RE: PST Alternative?
Why not just store them on the server; i.e. maiboxes and do away with .pst's? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Kevin Dietz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST Alternative? I am looking for alternate solutions to using PST files. I have had numerous users come to me with corrupt files. Are there any out there? Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Internet Mail Issues
Surprisingly, I'm very pleased with my broadband vendor (chartermi, a division of Charter). After the initial setup (about 1 yr ago), I haven't had a problem. In fact, last November when high winds brought down my Elm tree which took out my phone,cable and power cables, it was the cable company that got their cable back up and running first. My only complain (minor) is when they started moving people to a different mail server AND DIDN'T TELL ANYONE! So, when I couldn't email I had to call them and they just gave me the new server's name. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues Yo. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues It's a disenheartening thought that for individual broadband access most people now have a choice between the two worst customer-service organizations in the universe, the phone company and the cable company. Crista, you don't want to hear me sing and I didn't mean to criticize you, just to point out some facts that hopefully would help you convince your client to upgrade their service so that you didn't have to jump through those hoops. But here's another useful suggestion, provided free of charge and without Airplane! references. I just Googled on Outbound mail relaying service and found in one of the first links http://www.tzo.com/MainPageServices/ProductSummaries/13_OMR.html Since Comcast seems to be blocking themselves: for $99/year, less than I pay for my personal home page, you can relay off of these guys and hopefully get out of the RBL ghetto. I'm sure they could tell you how to set your Exchange server to do it, too. I haven't used this service, I'm not affiliated with them and for all I know they sell helpless baby rabbits to Estee Lauder, but if you look at their service and some competitors you may be able to find a way to at least temporarily get the mail flowing again until Comcast can fix their BAS or your client finds another provider. As we say here in Philly, Good luck wid it. p.s.: Do you like movies about gladiators? -Original Message- From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues Hahaha... should we all get together and sing Kumbaya now? We are hosting our DNS and there is an MX record for the server, however we cannot do reverse DNS because comcast won't let us. While I agree comcast is not a 'business ISP', for nice little startups and two person home offices (my main client base) it works until you want to add a server. I suggested DSL, but it wasn't available in the area (not to mention the bandwidth you're giving up...) so you work with what you can when these things happen. As far as relaying through the comcast host, I'm trying to figure out how to set that up with authentication, but I admittedly have not had a lot of time to browse the KB and not sure it would fix it because it seems comcast IS blocking themselves because this node was found on a blacklist. We have started the proceedings for a static IP from comcast who says we will have reverse DNS ability at that time, but we'll see. In the mean time I'd still like to know if there's anything else to check in case that doesn't fix the issue. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: doubletake
I've got a 95 pound Malamute who plays chase games with my 5 pound cat. (And guess who chases who.) Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy you will ever meet. He is nothing but love. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake The dog is 150 pounds, half wolf, half German Sheppard. About the dumbest most loveable dog I have ever met. But boy does he smell... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail server Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: doubletake What does double take really do for exchange?? Yeah so I have a bit by bit copy of the store, my dog comes in and pees on my primary server, now what will double take do for me? will it change IP and Server for me to fail over? How do my users see that there is a double take server?? Any one run this or have it installed that can tell me?? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
My sentiments exactly, Erik. I think your post says it all regarding MVP's or any other certification/award/whathaveyou. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the types of consulting engagements. One such type: I want to put in a new email system. Please tell me which system from all of the major players would fit in my environment. Another such type: I've already decided that Lotus Notes is the email system for me. Please draw from your vendor-specific expertise and help me with my deployment. There are others of course. You seem fixated on the ethical problems that might arise with a vendor-biased consultant being hired for the first of my examples. In this first example, you are completely correct in pointing out the very real conflict of interest. I cannot and should not expect completely neutral recommendations from a person who markets themselves as an expert in $vendor's technology. Logic would dictate that the consultant would recommend the technology that they are affiliated with. You have completely and repeatedly ignored the possibility of the second (and IMO more frequently occurring) type. If I am already running a $vendor shop, I want to hire the best talent I can. I would expect that the best talent I can find would be familiar with $vendor technology. The decision to use a particular vendor has already been made. By me. Without any prodding or cajoling by said consultant. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics OK, I can be childish as well. You PROVE it. Prove to me that accepting gifts from vendors and then turning around to clients and providing information and services about and from those vendors is NOT a real or perceived conflict of interest. You prove that false. Prove it. It is your opinion, not a fact. Everything you cite is made up in your own mind. Again, you are mixing up fact and opinion. What you believe is not necessarily what is true. That appears to be especially true in that special place known as Deckler-Land. By the way, surrounding your claimed invitation to be an MVP, who invited you and when? I don't recall you ever offering much positive peer support in the forums, but I do recall that you were considered to be a heckler way back before Exchange was even a product with a SKU. I find it hard to believe that you would ever have been welcomed as an MVP. Care to prove this assertion as well? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics You can be offended all you want, it does not change the FACT that accepting a direct gift from a vendor creates an obvious problem with basic conflict of interest rules. I don't make these rules up all I have stated is that a real or perceived conflict exists. If the argument held no water, then there would be no reason to be offended. It's not exactly a gift. It's a recognition for a contribution pefrormed. There are, admittedly, strings attached, although there are none that I consider to be ethical issues. I completely resent your entire assertion that I am somehow unethical because I accept the title and gifts associated with being an MVP. I will defend my standards of ethics against anyone's, including your poorly defined and indefensible set. In fact, I was nearly fired from my current job because I defended ethical behavior, but the system worked and I am still here. (This was completely unrelated to anything surrounding Microsoft or MVP.) So, let's get back to the real argument. Please either (1) prove how being an MVP is unethical, or (2) go away and let this thread rest. I tire of your repeated extrapolations, digressions, and less-than-brilliant treatises. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics The flaw here is that that Cisco Certified has clearly defined things that must be met
RE: OWA - File not found when logging out
ROLMAO thanks, John, that was a good one. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - File not found when logging out You must Die for asking a Technical question rather than an ethics question on this board. :) _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pat Richard Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - File not found when logging out Greetings! We've got a client with a fairly new 2000 SBS box. Exchange SP3 and the post SP3 rollup are installed. For some reason, when logging out of OWA, the logout page (To complete the logout) is missing. The file (/exchweb/bin/USA/logoff.asp) DOES exist in the folder, it's just not displayed, with the server reporting it as a 404 error. All other features of OWA work fine (as far as I can tell - no reported issues). Anyone seen this before? I'm not aware of anyone tinkering with the server, and the IIS stuff looks ok. I've tried Googling and KB'ing this, but didn't come up with anything. Thoughts, comments, suggestions, and death threats are all welcome. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spamcop/NAT
Our Exchange server (2K) is also natted. We haven't had any problem that you seem to be having. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spamcop/NAT Hello All. I am still getting notifications from spamcop. I know the Exchange server is not relaying. The Exchange server in question is behind a NAT. Could being behind a NAT somehow make the Exchange server appear to be open relay because of the NAT translating the addresses from the outside? Exchange Servers behind NAT devices might be seeing the connection as coming from the local subnet, thereby allowing relaying. I hope I am making sense. Should I move the Exchange server out from behind the NAT? Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server
Cool site. Thanks for posting, Don. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server Looking good from network-tools.com as well... You might want to bookmark that site, it comes in very handy for the likes of these problems... -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server :) ok thanks for the help Our DNS is provided by our ISP, I guess I need to ring them and find out whats going on, we changed about a week ago and instructed they change our MX, I assume it should be fine by now? When I test it from here I get the new IP, so some servers are aware (and this is my home connection, which is on a different ISP to the corporate, so different DNS servers) Thanks again -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: 11 December 2003 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server Roh roh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server I see 62.49.146.170... www.network-tools.com sees: IP address: 62.49.146.170 Host name: mailgate.partition.co.uk Alias: no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk Your DNS is outta whack -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server Hi Don What address do you see as my MX? It should be 80.176.164.194 Thanks a lot for the help -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: 11 December 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server It's not your Exchange server if your MX record points to your FW. I telnetted to your MX and the connection failed... -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server Hi there Yeah, the public and private IPs/NAT are all setup as is port forwarding, has been working for ages, no idea why its stopped now I think over the weekend I'll move the Exchange Server outside the firewall and see what happens Anything I can check on the Exch server? thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: 11 December 2003 15:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server I'm assuming the external interface on the SW has a public IP and the internal interface has a private IP and you are attempting to NAT you connection. In the Sonicwall, under the advanced setting, you should have it setup under one-to-one NAT the public/private translation for your Exchange server. Then under Access have a rule to allow port 25 to that private address. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server Hi, Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4 Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall ProVX firewall Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine for a number of years Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the Exchange Server at all I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our mailserver successfully and send an email from there Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our Sonicwall ProVX Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate the firewall Thanks Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What ports to open
We're running fw1 4.1 and not having any trouble with OWA; using 443. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What ports to open Your firewall also needs to be able to pass WebDAV traffic. Firewall-1 and other products like it can filter out WebDAV traffic which will cause your OWA client to fall back to compatibility or netscape mode. I've even seen some cases where that would not work, either. Good luck, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What ports to open 80, 443 I think? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rsamman Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What ports to open My OWA is working from within ( locally ), but I can't access it from home What ports do I need open to have it working Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a SAN
We're also running E2K on an EMC FC4700 SAN. No problems so far and adding disk space via another LUN is a snap. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a SAN We have both IBM Sharks and EMC clarions and they both have tested very nicely, though I prefer the EMC solution due to hardware costs and more feature rich functionality. Anthony L. Sollars__ Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( office: 425.254.4845 7 fax: 425.793.6965 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a SAN Hi all We are going to be purchasing a low/mid end SAN and plan on moving our Exchange Back End Server Storage to it ... Comments? Things to read? Experiences? Choices of SAN? Thanks in advance ... Mike Wohlgemuth To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research - Steven Wright _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: System wide signature
