RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Good enough. Thank you all for the answers. Jeremy -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers The dumpster for a user is cleared when that user is moved using the MOVE MAILBOX task in ADUC. It doesn't matter if the user is going between MDB or between servers. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Posted At: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP traffic. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield I know this is not a 100% exchange question. We are running 5.5 and Groupshield. If someone sends an email to an alias on the system, would Groupshield stop it? We have a user that claims that he is getting email at his real address that is infected with viruses. This email gets bounced off the exchange server through an alias. Any help would be appreciated. Tigue __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
I made no promises as to how well it works on the store.. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield scans = trashes - Original Message - From: Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:27 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP traffic. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield I know this is not a 100% exchange question. We are running 5.5 and Groupshield. If someone sends an email to an alias on the system, would Groupshield stop it? We have a user that claims that he is getting email at his real address that is infected with viruses. This email gets bounced off the exchange server through an alias. Any help would be appreciated. Tigue __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Spellchecker
I use messageware's plus pack and it works great for me. http://www.messageware.com/products/pluspack2k.html -Original Message- From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Spellchecker Checked the FAQs and did not see anything. Anyone using a Spellcheck add-on for E2K OWA? Are there any that the list recommends? Outside of waiting for Exchange 2003. TIA, Steve Iadarola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendar review
Exchange 2k SP3 AD mixed mode Outlook 2k clients running on NT I had a request from a manager to be able to view his subordinate's calendars, so I created a global security group to which he and his secretary belong and gave that group reviewer rights on the calendars. When they try to open the calendar all they get is unable to display, but it works perfectly if you add them directly to the permissions list. Is there a weird rule with the type of security groups that can be used? It has been two days since I created the group and the users have logged off and on today. Thank you, Jeremy --- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar review
I would if I could, but I'm in Mixed mode AD and won't be moving to native for about another 2 months. Are universal groups the only ones that work for permissions like this? The global group is mail enabled, but hidden from the GAL after I added it to the permissions. Thanks again, Jer -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Calendar review Use a mail enabled universal security group. On 4/4/03 9:51, Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 2k SP3 AD mixed mode Outlook 2k clients running on NT I had a request from a manager to be able to view his subordinate's calendars, so I created a global security group to which he and his secretary belong and gave that group reviewer rights on the calendars. When they try to open the calendar all they get is unable to display, but it works perfectly if you add them directly to the permissions list. Is there a weird rule with the type of security groups that can be used? It has been two days since I created the group and the users have logged off and on today. Thank you, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Asking for Password
Has the user restarted? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Asking for Password Please Help! I am running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2000 AD domain. Everything has been working great so far, until today. A user was asked to change their password by the systems. He did so and all of sudden Outlook is now asking for a password. He puts it in and it works fine. Why would he all of sudden need to put in his password? I have waited while and still the same results. Thanks. I will be searching the KB as well. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Asking for Password
Does this look at all like what you have going on? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b321652 -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Asking for Password I forced a replication earlier, but that didn't seem to help. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Asking for Password I believe you can clear the token that the MAPI client uses/used to which GC it hits to locate it's mail server. It does this once when you first login. Not sure if this is causing the login problem. But you can always force a replication then try. From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Asking for Password Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:02:45 -0500 The E2K box is near a DC, but the root of my forest is in NJ and I am in MD. We are connected via a T1. I gave it enough time (20 minutes) to replicate, I thought. How do I tell which GC the exchange box is pointing to? -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Asking for Password Vincent, Where is the e2k server located with regards to your closest DC? What is your replication schedule set to? What GC is the outlook client pointing to? Is that the closest GC to your Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Asking for Password Please Help! I am running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2000 AD domain. Everything has been working great so far, until today. A user was asked to change their password by the systems. He did so and all of sudden Outlook is now asking for a password. He puts it in and it works fine. Why would he all of sudden need to put in his password? I have waited while and still the same results. Thanks. I will be searching the KB as well. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Additions to the Schema
You'll have to install the exchange admin tools on your local machine. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Additions to the Schema I'm working here on migrating our organization from 5.5 to 2000, and I've just installed the ADC. Now when I access AD Users Computers from the machine with the ADC installed, I see a bunch of Exchange tabs with various config options. But I don't see any extra tabs from any other machine (like my workstation), that I use to actually administer users. Is this normal? Will it change when I actually install Ex2000? Thanks. -Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Storage limit warning not emailing
Exchange 2k Standard sp3 Windows 2k sp3 Due to the looming 16GB limit I am starting to setup storage limits on my server. I wanted to start the testing by enabling the warning on one account (my account). I set my warning limit to 10k, which is less than the 5k that my mailbox currently takes up. I have it set to run every night at midnight in the Private Information store properties, but I don't have any storewide warnings or quotas set there. I don't get any emails about exceeding the limit. Is there anything else that I have to do beyond the setting on the user object? I don't see any errors in event viewer that anything failed or even ran at Midnight other than the database maintenance that runs from 11PM to 3AM. Any help or direction is greatly appreciated. Thank you, Jeremy I. Shannon, Network Administrator Premier Dental Products [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be priveleged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unknw user: possible infection?
I agree. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Dflorea;privateconsulting.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unknw user: possible infection? It's Klez or a related (BugBear) worm, on a third party's PC somewhere, spoofing your address as the 'from' address. So if it bounces, it bounces back to you. Delete, Fuggedaboutit. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unknw user: possible infection? A strange occurrence has happened in the last two days. Right around 3:50 PM (EST), I start receiving ndr's saying that a message for [EMAIL PROTECTED] cannot be delivered. There is no such user or mailbox. Trend also sends me a mail saying it's found and quarantined the bugbear virus The text message that cannot be delivered is at the end of this message. The file that is sent out is the worm_bugbear virus. I've checked Trendmicro's site for information on how bugbear propogates itself as I thought that this is possibly an infected machine. However, on the day that bugbear information hit the internet, I checked and then immediately upgraded the Trendmicro anti-virus. I've got relaying turned off and have verified it using the method described numerous times on this list. Do I have an infected desktop? I'm running Trend's Officescan on the desktop. What also confuses me is that it I start getting the ndr's right around 4 PM, EST. And just as a side note, there actually is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:00:38 -0400 (EDT) from rly-yb01.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.1] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: - Transcript of Session Follows -. The line beginning with describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --AOL Postmaster - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to air-yc03.mail.aol.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 jhaze99 IS NOT ACCEPTING MAIL FROM THIS SENDER 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
I haven't had any problems with Groupshield either. Maybe not because it is great, but the fact that it gives you the ability to use the Blackstone list - which has protected us from every virus that has come up lately. I love Epolicy and would recommend it to anyone. Centralized, hierarchical control of all of you virus apps, saves me hours every week and every outbreak. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Here is a MS KB article on it: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q319011; -Mike -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Elaborate: I called McAfee about the product once for help with a problem, they charged us for the help then transferred us. The next guy that came on the phone said that the product was no longer supported. We had tons of problems with it, service was always stopping, updates we slow coming when compared to other products, tons of technical problem. we dumped it. We are running Symantec no, no problems. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure out why this is happening. Any help is appreciated. ~!M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
RE: New Exchange Server
Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller. Her theory is right. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Andrea, Please let me disagree. All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will create a temp page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this with my hardware guys). Then when time allows, the replacement drive can be added and the page file moved to it, with all the necessary reboots. I also disagree about the 0% downtime according to your scenario #2. Based on my experience, as soon as RAID failed on the page file volume, the server did a blue screen of death. So much for 0% downtime. *In theory* the server *should* have kept running. But it did not. So screw it. If it is going to crash anyway I am not going to spend extra money on it. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
You are blacklisted by several systems. Go to www.dnsstuff.com and check to see what lists you are on and what you can do. First thing, stop relaying. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Is the person actually closing out IE after they logoff of OWA? OWA doesn't remove the login by default until you start another IE session. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange . I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Security Breach????
Perhaps a virus with a fake from address sent to someone else in your organization. This happens with Klez, even though I don't think that is a Klez subject line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Security Breach Hello everyone, One of my users (unfortunately it's my Supervisor) got an alert from Group Shield saying that his attachment (.exe) was blocked. But he swears that he didn't send out any emails. Not only that, we were unable to find anything on his Sent Items folder either. Here is what he received on his inbox from Postmaster -Original Message- From: postmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] mailto:[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliverable mail--Helvetica The following mail can't be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Helvetica The attachment is the original mail * I just can't seem to find any information on this on the internet. Helvetica is a font. That's all I've got so for. Could this be a Security breach? Is someone using my exchange server? Has anyone received any messages like this before? Please help. Any input is welcome! Thanks everyone! rama Rama Arumugam Network Administrator Wire DynamiX.com (253) 395-4527 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Local host as smarthost
That's what I was thinking too, thanks Chris. Does anyone else use a smarthost on the inside interface of their firewall? I really don't have the hardware to setup anything outside of the firewall that would be reliable enough to handle our mail. Thank you, Jeremy -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Local host as smarthost I think any address you forward it to is going to add the stamp for the internal IP address then based on what you've said. -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Local host as smarthost DNS name resolves to internal address due to internal AD DNS. External address isn't routable because I'm behind the firewall that does the address translation. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Local host as smarthost Tried the DNS name or the external IP address? -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Local host as smarthost Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 I want to use Praetor (my content screening software) to add a disclaimer to the end of my emails (I know they are pointless, but management asked for it). It is my understanding that to do this I have to forward outgoing mail to a smarthost, the issue is that Praetor and Exchange are on the same server. The smarthost works if I use the actual internal IP address, but not if I use localhost or 127.0.0.1 (it just says host did not respond to connection). I don't want to use the internal IP address because that would be included in the message header. Is there something that I may be missing or a different way to go about this? I was hoping I could just use this functionality and not write one using VB. TIA, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Local host as smarthost
Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 I want to use Praetor (my content screening software) to add a disclaimer to the end of my emails (I know they are pointless, but management asked for it). It is my understanding that to do this I have to forward outgoing mail to a smarthost, the issue is that Praetor and Exchange are on the same server. The smarthost works if I use the actual internal IP address, but not if I use localhost or 127.0.0.1 (it just says host did not respond to connection). I don't want to use the internal IP address because that would be included in the message header. Is there something that I may be missing or a different way to go about this? I was hoping I could just use this functionality and not write one using VB. TIA, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Local host as smarthost
DNS name resolves to internal address due to internal AD DNS. External address isn't routable because I'm behind the firewall that does the address translation. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Local host as smarthost Tried the DNS name or the external IP address? -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Local host as smarthost Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 I want to use Praetor (my content screening software) to add a disclaimer to the end of my emails (I know they are pointless, but management asked for it). It is my understanding that to do this I have to forward outgoing mail to a smarthost, the issue is that Praetor and Exchange are on the same server. The smarthost works if I use the actual internal IP address, but not if I use localhost or 127.0.0.1 (it just says host did not respond to connection). I don't want to use the internal IP address because that would be included in the message header. Is there something that I may be missing or a different way to go about this? I was hoping I could just use this functionality and not write one using VB. TIA, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 IIS5 redirect question
You just need to put the entire address, https://servername/exchange. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 IIS5 redirect question Hello all, i have a exchange 2000 server set up with OWA also. i am using SSL and i want to set up a redirect so my users only need to type in http://servername.domainname and not https://servername/exchange. i went under the default web site in IIS 5 and went to the home directory tab and chose Redirection to a URL and for the redirect url i put /exchange but it isnt working. can someone help me out a bit on this one. thanks for all the help!! Bob Chyka _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping Spam
I use and like CMS's Praetor. There is some administration to it, but it is worth it if your CEO doesn't get animal porn emails anymore. Check it out at http://www.cmsconnect.com. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam Yes I am looking for server based. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam Sunbelt makes one. But I think like most of them they are client based. If your looking for server based I don't have any options for you. http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam My question: Is there a 3rd party tool anyone recommends to block spam ? I'm looking for something for the Microsoft Windows platform. I found plenty for UNIX and LINUX... In answer to your question: The TURF Directory has to be created and does not exist by default. The default entry is C:\Turfdir but you can change the path by altering a registry entry. Look on the MS KBase for this registry entry..don't remember it. Don't forget to restart the IMS as well as the IS after you do change the message filtering options and after you create the folder. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam it's pretty difficult to stop spam as such - precisely for the reason you have discovered: domains keep changing... you really need a dedicated 3rd party solution for this as ex is not good enough as is. q2 - have a look at http://spam.abuse.net/ as for q3 - don't know and can't remember as not using ex5.5 Rob be lucky... -Original Message- From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 July 2002 15:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stopping Spam I have 3 questions. I know I can block Spam from a particular sender, or block all the senders from a certain domain, using Message Filting in Exchange 5.5. I got a list of individual address from the Junk senders list and Adult senders list but the domains all seem to be different. 1. Do I have to put them individually or can I import them some how? 2. Also does anyone have a list of Spam domains that I can put in, in addition to the address I already have? 3. Where is the folder called Turf suppose to be in MS Exchange 5.5, where all of the filtered e-mails are suppose to go. I did a search for it and it didn't find it. ANY help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to prevent certain users from sending+recieving Internet mail
FAQs at the bottom of the email. -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to prevent certain users from sending+recieving Internet mail We have the need to block specific users (contractors) from sending and receiving Internet mail. Does anyone know of a way to do this under E2K? I tried removing the SMTP address but it is a required attribute. Thanks, david moore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archives
I have gotten one of these for every post in the last week or so. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archives See? Morons... Re: your subscribe request subscribe Sorry, but the email address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is already a member of 'exchange'. Because you are already subscribed, internet.com did not subscribe you again. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Archives Subject: RE: Archives Because SWYNK is all fscked up and disorganized. Er... Subscribes to a laissez-faire, decentralized management philosophy. Whereas Simpler-Webb (http://www.swinc.com) is a dynamic company that does its shizatt right. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:06 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Archives Subject: RE: Archives I just want to know why you can't get the look up the SQL lists from SWINK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: While at Baja Fresh
At least be funny if your going to post that far OT. -Original Message- From: Dumb Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: While at Baja Fresh I noticed something at lunch. Why isn't the phrase chopping [one's] meat a double-entendre? Were the guido making the burrito innards using a different implement--a mallet rather than a cleaver, for instance--much snickering would ensue; e.g., see that guy over there beating his meat. Guffaw. As it were, he was merely chopping his meat. Utterance of this observation did not elicit even a slight chortle from those at the table. Only stoic acknowledgement of fact. GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders
Add exchange attributes to the group so they show up in the GAL. Then you can add them, you can remove the email addresses after you have added them to security. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Public Folders
Yes that's it, sorry I worded it wrong. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders When I right click on the groups. It doesn't give me an option to add the attributes only to remove them. It does give me an option to add an email address. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Add exchange attributes to the group so they show up in the GAL. Then you can add them, you can remove the email addresses after you have added them to security. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Public Folders
I'm having a slow day, I can reply quickly :) -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Sorry for my not-so immediate response (work gets in the way!). What Jeremy has said is kinda my understanding, but I must admit for all my customers so far, we've implemented native mode domains and so I've avoided this problem. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 July 2002 15:38 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: RE: Public Folders Let me give that a whirl. Thanks for the immediate responses man. I appreciate that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Yes that's it, sorry I worded it wrong. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders When I right click on the groups. It doesn't give me an option to add the attributes only to remove them. It does give me an option to add an email address. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Add exchange attributes to the group so they show up in the GAL. Then you can add them, you can remove the email addresses after you have added them to security. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I've tried creating security groups and placing the correct people inside those groups. But when I go to add them in the permissions page they don't show up. Unless I'm doing this wrong? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You could also use security groups, but you would have to replace all of the distribution groups in the permissions. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Unfortunately we don't have our AD in native mode yet cause we have one site that's still running NT 4.0. So from what I'm hearing is the only other alternative is to actually list the users one by one until we are in native mode? Am I right on this one? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders Ordinarily you'd set up a connection agreement that replicates the DLs to AD as UDGs (creation of UDGs is hard coded within the ADC). Then, assuming you've got a native mode domain, the store.exe process would convert these to a USG on an as-needed basis when people accessed the public folders. Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 July 2002 19:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Public Folders Subject: Public Folders All, I have a question concerning rehoming public folders from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. I can rehome the folders just fine. The one thing that we have a problem with is that we have distribution lists that were given permissions to certain public folders. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can give that list the same permissions on the E2K server where the rehomed public folder resides. Can this be accomplished and how? setup: 4- 5.5 servers (2 mailbox servers and 2 IMS servers) 2- E2K servers (1 server has ADC installed and mailbox server, 1 mailbox server) All DC's are upgraded to W2K If i've left something out please let me know. TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Can't open attachments
Are you sure this isn't related to outbreak manager from McAfee? One option in it is to block all attachments, check your rules in Outbreak manager if you have it setup. -Original Message- From: Netadmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't open attachments GroupShield has a HotFix7 (available from their download page) which worked for me. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't open attachments Groupshield is generally reasonably reliable? Have they threatened you? If you testify against them we can provide you with generally reasonably reliable protection. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't open attachments The attachment does enter the Exchange system but the problem turned out to be Groupshield. Groupshield had gone belly up and seemed to be regarding every attachment as a potential virus so wouldn't open them. The confusing part was that there was no useful error message other than something like: - Outlook was unable to open attachment. I'm not a great fan of Groupshield however it's generally reasonably reliable. I ran a repair on it which seems to have fixed the problem. Regards Tony Are you sure the attachment enters the Exchange system? -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 July 2002 02:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't open attachments Hi Everyone, I have a problem with a user (using Outlook 2000) who can't open attachments. When she opens new e-mails there is no attachment icon displayed even though the message contains an attachment. She can open e-mail that was sent to her yesterday but not today's. This isn't an Outlook blocking .exe file type issue. It seems to be server side problem because she has the same trouble regardless of the PC she uses. The Exchange server is running W2K (SP2) and Exchange 5.5 (SP4). No other users are affected. There are no limits placed on her mailboxe. Several weeks ago I migrated her mailbox from an old mail server to the current one. I don't know if this is relevant though because she's bee fine until now. Any ideas? Regards Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice The content of this e-mail is intended only for the confidential use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not such a person, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that reading it, copying it, or in any way disseminating its content to any other person, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying to this e-mail immediately. Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB - A Public Company (publ) - is incorporated in Stockholm Sweden with limited liability and is regulated by The Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the United Kingdom. It is registered in England and Wales under Number BR000979. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unknown users e-mails entering environment
This seems to be a new practice for spammers, we just spoke about it yesterday. They fake their headers just like the klez, but the only payload is the annoying email. Figure out the sending server from the header and see if it is a domain that you can block. -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unknown users e-mails entering environment Could be Klez... -Original Message- From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unknown users e-mails entering environment exchange 5.5, sp4, nt4, sp6a I am seeing a rash of e-mails being delivered to users where the FROM and TO addresses are ex-employees of the company. The users who are getting the e-mails are not on the FROM, TO, or BCC lines. if I send an e-mail to any of the addresses in the e-mail, I will get an undeliverable message stating user not in address book. any sugestions?? thanks Jon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Block Addresses
I use CMS's content filtering software, Praetor, for this and I'm very happy with how it has worked. Here is a link to check out http://www.cmsconnect.com/Praetor/prMain.htm . Be forewarned that any content filtering software is a lot of work at the beginning to get it working properly for your and your company's needs. Jeremy -Original Message- From: Awais Butt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Block Addressess Dear All, I want to know how can I can Block external mail in Exchange 5.5 in Exchange 2000 as well as I want to Block such type of mails which subject/text body having special sentences or words. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emails don't show in additional mailbox
Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. It will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different users that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, no changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I can fix the problem first. Thank you in advance, Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox
Ah, the three messages were marked private. Stupid overlook. Is there a way that I could allow private emails to show in a mailbox such as this? Thank you very much, Jer -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox The messages in question are marked as private and/or the view is configured incorrectly. -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails don't show in additional mailbox Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. It will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different users that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, no changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I can fix the problem first. Thank you in advance, Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox
Cool, thank you for the help anyway. I'll just set the main user up to be able to mount the mailbox directly if this happens again. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox Other than unmarking them? Not in Outlook 2000, in Outlook 2002 I believe you can... but don't quote me on the latter. -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox Ah, the three messages were marked private. Stupid overlook. Is there a way that I could allow private emails to show in a mailbox such as this? Thank you very much, Jer -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox The messages in question are marked as private and/or the view is configured incorrectly. -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails don't show in additional mailbox Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. It will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different users that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, no changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I can fix the problem first. Thank you in advance, Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
I agree with Jim. This list has already helped me fix a few problems I didn't even know I had until I scanned some other people's issues. I'm also sure that one day the joking around will keep me from yelling at a user who really doesn't deserve it. You need to smile every now and then, or you just become a boring, mean person. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ? Your insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not borne out by the many many people that regularly comment on how this list has helped them become a better Exchange professionals. I am one of those. If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at my expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem. Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA -Original Mes sage- From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? This is precisely what I'm talking about. I don't have a problem having fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for another list. Thanks for being candid with me. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the flu from all the hugging. e -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions. If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's down the road and to the left. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists? Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled professionals and less comedians? All this useless chatter is driving me up the wall ... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA and AOL
Has anyone here had any problems with AOL users connecting to OWA? I have a few users that are having issues, they can't authenticate. It isn't the AOL browser either, I've had them try to use IE when logged in. I just wanted to ask prior to setting up a test AOL box, oh the horror. Is there anything that can be done to make OWA more friendly to AOL users, or does anyone know of an AOL config change that has to be done? Thank you in advance, Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Upgrade question
If you have remote users, show them the new OWA. That functionality alone convinced management here. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question take a bat to the server -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
1. Dazed and Confused 2. Fast Times at Ridgemont High 3. Half Baked Ugh, you don't do drug tests for your positions do you? -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question 1. Blade Runner 2. Godfather 1 2 3. Pulp Fiction Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Poop. J. C., not J. S.. -Original Message- From: David Florea Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question 1. History of the World, Part I 2. Star Wars Trilogy 3. J. S. Superstar -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question 1. Life of Brian 2. Crimson Tide 3. Boys from Brazil -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: King, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:51 PM Subject: RE: Cerification question 2001 A Space Odyssey Clockwork Orange Full Metal Jacket Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke. But there's no Monty Python, so... 1. Dogma 2. Apollo 13 3. 12 Angry Men They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this, though... - Original Message - From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: RE: Cerification question Go on, tell us, and we can put it to the test :-) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question That is so not fair. I doubt that my three favorite movies would endear me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say, neandrathal, in their choices. M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Virus activity
It's the klez.h virus. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus activity Is it just me or is anyone else been getting tons of .pif's, .exe's, .scr's, etc. into their mail systems? Antigen is getting them all but the frequency is much higher than normal... Bill Lambert Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus activity
Because Antigen is stripping the files. -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus activity Funny though, I haven't received a single copy of Klez on any of my systems... Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: sexta-feira, 26 de Abril de 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus activity Oh yea. Klez is really doing a number. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus activity Is it just me or is anyone else been getting tons of .pif's, .exe's, .scr's, etc. into their mail systems? Antigen is getting them all but the frequency is much higher than normal... Bill Lambert Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Accounts
If you upgraded exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, you may have an issue with the everyone group having read rights. You need to use ADSI edit to change the right at the topmost container, so that it isn't inherited by your entire organization. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Accounts Hi There is a problem where i am at of users can attach and read other users email. They don't have Domain Admin rights(some of them do as far as workgroup managers). Is there a way to fix this. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT idx
I usually just rename those files, r they important? Yours truly, Freshprince11 -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT idx Oh, everyone knows that you use WinZip to do that! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:23 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OT idx Subject: RE: OT idx Oh my. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT idx the pagefile.sys is about 550 MB, is there a way to make that smaller? -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT idx They're for querying the MS index server. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT idx Hi there what is a .idx and .ldx file? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Question
He's pretty badly infected, I got one for every post I've made in the past month. I can only imagine how many some of you got. -Original Message- From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question List member with wacky antivirus situation from what I can tell. I've got 4 of them from this morning. It does confirm that CA Inoculate IT itself is really a virus though. Much as I've suspected in the past. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question This morning I received the following e-mail: -Original Message- From: ANTIGEN_PELLIG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:55 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Antigen Notification:Antigen found VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus Antigen for Exchange found Body of Message infected with VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus. The file is currently Cleaned. The message, RE: SMTP message size limits, was sent from Christopher Hummert and was discovered in PINK, Nathaniel\Inbox located at FPM Netops/FPMMAIL/PELLIG. -End of Original Message- Now I've checked around and I've failed to find any information about this virus, furthermore even with our most recent updates to Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition it didn't find anything either. Does anyone thing this is something I should worry about or does anyone know what this virus is? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Split DNS
If you made the new box a DC you could be having issues that the DNS is now setup as a root server. If you go into dns and see a . zone, delete it and that will let it search the real root servers for internet IP's. -Original Message- From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Split DNS I have 2 servers: - One server is Domain Controller with DNS Active Directory - integrated - Second server is Exchange Server 5.5 on NT 4.0 with DNS for external use. On the second server I have two network cards, one for internal and second for external. External domain is the same with the internal. My problem is: I install Windows 2000 server on the second server. After that I install DNS service but I can't go out to internet. I have ping replay from IP addresses but the DNS server cannot resolve the name. Can you help me ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DNS for wbpr.com
Why is it never *their* fault? :) I had the exact same issue and it took 2 months for me to convince them that they had to contact their ISP to make the change. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS for wbpr.com The preference can be anything from 0 to 65534 or so. 10 tends to be customary as primary, but it doesn't matter. The issue is indeed on their end - specifically their DNS entries. Your IMC is doing a lookup for ALL MX records for wbpr.com, and gets back just one - mail.wbpr.com. When it looks that up to find the IP address, its dealing with round robin DNS - you roll the dice and you take your chances. But, your DNS server will cache that value for a length of time (determined by their zone information). Generally that's 4 hours. Now - since your IMC will retry every 4 hours or so, because it's a transient error (can resolve via DNS but the server isn't available) - you're going to end up with that data live in the cache for a while... In other words. You lost the roll of the dice. The issue is their DNS and only their DNS. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS for wbpr.com DDNS hosted DNS with a multi homed server that is autoupdateing//?? Why is the cost 100?? Should be like 10. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS for wbpr.com I see what you are talking about. Mail.wbpr.com has 2 IP's. Strange Non-authoritative answer: wbpr.comMX preference = 100, mail exchanger = mail.wbpr.com wbpr.comnameserver = nameserver.coqui.net wbpr.comnameserver = nameserver.coqui.com mail.wbpr.com internet address = 196.42.23.4 mail.wbpr.com internet address = 64.213.243.212 nameserver.coqui.netinternet address = 196.28.61.36 nameserver.coqui.cominternet address = 196.28.61.66 -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DNS for wbpr.com Our client, wbpr.com, appears to have issues with their DNS records. They have 2 MX records with the same preference, and one of the boxes (64.213.243.212) does not respond. Of course, *my* DNS server tries to connect to that one first, resulting in the dreaded Host Unreachable error. The 2nd IP is never attempted. If I hard code the good IP (196.42.23.4) in the IMS, magically the mail delivers. Of course, the customer claims no one else on earth is having problems sending them mail. Obviously it's a DNS issue - but is it *my* DNS server's fault that it never looks for the 2nd IP address, or is it their problem? (dnsstuff.com couldn't even connect to their mail server, so I'm voting for it's their problem.) Many thanks. Lynne July _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
What type of VPN is up to him and depends on the hardware that he has, or the software if he wants to go that way. I do use a Cisco PIX for mine with IPSEC clients, but that may not be what he wants. To each their own :) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!! L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT! I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes in the FW, it runs parallel to it. Use the IPSEC client and you're at least able to sleep at night. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DNS
Have your reverse zones been delegated to you by your Internet provider? It is possible that the reverse zones aren't pointing to you, so it wouldn't matter if you updated your names servers. Go to dnsstuff.com and do a reverse lookup on your mail server's IP to see what name server responds. Most likely your ISP is hosting the reverse zone and doesn't have any information about your server. I had the same problem and had to contact ATT to delegate the zone to me before I could fix it. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS Reverse lookup is giving me fits for one of my sites - vitalms.com (209.154.100.11). Although we have published the PTR record, it does not resolve. Our corporate site - vitalps.com (209.154.100.10) - does resolve properly. We use the same name servers for both sites. What am I missing? Thanks. Lynne -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS And that you're authoritative for the entire reverse zone. If you have a portion of a class C for example, your ISP may centralize the reverse zone and handle the updates for all of its customers who share that block. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS You make sure that you have a reverse lookup zone with a PTR record for your Exchange server. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS Ben, how can I solve this. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS It doesn't appear that you have reverse DNS records for your Exchange server. If the receiving domain is doing reverse lookups, they may not accept mail from your domain. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS Jennifer Hi, if you are talking about my previous problem about brain.net.pk, which is still there, every evening I have to restart my smtp service which then sends mail to brain.net.pk domain. About DNS, actually I got this error from one of the domain I was send mails. The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mail.ubl.com.pk #5.0.0 thanks regards. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS Q172953 Once again, vague. Maybe this article will help you to form a more detailed question. Post your problem in detail and what you have done to try and solve your problem. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DNS Dear List, How can one check that the DNS is configured properly for exchange server? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Exchange forms exe's replaced
I apologize for how many times this posted, I don't think I was the only one that had problems with posting for that week. Anyway, does anyone have any idea of what I could do here? I really don't want to recreate all of these forms. I'd appreciate any help. Thanks, Jer -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange forms exe's replaced I've tried to post this earlier, but it didn't show up. I appologize if it ends up posting twice. I recently upgraded to Exchange 2000 and installed McAfee Groupshield version 5.1.0. It was my practice with the old Groupshield to block exe attachments and I set the new version to do the same. What happened was it blocked the exe's for my public folder forms from being downloaded and replaced them with its own replaced.txt files. I have dealt with the issue of the exe's being blocked, now my problem is replacing the replaced.txt files with the original exe's. Now when someone tries to run a form they download the replaced.txt file to their local cache instead of the original exe. My question is : Is there a way for me to manually place the exe's where the files are downloaded from to the local cache? I was able to fix the ones that I have the original cfg files for, but I am missing about 4 cfgs. I have the exe's that were replaced, but I don't know where to put them or how to put them there. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange exe's replaced.
I recently upgraded to Exchange 2000 and installed McAfee Groupshield version 5.1.0. It was my practice with the old Groupshield to block exe attachments and I set the new version to do the same. What happened was it blocked the exe's for my public folder forms from being downloaded and replaced them with its own replaced.txt files. I have dealt with the issue of the exe's being blocked, now my problem is replacing the replaced.txt files with the original exe's. Now when someone tries to run a form they download the replaced.txt file to their local cache instead of the original exe. My question is : Is there a way for me to manually place the exe's where the files are downloaded from to the local cache? I was able to fix the ones that I have the original cfg files for, but I am missing about 4 cfgs. I have the exe's that were replaced, but I don't know where to put them or how to put them there. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange forms exe's replaced
I've tried to post this earlier, but it didn't show up. I appologize if it ends up posting twice. I recently upgraded to Exchange 2000 and installed McAfee Groupshield version 5.1.0. It was my practice with the old Groupshield to block exe attachments and I set the new version to do the same. What happened was it blocked the exe's for my public folder forms from being downloaded and replaced them with its own replaced.txt files. I have dealt with the issue of the exe's being blocked, now my problem is replacing the replaced.txt files with the original exe's. Now when someone tries to run a form they download the replaced.txt file to their local cache instead of the original exe. My question is : Is there a way for me to manually place the exe's where the files are downloaded from to the local cache? I was able to fix the ones that I have the original cfg files for, but I am missing about 4 cfgs. I have the exe's that were replaced, but I don't know where to put them or how to put them there. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange forms exe's replaced by Groupshield
I recently upgraded to Exchange 2000 and installed McAfee Groupshield version 5.1.0 from Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield 4. It was my practice with the old Groupshield to block exe attachments and I set the new version to do the same. What happened was it blocked the exe's for my public folder forms from being downloaded and replaced them with its own replaced.txt files. I have dealt with the issue of the exe's being blocked, now my problem is replacing the replaced.txt files with the original exe's. Now when someone tries to run a form they download the replaced.txt file to their local cache instead of the original exe. My question is : Is there a way for me to manually place the exe's where the files are downloaded from to the local cache? I was able to fix the ones that I have the original cfg files for, but I am missing about 4 cfgs. I have the exe's that were replaced, but I don't know where to put them or how to put them there. Thanks in advance for any help. Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
