Re: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Lends a whole new meaning to the phrase, Good s***. - Original Message - From: Jennifer Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:44 AM Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I think Ed Norton was high on sewer fumes. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Yeah, we hijacked this thread fair and square! To the moon! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions What does this have to do with the Honeymooners? -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions What you need to do is add the Total Ops column to your Exchange admin program. This will show you what mailbox is doing the most amount of operations on your exchange server. It is most likely a rule that is forwarding to the internet so you will need to login to that mailbox and see what is going on. Mike -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Bang! Zoom! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions One of these days, Alice. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:15 PM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Is that an auotresponse? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Duh I was being sarcastic. /Duh -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can
RE: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring
I have recently implemented it here in our Exchange 5.5 environment. It is proving very useful for us, probably the main limitation is that it's speed is limited by the MAPI interface. It will certainly prove very useful if you want to provide detailed reports on Attachments etc. Let me know if you have any other questions. Regards Steve -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 19:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring Andy, Did you end up using this software? Do you know of any other software that performs similar functions (specifically mailbox size and what kind of attachments are in each mailbox) to the Active folders? I'm not having much luck, other than this post from you. I've already posted this (that I'm looking for it) but figured I'd direct the question to you. Thanks in advance for your help, Denyse Andy Russell at 8/1/2001 5:56:27 AM I've been looking for exchange monitoring and reporting tools - the only half decent tool I've found so far is Active Folders by C2C software (http://www.c2c.com/products/Active_f/default.htm) Seems to do all the usual stuff like mailbox size checking, looking for inactive mailboxes, checking stats for public folders, searching for specific text strings or attachments within mailboxes etc. etc. My questions are; Does anyone have any good/bad experiences of this product or C2C software generally? Secondly we're going to go to Exchange 2000 one day - does anyone know what native reporting tools are already in Exchange 2000 - ie. stuff like the above? Thanks Andy Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This communication is confidential and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use of the information and you are requested to notify mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately that you have received it and then destroy the copy in your possession. Commerzbank AG is regulated by the FSA for the conduct of investment business in the UK. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring
Another product is SRM from Highground which has now been bought out by Sun. http://www.sun.com/storage/software/storage_mgmt/srm_exchange/index.html More sophisticated than Active Folders if I remember correctly but also more expensive. Regards Mark -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring I have recently implemented it here in our Exchange 5.5 environment. It is proving very useful for us, probably the main limitation is that it's speed is limited by the MAPI interface. It will certainly prove very useful if you want to provide detailed reports on Attachments etc. Let me know if you have any other questions. Regards Steve -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 19:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring Andy, Did you end up using this software? Do you know of any other software that performs similar functions (specifically mailbox size and what kind of attachments are in each mailbox) to the Active folders? I'm not having much luck, other than this post from you. I've already posted this (that I'm looking for it) but figured I'd direct the question to you. Thanks in advance for your help, Denyse Andy Russell at 8/1/2001 5:56:27 AM I've been looking for exchange monitoring and reporting tools - the only half decent tool I've found so far is Active Folders by C2C software (http://www.c2c.com/products/Active_f/default.htm) Seems to do all the usual stuff like mailbox size checking, looking for inactive mailboxes, checking stats for public folders, searching for specific text strings or attachments within mailboxes etc. etc. My questions are; Does anyone have any good/bad experiences of this product or C2C software generally? Secondly we're going to go to Exchange 2000 one day - does anyone know what native reporting tools are already in Exchange 2000 - ie. stuff like the above? Thanks Andy Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This communication is confidential and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use of the information and you are requested to notify mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately that you have received it and then destroy the copy in your possession. Commerzbank AG is regulated by the FSA for the conduct of investment business in the UK. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: MAPI Client Problems
Does this apply? Error Message: Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. (Q237825) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN;q237825 Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Januar 2002 08:12 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry I didn't mean too :) -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 18:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Well, you don't have to yell. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I am 100% sure that it isn't permissions! The user can access each individual mailbox both through Outlook Web access and also by opening the mailbox as there primary mailbox in there outlook profile. However this means that they have to log in and out of outlook all the time and change the outlook profile to check each of the other mailboxes! -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 17:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Permissions is not an issue and you swear on your life? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I don't believe the problem is related to any specific MAPI client or version. Normally this user uses Outlook 2000 however - as a troubleshooting method I tried a no frills MAPI client to see if the problem still occurred and it did. - Some of the kb articled mention to use an Exchange client as Outlook doesn't give uses as much control over folders etc... Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users
Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K?
Hello Everyone, Cunrrently I have three servers running NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4, two of these run connectors and one holds the Private and Public information stores. I am planning to replace the computer that holds the stores with a new one and was wondering if anyone could tell me if I would run into any problems if I set it up with Windows 2000 SP2 and Exchange 5.5 Sp4? Thanks, Laurence Bryant CEM Centre University of Durham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K?
That's exactly what I have here and it works like a champ.. -Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? Hello Everyone, Cunrrently I have three servers running NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4, two of these run connectors and one holds the Private and Public information stores. I am planning to replace the computer that holds the stores with a new one and was wondering if anyone could tell me if I would run into any problems if I set it up with Windows 2000 SP2 and Exchange 5.5 Sp4? Thanks, Laurence Bryant CEM Centre University of Durham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K?
-Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? That's exactly what I have here and it works like a champ.. -Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? Hello Everyone, Cunrrently I have three servers running NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4, two of these run connectors and one holds the Private and Public information stores. I am planning to replace the computer that holds the stores with a new one and was wondering if anyone could tell me if I would run into any problems if I set it up with Windows 2000 SP2 and Exchange 5.5 Sp4? Thanks, Laurence Bryant CEM Centre University of Durham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K?
-Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? That's exactly what I have here and it works like a champ.. -Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? Hello Everyone, Cunrrently I have three servers running NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4, two of these run connectors and one holds the Private and Public information stores. I am planning to replace the computer that holds the stores with a new one and was wondering if anyone could tell me if I would run into any problems if I set it up with Windows 2000 SP2 and Exchange 5.5 Sp4? Thanks, Laurence Bryant CEM Centre University of Durham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K?
