RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Good enough. Thank you all for the answers. Jeremy -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers The dumpster for a user is cleared when that user is moved using the MOVE MAILBOX task in ADUC. It doesn't matter if the user is going between MDB or between servers. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Posted At: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/ser vers
Nope. Once you moved the mailbox, anything recoverable in the DIR bin got whacked. You will have to restore from backup. -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Too bad. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Restore from a backup taken before he deleted the items to your recovery server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/ser vers
So sad. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Too bad. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
The dumpster for a user is cleared when that user is moved using the MOVE MAILBOX task in ADUC. It doesn't matter if the user is going between MDB or between servers. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I. Shannon Posted At: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers Exchange 2k SP3 Windows 2k SP4 I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30 days). Is there any way to get to the deleted items retention folder on the old server? It is still up and running and a member of the organization. Thank you for any help. Jeremy DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two GAL's for two groups
We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How do you make a particular GAL the default for a group of users? Thanks Walt Brannon University of New Orleans _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two GAL's for two groups
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;182902 -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Two GAL's for two groups We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How do you make a particular GAL the default for a group of users? Thanks Walt Brannon University of New Orleans _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two GAL's for two groups
Permissions. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Two GAL's for two groups We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How do you make a particular GAL the default for a group of users? Thanks Walt Brannon University of New Orleans _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two GAL's for two groups
That would be ACLs on the GAL? Walt -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Two GAL's for two groups Permissions. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Two GAL's for two groups We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How do you make a particular GAL the default for a group of users? Thanks Walt Brannon University of New Orleans _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication Across Routing Groups
What do you mean by instance? Do you mean an available public folder store on each local server which pertains to the global public's from the context you want to replicate from? Well if so, then yes :) I fixerered this problem, I think some kind of corruption took place more than anything. I reverted back to my old config, they still didn't work. I put it back how I wanted it, obviously they were still not working. What I did then was delete the public folder store on each server that was having the problem and re-created it, after a while they were back working again, so ive done this on every server and there all fine now, they are all working as I want them with my chosen setup :) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 May 2003 08:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Across Routing Groups Have you created instances on those public folder servers? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, to combat a problem I have been having, I have recreated the configuration within Exchange, and used different routing groups for different servers to accomplish the same setup as I had previously. However, since putting the different servers in different routing groups, public folders are no longer working. The public folders work at head office where I am, but at remote sites where servers are in a different routing group, the public folders cannot be accessed and they say that they probably haven't been replicated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication Across Routing Groups
Have you created instances on those public folder servers? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, to combat a problem I have been having, I have recreated the configuration within Exchange, and used different routing groups for different servers to accomplish the same setup as I had previously. However, since putting the different servers in different routing groups, public folders are no longer working. The public folders work at head office where I am, but at remote sites where servers are in a different routing group, the public folders cannot be accessed and they say that they probably haven't been replicated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Replication Across Routing Groups
Hi, to combat a problem I have been having, I have recreated the configuration within Exchange, and used different routing groups for different servers to accomplish the same setup as I had previously. However, since putting the different servers in different routing groups, public folders are no longer working. The public folders work at head office where I am, but at remote sites where servers are in a different routing group, the public folders cannot be accessed and they say that they probably haven't been replicated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number of Storage Groups?
Hello All, I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage group on an Exchange 2000 server (NOT Enterprise edition). Can I simply create another storage group on the same server and move over half my users get the space limit down from 16 GIGS? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Number of Storage Groups?
Exchange 2000 Standard only supports one storage group. You need Enterprise to add more. -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello All, I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage group on an Exchange 2000 server (NOT Enterprise edition). Can I simply create another storage group on the same server and move over half my users get the space limit down from 16 GIGS? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Number of Storage Groups?
Tim, I believe the Standard version of Exchange is limited to 1 Storage group and 1 database. Denny -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Number of Storage Groups? Hello All, I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage group on an Exchange 2000 server (NOT Enterprise edition). Can I simply create another storage group on the same server and move over half my users get the space limit down from 16 GIGS? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Number of Storage Groups?
Nope. Ex2K Std edition only allows a single SG (16GB max). You need to purchase, license and install Enterprise Edition, which will allow you to have expanded storage capability. -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Number of Storage Groups? Hello All, I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage group on an Exchange 2000 server (NOT Enterprise edition). Can I simply create another storage group on the same server and move over half my users get the space limit down from 16 GIGS? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Number of Storage Groups?
Enterprise also supports saucer separation. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Nope. Ex2K Std edition only allows a single SG (16GB max). You need to purchase, license and install Enterprise Edition, which will allow you to have expanded storage capability. -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Number of Storage Groups? Hello All, I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage group on an Exchange 2000 server (NOT Enterprise edition). Can I simply create another storage group on the same server and move over half my users get the space limit down from 16 GIGS? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Number of Storage Groups?
Enterprise also supports saucer separation. This feature is definitely worth the extra expense. (That made me laugh so hard this morning. Thanks Martin!) -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000Server
XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170 Is there any tricks or workaround to move an exchange server 2000 to a different admin group ? By mistake our ex2k server has been installed in the wrong admin group. The Goal of that was to be able to delegate some administrative task to an Admin only to that ex 2000 server. And protect the other ex2k server... We want to avoid having to reinstall the ex2k server if possible... reg JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000Server
None that I know of. Assuming you're in native mode, bring up a new server in the correct administrative group and move the objects to that server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170 Is there any tricks or workaround to move an exchange server 2000 to a different admin group ? By mistake our ex2k server has been installed in the wrong admin group. The Goal of that was to be able to delegate some administrative task to an Admin only to that ex 2000 server. And protect the other ex2k server... We want to avoid having to reinstall the ex2k server if possible... reg JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server
I believe you've gained additional information for the 'things not to do in Exchange' list. Sorry. :( On 3/3/03 22:43, Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170 Is there any tricks or workaround to move an exchange server 2000 to a different admin group ? By mistake our ex2k server has been installed in the wrong admin group. The Goal of that was to be able to delegate some administrative task to an Admin only to that ex 2000 server. And protect the other ex2k server... We want to avoid having to reinstall the ex2k server if possible... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
thanks Mcgiver _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI -Original Message- From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Groups Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
I would think it's more likely you'd have to use CDOEXM. But I don't know for sure. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Groups It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI -Original Message- From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Groups Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
I know that the SDK has a piece of vbs that will create stores (mailbox and PF).. you might take a look there. (I used that code to write a perl script to mount/dismount dbs for me)... the file I used was called 'createstore.vbs' ttp://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/ _esdk_samples_createstore_navigating.asp jeff e. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Groups I would think it's more likely you'd have to use CDOEXM. But I don't know for sure. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Groups It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI -Original Message- From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Groups Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
Probably. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Childers Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Groups Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List
I never did get a response to this and I can't find any information on this from the archives or Microsoft how to's... Am I to assume that it can't be done in e2k like it could be done in 5.5? Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth -Original Message- From: Eric Goforth Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List Hello Friends; I am having a heck of a time with the Address Lists in E2K. I have setup a few address lists for different domains that we are hosting on our system. On one domain in particular they want a distribution group setup to send to everyone in the domain. So far so good. I setup a Distribution Group called [EMAIL PROTECTED] The address works great and the email gets to everyone just fine. Here is the problem. In their Address List, using the filter builder, I can get the users listed just fine or I can the Distribution Group listed just fine, but not both. My filters look a lot like: User - Email Address - Does - End With - *thedomain.com User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - Administrator* User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - IUSR* At this point, it brings up all of the recipients with no problem. If I add: Group - Alias - Does - Start With - staff* I get No results found. If I just run the Group line by itself, I get the group but no users. Can anyone offer some advice on this? I appreciate it. Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List
I build my address lists based on common attributes across all objects... The problem you are running into I believe (I looked at the problem briefly when you first posted) is that the LDAP query you wind up creating is a series of 'ands'and you need an 'or' for the DL objects to be included. Microsoft has a whitepaper on Exchange hosting www.microsoft.com/isn which goes into some detail on building address lists. You might check it for some tips on building the lists that you want. -Original Message- From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List I never did get a response to this and I can't find any information on this from the archives or Microsoft how to's... Am I to assume that it can't be done in e2k like it could be done in 5.5? Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth -Original Message- From: Eric Goforth Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List Hello Friends; I am having a heck of a time with the Address Lists in E2K. I have setup a few address lists for different domains that we are hosting on our system. On one domain in particular they want a distribution group setup to send to everyone in the domain. So far so good. I setup a Distribution Group called [EMAIL PROTECTED] The address works great and the email gets to everyone just fine. Here is the problem. In their Address List, using the filter builder, I can get the users listed just fine or I can the Distribution Group listed just fine, but not both. My filters look a lot like: User - Email Address - Does - End With - *thedomain.com User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - Administrator* User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - IUSR* At this point, it brings up all of the recipients with no problem. If I add: Group - Alias - Does - Start With - staff* I get No results found. If I just run the Group line by itself, I get the group but no users. Can anyone offer some advice on this? I appreciate it. Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List
Hello Friends; I am having a heck of a time with the Address Lists in E2K. I have setup a few address lists for different domains that we are hosting on our system. On one domain in particular they want a distribution group setup to send to everyone in the domain. So far so good. I setup a Distribution Group called [EMAIL PROTECTED] The address works great and the email gets to everyone just fine. Here is the problem. In their Address List, using the filter builder, I can get the users listed just fine or I can the Distribution Group listed just fine, but not both. My filters look a lot like: User - Email Address - Does - End With - *thedomain.com User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - Administrator* User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - IUSR* At this point, it brings up all of the recipients with no problem. If I add: Group - Alias - Does - Start With - staff* I get No results found. If I just run the Group line by itself, I get the group but no users. Can anyone offer some advice on this? I appreciate it. Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merging Admin Groups
Hi, I have the following scenario. Two Exchange 5.5 Server part of the same organization but in different sites have been in-place upgraded to Exchange 2000. Now each is in it's own Administrative Group. How can they be put in one and the same Admin group? In a few month these servers have to be put on new hardware, so re-isntallation is scheduled. Is it possible to reinstall them into one Admin Group? regards, Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Merging Admin Groups
You cannot move servers between administrative groups. When your Exchange organization is in native mode, you can build a new server in a different administrative group and move mailboxes between them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Uso Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Merging Admin Groups Hi, I have the following scenario. Two Exchange 5.5 Server part of the same organization but in different sites have been in-place upgraded to Exchange 2000. Now each is in it's own Administrative Group. How can they be put in one and the same Admin group? In a few month these servers have to be put on new hardware, so re-isntallation is scheduled. Is it possible to reinstall them into one Admin Group? regards, Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Merging Admin Groups