Probably for the same reason we in I/S are being slowly pressured into it: herd instinct. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why? - Original Message - From: Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM Subject: RE: System wide signature Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook and both of these knowledge base articles say it won't work with MAPI. Anybody else have any ideas? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature Hi Greg, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327 or http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680 -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature Sorry, Running Exchange 2000 SP3 Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature What version of MS Exchange are you running? -- From: Gregory Householder Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System wide signature Hello everyone, I've been asked if there is a way to add a confidentiality clause to the end off all of our messages that are sent system wide. I know you could put it into a signature file, but I'm not sure if there is a way to set it up on the server so that all emails get it attached to it. Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line. For the whole shebang (a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back online), it came to around $5K per year. Heck, the way Trend's been upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Get your wallet ready... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
I agree with you on that point, Ben. The spam part doesn't bother me too much but the a/v does. It's a little troubling to give up that kind of control. And thank you for pointing that out. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Here's the only problem I have with ANY service like that. It means that I am relying on THEM to determine what is and is not spam, and I am relying on THEM to scan my e-mail for viruses. I don't like doing either - I would much rather be in control of both of those options. It may mean a little more work for me, but it also means that everything is customized to my environment. I doubt that there is much flexibility from them in changing the options that are already set up... Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:10 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line. For the whole shebang (a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back online), it came to around $5K per year. Heck, the way Trend's been upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Get your wallet ready... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
Really? Our price ranged from (and I haven't received an exact quote), IIRC, around $2 to $3.20 per mailbox per month. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus They must have dropped their price since we looked at them. 5k per year? They based our price on throughput.It came to 40k a year I think. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line. For the whole shebang (a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back online), it came to around $5K per year. Heck, the way Trend's been upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Get your wallet ready... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
We're a small organization (90 bed rural hospital) and our dept is, of course, small, too. Their's just 7 of us and that includes director and supervisor. But because of other duties I'm pretty much in charge of servers, email admin, patch mgmt, firewall, etc. So, part of me, said hey that's not too bad; let somebody else handle that burden. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus I thought the same at first, but they do let you manage a great deal of config. We just wanted to get a feel for what this kind of service offered. We stuck with in house. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Here's the only problem I have with ANY service like that. It means that I am relying on THEM to determine what is and is not spam, and I am relying on THEM to scan my e-mail for viruses. I don't like doing either - I would much rather be in control of both of those options. It may mean a little more work for me, but it also means that everything is customized to my environment. I doubt that there is much flexibility from them in changing the options that are already set up... Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:10 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line. For the whole shebang (a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back online), it came to around $5K per year. Heck, the way Trend's been upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Get your wallet ready... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
Trend for email and desktop a/v and we've got a budget for spam but haven't implemented it yet. That's why we met with Sprint. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus What are you running for those services now if you don't mind me asking? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus We're a small organization (90 bed rural hospital) and our dept is, of course, small, too. Their's just 7 of us and that includes director and supervisor. But because of other duties I'm pretty much in charge of servers, email admin, patch mgmt, firewall, etc. So, part of me, said hey that's not too bad; let somebody else handle that burden. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus I thought the same at first, but they do let you manage a great deal of config. We just wanted to get a feel for what this kind of service offered. We stuck with in house. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Here's the only problem I have with ANY service like that. It means that I am relying on THEM to determine what is and is not spam, and I am relying on THEM to scan my e-mail for viruses. I don't like doing either - I would much rather be in control of both of those options. It may mean a little more work for me, but it also means that everything is customized to my environment. I doubt that there is much flexibility from them in changing the options that are already set up... Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:10 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line. For the whole shebang (a/s, a/v, dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back online), it came to around $5K per year. Heck, the way Trend's been upping their maintenance fees just for a/v, it almost seems a bargain. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Get your wallet ready... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to their a/s and a/v software. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Encryption packages
You're right on that, Christopher. It's not a requirement. However, if an org does not encrypt, they do need to document that fact and why they didn't implement it. We've looked into it to a small degree but haven't started doing it (and, hopefully, won't). Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS03-046 Exchange Critical Update
I put it on the same day it was released and didn't detect any problems. (E2000 in AD env) Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS03-046 Exchange Critical Update Hello All. Anyone seen problems when/after running the MS03-046 Exchange 2000 critical update? Gonna put the patch on this weekend and would like to know if anyone had problems? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
I agree with checking with MS licensing rep however, I've never assumed that a license to use Outlook was a license to use Office but quite the opposite. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized to quote official licensing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook 2003. Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 straight to 2003. What a difference! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on our client systems. My question is... Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. Thanks Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot off the Fixes....
How did you hear about this (MS046)? I'm subscribed to MS's security bulletin service but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this patch. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes MS03-046 is listed as critical and involves somebody sending bogus data to your smtp port. In our case, the smtp port of our exchange server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus gateway and then to the exchange machine. In this scenario, the bogus smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server. If your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a hurry to load that patch. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hot off the Fixes Anyone applied these yet? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange archive
Great, thanks, Andy! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange archive Try: http://www.mail-archive.com/exchange%40ls.swynk.com/ - Original Message - From: Chinnery, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:31 AM Subject: Exchange archive Is the Exchange archive no longer available? I had a question about a subject (anti-spam products) that I knew had been answered before. I wanted to check the archive but looking at the end of some Exchange posts, where the link used to be, I didn't see any link to the archive. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
They didn't rank very high in Network World's test of anti-spam vendors, though. NWfusion has a nice table though: http://www.nwfusion.com/bg/2003/spam/results.jsp?category=Server (I've been tasked to find almost the same thing except they're more concerned about spam. We already use Trend's AV product which I swear by. Ever since we installed Trend we haven't had a virus outbreak.) Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Something from GFI? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 16:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not appear that this program will updated past its 4.5 version. The program has some nice features, but anything NAI blows, the support gets worse by the day, so I want to move on. The current setup I have is a single server that receives to WebSheild for AV scanning and keyword content filtering. Then it passes it on via port 26 to my MailFrontier for antispam scanning (both run on the same box) which then finally passes it on to the Exchange server boxen on port 25 just like usual. Here are the features I am looking for * Keyword Blocking * The ability to turn anti spam off and just use keyword blocking. * AV scanner * Ability to pass the mail on another port (such as when an AV gateway and an Antispam gateway are on the same box) * Recipient Exclusion * Sender exclusion (allow mail to pass directly from specified email addresses without scanning for content or virus's) * Originator Blocking (just dump any email that comes from specified persons) * A bonus would be that if it could do a lookup against my GAL and just dump any email for an address that does not exist * Must run on Wintel platform * Customizeable NDR's for content filtering, etc Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
From Wired.com (http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,60473,00.html): VeriSign's controversial typo-squatting Site Finder service is about to be bypassed by an emergency software patch to many of the Internet's backbone computers. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist All you base are belong to us Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist I'm surprised how quiet this group is being regarding this issue. This has potentially enormous ramifications. For one thing, this effectively breaks reverse-DNS lookups that anti-spam applications use to verify sending domains as being valid. Come on now, Verisign is masking the difference between a valid domain and NXDOMAIN for all protocols, all users, and all software. Doesn't anyone here have an opinion? Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist [My apologies for the cross-post, but this has the potential to impact just about everybody who uses the Internet...] As of a little while ago (it is around 7:45 PM US Eastern on Mon 15 Sep 2003 as I write this), VeriSign added a wildcard A record to the .COM and .NET TLD DNS zones. The IP address returned is 64.94.110.11, which reverses to sitefinder.verisign.com. What that means in plain English is that most mis-typed domain names that would formerly have resulted in a helpful error message now results in a VeriSign advertising opportunity. For example, if my domain name was somecompany.com, and somebody typed soemcompany.com by mistake, they would get VeriSign's advertising. (VeriSign is a company which purchased Network Solutions, another company which was given the task by the US government of running the .COM and .NET top-level domains (TLDs). VeriSign has been exploiting the Internet's DNS infrastructure ever since.) This will have the immediate effect of making network trouble-shooting much more difficult. Before, a mis-typed domain name in an email address, web browser, or other network configuration item would result in an obvious error message. You might not have known what to do about it, but at least you knew something was wrong. Now, though, you will have to guess. Every time. Some have pointed out that this will make an important anti-spam check impossible. A common anti-spam measure is to check and make sure the domain name of the sender really exists. (While this is easy to force, every little bit helps.) Since all .COM and .NET domain names now exist, that anti-spam check is useless. VeriSign's commentary: http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/implementation.pdf http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/bestpractices.pdf Third-party reference: http://www.cbronline.com/latestnews/d04afc52ae9da2ee80256d9c0018be8b -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Any issues with W2k RPC patch on Exchange 2000?