(Sorry about the blank posts - my mouse decided to go beserk) Thanks Dominic - I'll give it a go then. Laurence Bryant -Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? That's exactly what I have here and it works like a champ.. -Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? Hello Everyone, Cunrrently I have three servers running NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4, two of these run connectors and one holds the Private and Public information stores. I am planning to replace the computer that holds the stores with a new one and was wondering if anyone could tell me if I would run into any problems if I set it up with Windows 2000 SP2 and Exchange 5.5 Sp4? Thanks, Laurence Bryant CEM Centre University of Durham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring
I appreciate the input that both of you have provided, thank you. Denyse -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring Another product is SRM from Highground which has now been bought out by Sun. http://www.sun.com/storage/software/storage_mgmt/srm_exchange/index.html More sophisticated than Active Folders if I remember correctly but also more expensive. Regards Mark -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring I have recently implemented it here in our Exchange 5.5 environment. It is proving very useful for us, probably the main limitation is that it's speed is limited by the MAPI interface. It will certainly prove very useful if you want to provide detailed reports on Attachments etc. Let me know if you have any other questions. Regards Steve -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 19:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring Andy, Did you end up using this software? Do you know of any other software that performs similar functions (specifically mailbox size and what kind of attachments are in each mailbox) to the Active folders? I'm not having much luck, other than this post from you. I've already posted this (that I'm looking for it) but figured I'd direct the question to you. Thanks in advance for your help, Denyse Andy Russell at 8/1/2001 5:56:27 AM I've been looking for exchange monitoring and reporting tools - the only half decent tool I've found so far is Active Folders by C2C software (http://www.c2c.com/products/Active_f/default.htm) Seems to do all the usual stuff like mailbox size checking, looking for inactive mailboxes, checking stats for public folders, searching for specific text strings or attachments within mailboxes etc. etc. My questions are; Does anyone have any good/bad experiences of this product or C2C software generally? Secondly we're going to go to Exchange 2000 one day - does anyone know what native reporting tools are already in Exchange 2000 - ie. stuff like the above? Thanks Andy Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This communication is confidential and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use of the information and you are requested to notify mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately that you have received it and then destroy the copy in your possession. Commerzbank AG is regulated by the FSA for the conduct of investment business in the UK. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K?
It probably has to be W2K Server? -Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? (Sorry about the blank posts - my mouse decided to go beserk) Thanks Dominic - I'll give it a go then. Laurence Bryant -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? That's exactly what I have here and it works like a champ.. -Original Message- From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 on NT4 and W2K? Hello Everyone, Cunrrently I have three servers running NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4, two of these run connectors and one holds the Private and Public information stores. I am planning to replace the computer that holds the stores with a new one and was wondering if anyone could tell me if I would run into any problems if I set it up with Windows 2000 SP2 and Exchange 5.5 Sp4? Thanks, Laurence Bryant CEM Centre University of Durham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAPI Client Problems
When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit into those 28 inch waist Speedos. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users on the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3 or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox. Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems And you have already tried recreating the profile? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Client Problems Hello All, I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am having with one user. I have checked the permissions and everything works fine through Outlook Web Access. When they are using Outlook 5.0 / Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are displayed when they try to use a any of there secondary mailboxes, the error Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The operation failed. displayed. (Primary mailbox opens fine) Also when reminders pop up, the following message is displayed Cannot turn off the reminder. You may be reminded again. The operation failed. The Exchange Server is 2000 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1... Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, Regards Winston PS. Happy New Year to everybody! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: MAPI Client Problems
When was it released? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit into those 28 inch waist Speedos. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users on the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3 or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox. Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems And you have already tried recreating the profile? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Client Problems Hello All, I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am having with one user. I have checked the permissions and everything works fine through Outlook Web Access. When they are using Outlook 5.0 / Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are displayed when they try to use a any of there secondary mailboxes, the error Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The operation failed. displayed. (Primary mailbox opens fine) Also when reminders pop up, the following message is displayed Cannot turn off the reminder. You may be reminded again. The operation failed. The Exchange Server is 2000 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1... Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, Regards Winston PS. Happy New Year to everybody! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: MAPI Client Problems
Ponch released his Speedo around 1982 when he could no longer hold his gut in. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When was it released? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit into those 28 inch waist Speedos. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users on the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3 or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox. Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems And you have already tried recreating the profile? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Client Problems Hello All, I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am having with one user. I have checked the permissions and everything works fine through Outlook Web Access. When they are using Outlook 5.0 / Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are displayed when they try to use a any of there secondary mailboxes, the error Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The operation failed. displayed. (Primary mailbox opens fine) Also when reminders pop up, the following message is displayed Cannot turn off the reminder. You may be reminded again. The operation failed. The Exchange Server is 2000 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1... Any suggestions would be greatly
RE: MAPI Client Problems
I so needed that mental image first thing the morning :) Stop thinking of the Beverly Hillbillies, *now* -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Ponch released his Speedo around 1982 when he could no longer hold his gut in. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When was it released? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit into those 28 inch waist Speedos. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users on the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3 or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox. Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems And you have already tried recreating the profile? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Client Problems Hello All, I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am having with one user. I have checked the permissions and everything works fine through Outlook Web Access. When they are using Outlook 5.0 / Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are displayed when they try to use a any of there secondary mailboxes, the error Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The operation failed.
RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
That Jerry Hubbard was a sixth cousin. :) Jerry W. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Wasn't Jerry Hubbard the sidekick of Barth Gimble? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry W. Hubbard Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 9:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Dear Martin, Are you saying the frequency of the beat oscillates at frequency x and sets up a standing wave in the air surrounding it? Just and old f*rt technician seeing if he understands. Jerry W. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS This is a great list. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Obviously bumble bees do fly but no fixed wing study in a conventional wind tunnel has shown how enough lift can be generated to lift the huge mass of a bumble bee (compared to its wing size). A wide range of studies have been done in recent years to try to understand the bee's unique method of flying. Insects like the bee do not flap their wings up and down as one might think. The movement of their wings is forward and backward. Lay your right hand on the table (palm down) and move it to the left. That is what the bee does as the first part of its wing beat. This movement produces lift because your hand produces the same effect as an airplane wing. Air moving over the top produces a low pressure because of the greater curvature, a principal known as Bernoulli's principal. Now flip your hand over (palm up) and return it to its original position. Computer studies shown that the timing of the flip is critical. The wake of the forward stroke allows the wing to recapture energy as the wing is moved back. There is a surge of forces on the wing as this happens which provides great lift at minimal energy. Dr. Adrian Thomas of Oxford University says, The whole system is a lot more complicated than we thought. A lot remains to be done to understand this, but the maneuverability and efficiency of it indicates man needs to understand to improve his own methods of flying. To suggest that such systems come about by chance strains credibility to the limit. The enormous complexity of the motion, the design of the wings to do the flying, and the support system that moves the wing all speaks of highly planned and designed structures that we still do not totally understand. Does that answer your question? Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 Listowner www.exchange-mail.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lotus Notes Connector Replication
All, I'm having a strange problem with my Lotus Notes Connector. I'm exporting containers that contain users accounts from 3 different sites into our mother company's NAB. The problem is that I only get user accounts from 2 of the sites and not the 3rd replicated to the NAB. Does anyone have any ideas why this could happen? Is there something I have to configure to get that container from the 3rd site? We are setup using Exch 5.5 w/Notes Connector- connected to a Domino Notes Server 4.6. Thanks for the help, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Active File for NNTP
Can anyone provide me with a copy of their active file for newsgroups or point me to a location I can grab one? I've switched providers for our Internet. The previous provider allowed desktops to pull messages. This provider provides a news feed but according to their last email, they do not provide an active file. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Active File for NNTP
According to RFC-977, the LIST command is supported by an NNTP server (i.e. is not optional). All you need to do is use telnet to open a connection to 119 and issue list capturing to a text file. There's your active file. - Original Message - From: Shields, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:04 AM Subject: Exchange Active File for NNTP Can anyone provide me with a copy of their active file for newsgroups or point me to a location I can grab one? I've switched providers for our Internet. The previous provider allowed desktops to pull messages. This provider provides a news feed but according to their last email, they do not provide an active file. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Active File for NNTP
I've tried that and tried list active on their nntp service. I get illegal command Secondly, I realized, using Win2k Telnet - I can't find the logging feature that was part of the WinNT4 Telnet. Is it gone? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Active File for NNTP According to RFC-977, the LIST command is supported by an NNTP server (i.e. is not optional). All you need to do is use telnet to open a connection to 119 and issue list capturing to a text file. There's your active file. - Original Message - From: Shields, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:04 AM Subject: Exchange Active File for NNTP Can anyone provide me with a copy of their active file for newsgroups or point me to a location I can grab one? I've switched providers for our Internet. The previous provider allowed desktops to pull messages. This provider provides a news feed but according to their last email, they do not provide an active file. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAPI Client Problems
speedos -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Ponch released his Speedo around 1982 when he could no longer hold his gut in. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When was it released? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit into those 28 inch waist Speedos. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users on the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3 or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox. Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems And you have already tried recreating the profile? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Client Problems Hello All, I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am having with one user. I have checked the permissions and everything works fine through Outlook Web Access. When they are using Outlook 5.0 / Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are displayed when they try to use a any of there secondary mailboxes, the error Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The operation failed. displayed. (Primary mailbox opens fine) Also when reminders pop up, the following message
RE: Blocking spam
I sent it on to my boss, and to the field manager who sends me the daily e-mail please block such and such domain. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking spam
We do that here about every 2 years anyway, due to buyouts. It does cut down on the spam, I must say! -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Once the horse is out of the barn, though, what do you do? Make them get all new e-mail addresses? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I agree. It is dead on accurate. When I started here we had content filtering. And I had to do the same thing. I slowly started turning off the filters and now the only thing it does is extension blocking. I explained to management and my users why this was happening to them and how they had done it to themselves and how they should fooble their email addys if they don't want to get on a list and everything is happy now. Bottom line: Its about user education in my book. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Screwed up display name
E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + IGamedayInternational N.V.Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Just curious, are you planning on running your differential backup after every new message is received by your system. :) I have yet to hear of a full system crash taking out both drives in a mirrored log set. Are you using Packard Bell HW? Unless your building was a terrorist target or experienced an act of deity, you wouldn't have an issue (and if it did happen, you wouldn't have your differential backups, would you?). Just curious, how is working for attorney's any different that working in an SEC regulated environment, the healthcare industry, or a retail environment that takes their business seriously? Having worked in all of those industries over the last 14 years, I can't see how your situation is any different just because you work with lawyers. The only difference I am aware of is that for the most part, they're cheap and the older one's can't stand technology. If your system is architected correctly, you will not have an issue with a full Exchange Aware backup nightly. If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? Tom. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of failure it is still possible to lose the entire server, isn't it? And if it is, the logs you are so fond of referring to will be about as useful as your sarcasm. If you ever have the misfortune to work for lawyers you will find that there are certain things you do and deal with and a full system daily backup which is as up-to-date as possible is an absolute requirement. That is the reason that I am asking and why I feel my use of differentials is warranted. If I am not mistaken, a tape of any sort is only going to be as useful as the last information written to it if that is the only source of data, is it not? Therefore, a full server crash in the late afternoon with only last night's full backup leaves you SOL for almost a full day's work. However, if I am incorrect in my assumption that a tape which contains a full backup along with differential backups will allow me to rebuild my server completely and restore it to the point of the last differential then I would honestly be interested in hearing why. Furthermore, if there is a way to restore and roll the logs should the server that the logs were on be completely dead using just a full backup from the night before than I retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I
RE: Blocking spam
Be sure to post their reply! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I sent it on to my boss, and to the field manager who sends me the daily e-mail please block such and such domain. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAPI Client Problems
Fat Ponch in Speedos .. EWW! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems speedos -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Ponch released his Speedo around 1982 when he could no longer hold his gut in. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When was it released? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit into those 28 inch waist Speedos. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users on the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3 or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox. Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems And you have already tried recreating the profile? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Client Problems Hello All, I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am having with one user. I have checked the permissions and everything works fine through Outlook Web Access. When they are using Outlook 5.0 / Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are displayed when they try to use a any of
RE: Screwed up display name
And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking spam
Hi there One of the funniest that I ever ran into One of the ladies here complained rather loudly that she was getting porn email and demanded it be stopped. She is a highly religious girl and will not allow herself to be subjected to this!! I explained to her that she probably signed herself on to some mailing list and her name was taken from there. When she told me she was on the Jackie Martley joke list, I found her problem. It was at that point that I used Ed Crowley's quote from the bottom of his emails and walked away, quietly laughing. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I sent it on to my boss, and to the field manager who sends me the daily e-mail please block such and such domain. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