I'll use the famous Ed Crowley Exchange 2000 Move Server Method ;-) thanX Uso From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:31 PM Subject: RE: Merging Admin Groups You cannot move servers between administrative groups. When your Exchange organization is in native mode, you can build a new server in a different administrative group and move mailboxes between them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Uso Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Merging Admin Groups Hi, I have the following scenario. Two Exchange 5.5 Server part of the same organization but in different sites have been in-place upgraded to Exchange 2000. Now each is in it's own Administrative Group. How can they be put in one and the same Admin group? In a few month these servers have to be put on new hardware, so re-isntallation is scheduled. Is it possible to reinstall them into one Admin Group? regards, Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ON S EPARATE EXCHANGE 2000 SERVERS
SMTP domains can span multiple routing groups.. your issues sound like they could possibly be directory related. Can users see the entire GAL? Do they receive NDRs? What do those NDRs say? Errors in the event viewer? -Original Message- From: Marko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 1:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ON SEPARATE EXCHANGE 2000 SERVERS Hi! I am trying to host a single domain, named us.com on two separate exchange 2000 servers that are each in a separate routing group connected by a routing group connector. However, it is not possible to send mail between recipients hosted on each exchange server, since a bounce occurs. Apparently, the same domain cannot be hosted on two exchange servers that are in SEPARATE routing groups. The above scenario DOES WORK if placing the two exchange servers in the SAME routing group. It appears that having exchange servers in the same routing group ensures that both exchange servers are using the same global catalog in active directory to deliver mail. The way my domain is split is so that one server, call it server A, hosts part of mailboxes for domain us.com. Server B hosts part of mailboxes for domain us.com and all mailboxes for domain europe.local. Both server A and B are primary domain controllers with active directory, DNS and Exchange installed on a single machine. Why do server A and B have to be in different routing groups and have to host the same domain? Server A is located in the US, server B is in Europe. They are connected via a rather reliable VPN. Only server A has a static Internet IP assigned, therefore server B cannot directly accept messages from the Internet; it is connected to a DSL modem with a dynamic IP. Users on server A and B share the same domain name - us.com; user account and mailbox for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is located in the US on server A, while user account and mailbox for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is located in Europe on server B. European users (connecting to server B) cannot have their accounts hosted on server A, since they use Outlook to connect to server B locally. The same, European, users also must have @us.com domain email set as Primary SMTP Account, with the intranet SMTP address @europe.local set as secondary SMTP account. ACTIVE DIRECTORY IMPLEMENTATION: Server A is PDC for domain us.com and has a trust relationship established with server B that is PDC for domain europe.local. Both domains are within the same forest. The DNS entry for domain us.com is on server A, a secondary copy of the domain us.com is stored in server B's DNS. The MX record for domain us.com is pointing only to the exchange server A, the host being a.us.com. Is there a better DNS configuration for what we want? Both Exchange servers are in the same Exchange organization and in the same administrative group. Once routing connectors are created, servers are connected to each other, everything appears to be working in the monitoring view. Is there any way to implement this scenario with two Exchange servers in separate routing groups. Once again, this scenario works with the two servers in the same routing group, where it appears that mailboxes within the same domain can be spread across multiple exchange servers. But we need to separate the two servers, since they are not connected in a LAN, and we are also using fax connectors that each must work within a separate routing group with a separate server. I would greatly appreciate any help! Regards, Marko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ONSEPARATE EXCHANGE 2000 SERVERS
just because you have two exchange servers in 2 seperate routing groups that should not prevent the 2 exchange servers from seeing each other or for the MTA's on each server to be able to recognise which server the mailboxes are on and send them to the appropriate server. Are your routing groups connected via a smtp or a ip connector. Also are the upns for the users the same on both servers, meaning when you create a user name on the win2k dc when it gives you the option for upn name does it say xyz.com on both servers, meaning if you create a user cslled kane on server a is it [EMAIL PROTECTED] and if you create a user called kane1 on server b is it [EMAIL PROTECTED] or is it [EMAIL PROTECTED] UPNS have to be the same on both servers. Having said that are these 2 servers in the same domain, sorry if you had already answered this question in your essay, but answer it again. Are they part of the same domain or are they 2 seperate domainslike one is xyz.us.com and the other is xyz.europe.com. If they are different i bet you your upns are also different. I would suggest trying to create a upn on server b also called xyz.us.com and assign that all your users and then see if the problem goes away. Also for your users in europe have you created a smtp server on their exchange server and have that forward to a smart host or you did not bother creating a virtual smtp server and directly forwarding everything to a smart host. Just wondering..hope this helps or atleast give you a direction to look in to trouble shoot. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 6:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ONSEPARATE EXCHANGE 2000 SERVERS Are the two domains in the same AD forest? If not, you have two organizations and you will need some sort of third party directory syncronization utility to essentially create contacts on one side for mailboxes on the other. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marko Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ON SEPARATE EXCHANGE 2000 SERVERS Hi! I am trying to host a single domain, named us.com on two separate exchange 2000 servers that are each in a separate routing group connected by a routing group connector. However, it is not possible to send mail between recipients hosted on each exchange server, since a bounce occurs. Apparently, the same domain cannot be hosted on two exchange servers that are in SEPARATE routing groups. The above scenario DOES WORK if placing the two exchange servers in the SAME routing group. It appears that having exchange servers in the same routing group ensures that both exchange servers are using the same global catalog in active directory to deliver mail. The way my domain is split is so that one server, call it server A, hosts part of mailboxes for domain us.com. Server B hosts part of mailboxes for domain us.com and all mailboxes for domain europe.local. Both server A and B are primary domain controllers with active directory, DNS and Exchange installed on a single machine. Why do server A and B have to be in different routing groups and have to host the same domain? Server A is located in the US, server B is in Europe. They are connected via a rather reliable VPN. Only server A has a static Internet IP assigned, therefore server B cannot directly accept messages from the Internet; it is connected to a DSL modem with a dynamic IP. Users on server A and B share the same domain name - us.com; user account and mailbox for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is located in the US on server A, while user account and mailbox for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is located in Europe on server B. European users (connecting to server B) cannot have their accounts hosted on server A, since they use Outlook to connect to server B locally. The same, European, users also must have @us.com domain email set as Primary SMTP Account, with the intranet SMTP address @europe.local set as secondary SMTP account. ACTIVE DIRECTORY IMPLEMENTATION: Server A is PDC for domain us.com and has a trust relationship established with server B that is PDC for domain europe.local. Both domains are within the same forest. The DNS entry for domain us.com is on server A, a secondary copy of the domain us.com is stored in server B's DNS. The MX record for domain us.com is pointing only to the exchange server A, the host being a.us.com. Is there a better DNS configuration for what we want? Both Exchange servers are in the same Exchange organization and in the same administrative group. Once routing connectors are created, servers are connected to each other, everything appears to be working in the monitoring view
RE: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ONSEPARATE EXCHANGE 2000 SERVERS
Are the two domains in the same AD forest? If not, you have two organizations and you will need some sort of third party directory syncronization utility to essentially create contacts on one side for mailboxes on the other. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marko Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ON SEPARATE EXCHANGE 2000 SERVERS Hi! I am trying to host a single domain, named us.com on two separate exchange 2000 servers that are each in a separate routing group connected by a routing group connector. However, it is not possible to send mail between recipients hosted on each exchange server, since a bounce occurs. Apparently, the same domain cannot be hosted on two exchange servers that are in SEPARATE routing groups. The above scenario DOES WORK if placing the two exchange servers in the SAME routing group. It appears that having exchange servers in the same routing group ensures that both exchange servers are using the same global catalog in active directory to deliver mail. The way my domain is split is so that one server, call it server A, hosts part of mailboxes for domain us.com. Server B hosts part of mailboxes for domain us.com and all mailboxes for domain europe.local. Both server A and B are primary domain controllers with active directory, DNS and Exchange installed on a single machine. Why do server A and B have to be in different routing groups and have to host the same domain? Server A is located in the US, server B is in Europe. They are connected via a rather reliable VPN. Only server A has a static Internet IP assigned, therefore server B cannot directly accept messages from the Internet; it is connected to a DSL modem with a dynamic IP. Users on server A and B share the same domain name - us.com; user account and mailbox for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is located in the US on server A, while user account and mailbox for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is located in Europe on server B. European users (connecting to server B) cannot have their accounts hosted on server A, since they use Outlook to connect to server B locally. The same, European, users also must have @us.com domain email set as Primary SMTP Account, with the intranet SMTP address @europe.local set as secondary SMTP account. ACTIVE DIRECTORY IMPLEMENTATION: Server A is PDC for domain us.com and has a trust relationship established with server B that is PDC for domain europe.local. Both domains are within the same forest. The DNS entry for domain us.com is on server A, a secondary copy of the domain us.com is stored in server B's DNS. The MX record for domain us.com is pointing only to the exchange server A, the host being a.us.com. Is there a better DNS configuration for what we want? Both Exchange servers are in the same Exchange organization and in the same administrative group. Once routing connectors are created, servers are connected to each other, everything appears to be working in the monitoring view. Is there any way to implement this scenario with two Exchange servers in separate routing groups. Once again, this scenario works with the two servers in the same routing group, where it appears that mailboxes within the same domain can be spread across multiple exchange servers. But we need to separate the two servers, since they are not connected in a LAN, and we are also using fax connectors that each must work within a separate routing group with a separate server. I would greatly appreciate any help! Regards, Marko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Storage Groups and Databases
i agree that is what i planned on but just wanted to get some confirmation on my idea.. thanks! Bob C. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: Re: Storage Groups and Databases I'd leave well enough alone and leave 'em all in one SG. Your server's going to be hurting no matter what, but the KISS principle comes into play here. Missy - Original Message - From: Bob Chyka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:58 PM Subject: Storage Groups and Databases Hello, once again thanks for the help on an earlier question. i have one more we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and only one server until next year sometime. the server is a dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz processors and 3 gigs of RAM. it has a Perc RAID card with 128 megs on it and 2 har drives with RAID 1 for the OS, 2 hard drives with RAID 1 for the logs, and 3 RAID 5 drives for the database. my question is should i configure 1 storage group and 1 database for all the users or should i break them down. is there even a performance issue having different storage groups etc. thanks for any input.. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Storage Groups and Databases
Hello, once again thanks for the help on an earlier question. i have one more we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and only one server until next year sometime. the server is a dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz processors and 3 gigs of RAM. it has a Perc RAID card with 128 megs on it and 2 har drives with RAID 1 for the OS, 2 hard drives with RAID 1 for the logs, and 3 RAID 5 drives for the database. my question is should i configure 1 storage group and 1 database for all the users or should i break them down. is there even a performance issue having different storage groups etc. thanks for any input.. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Storage Groups and Databases
I'd leave well enough alone and leave 'em all in one SG. Your server's going to be hurting no matter what, but the KISS principle comes into play here. Missy - Original Message - From: Bob Chyka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:58 PM Subject: Storage Groups and Databases Hello, once again thanks for the help on an earlier question. i have one more we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and only one server until next year sometime. the server is a dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz processors and 3 gigs of RAM. it has a Perc RAID card with 128 megs on it and 2 har drives with RAID 1 for the OS, 2 hard drives with RAID 1 for the logs, and 3 RAID 5 drives for the database. my question is should i configure 1 storage group and 1 database for all the users or should i break them down. is there even a performance issue having different storage groups etc. thanks for any input.. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Storage Groups and Databases
How big is the database and what is its anticipated growth rate? -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Storage Groups and Databases Hello, once again thanks for the help on an earlier question. i have one more we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and only one server until next year sometime. the server is a dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz processors and 3 gigs of RAM. it has a Perc RAID card with 128 megs on it and 2 har drives with RAID 1 for the OS, 2 hard drives with RAID 1 for the logs, and 3 RAID 5 drives for the database. my question is should i configure 1 storage group and 1 database for all the users or should i break them down. is there even a performance issue having different storage groups etc. thanks for any input.. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Storage Groups and Databases
getting senile something about fragmented virtual memory when you have a bunch of mailbox stores... I don't remember and I'm too lazy to go look right now. If you break it down, do it for other reasons, like you want your top brass to be in one store for quicker DR or something. Although Because Missy said so is a perfectly valid reason to leave it the hell alone. -tom -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 03:17 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Storage Groups and Databases Subject: Re: Storage Groups and Databases I'd leave well enough alone and leave 'em all in one SG. Your server's going to be hurting no matter what, but the KISS principle comes into play here. Missy - Original Message - From: Bob Chyka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:58 PM Subject: Storage Groups and Databases Hello, once again thanks for the help on an earlier question. i have one more we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and only one server until next year sometime. the server is a dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz processors and 3 gigs of RAM. it has a Perc RAID card with 128 megs on it and 2 har drives with RAID 1 for the OS, 2 hard drives with RAID 1 for the logs, and 3 RAID 5 drives for the database. my question is should i configure 1 storage group and 1 database for all the users or should i break them down. is there even a performance issue having different storage groups etc. thanks for any input.. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Global Groups as distribution lists in E2K
We are running into some issues with our E2K migration plan. We are creating an empty root NATIVE AD domain. We are upgrading our NT4 master user domain to MIXED mode AD. Original plan was to configure a DL connection agreement to create DLs as universal security groups in the native AD domain, and everything else in the mixed mode domain. Then, we found out that Outlook cannot be used to manage DLs that aren't in the same domain (Outlook only talks to GCs, and GCs only have read-only copies of groups from other domains). One possible solution is to use global groups instead of universal groups. We would write a script to read all of our MSX5.5 DLs and create corresponding AD global groups in a special OU. Then, we'd configure a CA to replicate DLs to this OU. I realize that global groups are limited to members from the local domain, but that is OK. However, my questions are: 1. If ADC attempts to replicate a DL from MSX5.5 to AD and finds a global group of the same name, will it populate the global group? In other words, will group membership replication work? 2. I've never heard of anyone doing this. Am I missing something that is going to bite me later? We would eventually move to all native mode AD, and at point we'd convert the global groups to universal security groups. Sound reasonable? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Somewhat OT - Global Groups
I would say do whatever works best for you. 400 groups seems like a lot, but then again, I do not know how you do things on the inside! -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Somewhat OT - Global Groups I was just using HRO as an example. I'm on a military base and we usually have one global group for each unit that contains all the members of the unit for the dissemination of unit-specific information. Then we create a group for each section of the unit and place the appropriate members into that group. Like my examples, we have some people that need access to specific folders so we have to create groups for those users. Then there's the base-wide groups for when we need to get info to everyone. And on and on. We have about 400 groups total. I'm just curious if that's how it's done on the outside. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Somewhat OT - Global Groups Im not sure why you would even need to create a group called HRO Users in this particular case. I'm lazy, so in this example, I would simply apply the different individual user permissions on a folder by folder basis depending on which user required it rather than creating a separate group. I suppose you could always create one HRO Users group that they are all members of and then apply DENY permissions individually to the users who do not need access. On the other hand, if HRO Users represents 10,000 users and each group is a percentage of that, then I would create individual groups for each different area of folder access. This probably didnt answer your question, but then again, while you are thinking of creative ways to apply permissions, Im at home sleeping like a baby. -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Somewhat OT - Global Groups Posted this in a newsgroup and got no response. Thought I'd throw it out here. I know the mantra goes, manage by groups, not individuals. However, I have a question that I'm hoping someone may have some thoughts on. Say I create a group called HRO Users and put the entire section of 8 people in it. Call them Users A through H. I then create four shared folders on my file server and want to give various HRO users access. But not all of them in the HRO Users GG. HRO Management - A, B, C, D HRO Clerks - E, F, G, H HRO IT - A, B, E HRO Exchange - C, D, F Is creating a GG for Each folder the proper/best way to give these people access? I then have to have five GGs for 8 users. A couple more folders and I'm up to a one to one ratio which doesn't seem logical to me. Is there a better way? To make this a little on-topic, I've read that you can manage your PFs using DLs and the same concept. Does anyone do this? Seems like an awful lot of DLs... Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email
RE: Somewhat OT - Global Groups
Microsoft says that GG are the way to go, but every network is different. If you have an admin that knows how to clean up the structure when someone leaves then managing this situation by individuals would probably be ideal. Oppturnity of Scale. Microsoft doesn't normally recommend a very good practical solutions for situations when the groups are as small as what you are need ing to do. Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Somewhat OT - Global Groups Posted this in a newsgroup and got no response. Thought I'd throw it out here. I know the mantra goes, manage by groups, not individuals. However, I have a question that I'm hoping someone may have some thoughts on. Say I create a group called HRO Users and put the entire section of 8 people in it. Call them Users A through H. I then create four shared folders on my file server and want to give various HRO users access. But not all of them in the HRO Users GG. HRO Management - A, B, C, D HRO Clerks - E, F, G, H HRO IT - A, B, E HRO Exchange - C, D, F Is creating a GG for Each folder the proper/best way to give these people access? I then have to have five GGs for 8 users. A couple more folders and I'm up to a one to one ratio which doesn't seem logical to me. Is there a better way? To make this a little on-topic, I've read that you can manage your PFs using DLs and the same concept. Does anyone do this? Seems like an awful lot of DLs... Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Somewhat OT - Global Groups
I was just using HRO as an example. I'm on a military base and we usually have one global group for each unit that contains all the members of the unit for the dissemination of unit-specific information. Then we create a group for each section of the unit and place the appropriate members into that group. Like my examples, we have some people that need access to specific folders so we have to create groups for those users. Then there's the base-wide groups for when we need to get info to everyone. And on and on. We have about 400 groups total. I'm just curious if that's how it's done on the outside. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Somewhat OT - Global Groups Im not sure why you would even need to create a group called HRO Users in this particular case. I'm lazy, so in this example, I would simply apply the different individual user permissions on a folder by folder basis depending on which user required it rather than creating a separate group. I suppose you could always create one HRO Users group that they are all members of and then apply DENY permissions individually to the users who do not need access. On the other hand, if HRO Users represents 10,000 users and each group is a percentage of that, then I would create individual groups for each different area of folder access. This probably didnt answer your question, but then again, while you are thinking of creative ways to apply permissions, Im at home sleeping like a baby. -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Somewhat OT - Global Groups Posted this in a newsgroup and got no response. Thought I'd throw it out here. I know the mantra goes, manage by groups, not individuals. However, I have a question that I'm hoping someone may have some thoughts on. Say I create a group called HRO Users and put the entire section of 8 people in it. Call them Users A through H. I then create four shared folders on my file server and want to give various HRO users access. But not all of them in the HRO Users GG. HRO Management - A, B, C, D HRO Clerks - E, F, G, H HRO IT - A, B, E HRO Exchange - C, D, F Is creating a GG for Each folder the proper/best way to give these people access? I then have to have five GGs for 8 users. A couple more folders and I'm up to a one to one ratio which doesn't seem logical to me. Is there a better way? To make this a little on-topic, I've read that you can manage your PFs using DLs and the same concept. Does anyone do this? Seems like an awful lot of DLs... Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
Thanks for the reply. I will try this between all servers. As I read the technet article Q272218 I can run Rpingc.exe from one server and rpings.exe from the other server to prove rpc connectivity. Just one question. Assuming our exchange 2000 server is called server2000 and our exchange 5.5 server that we selected to connect to is called server5. Along with this we have several other exchange 5.5 servers/sites. What is the communication flow? Is server5 solely responsible for replicating config data it gets from server2000 to other exchange 5.5 servers/5.5 sites in the org? In which case all we we require is clear communication between server2000 and server5. And clear communication between server5 to all other exchange 5.5 servers/5.5 sites. The reason I ask is that this is a new network and I don't think the other exchange 5.5 servers/5.5 sites can see server2000 but the can see server5 Regards Leo Sounds like RPC connectivity problems. Time to whip out RPC Ping and get to work. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups We installed the ADC then joined our exchange 5.5 site with a new exchange 2000 server from our new domain. The config_ca appears to work from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, we can see all the exchange 5.5 sites and connectors in ESM. But we can not see any Exchange 2000 configuration in Exchange 5.5 admin (no admingroups/sites or connectors). When we forced CA replication once the E2k admin groups started to appear in E5.5. as sites but they vanished shortly afterwards!!??? We have increased the logging of the ADC to minimum for all types and checked the errors we are getting and nothing seems to be obvious. We have yet to set up any recipient or Public folder CA's as the configuration information needs to be resolved first (along with a complete tidy-up of their Exchange 5.5 mailboxes etc). The only other clue we have is that the Automatically Directory replication connector on the Exchange 5.5 server we connected to (ADNAutoDRC) will not display the properties of any tabs and generates an error. The error states that the local bridgehead server has no information stores and can not be contacted gives a code of c10306a4. The bridgehead server listed in the error does have stores and they are running/mounted. How is the server trying to be contacted when choosing these tabs, what tests can I perform? We believe we have set up permissions correctly and network connectivity appears to be working. I can net view the shares on the bridgehead server from the exchange 5.5 system Any ideas or troubleshooting tips would be greatly apprecaited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
Hi there If I'm reading you correctly, this sounds like you should be looking at the SRS service. The reason the SRS exists is so that the 5.5 servers can see the 2000 servers. Quick things to look at: Is SRS running? Is this a regular or cluster server? Hope this points you in the right direction Russell -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups Thanks for the reply. I will try this between all servers. As I read the technet article Q272218 I can run Rpingc.exe from one server and rpings.exe from the other server to prove rpc connectivity. Just one question. Assuming our exchange 2000 server is called server2000 and our exchange 5.5 server that we selected to connect to is called server5. Along with this we have several other exchange 5.5 servers/sites. What is the communication flow? Is server5 solely responsible for replicating config data it gets from server2000 to other exchange 5.5 servers/5.5 sites in the org? In which case all we we require is clear communication between server2000 and server5. And clear communication between server5 to all other exchange 5.5 servers/5.5 sites. The reason I ask is that this is a new network and I don't think the other exchange 5.5 servers/5.5 sites can see server2000 but the can see server5 Regards Leo Sounds like RPC connectivity problems. Time to whip out RPC Ping and get to work. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups We installed the ADC then joined our exchange 5.5 site with a new exchange 2000 server from our new domain. The config_ca appears to work from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, we can see all the exchange 5.5 sites and connectors in ESM. But we can not see any Exchange 2000 configuration in Exchange 5.5 admin (no admingroups/sites or connectors). When we forced CA replication once the E2k admin groups started to appear in E5.5. as sites but they vanished shortly afterwards!!??? We have increased the logging of the ADC to minimum for all types and checked the errors we are getting and nothing seems to be obvious. We have yet to set up any recipient or Public folder CA's as the configuration information needs to be resolved first (along with a complete tidy-up of their Exchange 5.5 mailboxes etc). The only other clue we have is that the Automatically Directory replication connector on the Exchange 5.5 server we connected to (ADNAutoDRC) will not display the properties of any tabs and generates an error. The error states that the local bridgehead server has no information stores and can not be contacted gives a code of c10306a4. The bridgehead server listed in the error does have stores and they are running/mounted. How is the server trying to be contacted when choosing these tabs, what tests can I perform? We believe we have set up permissions correctly and network connectivity appears to be working. I can net view the shares on the bridgehead server from the exchange 5.5 system Any ideas or troubleshooting tips would be greatly apprecaited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
We installed the ADC then joined our exchange 5.5 site with a new exchange 2000 server from our new domain. The config_ca appears to work from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, we can see all the exchange 5.5 sites and connectors in ESM. But we can not see any Exchange 2000 configuration in Exchange 5.5 admin (no admingroups/sites or connectors). When we forced CA replication once the E2k admin groups started to appear in E5.5. as sites but they vanished shortly afterwards!!??? We have increased the logging of the ADC to minimum for all types and checked the errors we are getting and nothing seems to be obvious. We have yet to set up any recipient or Public folder CA's as the configuration information needs to be resolved first (along with a complete tidy-up of their Exchange 5.5 mailboxes etc). The only other clue we have is that the Automatically Directory replication connector on the Exchange 5.5 server we connected to (ADNAutoDRC) will not display the properties of any tabs and generates an error. The error states that the local bridgehead server has no information stores and can not be contacted gives a code of c10306a4. The bridgehead server listed in the error does have stores and they are running/mounted. How is the server trying to be contacted when choosing these tabs, what tests can I perform? We believe we have set up permissions correctly and network connectivity appears to be working. I can net view the shares on the bridgehead server from the exchange 5.5 system Any ideas or troubleshooting tips would be greatly apprecaited Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
Sounds like RPC connectivity problems. Time to whip out RPC Ping and get to work. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups We installed the ADC then joined our exchange 5.5 site with a new exchange 2000 server from our new domain. The config_ca appears to work from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, we can see all the exchange 5.5 sites and connectors in ESM. But we can not see any Exchange 2000 configuration in Exchange 5.5 admin (no admingroups/sites or connectors). When we forced CA replication once the E2k admin groups started to appear in E5.5. as sites but they vanished shortly afterwards!!??? We have increased the logging of the ADC to minimum for all types and checked the errors we are getting and nothing seems to be obvious. We have yet to set up any recipient or Public folder CA's as the configuration information needs to be resolved first (along with a complete tidy-up of their Exchange 5.5 mailboxes etc). The only other clue we have is that the Automatically Directory replication connector on the Exchange 5.5 server we connected to (ADNAutoDRC) will not display the properties of any tabs and generates an error. The error states that the local bridgehead server has no information stores and can not be contacted gives a code of c10306a4. The bridgehead server listed in the error does have stores and they are running/mounted. How is the server trying to be contacted when choosing these tabs, what tests can I perform? We believe we have set up permissions correctly and network connectivity appears to be working. I can net view the shares on the bridgehead server from the exchange 5.5 system Any ideas or troubleshooting tips would be greatly apprecaited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Right-click Recipients Recipient Update Services container, select Add, then select Recipient Update Service... Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential Domain that contains MSX servers and users is mixed mode. Domain with DLs (Universal Distribution Groups) is native. See second paragraph of my original post. I have found one Q article since my post that indicates I need a separate RUS in the domain that the DLs are replicated to. Unfortunately, it didn't spell out how to do that. More research on my part... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential Is your Windows 2000 domain in native mode? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm seeing, so obviously, I'm confused... I have two AD domains: ADSTEST (native) and KIITEST (mixed). All user IDs and Exchange servers are in KIITEST. Connection agreements are in place to replicate everything except DLs into KIITEST (mixed mode domain). DLs go into ADSTEST (native AD). Everything seems to be working EXCEPT that when mailboxes are moved from the 5.5 server to the 2K server, any mailbox permissions granting access to members of a DL no longer work. Checking the DLs in question shows they are still USGs and have not been converted to USGs. Everything I've seen about DLs used to grant security always reference public folders - I've never seen mention about DLs used to grant security to mailboxes. Do DLs need to be USGs to grant access to mailboxes? If so, must I convert them manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Security Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
If I recall, you take a 100MB hit for each SG you load and another 10MB hit for each IS within the SG. That's just to get the system started. Once the dynamic buffer caching starts growing the allocation to hold the active data, it's more. As Chris said, fragmentation of memory starts to become a problem. If you ever shut down one of the stores or SG's for any reason on a system that fully loaded, you may not be able to start it back up without a full restart. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows is a common thing. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm seeing, so obviously, I'm confused... I have two AD domains: ADSTEST (native) and KIITEST (mixed). All user IDs and Exchange servers are in KIITEST. Connection agreements are in place to replicate everything except DLs into KIITEST (mixed mode domain). DLs go into ADSTEST (native AD). Everything seems to be working EXCEPT that when mailboxes are moved from the 5.5 server to the 2K server, any mailbox permissions granting access to members of a DL no longer work. Checking the DLs in question shows they are still USGs and have not been converted to USGs. Everything I've seen about DLs used to grant security always reference public folders - I've never seen mention about DLs used to grant security to mailboxes. Do DLs need to be USGs to grant access to mailboxes? If so, must I convert them manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Is your Windows 2000 domain in native mode? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm seeing, so obviously, I'm confused... I have two AD domains: ADSTEST (native) and KIITEST (mixed). All user IDs and Exchange servers are in KIITEST. Connection agreements are in place to replicate everything except DLs into KIITEST (mixed mode domain). DLs go into ADSTEST (native AD). Everything seems to be working EXCEPT that when mailboxes are moved from the 5.5 server to the 2K server, any mailbox permissions granting access to members of a DL no longer work. Checking the DLs in question shows they are still USGs and have not been converted to USGs. Everything I've seen about DLs used to grant security always reference public folders - I've never seen mention about DLs used to grant security to mailboxes. Do DLs need to be USGs to grant access to mailboxes? If so, must I convert them manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Domain that contains MSX servers and users is mixed mode. Domain with DLs (Universal Distribution Groups) is native. See second paragraph of my original post. I have found one Q article since my post that indicates I need a separate RUS in the domain that the DLs are replicated to. Unfortunately, it didn't spell out how to do that. More research on my part... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential Is your Windows 2000 domain in native mode? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm seeing, so obviously, I'm confused... I have two AD domains: ADSTEST (native) and KIITEST (mixed). All user IDs and Exchange servers are in KIITEST. Connection agreements are in place to replicate everything except DLs into KIITEST (mixed mode domain). DLs go into ADSTEST (native AD). Everything seems to be working EXCEPT that when mailboxes are moved from the 5.5 server to the 2K server, any mailbox permissions granting access to members of a DL no longer work. Checking the DLs in question shows they are still USGs and have not been converted to USGs. Everything I've seen about DLs used to grant security always reference public folders - I've never seen mention about DLs used to grant security to mailboxes. Do DLs need to be USGs to grant access to mailboxes? If so, must I convert them manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distribution Groups Global Security Groups
Can Global Security Groups be mail enabled and be used as Distribution Groups? Should every distribution group, also be a global security group? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups
Yes. But not the preferred method as it is a additional security concern. - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups Can Global Security Groups be mail enabled and be used as Distribution Groups? Should every distribution group, also be a global security group? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups
What would be the best method? Having both a distribution group for email and security group for handling resources? They can't have the same name! correct? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 11:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups Yes. But not the preferred method as it is a additional security concern. - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups Can Global Security Groups be mail enabled and be used as Distribution Groups? Should every distribution group, also be a global security group? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups
Correct not the same name. When setting up groups/lists it would be best to read up on exactly what fits your domain setup best. - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:06 AM Subject: RE: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups What would be the best method? Having both a distribution group for email and security group for handling resources? They can't have the same name! correct? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 11:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups Yes. But not the preferred method as it is a additional security concern. - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups Can Global Security Groups be mail enabled and be used as Distribution Groups? Should every distribution group, also be a global security group? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups
Think of security groups being a subset of distribution groups. Every security group is also a distribution group. Not all distribution groups are security groups. It probably does not make sense to use all security groups to send mail, but that is something you can figure out on a case-by-case basis. Ed Crowley hp Services --- Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can Global Security Groups be mail enabled and be used as Distribution Groups? Should every distribution group, also be a global security group? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Sec urity Groups
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not appear in the GAL You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it have the same access and privileges to resources A Distribution group is the same as a DL in 5.5 I hope this helps a bit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Sec urity Groups
Can someone give me an explanation as to why the dist lists in ex.5.5 became security groups in Ex.2000? Do they need to be security groups? They are used for email distributions as groups... Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups
Hi Ron, I'm not using Ex2k yet but from Active directory training, security groups can be used to provide access to resources (Shares and printers etc) and also for distribution purposes (Exchange 2k), whereas distribution groups can only be used for distribution purposes. Like I said haven't actually used this in anger yet so peoples practical experience may carry more weight. Cheers, Steve Steve Ellis IT Technician, MCP, MCSA MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Saia-Burgess Gateshead Ltd, Dukesway, Team Valley Trading Estate Gateshead, Tyne Wear NE11 0UB Tel: +44 (0) 191 401 6133 Fax: +44 (0) 191 401 6101 www.saia-burgess.co.uk -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 1:55 pm To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups When I moved my exchange 5.5 info to the AD my distribution lists also become distribution groups and security groups. Do they need to be both? Or can I remove the security group from the AD? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG, however, practical limitations kick in with 4. All the Official MS documentation says that Exchange 2K Enterprise version is limited to 4 SG's and 5 MDB's per SG. You have to remember that each SG is a separate storage engine, requiring it's own memory space and a big slice of processor time. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Thank you very much John. You are AMAZING! --Felicity The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG, however, practical limitations kick in with 4. All the Official MS documentation says that Exchange 2K Enterprise version is limited to 4 SG's and 5 MDB's per SG. You have to remember that each SG is a separate storage engine, requiring it's own memory space and a big slice of processor time. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows is a common thing. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Thank you for this clarification Chris. -- Felicity The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows is a common thing. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Not really. I finished that class two weeks ago. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores Thank you very much John. You are AMAZING! --Felicity The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG, however, practical limitations kick in with 4. All the Official MS documentation says that Exchange 2K Enterprise version is limited to 4 SG's and 5 MDB's per SG. You have to remember that each SG is a separate storage engine, requiring it's own memory space and a big slice of processor time. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distribution Lists vs Security Groups
When I moved my exchange 5.5 info to the AD my distribution lists also become distribution groups and security groups. Do they need to be both? Or can I remove the security group from the AD? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups
Paul? -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups When I moved my exchange 5.5 info to the AD my distribution lists also become distribution groups and security groups. Do they need to be both? Or can I remove the security group from the AD? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups
Depends on what you want to use the DLs for. They don't have to be both. Rob -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups When I moved my exchange 5.5 info to the AD my distribution lists also become distribution groups and security groups. Do they need to be both? Or can I remove the security group from the AD? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Yes. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Thx. Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could do this? thx bill -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by installing other servers :) -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by installing other servers :) -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Thx. Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could do this? thx bill -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by installing other servers :) -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Oops, didn't see that! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by installing other servers :) -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Sorry Bill, didn't read the whole question. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Thx. Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could do this? thx bill -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by installing other servers :) -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
In E2K, you still can't set mailbox size limit based on group membership. That would be a great feature though. What you can do in E2K is set up multiple information stores with different default mailbox size limits. Then create mailboxes for some people in one store and for other people in another store. You can have 4 storage groups, each storage group having 5 stores. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Thx. Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could do this? thx bill -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by installing other servers :) -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1. Works for me given the proper header fields and a few minutes in excel. a2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory/ads ilinks.asp (link wrap and all that) a3. Bummer, no pizza for me this weekend. a4. Use templates to create users. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1.) Ha. admin.exe extended switchesdoc/link on these?? pls? a2.) Thx! a3.) Pizza and beer... that's it for a custom app/interface? ummm maybe... a4.) Users already made...was thinking from a continuing maint/admin stand point. thx! bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. Works for me given the proper header fields and a few minutes in excel. a2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory/ads ilinks.asp (link wrap and all that) a3. Bummer, no pizza for me this weekend. a4. Use templates to create users. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1.) Got it thx! bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1.) Ha. admin.exe extended switchesdoc/link on these?? pls? a2.) Thx! a3.) Pizza and beer... that's it for a custom app/interface? ummm maybe... a4.) Users already made...was thinking from a continuing maint/admin stand point. thx! bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. Works for me given the proper header fields and a few minutes in excel. a2. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory/ads ilinks.asp (link wrap and all that) a3. Bummer, no pizza for me this weekend. a4. Use templates to create users. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? Umm sorry.. a1)...she not work for me a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it a3) Ummm this sound like it's not really possible..simply... Are we saying here that this does not exist in standard exch55? that's about where it seems we're at.. thx bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? a1. admin.exe /i a2. ADSI a3. Sure, what's our budget. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per store. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups? OK is there a tool out there that will let me say have different size restrictions for different groups of users? I do not want to do this on a per person basis..it took a long time to get away from that. I presently do the restrictions on the priv for everybody But I do say have a group of users which could use more room on their restrictions. so it would be nice to say do the priv...then have a override for a group. Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a ideas? thx Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing groups
I have 4 routing groups. 2 are pure 5.5 servers. 1 is mixed. 1 is pure exch2k. Should I set routing group connectors up to all groups from the pure exch2k group? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD built-in groups on other servers
Check your DNS server address on the new server, it should point to W2K's DNS server. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD built-in groups on other servers * This electronic message transmission contains information from the law firm of Dinsmore Shohl which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us by telephone (1-800-934-3477) or by electronic mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) immediately. * -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have setup another server and can not see the built-in groups that are on the AD PDC. These are w2k machines. What do I need to do so I can see the admin group, for example, to set some sharing and security permissions? Or do I have to setup a local admin group on the new server? Jim Liddil M.S. Lab/IT Manager Phytoceutica Inc. (203)781-2544 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyt6nwACgkQugWPsDOlFFKIOwCfc/6giydt6XkHRgWpst3Qx7+5 fWAAn0EZZw6/n3H+r3JqBv9kRpqi1aCW =+4q9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email has been scanned by MailMax. http://www.maximizeit.net * * This electronic message transmission contains information from the law firm of Dinsmore Shohl which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us by telephone (1-800-934-3477) or by electronic mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) immediately. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD built-in groups on other servers
There's no PDC in Windows 2000/Active directory. One of the roles that's available in your domain is the PDC emulator role, but that's not the same. If you are asking Why can't I use AD Users Computers on my new server? then the answer is: 1.) It's not a domain controller (dcpromo will fix this up for you) or 2.) You haven't set up the Terminal Services client on it, and set your server to do it. or 3.) You haven't installed the ADMINPAK.MSI on that server. Pick one. Administer righteously thereafter. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:19 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: AD built-in groups on other servers Subject: AD built-in groups on other servers -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have setup another server and can not see the built-in groups that are on the AD PDC. These are w2k machines. What do I need to do so I can see the admin group, for example, to set some sharing and security permissions? Or do I have to setup a local admin group on the new server? Jim Liddil M.S. Lab/IT Manager Phytoceutica Inc. (203)781-2544 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyt6nwACgkQugWPsDOlFFKIOwCfc/6giydt6XkHRgWpst3Qx7+5 fWAAn0EZZw6/n3H+r3JqBv9kRpqi1aCW =+4q9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Migration Groups
It's possible that they only convert to USGs when the PF is actually accessed. Are you actually experiencing problems accessing your Public Folders or are you just trying to pre-empt potential problems? Mark P.S. Please don't snip off the whole conversation thread, just the junk signatures/disclaimers at the bottom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 April 2002 15:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Migration Groups Thank you and yes I did create a CA for the public folders and started the replication prior the installation of the first Exchange 2000 server into the same 5.5 site. This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Migration Groups
Thank you and yes I did create a CA for the public folders and started the replication prior the installation of the first Exchange 2000 server into the same 5.5 site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Migration Groups
I established the Native-Mode domain to host the Universal Group and created a CA to replicate only distribution lists to it. I also installed the first Exchange 2000 server into the same site as the Exchange 5.5. The information store suppose to detect what distribution list being used to assign permission on Public Folder and convert them to a Universal Security Group. They only exist in the native mode domain and not the other domain. The Information store suppose to automatically convert them to USG. I verified that the group are being used to assign permission to PF. Any idea why there are still UDG and not being converted to USG? They are too many to convert manually. Thanks, TMS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Migration Groups
Did you follow Q296051? Tom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Migration Groups I established the Native-Mode domain to host the Universal Group and created a CA to replicate only distribution lists to it. I also installed the first Exchange 2000 server into the same site as the Exchange 5.5. The information store suppose to detect what distribution list being used to assign permission on Public Folder and convert them to a Universal Security Group. They only exist in the native mode domain and not the other domain. The Information store suppose to automatically convert them to USG. I verified that the group are being used to assign permission to PF. Any idea why there are still UDG and not being converted to USG? They are too many to convert manually. Thanks, TMS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Groups and such
I was all for it, the first time you asked. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Groups and such How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within Exchange 5.5? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
