RE: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM
I just wanted to say thanks to Chris for making me aware of this problem. I have been trying to fix a problem with being unable to connect to mailboxes on only one of my servers via OWA for quite a while. It would appear that NT4 talking to NT4 does not suffer even if these files are mismatched, but w2k talking to NT4 does. After updating, problem is fixed. Thanks again Nick -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: 08 November 2002 17:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM I forgot to provide attribution to those steps... it was Peter Peedu from MS who suggested it in the public newsgroups. I don't know anything about it other than it has worked for a couple of people. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Chris that's an idea.. Of course Ive wiped the machine now. I could reload the ghost image for kicks and try it. One Q: for kicks I checked my term W2K Pro (which has ech55 admin ..work fine) ie.ethe SECURITY.DLL only shows me the version number not any of the text you indicate. Should I ref by the ver number to find which ones i.e. 56 or 128? thats for the input bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM I was logging in with the domain administrator account My domain admin account doesn't have Exchange admin permissions, so it'd create this error every time, however... Check the following files. How to determine if you are using 56bit or 128 bit encryption on SECURITY.DLL , NTLMSSPS.DLL and SCHANNEL.DLL file. Take properties and Version the description of the file will tell. SECURITY.DLL NtLm Security Support Provider Client DLL (Export Version) 56 bit version NtLm Security Support Provider Client DLL (Domestic Use Only) 128 bit version NTLMSSPS.DLL NtLm Security Support Provider Service DLL (Export Version) 56 bit version NtLm Security Support Provider Service DLL (Domestic Use Only) 128 bit version SCHANNEL.DLL TLS / SSL Security Provider (Export Version) 56 bit version TLS / SSL Security Provider (Domestic Use Only) 128 bit version Make sure you DO NOT have a mix of these files. Meaning either 128 Bit on all three or 56 bit on all three. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions I was logging in with the domain administrator account. Background: Ghosted server from one machine to another. From IDE drive machine to scsi raid. Had to Run W2K svr cd cause Boot Inaccess... W2K svr. Added machine back into domain. Got Exchange error Unload exchange admin, regclean, reload exchange admin, run sp4, run Q289606. still get exchange error. No Had not tried RPCping yet. Looked at archives - NO results returned..blank page. I do not remember this topic on the list (IF you can tell me when I look back over my last 1 1/2 worth of list) MS Technet - NG It worked fine on the original server. I know it has something to do with having to reload w2k kind'a to get the scsi drive to loadup right. But why it would not comm..after reloading has got me puzzled. bill -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM What account have you logged into the workstation with? Does it have SA rights? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM has anyone seen this error DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM from trying to run exchange admin exchange 55sp4 admin loaded on machine (which was ghosted/cloned) reloaded admin + sp4 + Q289606 still get error any clues? No luck for me on MS technet thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly
AW: Logging denied connections on Exchange 2000
Sorry, still no success - it does not log denied connection attempts Any ideas, anyone ? COFFEE.EXE Missing - Insert Cup and Press Any Key -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2002 00:44 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: Re: AW: Logging denied connections on Exchange 2000 All righty then, give this one a whirl. This comes from Q324205. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q324205; SUMMARY Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1 (SP1) or later includes the Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) Protocol diagnostics logging functionality. You can use SMTP Protocol diagnostics logging to troubleshoot connectivity and mail flow issues. This article describes how to configure the SMTP Protocol log file. MORE INFORMATION How to Configure the SMTP Protocol Log File Start Exchange System Manager, expand Administrative Groups, expand First Administrative Group, and then expand Servers. Right-click Server_name, and then click Properties. Click the Diagnostics Logging tab. Click MSExchangeTransport in the Services pane, click SMTP Protocol in the Categories pane, and then set the SMTP Protocol logging level to Minimum or higher so that you can see header and transaction data. NOTE: The SMTP Protocol Log file is located in the Exchsrvr\Server_name.log folder. For example, if the Exchange 2000 server is named Exchange2000, the SMTP Protocol Log file is located in Exchsrvr\Exchange2000.log. The SMTP Protocol log file is saved as a tab-delimited text file. Microsoft recommends that you view the file by using Microsoft Excel. Available Logging Levels None: Nothing is logged. Minimal: Fatal (500 level) SMTP protocol errors are logged. Medium: Transient (400 level) SMTP protocol errors are logged. NOTE: If you set the logging level to Maximum, you receive the same information as you do when you set the logging level to Medium. You gain no additional benefits if you change the logging level from Medium to Maximum. Greg I have activated everything there but it seems it is only logging what happens AFTER the connection was successfully established. What I want to see is if an incoming connection is NOT accepted by my server because the IP address has been blocked Freddie Exchange System Manager | Servers | server | Protocols | SMTP | SMTP virtual server | Properties On the General tab at the bottom you can enable logging and by hitting the properties button, you can include a ton of information. Hi list I have now been searching the Exchange Help and Google for some time to find out how to do this but I cannot find the answer If I have blocked some IP addresses from connecting in the SMTP Virtual Server Properties, I would like to be able to check if there has been any attempts to connect from these hosts. In Exchange 5.5 I could enable full SMPT logging and check here but I cannot find the equivalent feature in Exchange 2000 The same goes for the filtering in the Message Delivery Properties Can anybody help, please TIA Freddie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange, Outlook and speed
Hi guys, I have a situation where Outlook is very slow over a VPN connection. If i give u a bit of history, on how i set this up then perhaps you can tell me where i went wrong. Firstly, we have an office here in the UK where Exchange 5.5 server is running on a PDC, they can only afford one server, so everything runs on it. During the day, they have around 8 - 10 users connect locally to it for their daily work. They only really use it for mail and Internet access, and a bit of file/print. Last year i upgraded their Internet link to ADSL and put up a proxy (winroute), Everything was working fine. The director has since move to New York to set up an office over there, and i set up his laptop to VPN in to the server for his mail. Now he has set up an additional 3 users in this office who also use the VPN to get mail and at times things can get slow. I told him using the Internet for transport, is gonna be slow at times due to the nature of the Internet. However, i know i can speed things up because of the way i initially set things up. Name resolution seems to be my biggest headache. I have no DNS set up and use Netbui for name resolution, so i guess this is gonna add to the overhead. Thus RAS has TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled Laptops in NY have TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled UK users are ok and have no problems. I would like to speed things up a bit for the NY users. I'm also confused with binding orders on the server and to what interfaces i should bind all these protocols to. The server has 2 nics, one for the local net and the other goes to the router for the ADSL, i guess i only need to bind this side right? I guess DNS would be the best way forward for name resolution, but as i say i have no DNS server locally. All mail arrives at a different domain (their web site host) who then forward it to another domain, to pop 3 mail boxes which i then get a program (igetmail) to pick up and deliver to exchange server. When i ping the routers external and internal interfaces i get the IP address and it resolves back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The question i want to ask, is what is the best way for me to set this up for a quicker connection for outlook. How do i set up the DNS on the router! Any advice would be appreciated. David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange, Outlook and speed
