RE: Outlook on an ex5.5 box
If I were you, I'd test installing it on your lab server to make sure you don't break anything before installing it the same way on your production server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Kelley Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook on an ex5.5 box Has anybody seen any problems installing Outlook on an exchange 5.5 server. I thought I once read an article that mentioned it's not recommended because of possible MAPI conflicts. I'm trying to configure the InterOrg Replication Utility and a requirement is to have outlook 98 and exchange 5.5. Thanks - Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSXCHANGE 5.5 + IMC
If this is an Exchange Server generating the message, then routing is enabled in the IMS, but the specified e-mail domain 63.230.xx.xx is not recognized as an inbound domain. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 6:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MSXCHANGE 5.5 + IMC Can some on help me w/ this message? What is the error. Is it a relay issue or a user not fund issue'? Thanks Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Test Sent: 10/19/2001 5:55 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 10/19/2001 5:55 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Arris ;l=SYSTEM001-011020005511Z-7183 MSEXCH:IMS:Arris :SITENAME:SYSTEM001 3550 (000B09AA) 550 Relaying is prohibited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Your presumption that the perpetrator would require a lot of time to write correct prose is rather presumptive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. I believe item #1 (of my post) is most probable.. hell, I must leave OL2k open and unattended on my PC a dozen times every day for minutes at a stretch. However, this takes balls. Considering the length and articulate phrasing of the message, it seems the person would have spent an inordinate amount of time at McDonald's desk. Certainly someone should have seen somebody there. I have recommended they check the EV on the server which McDonald's mailbox resides for EV 1016's.. just incase the Admin was in on it. Tim. -Original Message- From: Wright, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message It appears that it was send via Exchange since there are no internet addresses in the TO: FROM: fields. Also, if you check the headers and there is nothing there, then you have the culprit in-house and logging on legitimately via the user's account. The original suggestions below are probably what occurred. How accessible is the VP's computer? May be someone took a quick opportunity at an unattended computer. If they were very clever, they might have set the message to delay a day or so before delivery. Hope everyone at the company took it seriously and went home ;-) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Headers, Let us see the headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
He left his box accessible. Well, McDonald shares in responsibility then. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message ha.. actually I just learned he 'was' asked that question.. Turns out, ol' McDonald was away from his desk from 9 till 10am and left his box accessible. All indications are that the message was sent from the client on his desk. The message was found in the Sent Items of his mailbox. There appears to have been no logon recorded in Admin during that hour (implying his mailbox was not opened from another PC), and there were no suspicious 1016's (implying the Admin was not in on it). The message was of blue Arial font (implying OWA was not used to send it, and his password is secure), and there was no access recorded by the box acting as the SMTP server (implying O.E. was not used to send it, and his creds are secure). Oh.. and someone saw somebody at his desk around the time (implying.. oh hell..) so they figured it out. this was not quite the challenge I thought it'd be. Tim. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Ask McDonald, Where exactly were you at 9:19AM this morning, and for how long before that, and who knew? i.e. was he in the washroom with his $250 Italian leathers poking out underneath the stall, making noises that indicated extreme abdominal discomfort... :) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:13 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Investigating a Forged Message Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. I believe item #1 (of my post) is most probable.. hell, I must leave OL2k open and unattended on my PC a dozen times every day for minutes at a stretch. However, this takes balls. Considering the length and articulate phrasing of the message, it seems the person would have spent an inordinate amount of time at McDonald's desk. Certainly someone should have seen somebody there. I have recommended they check the EV on the server which McDonald's mailbox resides for EV 1016's.. just incase the Admin was in on it. Tim. -Original Message- From: Wright, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message It appears that it was send via Exchange since there are no internet addresses in the TO: FROM: fields. Also, if you check the headers and there is nothing there, then you have the culprit in-house and logging on legitimately via the user's account. The original suggestions below are probably what occurred. How accessible is the VP's computer? May be someone took a quick opportunity at an unattended computer. If they were very clever, they might have set the message to delay a day or so before delivery. Hope everyone at the company took it seriously and went home ;-) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Headers, Let us see the headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject:Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious;
RE: OWA/Exchange Ports Security - anyone?