I haven't seen any issues when I installed it some time ago (Ex2K). Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any issues with W2k RPC patch on Exchange 2000? Has anyone applied the Blaster RPC patch to a W2k (SP3) Exch 2k (SP3) machine? If so, how did it go? Has anyone heard of any issues with Exchange 2000 and this patch? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
Yeah, Don isn't as quick as some to comment, but he can be pretty brutal when ho does. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Aye Carumba! Don, I'd hate to have you or any one of about two dozen other people on this list mad at me. I think I'd just go unplug my whole network from the Internet, if I was ever stupid enough to let that happen! :0) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. And we don't even want to get into my observation of the whole thing... FWIW Mitchell, one ought not act like an a$$ if one expects to be left alone. And I mean that in oh so many ways that you couldn't even begin to fathom... FWIW Ben, looks like you've got it covered, but lemme know if you need anything ;) -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Observation: Messages in my Exch-Swynk folder since 2003-01-15: 8278 Posts from Ben Winzenz, mostly answering questions: 68 Posts from Mitchell Lawrence, just attacking Ben: 4 'nuff said. -Original Message- From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. You are right Tony, What I should have said is: Boy what a prick, *ploink* goes the asshole. Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Boy, I am going to have to say a Rosary for both you guys. From: Lawrence, Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:56:42 -0500 What an asshole Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence Network Administrator/Systems Analyst **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Bite me. If I told you that you should run eseutil on your databases just because I think your database is corrupt, without any reasoning why I thought it was corrupt, would you? I certainly won't. John responded to my response with what seemed to be a well though out answer. You, however, seem to have no clue. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:35 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. He did seem a bit defensive didn't he? Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence Network Administrator/Systems Analyst **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I understood that you had not scanned the Exchange files with a file based AV product. However, if you have a product that runs for a long time, then suddenly stops working (locking up the server, etc) then the server starts working again when you take the product off, you should look at the points of intersection as to where a problem may have developed. In this case, your message databases. -1018 errors don't have to be recorded to have a problem inside the database. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I don't have a corrupted database. Why would you or what leads you to make that assumption? I have no 1018 errors, I have no event logs of any kind that point to any database errors. The problem has not re-occurred since removing the AV software. Like I said before, I did not have the file-level AV scanning the databases. If you are going to make a claim such as I should run maintenance, back it up with the reasons why. Not just saying you think I have database corruption. Tell me why you think I have corruption. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:46 AM Posted
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Or, if it's always sent as an attachment, PKzip v6.0 is pretty good and a lot easier than setting up email encryption. Of course, there is the hassle of zipping the file, exchanging the password with the recipient and knowing that only the attachment is encrypted. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm wrong but the easiest way in this instance would be to just encrypt the e-mail. Windows does provide CA and you can always get another certificate from a known source. Another way to go is to use pgp or some offshoot of that. I don't know but sometimes we (designers/administrators) get a little over excited using technology we don't really have to use. Well, just my 5 cents. -Patrick -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 19:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support it, TLS is an option. Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping
No problems here. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Are other people having trouble with the Exchange remote agent service stopping? We did the update to 9.0, it worked two days in a row and failed again. Thanks for any replies, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing
Some time ago (I believe it was last year), I listened to a webcast put on by Microsoft. During the Q A, one person asked the Microsoft rep what the licensing requirement would be for the following scenario: 5 Mailboxes all being accessed from 1 computer His answer: 1 license because only 1 machine was used. Which just goes to show, as had been said mb people much more experienced with Exchange than me, that it all depends on who you talk to and that you should always direct licensing questions to your Microsoft representative. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing You need to have as many CALs (client access licenses) as you do users who will connect. As far as I know each user must have their own CAL. Terminal Services works the way you're suggesting, but not this. You might not be able to buy a 5.5 CAL anymore... You may have to buy Exchange 2000 CALs (isn't there a Exchange 2003 coming out? In that case buy THOSE CALs), since a CAL is backwardly compatible. Matt -Original Message- From: Stew Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Licensing Can anyone explain how Exchange 5.5 licensing works. If we need to have 250 users mailboxes do we need 250 licenses? Is is based on concurrent users--for example if a company has 1000 mailboxes but at any point only 50 people are connected to the exchange server do you only need 50 licenses? Â Its a bit confusing, I am sure many of you will agree. We definitely want to make sure we do this the right way. Â Many thanks. Â Stew __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages
ROFLMAO I don't why, maybe because it's late in the day, but that just really hit my funny bone. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages Why not just tell them to send it to the correct SMTP address? - Original Message - From: Russell Hopkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:34 PM Subject: RE: Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages Sorry, I guess I wasn't as clear as I'd thought: We need to change the destination e-mail address for one external domain. For example, if our domain is xyz.com and one of our users ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sends an e-mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we want the message to actually go out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hope this clears up our issue. Thanks. Sure. Add the email addy to each Exchange mailbox and then set it as the default reply-to. -Original Message- From: Russell Hopkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages We have a need to change the domain name on certain outbound messages (e.g., mail going out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be readdressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I know this can be done for inbound messages, but is there any way of accomplishing this for outbound messages on 5.5? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA
Got it. I was using the Exchanges tools loaded on my computer, which is where I got the IIS admin message. When I went to the Exchange server itself, then I was able to look at the properties for the virtual server. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA No, no, no... If you set it in IIS, Exchange will come around and whack it sooner or later. This setting must be change in System Manager. Drill down through Administrative Groups, Servers, Protocols, HTTP, Exchange Virtual Server, and right click on the Exchange virtual directory. Select Properties and click on the Access tab. Click Authentication. At the bottom will be a spot for default domain. Repeat for public. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA Comes back with You must use IIS Admin to manage this Virtual Server's properties. Then there is your answer. Set the default domain in IIS -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA
NT However, reading thru Jim McBee's book, he says the user still has to put in the domain name. No big deal; just one of user education. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA How is the domain listed? Is it the NT 4 equivalent name, or is the DNS style 2000 name? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA You missed part of my message, Kevin. I also said that our domain is already listed in IIS yet users still need to enter it when logging on to OWA. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA Comes back with You must use IIS Admin to manage this Virtual Server's properties. Then there is your answer. Set the default domain in IIS -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA
Where do you input it in System Mgr? I've seen it in IIS but with our OWA, we still have to log on in the form domain\user name. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA You can specify the default Domain in IIS, or in the System manager if it's E2K. As for the syntax for user and pass in the URL -- I haven't tried it with OWA, but if it works it should be https://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA I am failing at getting a seamless login by entering the user credentials in the URL. I can get it to work on another environment w/o the domain. This environment uses DOMAIN\username then passowrd. System is E2K SP3, front-end, back-end topology. What is the syntax for entering login credentials in OWA into the URL? - John Q Jr. _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA
Comes back with You must use IIS Admin to manage this Virtual Server's properties. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA Dig down to the server object, then to the exchange virtual directory. Right click it and specify the domain. I believe you need to specify the W2K domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA Where do you input it in System Mgr? I've seen it in IIS but with our OWA, we still have to log on in the form domain\user name. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA You can specify the default Domain in IIS, or in the System manager if it's E2K. As for the syntax for user and pass in the URL -- I haven't tried it with OWA, but if it works it should be https://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Entering login credentials in URL for OWA I am failing at getting a seamless login by entering the user credentials in the URL. I can get it to work on another environment w/o the domain. This environment uses DOMAIN\username then passowrd. System is E2K SP3, front-end, back-end topology. What is the syntax for entering login credentials in OWA into the URL? - John Q Jr. _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.
We have it on a EMC 4700 and also use Backup Exec. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. Yes and No. We use a couple XIOTECH boxes and Backup Exec. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. Greetings all. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0. However, we will be upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year. We are considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN. The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software. I have two question. 1. Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 2. Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server? Comments on one or both? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Chris, I take exception to your comments in your second paragraph that the reality is that companies don't really care about protecting patient data. I work in a hospital and have met many people from other hospitals through seminars, meetings, etc. To say that we don't care is patently false. Patient confidentiality is a priority, second only to patient care. Our hospital has zero tolerance for PHI disclosure. A nurse blabs to someone about a patient and boom! she's fired. I know, I've seen it happen. The trouble with HIPAA is that they seem to want hospitals and healthcare organizations to be almost as secure as the Pentagon. Our administration hired a big name outfit to give their recomendations. I had to read through 23 documents from them. And some of them, the suggestions, were insane. One suggested (although it said it was optional) searching all purses and bags that patients or visitors to the hospital. I guess they're afraid someone would sneak in a floppy to be used to copy patient data. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT Not an expert on the science behind this essay http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403, but the idea of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the water is the only byproduct argument a bit disingenuous. Course as I said, I'm not an expert on the subject so I'm certainly open to knowing where the levels of hydrogen needed for such a thing would come from. Perhaps instead of replacing HIPPA, those companies subject to its regulations need to rethink how and why patient data would need to leave their environment and design secure systems (which e-mail aint) to facilitate that transmittal. Course the reality is companies aren't really interested in protecting patient data, just in being compliant with the various regulatory agencies which govern them. So, following the cheapest route to compliance they encounter the reality that cheap aint easy. On 2/25/03 16:06, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew somewhere we were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I should have said Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I made the statement. As far as the pollution: Fuel cells efficiently convert hydrogen fuel and oxygen from the air into electricity. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (HFCEVs) emit only water vapor from their exhaust pipes. Demonstrations of HFCEVs have been successful and this technology is expected to displace internal combustion engines in the 21st Century. Which I got from pretty much the first thing I could google up here: http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption
Security rule was published in the Federal Register on February 20. Compliance date is April 21, 2005. Like you, we're still looking at out options. I did read in Computerworld that Pkware's newest version of pkzip, I believe v6.0, uses better encryption and they feel it will meet HIPAA guidelines. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well last info I got from compliance yesterday was we got an extension til Oct 13, 2003. I hope you have better info than I do. :-) -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Actually, Mike, the finalized HIPAA security rule says that email encryption is one of the addressables. They removed it from the required section. Be that as it may, we too, are looking into email encryption. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well, basically, any information transmitted outside of our company through a public channel (internet included) has to be encrypted. Neither the specific type of, nor level of is explicitly stated. What I basically want to do is this. If anyone sends email outside of our company, I want it to be grabbed and encrypted. Decryption I would guess would have to happen at the client on the other side. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption You could have a look at MailMarshal Secure which is an email encryption and decryption gateway. It's an add-on to MailMarshal which provides content filtering, virus checking etc. Are you looking specifically at e-mail encryption or would something like transport layer encryption be sufficient? What does your security policy say? Leeann -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:25 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Exchange server level encryption
Actually, Mike, the finalized HIPAA security rule says that email encryption is one of the addressables. They removed it from the required section. Be that as it may, we too, are looking into email encryption. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well, basically, any information transmitted outside of our company through a public channel (internet included) has to be encrypted. Neither the specific type of, nor level of is explicitly stated. What I basically want to do is this. If anyone sends email outside of our company, I want it to be grabbed and encrypted. Decryption I would guess would have to happen at the client on the other side. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption You could have a look at MailMarshal Secure which is an email encryption and decryption gateway. It's an add-on to MailMarshal which provides content filtering, virus checking etc. Are you looking specifically at e-mail encryption or would something like transport layer encryption be sufficient? What does your security policy say? Leeann -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:25 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SysAdmin vocab.. t'hyuk..
Thanks, Tim. Those were great (esp Seagull Mgr). Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SysAdmin vocab.. t'hyuk.. BLAMESTORMING: Sitting around in a group, discussing why a server went down, and who was responsible. SEAGULL MANAGER: A manager who flies in, makes a lot of noise, craps on everything, and then leaves. CUBE FARM: An office filled with cubicles. MOUSE POTATO: The on-line, wired generation's answer to the couch potato. STRESS PUPPY: An admin who seems to thrive on being stressed out, whiney, and complains about stupid users all day. SWIPEOUT: An access card that has been rendered useless because the magnetic strip is worn away from extensive use. PERCUSSIVE MAINTENANCE: The fine art of whacking the crap out of an electronic device to get it to work again. 404: A completely clueless end-user. OHNOSECOND: That fraction of time after hitting Enter, in which you realize that you've just permanently erased a big database. Clipped from http://www.w2knews.com/?id=412 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Book recommendation
I found (find) Exchange 2000 Server 24seven by Jim McBee to be quite good. It's more on administering E2K rather than on installation. BTW (to whomever is readling/listening), is Paul R (I'm not even going to try the spell the last name), going to do a book on E2K? I came to rely quite a bit on his book on 5.5. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Book recommendation Can anyone recommend a good book for an E2K newbie. Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
I thought you couldn't cluster Exchange. BTW, we're running the same setup (albeit probably much smaller) and backing up using BE 8.6. We haven't run across any problems so far. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large Exchange 2000 cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its performance. Bryan Walbert agere systems Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards MS Exchange/Windows Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 610 712 5874 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
Rats, didn't work. Client access licenses exceeded. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA - http://216.87.16.88/exchange logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] with password 1234 -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Titanium OWA screenshots If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA here: http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
Thanks, Andrey. I used tester2 and got in okay. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots I just purchased a few additional licenses -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots Rats, didn't work. Client access licenses exceeded. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA - http://216.87.16.88/exchange logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] with password 1234 -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Titanium OWA screenshots If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA here: http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The SEC is killing me.