Maybe he is Australian and he is saying hello? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
Canadian Eh -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Maybe he is Australian and he is saying hello? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
So I see now. I do not see that when my messages arrive in my inbox. -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
Your display name is different now. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Canadian Eh -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Maybe he is Australian and he is saying hello? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
What gives? I have made no changes. Is this what I get for being a Man U supporter? I have no event syncs set up, nothing in my policies for this, and alias and display names do not reference GDY anywhere. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Your display name is different now. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Canadian Eh -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Maybe he is Australian and he is saying hello? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
Having the mib isn't enough. You also need the MIB.BIN file and the PERFMIB.INI files as well. And they are matched - they all must come from the same build. Enabling SNMP reading of perfmon variables (at least under NT4/MSX5.5) is an ugly and somewhat convoluted process. I once tried to build a master set of files, but I gave up after finding that lots of perfmon variables collided with existing MIB variable names. I tried to fix a few by hand, but it just seemed like far too much work. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Try this: http://www.robichaux.net/writing/exchange/goodies.html Search for MIB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. 404 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
I dont know. But i support Man U aswell. So maybe that is why my display name keeps displaying 'Joyce'. My second name is actually Smith. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name What gives? I have made no changes. Is this what I get for being a Man U supporter? I have no event syncs set up, nothing in my policies for this, and alias and display names do not reference GDY anywhere. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Your display name is different now. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Canadian Eh -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Maybe he is Australian and he is saying hello? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Screwed up display name
You should be shot for being a Man U supporter. Consider a name problem as getting off lightly. :-) -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 08 January 2002 15:31 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Screwed up display name Subject: RE: Screwed up display name What gives? I have made no changes. Is this what I get for being a Man U supporter? I have no event syncs set up, nothing in my policies for this, and alias and display names do not reference GDY anywhere. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Your display name is different now. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Canadian Eh -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Maybe he is Australian and he is saying hello? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Oh, yeah? I see Clayton GDY... -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Nope, just Clayton. And then just to confuse things, it does not go that way when I post to lists like this. Only seems to be to web based mail. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name And Clayton GDY is not what you see in the GAL? -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Screwed up display name
Did you use any NT4 to AD migration tools? E.g. ADMT or third-party equivalents. Some of them will overwrite the AD display name with the NT4 Full Name. This may be the source of Clayton GDY. Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Active File for NNTP
Inform your ISP that he is non-compliant with the RFC. He either enables the command or provides an active file. How does he expect his customers to use NNTP if they can't get a list of groups from his server? Telnet /? tells the story - Original Message - From: Shields, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Active File for NNTP I've tried that and tried list active on their nntp service. I get illegal command Secondly, I realized, using Win2k Telnet - I can't find the logging feature that was part of the WinNT4 Telnet. Is it gone? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Active File for NNTP According to RFC-977, the LIST command is supported by an NNTP server (i.e. is not optional). All you need to do is use telnet to open a connection to 119 and issue list capturing to a text file. There's your active file. - Original Message - From: Shields, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:04 AM Subject: Exchange Active File for NNTP Can anyone provide me with a copy of their active file for newsgroups or point me to a location I can grab one? I've switched providers for our Internet. The previous provider allowed desktops to pull messages. This provider provides a news feed but according to their last email, they do not provide an active file. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screwed up display name
Sorry not to clarify earlier. This is a 7 month old W2K Network running in Native Mode. Never had any NT4 DC's. Thanks though -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 8, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screwed up display name Did you use any NT4 to AD migration tools? E.g. ADMT or third-party equivalents. Some of them will overwrite the AD display name with the NT4 Full Name. This may be the source of Clayton GDY. Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 15:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screwed up display name E2K SP2, W2K SP2 For whatever reason, it was decided that we would not use last names on our display names. This was cool up until a couple of weeks ago. Now when we send email, rather than the dispaly name showing up as just the first name, the display is showing (in my case) Clayton GDY when we send to hotmail etc. I have checked all the usual is AD users and computers, and do not have any sort of recipient policy in place other than the default, which only dishes out our SMTP addresses. Where does this GDY come from (company is called Gameday), and how do I get rid of it. TechNet not too forthcoming on this one. What gives? Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
You've got to be kidding...
The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list.
This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds..
-
Previously from Thomas Nardo:
If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list
(maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in
my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did
you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had
highwaters?
---
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I'd ask for my subscription fee back if I were you. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
-Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. You could unsubscribe and reduce the number by one. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I would check the money back guarantee! -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(纷 \b=!䑶 0 槑zǚ�r㣬:.˛ m隊[hy杣\z[,怑)rɄZ Zvhࠧ+-i٢2ሞG( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Geez, that didn't even rhyme. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)潌r(康 \檆b!ຶ 0 觑zǚ쮱r슬:.˛ m隊[hy㠠\z[,㈠)rቄZZvh娧+-i٢2�G( -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking spam
Our 98%-effective content filter is simple enough!!! 1) First line of msg ends in !, !!, or especially !!! 2) Just $ 3) You've been selected 4) XXX gets the rest This lets through the subscribed JOD about the two soaking-wet coeds who rescued a 9-inch rooster from a pond--thereby keeping everyone happy. If this message reached you in error because YOUR content filter differs from the above, reply to www.spamusforever.ru Include your MasterCard number and mother's maiden name for verification -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Not a solution in my environment, unfortunately. :) They're still going to be getting a ton of spam (from their previous indiscretions) and they'll still insist upon me fixing (or at least reducing) that somehow. In our case the answer is content filtering and the attendant problems that go with it. Luckily we've tuned (and continue to tune) our filters fairly well and catch very little legitimate mail in it. I'd guess we spend maybe 15 minutes a day skimming through the quarantine and releasing stuff that's legit (deleting the rest of it). We also don't catch all spam, of course, but we catch a lot of it. And we do block more or less all of the dangerous attachment extensions. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam No, you say that sucks, you shouldn't have done that, then shake your head slowly and walk away. :) -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Once the horse is out of the barn, though, what do you do? Make them get all new e-mail addresses? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I agree. It is dead on accurate. When I started here we had content filtering. And I had to do the same thing. I slowly started turning off the filters and now the only thing it does is extension blocking. I explained to management and my users why this was happening to them and how they had done it to themselves and how they should fooble their email addys if they don't want to get on a list and everything is happy now. Bottom line: Its about user education in my book. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: changing port
In Martin's example, Exchange listens on port 25, Mailmarshall is installed on a separate box. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing port Just a quick question Martin, why do you have MX 20 Exchange ? If Exchange listens on port 97 nobody is going to find it anyway (on port 25) if MX 10 goes down, or am I missing something really obvious here...:-) Monday morning early Sander -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing port He wants it to go: Internet--(25)Mailmarshall(97)-(97)IMS However what I would do it setup MM on another machine, then configure DNS with MX records of 10 MailMarshal 20 Exchange Then have MM forward mail to the Exhc server -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing port I look forward to those who are sending you mail to connect to a port other than the RFC standard port 25 then. Or are you saying mail will still be received on port 25 to the Mail Marshall server and then forwarded off of port 97 to the Exchange server? D -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing port We are using Mail Marshall and the reason port 25 needs to be change is because Mail Marshall uses this port(97) for mail and sends mail to Exchange Server, instead of Exchange recieving it first. Mail Marshall is acting like a mail security gateway for Exchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
Dude - Ms. Baker can take you. Trust me.
And please know from experience you don't want to be on her special list.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Sorry, but you forgot to add your Kelly Only disclaimer, so
you can't make any threats.
