Notes Connector Question
All, I have a questions. We are are in native mode with our Exchange organization. In one site we have an E2K server with a Notes connector that connects with our corporate office. My question is, I remember on the Notes connector on Exchange 5.5 there was a file where you can edit to make the display names( when replicated from Notes to Exchange) appear "Lastname" "Firstname". Does anyone know what file I'm talking about? If so, can you please let me know what the name of it is? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Messaging Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Directory Export - SMTP address
Are these utils on the E2K cd? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Messaging Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Directory Export - SMTP address in 55 you needed HEADER.EXE at least thats the way I did it, Im sure there are other ways bill -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Directory Export - SMTP address How do you export the SMTP address without the entire DN using admin.exe to export to a .csv file? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Selecting address
Sounds like a bunch of horse$hittell the user. You can only use one address. Then tell him to go back to playing his 80's music on his computer. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Messaging Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Albert Charron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Selecting address Hi. I got a request from one of my user here and I really don't know how to answer to this. First of all, we are using Exchange 2000 SP3, and clients are Outlook 2000 SP3. All of our users has 2 smtp addresses (user@companyA and user@companyB) with one as default. My user want's to choose which of his two address he will use when he sends a message. For exemple: user@companyA is the default and the user wants to use user@companyB to send a particular message. I tried using the "from field" or the ReplyTO option in Outlook, but receipient keep receive mail from user@companyA. My question is: Is it possible to choose which address I will use to send a message? Albert Charron Administrateur système - Trisotech Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install Exchange 2000 as a DC or not?
You'd preferably would like to set it up as a member server. The less services running on an Exchange server the better. Exchange utilizes a lot of resources. I would think everyone would agree with that. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Messaging Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Wassink, Mw. A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install Exchange 2000 as a DC or not? Hi, Can some of you give me some advice whether or not to setup an Exchange 2000 server as a DC? We are building up a totally new forest consisting of a single domain and containing one Ex2000 machine. Sofar we have the following arguments: An argument for NOT making the Ex2000 machine a DC is that in case of disaster recovery the machine is easier to be recovered. An argument for making it a DC is that the helpdesk can manage mailboxes by connecting via whatever DC. Regards, Annemieke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My apologies but I must editorialize.
Testes123? That's pretty random huh? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Messaging Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Todd Bentley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My apologies but I must editorialize. For several years now I have subscribed to the Exchange Discussions Digest, and on more than one occasion have been rescued by its members. As I imagine it is with many of you, the weight of my IT responsibilities take up most of my day, and do not afford me the luxury of enjoying long, drawn out, discovery sessions in an effort to overcome the learning curves associated with these technologies. It is only because of lists like this I am able to stay on top of things, even if means several weeks pass before I can take the time to look back, and read up on and understand the details of the solution someone has provided me with. When posed with a problem I often "war post" to this and several other sources hoping to find help in the various responses. My explanations are not always well written and many of the responses come from left field. Nevertheless, I greatly appreciate them all, because I greatly respect the time people take out of their busy schedules to provide me with support and advice. It is nothing short of a selfless gift. A case in point; I had an Outlook client issue that was beginning to become quite a problem, of the many responses to my various postings I received this one from Exchange Discussions Digest: "Friese, Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Just went through this with PSS. Make sure your local domain name is in your LDT on the ISA. It has to be in the form of domain.com, .or, .net or .whatever with the "*" in front of it." Dead on. Thank you Casey! Thank you, thank you, thank you. However; I also received this reply from someone else: "$$%^&*() How many places did you post this for goodness sakes? Well, anyway I answered it in one of them if you can ever find it again." In response to the author of this particular reply; Yes, I did find your answer and it was as helpful and condescending as the one you just sent. To those of you who contribute to this and the other various lists out there I give my fondest thanks. For those who believe I have room in my inbox for messages that resemble web logs, perhaps there is an open mic night in your area that would enjoy your poignant humor. Todd L. Bentley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
I don't have any experience running Send Mail. What we are trying to do is when mail comes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it gets sent to this SendMail server. It reads the namelist of appropriate users that can receive mail and then it forwards it onto our Exchange 2000 mail server. Now, currently we have this setup on the pre-existing Exchange 5.5 server they have. What we are trying to do is just have it point to the new E2K server rather than the 5.5 server. This was done on the "Routing" tab on the IMC. But I can't seem to find out where in E2k I can do this. Any suggestions? TIA!, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Messaging Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail True. But I was also curious as to his level of knowledge with sendmail. With all the vulnerabilities and patches that come out on a regular basis, if he doesn't know that much about it then it might be better to see he can get rid of the machine instead of leaving a vulnerable machine out in the open. So I guess that leads to another question. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail I can think of a number of legitimate reasons to have a Sendmail gateway which have nothing to do with virus or content scanning, though those might be legitimate reasons as well. This is especially true in enterprise environments, or in secure environments. Exchange has rather limited routing and rewrite capabilities in comparison. On 1/10/03 16:00, "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok sorry but I'm going to ask it. Why are you doing this? Are you running virus or content scanning on the sendmail server? Do you know much about sendmail? If not, and you're not doing any scanning on the sendmail server it might be better to have the mail directed to the exchange server and take out the redundant system. If you do have a need for this system could you please tell us what's in the /etc/sendmail.cf file and in the /etc/mail/ directory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as "Inbound" mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a "Routing" tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
So I'm figuring that I'm going to need to make this change in the recipient policies? I'm just confused on how it's suppose to be setup in the recipient policy. Please advise. Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Messaging Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail I can think of a number of legitimate reasons to have a Sendmail gateway which have nothing to do with virus or content scanning, though those might be legitimate reasons as well. This is especially true in enterprise environments, or in secure environments. Exchange has rather limited routing and rewrite capabilities in comparison. On 1/10/03 16:00, "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok sorry but I'm going to ask it. Why are you doing this? Are you running virus or content scanning on the sendmail server? Do you know much about sendmail? If not, and you're not doing any scanning on the sendmail server it might be better to have the mail directed to the exchange server and take out the redundant system. If you do have a need for this system could you please tell us what's in the /etc/sendmail.cf file and in the /etc/mail/ directory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as "Inbound" mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a "Routing" tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Stuck Under Outlook Today
I like that solution :) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Stuck Under Outlook Today Eh? I'm not sure I really understand the problem based on the description, but remove the old profile and create a new profile named "More Beer". The new profile must be named "More Beer" or the gods will be angry. On 1/14/03 15:53, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, I have this weird problem. We have a seperate users mailbox stuck in another users mailbox. We tried to go and remove it and it doesnt' show up in the "Open Additonal Mailboxes" tab. We've tried removing the Exchange Profile and then re-add it. But it's still stuck in this users mailbox for some reason. Does anyone know if there is a way to remove this erroneous maibox? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Stuck Under Outlook Today
All, I have this weird problem. We have a seperate users mailbox stuck in another users mailbox. We tried to go and remove it and it doesnt' show up in the "Open Additonal Mailboxes" tab. We've tried removing the Exchange Profile and then re-add it. But it's still stuck in this users mailbox for some reason. Does anyone know if there is a way to remove this erroneous maibox? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Jim, thanks for the link. But the article is exact opposite of what I want to do. I want to be able to have mail forwarded from a foreign domain to our E2K server. Does this make sense? I believe the article was talking about having your Exchange server forward to a foreign domain. Would I do this in the Recipients Policies as well? TIA, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail I think this information should help you... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319759 Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail First of all I'm not managing this site. We just have to help them make what they have work with Exchange. Right now they are currently doing this with Exchange 5.5 (as per the Routing tab I was talking about earlier) So instead of going through all the political mumbo jumbo I just want to make it work. But I'm having a hard time trying to fine out where the equivalent of the "Routing" tab is on E2K. So I can basically point it to the new E2k server rather than the Exchange 5.5 server. If anyone is interested I can send them a screenshot of the Routing tab so you can get a better idea of what I'm talking about. Just email me offline. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Are you looking to get rid of managing the copy of the address list on the sendmail box? (either /etc/mail/aliases or /etc/mail/virtusertable), or are you looking to just remove the sendmail box entirely? The former is a good idea, the latter doesn't necessarily matter as much. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail > > > Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one > of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and > then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange > serverit > then process the mail from that address as "Inbound" mail.You see > where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we > are doing > this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail > > > There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling > lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question > specifically if I can)? > > On 1/10/03 14:22, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > All, > > As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a > "Routing" > > tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone > point > > me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving > myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. > Thanks for > you help! > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives:
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Sorry, It's servername.domainame (servername.ab.company.com) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics W.240.453.3575 C. 240.372.3644 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail Did you ever answer my question? By [EMAIL PROTECTED] do you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED]? On 1/13/03 13:57, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First of all I'm not managing this site. We just have to help them make what they have work with Exchange. Right now they are currently doing this with Exchange 5.5 (as per the Routing tab I was talking about earlier) So instead of going through all the political mumbo jumbo I just want to make it work. But I'm having a hard time trying to fine out where the equivalent of the "Routing" tab is on E2K. So I can basically point it to the new E2k server rather than the Exchange 5.5 server. If anyone is interested I can send them a screenshot of the Routing tab so you can get a better idea of what I'm talking about. Just email me offline. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Are you looking to get rid of managing the copy of the address list on the sendmail box? (either /etc/mail/aliases or /etc/mail/virtusertable), or are you looking to just remove the sendmail box entirely? The former is a good idea, the latter doesn't necessarily matter as much. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail > > > Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one > of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and > then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange > serverit > then process the mail from that address as "Inbound" mail.You see > where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we > are doing > this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail > > > There are several possible answers to that question and I'm > feeling lazy > today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question > specifically if I can)? > > On 1/10/03 14:22, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > All, > > As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had > a "Routing" > > tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can > someone point > > me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving > myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. > Thanks for > you help! > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
First of all I'm not managing this site. We just have to help them make what they have work with Exchange. Right now they are currently doing this with Exchange 5.5 (as per the Routing tab I was talking about earlier) So instead of going through all the political mumbo jumbo I just want to make it work. But I'm having a hard time trying to fine out where the equivalent of the "Routing" tab is on E2K. So I can basically point it to the new E2k server rather than the Exchange 5.5 server. If anyone is interested I can send them a screenshot of the Routing tab so you can get a better idea of what I'm talking about. Just email me offline. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Are you looking to get rid of managing the copy of the address list on the sendmail box? (either /etc/mail/aliases or /etc/mail/virtusertable), or are you looking to just remove the sendmail box entirely? The former is a good idea, the latter doesn't necessarily matter as much. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail > > > Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one > of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and > then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange > serverit > then process the mail from that address as "Inbound" mail.You see > where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we > are doing > this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail > > > There are several possible answers to that question and I'm > feeling lazy > today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question > specifically if I can)? > > On 1/10/03 14:22, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > All, > > As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had > a "Routing" > > tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can > someone point > > me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving > myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. > Thanks for > you help! > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as "Inbound" mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a "Routing" tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
I've looked in there a million times. I must just be going nuts. The tab must be setup somewhat differently. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics W. 240.453.3575 C. 240.372.3644 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Under servers, servername, smtp, default smtp virtual server, properties -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reroute Incoming Mail All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a "Routing" tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reroute Incoming Mail
All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a "Routing" tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Delay
The DSN just said "Delay" in the subject. That's about it. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Delay Was there a DSN code with this message? Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Bowles, John L. > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 3, 2003 07:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Message Delay > > All, > > Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And > should I be worried? > > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. > > YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. > > The list of email addresses are below. > > > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Delay
All, Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should I be worried? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. The list of email addresses are below. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recurring Calendar Error
What about just removing them as accounts and mailboxes all together and just make it a calendar item as a public folder? They'd still have the same functionality correct? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Get the outlook autoaccept script from www.exchangecode.com and lose the accounts for the resource mailboxes. Follow the instructions for setting the permissions correctly for the mailboxes and you will not have any problems in setting up recurring meeting requests. Just make sure that the users are inviting the conference room as a resource and not a mandatory or optional attendee. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Nikki, Let me take a look. I haven't logged in under that account in quite some time. I'll let you know. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error Wild guess here, the client acting as a resource, has the Outlook options set to AUTOMATICALLY DECLINE RECURRING MEETING REQUESTS? Look in calendar options for resources. Nikki > Bowles, John L. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > All, > > What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't > ask me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a > recurring meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the > error of: The "Conference Room" declined your meeting because it's > recurring. You must book each meeting separately with this resource. > > Does anyone have any idea why I can't book a recurring meeting? The > user who is trying to do this has Full Access to this mailbox. > > TIA, > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recurring Calendar Error
Nikki, Let me take a look. I haven't logged in under that account in quite some time. I'll let you know. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error Wild guess here, the client acting as a resource, has the Outlook options set to AUTOMATICALLY DECLINE RECURRING MEETING REQUESTS? Look in calendar options for resources. Nikki > Bowles, John L. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > All, > > What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't > ask me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a > recurring meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the > error of: The "Conference Room" declined your meeting because it's > recurring. You must book each meeting separately with this resource. > > Does anyone have any idea why I can't book a recurring meeting? The > user who is trying to do this has Full Access to this mailbox. > > TIA, > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recurring Calendar Error
All, What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't ask me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a recurring meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the error of: The "Conference Room" declined your meeting because it's recurring. You must book each meeting separately with this resource. Does anyone have any idea why I can't book a recurring meeting? The user who is trying to do this has Full Access to this mailbox. TIA, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting Calendar Event
And you said that you've made yourself the Owner of this calendar correct? Cause that should let you do anything on that calendar. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Calendar Event I logged on to the admin account on exchange via outlook and they still show as read only. Jim -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Calendar Event Export the calendar to a CSV, edit the CSV to eliminate the offending appointments, import the calendar to a new corporate calendar, verify the events are gone, delete the old calendar, rename the new one to match up with the name of the old one. That, or log on with the system administrator account and blow them away. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deleting Calendar Event A few weeks ago I created some test appt.s in the corporate calendar for next week. I can not delete them. They show as read-only. I made myself owner of the folder and even tried to delete them as admin in outlook. How can I get rid of these? Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 -> E2K
Chevy Chase in Christmas Vacation. Clark Griswold. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 -> E2K Clark who? > -- > From: Bowles, John L. > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:40 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 -> E2K > > I don't want to be like Clark Griswold when he opens his bonus > checkjust trying to get that rosey feeling. > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exch 5.5 -> E2K > > > All, > > I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What > I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector > setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are > located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all > our servers are on E2K. Do I still need to keep this directory > replication at all? I've actually had this server turned off for 2 > days and haven't seen any changes. I'm just trying to feel good about > me removing this server. Does it sound like it's good to go ahead and > remove the last Exch 5.5 server? > > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 -> E2K
I don't want to be like Clark Griswold when he opens his bonus checkjust trying to get that rosey feeling. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 -> E2K All, I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all our servers are on E2K. Do I still need to keep this directory replication at all? I've actually had this server turned off for 2 days and haven't seen any changes. I'm just trying to feel good about me removing this server. Does it sound like it's good to go ahead and remove the last Exch 5.5 server? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch 5.5 -> E2K
