RE: Organizational Forms
Errr..put a password on the form? Restrict permissions on the folder you publish the form in? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 16:26 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Organizational Forms I have most of my E-Forms in the Organizational Forms Folder. Now I want to let everyone View the folder, and also read the items in the folder, but I want to prevent them from designing, and publishing any forms. I have tried everywhich way till sunday to do this, but can't come up with a way. Can anyone lend some insight into this topic for me. Also I had a past user that created a form. In this form the boxes are not sunken but they have a black border around them, I have tried for the life of me to duplicate this, but cannot can someone lead me in the correct direction here also. Using Outlook 98. Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Scripting Question
Yes and no -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 16:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Scripting Question Okay I was looking around in Exchange Administrator when I went to Folders\System Folders\Events Root\ when I noticed a couple EventConfig entries for servers that no longer exist. Is there anyway for me to remove these, or are they stuck there forever. chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Topology tool
I ran it without a problem from a Win2K pro box to a bunch of NT4 Sp5 Exchange 5.5 Sp3 servers so Sp6 shouldn't be an issue from NT's point of view... What SP is your Exchange server at? Is LDAP enabled? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 18:16 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Topology tool try SP6...and Access to an Exchange server with LDAP Protocol Support. Exchange Server 5.5 or higher is necessary. is a prereq. - Original Message - From: Douglas Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:12 Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool I keep getting an error when I try to run exMap. Unable to Open Connection through the Active Directory Provider. I don't have AD!! I have Exchange 5.5 on NT4 SP5 and I'm running exmap on my win2K pro pc. Any ideas? I initially thought it only worked with AD but apparently thats not true. Exmap is a great free tool - it does what it says. Easy and quick, all you need is Visio. I have a nice big printout of my Exchange Org. posted above my desk. Our org. isn't very complex, but its nice to see all the sites and different connectors represented graphically. -Jim -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Topology tool Looks like a great tool... Anybody care to comment on its good or bad points ? - Original Message - From: Jim Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:18 Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool Quick search at www.microsoft.com for Exmap reveals (may be wrapped): http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn ol/exchange/downloads/topology.asp Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: EALES, Jack / RSAIFS - IOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool which is available where?? -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 December 2001 15:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED ON THE INTERNET - Please read the detailed disclaimer below. -- Exmap will do the trick for 5.5 -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Douglas Hull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Topology tool Does anybody know of a tool that will generate a visio diagram of your exchange topology? I found one on the MS website but it only works with active directory. I am using Exchange 5.5 on a mixture on W2K and NT boxes in our organization without AD. Many thanks. Doug List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The following message has been automatically added by the mail gateway to comply with a Royal Sun Alliance IT Security requirement: As this email arrived via the Internet you should be cautious about its origin and content. Replies which contain sensitive information or legal/contractual obligations are particularly vulnerable. In these cases you should not reply unless you are authorised to do so, and adequate encryption is employed. If you have any questions, please speak to your local desktop support team or IT security contact.
Re: Director's requirements
Title: Message Thanks for all the replies. I will try and explain it to my MD and hope for the best :) Lester - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:35 PM Subject: RE: Director's requirements Like on a Friday at 5. Then come in Monday and clean up the damage. Remember, a LOT of ISP's will bounce the attachment back with the NDR. So be prepared for 30,000MB of returned messages. -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Director's requirements Do it outside working hours -Original Message-From: Lester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 20 December 2001 08:44To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Director's requirements My Director wants to be able to send a 1MB attachment to over 6 clients who are external to our network. So all this will go thru the IMC. I have only a 256kbps net connection. This is going to generate huge traffic, due to which entire services will be distrupted. Is there any alternative solution I can offer him ? Or is there no solution at all ? Please help..!!! Regards, LesterList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL
Same publisher? :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 18:49 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: RE: ESEUTIL There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject Wanna do a book together? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother unless you have a problem (and are under the guidance of PSS or other suitable consultancy) or you've moved a ton of mailboxes off of the server and really need the space. There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject, but as I said, in short, don't. Neil -Original Message- From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 16:01 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: ESEUTIL Hi, This is probably a really dumb question but what are your recommendations for running the ESEUTIL utility on Exchange 2000 systems. With Christmas coming up it seems like the perfect time to run it, and do a Defrag on the DB's Any thoughts would be appreciated. Jez. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL
Same errors? ;-) -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 08:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same publisher? :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 18:49 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: RE: ESEUTIL There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject Wanna do a book together? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother unless you have a problem (and are under the guidance of PSS or other suitable consultancy) or you've moved a ton of mailboxes off of the server and really need the space. There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject, but as I said, in short, don't. Neil -Original Message- From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 16:01 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: ESEUTIL Hi, This is probably a really dumb question but what are your recommendations for running the ESEUTIL utility on Exchange 2000 systems. With Christmas coming up it seems like the perfect time to run it, and do a Defrag on the DB's Any thoughts would be appreciated. Jez. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NDR Still having problems
Title: Message I am still having problems with this. I can send to the address from an outside A/C but nothing from internal. Its as if the Exchange server is stopping me sending to this Domain. I have checked with their admin and we are not balcklisted. It does look like DNS but I can resolve there name and MX record using NSLOOKUP. Is there anywhere else in Exchange or DNS I should be looking to reslove this. The error message to remind everyone that I get is Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 21/12/2001 08:55 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 21/12/2001 08:55 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ONPSBS;l=SBSSERVER-011221085451Z-222 Thanks for any and all of your help. Kevan -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 19 December 2001 17:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NDR Then their might be a problem at the recipient server not being able to query its directory. You could telnet and try the VRFY command. -Original Message-From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 9:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NDR That's what it looks like, but there are other email addresses at the same domain that I know are correct and I am still getting an NDR about 5 seconds after sending. Kevan -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 19 December 2001 16:34To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NDR Yeah... it's resolving the name and contacting the server... but the recipient address is not found on the remote mail server. Check the recipient name. -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NDR If Im reading it correctly, the domain was found but that username doesnt exist. -Original Message-From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NDR This is the error message that I recieve. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.Subject: test from onpSent: 19/12/2001 15:41 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 19/12/2001 15:41 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ONPSBS;l=SBSSERVER-011219154034Z-53 Kevan -Original Message-From: Gousset, Laurent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 19 December 2001 15:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NDR Do an nslookup on the domain name that you are trying to send mail to and see if they have an MX reccord for their mail server. If they don't, add the domain name in on the IMS|E-mail domain button. Enter theFQDN and select the option "Forward all messages for this domain to host:" and enter the IP address of the domain. Stop and restart IMS. Laurent -Original Message-From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NDR whats the error message you are receiving? Brian -Original Message-From: Paul Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: NDR We use Exchange 5.5 sp4 on SBS 4.5. Clients outlook 2000. We are having problems sending mail to some domains. The messages that we can not send are bounced immediately. This leads me to suspect there is an incorrect setting in exchange or a DNS issue on our site. Has anyone any ideas where to start checking. I have read a lot of tech net articles but none seem appropriate. As I said earlier some (most) mails are delivered OK but others to quiet well know domains are
Setting permissions through site
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Win 2K SP2 I have been asked if it is possible to seperate administration tasks in a site. The Exchange site is owned by two departments say A and B. Could I set granular security so that group A can only administer group A's servers and users? What are the minimum permsissions at org, site, server level to allow someone to use Exchange Administrator? Usually I just set my Exchange Admins with Permission Admins at the Org, Site and Container levels. Are their any whitepapers on this subject? My search of the Exchange site has not returned any. Thanks in advance, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Setting permissions through site
