RE: Steven
Twice here. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 22:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I got it!! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven Nope, never saw it. --- Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 What do you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there is no issue. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large amount of time and effort to do. You may not even legally be able to do more than this. Check with your legal department. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email
RE: Future plans 2
The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 What do you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there is no issue. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large amount of time and effort to do. You may not even legally be able to do more than this. Check with your legal department. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
I use a sonicwall soho 2, and it blocks ports and you can block specific web sites as well. Cost about £450. Jason Cordingley -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 22:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
how to make private e-mails visible in a shared mailbox ?
Hello, Has anyone solved or found a workaround for the following situation : We have mailboxes that are treated by more than one person such as orders @ compagny.com and sometimes our clients will send an e-mail with sensitivity private to such a mailbox. For sensitivity you need to have the mailbox open as primary mailbox otherwise you can't see the e-mail. This gives ghostlike e-mails because you can see in the folder list that there are more unread e-mails than you can see in the mailbox. My question is now how can I set the sensitivity for all e-mails on a certain mailbox on normal ? Or is there a possibility to give my users the possibility to see those e-mails with an extra button ? Making such a shared mailbox a primary mailbox is not an option because those users have more then one of such mailboxes. Thanks in advance for any advice on this subject. Freya Jongkind E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dit e-mailbericht en alle documenten die ermee verzonden worden, zijn vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend voor gebruik door de persoon of de onderneming waaraan ze geadresseerd zijn. Indien deze e-mail verkeerdelijk bij u terechtkomt, gelieve de afzender te verwittigen en deze bestanden van uw computer te verwijderen. Ce message e-mail ainsi que tous les fichiers transmis sont confidentiels et uniquement destinés à l'usage de la personne ou de l'entité à qui ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message e-mail par erreur, veuillez en informer l'expéditeur et le supprimer de tout ordinateur. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Problems with time Zones in Calender
Please can someone help me with this -Original Message- From: Le Roux, Jacques (TWIi London) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 16:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problems with time Zones in Calender Hi there, When I go to calender and I select to add a time zone - my time difference is wrong. I am selecting GMT (London - with DST) and the extra zone is EST - 5:00 (US Canada - with DST). It shows the difference as 7 hours instead of 5. My servers have the correct time for their locations. All running 5.5, SP3. No updates or patches have been installed in the past few weeks so do not understand why it is suddenly doing this. Any ideas would be appreciated !!! Thanks in advance Jacques List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: instant messaging
We turned it on for just the IT Department and Executives and it works great. We enabled the paging feature so we can send short messages through IM to a cell phone if needed. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
E2K Server Administration Question
Hi there, How do I configure a user to be able to not only create the ads account but also the corresponding exchange mailbox ? The user is member of domain users and account operators (I'm not sure about the group name, I use german windows). Being member of account operators the user is able to create accounts, but in the dialogue where you can add a mailbox the line with the drop down box for the choice of the storage group is empty (nothing to chose from). I couldn't find any bultin groups that allow a user to do this; besides: don't ask me to put the user in the admin group, that's not what we want here... Any suggestions appreciated Peter Koch Schlund + Partner AG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA reply 404 error
I was able to repair this same problemby reinstalling SP2. Also the problem the 404 error was oddly enpugh related to the fact that I had restricted access to port 25 to a specific subnet. As long as I was in the subnet all worked well once I left the subnet it didn't. AlV -Original Message-From: Karel ten Hoope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:48 PMTo: Albert VasquezSubject: RE: OWA reply 404 errorImportance: High Hi Albert: I can get this same error to occur all the time, by sending an email with trailing periods. For example: Subject: This email will not have a problem Will not have a problem. But, Subject: This email will have a problem Does. Not sure if this is related to your issue, but it seems odd. Can you try this, and let me know if you can reproduce the problem? Thanks! Karel ten Hoope KNOWLEDGETECH Consulting Inc. EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]phone (Office): 604.484.4596phone (Cell): 604.454.7814 phone (fax): 604.648.8691 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000. Any comments appreciated Michael Jacob PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118 139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771 Mobile 0418 840005 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
Title: Message Napster still exists? LOL I thought that was ancient history! -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall It works for some, but not others. As you say, it will work with AOL. But what about something like Napster? -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall what about blocking login.oscar.aol.com ? -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 17:55To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall Port blocking wont work for most of these new toys. They have the ability to jump ports. What you need is something that can read TCP headers. So it knows rather than what port to block, it knows what software. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall What do you mean? You can do port blocking with many firewalls. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall You need packet filtering for that. Check out a Packeteer Packetshaper. -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Pub background cleanup
Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a. The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub. I searched the KB on the ID's and found nothing descriptive. Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar
Title: Message This sounds like a neat feature. Where do you get it? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar There is a nice feature online to add various sports team schedules to your OUtlook Calendar. Is there one out there for Olympic events? I am most interested in the hockey schedule. TIA Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company.
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
Current NAV release for Exchange is 2.5 with a 3.x release on the horizon. Wasn't aware that there ever was a CE version for Exchange. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE version numbers. I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 That is retarded. I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now. I would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that. That is a SERIOUS flaw. Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Yep. NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per month (uggh). I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 ??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000. Any comments appreciated Michael Jacob PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118 139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771 Mobile 0418 840005 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Pub background cleanup
What are they, errors, warnings or informational? What do the events actually say? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:24 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Pub background cleanup Subject: Pub background cleanup Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a. The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub. I searched the KB on the ID's and found nothing descriptive. Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mass calendar update
Title: Message http://www.slipstick.com/addins/calendar.htm -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mass calendar update Any chance you know the URL? I am bad at search engines... -Original Message- From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mass calendar update There's a custom form for this on slipstick.com. Modify it with your holidays and send to your clients. The appointments get put on each calendar. Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mass calendar update Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6. Is there any way to plug all the company's holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the server? mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar
Title: Message http://www.calendar-updates.com/ -Original Message-From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar This sounds like a neat feature. Where do you get it? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar There is a nice feature online to add various sports team schedules to your OUtlook Calendar. Is there one out there for Olympic events? I am most interested in the hockey schedule. TIA Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Pub background cleanup
I suspect then, that you've got some diagnostics logging settings turned up for the public store. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:47 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Pub background cleanup Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup Informational, the detail of the event says stuff like: 39 of 39 attachment(s) were deleted during a background cleanup. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup What are they, errors, warnings or informational? What do the events actually say? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:24 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Pub background cleanup Subject: Pub background cleanup Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a. The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub. I searched the KB on the ID's and found nothing descriptive. Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Pub background cleanup
My thought, too. I check it out. Thx. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup I suspect then, that you've got some diagnostics logging settings turned up for the public store. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:47 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Pub background cleanup Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup Informational, the detail of the event says stuff like: 39 of 39 attachment(s) were deleted during a background cleanup. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup What are they, errors, warnings or informational? What do the events actually say? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:24 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Pub background cleanup Subject: Pub background cleanup Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a. The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub. I searched the KB on the ID's and found nothing descriptive. Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server
Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
No, you can schedule the server in NAV CE to update daily. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE version numbers. I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 That is retarded. I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now. I would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that. That is a SERIOUS flaw. Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Yep. NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per month (uggh). I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 ??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000. Any comments appreciated Michael Jacob PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118 139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771 Mobile 0418 840005 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed
Help me understand returning folders
Good morning, The letter that follows this is curious. Why would folders return when there were no restores done? Are we haunted? Thanks for your assistance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Michel Carol Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:35 PM To: ENTERPRISE EMAIL Subject:Recovered Folders Mike I was minding my own business when suddenly 20 - 25 recovered folders showed up in my deleted items folder on email. Many of the folders were empty, but several contained items from 1999 and 2000 that were long ago deleted. I did delete all those folders again, so there is not much for you to look at. I just wanted you to be aware that this has occurred. Does this stuff ever really go away?! Carol List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mass calendar update
Title: Message Try this one: http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/holiday.htm Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mass calendar update That looks like a great feature, but it will not work for Outlook 2000/2K2. Any knowledge of where there is a compatible option? -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mass calendar update http://www.slipstick.com/addins/calendar.htm -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mass calendar update Any chance you know the URL? I am bad at search engines... -Original Message- From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mass calendar update There's a custom form for this on slipstick.com. Modify it with your holidays and send to your clients. The appointments get put on each calendar. Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mass calendar update Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6. Is there any way to plug all the company's holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the server? mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Help me understand returning folders
Sounds like DIR is set and someone did a recovery. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Help me understand returning folders Good morning, The letter that follows this is curious. Why would folders return when there were no restores done? Are we haunted? Thanks for your assistance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Michel Carol Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:35 PM To: ENTERPRISE EMAIL Subject:Recovered Folders Mike I was minding my own business when suddenly 20 - 25 recovered folders showed up in my deleted items folder on email. Many of the folders were empty, but several contained items from 1999 and 2000 that were long ago deleted. I did delete all those folders again, so there is not much for you to look at. I just wanted you to be aware that this has occurred. Does this stuff ever really go away?! Carol List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Pub background cleanup
Score!!! Checked the pub's properties on that server and background cleanup (whatever that is) logging was set to maximum. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup I suspect then, that you've got some diagnostics logging settings turned up for the public store. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:47 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Pub background cleanup Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup Informational, the detail of the event says stuff like: 39 of 39 attachment(s) were deleted during a background cleanup. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup What are they, errors, warnings or informational? What do the events actually say? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:24 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Pub background cleanup Subject: Pub background cleanup Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a. The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub. I searched the KB on the ID's and found nothing descriptive. Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing
Title: Message Running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 server sp1 Hi, Just a quick question. What is the best way to conduct periodic DR test on your Exchange server? Would you recommend uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange 5.5 or just deleting the MS Directory and IS store and restoring them from tape backup when you are ready to do another DR test. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing
Title: Message Well, for one thing, definitely do it on a Backup Server or Restore Server, and not in production. I'd try to do a variety of different potential situations. -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!The nations of the world are becoming more and more dependent on one another and it will not be possible to preserve a lasting peace so long as glaring economic and social imbalances persist. --Quotation from Catholic Peace document (author unknown) -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 server sp1 Hi, Just a quick question. What is the best way to conduct periodic DR test on your Exchange server? Would you recommend uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange 5.5 or just deleting the MS Directory and IS store and restoring them from tape backup when you are ready to do another DR test. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks,List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing
I'd recommend getting a recover server and testing on that. You can test different scenarios, e.g. single mailbox, full Exchange recovery, entire o/s etc. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Subject: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 server sp1 Hi, Just a quick question. What is the best way to conduct periodic DR test on your Exchange server? Would you recommend uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange 5.5 or just deleting the MS Directory and IS store and restoring them from tape backup when you are ready to do another DR test. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
I guess there are just different options between NAV CE and NAV for Exchange then. We currently have 7.5, and we also update daily, but he is saying that the Exchange portion allows him to update 10x/month. STOOPID! Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 No, you can schedule the server in NAV CE to update daily. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE version numbers. I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 That is retarded. I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now. I would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that. That is a SERIOUS flaw. Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Yep. NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per month (uggh). I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 ??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000. Any comments appreciated Michael Jacob PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118 139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771 Mobile 0418 840005 List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
Same here. I manually update the servers every morning to get the latest updates. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 I guess there are just different options between NAV CE and NAV for Exchange then. We currently have 7.5, and we also update daily, but he is saying that the Exchange portion allows him to update 10x/month. STOOPID! Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 No, you can schedule the server in NAV CE to update daily. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE version numbers. I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 That is retarded. I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now. I would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that. That is a SERIOUS flaw. Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Yep. NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per month (uggh). I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 ??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
RE: Steven
Title: Message call it £10 and you got a deal.. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 13 February 2002 22:42To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven Hell $10!!! I am in!! -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing
FYI, that recovery server can easily be any PC you have laying around. As long as it has disk space. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing I'd recommend getting a recover server and testing on that. You can test different scenarios, e.g. single mailbox, full Exchange recovery, entire o/s etc. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Subject: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 server sp1 Hi, Just a quick question. What is the best way to conduct periodic DR test on your Exchange server? Would you recommend uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange 5.5 or just deleting the MS Directory and IS store and restoring them from tape backup when you are ready to do another DR test. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
Correct...NAV CE and NAV for Exchange are completely separate products. NAV CE you can schedule daily, NAV for Exchange is max 10x per month. NAV for Exchange is managed through an HTML page, NAV CE can be globally managed through their MMC snap-in. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 I guess there are just different options between NAV CE and NAV for Exchange then. We currently have 7.5, and we also update daily, but he is saying that the Exchange portion allows him to update 10x/month. STOOPID! Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 No, you can schedule the server in NAV CE to update daily. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE version numbers. I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 That is retarded. I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now. I would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that. That is a SERIOUS flaw. Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Yep. NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per month (uggh). I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 ??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would
RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing
Im sorry I forgot to mention that yes I do have a dedicated Exchange DR server. It would be very bold to try this on a production server especially for routine testing. Thanks everyone for your advice. I think I will try all sorts of scenarios when conducting the DR tests. Thanks, -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing FYI, that recovery server can easily be any PC you have laying around. As long as it has disk space. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing I'd recommend getting a recover server and testing on that. You can test different scenarios, e.g. single mailbox, full Exchange recovery, entire o/s etc. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Subject: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 server sp1 Hi, Just a quick question. What is the best way to conduct periodic DR test on your Exchange server? Would you recommend uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange 5.5 or just deleting the MS Directory and IS store and restoring them from tape backup when you are ready to do another DR test. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar
Title: Message way cool since i have directtv nhl ticket. how come the schedule doesn't show up in bold? thanks dave -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar That's pretty cool. Thanks -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 6:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar http://www.calendar-updates.com/ -Original Message-From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar This sounds like a neat feature. Where do you get it? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar There is a nice feature online to add various sports team schedules to your OUtlook Calendar. Is there one out there for Olympic events? I am most interested in the hockey schedule. TIA Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) 1. Search Google for Ed Crowley Server Move Method. Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing, Recovery server licensing?