If, in the future, you want to send messages for only Kelly
to read, you should add the following:
Warning: This message was intended for Kelly only. Anyone
else reading this message will die.
Of course, you should probably run it by legal and have them
punch it up a bit. But then you wouldn't have to worry about
anyone else on the list reading your messages for Kelly. 8-{)
...Joel
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
That was for Kelly only...now you must die.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Did someone say lightsaber?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
The real question is: Are you willing to try it?
That was for the light saber thing. love ya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Would that taste like chicken too?
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
Mmm... fried Tener
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
I realize I am late to this discussion, as I have read many
catapult references, however I don't think it was addressed.
I am relatively new To the Exchange World, only a year and a
half working with it. But I have Been involved with
Networking and Computers in general for the last 12 years. I
got my start (as probably did everyone here) working on hardware.
Richard, I can tell you there are most certainly no user
serviceable parts In a monitor. And Opening one up can be
Fatal. The Flyback Capacitor Can hold a charge of several
thousand volts for years. There is more than enough Voltage
there to severely burn you, if not kill you. Like everyone
one else Here has said, it's cheaper to buy a new one, then
get an old one fixed. Unless.You live near a High
School that has a Vocational Education Program that
specializes in Electronics. These kinds of schools Will
usually Fix the equipment at no charge save for parts.
Just An idea.
Ken
Kenneth Davis
IT Manager
American Wood Moulding, LLC
For a moment, nothing happened.
Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: fix monitor
for all u hardware/monitor geniuses out there do u know a
good place on the web to tell me how to open/fix a monitor?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
This from a man who has taken a rash of sh!t... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) If you don't like it...beat it!!! Simple as that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I havent visited as much this week actually Kevin.;) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 16:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Which one are you? -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZZvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Excactly, after I got bombarded I took a step back and thought about why they were being sarcastic to me. To make me go the extra mile in trying to investigate a problem and learning. Rather than having someone just blurt out the answer. Most of the time it's for a reason. Not just to piss you off. But it's funny to watch people getting pissy from peoples remarks.. :-) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) This from a man who has taken a rash of sh!t... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) If you don't like it...beat it!!! Simple as that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Enumeration Question
David, I agree and really do appreciate you reminding me of that. However, none of our DL's are structured that way. This one in fact is over 15 characters long with special characters. Jim -Original Message- From: David Lemson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Enumeration Question Do not underestimate the power of a dictionary attack. Especially if the alias of the DL is less than 8 characters long, it is not hard to manage a brute-force attack. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Enumeration Question Chris, 1. Not an obvious name. 2. duh It did include an external SMTP addr \duh However, the DL was hidden from the GAL, as was the membership of the DL. 3. Dictionary generated listing wouldn't have worked for reason #1. 4. I COULD stand to lose 30 pounds. While fighting spammers does provide an amusing distraction from time to time, this is not what bothers me. What bothers me is the fact that they evidently got ahold of *every other* SMTP address in the GAL, as evidenced by the fact that they know what the addr is to this one hidden DL that is less than 2 months old. TIA O Great Exchang Yoda ;o) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Enumeration Question Other possibilities. The DL name is an obvious one that someone would guess (e.g. all@ sales@ hr@). The DL includes an external recipient and someone sent to the DL with it in the to or from field of a message. The address was created through a dictionary generated spam mailing. Someone in your org knows how to help you lose 30lbs in 30 days. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Enumeration Question Ok, here's the situation: Win2k SP2 with Exchange OWA 5.5 SP4+2 and IIS 5.0 In the past couple of weeks, we have been getting hit VERY hard by SPAM. It didn't really trip my trigger until I saw one particular NDR in my postmaster mailbox this morning. Upon opening and looking specifically at the distribution list, I found that the message was addressed to two different SMTP addresses within our organization. One of those addresses has been deleted, hence the NDR. The other addressee was a hidden DL that was created after 11/8/01, at the suggestion of one Mr. Louis Joyce, in a separate thread to someone else (see RE: email to a deleted mailbox). Now...there are three ways I can think of that someone has gotten ahold of our enumerated GAL: 1. They enumerated our GAL through the OWA, ala MS01-047 : OWA Function Allows Unauthenticated User to Enumerate Global Address List. This is Q307195. We have grepped the log files as far back as 07/01/01 on the OWA server, and can find no indication that this vulnerability has been exploited on our server. In the Add/Remove Programs, it doesn't show this hotfix as having been installed, but it does show hotfix Q313576 as having been installed and Q307195 is an included hotfix (I would say we could rule that option out). 2. We are one site in a two site organization, with the other site being the parent site. Therefore, all recipients in our GAL replicate to their GAL. So...the exploit described in #1 could be performed from their OWA site if the patch hasn't been applied, with the same results (Don't know their status yet). 3. Someone from within our company or theirs has enumerated the GAL and is selling it to outside sources. Have I left any possibilities out? James H (Jim) Blunt Network / Microsoft Exchange Admin. Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
If the sarcasm is too much, don't pay for the list. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:18 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r? ?? zo?r:??m [y z[)rà vh?+i??G â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\ ©àx¸¬µ§fyb²Ö)ìÃ)är
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
You're equating dead server and completely erased drives, which is an erroneous assumption on your part. There are two full system crash scenarios in which I could see not being able to recover from the logs. First - drive controller failure that includes destroying BOTH the database and log volumes (you DO have them on different RAID sets, right?). This is only an issue if you have 1 and only 1 RAID channel/array. Second - datacenter fire that physically destroys the box. You're DOA, even in your scenario, because the tape sitting in the drive with your most recent differential is melted, along with the server it backed up. As long as you have 2 of the 3 following items, you're 100% fine: -intact Database volume -intact log volume -intact copy of the last full Exchange aware backup With any 2 of those 3, you can recover your system to precrash considition with no committed data lost. Differentials are a waste of time for Exchange in 99% of all cases. SQL-esque databases are a different story, but that's another forum entirely Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of failure it is still possible to lose the entire server, isn't it? And if it is, the logs you are so fond of referring to will be about as useful as your sarcasm. If you ever have the misfortune to work for lawyers you will find that there are certain things you do and deal with and a full system daily backup which is as up-to-date as possible is an absolute requirement. That is the reason that I am asking and why I feel my use of differentials is warranted. If I am not mistaken, a tape of any sort is only going to be as useful as the last information written to it if that is the only source of data, is it not? Therefore, a full server crash in the late afternoon with only last night's full backup leaves you SOL for almost a full day's work. However, if I am incorrect in my assumption that a tape which contains a full backup along with differential backups will allow me to rebuild my server completely and restore it to the point of the last differential then I would honestly be interested in hearing why. Furthermore, if there is a way to restore and roll the logs should the server that the logs were on be completely dead using just a full backup from the night before than I retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B ackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2k recovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups
EXCH 5.5 x.400 to exch 2000 in seperate domain
Im trying to connect a 5.5 exchange server to a 2000 exchange server via x.400 connector. They are in seperate untrusted nt domains. Does anyone know of a helpful article? I can't seem to find one... Thanks, J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Yeah, and I thought it was 5, 7, 5. Can't be bothered to count those. JDE -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Geez, that didn't even rhyme. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)潌r(康-\檆b!ຶ 0 觑zǚ쮱r슬:.˛ m隊[hy㠠\z[,㈠)rቄZ Zvh娧+-i٢2�G( -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Oddly enough, some of the sharpest (and funniest) sarcasm comes from some of the most technically proficient and helpful people. As the man said, if you don't like the style of this list, you are free to go elsewhere. Les Bessant MCP[1] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! [1] Just those pesky electives to go... -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)椠r(� \檆b鰽! 0 槑zǚᥱr马:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,敨)r≄Z Zvh쮧+-i٢2 G( The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive antivirus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking spam
Something like: Congratulations!!! You've been selected by our steering committee to handle our AD design and implementation. Our selection was not based just on the $$$'s you will save us, but due to your experience and understanding. We look forward to working with you. (Still can't figure out how to work XXX in there) -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Our 98%-effective content filter is simple enough!!! 1) First line of msg ends in !, !!, or especially !!! 2) Just $ 3) You've been selected 4) XXX gets the rest This lets through the subscribed JOD about the two soaking-wet coeds who rescued a 9-inch rooster from a pond--thereby keeping everyone happy. If this message reached you in error because YOUR content filter differs from the above, reply to www.spamusforever.ru Include your MasterCard number and mother's maiden name for verification -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Not a solution in my environment, unfortunately. :) They're still going to be getting a ton of spam (from their previous indiscretions) and they'll still insist upon me fixing (or at least reducing) that somehow. In our case the answer is content filtering and the attendant problems that go with it. Luckily we've tuned (and continue to tune) our filters fairly well and catch very little legitimate mail in it. I'd guess we spend maybe 15 minutes a day skimming through the quarantine and releasing stuff that's legit (deleting the rest of it). We also don't catch all spam, of course, but we catch a lot of it. And we do block more or less all of the dangerous attachment extensions. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam No, you say that sucks, you shouldn't have done that, then shake your head slowly and walk away. :) -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Once the horse is out of the barn, though, what do you do? Make them get all new e-mail addresses? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I agree. It is dead on accurate. When I started here we had content filtering. And I had to do the same thing. I slowly started turning off the filters and now the only thing it does is extension blocking. I explained to management and my users why this was happening to them and how they had done it to themselves and how they should fooble their email addys if they don't want to get on a list and everything is happy now. Bottom line: Its about user education in my book. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny
Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Opinions: everyone has one... - Original Message - From: Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:18 AM Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)㘰r(㺷 \b췽!儶 0 䧑zǚ饱r幬:.˛ m隊[hyㄮ\z[,ㄳ)rZZvh寧+-i٢2尞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
The top of the Exchange world _created_ this list. - Original Message - From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:24 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Bog dogs? Would they be anything like Hounds of the Baskervilles? - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
The last time I ran with bog dogs, I got covered in swamp water :) Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I dunno. Sometimes I do it just to piss you off. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Excactly, after I got bombarded I took a step back and thought about why they were being sarcastic to me. To make me go the extra mile in trying to investigate a problem and learning. Rather than having someone just blurt out the answer. Most of the time it's for a reason. Not just to piss you off. But it's funny to watch people getting pissy from peoples remarks.. :-) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) This from a man who has taken a rash of sh!t... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) If you don't like it...beat it!!! Simple as that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Haiku on Friday Tuesday too early for this Haiku come Friday Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ewins, James Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Yeah, and I thought it was 5, 7, 5. Can't be bothered to count those. JDE -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Geez, that didn't even rhyme. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)潌r(康-\檆b!ຶ 0 觑zǚ쮱r슬:.˛ m隊[hy㠠\z[,㈠)rቄZ Zvh娧+-i٢2�G( -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Ha ha ha ha ha. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 16:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I dunno. Sometimes I do it just to piss you off. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Excactly, after I got bombarded I took a step back and thought about why they were being sarcastic to me. To make me go the extra mile in trying to investigate a problem and learning. Rather than having someone just blurt out the answer. Most of the time it's for a reason. Not just to piss you off. But it's funny to watch people getting pissy from peoples remarks.. :-) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) This from a man who has taken a rash of sh!t... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) If you don't like it...beat it!!! Simple as that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
No, sorry way passed YOU pissing me off ;-) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I dunno. Sometimes I do it just to piss you off. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Excactly, after I got bombarded I took a step back and thought about why they were being sarcastic to me. To make me go the extra mile in trying to investigate a problem and learning. Rather than having someone just blurt out the answer. Most of the time it's for a reason. Not just to piss you off. But it's funny to watch people getting pissy from peoples remarks.. :-) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) This from a man who has taken a rash of sh!t... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) If you don't like it...beat it!!! Simple as that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That is what makes this list great. With out the humor of this list or the ability to vent like some of us do, I can envision some users getting Squashed when they call and say the entire internet is down come fix it now Thomas is very correct. The top of the exchange world visits this list. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I think we need a new container. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking spam
The domain should be www.mycompany.xxx (with the XXX to be decided later, by you!) -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Hate can only flourish where love is absent. --William C. Menninger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Something like: Congratulations!!! You've been selected by our steering committee to handle our AD design and implementation. Our selection was not based just on the $$$'s you will save us, but due to your experience and understanding. We look forward to working with you. (Still can't figure out how to work XXX in there) -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Our 98%-effective content filter is simple enough!!! 1) First line of msg ends in !, !!, or especially !!! 2) Just $ 3) You've been selected 4) XXX gets the rest This lets through the subscribed JOD about the two soaking-wet coeds who rescued a 9-inch rooster from a pond--thereby keeping everyone happy. If this message reached you in error because YOUR content filter differs from the above, reply to www.spamusforever.ru Include your MasterCard number and mother's maiden name for verification -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Not a solution in my environment, unfortunately. :) They're still going to be getting a ton of spam (from their previous indiscretions) and they'll still insist upon me fixing (or at least reducing) that somehow. In our case the answer is content filtering and the attendant problems that go with it. Luckily we've tuned (and continue to tune) our filters fairly well and catch very little legitimate mail in it. I'd guess we spend maybe 15 minutes a day skimming through the quarantine and releasing stuff that's legit (deleting the rest of it). We also don't catch all spam, of course, but we catch a lot of it. And we do block more or less all of the dangerous attachment extensions. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam No, you say that sucks, you shouldn't have done that, then shake your head slowly and walk away. :) -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Once the horse is out of the barn, though, what do you do? Make them get all new e-mail addresses? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I agree. It is dead on accurate. When I started here we had content filtering. And I had to do the same thing. I slowly started turning off the filters and now the only thing it does is extension blocking. I explained to management and my users why this was happening to them and how they had done it to themselves and how they should fooble their email addys if they don't want to get on a list and everything is happy now. Bottom line: Its about user education in my book. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
It wasn’t 5-7-5 either! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Geez, that didn't even rhyme. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)潌r(康 \檆b!ຶ 0 觑zǚ쮱r슬:.˛ m隊[hy㠠\z[,㈠)rቄZ Zvh娧+-i٢2�G( -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
But you can't pick your friend's nose! -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! The world acquires value only through its extremes and endures only through moderation; extremists make the world great, the moderates give it stability. --Paul Valery -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Opinions: everyone has one... - Original Message - From: Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:18 AM Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)㘰r(㺷 \b췽!儶 0 䧑zǚ饱r幬:.˛ m隊[hyㄮ\z[,ㄳ)rZZvh寧+-i٢2尞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking spam
See Andy Webb's sig for a suggestion. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Something like: Congratulations!!! You've been selected by our steering committee to handle our AD design and implementation. Our selection was not based just on the $$$'s you will save us, but due to your experience and understanding. We look forward to working with you. (Still can't figure out how to work XXX in there) -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Our 98%-effective content filter is simple enough!!! 1) First line of msg ends in !, !!, or especially !!! 2) Just $ 3) You've been selected 4) XXX gets the rest This lets through the subscribed JOD about the two soaking-wet coeds who rescued a 9-inch rooster from a pond--thereby keeping everyone happy. If this message reached you in error because YOUR content filter differs from the above, reply to www.spamusforever.ru Include your MasterCard number and mother's maiden name for verification -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Not a solution in my environment, unfortunately. :) They're still going to be getting a ton of spam (from their previous indiscretions) and they'll still insist upon me fixing (or at least reducing) that somehow. In our case the answer is content filtering and the attendant problems that go with it. Luckily we've tuned (and continue to tune) our filters fairly well and catch very little legitimate mail in it. I'd guess we spend maybe 15 minutes a day skimming through the quarantine and releasing stuff that's legit (deleting the rest of it). We also don't catch all spam, of course, but we catch a lot of it. And we do block more or less all of the dangerous attachment extensions. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam No, you say that sucks, you shouldn't have done that, then shake your head slowly and walk away. :) -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Once the horse is out of the barn, though, what do you do? Make them get all new e-mail addresses? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I agree. It is dead on accurate. When I started here we had content filtering. And I had to do the same thing. I slowly started turning off the filters and now the only thing it does is extension blocking. I explained to management and my users why this was happening to them and how they had done it to themselves and how they should fooble their email addys if they don't want to get on a list and everything is happy now. Bottom line: Its about user education in my book. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Although his title makes my job a lot harder. I need to include graphs in all my communication with him. My Workload: Doug's Workload:* Can I take that * off your plate, Doug?[1] -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com [1] Seriously, I'm just kidding. Give it to Jeffe[2] [2] he had free time yesterday -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Yea, WTF is a Bog Dog? :) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
A dog the lives in a bog. bog (bôg, bg) n. - An area having a wet, spongy, acidic substrate composed chiefly of sphagnum moss and peat in which characteristic shrubs and herbs and sometimes trees usually grow. - Any of certain other wetland areas, such as a fen, having a peat substrate. Also called peat bog. - An area of soft, naturally waterlogged ground. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)ær( \æªb娽!驶 0 à§zÇä ±r鮬:.Ë mé[hyæ \z[,æ½¥)rãZ Zvh᳧+-iÙ¢2é¯G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I think I'm damn funny! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Damn! Not enough coffee yet... :o) D -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Bog dogs? Would they be anything like Hounds of the Baskervilles? - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I'm fricken hilarious! I kill me sometimes! D -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I think I'm damn funny! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Which is a reference to the Hounds of Baskervilles - Original Message - From: Thomas Di Nardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:01 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) A dog the lives in a bog. bog (bôg, bg) n. - An area having a wet, spongy, acidic substrate composed chiefly of sphagnum moss and peat in which characteristic shrubs and herbs and sometimes trees usually grow. - Any of certain other wetland areas, such as a fen, having a peat substrate. Also called peat bog. - An area of soft, naturally waterlogged ground. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)桴r(亷 \b!娶 0 䧑zǚᡱr庬:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,散)rZZvh餧+-i٢2᳞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Yeah! See it means something! ;o) D -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) A dog the lives in a bog. bog (bôg, bg) n. - An area having a wet, spongy, acidic substrate composed chiefly of sphagnum moss and peat in which characteristic shrubs and herbs and sometimes trees usually grow. - Any of certain other wetland areas, such as a fen, having a peat substrate. Also called peat bog. - An area of soft, naturally waterlogged ground. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Perzactly! Ya'll stop pickin on me! I'm feewing hurt and sad... Nobody wikes me... Wh The carebear list is where? ;o) D -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Which is a reference to the Hounds of Baskervilles - Original Message - From: Thomas Di Nardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:01 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) A dog the lives in a bog. bog (bôg, bg) n. - An area having a wet, spongy, acidic substrate composed chiefly of sphagnum moss and peat in which characteristic shrubs and herbs and sometimes trees usually grow. - Any of certain other wetland areas, such as a fen, having a peat substrate. Also called peat bog. - An area of soft, naturally waterlogged ground. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)桴r(亷 \b!娶 0 䧑zǚᡱr庬:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,散)rZ Zvh餧+-i٢2᳞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
And i live roughly 20 miles away from where the hound of the baskervilles was set. I expect my badge in the post. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 17:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Which is a reference to the Hounds of Baskervilles - Original Message - From: Thomas Di Nardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:01 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) A dog the lives in a bog. bog (bôg, bg) n. - An area having a wet, spongy, acidic substrate composed chiefly of sphagnum moss and peat in which characteristic shrubs and herbs and sometimes trees usually grow. - Any of certain other wetland areas, such as a fen, having a peat substrate. Also called peat bog. - An area of soft, naturally waterlogged ground. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)桴r(亷 \b!娶 0 䧑zǚᡱr庬:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,散)rZZvh餧+-i٢2᳞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking spam
