RE: Sending email via a batch file

[King, John]

http://www.infradig.com/postie/index.shtml

>From the site :
The ultimate command-line mailer! Send and receive mail form the
command-line or execute from within virtually any program. Supports NNTP,
SMTP, ESMTP, MIME, BASE64 and UUENCODE for posting, and POP3, IMAP4, HTTP
protocols for receiving. Available for Windows and Unix. Can post HTML and
MHTML (embedded objects) messages.

I do believe there is a free exe for download.  I have used this for a set
of large batch scripts that generate emails.  Rock solid.

John

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file


Well, you could use batch files to call something else also. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file

I agree.  However, this person wanted to send e-mail from a batch file.
I interpret that to mean .BAT or .CMD files, for which BLAT is well
suited and ready to go.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file


You don't need Blat. Any person who calls themselves a developer should
have some knowledge of the different ways you can send mail with CDO. 

-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending email via a batch file

BLAT.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending email via a batch file


We have a developer that is trying to find a way to send email via a
batch file.  Does anyone know if this is possible and what the code is
that he should use?  It will be sent to our SMTP server and then out
from there.  We tried echoing a telnet session but we cannot figure out
how to do a return command.  If you know of something different please
let me know.  We are trying to stay away from buying anything third
party.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: how does everyone fight this spam?

[King, John]

I second this.  We have been running Postfix with SpamAssassin for months.
It works great.

John

-Original Message-
From: Schlarb, Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how does everyone fight this spam?


Use Postfix/ Spamassassin in this environment. Postfix MTA allows you to put
rules in to filter on expired addresses, known spam addresses, specfic
information in the header as well as attachments. Spamassassin spam
filtering itself is very good.

Henry Schlarb

"Most people, when they stumble across truth, merely pick themselves up,
dust themselves off and walk away as if nothing happened."
  With acknowledgment to Winston Churchill



-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 7, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: how does everyone fight this spam?


Hi all. We are receiving a lot of these bogus messages every day - "bug
notice", "failure message", "report", "error advice", "bug
announcement", etc. Some of them have a fake Microsoft address in the
from line. They seem to be generated by a virus. Our antivirus programs
(SurfControl and NAVEX) catch and kill the virus, but the messages still
get through. They don't seem to have any consistent subject or From
address...

It seems that other organizations should be affected too, I am just
wondering how others are dealing with these messages.

Thanks!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT :: Other Discussion List

[King, John]

/s/perl/vbscript

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List


Sorry, can't help ya there, I use perl. 

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List

Would prefer vbscript for now it's all I know 






Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015


-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List


No
What language in particular (perl, jscript, python, vbscript)?
ActiveDir.org


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT :: Other Discussion List

Does anybody know of good lists for

SMS
Windows Scripting
Windows 2000 and AD?

TIA,
Joshua

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Spamassassin - Good?

[King, John]

I have been using spam assassin on a linux platform since February with much
success.  It is easy to configure and works very well.  I recently upgraded
to the newest version which adds functionality to preserve the original
message.  This is a big plus when dealing with false positives.  Some of the
features include white listing trusted mailers, vipul razor support, and
content rating.  In my configuration it is filtering email site wide, with a
set threshold.  Below is an example of a spam assassin report :

Content analysis details:   (30.00 points, 5 required)
SUBJ_GUARANTEED(2.9 points)  Subject GUARANTEED
BANG_GUARANTEE (0.5 points)  BODY: Something is emphatically guaranteed
MARKETING_PARTNERS (2.1 points)  BODY: Claims you registered with some kind
of partner
EXCUSE_14  (0.1 points)  BODY: Tells you how to stop further spam
EXCUSE_15  (1.8 points)  BODY: Claims to be legitimate email
EXCUSE_19  (0.9 points)  BODY: Claims you opted-in or registered
OFFERS_ETC (0.6 points)  BODY: Stop with the offers, coupons,
discounts etc!
FULL_REFUND(1.5 points)  BODY: Offers a full refund
...

It has worked better than I could have every expected and for free.  It is
nice to be able to provide new functionality even with a shrinking budget.

Good luck,
 John

-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spamassassin - Good?



Hello, 

I would be grateful to hear anyones opinion on spamassassin. I am in a
postion where I might be told to start using it.

Thanks,

Ken Jasa
Messaging Manager
Weber Shandwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations..... [bcc]

[King, John]

Not to be too redundant here, but I have been running Postfix on a Slackware
box as a corporate SMTP gateway.  I would highly recommend Postfix for such
an application.  The benefits of such a system are RBL checks on incoming
mail, low overhead, and with rrd one can produce pretty little graphs(to
show management).  Recently Spam had become a major problem for us, as many
others I am sure.  I decided to implement SpamAssasin with Postfix in
advanced filtering mode.  There is plenty of documentation on different
filtering techniques with Postfix.  Since 2/12/03 SpamAssassin has caught
10143 pieces of UCE with a very low false positive rate.  The best part
about the system is it costs our company $0.  Just some thoughts on non
commercial software.

John

-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SPAM blockin software recommendations. [bcc]



It seems the idiots are getting better all the time :-)..
I don't run Postfix myself so I can't really comment on the paper you refer
to.

Take a look at www.postfix.org too, I personally check several sources to 
find out if a certain piece of information is true. Which does not mean I 
don't trust Advosys but I'd rather check it all the same. They may have 
forgotten some information you may need.


B.

At 19:25 23-03-2003 +, you wrote:
>I think I'll have a play with Redhat 8 tomorrow as we have the CDs at work,
>last time I installed it I used Webmin to configure Postfix and it seemed
>fairly straightforward to get the basics working.
>
>http://advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html seems fairly
>idiot-proof for the spamassassin filtering?
>
>regards
>Paul
>- Original Message -
>From: "B. van Ouwerkerk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 6:07 PM
>Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. [bcc]
>
>
> > At 17:47 23-03-2003 +, you wrote:
> > > > I recommend qmail, which is not only highly secure - it has
> > > > NEVER had a security breach - but is also at least 4-5 times
> > > > as fast as Sendmail, and much, much easier to set up and configure.
> > >
> > >I know this question always stirs up a bit of a hornets nest amongst
*nix
> > >users, but which distro would you suggest for someone with sod-all *nix
> > >knowledge looking to setup an MTA with spamassassin filtering?
> >
> > Really?? I don't see why it should..
> >
> > If you like to do things the hard way (like /me) you should go for
> > Slackware. It's the best but also less friendly for Windows users. Pico
is
> > wat comes as close to a gui as it gets.. for those of you who don't know
> > Pico, it's just as graphical as the good old edit on the DOS prompt. :-)
> > It even got some mouse support.. but who needs a mouse if you can do it
> > with tapping some keys.. right?
> >
> > More friendly distro's are RedHat, Suse both provide commercial support.
I
> > think Mandrake provides commercial support too. If you feel more like a
> > free product then Debian is your distro.
> > Whatever you do don't use Linuxconf for setting up Sendmail, it's broke.
> >
> >
> > B.
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Very OT - txt handling

[King, John]

Umm yeah that would be cool, but if you have Visual Basic that maybe a good
route.  It would be easy to parse the text file and then write it out to a
csv file.  A csv file will open in Excel and look fine.  Then compile exe
and schedule to run at any time.  As a matter of fact you could probably do
it just the same with VBscrit if you don't have visual basic.

Good Luck,
John

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Very OT - txt handling


You could get the MS UNix service 3.0 very inexpensively..

It's cool..work pretty well for the tools Ive used so far..
cheap for what you get and it's power..

has may unix thing ported to MS/win32

bill

-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Very OT - txt handling


Kim,

There are several things that might be of help.

A combination of Unix tools (ported to Win32 of course) grep & wc  (grep can
search for text/regular expression and wc can count lines, characters etc.
This will find out the stats you want; but won't automatically update the
files.  You can create text files; but would need to import them.  Search
google for the win32 ports of these utilites.  I don't have an exact URL.

Perl is an excellent language for parsing text.  You should be able to use
it to count up the statistics you are looking for, and then create/update a
document like it sounds like you want to do.  http://www.activestate.com


HTH

Arron


===
Arron S. King
Network & Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
v: 614.251.4515
f:  614.252.2650




-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Very OT - txt handling


Hi there, 
 
I came across your address on the net, and I would like to ask you a
quick programming question.  Could you point me out to a sort of code
that can count the number of characters and lines in a txt file and
transfer that to exell or access? 
 
I have the following example (txt)
 
45 14:53:52 ENTRANCE ARTS (2) ACCESS GRANTED KIM SCHOTANUS (16788937)
46 15:14:52 EXIT ARTS GRANTED
47 16:00:48 ENTRANCE ARTS (2) ACCESS GRANTED PROCOPIO ALB (07723137)
48 16:52:24 EXIT ARTS (3) ACCESS GRANTED BECKERS PAUL (04906723)
...
 
In this example the first line is the line number, that is reset to 00
after 99, then there is the time, the action performed -ENTRANCE ARTS
(2) ACCESS GRANTED- and the name and permission code.
Line 46 is a special command, this is when someone overrides the system
(which happens quite often)
 
after each 20 lines there is a blank line and then a line with the date
 
The idea is to find/create a little code that pushes the data in this
txt file to exell on a daily basis.
 
Do you know of any code that could do this?
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RBL's

[King, John]

Never listen to sales schmucks anyways...
RBL = Real Boston Lager...

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs@;LEAWOOD.ORG]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


OH!  So we are talking about what's stuck in Chris' beard!  Now I
understand :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely@;TripathImaging.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Reddish Brown Lint???

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs@;LEAWOOD.ORG] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


What is RBL? :P



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Oh wait. Never mind Mr. Hummert. I finally understand what is going on. 

You took my general statements regarding the number of mail
administrators who couldn't spell RBL or who didn't fully understand its
implications as some kind of a personal attack. I can assure you that I
had neither you, nor anyone else on the list in mind particularly when I
created those statistics.

There are plenty of things on this list which the vast majority of
members don't completely understand. Heck, I've got an ever growing list
of things I don't understand completely. Not understanding something
isn't a sin; jumping willy nilly onto the latest and greatest technology
without understanding the pros and cons of it might be. My posts were
simply meant to provide a warning to those who might be interested that
all that glitters is not gold.

Sorry Christopher, this song isn't about you.

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> I asked for clarification from Mr. Walsh that I might learn to curb my

> apparently misplaced anger. How, Mr. Hummert was that rude?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >
> > Hu you being rude to someone elseimagine that?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris 
> > Scharff
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:24 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> >
> >
> > >Ok what makes you such a wizard?
> >
> > The cool pointy hat and eye of newt in my toolkit.
> >
> >
> > Who exacty was I rude to? The two people in the thread who I 
> > directly replied to?[1] Or did I offend those mail administrators to

> > whom my coments applied for revealing that in this instance they 
> > wore no clothes?
> >
> >
> > [1] Close personal friends who wouldn't take offense at my comments 
> > even if they had been directed at them.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Walsh, Ric
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Sent: 10/31/2002 9:31 AM
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> >
> > Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. 
> > Have you though of taking an anger management class?
> >
> > Ric Walsh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM
> > > To:   Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject:  RE: RBL's
> > >
> > > I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL.

> > > The
> >
> > > majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the implications

> > > of
> > the
> > > functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it

> > > actually works or not.
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...)
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to 
> > > > comprehend its functionality?
> > > >
> > > > William
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris 
> > > > Scharff
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL 
> > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd 
> > > > parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have

> > > > to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo 
> > > > is costing their company business.
> > > >
>

RE: Comp Time Question

[King, John]

Are you kiding me. All those kids that show up to buy the latest issue of
2600. You bet they are scewing up the public kiosks!

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Comp Time Question


Do you have to work a lot of weekends?


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Comp Time Question

Large corp.  Hourly - restricted overtime.  No more than 1 hour per week
per employee (no joke).  Salary, no comp time, no overtime.

However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in "trouble" for
showing up at 10 the next day.  But that's up to my boss.  Weekends?
Sucks to be me.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier@;courts.state.tx.us] 
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Comp Time Question
Subject: RE: Comp Time Question


Here at the state gummint, that's what I get.

In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, "Too bad, so sad,
you're salaried."

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs@;LEAWOOD.ORG] 
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Comp Time Question
Subject: RE: Comp Time Question


Here at the City and being "Salary", my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1
ratio for time I work over 40 hours :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Comp Time Question


Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time?

I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate
their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their
normal workweek.

Example:  If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus
package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or
what?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11
Fax:401-738-9813
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:   http://www.summit-technical.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ

[King, John]

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q191687&;

Looks like you had better check your PIX rules.  Can you telnet to port 25
from the outside of the DMZ..?

John

-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:jdubyn@;optonline.net]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ


Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using Front-End server in a
DMZ.

Here's the environment:

PIX firewall>DMZ that houses a Front-End Exchange SP3 server>PIX
Firewall>Local LAN with Back-End Exchange SP3 server.

Originally, POP3 was setup on the Back-End server and is presently
functioning perfectly.  In order to secure the environment, we are
testing a
Front-End server to offload and secure that functionality.

When a POP3 account is inside the firewall or on the DMZ, there is no
problem with connectivity.  Unfortunately, when it is on the Internet,
email times out with the following error:

"The connection to the server has failed.  Account "ACCOUNT", Server:
"SERVER", Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure(SSL); NO, Socket Error: 10061,
error Number 0x800CCCoE"

We have disabled Anonymous logon and are using Windows Authentication
for
POP3 clients on the Exchange server(s).

We cannot seem to find why it works from the inside and not from the
outside.

We've been using a number of different documents for reference,
including:

Q278339 - TCP/UDP Ports Used By Exchange 2000 Server
Q278339 - Exchange 2000 Windows 2000 Connectivity Through Firewalls
Exchange 2000 Deployment Guide (Chapter 6)
E2KFrontBack.doc

but cannot find a definitive answer.

Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot why POP3 is not working for the
machines on the Internet?

Thanks!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Instant Messaging with 5.5

[King, John]

Exchange IM, who needs any stinkin' Exchange IM.  Use Jabber (jabber.org).
Open, Free, Function.  Can't ask for much more.  Clients are totally cross
platform.  You can add transports on the server for AIM, Yahoo, MSN.  Chat
with everyone on an open IM network.  Jabber is all XML based.  Pretty sweet
alternative.  

 ~John

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Instant Messaging with 5.5


Not that I know of. IM for 2000 can be a pain though. 

- Original Message - 
From: "Nelsen, Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:53 AM
Subject: Instant Messaging with 5.5


> I know Exchange 2000 has this, is anyone doing this with 5.5 ?
> 
> Grant S. Nelsen
> Network Communications Manager
> Office of Technology Integration
> Eastern Suffolk BOCES
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Time Sync - OT

[King, John]

"net time \\timeserver /set /yes" This is in a batch file called from logon
script.  
Use this (Free)program to sync TimeServer's time with Atomic Clock
http://www.winsite.com/bin/Info?100034325
I do believe that the Atomic Clock is accurate within 0.3 seconds..

 Good luck,
  ~John


-Original Message-
From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Time Sync


Hi everyone,

What is everyone using to sync the time on servers and workstations?

Thanks
Paul

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Smtp connector gone mad?

[King, John]

hmmm,  a mad server eh..
Maybe you should stop giving the server absente...

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad?


OK. Make it so.
I have like 30 domains that we accept mail for. Please give some more
details on EXACTLY what you want to accomplish and we can try to help you
out. Otherwise we're guessing or making stuff up. Some people on this list
have very vivid imaginations and you wouldn't want that.

-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad?


Yeah I know I have not provided all the info, sorry.

We have multiple domain names and want to accept messages into the org from
the internet via this connector.

Regards
Leo

> You don't need an SMTP connector for sending and receiving email. 
> that might just be what the "SMTP virtual server" is for?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:43 PM
> Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad?
> Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
> 
> We want to be able to accept incoming email from the internet.
> 
> Leo
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[King, John]

That is a really good movie and if you have a strong stomach and imagination
you should check out the prequil..  EVIL DEAD series..  Excellent stuff..


-Original Message-
From: Glaman, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


An off the wall movie is Army of Darkness.  This is a big time B movie.  

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Dang right, you're disfunctional with Clockwork Organge being one of your
favorites.  I didn't care for a bit; although Malcom McDowell (sic?) was
good in it.

Now, if you're looking for a favorite off-the-wall movie,I'd vote for "Being
John Malcovich."

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-----Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


2001 A Space Odyssey
Clockwork Orange
Full Metal Jacket

Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...?

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question


Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't
chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke.  But there's no Monty Python, so...

1.  Dogma
2. Apollo 13
3.  12 Angry Men

They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this,
though...

- Original Message -
From: "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Go on, tell  us, and we can put it to the test :-)

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Cerification question
>
>
> That is so not fair.  I doubt that my three favorite movies
> would endear
> me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say,
> neandrathal, in their choices.
>
> M

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[King, John]

Ok so I was wrong and BlockBuster does carry it..  Silly me, when will I
realize that Cooperate America rules all that is molecular...

http://www.blockbuster.com/bb/movie/details/0,7286,VID-V+++237115,00.html?

  ~John

-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


So where does one find this film?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


I just caught it last week, and was blown away.  After watching it, I
immediately played it again with the director's commentary.  Who knew Bubble
Boy could act?



-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


I know that this is wyyy OT, but if you haven't watched 'Donnie Darko'
yet, then go out and rent it..!!  Trust me it is amazing, and not (sic) like
some of my favz.  It is an indy flick so BlockBuster most likely doesn't
carry it...  

www.donniedarko.com

Seriously this film is a dark comedy and is the best flick I have seen in
awhile.  A refreshing change from Patriotic inspired Police society big
explosion trash..


-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Dang right, you're disfunctional with Clockwork Organge being one of your
favorites.  I didn't care for a bit; although Malcom McDowell (sic?) was
good in it.

Now, if you're looking for a favorite off-the-wall movie,I'd vote for "Being
John Malcovich."

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


2001 A Space Odyssey
Clockwork Orange
Full Metal Jacket

Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...?

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question


Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't
chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke.  But there's no Monty Python, so...

1.  Dogma
2. Apollo 13
3.  12 Angry Men

They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this,
though...

- Original Message -
From: "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Go on, tell  us, and we can put it to the test :-)

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Cerification question
>
>
> That is so not fair.  I doubt that my three favorite movies
> would endear
> me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say,
> neandrathal, in their choices.
>
> M

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/

RE: Cerification question

[King, John]

I know that this is wyyy OT, but if you haven't watched 'Donnie Darko'
yet, then go out and rent it..!!  Trust me it is amazing, and not (sic) like
some of my favz.  It is an indy flick so BlockBuster most likely doesn't
carry it...  

www.donniedarko.com

Seriously this film is a dark comedy and is the best flick I have seen in
awhile.  A refreshing change from Patriotic inspired Police society big
explosion trash..


-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Dang right, you're disfunctional with Clockwork Organge being one of your
favorites.  I didn't care for a bit; although Malcom McDowell (sic?) was
good in it.

Now, if you're looking for a favorite off-the-wall movie,I'd vote for "Being
John Malcovich."

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


2001 A Space Odyssey
Clockwork Orange
Full Metal Jacket

Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...?

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question


Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't
chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke.  But there's no Monty Python, so...

1.  Dogma
2. Apollo 13
3.  12 Angry Men

They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this,
though...

- Original Message -
From: "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Go on, tell  us, and we can put it to the test :-)

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Cerification question
>
>
> That is so not fair.  I doubt that my three favorite movies
> would endear
> me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say,
> neandrathal, in their choices.
>
> M

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[King, John]

2001 A Space Odyssey
Clockwork Orange
Full Metal Jacket

Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...?

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question


Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't
chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke.  But there's no Monty Python, so...

1.  Dogma
2. Apollo 13
3.  12 Angry Men

They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this,
though...

- Original Message -
From: "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Go on, tell  us, and we can put it to the test :-)

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Cerification question
>
>
> That is so not fair.  I doubt that my three favorite movies
> would endear
> me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say,
> neandrathal, in their choices.
>
> M

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[King, John]

I have been conducting all my interviews wrong..!!!


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


This may sound odd but there is one golden question that will tell you
exactly if the candidate will fit the group or not: "What are your three
favorite movies?"  If the person likes similar movies as the general team
and sounds smart, than he/she is a good buy.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


I deal with (new and different) people daily who have "worked with Exchange
for years" but don't know their database from their check file. I wouldn't
let them within 20 feet of any Exchange server that I worked on but they are
the hired "Exchange expert" for their company.  The fact is that people are
people, and certified people are not inherently better than experienced
people or vice versa.  I think that the best bet is the person who realizes
that, regardless of how much he knows, he does not know everything and is
always willing and wanting to learn more than he currently knows.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Cerification question
Subject: RE: Cerification question


Very good points. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question


You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs
out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience.  Most
hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but...
then certs.  Additionally while experience is the best there are people that
have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any
other capabilities of the hardware/software.  They are nearly as bad as the
paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and
because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way
they did it at their last job.  At least the Paper boyz know they are
limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the
drama the "experience" guy does.  They piss me off so much more, that and
they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way
but that it is just the best way.  Experience is NOT always the best
qualifier either

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server

[King, John]

Actually you could patch a running Linux kernel, well kind of..  If you
follow the virtual Linux server stuff.  It gets confusing, but you can run
many 'virtual' servers on top of a real server.  Each virtual server, is
considered it's own node..
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

Patching a Linux kernel and not rebooting, is like saying that you can apply
Win2k SP2 and not reboot.

Besides if he uses IPtables, TCPwrappers, PortSentry to block TCP/IP/UDP
ports that arn't being used, then how do you exploit kernel level security
holes..?

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Seeing as its impossible to patch a running kernel without rebooting a Linux
box, not to mention that you're running Redhat 7.2, which hasn't been
available for 16 months, I'd like to know how you've not rebooted during
that time. Or are all those kernel holes still there.

Now - the exchange servers, which average a few thousand messages an hour,
moderate use, have been up 130 days since restarting, and that was the
result of system level updates.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Nothing that a cron job running up2date can't fix. The IP is 
> 216.210.178.29 If you can get in, then change the front page 
> to prove it but don't do anything destructive. I'll give you 
> $50 if you get through.good luck cause your going to need it
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Roger Seielstad
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> And just how many people are provided exterprise messaging 
> and collaboration services off your Linux box?
> 
> And what's the IP so I can drop it like a rock, since there 
> have been a few hundred security flaws in Linux over the last 
> 16 months...
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:22 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> > 
> > 
> > Funny thing is I never have this problem on any of the 
> software I run 
> > on my Linux box. In fact there hasn't been the need to reboot it in 
> > over 1 year 4 months
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen 
> > Mynhier
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:21 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> > 
> > 
> > Hm I'm guessing leaky memory in third party aps
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:24 AM
> > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> > Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> > Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> > 
> > 
> > Due to MS wonder memory management in Win2K
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:21 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> > 
> > 
> > But why are the reboots required?
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> > 
> > 
> > If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to 
> reboot our MSX55 
> > servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly 
> > for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want.
> > 
> > It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that 
> > they do indeed stop). After the reboot is complete, it 
> verifies that 
> > any service running at the time of reboot is running after 
> the reboot.
> > 
> > Sends email showing the results.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> > 
> > 
> > Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 
> > 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have 
> found next 
> > to nothing about how

RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server

[King, John]

www.insecure.org/nmap

Nmap is the best port scanner, around..
well, at least for the 7337...

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Nmap? What's that?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Nmap gives it a good score..
As long as you are keeping your SSH protocal up to date, looks good..

Uptime 35.809 days (since Tue Mar 19 18:58:40 2002)
TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments
 Difficulty=3677580 (Good luck!)
IPID Sequence Generation: All zeros

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Ill probe it

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Nothing that a cron job running up2date can't fix. The IP is
216.210.178.29 If you can get in, then change the front page to prove it
but don't do anything destructive. I'll give you $50 if you get
through.good luck cause your going to need it

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger
Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


And just how many people are provided exterprise messaging and
collaboration services off your Linux box?

And what's the IP so I can drop it like a rock, since there have been a
few hundred security flaws in Linux over the last 16 months...

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Funny thing is I never have this problem on any of the software I run
> on my Linux box. In fact there hasn't been the need to reboot it in 
> over 1 year 4 months
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Mynhier
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Hm I'm guessing leaky memory in third party aps
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:24 AM
> Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Due to MS wonder memory management in Win2K
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> But why are the reboots required?
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot our MSX55
> servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly 
> for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want.
> 
> It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that
> they do indeed stop). After the reboot is complete, it verifies that 
> any service running at the time of reboot is running after the reboot.
> 
> Sends email showing the results.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows
> 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next 
> to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail

> server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a 
> certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would 
> greatly appreciate the information.
> 
&g

RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server

[King, John]

Nmap gives it a good score..
As long as you are keeping your SSH protocal up to date, looks good..

Uptime 35.809 days (since Tue Mar 19 18:58:40 2002)
TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments
 Difficulty=3677580 (Good luck!)
IPID Sequence Generation: All zeros

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Ill probe it

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Nothing that a cron job running up2date can't fix. The IP is 216.210.178.29
If you can get in, then change the front page to prove it but don't do
anything destructive. I'll give you $50 if you get through.good luck
cause your going to need it

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


And just how many people are provided exterprise messaging and collaboration
services off your Linux box?

And what's the IP so I can drop it like a rock, since there have been a few
hundred security flaws in Linux over the last 16 months...

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Funny thing is I never have this problem on any of the software I run 
> on my Linux box. In fact there hasn't been the need to reboot it in 
> over 1 year 4 months
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen 
> Mynhier
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Hm I'm guessing leaky memory in third party aps
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:24 AM
> Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Due to MS wonder memory management in Win2K
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> But why are the reboots required?
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot our MSX55 
> servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly 
> for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want.
> 
> It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that 
> they do indeed stop). After the reboot is complete, it verifies that 
> any service running at the time of reboot is running after the reboot.
> 
> Sends email showing the results.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 
> 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next 
> to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail 
> server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a 
> certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would 
> greatly appreciate the information.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> James Cornett
> 
> Network Administrator
> New Israel Fund
> 1101 14th Street, NW
> Sixth Floor
> Washington, DC 20005
> Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269
> Fax: 202-842-0991
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.newisraelfund.org
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: m

RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server

[King, John]

You mean like BSOD..?

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server


Which still doesn't do half what Exchange does.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Ah sendmail sucks. No public folders. If I was to run a mail 
> server on Linux it would be qmail
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Stephen Mynhier
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Then run SendMail
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:22 PM
> Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Funny thing is I never have this problem on any of the 
> software I run on my Linux box. In fact there hasn't been the 
> need to reboot it in over 1 year 4 months
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Stephen Mynhier
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Hm I'm guessing leaky memory in third party aps
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:24 AM
> Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Due to MS wonder memory management in Win2K
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> But why are the reboots required?
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot 
> our MSX55 servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly 
> for IMS, weekly for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for 
> what you want.
> 
> It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and 
> verifies that they do indeed stop). After the reboot is 
> complete, it verifies that any service running at the time of 
> reboot is running after the reboot.
> 
> Sends email showing the results.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
> 
> 
> Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of 
> Windows 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and 
> have found next to nothing about how to do this. What I am 
> trying to do is on our Mail server I want to have the machine 
> reboot say every Sunday night at a certain time. If anyone 
> knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would greatly 
> appreciate the information.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> James Cornett
> 
> Network Administrator
> New Israel Fund
> 1101 14th Street, NW
> Sixth Floor
> Washington, DC 20005
> Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269
> Fax: 202-842-0991
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.newisraelfund.org
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --
> --
> --
> The information contained in this email message is privileged 
> and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
> message is 

RE: IMS queue oddities

[King, John]

Never mind, it seems to be NDRs..  Sorry for my stupidly and time wasting...

   ~John

-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMS queue oddities


Hello all,

I have a question for the Exchange experts.  MS Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a..  I
recently went live with a Postfix mail gateway.  So now email comes in
through our firewall (PIX) and directly to the Postfix mail gateway.
Postfix determines what mail to relay to the internal MS Ex box.  This works
great.  Before going live with the Postfix mail gateway I would sometimes
see mail in the IMS (outbound) Queue on Exchange with an originator of
'<>'..  The question is that now that there is a secure mail gateway in
place with relay restrictions, I still see these messages in the MS Ex IMS
outbound queue.   

Could these messages leaving Ex be NDRs generated by Exchange..?  It isn't
causing a problem, but still worries me that I don't know why they are
there..  Sorry if this is a stupid question...


   ~John

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

IMS queue oddities

[King, John]

Hello all,

I have a question for the Exchange experts.  MS Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a..  I
recently went live with a Postfix mail gateway.  So now email comes in
through our firewall (PIX) and directly to the Postfix mail gateway.
Postfix determines what mail to relay to the internal MS Ex box.  This works
great.  Before going live with the Postfix mail gateway I would sometimes
see mail in the IMS (outbound) Queue on Exchange with an originator of
'<>'..  The question is that now that there is a secure mail gateway in
place with relay restrictions, I still see these messages in the MS Ex IMS
outbound queue.   

Could these messages leaving Ex be NDRs generated by Exchange..?  It isn't
causing a problem, but still worries me that I don't know why they are
there..  Sorry if this is a stupid question...


   ~John

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Remote Site Question

[King, John]

There is a T1 terminated, but it is not live... yet..

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Remote Site Question


If it's a failed dot.com what did they do for connectivity previously?

- Original Message -
From: "King, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: Remote Site Question


> Hello all,
>
>   I am stuck trying to figure out an email solution for a company that we
> have acquired.  I have until the end of today to do this..!  This is a
> temporary fix until the T1 at the new facility can be put in place.  This
is
> the deal,
>
> There will be 15 users that need to access email hosted on our Exchange
5.5
> sp4 server.  The new facility has NO internet connection.  We have a RAS
> server here with 2 lines.  We cannot allow this facility to be connected
to
> RAS 24/7 as the lines are shared by multiple other users.  The idea that I
> have is this.  I would like to bring an Exchange 5.5 sp4 server down
there.
> I will need this server to dial up the RAS connection to sync the email
> accounts with our primary ExCh server during off hours.  That shouldn't be
> that hard, but I don't want all of the email accounts to sync.  I just
need
> the 15 email accounts in question to sync.  Is there a way to specify what
> accounts to sync, or is it an all or nothing type of deal?  I am sorry for
> the lack of info, as this was tossed onto me this morning.  I have never
> setup Exchange  IMS to connect via Dial up so I don't know too much about
> this.  Any help would be much appreciated..
>
>
>Thanks,
> ~John
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Remote Site Question

[King, John]

All that I know about the remote location is an address...  I have been told
next to nothing and it is really pissing me off.  How the hell am I supposed
to come up with a professional solution with out any bleapin' details.  So I
don't know how many analog lines there will be.  The new facility is a DOT
com that went bust, so I can assume that it must be wired well..

I have tossed around the idea of POP accounts, but it will tie up their
analog lines...  I don't know if each station will have 2, 3, or just 1
analog line..  It is a solution though..

My fall back is just going down there with a win2k box that a RAS connection
setup to our RAS server and set it up with outlook web access..  That way
they can dial on demand, but only one user can check their mail at once..



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Site Question


How many analog lines do you have in the remote location?
A T1 takes about a month, so I wouldn't put to much into this.

How about a couple of Earthlink accounts to dial in and the users can POP or
IMAP their mail down?

-Original Message-----
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Remote Site Question


Hello all,

  I am stuck trying to figure out an email solution for a company that we
have acquired.  I have until the end of today to do this..!  This is a
temporary fix until the T1 at the new facility can be put in place.  This is
the deal,

There will be 15 users that need to access email hosted on our Exchange 5.5
sp4 server.  The new facility has NO internet connection.  We have a RAS
server here with 2 lines.  We cannot allow this facility to be connected to
RAS 24/7 as the lines are shared by multiple other users.  The idea that I
have is this.  I would like to bring an Exchange 5.5 sp4 server down there.
I will need this server to dial up the RAS connection to sync the email
accounts with our primary ExCh server during off hours.  That shouldn't be
that hard, but I don't want all of the email accounts to sync.  I just need
the 15 email accounts in question to sync.  Is there a way to specify what
accounts to sync, or is it an all or nothing type of deal?  I am sorry for
the lack of info, as this was tossed onto me this morning.  I have never
setup Exchange  IMS to connect via Dial up so I don't know too much about
this.  Any help would be much appreciated..


   Thanks,
~John  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remote Site Question

[King, John]

Hello all,

  I am stuck trying to figure out an email solution for a company that we
have acquired.  I have until the end of today to do this..!  This is a
temporary fix until the T1 at the new facility can be put in place.  This is
the deal,

There will be 15 users that need to access email hosted on our Exchange 5.5
sp4 server.  The new facility has NO internet connection.  We have a RAS
server here with 2 lines.  We cannot allow this facility to be connected to
RAS 24/7 as the lines are shared by multiple other users.  The idea that I
have is this.  I would like to bring an Exchange 5.5 sp4 server down there.
I will need this server to dial up the RAS connection to sync the email
accounts with our primary ExCh server during off hours.  That shouldn't be
that hard, but I don't want all of the email accounts to sync.  I just need
the 15 email accounts in question to sync.  Is there a way to specify what
accounts to sync, or is it an all or nothing type of deal?  I am sorry for
the lack of info, as this was tossed onto me this morning.  I have never
setup Exchange  IMS to connect via Dial up so I don't know too much about
this.  Any help would be much appreciated..


   Thanks,
~John  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MSX5.5 hacked

[King, John]

nc.exe is really the win32 port of the infamous NetCat *nix program by
Hobbit.  This program can be used to get a remote command prompt.  Most
likely that is what cmd1.exe was used for.  As for the third file, maybe an
ftp server binary..?  Have you shut down the server..?  Do you log TCP/IP
traffic..?  If so then you could find out what is going on at the protocol
level.  Too bad it isn't a *nix system or you could use TCT to do some post
mortem analysis..

  Good Luck,
   ~John

-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MSX5.5 hacked
Importance: High


HI all
MSX5.5/SP4

We have found ftp1.exe, nc.exe and cmd1.exe in c:\inetpub also nc.exe and
ftp1.exe are running in memory. After reading our logfiles those files are
there since Feb 24. Does anybody know what kind of hack is that and how to
get red of those whitout causing any post-hack attack.

Tia
-er

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!

[King, John]

Does that site run slashcode...

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!


Hi! My name is "Chris" and I want to tell you all about what I've got under
my pink sundress! I've done a brick-level backup of my Private Information
Store and run file-level antivirus scanning on my M: drive, so you know I've
been *very bad*!![1]

[1] Anything else I can do for you Dean? [2]
[2] Sorry for the spam folks. ;)
--
Chris Scharff
The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com
The Home Page for Mail Administrators.

Software pick of the month: EasyDNS
http://www.easydns.com
Exchange FAQs:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA firewall access?

[King, John]

resembles TFTP but yet smells worse...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA firewall access?


And port 43555 for Fish Taco Transport Protocol (FTTP)

-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA firewall access?


443 for SSL connections only..  If you run IIS with Secure Sockets layer
then sure 443 and it will work fine, but otherwise use 80.  SSL would be the
best though..

   ~John

-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA firewall access?


Hi All,

I need my memory refreshed as to which ports must be open on a firewall to
allow OWA use... just 443?

Thanks,
Fred

Fred Macondray
Systems Administrator
Virtual Purchase Card, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com

-   "Guaranteed B2B Purchases"


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA firewall access?

[King, John]

443 for SSL connections only..  If you run IIS with Secure Sockets layer
then sure 443 and it will work fine, but otherwise use 80.  SSL would be the
best though..

   ~John

-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA firewall access?


Hi All,

I need my memory refreshed as to which ports must be open on a firewall to
allow OWA use... just 443?

Thanks,
Fred

Fred Macondray
Systems Administrator
Virtual Purchase Card, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com

-   "Guaranteed B2B Purchases"


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles

[King, John]

Thanks much..

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles


Tools/Options/Show Permission page for all objects.  Tell it to show roles
while you're at it.

-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles


Hello all,

  Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would
toss it to the list.  This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5
sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a.  No trouble with the server..  I have recently migrated
to a new workstation.  I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I
don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc..  I had the
admin installed on my old workstation as well.  Both workstation installs
are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4.  Now this is the trouble on the new
workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but
when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin
version on my old workstation.  In particular I need to see the permissions
tab, but it is missing.  I checked my old workstation and the admin was
loading with NO command line switches...  The installs seem to be the same,
what am I doing wrong..?  Any ideas..  I hope that I am not being a doofus
and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though..

   Thanks,
   ~John

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 5.5 admin troubles

[King, John]

Hello all,

  Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would
toss it to the list.  This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5
sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a.  No trouble with the server..  I have recently migrated
to a new workstation.  I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I
don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc..  I had the
admin installed on my old workstation as well.  Both workstation installs
are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4.  Now this is the trouble on the new
workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but
when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin
version on my old workstation.  In particular I need to see the permissions
tab, but it is missing.  I checked my old workstation and the admin was
loading with NO command line switches...  The installs seem to be the same,
what am I doing wrong..?  Any ideas..  I hope that I am not being a doofus
and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though..

   Thanks,
   ~John

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!

[King, John]

SlipStick is da bomb..!



-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
m e nu ts!


GOT IT - Thanks

The SlipStick site worked

Cheers All

-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2002 9:15AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
m e nu ts!


He can't uninstall the patch.  He'd have to uninstall Office and reinstall
it.

There is a way to control how the security behaves, however.  As another
poster offered the secrets to it are found here:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm

Aloha,

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering 
> is driving me nu ts!
> 
> 
> Uninstall the patch or zip everything there is no way of 
> Turing it off.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is 
> driving me nu ts!
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have an outlook 2000 workstation that is blocking all exe 
> files and other nasty extensions I need to turn this OFF!
> 
> I can find no option to turn this off under the setting in 
> outlook - nor can I find anything useful in TechNet...
> 
>   Any Ideas?
> 
>   Thanks
> 
> 
> > Adriaan Van Huissteden
> > 
> > Network Administrator
> > Connect Credit Union
> > Phone: (03) 6233 0660
> > 
> > 
> Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments 
> (if any) may be confidential or legally privileged material. 
> It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this 
> message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, disclosure, copying or distribution of 
> the message, or any action or omission taken by you in 
> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you 
> receive this communication in error, please contact the 
> sender immediately and delete this e-mail and associated 
> material from any computer. Any views expressed in this 
> communication are those of the individual sender, except 
> where the sender specifically states them to be views of 
> CONNECT Credit Union. Whilst virus-scanning software is 
> utilised by CONNECT, no responsibility is taken for virus 
> damage that may originate from this transmission.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments (if any) may be
confidential or legally privileged material. It is intended solely for the
addressee.  Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you
are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying or distribution of the
message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this communication in error,
please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and associated
material from any computer. Any views expressed in this communication are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be views of CONNECT Credit Union. Whilst virus-scanning software is
utilised by CONNECT, no responsibility is taken for virus damage that may
originate from this transmission.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://w

RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!

[King, John]

You must need the Outlook security update over-ride..!  What you need to do
is download the admin pack for Exchange 5.5, set it up.  After that it
creates an "Outlook Security Settings" public folder.  Then you(if u r da
admin) will need to navigate to this folder and post using the default form.
There you can set over-ride setting on an individual user basis..  For more
info and all da grimmy details check this..

http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm

  Good luck
   ~John

-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
m e nu ts!


That is not a problem, but a security feature.



-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving me
nu ts!


Hi All,

I have an outlook 2000 workstation that is blocking all exe files and other
nasty extensions I need to turn this OFF!

I can find no option to turn this off under the setting in outlook - nor can
I find anything useful in TechNet...

Any Ideas?

Thanks


> Adriaan Van Huissteden
> 
> Network Administrator
> Connect Credit Union
> Phone: (03) 6233 0660
> 
> 
Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments (if any) may be
confidential or legally privileged material. It is intended solely for the
addressee.  Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you
are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying or distribution of the
message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this communication in error,
please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and associated
material from any computer. Any views expressed in this communication are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be views of CONNECT Credit Union. Whilst virus-scanning software is
utilised by CONNECT, no responsibility is taken for virus damage that may
originate from this transmission.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Restricting use of MSN Messenger

[King, John]

Just don't give your damn support group the root password..

-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restricting use of MSN Messenger


Maybe you should just talk with him and save yourself some work.  If he
shouldn't be using it, then let him know.  If that doesn't work, then why
the hell is he still employed with you..  If you restrict access and he just
comes into work one day to find it won't work any more, then he will be
confused/upset.  I think it would be better to just tell him how it is..!
Either way you really should have a firewall in place.  Internet connections
and corporate LANs make for a bad mix sometimes.  Do it with Linux or *BSD,
that way it is FREE and Secure.. hehe

   Good luck, just my thoughts

   ~John

-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger


Unfortunatley YES. I could take it away, but he is kinda part of the support
team and therefore needs to know the domain admin password which could be
used to override the local admin account!

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:25 PM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> 
> Does this person have admin rights to their own workstation?
> Uninstall it - they wont be able to re-install.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> 
> 
> And how do i do that then ? (Not very good at W2K yet !)
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From:   Morgan, Joshua [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:   Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:37 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > 
> > Just set his Local Policy under windows 2000 to not let him run Windows
> > Messenger
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Joshua Morgan
> > PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:39 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > 
> > 
> > Is there anything like this that runs on Windows ???
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeff Green [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:30 AM
> > > To:   Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject:  RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Put a firewall in place (?)
> > > 
> > > Get a PC, two(+) ethernet cards and install Linux with 2.4 kernel 
> > > (RedHat, SuSE, etc).
> > > 
> > > Install iptables package, then download and install
> > > Firewall Builder (http://www.fwbuilder.org/index.html)
> > > 
> > > Info on how to block these IM services is at
> > > 
> > > http://www.oofle.com/messaging/index.htm
> > > 
> > > -  seems to work here
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   Regards,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 30 January 2002 10:24
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   This is not strictly to do with exchange, but I would like to run it
> > 
> > > past all you techies out there !
> > >   I need to stop a user running MSN Messenger & Excite messenger 
> > > services. I have forced IE to use a proxy, but this does not stop the 
> > > messenger services. User has W2K workstation. Network is NT4,SP6a No 
> > > firewall in place ! (So that is not an option!) Does anyone know of a 
> > > policy that would work ??? Thanks in advance...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
> > > London Road  Henley Road 
> > > Teynham  Paddock Wood 
> > > Kent Kent 
> > > ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 
> > > 
> > > Te

RE: Restricting use of MSN Messenger

[King, John]

Maybe you should just talk with him and save yourself some work.  If he
shouldn't be using it, then let him know.  If that doesn't work, then why
the hell is he still employed with you..  If you restrict access and he just
comes into work one day to find it won't work any more, then he will be
confused/upset.  I think it would be better to just tell him how it is..!
Either way you really should have a firewall in place.  Internet connections
and corporate LANs make for a bad mix sometimes.  Do it with Linux or *BSD,
that way it is FREE and Secure.. hehe

   Good luck, just my thoughts

   ~John

-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger


Unfortunatley YES. I could take it away, but he is kinda part of the support
team and therefore needs to know the domain admin password which could be
used to override the local admin account!

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:25 PM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> 
> Does this person have admin rights to their own workstation?
> Uninstall it - they wont be able to re-install.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> 
> 
> And how do i do that then ? (Not very good at W2K yet !)
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From:   Morgan, Joshua [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:   Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:37 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > 
> > Just set his Local Policy under windows 2000 to not let him run Windows
> > Messenger
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Joshua Morgan
> > PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:39 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > 
> > 
> > Is there anything like this that runs on Windows ???
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeff Green [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:30 AM
> > > To:   Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject:  RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Put a firewall in place (?)
> > > 
> > > Get a PC, two(+) ethernet cards and install Linux with 2.4 kernel 
> > > (RedHat, SuSE, etc).
> > > 
> > > Install iptables package, then download and install
> > > Firewall Builder (http://www.fwbuilder.org/index.html)
> > > 
> > > Info on how to block these IM services is at
> > > 
> > > http://www.oofle.com/messaging/index.htm
> > > 
> > > -  seems to work here
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   Regards,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 30 January 2002 10:24
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   This is not strictly to do with exchange, but I would like to run it
> > 
> > > past all you techies out there !
> > >   I need to stop a user running MSN Messenger & Excite messenger 
> > > services. I have forced IE to use a proxy, but this does not stop the 
> > > messenger services. User has W2K workstation. Network is NT4,SP6a No 
> > > firewall in place ! (So that is not an option!) Does anyone know of a 
> > > policy that would work ??? Thanks in advance...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
> > > London Road  Henley Road 
> > > Teynham  Paddock Wood 
> > > Kent Kent 
> > > ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 
> > > 
> > > Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 
> > > Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 
> > > 
> > > All business is conducted in accordance with the company's
> > > terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on 
> > > request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated 
> > > by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of 
> > > this company.
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Confidentiality Note:  The information contained in this email and
> > > document(s) attached are for the exclusive use of the addressee and
> may
> > > contain confidential

RE: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE?

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Seagate offers a reporting tool, ah uh Seagate analysis I do believe
that it is called.  I have not used it since a few revs back, but
when I did use it I was able to generate reports from Exchange server
data.  It was actually pretty slick.  I don't know how the new
version is, but you can find out some info on it here:

http://www.crystaldecisions.com/products/crystalanalysis/

just a thought...

   ~John


- -Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE?


Have a look in the mailbox resources, under the IS.  I think you can
save
the contents of this from the filemenu.

- -Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 7:57 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE?


Good afternoon,

I am interested in determining the amount of space users are user per
mailbox.  Does anyone know of any program that can extract this data
so I
can put it to a spreadsheet?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named
recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the
subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify
the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any
information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read
this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web
page
http://www.beca.co.nz


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBPEXQxLlMSqGNvpxoEQKwzgCfVIXXci+QRbzWJCDmdWnomHl7ewQAoLRy
+dY3zmq+FHSN+bkUtptazvw+
=aJ/5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: detecting an Exchange server on the Network

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Use tcpdump if u got a *nix box..  I am assuming windows only, so
there are some other options..  There is the tcpdump port for
windows, windump (requires a raw packet driver)..  A must have dl it
@ http://netgroup-serv.polito.it/windump/install/default.htm ..
It might be difficult to find an exchanger server that way, needle /
haystack , especially if no one knows hostnames/ips..  GFI software
makes a network scanner that is pretty nifty, free (as in beer) dl @
http://www.gfi.com/languard/lanscan.htm ..  You would need to know at
least a range of ips to scan.  HTML reports and all that jazz.. 
Sounds like maybe good old social interaction might be the
appropriate path as opposed to all these digital (01101) behind the
backs...

  Just some thoughts..

   ~John

- -Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: detecting an Exchange server on the Network


Is there a way to find out if there is an exchange Server on a
network
without knowing its name or IP? I have someone who wants to see if a
user/admin at another location is setting up email without his
knowledge. I
was thinking maybe use RPC-ping, but having never used it, I'm not
sure if
that would work or not, since he doesn't know ip address or name. 
Anyone have a good way? Network sniffer, scanning for SMTP traffic?
This
might work..but I think he wants to catch the server before it gets
to that
stage.
Thanks!
Ron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBPDM43blMSqGNvpxoEQKwFQCcC+kqO7D6k7AzbbTS6Wj9jWH5vEoAn17W
p+9rx2W0Z3/ZSi9upM7DpWOZ
=2Mbi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Help please

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I have a Pix 515 that I run 6.1 on..  I thought they only shipper
with 32mb as a minimum..  You should be able to download IOS versions
with a valid cco, regardless of what PIX model you have..  


   ~John

- -Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please


Yes I have a cco login that's where it blocks me.

Pix 515

Web site says that it comes with 16mb but 6.0 requires 32mb

I really appreciate all the help.  

- -Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please

Which model of the PIX do you have?

D

"Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun." -Don Marquis

- -Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please


Version 5.3(5)

- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please

What version are you on now?

- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please


That doesnt make any sense.  Download the file to a server running
tftp.
Tftp the image to your router?

- -Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please


Can't upgrade to 6.0.  cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only
have
16mb
in my router.

Also,  tom I have verified that information.  Thanks.

- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please

Upgrade to 6.0 IOS

- -Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please


I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time
where
the
PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in
either
direction.  Tended to time things out and make stuff not work.

D

"The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but
how
we
behave when we don't know what to do." -John Holt

- -Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please


Don,

I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and
pix
,
but never heard of any with http.

Ronald,

The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to
the
segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If
it
is
working, call Ci$co.

/Peter
- - Original Message -
From: "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM
Subject: RE: Help please


> That's another theory too...  However, on the PIX there are some
> strange occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic
> correctly.   Not always, but I've seen it.
>
> D
>
> "Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work
> together when no one has any idea where they're going." - - 
> http://www.despair.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Help please
>
>
> Ronald,
>
> If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange
> then
you
> have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do
> with your proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is
> http is  http. . On your OWA server diasble any other
> authentication  but Basic.
If
> I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ?
>
> /Peter
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM
> Subject: RE: Help please
>
>
> > Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic?  What
> > do  

> > the logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)?  My money says your issue
> > resides in there.
> >
> > D
> >
> > "It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was
> > on to something." -Ornette Coleman
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Help please
> >
> >
> > Yes that article has been followed to the letter.  I apologize
> > for the ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming
> >  increasingly frustrating.  It SHOULD work.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > F

RE: OFF TOPIC (Slightly) - Surfcontrol

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I have no experience with Surfcontrol's E-mail filter, but I can tell
that there Superscout webfilter product has some serious issues..  It
can be bypassed with easily..  This bug was brought to their
attention, released to the Bugtraq comunity and still never fixed.. 
If their E-mail filter is at all similar in quality, I would stear
clear..

~John

just my $.o2

- -Original Message-
From: David Hornby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OFF TOPIC (Slightly) - Surfcontrol



Is anyone currently using SurfControls "Superscout E-mail filter" (Or
even
their web filter)??   I am currently using MAILsweeper for exchange
but I am
currently upgrading all of our systems.  I have tried the Super scout
web
filter but not the E-mail filter.  I'm really just after an idea how
good
Surf control is compared to MAILsweeper.
Any help much appreciated

Dave

- --
Dave Hornby
Technical Support Analyst
- --


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBPB9LorlMSqGNvpxoEQIjNQCg+9NW7769jjRGMlSy7cWYAbzZgPYAnRg7
8kWO09T73KijFc0ScXLQ0cyh
=S/7G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Reply

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I want a Super Pimp T-Shirt...

- -Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Reply


Mr. Dogg,

I think you may be taking food out of the mouths of a number of
talented
developers. Given enough money I know of at least two developers who,
less
my 10% finders fee, will be happy to code an add-on which integrates
into
the Exchange admin which would meet Doug's stated objective. Adopt
the party
line and we'll send you a $10 t-shirt with every sale.

Chris Scharff
Super Pimp T-Shirt Emporium

> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange Reply
> 
> 
> Again.. The answer is still no.
> 
> --
> Dr. Milton R. Dogg   
> Of the Dogg Foundation
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug
> Eubank Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:43 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange Reply
> 
> 
> Is there a way to set up an auto reply through Exchange 
> Administrator for a mailbox or DL, rather than setting it up 
> through Outlook? We are running Exch 5.5 on NT4, with Outlook 
> 2000 clients. Thanks.
> 
> Doug
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBPBpj9blMSqGNvpxoEQJ/egCgyQsQWN0oOm//Nf4N5/M5BX4BDqgAnAoB
bH2GoFZzBJbkn2zCWa6LytA4
=wSp/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

careful u don't end up here relays.mail-abuse.org  hehe

- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


What you are seeing are NDRS that can't be returned.
I wouldnt worry about those.


- -Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


RFC821
"then it must construct an "undeliverable mail" notification message
and
send it to the originator of the undeliverable mail (as indicated by
the
reverse-path)."

This would seem to indicate relaying?  However, I have my system
setup to
NOT relay.  I've even tested (per the faq)?  According to the
"telnet" test
I'm good-to-go?  Am I missing something?

- -Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


You're being spammed by the looks of things, unless you are
intentionally
sending out emails with the subject lines you are describing below.
You need
to turn relaying off or configure it correctly.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




- -Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 15:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


Ok.  I've read both Faqs.  Now what?  I did not read anything that
tells me
how to track down the source of the message.  There does not appear
to be
any information to go by.  Can I track by Message ID?  How do I get
the
message ID from a Postmaster notification?  How do I determine the
source?

- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


hehe.
And actually it should be 2821 ,( Section 6.1 I believe)


- -Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


Doh.. Sorry.

"3.39 Q: Messages are being sent from my site with an empty
originator, 
A: That is a system generated message, either an NDR or a delivery
receipt.
See RFC-821, section 3.6 for the reasoning behind this."


- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


FAQ


- -Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


I've started getting some strange Outbound messages to Postmaster. 
Please
take a look.  It appears that these messages are originating from the
inside
but I am not sure how to track down their source.  Any suggestions?

- ---
A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has
expired.  The message was not delivered to the following addresses:

The message that caused this notification was:
  To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  From: <>
  Subject:  Undeliverable: Lowest mortgage rates on the web!
- ---
A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has
expired.  The message was not delivered to the following addresses:

The message that caused this notification was:
  To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  From: <>
  Subject:  Undeliverable: Congrats! You're a Winner!
- ---
A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has
expired.  The message was not delivered to the following addresses:

The message that caused this notification was:


  To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  From: <>
  Subject:  Undeliverable: Never pay another phone bill again



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: 

RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Maybe this link may help...  http://www.slipstick.com/exs/relay.htm
I seems like u need to stop anonymous relay.!  Do u route incoming
smtp mail..?  If so impliment proper routing
restictions..  To check the anonymous realy, from an outside source
telnet to mailserver:23(better yet use ssh)
once connected try to send a mail message with a bogus mail from
source and if it lets u send then anonymous relay is enabled.
If anonymous relay is disabled it will display propmt like anonymous
relaying denied..

just some thoughts..

  ~John

- -Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


You're being spammed by the looks of things, unless you are
intentionally
sending out emails with the subject lines you are describing below.
You need
to turn relaying off or configure it correctly.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




- -Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 November 2001 15:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


Ok.  I've read both Faqs.  Now what?  I did not read anything that
tells me
how to track down the source of the message.  There does not appear
to be
any information to go by.  Can I track by Message ID?  How do I get
the
message ID from a Postmaster notification?  How do I determine the
source?

- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


hehe.
And actually it should be 2821 ,( Section 6.1 I believe)


- -Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


Doh.. Sorry.

"3.39 Q: Messages are being sent from my site with an empty
originator, 
A: That is a system generated message, either an NDR or a delivery
receipt.
See RFC-821, section 3.6 for the reasoning behind this."


- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


FAQ


- -Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)


I've started getting some strange Outbound messages to Postmaster. 
Please
take a look.  It appears that these messages are originating from the
inside
but I am not sure how to track down their source.  Any suggestions?

- ---
A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has
expired.  The message was not delivered to the following addresses:

The message that caused this notification was:
  To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  From: <>
  Subject:  Undeliverable: Lowest mortgage rates on the web!
- ---
A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has
expired.  The message was not delivered to the following addresses:

The message that caused this notification was:
  To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  From: <>
  Subject:  Undeliverable: Congrats! You're a Winner!
- ---
A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has
expired.  The message was not delivered to the following addresses:

The message that caused this notification was:


  To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  From: <>
  Subject:  Undeliverable: Never pay another phone bill again



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMA

RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal server

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Yup, you nailed it that time.  I feel bad enough open up extra
settings, I don't know if I can deal with an unpatched install of
Outlook floating around.  I have been burned by silly users too many
times..  I appreciate the help on this..
 
   ~John

- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


H. Just so I am clear.. The Security Update works as expected if
the
remote user accesses Outlook directly, but not if they attempt to
access it
via the sales app's conduit? 
Of course, the easiest workaround may be to simply install Outlook
w/o the
security update on the TSE...


- -Original Message-----
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


 
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

NO.  It is not just running Outlook, that works fine, for all
users...  It is the sales app that is published for remote users. 
This app users Outlook as a conduit to email quotes via the MAPI
engine.  The way that this sales program accesses the Outlook MAPI
engine violates the default settings of the Outlook security update. 
I have setup the over ride to 'automatically approve' direct MAPI
access, although I didn't want to:(..  This fixed the problem for our
LAN users running the client locally, but doing the same for the
terminal server users makes no difference.  It doesn't even work when
running the sales app as administrator through terminal server.. 
This is beginning to bug the shit out of me..

   ~John

- - -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


Does it work if you logon as administrator to the TSE server and then
open
Outlook?


- - -----Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


 
- - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ok here is the lowdown..

  Windows 2k SP 1 Advanced Server with Terminal Services activated
  Citrix Metaframe 1.8 sp3
  It is part of a Citrix server farm, but the only server with this
app published
  Outlook 2k SR1+security update installed via add remove programs
with the command 
  '*:\setup.exe Transforms=c:\temp\termsrvr.mst' where termservr.mst
came from ms office  resource kit.  Outlook works for all users.   No
roaming profiles..  I checked permissions of the registry key
Security with the DWORD value 'CheckAdminSettings' set to 1, everyone
has read permissions.  I am running out of ideas.  It isn't a normal
situation, because remote users are client from Terminal server.. 
Please help..?

   ~John

- - - -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


What version of Outlook, TSE and MetaFrame (SP level as well) are you
using?
Also, how did you Originally install Outlook? Do you use roaming
profiles?



- - - -Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal server


 
- - - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

   I am new to this list so please bear with me.  I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue..  I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here.  Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which needs special security
update over ride features set per users.  I have done this and it
works fine.  I downloaded the adminpack.exe setup the proper form,
set the client registry key and so on..  My local LAN users work
fine.  I have a handful of sales users connecting through a WAN to a
Terminal Citrix server farm..  They need the same over ride access to
email a quote from the same app that is published and run from the
Citrix server.  Outlook is installed and I have done the same
registry key modifications, but it will not work.  The only
difference here is that the remote users are running this app through
terminal server..  I have not rebooted the server since adding the
registry values, I am under the impression that it is an on the fly
check performed when over ride access is needed..?  Does anyone have
any ideas?  Has this been done before.?  I am sorry if this is an
already discussed issue..  Any help would be greatly appreciated

RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal server

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

NO.  It is not just running Outlook, that works fine, for all
users...  It is the sales app that is published for remote users. 
This app users Outlook as a conduit to email quotes via the MAPI
engine.  The way that this sales program accesses the Outlook MAPI
engine violates the default settings of the Outlook security update. 
I have setup the over ride to 'automatically approve' direct MAPI
access, although I didn't want to:(..  This fixed the problem for our
LAN users running the client locally, but doing the same for the
terminal server users makes no difference.  It doesn't even work when
running the sales app as administrator through terminal server.. 
This is beginning to bug the shit out of me..

   ~John

- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


Does it work if you logon as administrator to the TSE server and then
open
Outlook?


- -Original Message-----
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


 
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ok here is the lowdown..

  Windows 2k SP 1 Advanced Server with Terminal Services activated
  Citrix Metaframe 1.8 sp3
  It is part of a Citrix server farm, but the only server with this
app published
  Outlook 2k SR1+security update installed via add remove programs
with the command 
  '*:\setup.exe Transforms=c:\temp\termsrvr.mst' where termservr.mst
came from ms office  resource kit.  Outlook works for all users.   No
roaming profiles..  I checked permissions of the registry key
Security with the DWORD value 'CheckAdminSettings' set to 1, everyone
has read permissions.  I am running out of ideas.  It isn't a normal
situation, because remote users are client from Terminal server.. 
Please help..?

   ~John

- - -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


What version of Outlook, TSE and MetaFrame (SP level as well) are you
using?
Also, how did you Originally install Outlook? Do you use roaming
profiles?



- - -Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal server


 
- - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

   I am new to this list so please bear with me.  I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue..  I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here.  Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which needs special security
update over ride features set per users.  I have done this and it
works fine.  I downloaded the adminpack.exe setup the proper form,
set the client registry key and so on..  My local LAN users work
fine.  I have a handful of sales users connecting through a WAN to a
Terminal Citrix server farm..  They need the same over ride access to
email a quote from the same app that is published and run from the
Citrix server.  Outlook is installed and I have done the same
registry key modifications, but it will not work.  The only
difference here is that the remote users are running this app through
terminal server..  I have not rebooted the server since adding the
registry values, I am under the impression that it is an on the fly
check performed when over ride access is needed..?  Does anyone have
any ideas?  Has this been done before.?  I am sorry if this is an
already discussed issue..  Any help would be greatly appreciated..
Uh also it is Exchange 5.5 sp4.. Sorry if this comes through twice..


   Thanks,
~John

- - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO9/4U7lMSqGNvpxoEQJohgCfUsxKxe/XCmp9zNSplW9zZbHFn2sAoNeb
KTYvrI5mfWf5zb+uaIq24Ofp
=Rl8B
- - -END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwU

RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal server

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ok here is the lowdown..

  Windows 2k SP 1 Advanced Server with Terminal Services activated
  Citrix Metaframe 1.8 sp3
  It is part of a Citrix server farm, but the only server with this
app published
  Outlook 2k SR1+security update installed via add remove programs
with the command 
  '*:\setup.exe Transforms=c:\temp\termsrvr.mst' where termservr.mst
came from ms office  resource kit.  Outlook works for all users.   No
roaming profiles..  I checked permissions of the registry key
Security with the DWORD value 'CheckAdminSettings' set to 1, everyone
has read permissions.  I am running out of ideas.  It isn't a normal
situation, because remote users are client from Terminal server.. 
Please help..?

   ~John

- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server


What version of Outlook, TSE and MetaFrame (SP level as well) are you
using?
Also, how did you Originally install Outlook? Do you use roaming
profiles?



- -Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal server


 
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

   I am new to this list so please bear with me.  I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue..  I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here.  Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which needs special security
update over ride features set per users.  I have done this and it
works fine.  I downloaded the adminpack.exe setup the proper form,
set the client registry key and so on..  My local LAN users work
fine.  I have a handful of sales users connecting through a WAN to a
Terminal Citrix server farm..  They need the same over ride access to
email a quote from the same app that is published and run from the
Citrix server.  Outlook is installed and I have done the same
registry key modifications, but it will not work.  The only
difference here is that the remote users are running this app through
terminal server..  I have not rebooted the server since adding the
registry values, I am under the impression that it is an on the fly
check performed when over ride access is needed..?  Does anyone have
any ideas?  Has this been done before.?  I am sorry if this is an
already discussed issue..  Any help would be greatly appreciated..
Uh also it is Exchange 5.5 sp4.. Sorry if this comes through twice..


   Thanks,
~John

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO9/4U7lMSqGNvpxoEQJohgCfUsxKxe/XCmp9zNSplW9zZbHFn2sAoNeb
KTYvrI5mfWf5zb+uaIq24Ofp
=Rl8B
- -END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO+AMYrlMSqGNvpxoEQJT8QCg4QDlIJXaJ/q59jS8VfhroWx7yU0An2XB
09ClqDRpgjbtv7cmIw+kp5+p
=Ztdh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal server

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

   I am new to this list so please bear with me.  I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue..  I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here.  Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which needs special security
update over ride features set per users.  I have done this and it
works fine.  I downloaded the adminpack.exe setup the proper form,
set the client registry key and so on..  My local LAN users work
fine.  I have a handful of sales users connecting through a WAN to a
Terminal Citrix server farm..  They need the same over ride access to
email a quote from the same app that is published and run from the
Citrix server.  Outlook is installed and I have done the same
registry key modifications, but it will not work.  The only
difference here is that the remote users are running this app through
terminal server..  I have not rebooted the server since adding the
registry values, I am under the impression that it is an on the fly
check performed when over ride access is needed..?  Does anyone have
any ideas?  Has this been done before.?  I am sorry if this is an
already discussed issue..  Any help would be greatly appreciated..
Uh also it is Exchange 5.5 sp4.. Sorry if this comes through twice..


   Thanks,
~John

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBO9/4U7lMSqGNvpxoEQJohgCfUsxKxe/XCmp9zNSplW9zZbHFn2sAoNeb
KTYvrI5mfWf5zb+uaIq24Ofp
=Rl8B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook 2k Security update over ride and Terminal server

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

   I am new to this list so please bear with me.  I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue..  I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here.  Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which needs special security
update over ride features set per users.  I have done this and it
works fine.  I downloaded the adminpack.exe setup the proper form,
set the client registry key and so on..  My local LAN users work
fine.  I have a handful of sales users connecting through a WAN to a
Terminal Citrix server farm..  They need the same over ride access to
email a quote from the same app that is published and run from the
Citrix server.  Outlook is installed and I have done the same
registry key modifications, but it will not work.  The only
difference here is that the remote users are running this app through
terminal server..  I have not rebooted the server since adding the
registry values, I am under the impression that it is an on the fly
check performed when over ride access is needed..?  Does anyone have
any ideas?  Has this been done before.?  I am sorry if this is an
already discussed issue..  Any help would be greatly appreciated..


   Thanks,
~John

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBO97YxLlMSqGNvpxoEQLznQCgrdM2OGfjiFkPl7nsXQww0v1rkYQAoN/l
5Ol8IpdWwOjLahfMjBDbiUWT
=XhIA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook Security update and Terminal server

[King, John]

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

   I am new to this list so please bear with me.  I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue..  I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here.  Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which needs special security
update over ride features set per users.  I have done this and it
works fine.  I downloaded the adminpack.exe setup the proper form,
set the client registry key and so on..  My local LAN users work
fine.  I have a handful of sales users connecting through a WAN to a
Terminal Citrix server farm..  They need the same over ride access to
email a quote from the same app that is published and run from the
Citrix server.  Outlook is installed and I have done the same
registry key modifications, but it will not work.  The only
difference here is that the remote users are running this app through
terminal server..  I have not rebooted the server since adding the
registry values, I am under the impression that it is an on the fly
check performed when over ride access is needed..?  Does anyone have
any ideas?  Has this been done before.?  I am sorry if this is an
already discussed issue..  Any help would be greatly appreciated..
Uh also it is Exchange 5.5 sp4.. Sorry if this comes through twice..


   Thanks,
~John

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBO97pWrlMSqGNvpxoEQLhuQCgmTBIJOALiJ0/SvSb1ysvuJVI2vYAoIt2
yZmvdkQm49IhYRcVw0w4SY1O
=p5xX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]