RE: doubletake

2004-01-09 Thread David, Andy
Yes, and all their names as well! 
 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

Do you want to see pictures of my 257 cats?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

Cool. A dog thread.
 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy
you will ever meet. He is nothing but love.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

The dog is 150 pounds, half wolf, half German Sheppard. About the dumbest
most loveable dog I have ever met. But boy does he smell... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail
server

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: doubletake


What does double take really do for exchange??

Yeah so I have a bit by bit copy of the store, my dog comes in and pees on
my primary server, now what will double take do for me? will it change IP
and Server for me to fail over? How do my users see that there is a double
take server??

Any one run this or have it installed that can tell me?? 

Thanks. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm

RE: Exchange 2003 backups

2004-01-09 Thread David, Andy
You should be able to backup a pst after (30) minutes of inactivity.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;222328

 

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups

Matthew, you will find that the PST=BAD has become religious dogma on this
list. In reality, PST files are just another tool, and much like any other
tool (inclined plane, fire, chainsaw, etc) they are neither inherently good
nor evil.

On the other hand, while PST files can serve a useful purpose, they are
definitely in the chainsaw category of tools. They can be handy for some
situations, but they need respect, and users of PST files must understand
their limitations.

PST files cannot hit the 2GB file size. If they do, you will corrupt the
PST, and will need a special recovery tool to get back SOME of the data in
the PST. I have heard rumors that the corruption can occur well before the
2GB mark, so we tell any of our PST users to stay below 1GB.

PST files cannot be backed up while they are open. Any users we have with
PST files run a startup script that zips their PST to a file server[1], then
runs Outlook after the zip is done.

You, as the email admin, have no visibility into these PST files. You
cannot, for example, use exmerge to delete infected emails as you could if
they were in the store.

 
[1] The argument could be made here to remove disk space from the file
server, add it to the exchange server, and don't use the PST file. This
certainly should be done if possible, but isn't always practical.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Joyce
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups


yes, this is my concern.
The main part of my question was what to backup and how often. ...and
retention setting for mailboxes and deleted items.

I need to figure out a robust policy which won't need tobe changed 6 months
because of store bloating.

Import all those PSTs is just not something I'm prepared to do.


I can see, that had I not used PSTs and used bigger mailboxes (not something
I could have done, predecessor, etc) then staff would be forced to managed
their mail better.



Matt


--


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
 Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
 
 
 Really big hard drives is how we do it.
 
 Our users keep the mail they need and are encouraged to dispose of the 
 mail they don't need.  Occasionally they do.
 
 Of course, we have the luxury of having an abundance of storage space 
 on our Exchange servers the bigger challenge is the effect those large 
 information stores can have on backups and restores.
 
 -Ben-
 Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information 
 Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Erick Thompson
 Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
 
 I'd recommend a public folder. That way, not only do you have
 access to email from years ago, but all users (with correct 
 permissions) have access, instead of only the user who has it 
 in a PST.
 
 Erick
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Matthew Joyce
  Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:35 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
  
  
  This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they considered bad ?
  
  How else can I give users access to email from 2 years ago
 ? yes, they
  do need to access these.
  
  What do other organisations do ?
  
  Matt
  
  
  --
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve 
   Molkentin
   Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:30 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
   
   
   PST = Bad.
   
   themolk.
   
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 backups


Hi,

I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. It is a 
single server setup.

I used to use BackupExec+Exchange agent to backup to a DLT.
   The stores
and the individual mailboxes were backed up daily and
  every week I
would stop the services and do a full backup.

Before I rush out an pay Veritas for the license upgrade, I 
thought I would revue the situation.

Some background info...
The server has 100gb of raid5 diskspace.
There is about 125 mailboxes, I expect this to continue
 to rise to
 

RE: Exchange 2003 backups

2004-01-09 Thread David, Andy
That's why E2003 handles them so well.
 

-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups

Err, Outlook 2003 has the ability to handle PST files in excess of 2Gb.
Exchange itself doesn't know or care about PST files.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta
Sent: 09 January 2004 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups


Exchange 2003 pst files larger than 2gig are possible I believe.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



RE: Disabling Outlook access to Exchange 5.5

2004-01-09 Thread David, Andy
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;146764
 

-Original Message-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disabling Outlook access to Exchange 5.5

Is there a way to block Outlook users from connecting to an Exchange 5.5
server? We are moving users from one server to another and want to block
them from logging into their mailbox on the weekend.


Ralph Elmerick
NT  Exchange Administrator
Information Systems Technical Principal 
 
 



**
PLEASE NOTE: The above email address has recently changed from a previous
naming standard -- if this does not match your records, please update them
to use this new name in future email addressed to this individual.

This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



RE: unhold

2004-01-09 Thread David, Andy
DeThong
 

-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unhold

Unhold


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



RE: RPC over HTTP

2004-01-08 Thread David, Andy
Do you like it with eggs? 
Do you like it with ham?

 

-Original Message-
From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP

I did like rpc.mydomain.com
I still can not contact the server.

Eric


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP

What do you mean by that?  There are no special DNS records that need to be
created other than an A record in your externally-accessible DNS...
Are you referring to something else?


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner  White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday,
January 08, 2004 11:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: RPC over HTTP
Subject: RPC over HTTP



To publish you Exchange 2003 server on the Internet for HTTP, how should
your DNS look to contact it?

I think I have done the pre-install Server 2003 configs and Exchange
2003 configs too.

Eric

 





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



RE: doubletake

2004-01-08 Thread David, Andy
Cool. A dog thread.
 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy
you will ever meet. He is nothing but love.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

The dog is 150 pounds, half wolf, half German Sheppard. About the dumbest
most loveable dog I have ever met. But boy does he smell... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail
server

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: doubletake


What does double take really do for exchange??

Yeah so I have a bit by bit copy of the store, my dog comes in and pees on
my primary server, now what will double take do for me? will it change IP
and Server for me to fail over? How do my users see that there is a double
take server??

Any one run this or have it installed that can tell me?? 

Thanks. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



RE: Internet Mail Issues

2004-01-07 Thread David, Andy
Stop calling me Shirley!
 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues

Who is Shirley Comcast?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of East, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues

Shirley Comcast will allow you to relay your outbound mail through their
MXed, reverse-DNSed mailhost, right? If so, just point your Exchange server
to relay all outbound mail through them.

If not, ditch Comcast. They're not a business-class ISP in my opinion, at
least.

--
be - MOS

Replace repetitive expressions by calls to a common function.


 -Original Message-
 From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:51 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Internet Mail Issues
 
 
 I have a client who is migrating away from an ISP hosted POP mail 
 account to a newly created exch 2003 box and we're experiencing 5.5.0 
 smtp;550 Dynamic IPs/open relays blocked. Contact 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], 5.5.0
 smtp;550-68.37.144.103 blocked by
 blacklist.mail.ops.asp.att.net. and to aol Could not deliver the 
 message in the time limit specified.  I've contacted both earthlink 
 and att/comcast and both insist that the new server is not blacklisted 
 and a quick search on ORDB shows we are not blacklisted (The server 
 had only been up 4 hours and we were getting this message from
 att/comcast!) I've locked down the server and we're not allowing relay 
 so I'm thinking it might be reverse dns, but comcast (our isp) won't 
 allow us to host reverse dns or set up an entry for us.
  Before we shutdown the server and get an new ISP that will allow 
 reverse dns, does anyone else have an idea?
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server

2004-01-06 Thread David, Andy
Any chance this is simply a corrupt meeting in the calendar? How many users
is this affecting?  


-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server

Greetings!

We have 4 Exchange Servers (E2K Enterprise) and 4 Enterprise Blackberry
Servers (2.6). Over the last few months, we have had our Blackberry users
complain of their Exchange Calendar's locking up when they attempt to access
them. If another user (their assistant) attempts to open their calendar
remotely, it locks that persons machine up as well. We have tried
troubleshooting this to no avail and am hoping someone else has run in to
this. Both MSFT and Blackberry have been useless, pointing the finger at the
other companies software.

Some interesting notes:

* Affected calendar can be opened with Outlook 2003 and with OWA, but with
no other versions of the Outlook client

I am desperate... any ideas?

Thanks,
Jeremy

---
Jeremy T. Slater
Network Administrator
MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com
727.373.8153  -  Direct
727.461.4801  -  Receptionist
727.443.6067  -  Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator

2004-01-05 Thread David, Andy
Unfortunately, 1016s are poor indicators and are generated regardless of
logging level. Increasing the logging level in the IS to max -( Logons or
something similar) cant remember the specific category name off the top of
my head )) should yield better info.



-Original Message-
From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator

The only way I know of is to increase the logging for the info store to
medium and then look for event 1016 in the application log on the exchange
server. This is generated every time an account accesses a mailbox that is
not its primary mailbox. No amount of permission granting will stop it from
being generated.

You can also look in the Exchange properties for the server mailboxes to see
who last logged on to a particular mailbox.

You could also look in the person's File, Open in Outlook and see if another
mailbox is in the recently accessed list.

Either way you will need to access the Exchange server or the user's local
Outlook.

If wrong doing is suspected, it is appropriate for the CEO to order an audit
of operations and see what comes up.

I'm not aware of any auditing tools that would not require at least minimal
access to the user's logon and workstation or the exchange server.

Best Regards, 

Dan Bartley

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 03:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator

Hi,

I am a independent consultant hired to investigate an administrator who the
CEO belives he is accessing sensative email from others mailbox.

While it is NOT possible to configure anything on the exchange server, is
there anything I can do a spot-check or any tools like sniffer, so that I
can monitor any possible wrong-doing of the administrator?

If you have any insight on this issue, please kindly drop me a line at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cheers,
Rick

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: replay log files for one user?

2004-01-02 Thread David, Andy
Did ya use the DumpsterAlwaysOn trick via Outlook? Otherwise, it's a full
restore unless you have been doing mailbox level backups of some sort.
Personally, I have never seen emails just disappear.



-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: replay log files for one user?

Ex2k SP3
Win2k SP3
OL 2002 SP1

My CEO came into us today and informed us that all of his email is gone.
According to him it was there at 10:05 and gone at 10:10.  Of course he
claims that he did not move or delete it, which I have confirmed.  Nothing
in the DIR, nothing in trash, or other folders.  No one else has access to
his mailbox.

One of our guys is busy trying to figure out what happened.  My task has
become to get it back.

I've done DR, but only for a full system.  Never a single user.  I was
wondering if there is a way to replay the log files for single user or do I
have to put all on my DR box and then drop to a pst from there to import
back into his account?

Your help is appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Personal folders

2003-12-30 Thread David, Andy
Check permissions, if they look ok, make sure the read-only attrib isnt set
on that pst.
 

-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 10:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Personal folders

Does anyone know when a user has a new windows  profile, why they can't
access thier personal folder. Some  windows profiles  was change and when
you add their pst to their OutLook profile and try to open it , it give an
error permission denied, and they are logging in with thier new windows
profile?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Mailbox Sizes

2003-12-30 Thread David, Andy
There is a post SP3 fix for this. Alternatively, you could stop and restart
the store.
 

-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Sizes

Hi All,

  Can someone tell me why it would take up to a day for mailbox sizing to
occur? For instance, I change the size limit of a users mailbox from 50MB to
Unlimited, for some reason it doesnt take effect until the next day or a few
hours later.

  This seems awefully slow to me. Does anyone know of a solution to make it
faster or more consistant.

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/ser vers

2003-12-30 Thread David, Andy
Nope. Once you moved the mailbox, anything recoverable in the DIR bin got
whacked. You will have to restore from backup.
 

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers

Exchange 2k SP3
Windows 2k SP4

I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday.
Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is
empty when you bring it up.  The new server has the same deleted items
retention setting as the old server (30 days).  Is there any way to get to
the deleted items retention folder on the old server?  It is still up and
running and a member of the organization.
Thank you for any help.
Jeremy


DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged.
If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this
communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender
immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them
for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium.  Thank you for your
cooperation.
Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/ser vers

2003-12-30 Thread David, Andy
So sad.
 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage
groups/servers

Too bad.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers

Exchange 2k SP3
Windows 2k SP4

I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday.
Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is
empty when you bring it up.  The new server has the same deleted items
retention setting as the old server (30 days).  Is there any way to get to
the deleted items retention folder on the old server?  It is still up and
running and a member of the organization.
Thank you for any help.
Jeremy


DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged.
If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this
communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender
immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them
for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium.  Thank you for your
cooperation.
Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD

2003-12-23 Thread David, Andy
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/features/win_compare.asp

 

-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD

Hi all,

What do you think are the features I am going to lose if I deploy
Exchange2003 in a Windows2000 AD(native) domain instead of a Windows2003 AD
domain?

So far, based on the following article I could lost the InetOrgPerson
objects :
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822591Product=exch2
003

thx
-Eric

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K

2003-12-23 Thread David, Andy
You are not allowed to thank Robert per the Decklerheitsgebot Purity Laws
of IT Ethics.
 

-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K

Cheers Robert as I said I just wanted it confirmed ;-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K


Yes of course it can.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus



 -Original Message-
 From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 December 2003 12:44
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
 
 
 
 I would be grateful if anyone would be able to confirm that
 Exchange 2k is able to utilise dual processor technology on 
 W2k server.
 
 Regards
 David
 
 
 Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading,
 Berkshire, RG7 3YG 
 Registered Charity No. 209617 
 A company limited by guarantee 
 Registered in England Company No. 291646
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K

2003-12-23 Thread David, Andy
I want my compiler!
 

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K

Shhh don't worry about him. He's just jealous that Windows Server MVPs get
better bribes than Exchange server ones do.


 -Original Message-
 From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 December 2003 13:53
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
 
 
 Am I allowed to apologise then?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
 Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:50 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
 
 
 You are not allowed to thank Robert per the Decklerheitsgebot Purity 
 Laws of IT Ethics.
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
 
 Cheers Robert as I said I just wanted it confirmed ;-)
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir
 Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:47 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
 
 
 Yes of course it can.
 --
 Robert Moir
 Microsoft MVP
 Senior IT Systems Engineer
 Luton Sixth Form College
 RM Eunt Domus
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 23 December 2003 12:44
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
  
  
  
  I would be grateful if anyone would be able to confirm that Exchange 
  2k is able to utilise dual processor technology on W2k server.
  
  Regards
  David
  
  
  Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading,
 Berkshire,
  RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee 
  Registered in England Company No. 291646
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Slightly OT: Outlook 2003 in cached mode

2003-12-22 Thread David, Andy
I saw that delay in the early beta versions of Outlook 2003. 
 

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slightly OT: Outlook 2003 in cached mode

I don't know what is happening but I have tried the following on five
Exchange 2003 servers using Outlook 2003 in cached mode from default
installs.

If I use Outlook 2003 on a new mailbox and allow it to sync fully then send
a message to myself. It will take approximately 30 seconds to appear in the
Inbox. If I remove the tick for Cached Mode in the profile so it is directly
linked to Exchange the message appears instantly in the Inbox.

It would appear cache mode on Outlook 2003 is polling the server every so
often, is this the case? Can it be changed? Anyone else tried this and seen
this problem?

TIA,

Paul




The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for
the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20
7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error
or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy,
please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1

2003-12-22 Thread David, Andy
Was RC1 standard and the RTM Enterprise? 
 

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade from 2003 RC1

I recently asked this question at microsoft.public.exchange.admin, and
failing to get an answer in a couple of days, thought I'd ask again here.
It's possible I'm being impatient, since I'm mostly working during this
Christmas season while the person who knows the answer is doubtlessly taking
a much-deserved holiday, but on the off-chance that the Someone Who Knows is
currently available I'm going to repost it here

I find myself in a very deep crack here. I installed RC1 last summer, let it
expire, and then last week attempted to upgrade it to RTM. Seemed to work.
However, the RTM continues to behave as though it is time-limited and
announces my eval period has expired, shutting Exchange down after a
half-hour to an hour. So, trying to back out of this situation, I thought to
uninstall. However, I am prevented from uninstalling by a message which
declares that an upgrade from Standard to Enterprise is in progress and that
I must do a Reinstall to complete it. Unfortunately, even after a Reinstall,
the problems persist, and I can go neither forward nor backward.

So, there it is. Re-building the domain is not an option here, since it is a
production domain...Any assistance greatly appreciated,

Patrick Crawford
VaspTech LLC




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

2003-12-22 Thread David, Andy
If two people make and save changes to the same open document, don't the
owners of the PF get a conflict message in their inboxes? 


-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

I disagree. I presented a scenario and asked a yes or no question. I
supplied enough information for a yes or no answer.

I did not ask for assistance with a design or a solution, just a simple
question about whether or not Exchange has the capability to do what I
asked. 

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

I think Ed's answer was appropriate given the amount of information you gave
out in your first post.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Posted
At: 22 December 2003 15:22 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?


The document management suggestion was inappropriate because we have a
single document that 2 people have modify rights to and another dozen or so
people can read. So deploying a DMS is an expensive solution when the
problem boils down to preventing 2 people from modifying one particular file
at the same time. Especially if there is an inherent method within Exchange
to prevent the problem from happening in the first place, which is really
all I wanted to know.

Thank you for your answer though.

Jason 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

The answer was correct.  What Ed left out was the No. at the front in
answer to your question of whether there is any way to prevent multiple
editors of an attachment to a public folder.

Did you go look at the 80-20 web site and see what features there product
offers?  What exactly makes the suggestion of a product which may solve your
problem inappropriate?  There are also lots of others with different feature
sets as Ed alluded.

As for little value to the thread, complaining because you didn't get the
answer you wanted regardless of the veracity of the answer really has low
value.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

Deploy a real document management system? Not only does this suggestion
not asnwer the question I asked, it is completely inappropriate for my
particular situation, and adds little value to this thread.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

Deploy a real document management system, one that has the capability to
check out and check in documents.

http://www.80-20.com is one that integrates with Exchange.  There are many
others that may or may not integrate with Exchange.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?


When a user has a Public Folder attachment open, other users can also open
the same attachment and make changes. Is there any way to prevent this? For
example, to force the document to open as read-only when someone else has it
open?

Jason



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL 

RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1

2003-12-22 Thread David, Andy
Standard RC1 to Standard RTM ( or Enterprise RC1 to Enterprise RTM) was the
only supported path AFAIK.
 

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrade from 2003 RC1

Yes, apparently.

- Original Message -
From: David, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:49 AM
Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1


 Was RC1 standard and the RTM Enterprise?


 -Original Message-
 From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:16 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Upgrade from 2003 RC1

 I recently asked this question at microsoft.public.exchange.admin, and
 failing to get an answer in a couple of days, thought I'd ask again here.
 It's possible I'm being impatient, since I'm mostly working during this
 Christmas season while the person who knows the answer is doubtlessly
taking
 a much-deserved holiday, but on the off-chance that the Someone Who Knows
is
 currently available I'm going to repost it here

 I find myself in a very deep crack here. I installed RC1 last summer, let
it
 expire, and then last week attempted to upgrade it to RTM. Seemed to work.
 However, the RTM continues to behave as though it is time-limited and
 announces my eval period has expired, shutting Exchange down after a
 half-hour to an hour. So, trying to back out of this situation, I thought
to
 uninstall. However, I am prevented from uninstalling by a message which
 declares that an upgrade from Standard to Enterprise is in progress and
that
 I must do a Reinstall to complete it. Unfortunately, even after a
Reinstall,
 the problems persist, and I can go neither forward nor backward.

 So, there it is. Re-building the domain is not an option here, since it is
a
 production domain...Any assistance greatly appreciated,

 Patrick Crawford
 VaspTech LLC




 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la
ng
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: E2K3 Exchange Services group missing

2003-12-19 Thread David, Andy
Domainprep needs to be run in the root domain as well.
That being said, I was under the impression that the Exchange services group
wasn't created unless the ADC was already installed.


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K3 Exchange Services group missing

I ran forest prep and it created domain servers, enterprise servers and
services in the forest root. I then ran domain prep in a second level domain
but only domain servers and enterprise servers got created. No Exchange
services group. I reran domain prep and it reports completing successfully
but no exchange services ever gets created. Can this be manually? Or is
there a way to force the creation of this group?

Bill

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Header Info

2003-12-19 Thread David, Andy
If it never leaves the IMS, I don't think it will. If there is a
restriction on the remote server, it shouldnt be sitting in the IMS
anyway, it should simply bounce back to the sender almost immediately after
the remote server denies the connection.



 

-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Header Info

Exchange 5.5/4 Win2000/4
Potentially silly question.  (Technical, non-ethical, sorry) If I send an
e-mail to external domain and it sits in my outbound IMS queue and can't get
delivered because of a restriction on the receiving domain's e-mail server,
my NDR should have header info in right?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-18 Thread David, Andy

Who says? Feel free to ask for your money back, otherwise delete anything
you don't like or unsub.  If you really want this thread to die, stop
responding to it.
Besides, shouldn't you be preparing for the Rose Bowl?


 

-Original Message-
From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

This is not the platform for these type of debates.  This is a professional
forum about Exchange.

http://groups.yahoo.com/search?query=ethics

Many forums will discuss this stuff, go somewhere more appropriate.  If this
forum were moderated these people would have received warnings by now.

Nathan

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

You can always delete these emails if you arent interested.
 

-Original Message-
From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,
STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,
STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,
STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,

You are wasting our time.  How ethical is it to waste a bunch of
professional's people's time, which have better things to be doing and
reading.  Reply to those that care.

STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,
STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,
STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,
STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,
STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP,

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Boy, I hate to jump in, but perhaps I can end this...

Greg, in the absolute, you are correct. Accepting *anything* of *any* value
whatsoever from third parties that stand to gain from your relationship to
your client could be considered a breach of ethics - in the absolute. Even
if the gift (title, free software, pencils..) does not influence, the
perception of the relationship to the third party is still tainted.

Note I say could be. The crux is in the context. Does your client expect
objectivity on your part? That is the critical difference. If an IT
professional bills themselves as providing the very best vendor neutral
solution, then accepting vendor gifts (even titles) could be considered a
breach of ethics. 

Disclosure is another big factor. Has the relationship between you and the
third party been disclosed to the client?

For example, If I hire a lawyer to sue a company, I would every right to
expect that the lawyer not be getting any gratuities whatsoever from that
company. If the lawyer were receiving anything of value (even titles, which
could enhance their status) from the company, that would be a breech of
ethics. Furthermore, I'd expect any past relationship with the company be
disclosed fully to me. Failure of this, even if the lawyer's performance
wasn't actually swayed in the slightest, would still create a perception of
impropriety.

Now, if I call up the local Trane dealer for a new furnace, I certainly
don't expect any objectivity on from him/her. It is not a problem if Trane
has bestowed titles, free trips to the Bahamas, fish tacos, or any other
gratuity to him/her. In fact, the more the better, since that means they are
more than likely competent at what they do.

I'd say IT consultants dealing with Exchange are in the second group.
Most pitch MS solutions, and make no claims of objectivity. Also, when an IT
professional uses something like Microsoft MVP after their name, that serves
as a disclosure to the client that there is an existing relationship between
the consultant and Microsoft.

For sure ethics standards are a slippery beast and make for an ever changing
landscape. It would be simpler if the whole world adopted the not even the
appearance of impropriety standard, but that just isn't going to happen.
Therefore, every profession defines, and continually redefines the line
that divides ethical from unethical. 





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I will state this again for the 11 millionth and 1 time now. Accepting
direct gifts from third parties, especially significant gifts such as large
dollar items and titles, presents a real or perceived conflict of interest
between an IT professional's client (either the customer or company that he
or she works

RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

2003-12-18 Thread David, Andy
Is the store growing rapidly as well?

Verify you arent allowing auto-replies to the Internet and that if you are
running AV software on the server, you arent scanning the exch dirs. 
 

-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

I have just upgraded a Windows 2000 Server / Exchange 2000 Server to Windows
Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003.  The upgrade seemed to go well.

Now my transaction log disk is filling up fast.

I would appreciate any hints on where to find documents for diagnosing this
type of issue.

Thanks,
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

2003-12-18 Thread David, Andy
Scan yours and let us know what happens.
 

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

Why would AV scanning on the Exchange dirs cause the logs to grow?  Or are
you addressing the sluggish performance symptom.  

Is internal mail delivery taking a long time to deliver as well?

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST


No it was about the same size yesterday, give or take a few MB.

Checked them. Thanks for your time.

Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

Is the store growing rapidly as well?

Verify you arent allowing auto-replies to the Internet and that if you are
running AV software on the server, you arent scanning the exch dirs. 
 

-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

I have just upgraded a Windows 2000 Server / Exchange 2000 Server to Windows
Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003.  The upgrade seemed to go well.

Now my transaction log disk is filling up fast.

I would appreciate any hints on where to find documents for diagnosing this
type of issue.

Thanks,
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

2003-12-18 Thread David, Andy
Im simply offering suggestions. 
If you scan the M: drive, it will certainly cause a growth in transaction
logs. However, I can only assume that since he has upgraded to E2003, the M:
drive is no longer visible, so I left that part off.


 

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

I realize that AV scanning your database will cause your machine to run like
a sick dog, but are you suggesting it will bloat the size of the log files?
I've never done that because I've always known better.



Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST


Scan yours and let us know what happens.
 

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

Why would AV scanning on the Exchange dirs cause the logs to grow?  Or are
you addressing the sluggish performance symptom.  

Is internal mail delivery taking a long time to deliver as well?

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST


No it was about the same size yesterday, give or take a few MB.

Checked them. Thanks for your time.

Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

Is the store growing rapidly as well?

Verify you arent allowing auto-replies to the Internet and that if you are
running AV software on the server, you arent scanning the exch dirs. 
 

-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST

I have just upgraded a Windows 2000 Server / Exchange 2000 Server to Windows
Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003.  The upgrade seemed to go well.

Now my transaction log disk is filling up fast.

I would appreciate any hints on where to find documents for diagnosing this
type of issue.

Thanks,
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-17 Thread David, Andy
As a Microsoft Partner, does your company get any freebies?

 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Alright, this is a good question. Bottom line is that if, as the hiring
body, you don't care then ethics are irrelevant in your decision and you do
what you want. Ethics do not have to be the end all, be all of decision
making. And, it is also absolutely not the case that MVP's will always
recommend Microsoft software for their own personal gain.

You are exactly correct, you have final say about what you feel is and is
not relevant about your hiring decisions. But, this does not change the
situation that the MVP title is a real or perceived conflict of interest.
Of course it is, but whether or not you care is up to you.

 My company, Consolidated Widgets, Inc., has previously decided to = 
 standardize on MS software at all levels.  When it comes time to make 
 hiring = decisions, whether for FTEs or for conslutants, how should I 
 proceed?  Let's take = the example of an Exchange deployment project. 
 =20
 
 First thing to be decided:=20
 Do I want a generic technologist?
 Do I want an unrelated technology guru?
 Do I want a Windows/Exchange guru?
 
 Assuming I choose the last option:
 Do I want someone who has heard of Exchange and may be able to help 
 with = my deployment after reading some books?
 Do I want someone who is an expert, and can demonstrate their 
 expertise somehow?
 
 The demonstration of the expertise is all that the MVP status is, IMO.  
 = You don't attain MVP status by sending in a bunch of cereal box 
 tops, as one = can do to get an MCSE. =20
 
 You whole premise is that an employee/conslutant with an MVP will 
 automatically recommend technology from their masters *for their own = 
 personal gain*.  I don't see this being the case.  If I'm hiring Ed 
 (to use him = as an
 example) to help with my Exchange migration, I've already made the = 
 decision to use that MS technology.  At that point, I want the best 
 person I can = find and afford.  Why hire a consultant, if not for 
 their knowledge?
 
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Automating email via Exchange

2003-12-17 Thread David, Andy
http://www.express-soft.com/mailmate/clickyes.html
http://www.dimastr.com/redemption/

 

-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange

You know, this is the very reason that we put Outlook 2000 (w/o security
patch) on our scanning PC (it interfaces with the GAL and allows you to send
the scanned document directly to a mailbox).  It would sure be nice if there
was an alternative. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner  White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:26 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Automating email via Exchange
Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange


E-mail merge under Office 2k and later (with the OL security PITA in
place) blows chunks. Unless the stars are aligned correctly, you get
prompted for each recipient 

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:14 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange
 
 
 Mail merge with Microsoft Word maybe?
 
 Or use a third-party mailing list program - some of those allow to 
 combine generic text with some personalized stuff. That's what a lot 
 of spammers use.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:25 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Automating email via Exchange
 
 Hello all.  I need help with automating an email to 140 users on our 
 Exchange system. The email contains a generic message for all, and 
 then some personal information like user name and password.  Is there 
 a good way to automate this with Exchange/Outlook? (By automate I 
 mean, send an individual email to each user with the generic message 
 and then insert their personal info.) Or do I need to go get a third 
 party utility to do this?  Thanks for any help you can provide.
 
 
 Damian Scoles
 Senior Technical Analyst
 MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Command line directory export of GAL container

2003-12-16 Thread David, Andy
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447




 

-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Command line directory export of GAL container

How does one export the contents of the Global Address List container from
the command line (Exchange 5.5)?

I can select the Global Address List container from within Admin as the
source to export to a csv file, but I want to script the process.

Tim.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: IFS

2003-12-16 Thread David, Andy
Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point
during normal processing.


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IFS


Help, 

Under the folder mdbdata there is suddenly a .IFS file, can anyone tell me
what it is/does, and how it got there? 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Priv.edb

2003-12-16 Thread David, Andy
Those html files are your .stm files. Leave them be!
 

-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb

Its not a large system and as i say its running SBS 2000. So, i will leave
of circular logging then. Its just i've always dealt with 5.5 servers and
that's how i had it there.
The weird thing is when i check the setup of Exchange 2000 i see that on the
C:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ *.log files Pub1.edb = 16mb (not much usage made of
Public folders)

Howerver, this is what i find wierd, in the same place i have another
pub1 = 14mb and is specified as an html doc??

I see the same for my Priv1.edb database E:\exchsrvr\ priv1.edb = 2.15 GB
priv1 = 7.32 GB (shows its an html document)
no log files can be seen? 

Is this right, should i have a 7.32 Gb priv1 html doc sat next to my
priv1.edb file

anyone shed some light on this? I just inherited the box :(

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error

2003-12-16 Thread David, Andy
Did they recently change their passwords?
 

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error

We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when
trying to open their mailbox on the server: Unable to display the selected
folder or item. You do not have permission to log on while no permissions
have changed and their accounts are not locked out.  Any ideas?

Exchange 2000 SP3
Outlook 2000 and 2002
Win2k Domain

Thanks,
Ryan

 
 
 
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K

2003-12-16 Thread David, Andy
Sounds kinky.
 

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K

SRS uses X.400, in its own way, right?

-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K

Yes, it is lot more resilient and robust than other connectors.




 -Original Message-
From:   Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K

Actually, it has a lot of advantages - in Exchange 5.5, that is.

Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:17 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
 
 
 Yes, but what reasoning would you have for just using an X.400 
 connector?  Because it has a lot of limitations that's why I ask.
 
 _
 John Bowles
 Exchange Engineer
 OIG/HHS
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davinder 
 Gupta
 Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:15 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
 
 
 Hi Guys,
 
 Can an Exchange 5.5 connector (x.400) in one exchange site talk to 
 another connector (x.400) connector in Exchange 2K?
 
 Thanks
 Davinder
 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

2003-12-15 Thread David, Andy
Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox store!  

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Actually, its one copy per server containing a mailbox in the distribution.
That's important to remember when dealing with multiple servers.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
 
 
 As Tony says, search under Single Instance Storage (aka SIS) for the 
 techie explanation.
 
 In the case your friend cites, he's wrong. What will happen is that 
 your mail gets sent to 1000 people, and there is one copy of it. Now 
 if one of them opens that mail and annotates it with their thoughts on 
 what you said, and then saves it, then the server will hold one copy 
 of his altered mail for him and 1 other copy for the other 999 people.
 
 
 -- 
 Robert Moir
 Microsoft MVP
 Senior IT Systems Engineer
 Luton Sixth Form College
 RM Eunt Domus
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: 14 December 2003 10:55
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
  
  
  Hi,
  
  Let's say a user sends a 1Mb attachment by email to 1000 
  people, does it add 1000Mb to the Exchange Database?
  
  I put out a post like this before  the replies were negative.
  
  But now a friend pointed out that a recipient who has a 
  mailbox on the Exchange Server could for example open this 
  email  change it.
  
  Then save it (i.e. the email was changed).  
  
  So he's saying that this shows that each person gets their 
  personal copy of the email.
  
  Therefore, the 1Mb attachment in the email to 1000 people 
  DOES increase the Exchange Database size by 1000Mb.
  
  Pls. can you shed some light on this discussion for us?
  
  I'd appreciate some official article from Microsoft (e.g. 
  Technet) to prove my point.
  
  Help!
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Pls. Cc all replies to me on: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

2003-12-15 Thread David, Andy
Yep. This year for Christmas they gave me the first season of Hello Larry
on DVD. 
 

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

MS paid you to say that, didn't they...  :P 

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox store!  

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Actually, its one copy per server containing a mailbox in the distribution.
That's important to remember when dealing with multiple servers.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
 
 
 As Tony says, search under Single Instance Storage (aka SIS) for the 
 techie explanation.
 
 In the case your friend cites, he's wrong. What will happen is that 
 your mail gets sent to 1000 people, and there is one copy of it. Now 
 if one of them opens that mail and annotates it with their thoughts on 
 what you said, and then saves it, then the server will hold one copy 
 of his altered mail for him and 1 other copy for the other 999 people.
 
 
 --
 Robert Moir
 Microsoft MVP
 Senior IT Systems Engineer
 Luton Sixth Form College
 RM Eunt Domus
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 14 December 2003 10:55
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
  
  
  Hi,
  
  Let's say a user sends a 1Mb attachment by email to 1000 people, 
  does it add 1000Mb to the Exchange Database?
  
  I put out a post like this before  the replies were negative.
  
  But now a friend pointed out that a recipient who has a mailbox on 
  the Exchange Server could for example open this email  change it.
  
  Then save it (i.e. the email was changed).  
  
  So he's saying that this shows that each person gets their personal 
  copy of the email.
  
  Therefore, the 1Mb attachment in the email to 1000 people DOES 
  increase the Exchange Database size by 1000Mb.
  
  Pls. can you shed some light on this discussion for us?
  
  I'd appreciate some official article from Microsoft (e.g. 
  Technet) to prove my point.
  
  Help!
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Pls. Cc all replies to me on: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Sources of outages

2003-12-15 Thread David, Andy
Poor Admin Practices : 90%

 

-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Sources of outages

Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem
to be accurate. Agree? 


Communication lines and services  80 percent

Servers   14 percent

Routers and switches  1 percent



Regards,
Orin 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-12 Thread David, Andy
I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance.

 

-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Shut the fu*k up already, everyone. If anyone wants to continue this
childish diatribe, take it offline.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Yes, you certainly schooled me. You are so very witty and clever I could
never hope to compete with such a superior intellect.

An AOL reference? Paaaleeeze.

I get along with my coworkers just fine, thanks for your concern.

Value is irrelevant, hence the point about a philosophical discussion.
Many times, the greatest evils are wrapped in appealing packages.

And yes, I love my fans. With fans like mine, who needs detractors?

 Let's call it 98, but I've been out a while since Exchange was not my 
 focal point in recent years (nor is it now, I just thought I'd smack 
 you around a
 bit.)
 
 Yes I am contributing.  You got that right, genius.  What gave it 
 away, the 'you've got mail' chime?
 
 As far as the philosophical issue goes, you don't seem to have a lot 
 of supporters.
 
 Do you have co-workers?  Do you get along?  I bet not.  And you didn't

 comment on the VALUE of people like Missy, Ed, CTHULU, et al versus 
 what you bring to the table.
 
 I'm done with this.  You lose, and you will always lose.  Have fun 
 with your adoring fans.
 
 began
 
 4-5 years. Ha! That puts you at around 1999-1998. This list has been 
 around since 1994.
 
 This is a philosophical issue about ethics that has been raging for 
 about
 
 8 years or so. I specifically try to avoid the subject, but certain 
 individuals can't seem to let it go. Guilty conscious maybe? Who
knows.
 
 And you are contributing to the continuation of this thread. Welcome 
 to the party.
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-12 Thread David, Andy
Good choice. The doctor has the same hairline and legs as you.
 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 The sudden absence of We Love Our MVPs Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
 cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List 

RE: Seeking documentation

2003-12-12 Thread David, Andy
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx

Scroll down.
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Seeking documentation

Thanks for reading.  I am looking into migrating to SBS 2003 from Windows NT
4 domain.  I have a PDC (NT4), SQL 2000(Win2k) and Exchange 5.5 (NT4) all
running on separate servers.  I have not found any documentation about the
upgrade/migration of this particular scenario.  Any help? 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread David, Andy
What do the firewall logs show? 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server


 Hi,
 
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
 
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
 
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
 
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the
Exchange Server at all
 
I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our
mailserver successfully and send an email from there
 
Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our
Sonicwall ProVX
 
Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall
 
I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and
give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate
the firewall
 
Thanks
 
Nik



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread David, Andy
Surely the firewall logs must show which SMTP connections are accepted or
dropped.
 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

They don't show errors, just blocked websites and such, they arent very
detailed 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: 11 December 2003 16:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

What do the firewall logs show? 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server


 Hi,
 
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
 
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
 
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
 
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the
Exchange Server at all
 
I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our
mailserver successfully and send an email from there
 
Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our
Sonicwall ProVX
 
Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall
 
I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and
give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate
the firewall
 
Thanks
 
Nik



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-11 Thread David, Andy
Pepsi.
 

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Some more information on Professional Ethic

http://www.westga.edu/~rlane/professional/lecture_professionsprofessionaliz
ation2.html

For those with any interest.

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I did not say what you say I said.

What I said was that, in my opinion, accepting honorary titles from vendors
is a conflict of interest and something that should be avoided by those who
are, or; technically, consider themselves, professional IT people. That is
my opinion. And this is not just my opinion, check out other professions and
their views on accepting honorary titles. Go educate yourself on the subject
matter.

Now, the other thing that you are incorrect in is that I did not bring this
subject up. This subject came up years and years ago back around
1996/1997 during normal list discussions. It is not like I just started
blasting people out of the blue. However, it seems that every time I post to
this list somebody is still holding a grudge from 1996/1997 and brings this
subject up. Once it is brought up, I will state my opinion and defend it.

Money is simply the physical manifestation of ego and thus there is no
difference between the two. I hold myself to my own professional code of
conduct. I have no idea if it is better or different or longer than anyone
else's. It is mine and that is all I know.

 No, You are wrong.
 
 Explain to me how you can tell someone that they are unethical AND not 
 expect it to be taken as an insult.  You feel justified in your 
 position and that is fine.  When you come into a public forum and say 
 that anyone who is an MVP is unethical, you cannot expect MVPs to take 
 it any other way than an insult.  By making your opinions as a 
 statement, you have committed catagorical slander on a group of people 
 YOU
DON'T EVEN KNOW.
 
 If you had said that you disagree with vendor recognition, but that 
 MVPs do a lot of good for the Microsoft community (this discussion 
 list being a prime example), then you would be airing your opinion 
 with out discrediting the good work that some MVPs do.  Can you really 
 blame anyone for accepting recognition?  It is human nature to want 
 and
deserve laud and attention.
 
 It is obvious that you measure yourself a much longer moral yardstick 
 than the rest of us.  Perhaps you should start your own Exchange list 
 for-the-morally-upright to keep these reactions from happening in the 
 future.
 
 Eric Fretz
 
 L-3 Communications
 ComCept Division
 2800 Discovery Blvd.
 Rockwall, TX 75032
 tel:   972.772.7501
 fax:  972.772.7510
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-11 Thread David, Andy
Im Dr. Love.
 

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Actually, degree DOES equal title.

One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt.  The next day Washington State
Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some
mythical contributions I have made to the industry.

My signature would now read:

DR. James Blunt, Computer Engineer

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research.

degree  title

 check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary 
 titles.
 
 googling
 Dr. receives honorary degree
 lawyer receives honorary degree
 
 Just for reference.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-11 Thread David, Andy
Pepsi.
 

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a
statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and only posted those
(and another link) on professionals and ethics. My statement was not an
attack, only a point of reference. If you remember, I was also the only
person to respond to your list challenge about your book that followed
through.

You've belittled me without reason or cause. Very professional of you.

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research.

degree  title

 check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary
titles.
 
 googling
 Dr. receives honorary degree
 lawyer receives honorary degree
 
 Just for reference.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-11 Thread David, Andy
Only after 9pm. 
 

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I thought that was Dr. Thong...

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
 
 
 Im Dr. Love.
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
 
 Actually, degree DOES equal title.
 
 One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt.  The next day Washington 
 State Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due 
 to some mythical contributions I have made to the industry.
 
 My signature would now read:
 
 DR. James Blunt, Computer Engineer
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
 
 
 Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research.
 
 degree  title
 
  check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary 
  titles.
  
  googling
  Dr. receives honorary degree
  lawyer receives honorary degree
  
  Just for reference.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
Did you re-install the backup agents after installing the hotfixes to all
the servers?

-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?


Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my
production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1
on. The exchange agent is also installed. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?

Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems?

Scott

-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?

We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First
Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the
life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to
see and backup the private and public info stores. 

It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks
mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the
IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different
backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by
its self.

I have even created a new account for it to use to login with.

Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid
if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas.

Thanks

Miles



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=en
glish
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Snooping

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
Exmerge


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Snooping


Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data
for perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted folders).

Please assist.

TIA

Regards, 
Orin 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Snooping

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
Not on a pst.


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping


Doesn't Exmerge still keep user permissions?

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping


Exmerge


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Snooping


Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data
for perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted folders).

Please assist.

TIA

Regards, 
Orin 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Insufficient System resources

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
Any AV software running on the Exch Server?


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Just tried that and it did not work...

Any other ideas?






Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015


-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the
directory service.

Paul

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Insufficient System resources


Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP4


When I go into the permissions tab of one of my users and choose add I get
this message

Insufficient System resources exist to complete the requested service
Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc00205aa

Has anyone else seen this?   I have loaded the exchange admin on several
machines and all get the same error

TIA
Joshua Morgan   



Joshua Morgan
Senior Network Administrator
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for
the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20
7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error
or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy,
please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Insufficient System resources

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
Well, there ya go.


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Yes (sorry for got to add that) Groupshield for Exchange...








Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015


-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Any AV software running on the Exch Server?


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Just tried that and it did not work...

Any other ideas?






Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015


-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the
directory service.

Paul

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Insufficient System resources


Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP4


When I go into the permissions tab of one of my users and choose add I get
this message

Insufficient System resources exist to complete the requested service
Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc00205aa

Has anyone else seen this?   I have loaded the exchange admin on several
machines and all get the same error

TIA
Joshua Morgan   



Joshua Morgan
Senior Network Administrator
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for
the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20
7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error
or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy,
please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Insufficient System resources

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
Bad dat/update  Who knows. Heck, I could be wrong. But I would start
looking there first.


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Ok   now can you expand on that   Groupshield has been on this machine
for over a year and we are just recently experiencing the problem







Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015


-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Well, there ya go.


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Yes (sorry for got to add that) Groupshield for Exchange...








Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015


-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Any AV software running on the Exch Server?


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


Just tried that and it did not work...

Any other ideas?






Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015


-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources


I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the
directory service.

Paul

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Insufficient System resources


Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP4


When I go into the permissions tab of one of my users and choose add I get
this message

Insufficient System resources exist to complete the requested service
Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc00205aa

Has anyone else seen this?   I have loaded the exchange admin on several
machines and all get the same error

TIA
Joshua Morgan   



Joshua Morgan
Senior Network Administrator
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for
the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20
7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error
or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy,
please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm

RE: Export and Import of fields

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
Are you exporting the subcontainers as well? 
Your export.ini should look something like this:

   basepoint=/o=yourorgname
   exportobject=mailbox
   informationlevel=full
   subcontainers=yes


-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields


Ok guys, forget the complicated stuff, I figured all of the scripting part
out...now my problem is still syntax related I am sure, but I am not getting
the desired results.  When I do a manual pull I get 15K some odd mailboxes
but when I do it with the script I only get about 7K.  Now looking at the
options documentation I see that it defaults to the Recipients container and
when you do it in the GUI it defaults to the Global Address List...so I
added the line Container=Global Address List, but I am still getting the 7K
mailboxes.  Anyone know what I need it to do to pull the entire org?

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields

Write a batch file with two Export passes then Type one file and append it
() to the other.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields

The help file shows 

ExportObject=[Mailbox, Remote (custom recipients), DL, Recipients (all
recipients), All (all object types)] (default=Mailbox)

I need to get Mailbox and DL in one automated export.

-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields

I don't think that will work, obj class is where you differentiate DL's and
Mailboxes.  If you do not specify you only get mailboxes.  I think you have
to do it with the /o and options file, I just don't know the proper syntax.

-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields

headers.exe.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields


I have a question related to this as well. I am trying to set up admin /e
export of all DL's and Mailboxes in an Exchange 5.5 org and looking at the
Options file, I don't understand the syntax for getting what I need can
anyone help me out.  I see you can grab one or the other or all but is there
a way to just get what I need?

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields

Yes there is such a way. It is in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Export and Import of fields

Is there a way to export (then Import once modified) a CSV file the Fields
from within Exchange including Phone Address and such...


I am using Exchange 5.5 SP4






Joshua Morgan
Senior Network Administrator
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 

RE: Public Folder Calendar Export to html

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
May want to look at slipstick and see if anything fits the bill.
http://www.slipstick.com/calendar/olpubcal.htm



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Calendar Export to html


I'd like to know if anyone knows of a product that can export a public
folder calendar from Exchange 2000 as a web page, automatically at a
specified interval, that runs as a service.  I have a school district that
has secretaries that update the school calendar that shows on the schools
web page.  I'd like it to FTP the created web pages to the site.  I've
searched for a week now, and there are a good number of collaboration
extensions, but I couldn't find this specific functionality.

Thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out.


-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000


Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
Exchange 5.5 ? i.e. can I interchange my outlook client between 2000 and
2003 to access my own mailbox on Exchange 5.5 ? Outlook will be installed on
different workstations.

Cheers

Raji Arulambalam   
Senior Systems Administrator  
Environment Bay of Plenty - Regional Council, Whakatane, New Zealand

Email disclaimer: This email and any attachments are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in
any way. If you receive this message in error, please let us know by return
email and then destroy the message. Environment Bay of Plenty is not
responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments
after sending.
**
This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-10 Thread David, Andy
I can moonwalk.



-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a brain
seizure.

The subject Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 means that I am migrating a
client from GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange, specifically Exchange 2000. My
apologies, I thought that would be obvious given that this is an Exchange
list. My fault, I should have been more specific.

Now the reason that this question about the 5.2.6 client comes up in
relation to GroupWise 6.5 is that Microsoft indicates that the GroupWise 6.5
client does not work with the Exchange Migration Wizard. I actually have not
tested this completely but will before the end of the week. I decided to go
with a known entity, the GroupWise 5.2.6 client, the recommended client from
Microsoft. So, from preliminary testing, you have to run the 5.2.6 client to
interact with the Exchange Migration Wizard but it also has to interact with
the GroupWise 6.5 PO, hence the question to the list.

Now, thanks entirely to myself and no thanks to the sarcastic peanut
gallery, I have solved this issue and am more than happy to pass along my
findings in the hope that someone else may benefit from this knowledge.

I was able to get the 5.2.6 client working against the 6.5 PO by removing
the checkbox to enforce a minimum client on the GroupWise PO and by doing
some file copying. What I did was to install the standard GroupWise 5.2.6
client on a workstation. However, running it against the GroupWise 6.5 PO
generated an error, something to the effect that Your PO does not have the
correct views for this client. So, I went into the ofviews\win directory
on the client and copied the non-duplicate files to the ofviews\win
directory of the GroupWise 6.5 PO. I did not replace any .vew or .ini files
and while I have not tested it, I would not recommend that you replace any
of the 6.5 files with 5.x files.

Thus far, I have tested this successfully connecting in DIRECT mode to the
GW PO. The GW 5.2.6 client works and the Exchange Migration Wizard works.
One item of note is that the extraction seems to be taking an inordinately
long amount of time. While previous experience has shown DIRECT to be faster
in the extraction versus CLIENT/SERVER, I am going to test CLIENT/SERVER
next. And then I am going to test using a GroupWise 6.5 client instead of
the 5.2.6 client but I do not anticipate that will work. If anyone has some
specific experience on this and knows for sure, I'd appreciate a heads-up so
that I can avoid wasting time.

Since this is the first GroupWise 6.5 migration that I have done and from
the lack of any useful information from the list perhaps one of the very
first or very few, I'll keep the list updated with information on how this
goes and any caveats or issues I encounter.

 I'd like to modify that a bit if I could...  ;o)
 
 pimp-slap decklertheheckler
 
 You are aware that this is an Exchange list right?
 
 /pimp-slap decklertheheckler
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:29 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
 
 In times like these, IRC commands like /pimp-slap user would be 
 real handy.
 
 Eric Fretz
 
 L-3 Communications
 ComCept Division
 2800 Discovery Blvd.
 Rockwall, TX 75032
 tel:   972.772.7501
 fax:  972.772.7510
 
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OWA and SMTP

2003-12-09 Thread David, Andy
Shouldn't the ISA server be in the DMZ?


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Don't they show ISA in there as well? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

Why do Microsoft FE/BE whitepapers show FE in DMZ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

I couldn't have said it better myself. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

What I don't understand is why everyone thinks that placing their FE server
in a DMZ is a more secure/better way/whatever have you.  IMHO, it is not.  I
don't understand what you think you are going to be gaining by placing it
there other than increased headache for the setup and troubleshooting. Some
may offer the argument that if your FE server gets hacked, it is somewhat
isolated.  Let's be honest.  With the ports that are required to be open
between the FE and BE, if someone hacks your FE server, they can own your
internal network whether the FE is in a DMZ or not.  I'm just not convinced
that there is a need to place FE servers in the DMZ.  That, plus I seem to
remember that it is now Microsoft's suggestion to NOT place the FE server in
the DMZ.  I'll see if I can find the reference to that. 

Davinder, you are, of course, welcome to deploy this how you see fit. It is,
after all, your network, not mine.  Ultimately, if you feel it is a better
setup to place your FE server in your DMZ, then do that.  I'm just trying to
offer feedback.  As far as 5.5, that is a different scenario altogether.
5.5 would allow you to install OWA separate from the Exchange mailbox
server.

Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner  White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday,
December 09, 2003 10:45 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA and SMTP
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Thanks everybody for replying. The plan is exactly to open 443 from outside
and required ports for GC/LDAP and required ports for BE server. The DMZ is
separate physical network (VLAN) and Firewall is going to allow these
specific kind of traffic only to required specific servers on inside
network. 

You guys seem very concerned with that which I respectfully don't
understand. Also this is exactly what we did in exchange 5.5, right??

Or another idea might be to create an IPSec tunnel between FE server and DCs
and limit the number of ports that way, ideas?


Thanks
Davinder



 -Original Message-
From:   Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: OWA and SMTP

I totally agree.  It is much easier to do extensive logging (and packet
filtering, for that matter) with a good layered firewall, as opposed to
locking down IIS (and Windows) to accept connections in an unsecured zone.  

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Why go through the hassle?  It is much easier (and just as secure) to simply
put the FE server inside your network, open up port 443 and 25 to the FE
server (I would not open port 80 for OWA), and that is all you should have
to do.  If you want to be even more secure, use something like ISA server to
publish the FE OWA server.  There are some servers that belong on a DMZ. A
FE OWA server is not one of them.


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner  White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:36 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA and SMTP
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Have FE and BE on separate VLANs and set up access lists on the routers
allowing just the back-end VLAN to only accept traffic from the front-end
VLAN if it is coming from the FE server, and only the specified ports.

How does that sound?


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

What Martin is saying is that those are not the only ports you have to open.
There are MANY more that are required to be opened to allow for
communication between the FE server and the BE server, and communication
betweent the FE server and the 

RE: removal of first exchange 2000 server

2003-12-09 Thread David, Andy
Have you tried creating a new Outlook profile? Removing and re-adding the
Outlook Address Book?



-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: removal of first exchange 2000 server


I have had a mixed exch 2000/2003 site running for about a month.  I have
followed the Q article regarding removal of first exchange server in a site.
Now some of my clients are having issues when accessing their mailbox's.
outlook is set for their mailbox to point to the new server and outlook
opens but clicking inbox locks outlook.  I have tried
repairing outlook and upgrading it to 2003 but nothing fix's it.   Any
info would be appreciated.

Exchange 2003 on windows 2003 cluster.
Removed server is exchange 2000 on windows 2000 non cluster Client outlook
xp/2003


Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky  Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Active Directory

2003-12-09 Thread David, Andy
Huh?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Active Directory


When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over.
Has anyone had that problem.

Thank you

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk

2003-12-04 Thread David, Andy
Use Perf Optimizer and move the edb files to the new drive.


-Original Message-
From: Jees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk


Hi guys,
 
   Will be gratefull if you can contribute to this
please. 
 
I have an Exchange 5.5, sp4 server on win 2k with sp4.
 
In my Dell Power Edge 2400, i have two scsi disks
(01) within this exchange server. Disk 1 has 3 18g
hds with a logical drive of G.
 
G contains Exchsrvr folder which hosts priv.edb and
pub.edb.  its like g:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ and the two
edb files.
 
Now, G is near capacity and would like to upgrade it
to bigger space.
 
I have purchased two 36gb hd from Dell (based on
Dell's advise), and ready to be backing up the G drive
and the rest.
 
I would like you to feel free to suggest any tips and
tricks that u know off, or any advise.
 
Thanking you



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Backup rituals

2003-12-04 Thread David, Andy
Full plus replaying the trans logs will restore you to the point of failure.


-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


Wouldn't doing a diff/incremental + weekly full give you a tighter restore
point window (restore to the hour instead of to the day)?

Eric Holliday 

- PST's?  We don't need no stinkin' PST's!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Why bother?  The only value I would see in that would be if you were backing
up off-site.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or incremental
during the day?  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to
familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto
re.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what
to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test
these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk
space. Just to learn it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz


The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended
for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or
there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is
strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct,
special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the
contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being
passed on.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange client or mapi

2003-12-04 Thread David, Andy
He'll still need a profile however.
Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure.
http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profinst.e
xe



-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi


Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server was 
not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using 
Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is 
safe to use


From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange client or mapi
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500

When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up
the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler.  Is there a way
to change this.  I need a profile for Arcserves alert service.

Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky  Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Shop online for kids' toys by age group, price range, and toy category at 
MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [ex55] Two servers in one domain 1 in another, same site

2003-12-04 Thread David, Andy
Nope.


-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [ex55] Two servers in one domain 1 in another, same site


Do all the exchange servers in a site have to be in the same domain?  All
our sites have always been single server sites until now.

Thanks.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Single Use E-Mail?

2003-12-03 Thread David, Andy
I dont think this will reduce unwanted email.


-Original Message-
From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Single Use E-Mail?


I'd like to allow my users to create a single use e-mail address to help
reduce unwanted e-mail.

- User mailbox '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

This user can create any new e-mail address by adding a suffix (with a
special char '-' for example) such as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. All
suffixes are by default allowed. There would need to be a method that would
allow the user to blacklist a specific suffix.

My idea would be to create an EventSink for Exch 2000/2003 that when a
message is addressed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' it would parse the LHS of the @
and then do a lookup in a table to see if the blacklist existed. If it did,
then it would return a '550 Mailbox does not exist' error code. If it does
not exist, then the To: Field would be rewritten to strip out the '-suffix'
and deliver the mail to the intended recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'


Questions:
1. Does something already exist today that does this? An event sink? 3rd
Party App (MailMarshal, GFI MailEssentials)? Freeware on Linux, etc?

2. I've already coded the basic functionality for the database look and web
interface to modify the blacklist but the Event Sink is causing me some
issues. Anyone have experience in Event Sink programming willing to jump in
an help with the development?

3. Is this a crazy idea and I should just abandon it?

- David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Backup rituals

2003-12-03 Thread David, Andy
Fulls are always preferred.  Additionally, online backups perform checksum
validity checks of the database. 
You should test your backups frequently on your DR server as well. How do
you know you are getting a good backup otherwise?


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space.  I
thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and
time, but maybe not.  Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick
recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)???

Thanks,

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


I prefer full backup every day.


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Backup rituals

2003-12-03 Thread David, Andy
Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to
familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what
to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test
these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk
space. Just to learn it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Backup rituals

2003-12-03 Thread David, Andy
Agreed.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


That's it! My bad.
::turns in MVP card:: 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to
familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what
to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test
these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk
space. Just to learn it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Backup rituals

2003-12-03 Thread David, Andy
Nope. Too much work. 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or incremental
during the day?  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to
familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what
to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test
these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk
space. Just to learn it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz


The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended
for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or
there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is
strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct,
special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the
contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being
passed on.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

2003-12-02 Thread David, Andy
Stop doing BLBs..Or at the very minimum, upgrade Veritas to at least 8.6.


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem
with restoring individual user mailboxes.  Everytime I try to restore an
individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs.  It never
fails or gives an error message.
 
My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server
(SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5.
 
Thanks,
Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

2003-12-02 Thread David, Andy
Do a full, online backup of the store ASAP with either Veritas or NTBACKUP.


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan.
5th.  Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was
built 2.5 years ago!  Brick backups are start because this box could tank at
any moment.  I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it
until then.

I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though.


Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy
crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment
like they would a Microsoft Mail environment.  Quit depending on it.

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem
with restoring individual user mailboxes.  Everytime I try to restore an
individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs.  It never
fails or gives an error message.
 
My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server
(SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5.
 
Thanks,
Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

2003-12-02 Thread David, Andy
You can not do a complete Exchange restore with BLBs. You must/should do a
full online backup of the DS and IS.
Install the Exch Admin gui on a remote W2k machine and back it up to disk.



-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


Murphy's law says that any working device can crap out and any moment.  This
box is running on a gateway 1U server with no RAID drives.  All it takes is
one hardware failure on a drive to take out the Private store and I am
screwed.  This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large
enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes.  I've had to use Backup-to-disk
folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups.  Yes, I know I
need tape drives.  Yes, I know that I need backup exec 9 (and the exchange
agent).  Those are all planned purchased in Q1 of '04.



Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level 
backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something


From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600

I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan.
5th.  Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was
built 2.5 years ago!  Brick backups are start because this box could tank at
any moment.  I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it
until then.

I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though.


Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy
crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment
like they would a Microsoft Mail environment.  Quit depending on it.

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem
with restoring individual user mailboxes.  Everytime I try to restore an
individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs.  It never
fails or gives an error message.

My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server
(SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5.

Thanks,
Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Set yourself up for fun at home!  Get tips on home entertainment equipment, 
video game reviews, and more here.   
http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ: 

RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

2003-12-01 Thread David, Andy
1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack.


-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server


Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5.

-Original Message-
From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

You in 5.5 ??

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the
organisation.

If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message
informing me that the address does not exist.

Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

2003-12-01 Thread David, Andy
Apply SP4 to your client.
As for your orphan, do a directory export (all objects - including the
secondary proxy addresses) to find it. 
If you arent sure how to export the secondary proxy addresses, do a search
in Technet on how to do that.




-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server


2653.23 SP4.

Sorry, I pulled the Help..About on a client Administrator machine. 

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 December 2003 13:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

Living dangerously, eh? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack.


-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server


Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5.

-Original Message-
From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

You in 5.5 ??

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the
organisation.

If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message
informing me that the address does not exist.

Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Private Store size problems.

2003-12-01 Thread David, Andy
5.5 Enterprise also includes additional connectors.



-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Private Store size problems.


Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange
standard and exchange enterprise?


Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Private Store size problems.


Require all users to use POP.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Private Store size problems.

My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to
5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about
every 20 days.  Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or
even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline?  Also, is there
any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation?

Thanks

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [EX55] Mailbox Move

2003-12-01 Thread David, Andy
Yes.


-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [EX55] Mailbox Move


Does the Mailbox Move function of Exchange 5.5 perserve single instance
storage?

K


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: message retrieval

2003-11-26 Thread David, Andy
If you have message tracking enabled, you can search by message ID.


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: message retrieval



How can I retrieve a message from the server using the message ID? 
Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP Woes

2003-11-25 Thread David, Andy
Crank up logging!


-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Woes


Exchange 5.5/4/Win2000/4.
About 1 week ago I started having problems e-mailing users @verizon.net
(206.46.170.12).  The NDR's state One or more mandatory argument(s) were
missing from the recipient and the stuck messages in the outbound IMS queue
have the follwing error [450 Requested mail action not taken-Try
later:sc006pub.verizon.net].  This is the only domain I am having problems
e-mailing.  I am not on any RBL's and I can telnet their relay server for
about 10 seconds then it disconnects me.  I've had the Verizon users contact
support and they are telling them it's a problem on my end. 
What should I be looking at?  Thanks, Scott.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP Woes

2003-11-25 Thread David, Andy
It will let you see the actual SMTP conversation.




-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Woes


Andy, I'll give that a shot but will that tell me more than the error
message in the outbound IMS queue?

 Crank up logging!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:30 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: SMTP Woes
 
 
 Exchange 5.5/4/Win2000/4.
 About 1 week ago I started having problems e-mailing users 
 @verizon.net (206.46.170.12).  The NDR's state One or more mandatory 
 argument(s) were missing from the recipient and the stuck messages in 
 the outbound IMS queue have the follwing error [450 Requested mail 
 action not taken-Try later:sc006pub.verizon.net].  This is the only 
 domain I am having problems e-mailing.  I am not on any RBL's and I 
 can telnet their relay server for about 10 seconds then it disconnects 
 me.  I've had the Verizon users contact support and they are telling 
 them it's a problem on my end. What should I be looking at?  Thanks, 
 Scott.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
 =lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Default save outlook 2002

2003-11-24 Thread David, Andy
Its hidden. Change the options in Explorer to see it.
You can change the default location simply by browsing to a new location
within Outlook and saving the attachment there. That new path will be saved.



-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Default save outlook 2002


Hi everyone,

I just got a laptop back from a traveler  who has switched to outlook in
anticipation of our Exchange deployment,

Her only complaint is the default save folder when she tries to save a
doc, it comes up with olk917 within the Temp Int Files directory, but when
she goes to browse to it, it is not there.

A)  why is it not accessable  B) where did it actually save it too?

C)  can I just change the default location?  outlook 2002







  Jean-Paul Natola
  Systems Administrator
  Information Technology
  Family Care International
  588 Broadway Suite 503
  New York, NY 10012
  Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
  Fax:212-941-5563
  Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF

2003-11-18 Thread David, Andy
Does the dev server have McAfee installed on it as well?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF


I have applied recent  MS Patch KB829418 to one of my production servers
(after testing ok on dev server). However, after approx 4 hours I get
STORE.EXE GPF. The patch has updated STORE.EXE to 5.5.2657.74 (fixes a
problem with Outlook 2003 rules processing).

Exchange 5.5 SP4. NT4 SP6a plus security patches.
Server running Exchange only but has Internet Mail Service and NNTP news
service connectors.

Also running McAfee GroupShield 5.0 SP2 Patch 1.

Have contacted PSS but they require a crash dump which so far I have not
been able to obtain.

Backed off patch and server runs fine.

Problem - repeatable.

Anyone experienced any problems with KB829418 on Exchange 5.5?

Thanks
Dave Parker
Rutherford Lab
UK


 



 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?

2003-11-14 Thread David, Andy
Specifically:
net stop MSExchangeSA /y

( 3 times)




-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?


As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going to go down the
shutdown path... some dust covers an old rule of thumb I either
read/heard/experienced once...that when shutting down one of the Exch
services ..particularlly with a remote script etc... issue the command three
times in the script...

don't ask... again it sticks in the duldrums of my feable mind but it's
there for 55 you could get fancy and write it so it check service state
also..which might help

I could be way off

bill

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?


wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way?

-Original Message-
From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns?


Greetings,
  2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4.

I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to
help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't
doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the
AT service?




  --Brett

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?

2003-11-14 Thread David, Andy
Ah yes. Missed that part. 
If I was only stopping one service, I may only put it in there once in a
batch file.



-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?


Andy shouldn't that be 

(remember click your heals together 3 times and repeat)
net stop MSExchangeIMC /y


since he only wanted the IMC?

bill

Wouldn't net stop MSExchangeSA /y take down basically all of exchange


-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?


Specifically:
net stop MSExchangeSA /y

( 3 times)




-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?


As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going to go down the
shutdown path... some dust covers an old rule of thumb I either
read/heard/experienced once...that when shutting down one of the Exch
services ..particularlly with a remote script etc... issue the command three
times in the script...

don't ask... again it sticks in the duldrums of my feable mind but it's
there for 55 you could get fancy and write it so it check service state
also..which might help

I could be way off

bill

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?


wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way?

-Original Message-
From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns?


Greetings,
  2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4.

I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to
help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't
doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the
AT service?




  --Brett

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging

2003-11-13 Thread David, Andy
Set the Deleted Item Retention time for messages to 0 and IS maintenance to
always and let that puppy run for awhile. Also, check the 1221 events in
the app log and see how much space has been freed up. The 1221's will give
you the min amount you can reclaim after defragging with eseutil again. 
And of course, take another backup *after* you run eseutil  :)




-Original Message-
From: pat karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging


Hi all,

I run an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server on Win NT 4.0.  Over the weekend it reached
it 16GB threshold and I had to defrag it using the ESEUTIL. 
Afterwards, I made a backup and began clearing out over 100 accounts that
contained close to 8GB's worth of data (according to the privates stores
resources area).  After which, I went back and viewed the size of the
PRIV.EDB and it remained the same size as it was before the purging.  It was
explained to me that I needed to run another backup and did so. 
Nothing has changed on the size of the PRIV.EDB database, shows 14.7 GB's.
I even ran the ESEUTIL once afterwards and another backup.  I am using
Brightstor Enterprise Backup.  Once again nothing changed.  Does anyone know
why this is happening and how I can recover all of the space that I cleared?

best regards,

Pat

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2002 - Exchange 2k Error Message

2003-11-13 Thread David, Andy
If you do a search on 0x800CCC0F in Technet, Im betting there are more
suggestions than just turning off email scanning to resolve the issue.
Otherwise, I would crank up transport logging :
(Tools/Options/Other/Advanced Options) and see if that reveals anything
worthwhile.



-Original Message-
From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 - Exchange 2k Error Message


A client of mine is receiving the following message from our Exchange server
when sending and receiving mail using pop3:

Task 'mail.client.net - Sending and Receiving' reported error (0x800CCC0F)
: 'The connection to the server was interrupted.  If this problem continues,
contact your server administrator or Internet service provider (ISP).  The
server responded: ???r?

We host email for multiple clients and this is the only client receiving
this message, however it is important to note that this does not seem to
impact their sending or receiving email.  I've looked at MS for this and
their only suggestion was turning off email scanning, which we did and she's
still receiving the message.

The POP client is set for a 10 minute server timeout, the server is set to
20 minutes (I increased it hoping to alleviate the problem.)  Anyone have
any idea what is causing this or how to eliminate it?  It doesn't look like
a good server response to me.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Question about Email Notification

2003-11-13 Thread David, Andy
And if your client suppresses read receipts, the sender will never get any
notifications at all! 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question about Email Notification


The delivery receipt indicates that mail server has accepted the email you
sent. There read receipt is a little tougher as read can have a lot of
meanings. Lets say I send you an email with a read receipt. You look at it
in the preview pane and then delete it. You then empty your deleted folders.
I will get an email that says Not Read. Now the truth is I did read it but
after I deleted it.

You can see its not something to base your email life on. 

-Original Message-
From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question about Email Notification

Both of these options in Exchange 5.5 are very vague.  What is the true
definition of these two options and is it truly a confirmation that the
recipient Read or Received the email.

I have heard different stories from both Microsoft and other Exchange
Admins.  Whats your hearsay on this?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?

2003-11-13 Thread David, Andy
lol


-Original Message-
From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns?


Greetings,
  2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4.

I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to
help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't
doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the
AT service?




  --Brett

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: PST-file backup problem

2003-11-12 Thread David, Andy
While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC,
after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them
up! 


-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a very small
exception list - pres  VPs of my org.)  I do backup the stores on my
server.

I have that VIP list in it's own store.  I have 2 other stores that hold the
remainder of my organization.  I use deleted item retention to allow users
to self-recover from oops I deleted a really important message).

All of my stores have a size limit.  Granted the VIP store is really big
(but the overall use is pretty small).  The other stores have reasonable
limits, and I do make exceptions for those who can demonstrate the need.  

PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at least in the
supported  sense), I had constant problems:  
* PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their computer on
w/outlook open, 
* Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame me when they
forget!)
* PSTs get corrupted

I would rather rebuild a server  in the very slim event that I had a severe
crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out problems I used to have with
PSTs!

HTH 

Arron


=
Arron King
Network  Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 614-251-4515
F: 614-252-2650


-Original Message-
From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem


Hi, and thanx alot for your time!!

Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000 users. Keep all
emails in store.. A good idea, but what happens if you have to crash
recover/recover databases or a single mailbox..? If all data is kept in
stores(without any mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase
radically-restore times increase radically!!

Hopefully you see my problem now..?


-Arttu-

-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lähetetty: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:01 PM
Vastaanottaja: Exchange Discussions
Aihe: RE: PST-file backup problem


You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're
using Exchange.  

If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST
files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed
by Exchange in a Store.  Backup is easier, and you will save disk space with
the Exchange SIS.  (You won't initially magically get SIS by importing
[reimporting?] the PST files into Exchange, but as the data grows you will
see a difference in your SIS).

 -Original Message-
 From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:46 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 Hello !
 
 My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files
 you always have to back up every PST-file. This is because 
 Outlook changes the file every time it's opened etc. So you 
 cannot take just incremental from changed files. Usually you 
 end up backing up all PST-files.. Ok.. so what you say! 
 
 The problem is that if you have to pay for every Gig you
 take, you end up paying a lot of money!
 
 Is there any third party tool or way to get rid of this problem?
 
 Having the same problem? Or is it just me ;)
 
 Rgs,
 
 -Arttu-
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   

RE: PST-file backup problem

2003-11-12 Thread David, Andy
Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at some point the
file closes, and it will back them up correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant
test that myself anymore.


-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees an open PST as
corrupt, not as an open file.  It completes the backup job; but marks it as
having failed.


=
Arron King
Network  Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 614-251-4515
F: 614-252-2650


-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC,
after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them
up! 


-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a very small
exception list - pres  VPs of my org.)  I do backup the stores on my
server.

I have that VIP list in it's own store.  I have 2 other stores that hold the
remainder of my organization.  I use deleted item retention to allow users
to self-recover from oops I deleted a really important message).

All of my stores have a size limit.  Granted the VIP store is really big
(but the overall use is pretty small).  The other stores have reasonable
limits, and I do make exceptions for those who can demonstrate the need.  

PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at least in the
supported  sense), I had constant problems:  
* PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their computer on
w/outlook open, 
* Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame me when they
forget!)
* PSTs get corrupted

I would rather rebuild a server  in the very slim event that I had a severe
crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out problems I used to have with
PSTs!

HTH 

Arron


=
Arron King
Network  Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 614-251-4515
F: 614-252-2650


-Original Message-
From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem


Hi, and thanx alot for your time!!

Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000 users. Keep all
emails in store.. A good idea, but what happens if you have to crash
recover/recover databases or a single mailbox..? If all data is kept in
stores(without any mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase
radically-restore times increase radically!!

Hopefully you see my problem now..?


-Arttu-

-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lähetetty: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:01 PM
Vastaanottaja: Exchange Discussions
Aihe: RE: PST-file backup problem


You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're
using Exchange.  

If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST
files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed
by Exchange in a Store.  Backup is easier, and you will save disk space with
the Exchange SIS.  (You won't initially magically get SIS by importing
[reimporting?] the PST files into Exchange, but as the data grows you will
see a difference in your SIS).

 -Original Message-
 From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:46 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 Hello !
 
 My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always 
 have to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the 
 file every time it's opened etc. So you cannot take just incremental 
 from changed files. Usually you end up backing up all PST-files.. Ok.. 
 so what you say!
 
 The problem is that if you have to pay for every Gig you take, you end 
 up paying a lot of money!
 
 Is there any third party tool or way to get rid of this problem?
 
 Having the same problem? Or is it just me ;)
 
 Rgs,
 
 -Arttu-
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter

RE: PST-file backup problem

2003-11-12 Thread David, Andy
Not sure on the period of inactivity on the part of the user, but, yea,
something like that. Or I could be completely wrong. Its just something that
I kinda recall from the back of my mind.  Theres not much back there.



-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


Andy,

Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of
the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself, allowing the
file to be backed up correctly?

Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the
open file handle closes, thereby allowing Veritas to back it up correctly?

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at some point the
file closes, and it will back them up correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant
test that myself anymore.


-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees an open PST as
corrupt, not as an open file.  It completes the backup job; but marks it as
having failed.


=
Arron King
Network  Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 614-251-4515
F: 614-252-2650


-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC,
after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them
up! 


-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem


FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a very small
exception list - pres  VPs of my org.)  I do backup the stores on my
server.

I have that VIP list in it's own store.  I have 2 other stores that hold the
remainder of my organization.  I use deleted item retention to allow users
to self-recover from oops I deleted a really important message).

All of my stores have a size limit.  Granted the VIP store is really big
(but the overall use is pretty small).  The other stores have reasonable
limits, and I do make exceptions for those who can demonstrate the need.  

PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at least in the
supported  sense), I had constant problems:  
* PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their computer on
w/outlook open, 
* Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame me when they
forget!)
* PSTs get corrupted

I would rather rebuild a server  in the very slim event that I had a severe
crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out problems I used to have with
PSTs!

HTH 

Arron


=
Arron King
Network  Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 614-251-4515
F: 614-252-2650


-Original Message-
From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem


Hi, and thanx alot for your time!!

Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000 users. Keep all
emails in store.. A good idea, but what happens if you have to crash
recover/recover databases or a single mailbox..? If all data is kept in
stores(without any mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase
radically-restore times increase radically!!

Hopefully you see my problem now..?


-Arttu-

-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lähetetty: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:01 PM
Vastaanottaja: Exchange Discussions
Aihe: RE: PST-file backup problem


You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're
using Exchange.  

If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST
files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed
by Exchange in a Store.  Backup is easier, and you will save disk space with
the Exchange SIS.  (You won't initially magically get SIS by importing
[reimporting?] the PST files into Exchange, but as the data grows you will
see a difference in your SIS).

 -Original Message-
 From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:46 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 Hello !
 
 My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always 
 have to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the 
 file every time it's opened

RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu

2003-11-12 Thread David, Andy
Could be any number of things.
Search in Technet for an article called Troubleshooting High CPU
Utilization By Store.exe and see if that points to anything useful.


-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu


Hi all

I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the
store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop responding.

I can shut the services down manually and restart  takes a looong time. I
have removed all antivirus products from server there is pleanty of disk
space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror drive. priv is 6.53 gb
and pub is 1.53  they are not growing rapidly. dir edb is 350 meg

I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is consistant.

Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These are
good reboots no dirty shutdowns

Thanks for any info

I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure there were no
hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India)

Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: PST-file backup problem

2003-11-12 Thread David, Andy
Excellent. I thought I remembered something through the beer haze.


-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem




Summary from an MS kb article: (222328 )

Outlook locks personal folder files (.pst) while they are in use; it is not
possible to copy the .pst file while it is locked. Outlook releases the lock
on a .pst file after 30 minutes of inactivity, by default. This article
describes how to control the timeout value after which Outlook releases the
file lock on a .pst file.


 -Original Message-
 From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:03 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 Not sure on the period of inactivity on the part of the user,
 but, yea, something like that. Or I could be completely 
 wrong. Its just something that I kinda recall from the back 
 of my mind.  Theres not much back there.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 Andy,
 
 Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on
 the part of the user, that the .pst file file handle will 
 close itself, allowing the file to be backed up correctly?
 
 Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back
 them up, the open file handle closes, thereby allowing 
 Veritas to back it up correctly?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:40 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at
 some point the file closes, and it will back them up 
 correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant test that myself anymore.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees
 an open PST as corrupt, not as an open file.  It completes 
 the backup job; but marks it as having failed.
 
 
 =
 Arron King
 Network  Systems Administrator
 Ohio Dominican University
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 V: 614-251-4515
 F: 614-252-2650
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal
 folders, IIRC, after (30 min?), the open file handle closes 
 on psts and you can back them up! 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a
 very small exception list - pres  VPs of my org.)  I do 
 backup the stores on my server.
 
 I have that VIP list in it's own store.  I have 2 other
 stores that hold the remainder of my organization.  I use 
 deleted item retention to allow users to self-recover from 
 oops I deleted a really important message).
 
 All of my stores have a size limit.  Granted the VIP store is
 really big (but the overall use is pretty small).  The other 
 stores have reasonable limits, and I do make exceptions for 
 those who can demonstrate the need.  
 
 PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at
 least in the supported  sense), I had constant problems:  
 * PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their 
 computer on w/outlook open, 
 * Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame 
 me when they
 forget!)
 * PSTs get corrupted
 
 I would rather rebuild a server  in the very slim event that
 I had a severe crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out 
 problems I used to have with PSTs!
 
 HTH
 
 Arron
 
 
 =
 Arron King
 Network  Systems Administrator
 Ohio Dominican University
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 V: 614-251-4515
 F: 614-252-2650
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem
 
 
 Hi, and thanx alot for your time!!
 
 Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000
 users. Keep all emails in store.. A good idea, but what 
 happens if you have to crash recover/recover databases or a 
 single mailbox..? If all data is kept in stores(without any 
 mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase
 radically-restore times increase radically!!
 
 Hopefully you see my problem now..?
 
 
 -Arttu-
 
 -Alkuperäinen viesti-
 Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Lähetetty: Tuesday

RE: Virus with XP

2003-11-10 Thread David, Andy
Check to see if your local hosts file has a bunch of bogus entries.


-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus with XP


My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean it. Now
when I open my browser and go to www.google.com it take me to another
website www.cpanel.net. Has anyone seen this before and I do I fix this?
Thank

Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
www.jetproducts.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

2003-11-07 Thread David, Andy
Mongo change ISP.


-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5


I would if I could.

Earthlink does NOT offer a static IP for cable internet accounts. Earthlink
will NOT provide any DNS services, like making a PTR record.

Best Regards,
JMU

Jim Underwood




-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 14:40
To: Jim Underwood
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5


Why don't you just go with a static IP and make sure you have a valid
reverse ptr record?

-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5


When any user on our Exchange Server 5.5 tries to send an EMail to AOL or an
AOL company (Like cs.com), he receives the following nondelivery notice:

===
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test Msg to cs.com
  Sent: 11/06/03 13:41

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/06/03 13:41
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=ApolloInfoSys;l=APOLLO1-031106194050Z-1991
===

The Exchange Server is on an Earthlink Cable Internet network with dynamic
IP.

I have read that there may be two reasons for rejecting the mail:
1.  Incorrect reverse DNS
2.  AOL blocks all EMail from the broadband user networks like
Earthlink.net


So it would appear that I need to find an EMail host that I can relay our
outbound mail to.

===
MY QUESTIONS:
===
1. Do you agree with my assessment of the problem?  
   If not, what do you think it is and how can I fix it?
2. Can you recommend an EMail host that will accept relay from our
Exchange Server 5.5?


BACKGROUND INFO:

Mail Server is  Apollo1.ApolloIS.com
IP is   24.238.172.104
Reverse DNS is: user-0cetb38.cable.mindspring.com


Best Regards,
JMU


Jim Underwood
Apollo Information Systems, Inc.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

2003-11-07 Thread David, Andy
Does it include the standard open relay option?


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5


Martin Blackstone has an ISP you can use.  

 -Original Message-
 From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
 
 
 Mongo change ISP.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
 
 
 I would if I could.
 
 Earthlink does NOT offer a static IP for cable internet
 accounts. Earthlink
 will NOT provide any DNS services, like making a PTR record.
 
 Best Regards,
 JMU
 
 Jim Underwood
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 14:40
 To: Jim Underwood
 Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
 
 
 Why don't you just go with a static IP and make sure you have a valid 
 reverse ptr record?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:57 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
 
 
 When any user on our Exchange Server 5.5 tries to send an
 EMail to AOL or an
 AOL company (Like cs.com), he receives the following 
 nondelivery notice:
 
 ===
 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 
   Subject:Test Msg to cs.com
   Sent:   11/06/03 13:41
 
 The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/06/03 13:41
 Unable to deliver the message due to a
 communications failure
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
 ;p=ApolloInfoSys;l=APOLLO1-031106194050Z-1991
 ===
 
 The Exchange Server is on an Earthlink Cable Internet network
 with dynamic
 IP.
 
 I have read that there may be two reasons for rejecting the mail:
   1.  Incorrect reverse DNS
   2.  AOL blocks all EMail from the broadband user networks like 
 Earthlink.net
 
 
 So it would appear that I need to find an EMail host that I
 can relay our
 outbound mail to.
 
 ===
 MY QUESTIONS:
 ===
   1. Do you agree with my assessment of the problem?  
  If not, what do you think it is and how can I fix it?
   2. Can you recommend an EMail host that will accept
 relay from our
 Exchange Server 5.5?
 
 
 BACKGROUND INFO:
 
 Mail Server isApollo1.ApolloIS.com
 IP is 24.238.172.104
 Reverse DNS is:   user-0cetb38.cable.mindspring.com
 
 
 Best Regards,
 JMU
 
 
 Jim Underwood
 Apollo Information Systems, Inc.
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange on the road

2003-11-06 Thread David, Andy
And Scrappy Doo.


-Original Message-
From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on the road


There is also IMAP. 

-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on the road

1) OWA
2) VPN and OST file synchronization
3) RPC over HTTP (assuming you're running Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003)

You may also want to ensure that the downloaded messages weren't deleted
from the server (which might be the default with POP depending on the client
in use).  



 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Exchange on the road
 
 
 I have a customer that wants to be able to get their
 inter-office Exchange
 mails on the road.  They want to do this from within Outlook. 
  When I POP
 the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to 
 download ALL his
 messages, even those he has already read.  Is there a way 
 around this?  If
 I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the 
 domain, will he
 get duplicates?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Steve Cobb
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread David, Andy
Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups.


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.  

My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability
under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more
and more of an audit train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are
over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to
prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and
having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread David, Andy
They do in Apex.


-Original Message-
From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


do a mailbox cleanup to delete the voice mail attachments before you run the
backup.  Let everyone get used to the idea that if they don't listen to
voice mail right away, they lose it.

You probably wouldn't want to do that every day, though.

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:58 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Forum
Conversation: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups.


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.  

My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability
under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more
and more of an audit train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are
over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to
prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and
having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange on the road

2003-11-05 Thread David, Andy
OWA/VPN or leave the messages on the Exch Server.



-Original Message-
From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange on the road


I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange
mails on the road.  They want to do this from within Outlook.  When I POP
the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his
messages, even those he has already read.  Is there a way around this?  If I
let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get
duplicates?

Thanks,

Steve Cobb

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange Limits

2003-11-03 Thread David, Andy
Other than 0!  g





-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits


It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sort of question.  There's no right or
wrong answer.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible
Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange Limits
Subject: Exchange Limits



Exchange 2000 SP3

Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and
on idividual mailboxes?  I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and
200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years.  Some
select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits.

I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do
any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them?

Thanks for your help!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  1   2   >