001 04:07:53 +0500, Dan Winship wrote:
> > I'm using the snapshot of Evo from today (although I think this snapshot is a
> > few days old?).
> 
> Can you check the build date? (It's part of the version string that
> appears in the title bar of the main evolution window.)

Hmmm. Mine (from the last snapshot) just says ".10" in the title bar. No
date. And HELP->ABOUT doesn't bring up anything - in the composer
window; in the main shell window, it also just says ".10" there - no
date.

-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] When will there be new snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

There haven't been any new snapshots for over a week. Any idea when they
will start up again?

I haven't been able to access my contacts in over a week, because of
that incorrect db version linking issue. Auto-complete of addresses
(since it can't access the database) also doesn't work. Nor can I tab
from a "TO:" line, down to a "SUBJECT:" line in the composer. Yet the
snapshots have failed consistently for like 9-10 days with the same
error - can't find some ical header file.

These seem like they should be minor issues to resolve.


-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] very slow composition window creation

[Michael Leone]

> I used to have this problem every now and again with Evolution until
> some guys told me that it's an oafd problem.  They suggested using the
> following commands - "killev; killall oafd" when Evo is NOT loaded, then
> reloading it.  Evo works fine afterwards.
>
> What I do these days is to load Evo from a script, my script looks like
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> killev; killall oafd; evolution
>
>
> Evo works fine for me all the time now!

Be aware that killing oafd may - I think - cause a bit of aggravation if
you're running Natilus at the time you issue the "killall oafd", since
Natilus also uses oafd.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] inbox crash while checking mail

[Michael Leone]

> Subject: inbox crash
>
> This is the stability problem that I reported earlier today.  Evo simply
> crashes while updating mail from the IMAP server.

I don't have any debugging info, but my Evo has been crashing for a couple
weeks, when it applies filters, after getting new POP mail. Not on each
time, but often enough. That's why (in addition to missing my lost
contacts), I've been waiting somewhat impatiently for a new snapshot.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 0.10 "Tasmanian Devil" is out

[Michael Leone]

> > >   The new package should be linked with the newer db library, so the
> > > contacts should be visible again...
> >
> > I disagree with this - or we have different meanings to "newer".
> > [snip]
> > >From this evidence Evo 0.10 is using DB 1.85, which cannot read 2.x
> > version files.
>
> I see the same:
>
> $ file addressbook.db
> addressbook.db: Berkeley DB 2.X Hash/Little Endian (Version 5, Logical
> sequence number: file - 0, offset - 0, Bucket Size 4096, Overflow Point
> 3, Last Freed 0, Max Bucket 5, High Mask 0x7, Low Mask 0x3, Fill Factor
> 0, Number of Keys 65)

Wierd. I see this ..

[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ file addressbook.db
addressbook.db: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order)

Wonder why I don't see the level of detail the rest of you see, from that
"file" command?

> I don't understand what version of db Evo is actually using at runtime,
> since the only db package on my system seems to be db3-3.1.17-4.6x, and
> when I installed from RC no other db package was pulled over.

I have db2-2.7.7-1mdk, and db3-3.1.17-4.6x RPMs installed.

Doing a db_dump -p addressbook.db (thank you, Fernando, for that! :-)

[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ db_dump -p addressbook.db
format=print
type=hash
db_pagesize=4096
HEADER=END
PAS-DB-VERSION\00
0.1\00

And I see my entries.

Currently, I'm running evolution-0.10-ximian.1.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Calendar and Contact problems

[Michael Leone]

> > When I click on Contacts none of my existing contacts are visible. I
> > believe this is a libdb problem.
>
>   If you are using Evolution from CVS, there is a FAQ in it now.  Please
> check out the Troubleshooting section; it has an explanation of how to
> upgrade your contacts db if it's version 1.85 and Evolution is compiled
> against version 2.

For those of us not running evolution from CVS, but from the official RPMs,
how would we do this?
And is there any way for us to get the FAQ, without having to compile the
program?



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Calendar and Contact problems

[Michael Leone]

On 19 May 2001 10:56:33 -0700, Ujwal Sathyam wrote:

> >Do I really need to upgrade glibc, which every program needs, in order
> >to see my contacts?
> >
> 
> How about downloading and compiling the source for db3-utils? I have 
> found that in many cases, some newer RPM packages demand glibc2.2, 
> but the source compiles against glibc2.1 just fine. Of course, your 
> rpm database gets out of whack then.

Yeah, I've had problems in the past with the RPM database for that
reason. I have done a few installs by SRC rpm, or source, and could
probably do it again. Of course, ideally, Evo will go back to using the
db structure that it used to use (and that I have), and - hopefully - it
will become a non-issue.

-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Still no Contacts

[Michael Leone]

On 19 May 2001 08:40:34 -0400, Christopher James Lahey wrote:

> Other than this, you should be fine to upgrade.  I in fact discovered a
> simpler way than has been described before.  Try this:
> 
> killev
> cd ~/evolution/local/Contacts/
> cp addressbook.db addressbook.db.backup
> db_upgrade addressbook.db
> 
> See if your contacts reappear.  Once you're satisfied that they're
> available and safe, you can delete the backup at your leisure.
Nope, didn't work, and I compiled the latest BerkeleyDB from source.

(close Evo)
(killev)
(oaf-slay)

[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ file addressbook.db
addressbook.db: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order)
[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/bin/db_upgrade addressbook.db
[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ file addressbook.db
addressbook.db: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order)
[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/bin/db_dump -p addressbook.db
VERSION=2
format=print
type=hash
h_nelem=16
HEADER=END
 PAS-DB-VERSION\00
 0.1\00
 pas-id-3A8B578E\00

And then my records, in the new DB format.

And I still see no contacts at all.

I'm using an Evo Mandrake 7.0 rpm, on Mandrake 7.2.

It's been like close to a month since I've been able to see or access my contact list. Can't anybody please tell me something that will work, to get my contacts back?
 
-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 

Re: [Evolution] Contact list missing - resolved

[Michael Leone]

> I've just installed the new Evo 0.10 RPM from Red Carpet, and it is now
> linked to DB 2. This looks like it should fix everyones Contact
> problems!  Is Evo going to stay with this version of DB from now on?

Please God, let's hope so!



Seems odd - I installed db3; had to re-enter all my contacts last week (you
may remember my messages to this effect). Last night, I installed the latest
RH 6.2 version on my Mandrake 7.2 (there was no Mandrake-specific version of
this updated [I'm presuming mostly bug-fix] version ... will there be?).
Anyway, my contacts stayed availabe thru the upgrade. So I don't know if Evo
is actually linking with DB2 or DB3.

> Also, when are the new snapshots from HEAD coming online?

