RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification
I've been told by an MS person that I don't need the patch if I have post SP3 rollup installed. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 1:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification Does anyone know whether you still need this patch if you already applied the September Post SP3 Rollup? I mentioned last week that the files appears to be the same. But didn't see any response to that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:38 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: patch MS03-046 update clarification Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification that is what I thought ... just making sure I didn't need new glasses thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification The patch was not redone. Just the wording of the alert. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario, W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ... (snippet from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms03-046.asp ) V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published. V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from "Deployment" in the "Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4" section of "Security Patch Information." Comments? Clarifications? mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 using SSL
That is the setting. Note that when you check it the port number changes. It's an either-or situation. I've never needed to load a client certificate to use SSL. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Megginson Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 using SSL Thanks for the quick response. That's the "This server requires a secure connection (SSL)." check box on the Advanced tab, right? Under POP3 server Access/Authorization, I have both clear and Int. Windows Auth. if that matters. Don't I need to download a certificate to the client? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does this make sense ?
What do the Internet headers in each message tell you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Does this make sense ? Runnign Exchange 5.5 SP4 I recently had someone report to me that she was not getting all her emails from a specific company. The company was running an online training service and each time someone would sign up for a course, their system is supposed to send us and them, course confirmation emails. The system uses the BCC field to send these emails to us while the TO field contains the email address of the person who signed up for the course. So 3 people receive the confirmation, the person who signed up for the course, my staff person (blank copy) and the person at the company offering the service (blank copy). The problem is that some of these emails don't come through at all or sometimes if they do come through, it takes a couple of hours or even a day or so to reach us. I have enquired from the company whether they are having any problems with their mail service and they claim that the blank copies of the email confirmations reach them right away so they are pointing a finger at us saying the problem is at our end. However, I have had no problems sending myself emails from other sources. I have tried sending myself emails from my Yahoo, Hotmail and even my Verizon account and all the emails reach my Exchange server right away. I even sent myself an exact duplicate of the email confirmation that goes out spoofing the FROM address to read as the sender of the email confirmation message and they do come through almost instantly (which proves that my spam server is not catching these emails). Is it still possible that the problem might be on our end ? Why then would some emails reach my server instantly and some wouldn't ? I haven't had any other complaints from others about emails not reaching us on time. Please advise. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
Another thing we've been saying for years. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean, Nathaniel, V. Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. I was just at a office release kick off that MS had and they also said that the best path from 5.5 was a new server and Exchange 2003 Nathaniel Dean EVMS Health Services 721 Fairfax Ave 101 Norfolk VA 23507 757-446-0317 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. And how does little old Clark County have the money to send their sysadmin to two conferences in one year? Sheesh!! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com Where do you want to ride today? http://www.davidsonbicycles.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003. At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they say there. Thanks again. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized to quote official licensing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook 2003. Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. > > > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 > straight to 2003. What a difference! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2003. > > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to > Exchange > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 > on our client systems. > > My question is... > > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to > Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it > against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from > the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be > available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? > > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured > out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on > others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. > > Thanks > > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) > Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
RE: MIIS and Free Busy
I wasn't aware that any version of MMS or MIIS did free-busy synchronization since it really has nothing to do with the directory, being that free-busy data is stored in a system public folder. The only tool I was aware of that did this was the InterOrg Replication Tool that comes in the Resource Kit. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finch Brett Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MIIS and Free Busy I was actually surprised to find out that the next gen of Meta Directory (MIIS) will not do Free Busy. So what are people using in 2000/2003 to get Free Busy info across Forests? I thought if they can generate a GAL, why not Free Busy? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA display blank body after applying MS03-046 and MS03-047
James, Thats it. I don't recall reading this on the earlier security posts on MS site. I am still running IE4 on the EX55 box. Will install IE6. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and URLScan-Blocked Special Characters
