RE: RPC over HTTP Compatibility
Finally tossed out the pink sundress? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: RPC over HTTP Compatibility That's no rumor, I'm wearing a pair now with my leather shorts. > From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 11:02:10 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: RPC over HTTP Compatibility > > I heard a rumor too that knee high white socks with stripes on top are > coming back. > > > From: "Berry Schreuder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RPC over HTTP Compatibility > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 05:16:08 -0700 > > Hello, > > I have heard that RPC over HTTP can also work in a non Windows 2003 > only environment. > > Microsoft whitepapers state that besides EX2K3 on W2K3 you also need > W2K3 on your DC's and GC's. Now i have heard rumours that you only > need one server running on W2K3 with RPC Proxy service installed. > > This way you should for instance be able to run EX2K3 on W2K > > Can anyone confirm or deny this? > > Berry Schreuder > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =e > nglish > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =e > nglish > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event Sink problems
Hello, I am trying to register an event sink on a calendar folder in a mailbox. I have used this command: C:\>cscript regevent.vbs add onSyncDelete OfficeCalendar.SyncEvents file://./backofficestorage/exchangedemo.local/mbx/Berry/calendar It then produces the following output: Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved. Error Opening Record : -2147217768 Object cannot be created at this URL because an object named by this URL already exists. I've searched on both 2147217768 and 0x80040e98 (hex value) in the Knowledge Base and in Google (newsgroups) I run the script on an Exchange 2003 server on Windows Server 2003. I am logged on as Domain Administrator and have full permissions on that specific user's mailbox Suggestions anyone? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hide a Name from Address Book - Exchange 2000
I used to "hide" mailboxes from the GAL. How do I do that in Exchange 2000. Just so everyone knows the good news!.I did an in-place upgrade this weekend and it worked!!! There is some tweakingno biggie. Yahooonow if I can just figure out how to hide a mailbox... Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating test lab - advice on process?
Since, from the transactions herein, it seems most people just throw their timebombed evaluation CD into the drive and run the upgrade without so much as reading the release notes, I applaud your thoroughness. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Creating test lab - advice on process? Hi all, I'm currently creating a test lab for my Exchange 5.5 to E2K/E2K3 migration. We are a single AD domain shop, with a single Exchange server (thus single site). Currently, I've: - Setup a AD DC on production - Setup DNS secondary on said box - Let it sync nice a good - Taken it offline, seized FSMO roles - Change DNS from secondary to primary What I've left to do - Setup a Win2k SP4 box as domain member - Install Exchange 5.5 SP4 with same parameters as production environment - Restore DS and IS My testing will begin with the DS cleanup utilities and the ADC. I will then move to setting up a third box with Win2k3 and Exchange 2k3, and add it the Exchange 5.5 organization. I'll move the mailboxes and public folders over, then test test test. I'll then be running through the process of removing the Exchange 5.5 server and switching over to native mode. So, oh wise masters of Exchange, is this a sound plan? Is there anything I should watch out for or be aware of? This is just a test environment, so I'm not going to hose anything vital. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error messages 2
> set q=mx > intas.be Server: m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com Address: 10.0.0.246 Non-authoritative answer: intas.bepreference = 200, mail exchanger = mail.euro.net intas.bepreference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.intas.be intas.bepreference = 100, mail exchanger = relay.euronet.be telnet relay.euronet.be 25 Trying 195.74.212.27... Connected to relay.wanadoo.be. Escape character is '^]'. 220 relay.wanadoo.be ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.9/8.12.9; No UCE allowed Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:10:45 +0200 (CEST) ehlo foo.bar 250-www2.wanadoo.be Hello [216.30.136.98], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 1200 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender ok rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed [216.30.136.98] > From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:48:52 +0200 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: error messages 2 > > This is the second type of error message that people get, and a lot more > frequent: > > The email address could not be found. Check the email address and send > again. The MTS-ID of the original message is > MSEXCH:IMS:BMUK:Freyung:BMUKNT02 3550 (000B09B6) 550 5.7.1 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...Relaying denied > > Anyone have a clue? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e > nglish > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central)
That would most likely be illegal in the UK because it would contrivine the data protection act and RIP act. You would also be liable becuase you set it up. Just my 2p's worth, Paul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2003 14:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central) What is he moving from? > From: "Todd Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:25:44 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central) > > I have a client whom we are going to move to exchange 2000/3. He is > accustomed to having all email incoming and outgoing to have 2 copies > delivered to him and 1 copy delivered to his secretary (don't ask me). > So no matter who the email is for if it has his domain on the address he > wants to see it (perhaps it's a spam fetish). > Does any one have any ideas on how to pull this off in exchange. I know > I can create client rules but those can be turned off. > Thanx. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central)
