RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I am still waiting to hear from some other guys on the SQL Dev team. But I suspect that there is some gag order. Happy to help you Ed! --Felicity > Gee, thanks for the insight! That certainly clears evrything up! > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He said that he > can't comment on it. But he did say that there are some wild theories > out there. "Some are crazy and some are more sane" > > --Felicity > > Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there > > is nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) =20 > > > At ATE 2 years ago, we spent a lot of time answering questions about > > the > > > amazing E2K WebDav features in Outlook 2002 based on the > > >presentations given there eh Sig? I don't exactly trust things I > > >read on http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp as gospel > > >either. =20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:25 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html: > > > > > > > > > > > > The pending announcement is vitally important for Microsoft, > > > > because the rumors suggest that Kodiak, the next major release of > > > > Exchange Server, will use Yukon as its store rather than the > > > > current JET/EDB/ESE storage engine. If that is the case, then > > > > Yukon will need to handle the extraordinary storage flexibility > > > > that Exchange Server offers today. > > > > > > > > Read it closely. It doesn't say the next version of Exchange. It > > > > talks a about a future MAJOR release code named Kodiak. Also note > > > > that both articles is from 07/08/2001, about a year old! I > > > > wouldn't count on anything which isn't officially from Microsoft > > > > and current. > > > > > > > > And of course, these are all rumors unless it is officially > > > > confirmed in public by Microsoft. So, unless I read it on > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp I do not believe it > > > > > is true. > > > > > > > > Can we now get back to our daily work and stop feeding the rumor > > mill? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was > > > > absolutely > > > > > stunned to hear you say it wasn't so. I have been > > > > following this for > > > > a > > > > > long time and I though it was a done deal. > > > > > > > > > > Please give me your comments on the following links. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.dnjonline.com/TechEd2001/reports/sess_keynote_jon.htm > > > > > l > > > > > > > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html > > > > > > > > > > I am checking with a few of my SQL contacts who work for > > > > Microsoft to > > > > hear > > > > > what they can officially say about this. I know a few who work > > > > > on > > > > part of > > > > > the teams who are involved in the SQL.NET File System which > > > >
RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He said that he can't comment on it. But he did say that there are some wild theories out there. "Some are crazy and some are more sane" --Felicity > Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there is > nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > >=20 > > At ATE 2 years ago, we spent a lot of time answering questions about > the > > amazing E2K WebDav features in Outlook 2002 based on the presentations > > given > > there eh Sig? I don't exactly trust things I read on > > http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp as gospel either. > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:25 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html: > > > > > > > > > The pending announcement is vitally important for Microsoft, > > > because the rumors suggest that Kodiak, the next major > > > release of Exchange Server, will use Yukon as its store > > > rather than the current JET/EDB/ESE storage engine. If that > > > is the case, then Yukon will need to handle the extraordinary > > > storage flexibility that Exchange Server offers today. > > > > > > Read it closely. It doesn't say the next version of Exchange. > > > It talks a about a future MAJOR release code named Kodiak. > > > Also note that both articles is from 07/08/2001, about a year > > > old! I wouldn't count on anything which isn't officially from > > > Microsoft and current. > > > > > > And of course, these are all rumors unless it is officially > > > confirmed in public by Microsoft. So, unless I read it on > > > http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp I do not > > > believe it is true. > > > > > > Can we now get back to our daily work and stop feeding the rumor > mill? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was > > > absolutely > > > > stunned to hear you say it wasn't so. I have been > > > following this for > > > a > > > > long time and I though it was a done deal. > > > > > > > > Please give me your comments on the following links. > > > > > > > > http://www.dnjonline.com/TechEd2001/reports/sess_keynote_jon.html > > > > > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html > > > > > > > > I am checking with a few of my SQL contacts who work for > > > Microsoft to > > > hear > > > > what they can officially say about this. I know a few who work on > > > part of > > > > the teams who are involved in the SQL.NET File System which > > > you may or > > > may > > > > not know if very similar to WSS, and is optimized for handling the > > > sort of > > > > non-rectangular record sets that Exchange has. > > > > > > > > --Felicity > > > > > Neither will ESE98 being ported to SQL Server nor does the next > > > version > > > > > of Exchange have an SQL Server based database engine. > > > > > > > > > > As I mentioned already. Please check that information with the > > > source > > > > > you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information > > > here which > > > > > might confuse other people. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > >
RE: Outlook for Mac
How did you know? --Felicity > So the operation was a success then? > > > -Original Message----- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > Cuter:) > > --Felicity > > Hey Felicity I replaced the Xes with the Ys and everything started > working. > > > > Just kidding. > > > > Are you as cute as you sound? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:40 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > I don't use the MAC, but I can see your problem. Change the X's to the > > valid ip address of your Exchange Server. > > > > You may need to reboot, or if the MAC supports NBTSTAT do a NBTSTAT -RR > > > > HTH > > > > --Felicity > > > Hello Mac supporters, > > > I have a couple Mac clients connecting to Exchange 5.5 using a Mac > > > HOSTS file. My HOSTS file is formatted a bit differently than the one > you > > > posted. Mine looks like this: > > > > > > ServreName CNAME blah.blah.blah.edu > > > blah.blah.blab.edu A XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX > > > > > > There is no "IN" in the HOSTS file. > > > > > > See if this helps. > > > > > > Will Grever > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:11 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > Andrey, > > > > > > When setting up the profile in Outlook try using the IP address for the > > > Exchange 2000 server (if you haven't already). Then run the "Test > > Settings" > > > to see if the user will resolve then. > > > > > > Nate > > > > > > > -- > > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov > > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, June 3, 2002 17:12 > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject:RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > > > Thanks. Interesting question about WINS, but I don't know if Macs know > > > > what > > > > it is. > > > > > > > > The customers do not get to the point where their name would get > > > > underlined. > > > > That's exactly where it fails - resolving their name against their > GAL. > > > > > > > > the hosts file is something like this: > > > > > > > > exchserver IN CNAME exchserver.domain.com. > > > > exchserver.domain.com. IN A ip_address > > > > > > > > I don't think the problem is with HOSTS since they are getting the > > > > connection to the Exchange server. If they were not getting connection > > the > > > > error message would say "can't find the Exchange server". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:49 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrey, > > > > > > > > I do know that Macs do not use WINS (at least through Mac OS 9.2). > They > > > > can > > > > use DNS, however, I must admit to not having triedmy Outlook 2001 > > against > > > > and Exchange 2000 server. > > > > > > > > You say that they can ping the server so that means their TCPIP is > setup > > > > correctly. When you setup the Outlook profile did their name get > > > > underlined > > > > when you did the "Test Settings"? How is the "hosts" file setup? Do > > you > > > > have the listings for the DNS server(s) in the file? Do you have the > > > > correct FQDN for the Exchange server? > > > > > > > > That's all I have for now. If I think of anything else I will let you > > > > know. > > > > > > > > Nate Couch > > > > EDS Messaging > > > > > > > > > -
RE: Outlook for Mac
Cuter:) --Felicity > Hey Felicity I replaced the Xes with the Ys and everything started working. > > Just kidding. > > Are you as cute as you sound? > > -Original Message----- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > I don't use the MAC, but I can see your problem. Change the X's to the > valid ip address of your Exchange Server. > > You may need to reboot, or if the MAC supports NBTSTAT do a NBTSTAT -RR > > HTH > > --Felicity > > Hello Mac supporters, > > I have a couple Mac clients connecting to Exchange 5.5 using a Mac > > HOSTS file. My HOSTS file is formatted a bit differently than the one you > > posted. Mine looks like this: > > > > ServreName CNAME blah.blah.blah.edu > > blah.blah.blab.edu A XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX > > > > There is no "IN" in the HOSTS file. > > > > See if this helps. > > > > Will Grever > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:11 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > Andrey, > > > > When setting up the profile in Outlook try using the IP address for the > > Exchange 2000 server (if you haven't already). Then run the "Test > Settings" > > to see if the user will resolve then. > > > > Nate > > > > > -- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, June 3, 2002 17:12 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > Thanks. Interesting question about WINS, but I don't know if Macs know > > > what > > > it is. > > > > > > The customers do not get to the point where their name would get > > > underlined. > > > That's exactly where it fails - resolving their name against their GAL. > > > > > > the hosts file is something like this: > > > > > > exchserver IN CNAME exchserver.domain.com. > > > exchserver.domain.com. IN A ip_address > > > > > > I don't think the problem is with HOSTS since they are getting the > > > connection to the Exchange server. If they were not getting connection > the > > > error message would say "can't find the Exchange server". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:49 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > > > > Andrey, > > > > > > I do know that Macs do not use WINS (at least through Mac OS 9.2). They > > > can > > > use DNS, however, I must admit to not having triedmy Outlook 2001 > against > > > and Exchange 2000 server. > > > > > > You say that they can ping the server so that means their TCPIP is setup > > > correctly. When you setup the Outlook profile did their name get > > > underlined > > > when you did the "Test Settings"? How is the "hosts" file setup? Do > you > > > have the listings for the DNS server(s) in the file? Do you have the > > > correct FQDN for the Exchange server? > > > > > > That's all I have for now. If I think of anything else I will let you > > > know. > > > > > > Nate Couch > > > EDS Messaging > > > > > > > -- > > > > From: Tony Hlabse > > > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2002 10:38 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject:Re: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > > > Did you check WINS? > > > > -- Original Message - > > > > From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:30 PM > > > > Subject: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > > > I have a couple of customers who cannot connect to our Exchange 2000 > > > > > servers
RE: Outlook for Mac
Dang! Here is was thinking that I was so smart and I goof again. I am such a doofus. --Felicity > That WAS a deliberate ploy to get him to do a NetBIOS name cache refresh = > wasn't it (NBTSTAT -RR) ? :-P > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 June 2002 15:40 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > I don't use the MAC, but I can see your problem. Change the X's to the > valid ip address of your Exchange Server. > > You may need to reboot, or if the MAC supports NBTSTAT do a NBTSTAT -RR > > HTH > > --Felicity > > Hello Mac supporters, > > I have a couple Mac clients connecting to Exchange 5.5 using a Mac > > HOSTS file. My HOSTS file is formatted a bit differently than the one = > you > > posted. Mine looks like this: > >=20 > > ServreName CNAME blah.blah.blah.edu > > blah.blah.blab.edu A XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX > >=20 > > There is no "IN" in the HOSTS file. > >=20 > > See if this helps. > >=20 > > Will Grever > >=20 > >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:11 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > >=20 > > Andrey, > >=20 > > When setting up the profile in Outlook try using the IP address for = > the > > Exchange 2000 server (if you haven't already). Then run the "Test = > Settings" > > to see if the user will resolve then. > >=20 > > Nate > >=20 > > > -- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, June 3, 2002 17:12 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > >=20 > > > Thanks. Interesting question about WINS, but I don't know if Macs = > know > > > what > > > it is. > > >=20 > > > The customers do not get to the point where their name would get > > > underlined. > > > That's exactly where it fails - resolving their name against their = > GAL. > > >=20 > > > the hosts file is something like this: > > >=20 > > > exchserver IN CNAME exchserver.domain.com. > > > exchserver.domain.com. IN A ip_address > > >=20 > > > I don't think the problem is with HOSTS since they are getting the > > > connection to the Exchange server. If they were not getting = > connection the > > > error message would say "can't find the Exchange server". > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:49 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Andrey, > > >=20 > > > I do know that Macs do not use WINS (at least through Mac OS 9.2). = > They > > > can > > > use DNS, however, I must admit to not having triedmy Outlook 2001 = > against > > > and Exchange 2000 server. =20 > > >=20 > > > You say that they can ping the server so that means their TCPIP is = > setup > > > correctly. When you setup the Outlook profile did their name get > > > underlined > > > when you did the "Test Settings"? How is the "hosts" file setup? = > Do you > > > have the listings for the DNS server(s) in the file? Do you have = > the > > > correct FQDN for the Exchange server? > > >=20 > > > That's all I have for now. If I think of anything else I will let = > you > > > know. > > >=20 > > > Nate Couch > > > EDS Messaging > > >=20 > > > > -- > > > > From: Tony Hlabse > > > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2002 10:38 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject:Re: Outlook for Mac > > > >=20 > > > > Did you check WINS? > > > > -- Original Message -=20 > > > > From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:30 PM > > > > Subject: Outlook for Mac > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > >
RE: Outlook for Mac
I don't use the MAC, but I can see your problem. Change the X's to the valid ip address of your Exchange Server. You may need to reboot, or if the MAC supports NBTSTAT do a NBTSTAT -RR HTH --Felicity > Hello Mac supporters, > I have a couple Mac clients connecting to Exchange 5.5 using a Mac > HOSTS file. My HOSTS file is formatted a bit differently than the one you > posted. Mine looks like this: > > ServreName CNAME blah.blah.blah.edu > blah.blah.blab.edu A XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX > > There is no "IN" in the HOSTS file. > > See if this helps. > > Will Grever > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > Andrey, > > When setting up the profile in Outlook try using the IP address for the > Exchange 2000 server (if you haven't already). Then run the "Test Settings" > to see if the user will resolve then. > > Nate > > > -- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 3, 2002 17:12 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > Thanks. Interesting question about WINS, but I don't know if Macs know > > what > > it is. > > > > The customers do not get to the point where their name would get > > underlined. > > That's exactly where it fails - resolving their name against their GAL. > > > > the hosts file is something like this: > > > > exchserver IN CNAME exchserver.domain.com. > > exchserver.domain.com. IN A ip_address > > > > I don't think the problem is with HOSTS since they are getting the > > connection to the Exchange server. If they were not getting connection the > > error message would say "can't find the Exchange server". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:49 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > Andrey, > > > > I do know that Macs do not use WINS (at least through Mac OS 9.2). They > > can > > use DNS, however, I must admit to not having triedmy Outlook 2001 against > > and Exchange 2000 server. > > > > You say that they can ping the server so that means their TCPIP is setup > > correctly. When you setup the Outlook profile did their name get > > underlined > > when you did the "Test Settings"? How is the "hosts" file setup? Do you > > have the listings for the DNS server(s) in the file? Do you have the > > correct FQDN for the Exchange server? > > > > That's all I have for now. If I think of anything else I will let you > > know. > > > > Nate Couch > > EDS Messaging > > > > > -- > > > From: Tony Hlabse > > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > > Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2002 10:38 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > Did you check WINS? > > > -- Original Message - > > > From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:30 PM > > > Subject: Outlook for Mac > > > > > > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > I have a couple of customers who cannot connect to our Exchange 2000 > > > > servers with Outlook for Mac (versions 8.2 and 2001) > > > > > > > > They have set up their HOSTS file correctly. They can ping the > > Exchange > > > > server. When they launch Outlook, it seems to find the server as it > > > > prompts them to enter their username, windows domain name, and > > password. > > > > > > > > After they supply their credentials, Outlook comes back with an error > > > > message saying that their name could not be resolved against a global > > > > address list. > > > > When they try to log onto the same mailbox from a PC, everything > > works. > > > > Each customer has their own GAL with correct permissions and filter. > > > > > > > > Does anyone here have experience with Outlook for Mac and Exchange > > 2000? > > > > > > > > I have already checked all the articles on MS KB and searched through > > > the > > > > newsgroups. Found some tips but they did not help. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > > Andrey Fyodorov > > > > Senior Exchange Administrator > > > > iNNERHOST > > > > http://www.innerhost.com > > > > > > > > P.S. I can't believe I actually used to love Macs 10 years ago. > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/si
RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was absolutely stunned to hear you say it wasn't so. I have been following this for a long time and I though it was a done deal. Please give me your comments on the following links. http://www.dnjonline.com/TechEd2001/reports/sess_keynote_jon.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html I am checking with a few of my SQL contacts who work for Microsoft to hear what they can officially say about this. I know a few who work on part of the teams who are involved in the SQL.NET File System which you may or may not know if very similar to WSS, and is optimized for handling the sort of non-rectangular record sets that Exchange has. --Felicity > Neither will ESE98 being ported to SQL Server nor does the next version > of Exchange have an SQL Server based database engine. > > As I mentioned already. Please check that information with the source > you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information here which > might confuse other people. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > >=20 > > I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server > will > > be providing the next database engine for the next version of > Exchange. > > And the code name for the next version of SQL Server is Yukon. > >=20 > > Can you confirm that ESE98 is being ported to SQL Server? > >=20 > > TIA > >=20 > > --Felicity > > > The next version of Exchange is not codenamed Yukon. > > > > > > William > > > > > > *Titanium* Racing Bikes > > > "Why ride when you can fly?" - William Lefkovics > > > www.airborne.net > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity > Smith > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions. > > > One from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater > richness > > > - ie text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater > > > thinness - ie minimalism for text based phones - which strip away > all > > > conten but text, and then compress words for instance - removing > vowels, > > > TLA's etc. > > > > > > MIS will now be included with the next version of Exchange (code > name > > > Yukon). > > > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > > That'd be worth reading. I'm _still_ nicking odd quotes from you > when > > > > > > > I need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :) > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you > . . > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > Iam looking for information on: > > > > 1. Messaging & Collaboration > > > > 2. Unified Messaging > > > > > > > > The type of information I am looking for is on: > > > > 1. Why it is happening (who it is for) > > > > 2. Who is making it happening (vendors) > > > > 3. How is it happening (solutions) > > > > > > > > Looking for Articles? Consortiums? > > > > > > > > Note: I've got Technet, so I already have the Microsoft view on > this > > > > topic. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advanced, > > > > Leonard > > > > > > > > ___
RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server will be providing the next database engine for the next version of Exchange. And the code name for the next version of SQL Server is Yukon. Can you confirm that ESE98 is being ported to SQL Server? TIA --Felicity > The next version of Exchange is not codenamed Yukon. > > William > > *Titanium* Racing Bikes > "Why ride when you can fly?" - William Lefkovics > www.airborne.net > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions. > One from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater richness > - ie text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater > thinness - ie minimalism for text based phones - which strip away all > conten but text, and then compress words for instance - removing vowels, > TLA's etc. > > MIS will now be included with the next version of Exchange (code name > Yukon). > > --Felicity > > > That'd be worth reading. I'm _still_ nicking odd quotes from you when > > > I need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you . . > > > . > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > Iam looking for information on: > > 1. Messaging & Collaboration > > 2. Unified Messaging > > > > The type of information I am looking for is on: > > 1. Why it is happening (who it is for) > > 2. Who is making it happening (vendors) > > 3. How is it happening (solutions) > > > > Looking for Articles? Consortiums? > > > > Note: I've got Technet, so I already have the Microsoft view on this > > topic. > > > > Thanks in advanced, > > Leonard > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
Before posting the original reply I did have a look at all CDO model's. None of them (as far as I can see) allow you to specify which SMTP server you want to send your email out from. Can you tell me which method/property you are using to "hardcode" the SMTP server name? TIA --Felicity > > The Win2k CDO object model does NOT allow you to tell CDO what server > to > > use to send mail out. > > I'm sorry, but that's not correct. Windows 2000/.NET Server ships with > CDOSYS (CDO for Windows 2000) which is completely SMTP based and can > easily be used to submit a mail to a remote SMTP server. > > Just my $.02US > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:08 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange > >=20 > > I just wanted to correct my earlier post. Sorry if I led anyone > astray. > >=20 > > OWA and other web clients running WebDav might encounter problems with > > some legacy proxy server's detecting the WebDav http verbs and not > forward > > them. > >=20 > > However you should not experience this problem locally. The IIS SMTP > > server is merely a relay agent. I suspect Chris is correct in his > > response (I have no idea what he means though). > >=20 > > The Win2k CDO object model does NOT allow you to tell CDO what server > to > > use to send mail out. MAPI will by default send it out using your > mail > > profile and hence your SMTP server. > >=20 > > Once again I apologize for my mistake. > >=20 > > --Felicity > >=20 > >=20 > > > Tried specifying the Exchange server as the smart host? > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 5:27 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application > that > > > > > will mail outside of our local domain. > > > > > > > > > > We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is > > > > that while > > > > > we can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside > domains > > > > > fails. > > > > > > > > > > Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 > > > > > servers and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send > mail > > > > > directly to the remote domains. > > > > > > > > > > So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to > > > > forward all > > > > > messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am > > > > missing something > > > > > simple but, danged if I can figure it out. > > > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > Brian Narkinsky > > > > > System Manager > > > > > Department of Environmental Protection > > > > > MS 6520 > > > > > 2600 Blairstone RD > > > > > Tallahassee, FL 32399 > > > > > phone (850)488-1205 > > > > > fax (850)412-0400 > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >=20 > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions. One from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater richness - ie text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater thinness - ie minimalism for text based phones - which strip away all conten but text, and then compress words for instance - removing vowels, TLA's etc. MIS will now be included with the next version of Exchange (code name Yukon). --Felicity > That'd be worth reading. I'm _still_ nicking odd quotes from you when I > need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :) > > -Original Message- > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you . . . > > > > -Original Message- > From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > Iam looking for information on: > 1. Messaging & Collaboration > 2. Unified Messaging > > The type of information I am looking for is on: > 1. Why it is happening (who it is for) > 2. Who is making it happening (vendors) > 3. How is it happening (solutions) > > Looking for Articles? Consortiums? > > Note: I've got Technet, so I already have the Microsoft view on this topic. > > Thanks in advanced, > Leonard > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIS QUESTION
Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity > Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = > SERVER) > > I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = > to serverC. > > In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = > patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = > not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = > properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = > %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = > it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = > cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = > IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = > you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = > rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = > serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = > system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = > options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = > system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = > the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = > file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = > my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = > administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = > user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = > and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = > member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = > account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = > group on serverC but i dont even see them... > > ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
I just wanted to correct my earlier post. Sorry if I led anyone astray. OWA and other web clients running WebDav might encounter problems with some legacy proxy server's detecting the WebDav http verbs and not forward them. However you should not experience this problem locally. The IIS SMTP server is merely a relay agent. I suspect Chris is correct in his response (I have no idea what he means though). The Win2k CDO object model does NOT allow you to tell CDO what server to use to send mail out. MAPI will by default send it out using your mail profile and hence your SMTP server. Once again I apologize for my mistake. --Felicity > Tried specifying the Exchange server as the smart host? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 5:27 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that > > > will mail outside of our local domain. > > > > > > We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is > > that while > > > we can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains > > > fails. > > > > > > Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 > > > servers and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail > > > directly to the remote domains. > > > > > > So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to > > forward all > > > messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am > > missing something > > > simple but, danged if I can figure it out. > > > > > > Brian > > > Brian Narkinsky > > > System Manager > > > Department of Environmental Protection > > > MS 6520 > > > 2600 Blairstone RD > > > Tallahassee, FL 32399 > > > phone (850)488-1205 > > > fax (850)412-0400 > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm? -Felicity > Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... > > Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Where is everyone? > > > Off celebrating the World Cup? > > Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been > accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and > its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. > Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path > leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee > > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Where is everyone? > > > Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I > wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I > getting the silent treatment yet again? > > Sigh! > > -Felicity > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
NYC - everyone is coming on line at once, you must all be getting back from something. --Felicity > Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... > > Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Where is everyone? > > > Off celebrating the World Cup? > > Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been > accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and > its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. > Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path > leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee > > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Where is everyone? > > > Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I > wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I > getting the silent treatment yet again? > > Sigh! > > -Felicity > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
I was taking one of the memory array's out (not one of the vendor reps - although I was furious with them and would have taken all of them out (as in to whack not on a date)) and my nail got caught on one of the array's. --Felicity > You broke a nail, too? How? > > - Original Message - > From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:07 PM > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > I had a similar experience with Compaq. Made my company a Compaq-free > > zone at the time. > > > > It's amazing how future purchases are based on experiences like that. > > > > William > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D > > and rhymes with Hell. > > > > I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error > > messages in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the > > disk drive. So I called the D company and every support engineer told > > me it was something different. Eventually after I complained enough > > they started sending me replacement drives through a vendor. I plugged > > these in same message, they said oops, we sent you another bad drive, so > > their vendor sent me another. Oops, it was the same one I originally > > sent out. > > > > So the D company eventually sent me a drive from their real warehouse, > > and > > - we still got the error. Then they started saying that our application > > had caused the hard drive error message, and we were to rebuild the > > drive array from a backup. I asked them how is it that an application > > is causing hard drive error's. > > > > They didn't have an answer. We eventually migrated to a different > > server and we were able to sweet talk them into getting a replacement. > > > > I hated working on the innards of these servers as well. I mean have > > you seen how they are laid out. The memory array card's have to be the > > most bizzare thing I have ever seen. > > > > I broke a nail taking one of these out. > > > > Give me the C word any day. > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > > Maybe it's time to go with D or I! > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM > > > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > > > Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > > > > Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they > > > = were not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now > > > it's not a competitor anymore since they became the same company. But > > > I still like servers that start with C better than those that start > > > with H. But I = think > > > Ed is also from the C side, right? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > > > > Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed > > > > > Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. > > > > > =20 > > > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > > > > I apologise for the OT question... > > > > > > Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk > > > array? (hardware RAID) > > > > > > I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the = > > > array it is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this > > > without error
Re: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
I take it you are running WebDav. If so some of the legacy proxy server trap for non standard verbs in the IIS protocol. So when they see some of the WebDav verbs coming through they drop the packets. Have a look at your proxy logs to see what happens when it sees WebDav coming through. --Felicity > > I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that = > will > > mail outside of our local domain. > >=20 > > We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is that while = > we > > can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains fails. > >=20 > > Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 = > servers > > and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail directly to = > the > > remote domains. > >=20 > > So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to forward all > > messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am missing = > something > > simple but, danged if I can figure it out. =20 > >=20 > > Brian > > Brian Narkinsky > > System Manager > > Department of Environmental Protection > > MS 6520 > > 2600 Blairstone RD > > Tallahassee, FL 32399 > > phone (850)488-1205 > > fax (850)412-0400 > >=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where is everyone?
Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
All right what does argle mean? --Felicity > Argle. > - Original Message - > From: "MS Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:28 PM > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Maybe it's time to go with D or I! > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they > were > not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a > competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like > servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I > think > Ed is also from the C side, right? > > -Original Message- > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed > Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > I apologise for the OT question... > > Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? > (hardware RAID) > > I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the > array it > is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error > right? > > When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical > disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually > corrupts) > the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents > backups > from completing. > > hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't > handle > the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in > the > process of rebuilding itself... > > The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from > scratch > and restoring from backup > > Any thoughts? > > sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday > afternoon > Haiku for good measure: > > Friday afternoon > gotta get going home > server is cactus > > Thanks, > MP > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Calendar
Oops, I meant to say my date's AREN'T bold and I didn't have any DATES last year, Get your mind out of the gutter, Andy. --Felicity > Outlook version? Not shown Do they no longer exist? Are the dates not > bold? What happens if you change views? Have they been autoarchived? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:06 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Outlook Calendar > > > > > > Several users complained about Outlook Calendar. All events > > from last year calendar (2001) are not shown. Does anyone > > know whether this is the default rule from E2K? If not, how > > would I view last year Outlook calendar activities (i.e. > > tasks, meeting events, etc.) Thanks. > > > > Hong. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Calendar
This is beginning to sound like my love life. My dates are bold either and I didn't have any last year:( --Felicity > Outlook version? Not shown Do they no longer exist? Are the dates not > bold? What happens if you change views? Have they been autoarchived? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:06 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Outlook Calendar > > > > > > Several users complained about Outlook Calendar. All events > > from last year calendar (2001) are not shown. Does anyone > > know whether this is the default rule from E2K? If not, how > > would I view last year Outlook calendar activities (i.e. > > tasks, meeting events, etc.) Thanks. > > > > Hong. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
I meant the company whose name starts with C and rhymes with Compaq. Can we use full names, I see most of you don't do this. I slipped up once in my last email. --Felicity > Now what starts with the letter C? > Cookie starts with C > Let's think of other things > That starts with C > Oh, who cares about the other things? > > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie starts with C > > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > C is for cookie, that's good enough for me > Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie starts with C > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D and > rhymes with Hell. > > I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error messages > in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the disk drive. > So I called the D company and every support engineer told me it was > something different. Eventually after I complained enough they started > sending me replacement drives through a vendor. I plugged these in same > message, they said oops, we sent you another bad drive, so their vendor > sent me another. Oops, it was the same one I originally sent out. > > So the D company eventually sent me a drive from their real warehouse, and > - we still got the error. Then they started saying that our application > had caused the hard drive error message, and we were to rebuild the drive > array from a backup. I asked them how is it that an application is > causing hard drive error's. > > They didn't have an answer. We eventually migrated to a different server > and we were able to sweet talk them into getting a replacement. > > I hated working on the innards of these servers as well. I mean have you > seen how they are laid out. The memory array card's have to be the most > bizzare thing I have ever seen. > > I broke a nail taking one of these out. > > Give me the C word any day. > > --Felicity > > > > Maybe it's time to go with D or I! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM > > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > > Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they = > > were > > not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a > > competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like > > servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I = > > think > > Ed is also from the C side, right? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed > > Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. =20 > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > > > > I apologise for the OT question... > > > > Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? > > (hardware RAID) > > > > I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the = > > array it > > is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error = > > right? > > > > When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical > > disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually = > > corrupts) > > the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents = > > backups > > from completing. > > > > hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't = > > handle > > the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in = > > t
RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D and rhymes with Hell. I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error messages in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the disk drive. So I called the D company and every support engineer told me it was something different. Eventually after I complained enough they started sending me replacement drives through a vendor. I plugged these in same message, they said oops, we sent you another bad drive, so their vendor sent me another. Oops, it was the same one I originally sent out. So the D company eventually sent me a drive from their real warehouse, and - we still got the error. Then they started saying that our application had caused the hard drive error message, and we were to rebuild the drive array from a backup. I asked them how is it that an application is causing hard drive error's. They didn't have an answer. We eventually migrated to a different server and we were able to sweet talk them into getting a replacement. I hated working on the innards of these servers as well. I mean have you seen how they are laid out. The memory array card's have to be the most bizzare thing I have ever seen. I broke a nail taking one of these out. Give me the C word any day. --Felicity > Maybe it's time to go with D or I! > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they = > were > not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a > competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like > servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I = > think > Ed is also from the C side, right? > > -Original Message- > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed > Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. =20 > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > I apologise for the OT question... > > Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? > (hardware RAID) > > I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the = > array it > is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error = > right? > > When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical > disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually = > corrupts) > the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents = > backups > from completing. > > hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't = > handle > the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in = > the > process of rebuilding itself... > > The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from = > scratch > and restoring from backup > > Any thoughts? > > sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday = > afternoon > Haiku for good measure: > > Friday afternoon > gotta get going home=20 > server is cactus > > Thanks, > MP > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad amil folder management
Addendum to the last post. There was no adverse affects on the Exchange server I did this on. --Felicity > Actually there are other folders where you can whack (technical term, not > that totally disgusting context you are thinking of missy) contents willy > nilly (another technical term). For instance the nntp root folders. > > I was looking into importing\exporting newsgroup messages from one server > to another and would whack (technical term), selected files and could > occasionally get nntp to think the postings were its own. But it would > send a lot of them to the badmail folder in nntp (which I would whack). > > --Felicity > > So this is one place where you can do stuff outside of Exchange without > > causing something to be corrupted? > > > > Jim > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:37 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Dang, it there I go again, forgetting to check the quote=20 > > > reply check box. > > >=20 > > > I was suggesting that you just open up a command prompt=20 > > > navigate to the bad mail folder and delete all the contents. > > >=20 > > > --Felicity > > > > Speaking of perverse... > > > >=20 > > > > Or were you replying to something? > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Felicity Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:04 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > can't you just whack them? > > > >=20 > > > > --Felicity > > > >=20 > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >=20 > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad amil folder management
Actually there are other folders where you can whack (technical term, not that totally disgusting context you are thinking of missy) contents willy nilly (another technical term). For instance the nntp root folders. I was looking into importing\exporting newsgroup messages from one server to another and would whack (technical term), selected files and could occasionally get nntp to think the postings were its own. But it would send a lot of them to the badmail folder in nntp (which I would whack). --Felicity > So this is one place where you can do stuff outside of Exchange without > causing something to be corrupted? > > Jim > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:37 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management > >=20 > >=20 > > Dang, it there I go again, forgetting to check the quote=20 > > reply check box. > >=20 > > I was suggesting that you just open up a command prompt=20 > > navigate to the bad mail folder and delete all the contents. > >=20 > > --Felicity > > > Speaking of perverse... > > >=20 > > > Or were you replying to something? > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Felicity Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:04 PM > > > Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > can't you just whack them? > > >=20 > > > --Felicity > > >=20 > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >=20 > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bad amil folder management
Dang, it there I go again, forgetting to check the quote reply check box. I was suggesting that you just open up a command prompt navigate to the bad mail folder and delete all the contents. --Felicity > Speaking of perverse... > > Or were you replying to something? > - Original Message - > From: "Felicity Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:04 PM > Subject: Re: Bad amil folder management > > > can't you just whack them? > > --Felicity > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bad amil folder management
can't you just whack them? --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 2000
You can open up OLE objects in Outlook 2000 SP2. It will prevent people from programtically sending out email. BUT - you can always use Outlook Redemption which is way sexy! This is a set or programmatic objects that mimic the function of most Outlook methods so you can send out email even if you are running Outlook2000 Sp2 or Outlook XP. Please refer to http://www.dimastr.com/redemption/home.htm for more info. Keep in mind that for this sort of functionality you have to have yoru admin navigate to Public Folders\All Public folders\Outlook Security Settings and have him\her check all the automatically approve settings in the the Programmatic settings tab. Bottles of Whiskey, cuban cigars, low cut blouses may help you convince him\her or the necessity of checking these settings. --Felicity > All, > > Does anyone know off the top of their head if Outlook 2000 SP2 doesn't > allow you to open OLE objects? If anyone knows about this please let me > know. > > Thank you, > > ___ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IE access to Outlook calendar
XXXOBJECT classid=CLSID:0006F063---C000-0046 id=ViewCtlFolder width="100%" height="1000" codebase="http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/office/outlctlx.CAB#ver=9,0,0,3203"YYY XXXparam name="Namespace" value="MAPI"YYY XXXparam name="Folder" value="Calendar"YYY XXXparam name="Restriction" value=""YYY XXXparam name="DeferUpdate" value="0"YYY XXX/OBJECTYYY Replace XXX with the left angle bracket and YYY with the Right Angle bracket. Hope this works --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IE access to Outlook calendar
You should use the Outlook View Control. I will paste the code in my next email and you can run it. I fear that if I post it in this message the antivirus detectors for everyone who subscribes to this list will howl. This is so sexy when I first discovered it I almost... well, I'd better not get into that here, it would just encourage you perverts, or the perverts amongst you. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org
Management is getting all hot and bothered by all this new Microsoft licensing schemes. What they are doing is making a big noise about this, and threatening to leave Microsoft's warm embrace for *nix, and Novell. Pay no attention to them, they will never do it. Its all smoke to try to make MS change their mind. --Felicity > All, > > Our corporate standards include an NT4 domain and Exchange 5.5 (and has for > several years now). We have 13 plants located in various countries around > the world. Our corporate HQ (located in Finland) has hired a new IS > director who has given us a directive that, in lieu of the anticipated > AD/Win2K/E2K rollout, we will be changing our backend infrastructure to > novell e-directory/lotus notes/linux servers! > > Now, I am as open-minded as the next guy about the prospect of padding my > resume with all sorts of new applications, but that seems a bit drastic. > Apparently, it all comes down to money. > > Besides, I love my E55sp4 server; it NEVER gives me any problems. > > Has anyone else experienced this? Which would be more painful short-term? > long-term?: the AD/Win2K/E2K or Novell/Lotus/Linux? I get the impression > that this is a knee-jerk reaction to Microsoft licensing costs. > > Any thoughts, experiences, or warnings concerning this migration would be > appreciated. > > Sincerely, > Joseph Smith > MCSE (NT4 + 2K), CCNA, Network+ > > Network Administrator > Perlos, Inc. > 5201 Alliance Gateway > Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 > Work: 817-224-9012 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST
I can only imagine. --Felicity > There are several on the list available for live demonstrations of how > perverted we can be. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been > accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and > its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. > Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path > leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee > > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST > > > pervert! > > --Felicity > > He snips AND snaps his Thong > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:35 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: PST > > > > > > Stop being so snippy:) > > > > Sorry. > > > > --Felicity > > > note you may confuse us if you continue to snip threads. > > > > > > --Andycity > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:26 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: PST > > > > > > > > > note you may have to do this many times before you will get any > > > compaction. > > > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > == > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing Exchange Admin on .net server
BTW - my laptop was running win2k server, sp2 --Felicity > Forest prep? Domain Prep? > > Regards > > Mr Louis Joyce > Data Support Specialist > BT Ignite eSolutions > > > -Original Message- > From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 May 2002 15:44 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Installing Exchange Admin on .net server > > > Has anyone had luck gettng Exchange Admin installed on .net server? I know > it is a beta, but it seems it sees Exchange Server and says "Whoa, stop!" > without waiting to see what you are going to install. > > Exchange Server 5.5 > Microsoft > > > > > Issue Description: > > Exchange Server 5.5 is not supported by this version of Windows. For more > information, refer to http://www.microsoft.com/exchange . > > Contact Information: > > Microsoft Web site: http://www.microsoft.com > Telephone: (425) 635-7172 (U.S.) or (905) 568-3503 (Canada) > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing Exchange Admin on .net server
I am not sure if this helps or not, but I installed Visual Studio.Net on a
laptop running Exchange Server 2000.
It worked great, however all of my code wouldn't work any more as the COM
based model is gone - there are ways to get around this and use COM, but
no more stuff like
set objConn=Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection")
--Felicity
> Forest prep? Domain Prep?
>
> Regards
>
> Mr Louis Joyce
> Data Support Specialist
> BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 May 2002 15:44
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Installing Exchange Admin on .net server
>
>
> Has anyone had luck gettng Exchange Admin installed on .net server? I know
> it is a beta, but it seems it sees Exchange Server and says "Whoa, stop!"
> without waiting to see what you are going to install.
>
> Exchange Server 5.5
> Microsoft
>
>
>
>
> Issue Description:
>
> Exchange Server 5.5 is not supported by this version of Windows. For more
> information, refer to http://www.microsoft.com/exchange .
>
> Contact Information:
>
> Microsoft Web site: http://www.microsoft.com
> Telephone: (425) 635-7172 (U.S.) or (905) 568-3503 (Canada)
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST
pervert! --Felicity > He snips AND snaps his Thong > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST > > > Stop being so snippy:) > > Sorry. > > --Felicity > > note you may confuse us if you continue to snip threads. > > > > --Andycity > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:26 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: PST > > > > > > note you may have to do this many times before you will get any > > compaction. > > > > --Felicity > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST
Stop being so snippy:) Sorry. --Felicity > note you may confuse us if you continue to snip threads. > > --Andycity > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST > > > note you may have to do this many times before you will get any > compaction. > > --Felicity > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential >information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is >addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is >strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately >notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or >email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST
note you may have to do this many times before you will get any compaction. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
I also believe the Q article is incorrect. If you open the stm and the edb, it looks like messages are stored as XML. I have looked at messages that are coming from OutlookXP which should be arriving as MAPI. Thanks alot for all of your input guys and gals. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Oops, sorry I was searching on just Crowley! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Is he some relation to Aleister Crowley who seems to be some devil worshipper? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Pardon me for asking, but who is Ed Crowley and why should I worship at his feet? --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Email Limits
I am going out on a limb here, but I think Event Sinks might be an option. It seems to me that this event sink would run on every inbonud message and look to see if it was addressed to the particular receipent, and then do a redirect based on the previous number of emails regarding the job opportunity. To me, this might put a bit of a load on your server. I can't quantify this however. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Data Retreival from Exchange Database
If you are using Exchange 2000 you should Full Text Index your database
and then you could search on the subject matter you are looking for.
For instance
select ""DAV:DisplayName"" from scope(""DEEP TRAVERSAL"") where
""DAV:Subject"" contains('love')
if you are looking for love :)
You can also use this to search for the value of a property. I am not
sure what properties are indexed by default with Full Text search, but
have a look at the schema.txt file and it might be there.
Perhaps someone else has some ideas on how to query and index other values
than the defaults.
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
Thank you Julian, Damn you guys are good! --Felicity > Try looking on MS support website for Q241689, Q258509 etc.. > Or just search for 'public folder tree' > > > Yours,=20 > > Julian Stone=20 > > > -----Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: 23 May 2002 15:56 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: ? about public folders > > > Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. > > How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming > collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but > could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 > Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of > filler). > > --Felicity > > MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. > >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: ? about public folders > >=20 > >=20 > > I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. > >=20 > > I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in=20 > > Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development=20 > > Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set=20 > > permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage=20 > > group does not show up? > >=20 > > How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? > >=20 > > TIA > >=20 > > --Felicity > >=20 > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally=20 > privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named=20 > addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on=20 > +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are=20 > not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy,=20 > print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for=20 > viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for=20 > viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content=20 > Filtering Service. > > Visit our website at www.netstore.net=20 > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA connection
Mark, locate this file. At the top of the file just after the <% do this server.scripttimeout=300 This will allow your page to take up to 5 minutes to render. It is also possible that the resource you are trying to connect to does not exist. Is the exchange server running? Is your IIS Server hosting OWA running? Can you access the exchange server running plain old outlook? --Felicity > All, > > I have NT 4.0 sp5 Proxy 2.0 sp2 and OWA sp4 on one box and NT 4.0 sp5 Ex5.5 > sp4 on another box. I have followed the procedures to set up OWA. When I > access the page both internally and externally (servername.com/exchange) I > log on (using alias) and then put in a username and password an hit return. > I then wait and get the error message below. > > error 'ASP 0113' > Script timed out > > /exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp > > The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You can > change this limit by specifying a new value for the property > Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS administration > tools. > > I have looked on technet and only found how to extend the timout of the > scripts and even on 300 secs the script still times out. My question is how > does OWA communicate with Exchange server (RPC?) and how do I troubleshoot > this connection to find out what is causing the timeout. > > TIA > > Mark Condron > > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking > any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities > other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have > received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately > and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. > -- > DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are > solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those > of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically stated. > > -- > > Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, > Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH > > Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 /par Fax: > 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 > > Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk > www.volunteering-wales.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of filler). --Felicity > MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: ? about public folders > > > I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. > > I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I > am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, > not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public > folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? > > How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? > > TIA > > --Felicity > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
I hope that this isn't a subtle hint telling me to get lost! For the record the show is not based on me or my life. I started to watch the show once and found it too boring. --Felicity > Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to > see it go. > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > Oooh!! very nice. > > Thanks Neil! > > --Felicity > > Q232323 might clear things up a bit. > > > > Neil > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 > > Posted To: Swynk Exchange List > > Conversation: STM Question > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > > > > Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any > > references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native > > format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, > > a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the > > priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. > > > > I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and > > the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to > > do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program > > Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. > > > > TIA > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > > If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 > > >likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 > > >originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 > > >MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 > > >internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 > > >client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 > > > Mark > > >=20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was > > > >being held flooded in. I did have the "up-to-date" edb=20 file, al > > > >be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some > > > >of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened > > > >attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 > > > > Tks > > > >=20 > > > > Sander > > > >=20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Did you lose any mail? > > > >=20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Thank you Jeffrey!! > > > >=20 > > > > It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new > > > > stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 > > > > beers are on my tap! > > > >=20 > > > > Tks > > > >=20 > > > > Sander > > > >=20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Eseutil /p "databasename.edb" /createstm > > > >=20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM > > > > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > > > > Conversation: STM Question > > > > Subject: STM Question > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Morning Admins > > > >=20 > > > > I have appear
? about public folders
I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity > Q232323 might clear things up a bit. > > Neil > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 > Posted To: Swynk Exchange List > Conversation: STM Question > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references > to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in > the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc > as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but > everything else is stored in the STM. > > I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the > priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do > this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program > Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. > > TIA > > --Felicity > > > > If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 > > likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 > > originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 > > MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 > > internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 > > client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. > >=20 > > Mark > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that > > > was being held flooded in. I did have the "up-to-date" edb=20 > > > file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 > > > lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 > > > They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. > > >=20 > > > Tks > > >=20 > > > Sander > > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Did you lose any mail? > > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Thank you Jeffrey!! > > >=20 > > > It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new > > > stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 > > > beers are on my tap! > > >=20 > > > Tks > > >=20 > > > Sander > > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Eseutil /p "databasename.edb" /createstm > > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM > > > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > > > Conversation: STM Question > > > Subject: STM Question > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Morning Admins > > >=20 > > > I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for > > > one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 > > > does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 > > > an error: Information Store > > > (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 > > > -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 > > > anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 > > > one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. > > >=20 > > > Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, > > > which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. > > >=20 > > > Thanks > > >=20 > > > Sander > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http:/
RE: STM Question
Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity > If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood you > have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to the > STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only > new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened > by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. > > Mark > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > > > > Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that > > was being held flooded in. I did have the "up-to-date" edb > > file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been > > lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? > > They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. > > > > Tks > > > > Sander > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > > > > Did you lose any mail? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > > > > Thank you Jeffrey!! > > > > It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new > > stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of > > beers are on my tap! > > > > Tks > > > > Sander > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > > > > Eseutil /p "databasename.edb" /createstm > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM > > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > > Conversation: STM Question > > Subject: STM Question > > > > > > Morning Admins > > > > I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for > > one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store > > does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get > > an error: Information Store > > (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error > > -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see > > anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can > > one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. > > > > Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, > > which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. > > > > Thanks > > > > Sander > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal > views which are not the views of the BBC unle
how to manage full text search programmatically
do any of you know how to administer full text search programmtically? CDOEXM doesn't work? Nor do any of the other exchange management objects I have checked. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in case you were somehow unaware of this fact. --Felicity > I searched on the internet and it is a unix utility that does File System > Consistency ChecKing. > > I thought it was a Unix applet, only I thought is was a finger like > utility. It thought maybe is was a Microsoft port like eseutil. > > --Felicity > > > Sometimes you feel like a fsck. Sometimes you don't. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:57 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Group Mail > > > > > > > > > ! fsck. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Group Mail > > > > > > > > > It is a candy bar. > > > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Group Mail > > > > > > > > > Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and > > > Exchange. > > > > > > I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > > What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? > > > > > > > > Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical > > > question once > > > > in a while? Christ on cracker you people... > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: Group Mail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Mail
I searched on the internet and it is a unix utility that does File System Consistency ChecKing. I thought it was a Unix applet, only I thought is was a finger like utility. It thought maybe is was a Microsoft port like eseutil. --Felicity > Sometimes you feel like a fsck. Sometimes you don't. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Group Mail > > > > > > ! fsck. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Group Mail > > > > > > It is a candy bar. > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Group Mail > > > > > > Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and > > Exchange. > > > > I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. > > > > TIA > > > > --Felicity > > > > > What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? > > > > > > Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical > > question once > > > in a while? Christ on cracker you people... > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Group Mail > > > > > > > > > > > > How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and Exchange. I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. TIA --Felicity > What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? > > Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a > while? Christ on cracker you people... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Group Mail > > > > > > How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Thank you for this clarification Chris. -- Felicity > The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have > doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them > mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows > is a common thing. > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith > To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM > Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of > stores > > I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange > 2000 server. > > I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage > groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying "the > Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed." > > If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange > complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage > groups allowed. > > Can someone explain this to me. > > TIA > > --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Thank you very much John. You are AMAZING! --Felicity > The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG, however, > practical limitations kick in with 4. All the "Official" MS documentation > says that Exchange 2K Enterprise version is limited to 4 SG's and 5 MDB's > per SG. > > You have to remember that each SG is a separate storage engine, requiring > it's own memory space and a big slice of processor time. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been > accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and > its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. > Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path > leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee > > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of > stores > > > I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange > 2000 server. > > I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage > groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying "the > Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed." > > If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange > complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage > groups allowed. > > Can someone explain this to me. > > TIA > > --Felicity > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying "the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed." If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about MS Mail
Oops, sorry. Please forgive me and be patient with me. They block hotmail here, so I have use the web interface and the include original reply option selected by default. --Felicity > Is there a reason you don=92t include what you are replying too? Makes = > a > thread very hard to follow. > > --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond > http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: ? about MS Mail > > > Thanks again John, however MS Mail was first developed for the Mac in > 1987. > > Do you know where Network Courier fit into this equation? Did MS > purchase Network Courier and repackage it as MS Mail for the Mac, or was > this done somewhere later down the line. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about MS Mail
Thanks again for this clarification John. I think I understand the lineage now. Please be patient with me, as I am new to this list and have been working with Exchange for only 6 months or so, mainly from a developers experience. -- Felicity > As I said, Microsoft BOUGHT the company that created what was to become MS > Mail. I don't know who the company was. The roots of Microsoft Mail > postoffice server, were wrapped around a client running against a shared > file directory mail repository. > > Again, as I said, it didn't matter what the postoffice side of the service > sat on, just as long as the client could make a persistent connection to the > file structure. Up until 5 years ago, Lucent Technologies was running their > MS-Mail service on Unix servers with WfWg clients. > > Whether it was originally designed for MAC's, trash-80's, or two monkeys > with a wax tablet I don't know, could care less. The box that contained MS > Mail Postoffice Server had three sets of disks for clients, DOS, Macintosh, > and Windows. It was 15 years ago. Who cares? > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been > accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and > its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. > Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path > leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: ? about MS Mail > > > Thanks again John, however MS Mail was first developed for the Mac in > 1987. > > Do you know where Network Courier fit into this equation? Did MS purchase > Network Courier and repackage it as MS Mail for the Mac, or was this done > somewhere later down the line. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about MS Mail
Thanks a million Mark! -- Felicity > From http://www.groupware.com.au/prodinfo/213e.htm > > > Microsoft Mail 3.2 is essentially a Windows-only (local and remote) > strategy. While there is support for other platforms, it's either very poor > or requires a second mail system (see 'integration' directly below). The DOS > LAN and remote clients for Microsoft Mail for PC Networks are essentially > the old Network Courier interface, and have not been updated since 1991. The > Macintosh client for Microsoft Mail for PC Networks is TTY-like, scrolling > text only, and looks much like the pre-3.x Windows clients. > > > o The integration between Microsoft Mail for PC Networks (originally Network > Courier software) and Microsoft Mail for AppleTalk Networks (originally the > 'InBox' e-mail package) is poor. They are two separate mail systems, with > two separate message stores (Microsoft Mail for PC Networks uses a DOS-based > message store, Microsoft Mail for AppleTalk Networks uses a Mac-based > message store and 'talks' ONLY via AppleTalk), two separate administrative > tools and two separate user databases, connected with a gateway. > > -Original Message- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 22 May 2002 14:58 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ? about MS Mail > > > > > > Thanks again John, however MS Mail was first developed for > > the Mac in 1987. > > > > Do you know where Network Courier fit into this equation? > > Did MS purchase Network Courier and repackage it as MS Mail > > for the Mac, or was this done somewhere later down the line. > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal > views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, > copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify > the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent > or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
Thanks guys for being so patient with me:) But I think Andy brings up an interesting point, shouldn't you map the drive letter that EXIFS mounts to to Drive B which no-one uses any more? Or do you firmly believe in not mounting\exposing a drive? Also this drive is only mounted on the Exchange Server, not on the client, so as the exchange admin don't you control who and what has access to this drive? --Felicity > I always thought it was, there is no B: drive ;-) > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Drive m: > > > There is no C: drive. > > > -Original Message- > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Drive m: > > > oh, sorry, thanks for being so patient with me. I am new here and I > didn't realize you weren't being serious. > > --Felicity > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >*** > The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be >confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any >disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this >communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. >The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily >those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. > > This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. > (6) > >*** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
oh, sorry, thanks for being so patient with me. I am new here and I didn't realize you weren't being serious. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about MS Mail
Thanks again John, however MS Mail was first developed for the Mac in 1987. Do you know where Network Courier fit into this equation? Did MS purchase Network Courier and repackage it as MS Mail for the Mac, or was this done somewhere later down the line. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about MS Mail
Thanks John, I guess my question is regarding the relationship of Network Courier, MS Mail and Exchange. Did Exchange start off as MS Mail, or as Network Courier? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
pardon me for sounding so partonizing, but the M drive is the installable file system that ships with exchange. As you know all internet protocols (http, smtp, nntp, pop, imap) are now server by the same engine that does IIS. IIS consults the Exhcange store and a file handle to the item you are looking for in the Exchange store is returned. This is a true NTFS file handle and is provided by the EPoxy or EXIPC mechanism which masquarades exchange items as NTFS file handles using an asynchornous work queue which is extremely fast and provides little context switching. Think of it as another file system driver just the same as FAT, NTFS, CDFS, HPFS. The reason some of you do and some of you don't see an M drive is because IIS launches (specifically the W3svc service) before your exchange store service completes it start up process. Hence no M drive. All you do is bounce your w3svc service and you will have an M Drive. I chose to change HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC and make DependOnService have the value of MSExchangeIS. You can change the drive letter by editing the following registry key. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\EXIFS\Parameters On the Edit menu, click Add Value, and then add the following registry value: Value Name: DriveLetter Data Type: REG_SZ Value: P NOTE: If the DriveLetter value already exists, double-click the value, and then change the drive to n: or another letter. One more point about the EXIFS (Exchange Installable File System) - there are three methods of application deployment - xcopy from the file system, ftp, or email or sending data to an exchange public folder. NT admins like xcopy, web admins like ftp or webdave, exchange admins like to deploy to public folders. EXIFS provides a mechisim to keep everyone happy. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
? about the origin of MSMail/Exchange
Can anyone tell me if the first version of MSMail (the one made for the MAC) shipped with its own postoffice or was it simply a client for other post offices. Also when Microsoft purchased Network Courier did they use that to make Exchange or MSMail. TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
? about MS Mail
I though MS Mail was purchased from Network Courier in the late 80's, but I was speaking with someone who said that in actual fact it was first developed by Microsoft from scratch for The Mac Can anyone confirm this for me? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