Hi David, What you have can be fixed, though it would entail a bit of investment by your company. If name resolution really is a big pain for you (I can see other potential hotspots reading your mail though) you could create a host file and distribute it to each of your clients... Not ideal, but it will give you basic name resolution at no cost. Regards, Davy -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:David.Lloyd;which.co.uk] Sent: 12 November 2002 11:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange, Outlook and speed Hi guys, I have a situation where Outlook is very slow over a VPN connection. If i give u a bit of history, on how i set this up then perhaps you can tell me where i went wrong. Firstly, we have an office here in the UK where Exchange 5.5 server is running on a PDC, they can only afford one server, so everything runs on it. During the day, they have around 8 - 10 users connect locally to it for their daily work. They only really use it for mail and Internet access, and a bit of file/print. Last year i upgraded their Internet link to ADSL and put up a proxy (winroute), Everything was working fine. The director has since move to New York to set up an office over there, and i set up his laptop to VPN in to the server for his mail. Now he has set up an additional 3 users in this office who also use the VPN to get mail and at times things can get slow. I told him using the Internet for transport, is gonna be slow at times due to the nature of the Internet. However, i know i can speed things up because of the way i initially set things up. Name resolution seems to be my biggest headache. I have no DNS set up and use Netbui for name resolution, so i guess this is gonna add to the overhead. Thus RAS has TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled Laptops in NY have TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled UK users are ok and have no problems. I would like to speed things up a bit for the NY users. I'm also confused with binding orders on the server and to what interfaces i should bind all these protocols to. The server has 2 nics, one for the local net and the other goes to the router for the ADSL, i guess i only need to bind this side right? I guess DNS would be the best way forward for name resolution, but as i say i have no DNS server locally. All mail arrives at a different domain (their web site host) who then forward it to another domain, to pop 3 mail boxes which i then get a program (igetmail) to pick up and deliver to exchange server. When i ping the routers external and internal interfaces i get the IP address and it resolves back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The question i want to ask, is what is the best way for me to set this up for a quicker connection for outlook. How do i set up the DNS on the router! Any advice would be appreciated. David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange, Outlook and speed
Sorry i forgot to mention, on the laptops i already ammended the local host file for name resolution. They use Windows ME on the laptops answell as XP. I just edited the existing hosts file and put an entry in for the UK server. -- From: Davy Rowland[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12 November 2002 11:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange, Outlook and speed Hi David, What you have can be fixed, though it would entail a bit of investment by your company. If name resolution really is a big pain for you (I can see other potential hotspots reading your mail though) you could create a host file and distribute it to each of your clients... Not ideal, but it will give you basic name resolution at no cost. Regards, Davy -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:David.Lloyd;which.co.uk] Sent: 12 November 2002 11:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange, Outlook and speed Hi guys, I have a situation where Outlook is very slow over a VPN connection. If i give u a bit of history, on how i set this up then perhaps you can tell me where i went wrong. Firstly, we have an office here in the UK where Exchange 5.5 server is running on a PDC, they can only afford one server, so everything runs on it. During the day, they have around 8 - 10 users connect locally to it for their daily work. They only really use it for mail and Internet access, and a bit of file/print. Last year i upgraded their Internet link to ADSL and put up a proxy (winroute), Everything was working fine. The director has since move to New York to set up an office over there, and i set up his laptop to VPN in to the server for his mail. Now he has set up an additional 3 users in this office who also use the VPN to get mail and at times things can get slow. I told him using the Internet for transport, is gonna be slow at times due to the nature of the Internet. However, i know i can speed things up because of the way i initially set things up. Name resolution seems to be my biggest headache. I have no DNS set up and use Netbui for name resolution, so i guess this is gonna add to the overhead. Thus RAS has TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled Laptops in NY have TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled UK users are ok and have no problems. I would like to speed things up a bit for the NY users. I'm also confused with binding orders on the server and to what interfaces i should bind all these protocols to. The server has 2 nics, one for the local net and the other goes to the router for the ADSL, i guess i only need to bind this side right? I guess DNS would be the best way forward for name resolution, but as i say i have no DNS server locally. All mail arrives at a different domain (their web site host) who then forward it to another domain, to pop 3 mail boxes which i then get a program (igetmail) to pick up and deliver to exchange server. When i ping the routers external and internal interfaces i get the IP address and it resolves back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The question i want to ask, is what is the best way for me to set this up for a quicker connection for outlook. How do i set up the DNS on the router! Any advice would be appreciated. David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
That's normal behavior. Its called Dynamic Buffer Allocation - basically a memory cache of the databases. Why have so much memory if its not going to get used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
Very true. Most companies don't want to serve individuals - its too expensive. Doesn't help us individuals all that much though, does it? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server Having spent 17 long years in the utility industry, I can tell you that few suppliers are really interested in selling to residential customers. They want the big boys. I kind of figure that government-owned gas and electric utilities might be inevitable for those not already that way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server Potentially. However, you're not blessed with Bellsouth. The deregulation rules specify copper lines have to be deregulated, so they ran fibre to each neighborhoods. Since most of metro Atlanta is connected via slicks or significantly backhauled to central offices, that puts them in the unique situation where while everyone else can't offer faster than IDSL (144k - DSL over ISDN lines), they can offer ADSL or SDSL to just about every person in the area. And there are still no valid options for alternate local telephone service here. Yes, a few offer it, but as deregulation didn't include the cable plant entering your house, it's a sham. Then there's Atlanta's deregulated natural gas industry. The old company (Atlanta Gas Light) exists to actually manage the physical delivery only - you have to actually deal with a remarketer for all billing and service inquiries because AGL is forbidden by law to have any customers. Across the board, prices increased, and have stayed higher than pre-deregulation prices. Competition is an interesting thing. When it's a utility type need, I've yet to see it work in my favor. When it's not a utility, I'd agree that some competition is good. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server To the contrary, local competition in the telephone service has probably facilitated availability of DSL much faster than we would have seen otherwise. I really don't think Pacific Bell would be advertising its availability if it were a tarriffed product whose pricing and availability were mandated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server get into. Regardless you can argue the fact that more competition only creates better products That's not a hard and fast economics law, Hummert. All one has to do is look at local utility (telephone, gas, electricity) deregulation to see that compettion isn't always what its cracked up to be. Quite often, competition hurts products, not helps. For instance, Exchange's traditional competitors are Notes and Groupwise. Each of the three have a long and relatively distinguished implementation record. Now we have OpenExchange. At this point, its probably 3-5 years away from getting to the current state of any of the Big 3 in functionality, stability and scalability. That's 3-5 years the big players will continue on their own paths, most likely considering OpenExchange as nothing more than yet another wannabe. You see, competition isn't beneficial if the competitors aren't on a relatively level playing field to start. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server You can argue yes and no to that. But that's
RE: Exchange, Outlook and speed
Are you seeing that the initial connection is slow, or that the general Outlook experience is slow while working via VPN? Initial connect slowness is most often name resoulution - and it looks like you're working at fixing that. Mid session slowness is probably a few things. First, I'd suggest switching to work offline and syncronize rather than working online. That makes a huge difference in performance for remote users, espeically when they're on the wrong end of a slow link. Second - Outlook does some stupid network tricks with packets, and that can cause some issues. It sets the do not fragment bit on many data packets, which isn't usually a problem, until you pass it across a VPN tunnel. VPN's add a fixed amount of overhead to each packet - usually a handful of bytes (I can't remember the exact amount, but its like 50ish). Tack that onto a 1500+ byte packet that has the DF bit set, and guess what, you're over your maximum transmission size, and the packet bounces with an ICMP Need to fragment but DF bit set kinda error. The fix is to search technet for MTU and see how to set it for about 1400. That should make a big difference too. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:David.Lloyd;which.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 5:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange, Outlook and speed Hi guys, I have a situation where Outlook is very slow over a VPN connection. If i give u a bit of history, on how i set this up then perhaps you can tell me where i went wrong. Firstly, we have an office here in the UK where Exchange 5.5 server is running on a PDC, they can only afford one server, so everything runs on it. During the day, they have around 8 - 10 users connect locally to it for their daily work. They only really use it for mail and Internet access, and a bit of file/print. Last year i upgraded their Internet link to ADSL and put up a proxy (winroute), Everything was working fine. The director has since move to New York to set up an office over there, and i set up his laptop to VPN in to the server for his mail. Now he has set up an additional 3 users in this office who also use the VPN to get mail and at times things can get slow. I told him using the Internet for transport, is gonna be slow at times due to the nature of the Internet. However, i know i can speed things up because of the way i initially set things up. Name resolution seems to be my biggest headache. I have no DNS set up and use Netbui for name resolution, so i guess this is gonna add to the overhead. Thus RAS has TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled Laptops in NY have TCP/IP and NETBUEI enabled UK users are ok and have no problems. I would like to speed things up a bit for the NY users. I'm also confused with binding orders on the server and to what interfaces i should bind all these protocols to. The server has 2 nics, one for the local net and the other goes to the router for the ADSL, i guess i only need to bind this side right? I guess DNS would be the best way forward for name resolution, but as i say i have no DNS server locally. All mail arrives at a different domain (their web site host) who then forward it to another domain, to pop 3 mail boxes which i then get a program (igetmail) to pick up and deliver to exchange server. When i ping the routers external and internal interfaces i get the IP address and it resolves back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The question i want to ask, is what is the best way for me to set this up for a quicker connection for outlook. How do i set up the DNS on the router! Any advice would be appreciated. David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: somewhat OT
To be kept in the life style that you wish to become accustomed to. g -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT Who knows? I'd love to retire today. If I can only convince my wife to work full-time! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT You're gonna be around that long Ed? I figured you'd be retiring in about 5 years! ;0) (g, dr) Jim Blunt E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. Office: 372-9188 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT This presumes that the function of e-mail remains stagnant. If it doesn't, the pure hardware box has to chase a moving target, which is not an easy thing to do. Doesn't just about every company that has a hardware firewall also have a firewall administrator? Not that any of your forecasts scare me. I'm retiring within 20 years. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT So Roger, does this mean that you are getting ready for the sobering messages? First, let me say that I am not privy to any advanced product planning in what I am about to say, and am only speculating. I fully expect to see a pure hardware version of an entry level Exchange Server within ten years. The design goal would have to be such that a professional sys admin is not required. My guess is that initially it would be targeted at that same mid-tier that you identify, but perhaps a bit lower (25-100 seats) at first. It has to go that way. If you look at what is happening in networking as a whole, you have companies like LinkSys and D-Link that are almost totally focused on idiot proof boxes for basic functionality. Intel, Nortel and more recently Microsoft have all gone chasing after this space as well. It only makes sense that this space will grow up to include a line of mini-blade or little box headless servers that do all of the basics (mail, telephony, web hosting, etc.). General purpose storage and print servicing is already happening. As we all know, little machines grow up to become big machines. 20 years from now, it is not unreasonable to project that even quite large systems will be simple hardware modules that you add to your pile of network pieces. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT Simple. Its not cost effective to outsourse at the levels they target. They missed the boat from day one. There is a relative break even point for having your own IT staff, generally in the 25-75 user range, depending on what your company actually does. More than 100 or so, and you really need someone. Once you've got someone inhouse, they tend to have to be a jack-of-all-trades type, and do a lot of fumbling through. But the job gets done. Traditionally, an NT box with Exchange 5.5 Standard wasn't really that expensive - you could probably do that for $10k. Win2k with E2k has raised the prices a bit, but not exhorbinantly such. With leasing options, that server could be a few hundred a month. Like any service provider, the good fruit is in the middle of the tree, not the low hanging stuff. SO they tended to target 500 person plus orgs. This 600-ish person company has 8 sysadmins - we have enough time to manage Exchange. Without it, maybe we'd have one less headcount, but I'd bet that the headcount loss isn't drastically different than the cost of 600 users' outsourced mail needs. Now, the other side of this equation is that email is a core business need for most companies, and isn't that hard to at least get running[1]. More specialized things, like e-commerce and line of business apps make more sense in a managed environment. Email never did. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA [1] Running well is a different question, but running and running well aren't the issue here. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: somewhat OT You've hit the major
RE: Virus heads up
Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
I received this helpful e-mail from our AntiVirus agent last week. No machines have been hit yet. I will post it here in the hopes that it answers some questions. Steve BEGIN PASTE There is a new spam hoax being sent around the internet provided by the following company: Permissioned Media Inc., based in Panama. The e-mail will appear in your inbox and will ask you to click upon a link to view the greeting card you have been sent. The link is not necessarily related to a greeting card site, and after clicking on it, the website will state that software needs to be installed on your machine for you to view the greeting card. The terms and conditions of the license states that by agreeing to the installation of the software, you are also agreeing that a copy of the greeting card e-mail can be sent to everyone in your address book. If you accept the terms of the agreement, the executable will send a copy of the e-mail to the contacts in your Outlook Address Book. Saying no to the agreement will prevent the mass mailing of the hyperlink to the recipients listed in the Outlook Address Book. The following domains have been linked to this new hoax: www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net There is no attachment included in the message sent out but rather a link that must be agreed to to install the executable that will mail out an invitation to addresse 's in the Outlook Address Book. The actual program is not a worm or virus, but rather a scam to promote the company that created the spammer. The Subject of the message is as follows: Subject: %Recipient% you have an E-Card from %Sender%. Body: %Recipient%, %sender% has sent you an greeting card -- a postcard from Friend-Greetings.com. You can pickup your greeting card at Friend-Greetings.com by clicking on the link below. http://www.friend-greeting./%number%/pickup.html?code=%name%id=%number% Modified for non execution A content filter can be set using the following: * greeting card from * This will block the message from coming into an environment. Since there is no attachment related to the message virus detection will not be able to detect any executable on the message to remove its functionality. The executable is placed on desktop system by visiting the link provided in the message and agreeing to the license agreement. Sybari Software will continue to monitor the situation. We are providing this information due to concerns posed by several inquiries to support. Thank You, Sybari Software, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since bringing Exchange
2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single domain, single site, win2k SP3,
native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed
the steps to remove the first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the
old server, but the box itself remains as a DC on the network.
The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly when one of the
RUS runs. When the RUS was Always Run so were the errors. There are 2 RUS entries,
one updates all the time and works fine (Recipient Update Service (Athena)). The other
runs every four hours and produces 15 errors per pop (Recipient Update Service
(Enterprise Configuration)). Do I really need two of these? Is there anyway to see
what exactly is in the individual RUS?
Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH
Here is the error message:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 11/12/2002
Time: 7:05:21 AM
User: ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer: HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type:configuration
Object Name:CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name: HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: ARIES$
Client Domain: ATHENA
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
AccessesControl Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
It is not really a virus as much as SPAM. Just block those domains on your internet connection/proxy/firewall so the users cannot access those sites. And also use Trends eManager(30 day free trial) to block those incoming emails. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:grant;fsna.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I received this helpful e-mail from our AntiVirus agent last week. No machines have been hit yet. I will post it here in the hopes that it answers some questions. Steve BEGIN PASTE There is a new spam hoax being sent around the internet provided by the following company: Permissioned Media Inc., based in Panama. The e-mail will appear in your inbox and will ask you to click upon a link to view the greeting card you have been sent. The link is not necessarily related to a greeting card site, and after clicking on it, the website will state that software needs to be installed on your machine for you to view the greeting card. The terms and conditions of the license states that by agreeing to the installation of the software, you are also agreeing that a copy of the greeting card e-mail can be sent to everyone in your address book. If you accept the terms of the agreement, the executable will send a copy of the e-mail to the contacts in your Outlook Address Book. Saying no to the agreement will prevent the mass mailing of the hyperlink to the recipients listed in the Outlook Address Book. The following domains have been linked to this new hoax: www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net There is no attachment included in the message sent out but rather a link that must be agreed to to install the executable that will mail out an invitation to addresse 's in the Outlook Address Book. The actual program is not a worm or virus, but rather a scam to promote the company that created the spammer. The Subject of the message is as follows: Subject: %Recipient% you have an E-Card from %Sender%. Body: %Recipient%, %sender% has sent you an greeting card -- a postcard from Friend-Greetings.com. You can pickup your greeting card at Friend-Greetings.com by clicking on the link below. http://www.friend-greeting./%number%/pickup.html?code=%name%id=%number% Modified for non execution A content filter can be set using the following: * greeting card from * This will block the message from coming into an environment. Since there is no attachment related to the message virus detection will not be able to detect any executable on the message to remove its functionality. The executable is placed on desktop system by visiting the link provided in the message and agreeing to the license agreement. Sybari Software will continue to monitor the situation. We are providing this information due to concerns posed by several inquiries to support. Thank You, Sybari Software, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office SP-3 and Outlook/Exchange and the file attachment debacle
TechNet just sent out an e-mail about a future Webcast called Support WebCast: Microsoft Office 2000: Deploying Service Pack 3 ...is there such a thing for Office 2000? I thought the latest was SR-2??? If you are interested, the link is http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/servicedesks/webcasts/wc111902/wcblurb111902.asp Do any of you know if that fix to unblock attachments using OutlookSecurity.oft and Outlk9.adm will work with SP3? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Security Log errors
By default two RUS's are setup when you install E2K. One is for the domain
where the Exchange server is located in the other is for the
enterprise configuration. You say you have only two. Did you have a third at
one time when your 5.5 box was online. Also is the error exactly the same
each time. If so maybe an object is being called that is no longer there?
- Original Message -
From: Hooks, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM
Subject: Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since
bringing Exchange 2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single
domain, single site, win2k SP3, native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved
mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed the steps to remove the
first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the old server, but
the box itself remains as a DC on the network.
The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly when
one of the RUS runs. When the RUS was Always Run so were the errors. There
are 2 RUS entries, one updates all the time and works fine (Recipient Update
Service (Athena)). The other runs every four hours and produces 15 errors
per pop (Recipient Update Service (Enterprise Configuration)). Do I really
need two of these? Is there anyway to see what exactly is in the individual
RUS?
Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH
Here is the error message:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 11/12/2002
Time: 7:05:21 AM
User: ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer: HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type: configuration
Object Name: CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name: HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: ARIES$
Client Domain: ATHENA
Client Logon ID: (0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
Accesses Control Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. ===
RE: Virus heads up
True enough, but due to customer feedback, Symantec has added this spam tactic to their virus definition files and you can no longer install this .exe file on a machine that is the running the current version of Symantec Anti-Virus with the current definition files. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Incoming Mail not working
I have setup exchange2k in AD domain environment behind a pix firewall . I am able to send email using my exchange server but for some reason I am not able to receive anything. Here is the criteria of my setup. 2 DNS server with AD Intergrated Zones. 2 primary zones created domain.com and domain.org. Exchange 2k with default settings. domain.org is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to my 2 internal DNS servers using public IP addresses. domain.com is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to an external dns servers hosted by a consulting company. I've double checked all possibilities. I can send email using Exchange2K to myself and receive the message. When I use an outside email account to send to the excange server I get an undelivered mail message: unknown host: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. When I check my transaction logs I don't get any messages pertaining to incoming mail. How else can I troubleshoot my incoming mails. Is there any step that I'm missing between registering my dns servers with internic to setting up my pixfirewall? Please list some other variables that may resolve my incoming mail. Thanks, J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
You need to configure trend e-manager (if you have it) to block it with a rule that detects something in the subject line or message body. This is not a virus, it is more of a confidence trick, although NAV is now detecting the software that installs if you follow the link. As usual, this is causing much confusion amongst users... -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
The folks at CaliberCollision.com may want to rethink your SPAM filters (although I doubt you'll get this). I just got this message from your system, for the message I sent below. Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Blunt, James H (Jim) Subject = RE: Virus heads up Delivery Time = November 12, 2002 (Tuesday) 08:05:21 Policy = SPAM Content Filter Action on this mail = Delete message Warning message from administrator: An email message you sent to Caliber's electronic email system was not delivered. Your message was intercepted as the contents were not in compliance with Caliber's internal electronic mail standard. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up True enough, but due to customer feedback, Symantec has added this spam tactic to their virus definition files and you can no longer install this .exe file on a machine that is the running the current version of Symantec Anti-Virus with the current definition files. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
OK so the pattern is just protecting us from the other actions that take place if someone clicks on the URL, and the WORM_FRIENDGRT.B is not really a virus? I am happy to delete these messages but some users still ignore the warnings we have given and it starts sending messages which I would have hoped would be caught by the pattern file. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: 12 November 2002 15:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Security Log errors
Did not have three that I know of. The Operation ID changes in each message as does
the as does the Client Logon ID: the rest is exactly the same. Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Security Log errors
By default two RUS's are setup when you install E2K. One is for the domain
where the Exchange server is located in the other is for the
enterprise configuration. You say you have only two. Did you have a third at
one time when your 5.5 box was online. Also is the error exactly the same
each time. If so maybe an object is being called that is no longer there?
- Original Message -
From: Hooks, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM
Subject: Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since
bringing Exchange 2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single
domain, single site, win2k SP3, native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved
mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed the steps to remove the
first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the old server, but
the box itself remains as a DC on the network.
The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly when
one of the RUS runs. When the RUS was Always Run so were the errors. There
are 2 RUS entries, one updates all the time and works fine (Recipient Update
Service (Athena)). The other runs every four hours and produces 15 errors
per pop (Recipient Update Service (Enterprise Configuration)). Do I really
need two of these? Is there anyway to see what exactly is in the individual
RUS?
Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH
Here is the error message:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 11/12/2002
Time: 7:05:21 AM
User: ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer: HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type: configuration
Object Name: CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name: HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: ARIES$
Client Domain: ATHENA
Client Logon ID: (0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
Accesses Control Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
Exactly. OfficeScan will catch it once the user activates the program, but that's no fun. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Jonathan, Do you have a copy of the NDR? Dennis -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Incoming Mail not working I have setup exchange2k in AD domain environment behind a pix firewall . I am able to send email using my exchange server but for some reason I am not able to receive anything. Here is the criteria of my setup. 2 DNS server with AD Intergrated Zones. 2 primary zones created domain.com and domain.org. Exchange 2k with default settings. domain.org is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to my 2 internal DNS servers using public IP addresses. domain.com is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to an external dns servers hosted by a consulting company. I've double checked all possibilities. I can send email using Exchange2K to myself and receive the message. When I use an outside email account to send to the excange server I get an undelivered mail message: unknown host: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. When I check my transaction logs I don't get any messages pertaining to incoming mail. How else can I troubleshoot my incoming mails. Is there any step that I'm missing between registering my dns servers with internic to setting up my pixfirewall? Please list some other variables that may resolve my incoming mail. Thanks, J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security Log errors
The two choices I have for the RUS agreements are rebuild or update now - are
there potential negative consequences to running either of these operations in the
middle of the day? I have only about 135 users and the server has lots of RAM and
processing power. Thanks.
Tim Hooks
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since bringing Exchange
2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single domain, single site, win2k SP3,
native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed
the steps to remove the first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the
old server, but the box itself remains as a DC on the network.
The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly when one of the
RUS runs. When the RUS was Always Run so were the errors. There are 2 RUS entries,
one updates all the time and works fine (Recipient Update Service (Athena)). The other
runs every four hours and produces 15 errors per pop (Recipient Update Service
(Enterprise Configuration)). Do I really need two of these? Is there anyway to see
what exactly is in the individual RUS?
Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH
Here is the error message:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 11/12/2002
Time: 7:05:21 AM
User: ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer: HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type:configuration
Object Name:CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name: HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: ARIES$
Client Domain: ATHENA
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
AccessesControl Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
Right... but there's nothing for an e-mail server to catch/filter since all that is transmitted is a URL and the luser has to download said exe from a web browser. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions True enough, but due to customer feedback, Symantec has added this spam tactic to their virus definition files and you can no longer install this .exe file on a machine that is the running the current version of Symantec Anti-Virus with the current definition files. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Post the real domain names and perhaps someone might have some actual insight. Otherwise, it sounds like things are configured incorrectly and perhaps a good book on DNS might be in order. -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have setup exchange2k in AD domain environment behind a pix firewall . I am able to send email using my exchange server but for some reason I am not able to receive anything. Here is the criteria of my setup. 2 DNS server with AD Intergrated Zones. 2 primary zones created domain.com and domain.org. Exchange 2k with default settings. domain.org is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to my 2 internal DNS servers using public IP addresses. domain.com is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to an external dns servers hosted by a consulting company. I've double checked all possibilities. I can send email using Exchange2K to myself and receive the message. When I use an outside email account to send to the excange server I get an undelivered mail message: unknown host: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. When I check my transaction logs I don't get any messages pertaining to incoming mail. How else can I troubleshoot my incoming mails. Is there any step that I'm missing between registering my dns servers with internic to setting up my pixfirewall? Please list some other variables that may resolve my incoming mail. Thanks, J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
search all text, all mailboxes?
I've been asked to search all of our mailboxes on our Exchange server for a specific phrase to fullfill a Freedom of Information Act request. I know that Exmerge will search the entire Exchange server but only for subject or attachments. Is there a utility out there that will search the entire contents of the messages on the Exchange server as well? I've got 1800 mailboxes and I don't want someone to have to search through each one individually. Thanks, Horst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't activate Net Folder in Outlook 2000
We use Exchange and Netfolders without any issues. (We are using netfolders as a stop-gap measure while waiting for our new intranet system to go in) We only share committee calendars through netfolders, so I am unsure If i can be of much assistence. 1 - do the users in questions have the correct rights? 2- if you are doing e-mail messages are the exceeding the update size? They get the intial share sharing notification and reply -does the origating system see the user as responding? are they getting updates from the originating syste? are they processing the updates? Can you please give more details. Thanks Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 5:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Can't activate Net Folder in Outlook 2000 Hello, You cannot use Outlook's Net Folders feature if you are also connecting to an Exchange server; it's either one or the other. If you aren't using Exchange, then contact me off list. I had a lot of experience with them before switching to using Exchange. BTW: The Net Folders feature was not implemented in Outlook 2002. Here's a good page about them with some links to MS articles: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/netfolders.htm Regards, Allison W. On Thursday 07 November 2002 03:58, you wrote: Hi all, Has anyone tried out to activate Net Folder? Have tried my best to configure but the emails are still not shared in between OUtlook Users. Notifications are sent out to Users regards about Net Folder Sharing but emails are not displayed in the folders. Hope someone can give me a link/tips on this issue.. THanks in advanced! Regards, Ken L - This email was sent using FREE Catholic Online Webmail. Please tell your family, friends and children about COL Webmail! http://webmail.catholic.org/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
Greg, I'm not sure if you got the email I sent you yesterday, but I want to clarify one more thing: One EX55 box will be moved physically to another location, where its contents will be moved using EXMERGE. Therefore there'll be no chance to get the message flowing between the 2 Exchange boxes. Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution Looks like a plan. I'll assume from 9. that this is talking about your Exchange Organization A, which you are doing a Typical Migration on (put E2K servers into your E55 org and move users). As for the Exchange Ogranization B, which you have selected to use EXMERGE, this is a Foreign Mail System Migration and EXMERGE is a decent tool for this. To explain more about redirection, here goes. There is a SINGLE, proper method of migrating from foreign email systems. This is the ONLY method that ensure that no messages are lost. If anyone tells you that there is another method, they are wrong. Here is the overview: 1. Get both systems up and running 2. Get message flow going between the two systems either via SMTP or a proprietary connector 3. Syncrhonize directories between the two systems so that mailboxes from system SOURCE show up in System TARGET's address book as foreign mail entries (i.e. contacts). Again, this can be done a number of different ways depending on the systems involved. 4. To migrate a mailbox, first, convert the foreign mail entry in the TARGET system to a mailbox, preserving all addresses 5. Now, perform email redirection on the other systems to point them to the newly created mailbox in the TARGET system. 6. Once redirection is complete, export the SOURCE mailbox and import it into the TARGET mailbox What this does is completely eliminate any problems with missing messages during migrations. If performed correctly, you will never lose an email or get a bounced message during migration. Now, to be more specific about email redirection; since you asked. The issue that email redirection attempts to solve is preserving address fidelity, or the ability for users to address or respond to email during the migration process. A typical scenario that can occur is the following: 1. User A sends an email to User B 2. User A migrates to the new system 3. User B responds to message and it bounces Now, why does this occur? Well, for the most part it occurs because people that write email systems are apparently brain dead. For example, E55 stamps an internal X500 FROM address on every message an Exchange user sends out. This is actually a hold-over from MS Mail which used the ever popular 10/10/10 format. If you simply delete the Exchange mailbox and create a contact pointing to the new system, you have broken address fidelity because the new contact has a different X500 address than the old mailbox. Bad. The slickest way to solve this problem that I have found is to create a contact in the SOURCE system pointing to the new mailbox in the TARGET system. Then, use Exchange's handy dandy alternate recipient to define an alternate recipient of that contact. You can then export the mailbox info and import it to the new system and you will never break address fidelity. An alternate approach is to record all of the various email addresses and X500 address from the SOURCE mailbox and add them to your contact. You can preserve address fidelity in that manner as well, but if you do it this way you will have a gap in your migration process where you might miss a message. Now, you also have this problem: 1. User A sends a message to User B 2. User A migrates to new system 3. User B migrates to new system 4. User B responds to User A's message and it bounces. What is going on here? Well, that sweet, loveable X500 address is still sitting there stamped on that message. Unless you have that X500 address associated with a mailbox on the new system, your messages will bounce in this scenario. So again, you have to move all of your addresses from the legacy system, including the X500 address to the new system. Now, all of this is really not difficult, especially with the proper automation tools and techniques. However, email redirection is by far the most over-looked aspect of email migrations. And it can get pretty complicated when multiple systems are involved. It works out to something like n! scenarios that you have to take a look at. However, most of those scenarios typically end up being invalid. For some reason, people have reached the conclusion that email migrations mean missed messages and bounced email, but that does not have to be the case. With proper planning, design and engineering, email migrations can be flawless. I've been doing flawless email migrations for a long time now. This process works and is the ONLY thing that works. Greg, Thanks for your thorough response! Here are some
RE: Incoming Mail not working
I'm not sure. Where would it be located and what is it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
Do you have desktop AV in place? If so, it should be preventing users from launching the program. If not, consider this a lesson in why you should have AV at multiple layers of your system. Darcy -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up OK so the pattern is just protecting us from the other actions that take place if someone clicks on the URL, and the WORM_FRIENDGRT.B is not really a virus? I am happy to delete these messages but some users still ignore the warnings we have given and it starts sending messages which I would have hoped would be caught by the pattern file. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: 12 November 2002 15:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Incoming Mail not working
In the Library. With Col. Mustard. -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working I'm not sure. Where would it be located and what is it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make it vaguely legal. -Peter -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:datkinson;sevenww.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up You need to configure trend e-manager (if you have it) to block it with a rule that detects something in the subject line or message body. This is not a virus, it is more of a confidence trick, although NAV is now detecting the software that installs if you follow the link. As usual, this is causing much confusion amongst users... -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Public Store Recovery
