RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder.
Thanks for the reply! I forget to add that the E55 and E2k servers are in the same Admin Group/Site. I've try to replicate within the site, unsuccessfully. In Exchange Admin, I open the properties of the Schedule+ Free/Busy public folder, and under the Replica tab moved the E2k server to the Replicate Folders to column. The folder never replicated. Using the ADSI Edit util (per Q284200), I looked at the properties for the Admin Group, and it points to the E55 server (which holds the Schedule+ folder) as the SiteFolderServer. Can you think of anything else I may have missed. Thx again! You must replicate the free-busy folder between the Exchange 5.5 and 2000 public folder servers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder. I've introduced Exchange 2000 (E2k) into my test Exchange 5.5 (E55) Organization. After creating a few mailboxes on E2k, I tested scheduling. An E55 mailbox sees other E55 mailbox calendar info properly, but can't see any E2k mailbox calendar info. An E2k mailbox sees neither E55 nor E2k calendar info, but sees only its own calendar. E2k seems not to recognize, or is unable to access the system/public folders on the E55 box. In the Active Directory Connector (ADC), the following CA's are running: . 2-way Recipient Agreement for Mailboxes (I changed the exchange bridgehead from the E55 box to the E2k after E2k was installed for all CA's) . 1-way Recipient Agreement for Distribution Lists . Public Folder Agreement . Configuration CA I've applied the recommendations from Knowledge Base Articles 275171 and 284200 w/ no success. In case these issues are related, I've also noticed that new mailboxes, created from AD Users and Computers for either the E55 or E2k boxes, are not generating e-mail addresses - X.400, SMTP or any proxies. Thoughts? Derrick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 OST Issue
There is a known issue with using Outlook 2K3 with Exchange 5.5. Check Microsoft's KB. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of EXLIST Posted At: Sunday, December 28, 2003 4:57 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Outlook 2003 OST Issue Subject: Outlook 2003 OST Issue I apologize if this has been discussed recently. I haven't been checking this mailbox and just noticed the last message received was 10/01/03. My archive goes back to 11/2001 though. I have an issue with Outlook 2003 that I did NOT have through the Beta's. Now that I am running the RTM on my laptop I have noticed that I am missing Calendar items. This follows other folders as well, built in or added to synch. OL will report when On Line that it is in synch. I can audit a folder and see the store and local are not in synch. For example; If I am out for several days and work offline and add entries in my Calendar for billable work. I return to the office and connect to the LAN | work on line and synch. Go to another PC on the LAN in the same domain and open OL 2003 as me, some of those entries are missing. Workaround: on the laptop | open any folder | press Shift+F9 to force the folder to synch. ALL items are synched. This works for all folders. I have been doing this to make sure my offline changes are in the store. I have already removed | rebooted | re-installed Office 2003, no change. Client: WINXP PRO SP1 Server: WIN2K SP3, EX 5.5 SP4 Happy New Year to All Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDAP on E2K
All, Quick question. Where in E2k can you go to find out what port LDAP is using? I remember where it was in Exch 5.5. But It's escaping me right now where it is in E2K. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP on E2K
Exchange 2000 doesn't use LDAP. Active Directory does. It's port 389 (DC) and 3268 (GC). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:31 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: LDAP on E2K Subject: LDAP on E2K All, Quick question. Where in E2k can you go to find out what port LDAP is using? I remember where it was in Exch 5.5. But It's escaping me right now where it is in E2K. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP on E2K
Well, that goes to show you i'm still thining of ole Exchange 5.5. Sorry, caffiene hasn't sunk in yet :( But yes, I was asking where I could find out that info in AD. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP on E2K Exchange 2000 doesn't use LDAP. Active Directory does. It's port 389 (DC) and 3268 (GC). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:31 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: LDAP on E2K Subject: LDAP on E2K All, Quick question. Where in E2k can you go to find out what port LDAP is using? I remember where it was in Exch 5.5. But It's escaping me right now where it is in E2K. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2003 stopped working on Small Business Server
Any idea what would cause email to stop working. You are not even able to send internal messages. Did something in DNS get messed up. I did a trial install of SBS at home and was able to get exchange working right out of the box. I did not install the one that is not working but is was working until they connected a firewall/router. I have tried to take the firewall/router out but still does not work. If someone thinks they can help me I will gladly try and fill in more details for them. Kevin Beron Firstlogic, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 stopped working on Small Business Server
I'm assuming you've checked the services for E2k on this box correct? _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Beron Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 stopped working on Small Business Server Any idea what would cause email to stop working. You are not even able to send internal messages. Did something in DNS get messed up. I did a trial install of SBS at home and was able to get exchange working right out of the box. I did not install the one that is not working but is was working until they connected a firewall/router. I have tried to take the firewall/router out but still does not work. If someone thinks they can help me I will gladly try and fill in more details for them. Kevin Beron Firstlogic, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP on E2K
Netstat -a |more is a good diagnostic tool also. Or pipe it to a file, netstat -a ports.txt -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP on E2K Well, that goes to show you i'm still thining of ole Exchange 5.5. Sorry, caffiene hasn't sunk in yet :( But yes, I was asking where I could find out that info in AD. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP on E2K Exchange 2000 doesn't use LDAP. Active Directory does. It's port 389 (DC) and 3268 (GC). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:31 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: LDAP on E2K Subject: LDAP on E2K All, Quick question. Where in E2k can you go to find out what port LDAP is using? I remember where it was in Exch 5.5. But It's escaping me right now where it is in E2K. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP on E2K
Not sure what you mean. If you want to view which Domain Controllers Exchange is connecting to, go to ESM, Server properties, Directory Access tab. That will show you which DC's and GC's Exchange is using. Is that what you are looking for? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:39 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: LDAP on E2K Subject: RE: LDAP on E2K Well, that goes to show you i'm still thining of ole Exchange 5.5. Sorry, caffiene hasn't sunk in yet :( But yes, I was asking where I could find out that info in AD. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP on E2K Exchange 2000 doesn't use LDAP. Active Directory does. It's port 389 (DC) and 3268 (GC). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:31 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: LDAP on E2K Subject: LDAP on E2K All, Quick question. Where in E2k can you go to find out what port LDAP is using? I remember where it was in Exch 5.5. But It's escaping me right now where it is in E2K. Thanks, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder - Mail Enabled
Hi All, I have a wierd issue happening and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions? I have 2 servers designated as Public FOlders Servers (we will call them PF01 and PF02). All of My Exchange servers have their Public Stores (default ones) homed on PF01. Well I created a new folder from my mailbox and it added the folder to PF01 and replicated to PF02 with no issues. I can post and everything is cool without any issues. The problem is, when I Mail-Enabled them and I send them an email, the email routes to PF02 instead of PF01. Wierd huh? I have to wait until replication occurs for the message to show up on PF01. This taikes about 5 minutes to happen and it appears that we have a mail lag. Any suggestions on how I can force my mail routed messages to get to PF01 instead of PF02? -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ?
That way the SRS and ADC can be run only there and you don't have to install them on your production box. Ahh, good point. That's the insight I was looking for, thanks Andy. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ? I agree. Install 2003 on the swing server. That way the SRS and ADC can be run only there and you don't have to install them on your production box. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 8:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ? Install Exchange 2003 on the new box and then move mailboxes to it. The other way is more work and you don't get any benefit. Don't forget all the preparatory steps like the ADC, ForestPrep, and DomainPrep. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich III Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ? All, I've asked a similar question before, but that was 5.5 - 2000 and we didn't end up moving. So: I'm looking to move from 5.5 - 2003. At the end of the process I'll be running 2003 on the same physical box I'm now running 5.5 on. However, I don't want to do an in place upgrade so I'll be using a variation on the famous, should be patented, wonderful Ed Crowley method. I'll bring up a second server, move the mailboxes (public folder, GAL, etc.) to that new box then redo the old box as a 2003 server and move everything back. Here's the question: One of these moves will need to be from 5.5 - 2003, which? I could install 2003 on the temp box, and do the 5.5-2003 upgrade on the first move. Or I could install 5.5 on the temp box and do the upgrade on the move from the temp box back to the real box. I'm leaning toward making the temp box a 5.5 box. I've done 5.5-5.5 moves before so I know that's a snap. Also, If I make the original box the first 2003 server in the enterprise I won't have to deal with tearing down the first 2003 server right away. Thoughts? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hosting Multiple Domains in Exchange 2003 Was: Upgrade from 2003 RC1
Go to http://www.microsoft.com/isn, there are a few whitepapers there on Exchange 2000 hosting. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 12:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hosting Multiple Domains in Exchange 2003 Was: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 Thanks very much for putting me on track. Reinstalled and operational. Now my next task is to figure out how to host multiple email domains. I googled and the best thing I found was this: http://asia.cnet.com/newstech/systems/0,39001152,39013988,00.htm but found Exchange System Manager is some different for 2003. Has anyone any experience doing this task with Exchange 2003 who has a cookbook for this? Thanks, Patrick Crawford VaspTech LLC - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 There are Microsoft KB articles that will tell you exactly how to do it. After you move all five FSMO roles, you can then demote the domain controller and then rebuild the server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Crawford Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 There's already another DC in the domain, which is a GC. How do I move the FSMO roles to it? And does that satisfy your instructions below? - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:20 AM Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 Install another domain controller, move all the FSMO roles to it, make it a GC. Retire the original server and rebuild it from scratch properly and move everything back. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Crawford Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 I recently asked this question at microsoft.public.exchange.admin, and failing to get an answer in a couple of days, thought I'd ask again here. It's possible I'm being impatient, since I'm mostly working during this Christmas season while the person who knows the answer is doubtlessly taking a much-deserved holiday, but on the off-chance that the Someone Who Knows is currently available I'm going to repost it here I find myself in a very deep crack here. I installed RC1 last summer, let it expire, and then last week attempted to upgrade it to RTM. Seemed to work. However, the RTM continues to behave as though it is time-limited and announces my eval period has expired, shutting Exchange down after a half-hour to an hour. So, trying to back out of this situation, I thought to uninstall. However, I am prevented from uninstalling by a message which declares that an upgrade from Standard to Enterprise is in progress and that I must do a Reinstall to complete it. Unfortunately, even after a Reinstall, the problems persist, and I can go neither forward nor backward. So, there it is. Re-building the domain is not an option here, since it is a production domain...Any assistance greatly appreciated, Patrick Crawford VaspTech LLC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To
RE: GAL not showing up after 5.5 to 2003 migration
What do the users see in the GAL from Outlook? - just nothing or a bunch of empty lines that can be highlighted? -Original Message- From: Guy Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GAL not showing up after 5.5 to 2003 migration We have migrated users from 5.5 to 2003, now the users do not see the elements in the GAL. I test from a user which is DOMAIN ADMIN. In Exchange System Manager, under Recipients, All GAL, Default GAL, i checked that the default permissions allowed my users to read the information. Authenticated Users have under the Special permission (not inherited) Read, Execute, Read Permissions, List Contents, Read Properties, List Object, they also have Open Address List (not inherited) and List Contents (inherited). The Domain Admins have everything but Full Control. Under the General tab, when i hit Preview... i see the list of elements that should be in the GAL. Why aren't my users (Office 2003, Office XP, Office 2000 and possibly 97) not seeing the GAL ? Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 stopped working on Small Business Server
You may also want to check that the IP addressing is setup correctly on the LAN side of the router. If you had Public IP addresses before and now you went to a firewall you will now have different IP addresses behind the firewall (Prob a 192.168.0.X configuration) -Original Message- From: Kevin Beron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 stopped working on Small Business Server Any idea what would cause email to stop working. You are not even able to send internal messages. Did something in DNS get messed up. I did a trial install of SBS at home and was able to get exchange working right out of the box. I did not install the one that is not working but is was working until they connected a firewall/router. I have tried to take the firewall/router out but still does not work. If someone thinks they can help me I will gladly try and fill in more details for them. Kevin Beron Firstlogic, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTA errors
I am getting the following errors on my first exchange 2k server in exchange 5.5 organization: A sockets error 0 on a bind() call was detected. The MTA will attempt to recover the sockets connection. Control block index: 0. [BASE IL TCP/IP DRVR 11 258] (12) The source is MSEXCHANGEMTA and category is OPERATING SYSTEM. Any ideas?? Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MTA errors
My first guess would be checking the permissions like passwords on the service account if those still match. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Davinder Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 2:08 PM Subject: MTA errors I am getting the following errors on my first exchange 2k server in exchange 5.5 organization: A sockets error 0 on a bind() call was detected. The MTA will attempt to recover the sockets connection. Control block index: 0. [BASE IL TCP/IP DRVR 11 258] (12) The source is MSEXCHANGEMTA and category is OPERATING SYSTEM. Any ideas?? Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder.
There are several posts and replies in this forum about folders not replicating properly. I suggest you check the archives and try some of the suggestions posted. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder. Thanks for the reply! I forget to add that the E55 and E2k servers are in the same Admin Group/Site. I've try to replicate within the site, unsuccessfully. In Exchange Admin, I open the properties of the Schedule+ Free/Busy public folder, and under the Replica tab moved the E2k server to the Replicate Folders to column. The folder never replicated. Using the ADSI Edit util (per Q284200), I looked at the properties for the Admin Group, and it points to the E55 server (which holds the Schedule+ folder) as the SiteFolderServer. Can you think of anything else I may have missed. Thx again! You must replicate the free-busy folder between the Exchange 5.5 and 2000 public folder servers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000: 2K Mailboxes cannot see Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder. I've introduced Exchange 2000 (E2k) into my test Exchange 5.5 (E55) Organization. After creating a few mailboxes on E2k, I tested scheduling. An E55 mailbox sees other E55 mailbox calendar info properly, but can't see any E2k mailbox calendar info. An E2k mailbox sees neither E55 nor E2k calendar info, but sees only its own calendar. E2k seems not to recognize, or is unable to access the system/public folders on the E55 box. In the Active Directory Connector (ADC), the following CA's are running: . 2-way Recipient Agreement for Mailboxes (I changed the exchange bridgehead from the E55 box to the E2k after E2k was installed for all CA's) . 1-way Recipient Agreement for Distribution Lists . Public Folder Agreement . Configuration CA I've applied the recommendations from Knowledge Base Articles 275171 and 284200 w/ no success. In case these issues are related, I've also noticed that new mailboxes, created from AD Users and Computers for either the E55 or E2k boxes, are not generating e-mail addresses - X.400, SMTP or any proxies. Thoughts? Derrick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public folders contact list
I have a public folder contact list (Master Contact) with 4000 contacts. When I try to go from A to H it bombs. Nothing shows up under H If I close Outlook and then go to H everything is there. I have tried it on the Server with 1gb of ram it it still does it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public folders contact list
I have a public folder contact list (Master Contact) with 4000 contacts. When I try to go from A to H it bombs. Nothing shows up under H If I close Outlook and then go to H everything is there. I have tried it on the Server with 1gb of ram it it still does it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 To 2000 Move Mailbox Issue
Hi everyone. I have a 2 server Exchange 5.5 site that I am trying to get over to a single 2000 server. Corp.domain.com Win2k Exchange 2k location.corp.domain.com 2X Win2k 2X Exchange 5.5 The new server in the corp.domain.com is part of the rest of the exchange site. ADC has been running and all looks ok there as well. When attempting to move a mailbox from 5.5 to 2000 the following message appears, and I can't seem to find any Microsoft articles that are pertinent. There are some that mention this error ID, but none that are an exact match to this issue. I am thinking it is a permissions issue somewhere, perhaps with the system attendant? Error: Connecting to destination server. cn=,,CN=,DC=,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512- Any help is appreciated. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 To 2000 Move Mailbox Issue
Are you moving it from the Excchange 5.5 admin or the ESM? Doesn't work from 5.5 Admin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Schwarz Sent: Tuesday, 30 December 2003 2:56 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 To 2000 Move Mailbox Issue Hi everyone. I have a 2 server Exchange 5.5 site that I am trying to get over to a single 2000 server. Corp.domain.com Win2k Exchange 2k location.corp.domain.com 2X Win2k 2X Exchange 5.5 The new server in the corp.domain.com is part of the rest of the exchange site. ADC has been running and all looks ok there as well. When attempting to move a mailbox from 5.5 to 2000 the following message appears, and I can't seem to find any Microsoft articles that are pertinent. There are some that mention this error ID, but none that are an exact match to this issue. I am thinking it is a permissions issue somewhere, perhaps with the system attendant? Error: Connecting to destination server. cn=,,CN=,DC=,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512- Any help is appreciated. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal folders
Does anyone know when a user has a new windows profile, why they can't access thier personal folder. Some windows profiles was change and when you add their pst to their OutLook profile and try to open it , it give an error permission denied, and they are logging in with thier new windows profile? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Personal folders
Document Settings| Old Profile Folder set-- look there for the old pst and copy to the new folder created by the new profile From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Personal folders Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:25:16 -0800 Does anyone know when a user has a new windows profile, why they can't access thier personal folder. Some windows profiles was change and when you add their pst to their OutLook profile and try to open it , it give an error permission denied, and they are logging in with thier new windows profile? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hosting Multiple Domains in Exchange 2003 Was: Upgrade from 2003 RC1
Sure do wish that had been helpful. I've crawled all over the Service Providers pages at msft, but as I don't want to go into the full-scale Hosted Exchange ASP business, I can't find much useful there. I have some exposure to the Microsoft Provisioning System discussed there (heck, I even wrote the reporting sub-system for web-hosting), but that isn't the scale we're talking about here. What I need is some practical advise on how to host not hundreds or thousands, but just one more smtp domain on my single Exchange 2003 Enterprise server. From one domain, I can surely extrapolate to the few more I will need to do. pc - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:31 AM Subject: RE: Hosting Multiple Domains in Exchange 2003 Was: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 Go to http://www.microsoft.com/isn, there are a few whitepapers there on Exchange 2000 hosting. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 12:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hosting Multiple Domains in Exchange 2003 Was: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 Thanks very much for putting me on track. Reinstalled and operational. Now my next task is to figure out how to host multiple email domains. I googled and the best thing I found was this: http://asia.cnet.com/newstech/systems/0,39001152,39013988,00.htm but found Exchange System Manager is some different for 2003. Has anyone any experience doing this task with Exchange 2003 who has a cookbook for this? Thanks, Patrick Crawford VaspTech LLC - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 There are Microsoft KB articles that will tell you exactly how to do it. After you move all five FSMO roles, you can then demote the domain controller and then rebuild the server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Crawford Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 There's already another DC in the domain, which is a GC. How do I move the FSMO roles to it? And does that satisfy your instructions below? - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:20 AM Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 Install another domain controller, move all the FSMO roles to it, make it a GC. Retire the original server and rebuild it from scratch properly and move everything back. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Crawford Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 I recently asked this question at microsoft.public.exchange.admin, and failing to get an answer in a couple of days, thought I'd ask again here. It's possible I'm being impatient, since I'm mostly working during this Christmas season while the person who knows the answer is doubtlessly taking a much-deserved holiday, but on the off-chance that the Someone Who Knows is currently available I'm going to repost it here I find myself in a very deep crack here. I installed RC1 last summer, let it expire, and then last week attempted to upgrade it to RTM. Seemed to work. However, the RTM continues to behave as though it is time-limited and announces my eval period has expired, shutting Exchange down after a half-hour to an hour. So, trying to back out of this situation, I thought to uninstall. However, I am prevented from uninstalling by a message which declares that an upgrade from Standard to Enterprise is in progress and that I must do a Reinstall to complete it. Unfortunately, even after a Reinstall, the problems persist, and I can go neither forward nor backward. So, there it is. Re-building the domain is not an option here, since it is a production domain...Any assistance greatly appreciated, Patrick Crawford VaspTech LLC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