I'm curious what software package you're using, Ben, and how difficult was it to tune the filters. David -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Not a solution in my environment, unfortunately. :) They're still going to be getting a ton of spam (from their previous indiscretions) and they'll still insist upon me fixing (or at least reducing) that somehow. In our case the answer is content filtering and the attendant problems that go with it. Luckily we've tuned (and continue to tune) our filters fairly well and catch very little legitimate mail in it. I'd guess we spend maybe 15 minutes a day skimming through the quarantine and releasing stuff that's legit (deleting the rest of it). We also don't catch all spam, of course, but we catch a lot of it. And we do block more or less all of the dangerous attachment extensions. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam No, you say that sucks, you shouldn't have done that, then shake your head slowly and walk away. :) -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Once the horse is out of the barn, though, what do you do? Make them get all new e-mail addresses? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam I agree. It is dead on accurate. When I started here we had content filtering. And I had to do the same thing. I slowly started turning off the filters and now the only thing it does is extension blocking. I explained to management and my users why this was happening to them and how they had done it to themselves and how they should fooble their email addys if they don't want to get on a list and everything is happy now. Bottom line: Its about user education in my book. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam You know, this has to be the best email I've read here and have archived it for the day when my boss demands content filtering on our exchange server, heh. You know, if you had been reading the list for one week, you would have seen that this very issue was discussed in at least two threads. There's nothing you can do until you show your users how they actually get on people's sh!t lists. If you can teach them how to avoid behavior that gets them on people's sh!t lists, then and only then your spam input will decrease. Sure, you can install something like eManager (since you have ScanMail already, it's a cheap buy) but that just masks the problem. Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
And you're not dead yet? Sheessh JK -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I'm fricken hilarious! I kill me sometimes! D -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I think I'm damn funny! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Yea, I wanna kill you too sometimes! See, I am funny!!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I'm fricken hilarious! I kill me sometimes! D -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I think I'm damn funny! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nemx Power Tools
Has anyone used this , if so how did it perform?? Thanx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
The best Exchange people in the world are on this list. Reading this list is a priceless education for all Exchange Administrators. The wannabee comedians and scornful nerds lighten the day for many of us. If the list tone is hard for you to take, turn on your brains filter to take out the noise. If you missed it an alternate solution is, To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Have a great 2002. Jerry W. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] When eating corn on the cob, eat the kernels and leave cob. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+x )r? ?? zo?r:??m [y z[)r vh?+i??G _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contacts out of Synk with GAL
Dear All, I have recently updated the custom recipients in our Global Address List. Since this, user who previously added GAL custom recipients to their contacts are now getting NDR's. Even if the custom recipient still exists in the same container. I found the following technet article but it doesn't explain how to fix the problem. (Q237951). Any Ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Attendant mailbox
Hello all, I have a pb and i have not been able to find something relevant in the archive. The pb is that i have a System Attendant mailbox that is around 200 Mb. I would like to remove the infos in this mailbox if it not needed but up to now, i have been unable to access this mailbox. Could anyone help ? Thks Saheel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install trouble
I have just been given the task of setting up the companies exchange server. (Exchange 2000 on Win 2k server) Having never done it before I thought I'd give it a crack. Upon entering the setup screen I started going through the installation options and I got this error:- Microsoft Exchange Messaging and collaboration Services depends on Microsoft Exchange domain preperation, which has an install problem. Any ideas?? All knowledgebase stuff I can find relates to DNS of Master Domain controller - which is fine. TIA Dean Clark Database Administrator Calaba Ltd (+44) 0207 258 8462 07790 853 688 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
You're friggin hilarious... NOT! :P D -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Yea, I wanna kill you too sometimes! See, I am funny!!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I'm fricken hilarious! I kill me sometimes! D -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I think I'm damn funny! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Someone needs to get laid... Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes me a comedian. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)r(ື \檆b=!6 0 zǚ1r,:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
test
just testing please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Ah, but in the story Doyle has the hound covered with paint that glows in the dark, rather dowdy wouldn't you say? But then, it was effective dowdiness in the story. Quality sarcasm, like quality haiku, or even quality dowdiness is often great entertainment. It adds to the page turning (screen flipping? or maybe just flippin') aspect of the milieu. A good jab now and then about, say someone having trouble with the quality of the results produced by low quality tools can be useful irony, if it is done well (the jab that is), and it is done with a smile. Has anyone on his list every taken themselves too seriously or forgotten to smile while sticking it to some poor slob whose been saddled with a collection of tools foisted upon them by a useless PHB? Oh certainly not. Dowdy dogs wail on scurrilous neighbors rake muck the very high heels laugh -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) And i live roughly 20 miles away from where the hound of the baskervilles was set. I expect my badge in the post. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 17:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Which is a reference to the Hounds of Baskervilles - Original Message - From: Thomas Di Nardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:01 AM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) A dog the lives in a bog. bog (bôg, bg) n. - An area having a wet, spongy, acidic substrate composed chiefly of sphagnum moss and peat in which characteristic shrubs and herbs and sometimes trees usually grow. - Any of certain other wetland areas, such as a fen, having a peat substrate. Also called peat bog. - An area of soft, naturally waterlogged ground. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WTF is a bog dog??? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Did we hurt your wittle feewings??? Go find another list and see if you can find the same quantity of knowledge. If you can't run with the bog dogs, get out of our house! D -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)按r( \檆b娽!驶 0 zǚ䠱r鮬:.˛ m隊[hy愠\z[,潥)r㉄Z Zvh᳧+-i٢2鯞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)桴r(亷 \b!娶 0 䧑zǚᡱr庬:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,散)rZZvh餧+-i٢2᳞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Re: test
Oh no! A test! And I didn't study!! The dog ate my textbook! - Original Message - From: Dean Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: test just testing please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install trouble
Yikes! You need to read some more before embarking on this cruise ship. You need to have Active Directory running in your W2K domain, and you will need to run the Forest Prep for Exchange 2000 before you will get very far. Best of luck! Scott -Original Message- From: Dean Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install trouble I have just been given the task of setting up the companies exchange server. (Exchange 2000 on Win 2k server) Having never done it before I thought I'd give it a crack. Upon entering the setup screen I started going through the installation options and I got this error:- Microsoft Exchange Messaging and collaboration Services depends on Microsoft Exchange domain preperation, which has an install problem. Any ideas?? All knowledgebase stuff I can find relates to DNS of Master Domain controller - which is fine. TIA Dean Clark Database Administrator Calaba Ltd (+44) 0207 258 8462 07790 853 688 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test
What? The bog dog? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 17:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: test Oh no! A test! And I didn't study!! The dog ate my textbook! - Original Message - From: Dean Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: test just testing please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