Thanks for the input on this. While both my post here and on the MS newsgroups failed to elicit detailed specifics as to what exploits were being prevented by blocking these particular characters, these responses were useful and definitely preferable to what I received yesterday from MS PSS. Their answer was 'We know, but for security reasons we cannot tell you.' ( A snide aside: Thanks, MS. That took five phone calls, five emails, and you still have not agreed to non-decrement the case.) On a much more positive front, I received an excellent response from Rand Morimoto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), author of the book "Exchange 2003 Unleashed". My query to Rand was to help explain the two most problematic character blocks (from a customer irritation point a view) - the '..' and the '&'. Rand's response was as follows: "The '..' in a URL allows for traversal of the directory tree. This means that when I get access to one location on an Exchange server, I can send a .. command and walk "up" the directory tree. This can actually be minimized by having tight security rights, so I really don't see a problem with that issue. The '&' is more of a problem because that allows you to "string together" multiple commands. So you can tell an IIS server to open an email and to launch an executable at the same time. However this too can be minimized as a risk by hardening the server so that someone cannot hack the server to then launch an executable (i.e. I send an email to someone with an attachment, I somehow know that persons logon/password, I then "open and launch" the executable that brings the whole network down). This "presumes" that you allow executables into your network AND it presumes that someone has their user account compromised. But it's possible." "So by themselves, the ability to bypass URLScan for these commands, while it does weaken security, requires a couple other compromises to take place in your environment. Another option is go to IIS6 / Exchange 2003 OWA. IIS6 has functionality that allows you to run and access messages that may otherwise be URLScan compromising, however Exchange 2003 / IIS6 have better protections to allow access without restricting accessibility while minimizing security risks." The bottom line in our environment is that we will open the '..' and '&' for OWA, and let other security measures handle the potential risks. Jon -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 5:20 PM Posted To: exchange - new Conversation: OWA and URLScan-Blocked Special Characters Subject:OWA and URLScan-Blocked Special Characters OK, we all know that when you run Urlscan on an Exchange server that you will not be able to view certain notes in OWA, specifically those notes with special characters in the subject line. The special characters are below, along with the reason, according to MS documentation, that these should be blocked. .. Allows directory traversals ./ Allows trailing dot on a directory name \ Allows backslashes in URL % Allows escaping after normalization & Allows multiple CGI processes to run on a single request My management wants these characters unblocked. To prevent this I need a better understanding of what potential problems are being prevented by the disabling of these characters. The above explanation in the MS documentation is probably not going to be sufficient. Does anyone have a more detailed explanation of the possible exploits being blocked by disabling these characters?? Thanks. Jon Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA display blank body after applying MS03-046 and MS03-047
Were you running at least IE 5.5 SP2 on the OWA server, BEFORE installing MS-047? If not, then I would bet your problem is described in the second issue of the Q314532 link below. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA display blank body after applying MS03-046 and MS03-047 Have you read this part of the MS-047 bulletin yet? "You may get a blank message body when opening a message in OWA after the patch is installed if you have your Windows directory on the OWA Server set to read only permissions. To solve this problem, please reference the following Knowledge Base Article: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;314532"; -Original Message- From: Tariq Hamirani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA display blank body after applying MS03-046 and MS03-047 I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4 on NT4 with SP6a Intel Over the weekend I applied MS03-046 and MS03-047. Now OWA does not display text in the message body. I also suspect some user's may have been using Outlook 2003 to cause this. The question is should I apply Exchange5.5-KB818709-x86-enu.EXE to resolve this problem. Thanks Tariq Hamirani _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA display blank body after applying MS03-046 and MS03-047
Have you read this part of the MS-047 bulletin yet? "You may get a blank message body when opening a message in OWA after the patch is installed if you have your Windows directory on the OWA Server set to read only permissions. To solve this problem, please reference the following Knowledge Base Article: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;314532"; -Original Message- From: Tariq Hamirani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA display blank body after applying MS03-046 and MS03-047 I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4 on NT4 with SP6a Intel Over the weekend I applied MS03-046 and MS03-047. Now OWA does not display text in the message body. I also suspect some user's may have been using Outlook 2003 to cause this. The question is should I apply Exchange5.5-KB818709-x86-enu.EXE to resolve this problem. Thanks Tariq Hamirani _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 using SSL
If your going through a firewall make sure the appropriate port(995) for ssl pop3 or 993 for IMAP are open. No need for a certificate From: "Chris Megginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: POP3 using SSL Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:14:58 -0700 Thanks for the quick response. That's the "This server requires a secure connection (SSL)." check box on the Advanced tab, right? Under POP3 server Access/Authorization, I have both clear and Int. Windows Auth. if that matters. Don't I need to download a certificate to the client? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your current Internet access and enjoy patented spam control and more. Get two months FREE! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 using SSL
Thanks for the quick response. That's the "This server requires a secure connection (SSL)." check box on the Advanced tab, right? Under POP3 server Access/Authorization, I have both clear and Int. Windows Auth. if that matters. Don't I need to download a certificate to the client? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA display blank body after applying MS03-046 and MS03-047
I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4 on NT4 with SP6a Intel Over the weekend I applied MS03-046 and MS03-047. Now OWA does not display text in the message body. I also suspect some user's may have been using Outlook 2003 to cause this. The question is should I apply Exchange5.5-KB818709-x86-enu.EXE to resolve this problem. Thanks Tariq Hamirani _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does this make sense ?