Please correct me if I'm wrong but you MUST have a recovery server in order properly restore you dir.edb. I just went through this same situation. If you just reinstall the whole NT server box from the ground up you won't have the same SIDS and the directory service will NOT start! Your suppose to setup the recovery server as a BDC or member server on the domain so you can get a correct copy of the SAM first, the restore your *.edb files. To me, in my situation with running SBS, this cant be done. Cause under SBS you only can set it up as a PDC, so how could I setup a recovery server with 2 PDC's on the same network? Question, how does MS view the license status of a recovery server? Technicaly if it has to go online to pull the SAM, it needs it own new licenese while doing so correct? Or I'd hope this would be an exception? Thanks Howie --- Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, that recovery server can easily be any PC you have laying around. As long as it has disk space. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing I'd recommend getting a recover server and testing on that. You can test different scenarios, e.g. single mailbox, full Exchange recovery, entire o/s etc. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Subject: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 server sp1 Hi, Just a quick question. What is the best way to conduct periodic DR test on your Exchange server? Would you recommend uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange 5.5 or just deleting the MS Directory and IS store and restoring them from tape backup when you are ready to do another DR test. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Here follows a copy of the batch file that we use. you will need to modify the server name and may be where you put the backup log. rem ** 21/3/99 Backup Written by Mark Newton rem ** This will backup the information store and directory service on ESLSERVER01 rem ** modified 10/5/01 by AN Bingham for EXCHANGE-UK ntbackup backup DS \\EXCHANGE-UK IS \\EXCHANGE-UK /v /d Exchange-uk IS-DS /b /hc:on /t Normal /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e ntbackup eject exit Kevan -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
Right. :P -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 I guess there are just different options between NAV CE and NAV for Exchange then. We currently have 7.5, and we also update daily, but he is saying that the Exchange portion allows him to update 10x/month. STOOPID! Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 No, you can schedule the server in NAV CE to update daily. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE version numbers. I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 That is retarded. I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now. I would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that. That is a SERIOUS flaw. Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Yep. NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per month (uggh). I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 ??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Here's a copy of the bat file that I use, you'll note that I'm creating a log. ntbackup backup ds \\servername is \\servername /t normal /l c:\winnt\profiles\administrator\desktop\ntbkup.log /e /hc:on Chapter 16 of the manual will explain the switches. Murray -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Well, I used the commands that I found in the SYSTEM GUIDE for Windows NT Server. Chapter 16 covers BACKUP Murray -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE:NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 and updating
Hey, You can just open up task scheduler and change the settings! I have my Nav CE for exchange now checking for updates every 10 minutes. Works like a charm. Enjoy... Howie --- Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, you can schedule the server in NAV CE to update daily. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE version numbers. I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 That is retarded. I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now. I would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that. That is a SERIOUS flaw. Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Yep. NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per month (uggh). I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 ??? I have never heard of that. We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night. I wasn't aware that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great. All web administered and easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection. The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000. Any comments appreciated Michael Jacob PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118 139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771 Mobile 0418 840005 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Automating Online Backup Use the following procedure to automate online backups of the information store and directory service. From the Microsoft Windows NT Resource Kit compact disc, install the Winat.exe program on the local Windows NT directory of your local computer. Create a Windows NT common group called Microsoft Exchange Server Backup. Create an icon for the Backup.log file. This provides quick access to review the backup log for review. Copy the Ntbackup.exe icon from the Administrative Tools group to the Exchange Backup group. Create an icon for Winat.exe in the Exchange Backup group. In Windows NT Control Panel, double-click Services. Select the Schedule service, and then choose Startup. Configure for automatic startup and assign an ID that is a member of the Windows NT Backup Operators group. Make sure you enter the correct password. If the administrator ID password changes, you must change the password for the Schedule service. This account must also have Admin Role rights within the Microsoft Exchange Organization Site and Configuration containers you are backing up. Start the Schedule service. Create the backup batch file. Name this file Back.bat, and save it in the Winnt subdirectory. Run the Winat.exe program, and then schedule the Back.bat file. You do not need to have a logon session on the computer on which Winat.exe is running, because the Schedule service logs on to perform the operation under the defined security context. Set the batch job for interactive mode. Windows AT Command Scheduler When you use Windows AT Command Scheduler, the Windows NT Schedule service runs all jobs that have been scheduled. Because batch jobs are run in the context of the Schedule service, Windows NT security must be considered. When configuring the Schedule service, configure the account as a member of the Windows NT Backup Operators group. This enables a full backup of the information store and directory. Make sure the Back.bat jobs are set for interactive. This is required by the Ntbackup.exe program. Sample Batch File for Online Backup The following is a sample batch file you can use for backing up your files while the server remains online. rem ** 3/7/96 Backup Written by name rem ** This will back up the information store and directory service on server_name 1 and server_name 2. ntbackup backup DS \\Server_name1 IS \\Server_name1 /v /d Server-name1 IS-DS /b /t Normal /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e ntbackup backup DS \\Server_name2 IS \\Server_name2 /a /v /d Server_name2 IS-DS /b /t Normal /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e exit Sample Batch Files for Offline Backup The following are sample batch files you can use for backing up your files when the server is offline. You may need to experiment with the order in which you stop the services, so that you are not prompted when a service is dependent upon the one you are stopping. Example 1 rem ** Stop Microsoft Exchange services. rem ** You can stop Microsoft Exchange services and restart them automatically to backup. rem ** Files that a particular service may hold open REM // stop all services echo Stopping Services... net stop MSExchangeMSMI net stop MSExchangePCMTA net stop MSExchangeFB net stop MSExchangeDX net stop MSExchangeIMC net stop MSExchangeMTA net stop MSExchangeIS net stop MSExchangeDS net stop MSExchangeSA ntbackup backup c:\ d:\ /a /v /d Full File Based Backup /b /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e REM edbutil OPTIONS net start MSExchangeSA net start MSExchangeDS net start MSExchangeIS net start MSExchangeMTA net start MSExchangeIMC net start MSExchangeDX net start MSExchangeFB net start MSExchangePCMTA net start MSExchangeMSMI Example 2 You can start and stop Microsoft Mail (PC) MTA (PCMTA) services by enclosing the service name in quotation marks. You can determine the service names from the Exchange Administrator program or Windows NT Control Panel, or by viewing the Windows NT registry. If you are viewing the Windows NT Registry, open the following registry key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services All services are listed in alphabetical order. rem Batch File To Stop and Restart Microsoft Exchange Services rem For File Based Backup echo Stopping Services ... net stop MSExchangeMSMI net stop MSExchangePCMTA net stop MSExchangeFB net stop MSExchangeDX net stop MSExchangeMTA net stop MSExchangeIMC net stop MSExchangeIS net stop MSExchangeDS net stop PC MTA - HUB net stop MSExchangeSA ntbackup BACKUP d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata /v /d File Based Backup /b /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e net start MSExchangeSA net start MSExchangeDS net start MSExchangeIS net start MSExchangeMTA net start MSExchangeIMC net start MSExchangeDX net start MSExchangeFB net start MSExchangePCMTA net start MSExchangeMSMI net start PC MTA - HUB -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
On windows2000, at the command line type:
ntbackup /?