All, I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all our servers are on E2K. Do I still need to keep this directory replication at all? I've actually had this server turned off for 2 days and haven't seen any changes. I'm just trying to feel good about me removing this server. Does it sound like it's good to go ahead and remove the last Exch 5.5 server? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Now that comment is definitely categorized in the TMI department. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation But that's where the is BDSM chamber is, why would I want to move out..sorry got to go, I need to put the ball gag back in -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation Dont you think its time to move out of your parents basement? - Original Message - From: "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John > L. > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > > > Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a > knot there I see :) > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > > > In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database > tab, maintenance interval. > > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Online Defragmentation > Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > > > Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > > > Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, > aren't you? > > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > > > Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not > seeing the IS Maintenance tab. > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > > > You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? > > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation > > > I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. > > __ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation > > > IS Maint Tab > Properties of the Server. > > - Original Message - > From: "Garrish, Robert B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM > Subject: Online Defragmentation > > > > Dear DL Members, > > > > Our environment looks like this. > > > > NT Server 4.0 with SP6a > > Exchange 5.5 with SP4 > > > > One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation > > during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook > 20
RE: Online Defragmentation
Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: "Garrish, Robert B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation > Dear DL Members, > > Our environment looks like this. > > NT Server 4.0 with SP6a > Exchange 5.5 with SP4 > > One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation > during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 > Clients hang (hour glass). > In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical > order). > > > Event ID 179 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 180 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 181 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb > > Event ID 1207 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online > defragmentation has terminated > > Event ID 1221 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. > Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes > > > How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes > place during off hours? > > > Rob Garrish > Windows NT Engineer > Wawa Inc. > 610-558-8371 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
RE: Online Defragmentation
Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: "Garrish, Robert B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation > Dear DL Members, > > Our environment looks like this. > > NT Server 4.0 with SP6a > Exchange 5.5 with SP4 > > One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation > during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 > Clients hang (hour glass). > In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical > order). > > > Event ID 179 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 180 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 181 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb > > Event ID 1207 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online > defragmentation has terminated > > Event ID 1221 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. > Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes > > > How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes > place during off hours? > > > Rob Garrish > Windows NT Engineer > Wawa Inc. > 610-558-8371 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mai
RE: Online Defragmentation
Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: "Garrish, Robert B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation > Dear DL Members, > > Our environment looks like this. > > NT Server 4.0 with SP6a > Exchange 5.5 with SP4 > > One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation > during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 > Clients hang (hour glass). > In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical > order). > > > Event ID 179 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 180 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 181 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb > > Event ID 1207 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online > defragmentation has terminated > > Event ID 1221 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. > Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes > > > How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes > place during off hours? > > > Rob Garrish > Windows NT Engineer > Wawa Inc. > 610-558-8371 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: "Garrish, Robert B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation > Dear DL Members, > > Our environment looks like this. > > NT Server 4.0 with SP6a > Exchange 5.5 with SP4 > > One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation > during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 > Clients hang (hour glass). > In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical > order). > > > Event ID 179 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 180 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb > > Event ID 181 > Source = ESE97 > Category = Online Defragmentation > Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database > x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb > > Event ID 1207 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online > defragmentation has terminated > > Event ID 1221 > Source = MSExchangeIS Private > Category = General > Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. > Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes > > > How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes > place during off hours? > > > Rob Garrish > Windows NT Engineer > Wawa Inc. > 610-558-8371 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Yea, I know. That's what I finally convinced my manager to turn that function off. Up until now, they wanted to keep that function. But once that happened she realized that we cannot leave ourselves open to a potential mail loop because of our users, using Outlook incorrectly. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Deny auto-replies to the Internet and you wont have to worry about users setting it up incorrectly. - Original Message - From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:13 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk You're exactly right..that's what happened. I just didn't want to go into explaining all of that. But we cannot as mail administrators rely on our users to use this feature correctly. You're just setting yourself up for trouble. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: "Archie Call" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk > Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to > be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments > on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! > I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this > discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very > convincing. > > The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange > or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and > your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid > address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus > outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. > > If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. > > ...Archie Call > > Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
You're exactly right..that's what happened. I just didn't want to go into explaining all of that. But we cannot as mail administrators rely on our users to use this feature correctly. You're just setting yourself up for trouble. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message ----- From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: "Archie Call" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk > Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to > be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments > on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! > I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this > discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very > convincing. > > The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange > or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and > your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid > address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus > outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. > > If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. > > ...Archie Call > > Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: "Archie Call" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk > Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to > be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments > on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! > I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this > discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very > convincing. > > The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange > or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and > your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid > address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus > outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. > > If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. > > ...Archie Call > > Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Does this person work off multiple workstations? For instance using a laptop (using .ost files) and then using a desktop as well? One thing you might want to check out is Q article Q276248. My users have multiple workstations and can't understand why they keep getting duplicates and missing calendar items. I've told them to either dump using .ost files on your laptops or dump the unneeded workstation. Until then, this problem will persist. So we are no longer supporting people with multiple workstations. Fixed that little problem =] __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Â Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC2003
I see those fish tacos go to you too. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 I've got that T-shirt, too. That was in San Diego - my one and only MEC :-(. I remember it well because it was my first exposure to driving on the wrong side of the road :-). -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 3:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 It just says "Microsoft Exchange Conference 97" and it is an ugly green color. I went to a couple of Washington conferences too but they were not quite the dog and pony shows at MECs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Depends on what you call the first MEC. The first conference called MEC was San Diego '98. The Austin '97 conference, which I call the first MEC, was actually called the Microsoft Exchange Deployment Conference. Isn't that what your shirt says?! But some might argue that there were earlier conferences in Bellevue, Washington. I didn't go to any of them, so I don't consider them to be the first MEC. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC2003 Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? Bill Klosa Network Analyst PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 FAX: 773-381-4810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] S&C Electric Company Chicago, IL USA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC2003