Where are you getting the separation of duties part, Eric? I haven't seen anything like that. Although there's enough there (in HIPAA) that is to turn my hair greyer than it already is. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. I don't have any SEC requirements, here its all HIPPA. And their big thing so far is separation of duties and checks and balances. Pretty soon if I need to create a mailbox I'm going to need permission from the security group. :( -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The SEC is killing me. Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 100% Active Directory 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to satisfy certain SEC requirements. The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange 5.5 server. It worked in so far as all the mail went to the mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a very good job searching it. So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it. With 50 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast. So far so good. I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to satisfy SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention? Is there a better way? Or Better Software? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendations on backing up .pst files
Why can't you just go into Autoarchive and browse to My Documents? Won't that set the path? (We rarely use it so that's why the ?) Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendations on backing up .pst files Sensitivity: Private What is the generally recommended procedure of backing up .pst files, particularly the archive.pst file? Of course Outlook puts archive.pst on the local drive. If you put it in the My Documents folder (mapped to the network), when the user synchs the file on logout they get the WARNING DID NOT SYNCHRONIZE .PST FILE! (or something like that which will freak out all but the stouthearted). They cannot leave their computer until the synchronization finishes. Since the archive is, in effect, saving space in the IS by moving those files to a separate folder, losing the archive could be pretty bad? Is archiving Outlook files not the thing to do? Should that be turned off on all users and just let the IS swell to whatever it gets to? Should I create a logoff script to backup the .pst files to a separate network share? Thanks, John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NDR when meeting accepted or declined
Exchange 2000 (recently upgraded from 5.5) with Outlook 2000 clients Originally, the HR spec would send out a meeting request. Acceptance or decline replies would always generate a copy to HR sec. Now, when that happens, the user would get an NDR saying that the HR sec name/address is not valid. Per our consultants request, I've removed all permissions from the HR spec mailbox. I waited about 4 hours after doing this and then tried the meeting request. Once again, an NDR was generated. I'm at a loss as to where to go now. Does anybody have any suggestions? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR when meeting accepted or declined
Nope, happens with no requests, too. I know what you mean, though. We had people trying to reply to an email sent before the conversion and they'd get an ndr. That was an easy fix, though. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR when meeting accepted or declined Does this happen on ALL meeting requests, or the ones being replied to that were generated before you 5.5 upgrade? I had this type of issue myself, where people would try and reply to a message or meeting request that was generated before the conversion and would get NDR's. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR when meeting accepted or declined Exchange 2000 (recently upgraded from 5.5) with Outlook 2000 clients Originally, the HR spec would send out a meeting request. Acceptance or decline replies would always generate a copy to HR sec. Now, when that happens, the user would get an NDR saying that the HR sec name/address is not valid. Per our consultants request, I've removed all permissions from the HR spec mailbox. I waited about 4 hours after doing this and then tried the meeting request. Once again, an NDR was generated. I'm at a loss as to where to go now. Does anybody have any suggestions? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aloha and thanks for the info and entertainment.
Good-bye and good luck, Don. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Aloha and thanks for the info and entertainment. To all: I have enjoyed the entertainment of this list as well as the invaluable information. My career has taken me away from Systems work and into County Administration (political stuff). I will be one of the advisors to the Mayor of Maui County and will no longer be involved with the day-to-day administration of Exchange (or any other) systems. I wish you all a healthy and happy new year. Aloha Hauoli Makahiki Hou! Don Couch Systems Administrator/Facilities Manager (for the last day!) 808-891-7915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pacific Disaster Center/East West Center 590 Lipoa Parkway Suite 259 Kihei, HI. 96753 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Size of mailbox
Thank you Craig for giving such a succint lucid description of the Exchange store. I liked it so much I forwarded it to everyone in the department to read. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Size of mailbox Keep in mind that there is no such thing as a mailbox. So, in a very real sense, it consumes little if any space. Ok, what is it. The store or more accurately the two stores are two large combined storage environments. One is used to manage inherently private stuff (mailboxes) and the other is used to manage largely public stuff (public folders). Thus the priv and pub. You will often hear them referred to as single instance stores or storage. There are several important ways to think about what is in them. Everything is only in there once. If there are two copies of something, then the second copy is either not in one of the stores, or there are multiple servers and something has been replicated due to the requirements implied by the rights (more on this below). A mailbox is a view of the contents of the two stores. A mailbox view includes the entire hierarchy of the pub store and only those items in the priv store that are assigned to the security context and mailbox that matches the user's current profile. One item mail may appear in every last view of every last valid profile, or it may occur in only one. That will depend on to whom it was sent, and how it was dispositioned in a particular view. If someone deletes and item, all that does is remove it from their view. It is not actually purged until it is deleted from all currently valid security contexts that have been linked into that store. As you can imagine, a fair number of cycles in the server are spent on internal processes that maintain the integrity of the store. There are sweeping and garbage collection activities. Obviously, the storage allocated to a mailbox view is at best and on a good day, only a theoretical value. It looks at the stored objects (including calendar items and journal entries) that can be seen in in that view, and sums them. Obviously, the sum of all views is many times greater than the total physical size of the two stores on the typical server. But it is a convenient way of looking at the contents, and encouraging someone to delete stuff that they don't really need. But equally obvious, if I send two people on the same server as me a message and both of them delete it, but I keep a copy in my Sent Items folder, nothing has been deleted and the stores do not change size. All that changed was the contents of the two recipient's views. Does that help? snipped_ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
It's funny this question has come up as I was just reading an article in Network Computing (the web site actually) dealing with comp time. For me it was an eye opener. For example, just because someone is salary does not mean they are exempt from OT pay. Another part was that comp time is not a replacement for overtime pay. If you are non-exempt, you are stilll due OT even if your employer gives you comp time. Of course, before confronting an employer you should contact the Wage and Hour divison of the Labor Department to find out for sure whether you are exempt or non-exempt. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:Durham;txkusa.org] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Well I work Local Government (city) and I am hourly. Heres how we do ours. Comp time: If you work one hour you get 1.5 hours back in return. Comp time is used before any other time that you have (annual/sick/personal day). Comp time is easier to get approved on short notice, like if you decide at lunch that you want to take the rest of the day off and you have the comp time for it, then most likely it will not be a problem. -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Nope. You have to work an EXTRA 4 hours to fix all the problems you introduced in the first 4 hours. We are professionals you know getting paid for what we do is purely a bonus! :-) -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
http://www.networkcomputing.com/1321/1321f26.html#response Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Do you have a link to this article? Brian -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question It's funny this question has come up as I was just reading an article in Network Computing (the web site actually) dealing with comp time. For me it was an eye opener. For example, just because someone is salary does not mean they are exempt from OT pay. Another part was that comp time is not a replacement for overtime pay. If you are non-exempt, you are stilll due OT even if your employer gives you comp time. Of course, before confronting an employer you should contact the Wage and Hour divison of the Labor Department to find out for sure whether you are exempt or non-exempt. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:Durham;txkusa.org] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Well I work Local Government (city) and I am hourly. Heres how we do ours. Comp time: If you work one hour you get 1.5 hours back in return. Comp time is used before any other time that you have (annual/sick/personal day). Comp time is easier to get approved on short notice, like if you decide at lunch that you want to take the rest of the day off and you have the comp time for it, then most likely it will not be a problem. -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Nope. You have to work an EXTRA 4 hours to fix all the problems you introduced in the first 4 hours. We are professionals you know getting paid for what we do is purely a bonus! :-) -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
Great post, Craig. That should be added to the faq. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it Dear Jeff, To get any value out of this list, you have to assume that massive deletes without reads is the norm. Use a rule to move everything coming in from the list to a single folder. Sort that folder by subject. Don't even try to interact with a thread without using a tripane viewer/reader. Finally, you have to accept that techies go through a number of socialization phases on their way toward becoming true experts. One of them lasts for a while after they begin to understand enough to actually start helping others. It has similarities to post adolescence. If you have ever taught classes to people in the age ranges of either middle school (12-14) or college sophomore to about 35, then you clearly understand the entertainment opportunities. But gee, in order to get to the other side of anything, one does have to pass through it. Don't worry about either offending or being offended. You will - both. It is a normal part of the journey. I get to say that, since my hair is grey and I was here before all but about three others, back when Peter first started the list to replace the original Bravehearts group, which goes back to well before Exchange was called Exchange. One other thing - it's ok to come and go. Everyone has. CD -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:jhague;rmc.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it I am sorry that you misunderstood my rants - let me explain. First - I am not directing this at any one individual in particular - your right Generally Chris and the rest of the members of this list are correct or at least informative in many of the posts I have read. Second - I really don't care if your rude - you can all be total flaming a-holes as far as Im concerned as long as you don't work in my building it doesn't bother me a bit. Third - as stated, I enjoy the banter as well and a little humor always helps to get through the day. Fourth - the person who originally posted this message did know what the term meant and is probably quite capable of installing and using the technology. It wasn't until 6 or 7 replies in that someone asked what the term meant and from that point on the whole thread just went to hell - I don't see what good came out of it. This in itself wouldn't bother me too much but its not exactly an isolated case. Fifth - Im not even going to bother with your comment regarding my abilities as an admin because im too serious as it has no relevance to one's ability to do anything except, possibly, standup comedy. (OK, so I guess I did bother...). Finally, what really strikes me as interesting is that some of you post more replies complaining about people with stupid questions than there are posts of that nature in the first place. Add to that the humorous or off-topic posts and I think the percentage of posts that are in fact Exchange related and helpful drops to somewhere around 50% or less. Furthermore, some of you seem to think that a simple (and perhaps a stupid) question wastes your time but responding to that question in a rude manner does not - I just don't get it. What bothers me about this is that I have to pour through all of this crap looking for the wisdom of those of you who have already been there and done that which is why I subscribe to these lists in the first place. As I've stated, the fun stuff is OK too but lets at least try to keep most of this stuff relevant. Jeff -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:ouwerkerk92;zonnet.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it Although some of these replies sound a bit rude to you, I would still consider some of them to the point. Really.. how would you install/maintain the usage of RBL if you don't even know what it means.. How would you be able to decide which one to use.. At this point Chris Scharff is right.. a bit rude perhaps.. but right.. At some other points he was a bit rude too but I think he was right again.. He made me laugh.. I think you're taking it to serious to be an admin.. It's a hell of a job and humor is the only way to survive. For ppl who aren't admins some of the talk on this or any other list sounds rude.. but I guess it's not that bad at all. Or perhaps I'm just working in this field to long to know how ppl should talk to each other. If the posting has something to do about pets then I'm using the delete button.. So even that button has a perpose :-) Have fun, B. At 08:42 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: Absolutely - a reply with a link or just a single word is a wonderful thing if it actually helps and folks
unknw user: possible infection?
