RE: Exmerge problems

2001-11-15 Thread Hakan Bulin

Hi Kevin,

Some answers for your questions!

1. Outlook 2000 is installed, have tried both swedish and english version.
2. Exmerge version is 4.00.021
3. Exmerge is running on w2k sp2 box with exchange 5.5 sp4 installed.

What do you mean by pst-provider? 

Regards

//Hakan






 Hakan,
 
 A few questions:
 
 1) Do you have Outlook installed on the PC you are running ExMerge on? 
 2) Which version of ExMerge is it?
 3) Where are you running ExMerge from - NT W/S, NT Server, Exchange Server?
 
 
 On first parse, this looks like an error to do with the PST Provider not
 being installed (properly).
 
 Kevin
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Hakan Bulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 14 November 2001 14:04
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Exmerge problems
 
 
 Hi, 
 I've this weird error when trying to use exmerge for backup purposes.
 Hope anyone could help me. 
 I've copied the log file so all can see what is wrong! 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 //Hakan Bulin
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v4.00.021
 Start Logging:November 08, 2001   10:49:47
 
 [10:49:47] Logging Level: None
 [10:49:47] Reading settings from file 'C:\exchsrvr\bin\EXMERGE.INI'.
 [10:49:47] Error parsing DN '' (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo)
 [10:49:47] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x
 [10:49:47] Source server read from settings file is 'ALBAN'.
 [10:49:47] Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from file
 ''
 [10:49:47] Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected
 from file ''
 [10:49:47] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the
 list.
 [10:49:47] Current machine locale ID is 0x41d
 [10:49:47] 0x4e4 is not a supported locale. Using current machine default
 locale (0x41d).
 [10:49:47] Operating System Version 5.0 (Build 2195)
 [10:49:47] Incorrect registry value data type for
 'Software\Microsoft\Exchange\Setup\ExchangeServerAdmin'.
 [10:50:06] Error parsing DN '' (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo)
 [10:50:06] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x
 [10:50:22] Program settings successfully saved.
 [10:50:23] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date operations.
 [10:50:23] Merging data into target store. The program will copy only
 those messages that do not exist in the target store.
 [10:50:23] Associated folder data will NOT be copied to the target store.
 [10:50:23] Using 'Swedish' (0x41d) as the default locale (Code page 1252)
 [10:50:23] All mailboxes will be processed, regardless of locale
 [10:50:23] Initializing worker thread (Thread0)
 [10:50:23] Copying data from mailbox '1a01' ('ADMINISTRATOR') on Server
 'ALBAN' to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ADMINISTRATOR.PST'.
 [10:50:23] Store 'MSPST MS' was not opened.
 [10:50:23] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted for mailbox '1a01'
 ('ADMINISTRATOR').
 [10:50:23] Number of items copied from the source store for all mailboxes
 processed: 0
 [10:50:23] Total number of folders processed in the source store: 0
 [10:50:23] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not
 successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered.
 [10:50:23] Process completion time: 00:00:00 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exmerge problems

2001-11-15 Thread Hakan Bulin

Hi,

I've created the folder and there no special rights for c:\exmergedata.
I'm using an admin account so...And yes there are free space.
Have tested on only one mailbox to see how it works!

Regards

//Hakan






 Have you created C:\EXMERGEDATA folder?
 Exmerge User has rights to this folder?
 There is free space on drive C:?
 
 Rafael
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
 From: Hakan Bulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
 Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:04 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  Exmerge problems
 
 Hi,=20
 I've this weird error when trying to use exmerge for backup purposes.
 Hope anyone could help me.=20
 I've copied the log file so all can see what is wrong!=20
 Thanks in advance.
 
 //Hakan Bulin
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v4.00.021
 Start Logging:November 08, 2001   10:49:47
 
 [10:49:47] Logging Level: None
 [10:49:47] Reading settings from file 'C:\exchsrvr\bin\EXMERGE.INI'.
 [10:49:47] Error parsing DN ''
 (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo)
 [10:49:47] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x
 [10:49:47] Source server read from settings file is 'ALBAN'.
 [10:49:47] Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from
 file
 ''
 [10:49:47] Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected
 from file ''
 [10:49:47] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the
 list.
 [10:49:47] Current machine locale ID is 0x41d
 [10:49:47] 0x4e4 is not a supported locale. Using current machine
 default
 locale (0x41d).
 [10:49:47] Operating System Version 5.0 (Build 2195)
 [10:49:47] Incorrect registry value data type for
 'Software\Microsoft\Exchange\Setup\ExchangeServerAdmin'.
 [10:50:06] Error parsing DN ''
 (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo)
 [10:50:06] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x
 [10:50:22] Program settings successfully saved.
 [10:50:23] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date
 operations.
 [10:50:23] Merging data into target store. The program will copy only
 those messages that do not exist in the target store.
 [10:50:23] Associated folder data will NOT be copied to the target
 store.
 [10:50:23] Using 'Swedish' (0x41d) as the default locale (Code page
 1252)
 [10:50:23] All mailboxes will be processed, regardless of locale
 [10:50:23] Initializing worker thread (Thread0)
 [10:50:23] Copying data from mailbox '1a01' ('ADMINISTRATOR') on Server
 'ALBAN' to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ADMINISTRATOR.PST'.
 [10:50:23] Store 'MSPST MS' was not opened.
 [10:50:23] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted for mailbox '1a01'
 ('ADMINISTRATOR').
 [10:50:23] Number of items copied from the source store for all
 mailboxes
 processed: 0
 [10:50:23] Total number of folders processed in the source store: 0
 [10:50:23] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not
 successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered.
 [10:50:23] Process completion time: 00:00:00=20
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

Errr.. MS only started in the email business because of a little product
called Network Courier! Most people didn't trust that when it started and
CCMail was the product of choice for most businesses. The tables can turn
and it depends on how badly Oracle (or whoever) wants that business.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2001 21:08
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange


Ellison must take a tour of Compaq and see how they have on the average 2500
users per their exchange.
We as the second largest . have on the average 1900 users per exchange
server and the only time that they anyone has been down was because of HD
failure. However we have Oracle consultants every week working on our 6.4
Tetra Byte database which keeps crashing.
Would one really trust a company that has just started into email business?

- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


 On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote:
  3) They both will require competent administrators to function well

   I've found *anything* requires a competent administrator to function
well.

 --
 Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
not |
 | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
 | organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|


 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

Now you're talking - I qualify!!! Where can I fill in an application form??

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2001 17:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


More:

4) Bill Gates and Larry Ellison both wash floors for a living.
5) They're both swell lookers.
6) Neither one of them is Chinese.

 -Original Message-
 From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:02 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
 
 
 I found some similarities:
 
 1) They both cost more than sendmail
 2) Neither will run on Novell
 3) They both will require competent administrators to function well
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:32 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange
 
 
 
 Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and
 exchange alike one is an email system and the other is
 a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp
 gateway.
 Chris
 --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I
  thought this article was
  a little off-base.  Ellison claims that an Exchange
  Server can only handle
  250-500 Outlook users.  Seems like a lot of his
  numbers are exaggerated to
  me.  Thought others might find this interesting if
  you haven't already read
  it.
  
 
 http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp
 
 http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D1833
0,00.asp
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard

2001-11-15 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

What do you mean by caches the information store?? If you update the
profile in the right places (and that's why you need to use a
program/script), you shouldn't see a problem. There is a small problem with
Contacts displayed as an Address Book which I'm working on but apart from
that, I don't see any problems.

I guess there might be problems with Public Folders if they are not
replicated/instantiated on the new server.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2001 17:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard


Have you experienced any problems with just updating the profile as opposed
to creating a new one. I have seen a few articles that suggest the profile
caches the information store and can thus cause problems public folders.

Any comments

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2001 17:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard


Yes, you are correct. Simply speaking, when you do a Move Mailbox the DN
does not get changed, only the Home-MDB (and Home-MTA)(before anyone says
anything, yes I know other things get changed but these are the significant
elements for a profile). You might like to check out my website which offers
createprf.exe which has the facility to update a profile from one server to
another.

Kevin
www.mailsoftware.co.uk

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2001 16:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard


Hope someone can clear something up. If you use Move server wizard to move a
server out of a site into a new site but in the same organisation, will
Outlook get redirected? My understanding is that it will not Outlook MAPI
only gets redirected to servers in the same site, i.e. it works for move
mailbox. Is my understanding correct?

Thanks,

Paul

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged.
Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they
must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If
you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may
not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from
your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure.  Delphis does
not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have
been sent.  Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the
author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Public Folder as an email recipient

2001-11-15 Thread Rajagopal, Sriram

Hi,

I wuld like to know how to setup the public folder as a email recipient in
exchange5.5...is ther any other way other than creating a folder in the
container and having the mail id for that folder configured to rec.
mails.Can we create a mailbox directly in the public folder??


Ram.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Palm syncing and Deleted item retention

2001-11-15 Thread Bendall, Paul

Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook
and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and
wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted
items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry
addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000
so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not.
Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the
items are not available under deleted item retention. 

Regards, 

Paul 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: NTDSNoMatch and Migrating

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Taylor

Hi Bonnie
I have just completed this migration myself and have had a few small
hitches. One or two of the mailboxes  I had to migrate would not move at
all (I was moving to new hardware), some of the mailboxes also caused
the info store on the new server to die during migration (a bit of an
issue if you plan to migrate in working hours). I fixed these easily by
running eseutil on the old info store first to fix integrity. Other than
that if you follow the document from MS on migration it should go just
fine. (If it is a big site and you have the hardware available then I
would do this all in a lab first as it is much easier the second time
around)
To answer your questions (or try at least)
1. When migrating old mailboxes which are used by people other that the
name of the mailbox the ADC does create a disabled account (if you
choose to) and then it also assigns the correct permissions to those
mailboxes for the previous owner accounts.
2. I am pretty sure that it will pick up the new DN and not worry too
much about the aliases - I would sort these out anyway in the quest for
a nice tidy Exchange server, but that's just me grin
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Simon

-Original Message-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 14 November 2001 17:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: NTDSNoMatch and Migrating


Doing some cleanup work to prep for E2k migration (on a new win2k
server) and I'm trying to understand something to hopefully get it right
the first time.

I've used NTDSAtrb to create csv files of the duplcate primary
accounts on our EX 5.5 sp3 server (single server, single site).  I've
not reimported any csv data yet to populate Extension-Attribute-10.
Haven't installed/run ADC, ForestPrep, nor DomainPrep yet.

Questions:  

1)  If I choose to import to populate the NTDSNoMatch value, I think
I
know that ADC will create disabled (if I choose) user accounts in AD for
these mailboxes when the ADC agreement is set up and the ADC will
re-assign the primary account to the new account.  But, will it also
correctly re-assign the previous primary account as an owner on the
Ex5.5 mailbox, or is this something I have to do manually?  Are any
delegate permissions affected?  And, if permissions are correctly
reassigned, do these permission stick when the mailbox is moved to the
E2k server?  If it doesn't do some of these things, seems like it would
make sense for me to do these manually ahead of time as there are less
than 20.

2)  I've noticed that quite a few of our EX5.5 Directory Name
values
don't match the Alias Name and/or Primary Account name due to renames,
from long ago.  When the ADC looks to sync up, does it look at the DN,
or does it use the account name (or alias name)?  I think it would use
the account name, but our previous EX5.5 admin thinks the different DNs
could be a problem and that we might need to export to pst and reimport
to a new mailbox for every account that is off so that the new DN
matches somehow to AD.

Thanks,
Bonnie M.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Block an Exchange administrator from viewing a mailbox?

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Taylor

Hi Bob
Generally most organisations will frown upon the admins having user
access to all mailboxes, but how would they know to start with grin -
what you should do is assign Permissions admin on the mailbox container
and not user permissions then you will both be able to admin mailboxes,
but not read through all of each others mail
Cheers
Simon

-Original Message-
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 14 November 2001 18:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Block an Exchange administrator from viewing a mailbox?


Exchange 5.5(sp4) on W2K(SP2)member server.

I have co-worker who must be able to administer the Exchange server
(Full
control) when I am unavailable.  We have an agreement that we will not
view each other's mail, however, I would prefer it if we could alter
permissions on just our mailboxes so that he cannot see mine, and
vice-versa.  Logic (and my basic knowledge of Exchange) tells me this
cannot be done, but I wanted to ask the group if there were any options.

Thanks for your input

Bob Fronk, MCSE 
Information Technology
Davis H. Elliot Company, Inc
2176 Lee Highway
Cloverdale, VA  24077
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.davishelliot.com
 
(V)540.992.2865 (F)540.992.1495 (C)540.580.3101
 
 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Security issue in Exchange 2000

2001-11-15 Thread Bob ten Berge

Hi all,

We got a strange problem here, this is what happens:
When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in
his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined,
meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add
additional mailboxes to the profile, an error message pops up right away
when clicking on the Add Mailbox button stating that the user cannot be
found.
Now we remove the profile from Outlook, I make that person a Domain Admin
and he makes a new profile in Outlook 100% similar to the previous
profile. But now when he hits the Add Mailbox everything works the way it
should, i can even remove him from the Domain Admins group, it keeps
working.
When i make this person member of the group Administrators this does NOT
work. So obviously we're dealing with a faulty security setting or police
here.
Ofcourse this solution is only temporary, on the Exchange2000 server
something must be incorrect, I just don't know where to look anymore. I
tried changing security settings on several objects within Exchange System
Manager but i couldn't find anything there.
Maybe i'm looking at the wrong picture here, but I was/am looking for some
object that has different rights for Administrators and Domain Admins, if
there is anybody out there that has a clue about what i am talking about,
please help me!!

Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: logging out of OWA?

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Taylor
Title: Message



Hey 
Albert
This 
is a stab in the dark, but what if you disable integrated Windows Authentication 
on your webserver - haven't tried it yet, but it would make 
sense.
Cheers
Simon

  
  -Original Message-From: Albert Vasquez 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 
  22:05To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: logging 
  out of OWA?
  Vikas,
  Thank you for your feed back it is much appreciated 
  .
  However what I am interested in is manually logging 
  off ofOWA andwould like to disable the "feature" that allows 
  anyone other than the intended personto open the mail box from a 
  browser.
  
  i.e 
  If user1 is logged onto her machine and steps away for a second (yep, I know) 
  and user2 happens over to check his email and he punches in https://exchsrvr1/exchange and "viola" 
  up comes user1's mail box.
  
  How 
  can this be stopped?
  
  thanks again
  AlV
  
-Original Message-From: Vikas Kanodia 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:44 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: logging out 
of OWA?
Dear, 
U can access owa by specifing the username , e.g vikas is 
the name of the mailbox  owa is installed on gnspl-exch m/c , so type 
this is the i.e-
//gnspl-exch/exchnage/vikas 
u'll get the username  password 
Vikas 
-Original Message- From: 
Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: logging 
out of OWA? 
All, Does anyone know if there is a 
way to manually log off of the Web access for 
Exchange 2000? It seems to pull the cached account 
information from the host that is making the 
connection and open that users mailbox. I understand this is 
how it functions but can this be disabled? 
Info: E2k running on W2k 
SSL is in use 
I am sure you'll let me know if more information is required 
to help resolve this problem ;) 
TIA AlV 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Long Delays between send and receive

2001-11-15 Thread Dave Pollak

the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the
recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an
artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past
messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive
messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and
to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they
don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log
show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail?

dave

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


are the messages that she complains about always from the same person?
there is
a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient...

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
One kind word can warm three winter months.  Chinese proverb

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Long Delays between send and receive


Hello,

I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users
complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between
the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by
comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here
and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other
messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event
Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to
the remote smtp server. There are  no messages waiting here. I don't notice
any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from  my hotmail account
take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same
senders but I can't confirm that  I don't know where to begin
troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book
from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about
through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange
Administrator i.e.  know nothing?

Dave Pollak
Information Systems Specialist
Town of Bedford
603.472.5242
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Security issue in Exchange 2000

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Taylor

Hi Bob
Shouldn't you be looking at the permissions on the individual Exchange
mailboxes - you can find this in active directory if you look at
advanced features

-Original Message-
From: Bob ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 November 2001 12:12
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Security issue in Exchange 2000


Hi all,

We got a strange problem here, this is what happens:
When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in
his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined,
meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add
additional mailboxes to the profile, an error message pops up right away
when clicking on the Add Mailbox button stating that the user cannot be
found. Now we remove the profile from Outlook, I make that person a
Domain Admin and he makes a new profile in Outlook 100% similar to the
previous profile. But now when he hits the Add Mailbox everything works
the way it should, i can even remove him from the Domain Admins group,
it keeps working. When i make this person member of the group
Administrators this does NOT work. So obviously we're dealing with a
faulty security setting or police here. Ofcourse this solution is only
temporary, on the Exchange2000 server something must be incorrect, I
just don't know where to look anymore. I tried changing security
settings on several objects within Exchange System Manager but i
couldn't find anything there. Maybe i'm looking at the wrong picture
here, but I was/am looking for some object that has different rights for
Administrators and Domain Admins, if there is anybody out there that has
a clue about what i am talking about, please help me!!

Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Allen Crawford
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange





I'm guessing he's never lost any data.


-Original Message-
From:  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering.


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange



So you should.


As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too.


We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%.


-Original Message-
From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange



We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will
trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! 
I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can
tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a
non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in
some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database
and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with
priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and
scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would
be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that
can directly interface with the database.
On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for
the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over
a $100,000.00 just in CALS.
Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but
for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching
this development.



Jim Sullivan
One Call Medical, Inc.




-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange




Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and
exchange alike one is an email system and the other is
a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp
gateway.
Chris
--- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I
 thought this article was
 a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange
 Server can only handle
 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his
 numbers are exaggerated to
 me. Thought others might find this interesting if
 you haven't already read
 it.
 

http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp

http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Anybody have docs on MS UpdateFB utility?

2001-11-15 Thread Kopec, David
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange



Anybody have docs on MS 
"UpdateFB" utility? We are scheduled 
to use this this weekendafter we use Guidgen to rebuild the system 
folders. Anyone had good/bad experiences with this? 
Tips?


David 
Kopec? Electronic Messaging Specialist
Technology Services 
 Solutions
MFS ?Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





MS UpdateFB utility

2001-11-15 Thread Kopec, David

Anybody have docs on MS UpdateFB utility?   We are scheduled to use this
this weekend after we use Guidgen to rebuild the system folders.  Anyone had
good/bad experiences with this?  Tips? 



David Kopec? Electronic Messaging Specialist

Technology Services  Solutions

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Exhcnage Site Connectors

2001-11-15 Thread Stuart Swift

I have a small question that i thought you might be able to answer or
advise on, using Exchange 5.5 i want to connect to another Exchange server
on a different IP range in a different domain eg
 
NTSERVER3 - 192.168.2.13 - MEDIASTERLING
COMMS_SERVER - 192.168.1.13 - STERLING
 
I know you can use site connectors, now i am not sure if it is possible
just to use a site connector or do i have to setup a RAS connector as they
are on different IP ranges ?
 
Thought you might have some suggestions or knbow of a good resource that i
use to answer the question. Any information would be wonderful

Thank you for your time.

Stuart Swift
Mediasterling
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange



And 
how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox 
how would you know? 

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange
  I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
  -Original Message- From: 
   Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 
  PM To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange 
  How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Oracle vs. Exchange 
  So you should. 
  As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it 
  too. 
  We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same 
  dataloss as Exchange - 0%. 
  -Original Message- From: Jim 
  Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Oracle vs. Exchange 
  We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell 
  you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle 
  database any day of the week! I'm not sure of 
  the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In 
  a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard 
  drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even 
  need all the drives!) you can recover the database and 
  perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that 
  with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use 
  tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to 
  interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) 
  that can directly interface with the database. 
  On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise 
  license fee for the Oracle database instead of 
  CALS. A large company could easily have over a 
  $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will 
  probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be 
  watching this development. 
  Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, 
  Inc. 
  -Original Message- From: Chris 
  Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 
  Oracle vs. Exchange 
  Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
  exchange alike one is an email system and the other is 
  a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp 
  gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I 
   thought this article was  a 
  little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange  Server can only handle  250-500 
  Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his  
  numbers are exaggerated to  me. Thought 
  others might find this interesting if  you haven't 
  already read  it.  
   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   List 
  Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

  __ 
  Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you 
  at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Neil Hobson

By monitoring the MTS-IN folder.  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 14:31
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Oracle vs. Exchange
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and
the mailbox how would you know? 
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
 -Original Message- 
From:   Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject:RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. 
-Original Message- 
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 


So you should. 
As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. 
We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now.  It has the same dataloss as Exchange -
0%. 
-Original Message- 
From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 


We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop.  I can tell you that I will 
trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week!  
I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I
can 
tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss.  In a 
non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in

some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the
database 
and perform functions directly on the database.  Let me see you do that
with 
priv.edb.  As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs
and 
scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database.  It
would 
be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools)
that 
can directly interface with the database. 
On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee
for 
the Oracle database instead of CALS.  A large company could easily have
over 
a $100,000.00 just in CALS. 
Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there,
but 
for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be
watching 
this development. 


Jim Sullivan 
One Call Medical, Inc. 



-Original Message- 
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 



Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
exchange alike one is an email system and the other is 
a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp 
gateway. 
Chris 
--- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I 
 thought this article was 
 a little off-base.  Ellison claims that an Exchange 
 Server can only handle 
 250-500 Outlook users.  Seems like a lot of his 
 numbers are exaggerated to 
 me.  Thought others might find this interesting if 
 you haven't already read 
 it. 
 
 
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
 


__ 
Do You Yahoo!? 
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals 
http://personals.yahoo.com 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Long Delays between send and receive

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can
turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again
you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see
when it got to your exchange box.

This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent
and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when  I turn
up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time
it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is
provided.

ellery

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the
recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an
artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past
messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive
messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and
to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they
don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log
show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail?

dave

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


are the messages that she complains about always from the same person?
there is
a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient...

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
One kind word can warm three winter months.  Chinese proverb

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Long Delays between send and receive


Hello,

I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users
complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between
the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by
comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here
and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other
messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event
Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to
the remote smtp server. There are  no messages waiting here. I don't notice
any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from  my hotmail account
take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same
senders but I can't confirm that  I don't know where to begin
troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book
from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about
through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange
Administrator i.e.  know nothing?

Dave Pollak
Information Systems Specialist
Town of Bedford
603.472.5242
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Taylor
Title: Message



if we 
didn't know then would we necessarily care ;)

  
  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:31To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange
  And 
  how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox 
  how would you know? 
  
-Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 
7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle 
vs. Exchange
I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
-Original Message- From:  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: 
Oracle vs. Exchange 
How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. 

-Original Message- From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
So you should. 
As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it 
too. 
We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same 
dataloss as Exchange - 0%. 
-Original Message- From: Jim 
Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Oracle vs. Exchange 
We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell 
you that I will trade Exchange database with an 
Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not 
sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can 
tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data 
loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long 
as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you 
don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database 
and perform functions directly on the database. Let 
me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange 
admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange 
database. It would be very nice to have 
competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On 
the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee 
for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A 
large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 
just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not 
appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some 
of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching 
this development. 
Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, 
Inc. 
-Original Message- From: 
Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 
Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
exchange alike one is an email system and the other 
is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a 
smtp gateway. Chris 
--- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:  I'm not usually a big defender of 
Microsoft, but I  thought this article 
was  a little off-base. Ellison claims 
that an Exchange  Server can only handle 
 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of 
his  numbers are exaggerated to  me. Thought others might find this interesting if 
 you haven't already read  
it.   
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 List 
Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
__ 
Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you 
at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Kim Schotanus

I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Arnold, Jamie

Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July
Title: Message



I 
don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. 

  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange
  if 
  we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;)
  

-Original Message-From: Ellery July 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 
14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle 
vs. Exchange
And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC 
and the mailbox how would you know? 

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 
  7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Oracle vs. Exchange
  I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
  -Original Message- From:  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange 
  How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just 
  wondering. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  So you should. 
  As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it 
  too. 
  We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same 
  dataloss as Exchange - 0%. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can 
  tell you that I will trade Exchange database with 
  an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm 
  not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I 
  can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 
  0% data loss. In a non-clustered 
  environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in 
  some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can 
  recover the database and perform functions 
  directly on the database. Let me see you do that with 
  priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that 
  use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to 
  interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would 
  be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like 
  website tools) that can directly interface with 
  the database. On the cost benefit side, I could 
  pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle 
  database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have 
  over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out 
  there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, 
  I can tell you we will be watching this 
  development. 
  Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, 
  Inc. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
  exchange alike one is an email system and the other 
  is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as 
  a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I'm not 
  usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I  
  thought this article was  a little 
  off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange  Server can only handle  250-500 
  Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his  
  numbers are exaggerated to  me. Thought 
  others might find this interesting if  you 
  haven't already read  it.   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   List 
  Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

  
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

The MTS-IN motor is good for seeing if messages are coming in but not where
they are going.
Even if you use the Mail Database Viewer you basically only get message
good/bad, it came in the IMS, not necessarily that is got delivered to the
correct mailbox(s). Am I missing something?

I know a lot of this subjective but 0% assumes a lot.

ellery



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


By monitoring the MTS-IN folder.  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 14:31
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Oracle vs. Exchange
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and
the mailbox how would you know? 
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
 -Original Message- 
From:   Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject:RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. 
-Original Message- 
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 


So you should. 
As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. 
We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now.  It has the same dataloss as Exchange -
0%. 
-Original Message- 
From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 


We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop.  I can tell you that I will 
trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week!  
I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I
can 
tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss.  In a 
non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in

some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the
database 
and perform functions directly on the database.  Let me see you do that
with 
priv.edb.  As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs
and 
scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database.  It
would 
be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools)
that 
can directly interface with the database. 
On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee
for 
the Oracle database instead of CALS.  A large company could easily have
over 
a $100,000.00 just in CALS. 
Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there,
but 
for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be
watching 
this development. 


Jim Sullivan 
One Call Medical, Inc. 



-Original Message- 
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 



Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
exchange alike one is an email system and the other is 
a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp 
gateway. 
Chris 
--- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I 
 thought this article was 
 a little off-base.  Ellison claims that an Exchange 
 Server can only handle 
 250-500 Outlook users.  Seems like a lot of his 
 numbers are exaggerated to 
 me.  Thought others might find this interesting if 
 you haven't already read 
 it. 
 
 
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
 


__ 
Do You Yahoo!? 
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals 
http://personals.yahoo.com 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not 

RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

That is the order I would get them with HP not far behind.

How many users and locations do you have? then let the games begin.

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Public Folder as an email recipient

2001-11-15 Thread John Matteson

Any Public Folder can receive mail directly. You need to set DEFAULT
permissions to CONTRIBUTOR.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral;
begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil,
it multiplies it... Through violence you may murder the hater, but you do
not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate...Returning
violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night
already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out hate; only love can do
that. -- Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.



-Original Message-
From: Rajagopal, Sriram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder as an email recipient


Hi,

I wuld like to know how to setup the public folder as a email recipient in
exchange5.5...is ther any other way other than creating a folder in the
container and having the mail id for that folder configured to rec.
mails.Can we create a mailbox directly in the public folder??


Ram.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Clayton

Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Allen Crawford
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange









I thought
you were referring to Oracle.



-Original Message-
From: Ellery July
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001
9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange



And how would you know that. If email data
is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? 

-Original
Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001
7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

I'm guessing
he's never lost any data. 

-Original
Message- 
From:  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Oracle vs.
Exchange 

How do you
know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. 

-Original
Message- 
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 



So you
should. 

As a small
shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. 

We're stcuk
on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. 

-Original
Message- 
From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 



We are an
Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will 
trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the
week! 
I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison ,
but I can 
tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss.
In a 
non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact
(and in 
some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover
the database 
and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see
you do that with 
priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use
Microsoft's APIs and 
scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange
database. It would 
be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website
tools) that 
can directly interface with the database. 
On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license
fee for 
the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could
easily have over 
a $100,000.00 just in CALS. 
Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out
there, but 
for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be
watching 
this development. 



Jim Sullivan 
One Call Medical, Inc. 



-Original
Message- 
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 



Maybe I am
missing something but how are 9i and 
exchange alike one is an email system and the other is 
a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp 
gateway.

Chris 
--- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I 
 thought this article was 
 a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange 
 Server can only handle 
 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his 
 numbers are exaggerated to 
 me. Thought others might find this interesting if 
 you haven't already read 
 it.

 
 
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
 



__ 
Do You Yahoo!? 
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals 
http://personals.yahoo.com 

List Charter
and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter
and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter
and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter
and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Stuart Swift

Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Taylor
Title: Message



same 
applies to Oracle's claim then...

  
  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:48To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange
  I 
  don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. 
  
-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
Exchange
if 
we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;)

  
  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 
  14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle 
  vs. Exchange
  And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC 
  and the mailbox how would you know? 
  
-Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 
7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Oracle vs. Exchange
I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
-Original Message- From:  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. 
Exchange 
How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just 
wondering. 
-Original Message- From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
So you should. 
As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch 
it too. 
We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same 
dataloss as Exchange - 0%. 
-Original Message- From: 
Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can 
tell you that I will trade Exchange database 
with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison 
, but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database 
does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered 
environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in 
some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can 
recover the database and perform functions 
directly on the database. Let me see you do that with 
priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools 
that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to 
interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would 
be very nice to have competitive third party tools 
(like website tools) that can directly interface 
with the database. On the cost benefit side, I 
could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could 
easily have over a $100,000.00 just in 
CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal 
to the smaller shops out there, but for some of 
us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching 
this development. 
Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, 
Inc. 
-Original Message- From: 
Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 
Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
exchange alike one is an email system and the other 
is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i 
as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I'm not 
usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I  
thought this article was  a little 
off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange  Server can only handle  250-500 
Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his  numbers are exaggerated to  
me. Thought others might find this interesting if  you haven't already read  
it.   
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
 
List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread WEAVER, Simon

I like Dell! Certainly never had a problem with them!
Same as Compaq - no problem running them either! I do like their Smart Start
stuff!

Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 03:10:PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware

Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000.
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
...
This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.  Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.
Astrium Limited
Gunnels Wood Road
Stevenage
Hertfordshire
SG1 2AS

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Jeff A. Clarke

HThats all we have here and have never had a problem with them.
Can you elaborate?

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread James Winzenz

I agree too.  We are 90% Dell in our office and 10% Compaq.  They are both
great servers.  We have had no problems whatsoever with our Dell servers.
Even had a hard drive go down on one of them, and plugged a new one in, and
the RAID controller automatically scrubbed it and restored the RAID without
us having to do anything!  Have not had any experience with any IBM servers,
though.

James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.

 -Original Message-
From:   WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: looking for hardware

I like Dell! Certainly never had a problem with them!
Same as Compaq - no problem running them either! I do like their Smart Start
stuff!

Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 03:10:PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware

Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000.
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
...
This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.  Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium
Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.
Astrium Limited
Gunnels Wood Road
Stevenage
Hertfordshire
SG1 2AS

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up
and administering your servers.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

Dell, IBM, offer and do the same

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention

2001-11-15 Thread Don Ely

It's the config of his palm software that fzcked him...  Can you say bye bye
contacts?  Sounds like a good time for a test restore...

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention


Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook
and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and
wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted
items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry
addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000
so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not.
Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the
items are not available under deleted item retention. 

Regards, 

Paul 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread John Matteson

Unless you have a power related failure on a Saturday.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

-Original Message-
From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


I use DELL for all our intel needs and have never gone back to anything
else. Their machines are as stable as anything - the build quality is
extremely cool and their support services and on site maintenance
rocks!.


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Long Delays between send and receive

2001-11-15 Thread Dave Pollak

I'll turn up the event log. I've tried Neotrace and found that routes to the
senders in question (which are both in-state and nearby) go through five
states - insignificant, I presume, but makes for an interesting map.
whiffing - exactly - but guess who issues paychecks.

dave

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can
turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again
you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see
when it got to your exchange box.

This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent
and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when  I turn
up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time
it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is
provided.

ellery

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the
recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an
artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past
messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive
messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and
to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they
don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log
show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail?

dave

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


are the messages that she complains about always from the same person?
there is
a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient...

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
One kind word can warm three winter months.  Chinese proverb

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Long Delays between send and receive


Hello,

I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users
complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between
the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by
comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here
and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other
messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event
Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to
the remote smtp server. There are  no messages waiting here. I don't notice
any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from  my hotmail account
take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same
senders but I can't confirm that  I don't know where to begin
troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book
from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about
through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange
Administrator i.e.  know nothing?

Dave Pollak
Information Systems Specialist
Town of Bedford
603.472.5242
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Don Ely

Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash
or have an appearance of instability.

Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start
disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Long Delays between send and receive

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

It is really not the number of states but the number of routers and if any
are slower then others.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


I'll turn up the event log. I've tried Neotrace and found that routes to the
senders in question (which are both in-state and nearby) go through five
states - insignificant, I presume, but makes for an interesting map.
whiffing - exactly - but guess who issues paychecks.

dave

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can
turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again
you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see
when it got to your exchange box.

This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent
and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when  I turn
up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time
it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is
provided.

ellery

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the
recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an
artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past
messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive
messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and
to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they
don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log
show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail?

dave

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


are the messages that she complains about always from the same person?
there is
a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient...

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
One kind word can warm three winter months.  Chinese proverb

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Long Delays between send and receive


Hello,

I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users
complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between
the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by
comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here
and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other
messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event
Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to
the remote smtp server. There are  no messages waiting here. I don't notice
any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from  my hotmail account
take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same
senders but I can't confirm that  I don't know where to begin
troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book
from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about
through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange
Administrator i.e.  know nothing?

Dave Pollak
Information Systems Specialist
Town of Bedford
603.472.5242
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.

Mega-dittos on that.  Their smart start CD makes server setup a snap.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up
and administering your servers.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Martin Blackstone

My order would be Compaq, IBM, whoever

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


That is the order I would get them with HP not far behind.

How many users and locations do you have? then let the games begin.

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

one of the issues with Palm (which I actually prefer over PPC) is that if an
item is deleted on the palm it does not automatically get sent to the
deleted items folder (like it does with PPC). 

Don is right the info

ellery july
Technical Lead
Northwest Area Foundation
332 Minnesota
e-1201 
St. Paul, MN 55101
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone - 651-225-3895 
fax   - 651-225-7695   is probably gone, gone, gone.



-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention


Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook
and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and
wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted
items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry
addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000
so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not.
Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the
items are not available under deleted item retention. 

Regards, 

Paul 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack!

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July
Title: Message



I 
agree.

  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:00 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange
  same 
  applies to Oracle's claim then...
  

-Original Message-From: Ellery July 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 
14:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle 
vs. Exchange
I 
don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. 

  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 
  8:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Oracle vs. Exchange
  if we didn't know then would we necessarily care 
  ;)
  

-Original Message-From: Ellery 
July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 
14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Oracle vs. Exchange
And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the 
IMC and the mailbox how would you know? 

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 
  2001 7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
  I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
  -Original Message- From:  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 
  5:47 PM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle 
  vs. Exchange 
  How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just 
  wondering. 
  -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  So you should. 
  As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch 
  it too. 
  We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same 
  dataloss as Exchange - 0%. 
  -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I 
  can tell you that I will trade Exchange 
  database with an Oracle database any day of the week! 
  I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were 
  quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that 
  the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a 
  non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives 
  are intact (and in some cases you don't even 
  need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me 
  see you do that with priv.edb. As 
  exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and 
  scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's 
  exchange database. It would be very nice 
  to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that 
  can directly interface with the database. 
  On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single 
  enterprise license fee for the Oracle database 
  instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over 
  a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops 
  out there, but for some of us that already use 
  Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. 
  Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, 
  Inc. 
  -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
  exchange alike one is an email system and the other 
  is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i 
  as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I'm 
  not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I  thought this article was  a 
  little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange 
   Server can only handle  250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of 
  his  numbers are exaggerated to 
   me. Thought others might find this 
  interesting if  you haven't already 
  read  it.  
   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   
  List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ 

RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Neil Hobson

What's wrong with beermats? :-)

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 16:16
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: looking for hardware
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack!

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Clayton

My issues with Dell go back to the last time we all slagged off all the
vendors out there. From that thread I know loads of folks have had good
experiences with their Customer Service, but I never have. I have always
had to wait for 20 minutes on hold once I pressed 3 for server support,
only to get someone telling me that I had got through to the wrong
department when I did get a human being. 

The other thing someone mentioned, that I have also experienced, is that
when you do have a hardware failure, the get you jump through a million
hoops to avoid what they would call unnecessary service call outs. I
think the person mentioned they had a faulty hard drive, and put the
phone next to the machine so the guy on the phone could hear it
clunking, and he still wanted him to go through all of the diag's. While
I understand the thinking behind this, when you have a server which
needs surgery desperately, going through checkbox 2, list 7 isn't high
on the list of priorities for the customer, especially when it is a no
brainer like a hard disk failure. 

We had two Power Edge Servers at my last company, and I never really
liked em (inherited from a predecessor) mainly due to the fact that if
we ever needed any service, the service we got was absolute crap. To be
fair, this was in the UK, where both Dell and Compaq base their head
offices out of Dublin, I have not had dealings with Dell in the states.
I have, however dealt with Compaq in the US, and have found them very
responsive, even to the point of replying to an email posted on their
web site within a couple of hours, which is something I never
experienced with Dell.

As far as IBM is concerned, I have no idea. I have never even seen an
IBM Server in any of the places I have worked.

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Have you tried Dell? I use both and could not find a difference. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up
and administering your servers.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Glen Macdonald

Ditto - We are strictly a Dell shop -- love them.
Haven't had any real problems.

--- Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any
 of my Dell servers crash
 or have an appearance of instability.
 
 Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very
 unstable.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs
 using their smart start
 disks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: looking for hardware
 
 
 I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
 Any best bets?
 
 Kim
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

I have used Dell for my  SQL and exchange server with no hardware problems
and they are not the hardware police Compaq sometimes is.

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Clayton

Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's
cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I
have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers
crash
or have an appearance of instability.

Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start
disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Randal, Phil

Nor have we had any major problems.  And the latest Dell server
setup disk is just as easy to use as Compaq's SmartStart.

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

 -Original Message-
 From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 15:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell 
 servers crash
 or have an appearance of instability.
 
 Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using 
 their smart start
 disks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: looking for hardware
 
 
 I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
 Any best bets?
 
 Kim
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Neil Hobson

So from all of the messages in this thread, I deduce that:

Some people think Compaq are good.
Some people think Compaq are bad.
Some people think Dell are good.
Some people think Dell are bad.
Some people think

Hey!  There's a pattern forming here!

-Original Message-
From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 16:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: looking for hardware
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Ditto - We are strictly a Dell shop -- love them.
Haven't had any real problems.

--- Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any
 of my Dell servers crash
 or have an appearance of instability.
 
 Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very
 unstable.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs
 using their smart start
 disks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: looking for hardware
 
 
 I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000.
 Any best bets?
 
 Kim
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Difference in rights between administrators and domain admins in Exchange2000?

2001-11-15 Thread Bob ten Berge

Hi all,

We got a strange problem here, this is what happens:
When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in
his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined,
meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add
additional mailboxes to the profile, an error message pops up right away
when clicking on the Add Mailbox button stating that the user cannot be
found.
Now we remove the profile from Outlook, I make that person a Domain Admin
and he makes a new profile in Outlook 100% similar to the previous
profile. But now when he hits the Add Mailbox everything works the way it
should, i can even remove him from the Domain Admins group, it keeps
working.
When i make this person member of the group Administrators this does NOT
work. So obviously we're dealing with a faulty security setting or police
here.
Ofcourse this solution is only temporary, on the Exchange2000 server
something must be incorrect, I just don't know where to look anymore. I
tried changing security settings on several objects within Exchange System
Manager but i couldn't find anything there.
Maybe i'm looking at the wrong picture here, but I was/am looking for some
object that has different rights for Administrators and Domain Admins, if
there is anybody out there that has a clue about what i am talking about,
please help me!!

thanks so much in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Randal, Phil

You forgot to add another 36.4Gb drive for hot-swap.

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Mead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 16:10
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Compaq ML3770. Throw in 3x36.4Gb with a couple 9.1 and you're 
 set. Right
 Bob?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:16 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
 start disks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: looking for hardware
 
 
 I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
 Any best bets?
 
 Kim
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Brian Mead

Compaq ML3770. Throw in 3x36.4Gb with a couple 9.1 and you're set. Right
Bob?

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack!

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Benjamin Scott

On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
wrote:
 Mega-dittos on that.  Their smart start CD makes server setup a snap.

  Unless you want to deviate from what Compaq thinks you should do.  Then
you are doomed.  (Well, I exaggerate, but not by much.)

-- 
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Tom.Gray

Compaq also has great tech support (in my opinion).   Back in my banyan
vines days i had the occaision to call for help on Christmas and on
Thanksgiving -- they had people on the other end of the phone that were very
experienced.

Since our (forced) switch to NT I've only called a couple of times, but
after getting past the obvious questions (yes I checked the cables, no I
haven't installed anything, yes I  tried rebooting) I have gotten answers
promptly.

Compaq has a strange system for hardware replacement.  Three years they
fix/replace it, even onsite!  BUT, they contract out with local folks to do
that work and I have certainly NOT been impressed with their local
contractors.  (after watching one technician try to force a SIMM in
backwards for 5 minutes, I now make them stand in a corner and watch me
replace whatever components were necessary)

But their servers have been rock solid for us (1 motherboard, 1 memory, 1
hard drive but probably 15 DAT/DLT drive replacements over 10 years)

YMMV

Tom Gray, Network Engineer
All Kinds of Minds  The Center for Development and Learning
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATT Net: (919)960-





-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up
and administering your servers.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention

2001-11-15 Thread Bendall, Paul

I thought as much, so the Palm software or more accurately the Chapura
Pocket mirror is directly making MAPI calls to Exchange and making a hard
delete of the items? Would be a nice improvement if the software created a
PST file for all deletions, don't you think.

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention


It's the config of his palm software that fzcked him...  Can you say bye bye
contacts?  Sounds like a good time for a test restore...

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention


Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook
and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and
wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted
items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry
addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000
so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not.
Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the
items are not available under deleted item retention. 

Regards, 

Paul 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged.
Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they
must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If
you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may
not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from
your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure.  Delphis does
not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have
been sent.  Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the
author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis.

_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Mike Powell

My experience with 2 failed RAID drives on our Dell servers: Call tech
support. 10 minutes on hold, get technician. Explain hard drive
self-test notices filling up log. Tech asked how many. I said that I
stopped counting at 100. He said they'd get me a new drive ASAP. In
both cases, I had a drive in my hand FOUR HOURS LATER, even though we
are two hours away from Seattle. Not FedEx overnight, four hours same
day, courier didn't arrive until 7:30, but got there in time for
same-day replacement. I imagine service better than that.


Mike


-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


My issues with Dell go back to the last time we all slagged off all
the
vendors out there. From that thread I know loads of folks have had
good
experiences with their Customer Service, but I never have. I have
always
had to wait for 20 minutes on hold once I pressed 3 for server
support,
only to get someone telling me that I had got through to the wrong
department when I did get a human being. 

The other thing someone mentioned, that I have also experienced, is
that
when you do have a hardware failure, the get you jump through a
million
hoops to avoid what they would call unnecessary service call outs. I
think the person mentioned they had a faulty hard drive, and put the
phone next to the machine so the guy on the phone could hear it
clunking, and he still wanted him to go through all of the diag's.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Regarding Competence (was Oracle vs. Exchange)

2001-11-15 Thread Clayton

1. The closet is about 12' X 15', and I keep the lights nice and low,
with some cool music going all day, so I don't have to put up with that
annoying artificial light we all have the privilege of experiencing in
offices. I call it my closet because there is no window, but that is not
so bad, as I am 3 miles from the nearest beach, and the sun is 90
degrees every day of the year. So if I don't see the sun between
cigarette breaks, I'll make it.
2. Competent means you are able to do the task at hand. In our case, it
is keeping things ticking over, making recommendations on how things can
be improved, and doing the analysis in the first place. Off list,
William and I exchanged some thoughts on this yesterday, and the basic
consensus was that with the amount of technology out there, and the pace
at which new ones are introduced, it is virtually impossible to keep up.
I do not call that incompetence. I am not perfect at this lark, and I
make mistakes, and know less than I don't know. But I sure as heck can
find out what I need to know, when I need to know it, and that is only
because I know where to look for the answers in the first place. If I
wasn't competent, I wouldn't be able to do that. I suspect I am not
alone in this methodology either. 

I really wish I did know everything, as I would be independently wealthy
as a result. I have resigned myself to the fact that I alone am not able
to keep up with all that is going on in the IT world, and that if I
continue to gain as much knowledge as I can, eventually I will rely on
TechNet, or mail lists less for when I need some information.

In the mean time, I love having the resources at my disposal, and I
enjoy the varying degree of thoughts and opinions that go on here. If I
didn't use the resources to help me do my job, I would be incompetent;-)

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Regarding Competence (was Oracle vs. Exchange)


How big is the closet and is the light on?  That shows what competence
level
your organization think you are.

Interestingly, I would argue and have stated so in this and other groups
that most IT folks are incompetent. That is why we have software which
is
easily broken or used for non-intended purposes.  There are more network
people then phone and electrical people combines because we are unable
do
much without help from others. 

We make many decisions based on selfishness or herd mentality (over wise
no
one would own a Cisco Pix or Compaq Desktop) instead of organizational
cost/benefit analysis. 

Our incompetence and arrogance have us blaming the user yet we provide
them
little to training and many times it is a known bug.


We are not dumb just incompetent. This is the only job I know where you
can
tell the CEO you do not know and get to keep your job occasionally.

-Original Message- 
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Regarding Competence (was Oracle vs. Exchange)


If I knew everything there was to know about all of the software in my
environment, would that then make me competent? I certainly would not
need to ask questions here from time to time. 

Alas, I will never know everything about everything, and so cannot
charge vast sums of money for the wealth of knowledge not currently in
my possession.

Having said that I do believe I am competent. I approach problems
logically, divide and conquer all that sort of stuff. I use the tools I
have to find out what I need to know, and this list is one of those
tools, along with TechNet, contacts I have etc.etc.etc., you all know
the drill.

Am I required? Maybe not me personally, but someone is, if only to make
sure the boss can still download mpeg files in Media Player. /sarcasm
Do I need to be competent? I need to be able to solve problems, and make
recommendations for upgrades or other projects that come up, and I need
to know what to look for when things go squirrelly. So to me, that
sounds like competent.

But what do I know, I am just the dumb IT guy stuck in the closet ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


No, I did not say that.

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


So.. you're saying what.. that the members of this list aren't
competent?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle 

RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

another similar server for offline data restores.

BTW, when did Compaq start making ML3770 servers?

-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


You forgot to add another 36.4Gb drive for hot-swap.

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Mead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 16:10
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Compaq ML3770. Throw in 3x36.4Gb with a couple 9.1 and you're 
 set. Right
 Bob?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:16 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
 start disks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: looking for hardware
 
 
 I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
 Any best bets?
 
 Kim
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July

My story

Hum I had a similar experience with Compaq on my file server last. I had a
failed memory chip - they sent me two chips which were different them the
originals. They sent those  and when I called to ask about why I got them -
the tech told me because the ones I needed were backordered and if I put
them in my Compaq warranty would not cover them. In addition, because I use
a non-approved Compaq internal backup device (which they now approve) they
had me take it out. That is why I only purchase Dell servers now.

I have come to realize that Compaq usually delivers good service (and charge
a 25% premium over other vendors) because it only provides service to a very
limited number of approved products. They also assume that all third party
products conflict with their product. Because of this Compaq is losing
market-share and being absorbed by HP.


ellery july
Technical Lead
Northwest Area Foundation
332 Minnesota
e-1201 
St. Paul, MN 55101
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone - 651-225-3895 
fax   - 651-225-7695   

-Original Message-
From: Mike Powell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


My experience with 2 failed RAID drives on our Dell servers: Call tech
support. 10 minutes on hold, get technician. Explain hard drive
self-test notices filling up log. Tech asked how many. I said that I
stopped counting at 100. He said they'd get me a new drive ASAP. In
both cases, I had a drive in my hand FOUR HOURS LATER, even though we
are two hours away from Seattle. Not FedEx overnight, four hours same
day, courier didn't arrive until 7:30, but got there in time for
same-day replacement. I imagine service better than that.


Mike


-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


My issues with Dell go back to the last time we all slagged off all
the
vendors out there. From that thread I know loads of folks have had
good
experiences with their Customer Service, but I never have. I have
always
had to wait for 20 minutes on hold once I pressed 3 for server
support,
only to get someone telling me that I had got through to the wrong
department when I did get a human being. 

The other thing someone mentioned, that I have also experienced, is
that
when you do have a hardware failure, the get you jump through a
million
hoops to avoid what they would call unnecessary service call outs. I
think the person mentioned they had a faulty hard drive, and put the
phone next to the machine so the guy on the phone could hear it
clunking, and he still wanted him to go through all of the diag's.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Stuart Swift

Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found them
far less stable than the compaq one our parent company use, you might well
be right they could well be stable but in my experiance they are not,
ultimatly it makes no difference, as long as the server runs and is easily
upgradable, as system admins we are all happy. I will say this, i come from
a back ground of building PC's and in my experiance find that dell use
budget parts for there machines, parts IBM and compaq don't use. This has
alwasy steered me away from Dell servers. As we all know, well if we don't
we should Dell don't really make anything it is just badged Dell, i use a
Dell Powervault 705n 240gb RAID, but in truth it is a Quantum Snap. I don't
really believe that any server is any better or any less, it depends on the
enviroment it is in and how it is configured. 

nice to see you doing your bit Clayton :o)

oh and as for the stability of the Sys admin, true i am a very unstable man,
but aren't we all :o)

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's
cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I
have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers
crash
or have an appearance of instability.

Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start
disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Exchange cc:Mail Connector

2001-11-15 Thread Gargone, Barbara

Is there anyone out there who is experiencing problems with supporting
more than one cc:Mail connector within an Exchange 2000 organization?
In Exchange 5.5, you could have more than one cc:Mail connector as long
as they weren't directly connected to the same post office.  In Exchange
2000, the cc:Mail connector uses the primary cc:Mail proxy address on
the default recipient policy for routing to/from the directly connected
cc:Mail PO - (call it PO1)  The problem is, if another Exchange server
at a separate location supports a cc:Mail connector and it is configured
to connect to a separate post office (PO2), the second cc:Mail connector
is still using the primary cc:Mail proxy address on the default policy
which is for PO1.  This then forces all messages once received in
cc:Mail to route back through PO1 to Exchange.

Microsoft is aware of this problem, however, it may take more than just
our problem for them to provide a workaround or fix.  Is there anyone
else out there who is using cc:Mail and migrating directly to Exchange
2000 or who could comment on this specific issue.

Thank you in advance

Barbara Gargone









List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Clayton

Touche!

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found
them
far less stable than the compaq one our parent company use, you might
well
be right they could well be stable but in my experiance they are not,
ultimatly it makes no difference, as long as the server runs and is
easily
upgradable, as system admins we are all happy. I will say this, i come
from
a back ground of building PC's and in my experiance find that dell use
budget parts for there machines, parts IBM and compaq don't use. This
has
alwasy steered me away from Dell servers. As we all know, well if we
don't
we should Dell don't really make anything it is just badged Dell, i use
a
Dell Powervault 705n 240gb RAID, but in truth it is a Quantum Snap. I
don't
really believe that any server is any better or any less, it depends on
the
enviroment it is in and how it is configured. 

nice to see you doing your bit Clayton :o)

oh and as for the stability of the Sys admin, true i am a very unstable
man,
but aren't we all :o)

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's
cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I
have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers
crash
or have an appearance of instability.

Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start
disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Long Delays between send and receive

2001-11-15 Thread Dave Pollak

14 nodes but no discernible delay in any of them now. who knows about
yesterday?

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


It is really not the number of states but the number of routers and if any
are slower then others.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


I'll turn up the event log. I've tried Neotrace and found that routes to the
senders in question (which are both in-state and nearby) go through five
states - insignificant, I presume, but makes for an interesting map.
whiffing - exactly - but guess who issues paychecks.

dave

-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can
turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again
you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see
when it got to your exchange box.

This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent
and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when  I turn
up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time
it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is
provided.

ellery

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the
recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an
artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past
messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive
messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and
to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they
don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log
show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail?

dave

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive


are the messages that she complains about always from the same person?
there is
a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient...

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
One kind word can warm three winter months.  Chinese proverb

-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Long Delays between send and receive


Hello,

I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users
complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between
the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by
comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here
and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other
messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event
Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to
the remote smtp server. There are  no messages waiting here. I don't notice
any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from  my hotmail account
take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same
senders but I can't confirm that  I don't know where to begin
troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book
from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about
through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange
Administrator i.e.  know nothing?

Dave Pollak
Information Systems Specialist
Town of Bedford
603.472.5242
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Kim Schotanus

yes... some people think!

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November, 2001 5:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


So from all of the messages in this thread, I deduce that:

Some people think Compaq are good.
Some people think Compaq are bad.
Some people think Dell are good.
Some people think Dell are bad.
Some people think

Hey!  There's a pattern forming here!

-Original Message-
From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 16:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: looking for hardware
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Ditto - We are strictly a Dell shop -- love them.
Haven't had any real problems.

--- Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any
 of my Dell servers crash
 or have an appearance of instability.
 
 Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very
 unstable.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs
 using their smart start
 disks
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: looking for hardware
 
 
 Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: looking for hardware
 
 
 I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000.
 Any best bets?
 
 Kim
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Lefkovics, William

Brand name.  

No best bets.  Too many variables.

Also consider what products you are most comfortable with, which vendors you
have a good relationship with.

My favourite is HP.

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Archive all mailboxes?

2001-11-15 Thread Jeff Jakubiwski

I want to archive some of my mail on my server ( just a portion of my
mailboxes ) and get it out of the exchange database.

I know I can do .pst files, but there are some 1400 mailboxes, and I want
the ability to archive any emails more than 1 year old out of all the
mailboxes.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




OWA in DMZ

2001-11-15 Thread Dikeman, Bo



Good 
Morning,
Please forgive me if 
this question has already been answered, but I have searchedhigh and low 
and still can't get things to click right. I am trying to get OWA to work 
in our DMZ, here is what I have:

 
1. Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on a W2k member server 
on the inside.
 
2. A WinNT 4.0 PDC on the same subnet with the 
Exchange server
 
3. A Cisco PIX w/DMZ card
 
4. A W2k DC (for the DMZ domain) w/OWA 5.5 SP4 in 
the DMZ

There is a two-way 
trust between the domains for testing. This will eventually be a one-way 
trust where the DMZ domain trusts the production domain, but not vice 
versa. I have the following ports open for the OWA box: 53 TCP,UDP; 88 
TCP, UDP; 123 TCP; 135 TCP; 389 TCP, UDP; 445 TCP; 3268 TCP; 137 UDP; 138 UDP; 
and 139 TCP. Oh, and 80. I opened all of these per Q articles that 
said to do so, butany of these that definitely do not need to be open 
please let me know.I have also bound NTDS on the w2k box to 
1025 and that port (TCP and UDP) is open per Q280132. I have also bound 
the Exchange IS, DS, and SA to ports in the registry per q259240 and those three 
TCP ports open in the firewall.

The clincher is 
everything workswhen the OWA box is on the inside. Once the OWA box 
is in the DMZ that is not the case. Whenever a user tries to log on to OWA 
in this situation, they get the hourglass for a couple of minutes and get the 
script time out error in IE. Also, I have seen a couple of Q articles 
recommending to set authentication to clear text in IIS, that is 
set.

Any suggestions or 
any info that someone might need to make a suggestion, please, please fire 
in.

Thanks a 
bunch,

Bo Dikeman, 
MCSE
Network 
Administrator
NorthStar 
Communications Group, Inc.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Archive all mailboxes?

2001-11-15 Thread Lefkovics, William

I would still recommend Exmerge to pst I think.

Or backup, then use Mailbox manager to toast everything older than 1 year,
keeping the backup as your archive.

Or spend money.

William

Original Message-
From: Jeff Jakubiwski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Archive all mailboxes?


I want to archive some of my mail on my server ( just a portion of my
mailboxes ) and get it out of the exchange database.

I know I can do .pst files, but there are some 1400 mailboxes, and I want
the ability to archive any emails more than 1 year old out of all the
mailboxes.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




2000 Move mail box upgrade

2001-11-15 Thread NT Admin Issues
Title: 2000 Move mail box upgrade





I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange 2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I am getting errors as follows;

 Error: Connecting to destination server.
cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512-

I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve it.


Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade if Exchange 5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? 


Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine and can be re-homed, but mail boxes do not. 
 If it is possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5 on NT 4 to exchange 2000 can anyone help me out with what may be causing these connection problems? 



**
"This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the e-mail originator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, 
please check this e-mail for virus infection for which
CDG Management LLC accepts no responsibility"
**


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





pop3 and port 25

2001-11-15 Thread Jeff Pace

Ladies and gentlemen,
I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
(btw, this is my first time..so be gentle)
have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system.
I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email.
I get:
The connection to the sever has failed.
Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061
Error Number: 0x800CCC0E

after reviewing (Q191687)...
telnet established port 110 as active and listening.
netstat -an confirms port 25 not there.
it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available.
I am not currently running IIS.   
Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server..
Calgon take me away!
any help would be appreciated...thanks,
Jeff


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message



You 
are right. I believe it is 0%.

I've 
only experienced data loss as the result of severe hardware failure, oh and from 
Computer Associates software.

Both 
Oracle and Exchange produce full and complete test restores. Both have had 
or do have comprehensive monitors on them, including perfmons on the OS and 
application levels. 


-Original Message-From: Ellery July 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:48 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
Exchange
I 
don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. 

  -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange
  if 
  we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;)
  

-Original Message-From: Ellery July 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 
14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle 
vs. Exchange
And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC 
and the mailbox how would you know? 

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 
  7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Oracle vs. Exchange
  I'm guessing he's never lost any data. 
  -Original Message- From:  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange 
  How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just 
  wondering. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  So you should. 
  As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it 
  too. 
  We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same 
  dataloss as Exchange - 0%. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can 
  tell you that I will trade Exchange database with 
  an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm 
  not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I 
  can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 
  0% data loss. In a non-clustered 
  environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in 
  some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can 
  recover the database and perform functions 
  directly on the database. Let me see you do that with 
  priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that 
  use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to 
  interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would 
  be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like 
  website tools) that can directly interface with 
  the database. On the cost benefit side, I could 
  pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle 
  database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have 
  over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out 
  there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, 
  I can tell you we will be watching this 
  development. 
  Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, 
  Inc. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange 
  Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and 
  exchange alike one is an email system and the other 
  is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as 
  a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I'm not 
  usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I  
  thought this article was  a little 
  off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange  Server can only handle  250-500 
  Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his  
  numbers are exaggerated to  me. Thought 
  others might find this interesting if  you 
  haven't already read  it.   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp 
   List 
  Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

  List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





No Originator

2001-11-15 Thread Callan, Chris

Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers  I see a
few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all it has
is .  How do I find out who sent this mail.  Running NT 4.0  sp6 Exchange
5.5 sp4

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA in DMZ

2001-11-15 Thread Ellery July



make 
sure W2K is using service pack 2. What ports are open on the firewall for 
access and what permissions are granted.
I 
think ports 1025 and 1026 (not just 1025)higher need to be 
open because of RPC. I tend to stay away from this type of set up ,it is (my 
feeling) that it is less secure then inside with 443 only. Since you have a PIX 
use it to do a one-to-one NAT then only allow allow port 25 and 443 only. Two 
ports versus 14.

just 
my two cents

  -Original Message-From: Dikeman, Bo 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 
  11:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA in 
  DMZ
  Good 
  Morning,
  Please forgive me 
  if this question has already been answered, but I have searchedhigh and 
  low and still can't get things to click right. I am trying to get OWA to 
  work in our DMZ, here is what I have:
  
   
  1. Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on a W2k member 
  server on the inside.
   
  2. A WinNT 4.0 PDC on the same subnet with the 
  Exchange server
   
  3. A Cisco PIX w/DMZ card
   
  4. A W2k DC (for the DMZ domain) w/OWA 5.5 SP4 
  in the DMZ
  
  There is a two-way 
  trust between the domains for testing. This will eventually be a one-way 
  trust where the DMZ domain trusts the production domain, but not vice 
  versa. I have the following ports open for the OWA box: 53 TCP,UDP; 88 
  TCP, UDP; 123 TCP; 135 TCP; 389 TCP, UDP; 445 TCP; 3268 TCP; 137 UDP; 138 UDP; 
  and 139 TCP. Oh, and 80. I opened all of these per Q articles that 
  said to do so, butany of these that definitely do not need to be open 
  please let me know.I have also bound NTDS on the w2k box to 
  1025 and that port (TCP and UDP) is open per Q280132. I have also bound 
  the Exchange IS, DS, and SA to ports in the registry per q259240 and those 
  three TCP ports open in the firewall.
  
  The clincher is 
  everything workswhen the OWA box is on the inside. Once the OWA 
  box is in the DMZ that is not the case. Whenever a user tries to log on 
  to OWA in this situation, they get the hourglass for a couple of minutes and 
  get the script time out error in IE. Also, I have seen a couple of Q 
  articles recommending to set authentication to clear text in IIS, that is 
  set.
  
  Any suggestions or 
  any info that someone might need to make a suggestion, please, please fire 
  in.
  
  Thanks a 
  bunch,
  
  Bo Dikeman, 
  MCSE
  Network 
  Administrator
  NorthStar 
  Communications Group, Inc.
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Don Ely

I'd still like to see some elaboration on this instability you claim.  What
is not stable?  The RAID Controller, the server itself?  What is causing you
to feel this?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found them
far less stable than the compaq one our parent company use, you might well
be right they could well be stable but in my experiance they are not,
ultimatly it makes no difference, as long as the server runs and is easily
upgradable, as system admins we are all happy. I will say this, i come from
a back ground of building PC's and in my experiance find that dell use
budget parts for there machines, parts IBM and compaq don't use. This has
alwasy steered me away from Dell servers. As we all know, well if we don't
we should Dell don't really make anything it is just badged Dell, i use a
Dell Powervault 705n 240gb RAID, but in truth it is a Quantum Snap. I don't
really believe that any server is any better or any less, it depends on the
enviroment it is in and how it is configured. 

nice to see you doing your bit Clayton :o)

oh and as for the stability of the Sys admin, true i am a very unstable man,
but aren't we all :o)

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's cool,
so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I have done
my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Oh really!  Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash
or have an appearance of instability.

Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start
disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: No Originator

2001-11-15 Thread Neil Hobson

They're NDRs; it's by design; all in the RFCs.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:21
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: No Originator
Subject: No Originator


Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers  I see
a few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all
it has is .  How do I find out who sent this mail.  Running NT 4.0
sp6 Exchange 5.5 sp4

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade

2001-11-15 Thread Neil Hobson

Is the newuser account (in Windows 2000) enabled or disabled?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: NT Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
Subject: 2000 Move mail box upgrade


I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange
2000 through a move mailbox upgrade.  I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I
am getting errors as follows;
  Error: Connecting to destination server. 
cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on to the
Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed.
Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no:
8004011d-0512-
I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve it. 
Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade if Exchange
5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? 
 Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine and can be
re-homed, but mail boxes do not.  
If it is possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5
on NT 4 to exchange 2000 can anyone help me out with what may be causing
these connection problems? 


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the e-mail originator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, 
please check this e-mail for virus infection for which
CDG Management LLC accepts no responsibility
**
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade

2001-11-15 Thread Simon Taylor
Title: Message



Hi
I have 
had a similar issue when moving mailboxes to a new server - I ran eseutil with 
the /g (integrity) on the private store then tried again and it went through 
just fine.
Cheers
Simon

  
  -Original Message-From: NT Admin Issues 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 
  17:14To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 2000 Move mail 
  box upgrade
  I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to 
  Exchange 2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 
  server and I am getting errors as follows;
   Error: Connecting to destination server. 
  cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on 
  to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider 
  failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 
  8004011d-0512-
  I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve 
  it. 
  Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade 
  if Exchange 5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? 
  Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine 
  and can be re-homed, but mail boxes do not. 
   If it is 
  possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5 on NT 4 to exchange 2000 
  can anyone help me out with what may be causing these connection problems? 
  **"This 
  email and any files transmitted with it are confidential andintended 
  solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom theyare addressed. 
  If you have received this email in error please notifythe e-mail 
  originator.This footnote also confirms that this email message has 
  been swept byMIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, 
  please check this e-mail for virus infection for whichCDG Management 
  LLC accepts no 
  responsibility"**List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





AW: logging out of OWA?

2001-11-15 Thread Hans Willi Kremer

A LOG OFF Possibility will be implemented in Service pack 2

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

  Hans Willi Kremer 

  * freiberuflicher Dozent und Berater,
  * MCDBA, MCSE +I, MCSD, MCT,
  * Schwerpunkte SQL-Server  Exchange Server,
  * Buchautor zum SQL Server im Galileo-Press Verlag
  
  Website: HTTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Telefon: 0241 / 1681727
  Privat: 0241 / 9319743
  Küppershofweg 6 - 52134 Herzogenrath / Aachen 



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. November 2001 22:05
An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Betreff: logging out of OWA?



All,
Does anyone know if there is a way to manually log off of the Web access
for Exchange 2000? It seems to pull the cached account information from
the host that is making the connection and open that users mailbox. I
understand this is how it functions but can this be disabled?

Info:
E2k running on W2k 
SSL is in use

I am sure you'll let me know if more information is required to help
resolve this problem ;)

TIA
AlV

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Searching Public Folders Locations in AD

2001-11-15 Thread Hans Willi Kremer
Title: Nachricht



Situation:
Domain: Windows 2000 with Active 
Directory
Mail Service: Exchange 2000 with SP 1 on 3 
Servers in 1 Forest - 1 
Routinggroup

What have we done? We created 1 public folder named 
'Aachen', which has 1 replication on each mail-server (total: 3 replications in 
the mail-system). 
AD-Users and - Computers and other tools (for 
example ldp.exe) show only the public folder in Active Directory, 
but neither the replications nor their physical 
storage location.

Questions:
1. How many objects are in Active Directory for the 
public folder 'Aachen'? Possible answers: 1 (only for the public folder) or 3 
(that means 1 for each replication of 'Aachen').
2. If the correct answer will be 3 objects, what is 
a good way to find this objects in Active Directory or their physical 
location?

Many thanks for Your help.


Mit freundlichen GrüßenHans Willi 
Kremer 
* freiberuflicher 
Dozent und Berater, * 
MCDBA, MCSE +I, MCSD, MCT, 
* Schwerpunkte SQL-Server  Exchange Server, * Buchautorzum 
SQL Server im Galileo-Press Verlag 
 
Website: HTTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Telefon: 0241 / 1681727 Privat: 0241 / 9319743 Küppershofweg 
6 - 52134 Herzogenrath / Aachen 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: pop3 and port 25

2001-11-15 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.

Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients?
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: pop3 and port 25


Ladies and gentlemen,
I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
(btw, this is my first time..so be gentle)
have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system.
I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email.
I get:
The connection to the sever has failed.
Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061
Error Number: 0x800CCC0E

after reviewing (Q191687)...
telnet established port 110 as active and listening.
netstat -an confirms port 25 not there.
it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available.
I am not currently running IIS.   
Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server..
Calgon take me away!
any help would be appreciated...thanks,
Jeff


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: Long Delays between send and receive

2001-11-15 Thread Don Andrews

Has anyone suggested looking at the SMTP headers - unless they are stripped,
they will provide some indication of when each server in the route receives the
message - of course, they are not all time synched, but it MAY give some
indication - also will show when your IMC receives the message - we've on
occasion been able to identify long delays in the sending domain between the
senders mail server and their gateway by this method.

Dave Pollak wrote:

 Hello,

 I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users
 complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between
 the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by
 comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here
 and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other
 messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event
 Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to
 the remote smtp server. There are  no messages waiting here. I don't notice
 any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from  my hotmail account
 take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same
 senders but I can't confirm that  I don't know where to begin
 troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book
 from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about
 through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange
 Administrator i.e.  know nothing?

 Dave Pollak
 Information Systems Specialist
 Town of Bedford
 603.472.5242
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following
 annotations on 11/15/01 11:07:33
--
Warning: 
All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail 
system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient.  
This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for 
the use of the intended recipient(s).  If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error 
and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately. 
  

==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: pop3 and port 25

2001-11-15 Thread Campbell, Rob

Tried installing the Internet Mail Connector?

 -Original Message-
 From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:44 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: pop3 and port 25
 
 
 Ladies and gentlemen,
 I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle)
 have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system.
 I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set 
 a test email.
 I get:
 The connection to the sever has failed.
 Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061
 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E
 
 after reviewing (Q191687)...
 telnet established port 110 as active and listening.
 netstat -an confirms port 25 not there.
 it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available.
 I am not currently running IIS.   
 Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server..
 Calgon take me away!
 any help would be appreciated...thanks,
 Jeff
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Quest Software

2001-11-15 Thread Sargent, Rob

We're demo-ing the following Quest software tools ... 2Ma, Inlook and
Spotlight.

Could those of you who are using these products please provide some
feedback?

Thanks

Rob Sargent

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Archive all mailboxes?

2001-11-15 Thread Rodney Li

I am currently looking for an archiving solution too.

Some of the products, I have looked at are:
1. IXOS software - www.ixos.com
2. EAS software (Exchange Archive Software - www.educomts.com)
3. Archive one software - www.c2c.com

Anyone running any of those products and like them? I would appreciate
some comments:)

Thanks,
Rodney Li

 I would still recommend Exmerge to pst I think.
 
 Or backup, then use Mailbox manager to toast everything older than 1 year,
 keeping the backup as your archive.
 
 Or spend money.
 
 William
 
 Original Message-
 From: Jeff Jakubiwski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:18 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Archive all mailboxes?
 
 
 I want to archive some of my mail on my server ( just a portion of my
 mailboxes ) and get it out of the exchange database.
 
 I know I can do .pst files, but there are some 1400 mailboxes, and I want
 the ability to archive any emails more than 1 year old out of all the
 mailboxes.
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: No Originator

2001-11-15 Thread Steve Johnston

By reading RFC-2821.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/01 12:21PM 
Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers  I see a
few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all it has
is .  How do I find out who sent this mail.  Running NT 4.0  sp6 Exchange
5.5 sp4

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread Mark Kelsay

You really need to elaborate more when you make a statement like that.  I am
running hundreds of Dell servers, desktops and laptops and find that they
are work very well.  Please fill us in on the statement you made.


Mark



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware


I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. 
Any best bets?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: pop3 and port 25

2001-11-15 Thread Jeff Pace

I don't know??
is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!?

how do I tell

and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever,
client or both?

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25


Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients?
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: pop3 and port 25


Ladies and gentlemen,
I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
(btw, this is my first time..so be gentle)
have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system.
I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email.
I get:
The connection to the sever has failed.
Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061
Error Number: 0x800CCC0E

after reviewing (Q191687)...
telnet established port 110 as active and listening.
netstat -an confirms port 25 not there.
it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available.
I am not currently running IIS.   
Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server..
Calgon take me away!
any help would be appreciated...thanks,
Jeff


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade

2001-11-15 Thread NT Admin Issues
Title: RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade





It is enabled 


-Original Message-
From:  Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade


Is the newuser account (in Windows 2000) enabled or disabled?


Neil


-Original Message-
From: NT Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
Subject: 2000 Move mail box upgrade



I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange
2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I
am getting errors as follows;
 Error: Connecting to destination server. 
cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on to the
Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed.
Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no:
8004011d-0512-
I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve it. 
Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade if Exchange
5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? 
Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine and can be
re-homed, but mail boxes do not. 
 If it is possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5
on NT 4 to exchange 2000 can anyone help me out with what may be causing
these connection problems? 



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the e-mail originator.


This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, 
please check this e-mail for virus infection for which
CDG Management LLC accepts no responsibility
**
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Attached file stripped off

2001-11-15 Thread VDang
Title: Attached file stripped off





Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Attached file stripped off

2001-11-15 Thread Don Ely
Title: Message



Is it 
Exchange or the recipients mail server? Sounds like an encoding issue to 
me...

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Attached file stripped off
  Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off 
  the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Attached file stripped off

2001-11-15 Thread Don Ely
Title: Message



Unless 
of course, the server is configured in some fashion (e.g. third party 
product)to strip attachments...

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Attached file stripped off
  Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off 
  the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Attached file stripped off

2001-11-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Attached file stripped off



How do 
you know the IMS is doing it?

William

-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached file 
stripped off
Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the 
attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Offline address book not available

2001-11-15 Thread Erik Sojka

Do you have multiple containers under your Recipients container?  The
offline AB will only allow you to sync one container at a time.

 -Original Message-
 From: Tianhong Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:07 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Offline address book not available
 
 
 
 Server: Exchange 2000+SP1
 client: Outlook 2000.
 
 The client is setup to be able work offline. Everything is OK, except
 when I try to download the offline address book, there is no 
 any address
 book in the drop down list. I check the Exchange server, 
 offline address
 list is here. What's wrong?
 
 Thanks
 
 Tianhong
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Attached file stripped off

2001-11-15 Thread Dave Pollak
Title: Attached file stripped off



sounds 
like an av solution.

dave 
pollak

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 
  2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached 
  file stripped off
  Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off 
  the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Attached file stripped off

2001-11-15 Thread Chris Hampton

When I set up my first exchange box I had a similar
problem becaue of my out bound settings in the IMS I
did not have it set up as mime?plain test I changed it
to that and it worked fine.
Chris
--- Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 How do you know the IMS is doing it?
  
 William
  
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Attached file stripped off
 
 
 
 Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the
 attachments of my
 outbound mails. Thanks. 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Long Delays between send and receive

2001-11-15 Thread Dave Pollak

here's how microsoft says to do it.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/0/73.ASP I'd love to
give it a try if I had a clue.

dave

-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Long Delays between send and receive


Has anyone suggested looking at the SMTP headers - unless they are stripped,
they will provide some indication of when each server in the route receives
the
message - of course, they are not all time synched, but it MAY give some
indication - also will show when your IMC receives the message - we've on
occasion been able to identify long delays in the sending domain between the
senders mail server and their gateway by this method.

Dave Pollak wrote:

 Hello,

 I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users
 complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays
between
 the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by
 comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is
here
 and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets
other
 messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event
 Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to
 the remote smtp server. There are  no messages waiting here. I don't
notice
 any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from  my hotmail
account
 take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the
same
 senders but I can't confirm that  I don't know where to begin
 troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book
 from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked
about
 through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange
 Administrator i.e.  know nothing?

 Dave Pollak
 Information Systems Specialist
 Town of Bedford
 603.472.5242
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following
 annotations on 11/15/01 11:07:33

--
Warning:
All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate
e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than
the recipient.  This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway
and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).  If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified
that you have received this message in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.



==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




  1   2   >