RE: Server capacity
Shared folders is a common feature set in other applications, too. But good deal on the software! Dear Board of Directors: Thank you for providing this new messaging and collaboration suite for our company. It seems, however, that our hardware is not up to the task of meeting the messaging needs of our staff using this application. Indeed, our peers are switching from Exchange to other products, because they perceive Exchange is too slow, based on our experiences. Can you help us out? Thanks! Erick :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions The budget for the software isn't an issue for us. Microsoft is on our board of directors, and so supplies us with software at no cost. If we had to pay for the software, it would probably be another story, but even then I would still pull for Outlook/Exchange. I think the Outlook/Exchange combination is one of the best ways to handle the type of email we deal with, which is mostly project based and so the shared folders model works great. Thanks, Erick - Original Message - From: "Jorge Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:23 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity > I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so > outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using > Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc > for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no > expense other than your time and (maybe) a slight learning curve. > > -Jorge Herrera > > A turn-key solution that you can evaluate would be SME Server > http://www.e-smith.org/ > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Server capacity > > > I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial > constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper > stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. > If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have > a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't > set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it > puts on systems. > > Erick > > - Original Message - > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > hp Services > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > Blackstone > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Server capacity > > > > > > I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I > > have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB > > drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an > > Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. > > > The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of > > > shared folders and calendars. > > > > I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange > > > up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the > > users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a > > non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have > > what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? > > > > Thanks, > > Erick > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >
RE: Server capacity
I thought the exact same thing. Spend the money on the hardware instead of the software. You might lose some features, but you might gain in the long run. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jorge Herrera Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no expense other than your time and (maybe) a slight learning curve. -Jorge Herrera A turn-key solution that you can evaluate would be SME Server http://www.e-smith.org/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server capacity I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it puts on systems. Erick - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public folder replication
It was basically the permission problem. where default or anonymous permission was not set Regards Santhosh.H E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder replication What version(s) of Exchange at each site? Are permissions correct? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Santhosh. H Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: public folder replication Hi I have a problem accessing a replicated public folder from the outlook The replicated public folder is visible in the exchange administration window but not visible in the outlook client This master public folder is available to the outlook users who belong to the site where it resides but not to the site where it is replicated Any help or suggestion appreciated Regards Santhosh.H E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
Nope. I figured it out. Our Active Directory guy rebuilt (and renamed) the global catalog server on our subnet and we haven't rebooted the Exchange server since then. Now I'm not saying I saw a KB article about this problem, but the timing was right and it has been fixed since I rebooted the server. Thanks for all your help, Aaron -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Ok.. Hrmm. DNS config problem? (not likely but don't see any other bonus ideas flying around ) On 1/29/03 15:14, "Edwards, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Interesting you mention removing the IP stack. One of my coworkers told me to try that so I did. Unfortunately it didn't work. And yes I did install the RPC tool on a machine that's Outlook works. Aaron -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Profile Creation Problem On the plus side, I don't think it is telling you that you have an AD permissions problem. Just to check... You did install this on a workstation that works and get a successful result correct (Want to eliminate error with the tool). For gits and shiggles, what happens if you remove and reinstall the TCP/IP stack on one of these machines? On 1/29/03 14:40, "Edwards, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I tried putting an entry in the lmhosts file. Still no dice. I'm not real familiar with RPC ping. I downloaded it from Microsoft and tried to ping the Exchange server with the protocol sequence tcp/ip and the endpoint Rping. It gives me these errors: RPC Call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0xba The server is unavailable Any idea what this is telling me? Aaron -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem did you try the RPC ping? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
How is CommValt now a days ? Ryan, -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN We are planning to use Legato in this situation to backup our Exchange database. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large Exchange 2000 cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its performance. Bryan Walbert agere systems Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards MS Exchange/Windows Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 610 712 5874 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Server capacity
The budget for the software isn't an issue for us. Microsoft is on our board of directors, and so supplies us with software at no cost. If we had to pay for the software, it would probably be another story, but even then I would still pull for Outlook/Exchange. I think the Outlook/Exchange combination is one of the best ways to handle the type of email we deal with, which is mostly project based and so the shared folders model works great. Thanks, Erick - Original Message - From: "Jorge Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:23 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity > I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so > outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using > Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc > for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no > expense other than your time and (maybe) a slight learning curve. > > -Jorge Herrera > > A turn-key solution that you can evaluate would be SME Server > http://www.e-smith.org/ > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Server capacity > > > I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial > constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper > stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. > If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have > a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't > set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it > puts on systems. > > Erick > > - Original Message - > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > hp Services > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > Blackstone > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Server capacity > > > > > > I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I > > have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB > > drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an > > Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. > > > The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of > > > shared folders and calendars. > > > > I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange > > > up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the > > users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a > > non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have > > what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? > > > > Thanks, > > Erick > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe
RE: Server capacity
I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no expense other than your time and (maybe) a slight learning curve. -Jorge Herrera A turn-key solution that you can evaluate would be SME Server http://www.e-smith.org/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server capacity I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it puts on systems. Erick - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Server capacity > > > I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I > have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB > drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an > Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. > The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of > shared folders and calendars. > > I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange > up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the > users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a > non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have > what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? > > Thanks, > Erick > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP won't renew lease
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1011&source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 18:43 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: DHCP won't renew lease Importance: High I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the leasing of IP address to any of the clients. The clients who already have IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted could not get the new or same IP address. In the event viewer I see an event ID 1011 with the following warning "The DHCP Server issued a NACK to the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request. Has anyone seen this before? This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a. Thanks much in advance for any help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP won't renew lease
Bummer. What does the Windows forum say about it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'Exchange Discussions' Importance: High I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the leasing of IP address to any of the clients. The clients who already have IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted could not get the new or same IP address. In the event viewer I see an event ID 1011 with the following warning "The DHCP Server issued a NACK to the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request. Has anyone seen this before? This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a. Thanks much in advance for any help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP won't renew lease
I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the leasing of IP address to any of the clients. The clients who already have IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted could not get the new or same IP address. In the event viewer I see an event ID 1011 with the following warning "The DHCP Server issued a NACK to the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request. Has anyone seen this before? This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a. Thanks much in advance for any help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server capacity
I think the box would perform more or less adequately. I don't like the disk configuration, however; you should consider a RAID-1 pair for the OS and Exchange IS and DS logs, and the rest in a RAID-5 for the databases and MTA queues. Even better would be separate RAID-1 pairs for the OS and for the logs, but for 30 to 50 users, I don't think it's a requirement. I used to run 1,000 Exchange 5.5 users on a box that size [1], and I don't think Exchange 2000 causes that much extra load! You should check the Windows 2000 Hardware Compatibility List, however. With the dual whammy of a potentially unsupported hardware configuration and the difficulty of obtaining spare parts, this box may end up costing you far more than it saves. [1] Even with 256MB, but we upgraded that after a short while. The box was supposed to have come with 768MB, but 512MB of it was missing. It actually ran not too badly at 256MB. If you were to do one thing to that box, you should consider buying some more memory for it, even for 30 to 50 users. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server capacity I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it puts on systems. Erick - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Server capacity > > > I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I > have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB > drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an > Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. > The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of > shared folders and calendars. > > I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange > up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the > users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a > non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have > what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? > > Thanks, > Erick > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server capacity
I honestly cant say. However your company may want to think of this. They are spending a considerable amount of money for the software alone. Shouldn't that same consideration be given to the hardware? Nobody is going to be happy with the current scenario once it is in place. And as Ed said, since the hardware is history, if you have a hardware issue, you are liable to find yourself stuck between a rock and a hard place. Nobody is going to want to wait a week while you bid on RAID board from eBay. I would urge your company or whoever to either think about holding off on this project until you can get the funds for a server, or spend the money on one now. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server capacity I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it puts on systems. Erick - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Server capacity > > > I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I > have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB > drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an > Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. > The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of > shared folders and calendars. > > I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange > up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the > users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a > non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have > what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? > > Thanks, > Erick > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Server capacity
I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it puts on systems. Erick - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Server capacity > > > I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I > have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB > drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an > Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. > The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of > shared folders and calendars. > > I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange > up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the users > to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a non-profit with a > very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have what we need. Is > this server going to be a serious bottleneck? > > Thanks, > Erick > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
See KB article 251390. According to what I've found in MSDN, you can get the Assoc-NT-Account, or primary Windows NT account, using ADSI, but not other accounts that might have permissions on a mailbox. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Well, I was actually looking for both...the publicdelegates worked great for finding out who has 'send on behalf of' permissions, that is step one, now I need to know mailboxes that have extra NT permissions. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes I was talking about NT permissions. Of course, this would apply to client permissions, which I now realize is what you were probably asking about. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes g... machine crashed and strangely it sent this mail. The attribute is 'publicDelegates'... I use perl and Net::LDAP... but I'm sure there are many other ways get this. jeff e. ___ hrm... if you already have AD in place.. I believe this info is in AD. The attribute is -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EMC SAN Technology to recreate Outlook mailboxes
A SAN just looks like a set of disk drives to an Exchange server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EMC SAN Technology to recreate Outlook mailboxes Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Has anyone ever used EMC's SAN technology to recreate a exchange mailbox that had been deleted? It is my understanding with scripts and things that this is possible. Thanks for any insight that you might have. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My apologies but I must editorialize.
You're one to talk. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My apologies but I must editorialize. I see you make an impression on people everywhere you go Mr. Scharff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: My apologies but I must editorialize. No problem. I've added you to my kill file, so this shouldn't be a problem for you in the future. On 1/29/03 10:40, "Todd Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In response to the author of this particular reply; Yes, I did find your answer and it was as helpful and condescending as the one you just sent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
WINS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains I've got an odd situation with an Exchange 5.5 server (Win2K, but in an NT4 domain) not seeing all of the trusted domains. I've checked the FAQ, the archives, and the Microsoft KB. Here's the situation: Exchange 5.5 organization in TestNTDomain with three sites/five servers (one or two servers per site) TestNTDomain trusts Test2KDomain (among others) I can see Test2KDomain in the logon options for all of the servers in TestNTDomain, even log on using a user from the Test2KDomain. On four of the five servers, I can log on with the Exchange service account (TestNTDomain\Exchange), open the Exchange admin tool, and grant permissions to any user in the trusted domains. On the fifth server, which is on the same subnet and has the same network configuration as three of the four that are working [1], I cannot. It doesn't show the trusted domains in the drop-down list on the permissions window, nor can I add them by entering "test2Kdomain\user". Ideas? Thanks, Darcy [1] The one that's not working and three others are in Seattle, the last server is in New York and on a different subnet [2] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mta ,dat files
If you're working with Microsoft PSS, then you should heed their advice until the problem is resolved. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mta ,dat files I have a bunch of mta .dat files stuck in my mtadata folder. I have checked Technet and am currently working with MS techs and still no success. I have reinstalled Exchange 5.5 and applied SP4. Out of 1800 .dat files only 177 were processed. The MTA queue is at 0. What can I do to flush the files out of the mtadata folder. Any assistance would be appreciated. Now I have over 1900 .dat files and growing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server capacity
Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server capacity I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server capacity I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of shared folders and calendars. I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
It'd probably be a 500 Million MB download anyway ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 29 January 2003 22:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bastards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 I haven't seen Outlook 11 beta available publicly -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 I just knew the download would become available before the media would arrive. D'oh. K. Can you download Outlook 11 beta ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install, the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really have any problems with this beta. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message
RE: Exchange2003
Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bastards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 I haven't seen Outlook 11 beta available publicly -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 I just knew the download would become available before the media would arrive. D'oh. K. Can you download Outlook 11 beta ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install, the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really have any problems with this beta. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or d
RE: Exchange2003
I haven't seen Outlook 11 beta available publicly -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 I just knew the download would become available before the media would arrive. D'oh. K. Can you download Outlook 11 beta ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install, the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really have any problems with this beta. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/
RE: Exchange2003
I just knew the download would become available before the media would arrive. D'oh. K. Can you download Outlook 11 beta ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install, the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really have any problems with this beta. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
Re: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
Ok.. Hrmm. DNS config problem? (not likely but don't see any other bonus ideas flying around ) On 1/29/03 15:14, "Edwards, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Interesting you mention removing the IP stack. One of my coworkers told me to try that so I did. Unfortunately it didn't work. And yes I did install the RPC tool on a machine that's Outlook works. Aaron -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Profile Creation Problem On the plus side, I don't think it is telling you that you have an AD permissions problem. Just to check... You did install this on a workstation that works and get a successful result correct (Want to eliminate error with the tool). For gits and shiggles, what happens if you remove and reinstall the TCP/IP stack on one of these machines? On 1/29/03 14:40, "Edwards, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I tried putting an entry in the lmhosts file. Still no dice. I'm not real familiar with RPC ping. I downloaded it from Microsoft and tried to ping the Exchange server with the protocol sequence tcp/ip and the endpoint Rping. It gives me these errors: RPC Call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0xba The server is unavailable Any idea what this is telling me? Aaron -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem did you try the RPC ping? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Exchange2003
Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install, the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really have any problems with this beta. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
RE: Exchange2003
Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Exchange2003
there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMA
RE: Exchange2003
That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server capacity
I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server capacity I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of shared folders and calendars. I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Server capacity
I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of shared folders and calendars. I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Can you open the users mailbox logged in as you ? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 22:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR Ie Exchange admin privs, not just domain admin. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the user mailbox? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMERGE ERROR Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it says you do not have permissions on the information store but you actually do? I found an article that mentions something about copying the mapi32.dll file over... Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify Network Defence Ltd. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information please contact the Network Defence Technical Department on 01925 272001 Network Defence Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Ie Exchange admin privs, not just domain admin. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the user mailbox? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMERGE ERROR Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it says you do not have permissions on the information store but you actually do? I found an article that mentions something about copying the mapi32.dll file over... Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the user mailbox? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMERGE ERROR Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it says you do not have permissions on the information store but you actually do? I found an article that mentions something about copying the mapi32.dll file over... Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ontrack Powercontrols
>IIRC that includes online backups. Oo,ooo,ooo... I'll have to call them. I didn't see that option in their "trial" version, but maybe that's just a restriction of the trial. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ontrack Powercontrols IIRC that includes online backups. On 1/29/03 14:06, "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Just point it an EDB file you can go right in. If you have an EDB file. I don't see support for "online" backups. How many of us do regular "offline" backups? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ontrack Powercontrols Its pretty cool. I have tried it and it works as advertised. Just point it an EDB file you can go right in. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ontrack Powercontrols Has anyone looked at this product in detail? Looks too good to be true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXMERGE ERROR
I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMERGE ERROR Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it says you do not have permissions on the information store but you actually do? I found an article that mentions something about copying the mapi32.dll file over... Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BE 9
It shouldn't be an upgrade; it should be a service pack. Most of this product fixes issues from the old with not much *NEW* features in comparison. K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David J. Culliton Sent: 29 January 2003 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BE 9 I am using it now. It shaved about 20% off our typical enterprise backup times. I like the ability to modify the order in which my machines are backup up. If 8.6 had it - I never found it... I also like the interface better. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BE 9 Anyone upgrading to Backup Exec 9.0 It looks like it has some real good advantages and I am just looking for some opinions Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EXMERGE ERROR
Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it says you do not have permissions on the information store but you actually do? I found an article that mentions something about copying the mapi32.dll file over... Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BE 9
Be advised that the MSDE (Sql server) that ships with BE9 is the old unpatched vulnerable code. If you install BE9 you should immediately update the ssnetlib.dll file that they install or you could become part of the latest SQL virus party. I know this because I just installed the BE9 eval and then the next day I was scanning for the SQL vulnerability with EEYE's free utility and It found the machine with BE9 on it. There is an app note on the Veritas web site admitting the problem and telling you to go to Microsoft for the patches. Tom Alverson -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BE 9 I am using it now. It shaved about 20% off our typical enterprise backup times. I like the ability to modify the order in which my machines are backup up. If 8.6 had it - I never found it... I also like the interface better. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BE 9 Anyone upgrading to Backup Exec 9.0 It looks like it has some real good advantages and I am just looking for some opinions Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange2003
For anyone running the beta, does it feel like the system requirements are going to be a lot steeper then for Exchange 2000? I'm running Exchange 2000 on a dual PPro 200 Compaq server, and I'd love not to have to get new hardware. Thanks, Erick - Original Message - From: "Tim Ault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:34 PM Subject: Exchange2003 > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp > > Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? > > > Tim. > x3683 > > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts > > > > Hi, > > I have a really weird one here folks: > > This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some > names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a > duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing > has happened for the calendar and task folders. > > I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at > the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no > other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. > > Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking > the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted > from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. > > I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have > investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS > corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is > about missing user SID's. > > I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. > > Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? > > Thanks, > MP > > "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and > contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. > > If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it > immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) > 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are > prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in > this message and any attachment. > > Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to > this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for > the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any > attachment. > > Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer > viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, > damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any > attachment." > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
It really looks good. I like the way the preview pane can be on the side or bottom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mta ,dat files
I have a bunch of mta .dat files stuck in my mtadata folder. I have checked Technet and am currently working with MS techs and still no success. I have reinstalled Exchange 5.5 and applied SP4. Out of 1800 .dat files only 177 were processed. The MTA queue is at 0. What can I do to flush the files out of the mtadata folder. Any assistance would be appreciated. Now I have over 1900 .dat files and growing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
I've got an odd situation with an Exchange 5.5 server (Win2K, but in an NT4 domain) not seeing all of the trusted domains. I've checked the FAQ, the archives, and the Microsoft KB. Here's the situation: Exchange 5.5 organization in TestNTDomain with three sites/five servers (one or two servers per site) TestNTDomain trusts Test2KDomain (among others) I can see Test2KDomain in the logon options for all of the servers in TestNTDomain, even log on using a user from the Test2KDomain. On four of the five servers, I can log on with the Exchange service account (TestNTDomain\Exchange), open the Exchange admin tool, and grant permissions to any user in the trusted domains. On the fifth server, which is on the same subnet and has the same network configuration as three of the four that are working [1], I cannot. It doesn't show the trusted domains in the drop-down list on the permissions window, nor can I add them by entering "test2Kdomain\user". Ideas? Thanks, Darcy [1] The one that's not working and three others are in Seattle, the last server is in New York and on a different subnet [2] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My apologies but I must editorialize.
I see you make an impression on people everywhere you go Mr. Scharff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: My apologies but I must editorialize. No problem. I've added you to my kill file, so this shouldn't be a problem for you in the future. On 1/29/03 10:40, "Todd Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In response to the author of this particular reply; Yes, I did find your answer and it was as helpful and condescending as the one you just sent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
Interesting you mention removing the IP stack. One of my coworkers told me to try that so I did. Unfortunately it didn't work. And yes I did install the RPC tool on a machine that's Outlook works. Aaron -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Profile Creation Problem On the plus side, I don't think it is telling you that you have an AD permissions problem. Just to check... You did install this on a workstation that works and get a successful result correct (Want to eliminate error with the tool). For gits and shiggles, what happens if you remove and reinstall the TCP/IP stack on one of these machines? On 1/29/03 14:40, "Edwards, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I tried putting an entry in the lmhosts file. Still no dice. I'm not real familiar with RPC ping. I downloaded it from Microsoft and tried to ping the Exchange server with the protocol sequence tcp/ip and the endpoint Rping. It gives me these errors: RPC Call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0xba The server is unavailable Any idea what this is telling me? Aaron -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem did you try the RPC ping? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
Re: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
On the plus side, I don't think it is telling you that you have an AD permissions problem. Just to check... You did install this on a workstation that works and get a successful result correct (Want to eliminate error with the tool). For gits and shiggles, what happens if you remove and reinstall the TCP/IP stack on one of these machines? On 1/29/03 14:40, "Edwards, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I tried putting an entry in the lmhosts file. Still no dice. I'm not real familiar with RPC ping. I downloaded it from Microsoft and tried to ping the Exchange server with the protocol sequence tcp/ip and the endpoint Rping. It gives me these errors: RPC Call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0xba The server is unavailable Any idea what this is telling me? Aaron -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem did you try the RPC ping? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ontrack Powercontrols
IIRC that includes online backups. On 1/29/03 14:06, "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Just point it an EDB file you can go right in. If you have an EDB file. I don't see support for "online" backups. How many of us do regular "offline" backups? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ontrack Powercontrols Its pretty cool. I have tried it and it works as advertised. Just point it an EDB file you can go right in. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ontrack Powercontrols Has anyone looked at this product in detail? Looks too good to be true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMC SAN Technology to recreate Outlook mailboxes
Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Has anyone ever used EMC's SAN technology to recreate a exchange mailbox that had been deleted? It is my understanding with scripts and things that this is possible. Thanks for any insight that you might have. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Well, I was actually looking for both...the publicdelegates worked great for finding out who has 'send on behalf of' permissions, that is step one, now I need to know mailboxes that have extra NT permissions. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes I was talking about NT permissions. Of course, this would apply to client permissions, which I now realize is what you were probably asking about. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes g... machine crashed and strangely it sent this mail. The attribute is 'publicDelegates'... I use perl and Net::LDAP... but I'm sure there are many other ways get this. jeff e. ___ hrm... if you already have AD in place.. I believe this info is in AD. The attribute is -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My apologies but I must editorialize.
No problem. I've added you to my kill file, so this shouldn't be a problem for you in the future. On 1/29/03 10:40, "Todd Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In response to the author of this particular reply; Yes, I did find your answer and it was as helpful and condescending as the one you just sent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
I tried putting an entry in the lmhosts file. Still no dice. I'm not real familiar with RPC ping. I downloaded it from Microsoft and tried to ping the Exchange server with the protocol sequence tcp/ip and the endpoint Rping. It gives me these errors: RPC Call raised exception 0x6ba The server is unavailable RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0xba The server is unavailable Any idea what this is telling me? Aaron -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem did you try the RPC ping? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange2003
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: calendar, tasks and contacts
It turned out to be a corruption in the mail profile on a particular desktop machine. Unique circumstances none the less. Thanks for the pointer though... MP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2003 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: calendar, tasks and contacts I would first look at permissions. Does anyone else have permissions on that folder? His mailbox? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and Voice Mail
Its called Octel Unified Messenger, and is currently sold by Avaya, who has the old Lucent (and before that AT&T) PBX hardware business. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail > > > I saw something similar that worked with Outlook (not OWA), > developed by a > third party for Expanets, who took over the sales end of Lucent > Technologies. You might want to check with Expanets about > that. I can't > remember the company who developed it now, but when I called > them directly > they refered me back to the reseller. > > John Orban > System Administrator > The Country School > www.countryschool.org > > > -Original Message- > From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA and Voice Mail > > > Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years > ago I went to a > Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA they had this media > tool that > played voice messages on the web page itself. You just > clicked a button to > download and install. > > I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot find > anything like that > in OWA.Is it something that is thirdparty or something > that you download > separately or am I in a bad dream and just need to wake up? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BE 9
I am using it now. It shaved about 20% off our typical enterprise backup times. I like the ability to modify the order in which my machines are backup up. If 8.6 had it - I never found it... I also like the interface better. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BE 9 Anyone upgrading to Backup Exec 9.0 It looks like it has some real good advantages and I am just looking for some opinions Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
Is this an AD network? Are there firewalls inbetween the clients and the Exchange box or multiple subnets? The odds are it's still DNS; try troubleshooting it by putting an entry in the hosts file on the client. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
did you try the RPC ping? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ontrack Powercontrols
>Just point it an EDB file you can go right in. If you have an EDB file. I don't see support for "online" backups. How many of us do regular "offline" backups? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ontrack Powercontrols Its pretty cool. I have tried it and it works as advertised. Just point it an EDB file you can go right in. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ontrack Powercontrols Has anyone looked at this product in detail? Looks too good to be true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
First name basis probably. Don't do it! You have been warned! Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)245-8314 fax (850)412-0400 -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN you'll get to know your PSS people and TAM very well. -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will let you know how it works out. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN You can but shouldn't. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN I thought you couldn't cluster Exchange. BTW, we're running the same setup (albeit probably much smaller) and backing up using BE 8.6. We haven't run across any problems so far. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large > Exchange 2000 > cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our > Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its > performance. > > > Bryan Walbert > agere systems > Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards > MS Exchange/Windows Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 610 712 5874 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and Voice Mail
http://snurl.com/oe8 We used to disable the button through a reg edit. http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=288119 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years ago I went to a Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA they had this media tool that played voice messages on the web page itself. You just clicked a button to download and install. I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot find anything like that in OWA.Is it something that is thirdparty or something that you download separately or am I in a bad dream and just need to wake up? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
you'll get to know your PSS people and TAM very well. -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will let you know how it works out. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN You can but shouldn't. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN I thought you couldn't cluster Exchange. BTW, we're running the same setup (albeit probably much smaller) and backing up using BE 8.6. We haven't run across any problems so far. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large > Exchange 2000 > cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our > Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its > performance. > > > Bryan Walbert > agere systems > Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards > MS Exchange/Windows Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 610 712 5874 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and Voice Mail
I saw something similar that worked with Outlook (not OWA), developed by a third party for Expanets, who took over the sales end of Lucent Technologies. You might want to check with Expanets about that. I can't remember the company who developed it now, but when I called them directly they refered me back to the reseller. John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and Voice Mail Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years ago I went to a Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA they had this media tool that played voice messages on the web page itself. You just clicked a button to download and install. I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot find anything like that in OWA.Is it something that is thirdparty or something that you download separately or am I in a bad dream and just need to wake up? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ontrack Powercontrols
Its pretty cool. I have tried it and it works as advertised. Just point it an EDB file you can go right in. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ontrack Powercontrols Has anyone looked at this product in detail? Looks too good to be true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA and Voice Mail
Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years ago I went to a Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA they had this media tool that played voice messages on the web page itself. You just clicked a button to download and install. I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot find anything like that in OWA.Is it something that is thirdparty or something that you download separately or am I in a bad dream and just need to wake up? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ontrack Powercontrols
Has anyone looked at this product in detail? Looks too good to be true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Profile Creation Problem
Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: "The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists." They click OK and get: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed." Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will let you know how it works out. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN You can but shouldn't. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN I thought you couldn't cluster Exchange. BTW, we're running the same setup (albeit probably much smaller) and backing up using BE 8.6. We haven't run across any problems so far. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large > Exchange 2000 > cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our > Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its > performance. > > > Bryan Walbert > agere systems > Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards > MS Exchange/Windows Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 610 712 5874 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA
By the way, does America West airlines use any of your products? Just wondering. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:58 PM Subject: RE: OWA > Do I need to set anything for OWA to work? I got pass the first problem and > at the OWA logon screen. When I try to logon I get "OWA was unable to get to > your inbox." Do I need to set any permission on my Exchange server? > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA > > > After you posted, of course. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:25 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA > > > Thank I found something on technet > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: OWA > > > Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. > Did I forget a bolt? > > Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM > Subject: OWA > > > > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > > Object required: 'Application(...)' > > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > > > Tony > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
I did everything that was on your list except I use SP3 not 4 for Exch55OWA. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Ok tony Im not genius with this stuff But have you: 1.) Is it on a Server and NOT workstation? (remember server only) 2.) Is the server part of the same domain as your exch server (did you join it to the NT domain - I seem to remember you are Exch55) 3.) Did you load the server with IIS at time of install? 4.) Did you patch the Server OS? ie use the Windows Update (this would/should patch IIS too) 5.) Are you logged into the server with an account with the correct admin rights? (administrator should do) 6.) Did you log into the domain and NOT the machine (domain) 7.) did you load Exch OWA and tell it your correct exch server name? 8.) Did you patch the server with Exch55OWA with sp4 9.) Did you reboot the IIS server? After all this which maybe not totally correct step for step...It should work.. It's pretty straight forward..Assuming you are not doing anything special with the IIS server etcpermissions..so on.. there are likely a bunch more way to set stuff up then above...but when in dough KISS it works pretty much out of the box, sound like maybe you skip a step somewhere... Now if you are going to expose it to the Internet..I would recommend you definitely read up on securing IIS and some on W2K prior to letting lose in the wild. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Do I need to set anything for OWA to work? I got pass the first problem and at the OWA logon screen. When I try to logon I get "OWA was unable to get to your inbox." Do I need to set any permission on my Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA After you posted, of course. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Thank I found something on technet -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. Did I forget a bolt? Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: OWA > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List pos
my SMTP Connectors' queues are going crazy
Another issue with my Exchange 2000 relays that send out all mail from our Imail servers. These Exchange servers have been working fine for last few months. However recently they have been getting swamped. They still receive and send messages fine, however the average number of messages in the retry queues has grown from ~3,000 to ~10,000 Also a lot of queues in the ESM are displayed in the "Ready" connection state (green circle with a checkmark), however many of them have a good number of messages inside them. Am I the only one who is experiencing this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
Ok tony Im not genius with this stuff But have you: 1.) Is it on a Server and NOT workstation? (remember server only) 2.) Is the server part of the same domain as your exch server (did you join it to the NT domain - I seem to remember you are Exch55) 3.) Did you load the server with IIS at time of install? 4.) Did you patch the Server OS? ie use the Windows Update (this would/should patch IIS too) 5.) Are you logged into the server with an account with the correct admin rights? (administrator should do) 6.) Did you log into the domain and NOT the machine (domain) 7.) did you load Exch OWA and tell it your correct exch server name? 8.) Did you patch the server with Exch55OWA with sp4 9.) Did you reboot the IIS server? After all this which maybe not totally correct step for step...It should work.. It's pretty straight forward..Assuming you are not doing anything special with the IIS server etcpermissions..so on.. there are likely a bunch more way to set stuff up then above...but when in dough KISS it works pretty much out of the box, sound like maybe you skip a step somewhere... Now if you are going to expose it to the Internet..I would recommend you definitely read up on securing IIS and some on W2K prior to letting lose in the wild. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Do I need to set anything for OWA to work? I got pass the first problem and at the OWA logon screen. When I try to logon I get "OWA was unable to get to your inbox." Do I need to set any permission on my Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA After you posted, of course. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Thank I found something on technet -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. Did I forget a bolt? Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: OWA > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
Do I need to set anything for OWA to work? I got pass the first problem and at the OWA logon screen. When I try to logon I get "OWA was unable to get to your inbox." Do I need to set any permission on my Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA After you posted, of course. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Thank I found something on technet -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. Did I forget a bolt? Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: OWA > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Repeated attempts to log into IIS - SSL & OWA
Here are two KB articles that I managed to find: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;234022 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;218445 It is a ridiculous process and I recommend doing it on a test server first. I'm sure their are better walkthroughs written by non-M$ people. That is why I asked on this forum. Worst case is that you have to remove the certs and reinstall OWA. I wasn't able to get the cert going after a couple tries and ran out of time. I intend to revisit it soon though. Johnny -Original Message- From: Meade, Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:42 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Repeated attempts to log into IIS The guy that set this all up has moved on. He explained it to me - you just run the wizard and grant yourself a cert. I am thinking that the user could install the cert to their local machine and they would not get the security alert (until it expired - maybe you can make it for more than a year). It is all on the NT4 option pack (IIS, MS Certificate server, Key Manager). After you install OWA, **I think** you go to the IIS Exchange website and require secure communications and run Key Manager and then somehow associate the Certificate with the IIS website. HTH, Devin L. Meade, CNE, MCP Network Administrator Frankfurt-Short-Bruza www.fsb-ae.com www.oklahomadome.com -Original Message- From: Steve Aspindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 5:20 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Repeated attempts to log into IIS Please can you explain the steps to create your own certificate? I would like to do this but which app. do I need to run to generate the cert. Thanks Steve -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Winnt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 January 2003 08:51 To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Repeated attempts to log into IIS Hi Thanks for the response I will do some research into this as its not something I've used before Thanks Mr. Niki Blowfield IT Administrator Westminster Partitions & Joinery T - 020 8848 0126 F - 020 8848 8845 > -Original Message- > From: Meade, Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 27 January 2003 18:38 > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Repeated attempts to log into IIS > > > You can buy one if you want or you can issue one to yourself. > The general public is not using it. > > So far as someone else's certificate that they issued to > themselves - I wouldn't trust it :-). It is the same thing > as a stranger saying "Trust me". We simply tell our staff > "Trust this server even though we did not pay big bucks for a > certificate". > > Thanks, > > Devin L. Meade, CNE, MCP > Network Administrator > Frankfurt-Short-Bruza > www.fsb-ae.com > www.oklahomadome.