RE: Patches

[Greg Page]

Title: Message



What 
is St Bernard ?
 
 
Greg

  
  -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 
  11:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Patches
  
  Does 
  anyone have any experience with St Bernard for staying up with patches - is 
  there another product that you would 
  recommend?
   
  Thanks.
   
  Steve 
  Clark
  Clark 
  Systems Support, LLC
  AVIEN 
  Charter Member
  www.clarksupport.com
    
  301-610-9584 voice
    
  240-465-0323 Efax
   List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Patches

[Kevin Miller]

Title: Message



a 
really big dog. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Greg Page 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 10:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Patches
  What 
  is St Bernard ?
   
   
  Greg
  

-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 01, 
2001 11:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Patches

Does 
anyone have any experience with St Bernard for staying up with patches - is 
there another product that you would 
recommend?
 
Thanks.
 
Steve 
Clark
Clark 
Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN 
Charter Member
www.clarksupport.com
  
301-610-9584 voice
  
240-465-0323 Efax
 List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: cleanup of Pub folder permission's??

[Greg Page]

All your Antigen belong to us!

Greg


-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 8:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: cleanup of Pub folder permission's??


All you mail servers belong to us!!!

Zig (aka Bill)



-Original Message-
From: Greg Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: cleanup of Pub folder permission's??


You want fries with that?

Greg


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: cleanup of Pub folder permission's??


Over 65 million Exchange seat licenses sold worldwide.


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Western [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: cleanup of Pub folder permission's??


you know what annoys me is that the default for public folders is not
invisible.  any Tom Dick and Harry can make public folders which is good but
they should be invisible by default so there is not 17 zillion in accessable
public folders.  especially when they get mirrored on other sites but not
actually replicated.  crappy design.


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 31 August 2001 7:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: cleanup of Pub folder permission's??



Hello All,

I did a little research, but didn't find anything...I remember reading that
there is a process that removes permission's to pub folders periodically
based on account status (ie deleted, removed). Was I dreaming?? (hopefully
not about exchange). What I have are a bunch of left over admin names listed
in the permission's for pub folders. Not a big deal, just annoying...

Exch 5.5 SP3/NT4 SP6

Thanks!!
Pat


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Patches

[Clark, Steve]

Title: Message









http://www.stbernard.com/products/updateexpert/products_updateexpert.asp

 

 

Steve Clark

Clark Systems Support, LLC

AVIEN Charter Member

www.clarksupport.com

  301-610-9584
voice

  240-465-0323
Efax

 

-Original
Message-
From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001
10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patches

 

a really big dog. 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Page
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001
10:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patches

What is St Bernard ?

 

 

Greg

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001
11:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Patches

Does anyone have any experience with St Bernard for
staying up with patches - is there another product that you would recommend?

 

Thanks.

 

Steve Clark

Clark Systems Support, LLC

AVIEN Charter Member

www.clarksupport.com

  301-610-9584
voice

  240-465-0323
Efax

 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter
and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 403 Forbidden Error

[David N. Precht]

Is OWA 
setup and configured ?

  -Original Message-From: Bob Chyka 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:15 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 403 Forbidden 
  Error
  already did...everything is fine...
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Lynn 
Murray 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 

Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 3:10 
AM
Subject: RE: 403 Forbidden Error

Hi
 
Check that everyone belongs to the correct groups? 


  -Original Message-From: Bob Chyka 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 30 August 2001 
  02:36To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 403 
  Forbidden Error
  Hello Everyone,
   
  i have a Exchange 5.5 server that is also a 
  proxy 2.0 server.  e-mail is and has been working great for 2 years 
  now.  my boss fianlly wants us to be able to hit exchange from the 
  "outside".  when i go into the browser and put in the url i get the 
  authentication dialog box and after i put in the credentials i get the 
  error "403 access is forbidden"  off IE.  the server is a bdc 
  and i was wondering what i should be checking.  i have the right 
  access on the exchsrvr\webdata and webtemp directories.
   
  any help is appreciated..
   
  Bob ChykaList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Send As public folder address

[MJohnston]

That is exactly what I want to do. Thank you.

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 5:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send As public folder address


This link explains how to send as a public folder.  It is for
subscribing a public folder to a mailing list but might help you figure
it out.

http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/Subscribe.a
sp

Link may wrap.



Mark Kelsay



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send As public folder address


Exchange 5.5, NT4.

I set up a public folder for collection of various email messages. I'm
the
owner and I gave myself user permissions on the folder as well.
However,
when I try to send an email with the email address of the public folder
as
the "from" address, it tells me I don't have send on behalf of
permissions.

I set it up yesterday and tried various things with no success.  On
another
mailbox I can send as, the permissions are the same. Is it not possible
to
send as for a public folder?

Thanks, Michelle


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 403 Forbidden Error

[Clark, Steve]

Take a
standard user, log onto that server. Make sure they have the log on as locally
right. After you log on with that user, try the OWA and see the results – make sure
to use \\server\exchange\logon.asp
for access

 

I had
problems with rights within IIS and found this to work:

 

Site – Anonymous
and NT Challenge

Exchange –
Anonymous and basic

 

Steve Clark

Clark Systems Support, LLC

AVIEN Charter Member

www.clarksupport.com

  301-610-9584
voice

  240-465-0323
Efax

 

-Original
Message-
From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001
1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 403 Forbidden Error

 

Is OWA setup and
configured ?

-Original
Message-
From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:15
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 403 Forbidden Error

already did...everything
is fine...



-
Original Message - 



From: Lynn
Murray 



To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 

Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001
3:10 AM

Subject: RE:
403 Forbidden Error

 

Hi

 

Check
that everyone belongs to the correct groups? 





-Original
Message-
From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 August 2001 02:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 403 Forbidden Error

Hello Everyone,

 

i have a Exchange 5.5 server that is also a proxy 2.0
server.  e-mail is and has been working great for 2 years now.  my boss
fianlly wants us to be able to hit exchange from the "outside". 
when i go into the browser and put in the url i get the authentication dialog
box and after i put in the credentials i get the error "403 access is
forbidden"  off IE.  the server is a bdc and i was wondering
what i should be checking.  i have the right access on the
exchsrvr\webdata and webtemp directories.

 

any help is appreciated..

 

Bob Chyka

List
Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





List Charter
and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter
and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

[Simon Curtiss]

Well I would be very very careful, 'cos I just got bitten by this b$@%@%d.

I got an unrecoverable BSOD on my single Exchange Server and at 4pm on
Sunday and it took me 9 hours to wrestle the server back into production. No
data loss in the end - and as much as everyone hates ArcServeIT (and I'm one
of them) it saved my butt with the Disaster Recovery Option that we use.

I'm curious - does anyone who's used ArcServe 2000 still hate the product or
is this all based on the bad bad bad experiences they had with 6.5, 6.61 etc
etc etc.

I ask as I can upgrade Inoculate & Arcserve for my whole organisation for
less than $NZ 2500, or replace with Antigen & BE for about $NZ 20,000 - as
you could guess this will be pretty hard to argue through with my CFO -
Antigen in particular, as we use Mail Marshal which has all (and more) of
the content filtering that is in Antigen.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2001 6:13 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I already have it installed on my Exchange test server so far it seem
> OK, also I will look for some more info.
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:55 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> The tool is all or nothing.  Depending on what your servers are doing,
> it
> may stop or corrupt production files.
> You will have to research and test before deploying.  (who does that,
> right?)
> Also, check out:  http://www.securityfocus.com
> drill down to Microsoft then IIS.  You may find a better 
> solution there.
> 
> John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
> Network Engineer
> Business Men's Assurance 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:52 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I am trying to find more information about the IIS lock Down tool; I
> want to know if there is any problems or any reason why not 
> to use this
> tool.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **
> 
> Juan Rosas, MCP, CNA
> Network Engineer
> APICS--The Educational Society for Resource Management
> 5301 Shawnee Road, Alexandria, VA  22312
> Direct Phone: (703) 354-8996 x 2393FAX: 703/354-9386
> WEB:  www.apics.org  EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
> 
> Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations 
> expressed in
> this message are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
> the views of APICS or its affiliates.  Please note also that all data
> transmitted on APICS systems are subject to archival review. 
> 
> APICS: Making Business Run Better.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

[Joe L. Casale]

Dude, try to rationalize just not buying anymore seats of ArcReckIT, any
new servers you should get w/ BE. Since BEv8, their product has been the
best I have ever used. Their DR option is the bomb, used in a few times
never w/ a glitch, and its faster then just manually redoing the whole
thing!
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

Well I would be very very careful, 'cos I just got bitten by this
b$@%@%d.

I got an unrecoverable BSOD on my single Exchange Server and at 4pm on
Sunday and it took me 9 hours to wrestle the server back into
production. No
data loss in the end - and as much as everyone hates ArcServeIT (and I'm
one
of them) it saved my butt with the Disaster Recovery Option that we use.

I'm curious - does anyone who's used ArcServe 2000 still hate the
product or
is this all based on the bad bad bad experiences they had with 6.5, 6.61
etc
etc etc.

I ask as I can upgrade Inoculate & Arcserve for my whole organisation
for
less than $NZ 2500, or replace with Antigen & BE for about $NZ 20,000 -
as
you could guess this will be pretty hard to argue through with my CFO -
Antigen in particular, as we use Mail Marshal which has all (and more)
of
the content filtering that is in Antigen.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2001 6:13 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I already have it installed on my Exchange test server so far it seem
> OK, also I will look for some more info.
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:55 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> The tool is all or nothing.  Depending on what your servers are doing,
> it
> may stop or corrupt production files.
> You will have to research and test before deploying.  (who does that,
> right?)
> Also, check out:  http://www.securityfocus.com
> drill down to Microsoft then IIS.  You may find a better 
> solution there.
> 
> John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
> Network Engineer
> Business Men's Assurance 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:52 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I am trying to find more information about the IIS lock Down tool; I
> want to know if there is any problems or any reason why not 
> to use this
> tool.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **
> 
> Juan Rosas, MCP, CNA
> Network Engineer
> APICS--The Educational Society for Resource Management
> 5301 Shawnee Road, Alexandria, VA  22312
> Direct Phone: (703) 354-8996 x 2393FAX: 703/354-9386
> WEB:  www.apics.org  EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
> 
> Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations 
> expressed in
> this message are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
> the views of APICS or its affiliates.  Please note also that all data
> transmitted on APICS systems are subject to archival review. 
> 
> APICS: Making Business Run Better.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named
above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use,
dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you
have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return
or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank
you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal
www.marshalsoftware.com 


#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Patches

[Mark L. Kelsay]

I have tested both St. Bernard Update EXPERT and a product named Service
Pack Manager by Gravity Storm Software
http://home.san.rr.com/gravitystorm/
 .  I liked them both but Update
Expert supported updating hotfixes and service packs on more software.
 
Mr. Baker has a link you might want to take a look at.
 
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=SPackMgr.TXT
 
 
 
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 11:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Patches


Does anyone have any experience with St Bernard for staying up with
patches - is there another product that you would recommend?
 
Thanks.
 
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Patches

[Clark, Steve]

Thanks Mark. I really don't want to have to pay but I'm finding it extremely
difficult to stay up on updates for all the networks and individual PC's in
the many offices I manage. Seems that UpdateExpert will allow me to install
on a laptop and travel to each office to run the queries.

Thanks again for the response.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 7:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patches

I have tested both St. Bernard Update EXPERT and a product named Service
Pack Manager by Gravity Storm Software
http://home.san.rr.com/gravitystorm/
 .  I liked them both but Update
Expert supported updating hotfixes and service packs on more software.

Mr. Baker has a link you might want to take a look at.

http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=SPackMgr.TXT



Mark
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 11:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Patches


Does anyone have any experience with St Bernard for staying up with
patches - is there another product that you would recommend?

Thanks.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

[Joe L. Casale]

Whoops, replied to tha wrong message!
Sorry guys!

jlc

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 5:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

Dude, try to rationalize just not buying anymore seats of ArcReckIT, any
new servers you should get w/ BE. Since BEv8, their product has been the
best I have ever used. Their DR option is the bomb, used in a few times
never w/ a glitch, and its faster then just manually redoing the whole
thing!
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

Well I would be very very careful, 'cos I just got bitten by this
b$@%@%d.

I got an unrecoverable BSOD on my single Exchange Server and at 4pm on
Sunday and it took me 9 hours to wrestle the server back into
production. No
data loss in the end - and as much as everyone hates ArcServeIT (and I'm
one
of them) it saved my butt with the Disaster Recovery Option that we use.

I'm curious - does anyone who's used ArcServe 2000 still hate the
product or
is this all based on the bad bad bad experiences they had with 6.5, 6.61
etc
etc etc.

I ask as I can upgrade Inoculate & Arcserve for my whole organisation
for
less than $NZ 2500, or replace with Antigen & BE for about $NZ 20,000 -
as
you could guess this will be pretty hard to argue through with my CFO -
Antigen in particular, as we use Mail Marshal which has all (and more)
of
the content filtering that is in Antigen.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2001 6:13 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I already have it installed on my Exchange test server so far it seem
> OK, also I will look for some more info.
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:55 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> The tool is all or nothing.  Depending on what your servers are doing,
> it
> may stop or corrupt production files.
> You will have to research and test before deploying.  (who does that,
> right?)
> Also, check out:  http://www.securityfocus.com
> drill down to Microsoft then IIS.  You may find a better 
> solution there.
> 
> John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
> Network Engineer
> Business Men's Assurance 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:52 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I am trying to find more information about the IIS lock Down tool; I
> want to know if there is any problems or any reason why not 
> to use this
> tool.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **
> 
> Juan Rosas, MCP, CNA
> Network Engineer
> APICS--The Educational Society for Resource Management
> 5301 Shawnee Road, Alexandria, VA  22312
> Direct Phone: (703) 354-8996 x 2393FAX: 703/354-9386
> WEB:  www.apics.org  EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
> 
> Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations 
> expressed in
> this message are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
> the views of APICS or its affiliates.  Please note also that all data
> transmitted on APICS systems are subject to archival review. 
> 
> APICS: Making Business Run Better.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named
above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use,
dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you
have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return
or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank
you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal
www.marshalsoftware.com 


#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Send As public folder address

[Mark L. Kelsay]

My pleasure.  Glad to finally help someone out on this list.


Mark Kelsay



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send As public folder address


That is exactly what I want to do. Thank you.

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 5:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send As public folder address


This link explains how to send as a public folder.  It is for
subscribing a public folder to a mailing list but might help you figure
it out.

http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/Subscribe.a
sp

Link may wrap.



Mark Kelsay



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send As public folder address


Exchange 5.5, NT4.

I set up a public folder for collection of various email messages. I'm
the
owner and I gave myself user permissions on the folder as well.
However,
when I try to send an email with the email address of the public folder
as
the "from" address, it tells me I don't have send on behalf of
permissions.

I set it up yesterday and tried various things with no success.  On
another
mailbox I can send as, the permissions are the same. Is it not possible
to
send as for a public folder?

Thanks, Michelle


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Brick Level Backups

[John Allhiser]

Title: Brick Level Backups



I'm a 
little slow in checking the list.  I've had other 
"Labors".
I will 
say that William, your reply is worthy of a shortcut 
key.
 
Where 
I work, they use BE 7.5.  They had "open file" selected for 
everything.  When I was hired, I immediately changed to 
*gasp* NTBackup for our Exchange 5.5 systems.  I would offer 
this: It doesn't matter what you use to back up the rest of your 
network, databases (Exchange included) don't like 3rd party net 
software.  The latest agents notwithstanding.  MS SQL comes with its 
own backup software for this exact reason. NTBackup is Exchange aware right 
out of the box.  Imagine asking a DBA if you could go ahead and load 
ArcServe2000 on their DB server(s).  
   

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 
  11:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Brick 
  Level Backups
  I 
  can't.  I have a headache.
   
  Oh 
  wait from the archives
   
  
  The Top Ten Reasons why William Doesn't 
  recommend Brick-level 
  backups:10. The only product he's tried it with is ArcServeIT 
  (*shudder*)9. Brick-level backups should be done in conjunction with 
  regular backupstherefor duplicating the process.8. Brick-level backups 
  don't clear the transaction logs7. Brick-level 
  restores (esp of the entire store) are VERY slow6. Brick-level 
  restores result in loss of Single Instance Storage5. Brick-level backups 
  do not properly maintain all of the data structuresin the store that you 
  might need for a full restore (at least ComputerAssociates product 
  doesn't).4. The alternative is so much easier and cleaner - deleted item 
  retention.Set deleted item retention to say 30 days, a little user 
  education and theycan do their own 'mailbox' restore.3. Regular use of 
  exmerge (to pst files for backup) for important mailboxesis another 
  alternative.2. Section 3.11 at: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm says so(ok, I don't do everything I'm told 
  either).1. The archives at the Exchange list at swynk.com are full of 
  Brick-levelhorror stories.William Lefkovics, MCSE, 
  A+
   
   
  -Original Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:12 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Brick Level 
  Backups
  Hi 
  I'am in the process of implementing a backup 
  stategy using Arc Serve 2000 ,  Do I need to take backup of individual mailboxes , I know backing up 
  individual mailboxes are bad , can anybody tell me why they are bad ? . what are the  pro's and cons about 
  brick level backup. 
  Thanks Irfan List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

[John Allhiser]

Sometimes I reply to the wrong list...

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 7:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.


Whoops, replied to tha wrong message!
Sorry guys!

jlc

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 5:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

Dude, try to rationalize just not buying anymore seats of ArcReckIT, any
new servers you should get w/ BE. Since BEv8, their product has been the
best I have ever used. Their DR option is the bomb, used in a few times
never w/ a glitch, and its faster then just manually redoing the whole
thing!
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

Well I would be very very careful, 'cos I just got bitten by this
b$@%@%d.

I got an unrecoverable BSOD on my single Exchange Server and at 4pm on
Sunday and it took me 9 hours to wrestle the server back into
production. No
data loss in the end - and as much as everyone hates ArcServeIT (and I'm
one
of them) it saved my butt with the Disaster Recovery Option that we use.

I'm curious - does anyone who's used ArcServe 2000 still hate the
product or
is this all based on the bad bad bad experiences they had with 6.5, 6.61
etc
etc etc.

I ask as I can upgrade Inoculate & Arcserve for my whole organisation
for
less than $NZ 2500, or replace with Antigen & BE for about $NZ 20,000 -
as
you could guess this will be pretty hard to argue through with my CFO -
Antigen in particular, as we use Mail Marshal which has all (and more)
of
the content filtering that is in Antigen.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2001 6:13 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I already have it installed on my Exchange test server so far it seem
> OK, also I will look for some more info.
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:55 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> The tool is all or nothing.  Depending on what your servers are doing,
> it
> may stop or corrupt production files.
> You will have to research and test before deploying.  (who does that,
> right?)
> Also, check out:  http://www.securityfocus.com
> drill down to Microsoft then IIS.  You may find a better 
> solution there.
> 
> John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
> Network Engineer
> Business Men's Assurance 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:52 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I am trying to find more information about the IIS lock Down tool; I
> want to know if there is any problems or any reason why not 
> to use this
> tool.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **
> 
> Juan Rosas, MCP, CNA
> Network Engineer
> APICS--The Educational Society for Resource Management
> 5301 Shawnee Road, Alexandria, VA  22312
> Direct Phone: (703) 354-8996 x 2393FAX: 703/354-9386
> WEB:  www.apics.org  EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
> 
> Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations 
> expressed in
> this message are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
> the views of APICS or its affiliates.  Please note also that all data
> transmitted on APICS systems are subject to archival review. 
> 
> APICS: Making Business Run Better.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named
above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use,
dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you
have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return
or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank
you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal
www.marshalsoftware.com 


#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.co

RE: Send As public folder address

[MJohnston]

I had done everything but add them to my PAB/contacts. Once I did that and
selected the from address from there, it worked. Thanks again.

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send As public folder address


My pleasure.  Glad to finally help someone out on this list.


Mark Kelsay



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send As public folder address


That is exactly what I want to do. Thank you.

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 5:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Send As public folder address


This link explains how to send as a public folder.  It is for
subscribing a public folder to a mailing list but might help you figure
it out.

http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/Subscribe.a
sp

Link may wrap.



Mark Kelsay



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Send As public folder address


Exchange 5.5, NT4.

I set up a public folder for collection of various email messages. I'm
the
owner and I gave myself user permissions on the folder as well.
However,
when I try to send an email with the email address of the public folder
as
the "from" address, it tells me I don't have send on behalf of
permissions.

I set it up yesterday and tried various things with no success.  On
another
mailbox I can send as, the permissions are the same. Is it not possible
to
send as for a public folder?

Thanks, Michelle


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

x400 addressing

[Engels PHAT]

Previously I've connected our Exchange Sites via the X400 connector. Due to
some problems I want to get rid of the X400 addresses and therefor I've
switched to the IMS. Exchange is still using the X400 addressing to send
mail to recipients. See below. How get I prevent Exchange is using .

In the logging on our virus scan machine, put behind the Exchange server I
can prove if Exchange is still using these addresses. 

How can I get rid of them?

Fri Aug 31 10:01:21 2001  MAIL RECEIVED:
Received from IP address: 134.188.105.100
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Recipient list:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
MessageID: 999244881176
Size: 8244 bytes

Fri Aug 31 10:01:22 2001  MAIL SENT:
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Recipient list:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MessageID:  999244881176
Size: 8244 bytes


Piet Engels
Océ Technologies B.V.
Postbus 101
5900 MA Venlo 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm