RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule)
Title: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) What, like America and the IRA? -Original Message-From: Micciche Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 October 2001 21:24To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Lets see how long they stay neutral about terrorism now. Money talks and BS walks. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) wow. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net "Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness." Chinese Proverb -Original Message- From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Yep http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/10/02/europe/swissair/ Our Director of IT is stuck in Swizterland right now... -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 13:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Swissair went out of business? Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net The U.S. has decided to ban the cloning of human beings. Apparently, the great fear of cloning is that if you clone a human being, the 2nd generation won't have the same mental capacity as the first. Kind of like President Bush and his dad - Jay Leno -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Thanks for the advice, I got it to work but now he cancelled his trip, Swissair is no longer in business. So I can remove the forwarding. Stefan -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 13:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) And pray daily that someone doesn't send you an attachment that exceeds the storage limit on your Hotmail account that causes NDR's to be sent back to your Exchange account that are forwarded to Hotmail that cause more NDR's, etc., etc. Been there, done that with AOL. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 -Original Message- From: Ben Cabie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) set up a custom mailbox in exchange that forwards to the hotmail account, then open up his mailbox properties and use the custom mailbox as an alternate recipient List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule)
Title: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Swiss Air, Switzerland? Frank -Original Message-From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 03 October 2001 10:53To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) What, like America and the IRA? -Original Message-From: Micciche Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 October 2001 21:24To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Lets see how long they stay neutral about terrorism now. Money talks and BS walks. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) wow. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net "Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness." Chinese Proverb -Original Message- From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Yep http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/10/02/europe/swissair/ Our Director of IT is stuck in Swizterland right now... -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 13:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Swissair went out of business? Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net The U.S. has decided to ban the cloning of human beings. Apparently, the great fear of cloning is that if you clone a human being, the 2nd generation won't have the same mental capacity as the first. Kind of like President Bush and his dad - Jay Leno -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) Thanks for the advice, I got it to work but now he cancelled his trip, Swissair is no longer in business. So I can remove the forwarding. Stefan -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 13:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) And pray daily that someone doesn't send you an attachment that exceeds the storage limit on your Hotmail account that causes NDR's to be sent back to your Exchange account that are forwarded to Hotmail that cause more NDR's, etc., etc. Been there, done that with AOL. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 -Original Message- From: Ben Cabie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule) set up a custom mailbox in exchange that forwards to the hotmail account, then open up his mailbox properties and use the custom mailbox as an alternate recipient List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NT SBS
Sorry about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday? -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSYes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially after the news form MSyesterday - can't afford to answer the question of why in a year.Thanks for your concern.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSSo, have you made a decision?(I would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying withExchange5.5, put it on Win2000)William-Original Message-From: Clark, SteveTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: 10/2/01 7:24 PMSubject: RE: NT SBSHOLD THE PHONE - this was sent days agoSteve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSHaving a terrible time making the decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. Thiswill be going into a single server shop running OLD applications. Ex 2Klooks great but I have very little experience with the product and theydon't need the extra frills...Thanks for the feedback.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Gordon Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: NT SBSThe only problem I had with SBS is with Citrix .. otherwise its OK... though I do prefer 2k SBS which allows you to loadbalance acrossthree servers List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NT SBS
Did they put up a press release or something? John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS NT4 is going out to pasture. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Sorry about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday? -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Yes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially after the news form MSyesterday - can't afford to answer the question of why in a year.Thanks for your concern.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSSo, have you made a decision?(I would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying withExchange5.5, put it on Win2000)William-Original Message-From: Clark, SteveTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: 10/2/01 7:24 PMSubject: RE: NT SBSHOLD THE PHONE - this was sent days agoSteve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSHaving a terrible time making the decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. Thiswill be going into a single server shop running OLD applications. Ex 2Klooks great but I have very little experience with the product and theydon't need the extra frills...Thanks for the feedback.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Gordon Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: NT SBSThe only problem I had with SBS is with Citrix .. otherwise its OK... though I do prefer 2k SBS which allows you to loadbalance acrossthree servers List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NT SBS
I am trying to look for it at the moment. Hanief Chowdhary PC Network Administrator. TransGlobal Freight Management Ltd., International House, Girling Way, Great South West Road, Feltham, Middx. TW14 0PH Tel - (+44) 020 8 400 3521 (DDI) Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 03 October 2001 14:33To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS If you, or someone on the list has the posting Steve is referring to, would you mind reposting it to the list, or sending it to me directly? I seem to have missed it. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Yes - it was posted on this list and the NT list. Sorry, don't have the link. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Did they put up a press release or something? John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS NT4 is going out to pasture. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Sorry about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday? -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Yes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially after the news form MSyesterday - can't afford to answer the question of why in a year.Thanks for your concern.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSSo, have you made a decision?(I would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying withExchange5.5, put it on Win2000)William-Original Message-From: Clark, SteveTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: 10/2/01 7:24 PMSubject: RE: NT SBSHOLD THE PHONE - this was sent days agoSteve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSHaving a terrible time making the decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. Thiswill be going into a single server shop running OLD applications. Ex 2Klooks great but I have very little experience with the product and theydon't need the extra frills...Thanks for the feedback.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Gordon Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: NT SBSThe only problem I had with SBS is with Citrix .. otherwise its OK... though I do prefer 2k SBS which allows you to loadbalance acrossthree servers List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ
RE: Exchange Enterprise
If you are referring to Exchange 5.5 the short answer is YES. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange Enterprise Can you mix and match Enterprise and Standard within a site? We have one server that continually bumps up against the ceiling and they want to do Enterprise, but the other servers are in fine shape. Thx. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Enterprise
Which version? 5.5 (and 2000 AFAIK) is fine, but anything less and you need the annoying Microsoft Exchange Connector disk. Neil -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 03 October 2001 14:37 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Exchange Enterprise Subject: Exchange Enterprise Can you mix and match Enterprise and Standard within a site? We have one server that continually bumps up against the ceiling and they want to do Enterprise, but the other servers are in fine shape. Thx. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Title: Message Which version? 5.5 (and 2000 AFAIK) is fine, but anything lessand you need the annoying "Microsoft Exchange Connector" disk. Neil -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 03 October 2001 14:37Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: Exchange EnterpriseSubject: Exchange Enterprise Can you mix and match Enterprise and Standard within a site? We have one server that continually bumps up against the ceiling and they want to do Enterprise, but the other servers are in fine shape. Thx. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Blocking External E-mail
Were using Exchange 5.5, SP4, on NT 4.0, SP6. I know if I remove the SMTP address from a users mailbox, they will not be able to RECEIVE incoming E-mail from outside of the company. I can't remember what setting I change though to block them from SENDING E-mail outside the company. A point in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NT SBS
Please repost. I obviously fell down and hit my head and missed the whole thing. Thanks. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS If you, or someone on the list has the posting Steve is referring to, would you mind reposting it to the list, or sending it to me directly? I seem to have missed it. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Yes - it was posted on this list and the NT list. Sorry, don't have the link. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Did they put up a press release or something? John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS NT4 is going out to pasture. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Sorry about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday? -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Yes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially after the news form MSyesterday - can't afford to answer the question of why in a year.Thanks for your concern.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSSo, have you made a decision?(I would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying withExchange5.5, put it on Win2000)William-Original Message-From: Clark, SteveTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: 10/2/01 7:24 PMSubject: RE: NT SBSHOLD THE PHONE - this was sent days agoSteve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSHaving a terrible time making the decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. Thiswill be going into a single server shop running OLD applications. Ex 2Klooks great but I have very little experience with the product and theydon't need the extra frills...Thanks for the feedback.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Gordon Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: NT SBSThe only problem I had with SBS is with Citrix .. otherwise its OK... though I do prefer 2k SBS which allows you to loadbalance acrossthree servers List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ
RE: Exmerge Question
Open the Exmerge.ini file. This is where the config is for the utility. All the info is explained there. Joseph Ambrose System and Network Manager The Conference Board Phone : 001-212-339-0443 Fax : 001-212-836-3802 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our Award Winning Web Site: www.conference-board.org -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Exmerge Question Sorry all for being such a pest... I'm trying the Exmerge utility. It shows that users have a email by the size listed, but when I move them into the PST all it does is move the default folder names and it doesn't copy any messages/contacts ect.. any faq's about something like this? (But hey I'm learning.. there's a plus) :) Victor Sanchez Systems Administrator Vision Entertainment (310) 586-0012 (310) 586-1012 FAX (310) 413-4637 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.visionent.com / www.visionint.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: EXchange 5.5 OWA on different server.
Install IIS on server Put EX5.5 CD in drive Run setup Deselect everything appartfrom OWA Following instructions on screen and specify the remote exchange server Install SP of your choice for exchange Thats basically it. You do have to make some changes for ssl but this will get it running fairly quickly. Oh yeah point your browser at http:\\servername\exchange\ Hope this helps Richard -Original Message- From: Ambrose, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 14:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EXchange 5.5 OWA on different server. We did it. The docs should be on your Exchange 5.5. media. Joseph Ambrose System and Network Manager The Conference Board Phone : 001-212-339-0443 Fax : 001-212-836-3802 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our Award Winning Web Site: www.conference-board.org -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:EXchange 5.5 OWA on different server. Hey all another quick question.. I've read it's possible to put OWA on a different server then your exhange server, but I have yet to find any good docs or FAQ's on this subject.. I just see little things here and there saying it's possible, but nothing going into detail on how to do it... Can someone point me in the direction of some good material? thanx! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA authentication
Could be, but I'm not running E2K yet so I wouldn't know if it's an issue on it's OWA. Greg -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA authentication I thought this only happens with OWA for Exchange 5.5. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q295/0/67.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q262/9/02.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q190/4/33.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q236/9/09.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q238/4/44.ASP William -Original Message- From: John Allhiser To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: 10/2/01 7:08 PM Subject: Re: OWA authentication Yeah, I thought the same thing after I sent that 4 hours ago. Maybe Miss Cleo already gave the correct advice... John Allhiser - Original Message - From: Greg Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:45 PM Subject: RE: OWA authentication Is this E2K or E5.5? And what SP? Otherwise, the Physic Hotline awaits you! ;0] Greg -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA authentication Search Technet for Password set to expire in 0 days I'd give you the Q article, but I don't have it lying around... Usually this happens with the rollup security patch. It requires you to edit root.asp in the webdata directory. John Allhiser MCSE CCNA Network Engineer Business Men's Assurance -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA authentication I have a user who we have changed their domain password. When they go into OWA, they are given a screen that says their password is set to expire in 0 days. Go to options and change it. When we go to options, and click on the button to change password, we get a Page can not be displayed error. Any clues? I need to fix this ASAP Thanks, Joseph L. Heaton, MCSE NT Administrator FDI Consulting, Inc. 1610 Arden Way, Suite 145 Sacramento, CA 95815 (916)921-4390 x.228 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NT SBS
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5097753,00.html -Original Message-From: Hanief Chowdhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS I am trying to look for it at the moment. Hanief Chowdhary PC Network Administrator. TransGlobal Freight Management Ltd., International House, Girling Way, Great South West Road, Feltham, Middx. TW14 0PH Tel - (+44) 020 8 400 3521 (DDI) Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 03 October 2001 14:33To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS If you, or someone on the list has the posting Steve is referring to, would you mind reposting it to the list, or sending it to me directly? I seem to have missed it. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Yes - it was posted on this list and the NT list. Sorry, don't have the link. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Did they put up a press release or something? John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS NT4 is going out to pasture. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Sorry about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday? -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS Yes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially after the news form MSyesterday - can't afford to answer the question of why in a year.Thanks for your concern.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSSo, have you made a decision?(I would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying withExchange5.5, put it on Win2000)William-Original Message-From: Clark, SteveTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSent: 10/2/01 7:24 PMSubject: RE: NT SBSHOLD THE PHONE - this was sent days agoSteve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBSHaving a terrible time making the decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. Thiswill be going into a single server shop running OLD applications. Ex 2Klooks great but I have very little experience with the product and theydon't need the extra frills...Thanks for the feedback.Steve ClarkClark Systems Support, LLCAVIEN Charter Member"Who's watching your network?"www.clarksupport.com301-610-9584 voice240-465-0323 Efax-Original Message-From: Gordon Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: NT SBSThe only problem I had
Exchange upgrade question
Hello all. I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I think I do!). I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new Exch server. I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from Ex 5.5 to AD, and it seemed to work. Several hours later, I ran the /ForestPrep utility before installing Ex2k. I have now fully installed Exch2k, and patched it with the latest sp. My problem is, when I right-click on a user in AD, and select the Exchange Tasks option, the only available Exchange option is Enable Instant Messaging. There is no Move Mailbox option which, according to everything I've read, there should be. Anyone seen this? Anyone have any ideas what's going on? It's as if the Exchange services didn't get installed on the new box. Help! Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange upgrade question
Pat, 1.) Are you using the ADC from the Exchange CD? 2.) Do you have one-way or two-way replication setup? I believe you need to have two-way. I had two-way replication setup during my migration and everything worked fine. I did the move mailbox method. 3.) What machine are you using AD Users and Computers from? Do you have the Exchange Admin tools on the machine you are using? Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange upgrade question Hello all. I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I think I do!). I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new Exch server. I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from Ex 5.5 to AD, and it seemed to work. Several hours later, I ran the /ForestPrep utility before installing Ex2k. I have now fully installed Exch2k, and patched it with the latest sp. My problem is, when I right-click on a user in AD, and select the Exchange Tasks option, the only available Exchange option is Enable Instant Messaging. There is no Move Mailbox option which, according to everything I've read, there should be. Anyone seen this? Anyone have any ideas what's going on? It's as if the Exchange services didn't get installed on the new box. Help! Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook
I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer access their mail via web. They'll get the message: OWA was unable to get to your inbox. When disabling Hide from address book option box, the user can log in. Anyone know what's the workaround/fix for this? Thanking you in advance, Jim _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook
Microsoft say...Because OWA uses a MAPI session for name resolution, a hidden recipient cannot be resolved to a user name. This is by design. Though someone may know different. I'd like to know if it is possible too Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Klats Myboots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer access their mail via web. They'll get the message: OWA was unable to get to your inbox. When disabling Hide from address book option box, the user can log in. Anyone know what's the workaround/fix for this? Thanking you in advance, Jim _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook
wouldn't address book views be the solution for this? Hmmm... Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've stayed alive. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook Microsoft say...Because OWA uses a MAPI session for name resolution, a hidden recipient cannot be resolved to a user name. This is by design. Though someone may know different. I'd like to know if it is possible too Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Klats Myboots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer access their mail via web. They'll get the message: OWA was unable to get to your inbox. When disabling Hide from address book option box, the user can log in. Anyone know what's the workaround/fix for this? Thanking you in advance, Jim _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange upgrade question
You need to install the Exchange Admin tools to what ever computer you are going to manage from. If that is your DC, yes, you need to install it on it. The LDAP issue only applies to the situation where the Exchange is on a DC. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question Yes, I used the ADC from the Exch CD. I have 2-way setup. I set up a brand new Win2k box that is the AD PDC, if you will. I did NOT install the Exch Admin tools on that box, but rather the new Exch server. Should I set up the Exch Admin tools on my AD Controller? Thanks for the info. I'm also seeing some articles regarding LDAP and port 389. Some say that the connector should run on something other than 389. Did you change your LDAP port before doing the connector? Thanks, Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message- From: Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question Pat, 1.) Are you using the ADC from the Exchange CD? 2.) Do you have one-way or two-way replication setup? I believe you need to have two-way. I had two-way replication setup during my migration and everything worked fine. I did the move mailbox method. 3.) What machine are you using AD Users and Computers from? Do you have the Exchange Admin tools on the machine you are using? Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange upgrade question Hello all. I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I think I do!). I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new Exch server. I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from Ex 5.5 to AD, and it seemed to work. Several hours later, I ran the /ForestPrep utility before installing Ex2k. I have now fully installed Exch2k, and patched it with the latest sp. My problem is, when I right-click on a user in AD, and select the Exchange Tasks option, the only available Exchange option is Enable Instant Messaging. There is no Move Mailbox option which, according to everything I've read, there should be. Anyone seen this? Anyone have any ideas what's going on? It's as if the Exchange services didn't get installed on the new box. Help! Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook
I was afraid of that! Thanks for your reply Steve. Jim _o/\ __o _- \_ / \ , __(_)/_(_)/\___(_) /_(_)__ From: STEVE BROOK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:10:43 +0100 Microsoft say...Because OWA uses a MAPI session for name resolution, a hidden recipient cannot be resolved to a user name. This is by design. Though someone may know different. I'd like to know if it is possible too Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Klats Myboots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer access their mail via web. They'll get the message: OWA was unable to get to your inbox. When disabling Hide from address book option box, the user can log in. Anyone know what's the workaround/fix for this? Thanking you in advance, Jim _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook
Hi Drewski, Can you expand on this? Are you saying unhide the recipient then create an address book view showing only the ones you wish to be seen. Then set permissions on who can search the list. Do you then have to reset each client machine so the default address book view points to your list instead of the GAL. How do you stop people looking at the Global address list where they will see the guy you are trying to hide? Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook wouldn't address book views be the solution for this? Hmmm... Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've stayed alive. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook Microsoft say...Because OWA uses a MAPI session for name resolution, a hidden recipient cannot be resolved to a user name. This is by design. Though someone may know different. I'd like to know if it is possible too Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Klats Myboots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer access their mail via web. They'll get the message: OWA was unable to get to your inbox. When disabling Hide from address book option box, the user can log in. Anyone know what's the workaround/fix for this? Thanking you in advance, Jim _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Using native NTBACKUP utility to backup Exchange 5.5 server
Title: Message Yup...works for me. Users think you're a magician! -Original Message-From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Using native NTBACKUP utility to backup Exchange 5.5 server NTBackup is a fine way to do your online backups. Provided that, at least XAdmin is installed on the backup box. It does not do BLB's, but if you read the Ed C. Never Restore Method, you won't have to restore individual mailboxes. Check out this link... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Original Message-From: Ratini Heidi - IL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Using native NTBACKUP utility to backup Exchange 5.5 server OK I'm doing this correctly this time. Does anyone use the native "NTBACKUP" utility on their EX 5.5 installations to backup their Exchange IS's online? Recently Microsoft recommended we use the native NTBACKUP utility to do the page layer online backups. Just looking for input from anyone on this list currently doing this, rather than going to a 3rd party application for backups. Also, do any of you know if individual mailboxes can be restored when using NTBACKUP as the backup solution? I'm not sure on this aspect, but I would suspect not, I don't think NTBACKUP does brick layer backups. Thanks for any input you have, Heidi List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook
actually, I was hoping to jumpstart my brain, but it appears that my backup brain doesn't have the battery power. However, a search of Technet for Address book views reveals... not a whole heck of a lot. Mutter. However: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4844 http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4843 http://www.j51.com/~sshay/exchange/recipients/addr-book.htm give those a shot... Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net And in the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook Hi Drewski, Can you expand on this? Are you saying unhide the recipient then create an address book view showing only the ones you wish to be seen. Then set permissions on who can search the list. Do you then have to reset each client machine so the default address book view points to your list instead of the GAL. How do you stop people looking at the Global address list where they will see the guy you are trying to hide? Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook wouldn't address book views be the solution for this? Hmmm... Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've stayed alive. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook Microsoft say...Because OWA uses a MAPI session for name resolution, a hidden recipient cannot be resolved to a user name. This is by design. Though someone may know different. I'd like to know if it is possible too Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Klats Myboots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer access their mail via web. They'll get the message: OWA was unable to get to your inbox. When disabling Hide from address book option box, the user can log in. Anyone know what's the workaround/fix for this? Thanking you in advance, Jim _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just disappear? Dont they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all bounced email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I dont understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message- From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can view source and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called Ex-employees and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just disappear. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our administrator mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Apparently they just "disappear". Haven't had an Exchange guru yet contradict that. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just disappear? Dont they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all bounced email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I dont understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's a well-known Exchange Server black hole. I prefer to actually address the emails in case there is that one important message William "not a guru" Lefkovics -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Apparently they just "disappear". Haven't had an Exchange guru yet contradict that. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just "disappear"? Don't they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all "bounced" email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I don't understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail they don't bounce, they just dissapear. It's quite spooky, actually... DrewIf we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa)KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.htmlPics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net"Million to one chances crop up nine times out of ten." - Granny Weatherwax -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just disappear? Dont they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all bounced email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I dont understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Thanks William "yes you are, get over it already" Lefkovics. I only use it once someone's been gone 6 months to a year. -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's a well-known Exchange Server black hole. I prefer to actually address the emails in case there is that one important message William "not a guru" Lefkovics -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Apparently they just "disappear". Haven't had an Exchange guru yet contradict that. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just "disappear"? Don't they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all "bounced" email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I don't understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail I feel so loved (1) (1) Thanks for the plug Diane (2) (2) Now I can be as rich and famous as William (3) (3) Hi William (4) (4) Might be coming back out to Vegas in a couple of weeks... -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It was great meeting you. Those colourful beers at Quarks looked... well... Let's say they reminded me of my days in the lab in biochemistry at UBC. -Original Message-From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail I feel so loved (1) (1) Thanks for the plug Diane (2) (2) Now I can be as rich and famous as William (3) (3) Hi William (4) (4) Might be coming back out to Vegas in a couple of weeks... -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook
Great, I didn't realise the Address Book View could affect what is seen in the GAL. Do you know if this has any effect on OWA, or is it suck it and see? Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 18:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook actually, I was hoping to jumpstart my brain, but it appears that my backup brain doesn't have the battery power. However, a search of Technet for Address book views reveals... not a whole heck of a lot. Mutter. However: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4844 http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4843 http://www.j51.com/~sshay/exchange/recipients/addr-book.htm give those a shot... Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net And in the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook Hi Drewski, Can you expand on this? Are you saying unhide the recipient then create an address book view showing only the ones you wish to be seen. Then set permissions on who can search the list. Do you then have to reset each client machine so the default address book view points to your list instead of the GAL. How do you stop people looking at the Global address list where they will see the guy you are trying to hide? Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook wouldn't address book views be the solution for this? Hmmm... Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've stayed alive. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook Microsoft say...Because OWA uses a MAPI session for name resolution, a hidden recipient cannot be resolved to a user name. This is by design. Though someone may know different. I'd like to know if it is possible too Steve Brook -Original Message- From: Klats Myboots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 17:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hidden recipients can't log into exchange via web outlook I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer access their mail via web. They'll get the message: OWA was unable to get to your inbox. When disabling Hide from address book option box, the user can log in. Anyone know what's the workaround/fix for this? Thanking you in advance, Jim _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Site connectors between NT 2000 server
We have two Exchange 5.5 SP3 servers in different domains, one on NT4 and one on 2000 Server (don't ask why, way too complicated political). Users homed on the 2000 server now need access to calendars on the NT server. The 2000 server is NOT a domain controller. The two domains have a 100Meg LAN link. I can't get Exch5.5 on the 2000 server to communicate via a site connector with Exch5.5 on the NT server (still with me?), I get a DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM error. Technet article Q150880 seems the only article remotely relevent, and says If the Exchange Server computer is only a member server of the domain and not a PDC or BDC, remote administration will not work. The Exchange Server must be either a BDC or a PDC. Anyone know if it's possible to get around this, or am I missing something? I don't really want to have to remove 2000 for NT, nor do I want to install Active Directory. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange upgrade question
Actually the LDAP situation only applies to Exchange 5.5 Running on an AD DC. But yes you need to install the exchange Admin tools on any machine you want to manage mailboxes from. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] (714) 560-0900 ex5910 -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question You need to install the Exchange Admin tools to what ever computer you are going to manage from. If that is your DC, yes, you need to install it on it. The LDAP issue only applies to the situation where the Exchange is on a DC. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question Yes, I used the ADC from the Exch CD. I have 2-way setup. I set up a brand new Win2k box that is the AD PDC, if you will. I did NOT install the Exch Admin tools on that box, but rather the new Exch server. Should I set up the Exch Admin tools on my AD Controller? Thanks for the info. I'm also seeing some articles regarding LDAP and port 389. Some say that the connector should run on something other than 389. Did you change your LDAP port before doing the connector? Thanks, Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message- From: Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question Pat, 1.) Are you using the ADC from the Exchange CD? 2.) Do you have one-way or two-way replication setup? I believe you need to have two-way. I had two-way replication setup during my migration and everything worked fine. I did the move mailbox method. 3.) What machine are you using AD Users and Computers from? Do you have the Exchange Admin tools on the machine you are using? Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange upgrade question Hello all. I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I think I do!). I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new Exch server. I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from Ex 5.5 to AD, and it seemed to work. Several hours later, I ran the /ForestPrep utility before installing Ex2k. I have now fully installed Exch2k, and patched it with the latest sp. My problem is, when I right-click on a user in AD, and select the Exchange Tasks option, the only available Exchange option is Enable Instant Messaging. There is no Move Mailbox option which, according to everything I've read, there should be. Anyone seen this? Anyone have any ideas what's going on? It's as if the Exchange services didn't get installed on the new box. Help! Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange upgrade question
That's what I meant. Obviously, it won't be for Ex2K, since Ex2K uses AD as its directory, so there won't be that LDAP port conflict issue. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question Actually the LDAP situation only applies to Exchange 5.5 Running on an AD DC. But yes you need to install the exchange Admin tools on any machine you want to manage mailboxes from. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] (714) 560-0900 ex5910 -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question You need to install the Exchange Admin tools to what ever computer you are going to manage from. If that is your DC, yes, you need to install it on it. The LDAP issue only applies to the situation where the Exchange is on a DC. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange upgrade question Yes, I used the ADC from the Exch CD. I have 2-way setup. I set up a brand new Win2k box that is the AD PDC, if you will. I did NOT install the Exch Admin tools on that box, but rather the new Exch server. Should I set up the Exch Admin tools on my AD Controller? Thanks for the info. I'm also seeing some articles regarding LDAP and port 389. Some say that the connector should run on something other than 389. Did you change your LDAP port before doing the connector? Thanks, Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message- From: Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange upgrade question Pat, 1.) Are you using the ADC from the Exchange CD? 2.) Do you have one-way or two-way replication setup? I believe you need to have two-way. I had two-way replication setup during my migration and everything worked fine. I did the move mailbox method. 3.) What machine are you using AD Users and Computers from? Do you have the Exchange Admin tools on the machine you are using? Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange upgrade question Hello all. I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I think I do!). I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new Exch server. I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from Ex 5.5 to AD, and it seemed to work. Several hours later, I ran the /ForestPrep utility before installing Ex2k. I have now fully installed Exch2k, and patched it with the latest sp. My problem is, when I right-click on a user in AD, and select the Exchange Tasks option, the only available Exchange option is Enable Instant Messaging. There is no Move Mailbox option which, according to everything I've read, there should be. Anyone seen this? Anyone have any ideas what's going on? It's as if the Exchange services didn't get installed on the new box. Help! Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MS crop tool for PST files
Has anyone used this tool? http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q296/0/88.ASP It sounds like there is no way to recover all the data in the PST file. If that is the case, does anyone know of any other tools that allow you to recover all the data? Also, according to the article, you have to call MS to get it. Is that because it's not free? Thanks, Michelle List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Moving logs
Title: Moving logs I would like to move my Exchange logs from the default path to a different one but I haven't found a place to do that in Exchange. I'm specifically interested in moving the IMC logs. Is that even doable ? Thanks. Eric Peeters Network Administrator TexLoc Ltd List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving logs
Title: Moving logs Use the performance optimizer for Exchange. Regards,Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Eric Peeters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Moving logs I would like to move my Exchange logs from the default path to a different one but I haven't found a place to do that in Exchange. I'm specifically interested in moving the IMC logs. Is that even doable ? Thanks. Eric Peeters Network Administrator TexLoc Ltd List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.
install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000?
I've tried installing Exchange Server 5.5 on a box running Windows 2000 Server, and every time I try I get a won't work with this software type of message. Yet I hear of people running Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000. What am I missing? Are folks installing Exchange 5.5 to Windows NT Server 4.0, then migrating to Windows 2000 Server? Help... (glub glub) Sean List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000?
Just say Install anyways or whatever the choice is. As soon as you are done, update to SP4 -Original Message- From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000? I've tried installing Exchange Server 5.5 on a box running Windows 2000 Server, and every time I try I get a won't work with this software type of message. Yet I hear of people running Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000. What am I missing? Are folks installing Exchange 5.5 to Windows NT Server 4.0, then migrating to Windows 2000 Server? Help... (glub glub) Sean List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000?
It was a fresh Windows 2000 Server installation, no service pack yet installed, installing from a Select CD containing Exchange EE 5.5. I don't recall the exact error message, as this was a week or two ago and the machine is no longer in my hands, so I can't re-create the problem. Sorry this is so unhelpful. I guess I'll try it again in a week when I get that box back. Maybe I just goofed something up. Thanks, Sean -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000? Hmmm... I've not seen that error before. I've got a brand spanking new W2K server sitting right next to me that I just installed Exchange 5.5 on without any trouble at all. Do you have AD running or is it a stand alone? What SP? -Original Message- From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000? I've tried installing Exchange Server 5.5 on a box running Windows 2000 Server, and every time I try I get a won't work with this software type of message. Yet I hear of people running Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000. What am I missing? Are folks installing Exchange 5.5 to Windows NT Server 4.0, then migrating to Windows 2000 Server? Help... (glub glub) Sean List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000?
If the error Martin describes comes up just click ignore or whatever and continue on. It works fine. -Original Message- From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000? It was a fresh Windows 2000 Server installation, no service pack yet installed, installing from a Select CD containing Exchange EE 5.5. I don't recall the exact error message, as this was a week or two ago and the machine is no longer in my hands, so I can't re-create the problem. Sorry this is so unhelpful. I guess I'll try it again in a week when I get that box back. Maybe I just goofed something up. Thanks, Sean -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000? Hmmm... I've not seen that error before. I've got a brand spanking new W2K server sitting right next to me that I just installed Exchange 5.5 on without any trouble at all. Do you have AD running or is it a stand alone? What SP? -Original Message- From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000? I've tried installing Exchange Server 5.5 on a box running Windows 2000 Server, and every time I try I get a won't work with this software type of message. Yet I hear of people running Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000. What am I missing? Are folks installing Exchange 5.5 to Windows NT Server 4.0, then migrating to Windows 2000 Server? Help... (glub glub) Sean List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000?
Do you have an old CD?? I have done it many times.. It is an NT server ;o?? Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ This space has been rented by: Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs You 2 can rent this space if you need it. -Original Message- From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000? I've tried installing Exchange Server 5.5 on a box running Windows 2000 Server, and every time I try I get a won't work with this software type of message. Yet I hear of people running Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000. What am I missing? Are folks installing Exchange 5.5 to Windows NT Server 4.0, then migrating to Windows 2000 Server? Help... (glub glub) Sean List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: Message That's always the good stuff! -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Well the spam is deletable. It's the email from the boyfriend that doesn't know she's married that I enjoy reading -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Yes you are William, both you and Bill!Since you both told the list about this awhile back, I'm happy and even more wonderful is that my boss is happy. BTW, I'm with Ray, I only do this to really old users who I know are only getting spamm. Anyone who is still sending spamm to a person after they have left a company over 6 months, deserves to be dropped into a "blackhole". Diane -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's a well-known Exchange Server black hole. I prefer to actually address the emails in case there is that one important message William "not a guru" Lefkovics -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Apparently they just "disappear". Haven't had an Exchange guru yet contradict that. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just "disappear"? Don't they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all "bounced" email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I don't understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Well, maybe as (in)famousbut I'm not sure about as rich :-) Diane -Original Message- From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail I feel so loved (1) (1) Thanks for the plug Diane (2) (2) Now I can be as rich and famous as William (3) (3) Hi William (4) (4) Might be coming back out to Vegas in a couple of weeks... -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail LOL -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Well the spam is deletable. It's the email from the boyfriend that doesn't know she's married that I enjoy reading -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Yes you are William, both you and Bill!Since you both told the list about this awhile back, I'm happy and even more wonderful is that my boss is happy. BTW, I'm with Ray, I only do this to really old users who I know are only getting spamm. Anyone who is still sending spamm to a person after they have left a company over 6 months, deserves to be dropped into a "blackhole". Diane -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's a well-known Exchange Server black hole. I prefer to actually address the emails in case there is that one important message William "not a guru" Lefkovics -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail Apparently they just "disappear". Haven't had an Exchange guru yet contradict that. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just "disappear"? Don't they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all "bounced" email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I don't understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ
RE: MS crop tool for PST files
No one here deletes ANYTHING. Those that do, never empty their deleted items, so they might as well not have deleted it. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS crop tool for PST files And she/he gives you the I need a papertrail excuse for not cleaning out his/her mail , right ? Heard that one too many times. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 16:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS crop tool for PST files I know, but I had to have users archive to PST because our store was reaching it's 16GB limit. So, of course, my boss is the one having a problem now with a corrupted PST that is over 2GB. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS crop tool for PST files PST=BAD Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ This space has been rented by: Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs You 2 can rent this space if you need it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MS crop tool for PST files Has anyone used this tool? http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q296/0/88.ASP It sounds like there is no way to recover all the data in the PST file. If that is the case, does anyone know of any other tools that allow you to recover all the data? Also, according to the article, you have to call MS to get it. Is that because it's not free? Thanks, Michelle List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MS crop tool for PST files
Thank you! I'll give it a whirl. -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: AW: MS crop tool for PST files Try http://www.metrocast.net/~scott/pst2gb/ Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2001 22:35 An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Betreff: RE: MS crop tool for PST files I know, but I had to have users archive to PST because our store was reaching it's 16GB limit. So, of course, my boss is the one having a problem now with a corrupted PST that is over 2GB. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS crop tool for PST files PST=BAD Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ This space has been rented by: Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs You 2 can rent this space if you need it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MS crop tool for PST files Has anyone used this tool? http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q296/0/88.ASP It sounds like there is no way to recover all the data in the PST file. If that is the case, does anyone know of any other tools that allow you to recover all the data? Also, according to the article, you have to call MS to get it. Is that because it's not free? Thanks, Michelle List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Enterprise
There is no problem in mixing Enterprise and Standard edition within a site. I've done it in the past. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Enterprise I havent mixed that kind of config, but I would suggest, IMO, to keep the server config consistent across a site... They play nice that way, well, most of the time dave -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Enterprise Can you mix and match Enterprise and Standard within a site? We have one server that continually bumps up against the ceiling and they want to do Enterprise, but the other servers are in fine shape. Thx. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS If you, or someone on the list has the posting Steve is referring to, would you mind reposting it to the list, or sending it to me directly? I seem to have missed it. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Yes - it was posted on this list and the NT list. Sorry, don't have the link. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Did they put up a press release or something? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS NT4 is going out to pasture. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Sorry about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Yes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially after the news form MS yesterday - can't afford to answer the question of why in a year. Thanks for your concern. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com http://www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS So, have you made a decision? (I would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying with Exchange5.5, put it on Win2000) William -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: 10/2/01 7:24 PM Subject: RE: NT SBS HOLD THE PHONE - this was sent days ago Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com http://www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Having a terrible time making the decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. This will be going into a single server shop running OLD applications. Ex 2K looks great but I have very little experience with the product and they don't need the extra frills... Thanks for the feedback. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com http://www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: Gordon Shepherd [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin
RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Title: Message They are accumulating on Mars. Greg -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail How do they just "disappear"? Don't they fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry for the stupid question. I currently receive all "bounced" email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea of a DL, though I don't understand where the emails go. Do they just bounce? Pat Smith Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/ -Original Message-From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail YES! I use this [1] and it is wonderful!!! No more email's for users who have been gone for 2 years! Diane [1] Thanks for the tip Bill Higgins! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail It's one of those great discussions. I personally try to unsubscribe to as many as I can. Sometimes you can "view source" and go right to the unsub screen. If the e-mails shouldn't be going to someone else (like their replacement, manager,etc.) you can create a DL called "Ex-employees" and add the addresses to the smtp address list. They just "disappear". -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Notification Inbound Mail Hello, We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former employees. Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail failures. Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news, job news etc. Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering our Exchange server? We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and 99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had subscribed to. What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure messages? Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message Filtering? Is there a better option? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MS crop tool for PST files
we have the same problem here. 1. Separate into years (1999.pst, 2000.pst, 2001.pst) 2. archive old years to CD 3. put the old years .pst files to the hard drive some place where they can't find them and open them in mail folders and don't back them up to the file server..that way you can search the file server for .pst files and if one appears like 1999.pst you can just blow it away knowing that it's on their CDs in their drawer... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2001 8:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS crop tool for PST files On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, David N. Precht wrote: And she/he gives you the I need a papertrail excuse for not cleaning out his/her mail , right ? Heard that one too many times. I archive every message I send, and most that are directed to me, or even from threads I am involved in. But here's a novel concept: I sort everything into multiple levels of folders, and I don't keep everything in one big file. I don't use Outlook myself, but if I did, you can bet I would use multiple PST files. Meanwhile, it seems like half our customers just have an Inbox with 2000+ messages in every one. *sigh* -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DS_E_BUSY : After Restoring DS
Wow dude, so you built another server entirely, not at all connected to the original? What ware did you use to do the restore, and what was the config of the orig server compared to the config of the second, ie sp levels, exchange HF's, names, all that. Also post back your steps, and order of installing all HF's, and sps, and then restores etc... jlc -Original Message- From: Saeed Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DS_E_BUSY : After Restoring DS Hi We r using exchagne 5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6. I restored IS and DS on another server having same settings as the original one. But now when i want to make any changes to any setting in exchange or want to install antivirus, it gives me following message: The Directory is busy. Wait a few seconds and try again. ID: DS_E_BUSY. What should i do. I have spent two nights and still stands nowhere. Regards Sapaki List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Enterprise
We have a mixed here, 5.5 shop with both enterprise and standard on one site, no problem since the setup 2 yrs ago. Ong LB NIE/NTU Singapore -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Enterprise There is no problem in mixing Enterprise and Standard edition within a site. I've done it in the past. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Enterprise I havent mixed that kind of config, but I would suggest, IMO, to keep the server config consistent across a site... They play nice that way, well, most of the time dave -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Enterprise Can you mix and match Enterprise and Standard within a site? We have one server that continually bumps up against the ceiling and they want to do Enterprise, but the other servers are in fine shape. Thx. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO Exchange and Bar Code Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS If you, or someone on the list has the posting Steve is referring to, would you mind reposting it to the list, or sending it to me directly? I seem to have missed it. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Yes - it was posted on this list and the NT list. Sorry, don't have the link. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Did they put up a press release or something? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS NT4 is going out to pasture. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Sorry about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Yes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially after the news form MS yesterday - can't afford to answer the question of why in a year. Thanks for your concern. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com http://www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS So, have you made a decision? (I would definitely say bye to NT4. Even if we are staying with Exchange5.5, put it on Win2000) William -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: 10/2/01 7:24 PM Subject: RE: NT SBS HOLD THE PHONE - this was sent days ago Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com http://www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT SBS Having a terrible time making the decision to go with NT 4 or 2K. This will be going into a single server shop running OLD applications. Ex 2K looks great but I have very little experience with the product and they don't need the extra frills... Thanks for the feedback. Steve Clark Clark Systems
RE: DS_E_BUSY : After Restoring DS
LOTS! But thank you. W -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DS_E_BUSY : After Restoring DS Uh, that was my next post... He he.. William, is there anything exchange related you don't know! jlc -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DS_E_BUSY : After Restoring DS http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q160/8/50.asp William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Saeed Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DS_E_BUSY : After Restoring DS Hi We r using exchagne 5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6. I restored IS and DS on another server having same settings as the original one. But now when i want to make any changes to any setting in exchange or want to install antivirus, it gives me following message: The Directory is busy. Wait a few seconds and try again. ID: DS_E_BUSY. What should i do. I have spent two nights and still stands nowhere. Regards Sapaki List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