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:19 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Repeated attempts to log into IIS > > This doesn't require a purchased SSL Cert? > > J > > -Original Message- > From: Meade, Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:09 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Repeated attempts to log into IIS > > > Niki, > > --- Can anyone advise if theres anything else I should be doing > or be particularly concerned about? --- > > I would encrypt your OWA login process - On our private LAN, > we have OWA installed on an NT4 box (with IIS). Our firewall > forwards port 443 (SSL) to it. On this box, we issued > ourselves a certificate and have the client answer yes to the > Security alert. All this to ensure that the clients > credentials are encrypted. We have no proxy server in this > loop. Can you > change OWA to port 443 and then block port 80 at the firewall? > > Devin L. Meade, CNE, MCP > Network Administrator > Frankfurt-Short-Bruza > www.fsb-ae.com > www.oklahomadome.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield - Winnt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:46 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: Repeated attempts to log into IIS > > Hi > > We have an IIS4 server on our private LAN, port 80 traffic is > forwared to it from the firewall as it is our OWA server, it > is also our MS Proxy Server > > Its been used as an anonymous proxy from unauthorised users > based externally despite me trying a number of things to stop > this as advised from some kind soul on one of the MS newsgroups > > Instead, I've moved proxy server to another server, although > the 1st server will remain as our OWA server > > Today, I've noticed hundreds of failed attempts to log into > this server, which if you try to connect to it, just displays > the generic IIS4 sample website. > > With the addition of the \exchange subdirectory, you > obviously get the OWA log in > > I assume this is a consequ
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
I was talking about NT permissions. Of course, this would apply to client permissions, which I now realize is what you were probably asking about. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes g... machine crashed and strangely it sent this mail. The attribute is 'publicDelegates'... I use perl and Net::LDAP... but I'm sure there are many other ways get this. jeff e. ___ hrm... if you already have AD in place.. I believe this info is in AD. The attribute is -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
I was thinking of VBScript using ADSI. You need to also call a routine from another API that converts those cryptic SIDs into text names. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Eventually, they will be custom coded, and I am sure one of our guys can whip something up if I know where to look. We have 6 orgs and the first two are manual migrations with PF and DL sync tools that are being coded as we speak so they can coexist at first. The delegate access mailboxes is a problem that no one thought of and I was asked to see if I can I identify them for the manual part of the migration. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes I wonder if one of the migration tools out there could indicate that. Are you using one of them or strictly using MS tools/techniques. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Have you had a look at MBInfo? Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: OWA
After you posted, of course. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Thank I found something on technet -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. Did I forget a bolt? Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: OWA > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
Thank I found something on technet -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. Did I forget a bolt? Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: OWA > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
Tony PSS ID Number: Q248718 Article Last Modified on 06-22-2001 The information in this article applies to: Microsoft Outlook Web Access 5.5 Service Packs 1, 2, 3 Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 Symptoms When you try to log on to an Exchange Server 5.5 computer using Outlook Web Access (OWA), you may receive the following error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Resolution To resolve this problem: Start the Internet Information Server (IIS) Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in, and expand the Transaction Server folder. Click Computers, click My Computer, click Packages Installed, click IIS In-Process Applications, and then click Components. Delete the IISWAM.1_Root_Exchange component. Click the Internet Information Server folder, and then click Default Web Site. Right-click the Exchange virtual directory, and then click Properties. Under the Application Settings section on the Virtual Directory tab, there are three buttons: Remove, Configuration, and Unload. Click Remove, click Apply, and then click OK. In Control Panel, double-click Services, and stop the IIS Admin Service. NOTE: This also stops the FTP Publishing Service and the Web Publishing Service. Return to the Exchange virtual directory properties. The Configuration and Unload buttons are unavailable. Click Create. Click Apply, and then click OK. In Control Panel, double-click Services, and start the IIS Admin, FTP Publishing, and Web Publishing Services. Additional query words: Keywords: Issue Type: kbprb Technology: kbOutlookSearch kbExchangeSearch kbExchange550 kbZNotKeyword2 kbOWASearch kbOWA550SP1 kbOWA550SP2 kbOWA550SP3 Send feedback to Microsoft © 2002-2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. ___ \\ - - // (--@-@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on" +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. Did I forget a bolt? Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: OWA > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA
Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff. Did I forget a bolt? Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: OWA > I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get > > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? > > Tony > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
g... machine crashed and strangely it sent this mail. The attribute is 'publicDelegates'... I use perl and Net::LDAP... but I'm sure there are many other ways get this. jeff e. ___ hrm... if you already have AD in place.. I believe this info is in AD. The attribute is -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA
I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack? Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Eventually, they will be custom coded, and I am sure one of our guys can whip something up if I know where to look. We have 6 orgs and the first two are manual migrations with PF and DL sync tools that are being coded as we speak so they can coexist at first. The delegate access mailboxes is a problem that no one thought of and I was asked to see if I can I identify them for the manual part of the migration. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes I wonder if one of the migration tools out there could indicate that. Are you using one of them or strictly using MS tools/techniques. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Have you had a look at MBInfo? Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
I wonder if one of the migration tools out there could indicate that. Are you using one of them or strictly using MS tools/techniques. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Have you had a look at MBInfo? Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Have you had a look at MBInfo? Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outside of a company...
It's nice to know that I am not the only one who thinks it doesn't make sense... 8) Thanks. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outside of a company... That doesn't make any more sense to me than it does to you! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outside of a company... Hello. Exchange 5.5 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and 2002 users environment. I understand that there's an option to disable automatic replies and autofowarding in IMS. However, does anyone know if there's an option to allow users to send new emails to other SMTP servers, but do not allow forwarding (manually) e-mails to other SMTP servers? I guess it really doesn't make sense to me, but can anyone explain if it's true? Is it an Outlook function (I have been using Outlook since Outlook 97 days, but I don't remember find this feature.)? The reason I am asking is that one of Director used to work in a company that disabled forwarding, but allow users to send new e-mails and he is wondering why we are not doing it. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outsideof a company...
That doesn't make any more sense to me than it does to you! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outside of a company... Hello. Exchange 5.5 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and 2002 users environment. I understand that there's an option to disable automatic replies and autofowarding in IMS. However, does anyone know if there's an option to allow users to send new emails to other SMTP servers, but do not allow forwarding (manually) e-mails to other SMTP servers? I guess it really doesn't make sense to me, but can anyone explain if it's true? Is it an Outlook function (I have been using Outlook since Outlook 97 days, but I don't remember find this feature.)? The reason I am asking is that one of Director used to work in a company that disabled forwarding, but allow users to send new e-mails and he is wondering why we are not doing it. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outside of a company...
Hello. Exchange 5.5 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and 2002 users environment. I understand that there's an option to disable automatic replies and autofowarding in IMS. However, does anyone know if there's an option to allow users to send new emails to other SMTP servers, but do not allow forwarding (manually) e-mails to other SMTP servers? I guess it really doesn't make sense to me, but can anyone explain if it's true? Is it an Outlook function (I have been using Outlook since Outlook 97 days, but I don't remember find this feature.)? The reason I am asking is that one of Director used to work in a company that disabled forwarding, but allow users to send new e-mails and he is wondering why we are not doing it. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
Are you using Veritas NetBackup version 4.5? There is a known problem with the installation of Version 4.5 replacing the MS runtime DLLs with incompatible verions. Steve Smith Common IT Services Ministry of Management Services Province of British Columbia email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (250) 387-8698 -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 28, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4 OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100% store.exe. The memory was ~800Meg, but it's a 1Gig machine doing nothing else but exchange. I don't see anything in the event log indicating an error (at least it applied the 4 log files, thank god for logging ). I haven't found any on-topic KB articles. I see one on post-sp4 store.exe fixes (282533) but none of the specific fixes seem on topic. Any suggestions on where to begin the search for the problem? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
we originally installed rightfax ver. 7.0 and have since upgraded to 8.0 It has been one of the easiest things to install/maintain and we are running exch. 5.5 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
Mark, Good to know about Message Manager moving over the images to a network share. I wrote a script on the exchange server so that once it came in it would move the image to a network share based on the fax number it was sent to. Brett -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Faxination's a great one for the Enterprise level. Another good one is Message Manager from www.syssol.com.au which we've just implemented. It's does everything faxination does and also delivers inbound faxes to a network share, which was the reason we chose one over the other (we've got a requirement to bring 10,000 faxes per week into an image & workflow solution as well as the normal exchange based inbound & outbound) -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
Faxination's a great one for the Enterprise level. Another good one is Message Manager from www.syssol.com.au which we've just implemented. It's does everything faxination does and also delivers inbound faxes to a network share, which was the reason we chose one over the other (we've got a requirement to bring 10,000 faxes per week into an image & workflow solution as well as the normal exchange based inbound & outbound) -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax
Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5 and Norton Internet Security
Browser security should be medium only, perhaps Norton sets it to high or the equivalent? Harriet -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 5.5 and Norton Internet Security I had a user complain that "whenever I have Norton Internet Security running, I am not able to reply to or forward messages in OWA". I'm waiting for more details, but I didn't see anything in the archives on OWA and Norton. Has anyone seen this before? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