Good question.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Still no Contacts - gave up

[Michael Leone]

On 20 May 2001 22:08:48 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> Den 20 May 2001 12:44:42 -0400, skrev Michael Leone:
> > On 20 May 2001 10:48:14 -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> >  
> > > > If you're willing to wait a little while, CVS evolution will soon
> > > > handling upgrades just fine soon.  I just finished getting it to compile
> > > > with a fairly recent version of db in my source tree.
> > 
> > I finally just gave up, and just re-entered 2 dozen of them. At least
> > now they're there, and usable.
> > 
> > Since this is the 3rd time I've had to enter contacts (orginally setting
> > them up; re-entering after Evo started linking with a different version
> > of db, and wouldn't convert easily then, either; and now again, because
> > of a different version of db), I'd like to request that the db version
> > NOT change again, please. 
> > 
> 
> Did you by chance have any 8-bit chars in any of the entries? Could this
> problem be related to barfing on invalid UTF-8 sequences in the file, or
> is this not possible?

NO. Well, I had *1* entry that had a "&" in it, but I don't think that
would cause all of my entries to not show up.


-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Cannot initialize the Evolution shell bug

[Michael Leone]

On 14 May 2001 23:32:50 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote:
> > On 14 May 2001 21:27:33 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm running the latest gal, gtkhtml, evolution from anoncvs.  I have
> > > orbit-stable-0-5 from anoncvs.
> > >
> > > When starting evolution, i get a dialog box that says: Cannot initialize
> > > the Evolution shell.  If i delete ~/evolution and startup evolution, it
> > > says it's my first time running evo and then after a dialog I end up at
> > > the same error.  --debug doesn't seem to help.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any ideas on what's going on with this bug?
> >
> > Tools->Mail Settings->Edit->Special Folders
> >
> > Point the "Drafts" and "Sent Items" to the folders under Evolution
> > for "Drafts" and "Sent Items".

My mistake - that's the fix for a different error, when you send an
email, and it says "Can't parse URL". Never mind.

-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Cannot initialize the Evolution shell bug

[Michael Leone]

On 14 May 2001 21:27:33 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running the latest gal, gtkhtml, evolution from anoncvs.  I have
> orbit-stable-0-5 from anoncvs.
> 
> When starting evolution, i get a dialog box that says: Cannot initialize
> the Evolution shell.  If i delete ~/evolution and startup evolution, it
> says it's my first time running evo and then after a dialog I end up at
> the same error.  --debug doesn't seem to help.
> 
> Anyone have any ideas on what's going on with this bug?

Tools->Mail Settings->Edit->Special Folders

Point the "Drafts" and "Sent Items" to the folders under Evolution
for "Drafts" and "Sent Items".

Evo sometimes seems to forget that those folders are there, so you have
to explicitly tell it where they are.

-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

This space for rant
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Features

[Michael Leone]

From: "Kjartan Maraas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Which really looks to be the same as a vfolder on subject. It just lists
> all messages in all folders with the same subject.

Assuming they all have the same subject line. And I'd have to set up many
vfolders, one for each person I'm corresponding with, to get this effect.

While powerful, I don't think vfolders would be very well suited to this
feature.

Not that I myself want it, you understand.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] .IBEX file?

[Michael Leone]

Howdy all.

What, exactly, is the .ibex file? I have (at least) one that's large
than the mbox file. Is it some kind of index file?


-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] .IBEX file?

[Michael Leone]

On 16 Jun 2001 01:25:38 -0400, Duncan Mak wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:46:18PM -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> > Howdy all.
> > 
> > What, exactly, is the .ibex file? I have (at least) one that's large
> > than the mbox file. Is it some kind of index file?
> 
> Yes, the ibex file is the index file. For more info, see,
> http://www.ximian.com/tech/ibex.php3

OK; thanks.

I still don't understand this, tho ..

(original mail folder)

[turgon@minas-aran LRP]$ ls -la
total 7278
drwxr-xr-x2 turgon   turgon146 Jun 16 11:30 ./
drwxr-xr-x   41 turgon   turgon   1035 Jun 10 13:26 ../
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon 63 Jan 19 23:23
folder-metadata.xml*
-rw---1 turgon   turgon3307193 Jun 15 20:00 mbox
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon 124308 Jun 15 22:42 mbox.ev-summary*
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon4006400 Jun 15 22:42 mbox.ibex*

(delete/expunge 100+ emails from LRP folder)

[turgon@minas-aran LRP]$ ls -la
total 6582
drwxr-xr-x2 turgon   turgon146 Jun 16 11:31 ./
drwxr-xr-x   41 turgon   turgon   1035 Jun 10 13:26 ../
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon 63 Jan 19 23:23
folder-metadata.xml*
-rw---1 turgon   turgon2596623 Jun 16 11:31 mbox
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon 124308 Jun 16 11:31 mbox.ev-summary*
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon4006400 Jun 16 11:31 mbox.ibex*
[turgon@minas-aran LRP]$ 

Why would the index be close to twice as large as the file it's
indexing? I deleted/expunged many mails from this folder, and the mbox
size went from 3.3M down to the 2.59M you see above. Yet the .ibex file
size stayed the same, at 4M. Wouldn't it have also gone down, since
there was now over 100 emails less to index?

Or am I totally offbase here?


-- 
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Features

[Michael Leone]

> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:24:38PM +0200, thus said Marcel Schulte:
>
> >2. an option like "save replies together with received mail"
>
> You mean "threading"? That is an existing feature, it is toggled via the

I wouldn't think that what he means.

Suppose I filter mail from you to a folder called "Tuomas". Then I reply to
you. AND ONLY YOU; I do not include myself as a CC:.

This means, that our email "conversation" is split into 2 places - the
"Tuomas" folder, where you asked a question, and the "Sent Items" folder,
where I replied to it.

I think he's asking for an option include his replies, together with your
questions, in the same folder.

I think Outlook has an option to do something like this.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Features

[Michael Leone]

- Original Message -
From: "Kjartan Maraas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > Assuming they all have the same subject line. And I'd have to set up
many
> > vfolders, one for each person I'm corresponding with, to get this
effect.
> >
> > While powerful, I don't think vfolders would be very well suited to this
> > feature.
>
> No, it's more a matter of having a "button", or whatever, in the message
> (outlook only has it if you open the message in a separate window) that
> does a query on the subject of the specific message you run it from and
> lists all messages with that specific subject.

Right; but if I change the subject line, that can cause aggravations. Also,
I'd want different vfolders based on whichever person I'm corresponding
with, which means making many vfolders.

Anyway ... guess that's up to the developers.

>
> Cheers
> Kjartan
>
>


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] .IBEX file? UPDATE

[Michael Leone]

On 16 Jun 2001 11:53:50 -0400, Michael Leone wrote:

> Why would the index be close to twice as large as the file it's
> indexing? I deleted/expunged many mails from this folder, and the mbox
> size went from 3.3M down to the 2.59M you see above. Yet the .ibex file
> size stayed the same, at 4M. Wouldn't it have also gone down, since
> there was now over 100 emails less to index?

Ok. So after deleting even more email (I'm now down to a mbox size of
2M, from it's original size of 3.3M), I closed Evo, and deleted the
.ibex file.

This .ibex file was 4.4M in size; it never changed size, to reflect the
now smaller size of the mbox.

So, then I restarted Evo, and - as expected - it recreated the .ibex
file.