We are migrating to Ex2k. I created a new server running Exch 5.5 on Win2k. I moved mailboxes without incident. In the process of adding an instance of the Public Folderson the new server, I managed to lose the entire contents of the Public Store. Folders and subfolders are intact, but the contents are gone. The size of the database on the orginal server has not decreased (300MB), even after nightly maintenance, so perhaps the contents are still there? The size of pub.edb on the new server is 3MB. I restored a backup onto a Win2k server, but I'm just shy of enough disk space to do a defrag, (see recent thread Server Recovery) Are there any options available for recovery of the Public Store using a pub.edb restored to a win2k server? Thanks. Gregg Porter National Head Start Association _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
Thanks to everyone for their replies. I was worried in case the pattern was not doing its job. We've got inbound from the Internet covered but have the same problem as everyone else in that users don't do as they are told! Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: 12 November 2002 16:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Right... but there's nothing for an e-mail server to catch/filter since all that is transmitted is a URL and the luser has to download said exe from a web browser. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions True enough, but due to customer feedback, Symantec has added this spam tactic to their virus definition files and you can no longer install this .exe file on a machine that is the running the current version of Symantec Anti-Virus with the current definition files. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Jonathan you don't mention it, but I assume you have set up the appropriate recipient policies in Exchange System Manager i.e. added the public domains which the Exchange server is hosting? If the public email domains are different to the Exchange Server's domain, it needs to know about it. If the domains were different and you didn't insert the desired domains into the recipient policies, internal mail would be OK but you'd get the error you advertise when external sources try and send to you. If you have the recipient policies in place, make sure they're applied, and make sure that the user objects are picking them up in AD UsersComputers. Oh and turn off fixup smtp in the pix [no fixup protocol smtp] whilst setting up, just as a matter of course. You can turn it back on later when you have a more stable environment - then you'll better appreciate the subtelty of the problems it can cause. All the best, Andy -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: 12. november 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Incoming Mail not working I have setup exchange2k in AD domain environment behind a pix firewall . I am able to send email using my exchange server but for some reason I am not able to receive anything. Here is the criteria of my setup. 2 DNS server with AD Intergrated Zones. 2 primary zones created domain.com and domain.org. Exchange 2k with default settings. domain.org is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to my 2 internal DNS servers using public IP addresses. domain.com is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to an external dns servers hosted by a consulting company. I've double checked all possibilities. I can send email using Exchange2K to myself and receive the message. When I use an outside email account to send to the excange server I get an undelivered mail message: unknown host: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. When I check my transaction logs I don't get any messages pertaining to incoming mail. How else can I troubleshoot my incoming mails. Is there any step that I'm missing between registering my dns servers with internic to setting up my pixfirewall? Please list some other variables that may resolve my incoming mail. Thanks, J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: search all text, all mailboxes?
Several of the archival tools listed at www.mail-resources.com | web links will, as will tools such as those from Sherpa Software. -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz [mailto:HHinz;bcmhs.bc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions I've been asked to search all of our mailboxes on our Exchange server for a specific phrase to fullfill a Freedom of Information Act request. I know that Exmerge will search the entire Exchange server but only for subject or attachments. Is there a utility out there that will search the entire contents of the messages on the Exchange server as well? I've got 1800 mailboxes and I don't want someone to have to search through each one individually. Thanks, Horst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
No, the virus patterns for Scanmail don't protect you from users sending or receiving e-mail. And no, technically, this isn't a virus (as much as it hurts to agree with Precht), but that doesn't stop an AV company from writing definitions which will block 'harmful' executables. Trend already does this, and I suspect that if you send the actual exe through e-mail, it might very well be blocked and/or deleted. However, that's not how the thing propagates. If this is a significant issue, who handles your DNS? If it's handled in house, the list of URLs the thing currently uses ought to have been entered into bogus DNS zones on your DNS servers so user don't have the opportunity to access the URLs in question. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions OK so the pattern is just protecting us from the other actions that take place if someone clicks on the URL, and the WORM_FRIENDGRT.B is not really a virus? I am happy to delete these messages but some users still ignore the warnings we have given and it starts sending messages which I would have hoped would be caught by the pattern file. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: 12 November 2002 15:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Um... there's no virus sent via e-mail, thus Scanmail has nothing to clean. -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set in Scanmail? Thanks in advance. Phil -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new virus. Darcy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I don't believe you. You are impossible to ignore. I think these are also associated... www.cool-downloads.com www.cool-downloads.net www.friend-greetings.com www.friend-greeting.com www.friend-greetings.net www.friend-greeting.net www.friend-cards.net William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Sent Item
Restore from backup. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
If they click it, it will come. Reason 252 I like Tumbleweed MMS. And this whole thread was sitting in quarantine. Sweet. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Right... but there's nothing for an e-mail server to catch/filter since all that is transmitted is a URL and the luser has to download said exe from a web browser. martined -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
If they click it, it will come. Reason 252 I like Tumbleweed MMS. And this whole thread was sitting in quarantine. Sweet. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Right... but there's nothing for an e-mail server to catch/filter since all that is transmitted is a URL and the luser has to download said exe from a web browser. martined -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Read the Disaster Recovery white-paper. Follow the instructions there to Restore from backup, and run the log files. Or - as has been suggested once before - contact the person the message was sent to and ask them to send it back. Darcy -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
spectore.com. 10, mail.colony1.net. worldtitaniumcouncil.org. 10, gold.spectore.com. I cant telnet to gold.spectore.com Mail.colony1.net does connect, but its not E2K -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Please include the original message in your replies. If you're using the web interface, please check the Quote message in reply checkbox. -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Yes I do have recipient policies and the are applied. They appear on the accounts of the user in U C. Didn't turn off fixup on the firewall yet...that's next. Another question. Do I necessarily need an external DNS on my network for this to work? I only have two internal DNS servers (behind the firewall). What would be a ideal solution for a network that has the following: 1 firewall 2 Domain Controllers AD Intergrated Zone 1 Exchange Server 1 IIS server (on same server as Exchange 2000) Shouldn't I point my public domain name (Primary Secondary DNS setup) to my two internal DNS servers so they may resolve the correct service? Jonathan you don't mention it, but I assume you have set up the appropriate recipient policies in Exchange System Manager i.e. added the public domains which the Exchange server is hosting? =20 If the public email domains are different to the Exchange Server's domain, it needs to know about it. If the domains were different and you didn't insert the desired domains into the recipient policies, internal mail would be OK but you'd get the error you advertise when external sources try and send to you. If you have the recipient policies in place, make sure they're applied, and make sure that the user objects are picking them up in AD UsersComputers. Oh and turn off fixup smtp in the pix [no fixup protocol smtp] whilst setting up, just as a matter of course. You can turn it back on later when you have a more stable environment - then you'll better appreciate the subtelty of the problems it can cause. All the best, Andy -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com]=20 Sent: 12. november 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Incoming Mail not working I have setup exchange2k in AD domain environment behind a pix firewall . I am able to send email using my exchange server but for some reason I am not able to receive anything. Here is the criteria of my setup. 2 DNS server with AD Intergrated Zones. =20 2 primary zones created domain.com and domain.org. Exchange 2k with default settings. domain.org is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to my 2 internal DNS servers using public IP addresses. domain.com is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to an external dns servers hosted by a consulting company. I've double checked all possibilities. I can send email using Exchange2K to myself and receive the message. When I use an outside email account to send to the excange server I get an undelivered mail message: unknown host: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. When I check my transaction logs I don't get any messages pertaining to incoming mail. How else can I troubleshoot my incoming mails. Is there any step that I'm missing between registering my dns servers with internic to setting up my pixfirewall? Please list some other variables that may resolve my incoming mail. Thanks, J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
