RE: Windows 2000 Backup
Why not run a full everynight and then use something like Power Controls to access the backup if needed? How often do you see yourself restoring someones mail? -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Backup Sorry for the confusion I caused. I mean the W2k NTBackup that comes with Windows 2000 Advanced Server when Exchange 2000 is loaded you can see the BL or mailboxes. Seems from your message that you use the backup that comes with WIN2k server. How does it work for you. My management wants the BLBs and I want to know if anyone used the W2k NTBackup for this? Thanks -Original Message- From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup Hello Samantha: In my opinion, BLBs are not worth 2 cents! NTBackup doesn't do BLBs, as Chris said, however, you could use ExMerge to export VIP mailboxes (as someone else posted earlier). We use W2k NTBackup to disk then another scheduler to write that E2k data to tape and it works very well. Make sure you have a well-documented restore procedure to go with your backup plans and understanding all the different restore scenarios (and steps) is key as well. Good luck! -Juancho > NT backup doesn't do BLBs. It wasn't engineered by Veritas to have > that level of uselessness. You'll need to waste good money to get that > kind of inefficiency. > > > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:20:20 -0400 > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Windows 2000 Backup > > > > Hello All. > > > > I noticed that Exchange 2000 can be backed up using the Windows 2000 Backup. > > Anyone had any experience with this? It looks like it does BLB too! > > > > Thanks > > > > Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up
I would FIRST just try SMTPreinstall, without reinstalling Exchange itself. Use the appropriate smtpreinstall.exe file from your Exchange Service pack CD, see if that fixes it. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up Do we need to reinstall e2k now then e2k sp3? Kinda sketchy.. -Original Message- From: Bob Jiantonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up Also, running smtpreinstall.exe as appropriate for your service pack , fixes this issue. (sometimes) YMMV. There isn't very good info on this utility. This is the article I followed: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=319885 I only did this part though: For Exchange 2000 SP2 or later you can use the SMTP Reinstall Tool (Smtpreinstall.exe) to restore the missing Exchange 2000 ESMTP verbs and the Exchange 2000 versions of the files. Smtpreinstall.exe can be found in the \Support\UTILS\I386 folder on the Exchange 2000 SP2 or later CD. Run Smtpreinstall.exe in the previous Step 2: Reinstall Exchange 2000 Server. To run Smtpreinstall.exe: 1. Copy Smtpreinstall.exe to the \Exchsrvr\Bin folder. 2. Run Smtpreinstall.exe from that folder. 3. Restart the computer when you receive the prompt. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up Well, uninstalled symantec avf for exchange, followed Tony's steps as well, now we got airbiscuits. No inbound or outbound. I am having the guy reinstall e2k sp3 again and see what happens.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up However, this can be caused by other things, such as a virus scanner. Sybari Antigen, in particular, does this with certain old versions. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "One man's Spam is another man's UCE." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up >From an earlier post today that was resolved via a PSS call Hope this helps someone in the future. Symptom: Message queue properties displays 'The handle is invalid' and messages are stuck in the local and outbound queue. Resolution: Remove IIS, ensure metabase.bin is removed. Reboot Re-install IIS Re-apply Windows SP Reboot Re-install Exchange Re-apply SP Reboot Cause: Suspected to be caused by a corrupt metabase.bin file but Ms is not sure. There will be a KB article published in the near future that covers this problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have googled my butt off, and I have cranked up logging. I cannot get this one. All the smtp queues go into retry almost immediatelly. Help? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/
Problems opening attachments and some messages
Exchange 2000 SP3. Starting last week, users are having problems forwarding attachments that they receive from the internet. "Getting Operation Failed" from outlook. This happens when the user is logged into the domain. They can move the message into another folder and forward it without any problems. Now, if a user is logged into their local system they have no problems at all with the attachments. Any ideas that might help me figure this out? I've scanned technet from one end to the other on this subject. Sounds as if it might be a permissions problem, but, don't know of anything changing since last week. Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring DL Usage
I actually was just asking what people might be using and would/could recommend. I don't remember asking anyone to research, I can do that all on my own. Reading through some posts I found MessageStats, which was recommended by Missy for mailbox limits and I will also look at NetIQ's product which was just mentioned by Kevin. Thanks all... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring DL Usage Well since you want us to recommend and research this for you, how much money do you want to spend and how do you want the reports to run manually/auto if so daily/weekly. Which version of Exchange and what is your configuration. Are any of the DL personal? From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Monitoring DL Usage Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:03:26 -0700 Ya, I thought about that one but I thought there might be something out there that people use for reporting and could recommend -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitoring DL Usage Add yourself to all of the DLs and see how often you get mail. > From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:39:43 -0700 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Monitoring DL Usage > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to monitor the use of our many DL's to see if they're >> even being used. Does anyone have any recommendations on how to go >> about this? A search of KB's didn't turn up anything but I might not >> have used the right query syntax. >> >> Cheers, >> Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much
