RE: doubletake
Yes, and all their names as well! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake Do you want to see pictures of my 257 cats? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake Cool. A dog thread. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy you will ever meet. He is nothing but love. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake The dog is 150 pounds, half wolf, half German Sheppard. About the dumbest most loveable dog I have ever met. But boy does he smell... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail server Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: doubletake What does double take really do for exchange?? Yeah so I have a bit by bit copy of the store, my dog comes in and pees on my primary server, now what will double take do for me? will it change IP and Server for me to fail over? How do my users see that there is a double take server?? Any one run this or have it installed that can tell me?? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm
RE: Exchange 2003 backups
You should be able to backup a pst after (30) minutes of inactivity. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;222328 -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups Matthew, you will find that the PST=BAD has become religious dogma on this list. In reality, PST files are just another tool, and much like any other tool (inclined plane, fire, chainsaw, etc) they are neither inherently good nor evil. On the other hand, while PST files can serve a useful purpose, they are definitely in the chainsaw category of tools. They can be handy for some situations, but they need respect, and users of PST files must understand their limitations. PST files cannot hit the 2GB file size. If they do, you will corrupt the PST, and will need a special recovery tool to get back SOME of the data in the PST. I have heard rumors that the corruption can occur well before the 2GB mark, so we tell any of our PST users to stay below 1GB. PST files cannot be backed up while they are open. Any users we have with PST files run a startup script that zips their PST to a file server[1], then runs Outlook after the zip is done. You, as the email admin, have no visibility into these PST files. You cannot, for example, use exmerge to delete infected emails as you could if they were in the store. [1] The argument could be made here to remove disk space from the file server, add it to the exchange server, and don't use the PST file. This certainly should be done if possible, but isn't always practical. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Joyce Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups yes, this is my concern. The main part of my question was what to backup and how often. ...and retention setting for mailboxes and deleted items. I need to figure out a robust policy which won't need tobe changed 6 months because of store bloating. Import all those PSTs is just not something I'm prepared to do. I can see, that had I not used PSTs and used bigger mailboxes (not something I could have done, predecessor, etc) then staff would be forced to managed their mail better. Matt -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups Really big hard drives is how we do it. Our users keep the mail they need and are encouraged to dispose of the mail they don't need. Occasionally they do. Of course, we have the luxury of having an abundance of storage space on our Exchange servers the bigger challenge is the effect those large information stores can have on backups and restores. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups I'd recommend a public folder. That way, not only do you have access to email from years ago, but all users (with correct permissions) have access, instead of only the user who has it in a PST. Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Joyce Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they considered bad ? How else can I give users access to email from 2 years ago ? yes, they do need to access these. What do other organisations do ? Matt -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups PST = Bad. themolk. -Original Message- From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 backups Hi, I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. It is a single server setup. I used to use BackupExec+Exchange agent to backup to a DLT. The stores and the individual mailboxes were backed up daily and every week I would stop the services and do a full backup. Before I rush out an pay Veritas for the license upgrade, I thought I would revue the situation. Some background info... The server has 100gb of raid5 diskspace. There is about 125 mailboxes, I expect this to continue to rise to
RE: Exchange 2003 backups
That's why E2003 handles them so well. -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups Err, Outlook 2003 has the ability to handle PST files in excess of 2Gb. Exchange itself doesn't know or care about PST files. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta Sent: 09 January 2004 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups Exchange 2003 pst files larger than 2gig are possible I believe. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Disabling Outlook access to Exchange 5.5
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;146764 -Original Message- From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disabling Outlook access to Exchange 5.5 Is there a way to block Outlook users from connecting to an Exchange 5.5 server? We are moving users from one server to another and want to block them from logging into their mailbox on the weekend. Ralph Elmerick NT Exchange Administrator Information Systems Technical Principal ** PLEASE NOTE: The above email address has recently changed from a previous naming standard -- if this does not match your records, please update them to use this new name in future email addressed to this individual. This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: unhold
DeThong -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unhold Unhold _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: RPC over HTTP
Do you like it with eggs? Do you like it with ham? -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP I did like rpc.mydomain.com I still can not contact the server. Eric -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP What do you mean by that? There are no special DNS records that need to be created other than an A record in your externally-accessible DNS... Are you referring to something else? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: RPC over HTTP Subject: RPC over HTTP To publish you Exchange 2003 server on the Internet for HTTP, how should your DNS look to contact it? I think I have done the pre-install Server 2003 configs and Exchange 2003 configs too. Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: doubletake
Cool. A dog thread. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy you will ever meet. He is nothing but love. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake The dog is 150 pounds, half wolf, half German Sheppard. About the dumbest most loveable dog I have ever met. But boy does he smell... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: doubletake That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail server Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: doubletake What does double take really do for exchange?? Yeah so I have a bit by bit copy of the store, my dog comes in and pees on my primary server, now what will double take do for me? will it change IP and Server for me to fail over? How do my users see that there is a double take server?? Any one run this or have it installed that can tell me?? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Internet Mail Issues
Stop calling me Shirley! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues Who is Shirley Comcast? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues Shirley Comcast will allow you to relay your outbound mail through their MXed, reverse-DNSed mailhost, right? If so, just point your Exchange server to relay all outbound mail through them. If not, ditch Comcast. They're not a business-class ISP in my opinion, at least. -- be - MOS Replace repetitive expressions by calls to a common function. -Original Message- From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Internet Mail Issues I have a client who is migrating away from an ISP hosted POP mail account to a newly created exch 2003 box and we're experiencing 5.5.0 smtp;550 Dynamic IPs/open relays blocked. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], 5.5.0 smtp;550-68.37.144.103 blocked by blacklist.mail.ops.asp.att.net. and to aol Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. I've contacted both earthlink and att/comcast and both insist that the new server is not blacklisted and a quick search on ORDB shows we are not blacklisted (The server had only been up 4 hours and we were getting this message from att/comcast!) I've locked down the server and we're not allowing relay so I'm thinking it might be reverse dns, but comcast (our isp) won't allow us to host reverse dns or set up an entry for us. Before we shutdown the server and get an new ISP that will allow reverse dns, does anyone else have an idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server
Any chance this is simply a corrupt meeting in the calendar? How many users is this affecting? -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server Greetings! We have 4 Exchange Servers (E2K Enterprise) and 4 Enterprise Blackberry Servers (2.6). Over the last few months, we have had our Blackberry users complain of their Exchange Calendar's locking up when they attempt to access them. If another user (their assistant) attempts to open their calendar remotely, it locks that persons machine up as well. We have tried troubleshooting this to no avail and am hoping someone else has run in to this. Both MSFT and Blackberry have been useless, pointing the finger at the other companies software. Some interesting notes: * Affected calendar can be opened with Outlook 2003 and with OWA, but with no other versions of the Outlook client I am desperate... any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator
Unfortunately, 1016s are poor indicators and are generated regardless of logging level. Increasing the logging level in the IS to max -( Logons or something similar) cant remember the specific category name off the top of my head )) should yield better info. -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator The only way I know of is to increase the logging for the info store to medium and then look for event 1016 in the application log on the exchange server. This is generated every time an account accesses a mailbox that is not its primary mailbox. No amount of permission granting will stop it from being generated. You can also look in the Exchange properties for the server mailboxes to see who last logged on to a particular mailbox. You could also look in the person's File, Open in Outlook and see if another mailbox is in the recently accessed list. Either way you will need to access the Exchange server or the user's local Outlook. If wrong doing is suspected, it is appropriate for the CEO to order an audit of operations and see what comes up. I'm not aware of any auditing tools that would not require at least minimal access to the user's logon and workstation or the exchange server. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 03:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator Hi, I am a independent consultant hired to investigate an administrator who the CEO belives he is accessing sensative email from others mailbox. While it is NOT possible to configure anything on the exchange server, is there anything I can do a spot-check or any tools like sniffer, so that I can monitor any possible wrong-doing of the administrator? If you have any insight on this issue, please kindly drop me a line at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: replay log files for one user?
Did ya use the DumpsterAlwaysOn trick via Outlook? Otherwise, it's a full restore unless you have been doing mailbox level backups of some sort. Personally, I have never seen emails just disappear. -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: replay log files for one user? Ex2k SP3 Win2k SP3 OL 2002 SP1 My CEO came into us today and informed us that all of his email is gone. According to him it was there at 10:05 and gone at 10:10. Of course he claims that he did not move or delete it, which I have confirmed. Nothing in the DIR, nothing in trash, or other folders. No one else has access to his mailbox. One of our guys is busy trying to figure out what happened. My task has become to get it back. I've done DR, but only for a full system. Never a single user. I was wondering if there is a way to replay the log files for single user or do I have to put all on my DR box and then drop to a pst from there to import back into his account? Your help is appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Personal folders
Check permissions, if they look ok, make sure the read-only attrib isnt set on that pst. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Personal folders Does anyone know when a user has a new windows profile, why they can't access thier personal folder. Some windows profiles was change and when you add their pst to their OutLook profile and try to open it , it give an error permission denied, and they are logging in with thier new windows profile? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Sizes
There is a post SP3 fix for this. Alternatively, you could stop and restart the store. -Original Message- From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Sizes Hi All, Can someone tell me why it would take up to a day for mailbox sizing to occur? For instance, I change the size limit of a users mailbox from 50MB to Unlimited, for some reason it doesnt take effect until the next day or a few hours later. This seems awefully slow to me. Does anyone know of a solution to make it faster or more consistant. -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/ser vers
Nope. Once you moved the mailbox, anything recoverable in the DIR bin got whacked. You will have to restore from backup. -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/ser vers
So sad. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Too bad. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/features/win_compare.asp -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD Hi all, What do you think are the features I am going to lose if I deploy Exchange2003 in a Windows2000 AD(native) domain instead of a Windows2003 AD domain? So far, based on the following article I could lost the InetOrgPerson objects : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822591Product=exch2 003 thx -Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
You are not allowed to thank Robert per the Decklerheitsgebot Purity Laws of IT Ethics. -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Cheers Robert as I said I just wanted it confirmed ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Yes of course it can. -- Robert Moir Microsoft MVP Senior IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College RM Eunt Domus -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 December 2003 12:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K I would be grateful if anyone would be able to confirm that Exchange 2k is able to utilise dual processor technology on W2k server. Regards David Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England Company No. 291646 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
I want my compiler! -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Shhh don't worry about him. He's just jealous that Windows Server MVPs get better bribes than Exchange server ones do. -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 December 2003 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Am I allowed to apologise then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K You are not allowed to thank Robert per the Decklerheitsgebot Purity Laws of IT Ethics. -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Cheers Robert as I said I just wanted it confirmed ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Yes of course it can. -- Robert Moir Microsoft MVP Senior IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College RM Eunt Domus -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 December 2003 12:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K I would be grateful if anyone would be able to confirm that Exchange 2k is able to utilise dual processor technology on W2k server. Regards David Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England Company No. 291646 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT: Outlook 2003 in cached mode
I saw that delay in the early beta versions of Outlook 2003. -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Outlook 2003 in cached mode I don't know what is happening but I have tried the following on five Exchange 2003 servers using Outlook 2003 in cached mode from default installs. If I use Outlook 2003 on a new mailbox and allow it to sync fully then send a message to myself. It will take approximately 30 seconds to appear in the Inbox. If I remove the tick for Cached Mode in the profile so it is directly linked to Exchange the message appears instantly in the Inbox. It would appear cache mode on Outlook 2003 is polling the server every so often, is this the case? Can it be changed? Anyone else tried this and seen this problem? TIA, Paul The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1
Was RC1 standard and the RTM Enterprise? -Original Message- From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 I recently asked this question at microsoft.public.exchange.admin, and failing to get an answer in a couple of days, thought I'd ask again here. It's possible I'm being impatient, since I'm mostly working during this Christmas season while the person who knows the answer is doubtlessly taking a much-deserved holiday, but on the off-chance that the Someone Who Knows is currently available I'm going to repost it here I find myself in a very deep crack here. I installed RC1 last summer, let it expire, and then last week attempted to upgrade it to RTM. Seemed to work. However, the RTM continues to behave as though it is time-limited and announces my eval period has expired, shutting Exchange down after a half-hour to an hour. So, trying to back out of this situation, I thought to uninstall. However, I am prevented from uninstalling by a message which declares that an upgrade from Standard to Enterprise is in progress and that I must do a Reinstall to complete it. Unfortunately, even after a Reinstall, the problems persist, and I can go neither forward nor backward. So, there it is. Re-building the domain is not an option here, since it is a production domain...Any assistance greatly appreciated, Patrick Crawford VaspTech LLC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
If two people make and save changes to the same open document, don't the owners of the PF get a conflict message in their inboxes? -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Jason Clishe Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? I disagree. I presented a scenario and asked a yes or no question. I supplied enough information for a yes or no answer. I did not ask for assistance with a design or a solution, just a simple question about whether or not Exchange has the capability to do what I asked. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? I think Ed's answer was appropriate given the amount of information you gave out in your first post. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Posted At: 22 December 2003 15:22 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? The document management suggestion was inappropriate because we have a single document that 2 people have modify rights to and another dozen or so people can read. So deploying a DMS is an expensive solution when the problem boils down to preventing 2 people from modifying one particular file at the same time. Especially if there is an inherent method within Exchange to prevent the problem from happening in the first place, which is really all I wanted to know. Thank you for your answer though. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? The answer was correct. What Ed left out was the No. at the front in answer to your question of whether there is any way to prevent multiple editors of an attachment to a public folder. Did you go look at the 80-20 web site and see what features there product offers? What exactly makes the suggestion of a product which may solve your problem inappropriate? There are also lots of others with different feature sets as Ed alluded. As for little value to the thread, complaining because you didn't get the answer you wanted regardless of the veracity of the answer really has low value. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Jason Clishe Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? Deploy a real document management system? Not only does this suggestion not asnwer the question I asked, it is completely inappropriate for my particular situation, and adds little value to this thread. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? Deploy a real document management system, one that has the capability to check out and check in documents. http://www.80-20.com is one that integrates with Exchange. There are many others that may or may not integrate with Exchange. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only? When a user has a Public Folder attachment open, other users can also open the same attachment and make changes. Is there any way to prevent this? For example, to force the document to open as read-only when someone else has it open? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1
Standard RC1 to Standard RTM ( or Enterprise RC1 to Enterprise RTM) was the only supported path AFAIK. -Original Message- From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 Yes, apparently. - Original Message - From: David, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:49 AM Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 Was RC1 standard and the RTM Enterprise? -Original Message- From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade from 2003 RC1 I recently asked this question at microsoft.public.exchange.admin, and failing to get an answer in a couple of days, thought I'd ask again here. It's possible I'm being impatient, since I'm mostly working during this Christmas season while the person who knows the answer is doubtlessly taking a much-deserved holiday, but on the off-chance that the Someone Who Knows is currently available I'm going to repost it here I find myself in a very deep crack here. I installed RC1 last summer, let it expire, and then last week attempted to upgrade it to RTM. Seemed to work. However, the RTM continues to behave as though it is time-limited and announces my eval period has expired, shutting Exchange down after a half-hour to an hour. So, trying to back out of this situation, I thought to uninstall. However, I am prevented from uninstalling by a message which declares that an upgrade from Standard to Enterprise is in progress and that I must do a Reinstall to complete it. Unfortunately, even after a Reinstall, the problems persist, and I can go neither forward nor backward. So, there it is. Re-building the domain is not an option here, since it is a production domain...Any assistance greatly appreciated, Patrick Crawford VaspTech LLC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K3 Exchange Services group missing
Domainprep needs to be run in the root domain as well. That being said, I was under the impression that the Exchange services group wasn't created unless the ADC was already installed. -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K3 Exchange Services group missing I ran forest prep and it created domain servers, enterprise servers and services in the forest root. I then ran domain prep in a second level domain but only domain servers and enterprise servers got created. No Exchange services group. I reran domain prep and it reports completing successfully but no exchange services ever gets created. Can this be manually? Or is there a way to force the creation of this group? Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Header Info
If it never leaves the IMS, I don't think it will. If there is a restriction on the remote server, it shouldnt be sitting in the IMS anyway, it should simply bounce back to the sender almost immediately after the remote server denies the connection. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Header Info Exchange 5.5/4 Win2000/4 Potentially silly question. (Technical, non-ethical, sorry) If I send an e-mail to external domain and it sits in my outbound IMS queue and can't get delivered because of a restriction on the receiving domain's e-mail server, my NDR should have header info in right? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Who says? Feel free to ask for your money back, otherwise delete anything you don't like or unsub. If you really want this thread to die, stop responding to it. Besides, shouldn't you be preparing for the Rose Bowl? -Original Message- From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 This is not the platform for these type of debates. This is a professional forum about Exchange. http://groups.yahoo.com/search?query=ethics Many forums will discuss this stuff, go somewhere more appropriate. If this forum were moderated these people would have received warnings by now. Nathan -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 You can always delete these emails if you arent interested. -Original Message- From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, You are wasting our time. How ethical is it to waste a bunch of professional's people's time, which have better things to be doing and reading. Reply to those that care. STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, STOP,STOP, -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Boy, I hate to jump in, but perhaps I can end this... Greg, in the absolute, you are correct. Accepting *anything* of *any* value whatsoever from third parties that stand to gain from your relationship to your client could be considered a breach of ethics - in the absolute. Even if the gift (title, free software, pencils..) does not influence, the perception of the relationship to the third party is still tainted. Note I say could be. The crux is in the context. Does your client expect objectivity on your part? That is the critical difference. If an IT professional bills themselves as providing the very best vendor neutral solution, then accepting vendor gifts (even titles) could be considered a breach of ethics. Disclosure is another big factor. Has the relationship between you and the third party been disclosed to the client? For example, If I hire a lawyer to sue a company, I would every right to expect that the lawyer not be getting any gratuities whatsoever from that company. If the lawyer were receiving anything of value (even titles, which could enhance their status) from the company, that would be a breech of ethics. Furthermore, I'd expect any past relationship with the company be disclosed fully to me. Failure of this, even if the lawyer's performance wasn't actually swayed in the slightest, would still create a perception of impropriety. Now, if I call up the local Trane dealer for a new furnace, I certainly don't expect any objectivity on from him/her. It is not a problem if Trane has bestowed titles, free trips to the Bahamas, fish tacos, or any other gratuity to him/her. In fact, the more the better, since that means they are more than likely competent at what they do. I'd say IT consultants dealing with Exchange are in the second group. Most pitch MS solutions, and make no claims of objectivity. Also, when an IT professional uses something like Microsoft MVP after their name, that serves as a disclosure to the client that there is an existing relationship between the consultant and Microsoft. For sure ethics standards are a slippery beast and make for an ever changing landscape. It would be simpler if the whole world adopted the not even the appearance of impropriety standard, but that just isn't going to happen. Therefore, every profession defines, and continually redefines the line that divides ethical from unethical. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I will state this again for the 11 millionth and 1 time now. Accepting direct gifts from third parties, especially significant gifts such as large dollar items and titles, presents a real or perceived conflict of interest between an IT professional's client (either the customer or company that he or she works
RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST
Is the store growing rapidly as well? Verify you arent allowing auto-replies to the Internet and that if you are running AV software on the server, you arent scanning the exch dirs. -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST I have just upgraded a Windows 2000 Server / Exchange 2000 Server to Windows Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003. The upgrade seemed to go well. Now my transaction log disk is filling up fast. I would appreciate any hints on where to find documents for diagnosing this type of issue. Thanks, Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST
Scan yours and let us know what happens. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST Why would AV scanning on the Exchange dirs cause the logs to grow? Or are you addressing the sluggish performance symptom. Is internal mail delivery taking a long time to deliver as well? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST No it was about the same size yesterday, give or take a few MB. Checked them. Thanks for your time. Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST Is the store growing rapidly as well? Verify you arent allowing auto-replies to the Internet and that if you are running AV software on the server, you arent scanning the exch dirs. -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST I have just upgraded a Windows 2000 Server / Exchange 2000 Server to Windows Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003. The upgrade seemed to go well. Now my transaction log disk is filling up fast. I would appreciate any hints on where to find documents for diagnosing this type of issue. Thanks, Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST
Im simply offering suggestions. If you scan the M: drive, it will certainly cause a growth in transaction logs. However, I can only assume that since he has upgraded to E2003, the M: drive is no longer visible, so I left that part off. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST I realize that AV scanning your database will cause your machine to run like a sick dog, but are you suggesting it will bloat the size of the log files? I've never done that because I've always known better. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST Scan yours and let us know what happens. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST Why would AV scanning on the Exchange dirs cause the logs to grow? Or are you addressing the sluggish performance symptom. Is internal mail delivery taking a long time to deliver as well? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST No it was about the same size yesterday, give or take a few MB. Checked them. Thanks for your time. Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST Is the store growing rapidly as well? Verify you arent allowing auto-replies to the Internet and that if you are running AV software on the server, you arent scanning the exch dirs. -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING FAST I have just upgraded a Windows 2000 Server / Exchange 2000 Server to Windows Server 2003 and Exchange Server 2003. The upgrade seemed to go well. Now my transaction log disk is filling up fast. I would appreciate any hints on where to find documents for diagnosing this type of issue. Thanks, Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
As a Microsoft Partner, does your company get any freebies? -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Alright, this is a good question. Bottom line is that if, as the hiring body, you don't care then ethics are irrelevant in your decision and you do what you want. Ethics do not have to be the end all, be all of decision making. And, it is also absolutely not the case that MVP's will always recommend Microsoft software for their own personal gain. You are exactly correct, you have final say about what you feel is and is not relevant about your hiring decisions. But, this does not change the situation that the MVP title is a real or perceived conflict of interest. Of course it is, but whether or not you care is up to you. My company, Consolidated Widgets, Inc., has previously decided to = standardize on MS software at all levels. When it comes time to make hiring = decisions, whether for FTEs or for conslutants, how should I proceed? Let's take = the example of an Exchange deployment project. =20 First thing to be decided:=20 Do I want a generic technologist? Do I want an unrelated technology guru? Do I want a Windows/Exchange guru? Assuming I choose the last option: Do I want someone who has heard of Exchange and may be able to help with = my deployment after reading some books? Do I want someone who is an expert, and can demonstrate their expertise somehow? The demonstration of the expertise is all that the MVP status is, IMO. = You don't attain MVP status by sending in a bunch of cereal box tops, as one = can do to get an MCSE. =20 You whole premise is that an employee/conslutant with an MVP will automatically recommend technology from their masters *for their own = personal gain*. I don't see this being the case. If I'm hiring Ed (to use him = as an example) to help with my Exchange migration, I've already made the = decision to use that MS technology. At that point, I want the best person I can = find and afford. Why hire a consultant, if not for their knowledge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automating email via Exchange
http://www.express-soft.com/mailmate/clickyes.html http://www.dimastr.com/redemption/ -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange You know, this is the very reason that we put Outlook 2000 (w/o security patch) on our scanning PC (it interfaces with the GAL and allows you to send the scanned document directly to a mailbox). It would sure be nice if there was an alternative. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:26 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Automating email via Exchange Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange E-mail merge under Office 2k and later (with the OL security PITA in place) blows chunks. Unless the stars are aligned correctly, you get prompted for each recipient -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange Mail merge with Microsoft Word maybe? Or use a third-party mailing list program - some of those allow to combine generic text with some personalized stuff. That's what a lot of spammers use. -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automating email via Exchange Hello all. I need help with automating an email to 140 users on our Exchange system. The email contains a generic message for all, and then some personal information like user name and password. Is there a good way to automate this with Exchange/Outlook? (By automate I mean, send an individual email to each user with the generic message and then insert their personal info.) Or do I need to go get a third party utility to do this? Thanks for any help you can provide. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command line directory export of GAL container
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Command line directory export of GAL container How does one export the contents of the Global Address List container from the command line (Exchange 5.5)? I can select the Global Address List container from within Admin as the source to export to a csv file, but I want to script the process. Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IFS
Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point during normal processing. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IFS Help, Under the folder mdbdata there is suddenly a .IFS file, can anyone tell me what it is/does, and how it got there? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Priv.edb
Those html files are your .stm files. Leave them be! -Original Message- From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Priv.edb Its not a large system and as i say its running SBS 2000. So, i will leave of circular logging then. Its just i've always dealt with 5.5 servers and that's how i had it there. The weird thing is when i check the setup of Exchange 2000 i see that on the C:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ *.log files Pub1.edb = 16mb (not much usage made of Public folders) Howerver, this is what i find wierd, in the same place i have another pub1 = 14mb and is specified as an html doc?? I see the same for my Priv1.edb database E:\exchsrvr\ priv1.edb = 2.15 GB priv1 = 7.32 GB (shows its an html document) no log files can be seen? Is this right, should i have a 7.32 Gb priv1 html doc sat next to my priv1.edb file anyone shed some light on this? I just inherited the box :( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 permissions error
Did they recently change their passwords? -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error when trying to open their mailbox on the server: Unable to display the selected folder or item. You do not have permission to log on while no permissions have changed and their accounts are not locked out. Any ideas? Exchange 2000 SP3 Outlook 2000 and 2002 Win2k Domain Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
Sounds kinky. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K SRS uses X.400, in its own way, right? -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K Yes, it is lot more resilient and robust than other connectors. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K Actually, it has a lot of advantages - in Exchange 5.5, that is. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K Yes, but what reasoning would you have for just using an X.400 connector? Because it has a lot of limitations that's why I ask. _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davinder Gupta Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K Hi Guys, Can an Exchange 5.5 connector (x.400) in one exchange site talk to another connector (x.400) connector in Exchange 2K? Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox store! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Actually, its one copy per server containing a mailbox in the distribution. That's important to remember when dealing with multiple servers. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? As Tony says, search under Single Instance Storage (aka SIS) for the techie explanation. In the case your friend cites, he's wrong. What will happen is that your mail gets sent to 1000 people, and there is one copy of it. Now if one of them opens that mail and annotates it with their thoughts on what you said, and then saves it, then the server will hold one copy of his altered mail for him and 1 other copy for the other 999 people. -- Robert Moir Microsoft MVP Senior IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College RM Eunt Domus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 December 2003 10:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Hi, Let's say a user sends a 1Mb attachment by email to 1000 people, does it add 1000Mb to the Exchange Database? I put out a post like this before the replies were negative. But now a friend pointed out that a recipient who has a mailbox on the Exchange Server could for example open this email change it. Then save it (i.e. the email was changed). So he's saying that this shows that each person gets their personal copy of the email. Therefore, the 1Mb attachment in the email to 1000 people DOES increase the Exchange Database size by 1000Mb. Pls. can you shed some light on this discussion for us? I'd appreciate some official article from Microsoft (e.g. Technet) to prove my point. Help! Thanks in advance. Pls. Cc all replies to me on: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
Yep. This year for Christmas they gave me the first season of Hello Larry on DVD. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? MS paid you to say that, didn't they... :P -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox store! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Actually, its one copy per server containing a mailbox in the distribution. That's important to remember when dealing with multiple servers. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? As Tony says, search under Single Instance Storage (aka SIS) for the techie explanation. In the case your friend cites, he's wrong. What will happen is that your mail gets sent to 1000 people, and there is one copy of it. Now if one of them opens that mail and annotates it with their thoughts on what you said, and then saves it, then the server will hold one copy of his altered mail for him and 1 other copy for the other 999 people. -- Robert Moir Microsoft MVP Senior IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College RM Eunt Domus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 December 2003 10:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Hi, Let's say a user sends a 1Mb attachment by email to 1000 people, does it add 1000Mb to the Exchange Database? I put out a post like this before the replies were negative. But now a friend pointed out that a recipient who has a mailbox on the Exchange Server could for example open this email change it. Then save it (i.e. the email was changed). So he's saying that this shows that each person gets their personal copy of the email. Therefore, the 1Mb attachment in the email to 1000 people DOES increase the Exchange Database size by 1000Mb. Pls. can you shed some light on this discussion for us? I'd appreciate some official article from Microsoft (e.g. Technet) to prove my point. Help! Thanks in advance. Pls. Cc all replies to me on: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sources of outages
Poor Admin Practices : 90% -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sources of outages Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate. Agree? Communication lines and services 80 percent Servers 14 percent Routers and switches 1 percent Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Shut the fu*k up already, everyone. If anyone wants to continue this childish diatribe, take it offline. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Yes, you certainly schooled me. You are so very witty and clever I could never hope to compete with such a superior intellect. An AOL reference? Paaaleeeze. I get along with my coworkers just fine, thanks for your concern. Value is irrelevant, hence the point about a philosophical discussion. Many times, the greatest evils are wrapped in appealing packages. And yes, I love my fans. With fans like mine, who needs detractors? Let's call it 98, but I've been out a while since Exchange was not my focal point in recent years (nor is it now, I just thought I'd smack you around a bit.) Yes I am contributing. You got that right, genius. What gave it away, the 'you've got mail' chime? As far as the philosophical issue goes, you don't seem to have a lot of supporters. Do you have co-workers? Do you get along? I bet not. And you didn't comment on the VALUE of people like Missy, Ed, CTHULU, et al versus what you bring to the table. I'm done with this. You lose, and you will always lose. Have fun with your adoring fans. began 4-5 years. Ha! That puts you at around 1999-1998. This list has been around since 1994. This is a philosophical issue about ethics that has been raging for about 8 years or so. I specifically try to avoid the subject, but certain individuals can't seem to let it go. Guilty conscious maybe? Who knows. And you are contributing to the continuation of this thread. Welcome to the party. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Good choice. The doctor has the same hairline and legs as you. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin? :p -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 The Swynk List... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We'll be flaming YOU... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Or is it... The LOVE Boat... Exciting and New... Climb Aboard... We're expecting YOU... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 We have a love connection!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Hi Neighbor, I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers. Traffic on 75 is horrid right now. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens. Long live the overlord! It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too. (A very wet) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Jolyon, This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very consistently inconsistant in his logic. Its raining here too Rachel -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I was going to ask what form this compensation took. So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then? *Phew* Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very cold and soggy London in the dark. I love my job but I still need vitamin D. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The sudden absence of We Love Our MVPs Post-It pads and MSDN CD cases notwithstanding. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Seeking documentation
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx Scroll down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Seeking documentation Thanks for reading. I am looking into migrating to SBS 2003 from Windows NT 4 domain. I have a PDC (NT4), SQL 2000(Win2k) and Exchange 5.5 (NT4) all running on separate servers. I have not found any documentation about the upgrade/migration of this particular scenario. Any help? [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
What do the firewall logs show? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server Hi, Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4 Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall ProVX firewall Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine for a number of years Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the Exchange Server at all I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our mailserver successfully and send an email from there Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our Sonicwall ProVX Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate the firewall Thanks Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
Surely the firewall logs must show which SMTP connections are accepted or dropped. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server They don't show errors, just blocked websites and such, they arent very detailed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: 11 December 2003 16:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server What do the firewall logs show? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server Hi, Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4 Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall ProVX firewall Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine for a number of years Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the Exchange Server at all I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our mailserver successfully and send an email from there Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our Sonicwall ProVX Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate the firewall Thanks Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Pepsi. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Some more information on Professional Ethic http://www.westga.edu/~rlane/professional/lecture_professionsprofessionaliz ation2.html For those with any interest. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I did not say what you say I said. What I said was that, in my opinion, accepting honorary titles from vendors is a conflict of interest and something that should be avoided by those who are, or; technically, consider themselves, professional IT people. That is my opinion. And this is not just my opinion, check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles. Go educate yourself on the subject matter. Now, the other thing that you are incorrect in is that I did not bring this subject up. This subject came up years and years ago back around 1996/1997 during normal list discussions. It is not like I just started blasting people out of the blue. However, it seems that every time I post to this list somebody is still holding a grudge from 1996/1997 and brings this subject up. Once it is brought up, I will state my opinion and defend it. Money is simply the physical manifestation of ego and thus there is no difference between the two. I hold myself to my own professional code of conduct. I have no idea if it is better or different or longer than anyone else's. It is mine and that is all I know. No, You are wrong. Explain to me how you can tell someone that they are unethical AND not expect it to be taken as an insult. You feel justified in your position and that is fine. When you come into a public forum and say that anyone who is an MVP is unethical, you cannot expect MVPs to take it any other way than an insult. By making your opinions as a statement, you have committed catagorical slander on a group of people YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW. If you had said that you disagree with vendor recognition, but that MVPs do a lot of good for the Microsoft community (this discussion list being a prime example), then you would be airing your opinion with out discrediting the good work that some MVPs do. Can you really blame anyone for accepting recognition? It is human nature to want and deserve laud and attention. It is obvious that you measure yourself a much longer moral yardstick than the rest of us. Perhaps you should start your own Exchange list for-the-morally-upright to keep these reactions from happening in the future. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Im Dr. Love. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Actually, degree DOES equal title. One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington State Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some mythical contributions I have made to the industry. My signature would now read: DR. James Blunt, Computer Engineer -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research. degree title check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles. googling Dr. receives honorary degree lawyer receives honorary degree Just for reference. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Pepsi. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and only posted those (and another link) on professionals and ethics. My statement was not an attack, only a point of reference. If you remember, I was also the only person to respond to your list challenge about your book that followed through. You've belittled me without reason or cause. Very professional of you. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research. degree title check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles. googling Dr. receives honorary degree lawyer receives honorary degree Just for reference. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Only after 9pm. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I thought that was Dr. Thong... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Im Dr. Love. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Actually, degree DOES equal title. One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington State Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some mythical contributions I have made to the industry. My signature would now read: DR. James Blunt, Computer Engineer -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research. degree title check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles. googling Dr. receives honorary degree lawyer receives honorary degree Just for reference. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Did you re-install the backup agents after installing the hotfixes to all the servers? -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Snooping
Exmerge -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Snooping Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data for perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted folders). Please assist. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Snooping
Not on a pst. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Snooping Doesn't Exmerge still keep user permissions? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Snooping Exmerge -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Snooping Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data for perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted folders). Please assist. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Insufficient System resources
Any AV software running on the Exch Server? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Just tried that and it did not work... Any other ideas? Joshua Morgan AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the directory service. Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Insufficient System resources Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP4 When I go into the permissions tab of one of my users and choose add I get this message Insufficient System resources exist to complete the requested service Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc00205aa Has anyone else seen this? I have loaded the exchange admin on several machines and all get the same error TIA Joshua Morgan Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Insufficient System resources
Well, there ya go. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Yes (sorry for got to add that) Groupshield for Exchange... Joshua Morgan AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Any AV software running on the Exch Server? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Just tried that and it did not work... Any other ideas? Joshua Morgan AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the directory service. Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Insufficient System resources Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP4 When I go into the permissions tab of one of my users and choose add I get this message Insufficient System resources exist to complete the requested service Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc00205aa Has anyone else seen this? I have loaded the exchange admin on several machines and all get the same error TIA Joshua Morgan Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Insufficient System resources
Bad dat/update Who knows. Heck, I could be wrong. But I would start looking there first. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Ok now can you expand on that Groupshield has been on this machine for over a year and we are just recently experiencing the problem Joshua Morgan AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Well, there ya go. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Yes (sorry for got to add that) Groupshield for Exchange... Joshua Morgan AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Any AV software running on the Exch Server? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources Just tried that and it did not work... Any other ideas? Joshua Morgan AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the directory service. Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Insufficient System resources Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP4 When I go into the permissions tab of one of my users and choose add I get this message Insufficient System resources exist to complete the requested service Microsoft Windows NT ID no: 0xc00205aa Has anyone else seen this? I have loaded the exchange admin on several machines and all get the same error TIA Joshua Morgan Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm
RE: Export and Import of fields
Are you exporting the subcontainers as well? Your export.ini should look something like this: basepoint=/o=yourorgname exportobject=mailbox informationlevel=full subcontainers=yes -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields Ok guys, forget the complicated stuff, I figured all of the scripting part out...now my problem is still syntax related I am sure, but I am not getting the desired results. When I do a manual pull I get 15K some odd mailboxes but when I do it with the script I only get about 7K. Now looking at the options documentation I see that it defaults to the Recipients container and when you do it in the GUI it defaults to the Global Address List...so I added the line Container=Global Address List, but I am still getting the 7K mailboxes. Anyone know what I need it to do to pull the entire org? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields Write a batch file with two Export passes then Type one file and append it () to the other. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields The help file shows ExportObject=[Mailbox, Remote (custom recipients), DL, Recipients (all recipients), All (all object types)] (default=Mailbox) I need to get Mailbox and DL in one automated export. -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields I don't think that will work, obj class is where you differentiate DL's and Mailboxes. If you do not specify you only get mailboxes. I think you have to do it with the /o and options file, I just don't know the proper syntax. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields headers.exe. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields I have a question related to this as well. I am trying to set up admin /e export of all DL's and Mailboxes in an Exchange 5.5 org and looking at the Options file, I don't understand the syntax for getting what I need can anyone help me out. I see you can grab one or the other or all but is there a way to just get what I need? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export and Import of fields Yes there is such a way. It is in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export and Import of fields Is there a way to export (then Import once modified) a CSV file the Fields from within Exchange including Phone Address and such... I am using Exchange 5.5 SP4 Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Public Folder Calendar Export to html
May want to look at slipstick and see if anything fits the bill. http://www.slipstick.com/calendar/olpubcal.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Calendar Export to html I'd like to know if anyone knows of a product that can export a public folder calendar from Exchange 2000 as a web page, automatically at a specified interval, that runs as a service. I have a school district that has secretaries that update the school calendar that shows on the schools web page. I'd like it to FTP the created web pages to the site. I've searched for a week now, and there are a good number of collaboration extensions, but I couldn't find this specific functionality. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out. -Original Message- From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000 Hi Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on Exchange 5.5 ? i.e. can I interchange my outlook client between 2000 and 2003 to access my own mailbox on Exchange 5.5 ? Outlook will be installed on different workstations. Cheers Raji Arulambalam Senior Systems Administrator Environment Bay of Plenty - Regional Council, Whakatane, New Zealand Email disclaimer: This email and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. If you receive this message in error, please let us know by return email and then destroy the message. Environment Bay of Plenty is not responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments after sending. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I can moonwalk. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a brain seizure. The subject Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 means that I am migrating a client from GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange, specifically Exchange 2000. My apologies, I thought that would be obvious given that this is an Exchange list. My fault, I should have been more specific. Now the reason that this question about the 5.2.6 client comes up in relation to GroupWise 6.5 is that Microsoft indicates that the GroupWise 6.5 client does not work with the Exchange Migration Wizard. I actually have not tested this completely but will before the end of the week. I decided to go with a known entity, the GroupWise 5.2.6 client, the recommended client from Microsoft. So, from preliminary testing, you have to run the 5.2.6 client to interact with the Exchange Migration Wizard but it also has to interact with the GroupWise 6.5 PO, hence the question to the list. Now, thanks entirely to myself and no thanks to the sarcastic peanut gallery, I have solved this issue and am more than happy to pass along my findings in the hope that someone else may benefit from this knowledge. I was able to get the 5.2.6 client working against the 6.5 PO by removing the checkbox to enforce a minimum client on the GroupWise PO and by doing some file copying. What I did was to install the standard GroupWise 5.2.6 client on a workstation. However, running it against the GroupWise 6.5 PO generated an error, something to the effect that Your PO does not have the correct views for this client. So, I went into the ofviews\win directory on the client and copied the non-duplicate files to the ofviews\win directory of the GroupWise 6.5 PO. I did not replace any .vew or .ini files and while I have not tested it, I would not recommend that you replace any of the 6.5 files with 5.x files. Thus far, I have tested this successfully connecting in DIRECT mode to the GW PO. The GW 5.2.6 client works and the Exchange Migration Wizard works. One item of note is that the extraction seems to be taking an inordinately long amount of time. While previous experience has shown DIRECT to be faster in the extraction versus CLIENT/SERVER, I am going to test CLIENT/SERVER next. And then I am going to test using a GroupWise 6.5 client instead of the 5.2.6 client but I do not anticipate that will work. If anyone has some specific experience on this and knows for sure, I'd appreciate a heads-up so that I can avoid wasting time. Since this is the first GroupWise 6.5 migration that I have done and from the lack of any useful information from the list perhaps one of the very first or very few, I'll keep the list updated with information on how this goes and any caveats or issues I encounter. I'd like to modify that a bit if I could... ;o) pimp-slap decklertheheckler You are aware that this is an Exchange list right? /pimp-slap decklertheheckler -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 In times like these, IRC commands like /pimp-slap user would be real handy. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and SMTP
Shouldn't the ISA server be in the DMZ? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP Don't they show ISA in there as well? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP Why do Microsoft FE/BE whitepapers show FE in DMZ? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP I couldn't have said it better myself. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP What I don't understand is why everyone thinks that placing their FE server in a DMZ is a more secure/better way/whatever have you. IMHO, it is not. I don't understand what you think you are going to be gaining by placing it there other than increased headache for the setup and troubleshooting. Some may offer the argument that if your FE server gets hacked, it is somewhat isolated. Let's be honest. With the ports that are required to be open between the FE and BE, if someone hacks your FE server, they can own your internal network whether the FE is in a DMZ or not. I'm just not convinced that there is a need to place FE servers in the DMZ. That, plus I seem to remember that it is now Microsoft's suggestion to NOT place the FE server in the DMZ. I'll see if I can find the reference to that. Davinder, you are, of course, welcome to deploy this how you see fit. It is, after all, your network, not mine. Ultimately, if you feel it is a better setup to place your FE server in your DMZ, then do that. I'm just trying to offer feedback. As far as 5.5, that is a different scenario altogether. 5.5 would allow you to install OWA separate from the Exchange mailbox server. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:45 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: OWA and SMTP Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP Thanks everybody for replying. The plan is exactly to open 443 from outside and required ports for GC/LDAP and required ports for BE server. The DMZ is separate physical network (VLAN) and Firewall is going to allow these specific kind of traffic only to required specific servers on inside network. You guys seem very concerned with that which I respectfully don't understand. Also this is exactly what we did in exchange 5.5, right?? Or another idea might be to create an IPSec tunnel between FE server and DCs and limit the number of ports that way, ideas? Thanks Davinder -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OWA and SMTP I totally agree. It is much easier to do extensive logging (and packet filtering, for that matter) with a good layered firewall, as opposed to locking down IIS (and Windows) to accept connections in an unsecured zone. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP Why go through the hassle? It is much easier (and just as secure) to simply put the FE server inside your network, open up port 443 and 25 to the FE server (I would not open port 80 for OWA), and that is all you should have to do. If you want to be even more secure, use something like ISA server to publish the FE OWA server. There are some servers that belong on a DMZ. A FE OWA server is not one of them. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:36 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: OWA and SMTP Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP Have FE and BE on separate VLANs and set up access lists on the routers allowing just the back-end VLAN to only accept traffic from the front-end VLAN if it is coming from the FE server, and only the specified ports. How does that sound? -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP What Martin is saying is that those are not the only ports you have to open. There are MANY more that are required to be opened to allow for communication between the FE server and the BE server, and communication betweent the FE server and the
RE: removal of first exchange 2000 server
Have you tried creating a new Outlook profile? Removing and re-adding the Outlook Address Book? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: removal of first exchange 2000 server I have had a mixed exch 2000/2003 site running for about a month. I have followed the Q article regarding removal of first exchange server in a site. Now some of my clients are having issues when accessing their mailbox's. outlook is set for their mailbox to point to the new server and outlook opens but clicking inbox locks outlook. I have tried repairing outlook and upgrading it to 2003 but nothing fix's it. Any info would be appreciated. Exchange 2003 on windows 2003 cluster. Removed server is exchange 2000 on windows 2000 non cluster Client outlook xp/2003 Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
Huh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over. Has anyone had that problem. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk
Use Perf Optimizer and move the edb files to the new drive. -Original Message- From: Jees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk Hi guys, Will be gratefull if you can contribute to this please. I have an Exchange 5.5, sp4 server on win 2k with sp4. In my Dell Power Edge 2400, i have two scsi disks (01) within this exchange server. Disk 1 has 3 18g hds with a logical drive of G. G contains Exchsrvr folder which hosts priv.edb and pub.edb. its like g:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ and the two edb files. Now, G is near capacity and would like to upgrade it to bigger space. I have purchased two 36gb hd from Dell (based on Dell's advise), and ready to be backing up the G drive and the rest. I would like you to feel free to suggest any tips and tricks that u know off, or any advise. Thanking you __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Full plus replaying the trans logs will restore you to the point of failure. -Original Message- From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Wouldn't doing a diff/incremental + weekly full give you a tighter restore point window (restore to the hour instead of to the day)? Eric Holliday - PST's? We don't need no stinkin' PST's!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Why bother? The only value I would see in that would be if you were backing up off-site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or incremental during the day? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups, Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to familiarize yourself with this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.a sp Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk space. Just to learn it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange client or mapi
He'll still need a profile however. Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure. http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profinst.e xe -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server was not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is safe to use From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange client or mapi Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500 When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler. Is there a way to change this. I need a profile for Arcserves alert service. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shop online for kids' toys by age group, price range, and toy category at MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [ex55] Two servers in one domain 1 in another, same site
Nope. -Original Message- From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [ex55] Two servers in one domain 1 in another, same site Do all the exchange servers in a site have to be in the same domain? All our sites have always been single server sites until now. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Single Use E-Mail?
I dont think this will reduce unwanted email. -Original Message- From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Single Use E-Mail? I'd like to allow my users to create a single use e-mail address to help reduce unwanted e-mail. - User mailbox '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' This user can create any new e-mail address by adding a suffix (with a special char '-' for example) such as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. All suffixes are by default allowed. There would need to be a method that would allow the user to blacklist a specific suffix. My idea would be to create an EventSink for Exch 2000/2003 that when a message is addressed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' it would parse the LHS of the @ and then do a lookup in a table to see if the blacklist existed. If it did, then it would return a '550 Mailbox does not exist' error code. If it does not exist, then the To: Field would be rewritten to strip out the '-suffix' and deliver the mail to the intended recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Questions: 1. Does something already exist today that does this? An event sink? 3rd Party App (MailMarshal, GFI MailEssentials)? Freeware on Linux, etc? 2. I've already coded the basic functionality for the database look and web interface to modify the blacklist but the Event Sink is causing me some issues. Anyone have experience in Event Sink programming willing to jump in an help with the development? 3. Is this a crazy idea and I should just abandon it? - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Fulls are always preferred. Additionally, online backups perform checksum validity checks of the database. You should test your backups frequently on your DR server as well. How do you know you are getting a good backup otherwise? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space. I thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and time, but maybe not. Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)??? Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I prefer full backup every day. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups, Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to familiarize yourself with this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk space. Just to learn it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Agreed. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals That's it! My bad. ::turns in MVP card:: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups, Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to familiarize yourself with this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk space. Just to learn it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Nope. Too much work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or incremental during the day? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups, Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to familiarize yourself with this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk space. Just to learn it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
Stop doing BLBs..Or at the very minimum, upgrade Veritas to at least 8.6. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
Do a full, online backup of the store ASAP with either Veritas or NTBACKUP. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
You can not do a complete Exchange restore with BLBs. You must/should do a full online backup of the DS and IS. Install the Exch Admin gui on a remote W2k machine and back it up to disk. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Murphy's law says that any working device can crap out and any moment. This box is running on a gateway 1U server with no RAID drives. All it takes is one hardware failure on a drive to take out the Private store and I am screwed. This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes. I've had to use Backup-to-disk folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups. Yes, I know I need tape drives. Yes, I know that I need backup exec 9 (and the exchange agent). Those are all planned purchased in Q1 of '04. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment equipment, video game reviews, and more here. http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Apply SP4 to your client. As for your orphan, do a directory export (all objects - including the secondary proxy addresses) to find it. If you arent sure how to export the secondary proxy addresses, do a search in Technet on how to do that. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 2653.23 SP4. Sorry, I pulled the Help..About on a client Administrator machine. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Living dangerously, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
5.5 Enterprise also includes additional connectors. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange standard and exchange enterprise? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Require all users to use POP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EX55] Mailbox Move
Yes. -Original Message- From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EX55] Mailbox Move Does the Mailbox Move function of Exchange 5.5 perserve single instance storage? K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: message retrieval
If you have message tracking enabled, you can search by message ID. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: message retrieval How can I retrieve a message from the server using the message ID? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Woes
Crank up logging! -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Woes Exchange 5.5/4/Win2000/4. About 1 week ago I started having problems e-mailing users @verizon.net (206.46.170.12). The NDR's state One or more mandatory argument(s) were missing from the recipient and the stuck messages in the outbound IMS queue have the follwing error [450 Requested mail action not taken-Try later:sc006pub.verizon.net]. This is the only domain I am having problems e-mailing. I am not on any RBL's and I can telnet their relay server for about 10 seconds then it disconnects me. I've had the Verizon users contact support and they are telling them it's a problem on my end. What should I be looking at? Thanks, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Woes
It will let you see the actual SMTP conversation. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Woes Andy, I'll give that a shot but will that tell me more than the error message in the outbound IMS queue? Crank up logging! -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Woes Exchange 5.5/4/Win2000/4. About 1 week ago I started having problems e-mailing users @verizon.net (206.46.170.12). The NDR's state One or more mandatory argument(s) were missing from the recipient and the stuck messages in the outbound IMS queue have the follwing error [450 Requested mail action not taken-Try later:sc006pub.verizon.net]. This is the only domain I am having problems e-mailing. I am not on any RBL's and I can telnet their relay server for about 10 seconds then it disconnects me. I've had the Verizon users contact support and they are telling them it's a problem on my end. What should I be looking at? Thanks, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Default save outlook 2002
Its hidden. Change the options in Explorer to see it. You can change the default location simply by browsing to a new location within Outlook and saving the attachment there. That new path will be saved. -Original Message- From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default save outlook 2002 Hi everyone, I just got a laptop back from a traveler who has switched to outlook in anticipation of our Exchange deployment, Her only complaint is the default save folder when she tries to save a doc, it comes up with olk917 within the Temp Int Files directory, but when she goes to browse to it, it is not there. A) why is it not accessable B) where did it actually save it too? C) can I just change the default location? outlook 2002 Jean-Paul Natola Systems Administrator Information Technology Family Care International 588 Broadway Suite 503 New York, NY 10012 Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36 Fax:212-941-5563 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF
Does the dev server have McAfee installed on it as well? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF I have applied recent MS Patch KB829418 to one of my production servers (after testing ok on dev server). However, after approx 4 hours I get STORE.EXE GPF. The patch has updated STORE.EXE to 5.5.2657.74 (fixes a problem with Outlook 2003 rules processing). Exchange 5.5 SP4. NT4 SP6a plus security patches. Server running Exchange only but has Internet Mail Service and NNTP news service connectors. Also running McAfee GroupShield 5.0 SP2 Patch 1. Have contacted PSS but they require a crash dump which so far I have not been able to obtain. Backed off patch and server runs fine. Problem - repeatable. Anyone experienced any problems with KB829418 on Exchange 5.5? Thanks Dave Parker Rutherford Lab UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
Specifically: net stop MSExchangeSA /y ( 3 times) -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going to go down the shutdown path... some dust covers an old rule of thumb I either read/heard/experienced once...that when shutting down one of the Exch services ..particularlly with a remote script etc... issue the command three times in the script... don't ask... again it sticks in the duldrums of my feable mind but it's there for 55 you could get fancy and write it so it check service state also..which might help I could be way off bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way? -Original Message- From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns? Greetings, 2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4. I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service? --Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
Ah yes. Missed that part. If I was only stopping one service, I may only put it in there once in a batch file. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? Andy shouldn't that be (remember click your heals together 3 times and repeat) net stop MSExchangeIMC /y since he only wanted the IMC? bill Wouldn't net stop MSExchangeSA /y take down basically all of exchange -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? Specifically: net stop MSExchangeSA /y ( 3 times) -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going to go down the shutdown path... some dust covers an old rule of thumb I either read/heard/experienced once...that when shutting down one of the Exch services ..particularlly with a remote script etc... issue the command three times in the script... don't ask... again it sticks in the duldrums of my feable mind but it's there for 55 you could get fancy and write it so it check service state also..which might help I could be way off bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way? -Original Message- From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns? Greetings, 2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4. I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service? --Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Set the Deleted Item Retention time for messages to 0 and IS maintenance to always and let that puppy run for awhile. Also, check the 1221 events in the app log and see how much space has been freed up. The 1221's will give you the min amount you can reclaim after defragging with eseutil again. And of course, take another backup *after* you run eseutil :) -Original Message- From: pat karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Hi all, I run an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server on Win NT 4.0. Over the weekend it reached it 16GB threshold and I had to defrag it using the ESEUTIL. Afterwards, I made a backup and began clearing out over 100 accounts that contained close to 8GB's worth of data (according to the privates stores resources area). After which, I went back and viewed the size of the PRIV.EDB and it remained the same size as it was before the purging. It was explained to me that I needed to run another backup and did so. Nothing has changed on the size of the PRIV.EDB database, shows 14.7 GB's. I even ran the ESEUTIL once afterwards and another backup. I am using Brightstor Enterprise Backup. Once again nothing changed. Does anyone know why this is happening and how I can recover all of the space that I cleared? best regards, Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 - Exchange 2k Error Message
If you do a search on 0x800CCC0F in Technet, Im betting there are more suggestions than just turning off email scanning to resolve the issue. Otherwise, I would crank up transport logging : (Tools/Options/Other/Advanced Options) and see if that reveals anything worthwhile. -Original Message- From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 - Exchange 2k Error Message A client of mine is receiving the following message from our Exchange server when sending and receiving mail using pop3: Task 'mail.client.net - Sending and Receiving' reported error (0x800CCC0F) : 'The connection to the server was interrupted. If this problem continues, contact your server administrator or Internet service provider (ISP). The server responded: ???r? We host email for multiple clients and this is the only client receiving this message, however it is important to note that this does not seem to impact their sending or receiving email. I've looked at MS for this and their only suggestion was turning off email scanning, which we did and she's still receiving the message. The POP client is set for a 10 minute server timeout, the server is set to 20 minutes (I increased it hoping to alleviate the problem.) Anyone have any idea what is causing this or how to eliminate it? It doesn't look like a good server response to me. Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about Email Notification
And if your client suppresses read receipts, the sender will never get any notifications at all! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question about Email Notification The delivery receipt indicates that mail server has accepted the email you sent. There read receipt is a little tougher as read can have a lot of meanings. Lets say I send you an email with a read receipt. You look at it in the preview pane and then delete it. You then empty your deleted folders. I will get an email that says Not Read. Now the truth is I did read it but after I deleted it. You can see its not something to base your email life on. -Original Message- From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question about Email Notification Both of these options in Exchange 5.5 are very vague. What is the true definition of these two options and is it truly a confirmation that the recipient Read or Received the email. I have heard different stories from both Microsoft and other Exchange Admins. Whats your hearsay on this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
lol -Original Message- From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns? Greetings, 2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4. I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service? --Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST-file backup problem
While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC, after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them up! -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a very small exception list - pres VPs of my org.) I do backup the stores on my server. I have that VIP list in it's own store. I have 2 other stores that hold the remainder of my organization. I use deleted item retention to allow users to self-recover from oops I deleted a really important message). All of my stores have a size limit. Granted the VIP store is really big (but the overall use is pretty small). The other stores have reasonable limits, and I do make exceptions for those who can demonstrate the need. PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at least in the supported sense), I had constant problems: * PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their computer on w/outlook open, * Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame me when they forget!) * PSTs get corrupted I would rather rebuild a server in the very slim event that I had a severe crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out problems I used to have with PSTs! HTH Arron = Arron King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 614-251-4515 F: 614-252-2650 -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem Hi, and thanx alot for your time!! Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000 users. Keep all emails in store.. A good idea, but what happens if you have to crash recover/recover databases or a single mailbox..? If all data is kept in stores(without any mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase radically-restore times increase radically!! Hopefully you see my problem now..? -Arttu- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lähetetty: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:01 PM Vastaanottaja: Exchange Discussions Aihe: RE: PST-file backup problem You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're using Exchange. If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed by Exchange in a Store. Backup is easier, and you will save disk space with the Exchange SIS. (You won't initially magically get SIS by importing [reimporting?] the PST files into Exchange, but as the data grows you will see a difference in your SIS). -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST-file backup problem Hello ! My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always have to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the file every time it's opened etc. So you cannot take just incremental from changed files. Usually you end up backing up all PST-files.. Ok.. so what you say! The problem is that if you have to pay for every Gig you take, you end up paying a lot of money! Is there any third party tool or way to get rid of this problem? Having the same problem? Or is it just me ;) Rgs, -Arttu- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: PST-file backup problem
Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at some point the file closes, and it will back them up correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant test that myself anymore. -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees an open PST as corrupt, not as an open file. It completes the backup job; but marks it as having failed. = Arron King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 614-251-4515 F: 614-252-2650 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC, after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them up! -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a very small exception list - pres VPs of my org.) I do backup the stores on my server. I have that VIP list in it's own store. I have 2 other stores that hold the remainder of my organization. I use deleted item retention to allow users to self-recover from oops I deleted a really important message). All of my stores have a size limit. Granted the VIP store is really big (but the overall use is pretty small). The other stores have reasonable limits, and I do make exceptions for those who can demonstrate the need. PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at least in the supported sense), I had constant problems: * PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their computer on w/outlook open, * Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame me when they forget!) * PSTs get corrupted I would rather rebuild a server in the very slim event that I had a severe crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out problems I used to have with PSTs! HTH Arron = Arron King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 614-251-4515 F: 614-252-2650 -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem Hi, and thanx alot for your time!! Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000 users. Keep all emails in store.. A good idea, but what happens if you have to crash recover/recover databases or a single mailbox..? If all data is kept in stores(without any mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase radically-restore times increase radically!! Hopefully you see my problem now..? -Arttu- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lähetetty: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:01 PM Vastaanottaja: Exchange Discussions Aihe: RE: PST-file backup problem You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're using Exchange. If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed by Exchange in a Store. Backup is easier, and you will save disk space with the Exchange SIS. (You won't initially magically get SIS by importing [reimporting?] the PST files into Exchange, but as the data grows you will see a difference in your SIS). -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST-file backup problem Hello ! My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always have to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the file every time it's opened etc. So you cannot take just incremental from changed files. Usually you end up backing up all PST-files.. Ok.. so what you say! The problem is that if you have to pay for every Gig you take, you end up paying a lot of money! Is there any third party tool or way to get rid of this problem? Having the same problem? Or is it just me ;) Rgs, -Arttu- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
RE: PST-file backup problem
Not sure on the period of inactivity on the part of the user, but, yea, something like that. Or I could be completely wrong. Its just something that I kinda recall from the back of my mind. Theres not much back there. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem Andy, Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself, allowing the file to be backed up correctly? Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the open file handle closes, thereby allowing Veritas to back it up correctly? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at some point the file closes, and it will back them up correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant test that myself anymore. -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees an open PST as corrupt, not as an open file. It completes the backup job; but marks it as having failed. = Arron King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 614-251-4515 F: 614-252-2650 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC, after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them up! -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a very small exception list - pres VPs of my org.) I do backup the stores on my server. I have that VIP list in it's own store. I have 2 other stores that hold the remainder of my organization. I use deleted item retention to allow users to self-recover from oops I deleted a really important message). All of my stores have a size limit. Granted the VIP store is really big (but the overall use is pretty small). The other stores have reasonable limits, and I do make exceptions for those who can demonstrate the need. PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at least in the supported sense), I had constant problems: * PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their computer on w/outlook open, * Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame me when they forget!) * PSTs get corrupted I would rather rebuild a server in the very slim event that I had a severe crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out problems I used to have with PSTs! HTH Arron = Arron King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 614-251-4515 F: 614-252-2650 -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem Hi, and thanx alot for your time!! Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000 users. Keep all emails in store.. A good idea, but what happens if you have to crash recover/recover databases or a single mailbox..? If all data is kept in stores(without any mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase radically-restore times increase radically!! Hopefully you see my problem now..? -Arttu- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lähetetty: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:01 PM Vastaanottaja: Exchange Discussions Aihe: RE: PST-file backup problem You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're using Exchange. If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed by Exchange in a Store. Backup is easier, and you will save disk space with the Exchange SIS. (You won't initially magically get SIS by importing [reimporting?] the PST files into Exchange, but as the data grows you will see a difference in your SIS). -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST-file backup problem Hello ! My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always have to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the file every time it's opened
RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
Could be any number of things. Search in Technet for an article called Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization By Store.exe and see if that points to anything useful. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu Hi all I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the store.exe will consume 100 percent of cpu and evenually stop responding. I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a looong time. I have removed all antivirus products from server there is pleanty of disk space. dir.edb and priv and pub reside a 80 gb mirror drive. priv is 6.53 gb and pub is 1.53 they are not growing rapidly. dir edb is 350 meg I ran eseutil on both priv and pub and both report back state is consistant. Where should I go from here. I reboot the server every 12 hours. These are good reboots no dirty shutdowns Thanks for any info I have combed the MS articles checked with MS to make sure there were no hotfixes I should have (I think I was Talking to somebody in India) Any Ideas before I call MS would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST-file backup problem
Excellent. I thought I remembered something through the beer haze. -Original Message- From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem Summary from an MS kb article: (222328 ) Outlook locks personal folder files (.pst) while they are in use; it is not possible to copy the .pst file while it is locked. Outlook releases the lock on a .pst file after 30 minutes of inactivity, by default. This article describes how to control the timeout value after which Outlook releases the file lock on a .pst file. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem Not sure on the period of inactivity on the part of the user, but, yea, something like that. Or I could be completely wrong. Its just something that I kinda recall from the back of my mind. Theres not much back there. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem Andy, Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself, allowing the file to be backed up correctly? Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the open file handle closes, thereby allowing Veritas to back it up correctly? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at some point the file closes, and it will back them up correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant test that myself anymore. -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees an open PST as corrupt, not as an open file. It completes the backup job; but marks it as having failed. = Arron King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 614-251-4515 F: 614-252-2650 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC, after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them up! -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a very small exception list - pres VPs of my org.) I do backup the stores on my server. I have that VIP list in it's own store. I have 2 other stores that hold the remainder of my organization. I use deleted item retention to allow users to self-recover from oops I deleted a really important message). All of my stores have a size limit. Granted the VIP store is really big (but the overall use is pretty small). The other stores have reasonable limits, and I do make exceptions for those who can demonstrate the need. PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at least in the supported sense), I had constant problems: * PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their computer on w/outlook open, * Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame me when they forget!) * PSTs get corrupted I would rather rebuild a server in the very slim event that I had a severe crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out problems I used to have with PSTs! HTH Arron = Arron King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 614-251-4515 F: 614-252-2650 -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem Hi, and thanx alot for your time!! Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000 users. Keep all emails in store.. A good idea, but what happens if you have to crash recover/recover databases or a single mailbox..? If all data is kept in stores(without any mailbox size limits)..Back up times increase radically-restore times increase radically!! Hopefully you see my problem now..? -Arttu- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lähetetty: Tuesday
RE: Virus with XP
Check to see if your local hosts file has a bunch of bogus entries. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus with XP My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean it. Now when I open my browser and go to www.google.com it take me to another website www.cpanel.net. Has anyone seen this before and I do I fix this? Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Mongo change ISP. -Original Message- From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 I would if I could. Earthlink does NOT offer a static IP for cable internet accounts. Earthlink will NOT provide any DNS services, like making a PTR record. Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 14:40 To: Jim Underwood Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 Why don't you just go with a static IP and make sure you have a valid reverse ptr record? -Original Message- From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 When any user on our Exchange Server 5.5 tries to send an EMail to AOL or an AOL company (Like cs.com), he receives the following nondelivery notice: === Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Test Msg to cs.com Sent: 11/06/03 13:41 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/06/03 13:41 Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ApolloInfoSys;l=APOLLO1-031106194050Z-1991 === The Exchange Server is on an Earthlink Cable Internet network with dynamic IP. I have read that there may be two reasons for rejecting the mail: 1. Incorrect reverse DNS 2. AOL blocks all EMail from the broadband user networks like Earthlink.net So it would appear that I need to find an EMail host that I can relay our outbound mail to. === MY QUESTIONS: === 1. Do you agree with my assessment of the problem? If not, what do you think it is and how can I fix it? 2. Can you recommend an EMail host that will accept relay from our Exchange Server 5.5? BACKGROUND INFO: Mail Server is Apollo1.ApolloIS.com IP is 24.238.172.104 Reverse DNS is: user-0cetb38.cable.mindspring.com Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood Apollo Information Systems, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Does it include the standard open relay option? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 Martin Blackstone has an ISP you can use. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 Mongo change ISP. -Original Message- From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 I would if I could. Earthlink does NOT offer a static IP for cable internet accounts. Earthlink will NOT provide any DNS services, like making a PTR record. Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 14:40 To: Jim Underwood Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 Why don't you just go with a static IP and make sure you have a valid reverse ptr record? -Original Message- From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 When any user on our Exchange Server 5.5 tries to send an EMail to AOL or an AOL company (Like cs.com), he receives the following nondelivery notice: === Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:Test Msg to cs.com Sent: 11/06/03 13:41 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/06/03 13:41 Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ApolloInfoSys;l=APOLLO1-031106194050Z-1991 === The Exchange Server is on an Earthlink Cable Internet network with dynamic IP. I have read that there may be two reasons for rejecting the mail: 1. Incorrect reverse DNS 2. AOL blocks all EMail from the broadband user networks like Earthlink.net So it would appear that I need to find an EMail host that I can relay our outbound mail to. === MY QUESTIONS: === 1. Do you agree with my assessment of the problem? If not, what do you think it is and how can I fix it? 2. Can you recommend an EMail host that will accept relay from our Exchange Server 5.5? BACKGROUND INFO: Mail Server isApollo1.ApolloIS.com IP is 24.238.172.104 Reverse DNS is: user-0cetb38.cable.mindspring.com Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood Apollo Information Systems, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on the road
And Scrappy Doo. -Original Message- From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on the road There is also IMAP. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on the road 1) OWA 2) VPN and OST file synchronization 3) RPC over HTTP (assuming you're running Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003) You may also want to ensure that the downloaded messages weren't deleted from the server (which might be the default with POP depending on the client in use). -Original Message- From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on the road I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange mails on the road. They want to do this from within Outlook. When I POP the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his messages, even those he has already read. Is there a way around this? If I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get duplicates? Thanks, Steve Cobb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups. -Original Message- From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Ed, I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion. A colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today. My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more and more of an audit train. Senior managers throughout the industry are over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road. Kelly -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Quit doing brick level backup! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to present options. Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know of a package with thie capability? Thanks in advance, Kelly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
They do in Apex. -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? do a mailbox cleanup to delete the voice mail attachments before you run the backup. Let everyone get used to the idea that if they don't listen to voice mail right away, they lose it. You probably wouldn't want to do that every day, though. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:58 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Forum Conversation: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups. -Original Message- From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Ed, I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion. A colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today. My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more and more of an audit train. Senior managers throughout the industry are over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road. Kelly -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Quit doing brick level backup! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to present options. Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know of a package with thie capability? Thanks in advance, Kelly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on the road
OWA/VPN or leave the messages on the Exch Server. -Original Message- From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on the road I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange mails on the road. They want to do this from within Outlook. When I POP the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his messages, even those he has already read. Is there a way around this? If I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get duplicates? Thanks, Steve Cobb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
Other than 0! g -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