These are correct settings...aren't they? The MX record should allow sending emails servers to locate my Exchange server. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
I take my last post back. Your DNS records are all screwed up. Titaniumcouncil address goes nowhere, spectore.com goes to an iMail server at colony1.net, which I presume isn't an Exchange server hacked to look like an iMail server? Making DNS work properly first would be a really good start... All the best, Andy -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: 12. november 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE loves memory
This whole exchange rollout is becoming a Johnny joke! - (another Johnny joke..:) Thanks very much for the input about the memory - I thought something farily wonky was going on there _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delete Exchange Attributes Option on ADUC SNAP IN
Greetings: I am having some inconsistencies in the option to Delete Exchange Attributes showing up in ADUC snap in, sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. I am running WIN2K SP2 and E2KSP2 and making sure that the Advance Features is selected under view as described at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;307350;. Anyone have any suggestions or has run into the same issue. Thanks Clint -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This e-mail transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Gee, ya think? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:Rump;plasticgirl.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Well, I'm not the swiftest guy when it comes to this kind of stuff, but aren't 192.168.x.x IP addys NON-ROUTABLE? If so, then that's yer problem dude. Reconfigure your MX and A records so that they point to the NAT'ed IP address on the OUTSIDE of your firewall. I think... -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working These are correct settings...aren't they? The MX record should allow sending emails servers to locate my Exchange server. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Your AD zone/internal dns servers should ideally not be serving public recursive lookups. Big security issues there. Setup your public zones (redundant) on a separate machine(s) outside the firewall somewhere, or have your isp host them. Have your internal name servers forward lookups to your external DNS server(s), but don't disable recursion (my opinion). Have exch point to the internal name servers. Unfix smtp on your pix. byron -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Yes I do have recipient policies and the are applied. They appear on the accounts of the user in U C. Didn't turn off fixup on the firewall yet...that's next. Another question. Do I necessarily need an external DNS on my network for this to work? I only have two internal DNS servers (behind the firewall). What would be a ideal solution for a network that has the following: 1 firewall 2 Domain Controllers AD Intergrated Zone 1 Exchange Server 1 IIS server (on same server as Exchange 2000) Shouldn't I point my public domain name (Primary Secondary DNS setup) to my two internal DNS servers so they may resolve the correct service? Jonathan you don't mention it, but I assume you have set up the appropriate recipient policies in Exchange System Manager i.e. added the public domains which the Exchange server is hosting? =20 If the public email domains are different to the Exchange Server's domain, it needs to know about it. If the domains were different and you didn't insert the desired domains into the recipient policies, internal mail would be OK but you'd get the error you advertise when external sources try and send to you. If you have the recipient policies in place, make sure they're applied, and make sure that the user objects are picking them up in AD UsersComputers. Oh and turn off fixup smtp in the pix [no fixup protocol smtp] whilst setting up, just as a matter of course. You can turn it back on later when you have a more stable environment - then you'll better appreciate the subtelty of the problems it can cause. All the best, Andy -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com]=20 Sent: 12. november 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Incoming Mail not working I have setup exchange2k in AD domain environment behind a pix firewall . I am able to send email using my exchange server but for some reason I am not able to receive anything. Here is the criteria of my setup. 2 DNS server with AD Intergrated Zones. =20 2 primary zones created domain.com and domain.org. Exchange 2k with default settings. domain.org is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to my 2 internal DNS servers using public IP addresses. domain.com is registered with internic as having a primary dns that points to an external dns servers hosted by a consulting company. I've double checked all possibilities. I can send email using Exchange2K to myself and receive the message. When I use an outside email account to send to the excange server I get an undelivered mail message: unknown host: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. When I check my transaction logs I don't get any messages pertaining to incoming mail. How else can I troubleshoot my incoming mails. Is there any step that I'm missing between registering my dns servers with internic to setting up my pixfirewall? Please list some other variables that may resolve my incoming mail. Thanks, J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Yeah - probably the South Bay area! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory My memory is both faulty and dimm. I don't recall how to divide any standard DIMM or SIMM or other units into 391 and get and even result. Say Ed, when you do retire are you going to move someplace tropical? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Don't use faulty memory. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Except that no one else can get to your servers on 192.168.x.x addresses. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working These are correct settings...aren't they? The MX record should allow sending emails servers to locate my Exchange server. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
LOL -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:Rump;plasticgirl.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
No. That's way wrong. Those are private IP addys. They cannot be used for public internet address -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working These are correct settings...aren't they? The MX record should allow sending emails servers to locate my Exchange server. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The MX record is pointing at 192.168.20.5. That's an internal IP address! How the hell are outside machines supposed to find your mail server? Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 19:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working These are correct settings...aren't they? The MX record should allow sending emails servers to locate my Exchange server. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFY4zBiZQJPzCgfEQK1sACffypIxFPisf1BA3FgKZ5ewYshutwAoN5R fcyun8iNprr7woFwCjF5HcoD =fIK7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
Field of Worms? -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up If they click it, it will come. Reason 252 I like Tumbleweed MMS. And this whole thread was sitting in quarantine. Sweet. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Right... but there's nothing for an e-mail server to catch/filter since all that is transmitted is a URL and the luser has to download said exe from a web browser. martined -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
Are you laughing at his SMTP address or his choice of IP addresses on thhe MX records? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions LOL -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:Rump;plasticgirl.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/Busy Information
Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
Trend Office Scan does clean it. It was cleaning it early last week. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE Columbus, Ohio 43215 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up ROFL They really are pretty good folks, but sometimes you have to hit them with a brick to get them to notice things. What irked me about this was that well after I had alerted the department to this problem, the security group issued a warning *after* a user managed to get infected with this one. It was one of those we have just discovered the following virus, which has infected a user workstation. Okay - so neither the Help Desk nor SECURITY (!!!) paid any attention to the warning I sent. *sigh* A prophet is without honor in her own land. Darcy -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up Maybe they didnt notice the little envelope icon in the system tray... -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops. HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago. Apparently they ignored the warning. Darcy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a month now. It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to all your contacts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Incoming Mail not working
I actually didn't notice the address until after I sent that. I did visit the site and its not what you would think it is. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Are you laughing at his SMTP address or his choice of IP addresses on thhe MX records? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions LOL -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:Rump;plasticgirl.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No more free/busy data?
I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
The domains reminded me of the Bond flicks, Bond v. Spectre v. TitaniumFinger... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Are you laughing at his SMTP address or his choice of IP addresses on thhe MX records? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions LOL -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:Rump;plasticgirl.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free/Busy Information
Maybe items are set to private? - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:10 PM Subject: Free/Busy Information Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 LOL - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 22:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working I actually didn't notice the address until after I sent that. I did visit the site and its not what you would think it is. - -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Are you laughing at his SMTP address or his choice of IP addresses on thhe MX records? William - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions LOL - -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:Rump;plasticgirl.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdGA+jBiZQJPzCgfEQL95gCfWLXzYsK6DEKiG8i7AH5XZM0KDQIAoMJF sPat3VuPQmL8bb0CA09ivQhN =ppLh -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
Last month it would have ended at Dec 1, 2002. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: search all text, all mailboxes?
I looked at the only tool listed there, the VM Mailkeeper program and it only allows searching of one mailbox at at time. I need to search all of them at once. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 09:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: search all text, all mailboxes? Several of the archival tools listed at www.mail-resources.com | web links will, as will tools such as those from Sherpa Software. -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz [mailto:HHinz;bcmhs.bc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions I've been asked to search all of our mailboxes on our Exchange server for a specific phrase to fullfill a Freedom of Information Act request. I know that Exmerge will search the entire Exchange server but only for subject or attachments. Is there a utility out there that will search the entire contents of the messages on the Exchange server as well? I've got 1800 mailboxes and I don't want someone to have to search through each one individually. Thanks, Horst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
James Watt and others gave as one of their reasons for not having to take care of the environment as the looming end of the world, second coming, rapture, etc. etc. Maybe . . . -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
You are not getting any information at all? Or just partial info? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Information Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security Log errors
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=565source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since
bringing Exchange 2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single
domain, single site, win2k SP3, native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved
mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed the steps to remove the
first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the old server,
but the box itself remains as a DC on the network.
The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly
when one of the RUS runs. When the RUS was Always Run so were the
errors. There are 2 RUS entries, one updates all the time and works fine
(Recipient Update Service (Athena)). The other runs every four hours and
produces 15 errors per pop (Recipient Update Service (Enterprise
Configuration)). Do I really need two of these? Is there anyway to see
what exactly is in the individual RUS?
Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH
Here is the error message:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 11/12/2002
Time: 7:05:21 AM
User: ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer: HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type:configuration
Object Name:CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name: HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: ARIES$
Client Domain: ATHENA
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
AccessesControl Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security Log errors
I wouldn't worry about it with 135 users. Select Rebuild whenever you
feel the urge.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Security Log errors
The two choices I have for the RUS agreements are rebuild or update
now - are there potential negative consequences to running either of
these operations in the middle of the day? I have only about 135 users
and the server has lots of RAM and processing power. Thanks.
Tim Hooks
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since
bringing Exchange 2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single
domain, single site, win2k SP3, native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved
mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed the steps to remove the
first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the old server,
but the box itself remains as a DC on the network.
The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly
when one of the RUS runs. When the RUS was Always Run so were the
errors. There are 2 RUS entries, one updates all the time and works fine
(Recipient Update Service (Athena)). The other runs every four hours and
produces 15 errors per pop (Recipient Update Service (Enterprise
Configuration)). Do I really need two of these? Is there anyway to see
what exactly is in the individual RUS?
Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH
Here is the error message:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 11/12/2002
Time: 7:05:21 AM
User: ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer: HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type:configuration
Object Name:CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name: HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: ARIES$
Client Domain: ATHENA
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
AccessesControl Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail not working
192.168 addresses are not routable over the Internet. Yes, you need an externally facing DNS server with your servers' external IP addresses associated with the appropriate A records. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working These are correct settings...aren't they? The MX record should allow sending emails servers to locate my Exchange server. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 worldtitaniumcouncil.org MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 gold.spectore.com platinum.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.4 titanium.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.3 gold.spectore.com A (Address) 192.168.20.5 This might be a clue Jeroen Peters - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-295943;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working Domain names are spectore.com and worldtitaniumcouncil.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.1 iQA/AwUBPdFEvDBiZQJPzCgfEQI3nQCeJ7JQ9V/zeTHaEB1qJYcQ1z2BLoUAn1r9 O6lC84D5tJwM7Z8kJHGOPIpj =YLyk -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I grew up in a tropical locale, Merritt Island, Florida. It was a wonderful place to grow up. However, I now like the natural air conditioning here in the beautiful San Francisco Bay Area, thank you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Yeah - probably the South Bay area! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory My memory is both faulty and dimm. I don't recall how to divide any standard DIMM or SIMM or other units into 391 and get and even result. Say Ed, when you do retire are you going to move someplace tropical? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Don't use faulty memory. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Darcy, you sure expect a lot. It isn't fair to expect me to actually comprehend everything I read herein! Disregard my suggestion until the user does a shift-Delete from the Sent Items folder. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: somewhat OT
Not so much me--I have two kids. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT To be kept in the life style that you wish to become accustomed to. g -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT Who knows? I'd love to retire today. If I can only convince my wife to work full-time! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT You're gonna be around that long Ed? I figured you'd be retiring in about 5 years! ;0) (g, dr) Jim Blunt E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. Office: 372-9188 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT This presumes that the function of e-mail remains stagnant. If it doesn't, the pure hardware box has to chase a moving target, which is not an easy thing to do. Doesn't just about every company that has a hardware firewall also have a firewall administrator? Not that any of your forecasts scare me. I'm retiring within 20 years. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT So Roger, does this mean that you are getting ready for the sobering messages? First, let me say that I am not privy to any advanced product planning in what I am about to say, and am only speculating. I fully expect to see a pure hardware version of an entry level Exchange Server within ten years. The design goal would have to be such that a professional sys admin is not required. My guess is that initially it would be targeted at that same mid-tier that you identify, but perhaps a bit lower (25-100 seats) at first. It has to go that way. If you look at what is happening in networking as a whole, you have companies like LinkSys and D-Link that are almost totally focused on idiot proof boxes for basic functionality. Intel, Nortel and more recently Microsoft have all gone chasing after this space as well. It only makes sense that this space will grow up to include a line of mini-blade or little box headless servers that do all of the basics (mail, telephony, web hosting, etc.). General purpose storage and print servicing is already happening. As we all know, little machines grow up to become big machines. 20 years from now, it is not unreasonable to project that even quite large systems will be simple hardware modules that you add to your pile of network pieces. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT Simple. Its not cost effective to outsourse at the levels they target. They missed the boat from day one. There is a relative break even point for having your own IT staff, generally in the 25-75 user range, depending on what your company actually does. More than 100 or so, and you really need someone. Once you've got someone inhouse, they tend to have to be a jack-of-all-trades type, and do a lot of fumbling through. But the job gets done. Traditionally, an NT box with Exchange 5.5 Standard wasn't really that expensive - you could probably do that for $10k. Win2k with E2k has raised the prices a bit, but not exhorbinantly such. With leasing options, that server could be a few hundred a month. Like any service provider, the good fruit is in the middle of the tree, not the low hanging stuff. SO they tended to target 500 person plus orgs. This 600-ish person company has 8 sysadmins - we have enough time to manage Exchange. Without it, maybe we'd have one less headcount, but I'd bet that the headcount loss isn't drastically different than the cost of 600 users' outsourced mail needs. Now, the other side of this equation is that email is a core business need for most companies, and isn't that hard to at least get running[1]. More specialized things, like e-commerce and line of business apps make more sense in a managed environment. Email never did. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr.
RE: search all text, all mailboxes?
The only tool listed where? In the client section? Yes, it doesn't really provide searching either. But there are a number of others listed in the server section as well as the Sherpa Software product, which also provides search capabilities. -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz [mailto:HHinz;bcmhs.bc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions I looked at the only tool listed there, the VM Mailkeeper program and it only allows searching of one mailbox at at time. I need to search all of them at once. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 09:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: search all text, all mailboxes? Several of the archival tools listed at www.mail-resources.com | web links will, as will tools such as those from Sherpa Software. -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz [mailto:HHinz;bcmhs.bc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions I've been asked to search all of our mailboxes on our Exchange server for a specific phrase to fullfill a Freedom of Information Act request. I know that Exmerge will search the entire Exchange server but only for subject or attachments. Is there a utility out there that will search the entire contents of the messages on the Exchange server as well? I've got 1800 mailboxes and I don't want someone to have to search through each one individually. Thanks, Horst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:John.Bowles;celera.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information You are not getting any information at all? Or just partial info? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Information Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free/Busy Information
Are all users hitting servers in the same site? There are some limitations using Active/Active clustering as to which services work. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:John.Bowles;celera.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information You are not getting any information at all? Or just partial info? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Information Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