You can specify to only register one of the NIC's IP address in DNS. -Original Message- From: Chad Wasinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much Jose, We had bad issues with a server using 2 different IP addresses. This is a bad idea, it creates 2 DNS entries for the same server which confuses AD. My issues were with a DC specifically but I can see how it is also a bad idea on any server. My suggestion is to disconnect , disable and delete the DNS record for one of the NIC's. Good luck, Chad Wasinger System Administrator - Original Message - From: "Jose Manzano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:45 AM Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much > Hum.. > >When I do a route print I see the routing table referencing routes to > this network from both cards... > > So what I'm thinking is ... > > Clients sends request to Exchange Servers first nic with IP X.X.X.1 > > > Server sees request and sends back info from NIC2,different IP > > Client gets back data but with a different IP than he is expecting. > > Client gets confused and sends another request this time popping up > the message on the screen... > > Hum. > >Is this a way to knock out the 2nd nic from being set as a route > to this network with out disabling it? Like through the routing table ? > > Thank you! > > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much > > The default route from that server is probably going out the wrong NIC. > > > -Original Message- > From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much > > Hello Russell, > > > Thanks for replying... here are the answers > > > 1) There is a server that is attached to that message. If you have more > than one Exchange server, are you sure you have the right server (it's > happened to me here)? > >It is referring to the server that has the two nic's in it. What > happened > to you at your location. We do have 2 Exchange servers onsite. > > 2) Is this a remote user or a local user (I'm assuming a local user, but > again, I've been burnt on that also). > > They are local users > > 3) Is this all users or one user? > > All users :( > > 4) I would start with DNS. Make sure everything is resolving properly. > > I did nslookups internally and everything is pointing to the gig > card on > the server. The 10/100 does not seem to be used at all. > > ??? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much > > Hi Joe > > There are a couple of questions I have: > > 1) There is a server that is attached to that message. If you have more > than one Exchange server, are you sure you have the right server (it's > happened to me here)? > 2) Is this a remote user or a local user (I'm assuming a local user, but > again, I've been burnt on that also). > 3) Is this all users or one user? > 4) I would start with DNS. Make sure everything is resolving properly. > > HTH > > Russell > > > -Original Message- > From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Hello all, > > Here is my problem > > We have an Exchange 5.5 server that is constantly giving you > the message "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" . This is like every > 3rd or 4th message. I'm starting with the NIC's, the server has dual > NIC's that are active on the network. I'm thinking one is causing some > kind of issues when the server sends the data back, and the client gets > confused? I don't know just going on a hunch. > >I wouldn't think we would need dual NIC's on this server. The NIC's > are not teamed, nor is this server clustered. > > Any advice on troubleshooting this message would be highly > appreciated!!! > > Thank you!! > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
RE: Monitoring DL Usage
Ya, I thought about that one but I thought there might be something out there that people use for reporting and could recommend -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitoring DL Usage Add yourself to all of the DLs and see how often you get mail. > From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:39:43 -0700 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Monitoring DL Usage > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to monitor the use of our many DL's to see if they're >> even being used. Does anyone have any recommendations on how to go >> about this? A search of KB's didn't turn up anything but I might not >> have used the right query syntax. >> >> Cheers, >> Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
It's one followed by a 100 googles worth of zeros -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Isn't that the new theaters down at the mall? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 20:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Could you please show us what a googleplex is? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution 1000 0 Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution What's a google? > From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:25:43 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution > > Search on Google. I have seen products like that before. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
These upgrade articles are kind of quirky to me. I don't think they quite explain the upgrade scenarios that well. For instance the part about removing MMIS before an upgrade to Exchange 2003. Would if I am not doing an in place upgrade and doing a fresh intall on a separate server? I shouldn't have to remove it then correct? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Sure. I don't fear in-place upgrades from 2000 to 2003 like I did from 5.5 to 2000, though. :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:26 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 They don't have to be in place upgrades correct? We can bring in a new Exchange 2003 FE server into the Admin Group and then remove the old? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the non-supported possibility always exists otherwise. Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:21 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Here is my structure... I have a FE and a few BE servers. I want to bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers. So I cant bring in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right? I would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade our current FE to Exchange 2003 first. Damn, that sucks. I don't trust in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE? Can you have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative Group? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it wouldn't be supported. That's no.3 in the list here: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 >From Q822942 -For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the back-end server). Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3 before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Exchange permissions