[turgon@minas-aran LRP]$ ls -la
total 2782
drwxr-xr-x2 turgon   turgon146 Jun 16 13:33 ./
drwxr-xr-x   41 turgon   turgon   1035 Jun 10 13:26 ../
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon 63 Jan 19 23:23
folder-metadata.xml*
-rw---1 turgon   turgon2001376 Jun 16 13:30 mbox
-rwxr-xr-x1 turgon   turgon 124308 Jun 16 13:33 mbox.ev-summary*
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 711936 Jun 16 13:33 mbox.ibex

Note that the size is now only 17% of it's previous size (711,936 v
4,006,400). And, as a side effect, that I've gained 3M disk space. :-)

A suggestion: perhaps a button, or menu item, to "Rebuild index". Looks
like (for now), the .ibex isn't being updated to reflect downward sizing
of mbox files (altho I will admit that this is the only folder I've
tried this experiment on, as of this moment). Manually rebuilding the
index would help to clear out the cruft (a word I've only heard used in
conjunction with Linux, BTW :-).

Perhaps it wouldn't hurt, every now and again, to close Evo, and rm all
the .ibex files, so they could periodically be rebuilt. I'd hate to put
a command like that in a cron script, since Evo might be open and
running when the .ibex files got removed; and I presume that could cause
havoc.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash

[Michael Leone]

> Check 'hide deleted mail' if you want this behaviour.

Doesn't this still leave the deleted mail in the folder it was deleted from,
taking up space there instead of a separate "Trash" folder?

Since deleted mail seems not to go into the "Trash" folder, what is the
"Trash" folder used for? (currently and planned for future)

>
>
> On 03 Jul 2001 13:20:15 +0300, Marius Andreiana wrote:
> > Why deleted mail isn't moved to trash and it's marked with a line
> > instead ?
> >
> > I know I can use vfolders this way on deleted mail, but would be
> > better just to get rid of it (move to trash). Now I use ctrl+d ctrl+x
> > to delete mail and trash is always empty :(
> > Suggestion: delete move to trash, delete in trash deletes it
> > permanently. No expunge option.
> >
> > --
> > Marius Andreiana
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
>
>
>
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
>
>


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash

[Michael Leone]

- Original Message -
From: "Mark Neill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash


>
>
> > > Check 'hide deleted mail' if you want this behaviour.
> >
> > Doesn't this still leave the deleted mail in the folder it was deleted
from,
> > taking up space there instead of a separate "Trash" folder?
>
> It would still take up the space - is there an "Expunge Trash on Exit"
> option I've missed, or would it be difficult to add?

Yes, I realize. But it wouldn't be taking space in the folder it was deleted
from. With many deleted but not expunged mails in a particular folder, the
system has to go a longer distance to find the end of folder mailbox file,
to append any new incoming mail. (in the case of mbox filer, anyway). And
disk activity is always the slowest part of any program's work.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash

[Michael Leone]

> On 03 Jul 2001 08:44:28 -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> > > Check 'hide deleted mail' if you want this behaviour.
> >
> > Doesn't this still leave the deleted mail in the folder it was deleted
from,
> > taking up space there instead of a separate "Trash" folder?
>
> Yea, but so what? If we did it your way it'd still be taking up space
> but only in a physical Trash folder. Not to mention deleting messages
> would be MUCH slower.

OK. Are there clients who do do it this way? Move to a physical folder, I
mean.

> > Since deleted mail seems not to go into the "Trash" folder, what is the
> > "Trash" folder used for? (currently and planned for future)
>
> Deleted messages do show up in the Trash folder, even if you don't have
> "Hide Deleted Mails" checked off.

So "Trash" is not a physical folder, but is a VFolder instead, set to show
all mail from every physical folder that has a "Deleted" flag set?




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Re: Wah! 200107060152 snapshot segfaults on startup.

[Michael Leone]

>
> That can't be right, can it ? (Looks on spidermonkey..). No definitely
> not right...
>
> (some rpm-ing later)
>
> Much better. I guess a warning to us red-carpet folks is in order. Or
> maybe my setup's just hosed...

Makes me glad I manually install the snapshots via FTP, and not Red Carpet.
Altho I use Mandrake 7.2, and RC won't install the RH snapshots (even tho
they work perfectly for Mandrake, and always have), since I decided not to
change my system ID in /etc/mandrake-release to say "Red Hat" anymore.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] prefs all gone after latest snapshot

[Michael Leone]

On 07 Jul 2001 09:35:43 -0400, Scott Leerssen wrote:
> I just loaded the latest snapshot from Red Carpet and it whacked all my
> preferences (including mail server config!). 

It was announced on the list that this would happen, once the new
snapshots started using the bonobo-conf (?) method of config.

It shouldn't whack ALL your preferences - mine kept all my filters and
folders, for example. I *did* have to re-enter my mail account settings.
I didn't see that as too big of a deal, since I only have 2 POP accounts
I'm checking. 

 
--
 
--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF

Pysche closed for renovations.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] prefs all gone after latest snapshot

[Michael Leone]

On 07 Jul 2001 11:21:34 -0400, Scott Leerssen wrote:
> Shoot... sorry for the duplication of info.  Is there a searchable
> archive of this mailing list?

http://lists.ximian.com, I believe.

here's the email from July 3, announcing the change.

--

We've just migrated over to BonoboConf rather than gnome-config so all
of your settings will be lost (well, the config files will still be
there for your reference, but the config data will no longer be stored
there or read from there).

Also, make sure to oaf-slay before upgrading so that the wombat and
friends are slain.

Jeff





___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Shortcuts and Folders List Not Showing Number ofNew Messages

[Michael Leone]

On Sat, 2001-09-15 at 17:31, Eric Lambart wrote:
> Please forgive me when I ask, who cares?  

Me, for one. :-)

> Those numbers have NEVER been accurate anyway.  

Mine have always been accurate. But then, I don't use IMAP.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] RedHat 6.2 snapshots not pushed to ftp / RedCarpet

[Michael Leone]

On Sun, 2001-09-16 at 18:24, Richard Bellavance wrote:
> It seems that even though theRedHat 6.2 snapshots build ok, they don't
> get to the FTP server or Red Carpet.  The RH7 and Debian snapshots do
> get there, though...
> 
> Any idea what's wrong and when/if it will be fixed ?

The RH 6.2 snapshots have been in the FTP directories; I'm using the
Sept 13 snapshot; I backed off the Sept 14th snapshot, since the new
mail indicator was broken in that revision. I use Mandrake 7.2, so I
can't get the snapshots through RedCarpet.

Sure you're looking in the right directory?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] Contacts still a bit screwy in snapshot Sept 13

[Michael Leone]

I have a number of contacts, that I entered back around 0.11 (back when
Evo started using db 3.x to manage contacts). I can access all of them,
and send email to any contact.

1. I can not modify any existing contacts - it says "Error modifying
list: Card not found".
2. I *can* add new cards. I *can* then modify these newly added cards.
3. I can't delete any old cards. I *can* delete new cards, created in
step #2 above.