Journaling is probably what you are looking for. > From: "Todd Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:20:13 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central) > > IMAIL? It's POP3. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:38 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central) > > What is he moving from? > >> From: "Todd Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:25:44 -0400 >> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central) >> >> I have a client whom we are going to move to exchange 2000/3. He is >> accustomed to having all email incoming and outgoing to have 2 copies >> delivered to him and 1 copy delivered to his secretary (don't ask me). >> So no matter who the email is for if it has his domain on the address > he >> wants to see it (perhaps it's a spam fetish). >> Does any one have any ideas on how to pull this off in exchange. I > know >> I can create client rules but those can be turned off. >> Thanx. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e > nglish > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Viewing Error
When I try to access email via OWA, after entering the mailbox name And then domain\user name and password, I get the "Unable to get renderer" error. When I click on OK, it loads the OWA mailbox page but without showing the emails and It displays this header: "Page cannot be displayed. There is a problem within the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed" The strange thing is that it doesn't happen when you load a new browser window, but if you log out and log back in, you'll get the error message. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Exchange Admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange Exchange
Again, as per the last message you posted and I responded to, this error is not being generated by Exchange. It is being generated by whatever is listening at your default gateway. Your mx record may be labeled exchange.satake-usa.com, but whatever is listening isn't Exchange. nslookup Default Server: m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com Address: 10.0.0.246 > set q=mx > satake-usa.com Server: m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com Address: 10.0.0.246 Non-authoritative answer: satake-usa.com preference = 10, mail exchanger = exchange.satake-usa.com Authoritative answers can be found from: satake-usa.com nameserver = ns2.satake-usa.com satake-usa.com nameserver = ns1.satake-usa.com exchange.satake-usa.com internet address = 66.139.24.50 telnet exchange.satake-usa.com 25 Trying 66.139.24.50... Connected to exchange.satake-usa.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 SMTP service ready ehlo foo.bar 250-Requested mail action okay, completed 250-HELP 250 SIZE 3072000 Whatever is listening does indeed have a storage limit. I'm not sure why 30 seconds of research is not possible by anyone else on the list this morning, but the answer seems abundantly clear once one stops throwing out wild guesses and actually applies some kind of methodology to troubleshooting. > From: "Don Bruess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:41:17 -0700 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Strange Exchange > > I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending > large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a per > messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal box has > no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when this > started happening but I do know I use to be able to receive any size > files. Is there another settings somewhere I have missed? It appears to > be limiting e-mail to around 2 meg max and is applying the same rule to > the entire exchange server. > > Thanks, > dl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Exchange
Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can find no settings for limiting the size of e-mail. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Strange Exchange That is exactly what he's saying. Do you have a SMTP Gateway setup to stop spam, or a virus filter, or both? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Sorry, I am trying to troubleshoot a problem that I have very little knowledge in so if I appear to be a bit slow please forgive me. Your statement saying exchange is not listening confuses me. Are you saying there is some other software running between my exchange server and the rest of the world which is placing its limits on the mail? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Strange Exchange Again, as per the last message you posted and I responded to, this error is not being generated by Exchange. It is being generated by whatever is listening at your default gateway. Your mx record may be labeled exchange.satake-usa.com, but whatever is listening isn't Exchange. nslookup Default Server: m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com Address: 10.0.0.246 > set q=mx > satake-usa.com Server: m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com Address: 10.0.0.246 Non-authoritative answer: satake-usa.com preference = 10, mail exchanger = exchange.satake-usa.com Authoritative answers can be found from: satake-usa.com nameserver = ns2.satake-usa.com satake-usa.com nameserver = ns1.satake-usa.com exchange.satake-usa.com internet address = 66.139.24.50 telnet exchange.satake-usa.com 25 Trying 66.139.24.50... Connected to exchange.satake-usa.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 SMTP service ready ehlo foo.bar 250-Requested mail action okay, completed 250-HELP 250 SIZE 3072000 Whatever is listening does indeed have a storage limit. I'm not sure why 30 seconds of research is not possible by anyone else on the list this morning, but the answer seems abundantly clear once one stops throwing out wild guesses and actually applies some kind of methodology to troubleshooting. > From: "Don Bruess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:41:17 -0700 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Strange Exchange > > I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending > large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a > per messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal > box has no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when > this started happening but I do know I use to be able to receive any > size files. Is there another settings somewhere I have missed? It > appears to be limiting e-mail to around 2 meg max and is applying the > same rule to the entire exchange server. > > Thanks, > dl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect
This looks like results of being hacked because the patch from MS03-026 has not been applied. (It may have been applied at one time and somebody reran an older SP on the system) Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HongKong Posted At: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:07 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect Subject: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect Does anyone have a problem running Trend Micro Server Protect with E2K? We have a E2K server would not mount Priv1.edb store. This problem occured last week and we isolated it to Trend Micro Server Protect. Everytime we enabled Trend Micro Server Protect, E2K crashed (i.e. priv1.edb would not mount). We had not change anything on the server. Trend Server Protect has been on our E2K for the last three years without a problem. Event logs showed the followings: System Log Error 7031 the RPC service terminated unexpectedly. Application log error 9099 the MAD monitoring thread was unable to read the state of services Application log error 9097 The Mad monitoring thread was unable to connect ot WMI 0x8007005 (This last error 9087 repeated every 5 minutes until the problem was correct.) Application log error 4097 COM+ event system detected a bad return code 8007005 (this error recurs at each attempted log on). Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Exchange
There are two drives on the exchange server one has 12gig free the other program drive has 14gig free. There are no other drives on that system. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Strange Exchange The SMTP Virtual Servers don't have any limits either? There are three places for message size limits - Org-level under Global Settings/Message Delivery - User-level in the user properties - SMTP in the virtual SMTP server settings You have 12 GB of disk space left, but is that on the partition where SMTP Virtual Server has its queue files (by default the queue partition is where Exchange program files are installed)? Just asking, maybe your queue partition is low on disk space. -Original Message- From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Exchange I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a per messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal box has no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when this started happening but I do know I use to be able to receive any size files. Is there another settings somewhere I have missed? It appears to be limiting e-mail to around 2 meg max and is applying the same rule to the entire exchange server. Thanks, dl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K migration issue
It will work. Its by design. - Peter -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K migration issue Not too sure that will work. The E2K servers are in AD will the 5.5 servers are not. Also, the E2K servers are in a new Exchange ORG. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K migration issue Leave up the old Ex5.5 server for a little while. Outlook will see that it's mailbox has moved to a new server, and update the profile itself. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K migration issue Hello all, I was wondering if anyone out there knew of way to script Outlook profile changes. We are doing an E2K migration and I am looking for a way to automate the changes to the users Outlook profile. We are building out brand new E2K servers and exporting/importing all the mail from 5.5 to the E2K servers and need to point the users at the new servers. Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K migration issue
http://www.slipstick.com/exs/olroam.htm > From: "Bennett, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:58:19 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: E2K migration issue > > Hello all, > > I was wondering if anyone out there knew of way to script Outlook profile > changes. We are doing an E2K migration and I am looking for a way to > automate the changes to the users Outlook profile. > > We are building out brand new E2K servers and exporting/importing all the > mail from 5.5 to the E2K servers and need to point the users at the new > servers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
You always have to upgrade FEs first -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 >From Q822942 -For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the back-end server). Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3 before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery of all messages to admin (paranoia central)
You can set the delivery options for his account to forward to his secretary and deliver messages to both forwarding and mailbox. I guess you can do the same thing for all users in his domain (have it forward to his mailbox) although it's probably violating privacy laws. -Original Message- From: Todd Bentley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 6:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have a client whom we are going to move to exchange 2000/3. He is accustomed to having all email incoming and outgoing to have 2 copies delivered to him and 1 copy delivered to his secretary (don't ask me). So no matter who the email is for if it has his domain on the address he wants to see it (perhaps it's a spam fetish). Does any one have any ideas on how to pull this off in exchange. I know I can create client rules but those can be turned off. Thanx. Bentley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock & Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock & Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
Well, the filter is still going to need to download the mail to examine it. So I don't really see this as being any type of workable solution unless the guy wants to put an SMTP gateway and mail server in his house. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution This is for mail outside my organization. My boss has a personal email account with an isp that he checks via http. Jason > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution > > I would get an anti SPAM gateway and put it in front of your > mail server. > That way it will catch the SPAM before it gets in the mailboxes. > > -Original Message- > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Looking for POP3 Spam solution > > I know the spam topic gets beat to death here, but I've got > an executive request here. > > What I need is a product that will scan and delete messages > on a POP3 server *without downloading them*. Ideally, this > would be a product that runs as a standalone service > somewhere, and has a configurable blacklist. > > Anything like this out there? > > Jason > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Watch Out - New Virus
Aye -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus is anyone else getting the update source not found error? -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Watch Out - New Virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB LAST.A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