Exchange 5.5 or 2000? OWA is very different between them and the ramifications are too. I don't see much point in putting a front-end OWA server in the DMZ for either version, though. Just open port 443 to the Exchange OWA box inside your intranet, or, better, implement a VPN solution. Q1 and Q2 are answered in the Exchange 5.5 FAQ. Whether it is in the E2K FAQ is left as an exercise to the reader. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Lewinski Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA/Exchange Ports Security anyone? Could anyone tell me if the below can be considered as an acceptable approach to OWA implementation. 1. OWA/IIS resides in the DMZ 2. The only port that can get to it from the Internet is SSL/443 3. OWA/IIS can talk to the Exchange server on the internal network via two statically mapped ports for the IS DS. Q1. Is there any other ports I will need for the OWA to communicate with Internal Exchange Server and why? Microsoft says that you need to have 135/TCP open (Q259240), but I red few things here on the Board that port 135 is a security threat why? Q2 What ports do I need to open between the OWA/IIS on the DMZ and one of my DC's on the internal network. Again Microsoft calls for 135/TCP, 138/TCP and 137/UDP. Thanks Bob Lewinski _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinion on Backups
FAQ Appendix B. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Is there a way to make NTBACKUP restore a single mailbox? Not flaming, genuinely interested in knowing. TIA. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I like NT Backup, Backup Exec (Occasionally, the other night I didn't like it at all), CommVault Galaxy, Ultrabac, LiveVault, and there might be a few others. Off of the top of my head, those products are very good. ArcCrap is exactly that... Unreliable, no support, a pain in the arse, breaks more than it fixes... Shall I go on? -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups It seems like there's NO backup software anybody likes. Everytime someone mentions a brand, they get toasted. We use ArcServe (foisted on me by others). I'm not real wild about it, but I don't hate it either. But then I haven't had to do a major recovery with it yet. Their support is pretty poor, but so far the software has done the job for us (like I said, no disaster recoveries yet). I don't know that I'd go so far as to recommend it, but I wouldn't totally dis it either. Rob -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Do you always bet on the losing horse? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Govindaraj Rangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I would bet on ArcServe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinion on Backups I've been looking at Backup software for out NT/2000/Exchange servers. Right now we run Veritas Backup Exec but because of the poor support (Pay support sucks) and horriable Customer Service (They didn't have any information on file about my company or purchases). I've decided to choose another brand of tape software. What I'd like to know is what you're opinion is on the best software (Other then BE) to use with NT/2000 including Exchange support. Thanks -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: FW: Converter for Lotus Notes Data
There used to be companies that claimed such. May I suggest you check out http://www.slipstick.com and see if Sue has anything posted there? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jin Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: FW: Converter for Lotus Notes Data Is there a tool that can be used on the client side to do that? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OH
Thanks. Now I won't bother decoding it. My wife doesn't let me read such things. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH But the Pink Monitor award comes with the Inner Circle secret decoder ring so you can read Gary's earlier message. The message is all about beer, gurlz, hogs, and other manly man stuff. G. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH I don't want a Pink Monitor award. Sounds too girly... No offense ladies! :o) D -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH Then you don't qualify for the Pink Monitor award. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 ...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there are none so blind as those who will not see --The Moody Blues (I know you're out there) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH Pretty damn close! I was just putting the can to my lips when I started reading it. I about fell out my chair. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH Did it come spurting out of your nose? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 ...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there are none so blind as those who will not see --The Moody Blues (I know you're out there) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH ROFLMFAO Dammit!!! I spit Coke all over my monitor reading that! -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH He couldn't get a clue if he was in a field full of horny clues in the middle of clue mating season and had covered himself with clue musk. ...Joel Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH Uh... Mike, I suggest you get a clue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH kim kim kim kim kim kim... get a clue... -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OH how many more people have to leave this list before you guys shut the f*ck up? there are plenty of other venues for this insipid banter, which is so boring, it saps the very life out of this list. take it offline. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: OTG
I think it's a safe bet that someone has used it before. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OTG Has anyone ever heard of OTG software. IT works with Exchange file system. I read about it and was wondering if anyone has ever used it before. The link below explains the overview about it. http://www.otg.com/products/EX/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in MS Office 2000 VBE6.dll at 0156:65089137.
It's cheaper to place a Post-It Note over the place where that stupid dialog appears. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Error in MS Office 2000 VBE6.dll at 0156:65089137. I would swap out the monitor so it wouldn't show such nasty messages. Bad monitor. - Original Message - From: Joyce, Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:37 AM Subject: RE: Error in MS Office 2000 VBE6.dll at 0156:65089137. Maybe the PC in question is situated 'next to' an exchange server. ;) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 10:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error in MS Office 2000 VBE6.dll at 0156:65089137. If they're not used in e-mails, how is this an Exchange issue exactly? -Original Message- From: Adil Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error in MS Office 2000 VBE6.dll at 0156:65089137. Hello! The file is open successfully in other PC. These files are not used in e-mails. I am also change the RAM of this computer , but the problem is same. Regards Adil --- Joyce, Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do the files open successfully on another PC? Have they been sent via email? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Adil Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 09:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error in MS Office 2000 VBE6.dll at 0156:65089137. Hello! I am facing a problem in my exchange network. One of my client facing the problem that every time when he opens MS Word 2000 or MS Excel 2000 files he received the following error: Excel caused an invalid page fault in module VBE6.dll at 0156:65089137. I am reinstall his whole system and install Windows 98 and MS Office , but the problem is persist. Any suggestions regards Adil __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Deletion
Authentica has a product that does that. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion It's been to long to remember details, but read some propaganda, ... ummm, sorry, sales brochures regarding a system that encrypts messages. On delivery it would provide secure delivery read receipts, while preventing cut paste type operations. After a predetermined time or # of reads it would destroy the document. If you need a secure (and uncopyable) email you'll need to look for some heavy-weight security packages. All this, of course, assume that the recipient is not a security risk himself... -Original Message- From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion How do you know when someone's read it? Why couldn't they just take a screen shot or cut and paste or, god forbid, just re-type the message and send it out to the Internet? -Original Message- From: Bury, Sue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Deletion Is there a way to either disable forwarding a particular email to the Internet or automatically and permanently delete an email upon reading? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Understanding Non Delivery Message
Yup... That means that the address in the To field of this message was the return address on a message to your organization which was misaddressed. In turn, the original message has a reply to address that you can't deliver to, for what could be a number of reasons - DNS resolution or transient delivery falures are the most likely. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Understanding Non Delivery Message Ok, this time I'll paste the message...duh...I've put X's in the to address for obvious reasons. I'm getting messages periodically when mail is undelivered. I'm wondering why the From is showing only . I've looked at the IMS queues but there were no further details. I'm new to Exchange, obviously. Thanks for any help. A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has expired. The message was not delivered to the following addresses: The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Subject: Undeliverable: Endoxy Agreement Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Understanding Non Delivery Message
Its by design, RFC 821 I believe. NDRs should always be generated from a null address, which causes MTAs to not generate an NDR in the case said NDR is not deliverable. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Understanding Non Delivery Message I'm getting messages periodically when mail is undelivered. I'm wondering why the From is showing only . I've looked at the IMS queues but there were no further details. I'm new to Exchange, obviously. Thanks for any help. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Yep. That's the fact, jack. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. Coincidental time and date of a 1016 would be a good indicator of suspicious activity. Also, Reviewer access is not on by default in OL2k's Calendar; however, I do not know the delegate settings on McDonald's mailbox. (btw: Really? I never noticed that.. Are you certain?) Tim. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message You have to be careful about using the Event log data as evidence. If someone just looks at the calendar, it shows that the user logged on but was not the owner of the mailbox. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message If they didn't use his username/password, there would be an event in the event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did it..) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject:Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue, Outlook on server
Depending on the versions of Exchange and Outlook, yes, it can be bad. Technet has at least one article about issues with Ol2k on Exchange 5.5 boxes -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue, Outlook on server Well, yes, i did install outlook on an exchange server. I always thought the same as you, that is was bad, and when i had a product that wanted Outlook on the Exchange server, i pooh-poohed it. Then, I got another one, and i THOUGHT faxination was reputable and knew what they were asking for, so I went ahead and installed Outlook 98 on the exchange server that has faxination. Was that a major tactical error? Did I misunderstand the instructions from Fenestrae (faxination)? Oh, WebMail was the other product that wanted Outlook on the Exchange server -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Install the Exchange 5.o client that comes with Exchange 5.x onto the server. Use it to rename the mailbox. You didn't install Outlook to the exchange servers did you? That would have been bad. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Don't... There is some of the Res Kit on the actual Exch Media, you can look there for some tools although I haven't seen anything in mine. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Boy, do i feel dumb. First off, NO, i don't have a Exchange Resource Kit and second off, i don't know HOW to run nt4 mail client. Mail in the control panel is, of course, the 'profile manager' for Outlook. Ah, but maybe, just maybe, i can find a copy of outlook 97 lying around the house. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Ahh... OK, I've heard of it being renamed in earlier versions of Outlook, but never O2K. Do you have the Exchange Res Kit per chance? Not that it would have anything in it, but I'll take a look and see if I can find anything to help in there. Have you tried installing Outlook 97 or better yet, just use the NT 4.0 Mail client? I believe that contained Exchng32.exe... -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Well, the TechNet article said it was a problem in O2K, and I quote: OL2000: Inbox May Be Renamed When Deleting an Appointment The user remembers his secretary being active in his calendar when this happens, so I'm thinking that's probably it. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 14:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'd be very curious as to how that happened. There isn't an option in O2K to rename the inbox. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Hi Gang! We have a user whose Inbox got renamed. (Exchange 5.5, sp4. NT 4 sp 6a, user Outlook 2000). I found TechNet article Q249750 which seemed to be a very good fit for our situation. The article said to use exchng32.exe to rename the mailbox. I had to look around the shop, but i did find a copy of that old exchange client. Problem is, it won't run, at least not on my win2000 desktop. Get an error that reads: 'The NTVDM CPU has encountered an illegal instruction.' Same on an NT4 box. Do i have a bad copy of exchng32.exe? (mine is time stamped 8/9/96. Where can i get a good one? Or do i have to run this on a win98 box or something? It looks like it runs in a dos window Or does somebody know another way to rename an inbox back to INBOX? Thanks, Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Re: AntiVirus Change
Hello. Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs? Thanks. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16 Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using Antigen. Which means that if one virus pattern hasn't been updated, one of the others will. Good to fall back on. I can get docs comparing Antigen to Trend, feel free to contact me offline. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 10/19/2001 06:37 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change | --- -| And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AntiVirus Change
Why u no post link?? -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change The Comparing Whitepaper is from Compaq... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 21:46 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Just answer my question! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to Trend? *confused* -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Hello. Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs? Thanks. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16 Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using Antigen. Which means that if one virus pattern hasn't been updated, one of the others will. Good to fall back on. I can get docs comparing Antigen to Trend, feel free to contact me offline. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 10/19/2001 06:37 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change | - -- -| And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: AntiVirus Change
Cause I only have the PDF handy...sorry mate... But the title is: Anti-Virus Solutions for Microsoft Exchange Server (11FU-1299A-WWEN) and it's from December 1999!!! Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 23:56 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Why u no post link?? -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change The Comparing Whitepaper is from Compaq... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 21:46 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Just answer my question! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to Trend? *confused* -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Hello. Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs? Thanks. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16 Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using Antigen. Which means that if one virus pattern hasn't been updated, one of the others will. Good to fall back on. I can get docs comparing Antigen to Trend, feel free to contact me offline. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 10/19/2001 06:37 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change | - -- -| And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: AntiVirus Change
Thank u. U much nicer than inner circle... -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change Cause I only have the PDF handy...sorry mate... But the title is: Anti-Virus Solutions for Microsoft Exchange Server (11FU-1299A-WWEN) and it's from December 1999!!! Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 23:56 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Why u no post link?? -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change The Comparing Whitepaper is from Compaq... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 21:46 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Just answer my question! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to Trend? *confused* -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Hello. Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs? Thanks. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16 Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using Antigen. Which means that if one virus pattern hasn't been updated, one of the others will. Good to fall back on. I can get docs comparing Antigen to Trend, feel free to contact me offline. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 10/19/2001 06:37 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change | - -- -| And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AntiVirus Change
So you have fallen victim to the inner circle have you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change Thank u. U much nicer than inner circle... -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change Cause I only have the PDF handy...sorry mate... But the title is: Anti-Virus Solutions for Microsoft Exchange Server (11FU-1299A-WWEN) and it's from December 1999!!! Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 23:56 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Why u no post link?? -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change The Comparing Whitepaper is from Compaq... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 21:46 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Just answer my question! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to Trend? *confused* -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Hello. Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs? Thanks. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16 Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using Antigen. Which means that if one virus pattern hasn't been updated, one of the others will. Good to fall back on. I can get docs comparing Antigen to Trend, feel free to contact me offline. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 10/19/2001 06:37 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change | - -- -| And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
Re: AntiVirus Change
2 years in IT is like going back to the stoneage :) Martin - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:51 AM Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change Yeah, but given the changes in technology since 1999, that whitepaper isn't terribly useful IMHO other than as a guide on how to perform testing to answer your own question. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change The Comparing Whitepaper is from Compaq... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 21:46 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change Just answer my question! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to Trend? *confused* -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Hello. Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs? Thanks. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16 Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using Antigen. Which means that if one virus pattern hasn't been updated, one of the others will. Good to fall back on. I can get docs comparing Antigen to Trend, feel free to contact me offline. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 10/19/2001 06:37 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change | - -- -| And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
ETRN queues
Hi All MSX5.5+SP4+NT4+SP6a Have you ever make a configuration to let exchange that already uses properly a IMC to manage at the same time an ETRN queue? I am going to set this and want to know if somebody can share his/her previous experience on this. Rgds, -ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