Runnign Exchange 5.5 SP4 I recently had someone report to me that she was not getting all her emails from a specific company. The company was running an online training service and each time someone would sign up for a course, their system is supposed to send us and them, course confirmation emails. The system uses the BCC field to send these emails to us while the TO field contains the email address of the person who signed up for the course. So 3 people receive the confirmation, the person who signed up for the course, my staff person (blank copy) and the person at the company offering the service (blank copy). The problem is that some of these emails don't come through at all or sometimes if they do come through, it takes a couple of hours or even a day or so to reach us. I have enquired from the company whether they are having any problems with their mail service and they claim that the blank copies of the email confirmations reach them right away so they are pointing a finger at us saying the problem is at our end. However, I have had no problems sending myself emails from other sources. I have tried sending myself emails from my Yahoo, Hotmail and even my Verizon account and all the emails reach my Exchange server right away. I even sent myself an exact duplicate of the email confirmation that goes out spoofing the FROM address to read as the sender of the email confirmation message and they do come through almost instantly (which proves that my spam server is not catching these emails). Is it still possible that the problem might be on our end ? Why then would some emails reach my server instantly and some wouldn't ? I haven't had any other complaints from others about emails not reaching us on time. Please advise. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
I was just at a office release kick off that MS had and they also said that the best path from 5.5 was a new server and Exchange 2003 Nathaniel Dean EVMS Health Services 721 Fairfax Ave 101 Norfolk VA 23507 757-446-0317 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. And how does little old Clark County have the money to send their sysadmin to two conferences in one year? Sheesh!! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com Where do you want to ride today? http://www.davidsonbicycles.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003. At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they say there. Thanks again. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized to quote official licensing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook 2003. Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. > > > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 > straight to 2003. What a difference! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2003. > > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to > Exchange > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 > on our client systems. > > My question is... > > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to > Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it > against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from > the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be > available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? > > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured > out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on > others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. > > Thanks > > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) > Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
Two and a half hours ain't bad from what I hear. :) I have yet to go there yet. I know that I left Hazel Dell a couple of weeks ago and thought that there was a really bad accident since the traffic was stopped. I hear that it is nice, but, yeah the traffic sucks from what I have seen. I am not sure what the deal is with it and the county. I know that I get shown "no love" when I offer to check mail connectivity for each concert. I would think that they would want to be certain that it was working!!! :) Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Oh man. They need to fix the traffic problem to the amphitheater before they do that :) It took me nearly 2 and a half hours to get out a few weeks ago. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. S Actually, they are sending two of us. :) Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. And how does little old Clark County have the money to send their sysadmin to two conferences in one year? Sheesh!! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com Where do you want to ride today? http://www.davidsonbicycles.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003. At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they say there. Thanks again. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized to quote official licensing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook 2003. Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. > > > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 > straight to 2003. What a difference! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2003. > > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to > Exchange > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 > on our client systems. > > My question is... > > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to > Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it > against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from > the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be > available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? > > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured > out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on > others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. > > Thanks >
MIIS and Free Busy
I was actually surprised to find out that the next gen of Meta Directory (MIIS) will not do Free Busy. So what are people using in 2000/2003 to get Free Busy info across Forests? I thought if they can generate a GAL, why not Free Busy? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
I would welcome a look at your policy Ben. Just send it to the address below. Thank you John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance While you're at it, you might as well collect everyone's ATM PIN for safekeeping. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Your points are valid Ben. I started here 6 years ago and it was my 1st admin job. Having a list of all passwords semmed like the right thing to do at the time. And yes, management is aware of the list. I think I am going to take your advice on the GP password management. Just gotta hand it off. I know where in GP the password policy is, but right now, in the user acounts, "Password never expires" is checked. In order fro GP to do it's job, I will need to uncheck that. Correct? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Why is it necessary that you keep a list of all the passwords? It is one thing to have a list of service account passwords, and such, but all users is quite another thing. It is a HUGE security risk. Imagine what would happen if someone got ahold of the document that had everyones passwords. If you are using Exchange (valid assumption I think since this is an Exchange list), then you are using either NT or Windows 2000. Why can't you have your users manage their own passwords? Every client that logs in to the domain should have the ability to change their password - even 9x clients can change their passwords. This is not something that you should be doing or should have to do - now of course that is only my opinion and you are free to do as you like, but I would rather choke myself than have to maintain all my users passwords for them. Does HR know that you maintain a list of everyone's password? Does your corporate lawyer know? If not, you better make sure they do. I realize I am probably not being helpful to what you are wanting to do, but I (and probably most of the others on this list) have never run across a sysadmin who insisted on maintaining a list of all his/her users passwords. So if you like, simply dismiss this as a rant from me - it won't hurt my feelings if you do. I certainly wouldn't wish for your job if I was required to do what you are doing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gard
RE: Outlook 2003.