This will open both the GUI backup and automatically take you to the help
pages entitled: Command Line Parameters as follows:
Command line parameters
You can perform backup operations at the command prompt or from a batch file
using the ntbackup command followed by various parameters.
Syntax:
ntbackup backup [systemstate] bks file name /J {job name} [/P {pool
name}] [/G {guid name}] [/T { tape name}] [/N {media name}] [/F
{file name}] [/D {set description}] [/DS {server name}] [/IS {server
name}] [/A] [/V:{yes|no}] [/R:{yes|no}] [/L:{f|s|n}] [/M {backup type}]
[/RS:{yes|no}] [/HC:{on|off}] [/UM]
Parameters:
systemstate
Specifies that you want to back up the System State data. When you back up
the System State data, all of the System State data is backed up, therefore,
the /s switch does not apply. Also, the backup type will be forced to normal
or copy.
bks file name
Specifies the name of the backup selection file (.bks file) to be used for
this backup operation. A backup selection file contains information on the
files and folders you have selected for backup. You have to create the file
using the graphical user interface (GUI) version of Backup.
/J {job name}
Specifies the job name to be used in the log file. The job name usually
describes the files and folders you are backing up in the current backup job
as well as the date and time you backed up the files.
/P {pool name}
Specifies the media pool from which you want to use media. This is usually a
subpool of the Backup media pool, such as 4mm DDS. If you select this you
must not use the following switches: /A /G /F /T.
/G {guid name}
Overwrites or appends to this tape. Do not use this switch in conjunction
with /P.
/T {tape name}
Overwrites or appends to this tape. Do not use this switch in conjunction
with /P.
/N {media name}
Specifies the new tape name. You must not use /A with this switch.
/F {file name}
Logical disk path and file name. You must not use the following switches
with this switch: /P /G /T.
/D {set description}
Specifies a label for each backup set.
/DS {server name}
Backs up the directory service file for the specified Microsoft Exchange
Server.
/IS {server name}
Backs up the Information Store file for the specified Microsoft Exchange
Server.
/A
Performs an append operation. Either /G or /T must be used in conjunction
with this switch. Do not use this switch in conjunction with /P.
/V:{yes|no}
Verifies the data after the backup is complete.
/R:{yes|no}
Restricts access to this tape to the owner or members of the Administrators
group.
/L:{f|s|n}
Specifies the type of log file: f=full, s=summary, n=none (no log file is
created).
/M {backup type}
Specifies the backup type. It must be one of the following: normal, copy,
differential, incremental, or daily.
/RS:{yes|no}
Backs up the Removable Storage database.
/HC:{on|off}
Uses hardware compression, if available, on the tape drive.
/UM
Finds the first available media, formats it, and uses it for the current
backup operation. You must use the /P switch to designate a device-type
media pool when you use the /UM switch so that Backup searches for the
appropriate type of media (for example, 4mm DDS). When you use the /UM
switch, Backup will search the following media pools for available media:
Free pool, Import pool, Unrecognized pool, and Backup pool. When available
media is found, the search will stop and the media will be formatted and
used without prompting you for input. This command is not applicable to tape
loaders and should only be used if you have a stand-alone tape device.
Notes
You cannot restore files from the command line using the ntbackup command.
The following switches will default to what you have already set using the
graphical user interface (GUI) version of Backup unless they are changed by
a command line switch: /V /R /L /M /RS /HC. For example, if hardware
compression is turned on in the Options dialog box in Backup, it will be
used if /HC is not specified on the command line. But if /HC:off is
specified on the command line, it will override the Option dialog box
setting and compression will not be used.
If you have Windows Media Services running on your computer, and you want to
back up the files associated with these services, see Running Backup with
Windows Media Services in the Windows Media Services online documentation.
You must follow the procedures outlined in the Windows Media Services online
documentation before you can back up or restore files associated with
Windows Media Services.
You can only back up the System State data on a local computer. You cannot
back up the System State data on a remote computer.
If you are using Removable Storage to manage media, or you are using the
Remote Storage to store data, then you should regularly back up the files
that are in the following folders:
Systemroot\System32\Ntmsdata
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Title: RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 See Q152313 -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing, Recovery server licen sing?
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing, Recovery server licensing? burn a copy of the dir.edb to a cd and keep it off site I am also working on DR.. working on a getting a lab.. -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing, Recovery server licensing? Please correct me if I'm wrong but you MUST have a recovery server in order properly restore you dir.edb. I just went through this same situation. If you just reinstall the whole NT server box from the ground up you won't have the same SIDS and the directory service will NOT start! Your suppose to setup the recovery server as a BDC or member server on the domain so you can get a correct copy of the SAM first, the restore your *.edb files. To me, in my situation with running SBS, this cant be done. Cause under SBS you only can set it up as a PDC, so how could I setup a recovery server with 2 PDC's on the same network? Question, how does MS view the license status of a recovery server? Technicaly if it has to go online to pull the SAM, it needs it own new licenese while doing so correct? Or I'd hope this would be an exception? Thanks Howie --- Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, that recovery server can easily be any PC you have laying around. As long as it has disk space. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing I'd recommend getting a recover server and testing on that. You can test different scenarios, e.g. single mailbox, full Exchange recovery, entire o/s etc. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Subject: Exchange 5.5 Disaster Recovery Testing Running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 server sp1 Hi, Just a quick question. What is the best way to conduct periodic DR test on your Exchange server? Would you recommend uninstalling and reinstalling Exchange 5.5 or just deleting the MS Directory and IS store and restoring them from tape backup when you are ready to do another DR test. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5
Thanks to all. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Here follows a copy of the batch file that we use. you will need to modify the server name and may be where you put the backup log. rem ** 21/3/99 Backup Written by Mark Newton rem ** This will backup the information store and directory service on ESLSERVER01 rem ** modified 10/5/01 by AN Bingham for EXCHANGE-UK ntbackup backup DS \\EXCHANGE-UK IS \\EXCHANGE-UK /v /d Exchange-uk IS-DS /b /hc:on /t Normal /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e ntbackup eject exit Kevan -Original Message- From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5 Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box. The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back them up. However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file to run at a given time via the AT command. I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done. Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or point me to a source that shows. Thanks in advance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Viewing Global Address List
Using Outlook 2000 on Exch 5.5 . In Outlook, when we view the GAL in the Address Book, the Display Name (left hand column) gets truncated at 25 characters. Many of our Distribution Lists are a bit longer than that. Is it possible to change the # of characters that can be displayed? Rob Sargent List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Lucky you...I wish I hadn't ever heard of Walmart either... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: spam control
Title: Message Thanks for all your responses. I got in contact with mail marshall and I'm going to evaluate their software. Do any of you guys have any comments about the SurfControl Spam software? Nelson W. Siqueiros ADCS Inc. 858-676-9800 x 120 -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control Well for us, the spam slammer is a very welcome side effect. We needed the app to do confirmations. We receive data attachments from clients to enter into our own database, and to verify that data, we have the app force an email to KNOWN regulatory email addresses to verify that the data is valid. The app is a great spam stomper to boot, so I am happy. -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control I sort of agree, but I have (had) an @home.com email address and only had it because I was a cable modem subscriber. I never used this address for anything other than checking it once a month for my billing information. Guess what? I get about 8 junk emails each day on that account now. I know that I never filled out any form anywhere with it. So, I'm guessing that good old bankrupt @home sold it. I guess that probably wouldn't happen with any of our companies since we wouldn't sell the address, but it wouldn't be difficult for that address to get leaked out by someone else or through a business card or something like that. As for third-party spam-control software, we currently use nothing. I find it hard to justify the cost because not everyone receives the spam or as much as others. I typically get about 5-10 a day here myself, but I've filled out countless forms for product evaluations and such. Shift+Delete works fine for me, just a bit annoying is all. I am considering evaluating eManager to go with our ScanMail, but I'm in no hurry. In the meantime, I just keep adding domains to block when they are obviously not a company we plan on doing business with anytime soon. Em5000.net, 0mbranetworking.com, optinmembers.com, stuff like that... Martin Blackstone wrote: No, I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to go trudging through all the false positives for this stuff. It isn't my fault or my problem that my users put their email address in every site on the net, then wonder why they get so much spam. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software on Exchange? Do you use something else to control it?thanks for your input. Nelson W. SiqueirosADCS Inc.858-676-9800 x 120 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big.PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: spam control Hello, What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 SP3 server? any input would be very helpful.thanks Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- oftware.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-softw re.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
RE: Future plans 2
you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message KMart does; There is a KMart employee on the Swynk list. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's.
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message You know the answer Mr B. They both use Exchange. WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the
Outlook refuses to preview unread messages.
Hi. we are experiencing the following: Outlook inbox sometimes refuses to preview unread messages, also if you deleted an e-mail from the inbox it takes an unusual amount of time to disappear from the inbox. this happens sporadically only for some users and usually gets back to normal after some time. Also it does not matter if the message has an attachment or not the problem occurs either way. configuration: Server Windows 2000 Server SP2. Exchange 2000 Server SP2 Client: Windows 2000 Pro SP2 Outlook 2000 Sr2 Any advice is appreciated Juan Rosas List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages.
Any antivirus solutions deployed at server and/or client? William -Original Message- From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages. Hi. we are experiencing the following: Outlook inbox sometimes refuses to preview unread messages, also if you deleted an e-mail from the inbox it takes an unusual amount of time to disappear from the inbox. this happens sporadically only for some users and usually gets back to normal after some time. Also it does not matter if the message has an attachment or not the problem occurs either way. configuration: Server Windows 2000 Server SP2. Exchange 2000 Server SP2 Client: Windows 2000 Pro SP2 Outlook 2000 Sr2 Any advice is appreciated Juan Rosas List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Is it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the site. Or am I just being naive? Geoff Robbins -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)*PLEASE NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. * 1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7). Please make sure that files you send can be read in this format. The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain information from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The copyright in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property of Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of this message. Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their user ID and their compliance with the law. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Lincolnshire Police will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequental damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message or as a result of any virus being passed on. * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages.
Yes, Mcafee groupshield 5.0 at the server and Mcafee Antivirus 4.5 at the Client. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages. Any antivirus solutions deployed at server and/or client? William -Original Message- From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages. Hi. we are experiencing the following: Outlook inbox sometimes refuses to preview unread messages, also if you deleted an e-mail from the inbox it takes an unusual amount of time to disappear from the inbox. this happens sporadically only for some users and usually gets back to normal after some time. Also it does not matter if the message has an attachment or not the problem occurs either way. configuration: Server Windows 2000 Server SP2. Exchange 2000 Server SP2 Client: Windows 2000 Pro SP2 Outlook 2000 Sr2 Any advice is appreciated Juan Rosas List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 2000 Public Folders
After upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 I found it necessary to do an offline restore of the databases. The Private store is functioning correctly, but we are not able to see the Public Folders in Outlook. These folders appear in Exchange System Manager but not in the virtual directory (M:). If I try to create a new directory from Outlook with the same name as one that does not appear I receive a message that says a directory by that name already exists. Has anyone experienced this problem and if so how can it be resolved? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages.
Oh -Original Message- From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages. Yes, Mcafee groupshield 5.0 at the server and Mcafee Antivirus 4.5 at the Client. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages. Any antivirus solutions deployed at server and/or client? William -Original Message- From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook refuses to preview unread messages. Hi. we are experiencing the following: Outlook inbox sometimes refuses to preview unread messages, also if you deleted an e-mail from the inbox it takes an unusual amount of time to disappear from the inbox. this happens sporadically only for some users and usually gets back to normal after some time. Also it does not matter if the message has an attachment or not the problem occurs either way. configuration: Server Windows 2000 Server SP2. Exchange 2000 Server SP2 Client: Windows 2000 Pro SP2 Outlook 2000 Sr2 Any advice is appreciated Juan Rosas List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) You can. The issue is if the server you are removing is / was the first server in the site as it typically homes the public folders and site folders for public free / busy data and the offline address book. In that case also study Q152959. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group NAOCERT, Exchange Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Is it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the site. Or am I just being naive? Geoff Robbins -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)*PLEASE NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. * 1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm*PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7). Please make sure that files you send can be read in this format.The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain information from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The copyright in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property of Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988.If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden.Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of this message. Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their user ID and their compliance with the law.This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Lincolnshire Police will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequental damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message or as a result of any virus being passed on.*List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message What the hell do WalMart employees need mailboxes for? To let each other know that the Dale Earnhardt bandanas are on sale this week? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 You know the answer Mr B. They both use Exchange. WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) SBS /.single site single server will NOT commincate with any other XCH server. hard-coded that way. -Original Message-From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Is it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the site. Or am I just being naive? Geoff Robbins -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)*PLEASE NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. * 1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm*PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7). Please make sure that files you send can be read in this format.The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain information from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The copyright in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property of Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988.If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden.Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of this message. Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their user ID and their compliance with the law.This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Lincolnshire Police will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequental damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message or as a result of any virus being passed on.*List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Sorry guys SBS can be the only server in it's domain. You may be able to create a new domain and set up a two way trust to move the mailboxes. Matt - Original Message - From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:49 AM Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) You can. The issue is if the server you are removing is / was the first server in the site as it typically homes the public folders and site folders for public free / busy data and the offline address book. In that case also study Q152959. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group NAOCERT, Exchange Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Is it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the site. Or am I just being naive? Geoff Robbins -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)*PLEASE NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. * 1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm*PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7). Please make sure that files you send can be read in this format.The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain information from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The copyright in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property of Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988.If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden.Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of this message. Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their user
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message You need the Earnhardt bandanna, and some country and western music. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 What the hell do WalMart employees need mailboxes for? To let each other know that the Dale Earnhardt bandanas are on sale this week? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 You know the answer Mr B. They both use Exchange. WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a
Re: Future plans 2
Title: Message how many servers ? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:25 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 You know the answer Mr B. They both use Exchange. WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server.
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message ROFL -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 What the hell do WalMart employees need mailboxes for? To let each other know that the Dale Earnhardt bandanas are on sale this week? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 You know the answer Mr B. They both use Exchange. WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message I wish I knew. I lacked the enterprise experience to join their deployment team. That number includes thousands of resource mailboxes and may not be as many as I quoted. William -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Future plans 2 how many servers ? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:25 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 You know the answer Mr B. They both use Exchange. WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) AGAINSBS is XCH 5.5 but HARD-CODED NOT TO COMMUNICATE WITH ANY OTHER XCH SERVER INTRODUCED INTO ITS SITE. -Original Message-From: NeoNexus Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) I had Exchange 5.5 running on Win NT 4.0 SP 6a. I wanted it moved to Win 2000. I installed Exchange 5.5 on the Win 2000 Server. Both servers were in the same domain and were accessible to each other. When installing Exch 5.5 on the Win2k server, it asked if I wanted to join an already existing Exchange, and I said yes. I madesure to bring the new Exch to the same SP level as the old one. I also made sure OWA was installed with the whole kit and caboodle. I then used Move Mailbox to move them all over. I did them in clumps by highlighting them a block at a time. Did not take very long. Pretty slick. I then made sure all the various maint schedules were the same on both servers (In Exch Admin program, under servers, you should see both the old and new server listed!), made sure all the anti-relay was set up the same, etc. etc. I let both run for a day or two, then, on the old NT 4.0 server, I simply stopped the services from running. That was 1 1/2 weeks ago, and even OWA is still working! one of these days, I'll switch it over to Exch 2000 running on Win 2000, but Exch 5.5 is fine for now. Too many changes all at once will lead to overuse of the Tylenol! ;-) - Mark W. Harrison System Manager NeoNexus Systems, subdivision of Genesistems, Inc. - Computer and Telephone Systems Celebrating Our 25th Year of Custom Systems Integration (585) 475-9180 x 221 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.neonexus.com-- - Original Message - From: Robbins, Geoff. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Is it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the site. Or am I just being naive? Geoff Robbins -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)*PLEASE NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. * 1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm*PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7). Please make sure that files you send can be read in this
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) That's interesting. Microsoft tech support say otherwise. just add as a member server or as a BDC. Geoff -Original Message-From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 17:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) SBS /.single site single server will NOT commincate with any other XCH server. hard-coded that way. -Original Message-From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Is it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the site. Or am I just being naive? Geoff Robbins -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)*PLEASE NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. * 1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm*PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7). Please make sure that files you send can be read in this format.The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain information from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The copyright in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property of Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988.If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden.Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of this message. Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their user ID and their compliance with the law.This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Lincolnshire Police will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequental damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message or as a result of any virus being passed on.*List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OT (slightly) - need an outlook97 form
Can anyone point me in the direction of an Outlook survey-type form? We currently do not do any forms development here so I know nothing about building one - can it be done with less than 7 firing neurons?. One of the managers would like to put a staff satisfaction survey on-line and I figured this would be a good way to get my feet wet. If I could find some kind of existing survey-related Outlook form that I could play around with and modify to their liking, I could be a superstar for a day (a nice break from being known as that *$^%# rat-bastard e-mail nazi). Just need to drop it in a public folder - something with a few multiple-choice boxes, a couple of yes/no buttons, and the odd text field is what I'd like to end up with. yes - we still run Outlook 97 - pls don't shoot me thanks randy List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Thank you for everyones input. I know I can add another Server to the SBS Domain. Its just a question of whether I can put Exchange on that server and use the security information from the domain to set up the mailboxes on the new Exchange server. If I can then life will not be to bad. I will migrate each users mailbox individually to a pst and then import it to there new mailbox on the new exchange server. Only 30 users to do. I would do the same with the public Folders export them to a pst and then imprt them to the new server. I know I will have to re do the permisions on the Public Folders. If I can not bring up the new exchange server then I will have to migrate everyones mailboxes to pst's on there PC's. And the public folders to a pst on another server. Move all the other information off of the SBS Server. Take it offline. Promote my BDC to a PDC and then install Exchange on my new Win 2kServer. Set up all the mailboxes again. Then go round all the PC's again updating outlook and importing their pst's to the new exchange. Then import the public Folders, re do the permisions. And then finally reinstall NT4 on the old SBS server and bring it back as a BDC for use as a file and print server. And hopefully that will have done for SBS. Have I missed anything?? Kevan -Original Message-From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 18:14To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) That's interesting. Microsoft tech support say otherwise. just add as a member server or as a BDC. Geoff -Original Message-From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 17:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) SBS /.single site single server will NOT commincate with any other XCH server. hard-coded that way. -Original Message-From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution) Is it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the site. Or am I just being naive? Geoff Robbins -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)*PLEASE NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. * 1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be appreciated by the organization. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same Domain. I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 domain. Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and print services. Thank you in advance for ant help. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ
RE: OT (slightly) - need an outlook97 form
www.slipstick.com FAQ. Read it. Love it. Live it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Reject hatred without hating. --Mary Baker Eddy -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT (slightly) - need an outlook97 form Can anyone point me in the direction of an Outlook survey-type form? We currently do not do any forms development here so I know nothing about building one - can it be done with less than 7 firing neurons?. One of the managers would like to put a staff satisfaction survey on-line and I figured this would be a good way to get my feet wet. If I could find some kind of existing survey-related Outlook form that I could play around with and modify to their liking, I could be a superstar for a day (a nice break from being known as that *$^%# rat-bastard e-mail nazi). Just need to drop it in a public folder - something with a few multiple-choice boxes, a couple of yes/no buttons, and the odd text field is what I'd like to end up with. yes - we still run Outlook 97 - pls don't shoot me thanks randy List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 access
Because we have one user who works remotely (out of state) who prefers to use a Outlook2K client via internet mail. She is temporarily using owa until I can get this working again. Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Why pop3? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 18:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access The company I work for, WHY do you ask? Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Is this YOUR exchange server or someone elses ? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 20:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Mail Manager?, Hosting Control Panel?, Is this in the Exchange Administrator? Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Would this help? 1. Why do I get this error, There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected.? - Here is the error message I keep getting and the settings I have using outlook express: There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: 'Account Name', Server: 'mail.domain.ext', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR Bad login', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 incoming mail=mail.domain.ext outgoing mail=smtp.isp.ext account name=accountuser password=accountpassword When you change your account password it does not change an email addresses' password. You need to change the username's password to what you want it to be. You need to do this in the Mail Manager, located in your Hosting Control Panel =) Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:pop3 access Hello All, ex55srvsp4 on win2ksrvsp2 behind msproxy2 I have a user trying to access pop3 mail. My tests (using Outlook Express5) keep coming back to the repeated logon screen with the 0x800CCC90 and 92 errors. I have tried almost everything according to the MS articles associated with this error id. Please help me think out loud and give me any advice based on your experiences. Thanks, Fred Valdez List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 access
Not sure if you got my last message: Because we have one user who works remotely (out of state) who prefers to use an Outlook2K client via internet mail. She is temporarily using owa until I can get this working again. Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Why pop3? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 18:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access The company I work for, WHY do you ask? Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Is this YOUR exchange server or someone elses ? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 20:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Mail Manager?, Hosting Control Panel?, Is this in the Exchange Administrator? Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Would this help? 1. Why do I get this error, There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected.? - Here is the error message I keep getting and the settings I have using outlook express: There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: 'Account Name', Server: 'mail.domain.ext', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR Bad login', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 incoming mail=mail.domain.ext outgoing mail=smtp.isp.ext account name=accountuser password=accountpassword When you change your account password it does not change an email addresses' password. You need to change the username's password to what you want it to be. You need to do this in the Mail Manager, located in your Hosting Control Panel =) Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:pop3 access Hello All, ex55srvsp4 on win2ksrvsp2 behind msproxy2 I have a user trying to access pop3 mail. My tests (using Outlook Express5) keep coming back to the repeated logon screen with the 0x800CCC90 and 92 errors. I have tried almost everything according to the MS articles associated with this error id. Please help me think out loud and give me any advice based on your experiences. Thanks, Fred Valdez List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Help me understand returning folders
what is DIR and we did no recoveries. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help me understand returning folders Sounds like DIR is set and someone did a recovery. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Help me understand returning folders Good morning, The letter that follows this is curious. Why would folders return when there were no restores done? Are we haunted? Thanks for your assistance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Michel Carol Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:35 PM To: ENTERPRISE EMAIL Subject:Recovered Folders Mike I was minding my own business when suddenly 20 - 25 recovered folders showed up in my deleted items folder on email. Many of the folders were empty, but several contained items from 1999 and 2000 that were long ago deleted. I did delete all those folders again, so there is not much for you to look at. I just wanted you to be aware that this has occurred. Does this stuff ever really go away?! Carol List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 access
Put the domain in with the username. I've seen this happen when the alias is different from the username. John -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Not sure if you got my last message: Because we have one user who works remotely (out of state) who prefers to use an Outlook2K client via internet mail. She is temporarily using owa until I can get this working again. Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Why pop3? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 18:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access The company I work for, WHY do you ask? Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Is this YOUR exchange server or someone elses ? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 20:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Mail Manager?, Hosting Control Panel?, Is this in the Exchange Administrator? Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Would this help? 1. Why do I get this error, There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected.? - Here is the error message I keep getting and the settings I have using outlook express: There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: 'Account Name', Server: 'mail.domain.ext', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR Bad login', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 incoming mail=mail.domain.ext outgoing mail=smtp.isp.ext account name=accountuser password=accountpassword When you change your account password it does not change an email addresses' password. You need to change the username's password to what you want it to be. You need to do this in the Mail Manager, located in your Hosting Control Panel =) Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-45011120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED]Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:pop3 access Hello All, ex55srvsp4 on win2ksrvsp2 behind msproxy2 I have a user trying to access pop3 mail. My tests (using Outlook Express5) keep coming back to the repeated logon screen with the 0x800CCC90 and 92 errors. I have tried almost everything according to the MS articles associated with this error id. Please help me think out loud and give me any advice based on your experiences. Thanks, Fred Valdez List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pop3 access
Title: RE: pop3 access I assumed the alias matched the NT username. That is the first thing that MS demands practically. You NEED that username and alias in Exch to match -Original Message- From: John Mello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Put the domain in with the username. I've seen this happen when the alias is different from the username. John -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Not sure if you got my last message: Because we have one user who works remotely (out of state) who prefers to use an Outlook2K client via internet mail. She is temporarily using owa until I can get this working again. Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Why pop3? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 18:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access The company I work for, WHY do you ask? Fred -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Is this YOUR exchange server or someone elses ? -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 20:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Mail Manager?, Hosting Control Panel?, Is this in the Exchange Administrator? Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: pop3 access Would this help? 1. Why do I get this error, There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected.? - Here is the error message I keep getting and the settings I have using outlook express: There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected. Account: 'Account Name', Server: 'mail.domain.ext', Protocol: POP3, Server Response: '-ERR Bad login', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92 incoming mail=mail.domain.ext outgoing mail=smtp.isp.ext account name=accountuser password=accountpassword When you change your account password it does not change an email addresses' password. You need to change the username's password to what you want it to be. You need to do this in the Mail Manager, located in your Hosting Control Panel =) Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403) 295-4501 1120 68th Avenue NE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Calgary, AB T2E 8S5 http://www.novatel.ca -Original Message- From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pop3 access Hello All, ex55srvsp4 on win2ksrvsp2 behind msproxy2 I have a user trying to access pop3 mail. My tests (using Outlook Express5) keep coming back to the repeated logon screen with the 0x800CCC90 and 92 errors. I have tried almost everything according to the MS articles associated with this error id. Please help me think out loud and give me any advice based on your experiences. Thanks, Fred Valdez List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Message Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script. 10q W -Original Message-From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE : Resources
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/prodtechnol/exchange/maintain/featusability /cfsetup.asp Watch for line wrap. Brad J. Peer -Original Message- From: Gérard Dumazet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE : Resources Where to find it ??? -Message d'origine- De : Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : vendredi 8 février 2002 15:56 À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : RE: Resources There is a great TechNet article on this. -Original Message- From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Resources Hi all. I'm trying to setup exchange resources ie: meeting rooms, so that everyone can see the calendar. I've setup new mailboxes for each resource, and made the primary accoutn the secretary here, then I added them to the list of mailboxes which she has open, however the calendars are not visable now.. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Cheers Stu. ** Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims all responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor abd inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as United Coop deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its reputation. United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems from being used to view, store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or otherwise offensive or discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
Oh gees folks! at 20:00 /every:M,T,W,Th,F,Sa,Su c:\program files\navmse\navelive.exe /silent (line may have wrapped) change the 20:00 to 06:00, 10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and give yourself 4 at events daily. John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000. Any comments appreciated Michael Jacob PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118 139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771 Mobile 0418 840005 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Help me understand returning folders
Sorry, I was lazy. Deleted Item Retention. Not a restore from backup but the recover deleted items option in the outlook client. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help me understand returning folders what is DIR and we did no recoveries. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help me understand returning folders Sounds like DIR is set and someone did a recovery. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Help me understand returning folders Good morning, The letter that follows this is curious. Why would folders return when there were no restores done? Are we haunted? Thanks for your assistance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Michel Carol Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:35 PM To: ENTERPRISE EMAIL Subject:Recovered Folders Mike I was minding my own business when suddenly 20 - 25 recovered folders showed up in my deleted items folder on email. Many of the folders were empty, but several contained items from 1999 and 2000 that were long ago deleted. I did delete all those folders again, so there is not much for you to look at. I just wanted you to be aware that this has occurred. Does this stuff ever really go away?! Carol List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
could not open one or more attachments in outlook
anyone seen this before Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: could not open one or more attachments in outlook
Title: RE: could not open one or more attachments in outlook Yes if they are blocked by Outlook. Outlook 2K has two levels of blocking. One you can control, and one you can not. Other than that, we will need more specifics. -Original Message- From: JFadigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: could not open one or more attachments in outlook anyone seen this before Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Message Use the HEADERS.EXE file to build a CSV template of the mandatory and optional values you want to extract from the database. Use the directory export tool with the CSV file you generated with HEADERS and then set the limits you wanted on the boxes you wanted, then import. Barring that, and you want to set a GLOBAL value, use the values on the server in the Private Information Store object. This will not overwrite any values set on individual mailboxes. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script. 10q W -Original Message-From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Public Folders
Hi all , have a problem with viewing and creating Public Folders on Exch 2000 , SP2 , Win2000 , SP2. Can view the folders and contents fine from Outlook but in System Manager gives error C103b402 , check IIS settings, when I click on Public Folders. I have checked my IIS settings and all appears fine, I did play with Certificates before so this may have caused the problem but have removed all certs form site. Am sure this is a IIS problem but cant seem to find the fix. Also, under IIS I have about 7 web sites under Unassigned IP and using Host Headers. Have checked MS site but . Help.. TIA , Peter. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Message 275 warning, 300 prohibit. Wow that's pretty lenient. You must have ample IS space on your server. Im forced to set mine at 50MB warning 60 mB prohibit. But then again there are over 500 mailboxes. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Use the HEADERS.EXE file to build a CSV template of the mandatory and optional values you want to extract from the database. Use the directory export tool with the CSV file you generated with HEADERS and then set the limits you wanted on the boxes you wanted, then import. Barring that, and you want to set a GLOBAL value, use the values on the server in the Private Information Store object. This will not overwrite any values set on individual mailboxes. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script. 10q W -Original Message- From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
X400 mail to address exposed
My Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4sp6 IMS received this Internet email from (names changed for security): [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I have never seen this information in emails coming in from the Internet. Normally the reply to: and mail to: address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this normal? Is the sender's server using the x400 address as the reply to: address? From an Exchange security standpoint, it seems like this address gives away the organizational structure of the Exchange server. There is only one Exchange server in my Org with no connections to other Exchange servers- as far as I know. If my server is indeed making this type of connection with another server, how can I research it and stop it? All Internet email in and out of my Org should be across the IMS only. Thanks for any light on this topic. Guy Quintino Parker Services, Inc. Celebrating Success since 1979! http://www.parkerservices.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Message True indeed. We've got exec levels at over a Gig mailboxes. Pretty ridiculous, eh. That's what happens when they build an exchange server w/o limits! W -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact 275 warning, 300 prohibit. Wow that's pretty lenient. You must have ample IS space on your server. Im forced to set mine at 50MB warning 60 mB prohibit. But then again there are over 500 mailboxes. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Use the HEADERS.EXE file to build a CSV template of the mandatory and optional values you want to extract from the database. Use the directory export tool with the CSV file you generated with HEADERS and then set the limits you wanted on the boxes you wanted, then import. Barring that, and you want to set a GLOBAL value, use the values on the server in the Private Information Store object. This will not overwrite any values set on individual mailboxes. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script. 10q W -Original Message-From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Message and I have seen the OSTs/PSTs crap out after 750megs. MS documents state 2+ gig and you are SOL .. I have experienced it much lower -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 17:53To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact True indeed. We've got exec levels at over a Gig mailboxes. Pretty ridiculous, eh. That's what happens when they build an exchange server w/o limits! W -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact 275 warning, 300 prohibit. Wow that's pretty lenient. You must have ample IS space on your server. Im forced to set mine at 50MB warning 60 mB prohibit. But then again there are over 500 mailboxes. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Use the HEADERS.EXE file to build a CSV template of the mandatory and optional values you want to extract from the database. Use the directory export tool with the CSV file you generated with HEADERS and then set the limits you wanted on the boxes you wanted, then import. Barring that, and you want to set a GLOBAL value, use the values on the server in the Private Information Store object. This will not overwrite any values set on individual mailboxes. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script. 10q W -Original Message-From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6
What version do you have ? -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6 Oh gees folks! at 20:00 /every:M,T,W,Th,F,Sa,Su c:\program files\navmse\navelive.exe /silent (line may have wrapped) change the 20:00 to 06:00, 10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and give yourself 4 at events daily. John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 The only downfall is that in the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a month. Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc -Original Message- From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange server. That is what I am using. Antigen: http://www.sybari.com/home/ Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS Exchange v7.6 Has anyone had any experience with this product? Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000. Any comments appreciated Michael Jacob PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118 139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118 Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771 Mobile 0418 840005 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
They tend to save the little metal handles from Chinese carryout containers, also just in case. You gotta fill the living room with something, no? -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 17:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact True indeed. We've got exec levels at over a Gig mailboxes. Pretty ridiculous, eh. That's what happens when they build an exchange server w/o limits! W -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact 275 warning, 300 prohibit. Wow that's pretty lenient. You must have ample IS space on your server. Im forced to set mine at 50MB warning 60 mB prohibit. But then again there are over 500 mailboxes. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Use the HEADERS.EXE file to build a CSV template of the mandatory and optional values you want to extract from the database. Use the directory export tool with the CSV file you generated with HEADERS and then set the limits you wanted on the boxes you wanted, then import. Barring that, and you want to set a GLOBAL value, use the values on the server in the Private Information Store object. This will not overwrite any values set on individual mailboxes. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script. 10q W -Original Message- From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message They're loss -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I wish I knew. I lacked the enterprise experience to join their deployment team. That number includes thousands of resource mailboxes and may not be as many as I quoted. William -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Future plans 2 how many servers ? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:25 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 You know the answer Mr B. They both use Exchange. WalMart, based in Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
I am in a similar position. We had a 250MB warning, 300MB prohibit and a sales person complained to my boss and my boss said to remove the limits on EVERYONE. Now, I have 6 mailboxes in the 1GB+ range and the majority of the other mailboxes are above 400MB+. Of course all of these huge mailboxes are on laptops, so the OST is frickin huge and every other month it gets corrupted and has to be recreated. My company is about 230 user with a priv.edb of 47.5GB. Backups only take a whopping 8 hours for full backup, meaning about the same for a restore. Management is upset that the restore would take so long, but they aren't willing to enforce limits, or delete mail. Oh well, what can I do. Mike Z -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 5:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact They tend to save the little metal handles from Chinese carryout containers, also just in case. You gotta fill the living room with something, no? -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 17:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact True indeed. We've got exec levels at over a Gig mailboxes. Pretty ridiculous, eh. That's what happens when they build an exchange server w/o limits! W -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact 275 warning, 300 prohibit. Wow that's pretty lenient. You must have ample IS space on your server. Im forced to set mine at 50MB warning 60 mB prohibit. But then again there are over 500 mailboxes. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Use the HEADERS.EXE file to build a CSV template of the mandatory and optional values you want to extract from the database. Use the directory export tool with the CSV file you generated with HEADERS and then set the limits you wanted on the boxes you wanted, then import. Barring that, and you want to set a GLOBAL value, use the values on the server in the Private Information Store object. This will not overwrite any values set on individual mailboxes. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script. 10q W -Original Message- From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis. Neil -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
Title: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact As a side point, I would recommend setting a Receive limit That way, if you end up the subject of a d.o.s style attack or come across a message looping problem the unlucky mailbox(s) will eventually reach a point where it will stop. I normally set the receive limit quite high (normally around3 - 10 times that of the send limit (e.g. 500mb for a 50mb send limit/1000mb for a 300mb send limit). I haven't come across any problems with that yet since I set it over 3 years ago on over 1000 mailboxes. I have come across a message looping problem, which although we cut the link to the foreign X400 system before it became a problem, itwould have stopped the server going down if it had been a weekend or xmas break etc. Neil -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 946-0894 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
