RE: Exmerge problems
Hi Kevin, Some answers for your questions! 1. Outlook 2000 is installed, have tried both swedish and english version. 2. Exmerge version is 4.00.021 3. Exmerge is running on w2k sp2 box with exchange 5.5 sp4 installed. What do you mean by pst-provider? Regards //Hakan Hakan, A few questions: 1) Do you have Outlook installed on the PC you are running ExMerge on? 2) Which version of ExMerge is it? 3) Where are you running ExMerge from - NT W/S, NT Server, Exchange Server? On first parse, this looks like an error to do with the PST Provider not being installed (properly). Kevin -Original Message- From: Hakan Bulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 14:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exmerge problems Hi, I've this weird error when trying to use exmerge for backup purposes. Hope anyone could help me. I've copied the log file so all can see what is wrong! Thanks in advance. //Hakan Bulin E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v4.00.021 Start Logging:November 08, 2001 10:49:47 [10:49:47] Logging Level: None [10:49:47] Reading settings from file 'C:\exchsrvr\bin\EXMERGE.INI'. [10:49:47] Error parsing DN '' (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo) [10:49:47] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x [10:49:47] Source server read from settings file is 'ALBAN'. [10:49:47] Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from file '' [10:49:47] Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected from file '' [10:49:47] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the list. [10:49:47] Current machine locale ID is 0x41d [10:49:47] 0x4e4 is not a supported locale. Using current machine default locale (0x41d). [10:49:47] Operating System Version 5.0 (Build 2195) [10:49:47] Incorrect registry value data type for 'Software\Microsoft\Exchange\Setup\ExchangeServerAdmin'. [10:50:06] Error parsing DN '' (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo) [10:50:06] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x [10:50:22] Program settings successfully saved. [10:50:23] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date operations. [10:50:23] Merging data into target store. The program will copy only those messages that do not exist in the target store. [10:50:23] Associated folder data will NOT be copied to the target store. [10:50:23] Using 'Swedish' (0x41d) as the default locale (Code page 1252) [10:50:23] All mailboxes will be processed, regardless of locale [10:50:23] Initializing worker thread (Thread0) [10:50:23] Copying data from mailbox '1a01' ('ADMINISTRATOR') on Server 'ALBAN' to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ADMINISTRATOR.PST'. [10:50:23] Store 'MSPST MS' was not opened. [10:50:23] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted for mailbox '1a01' ('ADMINISTRATOR'). [10:50:23] Number of items copied from the source store for all mailboxes processed: 0 [10:50:23] Total number of folders processed in the source store: 0 [10:50:23] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered. [10:50:23] Process completion time: 00:00:00 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exmerge problems
Hi, I've created the folder and there no special rights for c:\exmergedata. I'm using an admin account so...And yes there are free space. Have tested on only one mailbox to see how it works! Regards //Hakan Have you created C:\EXMERGEDATA folder? Exmerge User has rights to this folder? There is free space on drive C:? Rafael -Original Message- From: Hakan Bulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exmerge problems Hi,=20 I've this weird error when trying to use exmerge for backup purposes. Hope anyone could help me.=20 I've copied the log file so all can see what is wrong!=20 Thanks in advance. //Hakan Bulin E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v4.00.021 Start Logging:November 08, 2001 10:49:47 [10:49:47] Logging Level: None [10:49:47] Reading settings from file 'C:\exchsrvr\bin\EXMERGE.INI'. [10:49:47] Error parsing DN '' (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo) [10:49:47] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x [10:49:47] Source server read from settings file is 'ALBAN'. [10:49:47] Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from file '' [10:49:47] Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected from file '' [10:49:47] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the list. [10:49:47] Current machine locale ID is 0x41d [10:49:47] 0x4e4 is not a supported locale. Using current machine default locale (0x41d). [10:49:47] Operating System Version 5.0 (Build 2195) [10:49:47] Incorrect registry value data type for 'Software\Microsoft\Exchange\Setup\ExchangeServerAdmin'. [10:50:06] Error parsing DN '' (CADRoutines::GetExchange5xServerNameInfo) [10:50:06] 'ALBAN' is running Exchange Server 5.x [10:50:22] Program settings successfully saved. [10:50:23] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date operations. [10:50:23] Merging data into target store. The program will copy only those messages that do not exist in the target store. [10:50:23] Associated folder data will NOT be copied to the target store. [10:50:23] Using 'Swedish' (0x41d) as the default locale (Code page 1252) [10:50:23] All mailboxes will be processed, regardless of locale [10:50:23] Initializing worker thread (Thread0) [10:50:23] Copying data from mailbox '1a01' ('ADMINISTRATOR') on Server 'ALBAN' to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ADMINISTRATOR.PST'. [10:50:23] Store 'MSPST MS' was not opened. [10:50:23] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted for mailbox '1a01' ('ADMINISTRATOR'). [10:50:23] Number of items copied from the source store for all mailboxes processed: 0 [10:50:23] Total number of folders processed in the source store: 0 [10:50:23] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered. [10:50:23] Process completion time: 00:00:00=20 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Errr.. MS only started in the email business because of a little product called Network Courier! Most people didn't trust that when it started and CCMail was the product of choice for most businesses. The tables can turn and it depends on how badly Oracle (or whoever) wants that business. Kevin -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 21:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Ellison must take a tour of Compaq and see how they have on the average 2500 users per their exchange. We as the second largest . have on the average 1900 users per exchange server and the only time that they anyone has been down was because of HD failure. However we have Oracle consultants every week working on our 6.4 Tetra Byte database which keeps crashing. Would one really trust a company that has just started into email business? - Original Message - From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:18 AM Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote: 3) They both will require competent administrators to function well I've found *anything* requires a competent administrator to function well. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Now you're talking - I qualify!!! Where can I fill in an application form?? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 17:55 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange More: 4) Bill Gates and Larry Ellison both wash floors for a living. 5) They're both swell lookers. 6) Neither one of them is Chinese. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I found some similarities: 1) They both cost more than sendmail 2) Neither will run on Novell 3) They both will require competent administrators to function well -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D1833 0,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard
What do you mean by caches the information store?? If you update the profile in the right places (and that's why you need to use a program/script), you shouldn't see a problem. There is a small problem with Contacts displayed as an Address Book which I'm working on but apart from that, I don't see any problems. I guess there might be problems with Public Folders if they are not replicated/instantiated on the new server. Kevin -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 17:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard Have you experienced any problems with just updating the profile as opposed to creating a new one. I have seen a few articles that suggest the profile caches the information store and can thus cause problems public folders. Any comments Paul -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard Yes, you are correct. Simply speaking, when you do a Move Mailbox the DN does not get changed, only the Home-MDB (and Home-MTA)(before anyone says anything, yes I know other things get changed but these are the significant elements for a profile). You might like to check out my website which offers createprf.exe which has the facility to update a profile from one server to another. Kevin www.mailsoftware.co.uk -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 16:28 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Profile after Move server wizard Hope someone can clear something up. If you use Move server wizard to move a server out of a site into a new site but in the same organisation, will Outlook get redirected? My understanding is that it will not Outlook MAPI only gets redirected to servers in the same site, i.e. it works for move mailbox. Is my understanding correct? Thanks, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged. Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure. Delphis does not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have been sent. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Public Folder as an email recipient
Hi, I wuld like to know how to setup the public folder as a email recipient in exchange5.5...is ther any other way other than creating a folder in the container and having the mail id for that folder configured to rec. mails.Can we create a mailbox directly in the public folder?? Ram. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Palm syncing and Deleted item retention
Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000 so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not. Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the items are not available under deleted item retention. Regards, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NTDSNoMatch and Migrating
Hi Bonnie I have just completed this migration myself and have had a few small hitches. One or two of the mailboxes I had to migrate would not move at all (I was moving to new hardware), some of the mailboxes also caused the info store on the new server to die during migration (a bit of an issue if you plan to migrate in working hours). I fixed these easily by running eseutil on the old info store first to fix integrity. Other than that if you follow the document from MS on migration it should go just fine. (If it is a big site and you have the hardware available then I would do this all in a lab first as it is much easier the second time around) To answer your questions (or try at least) 1. When migrating old mailboxes which are used by people other that the name of the mailbox the ADC does create a disabled account (if you choose to) and then it also assigns the correct permissions to those mailboxes for the previous owner accounts. 2. I am pretty sure that it will pick up the new DN and not worry too much about the aliases - I would sort these out anyway in the quest for a nice tidy Exchange server, but that's just me grin Hope that helps. Cheers Simon -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 17:43 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTDSNoMatch and Migrating Doing some cleanup work to prep for E2k migration (on a new win2k server) and I'm trying to understand something to hopefully get it right the first time. I've used NTDSAtrb to create csv files of the duplcate primary accounts on our EX 5.5 sp3 server (single server, single site). I've not reimported any csv data yet to populate Extension-Attribute-10. Haven't installed/run ADC, ForestPrep, nor DomainPrep yet. Questions: 1) If I choose to import to populate the NTDSNoMatch value, I think I know that ADC will create disabled (if I choose) user accounts in AD for these mailboxes when the ADC agreement is set up and the ADC will re-assign the primary account to the new account. But, will it also correctly re-assign the previous primary account as an owner on the Ex5.5 mailbox, or is this something I have to do manually? Are any delegate permissions affected? And, if permissions are correctly reassigned, do these permission stick when the mailbox is moved to the E2k server? If it doesn't do some of these things, seems like it would make sense for me to do these manually ahead of time as there are less than 20. 2) I've noticed that quite a few of our EX5.5 Directory Name values don't match the Alias Name and/or Primary Account name due to renames, from long ago. When the ADC looks to sync up, does it look at the DN, or does it use the account name (or alias name)? I think it would use the account name, but our previous EX5.5 admin thinks the different DNs could be a problem and that we might need to export to pst and reimport to a new mailbox for every account that is off so that the new DN matches somehow to AD. Thanks, Bonnie M. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Block an Exchange administrator from viewing a mailbox?
Hi Bob Generally most organisations will frown upon the admins having user access to all mailboxes, but how would they know to start with grin - what you should do is assign Permissions admin on the mailbox container and not user permissions then you will both be able to admin mailboxes, but not read through all of each others mail Cheers Simon -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 18:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Block an Exchange administrator from viewing a mailbox? Exchange 5.5(sp4) on W2K(SP2)member server. I have co-worker who must be able to administer the Exchange server (Full control) when I am unavailable. We have an agreement that we will not view each other's mail, however, I would prefer it if we could alter permissions on just our mailboxes so that he cannot see mine, and vice-versa. Logic (and my basic knowledge of Exchange) tells me this cannot be done, but I wanted to ask the group if there were any options. Thanks for your input Bob Fronk, MCSE Information Technology Davis H. Elliot Company, Inc 2176 Lee Highway Cloverdale, VA 24077 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.davishelliot.com (V)540.992.2865 (F)540.992.1495 (C)540.580.3101 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Security issue in Exchange 2000
Hi all, We got a strange problem here, this is what happens: When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined, meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add additional mailboxes to the profile, an error message pops up right away when clicking on the Add Mailbox button stating that the user cannot be found. Now we remove the profile from Outlook, I make that person a Domain Admin and he makes a new profile in Outlook 100% similar to the previous profile. But now when he hits the Add Mailbox everything works the way it should, i can even remove him from the Domain Admins group, it keeps working. When i make this person member of the group Administrators this does NOT work. So obviously we're dealing with a faulty security setting or police here. Ofcourse this solution is only temporary, on the Exchange2000 server something must be incorrect, I just don't know where to look anymore. I tried changing security settings on several objects within Exchange System Manager but i couldn't find anything there. Maybe i'm looking at the wrong picture here, but I was/am looking for some object that has different rights for Administrators and Domain Admins, if there is anybody out there that has a clue about what i am talking about, please help me!! Thanks in advance List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: logging out of OWA?
Title: Message Hey Albert This is a stab in the dark, but what if you disable integrated Windows Authentication on your webserver - haven't tried it yet, but it would make sense. Cheers Simon -Original Message-From: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 22:05To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: logging out of OWA? Vikas, Thank you for your feed back it is much appreciated . However what I am interested in is manually logging off ofOWA andwould like to disable the "feature" that allows anyone other than the intended personto open the mail box from a browser. i.e If user1 is logged onto her machine and steps away for a second (yep, I know) and user2 happens over to check his email and he punches in https://exchsrvr1/exchange and "viola" up comes user1's mail box. How can this be stopped? thanks again AlV -Original Message-From: Vikas Kanodia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: logging out of OWA? Dear, U can access owa by specifing the username , e.g vikas is the name of the mailbox owa is installed on gnspl-exch m/c , so type this is the i.e- //gnspl-exch/exchnage/vikas u'll get the username password Vikas -Original Message- From: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: logging out of OWA? All, Does anyone know if there is a way to manually log off of the Web access for Exchange 2000? It seems to pull the cached account information from the host that is making the connection and open that users mailbox. I understand this is how it functions but can this be disabled? Info: E2k running on W2k SSL is in use I am sure you'll let me know if more information is required to help resolve this problem ;) TIA AlV List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Long Delays between send and receive
the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail? dave -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive are the messages that she complains about always from the same person? there is a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! One kind word can warm three winter months. Chinese proverb -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Long Delays between send and receive Hello, I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to the remote smtp server. There are no messages waiting here. I don't notice any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from my hotmail account take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same senders but I can't confirm that I don't know where to begin troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange Administrator i.e. know nothing? Dave Pollak Information Systems Specialist Town of Bedford 603.472.5242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Security issue in Exchange 2000
Hi Bob Shouldn't you be looking at the permissions on the individual Exchange mailboxes - you can find this in active directory if you look at advanced features -Original Message- From: Bob ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 12:12 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Security issue in Exchange 2000 Hi all, We got a strange problem here, this is what happens: When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined, meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add additional mailboxes to the profile, an error message pops up right away when clicking on the Add Mailbox button stating that the user cannot be found. Now we remove the profile from Outlook, I make that person a Domain Admin and he makes a new profile in Outlook 100% similar to the previous profile. But now when he hits the Add Mailbox everything works the way it should, i can even remove him from the Domain Admins group, it keeps working. When i make this person member of the group Administrators this does NOT work. So obviously we're dealing with a faulty security setting or police here. Ofcourse this solution is only temporary, on the Exchange2000 server something must be incorrect, I just don't know where to look anymore. I tried changing security settings on several objects within Exchange System Manager but i couldn't find anything there. Maybe i'm looking at the wrong picture here, but I was/am looking for some object that has different rights for Administrators and Domain Admins, if there is anybody out there that has a clue about what i am talking about, please help me!! Thanks in advance List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Anybody have docs on MS UpdateFB utility?
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange Anybody have docs on MS "UpdateFB" utility? We are scheduled to use this this weekendafter we use Guidgen to rebuild the system folders. Anyone had good/bad experiences with this? Tips? David Kopec? Electronic Messaging Specialist Technology Services Solutions MFS ?Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MS UpdateFB utility
Anybody have docs on MS UpdateFB utility? We are scheduled to use this this weekend after we use Guidgen to rebuild the system folders. Anyone had good/bad experiences with this? Tips? David Kopec? Electronic Messaging Specialist Technology Services Solutions Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exhcnage Site Connectors
I have a small question that i thought you might be able to answer or advise on, using Exchange 5.5 i want to connect to another Exchange server on a different IP range in a different domain eg NTSERVER3 - 192.168.2.13 - MEDIASTERLING COMMS_SERVER - 192.168.1.13 - STERLING I know you can use site connectors, now i am not sure if it is possible just to use a site connector or do i have to setup a RAS connector as they are on different IP ranges ? Thought you might have some suggestions or knbow of a good resource that i use to answer the question. Any information would be wonderful Thank you for your time. Stuart Swift Mediasterling List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
By monitoring the MTS-IN folder. :-) -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 14:31 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Oracle vs. Exchange Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Long Delays between send and receive
If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see when it got to your exchange box. This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when I turn up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is provided. ellery -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail? dave -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive are the messages that she complains about always from the same person? there is a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! One kind word can warm three winter months. Chinese proverb -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Long Delays between send and receive Hello, I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to the remote smtp server. There are no messages waiting here. I don't notice any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from my hotmail account take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same senders but I can't confirm that I don't know where to begin troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange Administrator i.e. know nothing? Dave Pollak Information Systems Specialist Town of Bedford 603.472.5242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: Message if we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;) -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
looking for hardware
I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: Message I don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange if we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;) -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
The MTS-IN motor is good for seeing if messages are coming in but not where they are going. Even if you use the Mail Database Viewer you basically only get message good/bad, it came in the IMS, not necessarily that is got delivered to the correct mailbox(s). Am I missing something? I know a lot of this subjective but 0% assumes a lot. ellery -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange By monitoring the MTS-IN folder. :-) -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 14:31 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Oracle vs. Exchange Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
RE: looking for hardware
That is the order I would get them with HP not far behind. How many users and locations do you have? then let the games begin. -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder as an email recipient
Any Public Folder can receive mail directly. You need to set DEFAULT permissions to CONTRIBUTOR. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral; begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it... Through violence you may murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate...Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. -- Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: Rajagopal, Sriram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public Folder as an email recipient Hi, I wuld like to know how to setup the public folder as a email recipient in exchange5.5...is ther any other way other than creating a folder in the container and having the mail id for that folder configured to rec. mails.Can we create a mailbox directly in the public folder?? Ram. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I thought you were referring to Oracle. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: Message same applies to Oracle's claim then... -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange if we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;) -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
I like Dell! Certainly never had a problem with them! Same as Compaq - no problem running them either! I do like their Smart Start stuff! Simon Weaver NT Domain Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 03:10:PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ... This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited Gunnels Wood Road Stevenage Hertfordshire SG1 2AS List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
HThats all we have here and have never had a problem with them. Can you elaborate? Jeff -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
I agree too. We are 90% Dell in our office and 10% Compaq. They are both great servers. We have had no problems whatsoever with our Dell servers. Even had a hard drive go down on one of them, and plugged a new one in, and the RAID controller automatically scrubbed it and restored the RAID without us having to do anything! Have not had any experience with any IBM servers, though. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: looking for hardware I like Dell! Certainly never had a problem with them! Same as Compaq - no problem running them either! I do like their Smart Start stuff! Simon Weaver NT Domain Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 03:10:PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ... This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited Gunnels Wood Road Stevenage Hertfordshire SG1 2AS List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up and administering your servers. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Dell, IBM, offer and do the same -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention
It's the config of his palm software that fzcked him... Can you say bye bye contacts? Sounds like a good time for a test restore... -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000 so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not. Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the items are not available under deleted item retention. Regards, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Unless you have a power related failure on a Saturday. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware I use DELL for all our intel needs and have never gone back to anything else. Their machines are as stable as anything - the build quality is extremely cool and their support services and on site maintenance rocks!. -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Long Delays between send and receive
I'll turn up the event log. I've tried Neotrace and found that routes to the senders in question (which are both in-state and nearby) go through five states - insignificant, I presume, but makes for an interesting map. whiffing - exactly - but guess who issues paychecks. dave -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see when it got to your exchange box. This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when I turn up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is provided. ellery -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail? dave -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive are the messages that she complains about always from the same person? there is a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! One kind word can warm three winter months. Chinese proverb -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Long Delays between send and receive Hello, I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to the remote smtp server. There are no messages waiting here. I don't notice any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from my hotmail account take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same senders but I can't confirm that I don't know where to begin troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange Administrator i.e. know nothing? Dave Pollak Information Systems Specialist Town of Bedford 603.472.5242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Long Delays between send and receive
It is really not the number of states but the number of routers and if any are slower then others. -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive I'll turn up the event log. I've tried Neotrace and found that routes to the senders in question (which are both in-state and nearby) go through five states - insignificant, I presume, but makes for an interesting map. whiffing - exactly - but guess who issues paychecks. dave -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see when it got to your exchange box. This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when I turn up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is provided. ellery -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail? dave -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive are the messages that she complains about always from the same person? there is a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! One kind word can warm three winter months. Chinese proverb -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Long Delays between send and receive Hello, I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to the remote smtp server. There are no messages waiting here. I don't notice any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from my hotmail account take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same senders but I can't confirm that I don't know where to begin troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange Administrator i.e. know nothing? Dave Pollak Information Systems Specialist Town of Bedford 603.472.5242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Mega-dittos on that. Their smart start CD makes server setup a snap. Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up and administering your servers. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
My order would be Compaq, IBM, whoever -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware That is the order I would get them with HP not far behind. How many users and locations do you have? then let the games begin. -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention
one of the issues with Palm (which I actually prefer over PPC) is that if an item is deleted on the palm it does not automatically get sent to the deleted items folder (like it does with PPC). Don is right the info ellery july Technical Lead Northwest Area Foundation 332 Minnesota e-1201 St. Paul, MN 55101 email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone - 651-225-3895 fax - 651-225-7695 is probably gone, gone, gone. -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000 so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not. Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the items are not available under deleted item retention. Regards, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack! -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: Message I agree. -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange same applies to Oracle's claim then... -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange if we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;) -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ
RE: looking for hardware
What's wrong with beermats? :-) -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 16:16 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: looking for hardware Subject: RE: looking for hardware Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack! -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
My issues with Dell go back to the last time we all slagged off all the vendors out there. From that thread I know loads of folks have had good experiences with their Customer Service, but I never have. I have always had to wait for 20 minutes on hold once I pressed 3 for server support, only to get someone telling me that I had got through to the wrong department when I did get a human being. The other thing someone mentioned, that I have also experienced, is that when you do have a hardware failure, the get you jump through a million hoops to avoid what they would call unnecessary service call outs. I think the person mentioned they had a faulty hard drive, and put the phone next to the machine so the guy on the phone could hear it clunking, and he still wanted him to go through all of the diag's. While I understand the thinking behind this, when you have a server which needs surgery desperately, going through checkbox 2, list 7 isn't high on the list of priorities for the customer, especially when it is a no brainer like a hard disk failure. We had two Power Edge Servers at my last company, and I never really liked em (inherited from a predecessor) mainly due to the fact that if we ever needed any service, the service we got was absolute crap. To be fair, this was in the UK, where both Dell and Compaq base their head offices out of Dublin, I have not had dealings with Dell in the states. I have, however dealt with Compaq in the US, and have found them very responsive, even to the point of replying to an email posted on their web site within a couple of hours, which is something I never experienced with Dell. As far as IBM is concerned, I have no idea. I have never even seen an IBM Server in any of the places I have worked. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Have you tried Dell? I use both and could not find a difference. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up and administering your servers. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Ditto - We are strictly a Dell shop -- love them. Haven't had any real problems. --- Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
I have used Dell for my SQL and exchange server with no hardware problems and they are not the hardware police Compaq sometimes is. -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Nor have we had any major problems. And the latest Dell server setup disk is just as easy to use as Compaq's SmartStart. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:24 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
So from all of the messages in this thread, I deduce that: Some people think Compaq are good. Some people think Compaq are bad. Some people think Dell are good. Some people think Dell are bad. Some people think Hey! There's a pattern forming here! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 16:14 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: looking for hardware Subject: RE: looking for hardware Ditto - We are strictly a Dell shop -- love them. Haven't had any real problems. --- Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Difference in rights between administrators and domain admins in Exchange2000?
Hi all, We got a strange problem here, this is what happens: When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined, meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add additional mailboxes to the profile, an error message pops up right away when clicking on the Add Mailbox button stating that the user cannot be found. Now we remove the profile from Outlook, I make that person a Domain Admin and he makes a new profile in Outlook 100% similar to the previous profile. But now when he hits the Add Mailbox everything works the way it should, i can even remove him from the Domain Admins group, it keeps working. When i make this person member of the group Administrators this does NOT work. So obviously we're dealing with a faulty security setting or police here. Ofcourse this solution is only temporary, on the Exchange2000 server something must be incorrect, I just don't know where to look anymore. I tried changing security settings on several objects within Exchange System Manager but i couldn't find anything there. Maybe i'm looking at the wrong picture here, but I was/am looking for some object that has different rights for Administrators and Domain Admins, if there is anybody out there that has a clue about what i am talking about, please help me!! thanks so much in advance List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
You forgot to add another 36.4Gb drive for hot-swap. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Brian Mead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 16:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Compaq ML3770. Throw in 3x36.4Gb with a couple 9.1 and you're set. Right Bob? -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack! -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Compaq ML3770. Throw in 3x36.4Gb with a couple 9.1 and you're set. Right Bob? -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack! -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. wrote: Mega-dittos on that. Their smart start CD makes server setup a snap. Unless you want to deviate from what Compaq thinks you should do. Then you are doomed. (Well, I exaggerate, but not by much.) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Compaq also has great tech support (in my opinion). Back in my banyan vines days i had the occaision to call for help on Christmas and on Thanksgiving -- they had people on the other end of the phone that were very experienced. Since our (forced) switch to NT I've only called a couple of times, but after getting past the obvious questions (yes I checked the cables, no I haven't installed anything, yes I tried rebooting) I have gotten answers promptly. Compaq has a strange system for hardware replacement. Three years they fix/replace it, even onsite! BUT, they contract out with local folks to do that work and I have certainly NOT been impressed with their local contractors. (after watching one technician try to force a SIMM in backwards for 5 minutes, I now make them stand in a corner and watch me replace whatever components were necessary) But their servers have been rock solid for us (1 motherboard, 1 memory, 1 hard drive but probably 15 DAT/DLT drive replacements over 10 years) YMMV Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up and administering your servers. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention
I thought as much, so the Palm software or more accurately the Chapura Pocket mirror is directly making MAPI calls to Exchange and making a hard delete of the items? Would be a nice improvement if the software created a PST file for all deletions, don't you think. Paul -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention It's the config of his palm software that fzcked him... Can you say bye bye contacts? Sounds like a good time for a test restore... -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry addition to show items in the Contacts folder. The client was Outlook 2000 so the Contacts if hard deleted should still be visible but they are not. Does pocket mirror use it's own MAPI commands and this explains why the items are not available under deleted item retention. Regards, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged. Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure. Delphis does not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have been sent. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis. _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
My experience with 2 failed RAID drives on our Dell servers: Call tech support. 10 minutes on hold, get technician. Explain hard drive self-test notices filling up log. Tech asked how many. I said that I stopped counting at 100. He said they'd get me a new drive ASAP. In both cases, I had a drive in my hand FOUR HOURS LATER, even though we are two hours away from Seattle. Not FedEx overnight, four hours same day, courier didn't arrive until 7:30, but got there in time for same-day replacement. I imagine service better than that. Mike -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware My issues with Dell go back to the last time we all slagged off all the vendors out there. From that thread I know loads of folks have had good experiences with their Customer Service, but I never have. I have always had to wait for 20 minutes on hold once I pressed 3 for server support, only to get someone telling me that I had got through to the wrong department when I did get a human being. The other thing someone mentioned, that I have also experienced, is that when you do have a hardware failure, the get you jump through a million hoops to avoid what they would call unnecessary service call outs. I think the person mentioned they had a faulty hard drive, and put the phone next to the machine so the guy on the phone could hear it clunking, and he still wanted him to go through all of the diag's. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Regarding Competence (was Oracle vs. Exchange)
1. The closet is about 12' X 15', and I keep the lights nice and low, with some cool music going all day, so I don't have to put up with that annoying artificial light we all have the privilege of experiencing in offices. I call it my closet because there is no window, but that is not so bad, as I am 3 miles from the nearest beach, and the sun is 90 degrees every day of the year. So if I don't see the sun between cigarette breaks, I'll make it. 2. Competent means you are able to do the task at hand. In our case, it is keeping things ticking over, making recommendations on how things can be improved, and doing the analysis in the first place. Off list, William and I exchanged some thoughts on this yesterday, and the basic consensus was that with the amount of technology out there, and the pace at which new ones are introduced, it is virtually impossible to keep up. I do not call that incompetence. I am not perfect at this lark, and I make mistakes, and know less than I don't know. But I sure as heck can find out what I need to know, when I need to know it, and that is only because I know where to look for the answers in the first place. If I wasn't competent, I wouldn't be able to do that. I suspect I am not alone in this methodology either. I really wish I did know everything, as I would be independently wealthy as a result. I have resigned myself to the fact that I alone am not able to keep up with all that is going on in the IT world, and that if I continue to gain as much knowledge as I can, eventually I will rely on TechNet, or mail lists less for when I need some information. In the mean time, I love having the resources at my disposal, and I enjoy the varying degree of thoughts and opinions that go on here. If I didn't use the resources to help me do my job, I would be incompetent;-) -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Regarding Competence (was Oracle vs. Exchange) How big is the closet and is the light on? That shows what competence level your organization think you are. Interestingly, I would argue and have stated so in this and other groups that most IT folks are incompetent. That is why we have software which is easily broken or used for non-intended purposes. There are more network people then phone and electrical people combines because we are unable do much without help from others. We make many decisions based on selfishness or herd mentality (over wise no one would own a Cisco Pix or Compaq Desktop) instead of organizational cost/benefit analysis. Our incompetence and arrogance have us blaming the user yet we provide them little to training and many times it is a known bug. We are not dumb just incompetent. This is the only job I know where you can tell the CEO you do not know and get to keep your job occasionally. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Regarding Competence (was Oracle vs. Exchange) If I knew everything there was to know about all of the software in my environment, would that then make me competent? I certainly would not need to ask questions here from time to time. Alas, I will never know everything about everything, and so cannot charge vast sums of money for the wealth of knowledge not currently in my possession. Having said that I do believe I am competent. I approach problems logically, divide and conquer all that sort of stuff. I use the tools I have to find out what I need to know, and this list is one of those tools, along with TechNet, contacts I have etc.etc.etc., you all know the drill. Am I required? Maybe not me personally, but someone is, if only to make sure the boss can still download mpeg files in Media Player. /sarcasm Do I need to be competent? I need to be able to solve problems, and make recommendations for upgrades or other projects that come up, and I need to know what to look for when things go squirrelly. So to me, that sounds like competent. But what do I know, I am just the dumb IT guy stuck in the closet ;-) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange No, I did not say that. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So.. you're saying what.. that the members of this list aren't competent? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle
RE: looking for hardware
another similar server for offline data restores. BTW, when did Compaq start making ML3770 servers? -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware You forgot to add another 36.4Gb drive for hot-swap. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Brian Mead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 16:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Compaq ML3770. Throw in 3x36.4Gb with a couple 9.1 and you're set. Right Bob? -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack! -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
My story Hum I had a similar experience with Compaq on my file server last. I had a failed memory chip - they sent me two chips which were different them the originals. They sent those and when I called to ask about why I got them - the tech told me because the ones I needed were backordered and if I put them in my Compaq warranty would not cover them. In addition, because I use a non-approved Compaq internal backup device (which they now approve) they had me take it out. That is why I only purchase Dell servers now. I have come to realize that Compaq usually delivers good service (and charge a 25% premium over other vendors) because it only provides service to a very limited number of approved products. They also assume that all third party products conflict with their product. Because of this Compaq is losing market-share and being absorbed by HP. ellery july Technical Lead Northwest Area Foundation 332 Minnesota e-1201 St. Paul, MN 55101 email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone - 651-225-3895 fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message- From: Mike Powell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware My experience with 2 failed RAID drives on our Dell servers: Call tech support. 10 minutes on hold, get technician. Explain hard drive self-test notices filling up log. Tech asked how many. I said that I stopped counting at 100. He said they'd get me a new drive ASAP. In both cases, I had a drive in my hand FOUR HOURS LATER, even though we are two hours away from Seattle. Not FedEx overnight, four hours same day, courier didn't arrive until 7:30, but got there in time for same-day replacement. I imagine service better than that. Mike -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware My issues with Dell go back to the last time we all slagged off all the vendors out there. From that thread I know loads of folks have had good experiences with their Customer Service, but I never have. I have always had to wait for 20 minutes on hold once I pressed 3 for server support, only to get someone telling me that I had got through to the wrong department when I did get a human being. The other thing someone mentioned, that I have also experienced, is that when you do have a hardware failure, the get you jump through a million hoops to avoid what they would call unnecessary service call outs. I think the person mentioned they had a faulty hard drive, and put the phone next to the machine so the guy on the phone could hear it clunking, and he still wanted him to go through all of the diag's. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found them far less stable than the compaq one our parent company use, you might well be right they could well be stable but in my experiance they are not, ultimatly it makes no difference, as long as the server runs and is easily upgradable, as system admins we are all happy. I will say this, i come from a back ground of building PC's and in my experiance find that dell use budget parts for there machines, parts IBM and compaq don't use. This has alwasy steered me away from Dell servers. As we all know, well if we don't we should Dell don't really make anything it is just badged Dell, i use a Dell Powervault 705n 240gb RAID, but in truth it is a Quantum Snap. I don't really believe that any server is any better or any less, it depends on the enviroment it is in and how it is configured. nice to see you doing your bit Clayton :o) oh and as for the stability of the Sys admin, true i am a very unstable man, but aren't we all :o) -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange cc:Mail Connector
Is there anyone out there who is experiencing problems with supporting more than one cc:Mail connector within an Exchange 2000 organization? In Exchange 5.5, you could have more than one cc:Mail connector as long as they weren't directly connected to the same post office. In Exchange 2000, the cc:Mail connector uses the primary cc:Mail proxy address on the default recipient policy for routing to/from the directly connected cc:Mail PO - (call it PO1) The problem is, if another Exchange server at a separate location supports a cc:Mail connector and it is configured to connect to a separate post office (PO2), the second cc:Mail connector is still using the primary cc:Mail proxy address on the default policy which is for PO1. This then forces all messages once received in cc:Mail to route back through PO1 to Exchange. Microsoft is aware of this problem, however, it may take more than just our problem for them to provide a workaround or fix. Is there anyone else out there who is using cc:Mail and migrating directly to Exchange 2000 or who could comment on this specific issue. Thank you in advance Barbara Gargone List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Touche! -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found them far less stable than the compaq one our parent company use, you might well be right they could well be stable but in my experiance they are not, ultimatly it makes no difference, as long as the server runs and is easily upgradable, as system admins we are all happy. I will say this, i come from a back ground of building PC's and in my experiance find that dell use budget parts for there machines, parts IBM and compaq don't use. This has alwasy steered me away from Dell servers. As we all know, well if we don't we should Dell don't really make anything it is just badged Dell, i use a Dell Powervault 705n 240gb RAID, but in truth it is a Quantum Snap. I don't really believe that any server is any better or any less, it depends on the enviroment it is in and how it is configured. nice to see you doing your bit Clayton :o) oh and as for the stability of the Sys admin, true i am a very unstable man, but aren't we all :o) -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Long Delays between send and receive
14 nodes but no discernible delay in any of them now. who knows about yesterday? -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive It is really not the number of states but the number of routers and if any are slower then others. -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive I'll turn up the event log. I've tried Neotrace and found that routes to the senders in question (which are both in-state and nearby) go through five states - insignificant, I presume, but makes for an interesting map. whiffing - exactly - but guess who issues paychecks. dave -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see when it got to your exchange box. This is what I call a whiffer. The issue just whiffs by or is intermittent and spending time trying to run it down is exhausting. That is when I turn up the event log or monitoring and see if it happens again. 90% of the time it does not happen again. When it does happen again better information is provided. ellery -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive messages may not be not be noticed. testing to my internet mail account and to these two senders reveals no delays today. as with so many problems they don't occur when i'm watching. is there an incoming que? does the event log show connections made to smtp servers only on outgoing mail? dave -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive are the messages that she complains about always from the same person? there is a whole lot to email that isn't controlled by the recipient... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! One kind word can warm three winter months. Chinese proverb -Original Message- From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Long Delays between send and receive Hello, I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to the remote smtp server. There are no messages waiting here. I don't notice any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from my hotmail account take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same senders but I can't confirm that I don't know where to begin troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange Administrator i.e. know nothing? Dave Pollak Information Systems Specialist Town of Bedford 603.472.5242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
yes... some people think! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November, 2001 5:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware So from all of the messages in this thread, I deduce that: Some people think Compaq are good. Some people think Compaq are bad. Some people think Dell are good. Some people think Dell are bad. Some people think Hey! There's a pattern forming here! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 16:14 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: looking for hardware Subject: RE: looking for hardware Ditto - We are strictly a Dell shop -- love them. Haven't had any real problems. --- Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
Brand name. No best bets. Too many variables. Also consider what products you are most comfortable with, which vendors you have a good relationship with. My favourite is HP. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Archive all mailboxes?
I want to archive some of my mail on my server ( just a portion of my mailboxes ) and get it out of the exchange database. I know I can do .pst files, but there are some 1400 mailboxes, and I want the ability to archive any emails more than 1 year old out of all the mailboxes. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OWA in DMZ
Good Morning, Please forgive me if this question has already been answered, but I have searchedhigh and low and still can't get things to click right. I am trying to get OWA to work in our DMZ, here is what I have: 1. Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on a W2k member server on the inside. 2. A WinNT 4.0 PDC on the same subnet with the Exchange server 3. A Cisco PIX w/DMZ card 4. A W2k DC (for the DMZ domain) w/OWA 5.5 SP4 in the DMZ There is a two-way trust between the domains for testing. This will eventually be a one-way trust where the DMZ domain trusts the production domain, but not vice versa. I have the following ports open for the OWA box: 53 TCP,UDP; 88 TCP, UDP; 123 TCP; 135 TCP; 389 TCP, UDP; 445 TCP; 3268 TCP; 137 UDP; 138 UDP; and 139 TCP. Oh, and 80. I opened all of these per Q articles that said to do so, butany of these that definitely do not need to be open please let me know.I have also bound NTDS on the w2k box to 1025 and that port (TCP and UDP) is open per Q280132. I have also bound the Exchange IS, DS, and SA to ports in the registry per q259240 and those three TCP ports open in the firewall. The clincher is everything workswhen the OWA box is on the inside. Once the OWA box is in the DMZ that is not the case. Whenever a user tries to log on to OWA in this situation, they get the hourglass for a couple of minutes and get the script time out error in IE. Also, I have seen a couple of Q articles recommending to set authentication to clear text in IIS, that is set. Any suggestions or any info that someone might need to make a suggestion, please, please fire in. Thanks a bunch, Bo Dikeman, MCSE Network Administrator NorthStar Communications Group, Inc. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Archive all mailboxes?
I would still recommend Exmerge to pst I think. Or backup, then use Mailbox manager to toast everything older than 1 year, keeping the backup as your archive. Or spend money. William Original Message- From: Jeff Jakubiwski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Archive all mailboxes? I want to archive some of my mail on my server ( just a portion of my mailboxes ) and get it out of the exchange database. I know I can do .pst files, but there are some 1400 mailboxes, and I want the ability to archive any emails more than 1 year old out of all the mailboxes. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
2000 Move mail box upgrade
Title: 2000 Move mail box upgrade I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange 2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I am getting errors as follows; Error: Connecting to destination server. cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512- I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve it. Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade if Exchange 5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine and can be re-homed, but mail boxes do not. If it is possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5 on NT 4 to exchange 2000 can anyone help me out with what may be causing these connection problems? ** "This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the e-mail originator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, please check this e-mail for virus infection for which CDG Management LLC accepts no responsibility" ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
pop3 and port 25
Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Title: Message You are right. I believe it is 0%. I've only experienced data loss as the result of severe hardware failure, oh and from Computer Associates software. Both Oracle and Exchange produce full and complete test restores. Both have had or do have comprehensive monitors on them, including perfmons on the OS and application levels. -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%. -Original Message-From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange if we didn't know then would we necessarily care ;) -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:31To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange And how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox how would you know? -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I'm guessing he's never lost any data. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just wondering. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange So you should. As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too. We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%. -Original Message- From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange We are an Oracle shop and an Exchange shop. I can tell you that I will trade Exchange database with an Oracle database any day of the week! I'm not sure of the exact statistics that were quoted by Ellison , but I can tell you that the Oracle 9i database does have 0% data loss. In a non-clustered environment, as long as the hard drives are intact (and in some cases you don't even need all the drives!) you can recover the database and perform functions directly on the database. Let me see you do that with priv.edb. As exchange admins we all use tools that use Microsoft's APIs and scripting tools to interface with Microsoft's exchange database. It would be very nice to have competitive third party tools (like website tools) that can directly interface with the database. On the cost benefit side, I could pay a single enterprise license fee for the Oracle database instead of CALS. A large company could easily have over a $100,000.00 just in CALS. Obviously, this will probably not appeal to the smaller shops out there, but for some of us that already use Oracle, I can tell you we will be watching this development. Jim Sullivan One Call Medical, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I thought this article was a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange Server can only handle 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his numbers are exaggerated to me. Thought others might find this interesting if you haven't already read it. http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
No Originator
Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers I see a few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all it has is . How do I find out who sent this mail. Running NT 4.0 sp6 Exchange 5.5 sp4 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA in DMZ
make sure W2K is using service pack 2. What ports are open on the firewall for access and what permissions are granted. I think ports 1025 and 1026 (not just 1025)higher need to be open because of RPC. I tend to stay away from this type of set up ,it is (my feeling) that it is less secure then inside with 443 only. Since you have a PIX use it to do a one-to-one NAT then only allow allow port 25 and 443 only. Two ports versus 14. just my two cents -Original Message-From: Dikeman, Bo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA in DMZ Good Morning, Please forgive me if this question has already been answered, but I have searchedhigh and low and still can't get things to click right. I am trying to get OWA to work in our DMZ, here is what I have: 1. Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on a W2k member server on the inside. 2. A WinNT 4.0 PDC on the same subnet with the Exchange server 3. A Cisco PIX w/DMZ card 4. A W2k DC (for the DMZ domain) w/OWA 5.5 SP4 in the DMZ There is a two-way trust between the domains for testing. This will eventually be a one-way trust where the DMZ domain trusts the production domain, but not vice versa. I have the following ports open for the OWA box: 53 TCP,UDP; 88 TCP, UDP; 123 TCP; 135 TCP; 389 TCP, UDP; 445 TCP; 3268 TCP; 137 UDP; 138 UDP; and 139 TCP. Oh, and 80. I opened all of these per Q articles that said to do so, butany of these that definitely do not need to be open please let me know.I have also bound NTDS on the w2k box to 1025 and that port (TCP and UDP) is open per Q280132. I have also bound the Exchange IS, DS, and SA to ports in the registry per q259240 and those three TCP ports open in the firewall. The clincher is everything workswhen the OWA box is on the inside. Once the OWA box is in the DMZ that is not the case. Whenever a user tries to log on to OWA in this situation, they get the hourglass for a couple of minutes and get the script time out error in IE. Also, I have seen a couple of Q articles recommending to set authentication to clear text in IIS, that is set. Any suggestions or any info that someone might need to make a suggestion, please, please fire in. Thanks a bunch, Bo Dikeman, MCSE Network Administrator NorthStar Communications Group, Inc. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
I'd still like to see some elaboration on this instability you claim. What is not stable? The RAID Controller, the server itself? What is causing you to feel this? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found them far less stable than the compaq one our parent company use, you might well be right they could well be stable but in my experiance they are not, ultimatly it makes no difference, as long as the server runs and is easily upgradable, as system admins we are all happy. I will say this, i come from a back ground of building PC's and in my experiance find that dell use budget parts for there machines, parts IBM and compaq don't use. This has alwasy steered me away from Dell servers. As we all know, well if we don't we should Dell don't really make anything it is just badged Dell, i use a Dell Powervault 705n 240gb RAID, but in truth it is a Quantum Snap. I don't really believe that any server is any better or any less, it depends on the enviroment it is in and how it is configured. nice to see you doing your bit Clayton :o) oh and as for the stability of the Sys admin, true i am a very unstable man, but aren't we all :o) -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash or have an appearance of instability. Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin? -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: No Originator
They're NDRs; it's by design; all in the RFCs. Neil -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: No Originator Subject: No Originator Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers I see a few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all it has is . How do I find out who sent this mail. Running NT 4.0 sp6 Exchange 5.5 sp4 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
Is the newuser account (in Windows 2000) enabled or disabled? Neil -Original Message- From: NT Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:14 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 2000 Move mail box upgrade Subject: 2000 Move mail box upgrade I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange 2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I am getting errors as follows; Error: Connecting to destination server. cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512- I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve it. Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade if Exchange 5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine and can be re-homed, but mail boxes do not. If it is possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5 on NT 4 to exchange 2000 can anyone help me out with what may be causing these connection problems? ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the e-mail originator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, please check this e-mail for virus infection for which CDG Management LLC accepts no responsibility ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
Title: Message Hi I have had a similar issue when moving mailboxes to a new server - I ran eseutil with the /g (integrity) on the private store then tried again and it went through just fine. Cheers Simon -Original Message-From: NT Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 17:14To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 2000 Move mail box upgrade I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange 2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I am getting errors as follows; Error: Connecting to destination server. cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512- I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve it. Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade if Exchange 5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine and can be re-homed, but mail boxes do not. If it is possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5 on NT 4 to exchange 2000 can anyone help me out with what may be causing these connection problems? **"This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential andintended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom theyare addressed. If you have received this email in error please notifythe e-mail originator.This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept byMIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, please check this e-mail for virus infection for whichCDG Management LLC accepts no responsibility"**List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
AW: logging out of OWA?
A LOG OFF Possibility will be implemented in Service pack 2 Mit freundlichen Grüßen Hans Willi Kremer * freiberuflicher Dozent und Berater, * MCDBA, MCSE +I, MCSD, MCT, * Schwerpunkte SQL-Server Exchange Server, * Buchautor zum SQL Server im Galileo-Press Verlag Website: HTTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: 0241 / 1681727 Privat: 0241 / 9319743 Küppershofweg 6 - 52134 Herzogenrath / Aachen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. November 2001 22:05 An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Betreff: logging out of OWA? All, Does anyone know if there is a way to manually log off of the Web access for Exchange 2000? It seems to pull the cached account information from the host that is making the connection and open that users mailbox. I understand this is how it functions but can this be disabled? Info: E2k running on W2k SSL is in use I am sure you'll let me know if more information is required to help resolve this problem ;) TIA AlV List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Searching Public Folders Locations in AD
Title: Nachricht Situation: Domain: Windows 2000 with Active Directory Mail Service: Exchange 2000 with SP 1 on 3 Servers in 1 Forest - 1 Routinggroup What have we done? We created 1 public folder named 'Aachen', which has 1 replication on each mail-server (total: 3 replications in the mail-system). AD-Users and - Computers and other tools (for example ldp.exe) show only the public folder in Active Directory, but neither the replications nor their physical storage location. Questions: 1. How many objects are in Active Directory for the public folder 'Aachen'? Possible answers: 1 (only for the public folder) or 3 (that means 1 for each replication of 'Aachen'). 2. If the correct answer will be 3 objects, what is a good way to find this objects in Active Directory or their physical location? Many thanks for Your help. Mit freundlichen GrüßenHans Willi Kremer * freiberuflicher Dozent und Berater, * MCDBA, MCSE +I, MCSD, MCT, * Schwerpunkte SQL-Server Exchange Server, * Buchautorzum SQL Server im Galileo-Press Verlag Website: HTTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: 0241 / 1681727 Privat: 0241 / 9319743 Küppershofweg 6 - 52134 Herzogenrath / Aachen List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients? Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Long Delays between send and receive
Has anyone suggested looking at the SMTP headers - unless they are stripped, they will provide some indication of when each server in the route receives the message - of course, they are not all time synched, but it MAY give some indication - also will show when your IMC receives the message - we've on occasion been able to identify long delays in the sending domain between the senders mail server and their gateway by this method. Dave Pollak wrote: Hello, I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to the remote smtp server. There are no messages waiting here. I don't notice any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from my hotmail account take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same senders but I can't confirm that I don't know where to begin troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange Administrator i.e. know nothing? Dave Pollak Information Systems Specialist Town of Bedford 603.472.5242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 11/15/01 11:07:33 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
Tried installing the Internet Mail Connector? -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Quest Software
We're demo-ing the following Quest software tools ... 2Ma, Inlook and Spotlight. Could those of you who are using these products please provide some feedback? Thanks Rob Sargent List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Archive all mailboxes?
I am currently looking for an archiving solution too. Some of the products, I have looked at are: 1. IXOS software - www.ixos.com 2. EAS software (Exchange Archive Software - www.educomts.com) 3. Archive one software - www.c2c.com Anyone running any of those products and like them? I would appreciate some comments:) Thanks, Rodney Li I would still recommend Exmerge to pst I think. Or backup, then use Mailbox manager to toast everything older than 1 year, keeping the backup as your archive. Or spend money. William Original Message- From: Jeff Jakubiwski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Archive all mailboxes? I want to archive some of my mail on my server ( just a portion of my mailboxes ) and get it out of the exchange database. I know I can do .pst files, but there are some 1400 mailboxes, and I want the ability to archive any emails more than 1 year old out of all the mailboxes. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: No Originator
By reading RFC-2821. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/01 12:21PM Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers I see a few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all it has is . How do I find out who sent this mail. Running NT 4.0 sp6 Exchange 5.5 sp4 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
You really need to elaborate more when you make a statement like that. I am running hundreds of Dell servers, desktops and laptops and find that they are work very well. Please fill us in on the statement you made. Mark -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 and port 25
I don't know?? is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!? how do I tell and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever, client or both? Jeff -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 and port 25 Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients? Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 and port 25 Ladies and gentlemen, I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0 (btw, this is my first time..so be gentle) have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system. I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email. I get: The connection to the sever has failed. Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure (SSL)No, socket error:10061 Error Number: 0x800CCC0E after reviewing (Q191687)... telnet established port 110 as active and listening. netstat -an confirms port 25 not there. it states that IIS service must be running to make port 25 available. I am not currently running IIS. Is this the problem? I don't even have IIS on the server.. Calgon take me away! any help would be appreciated...thanks, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
Title: RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade It is enabled -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade Is the newuser account (in Windows 2000) enabled or disabled? Neil -Original Message- From: NT Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:14 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 2000 Move mail box upgrade Subject: 2000 Move mail box upgrade I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange 2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I am getting errors as follows; Error: Connecting to destination server. cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512- I have read the tech notes and seem to be unable to resolve it. Can some one tell me if I can perform a move mailbox upgrade if Exchange 5.5 exists on an NT4 sp6a Server? Public folders replicate from 5.5 to exchange 2000 fine and can be re-homed, but mail boxes do not. If it is possible to upgrade through moving mailboxes from 5.5 on NT 4 to exchange 2000 can anyone help me out with what may be causing these connection problems? ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the e-mail originator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. However, please check this e-mail for virus infection for which CDG Management LLC accepts no responsibility ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Attached file stripped off
Title: Attached file stripped off Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attached file stripped off
Title: Message Is it Exchange or the recipients mail server? Sounds like an encoding issue to me... -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached file stripped off Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attached file stripped off
Title: Message Unless of course, the server is configured in some fashion (e.g. third party product)to strip attachments... -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached file stripped off Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attached file stripped off
Title: Attached file stripped off How do you know the IMS is doing it? William -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached file stripped off Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Offline address book not available
Do you have multiple containers under your Recipients container? The offline AB will only allow you to sync one container at a time. -Original Message- From: Tianhong Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Offline address book not available Server: Exchange 2000+SP1 client: Outlook 2000. The client is setup to be able work offline. Everything is OK, except when I try to download the offline address book, there is no any address book in the drop down list. I check the Exchange server, offline address list is here. What's wrong? Thanks Tianhong List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attached file stripped off
Title: Attached file stripped off sounds like an av solution. dave pollak -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached file stripped off Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attached file stripped off
When I set up my first exchange box I had a similar problem becaue of my out bound settings in the IMS I did not have it set up as mime?plain test I changed it to that and it worked fine. Chris --- Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you know the IMS is doing it? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attached file stripped off Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Long Delays between send and receive
here's how microsoft says to do it. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/0/73.ASP I'd love to give it a try if I had a clue. dave -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Long Delays between send and receive Has anyone suggested looking at the SMTP headers - unless they are stripped, they will provide some indication of when each server in the route receives the message - of course, they are not all time synched, but it MAY give some indication - also will show when your IMC receives the message - we've on occasion been able to identify long delays in the sending domain between the senders mail server and their gateway by this method. Dave Pollak wrote: Hello, I'm a very very very part-time Exchange 5.5 administrator. One of my users complains periodically that emails sent to her have very long delays between the send time and receipt - 5 to 7 hours in some cases (confirmed by comparing send and received times). She assures me that the problem is here and she uses Outlook everyday so she must be correct. Anyway, she gets other messages during the delay from other senders. I see no errors in Event Viewer @ various logging levels and i can see when a connection is made to the remote smtp server. There are no messages waiting here. I don't notice any long delays elsewhere and messages sent to and from my hotmail account take minutes. It seems to me that the delays are consistently with the same senders but I can't confirm that I don't know where to begin troubleshooting this problem. Have read the O'Reilly Exchange Admin book from cover to cover (well, a couple of chapters anyway) and have poked about through the MS knowledge base. Did I mention that I'm a part-time Exchange Administrator i.e. know nothing? Dave Pollak Information Systems Specialist Town of Bedford 603.472.5242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 11/15/01 11:07:33 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm