RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures
D'oh, wrong tree! Thought I had someone to talk to about S/MIME then, I feel so alone. Will it ever take off...?! ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: 13 August 2003 18:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures I am actually looking for a process for people to sign (digitally) a document then pass it on to the next person. This will be an internal application so the need for an actual key isn't necessary. A date/time stamp would be nice as would some sort of historical tracking. - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures Matt, If you mean S/MIME when stating digital signatures, then your solution may be problematic or difficult to achieve. A digital signature only provides security by showing the recipient that the sender is authentic (by checking their certificate is valid) and that the message hasn't been tampered with in transit. It also carries the senders public key for encryption purposes, if configured. As I understand it. The problem with email is that you can never guarantee that the message has been read by the recipient unless you get them to purposely acknowledge the receipt of a message. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: 13 August 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Paperless workflow and digital signatures I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange 2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain internal forms (PO's, RFCE's, etc.). We currently have the forms saved (Word Doc) on a common share. It is filled out, printed, and hand delivered to the approving parties. My boss would like to see us use Exchange/Outlook to do a paperless workflow using digital signatures for approval. I have never looked into this so I would appreciate any suggestions from your experiences. I know the solution needs to be easy to use for the end-user and the cheaper the better. TIA, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running eseutil on another non-exchange server
Quick one... If I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4.0 sp6a and want to run the eseutil on another non-exchange server because it has more disk space, would that other server need to be the same OS level or could I run it on a Windows 2000 server with sp3 for example? I'm worried that because of the difference in platform levels, when I copy the defragged database back there may be problems Thanks K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures
Matt, If you mean S/MIME when stating digital signatures, then your solution may be problematic or difficult to achieve. A digital signature only provides security by showing the recipient that the sender is authentic (by checking their certificate is valid) and that the message hasn't been tampered with in transit. It also carries the senders public key for encryption purposes, if configured. As I understand it. The problem with email is that you can never guarantee that the message has been read by the recipient unless you get them to purposely acknowledge the receipt of a message. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: 13 August 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Paperless workflow and digital signatures I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange 2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain internal forms (PO's, RFCE's, etc.). We currently have the forms saved (Word Doc) on a common share. It is filled out, printed, and hand delivered to the approving parties. My boss would like to see us use Exchange/Outlook to do a paperless workflow using digital signatures for approval. I have never looked into this so I would appreciate any suggestions from your experiences. I know the solution needs to be easy to use for the end-user and the cheaper the better. TIA, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Mailbox
Hi bud, Have a look at what exmerge can do for you. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henderson Richard Sent: 16 July 2003 09:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move Mailbox Hi List, Is there a command line option to move mailbox's between 5.5 E2K stores? Something to batch move groups of users. Many thanks Richard *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles
I've seen this many times. The DC needs to be allowed to update the schema. Basically, you need to modify the NTDS to allow it modify the scema. Check this out: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326262 Let us know if it works k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: 15 July 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles Have you tried running setup from the ADC provided with Exchange SP3 instead? - Original Message - From: Foerst, Daniel P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:56 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 ADC Install troubles Hey all, I am setting up a development environment to test our migration scenario from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 but ran into a snag. In my development environment I have a Domain Controller that was built and added to our production domain in order to have a recent list of user accounts, groups, etc. This Domain Controller was then removed from the production area and added to the Developement environment where I needed to Seize the FSMO roles for the development domain. (The production domain has all the appropriate roles). When I attempt to install the ADC provided by our Exchange 2000 CD I eventually receive an error stating that the account that I am running the ADC setup.exe from does not have the sufficient rights to modify/upgrade the schema. (I don't have the exact error in front of me). This doesn't make sense because I am launching the ADC Setup from the Domain Administrator account, which I verified is part of the Domain Admins group, which is part of the builtin/Administrators group, it is part of the Enterprise Admins group, and the Schema Admins group. I even went as far to make another account with duplicte memberships thinking that the ADC had issues with the Domain Administrator account, but even that failed. I have verified that this DOmain Controller is indeed running all 5 FSMO roles and is a Global Catalog (the only domain controller in the development domain) . Can anyone point me in the right direction? Windows 2000 Server Service Pack 3 w/latest patches 1.8GHz server (speed shouldn't be an issue) 512MB memory Exchange 2000 ADC Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Originator
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: 15 July 2003 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Originator Exchange 5.5 sp3 NT sp6 I have been getting more and more of a of this in the queue with the originator . Can someone tell me where this is coming from? Where should I start with this? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of by Sent: 15 July 2003 16:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exmerge Dear all, So far all the articles I have read about exmerge is, it requires Exchange service account logon to perform the task. I am trying to setup a standard procedure that desktop support staff can learn using exmerge for archiving mailbox data to PST before deleting the exchange mailbox accounts. As I am avoiding informing them the password of exchange service account if possible, can somebody advise how to handle the situation? Thank you. BYS --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge
Wonky mouse. I'm sure you can use exmerege from the desktop logged in as the user to archive the data. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of knighTslayer Sent: 15 July 2003 17:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of by Sent: 15 July 2003 16:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exmerge Dear all, So far all the articles I have read about exmerge is, it requires Exchange service account logon to perform the task. I am trying to setup a standard procedure that desktop support staff can learn using exmerge for archiving mailbox data to PST before deleting the exchange mailbox accounts. As I am avoiding informing them the password of exchange service account if possible, can somebody advise how to handle the situation? Thank you. BYS --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
I think the ammount of users is the factor here, not the size of the message store. How many users? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: 10 July 2003 20:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service I know how to do that. I am talking about when you do a rebuild of the Recipient update service. My question is, how long should it take with a Priv.edb size of 9-10 GB? And should you see a performance hit while it goes on? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
John, Again, I think the ammount of users is the factor here, not the size of the message store. How many users? Use perfomance monitor, and so what if there is a performance hit, whats the particular problem with that? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: 10 July 2003 20:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Is there a way to check it's progress? Is there a performance hit? Any idea how long it should take with a 9-10 GB priv.edb? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service As long as it takes, and no, you can't stop it. It depends on DS access speed, processor, etc.. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know how to do that. I am talking about when you do a rebuild of the Recipient update service. My question is, how long should it take with a Priv.edb size of 9-10 GB? And should you see a performance hit while it goes on? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
What does task manger show having heavy CPU usage? Have you used perfmon yet? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: 10 July 2003 20:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service a little over a hundred users. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service John, Again, I think the ammount of users is the factor here, not the size of the message store. How many users? Use perfomance monitor, and so what if there is a performance hit, whats the particular problem with that? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: 10 July 2003 20:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Is there a way to check it's progress? Is there a performance hit? Any idea how long it should take with a 9-10 GB priv.edb? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service As long as it takes, and no, you can't stop it. It depends on DS access speed, processor, etc.. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know how to do that. I am talking about when you do a rebuild of the Recipient update service. My question is, how long should it take with a Priv.edb size of 9-10 GB? And should you see a performance hit while it goes on? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
NO! Perform a full backup, that will tell you if the DB is okay or not. I doubt this is anything to do with the store at all. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: 10 July 2003 21:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service I have only had to test and repair once and that was with 5.5 3 years ago. DO I just use the ESEutil? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Hmm... Lemme think some more.. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Yes and no. mostly no. Mine seems to run just fine, but, others in the organization, seem to still have speed issues when sending. click send, and anywhere from 30 to 120 seconds before message goes... John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Well, that may not be too odd, but does it deliver locally fast again? -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions I uninstalled 023, and the system seems a bit more stable than it was. actually alot. But it is still taking the store about 10 minutes to start. Odd. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service As a side note, another of my teammates here just installed 023 and says his machine is unusually slow... Maybe something to do with it? Try uninstalling 023 and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions MS03-023 has caused about 6 workstations here to endlessly reboot... I haven't tried it personally, but a couple guys in my group have and are hosed.. Don't know about the others causing any specific issues. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun In HTML Converter Could Allow Code Execution (823559) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 98 Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition Microsoft Windows Me Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Services Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Critical Bulletin: MS03-023 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-023.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-023.asp - - --- - - - --- Title: Flaw in Windows Message Handling through Utility Manager Could Enable Privilege Elevation (822679) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 2000 Impact: Privilege Elevation Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-025 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-025.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-025.asp - - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun in Windows Could Lead to Data Corruption (817606) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition - Microsoft Windows
RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users.
Or maybe OWA... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: 07 July 2003 19:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users. VPN Get a VPN and have all your users use it to connect to Exchange via OL. -Original Message- From: PJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question on calander sharing with remote users. I have recently upgraded to SBS 2000 which is a total package with exchange 2000 and sql 2000 on one box. Personally i see a flaw in doing so but when it comes to money that is all the company wanted to spend. My problem comes in where we have remote users that are connecting to the internet with various isp's, DSL and Cable connections. The Director wants everyone to be able to access each others calander. Seeing that in this version microsoft did away with the net folders option in exchange 2000 is there a way to share outside field agent's calander with the internal exchange server. Setup exchange is an internal setup behind a firewall, everyone inside this local lan is able to share calander everyone outside gets their mail from their external isp. i understand they did away with the net folders because of security issues, but there has to be a way of sharing their calanders with internal. Please let me know if anyone has run across this in previous situations. any help in correcting this will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Paul Melancon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users.
Does Ex2k3 do this any better? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: 07 July 2003 19:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users. OWA works fine if you just want to do calendaring and look up free/busy info. If you want to be able to open someone elses calendar, it is a pain in the butt. Who wants to have to type https://server.company.com/exchange/user/calendar every time they want to open someone else's calendar? Fuhgedaboutit. VPN with full Outlook would be preferable. But only if the machines in question are under your control, esp. when it comes to AV. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:51 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Question on calander sharing with remote users. Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users. Or maybe OWA... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: 07 July 2003 19:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users. VPN Get a VPN and have all your users use it to connect to Exchange via OL. -Original Message- From: PJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question on calander sharing with remote users. I have recently upgraded to SBS 2000 which is a total package with exchange 2000 and sql 2000 on one box. Personally i see a flaw in doing so but when it comes to money that is all the company wanted to spend. My problem comes in where we have remote users that are connecting to the internet with various isp's, DSL and Cable connections. The Director wants everyone to be able to access each others calander. Seeing that in this version microsoft did away with the net folders option in exchange 2000 is there a way to share outside field agent's calander with the internal exchange server. Setup exchange is an internal setup behind a firewall, everyone inside this local lan is able to share calander everyone outside gets their mail from their external isp. i understand they did away with the net folders because of security issues, but there has to be a way of sharing their calanders with internal. Please let me know if anyone has run across this in previous situations. any help in correcting this will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Paul Melancon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
Great news, I'm glad you came back and told us too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 03 July 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Just got round to trying this In addition to using your LMHOSTS file (mine didn't have any #PRE entries or the domain entry) and running NBTSTAT -R , I also removed the WINS server entry in TCP/IP properties this time around (DNS was already removed) so that all name resolution should be static mappings (I think) Works a treat now, and after installation, putting all the DNS and WINS entries back in doesn't affect the servers communicating Thanks a lot for your time and advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 17:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I wasn't too sure if it was 15 or 16. I may have done just 15 but I'm sure I get away with it, or that I'm lucky! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Midgley, Ian Sent: 01 July 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? The \0x1b character must be the 16th character in the domain preload line. I may be counting incorrectly but is there an extra space in the example file? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Here are a few more things to check. Make sure that the LDAP port is listening on port 389. You can check this by going to the congiuration contain, protocols and checking out the propities on the LDAP. Or you could use an LDAP browser to try and connect to it. Also, insert an LMHOST file in to \winnt\system32\drivers\etc on the server you are configuring Use my sample below and change accordingly 192.168.1.1 mbexch1 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 1234567890123456789 192.168.1.1 YOURDOMAIN \0x1b #PRE 192.168.1.2 mbexch2 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.3 mbexch3 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN Now do a nbtstat -R to purge and reload the netbios cache. Let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
I've no idea why he had a pop at me, anyway, what's in a name?
Harvey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: 03 July 2003 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called research. You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you
remembered it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification
in RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the
address and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - /
/ / = / ? / ^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
The + character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Group,
we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is
worried
about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks
Josh Douglas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
RE: Calendar Item will not delete.
Have you tried to do it in OWA? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 20:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Item will not delete. I have a user with a calendar meeting that was canceled and deleted but the meeting still exists on one attendees Calendar. Trying to delete it the user gets Unknown Error. We tried to export the calendar and reimport it with overwrite dupes but the import creates a new instance instead of overwriting the old. The event has attachments and the user is able to open the attachments. . The exported event looks ok in text. Test Appointment4/7/200312:00:00 PM 4/7/2003 12:00:00 PM FALSE FALSE 4/7/200311:45:00 AM Smith Ken Jones Ken;Hatfields Brent McCoys Geoff;Smith Keith;Jones Bruce;Simpson Rick2M (2311 Above) Normal FALSE Normal 4 Its exchange 5.5 with outlook 2002. Anyone have an idea on how I can get rid of this meeting so the user can sync his palm again. Thanks Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Good Anti Spam Software
Would run a relay in a DMZ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Manzano Sent: 02 July 2003 21:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Good Anti Spam Software Hello All, I am looking into purchasing Spam Filtering for our Exchange Server. We are currently Exchange 5.5 and will be moving to 2000 within the year. So I would like a solution that will work for both versions. Any good recommendations? Thank you in advance !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you
remembered it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification
in RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the
address and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - /
/ / = / ? / ^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
The + character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Group,
we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is
worried
about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks
Josh Douglas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi Thanks for the responses Any of these servers multi-homed? No, but the 2 existing servers that are already in the Exchange Site have 2 network adapters and the Compaq teaming drivers installed Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. Tried putting all three servers (2 existing and 1 new) into each others lmhosts and hosts, imported lmhosts, rebooted, problem persists Verify that you can resolve the hostname properly through both WINS and DNS. Are you referring to any other means other than pinging the netbios then the full hostname? Thanks for any further advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2003 16:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Any of these servers multi-homed? Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:57 AM Subject: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Dear All, This is a problem I had at my previous employer, and I got around it by temporarily removing DNS whilst joining the site, this isnt working here We have 2 Exchange Servers on our private LAN. One has mailboxes, one has IMC. Both Exch 5.5 SP4 Running on NT4 SP6a with only TCP/IP installed Both point to DNS and WINS servers on the same LAN address range There are no problems communicating between the 2 servers However, when attempting to join a 3rd server to the site, it fails at the point of running setup where it starts to make a copy of the directory, saying; A connection could not be made to the remote directory service, possibly due to a network failure. Be sure both directory services are running and that your network is available and running and then try again. Microsoft Exchange Setup Error: c1030b11 I've gone through the technet docs ensuring as best I can that comms are ok. Ping is fine, and I'm able to browse each server fine However, running RPCPing fails When running RPCPing32 from the new server (MBEXCH3) to an existing one (MBEXCH2) it fails and reports; RPC call raised exception 0x6ba - The server is unavailable RPC service is running on all servers Cant find any documentation on troubleshooting RPC Ping errors help ! Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 _ Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This Email together with any attachments is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. The unauthorised use, distribution, copying or alteration of the e-mail is forbidden and may be unlawful. If you have received the same in error, please advise the sender immediately by returning the e-mail and then delete it from your system. As Internet communications are not secure, Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Limited does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail or attachments. Furthermore, you should carry out such virus and other checks as considered appropriate to ensure that the opening and/or use of this e-mail and any attachments does not adversely affect other systems or data, for which Martin-Baker Aircraft
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi Thanks for the responses Any of these servers multi-homed? No, but the 2 existing servers that are already in the Exchange Site have 2 network adapters and the Compaq teaming drivers installed Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. Tried putting all three servers (2 existing and 1 new) into each others lmhosts and hosts, imported lmhosts, rebooted, problem persists Verify that you can resolve the hostname properly through both WINS and DNS. Are you referring to any other means other than pinging the netbios then the full hostname? Thanks for any further advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2003 16:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Any of these servers multi-homed? Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:57 AM Subject: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Dear All, This is a problem I had at my previous employer, and I got around it by temporarily removing DNS whilst joining the site, this isnt working here We have 2 Exchange Servers on our private LAN. One has mailboxes, one has IMC. Both Exch 5.5 SP4 Running on NT4 SP6a with only TCP/IP installed Both point to DNS and WINS servers on the same LAN address range There are no problems communicating between the 2 servers However, when attempting to join a 3rd server to the site, it fails at the point of running setup where it starts to make a copy of the directory, saying; A connection could not be made to the remote directory service, possibly due to a network failure. Be sure both directory services are running and that your network is available and running and then try again. Microsoft Exchange Setup Error: c1030b11 I've gone through the technet docs ensuring as best I can that comms are ok. Ping is fine, and I'm able to browse each server fine However, running RPCPing fails When running RPCPing32 from the new server (MBEXCH3) to an existing one (MBEXCH2) it fails and reports; RPC call raised exception 0x6ba - The server is unavailable RPC service is running on all servers Cant find any documentation on troubleshooting RPC Ping errors help ! Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 _ Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
Does exchange install as a new site on that server, I guess it does? This would prove that it is def. a connection issue. I feel your frustation, I've def. had the problem a couple of times before, but it was a few years ago. Out of intrest, is there any fax software running, that is one thing I rememeber being common to my problems, though it might not be related. What other software is on their like AV and such like...? I'm just digging up my old site notes, to see if I wrote down the problems and the resolution. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi Thanks for the responses Any of these servers multi-homed? No, but the 2 existing servers that are already in the Exchange Site have 2 network adapters and the Compaq teaming drivers installed Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. Tried putting all three servers (2 existing and 1 new) into each others lmhosts and hosts, imported lmhosts, rebooted, problem persists Verify that you can resolve the hostname properly through both WINS and DNS. Are you referring to any other means other than pinging the netbios then the full hostname? Thanks for any further advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2003 16:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Any of these servers multi-homed? Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:57 AM Subject: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Dear All, This is a problem I had at my previous employer, and I got around it by temporarily removing DNS whilst joining the site, this isnt working here We have 2 Exchange Servers on our private LAN. One has mailboxes, one has IMC. Both Exch 5.5 SP4 Running on NT4 SP6a with only TCP/IP installed
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
Here are a few more things to check. Make sure that the LDAP port is listening on port 389. You can check this by going to the congiuration contain, protocols and checking out the propities on the LDAP. Or you could use an LDAP browser to try and connect to it. Also, insert an LMHOST file in to \winnt\system32\drivers\etc on the server you are configuring Use my sample below and change accordingly 192.168.1.1 mbexch1 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.1 YOURDOMAIN \0x1b #PRE 192.168.1.2 mbexch2 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.3 mbexch3 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN Now do a nbtstat -R to purge and reload the netbios cache. Let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi Thanks for the responses Any of these servers multi-homed? No, but the 2 existing servers that are already in the Exchange Site have 2 network adapters and the Compaq teaming drivers installed Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. Tried putting all three servers (2 existing and 1 new) into each others lmhosts and hosts, imported lmhosts, rebooted, problem persists Verify that you can resolve the hostname properly through both WINS and DNS. Are you referring to any other means other than pinging the netbios then the full hostname? Thanks for any further advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2003 16:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Any of these servers multi-homed? Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:57 AM Subject: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Dear All, This is a problem I had at my previous employer, and I got around it by temporarily removing DNS whilst
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
Also, ommit the DNS settings from the TCP/IP properties. Eliminate everything -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 16:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi LDAP seems fine, I can also install Exchange 5.5 no problems standalone on this machine DNS is provided by a unix box I'll try your specific LMHOSTS recommendations and let you know the outcome Thanks a lot for the help Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Here are a few more things to check. Make sure that the LDAP port is listening on port 389. You can check this by going to the congiuration contain, protocols and checking out the propities on the LDAP. Or you could use an LDAP browser to try and connect to it. Also, insert an LMHOST file in to \winnt\system32\drivers\etc on the server you are configuring Use my sample below and change accordingly 192.168.1.1 mbexch1 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.1 YOURDOMAIN \0x1b #PRE 192.168.1.2 mbexch2 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.3 mbexch3 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN Now do a nbtstat -R to purge and reload the netbios cache. Let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi Thanks for the responses Any of these servers multi-homed? No, but the 2 existing servers that are already in the Exchange Site have 2 network adapters and the Compaq teaming drivers installed Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. Tried putting all three servers (2 existing and 1 new) into each others lmhosts and hosts, imported lmhosts, rebooted, problem persists Verify that you can resolve the hostname properly through both WINS and DNS. Are you referring to any other means other than pinging
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
I wasn't too sure if it was 15 or 16. I may have done just 15 but I'm sure I get away with it, or that I'm lucky! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Midgley, Ian Sent: 01 July 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? The \0x1b character must be the 16th character in the domain preload line. I may be counting incorrectly but is there an extra space in the example file? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Here are a few more things to check. Make sure that the LDAP port is listening on port 389. You can check this by going to the congiuration contain, protocols and checking out the propities on the LDAP. Or you could use an LDAP browser to try and connect to it. Also, insert an LMHOST file in to \winnt\system32\drivers\etc on the server you are configuring Use my sample below and change accordingly 192.168.1.1 mbexch1 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 1234567890123456789 192.168.1.1 YOURDOMAIN \0x1b #PRE 192.168.1.2 mbexch2 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.3 mbexch3 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN Now do a nbtstat -R to purge and reload the netbios cache. Let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi Thanks for the responses Any of these servers multi-homed? No, but the 2 existing servers that are already in the Exchange Site have 2 network adapters and the Compaq teaming drivers installed Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. Tried putting all three servers (2 existing and 1 new) into each others lmhosts and hosts, imported lmhosts, rebooted, problem persists Verify that you can resolve the hostname properly through both WINS and DNS. Are you referring to any other means other than pinging the netbios then the full hostname? Thanks for any further advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9
RE: RE: DR question
What is that issue? The problem with a system state restore is that the registry and boot files are restored (and cannot be deselected) and this is specfic to the hardware you are running. For example, if the system where you took the system state from has a SCSI controller X and the new server you are restoring to has SCSI controller Y, then you are not going to be able to boot as the drivers and system files and other such important stuff will not be there. You can sometimes get around this by installing the driver for controller Y on the current server then do the backup. This will just to get the information/data in the system state, then it's a matter of some clever tweaking in the recovery console and playing with boot.ini after you do the restore. What is the hardware you have? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wade Robinson Sent: 30 June 2003 19:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE: DR question Sorry I am running Exchange 2000. The Disaster Recovery white paper outlines several scenarios including recovering to a standby by server but it list as a first step to restore the Exchange servers windows system state info. I am not sure if an issue I am having is hw or possibly sw related so I would like to recovery to a new windows install. thanks I'm assuming you're running Exchange 5.5 since you didn't say. Trust me that http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm is the best way to do what you want. You can restore an Exchange database to a server with the same name and it should work fine. The bible for such things is http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.a sp. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wade Robinson Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DR question I would like to perform an Exchange disaster Recovery to a stand by server without restoring the original server system state information. I want to move this Exchange environment to a system with a clean OS. If I rename the current Exchange server than take it off line, bring up the new box using the original's name add it to the domain and reinstall Exchange / DR mode restore the Exchange databases and meta data will this work? I would like to have the original standing by with the ability to bring it back online if necessary. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm
RE: PFINFO question
You'd have nothing to lose with a mailbox - mapi connection direct to that site. Esp. with 20,000 public folders, that's one big ACL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question I am most concerned with one site that has about 2 public folders. All of the folders are on 2 servers and I have confirmed my access to that site. I do not have a mailbox in that site, howerver. I know it asks for a profile for the mapi connection but I know I can traverse sites...so I should not be having issues??? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: PFINFO question
What does the app log say on that target server in that site? Does it moan about permissions at all? Are these folders replicated to other sites and do you get the same problems for those folders in other sites? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 22:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question That one is the bulk of the PF's for that Org and I have confirmed that I am SA in all of the Sites that house PF's. You are probably correct in that I should create a mailbox on the site that has the most of the folders, but I still should not be having a problem...I know that I had a guy run it from that site and he got quite a few errors as well. I am really interested in finding what is causing the problem. Does anyone else have any suggestions? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question You'd have nothing to lose with a mailbox - mapi connection direct to that site. Esp. with 20,000 public folders, that's one big ACL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question I am most concerned with one site that has about 2 public folders. All of the folders are on 2 servers and I have confirmed my access to that site. I do not have a mailbox in that site, howerver. I know it asks for a profile for the mapi connection but I know I can traverse sites...so I should not be having issues??? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe
RE: Exchange 2000 Domino R5
You need a lotus notes directory connector I guess. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/NotesConnector.asp k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronk Sent: 23 June 2003 22:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Domino R5 All I bringing up a new Exchange 2k server to replace my Notes server but am having a issue with my boss. He wants to keep both systems alive and running together with the same email addresses ands same domain name. He wants to just migrate a few people at a time into the new exchange server, while the others stay on Notes until it is time for their move. I am not sure how to approach this?? I know that I can't use the same MX record that we have for the notes server because it will not know what server to go to. We have a domain name of mile-high.com and email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED], he wants to keep the same addressing for the email. I am able to send to the outside world with the new exchange account but can't receive from the outside. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?? I know I could use a notes connector but seems like alot of wasted time when the server is going to go away. Any Ideas are appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recoverable Deleted Items
In the latest version of exmerge (and maybe others) there is a setting to get items from the dumpster (5.5 only). Maybe this is your answer. You could export all the data to .pst files Let me know if this works for you... ...knighTslayer... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bingel, Chris Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recoverable Deleted Items In Ex5.5 is there a way as an administrator to view the messages in the Deleted Items recovery store without attaching to each mailbox in question? I've got some Legal/Security concerns to deal with, and I'd like to be as thorough as possible. Chris Bingel Associate - Networks and Infrastructure Constellation Energy Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recoverable Deleted Items
Works for 5.5 and above. In the latest version of exmerge (and maybe others) there is a setting to get items from the dumpster. Maybe this is your answer. You could export all the data to .pst files Let me know if this works for you... ...knighTslayer... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bingel, Chris Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recoverable Deleted Items In Ex5.5 is there a way as an administrator to view the messages in the Deleted Items recovery store without attaching to each mailbox in question? I've got some Legal/Security concerns to deal with, and I'd like to be as thorough as possible. Chris Bingel Associate - Networks and Infrastructure Constellation Energy Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
making reports from a Journal Account
Hi guys.
When journaling is enabled and all that mail data is dumped in the big fat
mailbox, its seems to be mostly a waste of resouce. This I can accpet, but
how about generating reports from all this data?
Lets says, using CDO and Outlook, creating a mini app that gets all the mail
header info and creates reports based on who sent messages to who, when, how
big and the subject etc. Surely this is possible right ?
Any guru's got any pointers ?
TIA
...knighTslayer...
.-.
{{@}}
8@8
.. 888
@\\/W\/\/W\//@ 8@8
\\/^\/\/^\// _)8(_
\_O__O_/ (@)__/8@8\__(@)
`~-=):(=-~`
| | | | |.|
| | | | |S|
| | | | |'|
| .. | |.|
| | () | | |P|
|_knighTslayer___| |'|
| \ /\ / | |.|
|--\ \/ /--| |U|
| '.__.' | |'|
|| || |.|
:| |: |N|
\ | | / |'|
\| |/ |.|
\ | | /|K|
`\ | | /' |'|
`-.| |.-` \ /
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: making reports from a Journal Account
Please ignore my auto-signature. Sorry in advance, I forgot to remove it. Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys. When journaling is enabled and all that mail data is dumped in the big fat mailbox, its seems to be mostly a waste of resouce. This I can accpet, but how about generating reports from all this data? Lets says, using CDO and Outlook, creating a mini app that gets all the mail header info and creates reports based on who sent messages to who, when, how big and the subject etc. Surely this is possible right ? Any guru's got any pointers ? TIA ...knighTslayer... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3 Collection
Yes Tony. You will need a third party product. ...knighTslayer... Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there any way of getting an Exchange 2000 server to collect pop3 email from other sources and deliver it to specific exchange mailboxes? I mean all automatic from the server... Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3 Collection
You might want to look at this site:- http://www.kinesphere.com/ Now, I have used this before. It's not the most stable. But its good enough for a small group of users. Some good reporting in it though! ...knighTslayer... Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes Tony. You will need a third party product. ...knighTslayer... Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there any way of getting an Exchange 2000 server to collect pop3 email from other sources and deliver it to specific exchange mailboxes? I mean all automatic from the server... Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: making reports from a Journal Account
Now where is the fun in that? I have all the tools I need (I guess),
just a little time spent equals $+£'s saved.
But there's no doubt, it can be done...?
Let's say the min tools required would be as follows:-
SOFTWARE
Exchange Server (Obv)
An Outlook client, to get access to the journal account
CDO, to interface with exchange
Visual Basic, to write the code (what ver?)
SQL server, to hose the data to and create reports.
BOOKS
Programming Exchange and Outlook
URL's
www.cdolive.com
Anything missing?
k
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of mike dilworth
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: making reports from a Journal Account
dont waste your time doing this when a 3rd party tool (www.e-nspect.com)
will do it for you, without the need to collect al that garbage.
mike
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:55 PM
Subject: making reports from a Journal Account
Hi guys.
When journaling is enabled and all that mail data is dumped in the big
fat
mailbox, its seems to be mostly a waste of resouce. This I can
accpet,
but
how about generating reports from all this data?
Lets says, using CDO and Outlook, creating a mini app that gets all
the
mail
header info and creates reports based on who sent messages to who,
when,
how
big and the subject etc. Surely this is possible right ?
Any guru's got any pointers ?
TIA
...knighTslayer...
.-.
{{@}}
8@8
.. 888
@\\/W\/\/W\//@ 8@8
\\/^\/\/^\// _)8(_
\_O__O_/ (@)__/8@8\__(@)
`~-=):(=-~`
| | | | |.|
| | | | | |
| | | | |'|
| .. | |.|
| | () | | | |
|_knighTslayer___| |'|
| \ /\ / | |.|
|--\ \/ /--| | |
| '.__.' | |'|
|| || |.|
:| |: | |
\ | | / |'|
\| |/ |.|
\ | | /| |
`\ | | /' |'|
`-.| |.-` \ /
.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB
This is going on in the Exchange2000 forum k -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB I have read the claims too. Sure it may be a usefull feature. I'd like to see it with my own eyes, just getting time to lab it. I don't see why Veritas would make the claim where clearly, they know what they are talking about and are actively promoting it. Still, best practice led from past experience is always the way to go. K -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB But more to the point what about Veritas 9? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB Using Arcserve is like painting with your left foot, sure it can be done, but boy is it difficult! Still, horses for courses. K -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB I find that interesting. We dumped veritas for Brightstor Arcserv 9. veritas needed just to much attention. -Original Message- From: Corneglio, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB That's what I thought. We DUMPED arcserv for backup exec and no regrets. Maybe Ronald has a bunch of netware boxes around. -Mark -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 2/10/2003 12:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB Use ArcServe? Did the universe just shift? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB Use arcserv. Veritas is still very low end as far as im concerned. And BLB's are bad no matter what the software co says. For one you need outlook on the server which is a no no. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB I just got done installing Veritas 9, the upgrade gagged so I spent 3 = hours on the phone with veritas fixing everything. They are so backed up that = any call more than a few minutes immediately goes to upper level tech = support. The guy mentioned how much better 9 is and mentioned that it can do BLB pretty well now. The support SIS etc. Anyone have any input on this? I already have read the BLBs are bad stuff. But I'm interested to see = what people have say. Jim Liddil Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms
RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB
And James confused me, I think two people same question different forum k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of knighTslayer Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB This is going on in the Exchange2000 forum k -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB I have read the claims too. Sure it may be a usefull feature. I'd like to see it with my own eyes, just getting time to lab it. I don't see why Veritas would make the claim where clearly, they know what they are talking about and are actively promoting it. Still, best practice led from past experience is always the way to go. K -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB But more to the point what about Veritas 9? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB Using Arcserve is like painting with your left foot, sure it can be done, but boy is it difficult! Still, horses for courses. K -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB I find that interesting. We dumped veritas for Brightstor Arcserv 9. veritas needed just to much attention. -Original Message- From: Corneglio, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB That's what I thought. We DUMPED arcserv for backup exec and no regrets. Maybe Ronald has a bunch of netware boxes around. -Mark -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 2/10/2003 12:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB Use ArcServe? Did the universe just shift? -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB Use arcserv. Veritas is still very low end as far as im concerned. And BLB's are bad no matter what the software co says. For one you need outlook on the server which is a no no. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB I just got done installing Veritas 9, the upgrade gagged so I spent 3 = hours on the phone with veritas fixing everything. They are so backed up that = any call more than a few minutes immediately goes to upper level tech = support. The guy mentioned how much better 9 is and mentioned that it can do BLB pretty well now. The support SIS etc. Anyone have any input on this? I already have read the BLBs are bad stuff. But I'm interested to see = what people have say. Jim Liddil Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use
RE: Exchange version standard or enterprise
When the Information store starts it will say its either a 16Gb limited store, or it will say unlimited store. Check out the eventlog (app). Standard = 16Gb Enterprise = unlimited -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange version standard or enterprise Hi - This sounds like it may be the most asked question but it does not seem easy to find. I'm trying to find out what Exchange version was installed on this server that I inhherited, Standard or Enterprise. The Server in sunnning on WinNT 4.0 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse e-mail disclaimer here: http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: making reports from a Journal Account
...I'm gonna go for it. I'm gonna spend some time working this out.
Now I believe in the open source community, so when I have cracked it,
I'll post my code/results etc. Now, I'm not a newbie to anything listed
below expect CDO, so if anyone does have pointers, then I'd be most
grateful.
...knighTslayer...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of knighTslayer
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 6:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: making reports from a Journal Account
Now where is the fun in that? I have all the tools I need (I guess),
just a little time spent equals $+£'s saved.
But there's no doubt, it can be done...?
Let's say the min tools required would be as follows:-
SOFTWARE
Exchange Server (Obv)
An Outlook client, to get access to the journal account
CDO, to interface with exchange
Visual Basic, to write the code (what ver?)
SQL server, to hose the data to and create reports.
BOOKS
Programming Exchange and Outlook
URL's
www.cdolive.com
Anything missing?
k
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of mike dilworth
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: making reports from a Journal Account
dont waste your time doing this when a 3rd party tool (www.e-nspect.com)
will do it for you, without the need to collect al that garbage.
mike
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:55 PM
Subject: making reports from a Journal Account
Hi guys.
When journaling is enabled and all that mail data is dumped in the big
fat
mailbox, its seems to be mostly a waste of resouce. This I can
accpet,
but
how about generating reports from all this data?
Lets says, using CDO and Outlook, creating a mini app that gets all
the
mail
header info and creates reports based on who sent messages to who,
when,
how
big and the subject etc. Surely this is possible right ?
Any guru's got any pointers ?
TIA
...knighTslayer...
.-.
{{@}}
8@8
.. 888
@\\/W\/\/W\//@ 8@8
\\/^\/\/^\// _)8(_
\_O__O_/ (@)__/8@8\__(@)
`~-=):(=-~`
| | | | |.|
| | | | | |
| | | | |'|
| .. | |.|
| | () | | | |
|_knighTslayer___| |'|
| \ /\ / | |.|
|--\ \/ /--| | |
| '.__.' | |'|
|| || |.|
:| |: | |
\ | | / |'|
\| |/ |.|
\ | | /| |
`\ | | /' |'|
`-.| |.-` \ /
.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trans logs
Your Exchange aware backup product does that. Or you do if you manually do so after a successful off-line backup. If the logs were not purged, then the option to do so wasn't set. knighTslayer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ashraph, Elizabeth A. Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trans logs Please forgive me in advance for asking this, but in Ex5.5 who deletes the transaction logs after a full backup, does Exchange or the Exchange aware Backup software (like Veritas). Has anyone seen cases where backups are successful but the logs don't get purged, what might cause this. Thanks. Liz Ashraph [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 bad?
You are correct, the username and password is plain text, if that's the authentication method used. Use SSL POP3 (Port 995) to make it secure. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: 05 February 2003 21:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Question? When a user from out side your firewall connects to exchange via POP3 and logs in. Is that username and password sent in clear text? Is there any security involved in this process? If not someone sniffing in the middle just got a username and password for your domain. I am a newbie to Exchange and security -Original Message- From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Justification to management? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? If he already wants to shut it off why does he need any reasons? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 bad? Are they any reasons to disable POP3 for use by users on a E2K setup? Security or any other? Customer would like to shut it off but needs reasons why POP3 should be shutdown. _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 bad?
http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3847pg=4 k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of knighTslayer Sent: 05 February 2003 21:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? You are correct, the username and password is plain text, if that's the authentication method used. Use SSL POP3 (Port 995) to make it secure. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: 05 February 2003 21:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Question? When a user from out side your firewall connects to exchange via POP3 and logs in. Is that username and password sent in clear text? Is there any security involved in this process? If not someone sniffing in the middle just got a username and password for your domain. I am a newbie to Exchange and security -Original Message- From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Justification to management? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? If he already wants to shut it off why does he need any reasons? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 bad? Are they any reasons to disable POP3 for use by users on a E2K setup? Security or any other? Customer would like to shut it off but needs reasons why POP3 should be shutdown. _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
What happens when you create a new shortcut in the winXP system? How does it look and does it work on the win2k system? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: 05 February 2003 20:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shortcuts to Outlook objects OK, I thought I had this problem licked until I hit a WinXP system. I have a W2K system running Outlook 2000. On this system, I can create a shortcut to a file located in an Outlook OST thus: outlook:\\Public%20Folders\Favorites\Consulting\budget_tracking.xls.eml This works great on this system. However, on a WinXP system running Outlook 2002, the shortcut doesn't work at all. Anyone have the syntax for this? I have checked Slipstick and found some stuff but none of it works. If I include the , WinXP wants to throw an http: in front of it. I know that this is a really silly, stupid problem but it is driving me nuts that I can get it to work on my system but not on this WinXP/O2002 system. Any help is greatly appreciated! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT
NT4.0 or 2000 ? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Reed, Alexander Sent: 04 February 2003 19:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT Is there a utility that will allow you to do a batch add of users for NT? I thought that there was one. Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: redhat 8 and sendmail forums
Being fed by the nipple of all things GUI, i need some help... I need to configure SENDMAIL on a REDHAT 8.0 Linux box. Would any of you guys know of any good lists/websites like this one where I could get NEWBIE advice. TIA ...knighTslayer... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums
I have the Bat Book. I just miss the basics of LINUX really. For example, I have installed REDHAT8.0 and I cannot compile macro files to make changes to the sendmail.cf file. It says silly little things like 'command not found' etc... I only installed LINUX a few days ago, so we are just getting to know each other. At the moment its like a bad date, its doing all the talking and tell me whats wrong with life and I can't get a word in edge ways ! k The batbook by O'Reilly is excellent..if your going to play with sendmail..buy it.. bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: redhat 8 and sendmail forums Being fed by the nipple of all things GUI, i need some help... I need to configure SENDMAIL on a REDHAT 8.0 Linux box. Would any of you guys know of any good lists/websites like this one where I could get NEWBIE advice. TIA ...knighTslayer... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums
Thanks Jim, As soon as I find something usefull, I'll post back. k Quoting Jim Helfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Being fed by the nipple of all things GUI, i need some help... I need to configure SENDMAIL on a REDHAT 8.0 Linux box. Would any of you guys know of any good lists/websites like this one where I could get NEWBIE advice. TIA ...knighTslayer... I subscribe to this list: ___ Redhat-install-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list To Unsubscribe Go To ABOVE URL or send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unsubscribe There are other Red-hat lists as well, not sure if there is one dedicated to sendmail, but if there is, would you report back to the list? Linux-sendmail is on my To-Do list as well. Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Recovery Assistance PLEASE!
Ben, You are replacing the server in the domain with the same name, SID and version of OS with relevant services packs (important). Replacing the DB's and patching them with 'isinteg -patch' will get you back to where you where before the crash. That is if your DB's where closed cleanly. i.e., the server should have the same IP and name as the one that died. You are just replacing the data. knighTslayer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: 03 February 2003 18:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server Recovery Assistance PLEASE! Follow-on to the below. I have found MS Article 155216 which pretty much describes what I think I need to do. However, I'm still not clear on the new site thing. If I create a new site with the same org and site name, copy the priv, pub, dir to their correct locations, how does the server rejoin the original site? Thanks again. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server Recovery Assistance PLEASE! Greetings: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows NT4 SP6 SRP Just for fun, my server decided to give me a no boot device found error when I started it up this morning. I ensured the RAIDs were all good, then called Dell tech support. He had me boot from a 2000 CD and examine the C drive which has empty except for a couple of dirs. He suggested I try a repair or parallel install. Hindsight, what I was actually looking at was the D: partition, but I've already reinstalled the OS so it doesn't really matter now. The question. I have my priv and pub still intact and would like to reinstall Exchange and simply move these DBs back to their original locations. Is this possible? I found an article from Rich Matheison on how to do this, but he has the server built in a new site with the same org and site name. How would I get it back to the original site? Should I delete the old server name from the site then install exchange and move the DBs? I'm stuck and the clock is ticking! Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums
PROBLEM SOLVED Roger, This is fantastic, though I do feel that I am cheating!!! A massive thank you for your help and also Allison, Jacob, Bill, Jim, Mike, Allan and Christopher.:) To summarise my problem: I needed to get email sent to a certain domain masqueraded, that is the header AND the envelope. To do this I had to use SENDMAIL. I used the latest version of REDHAT8.0, SENDMAIL 8 and the m4 compiler. The product, Webmin, a free open source package helped a GUI bred administrator get through Linux commands. The following url's helped greatly:- www.webmin.net www.redhat.com/support www.sendmail.org www.siliconvalleyccie.com/sendmail.htm For m4 compiler:- http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/rawhide/1.0/i386/RedHat/RPMS/m4-1.4.1-12.i3 86.html more detailed info:- For some strange reason, installing a custom REDHAT8.0 machine in text only mode with just SENDMAIL and its required dependencies screwed up the m4 compiler. The symptom I got was that every time I tried to compile a macro file I would get 'command not found'. To resolve this, I downloaded the latest m4 compiler from the REDHAT rpms download area and installed the package with the -U switch (upgrade). This then brought everything back together. Thanks ...knighTslayer... I can no go to sleep! -Original Message- From: Roger Haxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 February 2003 20:43 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums Why not download and install webmin to configure your sendmail? Personally I use Postfix on my Redhat 7.2 box. I have found that I like Postfix a LOT better than sendmail. And I use webmin on both Linux, AIX, and FreeBSD to do a lot of the configuration. http://www.webmin.net HTH, ~R~ -- Roger Haxton Network Administrator Sure-Tel [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Don't hate yourself in the morning, sleep until noon. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums I have the Bat Book. I just miss the basics of LINUX really. For example, I have installed REDHAT8.0 and I cannot compile macro files to make changes to the sendmail.cf file. It says silly little things like 'command not found' etc... I only installed LINUX a few days ago, so we are just getting to know each other. At the moment its like a bad date, its doing all the talking and tell me whats wrong with life and I can't get a word in edge ways ! k The batbook by O'Reilly is excellent..if your going to play with sendmail..buy it.. bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: redhat 8 and sendmail forums Being fed by the nipple of all things GUI, i need some help... I need to configure SENDMAIL on a REDHAT 8.0 Linux box. Would any of you guys know of any good lists/websites like this one where I could get NEWBIE advice. TIA ...knighTslayer... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 550 errors
Are they remote users where they VPN or dial in to your LAN ? Have you enabled POP3 support on your IMC and if so, have you configured the IP addresses allowed to relay ? Did you restart the IMC ? Ask yourself these questions and see how you get on. ...knighTslayer... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Strock Sent: 02 February 2003 07:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 550 errors I'm administering a 5.5 box, SP3 installed. I've got a couple users who have switched to using POP3/SMTP through this machine (they are remote users now). They are getting a message when trying to send mail to users outside the default domain of '550, relaying prohibited'. I've had them set it such that they have checked 'Server requires authentication' and had them put in their username/password for the domain. One user is using Outlook Express, one is using Outlook 2000. How can I correct this? Thanks. Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 550 errors
knighTslayer tips his helmet K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: 02 February 2003 17:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 550 errors IIRC, Checking Hosts and Clients that successfully authenticate is sufficient enough as well. -- Original Message -- From: knighTslayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:46:07 - Are they remote users where they VPN or dial in to your LAN ? Have you enabled POP3 support on your IMC and if so, have you configured the IP addresses allowed to relay ? Did you restart the IMC ? Ask yourself these questions and see how you get on. ...knighTslayer... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Strock Sent: 02 February 2003 07:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 550 errors I'm administering a 5.5 box, SP3 installed. I've got a couple users who have switched to using POP3/SMTP through this machine (they are remote users now). They are getting a message when trying to send mail to users outside the default domain of '550, relaying prohibited'. I've had them set it such that they have checked 'Server requires authentication' and had them put in their username/password for the domain. One user is using Outlook Express, one is using Outlook 2000. How can I correct this? Thanks. Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Masquerading
IIS in the bin. Ok. I'm working on RedHat 8.0 and SENDMAIL at the moment. Clunky but getting there. Are there any NT based, cheep/freeware MTA's that can totally modify the header and envelope? Thanks K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: 31 January 2003 11:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Masquerading Absolutely nothing is wrong. Sendmail (and a few other *nix mta's) offer the ability to completely destroy the integrity of the message headers. Not to mention, the from address isn't only stored in the header, its stored in the message body most of the time too. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Masquerading What's the deal with masquerading? I'm about to take my 5ft sword to this damn server if it doesn't behave soon... For mail sent to a certain domain, it pops off to my IIS5.0 server where I have an SMTP relay that masquerades the email domain to another address. This works a treat and when the mail arrives in the destination mail box it appears to have come from the changed domain name. i.e. Mail comes from exchange server where the addressing pattern is '@domain.com' and the destination @hotmail.com so forward to relay where masquerade changes address to @change.domain.com. It gets there with address @change.domain.com. This is okay. BUT In the header, the FROM field says [EMAIL PROTECTED], even though the return path, the display and everything else says [EMAIL PROTECTED] The display says [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's wrong with this piece of cra. ??? TIA K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IIS 5.0 SMTP
Hi guys, Is it possible to add disclaimers using IIS 5.0 ? I want my Exchange server to send mail to an IIS5.0 server where a disclamer is added for particular domains. TIA K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bind IMC to a single IP address
Hi, How do would you bind the IMC to just one IP address ? Here's the deal. I have an Exchange 5.5sp4 server running on a win2ksp3 server with IIS5.0. The LAN nic has the address 172.20.1.1 and I have IIS5.0 SMTP service listening on another IP bound to the same nic but in a different subnet (172.21.1.1) I want mail sent to a particular domain to hit my IIS5.0 SMTP service then relay on to the internet. At the moment I can't start my IIS5.0 SMTP service as exchange IMC is listening on the same port. Tia K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Masquerading
What's the deal with masquerading? I'm about to take my 5ft sword to this damn server if it doesn't behave soon... For mail sent to a certain domain, it pops off to my IIS5.0 server where I have an SMTP relay that masquerades the email domain to another address. This works a treat and when the mail arrives in the destination mail box it appears to have come from the changed domain name. i.e. Mail comes from exchange server where the addressing pattern is '@domain.com' and the destination @hotmail.com so forward to relay where masquerade changes address to @change.domain.com. It gets there with address @change.domain.com. This is okay. BUT In the header, the FROM field says [EMAIL PROTECTED], even though the return path, the display and everything else says [EMAIL PROTECTED] The display says [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's wrong with this piece of cra. ??? TIA K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bind IMC to a single IP address
Okay mum, I'll eat my meat and build a wall around my server farm. ; ) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: 31 January 2003 01:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bind IMC to a single IP address You have to remove the SMTP service if you want the IMS to function. YOu cant have any pudding if you dont eat your meat! -- Original Message -- From: knighTslayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:52:53 - Hi, How do would you bind the IMC to just one IP address ? Here's the deal. I have an Exchange 5.5sp4 server running on a win2ksp3 server with IIS5.0. The LAN nic has the address 172.20.1.1 and I have IIS5.0 SMTP service listening on another IP bound to the same nic but in a different subnet (172.21.1.1) I want mail sent to a particular domain to hit my IIS5.0 SMTP service then relay on to the internet. At the moment I can't start my IIS5.0 SMTP service as exchange IMC is listening on the same port. Tia K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
It really looks good. I like the way the preview pane can be on the side or bottom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BE 9
It shouldn't be an upgrade; it should be a service pack. Most of this product fixes issues from the old with not much *NEW* features in comparison. K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David J. Culliton Sent: 29 January 2003 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BE 9 I am using it now. It shaved about 20% off our typical enterprise backup times. I like the ability to modify the order in which my machines are backup up. If 8.6 had it - I never found it... I also like the interface better. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BE 9 Anyone upgrading to Backup Exec 9.0 It looks like it has some real good advantages and I am just looking for some opinions Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Exchange2003
I just knew the download would become available before the media would arrive. D'oh. K. Can you download Outlook 11 beta ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install, the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really have any problems with this beta. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Exchange2003
It'd probably be a 500 Million MB download anyway ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 29 January 2003 22:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bastards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 I haven't seen Outlook 11 beta available publicly -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 I just knew the download would become available before the media would arrive. D'oh. K. Can you download Outlook 11 beta ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install, the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really have any problems with this beta. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Cool. When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :( K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages that's being sent somewhere. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :) And it is running on pretty crappy hardware. -Original Message- From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds ! I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :) http://216.87.16.88/exchange/ logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] password is 1234 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2003 http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp Anyone hankerin' to upgrade? Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts Hi, I have a really weird one here folks: This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and task folders. I have Symantec AV Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running at the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection. Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder (thinking the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts folder. I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is about missing user SID's. I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3. Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg? Thanks, MP This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message