What about it? If I use ADSIEdit to view the permissions at the Org, I see the same thing that I see in ESM: Domain and Enterprise Admins are inheriting allow rights for Send As and Receive As. If I go up one level in ADSIEdit, to the CN=Microsoft Exchange container and view the ACL there, the Send As and Receive As ACE's aren't even there. What rights do Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have at the Org level in your environment? If someone can just tell me that it would be great. Jason > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange permissions > > ADSIEdit > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:14 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange permissions > > I've recently inherited an Exchange 2000 Organization. One of > the first things that I noticed was that all Domain and > Enterprise Administrators have the ability to open and read > anyone's mailboxes. I've checked the ACL on our mailbox store > (we only have one), and both Domain Admins and Enterprise > Admins have an inherited "Allow" under Send As and Receive > As. Obviously this is not the default configuration. > > I've made the registry adjustment listed in Q259221 to allow > me to see the security tab at the Org level. Even at the Org > level, Domain and Enterprise Admins are still inheriting an > allowed Send As and Receive As. > > But here's something else I noticed: when I use the > Delegation Wizard at the Org level to add an Exchange Full > Administrator, and then check the ACL on the Org, the new > administrator that I just added gets inherited allows on Send > As and Receive As, but also gets explicit denies on both of > those ACE's. From that point down the heirarchy, only the > explicit deny is inherited. > > So my question is this. At the org level, by default, are > Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins set with inherited allows > *and* explicit denies on Send As and Receive As? This would > indicate to me that perhaps a previous administrator here > simply removed the explicit deny? > > If someone could check the ACL on your Exchange Org and let > me know what permissions Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins > have, I'd much appreciate it. > > Thanks > > Jason > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS WWW service randomly stops few time a day
When the services stop are you able to simply restart them or do you have to reboot? Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS WWW service randomly stops few time a day Dear sir, Current web server = IIS4.0 running on NT 4.0 member server with OS SP6a installed Application running = Exchange Outlook Web Server with Exchange SP4 installed Ever since I loaded all latest patches and hotfixes from Windows Updates, I find the WWW service randomly stop running a few times a day. It is very hard to diagnose the reason why because there are no errors found from Event Viewer. Why? Regards, BY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Sweet, thanks. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS & EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
RE: Client Not connecting on reboot of Exchange 5.5 server....
One doesn't necessarily have to create a new profile. One could actually re-resolve the old profile and that should do the trick as well. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phillip Yan Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Client Not connecting on reboot of Exchange 5.5 server What if creating a new Outlook profile on the client in question? Phillip -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Client Not connecting on reboot of Exchange 5.5 server Hey ya all, this is really weird, Had to reinstall the imc on Monday and asked everyone to log off which this particular client says he did but after the server came up Outlook is very sluggish in starting or will not start at all, get either the "retry, work offline, or cancel" dialog box or the "Requesting Data from the Exchange Server" dialog box then it might open. Also some of the client machines have been getting the "Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange" window but very infrequently. Have 10 servers running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on nt40 sp6, the client is running xp and office xp with all patches loaded. The particular server that this client is on is the Public Folder server and has the IMC/CC mail connector's on it. Troubleshooting steps so far: 1. Turned off, "Enable Instant Messaging" on the client. 2. Unchecked the all Planner Options on the client. 3. Tried a hosts file with this server name in it. 4. Change the RPC binder order from default to tcp_ip and spx only. 4a. Ran the rpc ping utility from this workstation and set ping 50 times all successful. 5. Can ping server just by name. 5. arp -a has the correct server and mac address of the nic card 6. nbtstat -c shows the server. 7. Did a nslookup of the exchange server from this workstation and server resolved. 8. Looked in the Wins manager did notice another entire for this machine deleted it. 9. Can do a \\"exchange server" name from the workstation. 10. Uninstalled and reinstalled Office Xp. I'm cornfused now.and scratching my head about this... Any suggestions. Also I want to get a sniff of this workstation and know there is a new version of netmon called netmon2. I tried ftping to Microsoft's site via a link that I was given and also searching via the web with no luck do any of you have it? john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
This is for mail outside my organization. My boss has a personal email account with an isp that he checks via http. Jason > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution > > I would get an anti SPAM gateway and put it in front of your > mail server. > That way it will catch the SPAM before it gets in the mailboxes. > > -Original Message- > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Looking for POP3 Spam solution > > I know the spam topic gets beat to death here, but I've got > an executive request here. > > What I need is a product that will scan and delete messages > on a POP3 server *without downloading them*. Ideally, this > would be a product that runs as a standalone service > somewhere, and has a configurable blacklist. > > Anything like this out there? > > Jason > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange permissions
ADSIEdit -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange permissions I've recently inherited an Exchange 2000 Organization. One of the first things that I noticed was that all Domain and Enterprise Administrators have the ability to open and read anyone's mailboxes. I've checked the ACL on our mailbox store (we only have one), and both Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have an inherited "Allow" under Send As and Receive As. Obviously this is not the default configuration. I've made the registry adjustment listed in Q259221 to allow me to see the security tab at the Org level. Even at the Org level, Domain and Enterprise Admins are still inheriting an allowed Send As and Receive As. But here's something else I noticed: when I use the Delegation Wizard at the Org level to add an Exchange Full Administrator, and then check the ACL on the Org, the new administrator that I just added gets inherited allows on Send As and Receive As, but also gets explicit denies on both of those ACE's. From that point down the heirarchy, only the explicit deny is inherited. So my question is this. At the org level, by default, are Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins set with inherited allows *and* explicit denies on Send As and Receive As? This would indicate to me that perhaps a previous administrator here simply removed the explicit deny? If someone could check the ACL on your Exchange Org and let me know what permissions Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have, I'd much appreciate it. Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
As others have intimated, you need to download at least some of it to check it, and without checking the message body you're fairly limited in what you can test for. I'd give SAProxy a try from http://saproxy.bloomba.com - it's free, and it uses the spamassassin engine which is pretty damned good IMHO. Paul - Original Message - From: "Jason Clishe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:58 PM Subject: Looking for POP3 Spam solution I know the spam topic gets beat to death here, but I've got an executive request here. What I need is a product that will scan and delete messages on a POP3 server *without downloading them*. Ideally, this would be a product that runs as a standalone service somewhere, and has a configurable blacklist. Anything like this out there? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing SMTP addresses in bulk
Use an Export /Import for AD. There are samples on MS's site IIRC. I assume your using Exchange 2000 From: "Berry Schreuder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Removing SMTP addresses in bulk Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:06:55 -0700 When you add an SMTP address to a recipient policy it adds the addresses to all selected users. How can I remove an (or all) SMTP addresses for all users? Berry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows 2000 Backup
ummm that's my stapler... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup Didn't you get the memo? Um.yeah, it's just that we're putting new coversheets on all the TPS reports now before they go out. So if you could do that... it would be great. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:20 PM Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Backup > Sorry for the confusion I caused. I mean the W2k NTBackup that comes with > Windows 2000 Advanced Server when Exchange 2000 is loaded you can see the BL > or mailboxes. > > Seems from your message that you use the backup that comes with WIN2k > server. How does it work for you. My management wants the BLBs and I want > to know if anyone used the W2k NTBackup for this? > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup > > > Hello Samantha: > > In my opinion, BLBs are not worth 2 cents! > > NTBackup doesn't do BLBs, as Chris said, however, you could use ExMerge to > export VIP mailboxes (as someone else posted earlier). > > We use W2k NTBackup to disk then another scheduler to write that E2k data > to tape and it works very well. > > Make sure you have a well-documented restore procedure to go with your > backup plans and understanding all the different restore scenarios (and > steps) is key as well. > > Good luck! > -Juancho > > > > > > > NT backup doesn't do BLBs. It wasn't engineered by Veritas to have that > > level of uselessness. You'll need to waste good money to get that kind of > > inefficiency. > > > > > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:20:20 -0400 > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Windows 2000 Backup > > > > > > Hello All. > > > > > > I noticed that Exchange 2000 can be backed up using the Windows 2000 > Backup. > > > Anyone had any experience with this? It looks like it does BLB too! > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Windows 2000 Backup
Didn't you get the memo? Um.yeah, it's just that we're putting new coversheets on all the TPS reports now before they go out. So if you could do that... it would be great. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:20 PM Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Backup > Sorry for the confusion I caused. I mean the W2k NTBackup that comes with > Windows 2000 Advanced Server when Exchange 2000 is loaded you can see the BL > or mailboxes. > > Seems from your message that you use the backup that comes with WIN2k > server. How does it work for you. My management wants the BLBs and I want > to know if anyone used the W2k NTBackup for this? > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup > > > Hello Samantha: > > In my opinion, BLBs are not worth 2 cents! > > NTBackup doesn't do BLBs, as Chris said, however, you could use ExMerge to > export VIP mailboxes (as someone else posted earlier). > > We use W2k NTBackup to disk then another scheduler to write that E2k data > to tape and it works very well. > > Make sure you have a well-documented restore procedure to go with your > backup plans and understanding all the different restore scenarios (and > steps) is key as well. > > Good luck! > -Juancho > > > > > > > NT backup doesn't do BLBs. It wasn't engineered by Veritas to have that > > level of uselessness. You'll need to waste good money to get that kind of > > inefficiency. > > > > > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:20:20 -0400 > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Windows 2000 Backup > > > > > > Hello All. > > > > > > I noticed that Exchange 2000 can be backed up using the Windows 2000 > Backup. > > > Anyone had any experience with this? It looks like it does BLB too! > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
So now what are we to do for a week in October? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue For all of you that were not satisified with the Exchange content at TechEd 2003, this looks like a pretty good alternative and a pretty good replacement for MEC: http://www.winconnections.com/exc/ It has sessions with the following industry heavyweights: Tony Redmond Sue Mosher Jim McBee Paul Robichaux Mark Minasi Jan De Clercq Mark Russinovich Kevin McCuistion - Director, MS Exchange Looks like it has great content for both Exchange 2000/2003 as well as a lot of good Win2k3 stuff!! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was > presented earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my > own question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
You're not going to get a gig a minute on BLB's regardless of the HW. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange server). I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. Raj -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Bob, Its all about IIS. That is the easiest way to remember it. Exchange 2000 cannot run on IIS 6.0, but Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0. -Steve > What? I thought it was the other way around? > > OK, for those in the know, please clear this up. You upgrade Exchange > first, then OS? Or OS first, then Exchange? > > > > Bob Sadler > City of Leawood, KS, USA > WAN/Internet Specialist > 913-339-6700 x194 > > Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! > http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=3Db4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68=20 > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 > > > I do not believe you can install Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003. Windows > 2003 runs IIS 6.0, which Exchange 2000 does not support. On the other > hand Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0. So the proper upgrade path is > upgrade Exchange 2000 first and then upgrade the OS to Windows 2003. > > Thanks, > > Steve > > > > Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003=20 > > platform? > >=20 > >=20 > > Ron Pennell > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchange&text_mode=3D= > & > lang=3Denglish > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCC emails
Sure, you'll just need to write a categorizer event sink. Course it will prevent you from receiving messages just like this one. Enjoy. > From: "Exchange List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:41 +0500 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: BCC emails > > Dear List, > > Is there a way to block the bcc mails on server level or is there any software > any procedure to do that. > > Love u all, > Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much
Are the users offsite via VPN? Outlook is sensitive to packet fragmentation. Weird shit happens like the user can receive email but cannot send it. Try lowering the MTU, stepping down from the max in 10's. Also see if the vpn client or router supports udp encapsulization. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much Hello all, Here is my problem We have an Exchange 5.5 server that is constantly giving you the message "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" . This is like every 3rd or 4th message. I'm starting with the NIC's, the server has dual NIC's that are active on the network. I'm thinking one is causing some kind of issues when the server sends the data back, and the client gets confused? I don't know just going on a hunch. I wouldn't think we would need dual NIC's on this server. The NIC's are not teamed, nor is this server clustered. Any advice on troubleshooting this message would be highly appreciated!!! Thank you!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Product
The cost is per user. We got a huge discount for holding out for a while. I can tell you it is much much cheaper than some others we looked at. Its well worth the money if you are wanting to stop SPAM dead. They claim they can block 95% and they have kept their word and more. -Original Message- From: Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SPAM Product Whats the cost? Is it per account and how much? Thanx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Header Question
157.124.218.229 Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2003 14:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Header Question Hello Group, I have a question about the Internet headers of an Email. If one looks at this Spam Email Header - Received: from 169.139.15.251 (210.91.16.8 [210.91.16.8]) by mail.wpbpl.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id PYC9TG9D; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:22:09 -0400 Received: from [157.124.218.229] by 169.139.15.251 with SMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:21:11 +0600 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Beckie Yaung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Beckie Yaung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: my pictures are ready now Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:21:11 +0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F11140.F0BB5D4" X-Priority: 1 --F11140.F0BB5D4 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --F11140.F0BB5D4-- -- Would the spam be coming from the 210.91.16.8, 169.139.15.251, or the 157.124.218.229 IP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SPAM Product
Whats the cost? Is it per account and how much? Thanx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
For all of you that were not satisified with the Exchange content at TechEd 2003, this looks like a pretty good alternative and a pretty good replacement for MEC: http://www.winconnections.com/exc/ It has sessions with the following industry heavyweights: Tony Redmond Sue Mosher Jim McBee Paul Robichaux Mark Minasi Jan De Clercq Mark Russinovich Kevin McCuistion - Director, MS Exchange Looks like it has great content for both Exchange 2000/2003 as well as a lot of good Win2k3 stuff!! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was > presented earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my > own question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
AV/Spam scanning services
We are looking at services from Message Labs, Postini, Frontbridge, and Appriver. Anybody have any experience with these services in general or any one of them in paticular? I've been looking for any write ups, reviews, or comparisons but havent had much luck. Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Even if I plan on not using the FE to access the new Exchange 2003 server? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 You always have to upgrade FEs first -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 >From Q822942 -For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the back-end server). Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3 before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Sure. I don't fear in-place upgrades from 2000 to 2003 like I did from 5.5 to 2000, though. :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:26 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 They don't have to be in place upgrades correct? We can bring in a new Exchange 2003 FE server into the Admin Group and then remove the old? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the non-supported possibility always exists otherwise. Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:21 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Here is my structure... I have a FE and a few BE servers. I want to bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers. So I cant bring in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right? I would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade our current FE to Exchange 2003 first. Damn, that sucks. I don't trust in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE? Can you have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative Group? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it wouldn't be supported. That's no.3 in the list here: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 >From Q822942 -For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the back-end server). Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3 before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange server). I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. Raj -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the non-supported possibility always exists otherwise. Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:21 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Here is my structure... I have a FE and a few BE servers. I want to bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers. So I cant bring in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right? I would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade our current FE to Exchange 2003 first. Damn, that sucks. I don't trust in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE? Can you have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative Group? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it wouldn't be supported. That's no.3 in the list here: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 >From Q822942 -For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the back-end server). Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3 before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
The hardware requirements for E2K3 vs E2K are generally equivalent, whether that hardware is sufficient for you org is not really something I can say with any degree of certainty. It meets the minimum hardware requirements I believe. Whether or not it is worth $1000 for you is not really a question I can answer. It is for customers who hire me to do the work, since I performed my last E2K migration the weekend after TechEd and haven't looked back since. > From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:03:45 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain? > > I have considered that, however we have Exchange 2000 EE free as part of an > upgrade advantage purchased with Exchange 5.5 EE. Upgrading to E2K3 EE > would cost me upwards of $1000. Is it worth it? In addition, I will be > doing the install on a P3600 with 512MB of RAM and 3 18GB RAID1 arrays. Can > the hardware cope well? > > PS - What the he11 does IMNSHO mean? > > Steven > --- > Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Network Administrator > The Key School, Annapolis Maryland > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain? > > > IMNSHO upgrading to W2K at this point is a waste of time. If you're going to > upgrade, upgrade to E2K3. It greatly simplifies the upgrade process from > Exchange 5.5 and offers a number of significant enhancement which make it a > much more compelling upgrade story than E2K. > >> From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:29:31 -0400 >> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain? >> >> Hi guys, >> I'm getting ready to add a Windows 2003 DC to my Win2k AD network, >> which will eventually be an all Win2k3 AD domain. However, I'm also >> planning an Exchange 2000 upgrade in a matter of weeks. My question is, >> will I be able to run Forestprep and Domainprep against the Win2k3 AD? Or >> should I do this before adding the Win2k3 AD DC? NOTE: I will not be >> installing Exchange 2000 on a Win2003 box (for obvious reasons). > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e > nglish > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