So what do I need to do, to make all my contacts properly
editable/deletable?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] Still problems with unread counter in Sept 19th snapshot

[Michael Leone]

I just updated from the Sept 13th snapshot to the Sept 19th snapshot, on
RedHat 6.2. I'm now getting the new mail/unread mail indicator on the
folder list again (yay!), but it is NOT decreasing when I read the new
mail (boo!). 

Ah, well. Back to the old snapshot.


-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] Still problems with unread counter in Sept 19thsnapshot

[Michael Leone]

On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 23:51, Eric Lambart wrote:
> With the 0918, the number is decreasing (just tried it once) but NOT
> generally accurate, and all folders are missing the (##) until I click
> on them.  

Mine is NOT decreasing at all.

I downloaded new mail from my POP server; dialog box said 2 new
messages. And the folder they filtered into did indeed say "2" in bold,
and there were 2 bolded (i.e., unread) messages in the folder itself.
However, after reading the messages, the "2" on the folder bar did NOT
decrease back to zero, even tho both new messages were definitely read
(they had open envelope icons, and they went from bold to normal).

> non-bolded folder name suddenly bolded and displayed (4).  Upon opening
> the folder it remained at 4 and then I believe the count decreased as I
> read them.

My count did not (see above).

If I use the Sept 13th snapshot, the indicator on the folder bar DOES go down, when 
I read new messages in a folder.
 
-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] Still problems with unread counter in Sept 19thsnapshot - Fixed!

[Michael Leone]

On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 00:23, Eric Lambart wrote:
> Well, I AM using the 0918 snapshot so this bug may have just been
> (re?)introduced since then...

And seems to be fixed in the Sept 20th snapshot.

Thanks all!

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] How to use latest snapshots on Mandrake 8.1

[Michael Leone]

On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 14:00, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
> RH 7.1 RPMs will work fine.

And they are. Except that this snapshot seems to freeze up sometimes,
especially when I'm deleting a series of messages, one after the other.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] RH 7.1 snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

Hi. The web page says that the snapshots for Red Hat 7.1 were built, but
the evolution.rpm in the ftp directory is still the 2001.09.30 snapshot.
Some of the other files (libgal13, etc) *do* have a later date.

What's going on? Wasn't the main evo .rpm rebuilt?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] Sent folder still showing up as bold in 2001.10.18 snapshot

[Michael Leone]

The RH 7.0 snapshot still has the issue of the Sent folder listing the
total number of sent items in bold in the folder list view.
There is no count when you first open Evo, but as soon as you send an
email, the number shows up in bold.

I thought this had been fixed, or changed back to previous default, of
not showing any number in bold for Sent.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] Problems with last 3 snapshots

[Michael Leone]

The latest snapshot for RH 7 - snapshot 2001.10.24 - has the
"disappearing toolbar" problem come back. Only this time, switching to a
different folder, and then back to the original folder does *not* bring
back the toolbar, like it did before.

Also, the previous 2 snapshots seem to have a problem with large emails
- large being defined as 300+K email digests.

I get the Mandrake Newbie and Mandrake Expert mailing lists as digests,
which average 300K or so each day. I have folders for both, defined as
maildir format. I filter incoming mail into these folders. That part
works perfectly.

The last 2 snapshots have had problems *sometimes* when I click on a
digest. Sometimes I see no preview in the preview pane. Sometimes I do,
but double clicking on the email opens a blank window - no message text.
At which point, I can't close the window, and must su to a term, and
issue a "killev" and "oaf-slay".

But sometimes it does work as it should - I see the preview;
double-clicking opens a new window with the email text. It also
sometimes works if I right click on the message in the message list
window, and choose "Open" from the context window that comes up.

I *hate* intermittent errors. :-(

Using KDE 2.2.1 on Mandrake 8.1. Anybody else having any problems like
this?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] Latest snapshots still require full Mozilla?

[Michael Leone]

I tried to install the latest (2001.10.27) RH 7.1 snapshots, but failed,
since they seem to require Mozilla 0.9.5, and I stillhave 0.9.4 (which
came with my Mandrake 8.1).

I thought Evo only required the libnss, and not the whole Mozilla. I
can't use this snapshot, since the Mozilla 0.9.5 rpms from Mandrake
(Ximian doesn't yet support my distro) don't work for me; I get a "can't
create browser instance". I do have libnss3 v3.2.1-6.

Can somebody check the snapshot RPMs pre-requistes? If Evo only requires
the library, and not the full Mozilla, that would help a lot.


-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] Multiple POP retieve locks evo snap version 16.99200110311522

[Michael Leone]

On Wed, 2001-10-31 at 16:19, Scott Comboni wrote:
> Is anyone else having this problem?  Seems since the RC1 snaps I have
> had consistent lock ups when trying to retrieve email from 2 pop
> accounts.  It does not really lock just stops and you cannot close the
> window or cancel. Strange.

Seconded. Using RH7 snaps on Mandrake 8.1.

> Scott
> 
> 
> evolution-0.16.99-snap.ximian.200110311522
> -- 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] 2nd snapshot of 2001.10.31 now broke worse

[Michael Leone]

The 2nd snapshot - 2001.10.31.2256 - won't even start for me. I don't
even get a splash screen. (using RH 7 snaps on Mdk 8.1)

If I start evolution-mail in 1 xterm, and evolution in another, I get a
splash screen, but nothing more. Showing processes lists many of the evo
threads - alarm-notify, bonobo, etc. If I issue a "killev", I briefly
see Evolution's shell, but then it goes away.

Made sure I did a killev, killall oafd, gconftool --shutdown, rm -rf
/tmp/orbit-username before I upgraded. No luck; can't use this snap at
all.

Back to the 2001.10.29 snap again.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure.

 PGP signature

[Evolution] No new snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

There don't seem to be any new snapshots since the 14th; that was just
before RC2 came out. What's the scoop? I was using the snaps by
manuallly FTPing them, since Red Carpet doesn't work for my distro. And
the snapshot build status web page -
http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot - haven't been updated since even
earlier than that, the 11th.

Any idea on when snapshots will be available again?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg03372/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 22:08, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 17:12, Michael Leone wrote:
> > There don't seem to be any new snapshots since the 14th; that was just
> > before RC2 came out. What's the scoop? I was using the snaps by
> > manuallly FTPing them, since Red Carpet doesn't work for my distro. And
> > the snapshot build status web page -
> > http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot - haven't been updated since even
> > earlier than that, the 11th.
> > 
> > Any idea on when snapshots will be available again?
> 
> Not sure, nothing is really changing since RC2.

OK. But the last snapshot shows ".99.1", so it's not RC2. That may just
be a technicality. Even so, shouldn't the snapshots have been built? In
the past, they were built whether there were many code changes or not.
Has there been some change in policy?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg03410/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 12:44, Chris Tooley wrote:
> I would imagine that bandwidth gets pretty expensive when you have
> people downloading packages they already have installed, just so they
> can get the "latest" snapshot.  It doesn't really make any sense to keep
> running rpm upgrades on packages if the files don't change, that's just
> asking for something to break.

Well, no. If you look at the list of packages, and they're all the same
date as what you have, why would you waste your time downloading them
all over again? No wasted bandwidth there, except to log into the FTP
server and check.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg03422/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:17, NotZed wrote:
> 
> Nothing but RC packages are available, becuase we'd like to test them

Ah. But what about those of us who *can't* use RC. Me, for example - I
use Mandrake 8.1, and RC doesn't support my distro.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg03423/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 08:19, Manuel Borchers wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Am Don, 2001-11-22 um 02.48 schrieb Michael Leone:
> > Ah. But what about those of us who *can't* use RC. Me, for example - I
> > use Mandrake 8.1, and RC doesn't support my distro.
> 
> RC2 is on ftp.
> ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-gnome/your-distro/

OK. I presume that I only need the latest versions of the same 7 files
as the snapshots - evolution, gal18, gal-devel-18, libgal18, gtkhtml16,
gtkhtml-devel-16, libgtkhtml19? No new files needed?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg03437/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

[Michael Leone]

On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 12:28, Manuel Borchers wrote:
> Am Don, 2001-11-22 um 18.22 schrieb Michael Leone:
> > OK. I presume that I only need the latest versions of the same 7 files
> > as the snapshots - evolution, gal18, gal-devel-18, libgal18, gtkhtml16,
> > gtkhtml-devel-16, libgtkhtml19? No new files needed?
> 
> I can't remember exactly which files it were, but yes, these are needed
> from that dir, too...
> 
> rpm should tell you which are missing then ;-)

So far, I have ...

[root@minas-aran RC2]# ls
bonobo-1.0.14-ximian.1.i386.rpm 
bonobo-conf-0.14-ximian.1.i386.rpm  
bonobo-devel-1.0.14-ximian.1.i386.rpm   
libbonobo-conf0-0.14-ximian.1.i386.rpm
libbonobo-conf-devel-0.14-ximian.1.i386.rpm
evolution-0.99.2-ximian.3.i386.rpm 
libgal18-0.18.1-ximian.1.i386.rpm
gal-0.18.1-ximian.1.i386.rpm
gal-devel-0.18.1-ximian.1.i386.rpm  
gtkhtml-0.16.1-ximian.1.i386.rpm
gtkhtml-devel-0.16.1-ximian.1.i386.rpm
libglade-devel-0.16-ximian.4.i386.rpm
libgtkhtml19-0.16.1-ximian.1.i386.rpm
gnome-pilot-0.1.63-ximian.2.i386.rpm
gnome-pilot-devel-0.1.63-ximian.2.i386.rpm  
oaf-0.6.7-2mdk.i586.rpm
liboaf0-0.6.7-2mdk.i586.rpm
liboaf0-devel-0.6.7-2mdk.i586.rpm

Which gives me this, when I try and install ...

[root@minas-aran RC2]# rpm -Uvh --test *.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
file /usr/lib/libefs.so.1.0.0 from install of bonobo-1.0.14-ximian.1 conflicts with 
file from package libefs1-1.0.8-2mdk
file /usr/lib/libbonobo-print.so.2.0.0 from install of bonobo-1.0.14-ximian.1 
conflicts with file from package
libbonobo2-1.0.8-2mdk
file /usr/lib/libbonobo.so.2.0.0 from install of bonobo-1.0.14-ximian.1 conflicts with 
file from package libbonobo2-1.0.8-2mdk
file /usr/lib/libbonobox.so.2.0.0 from install of bonobo-1.0.14-ximian.1 conflicts 
with file from package libbonobo2-1.0.8-2mdk

Mandrake apparently uses libbonobo2, and not libbonobo. So what do I do now?
I'd hate to --force an install; who knows what doing that would break?
There is no bonobo-14 in Mandrake Cooker; only a bonobo-17. 

Sometimes the differences Linux distributions introduce *really* frustrates me. :-(

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots? - Solved for RC2 under Mandrake

[Michael Leone]

On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 12:28, Manuel Borchers wrote:
> Am Don, 2001-11-22 um 18.22 schrieb Michael Leone:
> > OK. I presume that I only need the latest versions of the same 7 files
> > as the snapshots - evolution, gal18, gal-devel-18, libgal18, gtkhtml16,
> > gtkhtml-devel-16, libgtkhtml19? No new files needed?
> 
> I can't remember exactly which files it were, but yes, these are needed
> from that dir, too...
> 
> rpm should tell you which are missing then ;-)

Ok. Since RC doesn't work for my distro, I picked up the binaries from
Mandrake Cooker (Cooker being Mandrake's "in testing" server). I had to
remove some Ximian snapshot RPMs, which conflicted with the
Mandrake-compiled snapshots:

[root@minas-aran Mdk]# rpm -e --test libgal18 gal-devel libgtkhtml19
gtkhtml gtkhtml-devel evolution

Then, using trial and error, I came up with this list for RC2 for
Mandrake 8.1:

[root@minas-aran Mdk]# ls -la
total 20123
drwxr-xr-x2 turgon   turgon   1170 Nov 22 21:29 ./
drwxr-xr-x3 turgon   turgon959 Nov 22 21:14 ../
-rw---1 turgon   turgon6348928 Nov 22 21:16 evolution-0.99.2-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon1308937 Nov 22 21:16 
evolution-devel-0.99.2-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 806047 Nov 22 21:16 
evolution-pilot-0.99.2-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 401057 Nov 22 21:26 GConf-1.0.7-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 348964 Nov 22 21:25 
gnome-pilot-0.1.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 118514 Nov 22 21:25 
gnome-pilot-conduits-0.7-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 282824 Nov 22 21:19 gtkhtml-0.16.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 580677 Nov 22 21:21 libdb3.3-3.3.11-5mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon6844254 Nov 22 21:22 
libdb3.3-devel-3.3.11-5mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 310455 Nov 22 21:24 
libdbtcl3.3-3.3.11-5mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 494014 Nov 22 21:20 libgal18-0.18.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 717123 Nov 22 21:20 
libgal18-devel-0.18.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 104195 Nov 22 21:26 libGConf1-1.0.7-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 152063 Nov 22 21:26 
libGConf1-devel-1.0.7-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon  45806 Nov 22 21:24 libglade0-0.17-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 142017 Nov 22 21:24 
libglade0-devel-0.17-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon   9764 Nov 22 21:27 
libglade-bonobo0-0.17-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon  30333 Nov 22 21:27 
libglade-gnome0-0.17-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon   9713 Nov 22 21:28 
libglade-gnome-db0-0.17-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon  67769 Nov 22 21:29 
libgnome-pilot1-0.1.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 800916 Nov 22 21:29 
libgnome-pilot1-devel-0.1.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 248642 Nov 22 21:20 
libgtkhtml19-0.16.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
-rw---1 turgon   turgon 384320 Nov 22 21:20 
libgtkhtml19-devel-0.16.1-1mdk.i586.rpm