How is your Container hierarchy set up? Permissions are allocated on a per-container basis and are site wide. What do you mean by use Exchange admin. View Admin permissions will allow you to get Admin started but won't allow you to do much. Be more specific about your requirements and then we can help you -do your admins need to simply add/delete mailboxes, or logon to mailboxes etc. Kevin -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 10:41 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Setting permissions through site Exchange 5.5 SP4, Win 2K SP2 I have been asked if it is possible to seperate administration tasks in a site. The Exchange site is owned by two departments say A and B. Could I set granular security so that group A can only administer group A's servers and users? What are the minimum permsissions at org, site, server level to allow someone to use Exchange Administrator? Usually I just set my Exchange Admins with Permission Admins at the Org, Site and Container levels. Are their any whitepapers on this subject? My search of the Exchange site has not returned any. Thanks in advance, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Setting permissions through site
Hi Kevin, The Organisation has multiple sites that are both geographically and administratively separated. I am only concerned with setting security for two departments located in a single site. The site is made up of four servers, two belonging to department A two belonging to department B. Each department would like to administer it's own servers and users but not be allowed to administer the server or users on the other department's servers. I guess the preferred solution would be to create two sites but that means someone has to move out of the existing site and deal with the associated problems. If I create a NT admin group and give them properties at the site container of View Only Admin and permission admin rights over the server, with no role over the organisation. The members of this group should be able to open Exchange Administrator and change settings on their own server but not on the other department's server? Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 11:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting permissions through site How is your Container hierarchy set up? Permissions are allocated on a per-container basis and are site wide. What do you mean by use Exchange admin. View Admin permissions will allow you to get Admin started but won't allow you to do much. Be more specific about your requirements and then we can help you -do your admins need to simply add/delete mailboxes, or logon to mailboxes etc. Kevin -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 10:41 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Setting permissions through site Exchange 5.5 SP4, Win 2K SP2 I have been asked if it is possible to seperate administration tasks in a site. The Exchange site is owned by two departments say A and B. Could I set granular security so that group A can only administer group A's servers and users? What are the minimum permsissions at org, site, server level to allow someone to use Exchange Administrator? Usually I just set my Exchange Admins with Permission Admins at the Org, Site and Container levels. Are their any whitepapers on this subject? My search of the Exchange site has not returned any. Thanks in advance, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Setting permissions through site
I think this will probably work for configuration of the individual servers themselves. You may have a problem with who creates/admins site objects particularly connectors etc. Also, as I say, container permissions are site wide. This means if you have containers which have mailboxes belonging to (i.e. admin'd by) both departments then it will be difficult to set correct permissions on these (unless you do it per mailbox). If you don't care about who does admin on mailboxes and maybe do the site-wide admin yourself, then your plan will satisfy your requirement but I would question how much the admins in these Departments would really be able to do. Kevin -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 11:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting permissions through site Hi Kevin, The Organisation has multiple sites that are both geographically and administratively separated. I am only concerned with setting security for two departments located in a single site. The site is made up of four servers, two belonging to department A two belonging to department B. Each department would like to administer it's own servers and users but not be allowed to administer the server or users on the other department's servers. I guess the preferred solution would be to create two sites but that means someone has to move out of the existing site and deal with the associated problems. If I create a NT admin group and give them properties at the site container of View Only Admin and permission admin rights over the server, with no role over the organisation. The members of this group should be able to open Exchange Administrator and change settings on their own server but not on the other department's server? Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 11:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting permissions through site How is your Container hierarchy set up? Permissions are allocated on a per-container basis and are site wide. What do you mean by use Exchange admin. View Admin permissions will allow you to get Admin started but won't allow you to do much. Be more specific about your requirements and then we can help you -do your admins need to simply add/delete mailboxes, or logon to mailboxes etc. Kevin -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 10:41 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Setting permissions through site Exchange 5.5 SP4, Win 2K SP2 I have been asked if it is possible to seperate administration tasks in a site. The Exchange site is owned by two departments say A and B. Could I set granular security so that group A can only administer group A's servers and users? What are the minimum permsissions at org, site, server level to allow someone to use Exchange Administrator? Usually I just set my Exchange Admins with Permission Admins at the Org, Site and Container levels. Are their any whitepapers on this subject? My search of the Exchange site has not returned any. Thanks in advance, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Setting permissions through site
Thanks for the info I now have a better understanding, it is not my recommendation to implement this scenario I just wanted to make sure my understanding was correct. If they want proper control limitations then they need seperate sites. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 12:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting permissions through site I think this will probably work for configuration of the individual servers themselves. You may have a problem with who creates/admins site objects particularly connectors etc. Also, as I say, container permissions are site wide. This means if you have containers which have mailboxes belonging to (i.e. admin'd by) both departments then it will be difficult to set correct permissions on these (unless you do it per mailbox). If you don't care about who does admin on mailboxes and maybe do the site-wide admin yourself, then your plan will satisfy your requirement but I would question how much the admins in these Departments would really be able to do. Kevin -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 11:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting permissions through site Hi Kevin, The Organisation has multiple sites that are both geographically and administratively separated. I am only concerned with setting security for two departments located in a single site. The site is made up of four servers, two belonging to department A two belonging to department B. Each department would like to administer it's own servers and users but not be allowed to administer the server or users on the other department's servers. I guess the preferred solution would be to create two sites but that means someone has to move out of the existing site and deal with the associated problems. If I create a NT admin group and give them properties at the site container of View Only Admin and permission admin rights over the server, with no role over the organisation. The members of this group should be able to open Exchange Administrator and change settings on their own server but not on the other department's server? Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 11:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Setting permissions through site How is your Container hierarchy set up? Permissions are allocated on a per-container basis and are site wide. What do you mean by use Exchange admin. View Admin permissions will allow you to get Admin started but won't allow you to do much. Be more specific about your requirements and then we can help you -do your admins need to simply add/delete mailboxes, or logon to mailboxes etc. Kevin -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 10:41 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Setting permissions through site Exchange 5.5 SP4, Win 2K SP2 I have been asked if it is possible to seperate administration tasks in a site. The Exchange site is owned by two departments say A and B. Could I set granular security so that group A can only administer group A's servers and users? What are the minimum permsissions at org, site, server level to allow someone to use Exchange Administrator? Usually I just set my Exchange Admins with Permission Admins at the Org, Site and Container levels. Are their any whitepapers on this subject? My search of the Exchange site has not returned any. Thanks in advance, Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: System Manager for XP
A. I see. You can install the W2K adminpak onto XP, it just doesn't function. Nice observation, Scott! Thanks. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: System Manager for XP Or, do what I did, which *appears* to work perfectly: 1.Install Win2K adminpak.msi onto WinXP Pro. 2.Install E2K System Manager. 3.Uninstall Win2K adminpak.msi from WinXP Pro. 4.Install .NET Server Beta 3 adminpak.msi (which is downloadable from Microsoft's web site). I'm running this way in production without any apparent problems. YMMV, but I think it will work for you, too. -Scott - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:05 AM Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Wait for the release code and don't use the beta for adminpak.msi in production. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: System Manager for XP O.K. I found the adminpak.msi for WinXP and solved my Administration Tools issue. Now when I go to install the system manager for exchange it wants the Windows 2000 Administration Tools. Anyone know the work around? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: System Manager for XP
This is also referenced on MS website in q304718 Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System Manager for XP A. I see. You can install the W2K adminpak onto XP, it just doesn't function. Nice observation, Scott! Thanks. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: System Manager for XP Or, do what I did, which *appears* to work perfectly: 1.Install Win2K adminpak.msi onto WinXP Pro. 2.Install E2K System Manager. 3.Uninstall Win2K adminpak.msi from WinXP Pro. 4.Install .NET Server Beta 3 adminpak.msi (which is downloadable from Microsoft's web site). I'm running this way in production without any apparent problems. YMMV, but I think it will work for you, too. -Scott - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:05 AM Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Wait for the release code and don't use the beta for adminpak.msi in production. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: System Manager for XP O.K. I found the adminpak.msi for WinXP and solved my Administration Tools issue. Now when I go to install the system manager for exchange it wants the Windows 2000 Administration Tools. Anyone know the work around? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Upgrade of Patches
Title: Upgrade of Patches Hi guys, I am running Exchange 5.5 (Build 2650.24: ServicePack 3) on NT 4.0 server SP 6, with about 150 users. Can anybody advice me on what upgrade path I need to go. what they latest patch is. Many thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic) is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Upgrade of Patches
Title: Upgrade of Patches Exchange 5.5 Service Pack 4 - Original Message - From: Martey, Emmanuel E To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 08:41 Subject: Upgrade of Patches Hi guys, I am running Exchange 5.5 (Build 2650.24: ServicePack 3) on NT 4.0 server SP 6, with about 150 users. Can anybody advice me on what upgrade path I need to go. what they latest patch is. Many thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic) is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Upgrade of Patches
Title: Upgrade of Patches SP4 for Exchange 5.5 Post SP6A security fixes, etc Check out http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security Phil -Phil RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK -Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 13:42To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Upgrade of Patches Hi guys, I am running Exchange 5.5 (Build 2650.24: ServicePack 3) on NT 4.0 server SP 6, with about 150 users. Can anybody advice me on what upgrade path I need to go. what they latest patch is. Many thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic) is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OWA hangs on logon
Hi, I have a wierd problem. I have OWA installed on IIS5. I have setup the domain\administrator account with Service Account Admin rights at all Exch 5.5 levels. I do this as a last resort in helping troubleshoot/login to troubled users mailboxes. This has worked fine, but now, and I dont think anything has changed as far as settings, when I logon through OWA with the domain\administrator account to any mailbox, the logon hangs or sometimes I can get into a mailbox but then the session will time out after a minute or so while I am browsing through messages or folders. My last resort is to install IIS5 on the exchange server itself to see if that makes a difference. But before I do that, I wanted to see if anyone has any feedback on this. Thanks Rod List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 100% CPU when Synch
Title: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Ok I had to recreate his mailbox Everything seemed fine after that until after I restored his calendar.. Now its going 100% when it syncs the calender, or when you access the calender -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 100% CPU when Synch Don't forget : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q247674 - Original Message - From: Keith Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 18:26 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Michael, So far no one has suggested this on the list so I think I will. Maybe the install of outlook is corrupted (its probably a longshot). You might want to try to uninstall Outlook/Office and the reinstall it. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] (714) 560-0900 ex5910 -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Preventing and not allowing are different indeed. And I'll bet that your site doesn't disable local virus scanning just because you block the POP ports. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Not allowing POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway If it doesn't, then you're preventing it wrong ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I believe we're all free to counter bad advice. And I gave several suggestions, here and offline. I seriously doubt that there is a single AV vendor who makes client- and server-end AV products who says they shouldn't be used simultaneously. Not allowing POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway--it's quite easy. Please don't get upset when you make a questionable blanket statement based upon reasons you can't recall, and someone objects. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. I will admit that I don't always present things in a matter which explains every nit-picking detail. I do know that it was explained to me some time ago exactly why we do not enable client-based Exchange AV here and while I can't remember every single detail, I do know there were valid reasons presented that stated why we would not employ this feature. I still pose the question to you of have you spoken to your Exchange AV vendor and asked them about having both server and client side scanning simultaneously? You never answered me. I don't know why you feel a burning desire to prove your overwhelming knowledge about this subject, and try and prove that I don't know what I am talking about - don't know if you noticed, but I'm not the only one that suggested disabling antivirus on the client. Or were you too busy thinking of a retort to my comments? I did notice that disabling it had no effect. I also made some other suggestions, or didn't you notice those either? I haven't seen any suggestions come out of your mouth (or keyboard, as it were). Your comment about a need for client-based Exchange AV is relevant when dealing with non-Exchange POP3 access. I agree with that. We don't allow POP access because of this, and other security reasons. The MAPI scenario, while acknowledged to by MS, I have never seen happen in a real-life scenario. Have you? We still use MAPI-based scanning, and process a LOT of mail, and this scenario has never happened to us. Then again, if you buy cheap AV software, you may be more at risk. None of us here are too worried about it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch The server and client don't fight for the messages--the client tells the server to send a message, the server sends it (whether the server first scans it or not is irrelevant) and the client then scans it. The more CPU cycles spent scanning by the client, the less cycles are available to request the next
Re: 100% CPU when Synch
Title: RE: 100% CPU when Synch How many items/how big is the calendar ? - Original Message - From: MHR(Michael Ross) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 08:41 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Ok I had to recreate his mailbox Everything seemed fine after that until after I restored his calendar.. Now its going 100% when it syncs the calender, or when you access the calender -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 100% CPU when Synch Don't forget : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q247674 - Original Message - From: "Keith Nelson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 18:26 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Michael, So far no one has suggested this on the list so I think I will. Maybe the install of outlook is corrupted (its probably a longshot). You might want to try to uninstall Outlook/Office and the reinstall it. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] (714) 560-0900 ex5910 -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Preventing and not allowing are different indeed. And I'll bet that your site doesn't disable local virus scanning just because you block the POP ports. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch "Not allowing" POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway If it doesn't, then you're preventing it wrong ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I believe we're all free to counter bad advice. And I gave several suggestions, here and offline. I seriously doubt that there is a single AV vendor who makes client- and server-end AV products who says they shouldn't be used simultaneously. "Not allowing" POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway--it's quite easy. Please don't get upset when you make a questionable blanket statement based upon reasons you can't recall, and someone objects. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. I will admit that I don't always present things in a matter which explains every nit-picking detail. I do know that it was explained to me some time ago exactly why we do not enable client-based Exchange AV here and while I can't remember every single detail, I do know there were valid reasons presented that stated why we would not employ this feature. I still pose the question to you of have you spoken to your Exchange AV vendor and asked them about having both server and client side scanning simultaneously? You never answered me. I don't know why you feel a burning desire to prove your overwhelming knowledge about this subject, and try and prove that I don't know what I am talking about - don't know if you noticed, but I'm not the only one that suggested disabling antivirus on the client. Or were you too busy thinking of a retort to my comments? I did notice that disabling it had no effect. I also made some other suggestions, or didn't you notice those either? I haven't seen any suggestions come out of your mouth (or keyboard, as it were). Your comment about a need for client-based Exchange AV is relevant when dealing with non-Exchange POP3 access. I agree with that. We don't allow POP access because of this, and other security reasons. The MAPI scenario, while acknowledged to by MS, I have never seen happen in a real-life scenario. Have you? We still use MAPI-based scanning, and process a LOT of mail, and this scenario has never happened to us. Then again, if you buy cheap AV software, you may be more at risk. None of us here are too worried about it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff
RE: Upgrade of Patches
Title: Upgrade of Patches SP4 went on to our Exchange 5.5 servers without any problems. To make sure, you might want to do the following: Set all exchange services (and and exchange antivirus services) to manual, reboot, apply SP4, reboot if it asks, then set services back to automatic and restart them. Prevents any "cannot write to file" messages (which I did see when applying SP3). Phil -Phil RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK -Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Upgrade of Patches Thanks, Is there any precauion apart from backups?. -Original Message-From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21/12/2001 13:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Upgrade of Patches SP4 for Exchange 5.5 Post SP6A security fixes, etc Check out http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security Phil -Phil RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK -Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 13:42To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Upgrade of Patches Hi guys, I am running Exchange 5.5 (Build 2650.24: ServicePack 3) on NT 4.0 server SP 6, with about 150 users. Can anybody advice me on what upgrade path I need to go. what they latest patch is. Many thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic) is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic) is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Upgrade of Patches
Title: Upgrade of Patches Thanks, Is there any precauion apart from backups?. -Original Message-From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21/12/2001 13:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Upgrade of Patches SP4 for Exchange 5.5 Post SP6A security fixes, etc Check out http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security Phil -Phil RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK -Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 13:42To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Upgrade of Patches Hi guys, I am running Exchange 5.5 (Build 2650.24: ServicePack 3) on NT 4.0 server SP 6, with about 150 users. Can anybody advice me on what upgrade path I need to go. what they latest patch is. Many thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic) is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic) is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 100% CPU when Synch
Title: Message not sure how big it is. it locks up when ya look at it -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 100% CPU when Synch How many items/how big is the calendar ? - Original Message - From: MHR(Michael Ross) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 08:41 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Ok I had to recreate his mailbox Everything seemed fine after that until after I restored his calendar.. Now its going 100% when it syncs the calender, or when you access the calender -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 100% CPU when Synch Don't forget : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q247674 - Original Message - From: "Keith Nelson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 18:26 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Michael, So far no one has suggested this on the list so I think I will. Maybe the install of outlook is corrupted (its probably a longshot). You might want to try to uninstall Outlook/Office and the reinstall it. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] (714) 560-0900 ex5910 -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Preventing and not allowing are different indeed. And I'll bet that your site doesn't disable local virus scanning just because you block the POP ports. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch "Not allowing" POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway If it doesn't, then you're preventing it wrong ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I believe we're all free to counter bad advice. And I gave several suggestions, here and offline. I seriously doubt that there is a single AV vendor who makes client- and server-end AV products who says they shouldn't be used simultaneously. "Not allowing" POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway--it's quite easy. Please don't get upset when you make a questionable blanket statement based upon reasons you can't recall, and someone objects. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. I will admit that I don't always present things in a matter which explains every nit-picking detail. I do know that it was explained to me some time ago exactly why we do not enable client-based Exchange AV here and while I can't remember every single detail, I do know there were valid reasons presented that stated why we would not employ this feature. I still pose the question to you of have you spoken to your Exchange AV vendor and asked them about having both server and client side scanning simultaneously? You never answered me. I don't know why you feel a burning desire to prove your overwhelming knowledge about this subject, and try and prove that I don't know what I am talking about - don't know if you noticed, but I'm not the only one that suggested disabling antivirus on the client. Or were you too busy thinking of a retort to my comments? I did notice that disabling it had no effect. I also made some other suggestions, or didn't you notice those either? I haven't seen any suggestions come out of your mouth (or keyboard, as it were). Your comment about a need for client-based Exchange AV is relevant when dealing with non-Exchange POP3 access. I agree with that. We don't allow POP access because of this, and other security reasons. The MAPI scenario, while acknowledged to by MS, I have never
Re: 100% CPU when Synch
Title: Message right click, properties do an advanced find to see how many items - Original Message - From: MHR(Michael Ross) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 08:55 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch not sure how big it is. it locks up when ya look at it -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 100% CPU when Synch How many items/how big is the calendar ? - Original Message - From: MHR(Michael Ross) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 08:41 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Ok I had to recreate his mailbox Everything seemed fine after that until after I restored his calendar.. Now its going 100% when it syncs the calender, or when you access the calender -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 100% CPU when Synch Don't forget : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239938 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q247674 - Original Message - From: "Keith Nelson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 18:26 Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Michael, So far no one has suggested this on the list so I think I will. Maybe the install of outlook is corrupted (its probably a longshot). You might want to try to uninstall Outlook/Office and the reinstall it. Keith Nelson Network Administrator Orange County High School of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] (714) 560-0900 ex5910 -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch Preventing and not allowing are different indeed. And I'll bet that your site doesn't disable local virus scanning just because you block the POP ports. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch "Not allowing" POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway If it doesn't, then you're preventing it wrong ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I believe we're all free to counter bad advice. And I gave several suggestions, here and offline. I seriously doubt that there is a single AV vendor who makes client- and server-end AV products who says they shouldn't be used simultaneously. "Not allowing" POP access doesn't prevent the user from configuring it anyway--it's quite easy. Please don't get upset when you make a questionable blanket statement based upon reasons you can't recall, and someone objects. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. I will admit that I don't always present things in a matter which explains every nit-picking detail. I do know that it was explained to me some time ago exactly why we do not enable client-based Exchange AV here and while I can't remember every single detail, I do know there were valid reasons presented that stated why we would not employ this feature. I still pose the question to you of have you spoken to your Exchange AV vendor and asked them about having both server and client side scanning simultaneously? You never answered me. I don't know why you feel a burning desire to prove your overwhelming knowledge about this subject, and try and prove that I don't know what I am talking about - don't know if you noticed, but I'm not the only one that suggested disabling antivirus on the client. Or were you too busy thinking of a retort to my comments? I did notice that disabling it had no effect. I also made
Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Old Mail showing up Mail stuck in the queue ? - Original Message - From: Todd White To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 09:31 Subject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Relay problem???
Title: Message Hello all, I have a NT 4.0 sp6a box running Exchange 5.5 sp4. All routing restrictions in place. This morning I came in and found about 40 Inbound failures in my mailbox. One user had about 35 messages from a list. None of the emails were even sent to our domain. For instance, the TO: field has [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the from field has [EMAIL PROTECTED], yet the messages are still in his mailbox Any ideas? Here is a sample from one of the inbound failures I recieved: This is a MIME-encapsulated message Unknown command. --EAB17341.1008930169/multi9.netcomi.com Unknown command. The original message was received at Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:22:48 -0600 Unknown command. from root@localhost Unknown command. - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - Unknown command. recipient list not shown: ; Unknown command. - Transcript of session follows - Unknown command. 553 recipient list not shown: ;... List:; syntax illegal for recipient addresses Unknown command. --EAB17341.1008930169/multi9.netcomi.com Unknown command. Content-Type: message/delivery-status Unknown command. Reporting-MTA: dns; multi9.netcomi.com Unknown command. Arrival-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:22:48 -0600 Unknown command. Final-Recipient: RFC822; @multi9.netcomi.com Unknown command. Action: failed Unknown command. Status: 5.1.3 Unknown command. Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:22:49 -0600 Unknown command. --EAB17341.1008930169/multi9.netcomi.com Unknown command. Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers Unknown command. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. Received: (from root@localhost) Unknown command. by multi9.netcomi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA17341; Unknown command. Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:22:48 -0600 Unknown command. Received: from server.ohionet.net (ohionet.net [216.13.247.117]) Unknown command. by multi9.netcomi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA17323 Unknown command. for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:22:47 -0600 Unknown command. Received: (from admin@localhost) Unknown command. by server.ohionet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA16069 Unknown command. for weaveramin_site21-list; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 02:18:46 -0500 Unknown command. Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 02:18:46 -0500 Unknown command. Resent-Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. X-Authentication-Warning: server.ohionet.net: admin set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Unknown command. Received: from server.lyghtforce.com ([66.28.104.53]) Unknown command. by server.ohionet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA16060 Unknown command. for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 02:18:40 -0500 Unknown command. Received: by server.lyghtforce.com from localhost Unknown command. (router,SLMail V4.1); Fri, 21 Dec 2001 01:17:53 -0600 Unknown command. for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. Received: from server [66.28.104.53] Unknown command. by server.lyghtforce.com [66.28.104.53] (SLmail 4.1.3395) with ESMTP Unknown command. id 2F1F4C15F53811D5BAF100D0B7A64D23 Unknown command. for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 01:17:52 -0600 Unknown command. Received: from server by server (SLList/1.0); Unknown command. Fri, 21 Dec 2001 01:17:51 -0600 Unknown command. Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 01:17:51 -0600 Unknown command. From: "SLList" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. Old-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. Message-ID: sllist-12212001011751.111.3@server Unknown command. X-sllist-antiloop: server Unknown command. Expiry-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:17:51 -0600 Unknown command. Subject: SLList command results: No commands found Unknown command. X-SLUIDL: 8ED3684A-F5D411D5-BAF100D0-B7A64D23 Unknown command. Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. Precedence: bulk Unknown command. Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; Unknown command. X-Loop: forwarded by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unknown command. --EAB17341.1008930169/multi9.netcomi.com-- Unknown command. --- SLList v1.0 - job execution complete. Rudy Lovato Heel, Inc. (505) 293-3843 Ext. 7025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mailbox size limits
This is great information but emails on the same server do not pass through the MTA. So how do I limit the size of a message that is being sent within the server to another user on that server? Happy Holidays, Mike -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits Each MTA will have a size limit that can pass through it. Check out Server-MTA-General-Message Size. The size is set in KBytes. Kevin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 20:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox size limits Good afternoon, OUTLOOK 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4. How can I limit the size of message inside our organization? I know I can limit the size of messages bound to and from the Internet but how do I limit the size for in house eMAILs? On the Limits tab I see Message Sizes incoming and out going and I hope this is where I do this. Is there a global setting where all users are restricted equally? Happy holidays. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up Give us a clue! Would the mail be mail that had been deleted before? Where does the mail show up - Inbox? Kevin -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Old Mail showing up Mail stuck in the queue ? - Original Message - From: Todd White To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 09:31 Subject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
hide availability
Need to find a way to block a particular users availability times. I have seen some articles say to create an appointment from like 9 a to 6p but wouldn't these cause conflicts whenever he goes to enter an appointment? NT4 sp6a, EX 5.5 sp4 Mike Cosca mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.careerbuilder.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD
Yes, and no. Murray -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD I'm assuming that you checked the rules to make sure that you didn't accidentally add someone. Do you have and stop processing rules as part of each rule? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest. John Keats -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD OK, Outlook 2000. There are rules set for junk and adult content which forward individual email from specific addresses or any email from a specific domain directly to the deleted items folder. An internal email from my CEO was dumped directly into the deleted items folder unread and I never saw it come in. Obviously, I do not have our domain or any of our staff members names included in the list of names and domains to be deleted. Murray -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD well, ok. First of all: Outlook..? www.slipstick.com Secondly, without showing us the rule, I don't see how we can help, really. Rules aren't SUPPOSED to do that sort of thing, but you haven't even told us the Outlook version number... Or the Exchange version number... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. John G. Riefenbaker -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD As a result in the increase in junk mail and other unwanted email, I turned the Rules Wizard on to direct specific names and domains to send these emails directly to the deleted items folder. I have just determined that Internal email from our staff has managed to be intercepted by the Rules Wizard and dumped some internal email into the deleted items folder. I have no way of knowing why or how this happened. Is there a problem with the Rules Wizard that anyone knows about? I'm disabling the Rules Wizard until I can determine just what is happening. Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mailbox size limits
Yeah, the Limits is the right place. If you get hold of an ADSI editor or use Admin Import you can set the Submission-Cont-Length on all (some) mailboxes. ARe ou really that tight on disk space? Kevin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 14:46 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits This is great information but emails on the same server do not pass through the MTA. So how do I limit the size of a message that is being sent within the server to another user on that server? Happy Holidays, Mike -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits Each MTA will have a size limit that can pass through it. Check out Server-MTA-General-Message Size. The size is set in KBytes. Kevin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 20:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox size limits Good afternoon, OUTLOOK 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4. How can I limit the size of message inside our organization? I know I can limit the size of messages bound to and from the Internet but how do I limit the size for in house eMAILs? On the Limits tab I see Message Sizes incoming and out going and I hope this is where I do this. Is there a global setting where all users are restricted equally? Happy holidays. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hide availability
Do you mean "block" as in "make invisible" or "block" as in "attribute time in one segment"? -Original Message-From: Mike Cosca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:59To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: hide availability Need to find a way to block a particular users availability times. I have seen some articles say to create an appointment from like 9 a to 6p but wouldn't these cause conflicts whenever he goes to enter an appointment? NT4 sp6a, EX 5.5 sp4 Mike Cosca mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.careerbuilder.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hide availability
I would like it to appear as "No Information" if possible Mike Cosca mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.careerbuilder.com -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hide availability Do you mean block as in make invisible or block as in attribute time in one segment? -Original Message- From: Mike Cosca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hide availability Need to find a way to block a particular users availability times. I have seen some articles say to create an appointment from like 9 a to 6p but wouldn't these cause conflicts whenever he goes to enter an appointment? NT4 sp6a, EX 5.5 sp4 Mike Cosca mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.careerbuilder.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Oh where oh where..
Title: Message Silly ? but I cant find answer: Using the contacts with the address book view. When I click the To.. button in a new msg it lists my contacts, but it doesnt tell me the difference between and email or a fax #. It justs lists the names two times. Usually when I look at it woulud have name (fax) or name (email). This is a win-me box (i know i know..) running office 2000. Thx List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Identifying/reporting relayers
Title: Identifying/reporting relayers We recently found out that our Exchange box was being used for mail relay, and have fixed the issue. Event Viewer is still showing relay attempts, and the IP addresses that the attempts are originating from. Where can I look to identify and/or report this to? Thanks in advance! Don Guyer Information Systems Citadel Federal Credit Union Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up yes usually the mail was deleted a while back and is showing back up in the inbox -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Give us a clue! Would the mail be mail that had been deleted before? Where does the mail show up - Inbox? Kevin -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Old Mail showing up Mail stuck in the queue ? - Original Message - From: Todd White To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 09:31 Subject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Mail Enabled Public Folder
Good Morning! (depending where you are I guess) We have a public folder that we subscribe to an internal tech listserv. With Ex 5.5 we had no problem with this. Since we've gone to E2K about 3-4 months ago we have been unable to get this setup to work. You can send to it internally using the SMTP address that it is subscribed with. But coming from off campus or through the listserv, which hits the internet mail connector, this folder does not recieve the posts The folder is mail enabled and is not hidden from the address list. It is set to recieve posts from anyone and no restrictions or limits are set. I've been gone for a few months and I THINK I remember some posts on this a few months ago but can't locate them. Any ideas? Thanks! Simp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: hide availability
No way to do this to show "No Information" - this is only shown when the client cannot access the Free/Busy data. You can create an all day event which show as busy and you are right, Outlook will tell you it will conflict but Outlook will still allow you to create appointments. Kevin -Original Message-From: Mike Cosca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:30To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: hide availability I would like it to appear as "No Information" if possible Mike Cosca mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.careerbuilder.com -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: hide availability Do you mean "block" as in "make invisible" or "block" as in "attribute time in one segment"? -Original Message-From: Mike Cosca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:59To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: hide availability Need to find a way to block a particular users availability times. I have seen some articles say to create an appointment from like 9 a to 6p but wouldn't these cause conflicts whenever he goes to enter an appointment? NT4 sp6a, EX 5.5 sp4 Mike Cosca mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.careerbuilder.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Upgrade of Patches
Upgrade of PatchesThe latest Service Pack for Exchange is SP4. Use Winver.exe to make sure your system is running SP6a and not just SP6. Also, visit http://www.microsoft.com/security and grab the Security Toolkit. Run HFNETCHK and make sure you have all necessary security patches. Then, visit http://www.windowsupdate.com and make sure you have all the latest updates from there. Finally, visit http://www.microsoft.com/download and make sure you have the latest downloads form Exchange and Windows from there, too. Hope this helps. -Scott - Original Message - From: Martey, Emmanuel E To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:41 AM Subject: Upgrade of Patches Hi guys, I am running Exchange 5.5 (Build 2650.24: ServicePack 3) on NT 4.0 server SP 6, with about 150 users. Can anybody advice me on what upgrade path I need to go. what they latest patch is. Many thanks. Emmanuel List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL
Hey! William -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same errors? ;-) -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 08:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same publisher? :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 18:49 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: RE: ESEUTIL There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject Wanna do a book together? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother unless you have a problem (and are under the guidance of PSS or other suitable consultancy) or you've moved a ton of mailboxes off of the server and really need the space. There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject, but as I said, in short, don't. Neil -Original Message- From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 16:01 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: ESEUTIL Hi, This is probably a really dumb question but what are your recommendations for running the ESEUTIL utility on Exchange 2000 systems. With Christmas coming up it seems like the perfect time to run it, and do a Defrag on the DB's Any thoughts would be appreciated. Jez. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL
No. William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same publisher? :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 18:49 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: RE: ESEUTIL There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject Wanna do a book together? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother unless you have a problem (and are under the guidance of PSS or other suitable consultancy) or you've moved a ton of mailboxes off of the server and really need the space. There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book on this subject, but as I said, in short, don't. Neil -Original Message- From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 20 December 2001 16:01 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: ESEUTIL Subject: ESEUTIL Hi, This is probably a really dumb question but what are your recommendations for running the ESEUTIL utility on Exchange 2000 systems. With Christmas coming up it seems like the perfect time to run it, and do a Defrag on the DB's Any thoughts would be appreciated. Jez. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Topology tool
We are running 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP5 and I ran it without problem from my XP Pro box as well. -Original Message- From: EALES, Jack / RSAIFS - IOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool I ran it without a problem from a Win2K pro box to a bunch of NT4 Sp5 Exchange 5.5 Sp3 servers so Sp6 shouldn't be an issue from NT's point of view... What SP is your Exchange server at? Is LDAP enabled? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 18:16 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Topology tool try SP6...and Access to an Exchange server with LDAP Protocol Support. Exchange Server 5.5 or higher is necessary. is a prereq. - Original Message - From: Douglas Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:12 Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool I keep getting an error when I try to run exMap. Unable to Open Connection through the Active Directory Provider. I don't have AD!! I have Exchange 5.5 on NT4 SP5 and I'm running exmap on my win2K pro pc. Any ideas? I initially thought it only worked with AD but apparently thats not true. Exmap is a great free tool - it does what it says. Easy and quick, all you need is Visio. I have a nice big printout of my Exchange Org. posted above my desk. Our org. isn't very complex, but its nice to see all the sites and different connectors represented graphically. -Jim -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Topology tool Looks like a great tool... Anybody care to comment on its good or bad points ? - Original Message - From: Jim Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:18 Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool Quick search at www.microsoft.com for Exmap reveals (may be wrapped): http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn ol/exchange/downloads/topology.asp Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: EALES, Jack / RSAIFS - IOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool which is available where?? -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 December 2001 15:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED ON THE INTERNET - Please read the detailed disclaimer below. -- Exmap will do the trick for 5.5 -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Douglas Hull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Topology tool Does anybody know of a tool that will generate a visio diagram of your exchange topology? I found one on the MS website but it only works with active directory. I am using Exchange 5.5 on a mixture on W2K and NT boxes in our organization without AD. Many thanks. Doug List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The following message has been automatically added by the mail gateway to comply with a Royal Sun Alliance IT Security requirement: As this email arrived via the Internet you should be cautious about its origin and content. Replies which contain sensitive information or
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder
Set the ANONYMOUS role to Contributor (it was the DEFAULT role in 5.5) Neil -Original Message- From: Simpsen, Paul A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 December 2001 15:56 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Mail Enabled Public Folder Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder Good Morning! (depending where you are I guess) We have a public folder that we subscribe to an internal tech listserv. With Ex 5.5 we had no problem with this. Since we've gone to E2K about 3-4 months ago we have been unable to get this setup to work. You can send to it internally using the SMTP address that it is subscribed with. But coming from off campus or through the listserv, which hits the internet mail connector, this folder does not recieve the posts The folder is mail enabled and is not hidden from the address list. It is set to recieve posts from anyone and no restrictions or limits are set. I've been gone for a few months and I THINK I remember some posts on this a few months ago but can't locate them. Any ideas? Thanks! Simp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder
The anonymous role is set to author which has a bit more rights then Contributor, so this should be alright?? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder Set the ANONYMOUS role to Contributor (it was the DEFAULT role in 5.5) Neil -Original Message- From: Simpsen, Paul A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 December 2001 15:56 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Mail Enabled Public Folder Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder Good Morning! (depending where you are I guess) We have a public folder that we subscribe to an internal tech listserv. With Ex 5.5 we had no problem with this. Since we've gone to E2K about 3-4 months ago we have been unable to get this setup to work. You can send to it internally using the SMTP address that it is subscribed with. But coming from off campus or through the listserv, which hits the internet mail connector, this folder does not recieve the posts The folder is mail enabled and is not hidden from the address list. It is set to recieve posts from anyone and no restrictions or limits are set. I've been gone for a few months and I THINK I remember some posts on this a few months ago but can't locate them. Any ideas? Thanks! Simp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
EMAIL WITH NO DATE
One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up Is it possible that your clients are looking at *.ost info that never sync'd up to the server? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Hiding recipients in mail message
OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
The received field is missing from his view in outlook? D If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing. -Anon -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hiding recipients in mail message
I'm not sure how you would do it in VBA, but I think might be able to do it in batch using ondl to extract the names, and then pipe it to mapisend. -Original Message- From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hiding recipients in mail message OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up Switch that, reverse... Is it possible that your clients are looking at server info that never got sync'd to the *ost? -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Is it possible that your clients are looking at *.ost info that never sync'd up to the server? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
I have seen this when email is imported from Outlook Express - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:56 Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Switch that, reverse... Is it possible that your clients are looking at server info that never got sync'd to the *ost? -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Is it possible that your clients are looking at *.ost info that never sync'd up to the server? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Is it possible that your clients are looking at *.ost info that never sync'd up to the server? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
It's not doing it on all his email. Just a handful now and then. Most of it is from media sources. Murray -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
Yep. And from Eudora. The import hoses the dates. -- Original Message -- From: David N. Precht [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:04:44 -0500 I have seen this when email is imported from Outlook Express - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:56 Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- Sherry, MOS+AXE -- List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up Are you sure? I've seen exactly this when all of sudden people see what is really on the server and they aren't looking at cached-non-sync'd info... -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Switch that, reverse... Is it possible that your clients are looking at server info that never got sync'd to the *ost? -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Is it possible that your clients are looking at *.ost info that never sync'd up to the server? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ
RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
Ok. So it is consistent from specific senders, then? Like, a hotmail.com address would always have the appropriate date, but some 'media source' does not? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE It's not doing it on all his email. Just a handful now and then. Most of it is from media sources. Murray -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up these users don't have OST files -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Are you sure? I've seen exactly this when all of sudden people see what is really on the server and they aren't looking at cached-non-sync'd info... -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Switch that, reverse... Is it possible that your clients are looking at server info that never got sync'd to the *ost? -Original Message-From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Is it possible that your clients are looking at *.ost info that never sync'd up to the server? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm
RE: Hiding recipients in mail message
That is what I was thinking... -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Mail merge? -Original Message- From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hiding recipients in mail message OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hiding recipients in mail message
There's also some products like gammadyne that will help. It's not very expensive IIRC. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message That is what I was thinking... -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Mail merge? -Original Message- From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hiding recipients in mail message OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hiding recipients in mail message
Have they got that thing working now? William -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Mail merge? -Original Message- From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hiding recipients in mail message OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hiding recipients in mail message
Depends on your definition of working... ;o) D Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Have they got that thing working now? William -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Mail merge? -Original Message- From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hiding recipients in mail message OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE
I don't have enough of the email details, not sure that there is any repeating going on. My user says some of it was spam as well. Murray -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE Ok. So it is consistent from specific senders, then? Like, a hotmail.com address would always have the appropriate date, but some 'media source' does not? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE It's not doing it on all his email. Just a handful now and then. Most of it is from media sources. Murray -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EMAIL WITH NO DATE I don't think that is possible. Is it just a view setting? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: EMAIL WITH NO DATE One of my users has indicated to me that lately he is receiving email with no date at all. I was under the impression that Exchange dates the receive time and date for all email. Any ideas what could be causing this? Murray List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hiding recipients in mail message
I dunno. I'm only sending resumes out 1 address at a time. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Have they got that thing working now? William -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Mail merge? -Original Message- From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hiding recipients in mail message OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Identifying/reporting relayers
Title: Message Try http://www.apnic.net/ http://www.ripe.net/perl/whois -Original Message-From: Don Guyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 09:44To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Identifying/reporting "relayers" We recently found out that our Exchange box was being used for mail relay, and have fixed the issue. Event Viewer is still showing relay attempts, and the IP addresses that the attempts are originating from. Where can I look to identify and/or report this to? Thanks in advance! Don Guyer Information Systems Citadel Federal Credit Union Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mailbox size limits
It is not that we are tight on disk space it is just that our mailboxes are only 50M and if someone internally sends out 15M files it doesn't take long to close down mailboxes. that is why we are trying to limit the amount of data a person sends internally. By the way Kevin how is your mailboxes mover for multiple mailboxes coming along? Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits Yeah, the Limits is the right place. If you get hold of an ADSI editor or use Admin Import you can set the Submission-Cont-Length on all (some) mailboxes. ARe ou really that tight on disk space? Kevin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 14:46 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits This is great information but emails on the same server do not pass through the MTA. So how do I limit the size of a message that is being sent within the server to another user on that server? Happy Holidays, Mike -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits Each MTA will have a size limit that can pass through it. Check out Server-MTA-General-Message Size. The size is set in KBytes. Kevin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 20:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox size limits Good afternoon, OUTLOOK 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4. How can I limit the size of message inside our organization? I know I can limit the size of messages bound to and from the Internet but how do I limit the size for in house eMAILs? On the Limits tab I see Message Sizes incoming and out going and I hope this is where I do this. Is there a global setting where all users are restricted equally? Happy holidays. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hiding recipients in mail message
there are aplications that spammers use, that do that check http://astalavista.box.sk -Mensaje original- De: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Viernes, 21 de Diciembre de 2001 03:59 p.m. Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Asunto: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message I dunno. I'm only sending resumes out 1 address at a time. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Have they got that thing working now? William -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hiding recipients in mail message Mail merge? -Original Message- From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 6:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hiding recipients in mail message OK, this could be a challenge We have a user who needs to send out a mail, so that each recipient appears as the only recipient on the To: line (joe snow receives it To: Joe Snow etc). I tried suggesting he send it to himself and Bcc everyone, but he's persistent and won't have this. Does anyone know a bit of O2K VBA or another solution that can go through a d-list (in the mailbox, not the GAL) and send the mail individually to every person in it? My VBA's really not that good... Thanks in advance, and Merry Christmas Everyone!!! Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Old Mail showing up
Title: Old Mail showing up In the past 2 weeks, I have seen the same thing happen, but fortunately, it has only been reported by people in IS, no other users are complaining. This is start happening after I had to reboot my NT4 Exchange 5.5 sp3 server. In the past, I have noticed that after a reboot, numerous people complain about this and we pretty much tell them to deal with it: better the same message twice, than missing that one important message. I also do not use OST's, since I don't need to lug around a laptop. -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up these users don't have OST files -Original Message- From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up Are you sure? I've seen exactly this when all of sudden people see what is really on the server and they aren't looking at cached-non-sync'd info... -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up NO -Original Message- From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up Switch that, reverse... Is it possible that your clients are looking at server info that never got sync'd to the *ost? -Original Message- From: Nikki Cleland - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up Is it possible that your clients are looking at *.ost info that never sync'd up to the server? -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up No errors in the event log or messages pertaining to this -Original Message- From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up Does he mean that e-mail that has previously been sent is being resent? Had it happen here when the MTA didn't shut down cleanly - are there any messages in the Event Log that would point to recovery being run on the MTA?? Karen -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 15:48 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up What? SIS is simply a method of storing the contents table for messages within the IS. It has nothing to do with delivery! Fact is, Todd hasn't really given us enough info to start to diagnose the problem. Kevin -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 14:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Old Mail showing up Simple solution is to not reboot exchange. This is a Single Instance Storeissue. I saw this issue a couple of years ago with 5.5. I do not totally remember because it was on someone else'sexchange boxand itinvolved a registry change. The symptoms were after a reboot old mail was resent to client computer. The mail was from the SIS and usually between the time of the last two reboots. ellery july Technical Lead Northwest Area Foundation 332 Minnesota e-1201 St. Paul, MN 55101 email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone - 651-225-3895 fax - 651-225-7695 -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Old Mail showing up Anyone know why when sometimes you reboot the Exchange Server that Old mail shows up on the client side, only SOMETIMES? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
as I run out the door here for possibly (hopefully) the last time in 2001...
I feel the need to thank all of you on this list who's expertise and efforts helped make 2001 a bit easier on my brain. I'm sure there's a few thousand out there who share the sentiment. On behalf of all of us semi-pro's -- thanks again and Happy Holidays. randy. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
The MTA is having trouble talking to the IMS. Inbound email still works? William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
Yah, inbound has no problem. Do you think I need to do disaster recovery?? The MTA is having trouble talking to the IMS. Inbound email still works? William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
Sorry, Jimmy. It seems I have more questions than answers. Is there ANY outbound? Is this user specific? ANY changes made to the system at all? Connectors removed? X400 addressing messed up? Drivespace ok? Nothing else in the app event log at all? I have not seen this before. Hopefully someone else has? In your position, I would probably take an online backup. Apply Exchange5.5 sp4 over again, and have another look. Then I would plan to apply NTsp6a and reapply Exchangesp4 in the near future. Or I might call PSS. William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Yah, inbound has no problem. Do you think I need to do disaster recovery?? The MTA is having trouble talking to the IMS. Inbound email still works? William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
Did you seriously mess up X400? I would call PSS in your shoes. http://support.microsoft.com/ William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Everything works fine execept OUTBOUND email. Internal mail works ok when people are connected inside the LAN. I believe the X400 addressing is messed up. Is there a way to fix that? Do I need to do a new install of exchange 5.5? If so, Can someone tell me how to do that? I think soemthing went wrong in the organizational name. I have to have this working or I'm screwed! :( I hope anyone else can help. My Aol AIM is hgljim I hope someone could help me... Thanks. Sorry, Jimmy. It seems I have more questions than answers. Is there ANY outbound? Is this user specific? ANY changes made to the system at all? Connectors removed? X400 addressing messed up? Drivespace ok? Nothing else in the app event log at all? I have not seen this before. Hopefully someone else has? In your position, I would probably take an online backup. Apply Exchange5.5 sp4 over again, and have another look. Then I would plan to apply NTsp6a and reapply Exchangesp4 in the near future. Or I might call PSS. William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Yah, inbound has no problem. Do you think I need to do disaster recovery?? The MTA is having trouble talking to the IMS. Inbound email still works? William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
Thanks, Reverend. William -Original Message- From: John Eddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Jimmy, Why do you believe the x400 addressing is screwed up? If it was, I would believe that mail to a Distribution List would fail as well. Does it? If it does work, then x400 is probably fine. Can you look at the properties of the IMS and the MTA in control panel - services and see what account they are configured to start up with? Also, has the Exchange Service Account password been changed recently? Has it ever worked? When did it stop working? Are there any exchange 2000 servers in the site? Also, if it's really that important and immediate of a concern, I highly recomment calling support. I know lots of the brains on this list personally, and I think they'll all agree that one-on-one conversation in real time is usually the fastest route to a solution. Sure it costs money, but, if 'I have to get this working or I'm screwed' is the situation, maybe that option bears looking into. John Eddy Microsoft Exchange MVP Lead -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: zaterdag 22 december 2001 1:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Everything works fine execept OUTBOUND email. Internal mail works ok when people are connected inside the LAN. I believe the X400 addressing is messed up. Is there a way to fix that? Do I need to do a new install of exchange 5.5? If so, Can someone tell me how to do that? I think soemthing went wrong in the organizational name. I have to have this working or I'm screwed! :( I hope anyone else can help. My Aol AIM is hgljim I hope someone could help me... Thanks. Sorry, Jimmy. It seems I have more questions than answers. Is there ANY outbound? Is this user specific? ANY changes made to the system at all? Connectors removed? X400 addressing messed up? Drivespace ok? Nothing else in the app event log at all? I have not seen this before. Hopefully someone else has? In your position, I would probably take an online backup. Apply Exchange5.5 sp4 over again, and have another look. Then I would plan to apply NTsp6a and reapply Exchangesp4 in the near future. Or I might call PSS. William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Yah, inbound has no problem. Do you think I need to do disaster recovery?? The MTA is having trouble talking to the IMS. Inbound email still works? William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
Agreed. $250 is a small price to pay to put this to bed. It could cost more in downtime if you continue to try and troubleshoot yourself. -Original Message- From: John Eddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Also, if it's really that important and immediate of a concern, I highly recomment calling support. I know lots of the brains on this list personally, and I think they'll all agree that one-on-one conversation in real time is usually the fastest route to a solution. Sure it costs money, but, if 'I have to get this working or I'm screwed' is the situation, maybe that option bears looking into. John Eddy Microsoft Exchange MVP Lead -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: zaterdag 22 december 2001 1:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Everything works fine execept OUTBOUND email. Internal mail works ok when people are connected inside the LAN. I believe the X400 addressing is messed up. Is there a way to fix that? Do I need to do a new install of exchange 5.5? If so, Can someone tell me how to do that? I think soemthing went wrong in the organizational name. I have to have this working or I'm screwed! :( I hope anyone else can help. My Aol AIM is hgljim I hope someone could help me... Thanks. Sorry, Jimmy. It seems I have more questions than answers. Is there ANY outbound? Is this user specific? ANY changes made to the system at all? Connectors removed? X400 addressing messed up? Drivespace ok? Nothing else in the app event log at all? I have not seen this before. Hopefully someone else has? In your position, I would probably take an online backup. Apply Exchange5.5 sp4 over again, and have another look. Then I would plan to apply NTsp6a and reapply Exchangesp4 in the near future. Or I might call PSS. William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Yah, inbound has no problem. Do you think I need to do disaster recovery?? The MTA is having trouble talking to the IMS. Inbound email still works? William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 12/21/2001 5:26 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Jimmy Dejesus' on 12/21/2001 5:26 PM A required directory operation was unsuccessful The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=organization;l=MAIL1-011221222534Z-20 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:mail:MAIL1
Re: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP!!!!)
Just for Grins--what is PSS and how do you contact this support? JRiley - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:04 PM Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Agreed. $250 is a small price to pay to put this to bed. It could cost more in downtime if you continue to try and troubleshoot yourself. -Original Message- From: John Eddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Also, if it's really that important and immediate of a concern, I highly recomment calling support. I know lots of the brains on this list personally, and I think they'll all agree that one-on-one conversation in real time is usually the fastest route to a solution. Sure it costs money, but, if 'I have to get this working or I'm screwed' is the situation, maybe that option bears looking into. John Eddy Microsoft Exchange MVP Lead -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: zaterdag 22 december 2001 1:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Everything works fine execept OUTBOUND email. Internal mail works ok when people are connected inside the LAN. I believe the X400 addressing is messed up. Is there a way to fix that? Do I need to do a new install of exchange 5.5? If so, Can someone tell me how to do that? I think soemthing went wrong in the organizational name. I have to have this working or I'm screwed! :( I hope anyone else can help. My Aol AIM is hgljim I hope someone could help me... Thanks. Sorry, Jimmy. It seems I have more questions than answers. Is there ANY outbound? Is this user specific? ANY changes made to the system at all? Connectors removed? X400 addressing messed up? Drivespace ok? Nothing else in the app event log at all? I have not seen this before. Hopefully someone else has? In your position, I would probably take an online backup. Apply Exchange5.5 sp4 over again, and have another look. Then I would plan to apply NTsp6a and reapply Exchangesp4 in the near future. Or I might call PSS. William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Yah, inbound has no problem. Do you think I need to do disaster recovery?? The MTA is having trouble talking to the IMS. Inbound email still works? William -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) NO luck, I have no idea whats wrong. It seems that only outgoing mail isn't working. Everything else is fine. What could be wrong here? http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=28source= -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 17:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) Exchange 5.5 service pack 4 and windows nt 4.0 service pack 5 Here is some event logs: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Security Event ID: 28 Date: 12/21/2001 Time: 5:44:12 PM User: N/A Computer: POSEIDON Description: /O=ORGANIZATION/OU=MAIL/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL CONNECTOR (MAIL1) (XAPI-Gateway) attempted to open a session while suspended. [MTA MAIN BASE 1 43] (14) - In the spirit of giving, please give: Exchange version, Windows version and sp levels and advise of application event log entries if any... Please. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A required directory operation was unsuccessful (HELP) I get this error when i send a message. Does anyone know how to fix this? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder
Did you get an answer? Native mode or mixed mode? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Simpsen, Paul A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder Good Morning! (depending where you are I guess) We have a public folder that we subscribe to an internal tech listserv. With Ex 5.5 we had no problem with this. Since we've gone to E2K about 3-4 months ago we have been unable to get this setup to work. You can send to it internally using the SMTP address that it is subscribed with. But coming from off campus or through the listserv, which hits the internet mail connector, this folder does not recieve the posts The folder is mail enabled and is not hidden from the address list. It is set to recieve posts from anyone and no restrictions or limits are set. I've been gone for a few months and I THINK I remember some posts on this a few months ago but can't locate them. Any ideas? Thanks! Simp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder
No I didn't. Native mode. Could it be a directory permission. Everyone need read? Or authenticated users...Anonymous has author rights on client perms. Thanks -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder Did you get an answer? Native mode or mixed mode? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Simpsen, Paul A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder Good Morning! (depending where you are I guess) We have a public folder that we subscribe to an internal tech listserv. With Ex 5.5 we had no problem with this. Since we've gone to E2K about 3-4 months ago we have been unable to get this setup to work. You can send to it internally using the SMTP address that it is subscribed with. But coming from off campus or through the listserv, which hits the internet mail connector, this folder does not recieve the posts The folder is mail enabled and is not hidden from the address list. It is set to recieve posts from anyone and no restrictions or limits are set. I've been gone for a few months and I THINK I remember some posts on this a few months ago but can't locate them. Any ideas? Thanks! Simp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder
And some more info...Here is the notification I get when sending from my hotmail account. Reporting-MTA: dns;imail.ouhsc.edu Received-From-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:51:48 -0600 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 09:51:47 -0600 X-Display-Name: Tech Support -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder Did you get an answer? Native mode or mixed mode? William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Simpsen, Paul A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder Good Morning! (depending where you are I guess) We have a public folder that we subscribe to an internal tech listserv. With Ex 5.5 we had no problem with this. Since we've gone to E2K about 3-4 months ago we have been unable to get this setup to work. You can send to it internally using the SMTP address that it is subscribed with. But coming from off campus or through the listserv, which hits the internet mail connector, this folder does not recieve the posts The folder is mail enabled and is not hidden from the address list. It is set to recieve posts from anyone and no restrictions or limits are set. I've been gone for a few months and I THINK I remember some posts on this a few months ago but can't locate them. Any ideas? Thanks! Simp List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