Or you could just tell your bosses that their wives have been hitting on you since you were hired? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alexander Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC2003 You flew to and from the mainland, stayed there, and attended a conference for $400?!?! Wow! That's quite a bargain! Alex Ben Schorr wrote: > Have you tried telling them that if they don't send you that you're > going to show their wives the logs of what web sites they've been > visiting at work? > ;-) > > More seriously -- I recently got my firm to approve airfare to a > mainland conference by presenting it as a training opportunity and > pointing out that our training budget has been practically > non-existant and so $400 in 13 months is hardly an exhorbitant > request. They understand (even if > reluctantly) how important training is (especially in the IT field) so they > could not but agree that it was a reasonable request. > > Now if you've been going to expensive training events every month > perhaps that won't work for you. > > Aloha, > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:00 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> >> >> What kind of reasons have you guys usually given management to get >> them to send you to conferences like these? I'd really like to go but >> I have to come up with some very good justifications for going, thats >> why I am asking >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 17. joulukuuta 2002 8:02 >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: MEC2003 >> >> >> Depends on what you call the first MEC. The first conference called >> MEC was San Diego '98. The Austin '97 conference, which I call the >> first MEC, was actually called the Microsoft Exchange Deployment >> Conference. Isn't that what your shirt says?! But some might argue >> that there were earlier conferences in Bellevue, Washington. I >> didn't go to any of them, so I don't consider them to be the first >> MEC. >> >> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP >> Technical Consultant >> hp Services >> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral >> problems." >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles >> Marriott >> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: MEC2003 >> >> >> Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin >> Blackstone >> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: MEC2003 >> >> >> MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: MEC2003 >> >> >> Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? >> >> >> Bill Klosa >> Network Analyst >> PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 >> FAX: 773-381-4810 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> S&C Electric Company >> Chicago, IL USA >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: >> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: >> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: >> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: >> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: >> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: >> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> __ >> Do you Yahoo!? >> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. >> http://mailplus.yahoo.com >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _
RE: MEC2003
But you can buy a ticket to the MEC with your severence package =] __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Ummm That's the quickest way to get fired - er - laid off. -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Or you could just tell your bosses that their wives have been hitting on you since you were hired? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alexander Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC2003 You flew to and from the mainland, stayed there, and attended a conference for $400?!?! Wow! That's quite a bargain! Alex Ben Schorr wrote: > Have you tried telling them that if they don't send you that you're > going to show their wives the logs of what web sites they've been > visiting at work? > ;-) > > More seriously -- I recently got my firm to approve airfare to a > mainland conference by presenting it as a training opportunity and > pointing out that our training budget has been practically > non-existant and so $400 in 13 months is hardly an exhorbitant > request. They understand (even if > reluctantly) how important training is (especially in the IT field) so they > could not but agree that it was a reasonable request. > > Now if you've been going to expensive training events every month > perhaps that won't work for you. > > Aloha, > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:00 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> >> >> What kind of reasons have you guys usually given management to get >> them to send you to conferences like these? I'd really like to go but >> I have to come up with some very good justifications for going, thats >> why I am asking >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 17. joulukuuta 2002 8:02 >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: MEC2003 >> >> >> Depends on what you call the first MEC. The first conference called >> MEC was San Diego '98. The Austin '97 conference, which I call the >> first MEC, was actually called the Microsoft Exchange Deployment >> Conference. Isn't that what your shirt says?! But some might argue >> that there were earlier conferences in Bellevue, Washington. I >> didn't go to any of them, so I don't consider them to be the first >> MEC. >> >> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP >> Technical Consultant >> hp Services >> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral >> problems." >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles >> Marriott >> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: MEC2003 >> >> >> Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin >> Blackstone >> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: MEC2003 >> >> >> MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: MEC2003 >> >> >> Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? >> >> >> Bill Klosa >> Network Analyst >> PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 >> FAX: 773-381-4810 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> S&C Electric Company >> Chicago, IL USA >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: >> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >&
Error Message
All, I'm getting his error message on my SMTP Connector/Notes Connector server on E2K SP3. I can't find anything regarding this issue on technet. Has anyone seen this event? If so, can you please point me in the right direction? Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Auto-Response To The Internet
Nevermind...I wasn't looking in the right pane. Thank you very much for your quick response. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto-Response To The Internet I believe it's in the following location: ESM->Internet Message Formats->Advanced -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto-Response To The Internet All, How do I disable auto-response to the internet in Exchange 2000? I know when you went into the IMC in Exchange 5.5 you could disable it there. Is there such an option in E2K? Please let me know, Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Auto-Response To The Internet
I checked that location and there is no "Advanced" tab. Thank you. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto-Response To The Internet I believe it's in the following location: ESM->Internet Message Formats->Advanced -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto-Response To The Internet All, How do I disable auto-response to the internet in Exchange 2000? I know when you went into the IMC in Exchange 5.5 you could disable it there. Is there such an option in E2K? Please let me know, Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto-Response To The Internet
All, How do I disable auto-response to the internet in Exchange 2000? I know when you went into the IMC in Exchange 5.5 you could disable it there. Is there such an option in E2K? Please let me know, Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Attachemnt Problem
Actually, this email message that I'm trying to get through to the Outlook users is coming from a Notes user. We have a Notes Connector that ties our Corporate office with our office. This person is trying to send an email with text and a link. When this person send the message the entire body of the message is removed. Just the subject is intact. We are using ScanMail. But we do not have any .url or.lnk in our attachment blocking scheme. Any ideas? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Attachemnt Problem All, I'm looking on Slipstick now for the reg hack for Outlook to allow certain file types to not be delete on transmission. Does anyone know what I'm looking for and point me in the right direction? Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Attachemnt Problem
All, I'm looking on Slipstick now for the reg hack for Outlook to allow certain file types to not be delete on transmission. Does anyone know what I'm looking for and point me in the right direction? Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
I did, I connected with the 5.5 admin program on E2K while connected to the SRS server and removed the old Exchange 5.5 servers. But when I go into ESM I can still see the old servers (whited out) and it looks as if all the servers are still trying to do directory updates with these servers. Is this by design that they still stay in the EMS? Or is there something else that needs to be done? Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers I thought you could only do that from 5.5 Manager. - Original Message - From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 2:50 PM Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Does anyone know of a way to remove these retired Exchange 5.5 servers from the ESM? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers So you've ruled out a problem with the Config CA, then? Neil -----Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:13 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yea, it's been well over a month. And they are still resident in the ESM. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD. So, it may be a problem with your Config CA. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:02 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send directory updates to these servers. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Interface Event ID: 9318 Date: 12/9/2002 Time: 11:56:43 AM User: N/A Computer: E2K Server Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they normally look. The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that what you did? Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/site
RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Does anyone know of a way to remove these retired Exchange 5.5 servers from the ESM? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers So you've ruled out a problem with the Config CA, then? Neil -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:13 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yea, it's been well over a month. And they are still resident in the ESM. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD. So, it may be a problem with your Config CA. Neil -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:02 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send directory updates to these servers. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Interface Event ID: 9318 Date: 12/9/2002 Time: 11:56:43 AM User: N/A Computer: E2K Server Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they normally look. The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that what you did? Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
I wouldn't say I entirely ruled that out. I would say that I'm looking at other things that could be the problem. I just don't understand why It doesn't move it out of ESM. I've done replication on the Config_CA to see if it pushed the changes to the E2K servers. Still nothing. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers So you've ruled out a problem with the Config CA, then? Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:13 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yea, it's been well over a month. And they are still resident in the ESM. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD. So, it may be a problem with your Config CA. Neil -----Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:02 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send directory updates to these servers. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Interface Event ID: 9318 Date: 12/9/2002 Time: 11:56:43 AM User: N/A Computer: E2K Server Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they normally look. The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that what you did? Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sites
RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