[root@minas-aran Mdk]# rpm -Uvh *.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
   1:libdb3.3   ### [  4%]
   2:libdbtcl3.3### [  8%]
   3:libdb3.3-devel ### [ 13%]
   4:libgal18   ### [ 17%]
   5:libgal18-devel ### [ 21%]
   6:libglade0  ### [ 26%]
   7:libglade-bonobo0   ### [ 30%]
   8:libglade-gnome0### [ 34%]
   9:libgnome-pilot1### [ 39%]
  10:libGConf1  ### [ 43%]
  11:GConf  ### [ 47%]
  12:gnome-pilot### [ 52%]
  13:gnome-pilot-conduits   ### [ 56%]
  14:libGConf1-devel### [ 60%]
  15:libglade-gnome-db0 ### [ 65%]
  16:libglade0-devel### [ 69%]
  17:libgnome-pilot1-devel  ### [ 73%]
  18:libgtkhtml19   ### [ 78%]
  19:gtkhtml### [ 82%]
  20:evolution  ### [ 86%]
  21:evolution-devel### [ 91%]
  22:evolution-

Re: [Evolution] Deleting emails

[Michael Leone]

On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 19:31, Neil Hodge wrote:
> All:
> 
> I can't "delete" emails (the little circle-x button is greyed out).  I
> can only mark for deletion, then expunge.  How do I "delete" emails?

Exactly as you're doing now. That's how Evo works - mark for deletion;
expunge later.

You could try setting "Hide deleted messages" so they don't appear, but
they're still there, waiting to be expunged.


-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg04511/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Evolution] Header version incorrect?

[Michael Leone]

I use Evolution 1.02 (the Mandrake Cooker release, dated Dec 13), and I
noticed that it included the following header:

X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release)

This is definitely a post-1.0 release. It's probably a minor glitch, but
I just thought I'd mention it.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg04673/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Evolution] Decryption problem

[Michael Leone]

I seem to be having a problem decrypting emails sent by Outlook users. I
got one email that lists the encrypted email inline, i.e.,the email
consists of, 

-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

qANQR1DBwU4D8rnKA7oYdu4QCAC1JGGY35khCIVBgYIU1GNfE0js/FrBAW1J9tqo

and the encrypted part of the message continues until the "END PGP
MESSAGE" separator. But I see no button nor any option for decrypting
this email. If I save it, I can then decrypt it from the command line
properly.

How can I decrypt this email *inside* Evo?

Also, I received another encrypted email, from the same user. It appears
as blank in the preview pane, with no attachment listed. However, if I
examine the full message source, it shows this:

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from femail25.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail25.sdc1.sfba.home.com
[24.254.60.15]) by mustang.oldcity.dca.net (8.11.6/8.9.3/DCANET)
with ESMTP
id fBR5LI301279 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Dec 2001
00:21:19 -0500
Received: from beethoven ([24.11.62.109]) by femail25.sdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20011227052118.IXUJ20715.femail25.sdc1.sfba.home.com@beethoven>
for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:21:18 -0800
From: "Thomas Stavros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Leone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: encryption test III
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:24:34 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0077_01C18E6C.DC2DB640"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Importance: Normal
X-Evolution-Source: pop:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/inbox

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0077_01C18E6C.DC2DB640
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

qANQR1DBwU4D8rnKA7oYdu4QB/9z9G5uCVShJjqQZT/1XORhb0CeYA0moUkwEWYX
e9HmSweh7C/XYGhhujPOszKueJfFJ91J9hNpOej+vw0WFG/z1Y/CDlRryILUOcro

and so on.

Again, no way to decrypt this message inside of Evo.

I'm using Evo 1.02mdk, which is from the snapshot of Dec 13th, I
believe. I have gpg properly setup in /usr/bin/gpg, and have that path
specified in the TOOLS, MAIL SETTINGS, OTHER. Also, not that this email
is signed properly, and that I have been able to click on the SIGNED
icon, and verify other signatures. I think that Evo is finding gpg
properly.

gpg version = 1.06

Again, if I save this second message as a file, I can then decrypt it
from the command line properly.

Am I missing something basic here ?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

Foreman, roving paving crew, Dept. of Roads, Hades.



msg04702/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] How do I tell Evolution what browser to use

[Michael Leone]

On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 09:20, gene wrote:
> I set the default handler as follows and it works for me:
> 
> defaultopera  -newwindow "%s"

Did that; mozilla still comes up. Do I need to restart the Gnome program
I'm clicking on the link in?

>   
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 08:59, Mike Leone wrote:
> > > You have to select the browser in the gnome control center. I use Opera
> > > and it works.
> > >
> > > Control Center -> Document Handlers -> URL Handlers
> > 
> > And choose what - text/html? Doesn't work for me; mozilla still comes up,
> > instead of galeon.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > 
> 
> 
> 
-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] How do I tell Evolution what browser to use

[Michael Leone]

On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 18:54, Michael Leone wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 09:20, gene wrote:
> > I set the default handler as follows and it works for me:
> > 
> > defaultopera  -newwindow "%s"
> 
> Did that; mozilla still comes up. Do I need to restart the Gnome program
> I'm clicking on the link in?

Apparently yes. Also, galeon uses "--new-window" instead. Looks like
it's working now. Thanks to everybody who helped.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Evolution] Auto response function?

[Michael Leone]

Is there a way in Evo (i.e., not using procmail, etc) to have an
autoresponse email? I use Evo's POP3 features to get my mail from my
ISP, and don't want to change that. Is there any way to have a 'Your
email received; I'm looking into it" response auto-generated? What would
be even better is to be able to specify an auto-response, based on
original sender, or on address sent to.


-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Auto response function?

[Michael Leone]

On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:00, Aaron Kemp wrote:
> Maybe a filter action to send a message could solve this (and other)
> things?

There isn't such an action for filters, that I could see. That's why I
asked.

> 
> On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 19:01, Michael Leone wrote:
> > Is there a way in Evo (i.e., not using procmail, etc) to have an
> > autoresponse email? I use Evo's POP3 features to get my mail from my
> > ISP, and don't want to change that. Is there any way to have a 'Your
> > email received; I'm looking into it" response auto-generated? What would
> > be even better is to be able to specify an auto-response, based on
> > original sender, or on address sent to.
> 
-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Auto response function?

[Michael Leone]

On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:39, Steven Tryon wrote:
> PMMail has "send canned reply" as a filter action. I think something
> like that is what you would need.

What is PMMail - a different email client?  
 
-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Auto response function?

[Michael Leone]

On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 22:25, Steven Tryon wrote:
> A very fine pop3 client for OS/2 and MS Windows.

OK. But I want to stay with Evo.

> 
> On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 22:16, Michael Leone wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:39, Steven Tryon wrote:
> > > PMMail has "send canned reply" as a filter action. I think something
> > > like that is what you would need.
> > 
> > What is PMMail - a different email client?  
> -- 
> Steven Tryon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ 102798975
> 
> 
-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Evolution] Evo pilot conduits problems

[Michael Leone]

Hi. I'm setting up the conduits for my Palm III (yes, it's an old one).
I go into gnomecc, and define my conduits. Some of them (not all) are
giving me problems.

Specifically, the Evo address conduit. I get "Unable to instantiate
EAddress conduit". Since I'm running gnomecc from the command line, I
see this:

libgpilotdcm-WARNING **: unable to g_module_open
(/usr/lib/gnome-pilot/conduits/libeaddress_conduit.so), reason
/usr/lib/gnome-pilot/conduits/libeaddress_conduit.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory

Sync action in Pilot Conduits does say "Synchronized". Altho "Settings"
doesn't work.

Same thing happens with ECalendar and EToDO. 

libgpilotdcm-WARNING **: unable to g_module_open
(/usr/lib/gnome-pilot/conduits/libetodo_conduit.so), reason
/usr/lib/gnome-pilot/conduits/libetodo_conduit.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory

Thoughts?

[turgon@minas-aran pilot]$ rpm -qa | grep pilot
gnome-pilot-conduits-0.8-1mdk
libpilot-link4-0.9.5-8mdk
xpilot-4.3.2-2mdk
pilot-link-devel-0.9.5-8mdk
pilot-link-tcl-0.9.5-8mdk
jpilot-syncmal-0.62-2mdk
libgnome-pilot1-0.1.64-3mdk
pilot-link-0.9.5-8mdk
gnome-pilot-0.1.64-3mdk

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Evo pilot conduits problems

[Michael Leone]

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 15:56, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 14:57, Mike Leone wrote:
> > > It looks like mandrake is not packaging the conduits, atleast not in the
> > > evolution package.
> > 
> > But I'm not using Mandrake's packaging of Evolution.
> > 
> > [turgon@minas-aran turgon]$ rpm -qa | grep evolution
> > evolution-1.0.2-3.ximian.2
> > [turgon@minas-aran turgon]$
> 
> I had assumed since all the other packages were mdk.
> 
> Do the files actually exist?  Is the evolution package corrupt?  What
> version of mandrake?

Mandrake 8.1. I don't think Evolution itself is corrupt; I've had no
problems with it whatsoever. Mind you, I have no yet tried to access the
conduits using Evolution.

Not sure what "files" you are referring to ...?

I can probably find the 1.0.2mdk RPMs somewhere, and uninstall my Ximian
version, if you think that would help.

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Evo pilot conduits problems

[Michael Leone]

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 21:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> It wouldn't surprise me if the machine being used to
> generate the RPM has PeterW's libtool 1.4 performance patch.
> This is exactly what I see if I compile Evolution with this
> patch installed (which by the way cuts the compile time down
> by at least a factor of 2).  I submitted a bugzilla on this
> a number of months ago, as well as duscussing it on the list.
> This was how I discovered that you can't use the libtool patch
> if you want to compile conduits.

That may be it; I used the Evolution 1.0.2 from Mandrake Cooker, and
that conduit error disappeared. I still get a gpilotd crash when
choosing a memofile conduit, but we'll get to that later.

For now, I can't seem to find how to initiate a sync with my Palm III
from within Evo itself. Or do I do it some other way? Where's the
doc/tutorial that explains that, anyway? I went thru the help file, but
all that talks about it how to set up the conduits, and I've done that.
So how do I start Evo actually syncing over those conduits?

-- 

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


"Sometimes your lack of sympathy gets hard to explain, 
 So on your mask of make-up you just paint a little parody of pain" 
 "When you were young", Del Amitri



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Evolution] Addressbook has disappeared in 1.0.2 ?

[Michael Leone]

I had something weird just happen. I use a POP3 account. I then added a
IMAP account (I'm testing my own mailserver). It seemed to add fine.
Since I was testing, I screwed something up, and got an error in the
IMAP account (broken pipe, I believe it was).

I then removed the IMAP account from the list of accounts. And now I
have no contacts at all - totally blank.

The addressbook.db file is still there; looks like the records are still
there (the file is 28K+ in size). But now they're non-visible in Evo. 

How can I get them back?


-- 
--

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Addressbook has disappeared in 1.0.2 ? - RESOLVED

[Michael Leone]

I ended up syncing my Palm III into Evolution. That made the missing Evo
contacts come back, along with the Palm III entries.


On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 00:41, Michael Leone wrote:
> I had something weird just happen. I use a POP3 account. I then added a
> IMAP account (I'm testing my own mailserver). It seemed to add fine.
> Since I was testing, I screwed something up, and got an error in the
> IMAP account (broken pipe, I believe it was).
> 
> I then removed the IMAP account from the list of accounts. And now I
> have no contacts at all - totally blank.
> 
> The addressbook.db file is still there; looks like the records are still
> there (the file is 28K+ in size). But now they're non-visible in Evo. 
> 
> How can I get them back?
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> 
> --
> Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone
> 
> PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
> PGP public key:
> <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>
-- 
--

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Problems sending mail

[Michael Leone]

On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 19:05, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Try configuring Evolution to not use authentication for SMTP and odds
> are it will work because your postfix server doesn't support
> authentication at all.

As a default, no. However, postfix can be made to support SMTP
authentication.

-- 
--

--
Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Evolution] Error sending SMTP via SSL

[Michael Leone]

I'm playing around with using SSL for SMTP (and eventually POP3). I use
postfix as my local SMTP server. I made certificates for postfix, and
told postfix about (I followed a HOWTO at 
http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/personen/jaenicke/pfixtls/doc/setup.html),
and it all *seemed* to go OK. I got the same responses as the HOWTO
lists, and postfix didn't barf at the new settings.

However, when I changed Evo to "Use SSL" under the Sending options, I
got an error:

"Could not connect to workhorse.mike-leone.com (port 465). Operation in
progress"

And the mail never gets sent. No do I see anything in any logs on
workhorse - nothing in the mail.log; syslog; etc. So I'm not sure where
I screwed up.

Do I need to make and sign certificates for Evo? If so, where do I put
the cert/key files? There seems to be nothing in the HELP about using
SSL to send/receive mail; only to use GPG.

-- 

Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Error sending SMTP via SSL

[Michael Leone]

On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 00:30, Michael Leone wrote:
> 
> And the mail never gets sent. No do I see anything in any logs on
> workhorse - nothing in the mail.log; syslog; etc. So I'm not sure where
> I screwed up.

Now I am ... I forgot a postfix configuration option. Now it's going
thru.

Never mind. :-)

-- 

Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Evolution] SSL based services using DS floppy

[Michael Leone]

Hi. I want to start using some SSL based services thru my Dachstein
floppy (specifically: POP3 over SSL; IMAP over SSL; SMTP over SSL).

That would be port 993, 995, and 465, respectively.

I need to modify EXTERN_TCP_PORTS:

EXTERN_TCP_PORTS="0/0_smtp 0/0_ftp 0/0_ssh 0/0_pop-3 0/0_imap2 0/0_www
0/0_993 0/0_995 0/0_465 0/0_1023"

Also INTERN_SERVERS. (BTW ... my INTERN_SERVERS line is getting kinda
long. Can that be indexed - INTERN_SERVERS0; INTERN_SERVERS1; etc)

Then I'd need to do some IP Chains to forward them. I thought I'd create
INTERN_SMTPS_SERVER; INTERN_POP3_SERVER; INTERN_IMAPS_SERVER variables,
and just figure out (and duplicate) the relevent sections in
ipfilter.conf.

Or is there an easier way?

-- 

Michael J. Leone  Registered Linux user #201348 
ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] orthographic checking

[Michael Leone]

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 15:26, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 11:32, Rodolfo Pilas wrote:
> > 
> > Can you tell me how to avoid orthographic checking?
> 
> Cool word.
> 
> Orthography Or*thog"ra*phy, n. OE. ortographie, OF.
>orthographie, L. orthographia, Gr. ?, fr. ? writing
>correctly; 'orqo`s right + gra`fein to write. See Ortho-,
>and Graphic.
> 1. The art or practice of writing words with the proper
>   letters, according to standard usage; conventionally
>   correct spelling; also, mode of spelling; as, his
>   orthography is vicious.

So let's get this straight ... you want to *avoid* "conventionally
correct spelling". And yet you *also* want spell checking, but in a
different language.

Wha? Do you want spell checking or not? 

-- 

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


"Dominate! Dominate! Eat your young and aggregate!
 I have grotty silicon!"
   - what you hear when you play an AOL CD backwards



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: [Evolution] Printing to an ascii text file

[Michael Leone]

On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 23:56, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 21:08, Not Zed wrote:
> > Could also try cut and paste.
> > 'printing to a text file' is not a normal 'printing' operation.
> 
> Or even just file... save as...

"Save As" is not printing.

-- 

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Conform or be cast out.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

[Michael Leone]

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 12:13, Brian wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 11:13, Rob Walker wrote:
> 
> > I agree that this use of POP might not be optimum.  However, sometimes
> > we don't get to choose which type of server we connect to, our employer
> > tells us what we get to use.
> 
> Tell your employer that your current choice does not fit your needs :)

Then tell them goodbye when they hire somebody in your place who doesn't
complain ...

-- 

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Conform or be cast out.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

[Michael Leone]

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 14:03, Brian wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 13:03, Michael Leone wrote:
>  
> > > Tell your employer that your current choice does not fit your needs :)
> > 
> > Then tell them goodbye when they hire somebody in your place who doesn't
> > complain ...
> 
> Then go find another job where this isn't an isuse! :)

Since, as well all know, jobs are being given away in this economy,
especially to people who voluntarily quit their last jobs because the
company email policy was inconvenient to them.

My point being that it's easy to be glib by saying "Well, then, just get
another job!", as if it's as easy as saying "Well, then, just take
another breath!".

-- 

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:
<http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>

Conform or be cast out.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

[Michael Leone]

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 14:53, Brian wrote:
> It's called sarcasm, Mike, look into it.  

Yes, I know. And I was pointing out how it wasn't funny, even as
sarcasm.


> I was about as glib in my
> message as you were intelligent in yours.  Leave it to you to reply to
> the one non-serious thing in the message.  Jeez.

Hey, you don't like replies to your posts, then don't post. Jeez, how
much intelligence do you need for that?
-- 

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Conform or be cast out.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

[Michael Leone]

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 16:39, Brian wrote:
> I don't mind replies, especially the contradictory ones, it's the dumb
> replies that make me cringe as I hit the delete key.  The comment was
> intended as tongue-in-cheek, moron, which is why I posted *alternatives*
> beneath that.  Read the whole message next time before you instantly hit
> the reply key and defecate out one of your turds of wisdom in response,
> m'kay?  You'll come across as less stupid than normal and --who knows?--
> you might actually contribute something meaningful to the discussion.

Oooo, I've been flamed! Gee, I feel so bad now.

You could look me up in many of the lists where I actually help people,
and have for years.

> BTW, as a matter of etiquette, you shouldn't post crap like this to the
> list as it's even more boring to everyone else than it is to me.

The way you just did? If it's so bad, why did you continue to send it to
the list? More hypocracy?

> Well, time to see how well filters in Evolution really work!  Buh bye.

Thank goodness for that; now neither of us has to be bothered by you.

-- 

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Conform or be cast out.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Linux 2.5.10

[Michael Leone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 1 May 2002 at 14:51, Not Zed wrote:

> 
> 
> I dont think we (i certainly dont) plan to spend any time on fixing
> development kernel related problems.
> 
> There is some indication (from some bugs in bugzilla) that we are
> exposing kernel bugs.  This is a job for the kernel hackers, not us.

OK. But perhaps then Ximian's bugmaintainer (sorry; I forget your 
name) should be forwarding these suspected exposed bugs to the kernel 
hackers, so they can be fixed.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0.4 -- QDPGP 2.68 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBPM/koZq0HvZapbzfEQJGIACeL4/+02Ou5bVnpFBKfOYgWbKmht8AniSF
IC/IOun0vGyVyLkmRqTZ046E
=7TgU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Feature Request: PGP key-lookup

[Michael Leone]

On Sun, 2002-05-05 at 11:24, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> It would be really nice to have a "key lookup" feature in evolution that
> lets you download PGP
> keys from a keyserver if a message is signed but the public key of the
> sender is not in the key ring.
> 
> Any chance that this will be implemented in a future version?

Add: "keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net" to your ~/.gnupg/options file.

-- 

PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
PGP public key:


Conform or be cast out.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] will there be a Windows port?

[Michael Leone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 23 May 2002 at 13:22, Marko Asplund wrote:

> On 23 May 2002, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> > There are no plans that i'm aware of (though i'd probably be the
> > last to find out, being on the 'wrong' side of the world).
> > 
> > You could just use linux instead, or run an X server, not that i'm
> > saying they're ideal solutions mind you ...
> 
> i'm using Linux exclusively but there are Windows users in our company
> who can't switch to Linux because they need certain Windows
> applications. i'd like to be able to recommend Evolution for Windows
> for these people.

Perhaps they could run their Windows apps under WINE, or maybe 
Win4Lin? 

> 
> --
>  aspa
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0.4 -- QDPGP 2.68 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBPOzjoJq0HvZapbzfEQL4SQCeOnerHiVIkVGDYLhVC5QIoL9fFmEAnA7x
qIqOrST4pGokvz+yIcCTVsaR
=OORM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] will there be a Windows port?

[Michael Leone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 23 May 2002 at 15:24, Marko Asplund wrote:

> On 23 May 2002, Conrad O Dea wrote:
> 
> > ...
> > An alternative is to use VMwear to run a linux virtual machine on
> > the Windows box, or vice versa. http://www.vmware.com/
> 
> for a computer enthusiast switching to Linux or running Linux under VM
> ware may be an alternative but when it comes to people with not a very
> strong background in computers and who think Windows is the only "OS"
> you can run in a computer the list of choices is unfortunately a much
> more limited.

Especially if those of us who do know better, don't teach them 
otherwise, especially by teaching by example.



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0.4 -- QDPGP 2.68 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBPOzxdZq0HvZapbzfEQKavQCgxaZA6A3ZjAx7y3whN6ay4jkIewgAoMwM
QhWibfe7Vezp94ifXc3KkDIz
=epe5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution