RE: W3SVC message in event viewer
Do you have OWA, if yes this might be your OWA. Do you recognize the "user name" appeared in the error inside your domain ? -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC message in event viewer What account is being used for the w3svc service. and what kind of rights does that account have on he local server an dis it a local account or a domain account that is being used for the w3svc? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC message in event viewer You might get a better response from an IIS or NT list. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W3SVC message in event viewer I get the following message in Event viewer, "The server was unable to logon the Windows NT account due to the following error: Logon failure: unknown username or bad password. I know this is IIS stuff, but I don't know why this message is coming up or what is causing it so any insight would be helpful. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5
Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this "Backup Exec" ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 >It's good practice to be able to restore a >mailbox though ... No, it's not. Brick-level backup and restore just doesn't work well in practice, no matter what software you use. You've seen that yourself. If you can't deal with archiving departed user's stuff to PST files on CD via exmerge (what we do), simply hide the mailboxes forever (a modification of the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method). The data will always be live in the exchange databases, should you need to get at it. You might end up spending more money on tape backup hardware and disks in the long run, but you'll have "instant restore", and having that data there will not hurt performance for production users. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:02 AM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 Actully just before you asked this question I remembered that we do have procedures that we go through when a user leaves which includes exporting their mailbox to a PST file. I unfortunately don't handle our backups and restores and moves, adds, and changes it's our Admin people. I do have alittle control of it though. This last mailbox that we had to restore gave all kinds of errors and we had to reboot the server I don't think we had a PST file though. Karon > Have you considered exporting the ex-user's mailbox to PST[1], which can be > stored in an appropriate manner for your organisation[2]. When someone needs > that information, it's simple enough to mount the PST > > Deleted item retention should deal with those accidental deletions. > > > [1] One non-BAD use > [2] Archive to tape, burn to CD, etc > > Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > IT Manager, Sanderson Townend & Gilbert > Acting in a personal capacity > http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Tiggers don't do BLBs > > -Original Message- > From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 July 2002 16:45 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > We don't erroneously delete mailboxes. User's leave and then a few months > later an Attorney will need something out of that mailbox for a case and > we'll have to restore it. Or, we have to restore folders or pieces of > mail that a user deleted accidently. It's actually quite nice to be able > to do this when it works. > > Karon > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. > > > The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential > and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If > you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, > distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on > 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. > > Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not > relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend & Gilbert are neither > given nor endorsed by the firm. > > > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/re
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this "Backup Exec" ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only backing up the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to stop those services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not using the Open File Agent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > Hi, > > May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this "Backup > Exec" ? > It's Veritas ?? > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up their > Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only backing up the > mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to stop those services > periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not using the Open > File Agent. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
It's BrightStor , same under CA .. Is ArcServe 2000 really that bad ? I've just tried, and it turned out not too bad. On the middle of discussing want to purchase or not !! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Brightwhore? Same crap. New name. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > Hi, > > May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this "Backup > Exec" ? > It's Veritas ?? > > Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Hi Robert, So then, what software are you using & what is your current software max quality & relibility can provide ? Maybe i can apply !! Thanks -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yeah I've got an opinion on Brightstore sure enough, but as many people operate filters on "naughty" words, I'll confine myself to stating that it does not meet my minimum quality and reliability standards for server software. > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 October 2002 05:03 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, > hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. > > Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster > Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? > > Fin > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > Yes, as a google search would have shown. > > - Original Message - > From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > Hi, > > > > May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this > > "Backup Exec" ? It's Veritas ?? > > > > Thanks > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > > > I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up > > their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only > backing up > > the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to > stop those > > services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not > > using the Open File Agent. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
That's the thing i've tried. Do a full backup , Disaster Recovery and then crash the server. Then restore from bare , it's working. Puzzle me ?? -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 October 2002 09:07 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > It's BrightStor , same under CA .. > Is ArcServe 2000 really that bad ? No. It's worse. > I've just tried, and it > turned out not too bad. On the middle of discussing want to > purchase or not !! Ok, so it has a pretty looking backup routine. You can restore a few files from it. Now test if you can do a full disaster recovery "bare metal server" back to fully working with it. A surprisingly high number of people struggle to do this despite jumping through every hoop in the CA book. And the licencing doesn't work properly so prepare for lots of random failures to backup when the licence decides to fail because it's bored. Thanks to my boss, I had to use it for exchange and SQL backups in the past and it never ever worked properly to the point where I could trust it to work on backing things up unsupervised, and I never trusted it to restore properly either after many bad experiences. Robert Moir MS MVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College >SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0 0 rows returned _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Do you still remember the difficulty that you made on ArcServe ? Wondering .. Thanks Fiooon -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Would you believe currently NTBackup - the windows 2000 version - on all the servers I run which are the backoffice stuff like SQL, Exhange, and DCs. There are a few other servers where we still use arcserve for "simple file and print" server backups. We plan to do a full evaluation of what is out there next year when our new budget period starts, and other than "ditch arcserve", we have a fairly open mind about what to use instead. > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 October 2002 09:32 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > Hi Robert, > > So then, what software are you using & what is your current > software max quality & relibility > can provide ? > > Maybe i can apply !! > > Thanks > -Original Message- > From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > Yeah I've got an opinion on Brightstore sure enough, but as > many people operate filters on "naughty" words, I'll confine > myself to stating that it does not meet my minimum quality > and reliability standards for server software. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 04 October 2002 05:03 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > > > > > I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, > > hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. > > > > Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster > > Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? > > > > Fin > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > > > Yes, as a google search would have shown. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM > > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this > > > "Backup Exec" ? It's Veritas ?? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > > > > > > I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up > > > their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only > > backing up > > > the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to > > stop those > > > services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not > > > using the Open File Agent. > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Hi Muqeem, 1. What do u mean by network machines ? I did a DRecovery, once rebooted, it did come back to my network and log on to network . Thanks Fioon -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Importance: High First to address Karons Issue of only backing up the mailboxes incase of a server crash.. you will notbe able to recover the priv and pub databases... so it is wise to backup atleast once the databases... so that in case there is a server crash you can first restore the database.. and then restore the mailboxes from the most recent backup the mailbox backups.. as far as I can recall cannot be used to restore a dead server with failed or corrupt databases. The second issue of Fioon being able to perfomr a full disaster recovery... and adding chorus to Robert's woes... we have a tape library and using arcserve for th ebackup.. yes I was able to perfomr a disaster recovery as well... but only for the local machine... and none of the network machines so far have been able to come back on the disaster recovery. Another thing... for the disaster recovery to work.. CA says that you have to make a full backup with the arcserve agent on the remote machine.. that is all that is needed they said to make the disaster recovery kit... MICROSOFT SAYS FOR THE EXCHANGE SERVER THE M: IS A VIRTUAL DRIVE AND DO NOT... REPEAT DO NOT ATTEMPT TO BACKUP OF PERFORM ANTIVIRUS SCANS CA HAS MENTIONED NOTHING ABOUT THAT SO FAR. POint number 2 noticed... though I succesfully staged the disaster recovery for the local machine on which the tape library is installed which incidentally hosts.. win 2k server note:WIN2K Server, at the time of the disaster recovery i was asked to pop in the CD for WIN2K ADVANCED SERVER "Please pop in your win2K Advanced Server CD" says the dialog box... Ok now me thinks that this is a typo error and instead doesnt want to listen to CA and pop in win2k server |CD instead... but the machine spits it out saying.. no way can I have that.. now be a good boy and pop in the advanced server CD... so I scramble my kit for the evaluation advanced server CD and pop it in thinking it aint gonna work either... but hey presto... it worked and there me completed the staging process of the disaster recovery, wondering if its Microsoft that more bizzare or ArcServe. and me still suspicious that Bill Gates might have bought some stocks for ArcServe. Anyways... no point boring you with my tragic story. But me is still working on resolving the issue of being able to perform remote disaster recovery.. If some one has done that please let me know... -Original Message----- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Do you still remember the difficulty that you made on ArcServe ? Wondering .. Thanks Fiooon -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Would you believe currently NTBackup - the windows 2000 version - on all the servers I run which are the backoffice stuff like SQL, Exhange, and DCs. There are a few other servers where we still use arcserve for "simple file and print" server backups. We plan to do a full evaluation of what is out there next year when our new budget period starts, and other than "ditch arcserve", we have a fairly open mind about what to use instead. > -----Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 October 2002 09:32 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > Hi Robert, > > So then, what software are you using & what is your current > software max quality & relibility > can provide ? > > Maybe i can apply !! > > Thanks > -Original Message- > From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > Yeah I've got an opinion on Brightstore sure enough, but as > many people operate filters on "naughty" words, I'll confine > myself to stating that it does not meet my minimum quality > and reliability standards for server software. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 04 October 2002 05:03 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > > > > > > > > I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, > > hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. > > > > Any opinion on new ArcServe
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Are u saying Netbackup from CA ? -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Try Netbackup works on Unix or NT. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 03:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I was exposed recently to TSM Tivoli. I did about a 20-30 plus restores half of those from scratch. "Nothing but net". Pardon the pun. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Try HP OmniBack II. Don't know the price but works just great. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 It's BrightStor , same under CA .. Is ArcServe 2000 really that bad ? I've just tried, and it turned out not too bad. On the middle of discussing want to purchase or not !! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Brightwhore? Same crap. New name. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 > Hi, > > May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this "Backup > Exec" ? > It's Veritas ?? > > Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox
Hi Ed Crowley, You've got so much experience, would you like to have a few comment on ArcServe & Veritas ? I've tested on the ArcServe 's DR on a testing server,it's work fine. Would like to test on Veritas, but unfortunately they dont provided any DR evaluation copy, so i can't evaluate on that. I wonder how good is Veritas's IDR. I've heared so many bad comments of ArcServe here, which make me confuse . ..& worry. Now i'm can only test on the Veritas Normal Backup. Your advice is highly appreciately Thanks Fion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox BLB = Brick Level Backup, or backup of individual mailboxes. SMR = I am guessing that this is Single Mailbox Restore. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hei, Recently have interested in Veritas, but quite new. May i know what is BLB & SMR guys referring to ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Thank you very much. Fortunately, I'm not using BLB. I'll proceed with my SMR. If I can't get it back through agents tab, I'll try the decoder and/or mdbvue . I'll let you know how I made out. Thanks again, Louise -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox It's been quite a while when I was playing with this stuff and I remember that it is not trivial. Let's see what I can remember... The Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent script itself is stored as a hidden item in the folder it is applied to (in your case: the particular mailbox on Server A). Another second config item, also hidden, is created on the server the script is supposed to be executed (in your case Server B) in the system folder Event_Config (or similar - can't remember the correct name unfortunately). So, if you just want to get the script code back then try to restore the whole mailbox store on a recovery server [1] and use either a debugging tool [2] or try to connect with Outlook and see if you can get it via the Agents tab. [1] Note that if you use BLB [3] you might not be able to restore Scripting Agents. Only if you use an Exchange backup aware product to do a full IS backup/restore you have a chance. [2] Either MicroEye ScriptDorector (http://www.microeye.com/scriptdirector) or the Microsoft Agent Editor (used to be in the Exchange 5.5 SDK or BackOffice Resource Kit 4.5) or plain mdbvu32.exe (comes with Exchange on the setup CD). But the latter needs to be used CAREFULLY. [3] BLB => Brick Level Backup like it is offered with ArcServe, Veritas and other backup software. > -Original Message- > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox > > Hi all, > > I'm hoping you can assist me in just how to recover an event script that > is > associated with a particular mailbox. It seems the script just > disappeared and the developer did not have a copy. > > The mailbox sits on server A and the script was added to it through the > Agents tab. The script executes on Server B. Presently, I'm making an > assumption that restoring the mailbox from server A, I should also get the > script. > > Is this correct? > > Thanks in advance, > Louise > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox
Hi Paul. I'm Fioon, as many O as you like to have. Is the "bare metal restore" you mention below is also from Veritas ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Fiona, Don't go for the Veritas IDR solution. I have just installed it and we are using it because it given to us by Veritas with netbackup. All it does is an automated Windows NT/2000 MS install and at the end runs a GUI program to do a restore. A total waste of time to install a OS (about a hour or so) just to have it overwritten with the restore. There new replaement software they have just bought off another compkany called 'bare metal restore' seems to be a MUCH MUCH better product. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 12:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Fioon, call you Veritas representative and ask for an evaluation copy of the IDR (strange that there isnt an eval version, they have evals of all the other options). I've used both, and the Veritas solution is superior in every way to Arcserve (at least once CA got hold of it). Glenn - Original Message - From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox > Hi Ed Crowley, > > You've got so much experience, would you like to have a few comment on > ArcServe & Veritas ? > I've tested on the ArcServe 's DR on a testing server,it's work fine. Would > like to test on Veritas, but unfortunately they dont provided any DR > evaluation copy, so i can't evaluate on that. I wonder how good is Veritas's > IDR. I've heared so many bad comments of ArcServe here, which make me > confuse . ..& worry. > > Now i'm can only test on the Veritas Normal Backup. > > Your advice is highly appreciately > Thanks > Fion > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox > > > BLB = Brick Level Backup, or backup of individual mailboxes. > SMR = I am guessing that this is Single Mailbox Restore. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon > Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox > > > Hei, > > Recently have interested in Veritas, but quite new. May i know what is > BLB & SMR guys referring to ? Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox > > > Thank you very much. > > Fortunately, I'm not using BLB. I'll proceed with my SMR. If I can't > get it back through agents tab, I'll try the decoder and/or mdbvue . > I'll let you know how I made out. > > Thanks again, > Louise > > -Original Message- > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox > > It's been quite a while when I was playing with this stuff and I > remember that it is not trivial. > > Let's see what I can remember... The Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent script > itself is stored as a hidden item in the folder it is applied to (in > your case: the particular mailbox on Server A). Another second config > item, also hidden, is created on the server the script is supposed to be > executed (in your case Server B) in the system folder Event_Config (or > similar - can't remember the correct name unfortunately). > > So, if you just want to get the script code back then try to restore the > whole mailbox store on a recovery server [1] and use either a debugging > tool [2] or try to connect with Outlook and see if you can get it via > the Agents tab. > > [1] Note that if you use BLB [3] you might not be able to restore > Scripting Agents. Only if you use an Exchange backup aware product to do > a full IS backup/restore you have a chance. [2] Either MicroEye
RE: Front End Server
A. HP Netserver LH 3000. PIII. 1GHZ. 1.128GB RAM. RAID 5. B. Can I just disable the setting in the backend (on the configuration for front end)? Lets said, OWA. Can I disable the OWA Setting in Backend for OWA Logging in FrontEnd.. and redirect back the OWA Logging in Backend? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front End Server A. Insufficient data. B. Probably, depending on the products in use. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, May 26, 2003 10:22 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Front End Server Subject: Front End Server Hi, On the progress to upgrade Exchange5.5&Win4.0 to Ex2K&2K. So would like take some consideration on the Front End Server. We would like the Front End Server to work on these :- 1. Spam Filtering 2. NAV Exchange Scanning 3. Mail Relay 4. OWA Logging A. Do you guys think all this work on one server will be very burden to the server? B. If my Front End Server down, (OWA Logging,Mail Relay,NAV) should be able to redirect to the backend right? Rgds Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
Hi all, Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore & one office in Sri Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them built in "One forest" or "Two trusted forest". What wil be the pro & con... Any suggestion Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
One forest is easier for administration. Will it makes Sri Lanka >rely on HQ to run? Touch wood, if all DCs in Singapore down, then Sri Lanka will be affected? Maybe down for several hrs still can do, but if 2-3 days? thanks -Original Message- From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest One forest is easier for administration. It is not easy to share Exchange GALs between organisations in different forests. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest Hi all, Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore & one office in Sri Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them built in "One forest" or "Two trusted forest". What wil be the pro & con... Any suggestion Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
Oh! So you mean that DC in SL can still able to run if SG's DCs are down? Even for several days? thanks -Original Message- From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest So put a DC/GC in Sri Lanka! If you want a separate forest for SL you're going to need a DC anyway! -Original Message----- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest One forest is easier for administration. Will it makes Sri Lanka >rely on HQ to run? Touch wood, if all DCs in Singapore down, then Sri Lanka will be affected? Maybe down for several hrs still can do, but if 2-3 days? thanks -Original Message- From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest One forest is easier for administration. It is not easy to share Exchange GALs between organisations in different forests. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest Hi all, Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore & one office in Sri Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them built in "One forest" or "Two trusted forest". What wil be the pro & con... Any suggestion Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
Thanks for your information Steve. I did do my homework from read,read and read. But read will only get me confuse if no technical knowlegde,my company can't afford to provide me a testing server. I knew every info you listed below, it just that knowing some points doesn't mean knowing everything. I knew basic but not details whereby I still needs to observe others ,not only Win2k..time is not enough.. thanks -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest Fioon, Considering what you are proposing, you would benefit from at the very least reading up on Windows 2000 Server. It is vastly different from a management perspective from NT, and the introduction of AD will additionally complicate things for what you are proposing if you do not have an understanding of what is happening. Inter-site replication is great. Win2K now uses a "multi-pdc" concept in the way DC's manage the domain, as opposed to one PDC/many BDC's that NT used. Learn, learn, learn, put into practice, then learn some more. You cannot be over-prepared in regard to implementing a new system (is my mantra, anyway). Not as nice or succinct as Ed C's, but I am working on it. themolk. ...currently undergoing a "Freelance e-mail philosopher" apprenticeship. > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest > > > Oh! So you mean that DC in SL can still able to run if SG's > DCs are down? Even for several days? > thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest > > > So put a DC/GC in Sri Lanka! If you want a separate forest > for SL you're going to need a DC anyway! > > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest > > > One forest is easier for administration. Will it makes Sri > Lanka >rely on HQ to run? Touch wood, if all DCs in Singapore > down, then Sri Lanka will be affected? Maybe down for several > hrs still can do, but if 2-3 days? > > thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest > > > One forest is easier for administration. It is not easy to > share Exchange GALs between organisations in different forests. > > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest > > > Hi all, > > Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore & one > office in Sri Lanka. For the time being, they only need to > share Exchange GAL. Shall them built in "One forest" or "Two > trusted forest". What wil be the pro & con... > > Any suggestion > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex
Scan Gateway
We're in the exploring on the infrastructure on our Network to be ready for Win2k. There are some area which is in question marks. Email Scanning Gateway to be places on the DMZ. e.g. TrendMicro/Mailsweeper. Should it be place in different box or should it be place in the same box with the Front End Server? So far, we have been consult by 2 supplier. One said it's better to put different box, because put in one box with FE is useless. Reason is if email came into the FE, and only then the Scan Gateway scan the mail is too late. The virus already came into the FE, scan will not help. And another one supplier said it's ok to put into same box with FE. Another question is for Win2k Environment, is DNS very important? Once DNS down, and no cache available, does it mean clients cannot log on to the network? Thanks Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scan Gateway
Our Environment only have 275users internally, and another 50users access from overseas using OWA or POP3. Do you have any reason why should the gateway to be run on separate box? Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway I would advise to put your gateway on a separate box. I don't know how big your network is, but for 100 users, the gateway could be a simple PC. As for DNS, W2K/AD is all about DNS, DNS, DNS. Plan on having 2 DNS servers. For that matter, plan on having 2 DC/GC's. So make each of those a DNS server as well. -Original Message----- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scan Gateway We're in the exploring on the infrastructure on our Network to be ready for Win2k. There are some area which is in question marks. Email Scanning Gateway to be places on the DMZ. e.g. TrendMicro/Mailsweeper. Should it be place in different box or should it be place in the same box with the Front End Server? So far, we have been consult by 2 supplier. One said it's better to put different box, because put in one box with FE is useless. Reason is if email came into the FE, and only then the Scan Gateway scan the mail is too late. The virus already came into the FE, scan will not help. And another one supplier said it's ok to put into same box with FE. Another question is for Win2k Environment, is DNS very important? Once DNS down, and no cache available, does it mean clients cannot log on to the network? Thanks Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scan Gateway
Thanks everyone. But but but.. pardon me that these point is good for IT Engineer but not to management whereby there will ask Q such as, even though in same box, it will still be able to capture and hold the email if BE is down. They never care about the problem of crashes, upgrade etc. :) so I was thinking any reason that's I never thought of and of cox it should be valid to scare management off so that they agree to have it on dedicated box... Thanks ... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Correct. Another nice thing about the gateway on a separate box is that it give you a place to capture and hold email if you need to bring your Exchange boxes down for anything. It sits there nice and pretty and when Exchange comes back up, the mail goes in. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Scan Gateway Simply because its the easiest way to manage it. If it ever crashes or requires maintenance or upgrading, it wont affect other services. - Original Message - From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:31 PM Subject: RE: Scan Gateway > > Our Environment only have 275users internally, and another 50users access > from overseas using OWA or POP3. Do you have any reason why should the > gateway to be run on separate box? > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Scan Gateway > > > I would advise to put your gateway on a separate box. I don't know how big > your network is, but for 100 users, the gateway could be a simple PC. > > As for DNS, W2K/AD is all about DNS, DNS, DNS. Plan on having 2 DNS servers. > For that matter, plan on having 2 DC/GC's. So make each of those a DNS > server as well. > > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Scan Gateway > > > We're in the exploring on the infrastructure on our Network to be ready for > Win2k. There are some area which is in question marks. > > Email Scanning Gateway to be places on the DMZ. e.g. TrendMicro/Mailsweeper. > Should it be place in different box or should it be place in the same box > with the Front End Server? So far, we have been consult by 2 supplier. > > One said it's better to put different box, because put in one box with FE is > useless. Reason is if email came into the FE, and only then the Scan Gateway > scan the mail is too late. The virus already came into the FE, scan will not > help. > > And another one supplier said it's ok to put into same box with FE. > > Another question is for Win2k Environment, is DNS very important? Once DNS > down, and no cache available, does it mean clients cannot log on to the > network? > > Thanks > Fioon > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&
RE: Scan Gateway
My Environment:- The first stage of external email scan will be on the DMZ (Trend Micro Server Gateway). Email flow from Internet to Firewall and pass to Trend Server in DMZ to do the content scanning and email will be flow back to the Firewall again, and then flow into the Internal Net (Exchange Server) and go through the second AV Scan inside the Exch Server. Exchange Server itself located inside the Internal Net will have AV Exchange(Symantec) installed to be the second scanning stage or to be the internally email scan. So in this scenario, your 2 points cant be justify because I still have one AV in the Exchange that might have your 2 points problem. thanks -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Currently we're the same way. There are two other advantages of having a dedicated gateway scanner. It's typical for the AV vendors to have one or two bad virus definition files a year. I've seen them totally hose up a box when they're real bad. If you have that at the gateway, your internal mail flow will still work while you repair the gateway. People may notice that they are not getting internet mail, but won't be screaming as loud as if you took their mailbox server off line. Second advantage is upgrade path. Since the gateway is a separate box and passes all mail via SMTP, you can upgrade the antivirus or the Exchange system separately from each other without impact. If you needed to install a hotfix for Exchange or the OS, you can do so without having the extra variable of the antivirus product in the mix. Costs are always a concern with the ducks, but the AV gateway doesn't need to be a huge server. We ran a dual 500mhz, 500GB RAM with two disk arrays on our inbound server and were handling around 100k messages a day on it. It rated about 5000 an hour before we upgraded to a larger server. That server may run you about 3-4k depending on your vendor but you probably wouldn't need that something even that large. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway At TechEd, one of the MS dudes told us that MS doesn't use AV on the mail servers at all. All email is scanned by gateway servers. Maybe he will like that. "We can be just like MS" -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Thanks everyone. But but but.. pardon me that these point is good for IT Engineer but not to management whereby there will ask Q such as, even though in same box, it will still be able to capture and hold the email if BE is down. They never care about the problem of crashes, upgrade etc. :) so I was thinking any reason that's I never thought of and of cox it should be valid to scare management off so that they agree to have it on dedicated box... Thanks ... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway Correct. Another nice thing about the gateway on a separate box is that it give you a place to capture and hold email if you need to bring your Exchange boxes down for anything. It sits there nice and pretty and when Exchange comes back up, the mail goes in. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Scan Gateway Simply because its the easiest way to manage it. If it ever crashes or requires maintenance or upgrading, it wont affect other services. - Original Message - From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:31 PM Subject: RE: Scan Gateway > > Our Environment only have 275users internally, and another 50users > access from overseas using OWA or POP3. Do you have any reason why > should the gateway to be run on separate box? > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Scan Gateway > > > I would advise to put your gateway on a separate box. I don't know how > big your network is, but for 100 users, the gateway could be a simple PC. > > As for DNS, W2K/AD is all about DNS, DNS, DNS. Plan on having 2 DNS servers. > For that matter, plan on having 2 DC/GC's. So make each of those a DNS > server as well. > > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Scan
.Pst on OWA?
Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I've though of that b4, I thought the new version is so powerful.. It might can work as how its work with using Outlook Properties with Exchange Server (Intranet) to open Mailbox & P.Folder. Browse OWA through IE or etc is just only a browser, enable to open a file from within the workstation through browser is something that i can imagine (of coz,just imagine). Every Management in different Organization requires different thing. In my side, others country staff is using our Exchange Email. Hence they can only manage to open with either email through POP3 or OWA. I would stress to disable POP3. Their only choice left is to open with OWA. They needs to save ALL the items that they have SENT & receive. They keep it either for an evidence or for information. No choice, their database is too big for it to keep inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is served up on the server, the server would have to know about the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So would you share the drive your PST is on so the server could read it? Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
-Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Siegfried.. (I knew) You can already use OWA to open somebody else's mailbox calendar or anther public folder because this data is stored on the server. (I knew) I can imagine a custom application to import a PST into the Exchanger server database using a Web browser based interface that integrates into OWA (fairly simple, works here in a simple prototype). (Imagination, add a custom application integrate into OWA to open a pst file from the workstation not the exchange server :- Pst store in the workstation not exchange ) But I cannot imagine how you'd share a drive or PST to open it directly in OWA. It's just two different worlds... forget it since it cannot be done, only can imagine.. :) thanks > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? > > > I've though of that b4, I thought the new version is so powerful.. > > It might can work as how its work with using Outlook > Properties with Exchange Server (Intranet) to open Mailbox & > P.Folder. > > Browse OWA through IE or etc is just only a browser, enable > to open a file from within the workstation through browser is > something that i can imagine (of coz,just imagine). > > Every Management in different Organization requires different > thing. In my side, others country staff is using our Exchange > Email. Hence they can only manage to open with either email > through POP3 or OWA. I would stress to disable POP3. Their > only choice left is to open with OWA. They needs to save ALL > the items that they have SENT & receive. They keep it either > for an evidence or for information. No choice, their database > is too big for it to keep inside the server. > > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? > > > So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is > served up on the server, the server would have to know about > the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So > would you share the drive your PST is on so the server could read it? > > Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: .Pst on OWA? > > > > Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? > > Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
:) No other way to let OWA users to able to drag their Server Email into their own pc.. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? > (Imagination, add a custom application integrate into OWA to > open a pst file from the workstation not the exchange server > :- Pst store in the workstation not exchange ) That cannot work. The file is on the client, OWA runs on the server. What you are asking for is create a new client application that runs on your client computer to open your client PST file. That's not OWA any longer, that's Outlook 97/98/2000/2002/2003. Already exists and does the job opening a PST fairly well. Can you open a Word document stored on your local HD from a Web application without uploading it first? > -Original Message- > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 4:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 9:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? > > Siegfried.. > (I knew) You can already use OWA to open somebody else's > mailbox calendar or anther public folder because this data is > stored on the server. > > (I knew) I can imagine a custom application to import a PST > into the Exchanger server database using a Web browser based > interface that integrates into OWA (fairly simple, works here > in a simple prototype). > > (Imagination, add a custom application integrate into OWA to > open a pst file from the workstation not the exchange server > :- Pst store in the workstation not exchange ) But I cannot > imagine how you'd share a drive or PST to open it directly in > OWA. It's just two different worlds... > > forget it since it cannot be done, only can imagine.. :) > > thanks > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:33 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? > > > > > > I've though of that b4, I thought the new version is so powerful.. > > > > It might can work as how its work with using Outlook > > Properties with Exchange Server (Intranet) to open Mailbox & > > P.Folder. > > > > Browse OWA through IE or etc is just only a browser, enable > > to open a file from within the workstation through browser is > > something that i can imagine (of coz,just imagine). > > > > Every Management in different Organization requires different > > thing. In my side, others country staff is using our Exchange > > Email. Hence they can only manage to open with either email > > through POP3 or OWA. I would stress to disable POP3. Their > > only choice left is to open with OWA. They needs to save ALL > > the items that they have SENT & receive. They keep it either > > for an evidence or for information. No choice, their database > > is too big for it to keep inside the server. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:46 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? > > > > > > So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is > > served up on the server, the server would have to know about > > the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So > > would you share the drive your PST is on so the server > could read it? > > > > Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon > > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: .Pst on OWA? > > > > > > > > Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? > > > > Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL P
RE: "Bad Media"
Testing 123 -Original Message- From: Lau Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 12:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: "Bad Media" -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: "Bad Media" We are also running 3878. Here is an event we get in the system log (A parity error was detected on \Device\Scsi\adpu160m2.) We replaced the 39160 SCSI card and also loaded a new driver provided by ADIC. Server room is quite cool. I currently have a case open with Veritas so we'll see what happens from there. I'll let all you BE users know the outcome. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: "Bad Media" Hi Mike Boy, do you bring back some BAD memories for me. Look at this - with BE 8.6, what revision are you running? When I upgraded to 3878, some of my problem disappeared. Also, look at the tapes in question in BE - are you recording allot of hard errors or soft errors? Another thing you might want to look at is the temperature of the room. I know if my AC goes out (only happened twice in three years) and the temp rises a bit, this will affect the performance of my tapes. My problems were related to both my version of BE and Exabyte. Hope this points you in the right direction Russell -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: "Bad Media" Has anyone seen Backup Exec 8.6 label their media as "Bad Media". They are brand new LTO tapes in a brand new Adic Scalar 100. I called ADIC and they said that they have seen Veritas do this. ADIC told me to delete the devices and add them again. I did and it is working, but it will eventually do it again. Just wondering if anyone has seen any patches or heard of any fixes. No such thing on Veritas's support page. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and IIS Security
1.The lockdown tool can't lock down the *.htr files that keeps the most important thing (username & password). Lockdown tool can lock down the whole IIS lope holes.(If I do this, user cant log in) If I use lockdown tool to unblocked the *.htr files, I've tried the url scan, there are lope holes that gave hacker chance to hack in. Any suggestion? Thanks Rgds Fioon -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and IIS Security 1. What about using the iis lockdown tool and url scan? Check technet for how to get this to work nicely w/ owa. 2. yeah, but you'll still need to allow an rpc/mapi session between owa and the mailbox server(s), so you'll need to have the dmz configured for the necessary ports. So the idea here is that now a hack will have to compromise the web with http/s (because that's all that's open on the public side of the firewall), gain root, then discover and compromise the mailbox servers using the limited number of ports available between them and the then compromised owa host (dmz). Or, alternatively you could leave it on the internal lan whereby a hack would need to compromise the web with http/s, gain root, then easily discover everything and have full socket access to your other systems (subject to your application layer security model). I guess there are many ways to look at it. I've done it either way w/ 5.5. Good luck-byron -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and IIS Security Hi Everyone, Lately I've been noticing a number of attempts to hack one of our Exchange Servers. Our network is behind a Pix firewall and I've closed all unnecessary ports and have it fairly tightly locked down. However I have Port 80, 25 and 110 open for Exchange. My main concern is IIS. I am considering the possibility of disabling IIS and OWA on the Exchange server to minimize attacks. I have all the latest NT4 security patches (that I know of) but the hackers are still attempting to do mischief. There are two things I'd like to know: - 1. Is there a means of making IIS bullet proof with a patch or 3rd party tool? 2. Is it possible to install the OWA component on a server that is running IIS but not Exchange? The reason I ask this is because we have a web server that's running IIS. I thought it may reduce the risk of attack if I remove IIS from the Exchange server and use our web server for OWA? I know this is probably a dumb question but I thought I'd ask it anyway. I've checked out the FAQ but couldn't find anything on this particular scenario. The Exchange server in question is running Exchange 5.5 and Nt4 (SP6). The web server is running W2K (SP2). I'd greatly appreciate feedback re this. Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Ltd Auckland New Zealand Ph:64 09 522 5909 Fax:64 09 522 5901 Mob: 021 703035 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange
Jeremy, You mention you have 250 user to deal with !! What is the best way you use to upgrade those users' workstation ? For e.g. outlook / office / Service Pack . You go one station by one station ? Fioon -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange We currently run Exchange 5.5 SP3. We have installed NAV for Excahnge Version 1.5.2 The server has 1 gig of RAM. Recently we have been experiencing and issue in task manager. The memory allocated for NAVeAP.exe is very hightotaling almost all of the memory for the server. It usually is in the 900 meg range then the server begins to run VERY slow. Also when you look in Task Manager it is listed twice (NAVeAP.exe)The second one totaling about half the memory allocated of the first. I only have about 250 users with email accounts and by all accounts the server is not hit very hard. When rebooting the server everything seems ok for a day or so but then the memory allocated shoots up very high when a virus is detected and the server does a scan, when finished the server never reclaims the memory used and within a week I am more than likely forced to again reboot the server to reclaim the memory. Thanks in Advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING
Halo GuRus, Any best solution to stop the mail from spoofing? Recently i have received mails that always send to me with other sender name.This sender did not send the mails. The sender name is INTERNAL USER but the mail was coming from outside smtp address. We can't block the sender to send mail, we cant stop the spoofing,what can i do? This actual sender is from "240.039.039.2" FOR EXAMPLE ONLY. His address book have my internal user's email address. He take from it and put it in the "FROM" Column. and send to me. Anyone out therethanks a lot Poor Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracking Klez on exchange 2k.
Hi! I'm having the same problem..have u solve it? -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tracking Klez on exchange 2k. Yes, I'm running antivirus, as well as blocking extentions. (norton for exchange 2.5) I have a sneaking suspicion that a user, perhaps a remote access machine that's connecting to exchange may be infected. I'd like to hunt down the offender and chew them out. Does the message tracking center in System Manager pull the true sender's email addy, or the klez'ed spoofed one? I've got NAV CE running on all the on site workstations, so i'm moderately sure it's no one in my building, but i want to make sure. Question: If a user who is using Outlook for Corp/Workgroup settings is infected, will Klez send itself out via the Outlook-Exchange connection, or will it still use SMTP to distribute itself. If it does worm thru Outlook, does it still spoof the name? If it does, how can you tell the true originator without any headers? Couldn't find anything on Symantec's website about this. Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
I'm sorry to disturb. I also use Veritas BE 8.6 but never seen this kind scenario. Use you Server Performance to detect the processor baseline and compare the time.. I've sent a new problem with new mail to Exchange Disscuss List but never receive, so need to use this email to sent my problem out. Sorry again. Exchange 5.5 ; Outlook 2000. Only 1 user having this problem. Sent out 1 email but receiver received 3-6 times repeated email. The time that receiver received was so far e.g. 3pm ; 5pm ; 9pm. I've sent to this receiver but they only received once. I've recreated this sender mailbox but it happened again.. Fews receiver having this problem and keep on complaint. Any clue ? Thanks Fioon -Original Message- From: Gian Bee Choo Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2002 11:22 AM To: Fioon Cc: Madeline Yeo; Tan Yew Koon Subject: FW: Celebrate Xmas and New Year at home with PFS Catering! for your info. regards, Bee Choo -Original Message- From: D& A Delaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:57 PM To: Gian Bee Choo Subject: Re: Celebrate Xmas and New Year at home with PFS Catering! Will you PLEASE stop send this garbage - this is the 6th time this evening. We're not interested - and this email is not appreciated. - Original Message - From: Gian Bee Choo Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:36 PM Subject: Celebrate Xmas and New Year at home with PFS Catering! -Original Message- From: Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 4:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Neither have I Are you using a MAPI client to notify you when backups are complete? - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 8:54 PM Subject: Re: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > Mine must be misconfigured. I havent ever seen that. > > - Original Message - > From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:16 PM > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > Speaking from past experience, yes. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > Hi all, > > Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no > backups > > are running? > > > > Johnny > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Attack ??
Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blank messages
Hi, I having problem with the exchange virus. Exchange keeps on auto generate email to the people inside the address book. I have scanned ! Tried everything but fail to solve... I dont know which virus attacked !! help Fioon -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank messages Somebody is bcc'ing to you Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 12:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blank messages Just as some additional info: Internet headers are completely blank and messages are always about 800 bytes... Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de Maio de 2002 12:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Blank messages See? That's the messages I keep getting! It doesn't even have any info about when the message was sent! Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: Sent: None Subject: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Hi all.. I'm using Exchange 5.5. It's multiple users. Email auto generate by multiple user. For e.g. My address book have [EMAIL PROTECTED],and etc. Even thought this user (abc) did not switch on the pc, there was still have mail from his mailbox send to other people. But i have scanned this user pc, no virus detected. Below is e.g. of the mssg is normal alert generate by Exchange to all the administrator. I cant found any clues from the msg, i have ask the Victor :- user whether did he send mail..but he said no. Sender of the infected attachment: Victor_Hoon Recipient of the infected attachment: Ho Ping Ping\Inbox Subject of the message: Powered by One or more attachments were deleted. Attachment color.exe was Deleted for the following reasons: Virus UNAUTHORIZED FILE was found. This msg is generated because we had blocked the *.exe HELP -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? It might be the klez virus, which likes to spoof messages from postmaster. Usually these spoofed messages come from outside and don't indicate an infection inside the domain. Look at the headers of the messages to get an idea of where they are really coming from -Peter -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? One user or multiple users? Serdar Soysal -Original Message----- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Would you kindly gave me some direction on how to check the ip? This msg had been block, which mean that nobody will receive the msg. Thanks -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Getting back to the problem, I think you should use Outlook to look at the Internet headers of one of the messages that had its attachment stripped. You should be able to see in there the ip address of the sending PC. -Peter -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Hi all.. I'm using Exchange 5.5. It's multiple users. Email auto generate by multiple user. For e.g. My address book have [EMAIL PROTECTED],and etc. Even thought this user (abc) did not switch on the pc, there was still have mail from his mailbox send to other people. But i have scanned this user pc, no virus detected. Below is e.g. of the mssg is normal alert generate by Exchange to all the administrator. I cant found any clues from the msg, i have ask the Victor :- user whether did he send mail..but he said no. Sender of the infected attachment: Victor_Hoon Recipient of the infected attachment: Ho Ping Ping\Inbox Subject of the message: Powered by One or more attachments were deleted. Attachment color.exe was Deleted for the following reasons: Virus UNAUTHORIZED FILE was found. This msg is generated because we had blocked the *.exe HELP -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? It might be the klez virus, which likes to spoof messages from postmaster. Usually these spoofed messages come from outside and don't indicate an infection inside the domain. Look at the headers of the messages to get an idea of where they are really coming from -Peter -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? One user or multiple users? Serdar Soysal -Original Message----- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTENTION! The information contained in thi
RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent
Testing, Sorry for disturb. Have sent mail to Exchange Discussions but never received own mail .. -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 4:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent Ffolder Utility: Utility to rename or delete "special" Outlook folders such as the Calendar, Tasks, Inbox, and Contacts. VB source code included. http://www.slipstick.com/addins/gallery/index.htm#ffolder Look on technet for the information on how to rebuild the system folder with the "/ResetFolders" switch if needed: OL2000: Additional Command-Line Switches http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b197180 -Original Message- From: Adams, Kevin C. To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/19/03 11:18 PM Subject: RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent Thanks to all that answered. -k- -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions I thought that default mailbox folders such as deleted item and others are not able to be deleted. If other just recover them as long as retention is set and possible setting Dumpster always on just in case. I have found that user can delete mailbox folders using the OWa interface. The only way to get them back was to use the reset folders switch when starting Outlook. I wonder if they fixed the OWA issue I ran across since E2K2000/SP1 From: Ed Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Making an Outlook folder permanent Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) You might be able revoke a user's ownership permissions on his mailbox and then assign him individual permissions on folders therein, but I strongly suspect that Outlook wouldn't function properly in that case. Even if you could, I think it would probably be a waste of time. It would probably be easier to write a daemon that scans all mailboxes and puts back the folder if people delete it. Ed --- "Adams, Kevin C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings, Can anyone tell me if there is way to make a folder in a users mailbox that they cant delete? Any way at all? Thanks, -K- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received emails that are not suppose to
My email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I received [EMAIL PROTECTED] emails AND the most issue is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address does not exists in our Server. Exchange 5.5 with Win NT 4 Any advice? I don't know what can I check except the Email Header that can't tell anything.. Till now, I've get 2users reply on the same issue... Thanks Rgds Fioon -Original Message----- From: Fioon Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 9:23 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent Testing, Sorry for disturb. Have sent mail to Exchange Discussions but never received own mail .. -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 4:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent Ffolder Utility: Utility to rename or delete "special" Outlook folders such as the Calendar, Tasks, Inbox, and Contacts. VB source code included. http://www.slipstick.com/addins/gallery/index.htm#ffolder Look on technet for the information on how to rebuild the system folder with the "/ResetFolders" switch if needed: OL2000: Additional Command-Line Switches http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b197180 -Original Message- From: Adams, Kevin C. To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/19/03 11:18 PM Subject: RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent Thanks to all that answered. -k- -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions I thought that default mailbox folders such as deleted item and others are not able to be deleted. If other just recover them as long as retention is set and possible setting Dumpster always on just in case. I have found that user can delete mailbox folders using the OWa interface. The only way to get them back was to use the reset folders switch when starting Outlook. I wonder if they fixed the OWA issue I ran across since E2K2000/SP1 From: Ed Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Making an Outlook folder permanent Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) You might be able revoke a user's ownership permissions on his mailbox and then assign him individual permissions on folders therein, but I strongly suspect that Outlook wouldn't function properly in that case. Even if you could, I think it would probably be a waste of time. It would probably be easier to write a daemon that scans all mailboxes and puts back the folder if people delete it. Ed --- "Adams, Kevin C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings, Can anyone tell me if there is way to make a folder in a users mailbox that they cant delete? Any way at all? Thanks, -K- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received Email that not suppose to
My email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I received [EMAIL PROTECTED] emails AND the most issue is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address does not exists in our Server. Exchange 5.5 with Win NT 4 Any advice? I don't know what can I check except the Email Header that can't tell anything.. Till now, I've get 2users reply on the same issue... Thanks Rgds Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received Email that not suppose to
My email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I received [EMAIL PROTECTED] emails AND the most issue is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address does not exists in our Server. Exchange 5.5 with Win NT 4 Any advice? I don't know what can I check except the Email Header that can't tell anything.. Till now, I've get 2users reply on the same issue... Thanks Rgds Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Route Mail
Hi al, For route mail, specified domain or host server need to be specify in the SMTP Connector. One of my Oracle's Application (B2B) has to be configure to send email out to external users(e.g. Yahoo,Hotmail) hence this application needs to relay email to Exchange 5.5. What is the standard way to implements this? With Exchange 5.5, I need to specify route @yahoo.com.sg email relay to "yahoo.com.sg". I doubt this is a way, specify so many of the host servers. Thanks Rgds Fioon ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing
Hi, A question into your answer. How to do a ALL-domain route instead of per-domain route? Thanks -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing If your BT connection has an address space of *, and you enter a per-domain route of, say, hotmail.com, then any messages to hotmail.com will go via the new route since the address space is a more explicit match than just *. Neil -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 10 July 2002 15:41 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Routing Subject: RE: Routing Will this stop it going out over the BT connection ??? > -Original Message- > From: Neil Hobson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 July 2002 11:38 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routing > > > On the IMS, go to the Connections tab and look in the "specify by > email domain" area. You can set up per-domain routing, e.g. add in > your other domain and configure message delivery to the IP address of > the POP3 system. > > Neil > > -Original Message- > From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: 10 July 2002 08:05 > Posted To: Swynk Exchange List > Conversation: Routing > Subject: Routing > > > Lets see if anyone can answer this one today ... I'll try and put as > much info as possible this time > > Site 1 : Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4 SP6a > Site 2 : POP3 Mail system > > Scenario : Site 2 now owns Site 1 and we have set up various custom > recipients to forward mail around. However all the mail leaving Site 1 > currently goes out over our BT ISDN connection. How do I make all mail > destined for Site 2 use the fixed line we have in place between the 2 > sites and not go over the ISDN connection. Looking around in Exchange > admin I have routing tab on the IMS set for all messages sent to > Site1.com route to inbound. Is it just a case of adding a routing > entry here for Site2.com routing to Site2. If so how do i address > site2 (DNS,IP etc ) Pls help as I need this sorted ASAP. > > Regards > > Darren > > > > > Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd > London Road Henley Road > Teynham Paddock Wood > Kent Kent > ME9 9PR TN12 6DN > > Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 > Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 > > All business is conducted in accordance with the company's > terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on > request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated > by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of > this company. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > * > This email and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and intended solely for the use of > the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view > or opinions presented are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent those of > Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. > > If you have received this email in error, please > contact our Support Desk immediately on > 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