I've found some as well. But I haven't found anything on how to get them out of ESM. Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers I found some KBs on support.microsoft.com for "Event 9318 MSExchangeMTA". -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send directory updates to these servers. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Interface Event ID: 9318 Date: 12/9/2002 Time: 11:56:43 AM User: N/A Computer: E2K Server Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they normally look. The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that what you did? Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Yea, it's been well over a month. And they are still resident in the ESM. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD. So, it may be a problem with your Config CA. Neil -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:02 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send directory updates to these servers. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Interface Event ID: 9318 Date: 12/9/2002 Time: 11:56:43 AM User: N/A Computer: E2K Server Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they normally look. The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that what you did? Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send directory updates to these servers. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Interface Event ID: 9318 Date: 12/9/2002 Time: 11:56:43 AM User: N/A Computer: E2K Server Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they normally look. The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that what you did? Neil -----Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird SMTP Problem
All, I have this weird problem with one of the sites that I'm managing. It seems that everyone in the site can send and receive SMTP mail. But if you create a new user. It won't send or receive SMTP mail. They are entirely on W2K and E2K SP3. I've also narrowed it down to just this site having this problem. Everyone else seems to work fine. Anyone have any ideas what could cause this kind of behavior? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: forwarding and copying messages in exchange 2000
Johnny, You have to do the same thing. You need to create a contact. Then on the user property pages go to Exchange General. On there you'll have Delivery Options. In there you can forward to that contact that you created. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: forwarding and copying messages in exchange 2000 I want to forward a copy of all messages to a mailbox to an outside email. I know this was possible in 5.5 but have 2000. In 5.5 you could set up a custom recipient and in 5.5 administrator and get it going that way. I can't find any such functionality in 2000! I know it must be there, what good would a mailserver be if you couldn't forward email to another external address at the server level? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
Are these people within the same site? How many servers do you have if they are in the same site? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart@;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:John.Bowles@;celera.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information You are not getting any information at all? Or just partial info? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart@;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Information Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
You are not getting any information at all? Or just partial info? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart@;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Information Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Issue
All, Has anyone seen that when a use replies to a message from a personal folder that the message hangs in the Outbox? If anyone has any insight on how they resolved this problem please let me know. Backend: Using E2K SP3 Client: Outlook 2K Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
Well isn't that "Special Undocumented Feature" a dandy! I'm going to have to fix a lot of mailbox privileges during my migration. WONDERFUL!!! Thanks for the help Mike! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes Well, afaik, all you need to do is add reviewer rights to the top of the mailbox object itself and everything should work. It is one of those "Special Undocumented Features" TM. When you move a mailbox to an E2K server, it resets all the permissions on the top level of the mailbox object to default == none, anonymous == none, and consequently, the delegate doesn't have rights to see that they have rights.. (?) No idea why.. PSS told me after I called them.. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes This is normal as we found out in our test lab. > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > All, > > I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one Exchange > server to another. I'm in mixed mode right now and it doesn't matter > if I move a > mailbox between 5.5->E2K. Or E2K-E2K. But what seems to > happen is once > the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to > their bosses calendar for viewing lose their permissions to > view the calendar. Once you re-add them it works fine. Now > is there something I'm missing when moving mailboxes that > would prevent this from occuring? I've heard that the > permissions should stay intact during a move. But it doesn't > seem to be the case here. I've had 2 occurences happen so > far one mailbox moving from 5.5->E2K and E2K->E2K. Can > anyone shed any light on this? > > TIA, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
So far yes...but I would think it would any folder if they had permissions to it. Cause I don't see why it would just discriminate just to the calendar. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes Is it only the calendar folder which has this issue? > -Original Message----- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > The ladder half > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > And how are the other users accessing the mailbox (File | > Open Other Users > folder) or Tols | Services | MSE | Advanced ADD)? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > > > > Chris, > > > > When you go into someone's Outlook client and right click on the > > folder and select properties and go into the permissions > tab and grant > > it that way. That's what I mean by manually doing it. > Sorry that was > > a bit misleading. > > > > Thanks, > > > > ___ > > John Bowles > > Exchange Administrator > > Enterprise Support & Engineering > > Celera Genomics > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > > > > Manually added it how? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from > > one Exchange > > > server to another. I'm in mixed mode right now and it > > doesn't matter > > > if I move a > > > mailbox between 5.5->E2K. Or E2K-E2K. But what seems to > > > happen is once > > > the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to their > > > bosses calendar for viewing lose their permissions to view the > > > calendar. Once you re-add them it works fine. Now is there > > > something I'm missing when moving mailboxes that would > prevent this > > > from occuring? I've heard that the permissions should > stay intact > > > during a move. But it doesn't seem to be the case here. > I've had 2 > > > occurences happen so far one mailbox moving from 5.5->E2K and > > > E2K->E2K. Can anyone shed any light on this? > > > > > > TIA, > > > > > > ___ > > > John Bowles > > > Exchange Administrator > > > Enterprise Support & Engineering > > > Celera Genomics > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ &
RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
The ladder half ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes And how are the other users accessing the mailbox (File | Open Other Users folder) or Tols | Services | MSE | Advanced ADD)? > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > Chris, > > When you go into someone's Outlook client and right click on > the folder and select properties and go into the permissions > tab and grant it that way. That's what I mean by manually > doing it. Sorry that was a bit misleading. > > Thanks, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > Manually added it how? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > > > > All, > > > > I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from > one Exchange > > server to another. I'm in mixed mode right now and it > doesn't matter > > if I move a > > mailbox between 5.5->E2K. Or E2K-E2K. But what seems to > > happen is once > > the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to their > > bosses calendar for viewing lose their permissions to view the > > calendar. Once you re-add them it works fine. Now is there > > something I'm missing when moving mailboxes that would prevent this > > from occuring? I've heard that the permissions should stay intact > > during a move. But it doesn't seem to be the case here. I've had 2 > > occurences happen so far one mailbox moving from 5.5->E2K and > > E2K->E2K. Can anyone shed any light on this? > > > > TIA, > > > > ___ > > John Bowles > > Exchange Administrator > > Enterprise Support & Engineering > > Celera Genomics > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
Chris, When you go into someone's Outlook client and right click on the folder and select properties and go into the permissions tab and grant it that way. That's what I mean by manually doing it. Sorry that was a bit misleading. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes Manually added it how? > -Original Message----- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes > > > All, > > I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one > Exchange server to another. I'm in mixed mode right now and > it doesn't matter if I move a > mailbox between 5.5->E2K. Or E2K-E2K. But what seems to > happen is once > the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to > their bosses calendar for viewing lose their permissions to > view the calendar. Once you re-add them it works fine. Now > is there something I'm missing when moving mailboxes that > would prevent this from occuring? I've heard that the > permissions should stay intact during a move. But it doesn't > seem to be the case here. I've had 2 occurences happen so > far one mailbox moving from 5.5->E2K and E2K->E2K. Can > anyone shed any light on this? > > TIA, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
All, I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one Exchange server to another. I'm in mixed mode right now and it doesn't matter if I move a mailbox between 5.5->E2K. Or E2K-E2K. But what seems to happen is once the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to their bosses calendar for viewing lose their permissions to view the calendar. Once you re-add them it works fine. Now is there something I'm missing when moving mailboxes that would prevent this from occuring? I've heard that the permissions should stay intact during a move. But it doesn't seem to be the case here. I've had 2 occurences happen so far one mailbox moving from 5.5->E2K and E2K->E2K. Can anyone shed any light on this? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Instant Messaging
Thank you very much Ryan. I was reading the help notes on E2k about IM. And it said before you install IM. That you you need Adavanced Server and IIS 5.0. I just never heard of needing that. That's why I wanted to make sure. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Instant Messaging No... You'll need IIS, of course, which is required for Exchange 2k anyway. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:12 AM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Exchange and Instant Messaging Subject: Exchange and Instant Messaging All, Quick quesiton. Does Instant Messaging for Exchange 2000 require that you install Advanced Server? Please let me know. Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange and Instant Messaging
All, Quick quesiton. Does Instant Messaging for Exchange 2000 require that you install Advanced Server? Please let me know. Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retiring Exchange 5.5 servers
Please pass on the message to your co-worker for her instructor and tell him that there are such things as Q articles on Microsoft's site. If he needs help it's www.microsoft.com Read em, Learn em, Live em. Have a great day! Buh-bye. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Retiring Exchange 5.5 servers A co-worker of mine is at an Exchange class. She says the instructor told her that Microsoft recommends upgrading an Exchange 5.5 server to W2K/E2K before removing it from an E2K organization. Anyone hear anything like this? Sounds fishy to me. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Problems