A strange occurrence has happened in the last two days. Right around 3:50 PM (EST), I start receiving ndr's saying that a message for [EMAIL PROTECTED] cannot be delivered. There is no such user or mailbox. Trend also sends me a mail saying it's found and quarantined the bugbear virus The text message that cannot be delivered is at the end of this message. The file that is sent out is the worm_bugbear virus. I've checked Trendmicro's site for information on how bugbear propogates itself as I thought that this is possibly an infected machine. However, on the day that bugbear information hit the internet, I checked and then immediately upgraded the Trendmicro anti-virus. I've got relaying turned off and have verified it using the method described numerous times on this list. Do I have an infected desktop? I'm running Trend's Officescan on the desktop. What also confuses me is that it I start getting the ndr's right around 4 PM, EST. And just as a side note, there actually is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:00:38 -0400 (EDT) from rly-yb01.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.1] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: - Transcript of Session Follows -. The line beginning with describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --AOL Postmaster - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to air-yc03.mail.aol.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 jhaze99 IS NOT ACCEPTING MAIL FROM THIS SENDER 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unknw user: possible infection?
A!!! I hate it when I make a left-turn onto stupid. Of course, why didn't I think of that. I knew that about klez but didn't read anything about bugbear using the same MO. But I'm still real curious as to why it only hits around 4 PM. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Dflorea;privateconsulting.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unknw user: possible infection? It's Klez or a related (BugBear) worm, on a third party's PC somewhere, spoofing your address as the 'from' address. So if it bounces, it bounces back to you. Delete, Fuggedaboutit. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unknw user: possible infection? A strange occurrence has happened in the last two days. Right around 3:50 PM (EST), I start receiving ndr's saying that a message for [EMAIL PROTECTED] cannot be delivered. There is no such user or mailbox. Trend also sends me a mail saying it's found and quarantined the bugbear virus The text message that cannot be delivered is at the end of this message. The file that is sent out is the worm_bugbear virus. I've checked Trendmicro's site for information on how bugbear propogates itself as I thought that this is possibly an infected machine. However, on the day that bugbear information hit the internet, I checked and then immediately upgraded the Trendmicro anti-virus. I've got relaying turned off and have verified it using the method described numerous times on this list. Do I have an infected desktop? I'm running Trend's Officescan on the desktop. What also confuses me is that it I start getting the ndr's right around 4 PM, EST. And just as a side note, there actually is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:00:38 -0400 (EDT) from rly-yb01.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.1] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: - Transcript of Session Follows -. The line beginning with describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --AOL Postmaster - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to air-yc03.mail.aol.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 jhaze99 IS NOT ACCEPTING MAIL FROM THIS SENDER 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Are you sure about that or are you referring to MS Disk Manager and RAID5. Many SANS have luns set up for RAID on 36 or even 72 gig or larger drives. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Is there a concensus on this? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I always thought that write-back cache should be always turned off, whether it has battery or not. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
uh oh...here we go Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Thanks for the responds guys. I can see that no one here either a) actually read my posts or b) have a difficult time thinking in a rational manner. But I digress. The reason, that seemed obvious to me, that I asked the question was to have a link or something that would have taken about 10 seconds to type that would have pointed me it the right direction. Maybe this is documented on MS somewhere, I couldn't find it. I thought to myself...Hey, these guys seem pretty smart on this list, let me ask them. Boy, if I had only known...wow! Go back and read those replies that you guys wrote. They sound kind of silly huh? Just as everyone here felt the need here to critique my posts, I too felt the need to critique Ed. I thought that his reply was arrogant. It was filled with I know and you don't and I can't be bothered type of mentality, which seems to be inappropriate for a list such as this. To answer the question of why testing would not have given me a complete answer, well I thought that was a no brainner too, but let me walk you through my rational. There is obviously a difference in the logging levels, right? Well, I assumed that each logging level would expand on the amount of information logged compared to the previous level...still with me? I also assumed that there are things that ONLY get logged when certain conditions are met or only when a certain error occurs. Ok here is where I put it all together. I said to myself...I don't know what is logged at what levels; I don't want to waste time logging to much; I don't want to pick a level that might not log something I may value (again I do not know what is logged at what level). So silly me thought that asking this list would have been a good idea. Guess I was wrong. Live and learn. I was referred to this list by someone who mentioned that the people here are a great help...he forgot to mention the condescending comments that I you have to endure to get that help... Thanks for the help. Joe Rojas (For those who read this far: I know this posts is written in a condescending tone, but it seems to be the only acceptable tone here. Sorry.) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Your proposed answer would have been technically and factually inaccurate. I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since I've worked with thousands of Exchange organizations without a sheet detailing this information). Perhaps if you had a goal you were trying to achieve with regards to monitoring and reporting or something, we could provide you with a push in the right direction. But at the moment, your post appears to be nothing more than idle curiosity, in which case figure it out for yourself by testing is a more than appropriate response. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/8/2002 2:09 PM Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) I think that an answer of You know, I have no clue. would have been better :) The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give me a partial answer and I am looking for a complete one. Thanks for the attempt though! Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Try them and see. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Hi All, I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) Thanks in advance! Joe Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Haiku Friday
Well, I sent it on Friday Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Time blurred, what day this? I mean, haikus are nice, but... This is not Friday. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Long weekend on call Hospitals always awake Tourists please go home. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Long weekend is here No work, no users, no phone Just relax - and sleep. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Long weekend on call Hospitals always awake Tourists please go home. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Long weekend is here No work, no users, no phone Just relax - and sleep. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
LOL Forget the excellent and expert advice this list dispenses, this is actually why I subscribe to it. A daily dose of humor reduces stress almost as much as Jameson's. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Can you open my milk, mommy? -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related http://www.google.com/ Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant and Webmaster Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.1 Tel:+44 (0) 1344 444349 Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312 Fax:+44 (0) 207 681 1238 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/ -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 July 2002 14:43 pm To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Can someone give me the URL for Google? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related What is this Google thing you use? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=sensorsoft -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 04:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: None Exchange related Subject: RE: None Exchange related Tony, Do you have their web page or a phone number? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related We use a product by a company called SensorSoft. It's just a thermometer that attaches to a serial port. The software monitors the temperature and alerts us via pager and/or e-mail if it reaches a temperature that we define. It works great. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net -- -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
tombolian? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Problems
Shouldn't that be danger, will robinson? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Problems Danger will roger! -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Problems Mailbox Full! - Original Message - From: Farquharson, Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:26 AM Subject: Re: Email Problems -Original Message- From: MAIL-SYSTEM Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 5:25 PM To: Finn, Vincent P. Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable - ERROR REPORT - Message could not be delivered to the following recipient: Andrea.Farquharson / mime DDT1=RFC-822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; because: Unknown Non-Delivery Reason (522) What is the NDR message post it. - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Email Problems You have a pix and fixup is enabled? -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Problems Can anyone suggest how I should troubleshoot this problem? A Sprint representative corresponds via email with a few people in my company. Emails are exchanged okay initially. Then, for some reason, at times when he tries to email us, he gets an undeliverable message. This is the error report he receives: Where should I begin to try and resolve this?? Thanks! -Original Message- From: MAIL-SYSTEM Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 5:25 PM To: Finn, Vincent P. Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable - ERROR REPORT - Message could not be delivered to the following recipient: Andrea.Farquharson / mime DDT1=RFC-822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; because: Unknown Non-Delivery Reason (522) -- -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: License Issue
And, don't be too sure about them, either. On an Exchange CAL issue, our supplier said one thing and then I heard, during a MS webcast, the MS licensing specialist said the exact opposite! One of the experts on this list sometime ago (I forget who), said that whoever gives you the best advice, is to get it in writing. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: License Issue Or not, it seems after reflection Ask your product supplier. JDE -Original Message- From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: License Issue The only person who can correctly advise on licenses is... in the FAQ. JDE -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:License Issue Dear List, I have few points to discuss, 1. Can I install Exchnage 2000 Enterprise on Windows 2000 (Not Advance Server) 2. can I put one Windows to 2000 Advance server with Exchange 2000 Enterprise and put 2 site server as Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000. 3. Can I restore Windows Advance server 2000 System State backup on Windows 2000 server, if yes then, 4. Can I restore Exchange 2000 on the server. If am missing something please add or feel free to ask. Thanks and Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WALMART
I can understand that. Ludington (MI) is a small town of 12000 and where I work, the hospital, is the second largest employer. So, it's pretty usual to run into someone that works there no matter where you are. And, by the way, yes, Ludington does have all the modern amenities, too! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WALMART We have a few account reps that go there all the time to meet with Wal Mart and they said the city has really come along. THey even have a Movie Theatre now. The weirdest thing they said is that no matter where you go you see your co-workers as it is a Wal Mart built town. Work AND live together! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WALMART
Thanks. Just don't expect to visit the local K-Mart. It was one of the stores that closed. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WALMART Ludington is beautiful. We spent a weekend there last Thanksgiving. It was a great weekend retreat. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WALMART I can understand that. Ludington (MI) is a small town of 12000 and where I work, the hospital, is the second largest employer. So, it's pretty usual to run into someone that works there no matter where you are. And, by the way, yes, Ludington does have all the modern amenities, too! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WALMART We have a few account reps that go there all the time to meet with Wal Mart and they said the city has really come along. THey even have a Movie Theatre now. The weirdest thing they said is that no matter where you go you see your co-workers as it is a Wal Mart built town. Work AND live together! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WALMART
90 miles. I usually drive down there about twice a month for a show or dinner or both. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WALMART But you're not that far from Grand Rapids... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WALMART I can understand that. Ludington (MI) is a small town of 12000 and where I work, the hospital, is the second largest employer. So, it's pretty usual to run into someone that works there no matter where you are. And, by the way, yes, Ludington does have all the modern amenities, too! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WALMART We have a few account reps that go there all the time to meet with Wal Mart and they said the city has really come along. THey even have a Movie Theatre now. The weirdest thing they said is that no matter where you go you see your co-workers as it is a Wal Mart built town. Work AND live together! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovering Deleted Messages
And, if I may throw my 2 cents in... Be aware that if you do turn it on, it only works for those items that were originally in the Deleted Items folder. If a person hard-deletes a message, by keying shift-delete for example, it bypasses the Deleted Items folder. I got burned on this a while back. The user never just deleted an item, they always held the shift key down and then deleted it. They called and said they needed to retrieve an email message. No problem, I said, and told them how to recover a deleted message. Luckily, it wasn't a critical item. Check out Q178630 How to Recover Items That Don't Touch Deleted Items Folder for the procedure to recover hard-deleted items. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages That's your only option as I see it. However, I would talk to them about implementing the Deleted Item Retention after this event (all of our customers typically run about 14 days DIR). This will save you and your customer future hassles. -- From: David Stafford Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 13:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages No. Looks like they left the defaults when they loaded Exchange. My only option to restore to another machine? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages Greater than Day0? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages In outlook, tools recover deleted items, assuming you have a deleted item retention period on the server that is greater than zero days. -Original Message- From: David Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering Deleted Messages Fortunately I have not had many restore problems so I am not up to speed on the abilities of exchange to restore specific data. A customer has Exchange Server. A user has deleted (and emptied from his deleted items) a whole series of e-mails which were very important. Is there any way to recover those items. They do not message journal and I am unaware of of any other backups other than a full nightly backup of the exchange database. Can I restore that information from Last Nights backup? is there another mechanism in exchange that has a record of those messages. Thanks Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovering Deleted Messages
picky, picky :) Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages That's not entirely accurate. A hard delete simply marks it as deleted, without moving it to the Deleted Items folder. Exchange doesn't care how its deleted, it simply marks it as deleted and moves on, cleaning it up later. You do, however, have to enable the DumpsterAlwaysOn reghack as outlined in Technet to be able to recover it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages And, if I may throw my 2 cents in... Be aware that if you do turn it on, it only works for those items that were originally in the Deleted Items folder. If a person hard-deletes a message, by keying shift-delete for example, it bypasses the Deleted Items folder. I got burned on this a while back. The user never just deleted an item, they always held the shift key down and then deleted it. They called and said they needed to retrieve an email message. No problem, I said, and told them how to recover a deleted message. Luckily, it wasn't a critical item. Check out Q178630 How to Recover Items That Don't Touch Deleted Items Folder for the procedure to recover hard-deleted items. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages That's your only option as I see it. However, I would talk to them about implementing the Deleted Item Retention after this event (all of our customers typically run about 14 days DIR). This will save you and your customer future hassles. -- From: David Stafford Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 13:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Recovering Deleted Messages No. Looks like they left the defaults when they loaded Exchange. My only option to restore to another machine? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages Greater than Day0? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages In outlook, tools recover deleted items, assuming you have a deleted item retention period on the server that is greater than zero days. -Original Message- From: David Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering Deleted Messages Fortunately I have not had many restore problems so I am not up to speed on the abilities of exchange to restore specific data. A customer has Exchange Server. A user has deleted (and emptied from his deleted items) a whole series of e-mails which were very important. Is there any way to recover those items. They do not message journal and I am unaware of of any other backups other than a full nightly backup of the exchange database. Can I restore that information from Last Nights backup? is there another mechanism in exchange that has a record of those messages. Thanks Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't remember seeing anything in HIPAA that requires a disclaimer. (Although I did say in an earlier email, that we'd do it, too, because of HIPAA.) Actually, we'll do it but encrypt anything with PHI in it. Eric, I don't think a simple disclaimer will hold up under the due diligence part of HIPAA. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers We are going to start putting disclaimers on emails because HIPPA and government told us too if we want to stay in business. :\ -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers If you get a lawyer out of the office and talking like a human being, (I did this once) you get really interesting information. Like one told me once that if you create a website with all borrowed copywrited materials you should NEVER site the source of the materials in thinking that if you site the source all obligations go away. What you are really doing is giving the lawyer half of what he needs to prosecute you. (Fair use and copyright is based on knowledge of use and then the extent that the use effects the market, in a nutshell that's it). So if you steal something or want to make a lawyer work you DON'T put a disclaimer on it, that way your foreign ignorance and thus bypass the law. Not that I would ever suggestion such a thing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
At least, you guys live in bigger cities. Ludington, MI here. Small, sleeply tourist town but lots of beach. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Columbus, Ohio. U... Columbus, Ohio. -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Detroit, Michigan. Enjoying our 50 degree June summer. My golf has been cancelled 4 out of 6 weeks already. Getting ready to watch the Red Wings take game 1 of the Stanley Cup tonight. Mike Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a 1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type. Sander -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 June 2002 05:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Milwauke..the dullest tech place in the world. =20 And sleep is over rated. After all...I don't find anything so grate about my three hours a night...or day chuck -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Maui, Hawaii here. It's hot! Gotta go home now and have a nice swim in the ocean. ;-) Aloha Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I found _Mulholland Drive_ pretty darn interesting, although I think there may be laws about shipping that sort of movie overseas. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:13 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Where is everyone? Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Rented K-PAX the other day. I liked it. Can't send it to you though. Had to return it to Bockbluster. Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? B, freezing my tender portions off here in Australia :( Send warmthoh and some decent movies to watch :) Glenn. - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:35 AM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? me too LI, NY -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Wonderful Long Island, NY here... ...back to lurking -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm? -Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely=20 temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the=20 weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: stupid disclaimers
But, Elizabeth, can you cite a court cases? That was one of my questions. I've yet to read or hear about any company being excused liability simply because they had a disclaimer. However, I suppose, that if an employee maliciously forwards private company email, then a disclaimer might work. But, suppose somebody replys to a public d/l and inadvertently includes proprietary information in that email, am I then liable if I find a use for that information? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers http://www.emaildisclaimers.com/ There are several reasons why you might decide to add disclaimers to your e-mails. The reasons can be categorized into two groups: legal and marketing reasons. 1. Legal reasons If you were to be so unlucky to be sued for the contents of an e-mail, it is not certain whether an email disclaimer will protect you from liability in a court of law. However, it will certainly help your case and in some situations might exempt you from liability. More importantly, it may well prevent the actual occurrence of lawsuits against your company since the mere presence of the statement might deter most persons from seeking legal compensation from your company. Therefore the use of disclaimers is always recommended. There are 6 legal threats that disclaimers can help protect against: Breach of confidentiality: By including a disclaimer that warns that the content of the e-mail is confidential, you can protect your company against the exposure of confidential information. If the receiver breaches this confidentiality, they could be liable. Accidental breach of confidentiality: If an employee were to receive a confidential mail from someone and by accident forward it to the wrong person, the employee, and therefore the company, could be liable. This can easily happen. For instance a wrongly addressed e-mail can be forwarded to a postmaster, who might not be authorized to read the mail. Furthermore, e-mail can easily be intercepted. If you include a statement at the end of your mail that the message is only intended for the addressee, and that if anyone receives the e-mail by mistake they are bound to confidentiality, this could protect you. etc. etc. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I'm still fighting the battle of we don't need no stinkin' disclaimers. So far, I've won. BTW, has anybody ever heard if those disclaimers actually hold up in court? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Alright, alright. There. Fortunately Mailsweeper allows you to bypass by adding personalmail in the body somewhere. Are you happy? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers if it's a litmus test -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute action? -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I'm taking action on your message. I'm taking action on it right now. Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah. Tell your lawyers to get their $49.95 back from J.D.'s 'R' Us. -- be - MOS Noone ever built a statue to a critic. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Do think this was my design? Our lawyers think we need this. Like it actually performs some kind of function. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: stupid disclaimers I think I might just start blocking messages with moronic disclaimers before they even get to my system. I feel dumber just for having read the disclaimer below. This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. --- Clearswift monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy using Clearswift products. Find out more about Clearswift, its solutions and services at http://www.clearswift.com This communication is confidential and may contain privileged
RE: stupid disclaimers
I probably will, too. Especially, now that HIPAA privacy regs have been published and will go into affect next year. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I lost... They said it gives them a good foundation to any lawsuit. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I'm still fighting the battle of we don't need no stinkin' disclaimers. So far, I've won. BTW, has anybody ever heard if those disclaimers actually hold up in court? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Alright, alright. There. Fortunately Mailsweeper allows you to bypass by adding personalmail in the body somewhere. Are you happy? Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers if it's a litmus test -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute action? -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I'm taking action on your message. I'm taking action on it right now. Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah. Tell your lawyers to get their $49.95 back from J.D.'s 'R' Us. -- be - MOS Noone ever built a statue to a critic. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Do think this was my design? Our lawyers think we need this. Like it actually performs some kind of function. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: stupid disclaimers I think I might just start blocking messages with moronic disclaimers before they even get to my system. I feel dumber just for having read the disclaimer below. This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Job opportunity
Maybe because they don't just sell them in the US? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Job opportunity Why do the Italians develop a car that can do 175+ MHP on American roads where the speed limit is 55 MPH? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Job opportunity Why do people invent such perversions? -Original Message- From: Evan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Job opportunity Hello Folks, My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. I am currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone who can architect an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. There will be an application that reads/writes data to Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts to present the outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data to local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The clients intention is to have a process running, or activity triggered from Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would send the changes to the Exchange copy of that record. To keep the two sets of the same data in Sync. A wrinkle arises in that on the Exchange side, a given record may be in mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract position and I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this in further with you, if you have these skills. I look forward to hearing from you Best Regards, Evan 212-944-4488(work) 516-991-3908(cell) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Upgrade question