Oh man. They need to fix the traffic problem to the amphitheater before they do that :) It took me nearly 2 and a half hours to get out a few weeks ago. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. S Actually, they are sending two of us. :) Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. And how does little old Clark County have the money to send their sysadmin to two conferences in one year? Sheesh!! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com Where do you want to ride today? http://www.davidsonbicycles.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003. At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they say there. Thanks again. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized to quote official licensing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook 2003. Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. > > > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 > straight to 2003. What a difference! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2003. > > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to > Exchange > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 > on our client systems. > > My question is... > > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to > Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it > against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from > the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be > available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? > > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured > out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on > others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. > > Thanks > > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) > Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 using SSL
In the client, all you really do is check the box that says to use SSL. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Megginson Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 using SSL I'm searching for instructions on setting up OL2K or OLXP to use POP3 on E2K SP3 using SSL. I think I have the server setup correctly but am unsure of how to setup the client. aTdHvAaNnKcSe Chris Megginson, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
S Actually, they are sending two of us. :) Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. And how does little old Clark County have the money to send their sysadmin to two conferences in one year? Sheesh!! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com Where do you want to ride today? http://www.davidsonbicycles.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003. At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they say there. Thanks again. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized to quote official licensing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook 2003. Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. > > > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 > straight to 2003. What a difference! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2003. > > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to > Exchange > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 > on our client systems. > > My question is... > > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to > Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it > against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from > the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be > available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? > > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured > out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on > others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. > > Thanks > > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) > Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Sending email via a batch file
Plus 5-6MB of Overhead files. The 100K was for a complete solution. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file I can write something that will send email using CDO well under 100k. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich III Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file If echo to a telnet session is almost good enough I would use blat (http://www.interlog.com/~tcharron/blat.html) I use it all the time in batch (.cmd) files for notifications purposes (backup complete/failed, transfer this completed, update that done, etc) As others have mentioned, there are some better, fuller-featured, solutions out there, but at under 100K and a single .exe you can't beat blat for sending simple e-mails. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP3 using SSL
I'm searching for instructions on setting up OL2K or OLXP to use POP3 on E2K SP3 using SSL. I think I have the server setup correctly but am unsure of how to setup the client. aTdHvAaNnKcSe Chris Megginson, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
It will use as much as it needs. You can't force it to use more - it would be pointless. When it needs more, it grabs more. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:28 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Store.exe in Task Manager Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager So if store.exe is not using more memory (only 512K out of 2GB): A) Does that guarrentee it does not need more? B) Is there a way to force or encourage it to use more? I know, I know. I'm asking for someone else, OK? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
So if store.exe is not using more memory (only 512K out of 2GB): A) Does that guarrentee it does not need more? B) Is there a way to force or encourage it to use more? I know, I know. I'm asking for someone else, OK? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance While you're at it, you might as well collect everyone's ATM PIN for safekeeping. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Your points are valid Ben. I started here 6 years ago and it was my 1st admin job. Having a list of all passwords semmed like the right thing to do at the time. And yes, management is aware of the list. I think I am going to take your advice on the GP password management. Just gotta hand it off. I know where in GP the password policy is, but right now, in the user acounts, "Password never expires" is checked. In order fro GP to do it's job, I will need to uncheck that. Correct? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Why is it necessary that you keep a list of all the passwords? It is one thing to have a list of service account passwords, and such, but all users is quite another thing. It is a HUGE security risk. Imagine what would happen if someone got ahold of the document that had everyones passwords. If you are using Exchange (valid assumption I think since this is an Exchange list), then you are using either NT or Windows 2000. Why can't you have your users manage their own passwords? Every client that logs in to the domain should have the ability to change their password - even 9x clients can change their passwords. This is not something that you should be doing or should have to do - now of course that is only my opinion and you are free to do as you like, but I would rather choke myself than have to maintain all my users passwords for them. Does HR know that you maintain a list of everyone's password? Does your corporate lawyer know? If not, you better make sure they do. I realize I am probably not being helpful to what you are wanting to do, but I (and probably most of the others on this list) have never run across a sysadmin who insisted on maintaining a list of all his/her users passwords. So if you like, simply dismiss this as a rant from me - it won't hurt my feelings if you do. I certainly wouldn't wish for your job if I was required to do what you are doing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Disappearing email Subject: Password Mainenance Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password change for my company. Is there any password automation out there, that will allow me to setup a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a report of the new ones? There has to be something out there like that... Thanks John
RE: Password Mainenance
YES! :-) I think you would be well served by working with HR and/or management to come up with a password policy. I don't know how often you change them right now, but you can force password changes however many days you like. We have our passwords set to expire every 45 days and people must use strong passwords (3 of 4 UPPER, lower, 1234, &$*()#&%) and they also cannot use the past 10 passwords. Some would say that it is a stringent policy, but it sure as heck reduced the vulnerability of someone brute forcing a password. We also have accounts set to lock out after 3 or 4 bad login attempts (also negates brute forcing or guessing). Again, I would work with HR or management to see what they would like. Be sure to present what you would like first and then modify it if necessary. Are you using Active Directory then? Sounds like it since you are talking about Group Policies. I would be more than happy to forward you a sample of our policy if you would like. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:12 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Your points are valid Ben. I started here 6 years ago and it was my 1st admin job. Having a list of all passwords semmed like the right thing to do at the time. And yes, management is aware of the list. I think I am going to take your advice on the GP password management. Just gotta hand it off. I know where in GP the password policy is, but right now, in the user acounts, "Password never expires" is checked. In order fro GP to do it's job, I will need to uncheck that. Correct? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Why is it necessary that you keep a list of all the passwords? It is one thing to have a list of service account passwords, and such, but all users is quite another thing. It is a HUGE security risk. Imagine what would happen if someone got ahold of the document that had everyones passwords. If you are using Exchange (valid assumption I think since this is an Exchange list), then you are using either NT or Windows 2000. Why can't you have your users manage their own passwords? Every client that logs in to the domain should have the ability to change their password - even 9x clients can change their passwords. This is not something that you should be doing or should have to do - now of course that is only my opinion and you are free to do as you like, but I would rather choke myself than have to maintain all my users passwords for them. Does HR know that you maintain a list of everyone's password? Does your corporate lawyer know? If not, you better make sure they do. I realize I am probably not being helpful to what you are wanting to do, but I (and probably most of the others on this list) have never run across a sysadmin who insisted on maintaining a list of all his/her users passwords. So if you like, simply dismiss this as a rant from me - it won't hurt my feelings if you do. I certainly wouldn't wish for your job if I was required to do what you are doing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz N
RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification
I checked myself and the files are the same. You can also run the Baseline Security Analyzer on an Exchange server with the Sept. Rollup and it says it's OK. -Doug Jones -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MS Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification Does anyone know whether you still need this patch if you already applied the September Post SP3 Rollup? I mentioned last week that the files appears to be the same. But didn't see any response to that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:38 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: patch MS03-046 update clarification Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification that is what I thought ... just making sure I didn't need new glasses thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification The patch was not redone. Just the wording of the alert. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario, W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ... (snippet from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms03-046.asp ) V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published. V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from "Deployment" in the "Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4" section of "Security Patch Information." Comments? Clarifications? mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
While you're at it, you might as well collect everyone's ATM PIN for safekeeping. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Your points are valid Ben. I started here 6 years ago and it was my 1st admin job. Having a list of all passwords semmed like the right thing to do at the time. And yes, management is aware of the list. I think I am going to take your advice on the GP password management. Just gotta hand it off. I know where in GP the password policy is, but right now, in the user acounts, "Password never expires" is checked. In order fro GP to do it's job, I will need to uncheck that. Correct? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Why is it necessary that you keep a list of all the passwords? It is one thing to have a list of service account passwords, and such, but all users is quite another thing. It is a HUGE security risk. Imagine what would happen if someone got ahold of the document that had everyones passwords. If you are using Exchange (valid assumption I think since this is an Exchange list), then you are using either NT or Windows 2000. Why can't you have your users manage their own passwords? Every client that logs in to the domain should have the ability to change their password - even 9x clients can change their passwords. This is not something that you should be doing or should have to do - now of course that is only my opinion and you are free to do as you like, but I would rather choke myself than have to maintain all my users passwords for them. Does HR know that you maintain a list of everyone's password? Does your corporate lawyer know? If not, you better make sure they do. I realize I am probably not being helpful to what you are wanting to do, but I (and probably most of the others on this list) have never run across a sysadmin who insisted on maintaining a list of all his/her users passwords. So if you like, simply dismiss this as a rant from me - it won't hurt my feelings if you do. I certainly wouldn't wish for your job if I was required to do what you are doing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Disappearing email Subject: Password Mainenance Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password change for my company. Is there any password automation out there, that will allow me to setup a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a report of the new ones? There has to be something out there like that... Thanks John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=excha
RE: Sending email via a batch file
I can write something that will send email using CDO well under 100k. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich III Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file If echo to a telnet session is almost good enough I would use blat (http://www.interlog.com/~tcharron/blat.html) I use it all the time in batch (.cmd) files for notifications purposes (backup complete/failed, transfer this completed, update that done, etc) As others have mentioned, there are some better, fuller-featured, solutions out there, but at under 100K and a single .exe you can't beat blat for sending simple e-mails. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email via a batch file
If echo to a telnet session is almost good enough I would use blat (http://www.interlog.com/~tcharron/blat.html) I use it all the time in batch (.cmd) files for notifications purposes (backup complete/failed, transfer this completed, update that done, etc) As others have mentioned, there are some better, fuller-featured, solutions out there, but at under 100K and a single .exe you can't beat blat for sending simple e-mails. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification
Does anyone know whether you still need this patch if you already applied the September Post SP3 Rollup? I mentioned last week that the files appears to be the same. But didn't see any response to that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:38 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: patch MS03-046 update clarification Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification that is what I thought ... just making sure I didn't need new glasses thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification The patch was not redone. Just the wording of the alert. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario, W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ... (snippet from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms03-046.asp ) V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published. V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from "Deployment" in the "Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4" section of "Security Patch Information." Comments? Clarifications? mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
Your points are valid Ben. I started here 6 years ago and it was my 1st admin job. Having a list of all passwords semmed like the right thing to do at the time. And yes, management is aware of the list. I think I am going to take your advice on the GP password management. Just gotta hand it off. I know where in GP the password policy is, but right now, in the user acounts, "Password never expires" is checked. In order fro GP to do it's job, I will need to uncheck that. Correct? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Why is it necessary that you keep a list of all the passwords? It is one thing to have a list of service account passwords, and such, but all users is quite another thing. It is a HUGE security risk. Imagine what would happen if someone got ahold of the document that had everyones passwords. If you are using Exchange (valid assumption I think since this is an Exchange list), then you are using either NT or Windows 2000. Why can't you have your users manage their own passwords? Every client that logs in to the domain should have the ability to change their password - even 9x clients can change their passwords. This is not something that you should be doing or should have to do - now of course that is only my opinion and you are free to do as you like, but I would rather choke myself than have to maintain all my users passwords for them. Does HR know that you maintain a list of everyone's password? Does your corporate lawyer know? If not, you better make sure they do. I realize I am probably not being helpful to what you are wanting to do, but I (and probably most of the others on this list) have never run across a sysadmin who insisted on maintaining a list of all his/her users passwords. So if you like, simply dismiss this as a rant from me - it won't hurt my feelings if you do. I certainly wouldn't wish for your job if I was required to do what you are doing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Disappearing email Subject: Password Mainenance Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password change for my company. Is there any password automation out there, that will allow me to setup a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a report of the new ones? There has to be something out there like that... Thanks John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMA
RE: Sending email via a batch file
http://www.infradig.com/postie/index.shtml >From the site : The ultimate command-line mailer! Send and receive mail form the command-line or execute from within virtually any program. Supports NNTP, SMTP, ESMTP, MIME, BASE64 and UUENCODE for posting, and POP3, IMAP4, HTTP protocols for receiving. Available for Windows and Unix. Can post HTML and MHTML (embedded objects) messages. I do believe there is a free exe for download. I have used this for a set of large batch scripts that generate emails. Rock solid. John -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file Well, you could use batch files to call something else also. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file I agree. However, this person wanted to send e-mail from a batch file. I interpret that to mean .BAT or .CMD files, for which BLAT is well suited and ready to go. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file You don't need Blat. Any person who calls themselves a developer should have some knowledge of the different ways you can send mail with CDO. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file BLAT. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
Why is it necessary that you keep a list of all the passwords? It is one thing to have a list of service account passwords, and such, but all users is quite another thing. It is a HUGE security risk. Imagine what would happen if someone got ahold of the document that had everyones passwords. If you are using Exchange (valid assumption I think since this is an Exchange list), then you are using either NT or Windows 2000. Why can't you have your users manage their own passwords? Every client that logs in to the domain should have the ability to change their password - even 9x clients can change their passwords. This is not something that you should be doing or should have to do - now of course that is only my opinion and you are free to do as you like, but I would rather choke myself than have to maintain all my users passwords for them. Does HR know that you maintain a list of everyone's password? Does your corporate lawyer know? If not, you better make sure they do. I realize I am probably not being helpful to what you are wanting to do, but I (and probably most of the others on this list) have never run across a sysadmin who insisted on maintaining a list of all his/her users passwords. So if you like, simply dismiss this as a rant from me - it won't hurt my feelings if you do. I certainly wouldn't wish for your job if I was required to do what you are doing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Disappearing email Subject: Password Mainenance Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password change for my company. Is there any password automation out there, that will allow me to setup a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a report of the new ones? There has to be something out there like that... Thanks John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email via a batch file
Well, you could use batch files to call something else also. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file I agree. However, this person wanted to send e-mail from a batch file. I interpret that to mean .BAT or .CMD files, for which BLAT is well suited and ready to go. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file You don't need Blat. Any person who calls themselves a developer should have some knowledge of the different ways you can send mail with CDO. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file BLAT. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2C archiving software
David, Looked at this product but didn't like the idea of swapping my Priv database over to a Pub database, just moves the problem around in Exchange. Legacy Email I believe should be removed to improve Exchange times, but keep user transparent access. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 October 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: C2C archiving software Anybody using C2C Archive One for email archiving? I'd like to get some opinions about this product. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email via a batch file
I agree. However, this person wanted to send e-mail from a batch file. I interpret that to mean .BAT or .CMD files, for which BLAT is well suited and ready to go. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file You don't need Blat. Any person who calls themselves a developer should have some knowledge of the different ways you can send mail with CDO. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file BLAT. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email via a batch file
AFAIK, You now must maintain the older CDO support files yourself, for complete automatic use of CDO as it was first purposed. The new ones require user action in order to process an e-mail. AFAIK, If you use the new files, you must use a third party tools, to get "around" the user action screen. To make my apps M$ proof, I coded a SMTP mailer, very simular to BLAT. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file You don't need Blat. Any person who calls themselves a developer should have some knowledge of the different ways you can send mail with CDO. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file BLAT. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain?
Setup Outlook with another an alternate profile is one way but not sure what your trying accomplish. Is this for people that have outside accounts or just want to use outside email addy's to send from? From: "Michel Fayad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain? Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:16:02 +0300 Hi, We have Exchange 2000 configured to send and receive mail for our Domain (e.a. microsoft.com) A user in our company wants to be able to send email using a different Domain name (e.a. msn.com) Is there a way to configure Outlook/Exchange 2000 to give only this user permission to send on behalf this "external" email address? Hope anybody can help me with this issue. Best Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
Ouch., --steve > -Original Message- > From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Password Mainenance > > > No. > > We have always manually created the passwords in the past and > kept a list. > Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. > The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of > automating it yet maintaining a password structure. > I am one person managing two departments and too many servers > and sorkstations :) > > John Parker, MCSE > IS Admin. > Senior Technical Specialist > Digital Display Systems. > > Alpha Video > 7711 Computer Ave. > Edina, MN. 55435 > > 952-896-9898 Local > 800-388-0008 Watts > 952-896-9899 Fax > 612-804-8769 Cell > 952-841-3327 Direct > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Be excellent to each other" > ---End of Line--- > > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Password Mainenance > > > What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you > out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want > to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy > LophtCrack > - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of > the company you work for. > > > Ben Winzenz > Network Engineer > Gardner & White > (317) 581-1580 ext 418 > > > -Original Message- > From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:47 AM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: Disappearing email > Subject: Password Mainenance > > > Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password > change for my company. > > Is there any password automation out there, that will allow > me to setup > a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a > report of the > new ones? > > There has to be something out there like that... > > Thanks > > John Parker, MCSE > IS Admin. > Senior Technical Specialist > Digital Display Systems. > Alpha Video > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email via a batch file
You don't need Blat. Any person who calls themselves a developer should have some knowledge of the different ways you can send mail with CDO. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file BLAT. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email via a batch file
BLAT. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Items
Thanks Ed this took care of the issue. MH EXCH -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Items In their Outlook, check Tools > Options > Preferences > Calendar Options > Free/Busy Options > Publish X month(s) of Calendar free/busy information on this server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mh exch Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Items I have had an issue come up on setting a meeting in the Outlook calendar, I have selected the users that I want and beginning Dec 1st at 12:00 Am in to the new year 2004 they have no information listed (i.e. busy, out of office, tentative or busy) But I go to November or October and all is fine. Anybody have any problems with this or ideas? Exchange 2000 sp 4, Outlook Client 2000 sp 3 Thanks in Advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email via a batch file
CDO with VB... www.Cdolive.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email via a batch file We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Disappearing email Subject: Password Mainenance Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password change for my company. Is there any password automation out there, that will allow me to setup a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a report of the new ones? There has to be something out there like that... Thanks John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending email via a batch file
We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a batch file. Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is that he should use? It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out from there. We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out how to do a return command. If you know of something different please let me know. We are trying to stay away from buying anything third party. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Mainenance
What, you mean report what all the new passwords are to you? Are you out of your mind? I sure hope you are kidding. If you seriously want to get a list of ALL passwords, why don't you go out and buy LophtCrack - after all, what you are wanting is something to make you a hacker of the company you work for. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Disappearing email Subject: Password Mainenance Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password change for my company. Is there any password automation out there, that will allow me to setup a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a report of the new ones? There has to be something out there like that... Thanks John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password Mainenance
Hey all, I am nearing a time when once again, I need to do a password change for my company. Is there any password automation out there, that will allow me to setup a password structure, changes the passwords and give me a report of the new ones? There has to be something out there like that... Thanks John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification
that is what I thought ... just making sure I didn't need new glasses thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification The patch was not redone. Just the wording of the alert. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario, W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ... (snippet from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms03-046.asp ) V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published. V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from "Deployment" in the "Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4" section of "Security Patch Information." Comments? Clarifications? mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: patch MS03-046 update clarification
The patch was not redone. Just the wording of the alert. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario, W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ... (snippet from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms03-046.asp ) V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published. V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from "Deployment" in the "Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4" section of "Security Patch Information." Comments? Clarifications? mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch MS03-046 update clarification
The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario, W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ... (snippet from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms03-046.asp ) V1.0 October 15, 2003: First Published. V1.1 October 22, 2003: Removed unnecessary information from "Deployment" in the "Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4" section of "Security Patch Information." Comments? Clarifications? mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing email
True, but again...we're only talking about an occasional message disappearing. If something were POPing, it would take all the messages from the Inbox. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 8:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing email Force a password change on all of them. If something is POPing it, that will stop it. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing email I agree with what you're saying, which is why I didn't spend too much time worrying about it at first. But considering that 4 or 5 other people started having the same problem, all within a few days of each other, it raises suspicions that maybe it isn't something with the client. JC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing email Could be (1) another machine logged in to the account with delivery set to a PST, (2) a rule that moves the mail somewhere else or deletes it, (3) a view or a filter that somehow hides the message, such as one that shows only unread messages, so when she clicks on it it disappears from view. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing email Exchange 2000 SP4 I've got a user (Outlook 2000) that, beginning last week, claims to have had some email disappear on her. In one instance, she said she saw an email come into her Inbox, then saw it disappear within a second, before she had a chance to open it. I didn't really spend anytime looking at it; I was busy and told her that she must have a rule or a filter gone wacky on her. But now I'm starting to receive similar reports from other users. In fact, one of the users just came on board with us this week, got a brand new machine with Outlook 2003, and is on a different server from the other users having this issue (Exchange 2003). He swears he hasn't created any rules or filters in Outlook (he's only been here 2 days, so he hasn't had much time), and since his PC is brand new, I know there's nothing leftover on it from previous users. And, considering he's on our Exchange 2003 server, I can't even tie the disappearing emails to a single server. Any ideas? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain?
Hi, We have Exchange 2000 configured to send and receive mail for our Domain (e.a. microsoft.com) A user in our company wants to be able to send email using a different Domain name (e.a. msn.com) Is there a way to configure Outlook/Exchange 2000 to give only this user permission to send on behalf this "external" email address? Hope anybody can help me with this issue. Best Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange security issue
Exchange 2000 Enterprise SP3 Hi all, I've developed an ASP application to arrange meetings for some of our domain users (salesmen/saleswomen) through a Web page. This application runs under a privileged user's security context, and it uses MAPI objects (Session, Folder, Messages, Appointment, etc.) to connect to our Exchange Server 2000, retrieve users' calendars and create a page to render a combined calendar (showing combined availability). In order to allow accessing to other people's calendars, I had to grant "total access" permissions to the users' mailboxes for the user running the application. Otherwise, I received an error executing the GetDefaultFolder(CdoDefaultFolderCalendar) instruction. The error message was: "Collaboration Data Objects (0x505). You do not have permission to log on. [Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store - [MAPI_E_FAILONEPROVIDER(8004011D)]". Is it possible to configure a different set of permission parameters to allow access to other people's calendars without allowing full control to those user's mailboxes? Before using MAPI objects, I tried using the "ExOLEDB" provider and it worked fine. All I had to do is to add the privileged user, with a "publication editor" profile, to the user list located on "security tab" of the calendar properties configuration window. Nevertheless, I had to migrate to MAPI objects because the ExOLEDB provider isn't able to access a remote Exchange Server, and my application will run on a dedicated Web Server. Can anybody help me?. TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003
In the Front-End Toplogy guide whitepaper from Microsoft on Exchange *2000*, that's the recommended approach. Neil -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 21 October 2003 22:25 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Upgrade 2000 to 2003 Subject: RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003 I just got out from Exchange 2003 Server training and our instructor told us that Microsoft has changed their position about putting Front End servers in DMZ areas. They are now recommending that put all Front & Back end servers in your local network then use Proxy solutions to have your Front End servers to talk to outside of your network. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade 2000 to 2003 Can I please have comments on the following plan? The current setup: EX01, an Exchange 2000 Enterprise edition server sits on our LAN. In our DMZ we have MIS01, a Mobile Information Server 2002 server. (both these servers are member servers in the AD) Also in our DMZ, we have a workgroup win2k server which acts as our SMTP gateway for Exchange. Users access OWA on EX01 by connecting to our firewall using https, and the firewall NATs that through to EX01. All of that works fine. The plan: Taking advantage of our Software Assurance, upgrade EX01 to Exchange 2003 enterprise edition. Buy a license for Exchange 2003 Standard edition, and install that on MIS01, configure as front end server for OWA, connecting to mailboxes on EX01 Re-jig so MIS01 is also acting as our SMTP gateway, probably retaining the workgroup server as a backup MX MIS functionality (serversync, OMA, etc) is included in Ex2003, so we don't need MIS2002 anymore. Thanks in advance. Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