Mike, do you think it has anything to do with the error message I'm getting that is below at the very end? Please let me know. Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Problems The 'ASP 0115' error means that your ASP application is crashing or Dr. Watsoning on you. See if you Dr. Watson log is getting updated at the time of the crash. If it is not, it is something internal to IIS itself. Try setting the website in its own memory space to see if the problem follow the MTX process or not. Note: This will break any CDO mail on the machine, so you should test it first. If all else fails, then you will need to call Microsoft to get the Windows debuggers attached to the IIS service processes to see what is going on. Hope this helps. Mike - Original Message ----- From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:39 AM Subject: OWA Problems All, I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on the server in question. I'm running OWA off this server. And it seems as of yesterday OWA isn't functioning correctly. I've tried and restart the WWW services. Once I"ve done that it will work for about 3-5 mins and then return the same error when you try and reconnect later. The error I'm getting is this: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/logon.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. Now, I've been scanning my Event Viewer and only finding this warning in the logs as of yesterday: Event Type: Error Event Source: Active Server Pages Event Category: None Event ID: 5 Date: 8/12/2002 Time: 9:12:51 AM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE SERVER Description: Error: File /exchange/USA/logon.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Also, I've noticed this error that just started happening yesterday before the previous error message: Event Type: Warning Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Performance Event ID: 160 Date: 8/11/2002 Time: 7:37:58 AM User: N/A Computer: CELMRKV Description: MSExchangeIS (418) Background clean-up skipped pages. Database may benefit from online or offline defragmentation. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Now I've checked technet and found out that there is a hotfix for this problem here. First has anyone seen this before? What i'm wondering if this is error is effecting my OWA access? Please let me know if anyone has experienced this before and have any suggestions. Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Problems
All, I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on the server in question. I'm running OWA off this server. And it seems as of yesterday OWA isn't functioning correctly. I've tried and restart the WWW services. Once I"ve done that it will work for about 3-5 mins and then return the same error when you try and reconnect later. The error I'm getting is this: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/logon.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. Now, I've been scanning my Event Viewer and only finding this warning in the logs as of yesterday: Event Type: Error Event Source: Active Server Pages Event Category: None Event ID: 5 Date: 8/12/2002 Time: 9:12:51 AM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE SERVER Description: Error: File /exchange/USA/logon.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Also, I've noticed this error that just started happening yesterday before the previous error message: Event Type: Warning Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Performance Event ID: 160 Date: 8/11/2002 Time: 7:37:58 AM User: N/A Computer: CELMRKV Description: MSExchangeIS (418) Background clean-up skipped pages. Database may benefit from online or offline defragmentation. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Now I've checked technet and found out that there is a hotfix for this problem here. First has anyone seen this before? What i'm wondering if this is error is effecting my OWA access? Please let me know if anyone has experienced this before and have any suggestions. Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Copy Outlook rules
Why don't you just get a viable AV Scanner? i.e. ScanMail? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Copy Outlook rules Is there a way in Outlook to copy a rule and send it to someone else. I have a rule created to delete KLEZ virus email and I would like all my users to be able to install it in their Rulebase. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issues in E2K
I'm going to take a stab without even reading the entire post. You need to and instance of the Free/Busy system folder on E2K. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issues in E2K Hello everyone, E2k(sp2) and Ex55(sp4) in mixed mode in NT and 2000 domain with 2 way trust. I am facing an issue here with seeing others calendar. Since I have Admin rights I can see others calendar without any issues. As a domain user with regular permissions I CANNOT see other users calendar when I am logged in to the 2000 domain. If logged in to the NT domain as a user I CAN see others calendars!!. Here is what I have done so far: -Assign Read write permissions to domain users group in Mailbox store and Public folder store, which in turn propogates additional relevant permissions. - Assign Read write permission for Domain users on the Exchsrvr folder. I have tried adding the everyone group and assigning permissions, but does not seem to be working, Did not find anything in Msknowledgebase except Q282964 which was not too helpful Anyone has faced this situation before? Any ideas or suggestions? My next stop would be PSS. Thanks Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
Administrative Group ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site The last time I asked what an abbreviation stood for, one of the guys on the list wanted to draw and quarter me so, at the risk of getting shot for this questionwhat's an "AG"? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site What about granting these permissions on the AG? I might have missed that already since I'm jumping in an already warm conversation. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Also, I gave that particular user "Schema Admin" and "Enterprise Admin" permissions in the main site. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 7/24/2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb question...I don't see a group/user called "Exchange Full Administrator" on the main site and it works here. Is there some specific permission that gives what you are talking about? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Administrator of the machine or 'Exchange Full Administrator'.. these are two different things. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site
What about granting these permissions on the AG? I might have missed that already since I'm jumping in an already warm conversation. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Also, I gave that particular user "Schema Admin" and "Enterprise Admin" permissions in the main site. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Permissions for Exchange are delegated in the Exchange System Manager. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 7/24/2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site I sort of see where you are going with this but to ask a really dumb question...I don't see a group/user called "Exchange Full Administrator" on the main site and it works here. Is there some specific permission that gives what you are talking about? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP3 will not install at child site Administrator of the machine or 'Exchange Full Administrator'.. these are two different things. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Authentication Question
Thanks a lot for your response. I'll look into this. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Authentication Question Well, I have a 2 man team who is just coming off a project that could come in and help your security team lock down the network.[1] But using security policies you can require a machine to be logged into the domain to obtain a valid IP address from DHCP (or use static IP addresses). You could also implement Kerberos if you're a W2K shop. [1] Seriously. > -Original Message----- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Authentication Question > > Chris, in what area could I start looking at to make this happen? > OS? > > Thanks, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Authentication Question > > > You can prevent unauthorized workstations (e.g. machines which are not > part of the domain) from accessing any network resources. It's not an > Exchange thing though, it's a security team thing. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:09 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Authentication Question > > > > Well our Security Team is wondering if there is a way we can disable > > this. Off the top of my head I have no idea. That's why I turned > > to this list. Yea, my question is when a user (not in a domain) > > logs on locally while dialing in, can you not allow people to log > > onto the Exchange server when opening up Outlook client. You know, > > it prompts you for your credentials to log in. Can you disable that > > to only allow users who are connected to the domain to access email? > > Does that clarify the question? > > > > Thanks, > > > > ___ > > John Bowles > > Exchange Administrator > > Enterprise Support & Engineering > > Celera Genomics > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:04 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Authentication Question > > > > > > Is your actual question "Can I force workstations to log onto a > > domain > > > by not letting them get onto their mailbox while logging on > > locally?" > > > > Not that I know of. > > > > We have to make it policy here so that the antivirus updates work. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:59 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Authentication Question > > > > > > All, > > > > We have users that their workstations are not in a domain. They are > > able to logon onto our Exchange server by giving their credentials > > to get in. My question is, can you disable that function? And if > > so, are there any repercussions if you disable it? > > > > Thank you, > > > > ___ > > John Bowles > > Exchange Administrator > > Enterprise Support & Engineering > > Celera Genomics > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Ar
RE: Authentication Question
Chris, in what area could I start looking at to make this happen? OS? Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Authentication Question You can prevent unauthorized workstations (e.g. machines which are not part of the domain) from accessing any network resources. It's not an Exchange thing though, it's a security team thing. > -Original Message----- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Authentication Question > > Well our Security Team is wondering if there is a way we can disable > this. Off the top of my head I have no idea. That's why I turned to > this list. Yea, my question is when a user (not in a domain) logs on > locally while dialing in, can you not allow people to log onto the > Exchange server when opening up Outlook client. You know, it prompts > you for your credentials to log in. Can you disable that to only > allow users who are connected to the domain to access email? Does > that clarify the question? > > Thanks, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:04 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Authentication Question > > > Is your actual question "Can I force workstations to log onto a domain > by not letting them get onto their mailbox while logging on locally?" > > Not that I know of. > > We have to make it policy here so that the antivirus updates work. > > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Authentication Question > > > All, > > We have users that their workstations are not in a domain. They are > able to logon onto our Exchange server by giving their credentials to > get in. My question is, can you disable that function? And if so, > are there any repercussions if you disable it? > > Thank you, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Authentication Question
Well our Security Team is wondering if there is a way we can disable this. Off the top of my head I have no idea. That's why I turned to this list. Yea, my question is when a user (not in a domain) logs on locally while dialing in, can you not allow people to log onto the Exchange server when opening up Outlook client. You know, it prompts you for your credentials to log in. Can you disable that to only allow users who are connected to the domain to access email? Does that clarify the question? Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Authentication Question Is your actual question "Can I force workstations to log onto a domain by not letting them get onto their mailbox while logging on locally?" Not that I know of. We have to make it policy here so that the antivirus updates work. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Authentication Question All, We have users that their workstations are not in a domain. They are able to logon onto our Exchange server by giving their credentials to get in. My question is, can you disable that function? And if so, are there any repercussions if you disable it? Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Authentication Question
All, We have users that their workstations are not in a domain. They are able to logon onto our Exchange server by giving their credentials to get in. My question is, can you disable that function? And if so, are there any repercussions if you disable it? Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy
Man that's a good one. I'm LMAO!!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Have your mail administrator explain to him why he shouldn't be doing that. > -Original Message- > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:39 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > No, I don't hate my CIO, he wants to keep his mail in the PST to keep > from takig space on the server. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > I guess creating a new PST file and dragging/dropping stuff between > them was ruled out as being too easy? You must really hate this user > to keep storing > his mail in a PST file. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:27 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > > yes, and someone stole my credit card > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:16 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > > > > Your phone broke? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:05 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > > > > Does anyone know how to apply the fix from Q279431 without calling > > technical services > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy
That's the most ingorant thing I've heard in a long time besides some of my posts :) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy No, I don't hate my CIO, he wants to keep his mail in the PST to keep from takig space on the server. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy I guess creating a new PST file and dragging/dropping stuff between them was ruled out as being too easy? You must really hate this user to keep storing his mail in a PST file. > -Original Message- > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > yes, and someone stole my credit card > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > Your phone broke? > > > -Original Message- > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > Does anyone know how to apply the fix from Q279431 without calling > technical services _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy
You solved your own problem my friend. There really isn't a good reason why someone's email should be delivered to a .pst Cause I'm sure that .pst file is sitting right on his workstation/laptop w/out any backups. T ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Delivering mail to PSTs often breaks collaboration. Any data worth retaining belongs in the information store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Okay, this is my CIO, and he has all messages going from his inbox to his .pst He has had this setup for a while, and this never happened before. He just informed me that he figured out that the requests were showing up in the pst folder. This just started happening a couple of weeks ago. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy O2K.. any hotfixes or SP? Eliminate the PST from the equation. They suck, he doesn't need it and I don't support them. Can you see when he is scheduled or free for a meeting by trying to create a meeting request and cecking his availability. > -Original Message- > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > O2k, His Inbox, then it is moved to a pst, No, every 15 minutes when > free/busy updates, What do you mean by see his free/busy data > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > Outlook Version? Where is his mail delivered? Can you see the meeting > item in his calendar? How often does he get the unable to update > free/busy information error? Can users see his free/busy data? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > > I have one user that is sending out meeting request, then when they > > are accepted his return message tells him that the meeting doesn't > > exist. > He > > also gets a message that he is Unable to update his Free/Busy > > Scheduler. It is set to update every 15 mintues by default. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:18 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Free/Busy > > > > > > AdDiTiOnAl InFoRmAtIoN rEqUiReD i ThInK. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:11 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Free/Busy > > > > > > I am getting more and more people that are unable to update their > > > Free/Busy schedule. Is that anyway for me to do maintenance on > > > this?!?! > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.
RE: Free/Busy
Is his mailbox over it's limit? Or not allowed to "Send and Receive?" I had a problem with a user like the one you are describing. I bascially had an account they were trying to access their mailbox limit and send and receive limit set to 0. After I reinstated it, it worked fine. Just throwing out something off the top of my head. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy I have one user that is sending out meeting request, then when they are accepted his return message tells him that the meeting doesn't exist. He also gets a message that he is Unable to update his Free/Busy Scheduler. It is set to update every 15 mintues by default. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy AdDiTiOnAl InFoRmAtIoN rEqUiReD i ThInK. > -Original Message- > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Free/Busy > > I am getting more and more people that are unable to update their > Free/Busy schedule. Is that anyway for me to do maintenance on > this?!?! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders
I know what you are saying. I was actually being sarcastic when I replied back. But you can never see the tone in an email. But I do appreciate the response buddy. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Steady on! I was just being polite! What I was saying was something along the lines of "I responded first time, but I didn't ignore your response" etc. It's difficult to judge the tone of an email! :-) Neil -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 July 2002 15:46 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: RE: Public Folders Good god...you wake up on the wrong side of the bed? I was just thanking him. Nothing against anyone else. I know we all have work to do that doesn't pertain to this list. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Sorry for my not-so immediate response (work gets in the way!). What Jeremy has said is kinda my understanding, but I must admit for all my customers so far, we've implemented native mode domains and so I've avoided this problem. Neil -----Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 July 2002 15:38 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: RE: Public Folders Let me give that a whirl. Thanks for the immediate responses man. I appreciate that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Yes that's it, sorry I worded it wrong. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders When I right click on the groups. It doesn't give me an option to add the attributes only to remove them. It does give me an option to add an email address. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Add exchange attributes to the group so they show up in the GAL. Then you can add them, you can remove the email addresses after you have added them to security. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- F
RE: Public Folders
Good god...you wake up on the wrong side of the bed? I was just thanking him. Nothing against anyone else. I know we all have work to do that doesn't pertain to this list. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Sorry for my not-so immediate response (work gets in the way!). What Jeremy has said is kinda my understanding, but I must admit for all my customers so far, we've implemented native mode domains and so I've avoided this problem. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 July 2002 15:38 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: RE: Public Folders Let me give that a whirl. Thanks for the immediate responses man. I appreciate that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Yes that's it, sorry I worded it wrong. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders When I right click on the groups. It doesn't give me an option to add the attributes only to remove them. It does give me an option to add an email address. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Add exchange attributes to the group so they show up in the GAL. Then you can add them, you can remove the email addresses after you have added them to security. -----Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___
RE: Public Folders
Let me give that a whirl. Thanks for the immediate responses man. I appreciate that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Yes that's it, sorry I worded it wrong. -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders When I right click on the groups. It doesn't give me an option to add the attributes only to remove them. It does give me an option to add an email address. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Add exchange attributes to the group so they show up in the GAL. Then you can add them, you can remove the email addresses after you have added them to security. -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -----Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * __
RE: Public Folders
When I right click on the groups. It doesn't give me an option to add the attributes only to remove them. It does give me an option to add an email address. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Add exchange attributes to the group so they show up in the GAL. Then you can add them, you can remove the email addresses after you have added them to security. -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Public Folders
I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders
Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders
No, we are still in Mixed mode. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Are you running Native Mode in Active Directory? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folders
All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing site connectors
Ronald, Check out Q article Q184535 That should be what you are looking for. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing site connectors In my exchange 5.5 / ex2000 site, I have a site connector to a sister server that is no longer in-use. What is the best way to remove the connector?Is there more to it than just hitting delete on the edit menu? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
I try to blow my horn once if not twice a day. It makes you feel good. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? If I could do that, I'd never leave the house. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Yes, I do. I was just joking with Kevin. But I guess he didn't see that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? You don't? And you guys have the genome thingy? You're scaring me... > -Original Message- > From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:08 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: New Virus? > Subject: RE: New Virus? > > > Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're > good dewd!! > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: New Virus? > > > Nope. I block both those extensions. > > --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Bounceback
That would be our server that was blanked out. That was pretty funny about god doesn't except mail from mortals. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Bounceback Seems like God doesn't accept mail from mortals. What servername did you blank out? Yours or someone else's? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Bounceback All, Has anyone every seen this error message before? Currently we are in mixed mode with Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000. We have an SMTP Connector that delivers the E2K email to the internet and 2 IMS servers that deliver the 5.5 mail. Anyone have any ideas? TIA! Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: Meeting GOD Sent: 6/27/02 12:07 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 6/27/02 12:07 PM Delivery of the message required a bilateral agreement where not such agreement exists The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Company;l=E2KServer20206271606470112 ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics W: 240.453.3575 C: 301.938.6294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Bounceback
All, Has anyone every seen this error message before? Currently we are in mixed mode with Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000. We have an SMTP Connector that delivers the E2K email to the internet and 2 IMS servers that deliver the 5.5 mail. Anyone have any ideas? TIA! Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: Meeting GOD Sent: 6/27/02 12:07 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 6/27/02 12:07 PM Delivery of the message required a bilateral agreement where not such agreement exists The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Company;l=E2KServer20206271606470112 ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics W: 240.453.3575 C: 301.938.6294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Got it...testing back..did you get it? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test FAQ 1.11 --steve > -Original Message- > From: Gary Duckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Test > > > Test message please ignore > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient Policies
All, I'm trying to update my default recipient policy to add another SMTP address. But when I create new users it doesn't seem to apply the policy and create the SMTP address that I want. I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any ideas? Am I missing something here? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wal-Mart
Better make sure that those prices that are falling don't land on your Exchange server...cause god knows people need to get their jokes from their friends. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart No, but you can find cinder-block mountable ones. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Do they even make milk-crate mountable servers? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago. The pay was decent...but it's still in Arkansas. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone else worked there and what they thought about the working environment. They are switching from 5.5 to 2000. - Original Message - From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart > Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure. > Juuust curious. > > :-) > > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OT: Wal-Mart > > > Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email > system? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Log Files
Nope you wanna try the Linux list. If they don't answer your question come back and we will figure something out. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Matt Usher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Log Files I'm not sure if this is the right list. If not, please point me to an appropriate place. We have an Exchange2000 server running with SP2. The Exchange Database is on one drive (G: - RAID 5) The Exchange Logs are on another drive (L: - RAID 0) Backup Exec 8.5 installed We are running out of space on the L: drive. The logs are not being flushed. We run a daily incremental backup and a weekly full backup. After the backup finishes, the logs are not being flushed. I have looked at the Backup Exec log and the backup runs successfully, but just doesn't flush the logs. Any ideas? Pointers? Places to start? Thanks. Matt Usher _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event Logs
All, I'm getting this message in all my event logs on my Exchange servers. Does anyone know what is going on? Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: (5) Event ID: 3010 Date: 6/7/2002 Time: 8:32:21 AM User: N/A Computer: EXCHSVR Description: The description for Event ID ( 3010 ) in Source ( MSExchangeIMC ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: yahoo.com. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failure To Mount Store
The reason I think that file is corrupt cause I would get an error saying that Exchange cannot read the header of the E00.log. So that's why I'm assuming that it might be corrupt. I could be wrong. But nothing has changed on my E2K server since I've had it up. I mean nothing. The SG is local on the server to answer your other question. Thanks for the post Jennifer! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Failure To Mount Store John, I have done this on my test box. You may want to delete the directory associated with the storage group that was created initially before you create a new storage group with the same name, although it will work if you leave the old directory intact. I'd be curious to know why you can't mount the store though. Did you create the storage group and store remotely? Why do you think the e00.log is corrupt? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Failure To Mount Store But what I suggested, is that doable? Cause I don't want to spend time troubleshooting it if I can just get a quick fix like that. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Failure To Mount Store John, Read the Exchange 2000 Server Database Recovery document on the MS website.. that should get you going. -----Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002 16:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Failure To Mount Store All, Server in question: E2K server SP2 2 Storage Groups (2 mail stores) Ok, currently I'm unable to mount the store of my second storage group (which has nothing on it) It keeps giving me the error: The Database Files on this store are inconsistent. Now all the transaction logs are all present. We haven't added that storage group to our backups yet. So that's why the logs are still present. I think the E00. log it's trying to access is corrupted. Now since there is nothing on this SG can I just deleted it and re-add it to save me some time? Or if I delete this SG will there be some adverse effects? Cause If I deleted it I planned on renaming it the same name as I have it now. Will there be a problem with that? I'd like to hear what you guys/gals think. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failure To Mount Store
But what I suggested, is that doable? Cause I don't want to spend time troubleshooting it if I can just get a quick fix like that. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Failure To Mount Store John, Read the Exchange 2000 Server Database Recovery document on the MS website.. that should get you going. -Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002 16:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Failure To Mount Store All, Server in question: E2K server SP2 2 Storage Groups (2 mail stores) Ok, currently I'm unable to mount the store of my second storage group (which has nothing on it) It keeps giving me the error: The Database Files on this store are inconsistent. Now all the transaction logs are all present. We haven't added that storage group to our backups yet. So that's why the logs are still present. I think the E00. log it's trying to access is corrupted. Now since there is nothing on this SG can I just deleted it and re-add it to save me some time? Or if I delete this SG will there be some adverse effects? Cause If I deleted it I planned on renaming it the same name as I have it now. Will there be a problem with that? I'd like to hear what you guys/gals think. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Failure To Mount Store
All, Server in question: E2K server SP2 2 Storage Groups (2 mail stores) Ok, currently I'm unable to mount the store of my second storage group (which has nothing on it) It keeps giving me the error: The Database Files on this store are inconsistent. Now all the transaction logs are all present. We haven't added that storage group to our backups yet. So that's why the logs are still present. I think the E00. log it's trying to access is corrupted. Now since there is nothing on this SG can I just deleted it and re-add it to save me some time? Or if I delete this SG will there be some adverse effects? Cause If I deleted it I planned on renaming it the same name as I have it now. Will there be a problem with that? I'd like to hear what you guys/gals think. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delegation Wizard
Basically what is going on is this. We have 2 admins on the West Coast that have an exchange server out there. But since I manage the server here on the east coast it's in our Admin Group. Ok the only one that has Full Admin rights to the Org and AG is me. No one else. But all of a sudden these guys are running this Delegation Wizard and placing themselves inside the Org and AG. With no prior account in there to do this with. Now I have 2 extra accounts w/Full Admin rights in the Org and AG. I asked them how they did that and they said they just ran the Delegation Wizard. Does that clear things up? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard John, to understand you correctly lets use some examples. Fred Bloggs has not delegated rights within the exchange organisation whatsoever Then Fred just runs the Exchange system manager program and adds himself as an Exchange Full administrator at the organisation level. Please confirm this is what is happening. He is a member of what security groups? Do these groups have any delegated rights in the exchange organisation? Leo > I think you are missing the question I'm asking. They are adding > themselves without already having an account in org or admin group. > See what I'm saying? They are basically adding anything at any time. > Usually you would have to have an account already present. But there > isn't one. > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 > > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard > > > They're in the Delegation of Administration Wizard! Don't give > Exchange Full Admin rights to those whom you don't want to allow to > change permissions. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John > L. > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard > > > Ed, > > What permissions are you talking about? Cause as of now. They don't > have any permissions on the Org or the administrative group. > > Thanks, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 > > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard > > > Change their permissions so they can't do that. Security by > obfuscation is of little value. What's to stop them from asking the > opposite question and reversing what you've done? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John > L. > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Delegation Wizard > > > All, > > Is there anyway to remove the Delegation wizard that comes along with > the install of Exchange 2000? Currently we have admins that think > that it's fun to add themselves as Full Admins on our site. Can I > take care of this somehow? And what privileges do you need to add > yourself? I can't think of it off the top of my head. > > TIA, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/sea
RE: Delegation Wizard
I think you are missing the question I'm asking. They are adding themselves without already having an account in org or admin group. See what I'm saying? They are basically adding anything at any time. Usually you would have to have an account already present. But there isn't one. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard They're in the Delegation of Administration Wizard! Don't give Exchange Full Admin rights to those whom you don't want to allow to change permissions. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard Ed, What permissions are you talking about? Cause as of now. They don't have any permissions on the Org or the administrative group. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegation Wizard Change their permissions so they can't do that. Security by obfuscation is of little value. What's to stop them from asking the opposite question and reversing what you've done? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delegation Wizard All, Is there anyway to remove the Delegation wizard that comes along with the install of Exchange 2000? Currently we have admins that think that it's fun to add themselves as Full Admins on our site. Can I take care of this somehow? And what privileges do you need to add yourself? I can't think of it off the top of my head. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