Jumping in... That, support going away, was a major selling point for us to get our servers moved to Win 2000. (Actually, we also told them that our servers probably would be too slow to run 2K, so we're gettting new servers, too). It's crazy because our users are complaining about how slow the system is now. Yet, our selling point was support ending. Oh, well. I guess whatever convinces them as long as it's honest. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question The last thing you want to hear, when or if you need it, is Dude, you are so not supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Bryant Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question If its not broke you don't need support so who cares if support is available? Eventually the increased functionality may be of value to the higher ups, after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a bonus. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 E5.5 are closer to becoming non-supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any way. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
Well, here's an interesting solution my boss sent me: He included the total for the first column (21) to the list of the numbers by moving the '2' to right below the one. This then adds 3 (2+1) to the first column giving a total equal to the second. 2 8 3 1 7 2 1 Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday RAA! Yeah, I'm stupid. Thanks:-) -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday turn the 9 upside down -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday Help would be greatly appreciated. -Original Message- From: Jerig, Tony Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting HPM. Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the office while I am out. Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer gets the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's lodging. Quiz #1: Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you move just one number to make the totals equal? 2 8 3 1 7 21 6 4 5 9 24 Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. T. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
ROFLMAO I also subscribe to a listserv that relates to HIPAA issues (hippalive). And it is s dull and some of the posts from some users are more in the nature of see much I know. Besides the excellent support and advice I get (when I remember to pose the question properly including all the research I've done), the off-the-wall comments always make it an enjoyable read. I've been subscribed for a few years now and, sadly, it does seem that some of the experts (like the ED's) are less likely to appear. Cthulhu left, too. sigh Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! Not on a first date I don't -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Dang right, you're disfunctional with Clockwork Organge being one of your favorites. I didn't care for a bit; although Malcom McDowell (sic?) was good in it. Now, if you're looking for a favorite off-the-wall movie,I'd vote for Being John Malcovich. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question 2001 A Space Odyssey Clockwork Orange Full Metal Jacket Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke. But there's no Monty Python, so... 1. Dogma 2. Apollo 13 3. 12 Angry Men They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this, though... - Original Message - From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: RE: Cerification question Go on, tell us, and we can put it to the test :-) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question That is so not fair. I doubt that my three favorite movies would endear me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say, neandrathal, in their choices. M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
totally OT:Ed Crowley
Does anybody know what happened to Ed Crowley? It just hit me that I haven't seen any posts from him for a long time. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: List or one of its members has some BAS
Oh, thanks, Eric. I read that message over an hour ago and I still that can't that friggin' phrase out of my head. It's reduced my productivity from its normal 30% to less than 20%. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: List or one of its members has some BAS Lifeforms! Happy little Lifeforms!! -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: List or one of its members has some BAS Perhaps someone changed his internal chip. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: List or one of its members has some BAS Wow Bruce, I didn't know you used slang words like ain't. This is like hearing Data use a contraction when he speaks! ;) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: List or one of its members has some BAS Importance: High It ain't just you .. Martin - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:14 PM Subject: OT: List or one of its members has some BAS My two recent postings to this list triggered two resubs to the Exchange list, and a sub to a fscking food ezine? I can't imagine how annoying this is for a regular list contributor... Can a list moderator please fix this Don Ely Broken-Ass sh!t? /Don Ely Exhibit 1: Re: your subscribe request subscribe Sorry, but the email address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is already a member of 'exchange'. Because you are already subscribed, internet.com did not subscribe you again. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% Exhibit 2: Re: your subscribe request subscribe Sorry, but the email address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is already a member of 'myfooddirectory'. Because you are already subscribed, SparkLIST.com did not subscribe you again. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exhibit 3: Re: your subscribe request subscribe Sorry, but the email address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is already a member of 'exchange'. Because you are already subscribed, internet.com did not subscribe you again. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% Exhibit 4: Thank you for registering for the MyFoodDirectory.com newsletter. You should receive your first newsletter within the week. We welcome your comments and suggestions about the newsletter and the site. You may contact us any time at: http://www.myfooddirectory.com/contact.cfm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: best practice
ROFLMAO That's great! I love it! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice Yea, If I was renovating my entire domain I wouldnt make any backups beforehand either... -Original Message- From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice What a fine advertisement you would make for Microsoft. Never backed up the system and it works fine - what a brave fellow you are. :=) -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice well, they want it all to be kept, euhhh for backups I don't do anything at the moment as I'm awaiting a renovation of our entire domain (hardware)... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice A year ago? I would consider that an unrealistic request. If our email policy addressed this need, I might restore an old backup from the time to a recovery server. If the destination is internal, I would assume it delivered. If it's external, there is no way to know. William -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice do anyone of you ever get asked that a mail of a year old has actually been delivered to a destination? I don't have those logs anymore... -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice I like keeping Exchange logs at least until I run a full backup ...:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 09:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: best practice Hi, looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs, * how long do most of you keep your logs * how do you keep them (tape, CD, on the server) ... thanks, Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Virus Question
I got four this morning. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question You only got one? I got 20 all telling me I had sent them different virus's. They have a fsked up Antigen setup or something. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question This morning I received the following e-mail: -Original Message- From: ANTIGEN_PELLIG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:55 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Antigen Notification:Antigen found VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus Antigen for Exchange found Body of Message infected with VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus. The file is currently Cleaned. The message, RE: SMTP message size limits, was sent from Christopher Hummert and was discovered in PINK, Nathaniel\Inbox located at FPM Netops/FPMMAIL/PELLIG. -End of Original Message- Now I've checked around and I've failed to find any information about this virus, furthermore even with our most recent updates to Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition it didn't find anything either. Does anyone thing this is something I should worry about or does anyone know what this virus is? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delivery to non-existant mailbox
Exchange 5.5 sp2; clients are Outlook 2K To put it simply: Shelly has been replaced with Karen. Renamed Shelly's NT account and mailbox to Karen. Now, whenever someone uses the meeting planner to invite Karen to a meeting, Karen gets the request but the sender receives an NDR saying it can't deliver to Shelly. It's like Exchange is sending the request to both Karen and Shelly. This isn't the first time we've done this but it is the first time we ever had this happen. I can d/l the mailbox data to a .pst and recreate the mailbox but I'm wondering if I do that if the problem will go away. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: delivery to non-existant mailbox
Bingo! That was it. Thanks a lot, Jim. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: O'Conner, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: delivery to non-existant mailbox Check Outlook (Tools-Option-Delegates) to make sure no delegates are listed that reference Shelly. --jim -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: delivery to non-existant mailbox Exchange 5.5 sp2; clients are Outlook 2K To put it simply: Shelly has been replaced with Karen. Renamed Shelly's NT account and mailbox to Karen. Now, whenever someone uses the meeting planner to invite Karen to a meeting, Karen gets the request but the sender receives an NDR saying it can't deliver to Shelly. It's like Exchange is sending the request to both Karen and Shelly. This isn't the first time we've done this but it is the first time we ever had this happen. I can d/l the mailbox data to a .pst and recreate the mailbox but I'm wondering if I do that if the problem will go away. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: delivery to non-existant mailbox
Will do. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: delivery to non-existant mailbox Don't rename accounts, just delete them and create new ones. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: delivery to non-existant mailbox Exchange 5.5 sp2; clients are Outlook 2K To put it simply: Shelly has been replaced with Karen. Renamed Shelly's NT account and mailbox to Karen. Now, whenever someone uses the meeting planner to invite Karen to a meeting, Karen gets the request but the sender receives an NDR saying it can't deliver to Shelly. It's like Exchange is sending the request to both Karen and Shelly. This isn't the first time we've done this but it is the first time we ever had this happen. I can d/l the mailbox data to a .pst and recreate the mailbox but I'm wondering if I do that if the problem will go away. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
Now wouldn't you feel bad if he does just that. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Ports ! Get rid of that firewall. It just adds another useless level of complexity. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cooking.com Replies?
I gone one although it was in response to a post to the NT 2000 list. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cooking.com Replies? Yeah I'm getting them to. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cooking.com Replies? Is anybody else getting automated replies from Cooking.com everytime they post to the Exchange list? Also, on my previous thread, Martin Blackstone said, In IIS on the OWA server, you could also set the default domain. Then everyone would just get a Username and a password box. I went to the KB and found an article that seemed to tell me how to do this. But to do it you have to enable Basic Authentication. I don't want to do that. Is there another way? Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
That'd be cool. Except here in the state, NBC would be most of the time talking about the competitors backgrounds and history of the sport rather than actually showing it.Come to think of it, they do that now. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday How interesting To have broad sword Biathlon Now that's a sport, eh? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Haiku Friday Full contact Biathlon should be interesting as well. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Great idea Ed! Full contact figure skating No silver or bronze. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's not the judges It's the whole screwed up system Nobody's impartial Better idea Eliminates all bias: Battle to the death Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What a big joke Canadiens really got robbed Sack the bad judges! And give a second Gold medal to the great pair To whom it belongs Jamie Sale and David Pelletier are The real winners here! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday In figure skating A judging controversy Who'd have imagined? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Christensen Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Watch the Olympics Drink plenty of beer, and cheer Glad Friday is here! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Recover Deleted items .... Missing presumed dead !
Andy, I thought you had to do a reghack to be able to recover items that were deleted from folders other than Deleted Items. At least, that's what I had to do and I use O2K. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! Whoa. Step Back here. The DumpsterAlwaysOn thing allows you to recover items that have never touched the Deleted Items folder, i.e., they were hard-deleted. As long as you have at least version 8.03 of Outlook and are have set up your Exchange Server correctly, you should have the choice on the toolbar to Recover Deleted Items from the Deleted Items folder. (With the DumpsterAlwaysOn value, the Recover Deleted Items choice is enabled in all the folders - Outlook 2k and above - w/o it its only enabled when you are in the Deleted Items folder). -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! Apparently it is always on for deleted items anyway, you just need to add the key to be able to recover contacts etc ? I should clarify that the option is not even on the toolbar ! -Original Message- From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! No, but I was thinking that maybe you entered it incorrectly , i.e not as a DWORD or misspelled it etc... One other thing: What items are you trying to recover? Before Outlook 2000, you can only recover deleted items with the DumpsterAlwayson value from mail-type folders and not from the Contacts, etc... -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! I know where the key goes in NT4, is it different in W2K ??? -Original Message- From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! Are you sure you entered the DumpsterAlwayson Entry correctly and in the right spot in the registry? -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! I am using OL 97 on all other systems and it is avaliable t only happens when I use a W2K client ! -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! I think the option to recover deleted items was only added with Outlook 98. -Peter -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! All I have posted this problem before and the only answer I got was to ensure that the dumpsteralwayson key was set in the registry ! This key is set, but it still dosent work ! I have a problem where as I cannot recover deleted items using Outlook 97 on a W2K workstation (the option just isn't there !). I get the option from any other machine (NT4/98) and therefore can log into one of those to recover the items, however does anyone know why this should happen ??? (Server is NT4 SP6a, Ex 5.5 SP4). Regards Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This
RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption
We're thinking of not even sending PHI through email just to avoid the hassle of encryption. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption We are in the HealthCare so we would have to implement this either we like it or not. It's not mandated right now, but we are in the process of doing research to find out what it takes to secure our email. Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption Encryption is Rearranging data bits. You really want what? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook e-mail Encryption Hello! Can anyone give me advice on email encryption? I have been reading about Verisign product to secure emails, but I am wondering what other options are there. What kind of things you I should watch out for. What kind of obstacles you ran into to implement. And so on. Server: Exchange 5.5 Client: Outlook 2000 (Mixed with SP1 and SP2) Any advice will be greatly appreciated... Thank you, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Experience poll 20,000 users
I actually do work in a small shop. 250 notes plus 20 servers and around 300 users. There's only seven of us in the department, including the director and supervisor. So, I get to wear many hats: email admin, network admin and, sometimes, hardware support. I tend to try to gravitate towards the VPN and security side though; much more interesting that swapping out a hard-drive or keyboard. The unfortunate side is that our Exchange (5.5) is pretty vanilla. I don't get to work much with all that fun stuff you guys (and gals) get to. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Experience poll 20,000 users Ed come to think of it I used to know someone in the company and they did mention that. What they want is someone to do the day to day admin. stuff (what ever they think that is), while they migrate from 5.5 to 2000. Would love to involved with that project. Nice to put on the old resume. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:02 PM Subject: RE: Experience poll 20,000 users I would say that all differences are strictly arbitrary. In fact, working at a 20,000-person company (or even larger) might give you LESS relevant experience because administrators are often less broadly exposed to their environments. For example, in some large environments, an Exchange 2000 admin may hardly touch Active Directory. It's silly, but they're so big, they erect arbitrary walls. If you work for a 500-person company, you might do everything from Exchange to workstation motherboard swap-out. If I were hiring, I'd be looking for the best candidate instead of some arbitrary hoop. It could be that the 20,000-seat experience requirement is a restriction which has the purpose of getting their own internal person promoted. It's a common tactic in large companies that have policies about posting job openings to so severely restrict the qualifications that only someone who's already there qualifies. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Experience poll 20,000 users I recently applied for a job which requires experience with at least 20,000 users. The job would be as a Exchange Admin. , part of a team. They said I have all the qualifications except no 20,000 environment experience. Even though over the past 5 years I have had experience at sites ranging from say a few hundred to 7,000, it seems its 20,000 experience or nothing. I was curious as to how many here have experience with 20,000+ and what is the real difference between say 5,000 and 20,000 except for more servers, more connections and more users, hence more calls? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Terminal Server Security
Dennis, Maybe I missed this somewhere, but I thought I read in the TS docs that it had limited encryption capability. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Terminal Server Security Open only port 3389 and require High security. The usual mumbo jumbo about keeping up to date on security patches is a must! Denny At 03:52 PM 2/1/2002 -0500, Phil wrote: Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first. So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on the Internet Directly I miss spoke, I do want a firewall in front but I want to be able to connect to the terminal services from the internet directly. What do you think... - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 15:24 Subject: RE: Terminal Server Security Why the need for the Terminal Server in the first place? -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ot: Terminal Server Security I want to put a terminal server on the internet directly. What kind of precautions do I need to do in order to secure the box? I mean that I do not want to have people VPN into the network first. What are the security holes associated with doing this? When people lob in is it sent with plain text? Thanks! _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. === = == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose
And Trend reports it as: WORM_MYPARTY.A virus was found in attachment www.myparty.yahoo.com, ScanMail has moved the attachment to C:\Program Files\Trend\Smex\Virus. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose Maybe cause the payload looks like a weblink? When Nemix reports, it shows as: === The message contained 1 virus(es): www.myparty.yahoo.com infected with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] virus - - - === Your guess is as good as mine. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose I am also blocking *.com on our SMTP Scan Job for Antigen but this attachment slipped by. Luckily the user who got suspected something and called us. I have updated the virus engines running on our Antigen but I am curious why the attachment blocking didn't work? Any IDEAS? Saul This one slipped by our *.com file matching as well... actually it's been a little hit and miss... some were caught but others were not stopped until we installed the defnition file--We're running Antigen with the Norman def. I'm still seeing weird stuff some seem to be getting through he IMC scan and making it to the store and getting disinfected there. That's the first time I've ever seen that. Very odd indeed. Most that are being caught are by the virus definition--because generally we just get the *.com type block message. Wonder what's going on here. Fortunately we run something different on the desktop--and it had updated through the night. Josh Harmon -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose Somehow this one slipped past our .com filter on our linux firewall. NAV for exchange caught it by the .COM extension, and norton had just liveupdated us an hour earlier with the new definitions that would have caught it if it wasn't a blocked extension. I think the syntax of the attachment code is probably not RFC compliant. Tom -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose Fortunately we're all blocking *.com right? The *.com viruses are going to take forever to combat from a social engineering standpoint. It's probably worth investing some time in user education on .com files because I think this is going to be a new favorite virus writing style for the next few months. Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.mail-resources.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 1/28/2002 7:57 AM Subject: FW: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose -Original Message- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 5:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose Be aware that this morning you will likely find a copy of this new mass mailer in your mail systems. This is a pure social engineering attack, it contains an attachment named as a URL with a .com extension. Since .com is also an application, it will be run as such if its double-clicked on. Check with your AV company for updates and/or filtering criteria. If you can, be sure you have attachment filtering enabled at your mail gateway. Outlook Email Security Update, and Outlook 2002, both catch this attachment and prevent it from being available for the user to click on. Cheers, Russ - Surgeon General of TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article
I only have a limited number of users with login scripts. Many of the users in the cliniical areas rarely logoff or reboot their computers so the use of login scripts woulnd't help. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article Do you put the Officescan info in your logon scripts as well? I have found doing that ends the issues with pushing updates. One way or another, the client gets it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article Well, that's coincidence. I had the same reaction yesterday, too. I still think, though, that their Scanmail product is much that Officescan. I've had it just stop pushing updates to some desktops for no particular reason. So, I end up having to go to the machine and uninstall and reinstall the product. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article I was a little startled yesterday when I hit my server and the whole UI had gotten updated. Much better though. Sometimes Auto updates can be frightening. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article It already has been Do a manual update and tell it to update the server files as well. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article The article states that this is fixed in 5.0. Which, by the way also says it will be released in a couple of days. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article Does this affect version 5.0? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article Yeah, but it says the bug is fixed with a patch from Trend. I assume everybody will be keeping their AV products up-to-date. Still good article. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article good article, but it appears to only affect Office Scan...I wonder if Scan Mail has the same vulnerabilities? -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article Hi there If you're using Trend Micro, take a look at this article. Thanks Russell http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-819807.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
RE: OT help...
And moving it may not help at all. I've got it on a separate machine and have experienced similar problems. Trend's tech support's only suggestion was to remove and reinstall the client program on the client machine. I use their Scanmail av and love it but their Officescan product is not up to the same level of quality. Their gui also leaves a lot to be desired. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT help... Moving it to another machine after you have your clients installed is a MAJOR PITA. Be sure to talk to tech support first. They have some documentation to follow. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT help... I have only just installed it I will put it on a dedicated machine, see what it does... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January, 2002 8:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT help... Is this all the time, or just this new update? Have you checked on how to manually do it? There is a doc on their tech support that tells how to do it. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT help... NT4 network, OfficeScan HTML interface, setup done completely by the book, only thing I think might be a problem is that I have installed it on an Exchange server? It recognises the clients being installed but when I want to push out the initial update it doesn't recognise any of the domains... Kim -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January, 2002 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT help... Well, from the amount of detail you provided about your environment etc. I would guess that you are having a problem with something :-) More detail? -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 13, 2002 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT help... I can't get Trend Office scan updates pushed out... It recognises the clients but doesn't give a list to push the updates to... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: life cycle of Exchange
Thanks, Craig. My director were discussing the security issue, too. With HIPAA's security rules soon to be published, this is another stick we can hold over administration's head. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: life cycle of Exchange There are multiple reasons. All of the best ones (i.e. most compelling) revolve around security. It's getting to the point where it is difficult to find a way to penetrate a company's defenses attacking things in layer 6 and below. Wireless is a temporary exception, but most attacks are now launched in the application layer, and most of those are focused on e-mail. The reason that people use e-mail should be obvious: - you willingly accept bits from outside, so long as they meet certain criteria. - mail clients are supplied as a part of every version of Windows and have enough similarity to make a virus type of attack easier to proliferate. - because of the variability of attachments, the level of complexity and thus the chances that an undefended hole can be found are both very high. There are lots of way to envision attacking via e-mail. Most will be client-centric, but attacking the servers is not an unimaginable scenario. What a messaging product that is currently supported by the vendor buys you is a rapid response to security issues that are frankly guaranteed to arise. Just to protect yourself, it is an absolute necessity of life on the net to keep your product in a currently supported by the vendor state. That only leaves one question, what is the best strategy for moving it forward? There is no one right answer. If you are a large enterprise that is guaranteed to be hit by every virus that comes along, then you need to keep current with every hot fix that comes along, and you need to rev through each version so make sure that you are getting the most rapid response to hot fix requirements that might arise. If you are smaller, then this is probably unnecessary. However, there is another issue. Generally speaking, and this is a very broad and unspecific generality, the migration tools are easier to use and the chance of a system administration induced data loss event are minimized if you make routine small incremental steps that are a part of your regular activities. The more infrequently you do something, and the more rev levels that you skip, the greater the chance is that you will make a mess of it. What you want are consistent processes, not irregular fire drills. Fire drills will cost you more than you will save by not having a routine. Long ago I stopped believing in using backup tools as a means of recovering from data losses. In my experience, there are really only two common causes of data loss: 1. the deliberate actions of users that are not well thought out 2. sys admin mistakes in performing a fire drill restoration This is not to say that you should not be familiar with backup tools, nor that you should not use them at all, but you should recognize that they have a limited value, and tend to be more useful for hardware upgrades than almost anything else. What, you might ask, has this digression on backup have to do with keeping a mail system current? Let's say you are now two versions behind, quickly on the back of an envelope list all of the steps that you are going to perform when you do get around to your next upgrade. I think the point of my digression will become obvious . . . -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: life cycle of Exchange We all know that Microsoft has announced the planned end of support for NT 4.0. I know they had a link which listed life-cycles of various products but I can't seem to find it anymore. I've search under life-cycle, product life-cycle, etc, etc. Does anybody have a link or can tell me any planned end for support for Exchange 5.5? We're trying to convince administration to replace our servers and move 100% to Windows 2000. They, of course, ar balking at it so we're coming up with every, stinkin' little bit of reason we can. For some reason, just saying ...cause we believe it's a good idea... just doesn't seem to be an acceptable argument. Thanks, Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: Client Access Problem
LOL After seeing the fourth post, I just knew steam was starting to come out of your ears! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Client Access Problem For the love of god Stop sending the same friggin message with a different subject! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Client Access Problem I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server from IE 3.01 to 5.5 Sp2. I don't really understand this but clients are able to connect internally (including VPN) and through OWA. However when I try to connect through the internet, it is failing with Unable to open your default email folders. The microsoft Exchange server is unavailable. Network problems blah blah blah. The firewall is currently open to any (wide open). and when I check the syslog connections are being established. I'm at my wits _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by?
I usually carry a network cable with me. Which tells them I'm either a) fixing a network problem or b) on my way to an SM party. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Be sure when walking through the office to always have a piece of paper in your hand. Look serious and keep referring it to it as you walk. -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Easily counteracted by HHCLB [1] [1] Here He Comes--Look Busy -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? I've mastered sleeping with my eyes open. I only wake up for the daily lunch time Unreal Tournament slaughter. Today I'm employing my favorite manager technique, MBWA [1] [1] Manage By Wandering Around -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Don't jinx it. The mangers are sleeping. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Sure is quiet today. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
